1 nonlinear nanoptics m. bertolotti università di roma “la sapienza” dipartimento sbai erice...

90
1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

Upload: annabel-rice

Post on 31-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

1

NONLINEAR NANOPTICS

M. BERTOLOTTIUniversità di Roma “La Sapienza”

Dipartimento SBAI

Erice 2012

Page 2: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

2

Index

Introduction

Linear and Nonlinear Systems

Nonlinear Susceptibility

Nonlinear Optical Interactions

Nonlinearities in Metals

Composite Materials

Erice 2012

Page 3: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

3

Introduction (1)

It is now possible to fabricate artificial structures whose chemical compositions and shapes are controlled with a nanometer accuracy. These man-made systems are too small to behave like the bulk parent compounds and too big to behave like atoms or molecules.

They may present new properties and because we can tailor some of these for specific purposes, nanostructures have the potential for revolutionary applications in electronics and optics.

Furthermore, we know from the basic principle of quantum mechanics that when the size of a system becomes comparable to the characteristic length scale that determines the coherence of the wave functions, quantum size effects occur. The properties then become size and shape dependent.

Page 4: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

4

Introduction (2)

Optical properties in particular are very sensitive to quantum confinement.

In semiconductors, for example, when a photon is absorbed it creates an electron-hole pair, and the two particles interact strongly by electrostatics. Because the effective masses are small and the dielectric constant large, the exciton (bound state of the electron-hole pair) is large on the atomic scale. Depending on the material, the corresponding Bohr radius a0, which sets the natural length scale for all optical processes, is about 50 Å to 500 Å.

One can observe massive changes in optical properties when the dimension of a semiconductor sample, in one or several directions, approaches a0.

Page 5: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

5

Introduction (3)

The optical response of a material is the average of the material properties in a volume larger than 3.

In ordinary materials the ultimate blocks are atoms or molecules and the optical response is the refractive index n.

00 0

1 1 1r rP P

Np P E nE E

p dipole moment of the atom, N number of atoms per unit volume.

If the material is made by nanostructures with some optical properties, the optical response of the material is an average index nav which can be tailored according to the properties of the

nanostructures.

Page 6: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

6

Introduction (4)

If the typical dimension of the structure is of the same order of , confinement effects may occur and the structure may behave as a resonant cavity. Some consequences are:

- a change of the density of electromagnetic modes,

- Electromagnetic field confinement and enhancement,

- light velocity may be slowed down or become superluminal,

- nonlinear processes may be modified,

- suppression or enhancement of spontaneous emission may occur,

- thermal radiation distribution may be modified.

Page 7: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

7

A linear system is defined as one which has a response proportional to an external influence and has a well-known property, i.e. if influences, F1, F2 …., Fn are applied simultaneously, the response produced is the sum of the responses that would be produced if the influences were applied separately.A nonlinear system is one in which the response is not strictly proportional to the influence and the transfer of energy from one influence to another can occur.

Linear and Nonlinear Systems

Nonlinear Optics

Page 8: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

8

If the influences are periodic in time, the response of a nonlinear system can contain frequencies different from those present in the influences. However, the point to emphasize here is that, as well as the generation of new frequencies, nonlinear optics provides the ability to control light with light and so to transfer information directly from one beam to another without the need to resort to electronics.

Traditionally, nonlinear optics has been described phenomenologically in terms of the effect of an electric field on the polarization within a material.

Page 9: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

9

Electromagnetic processes are described by Maxwell’s equations which constitute a set of linear equations. In SI units:

where E and B are the electric and magnetic fields. The displacement fields D and H arise from the external charge and conduction current densities and J. In most cases of interest in nonlinear optics,

= 0 and J = 0.

MAXWELL EQUATIONS

Page 10: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

10

Constitutive relations connect the charge and current distributions within the medium and the displacement fields to the electric and magnetic fields.

0 D P E E B H

where P is the induced polarization in the medium resulting from the field E, is defined as a dielectric constant and 0 is the permittivity of free space (8.85 × 10-12 F m-1 in MKS units). Optical materials are mostly non magnetic = r 0 = 0.

Page 11: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

11

LINEAR THEORY

Usually one assumes a linear response of a dielectric material to an external field

0 P E

where P is the vector representing the electric dipole moment per unit volume induced by the external electric field E, 0 is vacuum permittivity and is a quantity characteristics of the considered material with no dimensions, called electric susceptibility.

Page 12: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

12

In general is a tensor

0

xx xy xzx x

y yx yy yz y

z zx zy zz z

P E

P E

P E

The symmetry properties of the material indicate which ones of the ij coefficients are zero.

