1 three dimensional architecture of tick-borne encephalitis virus

33
1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus Replication Sites and 1 Trafficking of the Replicated RNA 2 3 Lisa Miorin 1,5,* , Inés Romero-Brey 2,5 , Paolo Maiuri 1,3 , Simone Hoppe 2,4 , Jacomine Krijnse- 4 Locker 2,4 , Ralf Bartenschlager 2 , Alessandro Marcello 1,* 5 6 1 Laboratory of Molecular Virology, The International Center for Genetic Engineering and 7 Biotechnology (ICGEB), Padriciano, Trieste, 34149 – Italy 8 9 2 Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer 10 Feld 345, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany 11 12 3 Current address: Systems Cell Biology of Cell polarity and Cell division, Institut Curie, CNRS, 13 UMR144, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France 14 15 4 Electron Microscopy Core Facility, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, D-69120, 16 Heidelberg, Germany 17 18 5 These authors contributed equally to this work 19 20 *Corresponding authors: [email protected]; [email protected] 21 22 23 Running title: Spatio-temporal organization of TBEV replication 24 25 Word count: 26 Abstract: 235 27 Main text: 6389 28 29 Copyright © 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. J. Virol. doi:10.1128/JVI.03456-12 JVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 3 April 2013 on March 29, 2018 by guest http://jvi.asm.org/ Downloaded from

Upload: trinhcong

Post on 28-Jan-2017

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

1

Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus Replication Sites and 1

Trafficking of the Replicated RNA 2

3

Lisa Miorin1,5,*, Inés Romero-Brey2,5, Paolo Maiuri1,3, Simone Hoppe2,4, Jacomine Krijnse-4

Locker2,4, Ralf Bartenschlager2, Alessandro Marcello1,* 5 6 1Laboratory of Molecular Virology, The International Center for Genetic Engineering and 7

Biotechnology (ICGEB), Padriciano, Trieste, 34149 – Italy 8

9 2Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer 10

Feld 345, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany 11

12 3Current address: Systems Cell Biology of Cell polarity and Cell division, Institut Curie, CNRS, 13

UMR144, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France 14

15 4Electron Microscopy Core Facility, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, D-69120, 16

Heidelberg, Germany 17

18 5These authors contributed equally to this work 19

20

*Corresponding authors: [email protected]; [email protected] 21

22

23

Running title: Spatio-temporal organization of TBEV replication 24

25

Word count: 26

Abstract: 235 27

Main text: 6389 28

29

Copyright © 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.J. Virol. doi:10.1128/JVI.03456-12 JVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 3 April 2013

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 2: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

2

Abstract 30

Flavivirus replication is accompanied by the rearrangement of cellular membranes that may 31

facilitate viral genome replication and protect viral components from host cell responses. The 32

topological organization of viral replication sites and the fate of replicated viral RNA are not fully 33

understood. We exploited electron microscopy to map the organization of tick-borne encephalitis 34

virus (TBEV) replication compartments in infected cells and in cells transfected with a replicon. 35

Under both conditions 80 nm vesicles were seen within the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum 36

(ER) that in infected cells also contained virions. By electron tomography the vesicles appeared as 37

invaginations of the ER membrane displaying a pore that could enable release of newly synthesized 38

viral RNA into the cytoplasm. To track the fate of TBEV RNA we took advantage of our recently 39

developed method of viral RNA fluorescent tagging for live cell imaging combined with bleaching 40

techniques. TBEV RNA was found outside virus-induced vesicles either associated to ER 41

membranes or free to move within a defined area of juxtaposed ER cisternae. From our results, we 42

propose a biologically relevant model of the possible topological organization of flavivirus 43

replication compartments composed of replication vesicles and a confined extra-vesicular space 44

where replicated viral RNA is retained. Hence, TBEV modifies the ER membrane architecture to 45

provide a protected environment for viral replication and for the maintenance of newly replicated 46

RNA available for subsequent steps of the virus life cycle. 47

48

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 3: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

3

Introduction 49

Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is the etiological agent of tick-borne encephalitis, a 50

potentially fatal infection of the central nervous system occurring throughout wide areas in Europe 51

and Asia (1-3). TBEV is the most medically important member of the mammalian tick-borne group 52

of the genus Flavivirus within the family Flaviviridae (4). Flaviviruses are a large group of 53

arboviruses that are responsible for severe diseases in humans and animals. This virus group 54

includes, in addition to TBEV, the dengue virus (DENV), yellow fever virus (YFV), West Nile 55

virus (WNV) and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV). They have in common an enveloped virus 56

particle that contains a single-stranded, positive sense RNA genome, a similar genomic 57

organization and comparable replication strategies (5, 6). After entry, the incoming viral RNA is 58

translated giving rise to a polyprotein precursor that is processed by cellular proteases and the viral 59

protease NS2B/3 to obtain three structural and seven non-structural proteins (NS). The RNA-60

dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) residing in NS5 synthesizes complementary negative strand 61

RNA from genomic RNA with negative strands serving as template for the synthesis of new 62

positive strand viral RNAs. 63

Like all positive strand RNA viruses, flaviviruses replicate in the cytoplasm in close association 64

with virus-induced intracellular membrane structures. It is generally accepted that the formation of 65

these replication compartments (RC) provide an optimal microenvironment for viral RNA 66

replication by limiting diffusion of viral/host proteins and viral RNA, thereby increasing the 67

concentration of components required for RNA synthesis, and by providing a scaffold for anchoring 68

the replication complex (7). In addition, these virus-induced membranes may also shield double 69

strand (ds)RNA replication intermediates from host cell-intrinsic surveillance (8-10). Elegant 70

electron tomography (ET) studies on DENV- and WNV-infected cells have recently provided the 71

first three-dimensional view of the architecture of flavivirus RCs (11, 12). In these studies different 72

virus-induced membrane structures appeared to be part of a highly organized network of ER-73

derived rearranged membranes. Vesicle packets, containing dsRNA and proteins of the replication 74

complex, have been described as the sites of virus replication and appear in ET as invaginations of 75

the ER membrane bearing pore-like connections to the cytoplasm and possibly between themselves. 76

Convoluted membranes (CM) that are specifically enriched in NS2B/3 have been proposed as the 77

putative sites of protein synthesis and proteolytic cleavage (11, 13-15). 78

However, although ET images from fixed cells can provide a high-resolution snapshot of the 79

complex network of vesicles and interconnections, they cannot address the dynamic exchange of 80

proteins and viral RNA throughout these compartments. In order to provide a global picture of the 81

spatio-temporal organization of the RCs it is therefore important to integrate high-resolution 82

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 4: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

4

imaging approaches with innovative techniques that allow exploring in real time the dynamic 83

interplay between viruses and their host. Engineered subgenomic replicons expressing fluorescently 84

tagged nonstructural proteins (16-18) have been exploited to investigate the distribution and 85

dynamics of HCV replicase proteins. However, the only available tool to explore flaviviral RNA 86

trafficking has been reported for TBEV (19). The method is based on TBEV replicons containing 87

multiple high-affinity binding sites for the phage MS2 core protein fused to an autofluorescent 88

protein. Replicated viral RNA could then be visualized in living cells thus providing the first 89

description of flavivirus RNA dynamics in living cells (19). 90

In this work we took advantage of immuno-EM, thin-section TEM and high-resolution ET in 91

combination with live imaging approaches for TBEV RNA to identify replication compartments in 92

infected and replicon-transfected cells. We precisely mapped the spatial organization of virus-93

induced membranes and vesicles and studied the mobility of replicated viral RNA. We propose a 94

model where replication vesicles and the extra-vesicular space form an optimized environment to 95

support efficient virus replication. 96

97

98

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 5: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

5

Materials and Methods 99

Cells, viruses and plasmids. Baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) and African green-monkey (Vero 100

E6) cell lines were grown under standard conditions in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium 101

supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum. BHK21-EYFP-MS2nls cells are a cell pool stably 102

expressing EYFP-MS2nls and blasticidin S-deaminase, and they were cultured in the presence of 10 103

μg/ml blasticidin. Lentiviral particles for the transduction of the EYFP-MS2nls gene were prepared 104

in 293T-cells exactly as described previously (20) using pWPI-BLR-EYFP-MS2nls and packaging 105

constructs pCMVR8.91 and pMD.G (provided by Didier Trono). Working stocks of TBEV strain 106

Neudoerfl were propagated and titrated on Vero E6 cells. pWPI-BLR-EYFP-MS2nls was used to 107

generate a cell line constitutively expressing the EYFP-MS2nls protein suitable for immuno-EM 108

studies. The EYFP-MS2nls gene was isolated from pEYFP-MS2nls (21) by XbaI digestion and then 109

inserted into the multiple cloning site (MCS) of the pWPI-BLR vector (provided by Volker 110

