0' nm price0 117 320 doconeit rezone. ` tn 006 522. title (test,anallyses: screening and...

0 117 320

DOCONEIT REZONE

.

`TN 006 522

TITLE (Test,Anallyses: Screening and Verification. Instrdients for Bresphobl Children. Volume II].

INSTITUTION Pennsylvania State Dept. of Education, Hirrinburg. .

PUB DATI 'e77 l

NOTE 313p.; For relatOd docuaent, see ID 135 856s....__ ,,, , .

NM PRICE : BF -$0.83 RC- $16.73 Plus Postage.'DESCRIPTORS *Annotated Bibliographies; *Diagnostic Tests:

,

*Handicap Detection; Identification Tests; Norms;1!

Preschool Children; Preschool Education; *Preschool'.

Tests; $School Readiness Tests; Scoring; *ScreeningTests; Test literpretation; Test Reliability;' TestReviews;: Test SeleCtiow; Test:ValidityProjec'CONNECT

0'

IDENTIFIERS

.'ABSTHACT,.

. . $

. Thin is the second of two volutes developed by, .

Project CONNECT in order to enable local program Otrsonnel todeteraime the appropriateness.of a test for a particular Child. For71 preschool.tests the following inforaation is presented, whenavailablei', title, whether the-test is for screening or verification,bibliographic informatimelescriptive information, examineeapprokiatenesse'administrative tonsiderations, scoring. and .

..

interpretationo.iaplications for programming, noneative data, .

ftethnicAl asencts, references, and additional inicrpation. Test'titleand author indexes for both volumes are included. (NY)

.************************************************************************ ,Dccumens acquired by. ERIC include 'any informal unpublished *

* materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort *

*`to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal *

* reproducibility ate often encountered and this affects the' quality *

* of the microfiche and hardccpy reproductions ERIC makes available *-

* win the-ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS) : EDRS is not*'responsible for the quality' of the original document. Reproductions *

* supplied by BOBS are the best that can be made tro the original. * 4

**101141****114****4141********44304*********************4444441******21******44

b

,

4 VOLUME I

,

S DEPARTMENT OF WEALTH,EDUCATION L WELFARENATIONAL INSTITUTEIN

EDUCATION

THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO-DUCED EXACTLY AS.RECEIVED FROMTHE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN-ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONSSTATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRE-SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OFEDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY

'PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

alkby 5 TROLLY,

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) ANDUSERS OF THE ERIC SYSTEM

so T

F

F, 3'.

COMMUNI SELF SOCIAL' SCREENCATION MOTOR HELP ZATION TIVE It6 CATION DEV

. . -

69. lyiMD ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SCALE ; r 4

.

X X,

X

70: ABC INVENTORY.0

',

X.

.-

t

71. ABILITY PROFILE FORM

.

11( X. .

72. ACTIVITY LEVEL RATING SCALE X

,

X

73; MERICAN SCHOOL. READINESScEST4

.

A

..

.

. .

. .

.

74. iiiNTON BRENNER Dgv. GESTALTEST OF SCHOOL AgADINESS

-X , X

.

.

Vt

.

75. R1ZONA ARTIOLATION"VROFICIENCY SCALE

.

,'

X

76. SESSMENI OF CHILDREN'S'LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION X

-

. .

,

-

tit

77. AUDITORY POINTING TEST ,

.

.

.

, -

' X X .

.

AS AYLEY SCALES OF INFANTEVELOPMENT

.

. .

X

.

X

. .

79. BEHAVIORAL CHARACTERISTICSPROGRESSION 1

.

X

.

X.

III..

80.gENDER,VISbAL MOTOR_ESTALT JEST

_..,..____A.X 4

.

ti

X.

.

.3a

E

4

COMMUNI-' SELF SOCIAU- COGNI-SCREEN- VERIFI- IEPCATION MOTOR HELP ZATION 'TIVE ING CATION DEV

A '. ,

81. BINGHAm BUTTON TEST

,

.

,

. , X

.

_

''ATiELL INFANT INTELLIGENCE' CALE

.

,

.

,

, ..r.

.

, -

.

X

,:

83.,.

CIRCUS $ . . ,

,

..

. -.

..

84. OLUMBIA.MENTAL MATURITY. SCALE -

.

X X .

*85.: DNS ENAR ARTICU-LATION.SCREEN7-, I tXAM ,----

..

, X. , -

kLAIX*--116D1OAETRJC-SCRiEN-

ING EST,

X,N

I

i

I

.

I

s..

X

J .

-.,.4

o

87. DENVER"EYE SCREENING TEST

.

X

V .

X .

88. VETROIT TESTS OF LEARNINGAPTITUDE

.

.X X

89. DEVELOPING QRAL LANGUAGEWITH YOUNG CHILDREN X .

I I

'X X

A.-

. .

,

X-

90. DEVELOPMOIAL ACTIVITIES. SCREENING INVENTORY X

,

X,

X

91.' DEVELOPMENTAL CHECKLIST X X4

X,

X X X

92. EVEREUX TEST OF EXTREMITYGOORDINATION X

.

.

.

,

*fa

CONTENT AREAS EMPHASIS _

COMMUNI- SELF SOCIALI'. OMNI-SCREEN- VERIFI- 410CATION, tOTOR HELP ZATION . TIVE ING CATION V

.

.

93; FAIRVIEW DEVELOPMENTAL SCALE X X X X. X _

-,

14. EAIRVIEW LANGUAGEVALUATION SCALE.' . X

.-X-

r . ,

95. FAIRVrEW PROBLEM BEHAVIOR .

XRECORD.

-, Ai, , .

..

96. FAIRVIEW SELF-HELP SCALE X X X X.

97, FULL RANGE EICTURE : : .

VOCABULARY EST . X X

, -

98.pL6MAN-FRISTOE TEST OF _ATICULATION X X .

,..

, - .99. 13LDMAN-FRISTOE-W 0DCOCK '

,

EST OF-AUDITORY DISCRIM. X

10. GUIDE TO IHE CHILD S".. ,

..- ,o

LEARNING.JKILLS .

%, X.

t.

101, HESS SCHOOL READINESS SCALE.

X X.

- .

102. ISKEY-NE RASKA TESTS OFLEARNING APTITUDE . X X /X

, - ,

103. OUSTON TpI FOR ..

,

.

LANGUAGE- DEVELOPMENT 'X

. 41. ,

104. INITIAL LEARNING ASSESSMENT X° X. X

I

w V ,1.-7 TITLE

.10

tONTENt AREAS EAPAltsis^ 4

ANNUM I.- SELF SOCIAL!.' COCA I SCREEN- VER I FI - I EPr CATION. MOTOR -HELP ZAT I ON: T I VE INS CAT ION BEY ,

1 .

11)5,. KAHN INT E LLI,GENCOEST . X' X

_-.

X

106, plAt PROBLEM CHECKLIST &OHN SOC I AL COMPETENCE SCAL ..

. .

X.4

407,1 VARN I NGICCOMK. I SHMENTROF I LE

.X . X X X X X

108. LI NDAMOOD fiUD I TORY CONCEPTU-%AL I ZA,T I ON EST _

..

.. .

-.I

X r-' .

I

. .

109. MIAG I C KVIGDOM X

...

.. .

..

.--*

.,

fno. gEMPH It MODE', : COMPREHENSIVE

EVE LOPMENT SCALE .X X X X X

.

X

111:. MINNESOTA PRESCHOOL SCALE

-

-. .

. ,

X X ..

112. MURPHY-DURRELL RiAD I NGREADINESS ANALYS VS

.

=-._.c,

T

X X,----:.

113. FEABODY 4EVELOPMERTAL MOTORSCALES

-

.

.

.. .

.

.

1, X

k

-,

DI .

STEABODY PICTURE VOCABULARYE X

...

.

me

X.

115. PHYs IC I AN ' HANDBOOSCREENING PEST FOR: D X X

116: PIAGETIAN ATTAINMErii KIT .,

#. .

.,...

X X

.

._

ea10

a.

TITLE ,

-e

wCONTENT AREAS

A

EMPHASIS*

COMMUN I SELF SOC I ALI COON! SCBEEN-1 YEA I I I EP

c:SAT! ON MOTO11 HELP 7AT I ON . T I VE I N6 CAT I ON- a DEV

117. PICTORIAL TEST OfrINTELLIGENCE i .

' ._-

X

. _

..

118. rirTAGE GUIDE TO EARLYUCATI ON

,rX X X

. .. .

.

. 0 -...--...

119. PRESC,14Q0L AND EARLY PRIMARY7 SKILL .SURVEY ,

,...._

,.

.

A

,,

,

A

12O PRQFJ LE OF BASIC LEARNINGABITIESLI / X.

C

. . ':.

.121. iROGRAM FQR PRESCHOOLISUALLY' IMPAIED

PRESCHOOL'

DEVELOPMENTAL LHECKLIST.

.. .

X:

-.

,

,..

:\X

.

-

.

X

..

:.

.

.

,

.

X

12VPSYCHOERUCAT1dNAL EVAL TIONOF THE PRESCHOOL CHILD

...-

.

X.

4 --.1

X. .- X'..

125. PSYcHOEDKATIONAL OVENTOY.OF BASIC SKIJELS & SNL. AV. .

. . -I

/

i

124:- PUPIL RATING SCALE

.

X

,

.. .

.

,.

125. ttifIL. RECORD OF EDUCATIONALEHAVIOR . X' '

.,

,..

.

,

.

r ..

,

126. QUICK TEST ,,

.

X.

.-

.,,

.

X X.

.

.

...

.

V7. -RECEPTIVE XPRPSIVE EMERt.GENT LANGUAGE SCALE ' -, ' . A

, .

,

.

12

.14

VS' '

TITI* CONTENT AREAS Drivers

cotourii- sgLe SOC CNN I."'" SCREW' VER I F r-, I EP

CATION MOTOR HELP ZAT I ON TI YE -CATION DEV

O

.

CALE Or EFFECT' YE:NESS -

;. TI VAT 10N .

.74

.., ,, ,

. .,

.. , 7', X -. -.-

,

A .49 ftCitlIOL. READtNES# ..tIRYEY,x'.

. . -

.,

-

1II

X 0 .

-.I. A.

V

' 130. SEQUENCED INVEgORY OFOMMUN 1 CAtl ON DEVELOPMENT

. 7',

.

' cl'-,*

.

,

. .

.

.

.

,11-1); SON DRAWING COORD I N: ".. /MT . '

,

,

.

4

.

, '

A1 . .

132. koss'oN' lffiL LIA E,N_ CE TEST

,.,

,

.-,

,

. .

LEACHLNG iEStAkCH MOTOR .

*JCALE.

1.X

.

X

134. gitituN7DARLEi l'EsTs-: oFT I CIAATI ON i-' -= , "X'

4..

.. ,

,

.

. .

.1.

X X

4

135. TM FOR AUP I TORY COMPR E -6HENS ION OF LANGUAGES ,. A X .,

, ..

,.

...

4 . s

(

. f . ,

136. TEST. OF CONCEPT UT] L I ZATI ON

,t7

,:k. '

.

..

..

13 s. -- y 1 suAL, fFi.`61 pity ..scALEt , ,..,,, .

.

,

.,

138. tiALKO EADINEals Tory . FOR .k.

. . ISADVA T AGED rRESCH . 'CH I LD-. \ , - .

.

,4

. 4

4 ' ,

139. triniiioToN SpEEgif SOUND r....2:,

JEST - . X , ISCRIMINATON

13

,

at

r

,

s. 14-

1A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: March 1977

TITLP AAMD ADAPTIVE BETIOR SCALE Screening EZI Verification EJ

BIBLIOGRAPHIC'INFORMATION:

Author: Nadine Lambert Linda ColeMyra Windmiller Richard tiguercij;

12,ublisher: Ordering Informatibn:

.American,Assoc. on Mental Deficiency5201 Connecticut Avenue,Washington, D. C. 20015

Editor: Forms: Public School Version -1974 --Vision

Copyright Date: 1975 (Cost: Specimen set $10.00; Manual - $7.00; Scale booklet - $1.00 (for 100 or

more 7 $0.50)

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:

, Purpose:\ To assess a child's adaptive behavior in a classroom secing, toenhance a program placement decision.

j

Age 'Range (CA): MA: Grade Level: Preschool - SchoolageNorMs are from.7 yr. 3 mo. - 13 yr. 3 mci.

Format;

Scale contains two,parts divided into Part I, skillS and habits of the

child, and Part II, social expectations placed upon the child.

Time Required:

UntimedSub-Areas: See Additional Information

Part I: Independent functioning Numbers and time

Physical development Vocational activity

Economic activity Self-direction

ObservatAonal Informatiqh:The total scale is observational. There- is4pace on the

any additional infQroration 'that should be known about the child.

Personally Identifiable Information Required:

child's name, date of birth

Datetpf testing -

Nam of person filling out scaleName of person used as the information source

15

SocializationResponsibilityLanguage develop-ment

over sheet for

t

Page 2 TEST ANALYSIS

TIlt. : AAMD ADAPTIVE BLAVIOR SCALE Screening 0 Verification E0

EX INEE APPROPRIATENESS:

Prerequisite Skills:

None

Disability GrouP:Mentally retarded, Educationally handicapped,

and Scarping disabilities), Normal

Age Range (CA): MA:. GRADE LEVEL:

Norms are from 7 yr. 3 mo. - 13 yr. 3 mo.7,

:"

4

havior/Emotional problems

reschool - Schoolage

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIDe

GrOup or Individual: Iredividual,

Training Needed by Examiner:gxam4ner must be thoroughly familiar with the AB Should be competent in

copducting a nondirected interview or complete observation.Other Persons Required:,

If the scorer is not the informant then a person tho oughly familiar with

the child is needed.Miterials'Required: (*items not provided in kit)

O

NoneV

\

41

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:,,.

401..

P. ocedureEach- item is stored in accordance with the directions stated forthat item. Two different methods are, used: 1 Select Most appropr

ate statement. 2. Select all appropriate stateMents with regard to frequency-.. Scoresare t,ptaled for each item,'subdomain, and domains May be compared to reference tablesfor Percentile ranks.

FormatScoring is done in the record book. Each item score is recorded in a circle,

each subdomain in a'triangle And domain in a Ttangle.

Space for Recording Retest: . ..1

.The manual recommendstbat only one ABS per recor booklet by made to pre-'

vent bias-from the previous testing. Extra materials are rovided in the event of

.errot. ,

.Sumaary Sheelmluaphic representation):

A Data S ry Sheet for each part records subd'O in and domain score. A

Profile Summary records domain scores and their percentile ranking.

4

I

"71.

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: ANKD ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SCALE, Screening El Verification FA

. ,

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING: ..

14.

..

, . .

-Provides information upon which an individual educational' plan may be based.

. .

..

. .. S

,

,i,. . . .

-,

.

-,'- -

,

,

. .

..

.

.1

,' -. )

-. ..

. , ..

.

. , .

.

..

.' ,` A

4

.

.

..

.

`NORMATIVE DATA: .-.

.

Sample ,0Size: 2600; 200 TMR, 400 EH, 1,000*EMR, 1,000 formal childrgn.... -

------. .

Population Descriptors Used: _ ,

-Grades 2-6 J

Class placement , . ,,

Sex-. .

Population density of residence a

Socioeconomic status . .''& ..,

.

Ethnic status . c, .

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: .

.

..

,

,, ,

Reliability: No studies have been ma with the Public School 'Version.ltData

reported for the -1974 Revision reported a me reliability of .86 for Part_I,, and'

.57 f Part II.

-

, 4.

idIty:' .. ' .. .

From item ,analysis, highly significant cOrrelations of Class placement with

domain scores was found. Only correlatiohs not'significant for Part I wits the

'12 yr. 3 mo. - 13 yr. 2 mo. group. . .

.

,

.

.$

.

-,I. .

REFERENCES: ,

, .

.

. u ..

'1..

0/ Z\-,AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale - manual , .

.. . . scale booklet

. ,

,.

... . )

_

. ..

1- ,

.

.

0

1'7

4.

-;

Page 4 TEST. ANALYSIS

TITLE: AAMD ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SCALE

nommummemy

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

Screening Verification GB

SUB=AREAS:

'Part 11: Violent and ddstructive behaviorAntisocial behavior'Rebellious behaviorUntrustworthy behavio4WithdrawalStereotyped behavior and odd mannerismsIipppropriate interpersonal mannersURhcceptable vocal habitsUnacceptable or eccentric habits 9Hyperactive tendenciesPsydhblogical disturbancesUse of iedicttions

Norm tables are divided dnto: .AgeSex - Part II onlyEthnic status - Part II onlyClass placement

1

4

S

II

N

V

a

1-A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE

HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

/ TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: February 1977'

A°

TITLE: ABC INVENTORY.

I

BfiLINAAPHIC:INFORMAT4ON:.

Atahop: Normand AdairGeorge Blescb

Publisher:-* Division of Testkei, .Inc.

116840East'Airport.RoAdMusk'egon,,Michigan 49444

id'itorrt.