Alternatively

xx xy xzx x

y yx yy yz y

z zx zy zz z

D E

D E

D E

Page 13: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

13

HOMOGENEOUS MATERIALS

not depending on space

div div

Brot rot

t tdiv 0 div 0

rot rott t

E E

BE E

B B

B E Ej B j

If

Page 14: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

14

WAVE EQUATION

Starting from Maxwell’s Eqs

0

div E 0

Brot E

t

div B 0div B 0

Drot B

t

rn refractive index

Page 15: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

15

Experimentally the refractive index is a function of wavelength (frequency)

r rn( ) ( ) ( ) 1 ( )

This phenomenon is called DISPERSION.

DISPERSION

Nucleus: ~2000 electron mass, i.e., infinite mass

The polarization in a material medium can be explained considering the electrons tied to the atoms as harmonic oscillators.

Page 16: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

16

DISPERSION

i t0mx x kx eE e (one-dimensional model)

From the solution:i t

02 20

20

eE ex

mm( i )

k

m

the induced moment is calculated:

2

02 20

i tep ex E e

m i

Driving Force

RestoringForce

Damping

xE

e-

Page 17: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

17

For N oscillators per volume unit, the polarization is:

tieE

im

eNpNP

0220

2

Calling

2

2 20

i t0 0

0

eatomic polarizability

m( i )

NP N E E E E e

where is the electric susceptibility.

0 r 0 00

2r

0

N(1 ) 1

Nn 1 1 n

Page 18: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

18

If the second term is lower than 1 (as it happens in gases):

2

2 20 0

Nen 1

2 m( i )

In the expression n comes out to be a complex number.

22

2 20 0

Nen 1

m( i )

Page 19: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

19

ABSORPTION

The term i is responsible for absorption. The complex index can be written as

2 2 2 2

02 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0

Ne ( ) Nen n ik 1 i

2 m 2 m

If we consider a plane wave

E Aexp i( t kz) where

2k n n

c

-0.5

0

0.5

1.0

-3.0 -1.5 0 1.5 3.0

- 1

0(a

.u.)

-0.5

0

0.5

1.0

-3.0 -1.5 0 1.5 3.0-0.5

0

0.5

1.0

-3.0 -1.5 0 1.5 3.0

- 1

0(a

.u.)

Page 20: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

20

The last exponential represents a term of attenuation. The attenuation coefficient may be defined from:

2 z(0)

1 dII(z) E I e

I dz

By comparison with the previous equation

4k

2 n 2 k

E Aexp i t z exp z

2 n 2 kE Aexp i t z exp z

we see that, substituting the complex refractive index, one has 2

k (n ik)

which gives

Page 21: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

21Both and are functions of the frequency. n k

-0.5

0

0.5

1.0

-3.0 -1.5 0 1.5 3.0

- 1

0

( a. u

. )

kn

It can be noticed that a small value of leads to an elevated attenuation.

10.0001 and 0.5 gives 25 cm . k m

k

Page 22: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

22

METALS

In a metal the electrons are free and they do not oscillate around the atoms. Therefore k = 0 and 0 = 0.

In the equation for n2 it is sufficient to put 0 = 0.2

22

0

Nen 1 N density of electrons

m( i )

If <<

2p22

n 1

22

p0

Nem

Plasma frequency

For Al, Cu, Au, Ag N ~ 1023 cm-3 and P~ 2.1016 s-1.

Page 23: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

23

For n is real and the waves propagate freely.

For n is pure imaginary and the field is exponentially attenuated with the distance from the surface. Therefore the radiation is reflected from the surface.

Therefore, for visible and infrared radiation < P and n is imaginary. In general, n is complex because of :

2 2 22

2 2 2 20 0 0

2 2 2 2

1

p p

iNe Ne Nen i

m i i m m

i

P>

P

Page 24: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

24

NONLINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITY

Dipole moment per unit volume or polarization in the linear case

The general form of polarization in a nonlinear medium is

jijii EPP 0 jijii EPP 0

lkj)(

ijklkj)(

ijkj)(

ijii EEEχEEχEχPP 3210 lkj)(

ijklkj)(

ijkj)(

ijii EEEχEEχEχPP 3210

Page 25: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

25

JUSTIFICATION OF THE PRESENCE OF A NONLINEAR RESPONSE

If the force exercised by the electric field of the wave becomes comparable with the Coulomb’s force between the electron and the nucleus, the oscillator is perturbed (anharmonic oscillator) and, at the lower level of the perturbation, we can write:

2 20x(t) x(t) x(t) Dx (t) (e / m)E(t) (4)

xE

Page 26: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

26

The solution of eq.(4) can be expressed as the sum of two terms (1) (2)x(t) x (t) x (t) (5)

in which x(1)(t) is obtained solving eq.(4) without the anharmonic term, whereas x(2)(t) is considered a small correction of the solution at the first order x(1)(t) and is obtained utilizing x(1)(t) in the anharmonic term