Lohmann) via the SpeI restriction site. The construct pTNd/ΔME_24×MS2, the replication-111

deficient TNd/ΔME_24×MS2_GAA replicon carrying the GDD to GAA mutation in the viral NS5 112

protein, the pMS2-EYFP, pEYFP-MS2nls and pCherry-MS2nls vectors used for visualization 113

purposes were previously described (19, 21). 114

115

RNA transcription and transfection. Subgenomic replicon RNAs were transcribed in vitro as 116

described in detail elsewhere (19, 22). 4×106 cells were resuspended in 400μl ice-cold PBS and 117

mixed in a 0.4 cm gene-pulser cuvette with 10 μg of RNA to be electroporated with a Bio-Rad 118

Gene Pulser apparatus at 0,25 kV with a capacitance of 960 μF (19). After electroporation, cells 119

were washed in complete growth medium without antibiotics and seeded in the same medium. 120

121

Samples staining and imaging for indirect immunofluorescence analysis. IF analysis was 122

performed 24h upon infection or transfection. Cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% PFA for 123

15 min, incubated 5 min with 100mM glycine and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min. 124

Subsequently the cells were incubated at 37°C for 30 min with PBS, 1% bovine serum albumine 125

(BSA) and 0,1% Tween 20 before incubation with antibodies. The coverslips were rinsed three 126

times with PBS 0,1% tween 20 (washing solution) and incubated for 1h with secondary antibodies. 127

Donkey antibodies specific for rabbit or mouse immunoglobulin G and conjugated to Alexa Fluor 128

594 or Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes) were used for this analysis. Coverslips were finally 129

washed three times with washing solution and mounted on slides using Vectashield mounting 130

medium (Vector Laboratories). For the detection of viral antigens we used the following antibodies: 131

mouse monoclonal antibody detecting NS1 (provided by Connie Schmaljohn); polyclonal rabbit 132

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 6: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

6

anti-TBEV serum that can be used for both structural and non-structural protein detection (23) 133

(provided by Franz X. Heinz); polyclonal rabbit anti-prM serum (provided by Franz X. Heinz). The 134

J2 mouse monoclonal anti-dsRNA antibody (English and Scientific Consulting, Szirak, Hungary) 135

was used to detect replication complexes, whereas for the ER staining we used the mouse 136

monoclonal anti-PDI (AB2792, Abcam) antibody. Fluorescent images of fixed cells were captured 137

on Zeiss LSM510 META confocal microscope with a 63× NA 1.4 Plan-Apochromat oil objective. 138

The pinhole of the microscope was adjusted to get an optical slice of less than 1.0µm for any 139

wavelength acquired. 140

141

Epoxy embedding of cells for transmission electron microscopy. BHK-21 cells grown on 10 cm 142

diameter dishes were infected with TBEV at MOI = 2 or transfected with in vitro transcribed 143

TNd/ΔME_24xMS2 replicon RNA. After 24 h cells were washed 3 times with pre-warmed PBS 144

and fixed for 30 min with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (GA) in 50 mM Na-cacodylate buffer [pH 7.4] 145

containing 1 M KCl, 0.1 M MgCl2, 0.1 M CaCl2 and 2% sucrose. Cells were washed 5 times for 5 146

min each with 50 mM Na-cacodylate buffer and post-fixed on ice in the dark with 2% OsO4 in 50 147

mM Na-cacodylate buffer for 40 min. After washing the cells overnight in distilled water they were 148

treated with 0.5% uranylacetate (UA, dissolved in water) for 30 min, rinsed thoroughly with water 149

and dehydrated in a graded ethanol series at room temperature (40%, 50%, 60%, 70% and 80%, 5 150

min each; then 95% and 100%, 20 min each). Cells were immersed in 100% propylene oxide and 151

immediately embedded in an Araldite-epon mixture (Araldite 502/Embed 812 kit, Electron 152

Microscopy Sciences). After polymerization at 60°C for 2 days embedded cells were sectioned 153

using a Leica Ultracut UCT ultramicrotome and a 35° diamond knife (Diatome, Biel, Switzerland). 154

Sections with a thickness of 60 nm were collected onto 100 mesh copper grids that had been coated 155

with Formvar (Plano, Wetzlar, Germany) and coated with carbon. Sections were counter-stained 156

with 2% lead citrate in H2O for 2 min. Samples were analyzed by using a Biotwin CM120 Philips 157

electron microscope (100 kV) equipped with a bottom-mounted 1K CCD camera (Keen View, SIS, 158

Münster, Germany). 159

160

Immunolabeling of thawed cryo-sections. TBEV infected and replicon transfected cells were 161

fixed by adding an equal amount of 8% PFA and 0.2% GA in 0.2 M PHEM buffer (120 mM Pipes, 162

100 mM Hepes, 4 mM MgCl2, 40 mM EGTA, pH 6.9) to the culture medium for 1 h at room 163

temperature. Cells were then fixed for 1 h with 4% PFA and 0.1% GA in 0.1 M PHEM at room 164

temperature. The fixative was removed and the cells were stored at 4 °C in 4% PFA in 0.1 M 165

PHEM until further processing. After extensive washing with 0.1 M PHEM remaining aldehyde 166

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 7: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

7

groups were blocked with 30 mM glycine in 0.1 M PHEM. Cells were scraped off the plate, 167

embedded in 10% gelatine and infiltrated in 2.3M sucrose overnight at 4 °C. Cell pellets were 168

mounted onto sample holder pins, frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen. 60nm cryo-sections were 169

prepared using a Leica Ultracut UC6 microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and a 170

diamond knife (Diatome, Biel, Switzerland). Sections were picked up with a mixture of 2% 171

methylcellulose and 2.3 M sucrose (1:1) and after thawing transferred to 100 mesh formvar and 172

carbon-coated grids. Labeling of thawed cryosections was performed essentially as described 173

elsewhere (24). In brief, sections were molten by floating on 2% gelatine for 30 min at 37 °C, 174

incubated in 30 mM glycine in PBS for 10 min and then 30 min at room temperature in blocking 175

solution (PBG: (0.8% [w/v] BSA [Sigma], 0.1% [w/v] fish skin gelatin [Sigma] in PBS). Sections 176

were then incubated with primary antibody diluted in blocking buffer, for 30 min at room 177

temperature. After 5 times washing for each 5 min in blocking buffer, sections were incubated with 178

rabbit anti-mouse followed by protein A coupled to 10 nm gold (Cell Microscopy Center, Utrecht, 179

The Netherlands) diluted in blocking solution. After washing with PBS and distilled water, grids 180

were contrasted with a mix of 2% methylcellulose and 3% UA (1:6) for 10 min on ice. 181

182

Electron tomography. Sections of 250 nm thickness were collected on palladium-copper slot grids 183

(Science Services, Munich, Germany) coated with Formvar (Plano, Wetzlar, Germany). Protein A-184

gold (10 nm) was added to both sides of the sections as fiducial markers. Single and dual axis tilt 185

series were acquired with a FEI TECNAI TF30 microscope operated at 300 kV and equipped with a 186

4k FEI Eagle camera (binning factor 2, on the specimen level) over a -65° to 65° tilt range 187

(increment 1°) and at an average defocus of -0.2 µm. Tomograms were reconstructed using the 188

weighted back-projection method implemented in the IMOD software package (version 3.11.5) 189

(25). Rendering of the 3D surface of the tomograms was performed by using the AMIRA 190

Visualization software Package (version 5.4.2, Visage Imaging, Berlin, Germany). Models were 191

generated from unfiltered and 2x binned tomograms by manually masking areas of interest, 192

thresholding and smoothing labels. 193

194

Microscopy and live imaging acquisition. BHK-21 cells were electroporated with the TBEV 195

replicons’ RNA and plated on glass-bottom plates (MatTek, Ashland, MA, USA). For the 196

visualization of the viral RNA cells were co-transfected either with MS2-EYFPnls, expressing a 197

hybrid protein composed by the core protein of the MS2 bacteriophage fused to EYFP and to a 198

nuclear localization signal (nls), or with the same construct without the nls. At the appropriate time 199

point post-transfection, cells were transferred on a humidified and CO2-controlled on-stage 200

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 8: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

8

incubator (PeCon GmbH, Erbach, Germany) at 37°C in complete DMEM medium without phenol 201

red for live cell imaging. For FRAP experiments images of 512×512 pixels (29,25×29,25 µm) and 202

optical thickness of 1 µm were acquired using 1% or less of the power of the 514 nm laser line. 203

EYFP was bleached at 514 nm (Argon laser, maximum output 500 MilliWatt) in a circle of 30 204

pixels of diameter, at full laser power, for 10 passages. For FLIP measurements images were 205

acquired as described above and bleaching was performed at every acquisition. Images were 206

analyzed with ImageJ (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 207

USA, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). 208

209

210

211

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 9: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

