1 language documentation in west africa july 26 2010 winneba, ghana david nathan & sophie...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Language Documentation in West AfricaJuly 26 2010
Winneba, Ghana
David Nathan & Sophie SalffnerEndangered Languages Archive
Hans Rausing Endangered Languages ProjectSOAS, University of London
Audio & video:lessons from
our first beach visit
2
This session
Goals to bring out what we learned from the
documentation recording events of 20 July … to enable us to make great recordings
next time!
3
a quick reminder of audio workflow …
4
Audio workflow
who/what/where /why/how do you want to record?
contact people
audio training
equipment & budget
assemble, test, practise
Before you go
5
Audio workflow
transport safely
check environment, situations, permissions
make test recordings
local training & collaboration
On site, before recording
6
Audio workflow
record!
monitor!
collect metadata
label check quality
monitor
Sessions
7
Audio workflow
label check quality
backup add information (transcriptions, annotations, metadata etc)
After sessions
8
Audio workflow
send samples to archive
add information (transcriptions, annotations, metadata etc)
... package and send to archive
Later
9
Documentation workflow
documentation goals
research, arrangements
preparation etc
something happened
recordings + metadata
we recorded
media resources“data”
social and physical context
transfer, convert,share
elicitation
linguistic explanation
linguistic analysis
archiving
community support
10
How can we do this?
Reflect on experiences – at beach, and before and after
Review recorded materials Revisit equipment, skills, choices, methods Check how all this fitted with goals
11
Documentation recording concepts
“data collection” ???
goals outcomes
events
methods
equipment
review
review
12
Group brainstorming
in your project groups, discuss and formulate: at least 4 points of learning, or suggestions
for improvement make them concrete
groups will share these points after your discussion
13
Discussion and sharing
14
Some suggestions (general)
general - we didn't encourage or observe much activity - we could have planned better and also been more flexible e.g. ask someone to walk along the beach and
describes the various boats, crews etc ask someone to take us on a tour around
the boat one of us asks to be taught how to do
something I noticed that there was a lot of banter on
the boats and between the crews
15
Some suggestions (general)
the nature of our presence and interaction probably influenced how people responded (and didn't respond), we could have been more prepared, thoughtful, flexible, and adventurous
we noticed various activities etc that while maybe difficult to capture the event's language, it could be useful to video or photograph them and then use them to elicit accounts later (e.g. launching)
there were some problems because the beach fishing situation seems to be populated by men, and the consultants we used to help later were younger women
16
Some suggestions (general)
some interviewed people turned out to not be Effutu speakers so we could have been clearer about who we interacted with, and been prepared for what kind of material would be useful to collect from non-Effutu speakers
we didn't take much opportunity of using the authentic social settings to elicit real social and situated interactions
17
Some suggestions (general)
we didn't practice shooting/recording first (to check light, sound etc) before approaching consultants
we didn’t really check out the situation on/around boats
i.e. we should have used some of the time to research the situation, not go directly into recording consultants
18
Some suggestions (general)
some problems with equipment preparation, e.g. batteries not charged
19
Some suggestions (audio)
level and nature of background noise means that close mic-ing and dead cat necessary (also checking and monitoring)
if possible also check out best direction to record (away from sea) and possible damping
settings know how to select them know what settings to use (WAV, 16 bit, 44
MHz, stereo or mono as required) set audio input level according to changing
situation
20
Some suggestions (video)
microphone needs to be close to speaker (due to background noise sources) - it cannot be camera-inbuilt or mounted on camera
limited space between boats - little space for tripod, and hard to get framing wide enough for multiple speakers or capturing gesture
light difficult would be better in morning or afternoon use backlight compensation might need to ask people to turn or move
21
Some suggestions (video)
settings (again) know how to select them know what settings to use (turn off AGC,
use backlight compensation) set audio input level according to changing
situation
22
I guessed …
that you would not mention metadata so far what metadata did you collect? (without clear documentation goals, it might
be hard to be explicit) for a documentation of fishing narratives,
procedures, and knowledge, what metadata might be collected?
.
23
Review of recordings
let’s look at (and listen to) some of your recordings
what factors will we take into account?
24
Some evaluation factors
moving image informative? (cf goals! – but be flexible) image clarity? aesthetic quality?
audio signal (= information) noise (= negative information) listenability content
25
More evaluation factors
do visual and audio media co-ordinate (ie complement each other)?
what is the documentation value of this recording?
uniqueness?
26
Evaluate and discuss your recordings
27
Summary and conclusion
each group make a concrete list of “to do”, “to learn”, and “to get” for next time
28
End