1 deborah nightingale © 2002 massachusetts institute of technology fundamentals of lean professor...
TRANSCRIPT
1 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Fundamentals of Lean
Professor Deborah Nightingale
September 9, 2002
2 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lean is a New Approach to Managing Enterprises
Origin and evolution of lean concepts
Core lean principles & practices
How lean differs from craft and mass production models of industrial organization
Lean implementation steps
Value stream mapping
3 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lean was Born out of Necessity: How to Withstand the Mass Production Behemoths
On August 15, 1945 --end of war with Japan --Toyota faced a daunting challenge: How to succeed against Western mass production auto giants poised to enter Japanese market?
Kiichiro Toyoda to Taiichi Ohno (father of lean production): “Catch up with America in three years.”
Ohno’s challenge: How to design a production system exploiting central weaknesses of mass production model
Japan faced many dilemmas: small & fragmented market, depleted workforce, scarce natural resources, little capital
Lean evolved as a coherent response to this challenge over a number of decades --a dynamic process of learning and adaptation later labeled as “lean production” by Western observers
4Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lean Response: Use Less of Everything, Offer Greater Variety of Higher Quality & More Affordable
Products in Less Time Best Japanese auto companies developed a fundamentally different way of making things
These companies changed the dynamics of international competition New goals in manufacturing systems --combined benefits of craft and mass production
Improved quality
High productivity
Efficiency at low volumes
Production flexibility
Rapid, efficient development cycle Product mix diversity
Lean production contrasts with traditionalmass production paradigm
Systemic principles are transferable
5 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
What is Lean Thinking?
The removal of muda!
Muda-Is a Japanese word for waste
Waste-any activity that absorbs resources & creates no value!
Source : Lean Thinking by Womack & Jones
6 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
More Japanese Terms
Kaikaku-radical improvement
Kaizen-continuous incremental improvement
7Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Taiichi Ohno (1912-1990) Toyota Executive
Types of Muda:
Mistakes which require recertification
Production of items no one wants
Processing steps which really aren’t needed
Employee or goods movement/transport from one place or another without any purpose
8 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Taiichi Ohno (1912-1990) Toyota Executive
Types of Muda:
People in downstream activity waiting because upstream activity has not delivered on time
Goods and services that don’t meet the need of customer
9 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Antidote to Muda: Lean Thinking
Provides way to specify value
Line up value creating actions in best sequence
Perform them more and more effectively
Provides a way to make work more satisfying
Conduct activities without interruption whenever someone requests them
10 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lean Thinking is the Dynamic Process of Eliminating Waste with the Goal of Creating Value for all
Enterprise Stakeholders
Knowledge-driven: Draws upon knowledge and innovation from everyone --workers, suppliers
Eliminating waste: Stresses elimination, not just reduction, of all types of waste
Creating value: Puts premium on “growing the pie”, not just reducing costs, to benefit all stakeholders
Dynamic and continuous: Pursues on-going systemic as well as incremental improvement --both innovation and continual improvement
Customer-focused: Customer needs and expectations “pull” enterprise activities
11 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lean Encompasses a Set of Mutually-Positively-Reinforcing Concepts, Practices and Tools Creating
a Virtuous Cycle
Synchronizing flow and pull: “Pull” based just-in-time production enabled by kanban system
Striving for perfect quality: Completely defect-free parts must flow to each subsequent process; variability reduction; quality designed-in, not based on inspection
Flexibility and responsiveness: Small lot sizes and quick set-up times; ability to respond to shifts in demand
Trust-based relationships: Mutual commitments and obligations, internally and externally with suppliers
Continuous improvement (Kaizen): Continuous improvement through work standardization, productive maintenance, error proofing, root cause analysis, and worker training & empowerment
12 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
5 Steps to
Becoming Lean
Northrop Grumman ISS
13 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
5 Steps to Becoming Lean
1. Define Value
2. Identify the Value Stream
3. Flow the Product
4. Pull
5. Strive for Perfection
Customer
Follow the Product
Eliminate Waste
Produce Just-in-Time
Continuously Improve
14 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1. Define Value
Definition
Information/Material in a Form That the Customer Is Willing to Pay for
Value is Defined by the Customer Value is Created by the Producer
15 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Who’s the Customer?
C
C C C
Who’s the customer?
Who’s the customer?
C
C
C
Cuser
shareholder
employee
environmental
16 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2. Identify the Product’s Value Stream
The Value Stream Consists of the Actual Tasks Required to Bring a Specific Product Through Three Critical Processes:
Design –Problem-solving From Concept Through Detailed Design and Engineering to Production Launch
Order –Information Management From Order-taking Through Detailed Scheduling to Delivery
Make –Physical Transformation from Raw Materials to Finished Product In the Hands Of the Customer
CUSTOMER
Example: Structural Design Value Stream Map
Change / Rework
Analyze ReworkRoot Cause
Pre-Contract Req’m’nts & Concept’l Des.