CdpyrIghi Datea ,1965

Cote: Set 1 $9.40

Screening Ca Verification

Ordering Information:

Forms!0,

Research'Edition

0

DESCRIPTIVE INE6RAATION:-%

, t

4Purpose:,

To determine a,

AdkAartgi:(tA):

.Formei:.

The inventorldcontiinsand type of question.

Time Bequsired:,.I.

8-49 &flutes'. ,kub=-Areas-:

4^None I

A

chil d's. kindergarten1 9

.MA:

414

Observiational Information;.

None

and school readiness.

.

Pre,--kindergarten.Gractelevel:

four, se ctions eaCh dealing with a different concept

pers6nally idehtifiable Iriformation Required:r

Child'i'name, sex, date Of birth, age, and address

.ScSool's name and district

ti

19..

10'

/

'tPage 3

TITLE: INVENTORY

_.

TEST ANALYSIS,Ammommlir

Screentilg ca yerifiCatIOD

EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS: -N


Some pl-racademic

Disability Groups:

All, ih the borderline to mild or moderate.. range.

Age Range (CA):, MA: GRADE LEVEL; Prekindergarten.

.

ADMINISTRATIVeCONSIDERATIoNS:

.Group or .inidividual:

IndividualTraining Neededby Examiner:

$one

Other Persons Required:

None

Materials Required: (*itemsnot provided-in kit)

*6" square pieces ofpaper approximately the weight of typing paper.

I

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:

,,. Prbcedure: ,

Each section is scored as stated in° the, manual. All §eptiolerrlre totaled

and are converted into a readiness age. .

Format:

All scoring is accomplished during the testing.- Scores are recorded on the. .-.

Inventory. ) 1,Space for Recording Retest: -,

410 ,. None .°

si

SuthmaryShee.t. (graphic representaion):

None

TEST, ANALYSIS.-

TITLE: ABC INVENTORY..

Scteening El Verificationol.........4",

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING(.

. .

. .

,

.

-Predi ts with a high degree of success, which children will be inadequate insubsequent cool performance. f

. ,

.

-May indicate which children should enter" alternative prograis to a formal .

kindergarten class.: .

.

---",

. .

,

t '. .

.

...., .

_.). f

.

.. . .

1

. - » ..

. .

NORMATIVE DATA: -.

Sample Size: 166 children

Population Descriptors Used:

Mile and femaleAges 4 yrs. 9 mos. to 4 yrs. 11 mos:

15 schools

..

.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:.

.,.

Reliability: using snatched comparable groups, paired for age and enrolled in .the-'same school distridt, two years apart, showed a critical ratio, of .58 for the ABC

Inventory. Standard Error of Measurement is 2.08. .. , --,

Validity: "Compared pass-fail featuresbetween,children in the upper and lowerhalf of the scoi-e-dfttribution, (83 receiving a score above-68; and 83 scoring below

68): 43 children failed their first year in school:* 37 or 68%- were identified"

accurately, 77 or 631 'passirig,:t-

cored above 68.". .

.,

. .

_REFERENCES: .

.

The ABC Inventoy - manual ,

. inventory,form ) . -,

31 .

.

. .,

% .

.

. . x

TEST ANALYSIS

rt

TITLE: ABC INVENTORY Screening s Verification 0


Test items may be culturally biased (i.e. "What time of year do we swim?"Answer is summer; "W1en isthe-4th of auly or Christmas?")

Since the child is answering from his own background questioris like, "Which isbigger, a dog or a cat?", with dog being-the correct answer. This may not agreewill what the child sees in his home in which he has a toy poodle which is the samesip or smaller than the cat next door. This May hold true with the questions,,"Which is bigger, a boy or a man?" If the man is from the old country or from apoverty area, he may be smaller than a boy, since we know that in recent yearsAmericans haVe been'groWing taller.

j

r

22

(1,4 NO RT14 PROGRESS AVENUE


ImmimmilmrI-

1111.C: ACTIVITYLEVEL RATING SCALE Screening Ca Verification

OATt: 'March 1977

TEST ANALYSIS

or.

.BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:

Author: Katharine M. Banham,

PubRsher: Ordering informatipn:* Katharine Banham, Assoc. Prof.Duke UniversityJ)epartment of PsychologyDurham, North-Carolina 27706

Editor: Forms:

Infant -,2 yrs.Cdpyright Date: 'None Preschool children

Cost: No charge

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION: fV _

Pulpse:I I

A-,/

...to assist'in the psychological alsessment of c5rebral palsied

children..."

'Age Range (CA): 2 mgs. - MA: Grade Level

5 yrs..Format:

Child is rated in 10 behavior areas as to the child's activity,during.a

regular psychological testing session. Each item has 5 descriptive sentences.

Time Required: Untimed

Sub-Areas:

. None

Observational Information:

The Rating Scale is an observation instrument.

Personally Identifiable Information Required:Child's name, date of birth, address, age at first rating.

Rater's nameDate and time of rating , _

4

00


VOw,

TITLE:, ACT&ITY LEVEL RATING SCALE Serieningt1 Verification 0EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS:

Preregbisite

?Ability to move limbs freely.

. Disability Groups,:

Physically handicapped, Mentally

disturbed.0

Age Range (CA):2 mos: - MA:

2 yrs.

retarded, Socially-Emo onally

ti

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION:

Group or Individual: Individual.

Tneinihg Needed by Examiner:

Rater should be a keenpsychologist testing. the child.

Other Persons Required:A rateris treqUired if the

observations or'foz IA reliability ch

Materials Required: (*items not

Materials used during thisbeing administered. *.

observer.

4

A

C

Observa4ons may be made by the

psychologist chooses notto'make such closeeck.

provided in kit)observation are from the psychological test

.4*


Procedure: Chodse most appropriate sentence to the child's observed activity

level. Record rating (1': low or no activity to 5: high amounit of activity).

Add ratings for total.Format:

Rating and P4pfile Sheet lists all 10 areas. Area

4

for comments is provided.

SPace for Recording Retest:Three ratingsmay be made on the same Rating and Profile Sheet.

Summary Sheet(graphic representation):

None

'14

24

TEST ANALYSIS

,

..

.TITLE: ACTIVITY LEVEL RATING SCALE .Screening Elt Verification

.

.

o

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:

,.

,.

-May help'idefttify the hyper-, or hypo-active child,, .

* .

.-

-May indicate a child's developmental level with 'regard to activity. .

.

.

. L

r. 0*. .

. * .

.0 :

.

4.

.0

.

. .

..

0

. .

.

r

1

.. .,

NORhTIVE DATA: No Data Ayail4hle f

Sample Size: - ,

,.

- ,

Population Descriptors Used: '

____.

.

.

.

,,

.

e

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: . ,

Reliability: Rater reliability between 2 psychologists testing 56 mentally re-tarded and 12 normal cerebral palsied' children at 6 month ir%tervals was .98. Scores

show,some stability after 21/2 years of age. . .

..

.Validity: Between the Rating Scale total score and the Cattell'IQ for retarded

cerebral palsied children, the correiatiOn was .62 and .57 for those under and over

3g, months respectively. Between the Rating Scale and the developmental quotient onthe Quick Screening Scale, the correlation was .50 and. .58 for under and over 21/2 years

respectively. .t

/

REFERENCES:

. .

Activity Level Rating Scale - infant - 2 yearspreschool

"Activity Level of Retarded Cerebral Palsied Children",. excerptedfrom

Exceptional Children, 1972 . .

.

. I.

.

,

4TTST ANALYSIS

A

TITLE:, ACTIVITY LEVEL 4ATIN6 SCALE


Screehing' Veriftcatton

4,

A

"No positive relationship between activity level and IQ or developmentalquotient was noted"for noginally intelligent cerebral, palsied children or for

!non- handicapped children."

1

1-

4,-.-

26

CONNECID DIkitE : March 1977

1,A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE

NARRISSUNG, PENNSYLVANIA mooTEST ANALYSIS

TITLE:- AMERICAN SCHOOL READING READINESS TEST, Sceningrj_ Verificationo

'BIBLIOGRAPHIC'. .

INFORMATION:

Author: Willis E. Pratt, Ph.D. . .

George A. lc Stouffer, Jr., Ed.D. i ,

' Publisher ip . OrdjAing Information:% BobbS-Merril],'Hducational Publishing4300 W. 62n4Street,Indianapolis, Indiana 46206

. .

Editor: ., Forms: Revised Form X

Copyright Date: 1964

Cost: specimeA\Aet - $1.10;accessories - $5.90

Single copy - $0.41; Package of 35 tests and

4


Purpose: Designed as a survey teat to determine'a chiles reJdiness.to learn

to read.,

..,

410 yr

'Age Range (CA) : MA: 5-6 yrs. Grade Level: 'First Grader1

.-,

Format: Child is presented pictures, figures, or letters, letter combinationf,Words. Child, is to perform the task indicated by the examiner. 60 items in total':

. .

Time Require Approximately 30 minutes, with a break

.Sub-Areas: Picture vocabulary Letter combin tion recognition

Discrimination of form - Word recognition

Letter form recognition wptematchinciFollowing directions

Obseevirtional Information:Memory for Aesigns

None

Personally Identt jble InformatYQn.ttequired: le

Standard'-inforMation. : ,-

Whethei child gears glasses, attended kindergarten, English spoken in tome

Physical'orspeech defects 40 . v

4114

Io 7

-4

w

Akd

v

, Page 2

(

TEST ANALYSIS N

TITLE: AMERICAN SCHOOL READING READINESS TEST Screening CO Verification

EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS:


.Ability to follow directions

Disability Groups: All', but Learning disabled (those with perception problems)

and Visually impaired (even those with partial sight)

Age Rahge'(CA): MA: GR1DE LEVEL: First Grade

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS:

Group or Individual: 'Group. Ideally 10-15 children

Training Needed by Examiner:

None


None

Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit)"

* 8 x 5" piece of colored paper

"SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:

Procedure: Scoring key is,furnishea to ease scoring. 'One point for every cor-

rect answer. Add all correct answers together'in each sub-area and then total sub-

areas for total. Total Test Score may converted to percentile rank or stanine

AL(tabi$Aumanual). Predicted Reading Grade may be determinea (table in manual).0

Scoring is done' in the pupil record.

Space for Recording Rete:Test is in A nonreusable'booklet,

(graphicSummary Sheet g representation):dSummary of scores is on the record fo rtua ce'sheet.

-

+...

2b

\ TEST ANALYSIS.. .

.

Trtt'' AMERICAN SCHOOL READING READINESS TEST Screening X Verification i

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMJNG:.

-

-May provide informition to determine groups for ,reading skills.ti

x"--- ..

---

-May hg admi4istered prior to school entrance to provide infolhation into whattype of class a specific child should be placed, (e.g. accelerated reading, pre-reading, rudimentary, etc.) *

.

. ,

. .

. . .

. ,_

.

.

.

.

A .

.

.

NORMATIVE.OATA: i -sr

Sample Size: 1091 _\.

.

.

Population Descriptors Used:,

.

/ . Rural, urban,school districtsIndustrial, agricultural, residentialPublic, private, parochial schools

.

, See/o-economic status andlibther cultural factors. ...: l

I

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:.

,,-.

,

,Reliability: Odd/Even reliability wag .95. Standard error of measurement was

2.22 and 2.75 for children with and without kindergarten experience, respectively..

,

Validity: Correlation between the' ASRRT and the Reading Tests of the American

. School Achievement Test, Primary Battery I, Form D, was .75 and .81 for children

P. with and without kindergarten experience respectively:

. .

. .

w_.

. _

REFERENCES:,

American-School Reading Readiness Test - teacher's manual' ,

pupil's record booklet.

----

. ,

t-

.

.

..

/

,

2(,).

1

Page k TESTAITALTSTv. .

TITLE:AmmiciN SCHOOL READING READINESS TEST Screening gi Verification


. ThOASRRT,provides separate norms fOr children having kindergarten or no

kAdetgarten experience:.

,Aanual provides explanation of percentile rank and stanine scores to enable

the teacher to understand the reasons foi using either in this and all tests.

,'

4

A

Olt

3 0as

. ,;.

1-ANOWINPIKKIIISSAVENUENARRIMIUNO,PENNVIINIAM09

-4,

TEST ANALYSIS.?

DATE:. Aprilf 1977

rTITLE: ANTON BRENNER DEVELOPMENTAL

GESTALT TEST OF SCNOWREADINESSScreening Ea Verification

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: .

Author: Anton Brenner, Ph.D.

Publisher:WesternNPsychological Services-12031 Wilshire BoulevardLos Angeles, California 90025

Editor: '

Ordering Information:.

Forms: '1V


COst: Kit - $13.50; Manual, :7' $4.00; Protocol booklet (pkg. of 25) - $6.50:Test materials - $4,50

.DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION

Purpose: 44 To determine a child's readiness for school entry.

Age Range (CA): *5-6 yrs. MA: Grade Level:'

*May be used td assess younger children.Format:

Child is asked to reproduce fo count; and draw-a-man. *Achlevement-

Ability: ist is filled out by the teacher prior

to testing.:Time Required:

Approximately teh minutes, includiSub-Areas:

Number producing Sentence Gestalt

Number,recognition- Draw-A-Man

Ten, dot Gestalt,

g scoring.

Observational Informattion: I

Carefu ],,attention shoUld be given to the child's behaviors during,ihe

testing. Space for observations and comments is provided on the-cover sheet: ,

,

Persdnally Identifiable Information Required:,

..

Child's name,' address, phone number, date of birth, exact chronological-.age.

Sches4Lo-neme, diitrictTeacher's name, grade f.

Mother's name, father's name, father's occupa4on

31

TEST ANALYSIS

ITITLE: ANTON BRENNERTEVELOPMENTAL_

d4TALT.TEST OF SCHOOL READINESS.


Screening Eil Verification

'Prerequisite,Skills:

.Ability to copy

Di;ability Groups:

Learning disabled,, Educable/Borderline Merftally retarded, Hearing impaireaPhysicallThandlcapped:

Age Range (CA):-5-6 years KA:,


Group or Individual:Individual '

Training Needed by Examjner:Teacher or examiner should be familiar with the manual and underlying con-,

ceptual base. Experience with the use of the BGT is recommended with children notdesignated tO'be evaluated,

Other Persons Required:Wine4

,Materialt kequired: (*items not provided in kit)_ 15-20 1/2-inch blocks - same color

' -black or blue crayonkindergarten size pencil

.1r


-Proceddre: Specific criteria for Passing each item are in the manual. A plus is1 point, a minut is minus one point. All points are totaled, added to 4D (a constant)subtracted from all minus points and'compared to the table in the..manual degree ofreadiness (high, low, average).

Each subtest is broken down to its elements that are scored on the cover

sheet.Space for Recording Retest:

Protocol booklet is non-reusable.

Summary Sheet (graphic reilfesentationhCoversheetof the protoCol booklet serves as\a score summary.

'TEST ANALYSIS. ,

TITLE:. ANTON RUNNER DEVELOPMENTAL Screening r VerificationGESTALT TEST OF SCHOOL READINESS

., .

..

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING: ,

.

.

,. , 1 t

-May identify the early maturing or gifted child as well as the slow Maturingor retarded chil. , .3

.

,. . . .

-May identify children tat are motionally disturbed (long or short standingemotionallyproblems).

. .

,, .

.

-May aid in the compilation of "...a comprehensive picture of, the child'spersonality,.." which may lead to special recommendations in borderline cases.

. ,

..;

.

. .

,*

.-

NORMATIVE' DATA: . ..

Sample Size: ,

748 ..

.

Population Descriptors Used:Michigan '

KindergartenAge - 4 yrs. 9 mos.- - 6 yrs. 10mos.

.

,

.

e

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:Extensive research has been made with the BGT, statistics ciImi

rhere are' just examples.

ow

Reliability: Test/Retest; for 100 children tested ,in November and June was .55;for 77 children tested in March and June was .74. Odd/Even: 95 children tested in.January was .92, 374 tested in June was .83. Sub -test correlations with total testscore ranged from .66 (Draw-A-Man) to :93 (copying} with 95 children tested in June.

Validity: ,

BGT total score and the social-emotional behavior criterion yield a correla-tion:of .82. The BGT compared with teacher ratings yielded a correlation of .61 forkindergarten teachers which rose to .71 and .68 when compared with first. gradeteacher ratings seven months later. BGT total scores predicted accurately theAchievement-Ability: Social-Emotional behavior,in 79% of the cases.

, . .

REFERENCES:.

.. .

Anton Brenner Developmental Gestalt TestYSchool Readiness --. manual

.

.1 t .-

. .

.

3')

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE ANTON BRENNER DOVELOPMENTAL' I

GESTALT TEST r SCHOOL READINESSScreenings Verification


O

The BGT is.almost culture-free and may accurately assess non-English speakingchildren sinceinly the directions are lOpinglish and may be translated.