2(2) (2) 2 (2) (1)0

eE(t)x (t) x (t) x (t) D x (t) . (6)

m

In this way, considering the case in which the forcing electric field is formed by the sum of two fields at different frequencies

1 2j t j t1 1 2 2 1 2

1E(t) E cos t E cos t E e E e c.c. (7)

2

Page 27: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

27

We have the solution at the first order

1 2j t j t(1) (1) (1)1 2

1x (t) x ( )e x ( )e c.c. (8)

2

and subsequently the solution at the second order, solving eq.(6) with the use of (8) is

1 2 1 2

1 2

j t j t(2) (2) (2)1 2 1 2

j2 t j2 t(2) (2)1 2

1x (t) [x e x e

2

x 2 e x 2 e c.c] (9)

in which

2(2) 1 2

1 2 2 2 2 2 220 1 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 2

2 2(2) k

k 22 2 2 20 k k 0 k k

1 D(e / m) E Ex

2 j j j

1 D(e / m) Ex (2 ) ; k 1,2. (10)

2 j 4 j

Page 28: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

28

Therefore the solution of the second order brings to the generation of oscillations at a frequency different from the ones of the forcing field. In particular, it is possible to have frequencies equal to the sum or to the difference of the field frequencies or to the double (second harmonic). Moreover, we emphasize that the previous formulas remain valid also if just a single forcing field is present. In this case x(2)(t) will be the sum of a second harmonic term (2) and a null pulsation term (term of optical rectification).

Page 29: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

29

Remembering the expression for the medium polarization, we can write

(1) (2)P(t) Ne x (t) x (t) (11) where N is the number of dipoles for volume unit

L NLP(t) P (t) P (t) (12)

which, compared with (10)

(1)L 0

(2)NL

P E

P E E. (13)

2(2) 1 2

1 2 2 2 2 2 220 1 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 2

2 2(2) k

k 22 2 2 20 k k 0 k k

1 D(e / m) E Ex

2 j j j

1 D(e / m) Ex (2 ) ; k 1,2. (10)

2 j 4 j

permits to write

Page 30: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

30

SECOND HARMONIC PRODUCTIONThe nonlinear properties in the optical region have been demonstrated for the first time in 1961 by Franken et al. during an experiment of second harmonic generation. Sending red light of a ruby laser ( = 6.943 Å) onto a crystal of quartz, they observed ultraviolet light.

Page 31: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

31

The story is that when Franken published his paper on thesecond harmonic production, the proof reader corrected the

photo, suppressing the tiny spot of the second harmonicbelieving it was just a smash. You may see this on the photo

below in which under the arrow you see….nothing!

Page 32: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

32

In many crystals the nonlinear polarization depends on the direction of propagation, on the polarization of the electric field and on the orientation of the optical axis of the crystal. Since in such materials the vectors P and E are not necessarily parallel, the coefficient is a tensor. The second order polarization can be written as

(2)ijk j ki

j,k

P d E E (14)

where i, j, k represent the coordinates x, y, z. The main part of the coefficients dijk, however, are usually zero and so only a few of them must be considered.

Page 33: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

33

Only the non-centrosymmetric crystals can have a non null tensor dijk. In facts, let us consider an isotropic crystal. In this case dijk is independent from the direction and therefore it is constant. If now we invert the direction of the electric field, also the polarization must change sign, that is

(2) (2)ijk j k ijk j ki iP d ( E )( E ) d E E P .

It is clear that, not being able to be , dijk must be null.

Moreover, in materials for which d ≠ 0, since no physical meaning can be assigned to an exchange of Ej with Ek, it must be dijk = dikj.

(2) (2)i iP P

Page 34: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

34

Now if we consider the Maxwell equations writing

0D E P (15) we have

0D E P

rot B j jt t t

Brot E . (16)

t

The polarization can be written as the sum of a linear term plus a nonlinear one

0 L NLP E P (17)

In case of materials with second order nonlinearity PNL may be written as

NL ijk j kiP d E E . (18)

Page 35: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

35

So eq.(16) can be written, assuming j = 0

NLPErot B (19)

t t

from which22

2 NL2 2

PEE . (20)

t t

If we consider the unidimensional case of propagation along a direction z, we have

22 2NL ii i

2 2 2

(P )E E. (21)

z t t

Page 36: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

36

Let us consider now three monochromatic fields with frequencies 1, 2, 3 using the complex notation

1 1z1

2 2z2

3 3z3

j t k( )1ii

j t k( )2kk

j t k( )3 jj

1E (z, t) E (z)e c.c.

21

E (z, t) E (z)e c.c.21

E (z, t) E (z)e c.c. (22)2

where the indices i, j, k represent the components x or y.