9

Results 212

Subcellular localization of TBEV proteins and dsRNA in infected cells 213

As a first step to study the organization of TBEV replication sites we characterized by 214

immunofluorescence the sub-cellular localization of proteins and dsRNA in virus-infected BHK-21 215

cells. At 24 hours post-infection (hpi), viral proteins detected with a polyclonal TBEV-specific 216

antiserum (predominantly recognizing the structural protein E and NS1) were localized in the 217

perinuclear region and in discrete and irregularly shaped foci (Fig. 1A). As expected, these 218

structures partially colocalized with NS1-containing cytoplasmic foci (Fig. 1A) as well as with the 219

dsRNA replication intermediate (Fig. 1B), a well-accepted marker for flaviviral replication vesicles 220

(11, 12, 15, 26). A similar distribution pattern was observed with the prM-specific antibody that 221

also showed partial co-localization with NS1 cytoplasmic foci (Fig. 1C). In addition, co-222

immunolocalization studies of viral proteins and the rER marker protein disulphide isomerase (PDI) 223

suggested that ER-derived membranes provide the framework for the membranous TBEV 224

replication compartments (Fig. 1D). These data are in agreement with our previous observations for 225

the MS2-tagged TBEV replicon where newly synthesized viral RNA associates with viral proteins 226

and dsRNA replication intermediates in rER-derived cytoplasmic compartments (8, 19). 227

228

Electron tomography analysis of TBEV-induced membrane alterations 229

To reveal the three-dimensional organization of virus-induced membrane alterations we performed 230

a detailed ET analysis of TBEV-infected cells. At 24 hpi, BHK-21 cells were fixed, resin-embedded 231

and sectioned as described in Materials and Methods. Tomograms from 250 nm thick sections were 232

acquired and reconstructed. As shown in Fig. 2, TBEV infection induced membrane alterations 233

reminiscent of those previously described for mosquito-borne flaviviruses like DENV and WNV 234

(11, 12, 27) and more recently also for Langat virus (LGTV), a naturally attenuated tick-borne 235

flavivirus (28). Virus-induced single-membrane vesicles (Ve) with a diameter of 80 nm (± 10.6 nm; 236

n = 70) were observed in the lumen of a dilated rER, and appeared to be part of an elaborate 237

reticulovesicular network of interconnected membranes (Fig. 2A and B). ER-derived cisternae filled 238

with viral particles in the proximity of virus-induced vesicles, as well as individual virions 239

trafficking throughout the secretory pathway could also be detected (Movie S1). In addition, during 240

our studies, we frequently noticed virus particles with a diameter of about 40 nm (Fig. 2A and C, 241

yellow arrowheads) and TBEV-induced vesicles sharing the same ER lumen (Fig. 2B and Movie 242

S1). This finding supports the notion that replication, occurring in vesicles, and assembly of new 243

virions takes place in very close proximity (11). 244

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 10: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

10

In agreement with earlier reports (11, 12, 28, 29), detailed tomographic analysis revealed pore-like 245

structures (Fig. 2C, yellow arrowheads) connecting the lumen of the vesicles to the cytosol. These 246

pore-like openings could be detected in approximately 50% of the vesicles included in these 247

tomograms (n=14) (Fig. 2D). In addition, we found that adjacent/neighboring vesicles were 248

frequently tightly packed, but pore-like openings between them were not observed (Fig. 2E). This 249

observation differs from what has been previously reported for WNV (12) or LGTV (28). Whether 250

this depends on the virus or the cell-type or the sample preparation method remains to be 251

established. 252

253

Association of viral proteins with ER-derived membrane alterations induced in infected cells 254

To further characterize the ultrastructural modifications induced by TBEV infection and to allocate 255

viral proteins to specific membrane alterations we performed immuno-EM experiments on TBEV-256

infected BHK-21 cells. Thawed cryosections labeled with antibodies against the ER marker PDI 257

clearly showed that virus-induced vesicles (Ve) as well as newly assembled immature virions (Vi, 258

arrowheads) localize in the lumen of a dilated and rearranged ER compartment (Fig. 3A), thus 259

supporting our earlier immunofluorescence microscopy studies (Fig. 1D; (19)). A monoclonal 260

antibody to the NS1 protein (30) was used to mark TBEV-induced replication vesicles. As shown in 261

Fig. 3B and 3C, gold particles predominantly labeled 80 nm virus-induced vesicles that were 262

frequently located in the proximity of ER cisternae containing progeny virions (Vi, arrowheads). 263

However, NS1 could also be detected in the lumen of the ER or within the Golgi compartment 264

consistent with its putative roles in different steps of the viral life cycle (data not shown). TBEV-265

induced vesicles were also efficiently labeled with the rabbit polyclonal anti-TBEV serum we 266

previously used for immunofluorescence analysis of infected BHK-21 cells, which recognizes both 267

NS1 and the structural protein E (Fig. 3D). Attempts to label replication sites in immuno-EM with 268

the J2 antibody against dsRNA or with other antibodies raised against NS3 or NS5 were 269

unsuccessful. Viral particles trafficking towards the Golgi compartment were also labeled with the 270

polyclonal anti-TBEV serum (Vi, arrowheads). In addition, antibodies against the structural protein 271

prM showed specific labeling of TBEV particles (Fig. 3E and F). These particles were either 272

located in the lumen of the ER, frequently adjacent to virus-induced vesicles, or accumulated within 273

dilated ER cisternae, arguing that they represent newly assembled progeny virions. 274

275

Ultrastructural analysis of replicon-transfected BHK-21 cells 276

The ultimate goal of this study was to address TBEV RNA trafficking within virus-induced 277

intracellular compartments by exploiting the MS2-based replicon system we previously established 278

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 11: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

11

(19). In order to ascertain that transfection of MS2-tagged TBEV-derived subgenomic replicons 279

induces the same characteristic membrane alterations observed upon virus infection, we conducted 280

the analogous analysis as described above and compared the morphology of membranous structures 281

by using semi-thick sections (250 nm) prepared from replicon-transfected or virus-infected cells. 282

For this set of experiments we used BHK21-EYFP-MS2nls cells transduced with lentiviral vectors 283

expressing the nuclear variant of the EYFP-MS2 fusion protein. Previously, in order to tag TBEV 284

replicons, we always used a form of EYFP-tagged MS2 that localized both in the nucleus and in the 285

cytoplasm (8, 19, 31). However, we noticed that the accumulation of tagged TBEV RNA in the 286

cytoplasm corresponded to a depletion of the MS2 nuclear stain. Therefore, in order to increase the 287

signal to noise ratio in the cytoplasm, we exploited an EYFP-MS2 protein with a nuclear 288

localization signal (nls) for exclusive nuclear localization in the absence of TBEV replication. 289

EYFP-MS2nls remains associated with the replicated TBEV RNA carrying the MS2 binding sites 290

in the cytoplasm against a dark background offering a better tool for both dynamic and 291

ultrastructural studies. As shown in Fig. 4A, extensive co-localization of EYFP-MS2nls with 292

dsRNA was observed in the ER-derived perinuclear compartment in cells transfected with the 293

TNd/ΔME_24×MS2 wild type replicon whereas control cells transfected with the replicon carrying 294

an inactive NS5 RdRp showed only nuclear localization of EYFP-MS2nls (Fig. 4B). Detailed 295

tomographic analysis of cells fixed 24 h after transfection revealed rather small rER cisternae in 296

comparison to infected cells. These smaller ER tubules form a network of fragmented ER in the 297

perinuclear region of transfected cells (Movie S3, Fig. 4C and Movie S4). Nevertheless, vesicles 298

were observed in the rER lumen, having an average diameter of 85 nm (± 19.6 nm; n = 70). In 299

addition, similar to what we found in infected cells, most of the vesicles (75%, n=35) detected in 300

replicon-transfected cells had a pore-like opening towards the cytosol (Fig. 4D). Based on the 301

similarity between replicon- and infection-induced membranous structures and by analogy to 302

dengue virus (11) we concluded that TBEV-induced vesicles play a role in virus replication. 303

304

Immuno-EM analysis of replicon-transfected BHK-21 cells 305

Membrane alterations observed upon transfection of MS2-tagged subgenomic replicons were then 306

further characterized by immuno-EM (Fig. 5). As already suggested by our detailed three-307

dimensional analysis of replicon-induced ultrastructural changes (Fig. 4, Movie S3 and Movie S4), 308

PDI labeling clearly confirmed that TBEV-induced vesicles are part of an intricate network of 309

rearranged intracellular membranes that originate from the ER compartment (Fig. 5A). These 310

vesicles were labeled with anti-NS1 antibodies, again supporting their role in virus replication (Fig. 311

