1 training session on energy equipment lighting presentation from the energy efficiency guide for...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Training Session on Energy Training Session on Energy EquipmentEquipment
LightingLighting
Presentation from the
“Energy Efficiency Guide for Industry in Asia”
www.energyefficiencyasia.org
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
2
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Training Agenda: LightingTraining Agenda: Lighting
Introduction
Types of lighting systems
Assessment of lighting systems
Energy efficiency opportunities
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
3
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
IntroductionIntroduction
• Lighting energy consumption
• 20-45% in commercial buildings
• 3-10% in industrial plants
• Significant energy savings can be realized with a minimal capital investment
BackgroundEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
4
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
IntroductionIntroduction
• Light: electromagnetic waves in space
• Light is emitted through:
a) Incandescence
b) Electric discharge
c) Electro luminescence
d) Photoluminescence
Basic TheoryEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
5
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
IntroductionIntroduction
Definitions and Common TermsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Lumen• 1 lumen = the photometric equivalent of the watt
• 1 lumen = luminous flux per m2 of a sphere with 1 m radius and a 1 candela isotropic light source at the centre
• 1 watt = 683 lumens at 555 nm wavelength
Lux
• metric unit of measure for illuminance on a surface: 1 lux = 1 lumen / m2
6
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
IntroductionIntroduction
Definitions and Common TermsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Luminous intensity (I)
• measured in Candela (cd)
Luminous flux (lm)
• 4 x luminous intensity
7
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
IntroductionIntroduction
Definitions and Common TermsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Installed load efficacy• Average maintained illuminance on a working
plane: lux/W/m2
Installed load efficiency ratio
• Target load efficacy / Installed load
Rated luminous efficacy• Rated lumen output of the lamp / rated power consumption
• Lumens per watt
8
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
IntroductionIntroduction
Definitions and Common TermsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Room index• Ratio for the plan dimensions of the room
Target load efficiency• Installed load efficacy considered achievable under best efficiency
• Lux/W/m²
Utilization factor • A measure of the effectiveness of the lighting
scheme
9
E = I / d2
E1 d12 = E2 d22
E = I / d2
E1 d12 = E2 d22
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
IntroductionIntroduction
Definitions and Common TermsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
The inverse square law• Defines the relationship between illuminance from a point source and distance
E = Iluminance
I = Luminous intensity
d = distance
10
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
IntroductionIntroduction
Definitions and Common TermsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Color temperature
• Color appearance of a lamp and the light it produces
• Measured in Kelvin (K)
• Incandescent lamps: “true value” color temperature
• Fluorescent and high intensity discharge (HID) lamps: correlated color temperature
11
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
IntroductionIntroduction
Definitions and Common Terms
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Color rendering index (CRI)Color
rendering groups
CIE general color rendering Index(Ra)
Typical application
1A Ra > 90 Wherever accurate color rendering is required e.g. color printing inspection
1B 80 < Ra < 90 Wherever accurate color judgments are necessary or good color rendering is required for reasons of appearance e.g. display lighting
2 60 < Ra < 80 Wherever moderate color rendering is required
3 40 < Ra < 60 Wherever color rendering is of little significance but marked distortion of color is unacceptable
4 20 < Ra < 40 Wherever color rendering is of no importance at all and marked distortion of colour is acceptable
Table 1. Applications of color rendering groups (Bureau of Energy Efficiency, 2005)
12
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Training Agenda: ElectricityTraining Agenda: Electricity
Introduction
Types of lighting systems
Assessment of lighting systems
Energy efficiency opportunities
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
13
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Incandescent lamps
• Tungsten Halogen Lamps
• Fluorescent lamps
• High pressure sodium lamps
• Low pressure sodium lamps
• Mercury vapour
• Metal halide
• Blended
• LED lamps
HID lamps
14
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
Incandescent Lamps
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Emit radiation mainly in the visible region
• Bulb contains vacuum or gas filling
• Efficacy: 12 lumen / Watt