The polarization at frequency 1 = 3 - 2, for example, from (18) and from (22) results

3 2 3 21 j t k k z( )ijk 3 j 2ki

j,k

1P d E (z)E (z)e c.c. (23)

2

Page 37: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

37

Substituting eqs.(22) into (21) for the component E1i, it is necessary to calculate

1( )2 2

1i 1 12 2

E 1E (z)e t k z c.c. . (24)

2z z

If we assume2

1i 1i1 2

dE d Ek (25)

dz dz

we have

11 1

( )2j t k z2 1ii

1 1i 12

E 1 dE (z)k E (z) 2 jk e c.c. (26)

2 dzz

with similar expressions for2 3

( )2 ( )2j k2 2

E Eand .

z z

Page 38: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

38

Finally, substituting (26) and (23) into (21) we have

3 2 1j k k k z01i 1ijk 3 j 2k

1

dE (z)j d E E e c.c. (27)

dz 2

and in analogous way

1 3 2

1 2 3

j k k k z02k 2ijk 1i 3 j

2

3 j j k k k z3 0ijk 1i 2k

3

dE jd E E e c.c.

dz 2

dEj d E E e c.c.. (28)

dz 2

The second harmonic field is obtained immediately from (27) and (28) for the case of 1 = 2 and 3 = 21. Therefore it is enough to consider only, f.e., (27) and the last one of (28).

Page 39: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

39

To further simplify the analysis we can assume that the power lost by the frequency 1 (fundamental) is negligible, and therefore 1idE

0. (29)dz

So it is sufficient to consider just the last one of (28)

3j j k z0jik 1i 1k

dEj d E E e (30)

dz

where 31 2

and ( j) (i) (k)3 1 1k k k k . (31)

1 3 2

1 2 3

j k k k z02k 2ijk 1i 3 j

2

3 j j k k k z3 0ijk 1i 2k

3

dE jd E E e c.c.

dz 2

dEj d E E e c.c.. (28)

dz 2

Page 40: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

40

In eq.(31) is the constant of propagation of the beam at 1 polarized in the direction i. The solution of (30) for E3j(0) = 0 for a crystal of length L is

(i)1k

j k L0

3j jik 1i 1ke 1

E (L) j d E Ej k

or

22 22 20

3j jik 1i 1k 2

sen k L / 2I(L) E (L) d E E L . (32)

k L / 2

According to (32) a requirement for an efficient second harmonic generation is that k = 0, that is from (31) with 3 = 2, 1 = 2 =

2 ( )k 2k . (33)

( j) (i) (k)3 1 1k k k k . (31)

Page 41: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

41

If k ≠ 0, the second harmonic wave generated at a generic plane z1 which propagates until another plane z2 is not in phase with that generated in z2. This produces an interference described by the factor

2

2

sen k L / 2

k L / 2

in (32).

The condition is never practically satisfied because, due to dispersion, the refractive index depends on .

22 22 20

3j jik 1i 1k 2

sen k L / 2I(L) E (L) d E E L . (32)

k L / 2

2 ( )k 2k . (33)

Page 42: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

42

In general we have

(2 ) ( ) (2 ) ( )2k k 2k n n (34)

c

being

( )( ) n

k (35)c

and therefore

k 0.

Page 43: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

Coherence length

We have no more second harmonic production when

sin(ΔkL/2)/ΔkL/2 = 0

This is achieved when ΔkL/2 =π

Which means L = 2π/Δk

L is named coherence lenght.

Page 44: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

44

However, it is possible to make k = 0 (phase-matching condition) using various skills; the most used of which takes advantage from the natural birefringence of the anisotropic crystals. From (34) we can see that k = 0 implies

(2 ) ( )n n (36)

so that the refractive indices of second harmonic and of fundamental frequency have to be equal.

Using birefringent materials it is possible to fulfill the condition of phase matching.

(2 ) ( ) (2 ) ( )2k k 2k n n (34)

c

Page 45: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

45

As another example a PBG may be used to obtain phase matching

Page 46: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

46

Finally we point out that very well known electro-optic effects discovered in the XIX century are particular cases of nonlinear optics.

Pockels effect Δεr = qEo

P = εoχE εr = 1 + χ

P = εoχE + χ(2) Eo E = εo(χ + χ(2) /εo Eo )E = εo χ’E

χ’ = χ+ χ(2) /εo Eo 1+ εr + Δεr = 1 + εr +χ(2) /εo Eo

Δεr = χ(2) / εo Eo

Page 47: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

47

Kerr effect Δεr = qEo2

P = εoχE εr = 1 + χ

P = εoχE + χ(3) Eo2 E = εo(χ + χ(3) /εo Eo

2 )E = εo χ’E

χ’ = χ+ χ(3) /εo Eo2 1+ εr + Δεr = 1 + εr +χ(3) /εo Eo

2

Δεr = χ(3) / εo Eo2

Page 48: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

48

Nonlinear Optical Interactions

• The E-field of a laser beam

• 2nd order nonlinear polarization

C.C.)(~ tiEetE

)C.C.(2)(~ 22)2(*)2()2( tieEEEtP

2)2(

Page 49: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

49

2nd Order Nonlinearities • The incident optical field

• Nonlinear polarization contains the following terms

..)(~

21

21 CCeEeEtE titi ..)(~

21

21 CCeEeEtE titi

(2) 21 1

(2) 22 2

(2)1 2 1 2

(2) *1 2 1 2

(2 ) (SHG)

