1 descriptive grammar of english part 1: phonetics and phonology dr iwona kokorniak (with...

1

Descriptive Grammarof English

Part 1:Phonetics

and Phonology

dr Iwona Kokorniak

(with contribution from dr Jarosław Weckwerth)

20th December 2008

2

Allophones: Examples to consider

3


4


5


6


7


8


9

Allophonic processes

Different allophones of the same phonemeUsually within the word, but also across word boundaries

10

Casual speech (fast speech) processes

= phonostylistic processesSpeakers tend to make their pronunciation easier and fasterOn the phonostylistic levelThis involves the change of phonemesDifferent phonemes as a result Not just different realizations of phonemes (=allophones)

11

Casual speech processes

AssimilationPlace of articulation(Manner of articulation)(Voicing)

ElisionLiasion

12

Surprises of connected speech: Polish

grat /græt/ grad /græd/

13


t b

14


t b

15


t b

16


17

Assimilation

A phoneme may be realised differently as a result of being close to some other phoneme belonging to a neighbouring word

Principle the same as in coarticulationBut results in phonemic change

18

Assimilation

In Polish, mainly voicing assimilation

From right to left – regressive assimilation

19

Regressive assimilation

regressive/ anticipatory assimilation - if Cf (consonant final) becomes more like Ci (consonant initial) then we have to do with progressive assimilation;The influence comes from Ci: Cf │< Ci

20

Progressive assimilation

progressive/ perserverative – if Ci (consonant initial) becomes more like Cf (consonant final) then we have to do with progressive assimilation; influence comes from Cf │>Ci

21

Assimilation

We distinguish assimilation of:

place of articulationmanner of articulationvoicing

22

Assimilation: Polish

23

English assimilation

Huge problem: English doesn’t have much voicing assimilation

It prefers place assimilation

24

Polish English

t b

25

Polish English

t b

26

Polish English

t b

27

Polish English

28

Polish English

NO!

29


t b

30


t b

31


t b

32


33

t k


34

t k


35

t k


36


37

d b


38

d b


39

d b


40


41


d g

42


d g

43


d g

44


45


d m

46


d m

47


d m

48


49


n b

50


n b

51


n b

52


53


Regressive = anticipatory (right to left)

Voicing and manner don’t change, only the place of articulation does

54


Alveolar plosive and nasal sounds (t d n)

Change their place of articulation

To that of the following sound – velar or bilabial

55


/t/ > /p/ before /p, b, m/e.g.:

that personsat boldlyfat mouse

56


/t/ > /k/ before /k, g/e.g.:fat kingsmart girl

57


/d/ > /b/ before /p, b, m/e.g.: bad personbad boybad mother

58


/d/ > /g/ before /k, g/e.g.: bad king bad girl

59


/n/ > /m/ before /p, b, m/e.g.: sun bed sun protector sun movement

60


/n/ > /ŋ/ before /k, g/e.g.:run quicklyrun gracefully

61

Danger

Different from Polish!

Polish changes voicing

English tolerates voiced + voiceless clusters

62

Polish English

s b

63

Polish English

s b

64

Polish English

s b

65

Polish English

66

Polish English

NO!

67


s b

68


Nothing to do hereWhy?

69

This is why

Is there a bilabial fricative in English?No.There’s nothing that the /s/ sound could change to here

70

English assimilation: fricatives

71


Alveolar fricatives /s z/ can change only to post-alveolar fricatives/s z/ >/ʃ ʒ/But no change in voicing!!!/s/ > /∫/ before /∫, t∫, d, j//z/ > /ʒ/ before /∫, t∫, d, j/

72


/s/ > /∫/ before /∫, t∫, d , j /E.g. this church

/z/ > /ʒ/ before /∫, t∫, d ,j/ E.g. these churches

73


It is an optional process in connected speech

More frequent in less formal situations

74

Coalescence: A special case

would you?

75

Coalescence

A radical process of assimilationAlveolar plosive /t d/ or fricative /s z/Followed by /j/1st step: post-alveolar affricate or fricative + /j/2nd step: /j/ disappears

76

Coalescent assimilation

Frequent phrases with ‘you’:what you, could you, did you

But may also appear with other cases of /j/:this year, bad Europe, is young, what use, etc.

77

Assimilation of manner of art.

Assimilation of mannerOnly in really fast speech

in the

78

Assimilation of manner of art.