5B). Clusters of vesicles, defined as vesicle packets (14, 15, 32), could be observed in close 312

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 12: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

12

proximity to highly rearranged membranous structures most likely representing convoluted 313

membranes (CM), the putative sites for synthesis and processing of the flavivirus polyprotein. As 314

shown in Fig. 5C and D the TBEV-specific polyclonal antiserum labeled both vesicles and CM 315

(Fig. 5D, arrows). In addition, gold particles for the same antiserum were found also in the lumen of 316

the ER consistent with our previous findings on TBEV-infected cells. 317

318

Replicated viral RNA is not freely diffusible in the cytoplasm 319

The MS2-tagging method was then further exploited to study the dynamic interchange of newly 320

replicated TBEV RNA between MS2-defined perinuclear compartments and the cytoplasm. To this 321

end we took advantage of the fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) technique. FRAP 322

is a method for measuring the mobility of fluorescent particles in living cells (33, 34). A defined 323

portion of the system containing mobile fluorescent molecules is exposed to a brief and intense 324

focused laser beam, thereby causing irreversible photochemical bleaching of the fluorophore in that 325

region. The subsequent kinetics of fluorescence recovery in the bleached region, which results from 326

transport of fluorescent proteins into the bleached area from non-irradiated regions of the cell, as 327

well as transport of bleached fluorescent proteins out of the bleached area, provides a quantitative 328

measure of the mobility of the protein of interest. If the fluorescent protein cannot move, or is 329

bound to an immobile substrate, the recovery of fluorescence will not reach the pre-bleach values 330

showing the so-called immobile fraction. In our case the fluorescent protein is the MS2 phage coat 331

protein fused to EYFP. TBEV replicated RNA carrying an array of MS2 binding sites previously 332

characterized in our laboratory is detected by high affinity specific interaction between the RNA 333

stem-loops and the fluorescently labeled MS2 protein (19, 34). The viral RNA is continuously 334

synthesized by the viral polymerase and should be able to diffuse in the cytoplasm in complex with 335

EYFP-MS2 unless bound to an immobile structure or limited in its movements by physical barriers. 336

As shown in Fig. 6A, 6B and Movie S5, BHK-21 cells expressing the TNd/ΔME_24×MS2 replicon 337

RNA and MS2-EYFP were subjected to FRAP analysis at different time points. Full recovery of the 338

signal within few seconds was observed 6 hours after electroporation indicating free mobility of 339

MS2-EYFP at early time points of replicon amplification. In contrast, 12 hours after transfection 340

and at later time points, fluorescence recovery was severely impaired. Time points between 12 and 341

36 hours showed very similar recovery profiles with an initial recovery that quickly tails off and 342

never reaches pre-bleach values indicative of the presence of a relevant immobile fraction. The 343

initial portion of the recovery curve represents the unbound EYFP-MS2 that remains free to diffuse 344

in the bleached area. At later time points the amount of free EYFP-MS2 is reduced being 345

sequestered by the increasing amount of replicated RNA (compare the red curve in Fig. 6A taken at 346

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 13: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

13

12 hpe to the blue and green curves taken at 24-36 hpe, respectively). These data suggest that the 347

spatial constraints are established early and maintained thereafter. These results can be interpreted 348

in different ways that were addressed as follows: 349

The first possibility is that the replicated viral RNA is secluded into compartments that are not 350

accessible by the MS2-EYFP. To address this assumption we exploited the red-shifted variant 351

Cherry-MS2nls to mark viral RNA while the mobility of free GFP was monitored by FRAP as 352

previously described (21, 34-36). As shown in Fig. 6C, 6D, 6E and Movie S6, mobility of GFP 353

within the compartment did not differ significantly from the free mobility of the protein in the 354

cytoplasm. The second possibility is that the viral RNA is only slowly or not at all replicated, 355

resulting in little or no substrate available for free MS2-EYFP. However, bleaching did not affect 356

virus replication (data not shown) and we have earlier shown that replicated viral RNA accumulates 357

continuously up to 72 hours post-transfection (19, 31). Therefore we can exclude that the RCs are 358

inactive with respect to replication. The third possibility is that, a slow release of replicated viral 359

RNA bound to bleached MS2-EYFP residing in the region of interest (ROI) results in an increase of 360

the immobile fraction in the FRAP experiment. To address such a release of replicated, MS2-361

tagged, viral RNA from this region we depleted fluorescent MS2-EYFP from the cytoplasm and 362

measured loss of florescence at the compartment. This approach is called fluorescence loss in 363

photobleaching (FLIP) and is complementary to FRAP (37, 38). As shown in Fig. 6F and Movie 364

S7, we chose a region for bleaching in the cytoplasm distant from the MS2-enriched perinuclear 365

compartment and measured loss of fluorescence at a site in the cytoplasm as well as within regions 366

of MS2-EYFP accumulation in order to assess RNA exchange. Both sites were chosen 367

approximately at the same distance from the bleaching area. After each bleaching the intensity of 368

fluorescence was measured in every ROI. In principle each mobile fluorescent molecule that 369

diffuses at the bleaching site will be irreversibly bleached. Hence, regions of freely mobile proteins 370

will be loosing fluorescence quickly, whereas regions where the proteins are immobile or secluded 371

into membrane compartments will resist bleaching. This kind of measurements clearly showed that 372

fluorescent TBEV RNA-bound MS2-EYFP (blue line) is depleted less efficiently than freely 373

diffusible MS2-EYFP (green line). Importantly, as observed for the FRAP experiments (Fig. 6A) 374

where the immobile fraction decreased at later time points, immobilization of trapped TBEV RNA 375

within the MS2-defined compartment is not complete since 30% depletion is observed after 4 376

minutes of FLIP. This clearly points towards a certain degree of TBEV RNA exchange between the 377

compartments and the cytoplasm. 378

379

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 14: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

14

Free diffusion of viral RNA within interconnected regions of virus-induced membrane 380

alterations 381

Finally, we wanted to investigate the dynamic interchange of TBEV RNA within the area enriched 382

for the EYFP signal. To this end we took again advantage of the EYFP-MS2nls reporter that, in the 383

presence of replicating TNd/ΔME_24×MS2, accumulates efficiently in the cytoplasm against a dark 384

background, greatly enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio (Fig. 4A). This strategy is also particularly 385

useful when doing dynamic studies because it allows to selectively measure viral RNA kinetics 386

without taking into account free diffusion of unbound MS2 proteins in the cytoplasm. We designed 387

a FLIP experiment where the bleached area is located within perinuclear regions of MS2-EYFP 388

accumulation (Fig. 7A, red circle, bottom panels). If the tagged viral RNAs were all interconnected, 389

continuous bleaching would have resulted in depletion of fluorescence from the entire 390

compartment. Conversely, as shown in Fig. 7A and Movie S8, depletion of fluorescence was 391

restricted to a portion of the compartment, defined as ROI_1 in Fig. 7A, leaving the rest unaffected. 392

This experiment indicates that the perinuclear region, where replication of TBEV is likely to occur, 393

is not just a continuous network of virus-induced membrane alterations, but is rather composed of 394

physically separated sub-compartments. Within a sub-compartment the viral RNA is able to freely 395

diffuse (compare decay of ROI_1 in Fig. 7A with ROI_1 in Fig. 6F) indicating that most likely the 396

RNA is not completely associated to membranes. 397

To unambiguously identify the subcellular localization of newly synthesized viral genomes we 398

selectively labeled the MS2 protein bound to TBEV RNA by using antibodies specific to the 399

fluorescent tag. BHK-21 cells transduced with lentiviral vectors expressing EYFP-MS2nls were 400

either mock electroporated or electroporated with the TNd/ΔME_24×MS2 replicon RNA. At 24 h 401

upon transfection, cells were fixed and processed for immuno-EM as described in Material and 402

Methods. As shown in Fig. 7, immunogold-labeled TBEV RNA specifically localized in the 403

cytoplasm of TNd/ΔME_24×MS2 transfected cells, while, as expected only nuclear MS2 labeling 404

could be detected in mock-transfected cells (data not shown). Strikingly, detailed analysis of GFP-405

labeled cryosections revealed that more than 50% of the gold particles localized in the cytosol, 406

frequently surrounding virus-induced vesicles (Fig. 7E). In addition, particles associated or in close 407

proximity to ER-derived membranes (~ 35%), as well as adjacent to vesicle-surrounding 408

membranes (~ 9%) were also observed. To the contrary, labeled TBEV RNA was never detected 409

within the lumen of the vesicles, indicating that either the EYFP-MS2nls protein is too big to 410

translocate into the vesicle, or that actively replicating viral RNA is part of a huge protein/RNA 411

complex that shields the RNA from the MS2 protein and/or anti-GFP antibodies. 412