(2 ) (SHG)

( ) 2 (SFG) summ frequency generation

( ) 2 (DFG) difference frequency generation

(0)

P E

P E

P E E

P E E

P

(2) * *

1 1 2 22 ( ) (OR) optical rectificationE E E E

(2) 21 1

(2) 22 2

(2)1 2 1 2

(2) *1 2 1 2

(2 ) (SHG)

(2 ) (SHG)

( ) 2 (SFG) summ frequency generation

( ) 2 (DFG) difference frequency generation

(0)

P E

P E

P E E

P E E

P

(2) * *

1 1 2 22 ( ) (OR) optical rectificationE E E E

Page 50: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

50

1

2)2(

1

2213

Sum Frequency Generation

132

Application:Tunable radiation in the UV Spectral region.

Application:Tunable radiation in the UV Spectral region.

Page 51: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

51

1

2)2(

2

1213

Difference Frequency Generation

132

Application:The low frequency photon, amplifies in the presence of high frequency beam . This is known as parametric amplification.

Application:The low frequency photon, amplifies in the presence of high frequency beam . This is known as parametric amplification.

2

1

Page 52: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

52

Phase Matching

)2(

2

•Since the optical (NLO) media are dispersive, The fundamental and the harmonic signals have different propagation speeds inside the media.

•The harmonic signals generated at different points interfere destructively with each other.

•Since the optical (NLO) media are dispersive, The fundamental and the harmonic signals have different propagation speeds inside the media.

•The harmonic signals generated at different points interfere destructively with each other.

Page 53: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

Third Order Nonlinearities

When the general form of the incident electric field is in the following form,

The third order polarization will have 22 components

tititi eEeEeEtE 321321)(

~ tititi eEeEeEtE 321

321)(~

3,2,1,,),2(),2(

)(),(,3,

kjijiji

kjikjiii

3,2,1,,),2(),2(

)(),(,3,

kjijiji

kjikjiii

Page 54: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

54

The Intensity Dependent Refractive Index

• The incident optical field

• Third order nonlinear polarization

C.C.)()(~ tieEtE C.C.)()(~ tieEtE

)(|)(|)(3)( 2)3()3( EEP )(|)(|)(3)( 2)3()3( EEP

Page 55: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

55

)(|)(|)(3)()( 2)3()1(TOT EEEP )(|)(|)(3)()( 2)3()1(TOT EEEP

The total polarization can be written as

One can define an effective susceptibility

)3(2)1(eff |)(|4 E

)3(2)1(eff |)(|4 E

The refractive index can be defined as usual

eff2 41 n eff

2 41 n

Page 56: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

56

By definition

where

20 |)(|2

Ecn

I 20 |)(|

2

E

cnI

Innn 20 Innn 20

)3(20

2

2

12 cn

n )3(

20

2

2

12 cn

n

Page 57: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

57

Mechanism n2 (cm2/W) (esu) Response time (sec)

Electronic Polarization 10-16 10-14 10-15

Molecular Orientation 10-14 10-12 10-12

Electrostriction 10-14 10-12 10-9

Saturated Atomic Absorption

10-10 10-8 10-8

Thermal effects 10-6 10-4 10-3

Photorefractive Effect large large Intensity dependent

)3(1111

Typical values of nonlinear refractive index

Page 58: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

58

Material

Response time

Air 1.2×10-17

CO2 1.9×10-12 2 Ps

GaAs (bulk room temperature)

6.5×10-4 20 ns

CdSxSe1-x doped glass

10-8 30 ps

GaAs/GaAlAs (MQW)

0.04 20 ns

Optical glass (1-100)×10-14 Very fast

Third order nonlinear susceptibility of some material

Page 59: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

59

Nonlinearities in metals

• In metals bulk production of second harmonic radiation is usually inhibited due to symmetry reasons and only an electric quadrupole and a magnetic dipole terms may be active

• These reasons do not exhist at surface due to the lack of symmetry in a sheet region of the order of a few Å’s thickness between vacuum and the metal. In this case the discontinuity of the electric field is important

• Therefore, although the production of radiation has a very low efficiency (~10-10) it is interesting to examine what happens

Page 60: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

60

Nonlinearities in metals

• A reasonable elementary model for a metal is an isotropic free electron gas. A consequence of this is that metals are opaque to visible radiation.

