1 x. explaining relative price – arbitrage pricing theory
Post on 24-Jan-2016
228 views
TRANSCRIPT
1
X. Explaining Relative Price – Arbitrage Pricing Theory
2
3
4
5
Assume a two index RGP
1 1 2 2 ... cov( ) 0i i i i i i jR a I I e e e
i i2 Portfolio Expected Return
A 15 1.0 .6 B 14 .5 1.0 C 10 .3 .2
Three points describe a plane
6
1 1
2 12
1
But
i
iiP
iP i
iP
X
R X R
X
X
Any weighted average of points on a plane where the weights sum to 1 lie on the plane –any portfolio lies on the plane
Lies above a below – riskless arbitrage
7
iMiii eRR
iiiii eIIR ...2211 RGP
iFi BRR
...2211 iiFi BBRR
APT
8
What are the ’s?
What are the I’s?
What are the ’s?
ij
j
In general, I’s are systematic influences which have an impact on the return of a large percentage of stocks.
’s are characteristics of individual firms or sensitivities of industrial firms to systematic influences.
’s are the market price of the ’s.
9
How to Identify; Five Approaches:
1) Statistical methods for identifying the I’s and ’s simultaneously – factor analysis or principle components analysis.
2) Identify the firm characteristics that are judged as most important – estimate the ’s from multiple regression.
3) Identify the I’s; a priori macro variable.
4) Identify the I’s; a set of portfolios sufficient to capture all influences.
5) Mixtures of the above.
10
Identify simultaneously the ’s and the I’s.
Factor Analysis
Let the data speak to the return generating process.
ij
11
Conceptually most difficult to understand
Takes return data for each member of a setof securities over time (e.g. monthly returns)and the mathematically determines a set ofIndexes (portfolios) which best explains
returns iCov e 0je
Simple Example 4 stocks (countries) Belgium, Canada, France, U.S. Returrn data – monthly 1979-1988
12
13
C
U
B F1t Bt Ct Ft
Ut
f .67(R R ) .76(R R ) .76(R R )
+ .77(R R )
WHERE 1. R INDICATES RETURN 2. f INDICATES FACTOR VALUE 3. B IS BELGIUM
4. C IS CANADA
5. U IS UNITED STATES
6. F IS FRANCE
7. t IS TIME PERIOD
8. BARS INDICATE MEANS
C2,t Bt Ct
Ut
f .40(R R ) .73(R -R ) .37( )
+ .41(R )
B
U
Ft FR R
R
14
FOUR FACTOR MODEL OF THE
JAPANESE ECONOMY
VERSUS ONE FACTOR MARKET INDEX
NRI 400; 20 PORTFOLIOS
15
16
17
18
19
BARRA – MODEL
SIZE
LIQUIDITY
GROWTH
VALUE
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE
INDUSTRY MEMBERSHIP
20
21
M F 1 2 3 4
2
5 M
R -R .0022 1.33I 0.56I 2.29I 0.93I
R 24
(-3.94) (4.96) (1.99) (-2.27)
I (R -
F 1 2 3 4R ) (.0022 1.33I 0.56I 2.29I 0.93I )
22
23
24
Salomon Brothers Risk Attribute Model
1. Economics Growth = Monthly Changes In Total Industrial Production
2. Credit Quality = Return on High Yield Bonds – Return on Governments (10+Year)
3. Long Term Interest Rates = Yield Change in 30 Year Treasuries
4. Short Term Interest Rates = Yield Change in 3 Month Treasuries
5. Inflation Shock = Realization Inflation – Expected Inflation (CPI)
6. US Dollar = Change in Value of US Dollar Trade Weighted
7. Market (After 6 Factors Removed). S&P
8. Small-Cap Premium = Return Russel 2000 – S&P 500 (seven factors removed)
25
26
PORTFOLIO APPROCH
RETURN ON MUTUAL FUNDS RELATED TO:
1. RETURN ON S&P INDEX
2. RETURN ON SMALL STOCK INDEX
3. RETURN ON BOND INDEX
27
28
FAMA – FRENCH
1. TERM = LONG TERM GOVERNMENT BOND RETURN – T-BILL RATE
2. DEFAULT – LONG TERM CORPORATE BOND RETURN – RETURN ON LONG TERM GOVERNMENT BOND
3. SIZE – RETURN ON PORTFOLIO OF SMALL STOCK -PORTFOLIO OF REGULAR STOCKS
4. BOOK TO MARKET = RETURN ON PORTFOLIO OF HIGH BOOK TO MARKET FIRMS – RETURN ON PORTFOLIO OF LOW BOOL TO MARKET FIRMS
5. RETURN ON MARKET – T-BILL RATE
29
NORMAL DURATION
RETURN RELATED TO RETURN ON A MARKET PORTFOLIO
RETURN RELATED TO
1. RETURN ON A 4 YEAR PORTFOLIO OF BONDS (LEVEL OF INTEREST RATE)
2. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 10 YEAR TREASURY AND 2 YEAH TREASURY (TWIST IN YIELD CURVE)
3. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 4 YEAR AAA CORPORATE AND 4 YEAH TREASURY (PRICE OF RISK)
30
1 1 2 2
1 1
Why Bother
APT and CAPM are not mutually exclusive
If CAPM holds
( )
If APT holds
But if in indexes can be replicated with
portfolios of securities and
CAPM holds
i F M F
i F i i
R R R R
R R
2 2( ) ( )M F M FR R R R
31
1 1 2 2
1 1 2 2
( ) ( )
-
( - )
Not Mutually Exclusive
M M
M
M
i F i F i F
i F i i F
i F i F
R R b R R b R R
R R b b R R
R R R R
32
33
34
Passive Management
1. Better Match an index
2. Match an index + or – certain stocks
3. Passive management with changed sensitivity
a. Pension fund liabilities that go up with inflation will pay a price to have assets that go up with inflation. APT tells investors that the cost of zero inflation exposure is (-4.32x.37) = 1.60% b. Take on oil exposure may be free lunch
35
Active Management
1. Make bets e.g. on interest rates or inflation
2. Look for stocks out of equilibrium
3. Long short zero risk portfolios