1 rod bundle heat transfer test results; spacer grid effects and potential impacts on loca...
TRANSCRIPT
1
ROD BUNDLE HEAT TRANSFER TEST RESULTS;Spacer Grid Effects and Potential Impacts on
LOCA Evaluation Models
Stephen M. Bajorek, Ph.D.Senior Technical Advisor for Thermal-Hydraulics
Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchUnited States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionPh.: (301) 415-7561 / [email protected]
Presentation to the2009 Regulatory Information Conference
March 12, 2009
2
Spacer Grid Effects
The effect of spacer grids on reflood heat transfer has been observed in several test series (FLECHT-SEASET, FLECHT, FEBA). Important effects are:
Convective enhancement (downstream of grid) Droplet breakup Grid rewet
The NRC has sponsored tests at the Penn State Rod Bundle Heat Transfer Test Facility (RBHT) to investigate reflood heat transfer and other LOCA processes.
Reflood Heat Transfer Steam Cooling Droplet Injection
The NRC has recently begun to evaluate the data and incorporate findings into analysis codes.
3
RBHT Test Facility
Flow Housing Instrumentation
Rod Bundle
Window(s)
Detailed P Cells
Steam Probes
4
RBHT Steam Probe Rake
5
Digital Imaging System
Camera
Lens
Light SettingFocus
Focus (fine)
IR LaserAperture Power Indicator
Light
Droplets ScatteringSheet
TOP VIEWNOT TO SCALE
Shutter
6
Convective Enhancement
Clad Temperature, Exp 1096 (2.54 cm/sec, 137.9 kPa, 760 C initial temperature, 1.312 kW/m)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
time
tem
per
atu
re (
C)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
tem
per
atu
re (
F)
tc(66")
tc(73")
grid@ 69.25"
ct @ 66"
ct@ 73"
7
Droplet Breakup Steam Temp, Exp 1096 (2.54 cm/sec, 137.9 kPa, 760 C initial temperature, 1.312 kW/m)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
time
tem
per
atu
re (
C)
-100
100
300
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
tem
per
atu
re (
F)
sp(79.7")
sp(93.53")
grid@ 89.7
sp @ 79.7"
sp@ 93.53"
8
Spacer Grid Effects
Local convective enhancement downstream of spacer grids is due to disruption of the boundary layer. The “entrance length effect” increases the heat transfer coefficient as the boundary layer reforms.
Droplet breakup increases the interfacial area of the droplet field. Rapid evaporation decreases the steam temperature, which increases the rod to fluid heat flux.
9
Droplet Breakup – Dry Grids
The conventional “theory” has been that the primary mechanism for droplet breakup (and resulting downstream increase in evaporation) is due to drops interacting with a dry grid. Sharp obstructions shear the incoming droplet into two or more smaller droplets.
Grid Spacer
Rod Bundle
Outgoing Droplets
(Downstream)
Incoming Droplets
(Upstream)
10
RBHT Test 1300 Results
11
RBHT Test 1383 Results
12
Droplet Size vs. Time
13
Droplet Formation Processes
Dry Grid Wet Grid
May not persist except far from QF, or if VIN is small.
Drop formation by breakup at sharp interfaces.
Drop sizes found to be small.
For VIN > 1.0 in/s, most grids show quick rewet.
Drop formation may be due to entrainment from film on grid.
Drop sizes increase as quench front approaches grid.
14
Summary & Conclusions
RBHT data from recently completed test series is now being evaluated and used in code assessment.
RBHT Reflood test data show grid rewet to occur everywhere in the bundle when VIN > 3 in/sec and on two or more grids ahead of the quench front for low flooding rates.
Drop sizes downstream of a wet grid are larger than those produced by a dry spacer grid, indicating that the mechanism for drop formation changes.
Consequence for Evaluation Models: Wet grids can act as a source for droplets high in a bundle. Drop formation mechanism in codes to be concerned may not be that at the
quench front, but from rewet grids just downstream of high power and PCT locations.