. , , , ,
,
.
. ,
,

.
.
.

.
[], [],
[] .

011
. ,
.

. .
. ‘’
, .
.
.
,
.
,
,
.


. ,
, , , ,
010 vol.6
.1)

. ,
( ), ( )


.
.
(507~583) (538~598)
(523~592) .

. ,
. ,
.
.

,
.
2.
.
1) 1 (1995, 91~96)
012 vol.6
013
.

()
.2) [1992]
.3) (
) .4) [1996]
.5)
.6) [2009]
,
.7)
()[1980]
, , , ,
, , .

2) 11 -·-, (, 1985) 51~58.
3) - ·
(, 1992) 37~54. 4) PHILOSOPHIA76(, 1989) 85~99. 5) (, 1996) 176~188. 6) (, 1998) . 7) . ‘’ . ‘’
. . ‘’ . 23(, 2009, 150~151) . ,
‘’ ,
.
,
.8)

.9) , ‘
’ . ‘
’10)
.11)
, ()
. [1985] (2) - (3
) - (4) , ()
.12) [1987]
, →
.13) [1992]

. ,
,
, ,
8) (2, , 1980) 66~71. 9) [1980] , 66. 10) 3 ‘.’( 2-372b) 11) 3 ‘. , . , .
, , . , , . , , , .’( 2-372b) .
12) [1985] , 55~56. 13) PHILOSOPHIA75, 1987
147~161.
. (, , , )
.14)
[1996] .15)
[1997]
.16)
.
, [1996] ,
, ,
.17)
[2008]
,
.
,
.18)

, 3
.
14) [1992] , 39~54. 15) 13(
,1996) 59~77. 16) · 93(, 1997) 1~14. 17) [1996] , 178~190. 18) 53, 2008, 17~29.
014 vol.6
3. - -
(1)
. <1>
18 . 8
.
.
<1>


:
1
017
.
, ,
, .
, ‘’
, .
.
.19)
. ,
.
.
, .
“ .”
.20)
.
,
.
() .21)
3 ,
.22)
19) , ( 42, 271c) .
20) “. .”( 2.380c) 21) 4(, 2002) 587~620.
SEMINAR9
2003, 46~72 22) (3. 732a~734a)
016 vol.6
1 , 2 , 3
. ,
, , .

.
(2)
1)
[],
[], [] .
. ,
.
“ . , . ,
. ,
. .
.
. 10 , 10
10 . 2
. .
.” .23)
23) “. . . . . . . , . , . . .
. . . ” (2. 394a)
018 vol.6
, .
,24) .
‘, ’
. , ‘’ ‘’
, 25)
.
‘ ’ ,
.
.
. ,
?
. .
. , ‘
’ ?
. , ,
‘’ .26)
, 8
. . 7
. 7, 8
24) “. . .” (2. 394c) 25) [1998] , 126 512. [2009] . 26) “. , . , . ..
. . . . ” (2.375a)
018 vol.6
019
7 8
,
.
. 6 7 ?
. 6 7 .
.27)
, 7 . 8

. [] .
.28)
. .
“ ” []
. 29)

27) “. . .. ” (2.370c) 28) “. , ” (2.369c) 29) “, . . , . .”(
2.369c) ‘ ’, ‘.’
020 vol.6
, .
“ .” .
. 30)
, 8, , , .31)
‘ ’ ,
,
. , 2,
.32)
. ? .
. , . ,
, .33)
.
.
30) “. . ” (T85,771c) 31) .
, . .
47-1, 1998. 87~92.
32) “. . , ”(2.369c) 33) “. , . , , ,
”(2.370c)
021
.
?
. “ .” ,
“ .” .
, ,
, , .
“ .”
. “ ,
. .
.” .34)
10
.
.35)
.
(T85), (T85),
(T85), (T46),
(T85), (X3) .
34) “. , . . . . .
. . , , , , .
. . . , ,
”(2.394c) 35) ‘’ ‘’ . ‘. .
. (T85.762a). ‘’ . ‘’(T85.762b) .
82(, 2004)
,
. , 36)
. ,
.
.
.37)
. ‘
’ , ‘’ .
.
[2008]
,
.
‘’ ‘
’ .
.38)
7 , 7
. []
36) [1987] , 159. 37) , . ‘
. . . . . .
. ’(T85.762a) , ‘
’ . .
38) [1996] , 63, [1997] , 6. , [1996][1997] .
022 vol.6
12 .39)
.40) 7 .
7 .
7 , ( 7
) . (7
) , . .
, .
, .
. 41)
7 . ,
, .
, .42)
,
7 8
, ,
.43)
.
39) . (T85.771c 40) . .(T85.765a) 41) “. . . . .
. . . . . ”
(T44.564b) 42) “. ”(T44.669b) 43) [1997] . 1~14.
024 vol.6
025
.
, .
.44)
7 , 8
. ,
.
.
8
.45) 8
.

