1 thinking critically with psychological science chapter 1

116
1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

Upload: david-thorpe

Post on 27-Mar-2015

238 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

1

Thinking Critically with Psychological

Science

Chapter 1

Page 2: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

2

Thinking Critically with Psychological Science

The Need for Psychological Science The limits of Intuition and

Common Sense

The Scientific Attitude

The Scientific Method

Page 3: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

3

Thinking Critically …

Description The Case Study

The Survey

Naturalistic Observation

Page 4: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

4

Thinking Critically …

Correlation Correlation and Causation Illusory Correlation Perceiving Order in Random

Events

Page 5: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

5

Thinking Critically …

Experimentation Exploring Cause and Effect

Evaluating Therapies

Independent and Dependent Variables

Page 6: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

6

Thinking Critically …

Statistical Reasoning Describing Data

Making Inferences

FAQs About Psychology

Page 7: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

7

Impression of Psychology With hopes of satisfying curiosity, many

people listen to talk-radio counselors and psychics to learn about others and themselves.

Dr. Crane (radio-shrink)

http://ww

w.nbc.com

http://ww

w.photovault.com

Psychic (Ball gazing)

Page 8: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

8

The Need for Psychological Science

Intuition & Common Sense

Many people believe that intuition and common sense are enough to bring forth

answers regarding human nature.

Intuition and common sense may aid queries, but they are not free of error.

Page 9: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

9

Limits of Intuition

Personal interviewers may rely too much on their “gut feelings” when

meeting with job applicants.

Taxi/ G

etty Images

Page 10: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

10

Errors of Common Sense

Try this !

Pennies in a cup

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 11: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

11

Hindsight Bias is the “I-knew-it-all-along” phenomenon.

After learning the outcome of an event, many people believe they could have

predicted that very outcome. We only knew the dot.com stocks would plummet after

they actually did plummet.

Hindsight Bias

Page 12: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

12

OverconfidenceSometimes we think we know more than we actually know.

Anagram

BARGEGRABE

ENTRYETYRN

WATERWREATHow long do you think it would take to unscramble

these anagrams?

People said it would take about 10 seconds, yet on

average they took about 3 minutes (Goranson, 1978).

Page 13: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

13

Psychological Science

1. How can we differentiate between uniformed opinions and examined conclusions?

2. The science of psychology helps make these examined conclusions, which leads to our understanding of how people feel, think, and act as they do!

Page 14: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

14

4 GOALS OF PSYCHOLOGY

1. DESCRIBE

2. EXPLAIN

3. PREDICT

4. INFLUENCE

Page 15: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

15

The Scientific Attitude

The scientific attitude is composed of curiosity (passion for exploration), skepticism

(doubting and questioning) and humility (ability to accept responsibility when wrong).

Page 16: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

16

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking does not accept arguments and

conclusions blindly.

It examines assumptions,

discerns hidden values, evaluates

evidence and assesses

conclusions.The Amazing Randi

Courtesy of the Jam

es Randi E

ducation Foundation

Page 17: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

17

Scientific Method

Psychologists, like all scientists, use the scientific method to construct theories that organize, summarize

and simplify observations.

Page 19: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

19

Guidelines cont.

• Procedures must be repeatable– Other scientists can do

the same procedure or experiment

• Must use an organized and systematic approach in gathering data

Page 20: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

20

The Testing Method

•Reliability: a measure of consistency; must yield similar results on different testing occasions

•Validity: the degree to which a test measures what it is suppose to measure

Page 21: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

21

A Theory is an explanation that integrates principles and organizes

and predicts behavior or events.

For example, low self-esteem contributes to depression.

Theory

Page 22: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

22

A Hypothesis is a testable prediction, often prompted by a theory, to enable

us to accept, reject or revise the theory.

People with low self-esteem are apt to feel more depressed.

Hypothesis

Page 23: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

23

Research would require us to administer tests of self-esteem and

depression. Individuals who score low on a self-esteem test and high on a depression test would confirm our

hypothesis.

Research Observations

Page 24: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

24

Research Process

Page 25: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

25

Description

Case Study

A technique in which one person is studied in depth to reveal underlying behavioral principles.

Is language uniquely human?