• Color rendering index: 1A
• Color temperature: 2500 – 2700 K
• Lamp life <2000 hrs (BEE India, 2005)
15
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
Tungsten-Halogen LampsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Tungsten filament and a halogen gas filled bulb
• Tungsten atoms evaporate from the hot filament and move to cooler wall of bulb
• Efficacy: 18 lumens/Watt
• Color rendering index: 1A
• Color temperature: warm
• Lamp life < 4000 hrs
Tungsten halogen lamps (BEE India, 2005)
• Advantages:• More compact• Longer life• More and whiter light
• Disadvantages:• Cost more• Increased IR and UV• Handling problems
16
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
Fluorescent LampsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• 3 – 5 times as efficient as standard incandescent lamps and last 10 – 20 times longer
• Electricity passes through a gas or metallic vapor and causes radiation
• Fluorescent tubes are hot cathode lamps
(BEE India, 2005)
17
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
Fluorescent Lamps
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Different types (T12, T10, T8 and T5) differing in diameter and efficiency
• Most efficient at ambient temperature of 20-30 oC,
• Compact fluorescent lamps (CFL) have much smaller luminaries Compact fluorescent lamp (CFL)
(BEE India, 2005)
Features:
Halo-phosphate• Efficacy – 80 lumens/Watt (HF
gear increases this by 10%)• Color Rendering Index –2-3• Color Temperature – Any• Lamp Life – 7-15,000 hours
Tri-phosphor• Efficacy – 90 lumens/Watt• Color Rendering Index –1A-1B• Color Temperature – Any• Lamp Life – 7-15,000 hours
18
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
High Pressure Sodium (HPS) LampsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
BEE India, 2005
• Used in outdoor and industrial applications
• Consist of: ballast, high- voltage electronic starter, ceramic arc tube, xenon gas filling, sodium, mercury
• No starting electrodes
• High efficacy: 60 – 80 lumen/Watt
• Color rendering index: 1 - 2
• Color temperature: warm
• Lamp life < 24,000 hrs
19
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
Low Pressure Sodium (LPS) LampsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Commonly included in the HID family
• Highest efficacy: 100 - 200 lumen/Watt
• Poorest quality light: colors appear black, white or grey shades
• Limited to outdoor applications
• Efficacy: Color rendering index: 3
• Color temperature: yellow
• Lamp life < 16,000 hours
20
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
Mercury Vapor LampsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Oldest HID lamp
• Consists of: arc tube with mercury and argon gas and quartz envelope, third electrode, outer phosphor coated bulb, outer glass envelope
• Long life and low initial costs
• Very poor efficacy: 30 – 65 lumens/Watt
• Color rendering index: 3
• Color temperature: intermediate
• Lamp life: 16000 – 24000 hours
21
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
Metal Halide LampsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
BEE India, 2005
• Works similar to tungsten halogen lamps
• Largest choice of color, size and rating
• Better efficacy than other HID lamps: 80 lumen/Watt
• Require high voltage ignition pulse but some have third electrode for starting
• Color rendering index: 1A – 2
• Color temperature:3000 – 6000 K
• Lamp life:6000 – 20,000 hours
22
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
Blended LampsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• “Two-in-one”: 2 light sources in 1 gas filled bulb
• Quartz mercury discharge tube
• Tungsten filament
• Suitable for flame proof areas
• Fit into incandescent lamps fixtures
• Efficacy: 20 – 30 lumen/Watt
• Lamp life < 8000 hours
• High power factor: 0.95
• Typical rating: 160 W
BEE India, 2005
23
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
LED LampsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Newest type of energy efficient lamp
• Two types: • red-blue-green array• phosphor-coated blue lamp
• Emit visible light in a very narrow spectrum and can produce “white light”
• Used in exit signs, traffic signals, and the technology is rapidly progressing
• Significant energy savings: 82 – 93%
• Longest lamp life: 40,000 – 100,000 hours
24
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Reflectors• Impact how much light reaches
area and distribution pattern
• Diffuse reflectors:
• 70-80% reflectance but declining in time
• painted or powder coated white finish
• Specular reflectors:
• 85-96% reflectance and less decline in time
• Polished or mirror-like
• Not suitable for industrial open-type strip fixtures
BEE India, 2005
25
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Gear
• Ballast
• Current limiting device
• Helps voltage build-up in fluorescent lights
• Ignitors
• Start metal halide and sodium vapor lamps
26
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Types of Lighting SystemsTypes of Lighting Systems
Comparing lampsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Type of Lamp
Lum / Watt Color
Rendering Index
Typical ApplicationLife
(Hours)Range
Avg.