C.

a

3.4

k

IAMOIDIPROGRESSAVENC.MARRISSUROPENNYLVANIA.17109

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: April 1977

TITLE:,IIZONA ARTICULATION PROFICIENCY SCALE ' Screening 1!) Nerification0

. BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:.

Author: Janet Barker Fudala, Ph.D.

Publisher!Weste sychological.Services12031 W' shire B6ulevardLos Arigeles, California 90025

Editor: .'

,

Copyright Date:, 3:963, 1970, 1974

'Ordering ,information:

Fo rm s:

Cost: Kit - $18.50; Manual -.$3.00; Protocol booklet (pkg. of 25) - $6.50;Picture test cards - $9.50;*SurveY fotm-(pad of 50) - $6.50


Purpose: ., .

To measure a'child's articulatory proficiency in proportion to his total. -

speech. # ./

Age Range (CA): MAY.2-14 yrs. Grade Level:

Forniat:

Child is to identify verbally 48 picture cards or read 25 sentences.

time aired:. 10-15 minutes, including scoring.

Sub-Areas:

None

Observational Information:'

None

Personally identifiable InFormatien Required:

Child's name, se , irthdate, age, address, phone number

Parent's name-S6hool's , grade, room, teacher

Speech el ician's name

r

Page 2' TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: ARIZONA ARTICULATION lROFICIENCY SCALE ' Screening G3 Verification


#rerequisite Skills:.

language

DisabiAlty Groups:

Aphasics and other

Age Range (CA):

4

op-

severe language disoiders, Severe Cerebral palsy

MA: 2 -14 years


Group or Individual:

IndividualTraining Needed by' ExaMiner:-

11 Examiner' Should be a speech, ,language, or hear#g clinician, should befamiliar with 'phonetic notation,


None

Katerials'Required: (*items not prOvided in kit)-

. 48 picture cards2 picture cards: boy with hand in cookie jar

boy riding a bicycle

`SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:

Procedure: Only errors are recorded. Corresponding numerical value for eachconsonant.or vowel error value is circled, then added together separately forcon-sonants and vowels, then totaled and subtracted fiom 100 to obtain an_AAPS TotalScorarygilitc.h. is the percentagp:-of the child's articulation which is correct.

Ppotocol book10% contains the card number response word, age by which90% of the children tested had mastered the sound position of the sound; error and

numerical value. Same information is available for vowels in order of testing.

Space for Recording Aetest:There is a space for one retest which will, determine the percentage of

speech improvement over time.Summary Sheet (graphic representation):

A Survey Form provides a summary of the

Problems, listing most common misarticulations.may-be entered on one form.

child with severe aleticulitidtInformatlft for ten children

i \

(

36-

I

3 TEST ANALYSIS.

I TITLE: ARIZONA ARTICULATION PROFICIENCY SCALE 'Screening la -Verification III

. _ .

.

IMPLICATIONS.FOR PROGRAMMING:' .

.

.,

r . .

_ -Indicates the percentage of speech sounds that are correctly.articulated

Which may aid in the decision of assigning priority for articulation therapy.

=Will determine the percentage of articulatiOn improvement by prand post-.-

testing. 1.

- .

. -May be used as a language screening device.,,

,

,

..

.

.

..

N

NORMATIVE-DATA:. .

Sample Size: 702

Population Descriptors Used:Age - 3 yrs; 11 yrs. 11 mos.

,

Seattle Public Schools,

Examiners - 19 speech clinicians .

.

..

r,

...1

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:,

_ .

Reliability: Test/Retest reliability- withinhione week of initial testing was

.96: Inter-rater reliability was .99 when five examiners simultaneously rated.responses of 15 children. - '

Validity:.

,

Agreement with'10 graduate students in speech pathology with clinical

experience, rating two, 10-second samples of a child's spontaneous speech'and the

RAPS was .92..

,

. ..,

w

,

.,-

REFERENCES:

.

/ Arizona Articulation Proficiency Stale: Revised - manual.

.

-

.

.

.

.

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: ARIZONA ARTICULATION PROFICIENCY SCALE Screening ca Verification


a

38

1,

.r'0111=

OP

-..-DATE: APRIL 1977

014RIN PROGRESS AVENUEIMIRMSSURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17103

TEST ANALYSIS

)3TtE: ASSESSMENT OFRS=EN'SCOMP ON

LANGUAGE Screening Verification 10

'BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:

ROchaneFosterAuthor:

Jane .Giddah

Joel Stark'Publisher: Ordering Information:

Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.577 College Aveftile )

Palo Ito,. California 94306Editor: Forms:

Copyright ate: 1972

Cost: Manual - $2.50; Recording sheet (pad of 50) - et.254 Cards - $9.50

Air

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:.

Purpose,:

Designed to determine how many word classes in. different combinations oflcngthand complexity a child is able to understand.

,#

Age Range (CA): - 6 yisMA: Grade LeWel:

Format: I

Child is presented with a card with four pictures, then given a,,Orimulusword, phrase or sentence and'mdst point to the correct picture.

Time Required:

Ten minutesSub-Areas:

Part A: Core vocabularyPart B, C, D: Comprehension of an increased nuspber of alternatiVes.


None


Recording sheet unavailable for review.

yr,e" 39,

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE:. --A4SESSMENTOF CHILDREN'S LANGUAGE

COMPREHENSION


OvreqUisite Skills:

Ability to indicate a responsel,

Diability Groups:Language impaired, Severe Articulption prOblems, children with Limited

Speech.

Screening 1:3 Verification la

Age Range (CA):311 - 6 Yrs.KA: .4.


Group or Individual:Individual. There is a group-form for,this test for screening purposes.

Training Needed by Examiner:Examifier should be familiar with the objective of the Cgst. Spiech

clinician should review the results for-appropriate programming.

Other Persons Required:---7-

None

Materials Required: (*items not provided in WO'Stimulus cards

110

0.4P

4

il-

SCORING ite.INTERTTATION,--.s,-

Proc re: -Answers in Part A are addedare determined by a formula in the mknual.'mean scores by age and sex; caution shouldnature of language problems.

Format:,

Responsesheet unavailable

Space for Recording Retest:

together. Scores for%Parts B, C,'and D/Scores may be coMpared to tables for

be used due to the high/y

for review.

Response sheet unavailable for review.

Summary Sheet "(graphic repreientation):Response sheet unavailable for review.

40

'

TEST 'ANALYSIS

TITLE: ASSESSMENT OF CHILDREN'S LANGUAGE 11' Screentn4 0- Ve ficaton 53COMPREHENSION

. , .

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:' L

..

..0

-May provide some direction to the clinician by identifxing the nature of thok,---.items the child has difficulty with.

. b. . :.

. Ptovides concrete ideas for specific'remediation.progralt

.

- s for children.

deficient in several different areas. ,,

NORMATIVE DATA:p psita_Ayailable.

Sample Size:, -

opulation De'sd4ipio?s'Used:

I e

0

ti

Ns%

e

4

1

CJ

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: . It

'Reliability: .,11.-- .

Odd/2ven teliability was -.86 for Part A and .80 ..for Parts B, C,. and P.

.- P . : -V.Validity:

go Datf Available

REFERENCES:-

Assessment oOPChildren's Language Comprehension -,manual

o

,

. . ,, ,; Al.

4 0 .." i 1 4

Y.

)


TITLE: ASSESSMENT OF CHILDREN'S LANGUAGECOMPRE1ENSION


Scre'ening

d/e

erification ED

Provides a brief and underiliandable pverview of language aeweldpment and

language disorders.

The authors state that several items could be improved upon.

- There is a table of mean scores specifically for the neurologically or

ucationally haudicardloed..

A Group ForthRf'the ACLC is available for screening purposes.

4

oe

1

a.

11

4'24

I

o

11.

A

a

CIDININECTitu4 1(

1-A NORTH0PROGRESS AVENUE .

N

i

HARRISBURG, PENNSYLV 17109

.

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: May 1977

tITLE: AUDITORY POINTING TEST Screening Verification

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:

Janet B. Fudala, Ph.D. John D..Ross,AUthor: LuVern'H. Kunze, Ph.D.

.Publisher: Ordering Information:

AcademicTherapy Publications1530 Fourth St,reetSan Rafael, CaliforniA 94901

Editor: Forms: Form AForm B


Cost: Complete test pkg. $17.50; Manual - $5.00; Form A or B (pkg. of 25) -

$4.00; Cards And Plates $ 00

*

DESCRIPTIVE-INFORMATION:

Purpose:Designed to test a child's short term memory, distinguishing between memory

,,span and memory sequence.

Age'Range (CA): 5'yrs. - MA: Grade Level:

. 10 yrs. 11 mos.,

Format:Child is auditorially presented with a chain o; stimulus words, varying from

2 to 10,ords per set. Child is then to point at the picture corresponding to thesimuld-f, in the same order as presented by the examiner.

0Time Required:

ub-AreQs)

Untimed

None

Observational Informatiop:If there is a need for an unusual amount of encouragement or reassurance, it

should be rioted on .the. test form.

/Petsimally Identifiable Information Required).

Test form unavailable for review.

c

TEST ANALYSIS

. TITLE: AUDITORY POINTING TEST. Screening ri Verification,


Prerequisite Skills:.Ability to indicate.a response in a short period of time.

Disability Groups:Learning disabled, Mentally retard, Physically handicaPped,.4@ech and

Language impaired, Hearing impaired

Age Range (CA): 5 yrs. -, MA:10 yrs. 11 mos.

ADMINISTRATIK CONSIDERATIONS:

Groupillor indtvidu,;1: Individual

°

Training Needed by Eximine:. Test instructionAon the rest form should be read carefully. Five

should be admirlistered for iTactibe pribr t6 giving onefor credit.,

Othet Persons Required: 00bNone

Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit}10 StimulUs cards

°too

1ti

't44, ,S,CORIN6 AND° INTERPRETATION:

1,Four scores are determined for each set. 1 pt..for each word remem-

Procedure: bered*(item score); l'pt. for each word given kft correct order (orderscore)-lach pair is joined As a uait (pair score); subtract-1 pt. for-each item

i"iO3P ye).tfilargirdihLrr-iiieflp-ig. grstaguhcpieR ir9151:5 itg 1W1p1771gartli tg-

4man .L.p, oelnat: 'P % '

.

',Test form unavailable for review

W


Test form unavailable for review

Summary %beet (graphic representation):

Test form unavailable for reviewg

44

TEST ANALYSIS

..TITLE: AUDITORY POINTING TEST Screening LA Verification 0

lidk .

4

_IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING: ..,

, ..

..

,

-May indicate the proper course of remediation for specific types of emoryproblems.

.

.

.

.

, .

.

,.

tAr _

(

.

,

o.

. o

. .

.,

NORMATIVE DATA: ,

Sample -S1 e: 2160; 180 each boys & girls, kindergarten - Grade 5

. .

Population Descriptors Used: ..

.

,

Regular classesSeattle public schools .

.. . .

. Hearing within normal limits .

. r.

.

. -

'.41rECHNICAL ASPECTS:.

\

CReliability: Split half reliabili ty: .96 and .94 Form A and B respectively.

Test/Retest: varied from .93 when retested within three days of the initial testing,to .99 after a 7-day interval for retesting. Form A correlates with Form 8,.97.

' , Validity:The APT correlates with chronolbgical age, .734; with the Slosson MA.530;

MISC Digit Span, .497; MPA Auditory Sequential Memory,. .466; and Slosson IQ, .1Q5(or Virtually no correlation). .

.

.. , .

.)REFERENCES:.

,

. ..

.

- Auditory Pointihy Test, - manual ...

. .,....

.

--;I ,

r,

. .. .

AININNIMI114' .

.

..

.

I

45

V"'

I

-Page 4

1

TEST ANALYSIS-,

-*-1131.E: ALIDIVORY PQINTING TEST Screening Verification 0

r.

ADDITIONAL. INFORMATION:

An annotated list of possible ograms'or texts is provided.

4

dations for programs for specific types of disorders are provided in

41

4

,a

4e

. 1-A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE

NARRISSURO, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: .June 1977

TITLE. BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT Screening Verification


Bayley

- The Psychological CorporatiOn757 Third AvenueNew York, N. Y. 10017Am'

Ertor:.


Ordering Information:4

Forms:

.

Cost: Set - $98.00; Manual - $5.75; Combined package (pkg. of 25 of 3 recordfotms) - $7.00; Training films/videotapes are available for'rent or purchase -prices vary.

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:. .

The Mental Scale is "designed to assess sensory-perceptual acuities dis-Purpose: criminations apd ability to respond." The Motor Scale is "designed to

provide a measure of the degreeof control of the body coordination of the large mus-cles and finer manipulating skills of hands and fingers." The Infant Behavior Recordis designed to "assess the nature of the child's social and objective' orientations to-ward his enviroort."

Age Range :2-30 mos. MA: Grade Level:

Format: Child #1111asked to perform various motor and cpgnitive tasks appropriate ,

for his age group. A basal and ceiling level are established. There are a total of163 items in the Mental SCale and 81 in the Motor, no child is tested with al/.

Time Required: approximately 45-75 minutes

Sub - Areas:

Mental scaleMotor scale

Infant behavior record

. Observational Information: Notes may belkmade regarding the child's performance

to the right of the item. General notes 'may be made on the cover sheet of both'the mental and motorXscales. Observations of a child's interattipn with,the teqtmaterials may indicate additional items passed, e.g. regards ring, grisps ring,secures ring. .

4 Personally Identifiable Information Required:.

. .

Child's name, age, sex, address, birthplace, birth weight,'birth.ordChenatal or birth difficultiesild's health

Parent's names, educational levels, occupations ../

Household composition 4Place of testing

. Examiner's name

4:.

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: RhYLEY SCALES_ OF -INFANT DEVELOPMNT,

Screening Verification

EfAMINEE "APROPRIATENES:

Prtreq4 I s te

None

Disability Groups:

All

Age Range (CA): 2 -30 mos. MA: A


-Group-or Individual: Indi;ridual

Training Needed by Examiner: Examiner shouections and scoringTrocedure. Should be ableat varioga levels of development. Should haveages to bacome familiar with characteristic re

Other Persons Required: The child's motherduring testing to answer the examiner's questichild refuse; to perform for the examiner.

Materials Required: (*items not prOvided i

* 2'x4 Table12 -1" Red cubes

* ), Paper (not bond)2 Cups2 Red crayons

RabbitRed ring with string

2 TeaspoonsSugar pelletsBell

ld be thoroughly familiar with the dir-

to effectively interact with -infantsexperience in testing infants of all

sponses.or major caregiver should be present

ons and to administer any item the

n ki (See Additional Information)irxorRed balkYellow pencilRattleCribPlaypen (optional)Red flashlightLight stitchStopwatchFacial tissuesPegboard with six pegs

.0"

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:Check P (Pass) column for successful performance, F (Failure) column

Procedure: for unsuccessful performance. Colucw headed Other is marked 0 for

Omit, R for Refused, or RPT or reported by parent.

4111

Colinage is determined and all P's

above that level are added. is score is then compared to the norm tables for'thet

age to get a Mental and Psy omotor Developmental Index (MDI or PDI)or an age equiv.

Format: Record form for both the mental and motor scales contains: .item number,

age placement, situation code, item title, score and notes; Infant Behavior Record

is a checklist of behaviors and contains scaXed hnd/or behavior listings.

Space for Recording Retest:None *

Summary Sheet '(graphic representation):None

TEST ANALYSIS

.r

kTITLE: BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT . creening Verification x

---... - '

IMPLICATIONS' FOR PROGRAMMING:

- , ,I

.

-May demonstrate a child's nerd for an early intervention program.

--7.`--..,--\

-May aid in the Aete rmination of a z ctioning age for a more severely dis-

Tabled older child.. .

,

. . . .

,, ...

. .

./

.

i ..

, .

. .

, .

NORMATIVE DATA: ,

Sample Size: 1,262'children, aged 2-30 months, divided 14 age groups

. ,,

Population Descriptors Used: .

,Controlled fOr sex and race, area of residence (urban-rural) and education

of the head of the household.

,

..

.

..

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:.

, tStandard error of Measurement for the Mental Scale ranges from 4.2

Reliability: to 6.9, and the Motor Scale from 4 to 9.0. Split half reliabil-ity for the Mental Scale ranged from .81 to .93 and the Motor scale .68 to .v.-

Test/Re test: with 28, 8-mo. old infants tested 1 week apart had a mean of .764.

Validity:Additional studies are available. CorrelatiMons between the Mental and Motor

Scales ranged from .24 to .78 for raw scores and .aa-teis for standard scores. Median

across the 14 age groups was .46.

1 -

KFERENCES:"'.

....$ .

Bayley Scales of Infant ,Development - manual .

.

,

record forms

%....,.,

..

i . i, . . AP .

.-A / ..- -

49

.

ti

TEST ANALYSISk

TITLE: BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT , Screening 0 Verification a


Materials:(continued)

Blue ,box with two lidsBlue formboard with nine blocksToy carClear plastic bottle

Doll that squeaksPicture book

12 Square.yellow beadsRound plastic boxPink formboard with three blocksOrange pullstickToy watchScissorsToy chairJointed doll

0Toy cup -

2 Picture cardspoll with detached headPlateIncomplete watch cardsChalk.

10' String or cordPull toyTape measure

* Walking board* Stairs

Directions for the construction of a walking board and stairs are 'included in

the Manual.

