1 the facility registry system 2006 gis workgroup meeting cincinnati mainstreaming locational...

37
1 The Facility Registry System 2006 GIS Workgroup Meeting Cincinnati Mainstreaming Locational Improvement In Our Work Status Update of Locational Data Improvement

Upload: lillian-edwards

Post on 17-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

The Facility Registry System

2006 GIS Workgroup MeetingCincinnati

Mainstreaming Locational Improvement In Our Work

Status Update of Locational Data Improvement

2

Purpose

Locational StatusFRS Quality Improvements

3

EPA’s architecture enables the Agency by location to describe the quality of the environment and the activities occurring at that location

4

Facility Registry System

Creates a single, integrated set of facility identification information

Environmental InterestsLocational CoordinatesAffiliation

Provides links to EPA’s media information systemsConforms to the Data StandardVerifies the quality of data, including the linkages to EPA and State systems

The Agency Repository of Places of Environmental Interest

5

Snapshot of FRS Location Data

Feb 2006

6

Snapshot of FRS Location Data

Aug 2006

7

746K Have NO Lat/Long!

1,684,896 FRS 1,939,403 FRS

May 2005 Baseline August 2006 Baseline

51% without latitude/longitude859,042 records

49% with latitude/longitude825,854 records

62% withlatitude/longitude1,192,838 records

38% withoutlatitude/longitude746,565 records

MASS CLEAN UPRemoved locational points outside of U.S.

Land/Territories and Zip Code centriod points previously entered by contractors

Lat/Long data increased by 366,984 from May 2005 to August 2006

8

What Can Be Done?Who is to Do it?Where is the Data?What approach can be successful?

9

TRI

RCRAInfo

RMP

RADInfo

ICIS

NCDB

CERCLIS

Schools (new)

Partnerships with Programs

AFS

SDWIS

CAMDBS

NEI

PCS

Nat’l Performance Partnership

FRP (new)

BRACs (new)

1.9 million unique records linking to program interests such as:

10

Planned Efforts for Increased Partnerships Underground Injection Control (UIC) ~700,000 Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (EGRID) ~4,000More complete School Data ~20,000OECA Criminal Database ~1,800Underground Storage Tanks (UST) ~600,000- 1 million

Partnerships with Programs: Goal

11

Strategies to Locational Improvement

PartnershipsLeverage Exchange Network with StatesWork closely with Regions and Program Offices

DataData Stewardship and Data Quality Reviews Target critical data for consolidated acquisition/accessIntegrated Error Correction ProcessAutomated Processes : Geo-Coding Lat/Long

Tools and Technologies Improved Data Management Develop reusable tools

12

Partnerships with States:6 more in 2006

13

Top States for Records Without Locational Data in FRS in August 2006

2610416256Wisconsin

2533217335Indiana

2534217744Missouri

3928318585Minnesota

4895919646Ohio

674523998Arizona

4187124175Texas

4315126231Pennsylvania

3693929815Florida

3435529942North Carolina

2520730686South Carolina

2892731308Kansas

7431541400Illinois

9498068264New York

8457185264New Jersey

# WITH LAT/LONG# WITHOUT LAT/LONGSTATE

#7 (25715, 55818)

#13 (20832, 18070)

#17 (17453, 21990)

#15 (19376, 16357)

#11 (24058, 40996)

#14 (20336, 34079)

#8 (25690, 30903)

#12 (23069, 45539)

#10 (24349, 37554)

#5 (30702, 29400)

#4 (45492, 8956)

#9 (25342, 11789)

#3 (64875, 40495)

#1 (105837, 51959)

#2 (84689, 29850)

Rank # for May 2005 (Without, With)

14

Database EnhancementsFRS/LRT Redesign - ongoingGeospatially Enable Complete FRS Database -ongoing with RTPWeb Services Outbound through CDX - DoneWisconsin Pilot using GML, Web Services and

Polygonal ShapesRegional Pilot – Web Services for Locational Data - Region 1 CompleteUpgraded our geo-coding tools to better address-match in an automated process - ongoingRemoval of all ZIP Code Centroids - DoneAddition of Border Zone Indicator - DoneTribal Indicator on Tribal Country

15

Data Quality Improvement Efforts

Locational Data Clean Up of Values in the DatabaseQuality Report of FRS OverallFacilities on Tribal Land Universe – Redesign/Regional Clean UpNew Merge Script in FRS ReconciliationKatrina Support on Missing and Incorrect DataUpdates to FRS Linkage Application FRS - CDX Error Correction Service to Regulated CommunityDevelop quality checks in XML schema file structureIncreased Data Stewardship

16

Ways to Correct Data

Inform National ProgramRegional ExchangesSite Locator ToolError Tracking SystemFRS Update thru CDXLinkage ApplicationState Exchanges

17

ARC SDE Spatial Layers Available through Feature Services

Facility Site TableBorder IndicatorSite and Interest TableCERCLISRMPSDWISRCRA

18

US-Mexico Border Flag: 100km

19

Secure Entry

20

Facility Information Update

21

Search Facilities

22

Search Results

23

Facility Detail Report

24

Merge Screen

25

Linkage Screen

26

Information Update Page

27

Comments Page

28

Select ESLT

29

Enter Search Criteria

30

Zoom to Desired Extent

31

Select Function

32

Confirm Existing Locational Data

33

Correcting Locational Date thru CDX

34

Correcting Locational Date thru CDX

35

Correcting Locational Date thru CDX

36

Correcting Locational Date thru CDX

37

Questions?

Pat [email protected]

202-566-1687