Product: Component
Procurement
Supplier: XXX
ComponentProcurement Spec Structure Specs ICDs
Manage Program Program Req’m’nts
Systems EngineeringAllocate Requirements to Component
Allocate Requirements to Structure SEMP
Req’m’nts
Manage TeamApply Program PlansApply Technical PlansApply Processes & ToolsApply Resources
To All Processes Shown
-Specs-Environmental Criteria -Standard Parts -Standard Designs -Design Handbook -Geometric Design & Tolerancing -Mfg. Process Capability -Etc.
Des. Ref. Library
-Design for Manufacturing -Design for Assembly -Design to Cost -Design for Key Characteristics -Design for Supportability -Design for 6 Sigma -Design for ..........
Des.Proc. Guidance
Prime System Spec
Prime Contractor/
Team Process
Product: Vehicle
Customer: U.S. Government
Value: – Affordable – High Quality – High Performance Product – On Time Delivery
Define Structural Arrangement
• Finalize Conceptual Design • Conduct Structural Configuration/Cost/Mfg. Trades • Perform Airframe Analysis -Weights -Finite Element Model -Environmental Model -Internal Loads -Observability Model • Develop Material Allowables • Define Arrangement -Production Breaks • Develop ICDs
Prepare Prelim.Design• Develop Layouts • Create Assemblies • Create Sub -Assemblies • Perform Structural Analysis -Stress -Environmental -Weight • Production Factory Requirements Analysis • Develop Adv. Mfg. Plan Tooling & Mastering Concepts
Perform Detail Design
• Design Parts & Details • Perform Structural Analysis
Release BTP
• Build to Package• Buy to Package • CDRLs • Reports
Procure Suppliers • Build and • Assemble
Produce Product
• Fab Tooling • Build & Inspect• Deliver
Test System
• Development• Verification • Validation
Iterate
Iterate
System Req’m’ts Review
System Design Review
Prelim. Design Review
Critical Design Review
@ 80% BTPRelease0 xx yy zz
months months months monthsJ. Wessels 4/27/2001 Rev. 4
18 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
3. Flow the Product
4. Focus on actual object and never let it out of sight from beginning to completion
5. Ignore traditional boundaries of jobs, careers, functions, and organizations to form a Lean enterprise removing all impediments to the continuous flow of the product
6. Rethink specific work practices and tools to eliminate backflows, scrap, and all stoppages
1. Eliminate Activities That
Are Waste
2. Prefer One Piece Flow
Where possible
3. Focus on the Product and Its Needs Rather
Than the Organization or the Equipment
19 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
What Is a Value-Added Activity?
Definition
A value-added activity is any action that transforms information/material into a capability for our ultimate customer at
the right time and the right quality.
20 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Waste
Definition
Any Activity That Consumes Resources Yet Adds No Value
21 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Batch Production Example
Processes -Oriented Layout With Transfer Lot Size of Five Throughput Time (5 Units)
=
5x1 + 5x1 + 5x1 + 5x1 =
20 Min.
Work in Process
5 + 5 + 5 + 5 =
20 Units
ELAPSED
TIME
MIN
0
5
10
15
20
= Different Processes
Processing Time = 1Min./ Unit
22Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Batch Production Example
Processes -Oriented Layout With Transfer Lot Size of Five Throughput Time (5 Units)