The infant "...may be scored for an ability manifested at anytime during theobservation period even though failed to demonstrate it satisfactorily when a spec-ific opportunity was afforded him."

-4/

50

II

I. TITLE: BEHAVIORAL CRARACTERISTICS PROGRESSION Screeninga Verification 0

f_ 141110eniraMMUM$AvENUg, -.

--,11h*R63111111,PENNSVI.WAITA If*

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: February 1977'


Author:

Publisher: Ordering Information:VORT CorporationP. O. Box 11132Palo Alto, Californiva 94306

Editor: Forms:Santa,Cruz.Special EducatiOn Management System


Cost: Individual strands (25 copies ea.) - .50; BCP Charts - $3.95;Observation booklet - $6.95

.DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:

Purpose;To help a teacher identify which behaviors to focus upon within the basic,

area

A Range (CA): MA: Grade Level:Not specified

Format:There are 59 strands (behaviors) within the BCP. A child is assessed with

onAr those strands that are important to his educational progtam. Strands ate a

cone1nuum of behaviors and progress to mastery.

Time Required:Untimed

(4"-- sub-Areas: See Additional Information aStrands: 1-22 Self help, perceptual motor and language

23-45 Social, academic, pre-vocational and,vocational46-59 Appropriate for specific.handicaps

Qbservational Information:The BCP is completed through observation of the child. Identifying

.behaviors are listed on each strand in order to help characterize the child and any

educational, physical, etc. problems he may have


Child's nameShhooil

Teacher's name

511

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: BEHAVIORAL CUARACTERISTICS PROGRESSION Screening ID Verification


Prerequisite Skills: 4

None

Disability Groups:

All

Age Range (CA):-, MA:

Not specified

.


GAup or, Individual:

IndividualTraining Needed by Examiner:

Examiner must be familiar with the child's habitual behavior and performance.

He must have good observational skills. May be the 'classroom teacher...,

Other Persons Required:None

Materials Required: ( *items, not provided in kit)Materials found in any school pr16,gram.


Procedure: A determination is made by.the examiner whether the child can or cannot perform a behavior. A check mark is given for pass, 1: point if child performsthe behavior but not at the 75% mastery level, minus for fail and 'IP for Physicalhandicap prevents the acquisition of this skill or blank for behavior not displayed.

Format:Each strand is divided into a task analysis of the behavior. Each task is

contained in a box on the paper with the total strand.Space for Recording Retest:

Testing may continue on the slime strand until the child accomplishes all

objectives for that strand.Summary Sheet (graphic representation):.

The BCP chart may be used as a summary, if desired.

TEST ANALYSIS

T1tLE: BEHAVIORAL CHARACTERISTICS PROGRESSION Screening 0 Verification

-. IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:

-May be used to determine a child's present performance.levels, as welleasthe short term objectives that are an integral part of the child's IEP. --,

/

;'' ,

.

. .

-,

1

..

.

. ._ .

.

1/16

lipNORMATIVE DATA:" Criterion - referenced

temple Size:Ai

.

Population -Descriptors Us'ed:

.

..

_TECHNICAL ASPECTS: No Data Available

Reliability: ,

. .

'Validity: ..

.

. /-

1 .

.

.

.

REFERENCES:.

Behavioral Characteristics Progression - observation booklet

charts .

individual strands,,

,

.

*. .

,

*. .

53

sr-

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: BEHAVIORAL. CHARACTERISTICS PROGRESSION.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION)

The BCP has a builein 75% mastery level.

°Screening GB Verification 0 .

The information gathered from the BCP can be used in conjunction with anyadequate preschool curriculum:.

1,

2.

3.

healthattendance/promptnessfeeding/eating

Individu81 Strands

31.

32.

33.

social eating

-attention spantask completion

. 4. drinking 34. reading5. toileting 35. math6. grooming 36. 'practical math7. dressing 37. Writing8. undressing 38. spelling .

9. nasal hygiene 39. reasoning10. oral hygiene 40. music and rhythms11. self identification 41. art s and crafts12. sensory perception 42. pre-vocational. skills13. auditory perception 43. kitchen skills14. visual motor I 44. homemaking skills15. visual motor II 45. outdoor skills16. gross motor I 46. -sign:language17. gross motor II 47. finger spelling18. prearticulation 48. speech -reading19.

20.

articulationlanguage comprehension

49.

50.

-orientation.orientation II

21. language development 51. mobility I22.

23.listeningadaptive be'viors

52.

53.

mobility II 0wheelchair use

24. impulse control 54. ambulation25. interpersonal relations 55. alastqe26. responsible behaviors, 56. !Pinning27. personal welfare 57. articulation I28. self confidence 58. atticulation II29. honesty 59. health30. social speech

40

\ 54

Nis: AVENUE

NAItRONUNO, NNSYLVANIA 17101)r,

TEST ANALYSIS,

,

DATES March 1977 '

**,.

*TjTLE: BENDER VISUAL MOTOR GESTALT TEST Screening Veeificationa

BIBLIOGRaPH1CINFORMATION:

Author:-.Lauretta Bender, M.A., M.D. a

Publisher:.` Ordering Information:

American OrtkopsYchietric. Assoc., Inc.

49 sheridan'gvenufAlbany, New YOrk 12210

liter:, Forms:

Copyright Date:,..1946'I. vv.

4'Cost: Sp imen set - $3.00

-DESCRIPTIVE INFORAATFN:

etirpose: Designed to detectwisual-perceptual difficulties.and the possiblepresence of brain d7Age.

A

Age RaQ9e CA): 4 yrs. - MA:Adult

GraleLeVel:f

Format:411

\

Consists of nine figures to be copied on a separate piece of 04ier., /

.,

Untimed .-Time Required:

Sub-Areas:

None

, ,. -- fObservationat .Information: Notes should be made on the test p'per of any

unusual circumstances cbncerning the individual's behavior during the test situ i n.

A

t

Personally Identifiable Information Re

NOne

aI Page 2 TEST ANALYSIS

-A.

01 I'I No ,

TITLE: BENDEll ViSUALMOTOR GESTALT4TEST

...m.mm;


Prerequisite_Skilis:Ability to copy forms.

AP

V

Disability Groups:

''tseening:REJ Verification

-,0 4.

Meptally -al Organi4 Br4in dam'Age, AphAsics, Emotional'r Behivibr

, .

.problems, Hearing impairedalphysiCally Ilandicapped.

Age Range (CAI: 4 yr*. MA::

Adult

ADAINISTRATIVE.CONSIDERATIONS;

Group or Individual:. /Either'

TrainingNeeded by Examiner: Examiner'xamine need

administering the test. The person interpreting

'knowledgeable about the scoring criteria.

tither Persons Revired:

t

V

None.

-

not be.specia117.tAined for,the_eptodicedliguresshould be

Materials Requir(*iftems not provided in kit)

* 81/2 x sheet of white paper

t.

11.

110

SCORINAND INTERPRETATION':.Oles ./

Procedqe: Each figure is analyzed in accordance with the specific criteria

providedin the original monograph or tlie mApy books written on this subject.

Format:

None ."

Saace191- Record'in'g, RetesX:

Summary Sheet -(graphic representation).

'TEST ANALYSIS

f

TITLE: BENDER VISUAL MOTOR GESTALT TrST Screening C3 Verifitation

IMPLtCATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:-

:

--May be used to verify children as bei neurologically impaired.

.

-May be used as,one test in a batieiy, especially kith the hesitant child.k.,

%.

. ,

.

.

.

J.

4-,.

4 . .

111111151/4. .

,

.

.

,

.1.

.J

.

-------

.

. . .

. .

A

.

.

.

NORMATIVE DATA: -Data unavailable for review.. .

.

Sample Size:....

population Descriptors Used:

4.. .

.

..

..

.

.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:. ,

(

. Reliabi.lity: Inter-rater relibility ranged from .70. to .90.

a .

/Validity: See ,Additional Infoemation ifi . .

/ v..,.

A.

v

.

.,

. , ..

.

REFERENCES: -.

.

,

..4 . .

Instructions for the Use of Visua; Motor Gestalt 'Test

.Pre4thool Test Matrix: Individual Test Descriptions ',

Bender-gestalt Performance by Culturally Disadvantaged First Graders -

Perceptual and Motor Skill, 1971.,..

,

. .

_

.

...)

.

1 .

.

...t

.

.

. .

. .

- ,

,

.

TEST ANALYSIS ..,a

TITtE: ENDER VISUAL ROTOR GESTALT "TEsT Screening 1:11 Verl fi dation

AoDITIONALANFORMATION:

Although specific validity' figures are not stated, there is indication that

4the content validity is low.

It has been foUndin research that the Bender Gestalt Test yields lower scores

for non-white individuals.

I ,4

A

a

1

er.

./

5 8

jA NORM PflOGNkSS AVENUE'NARNISIRING, PENNSYLVANIA 17109,

TEST ANAqs

DATE:, March1977w-

TITLE:. hINGRAJM BUTTON TEST Screenix (2) Verificatiim .

SIBLIOGROHIC INFORMATION:

Author:'W. J. Bingham

Publisher: '

,Bingham Button Test46211 N. 125th.Street East.'Lancaster, California 93534

Editor:

Copyr!ght.Date: 107

Cost: - Set: - X53.00

--OESCRIPTIVEINFORMATION:

r.


Forms:.

s

Purpose: "...designed to measure a child's knowledge and understanding ofsimple terms and relationships that be will encounter in his primary school years."

A

,Age Range (CAi: 3-6years MA:

C'-

Grade Level: .

Format:

°Child is asked to perform 15 tasks, 10 items for each area, requiring sizeand color discrimination. *

rime Requil'ed:

UntiMedSub - Areas,:

Colors,

Sizes andComparisims'Object/Object relationse

Number conceptsPerson/object.relations

Obtervational InformatLiin:No observation isTequirecffor the chlculation of test results, however, a

trained person'could ObserVethe,child for visual and/or motor difficulties.

4s:Personally Adebtifiable InformationRequired:

Child's name, date Ofbirth,Tester's nameDate of testSchool's name

I ,

.4

5:i

a

#-*

1.TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE:, eiiionAm BUTTON TEST Screening Ei Verification 0.



,:

.

,

Ability to identify.colorsAbility to 'manipulate small. objects-,

Disability Groupi: i

All. Modification ma to beatade if admintitered to a geverely

4involved child or child with a sensory h dicap. TestWas formed omdisadvantaged-

childreh. . .

Age Range (CA):'3 -6 years,MA:

4-9

.e-


Group orindividuel:

Training Needed by,Exathiner: .

May be administered by .a professional or paraprofessional, Teachers and

teacher aides are suggested*ts have in-service training.Other Persons Required:

'NOne v

Maierials Required: (*itemseot provided in.kit)Small container (p4illibattlo)

'10 buttons: Large - red, blackMedium yellow'i pink

Small tan, green, or

Extra blue,'Erown,"white, - SI

SCORING AND TERPRETATIOC .

, .4,

# ,

Procedure: For each correct response mark.the test form with a +, each plus is

one point. Total all the pluses for the total score. This can be compared to-per-.centile scores in the manusi,

Format: : .

A key wordigappears.on the record form, for each item. Scoring is done

.imiediately below each wbrd. 4 - l'. A

Space for Recording Retest: ;

None, record formjspbn-reusable. 0'

Summary Sheet (graphic representatibn):None

60'

Page. 3 TEST ANALYSIS.

TITLE: BINGHAM BUTTON TEST0

. Screening,_ .

X Verification

.

IMPLICATIONS FOR 540GRAMMING:'-.-,

.

14p

-May indicate aAack'of reading readiness skills.. -.. .

-May identify children with visual alga motor coordination difficulties or cog-

nitive and association problems. -

,/ *... .

.

.

I, . . .

, .

. . .

.. , .

. .

, .. .

-..

.

,

,

N VE 'DATA:

ample Size: No Data Available,

.

. Population Descriptors liNd: .

Children attended SumMer Head Stare Program .

.

.Hilkly disadvantaged ' .

/

. .

.

.

.

'

o

TECHNICAL 'ASPECTS: , r

A,

D .

Reliability: Split, -half reliability with four children randomly selected from

ach of 15"different Head Start Proorams, obtained a KR coefficient of .89. Test/Retest:' test administered to 31 children _of the initial group tht follpwing summer;a coefficient of .137 was obtainer. .

'Validity: .

Four psychometricians administered the BBT to a selected group of Head Start

children. Results were compared to teacher ratings, eight weeks later, a chi square

correlation coefficient of .76 was found.

*.\

REFERENCES;

Bingham Button Test - manual, . 1

materialsP

.14

.

.

. \ r

4

Pap 4

. ibbTITLE: BING4e BUTTON TEST

4ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

TEST ANALYSIS

Screening s Verification

The manual states that, "use of this test for children of higher s cio- Z onomicbackgrounds (than 'standardization group) might not be suitable, other'general estimates of abiliaies." i

han to make

A.

4

4

p

62

4

gamma')144 NORM PROGRESS AVENUE


TEST ANAYSIS

DATE: June 1977

TITLE: CATELL INFANT INTELLIGENCE SCALE

lmilmmmr

BIBLICIGRAPHIC INFORMATION:

Author: Psyche Cattell

Publisher:

The Piychological Corporation757 Third Avenue .

New York, N. Y. 10017Editor:

Cdpyright Date: 1940

Cost: Manual - $15.00; Set of materials - $96,Q0; Test blank (pkg. of 25) - $2.8Q

Screening:CI Verification al

Ordering. Information: ,\er

4,

Forms-:


Purpose:

To assess the mental development of infants as much as podsibIe without'regard toMitems teat are heavily influenced by home training;

Age Range (CA). 3-30 mos. AA: Grade Level: -

Ar"_.4

Form41010There are 5 regular items and one or two alternative items-for eachagegroup (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,16,18,20,22,24,27 and 3Q mos,I.A Each itemrequests a child to perform e.g., turning head toward a bell, putting pegs in a peg.board. A basal and ceiling is determined.

Time Required:20-30 minutes:

Sub - Areas:

None

Observatio41 Infordation:Observations about the child's cooperation, alertness, etc. should he made o

the record form. Anything out of+the ordinary observed during the test period shouldbe noted.

Personally identifiable Information Required:. Record form unavailable .for review.

63.r

:Page 21114

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: CATTELL INFANT INTELLGENCENSCALE Screening Verification CD



None

Disability Groups:All, except Severely Physically involved children.

L

Age Range (CA):3-30 mos. MA:

II


Group OT IndiOduil: Individual.

ining Heeded by Examiner: Examinet should have a sound background in child

ppychol and experience in psychometric procedufes. Examiner should have taken a

nursery,sphool trainjm course. Should be alert to decide whether a response ispurposerui or oy cnan

Other Persons Required:.The child's mother opr caregiver should be in the room but should sit

where the child cannot see he face readily.

Materials Required: (*items not provided in-kit) (See Additional Information)

4" Wooden enbroidery ring (bright red) with 15".of string attached

12-1" Woodeh cubes - red2 Teaspoons

1-11/2" Diameter red rubber ball

Dumbbell shaped rattleBell with wooden handleSugar pellet,- 3/1-Omm in diameter

Aluminum cup rim 31/2"

MirrorDoor Key

1

fr


Procedure: Each item 1.,scored plus or minus dependent uponbhild beeting the

' specific criteria stated in the' manual. A basal iswestabliOsed andbitem value above

the basal is added for computation of a Mental Age.

"dr

Format:Record form unavailable for review.

Space fdr Recording Retest:Record form unavailable for review.

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):Record form unavailable for review.

ope 64

4


r

.TITLE: CATTELL INFANT INTELLIGENCE 'SCALE . Screening Verification CO.


-May 4 used to determine a child's approximate functioning leVel.

_ -May be used to show the need for an early intervention program for the /child.

.

.

....

.

. .:

.

.

. .

......-

. %

NORMATIVE DATA:.

Sample Size: 1,346 examinations with 274 children aged 3,6,9,12,18,24,30,and 36 months. ..

Population Descriptors Used: ,

Children were 'seen at the Center for Research in Child Health and Develop-

ment of Harvard University.All points showed that there was a normal delivery of a normal child.Residing in area for several years in order to complete study.At least 3 grandparents were of European stock.Mother was willing to bring child to the clinic at regular intervals.Mostly lower middle class families.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:...,

...

Reliability:

.Odd/Even reliability ranges from .56 at 3 months to .90 at 18 meths.

. .

VIldity: Correlations between the Infant Scale and the Standford-Binet Form Ladministered at 36 months ranged from .10 at 3 months to .83 at 30 months. There is a

goOd indicatiort that, there is a smaller than average chance for a 3-month old child

with a hie score to be below average at 3 years but not necessarily vice versa.111 . s.

