06-power plant frequency response analysis and modeling...power plant frequency response john...

26
Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006

Upload: others

Post on 07-Jul-2020

15 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Power Plant Frequency Response

John UndrillSeptember 2006

Page 2: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio

But - the response must be produced by the turbines inthe Balancing Authority Area

Because frequency changes rapidly, a major part of the complete response must be produced in a 10-20 second time frame

Therefore - a major part of FRR must be primary response

The Primary Controller is the Governor

Primary Response is Governor Response

Page 3: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Production of Frequency Response

Frequency Response is produced inherently by governor action

If unit is not at maximum governor should respond

But governor action may be blocked, overridden or countermandedPlant physics may require that limits be placed on primary response

eg. temperature - hydraulics - drum level control

Commercial considerations may inducd limits on primary responseeg. valve wear - compensation for foregone revenue

Page 4: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Primary and Secondary Control

Page 5: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Primary - Secondary Control

Page 6: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Primary Control = Governing

Page 7: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Primary - Response

Governor Responds to speed change

Speed dips when load increases

Power increases to equal increased load

No change in speed/load reference

Page 8: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

y p

Primary Response | Secondary Response - AGC adjusts speed-load references

Page 9: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

g

Grid Frequency

Fuel Command

Generator PowerGovernor

Responds to Frequency

changePlant ControllerReturns Power

to Schedule

Page 10: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

g

Governor Responds to Frequency

change

Plant ControllerReturns Power

to Schedule

Primary Control

Secondary Control

Page 11: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

g

Primary and Secondary Response

Primary Response Test -

No secondary Control Action

Page 12: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Hydro Plant Characteristics

o - Control action involves large pieces of equipment

- Temperature is not a factor

- Principal limitations are in hydraulics of civil works

- Rough running/draft tube stability my limit allowabledispatch ranges - but have little effect on primaryresponse capability

- Surge tank/manifold design may affect primary respo

- River hydrology often affects allowable secondary response

Page 13: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Steam Plant Characteristicser - Boiler control must respect dozens of rate limits

mperature stresses, drum level, coal mills, feedwater heating

al - Boiler Follow - Older plants- Primary response is steam turbine response- Steam turbine response can be very fast - 5% in 5 seconds- Useable Primary response is limited by boiler response capability- Plant capability - 5% fast - remainder - 2%/min or less

al - Turbine Follow - Supercritical and older very large plants- Primary response is boiler response- Turbine valves are used to control steam pressure - not power- Primary response to frequency is very limited and slow- Secondary response is limited by boiler response capability- Plant capability - 0% fast - remainder - 2%/min or less

al - Coordinated Control - Modern / Updated plants- Primary response is steam turbine response- Feedforward of steam demand signal to firing control

Page 14: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Main Plant Characteristics

- Primary response of gas turbine is fast- Generally better going up than coming down- Frequently desirable to implement rate limits to managetemperature transients

- Plant capability - 10 to 15 percent fast - remainder - 8%/mi

GT - Primary control (governor) acts on GT- ST valves are wide open in economical output range- ST output follows GTs - behind boiler response time consta- GT component of response is fast- ST component of response is slower- Plant capability - 5 to 8 percent fast - remainder - 3 to 5%/m

Page 15: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Gas Turbine Plants

Page 16: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must
Page 17: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must
Page 18: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

100 sec

Page 19: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must
Page 20: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Hydro Plants

Page 21: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must
Page 22: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

p y p

Page 23: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Large Steam Plants

Page 24: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

g y y p

Page 25: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Summary of FRR Capability

ge Modern Coal5 % in few seconds 1-3 % per minute

ce Thru & Turbine follow Coal0 % in few seconds 1-3 % per minute

er Boiler Follow Coal5 % in few seconds 1-3 % per minute

ro5-10 % in 15 seconds fast over full range

10-15 % in 15 seconds 8 % minute

GT5 - 8 % in 15 seconds 5-8 % minute

Page 26: 06-Power Plant Frequency Response Analysis and Modeling...Power Plant Frequency Response John Undrill September 2006 FRR is a Balancing Authority Obligatio But - the response must

Summary of Operational Realitiesal

ideal capability overidden byturbine temperature/stress limitsdrum level controlfeedwater heater level controlscoal feeder/mill limitations

rolow head - few limitationshigh head/underground/pipeline - civil works limitations

concern regardingreduced output economicswear of valveshot gas path exposure due to maneuvering

GTGT as in cimple cycle plantsST stress and boiler feedwater limitations as in coal plants