Susan K

uklin/ Photo R

esearchers

Page 26: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

26

Case Study

A clinical study is a form of case study in which the therapist

investigates the problems associated

with a client.

http://behavioralhealth.typepad.com

Clinical Study

Page 27: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

27

METHODS cont.• CASE-STUDY METHOD:

– Study an individual’s background forces that influence their behavior (family background, home life, neighborhood, school, etc.)

– ADVANTAGE:• Can exhibit individual differences and suggest

hypotheses• Can study phenomena you cannot manipulate• Can generate hypotheses to be tested

– DISADVANTAGE:• Information comes from family,

teachers and friends of individual being studied (biased?)

• Info. may be misleading• Can’t generalize nor replicate• Observer bias could be present• Cannot show causality• Psychologists can guide patients into saying

what they want hear

Page 28: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

28

METHODS cont.

• INTERVIEWS:– One-on-one questioning– ADVANTAGE:

• Develop rapport, relaxed atmosphere, questions in advance/flexibility

– DISADVANTAGE:• getting rid of the personal

prejudices of the interviewer, difficulty in expressing the results of an interview in exact terms

Page 29: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

29

METHODS cont.

• QUESTIONNAIRE:– ADVANTAGES:

• Gather facts about individuals or opinions

• Answers can be treated statistically

Page 30: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

30

METHODS cont.• TESTS

– I.Q.– Aptitude (A.S.V.A.B.)– Achievement (A.C.T., S.A.T.,

M.A.P.)– ADVANTAGES:

• more objective data than interviews and questionnaires

• Results can be expressed in statistical terms

• Scores can be compared with scores for large groups

– DISADVANTAGES:• Results do not give full and final

answers to individual problems

Page 31: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

31

Survey

A technique for ascertaining the self-reported attitudes, opinions or behaviors of people usually done by questioning a

representative, random sample of people.

http://ww

w.lynnefeatherstone.org

Page 32: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

32

Survey• Reveals attitudes and behaviors of large sample of people

•Learn about behavior and mental processes that cannot be observed in the natural setting or studied experimentally

Page 33: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

33

Limitations

• Limited generalization• Replication sensitive to sample selected

• Give socially desirable answers• Exaggerated answers to foul up results

• Different interviewers for different samples (gender, SES, ethnicity)

Page 34: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

34

Limitations (cont.)

•Easy to bias by Wording Effect

-“Given the number of shootings in schools, should we regulate handguns? True or False

-Cannot establish causal relationships

Page 35: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

35

Survey

Wording can change the results of a survey.

Q: Should cigarette ads and pornography be allowed on television? (not allowed vs.

forbid)

Wording Effect

Page 36: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

36

Survey

A tendency to overestimate the extent to which others share

our beliefs and behaviors.

False Consensus Effect

Page 37: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

37

Samples and Populations

• Example: Alf Landon defeated Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1936 poll (Roosevelt won by landslide)- surveyed voters by phone-during Great Depression

Wealthy->phones>Republican

Page 38: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

38

Samples• Must accurately represent the population they are intended to reflect.

• Only representative samples allow us to generalize from research samples to populations.

Page 39: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

39

Sample/Population• Sample: The individuals who are studied; part of a population

• Population: a complete group of organisms or events

• Infer:Draw a conclusion

Page 40: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

40

Problems in Generalizing

• Research sample (consider gender, age, ethnicity)

• Volunteer Bias

Page 41: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

41

Volunteer Bias

A source of bias or error in research that

reflects the prospect that people who offer to participate in research

studies differ systematically from people who don’t.

Page 42: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

42

Volunteer Bias

• More willing to disclose intimate information

• Volunteers have more spare time than nonvolunteers

• How do they differ from the population at large?

Page 43: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

43

Problems with Generalization

• Demographic variables:-age-education-socioeconomic status-marital status-number of children-location

Page 44: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

44

Survey

Random Sampling

If each member of a population has an equal chance of inclusion into a sample, it is called a

random sample (unbiased). If the survey

sample is biased, its results are not valid.

The fastest way to know about the marble color ratio is to blindly transfer a few into a smaller jar and count them.

Page 45: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

45

QuestionIf scientists conducted research with a “random sample” of students from Valencia, would their sample represent the

general U.S. population? Why or why not?

Page 46: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

46

Naturalistic ObservationObserving and recording the behavior of animals in the wild and recording self-seating patterns in a multiracial school lunch room constitute naturalistic observation.