=
5x1 + 5x1 + 5x1 + 5x1 =
20 Min.
Work in Process
5 + 5 + 5 + 5 =
20 Units
ELAPSED
TIME
MIN
0
5
10
15
20
= Different Processes
Processing Time = 1Min./ Unit
23 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
One -Piece Flow Example
Throughput Time (5 Units) =
1x4 + 1x1 + 1x1 + 1x1 + 1x1 =
8 Min.
Work in Process
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 =
4 Units
Product-Oriented Layout With Lot Size Of One
ELAPSED
MIN
TIME
0
1
2
3
4
= Different Processes
Processing Time = 1Min./ Unit
5
6
7
8
24 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
One -Piece Flow Example
Throughput Time (5 Units) =
1x4 + 1x1 + 1x1 + 1x1 + 1x1 =
8 Min.
Work in Process
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 =
4 Units
Product-Oriented Layout With Lot Size Of One
ELAPSED
MIN
TIME
0
1
2
3
4
= Different Processes
Processing Time = 1Min./ Unit
5
6
7
8
25 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4. Pull
Definition
Letting the Customer Pull Value from the Enterprise
Don’t Make Anything Until It Is Needed
Then Make It As Quickly As Possible
26 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Pull
Concept of letting the customer pull product from as needed instead of pushing it on them
Reduces inventories and produces one time cash windfall & return on investment
27 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
5. Strive for Perfection
Definition
Continuous Process Improvement
Pursue Perfection, Not the Competition
There Is No End to the Process of Reducing Efforts, Space, Costs and Mistakes
28 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Perfection
Continuous radical and incremental improvement
Continuous banishment of muda
29 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Seven Categories of Waste
Over Production …………...…
Waiting ………………………...
Transportation ………………..
Over Processing ……………..
Inventories …………………….
Movement ……………………..
Making Defective Products …
Delay From Previous Processing Steps
Making Ahead of Demand
Unnecessary Transport of Materials
Doing More Than Is Necessary
More WIP Than the Absolute Minimum
Unnecessary Movement of People During the Course of Their Work
Products Do Not Meet Customer Requirements
30 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Some General Product Definition Wastes
Seven Types of Waste
Inventories
More WIP Than the Absolute Minimum
Making Defective Products (Rework)
Products Do Not Meet Customer Requirements Over Processing
Doing More Than Is Necessary
Over Production
Making Ahead of Demand
Transportation
Unnecessary Transport of Materials
Movement
Unnecessary Movement of People During the Course of
Their Work
Waiting
Delay From Previous Processing Steps
• Task to Be Accomplished (New, In-work, etc.)
• Undocumented Information • Prioritization • Too Much Information
• Required to Stop a Given Task Due to Unavailable, Inaccurate, And/or Late Information • Jobs in Queue Waiting for Resources• Setup Time (Computer Logon, Printers, Xerox, etc.)
• Access to Data Storage • People Are Not Co-located • Walk to Tools (Printer, Copier, CADAM, Etc.) • Hand Carry Product for Signatures • Travel to Meetings • Transferring Data From One
Database to Another • Physical Movement of Product • Unnecessary Movement of Data (Physical or Electron Flows)
• Inaccurate / Incomplete Information • Inadequate Analysis • Requirements Creep • Change / Multiple Tools • Inadequate Testing
• Generating More Info Than Required • Excessive Iterations, Don’t Stop at Good Enough • Fine Tuning Beyond Required • Over Designing • Unnecessary Interim Drawings for Build • Over Analysis • Excessive Test Points • Duplicate Tasking
• Tasks Finished Before Required, e.g. Making Drawings Before They Are Needed
31 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Seven Types of Waste
Inventories
More WIP Than the Absolute Minimum
Making Defective Products (Rework)
Products Do Not Meet Customer Requirements Over Processing
Doing More Than Is Necessary
Over Production
Making Ahead of Demand
Transportation
Unnecessary Transport of Materials
Movement
Unnecessary Movement of People During the Course of
Their Work
Waiting
Delay From Previous Processing Steps
Exercise – Specific Examples You Encounter
32 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Apply Five Simple Principles:
Specify value from the standpoint of end customer
Identify the value stream for each product family
Make the product flow
So the customer can pull
As you manage toward perfection
33 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lean Thinking Differs Sharply from Craft and Mass Production in Important Ways
Source: Lean Aerospace Initiative
FOCUS CRAFT MASS PRODUCTION
LEAN THINKING
Improvement Master-driven continuous improvement
Expert-driven periodic improvement
Workforce-driven continuous improvement
Product
Batch and queue Operations
Focus
Overall aim
Quality
Business strategy
Task Customer
Synchronized flow and pull
Reduce waste and add value
Prevention (built in by design & methods)
Single items
Economies of scale and automation
Inspection (a second stage, after production)
Flexibility and adaptability
Reduce cost and increase efficiency
Mastery of craft
Integration (part of craft)
Customization
Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 35
Lean/Value Stream Philosophy
SUPPLIERS
The CUSTOMER’S CUSTOMERS
CUSTOMER
VALUE VALUE
STREAM
PERFECTION
FLOW PULL
The EXTENDED ENTERPRISE
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
36 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
What is a Value Stream Map?
A Visual Representation of Every Process in the a Product’s Path from Order to Delivery
Includes:
Information and Materiel Flow Integration
Product Through-Put and Cycle Times
Resources Utilized
Value Added Times
Location of Significant Waste
37 Deborah Nightingale © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Why Value Stream Map?
Systems Approach To:
Systems Approach To:
Identifies the Sources of Waste
Basis of an Lean Implementation Plan
Determine Future Operating State