• For frequencies lower than the plasma frequency, the electromagnetic radiation can penetrate only for a small depth (skin depth) of the order of the wavelength and due to their symmetry, bulk metals lack of dipole sources for second harmonic production.

Page 61: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

61

Nonlinearities in metals

• Within the skin depth of the incident electromagnetic field, there are, however, Lorentz forces on free (and to some degree also bound) electrons, as well as interband transitions, both of which lead to nonlinear bulk magnetic dipole polarization sources.

Page 62: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

62

Nonlinearities in metals

• Further, the breaking of inversion symmetry and the large change in dielectric constant at the metal-vacuum interface introduces strong surface currents within a few Fermi wavelengths of the surface which produce electric quadrupole terms. These mechanisms are however very weak. This notwithstanding, second harmonic generation from the surface of metals was studied since the beginning

Page 63: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

63

Nonlinearities in metals

Free electron gas theory

The equation of motion for a free electron is

2

2

1(1)

d e

m cdt

rE v B

Damping is neglected for simplicity.

Clearly, the only nonlinear term in this equation is the Lorentz force term. Since v << c in a plasma, the Lorentz force is much weaker than the Coulomb force, and then (e/mc)v B in (1) can be treated as a perturbation in the successive approximation of the solution.

Page 64: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

64

Taking

+ c.c. we have1 1 2 21 2

ik r i t ik r i te e E Ε Ε

01 1

01 2 1 2

(1)2i

22

1 2 221 2 1 2

1 2 2 2 1 1

e( )=

m

(2)

ik r i ti i

i k k r i t

e c.c.

ie

m

k k

e c.c.

r Ε

r

Ε Ε Ε Ε

and so on.

Page 65: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

65

For a uniform plasma with an electronic charge density , the current density is given by

1 2

1 2 (3)t

J J J

r r

with, for example,

2 21 2 1 2t

J r

Page 66: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

66

In a more rigorous treatment of an electron gas, we must also take into account the spatial variations of the electron density and velocity v. Two equations, the equation of motion and the continuity equation, are now necessary to describe the electron plasma:

1=-

p e

t m m c

v

v v E v B

0 (4)t

v

and

where p is the pressure and m is the electron mass.

The pressure gradient term in the equation of motion is responsible for the dispersion of plasma resonance, but in the following calculation we assume p = 0 for simplicity.

Page 67: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

67

Then, coupled with (4), is the set of Maxwell’s equations

0

1,

1 4 4, (5)

c

4 ,

c t

c t c

BE

E J vB

E

0 BWe assume here that there is a fixed positive charge background in the plasma to assure charge neutrality in the absence of external perturbation. Successive approximation can be used to find J as a function of E from (4) and (5).

Page 68: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

68

We assume here that there is a fixed positive charge background in the plasma to assure charge neutrality in the absence of external perturbation. Successive approximation can be used to find J as a function of E from (4) and (5). Let

(0) (1) (2)

(1) (2)

,

= ,

v v v

and

(1) (2) (6) j j j

with

and

(1) (0) (1)j v

(2) (0) (2) (1) (1) (7) j v v

Page 69: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

69

We shall find the expression for as an example assuming

Substitution of (6) into (4) and (5) yields

(2) (2 )j

exp .i i t E Ε k r

(1)(1)

(1)(1) (0) (1)

(1)

(2)(2) (1) (1) (1)

( ),

( )

4 ( ),

(2 )2 (8)

ei

t m

it

ei

t mc

vv E

v

E

vv v v v B

The second-order current density is then given by

(0) 2 2(2)

1 1 1 12 2 2

1 1

(2 )2

(9)4

i e ie

m m c

e

i m

J E E E B

E E

Page 70: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

70

Neglecting for the moment the (·E)E term, we may derive for the nonlinear polarization

1 1 1 1 (10)NL P E B E E

with3 (0)

2 3 24 8

ie e

m c m

The term with is sometimes referred as the “magnetic dipole” and the one with as “electric quadrupole” source.

The term E1 ()E1 strictly vanishes in reflection SHG, but it can be non-zero in more complicated geometries, including it.

Both terms are always polarized in the incidence plane (TM mode).

The first term is always present and is directed along

The second term arises only if the fundamental wave is polarized in the incidence plane.

k

Page 71: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

71

Adler for the first time speaks, for the centrosymmetric media, of two source terms for SH, one due to the magnetic dipole, due to the Lorentz force, and one due to the electric quadrupole, through the Coulomb force.