REFERENCES: ;

.

V

.%

The Measurement of Intelligence of Infants and Young Children - manual4

1444444

6

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: CATTELL INFANT INTELLIGENCE SCALE Screening 1: Vfilfication 130


. Materials: (continued)

81/2x11" Piece of onionskin paper,ao

15" Shoe lacePegboard and pegsOpaque handkerchief or cloth

12" String of brightly colored beads

11/2" Square x 3" Bpx

Dice or stones6" Jointless rubber doll that squeaks

PencilPaper.

8" Piece of plate glassBottle - 3" high with a 15/16", monthRound box - 2" diameter'Small toyForm board - square, triangle, .circle

8 Square kindergarten beads - 1/2"

Covered box - 2" square 31/2" with hole, in mover

7" Jointed rubber dollPictures of:. dog, cup, shoe, house, flag, clock, star, leaf, tegket,

and bodkPipecleaner.dog

8" Round stick:Doll's arm chairDoll's cup

3 Small boxes, 1 3/4" x 1 1/2" x 1"..

Oblong beCard with 6-objects attached: ,cat, button, thimble, cup, spoon,.

1 -engine .

:41/2x51/2° Piece of paper5. Pictures. of an incomplete watch

ForkCar .

18 2x4" pictUres of common objectsToy eggbeatetCard with objects'ached: cup, shoe, Pitany, knife, car, iron

Section dealing with test...scores and informing Parents of their child's test

resultAO s needs to be revised to refleCts the current legal and educational trends.

66

11

1A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 1710e

TEST ANALYSIS,

DATE: March 1977

TITLE: CHILD'S ABILITY PROFILE SEreening 0 Verification


, Author: vue

Publi'sher:

Instructional Fair, Inc.4158 Lake Michigan DriveGrand Rapids, Michigan 49504

Editor.:


Cost: Form A (spirit duplicator) - $4.00

Order ing information ?`

.4

Forms: :Form A - 4-5 years

I


Purpose:,

T6 indicate a child's plaOement in motor skills, selected discrimination,

and'social areas. .Possible use may be as a quick instrument used during prekinder-garteu registratio4

Age Range kLA): 4-5 years MA: Grade Level:

Format:

One page mimeographed scale with three items per area with criterion of

item failure.

Time Required:

UntimedSub-Areas:

S


None`

4-

Personally Identifiable Information Requir6d:

Child's namek entrance, and exit age, date of birthDate of testChild's height and weight

64'4

4

VP'

Page 2 TEST. ANALYSIS

TITLE: CHILD'S ABILITY PROFILE Screening E0 Verification


Prerequisitte Skills:

Adequate skills for age(speech.,

1

pisabillty Groups:

.41 yucable mtntally retardedpg/earning disabled, Speech impaireda.

Age,Range (CA): 4-5 years MA:

*

ADMINISVATIVE CONStDERAJION5:

Group or Individual: Individual

Training Needed by Examiner:None,

Other PerXns Required:

Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit)Masking tape *Picture books

* Tennis ball *Red Pen

* Ping pong ball* Piano

'* Large ball* .Zipper frame

1

* Button frame'* Snap frame

tV


Procedure:Put a red X on the line where the'child can no longer do the tasks.

Format:Scoring is done *en the profile sheet.

space for Recording Retest:

None*,

Summary Stleet (graphic representation):

A profile is formed by connecting all the X's.

68.

'Page' 3 . Wei TEST ANAVIS

4.*r

Mk.

..TITLE:. 'CHILD'S ARILITY PROFILE Screening I Verification;

'1'.. a ,

iIkOLICATWAS f.OR PROGRAMMING: 4'

.It-:,

4'C

.May,indicate a child in need of some special education s9rvices due

severe delay.it

,,..N-'if

t. ..

- C..

-May indicate a need for a more thorotigh,screenin ation: ,,,

« . 64(

4. .

Ill .

.,

.

r,..p.

...,

AP. _ ..1

. E.

1'

..

,

.

1

le e

. <1

. .

,4,

4 ' - 1 . 1

)"

.

-NORMATIVE DATA: No Data Alerilable ;%

_/,._$42lb

Sample Size: -. f:'4

. .4

Popul tion Descriptor t Used:

A4 00'

e.

.

- 0 4.

, .

, . --

,.

4 ..

4 .

. ..f - . 4 .

.. C -G 9 , -

.

.4.100

.

r

TECHNIOWASPECTS: No Data Avatlabik.

.

Reliability:.

m06-

4 ANal idlty: .

.

. . - -**,

..

. Ci , sit_. ., .

. . . ..

.,

% .

REFERENCES: ,

.. . 6"-:

Child's Ability Profile -\Porrr A

.. 11

... .i

,

I. \. .

. .. s.

. .

,

44-

1

I P

1-A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRISBURG PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: CIRCUS

DATE: May 197fi

Screening id Veilfication

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:Gerry Ann Bogatz WM. C. Ward

Author:Thomas Draper Susan Valentine ,Ann Jugeldut Ann McAloon -.

Published:Spencer Swinton

Ordering Informatiall:.-Addison-Wesley Testing Service

- Reading, Massachusetts 01867

Editor: Gray Sidwell, Nancy Bruno

Copyright Date: 1975, 1976

Forms: Level ALevel S.

.6*

one of the teacher's choice, materials for 10 children) - .$12.50; In vidual measuresCost: Specimen set - $7.50; .Core package, -Level A (4 predeterthr measures and

are available, ranging in price fro'm $3.75 to $1.00. e,.

4

DESCRIPTIVE INF410TION:.. .

Purpose:. .

,......,'- Designed to identify the instructional needs of individual children.19esighed'to'mOnitor and evalJAte early childhood education programs.

..:

Age Range (CA): . . MA: . Grade Level': Preprimary - Grade 1

Format:* child is to 401yd to a question,- by the exathindi-, by marking the. .

. %

,pictoiial choice' he thinks is correct; no verbal response is required except for thetest of pioductive language. d

.,

;Iiiree Required: $

' . Ontimed-,.: Sub-Areas::

'Spe Additional.

t

Information

up

Observational. Infomation: Child's behavior is .rated (usually

rarely) by observation after each test measure administered. Thar 5

are: Asked for help*with test*frcilth an adult; Appeared to,just.markKept his/her place on test; Looked at answers other children' marked'alternative choices to a:question carefully.

Personally identifiable Information Required'Chiltd'siname and number fOr machine scoring.

Teacher's nathe

School's name/

, occasionallybehaviors reviewnumbers at random;

; Seemed to weigh

71:

. TITLE: cIRCUS

e

EXAMINEE APPROeRIATiNES:-

.6Prerequisite Skills:-,Overall developmental level adequate for age

TEST ANALYSIS

Screening Ga Verification

Disaelltriroups:' ' .

Ia.

.

'

NSpeech impaired, Physically handicapped, Hearing impaired, Learning

- .'disable, Mild-Borderline Mentally retarded e

I

Age R

°

(CA):: MA: VADE LEVEL: Preprimary - Grade 1'ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS::'

ti

Group.or Individual: Small group,tapproximately 10 children. The Say andiXell .

sub-test is administered individually. Handicapped children may need to bt test4dindividual.y. ,

.

Training Needed by Examiner: Examinermay be a'Oiassroom teacher of teacheraide. Shduld be thoroughly familiar'with the test instructions, format, and'sdoring.

Should undeisland the rationale for.

utilizing the tests.IF ..

.

. dOther Persons Required: .

.

,,,

Proctors or aides may.be'needed'tqiinsure all' children are following. '

motions.Ailif

- .,

%Materials Required: (*items notprovided in kit}

--None

1

: SCORING AND INTERPRETP16i:

Procedure: Each child's answersiare compared to ais the number of correct responset. -A Sentence Report,ising his strengths and wea esses. A Behavior Inventory Sire

Forman' Each tot:Measure has its own performance.reco

to log the performanCe for'60 children: 'Norm scores are co

instruction booklet.Space forRecording Retest:

Norse, test booklets are non-reusable.

:

z

\er keg. NumericaiScore

or'each child stet=termined.

Summary,Shedt ( aphit representation):'Class Performance Record provides class summary

are not compiled.

}provides

et coritaOningtspaced in each measure's

4ti

ta: Individual summaries,

I-,

Page'3 a 'TEST ANALY

.

..

.

TITLE: CIRCUS ss .Screening, Verification. .

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING: .

.

-May aid in identifying' those children who may heed ancillary services, yet be,

in a regular class situation.. ' .

.

__.

. --May identify Children in need olf an indepth evaluation.

i'-May be used,to evaluate and monitor an- existing program and staff\.

..

.

.,

. ..

.

. .

...

. .. s

..

1 ,. .

.

. . _

_ .

NORMATIVE DATA:- ), . ...

..

Sample Size.: 2,985 (1,979 kindergarten,' 1,006 nursery school)".. .

Population Dessriptors Used: ;.

Geographic region: northeast, central, southwest, west/Sodthwest, U. S. :

'City size .

b SOcioeconomic status--,Ethuilp ba ound: White, Black, Spanish, other

...

.

, Individual norms and rtliabilities.have been determined for eachTECHNICAL ASPECTS: individual measure.

.,, .

a .** AeLiability: nie Standard Error of Measurement is provided for each meabure

'total and sub-tests 'for kindergarten and nursery school children for Level A and

4kindirgarten children for Level B. sip - 41'

VaTiclity: .. ., .

-Correlations between teacher's rating of childrens competencies ana CIRCUS

, t scores ;ranged from .25,.How Words Sound to ,56; Finding Letters and' Numbers

(Level A) and from '.25 Sees'and Remember to '.58 How Much and How Many, Part I

"(Level W. . ' , -- 41

r REFERENCES:.

..

'Circus:_ Manual and Technical Relpert"- teacher's edition,

,,Individual test measures - user's guides -' 1.

test booklets ..

. ti

, .

. . ,

,

,,

I..

, .i

.

Paige 4

'4ITLE: CIRCUS

TEST ANALYSIS I

Screening s Verification

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:-

Sub-'Area si.

Level A ,

What Words MeaiHow Much and How ManyLook-Alikes/L"'"

Copy :What You ,See

Finding Letters and NumbNoiSesHow Wards SofundHow Words WorkLiSten to the StorySay and TellDo'You Know.,.7See d Remember

,* ! Thinkikt Through

Make-A-.Tree'Activities nventoryBehavior Inventot.Educational Envi__nment

Questionnaire

p All tests are not given

the assessment innind.

to'any one child.

I

level B

How Much, How Many.Look-AlikesCopy What You See

'Finding Letters and Numbers.Things I LikeWord PuzzlesListen to the Story.'Say and, Tell

Do You Know...?See antRvember ('Think ft throughMake-A-Tiee,Activities InventoryEducational. Environment

Questionnaire.

Tests are chosen Ath the purpose of.1%

Practice sessions to insure that the child'undep6andscedure May be useful.prior to testing.

A Spanish ,version CIRCO is being deVbloped.

the proper marking pro-

04

,A booklet of suggested instructional activities After the CIRCUS has been

develop7d.

An Edicational Environment Questionnaire ip filled out by the teacher. It pro-

vides a serf-repoft'{teacher background, educitionalalues, find attitudes) and adescription of the class, schtol or Otogram. 1

.4

to

4 74


HARRISSURG,IPENNSYVAPIIA 17109.

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: May 1977

TITLE: COLUMBIA MENTAL MATURITY SCALE


Screening 12) Verification 0

Author:Bessie B.'BurgemeisterLucille Hollander Blum,

.. -. Irving Large See Additional

Publisher: Ordering Information: Information

Harcourt Brace Javonovichftc. The Psychological Corporation

,New Y6rk, New York 757 Third AvenueNew York, New Yorilk 10017

Editor: - Forms:- Third Edition

Copyright Date: 1954, 1959, 1972

Cost: Examiner's kit- $57.!t; Manual.- $5.25; Record form (pkg, of 35) - $4.75,

DESCRI TIVE INFORMATION: ik

4 pur se:

To measure a child's general reasoning ability.

(. ".1

Age Range (CA): 31/2 years- MA: Grade Level:

- 9 yrs. 11 mos.Foimat: I.

The mild is requested to choose the item that is different-from a series

Of items; differences cover size, shape, form, calor, etc. Response is non - verbal.

Froth 51 to 65 items are presented to,theiChild. , i

Time Recimf red: .' .4.15-20 minuted

Sub-Areas:

,None.. 41)

F

Observational Information: 4Record'fOrm proVidet'space to "indicate...any unusual Conditions which

affectectthe subject's behavior during the testing session."


Child's name, date of birth, exact chronological age..

. Sly

TEST ANALYSIS\

TITLE: COLUMBIA MENTAL MATURITY SCALE Screening 0 verification 0

'"EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS:'

Prerequisite Skills:Adequate receptive languageAbility to discriminate size, shape and form differences

\Disability Groups:' Physically handicapped, Brain damaged, Mentally retarded, Visually impaired,

Speech impaired, Hearing impaired.

Age Range (CA): 31/2 years-14A:

9 yrs. 11 mos.


Group or Individual:. Individual -

ih. Training Needed by Examiner: UnderStanding of thepurpose of the test, practice

with test materials,.sensitivity to the needs and behavior of young children. May be

ViTWqt(vsq.by a psychologist, counselor, or teacher under direct sunervItsinh of a

OTher.Persons Required:None

Materials Required: (*items not provided-in kit)"65 6x9" Picture cards

,.

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:All correct items are counted as thew score. This is "converted with

Procedure: tables in the manual to ari.Age Deviation Score, Percentile rank,'Stanine scores, and a Maturit'Index.' If a child achieves a 5elatively high raw score.on the ,level, he is tested with the next revel.

Format: lit

Record form spans two test levels, indication as to beg-inning and ending

items for each letel 1.s givep. All correctianswers are in blac/ k, all incor-

ract answers are in white.Space for Recording Retest:

.

None,.

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):

All scores a'relisted one record 'form:

7G

° TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE.: COLUMBIA MENTAL MATURITY VALE Screening El Verification


.

-May indicate the need for an in-depth evaluation of the child. .

-May help the teacher eliminate reasoning ability from the possibilitiescausing a child's difficulty in learning.

.. -

.:May get a reasoning level or ability,rating for a nonverbal child.

. . .

.

'4

.:.

,

1

NORMATIVE DATA:

Sample Size: 2600; 200 at each of 13 age groups

4,

Population Descriptors UsedGeographic area: Northeast, South, North, Central, WestRace.: StraVfied in accordance With the U. S. CensusEthnicity: To insure inclusion,74 Puerto Ricans and 14 Mexican-Americans were

in the" sample. .

Parental occupation: Stratified in accordance with the U. S. Censuil.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: Numerous studies have been made using the 1959 CMMS, which cor-relates highly with the 1972 revision.

Reliability: Standard error of measurement is 5 pts. for 3S-5S year olds and 6.,pts. fpr 6-:9 year olds. Split half reliability ranges from .85 with Level H; with 9year olds to .91 for levels C & E for 4' and 5S year olds.0Test/Retest reliability' ranged frop .84 to .86.

Validity:,Y. , With 177 children in first and second grades tested with the CMMS-andthe Stanford Achievement Test had correlations ranging from .31 (paragraph meaning) to.61 (arithmetic and vocabulary for grade 1 and .43 (science and social studies) to .61(arithmetic.con9epts). Correlations with the 1959 CMMS, 1972 CMMS, and Stanford-Binet form L-M were .84 and .67 respectively.

REFERENCES: .

,

Columbia Mental Matu'rity Sc Ale) Guide for Administration and Interpretation

.. .

.

, ..

.

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: COLUMBIA MENTAL MATURITY SCALE Screening 0 Verification 43


Ordering information and cost: (Continued)

May also be ordered frot Western Pftchological Services12031 Wilshire BoulevardLos Angeles, California, 9%025

Prices for materials are:sof

Kit - $64.50; Manual $4.50"i Record forms (pkg. of 25) - $6.50; over

20 pkg. of.forms - $5.00/pkg.s

Alhe Third Editilen has many new items and all items retained were examined forUpdating picbure'connt. The 1972 version is the only CMMS that i standardized.

ereIncluded administration directions for Spanish speaking chi l n. Administrator

should be from the,same population as the child.

The CMMS may bedS.dministered through the'use of an interpreter.

The manual cautions that the interpretation,of the CMMS results should be madewithin the limits of its scope. Additional caution shouldbe used when interpreting.extremely low'or extremely high scores.

.11

0

t--'TEST ANALYSIS

' ti

DATE: February.1977

TITtE: DENVER ARTICULATION SCREENING EXAM Screening rat Verification_


Authoy: Amelia F. Drumwright

Publisher:

LADOCA Project & PublishingFoundation, Inc,

East 51st Ave. & Lincoln StreetDenver, Dorado 80216

Editor:

Copyright Date: 1971*

Cost: Manual - $2.50;Picture oatds - $0.60

Availability:

Available from a

FP


Forms:

Workbook/manual - $3.25; -Test forms (pkg. of 25) - $0.50;

Mead Johnson Laboratories representative


. Purpose: "'

"...designed to reliably discrimi tween significant developmental

delay an normal variations in speeCh sound acquisition to detect copnon abnormalconditions..."