Courtesy of G

ilda Morelli

Page 47: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

47

METHODS

• NATURAL OBSERVATION:

– Observing and recording the behavior of organisms in their natural environment.

– ADVANTAGE:

description of the way organisms behave in their surroundings

– DISADVANTAGE:

no information on how or why the behavior occurs

Page 48: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

48

METHODS cont.

• DIRECTED OBSERVATION:– Involves observing

behavior under controlled conditions in an experimental or a laboratory setting

– ADVANTAGE:• Allows for control of

events and behaviors

– DISADVANTAGE:• Taking an organism from

its natural environment may change its behavior

Page 49: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

49

Descriptive Methods

Case studies, surveys, and naturalistic observation describe

behaviors.

Summary

Page 50: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

50

Assignment

• Form a hypothesis about human behavior and use the method of naturalistic observation to support/refute your hypothesis.

• Write what you observed and concluded.• Ex: If there are sales, then more women

than men will shop at malls. • Due MONDAY SEPTEMEBER 15

Page 51: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

51

longitudinal studies

• A psychologist studies the same group of people at regular intervals over a period of years to determine whether their behavior and/or feelings have changed and if so, how.

• Ex: Studying you when you were 5, then 10, then 15, then 20, then 25, then 30, etc…

Page 52: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

52

cross-sectional studies.

• In this study, psychologists organize individuals into groups based on age.

• Then, these groups are randomly sampled, and the members of each group are surveyed, tested, or observed simultaneously.

• Single point in time (snapshot)

• Ex: IQ, memory, disease

Page 53: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

53

Correlation

When one trait or behavior accompanies another, we say the two correlate.

Correlation coefficient

Indicates directionof relationship

(positive or negative)

Indicates strengthof relationship(0.00 to 1.00)

r = 0.37+

Correlation Coefficient is a statistical measure of the relationship between two

variables.

Page 54: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

54

Correlational Method

Examines the extent to which two or more variables are related and can

predict one another.

Page 55: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

55

Correlational Method

• Virtues:-reveals relations of variables outside the lab-replication possible

• Limitations:-cannot establish causal relationships because you do not manipulate the variables

Page 56: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

56

Correlation Coefficient

•A number that varies between +1.00 and -1.00

•Expresses the strength and direction (+/-) of the relationship between two variables

•The closer it is to 1.00 (regardless of +/-) the stronger the relationship

Page 57: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

57

Positive Correlation

•A relationship between variables in which one variable increases as the other also increases

• Example: Hours of study and GPA

Page 58: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

58

Positive Correlation

•A positive relationship means:As (A) increases, so does (B)

Hours of study (A) is positively correlated with GPA (B)

Page 59: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

59

Negative Correlation

A relationship between two variables in which one

variable increases as the other decreases.

•Example: Hours of TV and GPA

Page 60: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

60

Negative Correlation

•A negative relationship means:As (A) increases, (B) decreases

Number of hours of TV (A) has a negative relationship with GPA (B)

Page 61: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

61

Correlation Research

• Correlational research may suggest but does not show cause and effect

• Often seems clear cut:Increase in Hours of study-> increase in

GPA • But could go other way:Students doing well in school are motivated to study more

GPA-> Hours of study

Page 62: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

62

Page 63: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

63

Page 64: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

64

Page 65: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

65

Correlation Research

•Or some third factor (Confounding Variable): Achievement Motivation could cause both

-> Hours of study-> GPATest: length of marriage is correlated with male baldness.

Does marriage cause baldness?

Page 66: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

66

Perfect positivecorrelation (+1.00)

Scatterplot is a graph comprised of points that are generated by values of two

variables. The slope of the points depicts the direction, while the amount of scatter depicts the strength of the relationship.

Scatterplots

Page 67: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

67

No relationship (0.00)Perfect negativecorrelation (-1.00)

The Scatterplot on the left shows a negative correlation, while the one on the right shows no

relationship between the two variables.

Scatterplots

Page 68: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

68

Page 69: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

69

DataData showing height and temperament in people.

Page 70: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

70

Scatterplot

The Scatterplot below shows the relationship between height and temperament in people. There

is a moderate positive correlation of +0.63.

Page 71: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

71

or

Correlation and Causation

Page 72: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

72

Illusory Correlation

The perception of a relationship where no relationship actually exists. Parents conceive

children after adoption.