Page 72: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

72

Including the (·E)E term of (9), which can be transformed as:

(0) (1)2

2(0)

2 3

2 (0)

2 3 2 2

4

(11)1 /p

e e

i m m

ie

m

ie

m

E E v E

E E

EE

where is the plasma resonance frequency. With (11), and the vector relation the

current density in (9) can be written as

1/ 2(0)4 /p e m

/ ,c i B E 12 , E E E E E E

(0) 2 2(2) (0)

2 3 2 3

(0) 2 2 (0)

2 3 2 3 2 2

24

(12)4 1 /p

i e ie

m m

i e ie

m m

J E E E E

EE E E

Eq.(9) shows explicitly that aside from the Lorentz term, there are also terms related to the spatial variation of E. They arise from the nonuniformity of the plasma. In a uniform plasma, (0) = 0 and · E = 0 from (11). This means that k is perpendicular to E and therefore (E · )E also vanishes. The Lorentz term is the only term in J(2)(2)

(0) 2 2(2)

1 1 1 12 2 2

1 1

(2 )2

(9)4

i e ie

m m c

e

i m

J E E E B

E E

Page 73: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

73

Coming back to (9), we may now write

1 1 1 1 (13)NL P E E E E

instead of (10) where .

In the bulk the electric field is divergenceless and only the first term in (13) contributes: near the surface both terms are important.

420

3

8

m

ne

Page 74: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

74

Jha used the model of the free electron gas in order to explain the SH in the metals and for first he wrote the second order polarization with the two terms, that represent the contribution of bulk and surface.

Page 75: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

75

We look first at the component of PNL parallel to the surface, since is continuous across the surface, using translational symmetry in the plane of the surface we find

;NLP

1E

1 1 / , (14)zNL z P E

which gives a Dirac delta function at the surface in the limit of a step function equilibrium density profile. Thus there is an effective current sheet radiating at 2 at the surface, and following back the derivation of eq.(14) it is clear that results from the accumulated charge at the surface, signaled by the rapid variation in being driven by the component of the electric field parallel to the surface. The magnitude of the current sheet due to may be calculated in the free electron theory, since eq.(13) may be integrated across the surface.

NLP

1 ,zE

NLP

Page 76: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

76

For the normal component of the situation is different. From eq.(13) we find

NLP

21

1 1 , (15)z

z z zNL z z

E

P E E

which is ambiguous, since both and change discontinuously across the surface. Obviously, which appears in part because of the rapid variation of the normal field and in part because the response of electrons near the surface need not display inversion symmetry (1), is more subtle in nature than We note that even if the integral of eq.(15) could be performed, it is not clear whether the current sheet should be placed just inside or just outside the surface. This point is an ambiguity in the free electron model.

(1) J.Rudnick and E.A.Stern, PR B4 (1971) 4274

(2) J.E.Sipe et al. Solid State Comm. 34 (1980) 523; PR B21 (1980) 4389

1zE

,zNLP

.NLP

Page 77: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

77

We conclude that the free electron theory only leads to physically meaningful results for the first order fields if a step function profile is adopted for the equilibrium electron density; in that limit, however, well-defined predictions for the second harmonic generation cannot be made. Of course, one would certainly expect the free electron theory to be less than accurate in the surface region where the actual fields vary over distances on the order of a few Fermi wavelengths; the point we wish to stress here is that the theory is in a sense somewhat worse: it is inherently ambiguous.

If people use the free electron theory to describe SHG, a number of essentially arbitrary “prescriptions” are given for determining the magnitude and placement of the second harmonic current sheet; in some instances, is simply neglected.

zNLP

Page 78: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

78

In conclusion, the term E x B originating from the Lorentz force acts on the current produced at the first order by B (it is nonlinear in B). It is a bulk current in the metal and does not irradiate except if there is a boundary.

The second term is a surface electric quadrupole term. It is present in nonlinear reflection from a metal and originates from the discontinuity of the normal component of E at the interface which generates nonlinear currents. The surface currents are a tangential component and a bulk one directed along z.

The SH polarization from the perpendicular and parallel surface currents can be written as

(2 ) ( ) ( ) ( )surfacez z za P E Eand

(2 ) ( ) ( ) ( )surfacex x zb P E E

Page 79: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

79

Rudnick and Stern (1971) argued from physical grounds that the second harmonic current sheet should be placed outside the bulk metal, and that its magnitude should be specified in terms of parameters a and b of order unity.

These conclusions are borne out to some extent by the application of the hydrodynamic theory of the electron gas to the calculation of SHG. The sheet is called selvedge (Sipe, Surf. Sci. 84, p. 75, 1979) and is smaller than . It is to be placed outside the bulk metal.

The free electron theory does not place unambiguously the current sheet.