413

414

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 15: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

15

Discussion 415

Flaviviruses hijack cytoplasmic membranes in order to build functional sites for protein synthesis, 416

processing and RNA replication (7, 39-42). These sites, generally defined as replication 417

compartments, are required to efficiently coordinate different steps of the viral life cycle and to 418

protect replicating RNA from innate immunity surveillance (8-10). Over the last few years, several 419

electron microscopy studies have revealed important information about the ultrastructural 420

organization of these sophisticated intracellular membrane compartments (11, 12, 28). However, 421

this information is rather static and does not provide insights into intracellular trafficking of 422

proteins and viral RNA. In this work we have combined high-resolution ET and immuno-EM with 423

live-cell imagining studies of TBEV RNA dynamics to provide the first comprehensive picture of 424

the spatio-temporal organization of the flaviviral RC. 425

Our detailed 3D ultrastructural analysis clearly shows that TBEV infection triggers a remarkable 426

alteration of intracellular membranes (Fig. 2). These virus-induced membranes are derived from the 427

ER since they contain viral proteins and the ER-resident chaperone PDI (Fig. 1). PDI did not 428

directly label the vesicles (Fig. 3A), indicating that this protein is not recruited, but most likely 429

excluded from virus-induced membranes as observed for DENV-induced vesicles (11). 430

Interestingly, we consistently observed packets of vesicles with a diameter of about 80 nm that 431

appear as invaginations of the ER within a highly organized network of interconnected membranes 432

(Fig. 2A and B and Movie S1 and S2). Attempts to label vesicles with antibodies recognizing 433

dsRNA were ambiguous; although we detected immuno-gold labeling within the vesicles, the signal 434

appeared to be unspecific (data not shown). Nevertheless, labeling of the vesicles with antibodies 435

against the TBEV NS1 protein (Fig. 3B, 3C and 3D) supports the hypothesis that these structures 436

correspond to sites of virus replication. NS1 is an essential gene and modulates early viral RNA 437

replication (13, 43), possibly through its ability to regulate negative-strand synthesis of viral RNA 438

(44) and/or by interacting with NS4B (45). NS1 is located in the ER lumen and is associated with 439

the outer side of the replication vesicles through interaction with other transmembrane viral 440

proteins. Localization of DENV NS1 at replication vesicles was reported by Mackenzie (13) and 441

more recently by Welsch (11). Finally, immunoprecipitation of dsRNA intermediates was shown to 442

contain NS1 in addition to NS5 confirming previous co-sedimentation data (46, 47). Therefore, 443

NS1 can be considered a bona-fide marker for replication sites. The observation that NS1 is 444

associated to other compartments in addition to replication vesicles may reflect its involvement in 445

different steps of the viral life cycle, beyond RNA replication. 446

Approximately half of the vesicles showed a single pore-like connection to the cytoplasm. There 447

might be several explanations for this observation. Besides technical problems that may not allow 448

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 16: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

16

clear detection of pores in all vesicles, there could be a dynamic life-cycle of virus-induced vesicles, 449

from their formation, function in replication with a pore connection and eventual late step where the 450

vesicles are not connected with the cytosol by the pore anymore. This pore likely allows 451

recruitment of cellular cofactors to active sites of virus replication as well as for the release of 452

newly synthesized viral RNA to be used for translation and assembly (Fig. 2D). However, although 453

the vesicles were frequently closely associated, we could never detect direct connections between 454

neighboring vesicles in the same packet as described for Kunjin virus, and more recently also for 455

the naturally attenuated tick-borne LGTV (12, 28). This discrepancy might be due to differences in 456

the sample preparation. Alternatively, it might implicate that the architecture of flaviviral RCs 457

slightly changes based on the specific virus and/or cell line used for the analysis. 458

We also often observed newly assembled virions sharing the same ER lumen with putative 459

replicative vesicles, suggesting that replication and assembly sites are located in very close 460

proximity. Given the absence of pore-like openings directly connecting vesicles with the ER lumen, 461

it is likely that, once synthesized, the viral RNA is released via the pore to the cytosolic side of 462

these invaginations. The basic C protein would then interact with progeny RNA genomes to form a 463

nucleocapsid that buds back to the lumen of the ER acquiring the viral envelope. Thereafter, 464

immature viral particles would be either stored in clusters within dilated ER cisternae (Fig. 2A) or 465

transported through the cellular secretory pathway (Movie S1), where maturation occurs, in order to 466

be released to the extracellular milieu (48, 49). 467

In this study we also compared ultrastructural alterations induced by virus infection with those 468

associated with the replication of MS2-tagged TBEV subgenomic replicons. As observed upon 469

TBEV infection, dramatic reorganization of intracellular membranes with the appearance of single 470

membrane vesicles could be detected in the perinuclear region of the cell. Although ER tubules 471

hosting replicon-induced vesicles appeared fragmented and smaller than those observed in virus-472

infected cells, vesicles were similar in size and our detailed tomographic analysis revealed that they 473

also originated from the ER and were connected to the cytoplasm via pore-like channels. 474

Interestingly, at variance with virus-infected cells, replicon-induced vesicles did not accumulate in 475

packets but were rather dispersed through the cytoplasm as one or few invaginations of the ER 476

membrane (Fig. 4, Movie S3 and S4). We also observed a higher fraction of vesicles with pores in 477

replicon-transfected cells. However, the latter observation could be simply related to a better 478

accessibility of dispersed vesicles during ET. These data suggest that replicons, despite the 479

induction of massive ER rearrangements, are less efficient at forming vesicles which is consistent 480

with the lower level of viral replication previously reported (31, 50, 51). The induction of 481

membrane rearrangements could be due to the altered expression or regulation of viral proteins 482

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 17: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

17

resulting from the electroporation of large amounts of genomic RNA. For example, it has been 483

shown that the NS4A protein of mosquito-borne KUNV and DENV viruses possesses the intrinsic 484

capacity to induce membrane rearrangements similar to those induced upon virus infection (52, 53). 485

A similar role for TBEV NS4A remains to be clarified. 486

When we investigated the mobility of viral RNA by FRAP we found a consistent delay of the 487

recovery of fluorescence within perinuclear regions of MS2-EYFP accumulation (Fig. 6A). In 488

contrast, GFP did not show significant differences of mobility within the cytosol as compared to 489

that within TBEV induced replication compartments that are marked with cherry-MS2nls (Figure 490

6C), suggesting that these compartments are open to the cytosol and allow exchange of proteins. 491

Interestingly, recovery after 36 hours did not differ significantly from that at 12 hours after replicon 492

transfection. Although we cannot formally exclude that replication rates slow down at late time 493

points, thus masking an increase of recovery in the FRAP curve due to an increased permeability, 494

we can assume that the mobility of viral RNA is similar at early and late time points. In other terms, 495

at later time points there is not a massive disruption or reorganization of these membranous 496

compartments compatible with the liberation of viral RNA. Free accessibility of the fluorescent 497

MS2 concomitant with a slow recovery after photobleaching within the compartment suggests an 498

impaired movement of the genomic RNA out of this area. This could be coupled with a slow rate of 499

viral RNA biogenesis and/or with the association of a fraction of the viral RNA to polysomes on ER 500

membranes. To address this hypothesis we performed a FLIP experiment and we directly measured 501

trafficking of viral RNA between cytosol and sites of virus replication (Fig. 6F). Strikingly, we 502

could observe a slow release of replicated RNA from the compartment. 503

Another important observation relates to the mobility of tagged viral RNA within MS2-defined 504

regions of the cytoplasm. Previous FRAP studies performed with components of the HCV 505

replication complex NS4B and NS5A showed that the internal architecture of the membranous web 506

is relatively static, with limited exchange of viral nonstructural proteins between neighboring 507

factories (17, 18, 54). In the present study, for the first time, we monitored viral RNA dynamics 508

within perinuclear regions of virus replication. By using continuous bleaching of MS2 fluorescence 509

in the region where the RNA is clustered, we could observe a fast depletion of fluorescence, 510

consistent with a high mobility of the viral RNA (Fig. 7A and Movie S8). Mobility within this area 511

was indeed higher than mobility between the compartment and the cytosol, confirming that a 512

physical impediment restricts viral RNA egress rather than an intrinsic slow mobility of the viral 513

RNP (compare the blue line in Fig. 6F and 7A). However, depletion of fluorescence was clearly 514

restricted only to a discrete region in the cluster leading us to the conclusion that these TBEV-515

induced compartments are partitioned with respect to viral RNA mobility. In agreement with this 516

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 18: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

18

finding, specific labeling of the newly replicated RNA clearly revealed a high proportion of labeled 517