Confirming evidence

Disconfirming evidence

Do not

adopt

Disconfirming evidence

Confirming evidence

Adopt

Do not conceiveConceive

Michael N

ewm

an Jr./ Photo Edit

Page 73: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

73

IMPORTANT

Correlation

does NOT mean Causation!!!

Page 74: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

74

Given random data, we look for order and meaningful patterns.

Order in Random Events

Your chances of being dealt either of these hands is precisely the same: 1 in 2,598,960.

Page 75: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

75

Order in Random Events

Given large numbers of random outcomes, a few are likely to express order.

Angelo and Maria Gallina won two California lottery games on the same day.

Jerry Telfer/ S

an Francisco C

hronicle

Page 76: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

76

Experimentation

Like other sciences, experimentation is the backbone of psychology research.

Experiments isolate causes and their effects.

Exploring Cause and Effect

Page 77: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

77

Experimental Method

A scientific method that seeks to confirm cause and effect relationships

by introducing independent variables and observing their effects on dependent variables.

Page 78: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

78

Experimental Method

•Treatment: in experiments, a condition received by participants so that its effects may be observed.

Page 79: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

79

Many factors influence our behavior. Experiments (1) manipulate factors that interest us, while other factors are kept

under (2) control.

Effects generated by manipulated factors isolate cause and effect relationships.

Exploring Cause & Effect

Page 80: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

80

An Independent Variable is a factor manipulated by the experimenter.

The effect of the independent variable is the focus of the study. For example, when examining the effects of

breast feeding upon intelligence, breast feeding is the independent variable.

Independent Variable

Page 81: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

81

A Dependent Variable is a factor that may change in response to an

independent variable. In psychology, it is usually a behavior

or a mental process.

For example, in our study on the effect of breast feeding upon intelligence, intelligence is the dependent variable.

Dependent Variable

Page 82: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

82

Experimental Research

Manipulate the Independent Variable (IV)

Holding all other variables constant

Observe the impact on the Dependent Variable (DV)

Page 83: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

83

DRY MIX

Dependent Manipulate

Result Independent

Y X

Operational Definition of DV-the parameters of how we measure things

Page 84: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

84

Experimental Research

Example: Aggression & Alcohol

(IV): Alcohol-administered at different levels, doses

(DV):Aggressive behavior

Page 85: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

85

Experimental Research• Experimental Participants:Partake of the treatment (example: members would ingest alcohol)

• Control Group: do not take the treatment

(example: do not ingest alcohol)

*** all other conditions are held constant (helps determine cause and effect)

Page 86: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

86

Placebo

“Sugar pill” often results in the behavior that people expect.

•Physicians now and then give sugar pills to demanding, but healthy people. They often report they feel better.

Page 87: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

87

PlaceboExample: Tonic water & alcohol•Giving participants placebo (tonic water) but they think they are drinking alcohol

•We can conclude that changes in behavior stem from their beliefs about alcohol, not the alcohol itself.

Page 88: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

88

Blinds and Double Blinds

Expectations:-Aggression may not have resulted from alcohol because individuals may have expectations of the effects of alcohol.

-People act in stereotypical ways when they believe they have been drinking alcohol.

(people may become less anxious in social situations, more aggressive, or more sexually aroused)

Page 89: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

89

BlindWell-designed experiments control for the effects

of expectations by creating conditions under which participants are

unaware of the treatment.

Page 90: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

90

Double-Blind Studies

A study in which neither the participants nor the persons measuring results know who has received the

treatment.

Page 91: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

91

In evaluating drug therapies, patients and experimenter’s assistants should

remain unaware of which patients had the real treatment and which patients had the

placebo treatment.

Evaluating Therapies

Double-blind Procedure

Page 92: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

92

Assigning participants to experimental (Breast-fed) and control (formula-fed) conditions by random assignment minimizes pre-existing

differences between the two groups.

* Different from random sampling

Evaluating Therapies

Random Assignment

Page 93: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

93

ExperimentationA summary of steps during experimentation.

Page 94: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

94

ComparisonBelow is a comparison of different

research methods.

Page 95: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

95

Statistical Reasoning

Statistical procedures analyze and interpret data allowing us to see what the unaided eye misses.

Composition of ethnicity in urban locales

Page 96: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

96

Describing DataA meaningful description of data is

important in research. Misrepresentation may lead to incorrect conclusions.

