1 lingdy 10 feb 2012 tufs, tokyo david nathan endangered languages archive hans rausing endangered...

70
1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory and Practice for Language Documentation

Upload: josephine-price

Post on 03-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

1

LingDy10 Feb 2012TUFS, Tokyo

David NathanEndangered Languages Archive

Hans Rausing Endangered Languages ProjectSOAS, University of London

Audio Theory and Practicefor Language Documentation

Page 2: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

2

Questions

have you recorded audio? have you published audio? what else have you done with your audio?

Page 3: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

3

Questions

you buy a recorder for $x. A matching microphone should cost:

(a) 3x (b) 0.8x(c) 0.3x (d) 0.1x (e) relative cost is irrelevant

Page 4: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

4

Question

Digitally recorded audio is better quality than analogue recorded audio because:

(a) digital microphones are more accurate (b) digital formats are more accurate (c) digital equipment is newer(d) digital formats capture more

information (e) no, digital audio is not better

than analogue audio

Page 5: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

5

Big questions

what are we actually recording? what/who is it for? what is the role of audio in language

documentation?

Page 6: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

6

Epistemology for audio in documentation

an audio recording is made in order to be experienced by a human listener

a recording conveys what a human listener would experience at a particular location in an event setting

documentation goals define recording methodology

a recording should capture spatial information metadata about the recording and the recording

setting are required for full interpretation ethical recording respects speakers and honours

their contribution through your effort and skill

Page 7: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

7

Evaluating recordings

accuracy: how well is the signal captured, as true to its sources and without distortion?

intelligibility/information accessibility: can the desired content be identified?

signal vs. noise: is the ratio acceptable? can the focal source be separated from all sources of noise?

listenability/comfort/aesthetics: is it easy on the ears? will it be debilitating to listen to for an extended time?

Page 8: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

8

Evaluating recordings

localisation of sources: is enough spatial information captured?

separation of noise: can all sources of noise be separated?

representation of environment: are the acoustic properties of the recording space appropriately represented?

Page 9: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

9

Evaluating recordings

content (identity, performance, uniqueness, coverage): were the right people recorded doing the right things?

editability/repurposeability: is the recording suitable for turning to relevant purposes?

Page 10: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

10

Recording audio

making it is both art and science a critical and ethical responsibility strongest relationship to communities it’s not necessary to record everything, but it

is necessary to record well

Page 11: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

11

SIGNAL & NOISE

Page 12: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

12

Evaluating recordings

signal noise signal to noise ratio listenability (eg comfort, consistency) fit for purpose

Page 13: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

13

Evaluating recordings

audio professionals use their human ears as evaluator of audio quality and value, while many linguists (mistakenly?) look to formats, spectrographs, wave-forms, analyses etc

44.1 KHz, 24 bit

Page 14: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

14

Signal - what you want

content contextual and spatial information fidelity comfortable to listen to

Page 15: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

15

Noise - what you don’t want

from environment: near: people, animals, activities far: traffic, generators, planes machines: refrigerators, fans, computers not hearable: mobile phones, electrical

interference acoustic: reflections/resonance

Page 16: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

16

Noise - what you don’t want

generated by (unwanted parts of) event shuffling papers, clothes table banging backchannel from interviewer equipment handling, especially

microphones and cables (and recorders with built-in mics)

Page 17: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

17

Avoiding handling noise

use stands and cradles etc

Page 18: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

18

Noise - what you don’t want

generated by equipment wrong input levels circuity noise (cheap or incompatible) compression loss or distortion ALC/AGC effects (pumping) video camera motors

Page 19: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

19

Evaluating environment/situation

external environment access electricity external noise sources

Page 20: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

20

External noise sources

example possibilities for dealing with it

traffic investigate, record in quiet time

face away

use damping materials

children get them involved

show something to satisfy curiosity

animals choose time of day

weather (wind, thunder, rain etc)

use dead cat; wait; reschedule

see also General principles

Page 21: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

21

Dead cat

Page 22: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

22

Close-up noise sources

machinesexample possibilities for dealing with it

refrigerator pre-survey what comes on intermittently

turn off

relocate

motors, switching monitor

fans monitor, dead cat (windshield)

Page 23: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

23

Dealing with noise sources

be prepared and aware seek collaboration monitor use or modify room acoustics

location direction surfaces reflection absorption isolation

Page 24: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

24

Utilising room acoustics

location away from doors, windows, traffic areas

direction face away from noise sources

reflection avoid parallel surfaces

surfaces avoid hard smooth surfaces choose or create soft or rough surfaces

isolation find an ‘’airtight’’ place

Page 25: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

25

When is a noise not a noise?

When it is part of the content, for some interpretation of the eventJohn Cage performance

Page 26: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

26

PERCEPTION & PSYCHOACOUSTICS

Page 27: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

27

Audio perception/psychoacoustics

a human listener has: location, orientation in a physical setting two ears - incredibly sensitive a brain/mind

the mind selects from various sources of sound and other sensory information, using long- and short-term memory

listening is actually a “hallucination”

Page 28: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

28

Psychoacoustics and recording

microphones don’t have a mind: they can't distinguish wanted from unwanted sound

microphones don’t have “edges” like camera lenses

Page 29: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

29

Psychoacoustics and recording

the recording process removes acoustic information

if you only care about transcription, then you are going to throw away over 99% of the acoustic information!

real worldrecord acoustic phenomenarepresent (some) linguistic componentsderive data

Page 30: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

30

Implications for recording

typical recording methods are unscientific! … so what should we do?