MS2-tagged RNA genomes localized in the cytosolic space surrounding TBEV-induced membrane 518

alterations (Fig. 7E). Therefore we propose that upon synthesis within ER-derived vesicles, progeny 519

genomes must be released to a larger virus-induced extra-vesicular sub-compartment where RNA 520

translation and virus assembly occur. This subcompartment would be full of viral RNA that travels 521

from replication vesicles to the virion assembly sites and is connected to the cytoplasm (Fig. 8). 522

Such extremely organized architecture would certainly help in coordinating genomic RNA 523

recruitment for translation and/or packaging. 524

In conclusion, we generated a high-resolution structure of the three-dimensional organization of 525

TBEV-induced replication compartment. In addition, by exploiting the MS2-tagged replicon 526

system, we could combine structural information with dynamic data of newly replicated TBEV-527

RNA within functional intracellular compartments providing new insights into the spatio-temporal 528

organization of flavivirus replication compartments. 529

530

Acknowledgments 531

We thank the Electron Microscopy Core Facility (EMCF) at University of Heidelberg, and the EM 532

Facility at European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL, Heidelberg) for providing access to 533

their equipment, expertise, and technical support. We also thank Anil Kumar for the expert help in 534

handling lentiviral vectors and for useful discussions. LM benefited of a short-term EMBO 535

Fellowship (ASTF 217 – 2012). Work on Flaviviruses in AM’s laboratory is supported by the 536

Beneficientia Stiftung. R.B. is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 638, TP 537

A5 and TRR83, TP13). 538

539

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 19: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

19

Figures Legends 540

Figure 1. Localization of TBEV proteins and dsRNA in BHK-21 infected cells. BHK-21 cells 541

were either mock infected (MOCK, right panels) or infected with TBEV at MOI = 2 (TBEV, left 542

panels). After 24h, cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence as described in materials 543

and methods. (A) Cells co-stained with the anti-TBEV antiserum (TBEV; Alexa Fluor 594, red) and 544

with the monoclonal anti-NS1 antibody (NS1, Alexa Fluor 488, green). (B) Cells co-stained with 545

the anti-TBEV antiserum (TBEV; Alexa Fluor 594, red) and with the J2 monoclonal anti-dsRNA 546

antibody (dsRNA; Alexa Fluor 488, green). (C) Cells co-stained with the anti-prM antiserum (prM; 547

Alexa Fluor 594, red) and with the monoclonal anti-NS1 antibody (NS1; Alexa Fluor 488, green). 548

(D) Cells co-stained with the anti-TBEV antiserum (TBEV; Alexa Fluor 594, red) and with the anti-549

PDI monoclonal antibody (PDI; Alexa Fluor 488, green). The zoomed images shown in the middle 550

panels correspond to boxed regions in the left panels. 551

552

Figure 2. Ultrastructural analysis of the membrane alterations induced by TBEV infection. 553

(A) BHK-21 cells were infected with TBEV at MOI = 2, fixed 24 hpi and processed for ET as 554

described in materials and methods. Left: tomographic slice of a dual axis tomogram, shown in 555

Movie S2. Upon infection vesicles (Ve), as well as virions (yellow arrows) were observed in the 556

lumen of the rough ER. Right: 3D surface reconstruction of the whole tomogram displaying the 557

TBEV-induced vesicles (in light yellow) in the lumen of the ER (in light brown), as well as virions 558

(in dark red). (B) Two examples (left and right, respectively) of tomographic slices through the 559

whole tomogram depicting connections between ER tubules (yellow arrows). (C) Left: tomographic 560

slices of the same dual axis tomogram depicting several of these vesicles in the lumen of the ER in 561

close proximity to newly assembled virions (yellow arrows), also observed in the Golgi apparatus 562

(Movie S1). Right: 3D surface rendering of the same area displaying the TBEV-associated vesicles 563

(in light yellow) sharing the ER lumen with TBE-virions (in dark red) and surrounded by ER 564

membranes (in light brown). (D) Left: serial single slices depicting openings of several TBEV-565

induced vesicles to the cytosol (green, yellow and blue arrows). Right: XZ view of the 3D 566

reconstruction of the whole tomogram displaying these openings towards the cytosol (arrows with 567

matching colors). (E) Left: slices through the tomogram showing tight contacts of TBEV-induced 568

vesicles with their neighboring vesicles (yellow arrows). Right: 3D reconstruction displaying these 569

contacts between vesicles. Note that openings connecting vesicles were not observed in these 570

tomograms. 571

572

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 20: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

20

Figure 3. Immunogold EM of TBEV infected cells. BHK-21 cells were infected with TBEV at 573

MOI = 2, fixed 24 hpi, and thawed cryosections were labeled with antibodies against PDI (A), NS1 574

(B and C), prM (E and F), and with the anti-TBEV serum (D) that predominantly recognizes the 575

structural protein E and the nonstructural protein NS1. Vesicles within the lumen of dilated ER 576

cisternae (A) are specifically labeled with anti-NS1 (B and C) and anti-TBEV antibodies (D). 577

Arrowheads in all panels highlight TBEV virions, specifically labeled with prM (E and F) and 578

TBEV (D) antibodies, in the lumen of the ER or trafficking toward the Golgi apparatus. 579

Abbreviations: M, mitocondria; N, nucleus; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; Ve, vesicles; Vi, virions. 580

581

Figure 4. Ultrastructural analysis of the membrane alterations induced by 582

pTNd/∆ME_24×MS2. 583

(A) BHK21-EYFP-MS2nls cells were electroporated with the TNd/ΔME_24xMS2 replicon RNA. 584

24 hours post electroporation (hpe) cells were fixed, permeabilized with Triton X-100 and 585

incubated with an antibody against dsRNA that was then revealed by a secondary antibody 586

conjugated with Alexa-594. The EYFP channel is shown in the left panel, dsRNA in the middle 587

panel and the merge in the right panel. (B) BHK21-EYFP-MS2nls cells were electroporated with 588

the TNd/ΔME_24xMS2_GAA replicon RNA and treated as in (A). 589

(C) BHK21-EYFP-MS2nls cells were electroporated with TNd/∆ME_24×MS2, fixed 24 hpe and 590

processed for ET as described in materials and methods. Left: slice of a dual axis tomogram 591

showing the TBEV-induced vesicles (Ve) in the ER lumen. Right: 3D reconstruction of the 592

complete tomogram. ER membranes are depicted in light brown and TBEV-induced vesicles in 593

light yellow. This tomogram and its 3D membrane rendering are shown in Movie S4. (D) Left: 594

serial single slices through the same tomogram displaying connections between adjacent ER 595

tubules. Right: 3D reconstruction of the whole tomogram showing a network of interconnected ER 596

tubules. Note that the ER is highly fragmented in these cells in comparison to infected cells. (E) 597

Left: serial single slices through the same tomogram displaying an opening towards the cytosol of a 598

TBEV-induced vesicle (yellow arrows). Right: 3D surface model showing this opening that 599

connects the interior of the vesicle with the cytosol. 600

601

Figure 5. Immunogold EM of replicon-induced membrane alteration. BHK21-EYFP-MS2nls 602

cells were electroporated with TNd/∆ME_24×MS2, fixed 24 h after, and thawed cryosections were 603

labeled with antibodies against PDI (A), NS1 (B), and with the anti-TBEV serum (C and D). All 604

images show TBEV-induced vesicles (Ve) that are specifically labeled with anti-NS1 (B) and anti-605

TBEV antibodies (C and D). (D) Higher magnification image of membrane alterations induced by 606

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 21: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

21

replicon transfection corresponding to the boxed region in panel (C). Vesicles (Ve) and convoluted 607

membranes (CM) labeled with anti-TBEV antibodies are shown. 608

609

Figura 6. TBEV replicated RNA is not freely diffusible in the cytoplasm. (A) Analysis of 610

TBEV RNA dynamics by FRAP time course. BHK-21 cells were electroporated with the 611

TNd/ΔME_24×MS2 replicon RNA together with a vector expressing MS2-EYFP. At the indicated 612

time-points post-electroporation the fluorescence recovery of the MS2-EYFP protein in the area of 613

bleaching was analyzed. The graph shows values of fluorescence intensity normalized to the pre-614

bleach values and corrected for the loss of fluorescence due to the imaging procedure (34, 36, 55). 615

Data represent the average of acquisitions from at least 10 cells ± standard deviation. (B) Image 616

sequence from a FRAP experiment performed in BHK-21 cells 14 hours upon electroporation 617

(29,25 × 29,25 μm). The bright perinuclear region represents the subcellular compartment into 618

which replicated viral RNA is clustered and where ROIs were drawn. Times were collected before 619

bleaching (pre-bleach, 0 sec.), immediately after the bleaching (bleach, 20 sec.) and at 400 sec. after 620

the bleaching event (post-bleach). A movie is also available as supporting information (Movie S5). 621