J.Rudnick and E.A.Stern, PR B4 (1971) 4274

Page 80: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

80

Dependence on fundamental beam polarization direction

• A typical apparatus is shown in the figure

• Since the surface nonlinear sources are in the simplest theory proportional to (·E)E, then incident fields polarized only in the plane of the surface (normal to the plane of incidence) do not contribute to the harmonic signal.

• However the bulk terms proportional to E×H lead to harmonic generation for all incidence polarizations

A

PM

VA

Sample

Dichroic filters

BS

Prism

L2

L1

800nm

400nm

LaserSystem

HP-F

/2

A

PM

VA

Sample

Dichroic filters

BS

Prism

L2

L1

800nm

400nm

LaserSystem

HP-F

/2

PM

VA

Sample

Dichroic filters

BS

Prism

L2

L1

800nm

400nm

LaserSystem

HP-F

/2

Page 81: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

81

High Pass band filter

800 nm150 fs1 kHz

Neutral density filters

A

PM

VA

Sample

Dichroic filters

BS

Prism

L2

L1

LaserSystem

HP-F

/2

A

PM

VA

Sample

Dichroic filters

BS

Prism

L2

L1

LaserSystem

HP-F

/2

PM

VA

Sample

Dichroic filters

BS

Prism

L2

L1

LaserSystem

HP-F

/2

p (TM)

s (TE)

Experimental Setup

Page 82: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

82

• Neglecting bulk terms, a [ cos ]4 dependence on the polarization is predicted, where is the electric field angle relative to the plane of incidence.

• Deviations from this relation are indicative of contributions from the bulk term, and in particular the ratio

• M = ISH () / ISH ()

• yields information about the relative strengths of the surface versus bulk terms

• F.Brown et al., PRL 14 (1965) 1029• F.Brown and R.E.Parks, PRL 16 (1966) 507• N. Bloembergen et al., PR 174 (1968) 813

Dependence on fundamental beam polarization direction

p (TM)

s (TE)

Page 83: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

83

First experimental results

Page 84: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

84

Composite materials• It is possible to combine two or more

optical materials in such a manner that the effective nonlinear optical susceptibility of the composite material exceeds those of its constituents.

• Some structure is shown in the figure. In each case, the characteristic distance scale over which the constituent materials are mixed is much smaller than an optical wavelength.

• Consequently, the propagation of a beam of ligth through such material can be described by spatially averaged values of the linear and nonlinear refractive indices obtained by performing suitable volume averages.

• J.E. Sipe and R.W.Boyd, PR A46 (1992) 1614; JOSA B11 (1994) 297

• G.L.Fischer et al. PRL 74 (1995) 1871

Page 85: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

85

Structures

• If the two constituent materials of the composite posses different linear refractive indices, the electric field of the incident laser beam will become spatially nonuniform within the material. Under proper conditions, the electric field amplitude will become concentrated in the more nonlinear constituent of the composite, resulting in an enhanced overall nonlinear optical response.

Page 86: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

86

• Much of the early work on composite nonlinear optical materials concerned metallic colloids.

• For such materials, an enhancement of the electric field occurs in the vicinity of each metallic particle.

• The enhancement is particularly large when the laser frequency is near that of the surface plasmon resonance of the metallic particle

• D.Ricard et al. Opt. Lett. 10 (1985) 511• F.Hache et al. Appl. Phys. A47 (1988) 347

Page 87: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

87

Spherical particles a << dispersed with a very low volume fraction f << 1.

A single spherical inclusion experiences a local field Eloc

4(28)

3loch

PE E

3(29)

2h

i loci n

E E

Re( ) 0i

Re( 2 ) 0i h

(30)2 2

eff h i h

eff h i h

f with

and the field inside it is

If the inclusion is made of a metal with

one may choose the host and the inclusion dielectric constant such that

corresponding to the plasmon resonances, thus obtaining resonant enhancement effects. Thus the inclusion can experience an enhanced local field that, in case of several inclusions randomly dispersed in the host, leads to an effective dielectric constant eff that satisfies

where f is the volume fraction of the inclusion material.

Page 88: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

88

Similar effects can be obtained with dielectric particles. In this case the most spectacular effects are obtained when the size of the particle is smaller than the exciton orbits in semiconductor. Quantum effects appear

Page 89: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

89

Nonlinear optical properties of CdSe quantum-dot doped glasses

As an example Fig.1 shows typical room-temperature, linear low intensity, absorption spectra of CdSe QDs doped glasses.

Distinct discrete absorption lines as well as blue shift of the lowest energy electro-hole transition (absorption edge) with decreasing microcrystallite size are clearly seen.

S.H.Park, M.P.Casey, J.Falk, JAP 73 (1993) 8041

Page 90: 1 NONLINEAR NANOPTICS M. BERTOLOTTI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Dipartimento SBAI Erice 2012

90

The results of a measurement of the 567 nm transmission of the 26 A sample as a function of laser intensity is shown in the figure