.
.
.
.
. 46)
. . . ” (2.394c)
024 vol.6
,
.
‘’
. ‘’ .
.
, 47) .
48) . . . ,
49) .
.50)
.
.51)
,
.
.
2)
4
. .
47) [2009] . 48) (2, 2009) 312. 49) (2, 361b 50) [2009] , 556, 577. .
. 51)
. . . (T39.9c) .
026 vol.6
027
“‘( ) ’ ()
. () .
. .
. , (). ,
.
?
. ‘ ()’
, ‘ ()’ .
.
.
.
, .
.
,

< > .” .52)
,
.
, .
52) “, . () . , ,
. , . . . . . ,
. , . . , . .
. . , . , .
, . , , , ” (2.393a)
026 vol.6
‘’ .
, .53)
. ,
. 54)
‘’ 3
. 3
. 4 .55)
‘’ , 4 3

.
. ‘’ .56)
.
‘’ , ‘,
’ .
, ‘’
.
.
,
.
53) “. ” (T85.767a) 54) “ . . ”(X45.53a) 55) 16 (, 2005) 80. 56) [1996] , 73.
028 vol.6
,
. ()
.
‘ ’57)
, , ,
, .
‘ “,
” .’58)
.
, ‘
’ ‘. ’
. ‘
’ .
.
3)


. ,
.
57) [2009] , 440. 58) “. . ”(T44.563b)
028 vol.6

.59)
. ,
.
.
, .

. () .
. .60)
. , .

.
(2.375a) 60) “. . . . . .
. . . . . ()
. . ”(3.733c~734a)
030 vol.6
4.

. (), , ,
.
,
. 7 8
, .

.
‘’ . 8, , .
.
, ,
.
, ,
. ,
, .
.

,
. ,

.

,
030 vol.6
031
,

.

.
,

. ,
, , ,
.


(, 1998)
<> 23 (, 2009.08.30 )
16 , , 2005.
82, , 2004.
1, 1995.
PHILOSOPHIA76, , 1989.
, , 1996.
87~92.
11-
·-, , 1985.
- ·
, 1987.
, 1996.
4, ,
2002.
2003.
2009.
2
032 vol.6
The Trend of Thought in the Fajinglun []
Kim cheon hak (Geumgang Univ.)
Through the process of the development of the Dilun school, it is well known that the strand of its southern school became its main stream. Fajinglun by Lin(), belonging to this strand, is directly cited only in the Hwaeomgyeongmunuiyogyeolmundab
by Pyoweon () and the Hwaeomilseungseongbulmyoui
by Gyeondeung (), which has attracted public attention in relation with the Dilun school’s influence in Korean Buddhism, in addition to its being emphasized as a concrete illustration showing the last development in the theory of yuanji () by its southern school.
As for Lin’s lineage, there is agreement in that he belongs to the southern strand of Dilun school. I suppose that he is a unique scholar of Dilun after Huiyuan ().
Lin’s logical system is similar to Jizang (), which enables us to estimate that he might have been accustomed to the logic of Sanlun (). Especially, the possibility of the relation between the writings of Jizang and the Daeseungsaronhyeonuigi has become prominent. This work seems also to have been influenced from the Shidilunyishu by Fashang (). Concretely, Lin’s rhetoric of the letter ‘j i’ () is seen most frequently in Fashang. In addition, his relation with
Abstract
034 vol.6
Lingyu () should not be disregarded. However, we cannot find such a rhetoric in Huiyuan’s works, which can be a proof that Lin and Huiyuan belongs to different lines. We can find his relation with Tiantai, too, which suggests that the Fajinglun might have been written within the tradition of Buddhist thought in Southern China.
Key word
2009 11 15
2009 12 11