Incandescent 8-18 14 Excellent Homes, restaurants, general lighting, emergency lighting
1000
Fluorescent Lamps 46-60 50 Good w.r.t. coating
Offices, shops, hospitals, homes
5000
Compact fluorescent lamps (CFL)
40-70 60 Very good Hotels, shops, homes, offices
8000-10000
High pressure mercury (HPMV)
44-57 50 Fair General lighting in factories, garages, car parking, flood lighting
5000
Halogen lamps 18-24 20 Excellent Display, flood lighting, stadium exhibition grounds, construction areas
2000-4000
High pressure sodium (HPSV) SON
67-121
90 Fair General lighting in factories, ware houses, street lighting
6000-12000
Low pressure sodium (LPSV) SOX
101-175
150 Poor Roadways, tunnels, canals, street lighting
6000-12000
27
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Training Agenda: ElectricityTraining Agenda: Electricity
Introduction
Types of lighting systems
Assessment of lighting systems
Energy efficiency opportunities
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
28
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Assessment of Lighting SystemsAssessment of Lighting Systems
Designing with LightEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Better lighting: increased productivity
• Two main questions for designer:
• Choose correct lighting level
• Choose quality of light (color rendering)
29
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Assessment of Lighting SystemsAssessment of Lighting Systems
Designing with LightEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Illuminance level (lux)
Examples of Area of Activity
General Lighting for rooms and areas used either infrequently and/or casual or simple visual tasks
20 Minimum service illuminance in exterior circulating areas, outdoor stores , stockyards
50 Exterior walkways & platforms.
70 Boiler house.
100 Transformer yards, furnace rooms etc.
150 Circulation areas in industry, stores and stock rooms.
General lighting for interiors
200 Minimum service illuminance on the task
300 Medium bench & machine work, general process in chemical and food industries, casual reading and filing activities.
450 Hangers, inspection, drawing offices, fine bench and machine assembly, colour work, critical drawing tasks.
1500 Very fine bench and machine work, instrument & small precision mechanism assembly; electronic components, gauging & inspection of small intricate parts (may be partly provided by local task lighting)
Additional localized lighting for visually exacting tasks
3000 Minutely detailed and precise work, e.g. Very small parts of instruments, watch making, engraving.
Recommended light levels for different tasks (BEE India, 2005)
30
Assessment of Lighting SystemsAssessment of Lighting Systems
Recommended Illuminance LevelsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Scale of illuminance
• Illuminance for all non-working interiors > 20 Lux
• Factor 1.5 is the smallest significant difference in effect of illuminance
• Therefore the following scale is recommended:
20–30–50–75–100–150–200–300–500–750–1000 –1500–2000, …Lux
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
31
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Assessment of Lighting SystemsAssessment of Lighting Systems
Recommended Illuminance LevelsEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Illuminance ranges recommended for interior or activity
• Middle value (R) for working interiors
• Higher value (H) for visual work
• Lower value (L) where accuracy is non-important
32
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Assessment of Lighting SystemsAssessment of Lighting Systems
Methodology for Efficiency StudyEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Step 1: Make inventory of lighting system elements and transformers