Age Range (CA): 21/2 - 6 yrslA: Grade Level:

Format:Child is asked to repeat 22 words'contaiving 30 sound elements after the

test administrator.

Time Required:5 minutes

Sub-Areas:

rNone

ObserVatiorral Information:,A child is simultaneously evaluated for his speech intelligibility as sUb-

.

jectively deterafhed by the administra4pr.

Personally Identifiable Information Required,:

Child's name and addressEach individ4a1 testing requires the examiner's name,- date of test,

child's, age:

7j

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE.. DENVER ARTICULATION SCREENING EXAM Screeriing CI VerifIciio


Prerequisite Skills:Verbal language

Disability GroupsAll

4

Age Range (CN:11 - 6 yrs.MA:

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS:.

Group,br Individual:

Individual

Training Needed by Examiner: '.Examiner need hot be well versed in articulatorydevelopment. Should be able to discriminate between correct and incotkect sound'pro-.nunciation. May be a doctor, nurse, teacher or VaeS-Professional. ,


Materials Required: (*items nol provided-in.kit)

*Picture cards (used with an uncooperative child)

fik4

SCORING AND.INTERPREThION:

*Procedure: . _ .

.

^.

Circle sounds underlined that the child pronounces correctly. Count circlestip determine the raw score; Compare to chaff on back side Qi.f test form to,dettrminedhq.d%s

opeatrcentile,ranking.

. ..

All.scoring is dond immediately on the test form. I

Space for Recolin§ Retest:

Three testings may be recorded on one. test form.

SuMmary,Sheet (graphic represenAtation):

None 0

f-8

TEST ANALYSISm

., I

TITLE: ,DENVER ARTICULATION SCREENING EXAM, . .

Screening 0 . VaQfication.

ommmimmirI , , Ir

IMPLICATIONS FORPROGRAMMING: . . _ -

...

0 .

.

... -May identify the need for an in-depth speech evaluation..

.

.

b . ., .

*

.

.

.. I ..,

0 .. .

.

, ., . . .

..,

. .

V -. .

,- . .

,

NORMATIVi DATA:L ,

.

Sample Size: 1-50 children.

,,

.

Population Descriptors Used:..

. .

Ages 2 yrs. 4 mos. to 6 yrs. 3 mos. - ,

Eqmalonumber of boys and girls ,

Anglo, black andAlispanii residents of Denver, Colorado

J . ,.' \ .

.

,o

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: . .

.., '..

Reliability: ,

_.

.. . . . .

Test/Retest forA110'41ildren screened twice, 4-11 days &port by speech

pathologists, found acorrelatiorf.of .95. ,

Validity:,

, .

`Nine paraprofessionals using the RASE screenedx240 children. Of this group

89(43 normal'test results and.43 abn6rmal) were administered the Hejna Developmental

Artiodfation'Test by a gpeechlithologist, finding a copositfbitx of .88 and'a coneg-.

atiyity of .91. . . -,

.-

,.,

.

, .

.

. . '

REFERENCES: . .

.

. .

.- .

. Denver Articulation Screening Exam - manual

.

.

.

. ,

. 4.

- .

.

. ,,

.

. QC . ,.. , .

, f.

.

, TEST. ANALYSIS

TITLE: DENVER ARTICULATION SCREENING EXAM Screenipg Verif4cation

ADDITIONAL INrONMATION4)

7101Ago significant difference was noted aniong cultural groups in the standardization

population.1

A listing of "Percent of Children PisLng Sound'by Age and CulturalGroup'!is in the manual.

t

1-A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRiSSORG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: DENVER AUDIOMETRIC SCREENING TEST

DATE: May 1977

of"

Scr:eenipg 13 VerificationD-

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: ,

,

Authdr: Amelia F. Druxwright, M.A.

14bblisher:LADOCA.Project& Publishing

FoUndation, Inc.E. 51st-and Lincoln Streets,Denver, Colorado 80216

Editor:

CoPyrfligtit Date:. 1972

,e;Order-i Information:

Forms:

-.

Cost: Reference manual - $2.00; ManualAorkbook$6:50

$3.25; Test forms (Pkg.' of 25)

.4144


Purpose '',, .

,

. -' To quickly screen a child's4hearing at normal conversational levels.

4 P : It' A

* '

Age Range (CA): -6 yrs.

Format:

Grade Level: Preschool

Chid is tested with the aid of an audiometer at three puretone frequencylevets at one ititvisiy.

O

Time Required: Vntimed-

SublAreas: s

None'

e

4 ,

Observational Information: .

. .

Comments pay be entereetonithe test response form. .When testing a childunder 3 years of age, good observational data. should be compiled. AP

. ,

O

1

.

Personally klentiftablerInformatiOh Requirtd:

hild!s name, address

A

,

8t

a

to.

; TEST ANALYSIS ;

TITLE: DENVER AUDIOMETRIC SCREENING TEST Screening Ca Verification CY


Prerequisite Skills: f .

Ability to indicate a respon$ consistently.

4

,

Disability Groups:

All, mild to Modierate'disabilities'

Age Rae (CA): ::3-6 yrs. MA:.

4

AOMINISTRATIVE,CONSIDERATIONS:

Group or Individual: IndividualA

Training Needed by 'examiner: Examj.ner must be well acquainted with the

specific Operating instructions. for the audiometer being used. Must be able toteach the child the proper method of response,

Other"PersOns Required:.4 .

None ,e y0

we' i .4.

1

Materials Required: ( *items not provided in kit)

\(*Audiometer

* Earphones4

SCORING Al INTERPRETATI N:

a

Procedure: Child is tested at 3 puretone frequencies repeatedly until ke obtains

3,Qasses or failures. Each ear is' tested separately. 'P,(pass), F or F(uncertain) is'circled fdr each frequency tested and for the overall teat results..

Format:)10sheet,is divided into results for right and left ear.

Space for Re)ording Retest: .A

Three_s parate tests may be recorded on one,form.

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):.None .:i.

..

.

'1

84

6

1

1

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: 'DENVER AUDIOMETATC SCREENINOTEST Screening 00 Verification

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:i.....

.

.

-Nay indicate a child with a hearing impairment within the frequency band forppconversational,speech.

-May indicate a child in need \of a more in-depth evaluation.a

t,

, , .

.

I

. . 41. I

{

7 . '4^-ip.

1

.. 4

NORMATIVE DATA: No Data Available .; .

_.,_ _ _

Sample Size:

Population Descriptors Used: 0

V.

, . ..

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: No Data Available

Reliability:.

.. ,.

Validity:. ..

.

..

.

* . ..

. .

.

a

-

.

0 .

LREFERENCES:t.

-Dever Audibmetric Screenlw Test - manual ,

.

.

. -

. .. .

T.,

..

. _ ..

.

.

..JP ;

.

TEST ANALYSIS

-TITtt:'spFEp AUDIOMETRIC SCREENING TEST Screening Verification CI --

ADDITIONAL INFORMTJON:

Manual provides general operating instructions for audiometer.:

Provides hints for testing diff icult-to-te st children.

of,

o.

pr

of

A

fi

4

..

P 1

1 -A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE

HARRIiBUR.t, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: dENVER EtE SCREENING TEST

A

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:.

Aut ore.John Barker, M.D.,Arnold Goldstein,,

Publisher:LADOCA Project & PublishingFoundation, Inc.

& Lincoln StreetsDeriverf'Colorado 80216' .

Editor.%

Ph.D.


DATE: April 19-7j

Screening Ea Verification

*-

William K.'Frankenburg, M.D. ,

I

4Ordering Information:

Forms:

Cost: Ref'erence mahuaL - $2.00; Manual/Workbook - $3.25; Test forms (pkg. of-25) - $0.20 fee


Purpose:.

To determine the child's abilityl.to see and to determine the possible needfor corrction

,Age Range (CA): . ,. os. PIA,: Grade Level:'

_ . ears,Format: , ' A

Examiner is to administer an acuity test differing with the child!S age andabilities., Examiner examines child's eyes for different reactions.

Time Required:A

UntimedSub-Areas!

Vision test.

Pupillary light reflex tes$_c.Question

COver test

Observational..infotMation:Test centers on observing the child's eyes and reaction to light.

dentifiable Information Required:

None

6

.-

a

p_


TITLE: DENVER EYE SCREENING TESL Scieeningq .Verificatiott .

EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS:,'

Prereq-ursi te -Ski 11-s :

ft- None

Disability Groups:All,especially Severely/i3rofoundlyhandicapped

Range.(CA): 6 mos. RA:years


Group or Individual: 'Individual


A Examiner. should bevthoroughly familiar -with Vle tests and the rating scare.

May be used by trairied:paraprofessionals or a physician or his staff mem4prs.

Other Persons Required:If child is very young or apprehensive of new surroundings, the parent

should stay with the child.Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit)

4Pictute cardsFlashlightOccluder .

ti

% E card .

Spinning toy15 ft..String

444

.s'-

,'SCORiNG.AND INTERPRETATION: :04

Procedure: Scoring criteria arein the manual. Scoring is accomplished by

circling the correct lettep (P, F, U) for each sup- test.- Total test is then graded

by' specific criteria 4'4 normal, abnormal, or untAtable. .

.*

Format:Scoring sheet divides each item into 3 poSsiblerrestilts'- normal,,ab

untestable. ,Total test' ratins,criteria are listed"on the score sheet..

Space for RetOrding Retest':

None' ., .

. . p ',/,>

Summary Sheet (graphic representaton):None j : ),

s . .

.,

4 A 1

r

TEST MALYS S. .

TITLt: DENVER EYE SCREENING TEST' Screening 0 Vertficatign.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING: ..,

,.....

,

N

i

4

-May indicate the need for an in-depth evaluation of the child by .an eye ,

specialist. , ,, A __, .4

-May identify the child with a vision problem who may be-too sevep4ly involvedtobe able to respond-to conventional screening tests. ,

---, 4.

, .

.

.

.

.

. .

e.. ,

.

. .

u\s,-

.

.t

- ,.

. ..

. .

. .

t ",.."

e . t ,

1, .. _

.

4 .

sNORMATI1XE DATA: No Data 'Available

Sample Size: ....

4 --s

- S.Populbtron Descriptors Used; . ,

.

-. .

; 1,

0

,.

.

.

.

.

.

.

, . .

tilECkNICAL ASPECTS: No Data Available .

.1.

Reliability:

A

, Validity; ._, -. ., .

. V

. ..

.

t '

\

.

REFERENESI..

. .. .

Denver Eye Screening Test - manual .

.

-....

,i

.

5 .

e,f

. S18 '

.

,

.

.

.

- 4%

G

.

.

4 EiD

_

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: DOWER EYE ScRECING TEST Screening Verification'eri f i cation' (3

yo,

ADDITIONAL' NFAATION:" e

A .gieat deal of. practice is necessary before (paraprofessional would be ablertr

to make the correct interpretations of the eye' examination.

Training and Proficiency films and videotapes are available for rent and4

purchase.

.

I

4

tot

. .

e

1-A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

-14

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: May 1977

TITLE:DETROIT TESTS OF LEARNING APTITUDEvk

Screening 0 Verification 10


Author; HarryJ. Baker, Ph.D.Bernice Leland, M.A.

Publisher: '

Bobbs-Merrill Co., pc.

4300 West 62nd StreetIndianapolis, Indiana 46206

Editor:

Copyright Date: ;935, 1959, 1967

--Ordering inforMation:

Forms:. Revised, 1967

Cost: _Sample packet - $10.80; Examiner's handbpok and record forms $5.80;Pictorial material - $4.50; Record booklets (pkg. of 35) - $7.65; Set of 8 forms -

, $1:65.

DESCRIPTIVE 1NFORMATIQN:

Purpose:

To pAlae-an idea of an individual's mental development.

Age Range {CA):' Grade Level: Preschool High school

Format:,

Individual is asked, to perform various motor and verba4 tasks. There are19 sub -tests but from low are administered to each individual.

Time Required: Time limits are stated,in the manual for certain sub- tests;others Are untimed.

Sub-Areas: (See Additional Information)1. Pictorial absprdities 5: Motor speed and precision2. Verbal aburdities 6. Auditory attentfon span for unrelated

1'3. Pictorial opposites words4. Verbal,opposites '7. Oral commissions

.

Observational Information% 8. Social adjdstment

Note, should be made s to the child'.s reaction to the test, such as:failure to try, crying, etc.

Personally Identifiable Information Required: '

Child's-name, sex, birthaate, chronological ageSchool, gradeMedian mental age, IQTime'tarted, time finishedExaminer's nameDate-

I.

.10

al

41"

I

Page 2 TEST ANAL ITITLE:DETROIT TESTS OF LEARNING APTITUDE



Ability to speak understandably.Some. fine motor-dexterity_ 0

Disability Groups: (See Additional Information)

Mentally retarded, Leatning disabled, Language impaired .)

Screening El Verification 0

Age Range (CA): MA:A

. GRADE LEVEL: Preschool - High-sohool

ADMINISTRATIk CONSIDERATIONS:

Group or Individual: Individual, several sub-tests may be administered in small

groups.Training Needed by Examiner: "...only those persons who are fully equipped by

training to administer and interpret psychological tests can expect to obtain reliable

and consistent results." Practical experience with handicapped4children is recom-

mended.' Knowledge of testing procedures helpful.Other Persons Required:

None,

Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit)

Pictorial material booklet

* Book* Pencil

20 penniesSeveral pieces of paper

I

Et\SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:

. . Each sub-test is scored to particular criterion given in the manual.

Four types of scores may be defiveriProcedure: a raw score-number correct; aweighted score-number correct in a series multipli4d by number in that series; a cum-

ulative Score-number correct.ih 1 2 3 minutes and a scaled score -3, 2, 1, 0 points?depeloent on criteraa. 5cores are cOnverted to mAs.

format:, Pupils record boOklet provides stimulus word for verbal and auditory

soli -tests and key words for -social adjustment, orientation etc. Individual being

t'sted4may mark in the book fOrcertain Sub-tests td-Vrovide a very complete rornrA

per_orrancA.Space for -Recording, Retest:

. None

Summary5heet (graphic repreiehtatrori):Profile -sheet is'part of the record booklet. ,.Individual sub-test MAs are'

plotted in order (highest to lowest). A chronological Age. line may also be drawn to

p ;ovide direct. contrast.

/-6

,Page 3 TEs..4T ANALYSIS

TITLE:- DETROIT TESTSOF LEARNING APTITUDE Screening F7 Verification PI

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:.

. u 4 4

-May indicate the need fOr a complete psychological and educationalevaluation. . . .

-May be used to narrow the pOssiblittauses of 4 child's learning problem....

. ,

0

AIl

.

a ..

. .

As .

a

..{ '.

,

.

-

. .

NORMATIVE DATA: .

. .

Sample Size: Initial standardization: 50.persons at each age iev61,

.

Population bescriptors Used:ill:

111b..IQ ranged from 90 to 116 on a group intellrience test'DetKoit Public SchOols

._.,. ,.,

. ,

%.

,, .--,

<

. ..

. -TECHNICAL ASPECTS: N. . ,.

,

. d .

.

Reliability:. Tes Retest reliability.with 48 individuals tested five months ,.

apart was .9,5 with4 4Iudents, aged 7-12 years, tested 2-3.years apart, had a

correlation .675. I. :4,,

_ ..

.Validity: , ,.

16 sub -tests were correlated with eac other on 100 children, aged 8-12

years, the ma.ority of 'correlations' rangfd om .4 to ,2; highest correlation

was with Verba Absurdities and Verbal Opposites.

. a

Al-,, ., 7

REFERENCtSit.It. ,

.- .Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude r. Examiner's handbook

, :4 ,(revised, 1967).

Pupil record bookletPicture material .

_

.3 .

. .

9 ''

NO


TITLE: DETROIT TESTS OF LEARNING AISTITUDE Scrigning Verification 0AM

=ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

Sub-areas 'C Continued)

9. Visual attention span for/ objects

10. Orientlition.11. Free association12. MemorY for designs13. Auditory attention span for related syllables

14. Numbei ability15: Social adjustment B16% Visual attention span for letters17. Disarranged pictures:18. Oral directions 0

19. Likenesses and 4gfetenCes

Recommended, ub-test for specific handicaps:Visually Impa*red: Test numbers 2,4,6,8,11,13,15,19

Hearing Impaired:, West numbers 1,3,5,9,11,12,16,17Physically Handicapped: Omit test numberS5,12,77.,18

Speech Impaired: Omit,language items if articulation is very poor,defispitely omitttest number 11

Non-English speaking: Test numbers 3,5,12,17

Suggestions for testing the mentally retarded or mentally gifted are made, which

incorporates reaction time, perseveration, etc.

Originally the Detroit TestS was to be a verification instrument;however, since it was developed and standardized, in the mid 1930's, it seems ,impos-

sible that it would be able to accurately test an individual for this purpose.