(C) Analysis of GFP mobility within the replication compartment. BHK-21 cells were 622

electroporated with a vector expressing CherryMS2nls, to mark the RC, and with a GFP expressing 623

plasmid (pEGFP-N1) both in the presence (red line, GFP + TNd/ΔME_24×MS2) and in the absence 624

(green line, GFP) of the TBEV replicon RNA. After 24 hours GFP kinetics was investigated by 625

FRAP. In the graph the recovery curves of the GFP protein in the two different experimental 626

conditions are compared. The values of fluorescence intensity are normalized to the pre-bleach 627

values and corrected for the loss of fluorescence due to the imaging procedure as already described. 628

Data represent the average of acquisitions from 10 cells ± standard deviation. (D) Representative 629

image of BHK-21 cells transfected with GFP and CherryMS2nls in the presence of the TBEV 630

replicating RNA. A z-projection of 41 images 0,5 µm apart is shown. (E) Image sequence from the 631

FRAP experiment described in (C) (36,56 × 7,14 μm). Top, pre-bleach stacks in both channels (0 632

sec.). The circle indicates the area of bleach chosen in the RC marked by CherryMS2nls. Middle, 633

time point immediately after the bleaching event (0,5 sec.); bottom, post-bleach stack (13 sec.). A 634

video is also available as supporting information (Movie S6). (F) BHK-21 cells were electroporated 635

with the TNd/ΔME_24×MS2 replicon RNA together with a vector expressing MS2-EYFP. After 24 636

hours viral RNA release from the RC was monitored by FLIP. (G) selected images from a FLIP 637

experiment are shown (36,56 × 36,56 μm). The region for bleaching (red circle in the bottom 638

panels) was chosen in the cytoplasm away from the clustered TBEV RNA. Loss of fluorescence 639

was then measured in the cytoplasm both within (blue circle, ROI_1) and outside (green circle, 640

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 22: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

22

ROI_2) the RC. In the top graph the loss in fluorescence intensity within the three different ROIs 641

(Bleach; ROI_1 and ROI_2) is compared. Data are normalized as described in (A) and represent the 642

average of acquisitions from 10 cells ± standard deviation. A video is also available as supporting 643

information (Movie S7). 644

645

Figure 7. TBEV replication compartments are organized in discrete clusters. (A) BHK-21 cells 646

were electroporated with the TNd/ΔME_24×MS2 replicon RNA and with the EYFP-MS2nls 647

reporter. At 24 hours upon transfection viral RNA trafficking within the RC was analyzed by FLIP. 648

For this purpose, as shown in the bottom images (29,25 × 29,25 μm), the area of bleaching (red 649

circle) was located inside the compartment. Loss of fluorescence was then measured in two 650

different regions, one surrounding the bleaching area (blue region; ROI_1) and the other one more 651

distant (green circle; ROI_2). The top panel compares the loss of fluorescence curves of the three 652

selected ROIs. Data are normalized as already described and represent the average of acquisitions 653

from 10 cells ± standard deviation. A video is also available as supporting information (Movie S8). 654

(B) BHK21-EYFP-MS2nls cells were electroporated with TNd/∆ME_24×MS2, fixed 24 h after, 655

and thawed cryosections were immunogold-labeled with antibodies against GFP. Selected examples 656

of the different situations are shown in (C) and (D). 657

(E) Quantification of GFP-labeled EM cryosections prepared as described in Fig. 7B. Counting was 658

performed in triplicate measuring the distribution of >100 gold particles for each grid. Data are 659

plotted as percentage ± SD. 660

661

Figure 8. Model of TBEV-induced membrane alterations. Left: slice of the dual axis tomogram 662

shown in Fig. 4B. Right: two-dimension schematic model of the possible organization of TBEV 663

replication compartments. TBEV replication leads to the formation of a highly organized network 664

of interconnected and juxtaposed ER membranes in the perinuclear region of the cells. This 665

compartment is composed of vesicles (Ve, in light yellow) connected to the cytoplasm via pore-like 666

channels, of dilated ER cisternae (in brown), and of a cytoplasmic extra-vesicular space (in light 667

blue). Progeny viral RNAs are synthesized within the lumen of these ER-invaginations and are then 668

extruded through the pore into the cytoplasmic extra-vesicular space. Once released into this area 669

viral RNAs are available for downstream assembly into new viral particles that bud back into the 670

lumen of ER cisternae of infected cells (Fig. 2). Alternatively these RNAs may be engaged in 671

further rounds of translation and replication. 672

673

674

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 23: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

23

References 675

676 1. Gritsun TS, Lashkevich VA, Gould EA. 2003. Tick-borne encephalitis. Antiviral Res 677

57:129-146. 678 2. Lindquist L, Vapalahti O. 2008. Tick-borne encephalitis. Lancet 371:1861-1871. 679 3. Mansfield KL, Johnson N, Phipps LP, Stephenson JR, Fooks AR, Solomon T. 2009. 680

Tick-borne encephalitis virus - a review of an emerging zoonosis. J Gen Virol 90:1781-681 1794. 682

4. Gubler DJ, Kuno G, Markoff L. 2007. Flaviviruses, p. 1153-1252. In Knipe DM, Howley 683 PM, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA (ed.), Fields Virology, Fifth Edition ed. Lippincott, 684 Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. 685

5. Lindenbach BD, Thiel HJ, Rice CM. 2007. Flaviviridae: the viruses and their replication, 686 p. 1101-1152. In Knipe DM, Howley PM, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA (ed.), Fields 687 Virology, Fifth Edition ed. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. 688

6. Fernandez-Garcia MD, Mazzon M, Jacobs M, Amara A. 2009. Pathogenesis of 689 flavivirus infections: using and abusing the host cell. Cell Host Microbe 5:318-328. 690

7. Miller S, Krijnse-Locker J. 2008. Modification of intracellular membrane structures for 691 virus replication. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:363-374. 692

8. Miorin L, Albornoz A, Baba MM, D'Agaro P, Marcello A. 2012. Formation of 693 membrane-defined compartments by tick-borne encephalitis virus contributes to the early 694 delay in interferon signaling. Virus Res 163:660-666. 695

9. Overby AK, Popov VL, Niedrig M, Weber F. 2010. Tick-borne encephalitis virus delays 696 interferon induction and hides its double-stranded RNA in intracellular membrane vesicles. 697 J Virol 84:8470-8483. 698

10. Hoenen A, Liu W, Kochs G, Khromykh AA, Mackenzie JM. 2007. West Nile virus-699 induced cytoplasmic membrane structures provide partial protection against the interferon-700 induced antiviral MxA protein. J Gen Virol 88:3013-3017. 701

11. Welsch S, Miller S, Romero-Brey I, Merz A, Bleck CK, Walther P, Fuller SD, Antony 702 C, Krijnse-Locker J, Bartenschlager R. 2009. Composition and three-dimensional 703 architecture of the dengue virus replication and assembly sites. Cell Host Microbe 5:365-704 375. 705

12. Gillespie LK, Hoenen A, Morgan G, Mackenzie JM. 2010. The Endoplasmic reticulum 706 provides the membrane platform for biogenesis of the flavivirus replication complex. J 707 Virol. 708

13. Mackenzie JM, Jones MK, Young PR. 1996. Immunolocalization of the dengue virus 709 nonstructural glycoprotein NS1 suggests a role in viral RNA replication. Virology 220:232-710 240. 711

14. Mackenzie JM, Khromykh AA, Jones MK, Westaway EG. 1998. Subcellular localization 712 and some biochemical properties of the flavivirus Kunjin nonstructural proteins NS2A and 713 NS4A. Virology 245:203-215. 714

15. Westaway EG, Mackenzie JM, Kenney MT, Jones MK, Khromykh AA. 1997. 715 Ultrastructure of Kunjin virus-infected cells: colocalization of NS1 and NS3 with double-716 stranded RNA, and of NS2B with NS3, in virus-induced membrane structures. J Virol 717 71:6650-6661. 718

16. Moradpour D, Evans MJ, Gosert R, Yuan Z, Blum HE, Goff SP, Lindenbach BD, Rice 719 CM. 2004. Insertion of green fluorescent protein into nonstructural protein 5A allows direct 720 visualization of functional hepatitis C virus replication complexes. J Virol 78:7400-7409. 721

17. Jones DM, Gretton SN, McLauchlan J, Targett-Adams P. 2007. Mobility analysis of an 722 NS5A-GFP fusion protein in cells actively replicating hepatitis C virus subgenomic RNA. J 723 Gen Virol 88:470-475. 724