Page 97: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

97

Measures of Central Tendency

Mode: The most frequently occurring score in a distribution.

Mean: The arithmetic average of scores in a distribution obtained by adding the scores and then dividing by the number of scores that were added together.

Median: The middle score in a rank-ordered distribution.

Page 98: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

98

M&Ms Activity

1) Quantify (count) the data within the bag=total M&Ms

2) Sort them according to color (10 orange, 3 red, 4 green, etc…)

Page 99: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

99

M&M Activity

3) Determine the groups quantity (total)

4) Find the groups mean5) Find individual mode6) Find group’s mode

Bi-modal=> two categories with the same mode

Page 100: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

100

Measures of Central Tendency

A Skewed Distribution

Page 101: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

101

Measures of Variation

Range: The difference between the highest and lowest scores in a distribution.

Standard Deviation: A computed measure of how much scores vary around the mean.

Page 102: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

102

M&M Activity

7) Find the range of group’s bag quantity

*Highest # of m&ms-lowest # of m&ms

8) Find the range of colors in individual bag

9) Calculate Standard Deviation

Page 103: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

103

Standard Deviation

1) Determine the mean2) Subtract the mean from every number to get

the list of deviations (negative numbers are ok)3) Square the resulting list of numbers4) Add up all the resulting squares to get their

total sum5) Divide your result by one less than the number

of items in the list6) To get the SD, take the square root of the

resulting number

Page 104: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

104

Practice Standard Deviation

your list of numbers: 1, 3, 4, 6, 9, 19

1) mean: (1+3+4+6+9+19) / 6 = 42 / 6 = 7

2) list of deviations: -6, -4, -3, -1, 2, 12

3) squares of deviations: 36, 16, 9, 1, 4, 144

4) sum of deviations: 36+16+9+1+4+144 = 210

5) divided by one less than the number of items in the list: 210 / 5 = 42

6) square root of this number: square root (42) = about 6.48

Page 105: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

105

Standard Deviation

Page 106: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

106

Making Inferences

A statistical statement of how frequently an obtained result occurred by

experimental manipulation or by chance.

Page 107: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

107

Making Inferences

Representative samples are better than biased samples.

Less variable observations are more reliable than more variable ones.

More cases are better than fewer cases.

When is an Observed Difference Reliable?

Page 108: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

108

Making Inferences

When sample averages are reliable and the difference between them is relatively large,

we say the difference has statistical significance.

For psychologists this difference is measured through alpha level set at 5 percent (.05)

When is a Difference Significant?

Page 109: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

109

FAQ

Q1. Can laboratory experiments illuminate everyday life?

Ans: Artificial laboratory conditions are created to study behavior in simplistic terms. The goal is

to find underlying principles that govern behavior.

Page 110: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

110

FAQ

Q2. Does behavior depend on one’s culture?

Ans: Even when specific attitudes and behaviors vary across cultures, as they often do, the underlying processes are much the same.

Am

i Vitale/ G

etty Images

Page 111: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

111

FAQ

Q3. Does behavior vary with gender?

Ans: Yes. Biology determines our sex, and culture further bends the genders.

However, in many ways woman and man are similarly human.

Page 112: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

112

FAQ

Q4. Why do psychologists study animals?

Ans: Studying animals gives us the understanding of many behaviors that may have

common biology across animals and humans.

D. Shapiro, © Wildlife Conservation Society

Page 113: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

113

FAQ

Q5. Is it ethical to experiment on animals?

Ans: Yes. To gain insights to devastating and fatal diseases. All researchers who deal with animal research are required to follow

ethical guidelines in caring for these animals.

Page 114: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

114

FAQ

Q6. Is it ethical to experiment on people?

Ans: Yes. Experiments that do not involve any kind of physical or psychological harm beyond normal levels encountered in daily

life may be carried out.

Page 115: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

115

FAQ

Q7. Is psychology free of value judgments?

Ans: No. Psychology emerges from people who subscribe to a set of values and judgments.

© Roger Shepard

Page 116: 1 Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Chapter 1

116

FAQ

Q8. Is psychology potentially dangerous?

Ans: It can be, but it is not. The purpose of psychology is to help humanity with

problems such as war, hunger, prejudice, crime, family dysfunction, etc.