Page 31: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

31

Implications for recording

plan and manage recording goals equipment preparation environment and setup sources changes and actions settings

Page 32: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

32

Implications for recording

why is it important to record spatial information?

what other information (acoustic or non-acoustic) do we need?

Page 33: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

33

“Sound stage”

spatial information is an essential part of audio

we are amazingly attuned to it we should record in stereo

Page 34: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

34

“Sound stage”

... or in ORTF (binaural)

Page 35: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

35

MICROPHONES

Page 36: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

36

Microphones and audio quality

microphones are the greatest determinant of audio recording quality selection of appropriate microphone(s) for

the task placement and handling of the

microphone(s)

Page 37: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

37

Microphones in the digital era

microphones in the digital era recorder quality has increased but prices

decreased microphones have become comparatively

more expensive why? microphones are analogue devices!

Page 38: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

38

Microphone types

principle: dynamic vs condenser directionality: omni, cardoid, and shotgun spatiality: mono, stereo, binaural

Page 39: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

39

Microphone physical principles

dynamic generate signal from sound pressure more robust, less accurate used for musical and live performance

condenser more fragile, sensitive and accurate need power source - battery or phantom

power in general, use condenser microphones for

language documentation

Page 40: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

40

Omni

lavalier or tie-clip microphones are typically omni-directional

Page 41: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

41

Microphone directionality - omni

omni-directional

Page 42: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

42

Cardioid

many “standard” handheld microphones are cardioid units

Page 43: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

43

Microphone directionality - cardioid

cardioid

Page 44: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

44

Shotgun

shotguns are good for quiet sources, in some noisy environments, and for video work

Page 45: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

45

Microphone directionality - shotgun

shotgun/directional/hypercardioid

Page 46: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

46

Stereo microphones

spatial information is an essential part of audio

Page 47: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

47

Full “sound stage”: ORTF

Page 48: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

48

Simulating ORTF with 2 cardioids

17cm

110°

Page 49: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

49

Microphones - quality

generally, you get what you pay for each model has its own subjective colour decent microphones for language

documentation fieldwork cost from £120 to £300

Page 50: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

50

Reputable makers - include

AKG Audio Technica Beyerdynamic Røde Sennheiser Shure Sony

Page 51: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

51

Microphone placement

Page 52: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

52

Microphone usage principles

where should the microphone be? in general, about 20cm from the speaker’s

mouth

the inverse square law is your friend ...

Page 53: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

53

The inverse square law

Page 54: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

54

The inverse square law

Page 55: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

55

Using the inverse square law

if you have noise sources, maximise the signal to noise ratio by: placing the microphone as close as possible

to the signal source placing the microphone as far as possible

from the noise source

Page 56: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

56

AUDIO WORKFLOW

Page 57: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

57

Audio workflow

who/what/where /why/how do you want to record?

contact people

audio training

budget, research, and buy equipment

assemble, test, practise

Before you go

Page 58: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

58

Audio workflow

transport safely

check environment, situations, permissions

make test recordings

local training & collaboration

On site, before recording

Page 59: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

59

Audio workflow

record!

monitor!

collect metadata

(label) check quality

monitor

Sessions

Page 60: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

60

Audio workflow

(label) check quality

backup add information (metadata, metadocumentation, transcriptions, annotations, etc)

After sessions

Page 61: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

61

Audio workflow

… send samples to archive

add information (metadata, metadocumentation, transcriptions, annotations, etc)

... package and send to archive

Later

Page 62: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

62

CONNECTIONS

Page 63: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

63

Microphone connections

plugs cable types cables for stereo/mono, multiple wireless power sources for condenser microphones -

battery or phantom power

see http://www.hrelp.org/archive/advice/microphones.html

Page 64: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

64

Microphone connections

minijack/miniplug (fragile)

RCA/phono

1/4 inch (headphone)

XLR (Canon)

Page 65: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

65

XLR

professionals always use them electrical contact is independent of the

physical connection latching is independent of the electrical

contact

you can use XML-to-miniplug cables or converters for recorders with miniplug inputs

Page 66: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

66

IMPLICATIONS FOR VIDEO

Page 67: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

67

Implications for video

video captures spatial information – but so does audio

so these need to be co-ordinated match audio microphones and pattern to

video framing and events camera location is often not the correct

location for microphone get L & R channels correct!

Page 68: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

68

Implications for video

video formats for audio component may be compressed – how much does this matter?

don’t sacrifice audio quality for video should we record audio separately or not?

Page 69: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

69

IMPLICATIONS FOR METADATA

document the goals document the environment document the layout/setup

e.g. directional language use: diagrams, photos, oral and written

descriptions (e.g of relationships)

Page 70: 1 LingDy 10 Feb 2012 TUFS, Tokyo David Nathan Endangered Languages Archive Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project SOAS, University of London Audio Theory

70

End