Usually affects /δ/ in unstressed words

An example of progressive/perserverative assimilation (left to right)

79

Assimilation of voicing

Very rare in English

Only for a few fixed phrases

E.g. have to, of course

80

Assimilation of voicing

81

Elision

Another phonostylistic processSounds are elided = deleted

82

Elision = deletion

Consider:

wszystko

83

Elision

first cat

bold man

84

Elision

Alveolar plosive /t d/ elision

The most frequent

Quite similar to Polish

85

Alveolar plosive elision

An alveolar plosive may be deleted

At the end of a syllableAfter a consonant of the same voicing If another consonant follows (but

not /h/)

86


In other words, elision is common:

a voiceless continuant + /t/ followed by a word with an initial consonant /st, ft, ∫t/ + consonant e.g.: ‘next day’, ‘just one’,

87


a voiced continuant + /d/ followed by a word with an initial consonant/nd, ld, zd, ðd, vd/ + consonante.g.: ‘bend back’

88


word final clusters voiceless stop/affricate +/t/: /pt, kt, t∫t/voiced stop/affricate +/d/: /bd, gd/ may lose the final alveolar stop when the following word has an initial consonant, e.g. ‘helped me’, lagged behind’, ‘judged fairly’

89


sequence /-skt/ /k/ rather than /t/ is often elided e.g.’ risked prison’

>

90


The only cue to the presence of elided stops in medial position the total duration of closure as there’s the lack of release of the stop

91

Danger!

last night

locked door

92

Why?

Consider: jabłko

93

Elision + assimilation

is wrong!

Why?Polish doesn’t allow voiced + voiceless clustersAs opposed to English

94

Elision + assimilation

Therefore,

Elision creates a context for assimilation

95

Danger!

Consider:must be

96

Danger!

Compare:las był

Mind: this is obligatory in Polish

97

Polish English

WRONG!!!

English does not permit this kind of voicing assimilation

98

/h/ elision

the loss of /h/ in pronominal weak forms

e.g. ‘him, his’ and other consonantal elisions typical of weak forms

auxiliary ‘have’: could have

99

/h/ elision

100

Elision of /ə/

weak vowels are dropped in casual speech, especially /ə/initial /ə/ is often elidedparticularly when followed by a continuant and preceded by a word-final consonante.g. ‘not alone’ [not `ləυn], ‘he was annoyed’

101

Elision of /ə/

When final /ə/ occurs with following linking /r/ and word initial vowel, /ə/ may be elided, e.g.‘father and son’

102

Elision of /ə/

When a weak vowel precedes /w, l, r/ then the vowel is deleted and the next consonant will become syllabic.am

103

Connected speech

Assimilation and elision are phonostylistic processesBecause they depend on the style of speakingFormal vs. Informal(Remember: voicing assimilation is obligatory in Polish)

104

Connected speech

But there are also other processes in connected speechE.g. linking and intrusive R (examples of liaison)And weak forms

105

Rhoticity

Standard British English, Australian, New Zealand etc.are non-rhotic

/r/ pronouncedonly before a vowel

106

All varieties

right /raɪt/pride /praɪd/bury /'beri/

107

Non-rhotic varieties

car /kɑː/stored /stɔːd/word /wɜːd/

108

Liaison – Linking R

British English – a non-rhotic varietyIt retains word-final post-vocalic /r/ as a linking form when the following word begins with a vowel and where ‘r’ occurs in the spellingThus, spelling justification needed for linking /r/

109

Linking R

far out /fɑːr aʊt/4-8 /fɔːr eɪt/

110

Intrusive RBy analogy to linking R......in non-rhotic varieties only/r/ may be pronounced if

/ɑː ɜː ɔː ə/

are followed by a vowel

111

Intrusive R

there is no spelling justification for /r/ to appear

law and order /lɔːr ənd ɔːdə/

112

Intrusive R

a spa in the UK /spɑːr ɪn/drawing /drɔːrɪŋ/

the idea is /aɪdɪər ɪz/

113

Linking J

In vocalic junctures - where the first word ends in / i: ı eı aı oı/ another word starts with a vowela slight linking / j / may be heard between two vowels, e. g. my arms

114

Linking J: Zoom

115

Linking J

not sufficient to be equated with phonemic /j/, e.g. ‘my ears’ vs. my years

116

Linking W

linking [ w ] may be heard between a final /u: υə aυ/ and a following vowele.g. ’two-eyed’, ’too wide’

117

Casual speech processes

AssimilationRegressive vs. ProgressiveOf place of articulation vs. Manner or

art. Vs. voicing

ElisionLiaison

1 descriptive grammar of english part 1: phonetics and phonology dr iwona kokorniak (with...

Documents

polish english slide

regressive assimilation

polish slide

place assimilation slide

english assimilation

d b english assimilation

english assimilation

english assimilation