Many of the pictures do not have the proper proportions -eg. watch larger than boy

Pictures may also be difficult for the child to relate to and a pictoral absurdity

may identify the woman's clothing rather than-the fact that her coat is bn backward -s.

Pictures may also'confuse the child since in many cases,they depict circumstances

or situations which were correct in the 1930's but are not necessarily true today.

I 94

1.A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUENARRISORG,PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEST ANALYSIS-.

DATE: maalp 1977 .

ANA V

TITLE:DEVELOPING ORAL LMGUAGE WITH

YOUNG CHILDRENScreening Ea. Verific'ation 0

f

BIBLIOGRAPHIC 'INFORMATION:

Author: John.F. Murphy, M.Ed.Charles A. O'Donnekl,A.Ed74

Publisher:

Educatorsl'ublishing.Service, Inc.75 Moulton StreetCambridge, MA 02]/38

:Editor:

' Copyright Date: 1975

Cost: See Additional Information


Forms: e

,as

0

I


Purpose: Designed tohelp the parenor teacher obesVe the child's languageacquisition.by coponent part.

Age large *(CA): . MA: Grade,LeVel:

po.age or grade level specified: . .

- .

Format: ,.

. .:, \

Teacher or parent are to respond to question's bout child's abilities,athen list the child's weakne's'ses and strengths within thatarea.

, ,

1

Time Reciuired: Untimed

1

Sub-Areas:General developmentPerceptual developmenta


Inventory is an observation-instrtment

v'

Personally'identifiable Information Requiredi

None

'Page 2 TEST ANALYSIS- N

TITLE: At/ELOPING ORAL LANGUAGE WITHYOUNG CHILDREN

EXAMINEE APPROPRIATERESS:

Prerequisite Skills:,

Spoken language

Disabiliikty Groups:

Scrpening 0 Verification CI .

Age Range (CA): ; MA:

o age or grade level specified


Group or inalviduaT: Individual

Training Needed hy Examiner; 210 special trainiai. Wotd definitions anddescriptions are 'Divided. May be fined Oufr by a parent or teacher.

Other Perspns Required:

None

Matirialit Required: (*items not provided'inki,4)

None

'40

SWING AND INTERPRETATION:

ProcedS-e:

Format:

This inventory dois not yield a score, rattier it. lists''

'a child's strengths Id.weaknepses.

-Space for ReCording Retest:.

None

.Su# mmary Sheet

None

(grosaphic represeAtAtion)

.

V

4'

_ :

V 11.

'VETA

4kl

1a

.


DEVELOPING 0LOREN :.

NGUAGE WITHTITLE: Screening ril Verification

,c

I.,

IMPLICATIONS FOR P RAMMINp:. .

-May allow a parent or teacher to observe.and listen-for'one isolAted aspect of

a child's speech, language, or knowledge.,-

-May yield information to set up teaching goals through the list of strengths

and weaknesses. -...,

. . ,

oo

L . ., .

t

.

.

. . .

NORMATIVE DATA: No Data *Available.

.

. .Sample Size: (. .

Population. Descriptors Used: .

, .

. .

..

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: No Data Available.

,

Reliability:

Validity: -

...

.

,.

.

REFERENCES:A

Developing Oral Lifguage with Young Children: A Parent-Teacher Inventory

_ .

1

o

...

. ,

9 -t

r/1

I


TITLE:DEVELOPING ORAL LANGUAGE WITH

YOUNG CHILDRENScreening to Verification

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: -.0

The ihentory is cross referenced to a remediation program comprised of sixbooks: For each type of problem a listing of which books should be /used issupplied. A

The set costs - $11.50; individual books vary from $1:75 to $3.00.

I

9S

, 1-A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE,

NARRISIUNG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

'TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: June 1977

TITLE:. DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES SCREENING INvENToRYSceeeAing E3 Verification

1


Author:Rebecca F,. DuBosetMary Beth Langley

Publisher:Teaching Resources Corp.100 Bo son StreetBoston MA 02

Editor: Forms;



Cost: Kit - approximately $56.00

t.

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:-

Purpose: Desi4ned'as a screening measure'for children with handicaps in additionto a possible developmental delay as well as non-handicapped children with adevelopmental delay.

Age Range (CA): 6-60 mos. MA: Grade Level:

Fjprmat:

Child,ifpicisented varying/tasks to perform. A basal and a ceiling aredetermined. 'The testis totally AN-verbal and contains specific adaptations forthe visually impairpd.

TimRequired;Approximitely 25, -30 minutes

Sub-Areas:None

,

Observational Information:No additional observations of the child need to_be made. Notes may be made,

if necessary, to the right of the test items on the response form.I

4

Personally Identifiabl Information-Required:

Standard information

-TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES scREENINGiNvENToRYScreentng UU Verification (I

Page 2

,



None

Disability'Groups:All, especially useful with modifications proVided for the Multihandicapped,

Visually impaired or Hearing impaired

Age Range (CA):6-60 mos. MA:44,

;



Training Needed by Examiner:Examiner should have basic knowledge about normal child development. May

be administered by a regular classroom teac)ier.Other Persons-Required:

None

Materials- Required:. (*-items not provided in ki

* Ctip with handle

BlodksPegboard and pegs

* Brightly colored toy with30" string attached

Weighted roly-poly musicaltoy

Paper,-Marking pen, pencil or

crayonFormboard-circle, square,' triangle

Small bottle with narrow neck

*t) 0'

Small objects that fit in bot- 4tle (beans, M&Ms)

* Rubber squeeze toy2 ea:Shoes, balls, combs, cups

Stacking ringsDoll with facial featuresBeads and two stringsContainer

4 Bowls (red,_yel,low, green; '

blue)

Nested cupg

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:;

_ Score a plus for correct performance or, a minus fox. ,unsuccessfulA

Procedure: rformance for each item. Establish a basal and ceilini-level. Add

all additional p uses to the basal age level at 1- month credit per prti, which results

in a developmental level which may be converted td a developmental, qUotient.

',/

Format: S S.

.. . .

Response form lists anidentifying .phrase for each item in each age range.,


None


None

10

TEST ANALYSIS.

TITLE: DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES SCREENING' INVEWTORY Sc ening eg Verification, . . ..

.,


. ,.

. _

-May indicate a child's present lever in order to establish an individuaizededucation plan. .

-Instructional suggestions are provided in the manual forthe classroomteacher's use, especially when waiting.fok aispecific evaluation or report prior to

.

writing an IEP. .

.

.

4

.

. 1

- .

r , . 1

. . .

,.. . .

. 4. ,

NORMATIVE DATA: No Data Available .

....

Sample Size:,

.

1

,Population Descriptors Used:.

,..

.

/

i t

...-__..

v -1,.. .


,. .

. .

ReliabilifY: With 45 multihandicapped children tested with the DASI and the Cat-tell or Merrill Palmer, a correlation of .91 was found, showing the DASI tests' in thesame domain. A correlation of .19 was found with the DASI and-the REEL or Preschool'LangVa uace

ridiStcyae.: ,

,

.

With 42 delayed and nondelayed-children ranging in age from 7-74 months1 thefollowing correlations' were found: DASI & Preschool Attainment Re0or4, .97; DASI &DDST, .95. With 14 non-delayed day care children ranging.in age from 15-56 months,with the sameakests, a correlation of .92 was found for the DASI and PAR and .87 forthe DASI and LT.

1.

. REFERENCES:.

.st

Develtpmental Activities Screening Inventory 4:qual .

'record formmateri s

. .

_ .

10i

0, Tgst ANALYSIS

TITLE:DEvEtorNANTAi, ACTIVITIES/SCREENING INVENTORY Screening(/' Verification


Materials; (continued)

Picture of hammer, 7.44Hammer

WatchAppleCard printe d with circle

* CorRio

Hats

Sunglasses.Pictures of shoe, shirt, drink,. cookie, baby, 4/ar,sleep, cat,

printed wAthCard cross9x12" piece of cardboardPicture of eat, run, play; brushCard printed with squarePicture of cat, dog, horse, hen, baby, boy, girl, apple, ice crea9,-

carrots, sandwichPaper - small~ medium,large

* 3 Spoons' (different sizes)* 3 Measuring cups (different sizes)* 2 10" paper squares

Set Configuration cardsAzDot configuration cards"Picture of letter, swing, stove, lamp, car, coat, ironing board,

stamp, boy (girl), frying pan, light bulb, license plate,.hanger,

ironCard printed with triangleCardboard square

2 Cardboard triangles2 ea. Numeral cards (2; 4)3 pr. Word cards (stop, boy, girl)

. Test areas covered:

Fine motor coordinatidnCause and effectMeans-end relationshipAssociationNumber conceptsSize discriminationSeriation

[--;( NA1-A NORrTiki.PROGRE SSe'AVENA -U E109

CSMININE:Clir

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: March 1977

4

110 oEvELoPmENTat, CHECKLIST Screening al Verification

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:-

Author: Ruth. Zimmerman, B.A. , M. Ed.

Susan Bornstlin, B.A., M.Ed.

'Publisher:

Boston Center for Blind Children147 S. Huntington AvenueBoston, Massachusetts 62130

Editor!A

"Ordering Information: .

4

Forms:,

Copyright Date: See'Additional Information

Cost: checklist - $5.00

4

I.

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATIbN:

Purpose:

To evaluate visually impairedprogress.

Age Range (CA): 1-8 Yrs. 'MA:

Format:

Items are arranged in checklist form.

children's

Grade

Time Required: Untimed

Sub-Areas:

Self-helplanguage

Expressive langdage

Observational Idformation:

The checklist is totally observational

skill status and to measure their

Level:

Social skills'Gross motorFine motorPre-orientation & mobility

t Personally Identifiable Information,,Requireth'Child's name, 4ddress, ddte of birthSchool/ClassEye Diagnosis, age at onset, amount of visionAdditional handicapsDate of observationExaminer's name

103

C-

Page -2 TEST tLYSIS

TITLE: DEVELOPM'ENTAL CHECKLISTScreening El Verificationn


Prerequisite Skills:.

/None

Disability Gtoups : . 4

Visually impaired, Severely/Profoundly Mentally retarded

Age Range (CA): 1- 8 'yrs. MA:

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDAFTIONS.:._


Training Needed by Examiner:Examiner should be a good observer. Should be familiar with the checklist

items in the event that a directed interview is made.Other Persons Required:

Person familiar with the child's habitual performance and behavior isrequired if a directed interview is necessary.

Materials Required: (*items not provided in kW`Materials required may be availablein any nursery or preschooL or child's

home: 1

jI

SCORING AND INTERPRETATI

Procedure:

Check each item observed on the line preceding the test item, No scoresare given,

Format:.

Scoresheet is e evaluation items.

Space for Recording etest: N.

Four retests may be recorded, usually over the period of one year.! r.

I Summary Sheet Wephic representation):. ,.

Summary sheet4.are provided for each sub-area. ,Summary contains space toprovide the child's preednt skill level and the educational goals fOr the child byskill area. ' I- .

.

104

, It

t Page 3 TEST /ANALYSIS

011

TITLE: DEVELOPMENTAL CHECKLIST . Screening Eil Verification, .

4

IMPLICATIONS FQR PAOGRA4MINO: 4.aid.

-May provide'needeil informatiOn for the determination of presents levels of 'cbemptence. s" . <

\''..

-Ma y .provide sequential short-term objectives to reach an end goal in an -

individual eancition plan.

., 4,

y be used asa. year-end evaluation instrwnent of the ei;d*s_progress overthis period of time, . e

, % .

-- .

I 1

. ,

.t )'

.

. .

..

.

,

.

..

E

.

.

,

NO?MATIVE DATA: ' No Data Available

Sample Size: ,

t

PopulatiA Descriptors Used: . .

; ..;

. ,

.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS': No Data Ava4able

Reliability: . #,

* ,

!

Validity:, .

.

.t

411REFERENCES: .

Developmental Checklist

.,

.

. ..

A,

-..

105

1,

ir


.1

TITLE: DEVELOPMENTAL CHECKLIST Screening Verification

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: a

Provides examples of how to

1-

fill out the checklist and the summary pages.

The checklist was developed through a federal grant.

4

,>

100

P1160IteSS,AtENUE

NG, PGIISYLVA/GA 17109

, TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: March 1977,r

,

71 LE; bEVEREW TEST OF EXTREMITY COORDINATION ScreeningEl Verification ,

I

BIBLIOGRAPHFC.INFORMATION:

Author: George E. DeHaven, P.T..James D. Bruce, M.S. /

Pub)isher:

IDevereuk FoundationDevon, Pennsylvania 19333 .

Editor:

Copyright Date: 1971 (-

Image profiles (pkg of 25) 17100; individual pieces of equipment

Cost: Image-kit - $150.0 ual $15.00; Score Aeets (pad of

#

Ordering Information:.

',DeVereux I4dustrieiThey Edward L. French Dila i

11"0-34C.of Devereux's Rehabilitate n CenterForms'Devon, Pennsylvania, 19333

'

separately.

DEStRIPT1VE INFORMATION:

50)

are- $4.00;sold

Purpose: To measure 'a child's present levels in motor functioning.

Age Range (CA): 4-10 yrs. MA: Grade Level:

tormat:a#

Child asked to pet form 12 motor tasks with both hands and both feet.

Time Required: 20 minutes

Sub-keas: .

Sequential motor activityPine motor ability -

)

bbseriational informalion:

Hand preference is requested.

Personally Identifiable InfOrmalion


Required:

Statib balancePerqeptual actor activity

107

c

.4.

4 / -r

Page.2

a/

I

-TEST ANAI:YAS',

ttt

DEVEREUX TEST OF EXTREMITY cooRDimavoN,.: Screening UU Verification. 0. . rn

,EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS: '

,'Preee9uisite Skills: s.

. to .perform motor tasks with hands dr feet:.A

1.4 i -

Disability Groups: Emotionally handicapped, Neurologically impaired, Mentallyretarded, -Learnilla dbtabled. t '

/ . t

A.-.., t ,

Age Ran-6e (CA):11-10 yrs. MA:.

. i ..

ADMINISTRATIVE 'CONSIDERATIONS :

Group'or Endividual: '.Individual

. ,

Twin NedUed by Examiner: Examiner should be familiar with the criterion

logfor drIr t motot per4formance.

OthertPersonssokquired:

.0- None, .1 ,

I

a1.,

Materials Required: "( *items not proyided in kit)* Stopwatch 4

. -

4

SCORIA AND INTERPRETATION: /OM

Procedure: Child is scored upon performance.sO many successful attemptt in 10seconds, etc.,. Scores for both right and -left ate adde4 together. A ,SubvcAtegoryScore and a TAhl Score are determined, results are tempered to a typical- population.jn that age ranee.

Format: . .

Score sheet form: provides space foi fillinf in the'blanks.

Spade forRecording"Retest: The score sheet provides for two testingg, one on

one side, onekonlithe other.

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):An Image Profile is made, ith regard to the child's age; Profile is

divided into standard deviation above and below, the norm.

$ 10.8

'TEST ANATItIS 411

TITLE: IEVEIUX TEST'OF EXTREMITY COORDINATION Screening Ea verificatAn El

r 1 .

.


7Mayirielp determine.a child:a wesent-level in -motor functionihq for '

development of the IEP.,...

. .

-May help determine educational objectives. ce

.

.

,

. ,

. .

..

.

.

..

, ,

,_

.

. -

.., .

, -,%,

.

4 . .

. 1 ..4

. a

.

.

.

.

.

.

,

.

.

.

NORMATIVEi

DATA: Manual not available for review -

,

Samp4e Size:... . .

..

PopulatIon DescriptorT Used:.

.

....

.

. .

..;. .

,

I I

.

.

.

s

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: Nanual not available for 'review

Reliab'iiity: -.. .

. -44 .

Validity: ..-.; ....

.,

..

.

. -

. .

. .,

,

,:...o

a ,a

REFERENCES:,Devereux Test of Exttemity Coordidatidirdering Information .

score sheet.

image, profile '

P .

,

.

L. .

..,,

_ . iv,

t

'

ii

.

...

109.

El

t

A

Page 4 TEST

TITLE: DEVEREUX TEST OF EXTREMITY COORDINA ION Screening al Verification

ADDITIONAL INRAVTIOk: .

The DTEC is coordinated with IMAGE (Individual MOtor Achievement GuidedEducation).which contains over 373 stggested motor exercise activities.

..

at 41.

v

.

)

as

.7.i

t

a

at

a

I

c

1.10

.1-A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE

NANNISSUP10, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TE$T ANALYSIS

DATE : -march" 1977

TITLE: FAIRVIEW DEVELOPMENTAL SCALE

A..........

BIBLIOGRAPNICINFORMATION:

Screening 10 Verification 0

- Author: James S. Giampiccolo, Jr.Alan Boroskin

Publisher.. Ordering Information:

Research Development .

Fairview State Hospital2501 Harbor Boulevard.