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 24: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

24

18. Wolk B, Buchele B, Moradpour D, Rice CM. 2008. A dynamic view of hepatitis C virus 725 replication complexes. J Virol 82:10519-10531. 726

19. Miorin L, Maiuri P, Hoenninger VM, Mandl CW, Marcello A. 2008. Spatial and 727 temporal organization of tick-borne encephalitis flavivirus replicated RNA in living cells. 728 Virology 379:64-77. 729

20. Koutsoudakis G, Kaul A, Steinmann E, Kallis S, Lohmann V, Pietschmann T, 730 Bartenschlager R. 2006. Characterization of the early steps of hepatitis C virus infection by 731 using luciferase reporter viruses. J Virol 80:5308-5320. 732

21. Boireau S, Maiuri P, Basyuk E, de la Mata M, Knezevich A, Pradet-Balade B, Backer 733 V, Kornblihtt A, Marcello A, Bertrand E. 2007. The transcriptional cycle of HIV-1 in 734 real-time and live cells. J Cell Biol 179:291-304. 735

22. Mandl CW, Ecker M, Holzmann H, Kunz C, Heinz FX. 1997. Infectious cDNA clones 736 of tick-borne encephalitis virus European subtype prototypic strain Neudoerfl and high 737 virulence strain Hypr. J Gen Virol 78 ( Pt 5):1049-1057. 738

23. Orlinger KK, Hoenninger VM, Kofler RM, Mandl CW. 2006. Construction and 739 mutagenesis of an artificial bicistronic tick-borne encephalitis virus genome reveals an 740 essential function of the second transmembrane region of protein e in flavivirus assembly. J 741 Virol 80:12197-12208. 742

24. Griffiths G, Simons K, Warren G, Tokuyasu KT. 1983. Immunoelectron microscopy 743 using thin, frozen sections: application to studies of the intracellular transport of Semliki 744 Forest virus spike glycoproteins. Methods Enzymol 96:466-485. 745

25. Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. 1996. Computer visualization of three-746 dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol 116:71-76. 747

26. Westaway EG, Khromykh AA, Mackenzie JM. 1999. Nascent flavivirus RNA 748 colocalized in situ with double-stranded RNA in stable replication complexes. Virology 749 258:108-117. 750

27. Mackenzie JM, Jones MK, Westaway EG. 1999. Markers for trans-Golgi membranes and 751 the intermediate compartment localize to induced membranes with distinct replication 752 functions in flavivirus-infected cells. J Virol 73:9555-9567. 753

28. Offerdahl DK, Dorward DW, Hansen BT, Bloom ME. 2012. A three-dimensional 754 comparison of tick-borne flavivirus infection in Mammalian and tick cell lines. PLoS One 755 7:e47912. 756

29. Kopek BG, Perkins G, Miller DJ, Ellisman MH, Ahlquist P. 2007. Three-dimensional 757 analysis of a viral RNA replication complex reveals a virus-induced mini-organelle. PLoS 758 Biol 5:e220. 759

30. Iacono-Connors LC, Smith JF, Ksiazek TG, Kelley CL, Schmaljohn CS. 1996. 760 Characterization of Langat virus antigenic determinants defined by monoclonal antibodies 761 to E, NS1 and preM and identification of a protective, non-neutralizing preM-specific 762 monoclonal antibody. Virus Res 43:125-136. 763

31. Hoenninger VM, Rouha H, Orlinger KK, Miorin L, Marcello A, Kofler RM, Mandl 764 CW. 2008. Analysis of the effects of alterations in the tick-borne encephalitis virus 3'-765 noncoding region on translation and RNA replication using reporter replicons. Virology 766 377:419-430. 767

32. Mackenzie JM, Khromykh AA, Westaway EG. 2001. Stable expression of noncytopathic 768 Kunjin replicons simulates both ultrastructural and biochemical characteristics observed 769 during replication of Kunjin virus. Virology 279:161-172. 770

33. Axelrod D, Koppel DE, Schlessinger J, Elson E, Webb WW. 1976. Mobility 771 measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys J 772 16:1055-1069. 773

34. Maiuri P, Knezevich A, Bertrand E, Marcello A. 2010. Real-time imaging of the HIV-1 774 transcription cycle in single living cells. Methods. 775

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 25: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

25

35. Molle D, Maiuri P, Boireau S, Bertrand E, Knezevich A, Marcello A, Basyuk E. 2007. 776 A real-time view of the TAR:Tat:P-TEFb complex at HIV-1 transcription sites. 777 Retrovirology 4:36. 778

36. Maiuri P, Knezevich A, De Marco A, Mazza D, Kula A, McNally JG, Marcello A. 2011. 779 Fast transcription rates of RNA polymerase II in human cells. EMBO Rep 12:1280-1285. 780

37. Lippincott-Schwartz J, Snapp E, Kenworthy A. 2001. Studying protein dynamics in 781 living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:444-456. 782

38. Dundr M, Misteli T. 2003. Measuring dynamics of nuclear proteins by photobleaching. 783 Curr Protoc Cell Biol Chapter 13:Unit 13 15. 784

39. Mackenzie J. 2005. Wrapping things up about virus RNA replication. Traffic 6:967-977. 785 40. den Boon JA, Diaz A, Ahlquist P. 2010. Cytoplasmic viral replication complexes. Cell 786

Host Microbe 8:77-85. 787 41. Ahlquist P. 2006. Parallels among positive-strand RNA viruses, reverse-transcribing 788

viruses and double-stranded RNA viruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:371-382. 789 42. Novoa RR, Calderita G, Arranz R, Fontana J, Granzow H, Risco C. 2005. Virus 790

factories: associations of cell organelles for viral replication and morphogenesis. Biol Cell 791 97:147-172. 792

43. Khromykh AA, Sedlak PL, Guyatt KJ, Hall RA, Westaway EG. 1999. Efficient trans-793 complementation of the flavivirus kunjin NS5 protein but not of the NS1 protein requires its 794 coexpression with other components of the viral replicase. J Virol 73:10272-10280. 795

44. Lindenbach BD, Rice CM. 1997. trans-Complementation of yellow fever virus NS1 796 reveals a role in early RNA replication. J Virol 71:9608-9617. 797

45. Youn S, Li T, McCune BT, Edeling MA, Fremont DH, Cristea IM, Diamond MS. 2012. 798 Evidence for a genetic and physical interaction between nonstructural proteins NS1 and 799 NS4B that modulates replication of West Nile virus. J Virol 86:7360-7371. 800

46. Chu PW, Westaway EG. 1987. Characterization of Kunjin virus RNA-dependent RNA 801 polymerase: reinitiation of synthesis in vitro. Virology 157:330-337. 802

47. Grun JB, Brinton MA. 1987. Dissociation of NS5 from cell fractions containing West Nile 803 virus-specific polymerase activity. J Virol 61:3641-3644. 804

48. Mackenzie JM, Westaway EG. 2001. Assembly and maturation of the flavivirus Kunjin 805 virus appear to occur in the rough endoplasmic reticulum and along the secretory pathway, 806 respectively. J Virol 75:10787-10799. 807

49. Lorenz IC, Kartenbeck J, Mezzacasa A, Allison SL, Heinz FX, Helenius A. 2003. 808 Intracellular assembly and secretion of recombinant subviral particles from tick-borne 809 encephalitis virus. J Virol 77:4370-4382. 810

50. Khromykh AA, Westaway EG. 1997. Subgenomic replicons of the flavivirus Kunjin: 811 construction and applications. J Virol 71:1497-1505. 812

51. Jones CT, Patkar CG, Kuhn RJ. 2005. Construction and applications of yellow fever 813 virus replicons. Virology 331:247-259. 814

52. Miller S, Kastner S, Krijnse-Locker J, Buhler S, Bartenschlager R. 2007. The non-815 structural protein 4A of dengue virus is an integral membrane protein inducing membrane 816 alterations in a 2K-regulated manner. J Biol Chem 282:8873-8882. 817

53. Roosendaal J, Westaway EG, Khromykh A, Mackenzie JM. 2006. Regulated cleavages 818 at the West Nile virus NS4A-2K-NS4B junctions play a major role in rearranging 819 cytoplasmic membranes and Golgi trafficking of the NS4A protein. J Virol 80:4623-4632. 820

54. Gretton SN, Taylor AI, McLauchlan J. 2005. Mobility of the hepatitis C virus NS4B 821 protein on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and membrane-associated foci. J Gen Virol 822 86:1415-1421. 823

55. Phair RD, Misteli T. 2000. High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus. 824 Nature 404:604-609. 825

826

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 26: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 27: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 28: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 29: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 30: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 31: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 32: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 33: 1 Three Dimensional Architecture of Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

on March 29, 2018 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from