S. No.
Plant Locati
on
Lighting Device &
Ballast Type
Rating in Watts Lamp
& Ballast
Population Numbers
Use / Shifts as I / II / III shifts / Day
S. No.
Plant Locatio
n
Lighting Transformer Rating
(kVA)
Numbers Installed
Measurement Provisions Available Volts / Amps /
kW/ Energy
Table: Device rating, population and use profile
Table: Lighting transformer/rating and population profile
33
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Assessment of Lighting SystemsAssessment of Lighting Systems
Methodology for Efficiency StudyEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Step 2: Measure and document the Lux levels
• Step 3: Measure and document the voltage and power consumption at input points
• Step 4: Compare the measured Lux values with standard values as reference
• Step 5: Analyze the failure rates of lamps, ballasts and the actual life expectancy levels
34
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Assessment of Lighting SystemsAssessment of Lighting Systems
Methodology for Efficiency StudyEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Step-6 : identify improvement options, for example:
• Maximum sunlight use options through transparent roof sheets
• Replacements of lamps and ballasts to more energy efficient types
• Selecting interior colors for light reflection
• Modifying layout as per needs
• Providing individual / group controls for lighting
35
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Training Agenda: ElectricityTraining Agenda: Electricity
Introduction
Types of lighting systems
Assessment of lighting systems
Energy efficiency opportunities
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
36
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Energy Efficiency Opportunities Energy Efficiency Opportunities
Use Natural Day LightingEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• North lighting
• Glass strips across the roof
• Sky lights with fiber reinforced plastic (FRP)
• Atrium with FRP dome
• Natural light fromwindows
37
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
De-lamping to Reduce Excess Lighting
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Effective method to reduce energy consumption
• Reducing lamp height combined with de-lamping: illuminance hardly affected
• Complicated for series wired ballasts
• Less problematic with parallel wired ballast
Energy Efficiency Opportunities Energy Efficiency Opportunities
38
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Task LightingEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Low wattage lamps at task
• General illuminance at lower level
• Benefits:
• Reduce number of lighting fixtures
• Reduce lamp wattage
• Save considerable energy
• Better illuminance
• Aesthetically pleasing ambience
Energy Efficiency Opportunities Energy Efficiency Opportunities
39
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
High Efficiency Lamps & LuminariesEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Examples (9 – 75% savings):
• Metal halide lamps to replace mercury / sodium vapor lamps
• HPSV lamps where color rendering is not critical
• LED panel indicator lamps to replace filament lamps
• Luminaries with mirror optics instead of conventional painted ones
Energy Efficiency Opportunities Energy Efficiency Opportunities
40
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Reduction of Lighting Feeder Voltage
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Can save energy
• Provided drop in light output is acceptable
Per
cen
tag
e
Supply voltage percentage
1) Lamp current 2) Circuit power, 3) Lamp power, 4) Lamp output 5) lamp voltage 6) lamp efficiency
Effect of voltage variation of fluorescent tube light parameters (BEE India, 2005)
1
2
3
4
5
6
12
3
4
5
6
6
Energy Efficiency Opportunities Energy Efficiency Opportunities
41
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Electronic Ballasts instead of Electromagnetic Ballasts
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Oscillators that convert supply frequency to about 20,000 – 30,000 Hz
• Available for fluorescent tube lights, LPSV and HPSV lamps
• Benefits in fluorescent tube lights:• Reduced power loss: 1 Watt instead of 10-15
Watt• Improved efficacy at higher frequencies• Elimination of starter: no flickering
Energy Efficiency Opportunities Energy Efficiency Opportunities
42
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
Low Loss Electromagnetic Ballasts for Tube Lights
Loss per tube lights:
• Standard ballasts: 10 – 15 Watts
• Low loss ballasts: 8 - 10 Watts
Energy Efficiency Opportunities Energy Efficiency Opportunities
43
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Timers, Twilight Switches & Occupancy Sensors
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Timers: switching of unnecessary lights
• Twilight switches: depending on availability of daylight
• Occupancy sensors: depending on presence of people
• Applicable for general areas, conference rooms, cubicles, restrooms, exteriors
Energy Efficiency Opportunities Energy Efficiency Opportunities
44
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
T5 Fluorescent Tube LightEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Slimmer tubes than T12 and T8 tubes
• Improved luminaire efficiencies by 7%, and with super-reflective aluminum luminaire by 11-30%
• Mercury reduction: 3 mg instead of 15 mg per lamp
• Can only be operated with electronic ballasts and not existing luminaries
Energy Efficiency Opportunities Energy Efficiency Opportunities
45
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Lighting MaintenanceEl ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
• Light levels decrease >50% due to aging lamps and dirt on fixtures, lamps and room surfaces
• Maintenance options:
• Clean equipment
• Replace lenses
• Keep spaces bright and clean
• Re-lamping
Energy Efficiency Opportunities Energy Efficiency Opportunities
46
Training Session on Energy Training Session on Energy EquipmentEquipment
LightingLighting
THANK YOUTHANK YOU
FOR YOUR ATTENTIONFOR YOUR ATTENTION
© UNEP GERIAP© UNEP GERIAP
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
47
El ect ri cal E
quipment /
Light ing
© UNEP 2006© UNEP 2006
Disclaimer and ReferencesDisclaimer and References
• This PowerPoint training session was prepared as part of the project “Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction from Industry in Asia and the Pacific” (GERIAP). While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct and properly referenced, UNEP does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. © UNEP, 2006.
• The GERIAP project was funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
• Full references are included in the textbook chapter that is available on www.energyefficiencyasia.org