Editocq sta Mesa, California 92626.'orms:

.Copyright Date: 1974 (

Cost: Sample set - $1.00; Manual - $0.50;..Scales (pkg. of 100) - $10.00


.Purpohe: TO measure.bellaviOr and development of individuals that arti so

severely impaired that usual means of assessment are futile.

Age Range (CA): MA: Grade Level:

No age or grade level specified.Format:

Individual is rated on 26 items in terms of What he can do now.

Time Required: ,UntiMed

Sub-Areas:

Perceptual andFmOtor skills Language

Self-help skills Social interactionSelf direction

lObsepiational Informptionl

The FDS iaAn observation instrument.)


Standard informationpeneral description of the. subject: Medical status (checklist of additional

handicaps); and Mechanical aids (used for mobility).

I 1 1

I

r

L

Page 2 "TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: FAIRVI*k DEVELOPMENTAL SCALE Screening 53 Verification 0


',Prerequtsite Skills:None

Disability Groups:

Severely/profoundly Mentally retarded

Age Range (CA): - MA:

No age or'grade level specified.

..DMINISTRATIVE CONSIMATIONS:

' Group or Individual: Individual

Training Needed by Examiner:: Examiner should be thqroughly familiar with the.---Andivilual being rated.

1, Other Persons, Required:

4 None


Since observation/of'the individual occurs during the normal course of itday, no additional materials are required.

a

-SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:.. .

.. ,

The corresponding number of the descriptive statement which bestIles-'

Procedure:of

individual is circled. All 'item scores within a sub-areaand all sub-areas are totaled. The Total SCOre is uted in determining a DevelopmentalAge. A Developmental Quotient may be carElillated. A Developmental Level is found.bycompairaghto a table. .

..

The score sheet is the, scale. Conversion tables for Developmental Age andLevel are in the manual.

Space for Recording Retest:'

Scale is a non-reusable booklet.


Lore summary is on the cover sheet of tlt scale, and consists. of all

calculated) scores.

1

A

TEST ANALYSIS

, .

TITLE:FAiRVIEW DEVELOPMENTAL SCALE Screening Ea Verification4, ,

.


..

, ..

. .. .

,-May be used when determining present levels of functioning when preparing anIrigividual Educational Program (IEP).-

.

.

(

-May be used to determine progress throughout the instructtnal year.

.. . .

. . .. 4

. ,

.

. .,

.

. . _.

.

.i

.

. .4'

.

7A .

NORMATIVE DATA: , ',

.

Sample Size: I .

...

1700/

.

Population Descriptors Used: , ,

Severely profoundly mentally, xetarded residerits,of.Fairview ate e. Hospital, .

.. .

,

...,

, .

.;

.% ..

.

. .

. ,,

.

TEC644.4--ASPECTS; , . .,

,

a .

Reliability: Inter-rater: Scores yielded froretesting four wards with both AM.and PM shirts had an average range of .71 to .94. Tett/Retest: with-same pOpulationnd raters, rating the residents two months after the initial testing weraged from

110 5 ta .97.Validity:. ,.: .

,

The FDS was administered to 127 normal'children (aged 4 mes.'-approx. yrs,)by their parents. Relationship of chronological age to Total Score was non-linear ,

and negatively accelerated. The regression of total store on Chronological Age was

.91..

--.------1."--2-"REFERENCES: ) .-

.. ..

. I-,.. .. ,

. .

Fairview-evelopmental Scale - manual. .

.scale ,

, ..

.._-. .

- . . .

. . .1,

'----,

.

_ I.

. .I . .113 11

'TEST `ANALYSIS

TITLE:. FAIRVIEW DEVELOPMENTAL SCALE Screening Verification

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:,

Development and standardization of the FDS was accomplished with an adult

institutionalized population. The average age of the residents was about 18 years;the average Mental age was approximately .212 ye)frs withan average IQ' of 20.2, Con-

sidering these fj.gures it would seem realistically ap instrument that may be used'with pregchool ,children:

1

44,

.s

4

a

4.

114

TEST ANALYSIS

TittE: FAIRY W LANGUAGE'EVALUATION SCALE

C BIBkIOGI RNIC INFORMATION:

..

0 Edi,tor5!,!:",Mesa, Calif6rnia' 92626

- Forms:

Copyright Date:" r471

Author:. Alan Bdroskin;M.A.

February ,1977,


Publisher: Ordering Information:Research Department-Fairview Stat4; ligspitkl f

'4' '1,501 Harbdr Boulevard r

8 ..-Cost: Sample set'- $1.0ps Aanual $0.50; Scales (pkg. of 100) $10.00.

..

L

... .. DESCRIPTIVE'INFORMATION: -t.... ., . i o ' *, 'Purpose: To assess liarious,lemelt of verbal and nehvertal language to detect

change. , .. .- .- '

?2'' - ,

.- '- :

Age 'Range (CA) : . MA: .,:0, \. ., - .)

Format: Scale has ten lever in descending order of_language age. The, first'., . ,.

five-leyels contai4,6ight.itemm each; the secondfive have six items each.(

COMMUNICATION LEVEL: 3 mos . - 6 yrs :a'

' 'T i me Requ'i red;',-1, Unt.imed

'

,

.

,Tub. -Areas: -. )Scale covers both expressive and receptive language.

. ..-

. 1f ..

r

'A fl.

Observational,infdrMatiOn: . r, . .

Scale is scorediipon observation of dhilefii language,iperfOrmance....

shiet reguiresinfOrmation abOlat any speech related handicaps.

le, 0

, .,

Rersoimilv.lbentifiable informition Required:eV '

Child's lame, sex, date of birth, and age in months,

,Observer's name, place and date of the observat &on

Cover.

or

A

14

V

c

Page 2

S

TEST ANALYSIS'

TITLE; FAIIRVIpl LANGUAGE EVALUATION SCALE

' EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS:

'Prerequisite Skills:,

, None

ScreeninglEa Verifi6ation

r ce----°

Disability Groups:

Designed for Severely/Profoundlyused with Severe Language disorders:

Age Range (CA): MA:

4

institutionalized Mentally retarded; may be

COMMUNICATION LEVEL: 3 mos.(1. 6 yrs.



Training Needed by Examiner: Observerchild to be able toNrate the child's present status.

should be thoroughly


NoneN

Materials'Required (*items not provided in kit)

None

,

SCORING AND INTEOPRtTATION:

r

familiar with the

c7

Procedure: All.ifems,are scored until\a/1 items are passed onhighest level (10)- is reached. - Items etre scored by. checkmarkment of behavior most descriptive of child's present languageAge find Quotient are derived, and a Language Level is deferral 4.

ormat:

-Scoring is done directly on the scale.

Space for RecOrding Retest:None

Summary Sheet' (graphic representation):SuMmary of the scores is provided.'

one level orposite the state-ity: A Language

-3 116',

TEST ,ANALYSIS,

TITLE% FAIRV/EW LANGUAGE EVALUATION SCALE Screening El Verifttation,

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMINd:' .

.

-May be an aid in4the aetermining of a child's language level in a massscreening, especially withthe shy or withdrawn child.

. .

..

.. .

/

. .

. . .

. .

...,

.

. )

i

.

.

. . .

. ..

..

.1" e.. .

..

r 41

t

,

,

NORMATIVE DATA: No Data Available4

Sample Size:///

Population Descriptors Used: ..

,

-.-

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:.

-

. , Reliability: Four ward technicians evaluated.

15 residents, (that they werethoroughly familiar with; twice,two weeks apart. the Language Levels had a .948agreesient. A.second study testing the residents twice,, three months apart had arange

daigr9eement from.848 to .986:ity:

t

Item placement was done by comparison to other standardized tests..

. , ,

1

,_

.

REFERENCES:,

Fairview- Language Evaluation Scale - manual .._

.

record form I

,t,

.

, , $. .

.. .

. .,

..

: f.t'

.

'

...

117

1-A NORTH FWOGRESS AVENUE

NANNISSUINI, PENNSYLVANIA 17103

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: February 1977

TITLE: FAIRVIEW PROBLEM BEHAVIOR RECORD Screening Verification


Author: Robert T: Ross, Ph.D.

Publisher:Research DepartmentFairview State Hospital2501 Harbor BoulevardCosta Mesa, California 92626

Editor: ' Forms:



Cost: Manual - $0.50; Record forms (pkg. of 100) - $10.00 -

O.


FPurpose: % v

To "pinpoint those behaviors which might'inttrfere'with the ?individual's)

idndependent functioning." . ...,.-

/ ..

Grade Level:Age Range (CA): MA:

None stated. See Additional InformationFormat:

The FPBR isvin two parts. Part I - a listing of behavior problems and an

estimate of the frequency of the behavior. Part II - ansaajeCtive checklist used to .

determine the individual's prevailing mood.

Time Required:, '.

Untimed ,

Sub-Areas: -.....

--,Aggressiv4 behaviors - Covert behaviors

. Hyperactive behaviors'

Inappropriati behaviorst -

Sexual behaviors. .

-Observational Information:The FPBR is an observational instrument to help an administra4or conCen- 0,

trate on the individual's current behavior.


Child's name, sex, date of birthExaminer's name

,ii

-4t

Page 2 TEST ANALYSIS .P

4

TITLE: ,puRliEw PROBLEM BEHAVIOR RECORD Screening El Verification

EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS

Prerequisite Skitls:

None

Disability Groups: tv4

. 'V

SeVre or profoundly h4gAicapped. I

ir. ,

. . .

\, Age Range (CA):.

MA:

None stated, See Additi9nal Information

/ t


tiroptip or Individual:

IndividualTraining Needed by Examiner:

The FPBR is filled out by a person thoroughly familiar with thee,individual's behavior.' "s1


Materials Required: (*items not,provided In kit)None

A,

i.

SCORING AND JNTERPRETATION;

Procedure: Check each word or phrase which test debc ibes the individual'sbehavior. Scores op behavior item§ are summed to obtain ction scores and aegrancltotal. Checklist is scored + (desirable behavior)dand - desirable) for eachadjective listed that,the individual displayed within the, ast two weeks.

Format:

All items are scored on the record forms.

Space for Recorditig.Retest:

"None

Summary Sheet.(graphic representation):Summary of scores is noted.on the Adjective Checklist Form.

120

TEST ANALYSIS

1

....TITLE: VIMNTEkepOsum BEHAVIOR RECORD Screening--Gi' Verification 0-

1 -'_ IMPLICATIONS FOR, PROVAMMING: .

If---

-May aid in the determination of which ihdividuals would benefit from a

behavior management program, in order to help them become more-independent.,

. .

4 ,.

1

..

... .

,

/

. --

NORMATIVE DATA: Studies have been made with adult institutionalized persons.

Sample Size:,

Population Descriptors Used: 4

r. ..1 .

.,

'e

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: No Data Available -0.4

.

Reliabilitx:

.

.

...../.

..

Validity: .

.

I

.

,.

.

. .

PREFERENCES: .

'Fairview Behavior Problems Record - instruction sheetformrecord

. . .o. adjective checklist,

2

*

6 ..

, i

I

\

5

I

'

411 X t .

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: .FAIRVIEW PROBLEM BEHAVIOR RECORD, Screeninglil Nertfication

ADDIiIONALINFORMATIOk:

ti

4

-Although no afip or level is specified, the norms were determined with a popula-

tion of the averagesIge of 24. Since this scale is meant' to be used with'the severe

or profoundly mentally retArded, it seems applicable to preschoolers.'.

'-Certain sections of the FBPR may be inappropriate to score;for prescflool-

children (i.e. sexual behaviors)

'2-Definitions for frequency of behavior (rarely, sometimes, frequently) would be

useful but are not provided,'since what may be frequent for. one behavior may not be

frequent foz another.

r"

122.

111111111W,

Mara 1977.

.., TEST ANALYSIS

4

TITLE: FAIRVIEW SELF HELP SCALE Screening al Veri fi cati on El)

.BIBOOGRAPNIC INAANATAg:

Nuthor:"-Robertl. Ross, 15h. D.41.

Publ Orderingqinformation:. ResearchDepartmentFairvim State Hospital2501 Harbor BoulevardCosta Mesa, California 92§26

Editor.: '" Fbrms:

Copyright. Date: 1970

Cost: Sample set - $1.00; Manual - $0.50;;AScal4s tpkg: of ia0) - $10.00w

Availability:.

4


Purpose: Designed to assess1varioils aspects of adaptive behavior to detect

change in small increments. 40 're -

. . ..,

Age Range (CA): 1-4 yrs- MA: Grade Level: e

I)SeeAdditional Information *..

Format:- Child is rated as to his proficiency on 34 specific behaviors.

. t

Time Req4ced: 'Untimed

Sub-Areas:

- Motor dexterity.Self-help skills

a0bServational.informatiOn:kale is scored on the basis of observation. Additional -info oration

required: medical status (cheCkliat of, additional handicap's), mechanical aids

Oineelchair,etc and behavibr ,prOblems (checklist of.maladaptive behayiors).

Personally ideltifiableinformation Required: me


Ale

Communlcation skillsSocial interactionSelf- direction

I

- r

.


-TITLE: FAIRVIEW SELF HELP SCALE 'Screening V4rification

EXAMINEE APrROPRIATENESS:

Prere4u!site Urns:None

isabilip Groups:

Mentally retarded

Age Range (CA):1-4 yrs. MA:

NOMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS:


Training Needed by Examiner: Examiner should be thoroughly familiar with the

child being rated.

Otber'Persons Required:

interview format.

Materials Requlred (*items not provided in kit)

None

Parent may be required if the scale is used in an

r


Procedure: Each number correspondingto 'a descriptive statement that describesthe.childhs behavior is' circled ,one per item): Items in each sub.-area are totaledand then sub-areas are totaled, ,A Behavior Quotient may be computed and Ft BehaviorLevel determined..

Format:Scoring is done on the scale form*

.


Scale ie in a nonTreusable booklet,

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):Score summary is on the front coversheet.

124

Pag;3TEST ANALYSIS_

TITLE: FAIRVIEW SELF HELP SCALE " Screening ® Verification

. .

....

IMPLICATIONS FOR PR MG:. .-

- -May be use o determine a child's progress A an annual basis.f'-

. l .

4,

.4 c,,,-

..

. .N

.

. .. ..

_

..-

. ,. . . .

, ..ct)

4 /, .

.

.

.

0

.

NORMATIVE DATA: '.

Sample Size: 574 .

Population_ Descriptors used: .

. .

,

Institutionalized severely/profounT mentally;-seta pd'gd

, 4 ,

4 ,.

- TONNICAL ASPECTS: .,,

./.--'

Reliability: An attendant rated'each of 12 individuals he was most familiar

with,, and rated them again in tree months. Correlation between the morninaana,

afternoon shift ratings was .91.,

Validity: The FSHS correlated with the Vineland Social Maturity 4ale and the

Cain- Levine Social Competency Scale above .93. ., ,

.

,

.,

REFERENCES: ,

Fairview 'selt-Help Scale - manual ,

score sheet J

.,1 ( .

.

. .

A J

..

. . .. ,. .

425"

/FEW. ANALYSIS

/

TITLE: FAIRVIEW SELF HELP SCALE Screening 133 VeriffaNn


The'FSHS was originally intended for use with the adult population' f the

Fairiew Hospital who were severely or profoundly mentally retarded.

$

I

4

12C

I-A NORM PROGRESS AVENUE

tuAltftissultq, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

4'

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: May 1977

V.

le

TITLE: FULL RANGE PICTURE VOCABULARY TEST Screen i ng 151 .Veri f i cat ton


AuthorsR. B. Amthons

a. S. Ammons

Publisher:' Psychological Test Specialists

Box 1441*Missoula, Montana 59801

Editor:


foirms: . Form AForm B


Cost: Plates, instructions, norms, answer sheets - $15.00; Answer sheets

/(pkg. of 25) -.$2.50; .Provisional.manual (compilation'of_ayticles) - $2.75

I .

:.

. 1. l

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION;

Purpoe:Designed to be a guA0k test of verbal omprehension, and intelligence.

* all 4.1

Age Range (CA): Zyrs. --- MA: '- Grade' Level:

Adult .;I

Format:_

, .

' .

Subject is given a sti,mulus rd arid asked to indicate which picture of

rfour lest illustrates the word. ) ....,

Time Required: 10 .minutes

Sub-Areas:

None

\)Nkseryationat informat+:

ne

,Personally Identifiable Information Required:'

Mainiils name

I 12'-'

3

4

I

Page, 2

,

TEST ANALYSIS

JITtE: FULL RAPTP PICTURE VOCABULARY TEST Screening la. Verification U

(a

EXAMAEE AP1PROVRIATENESS:

Pretequitdite

Ability to indicate a respOfse in a consistent manlr.

Disability Groups:Physically handicapped, Severely Speech impaired, Aphasic, Emotionally

disturbed-S

-Age Range (CA): 2 yrs. - MA:m6z, Adult,

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS': ,


Training Needed by Examiner: Examiner should be able to gain rapportia-with the

individual being tested.' Should be familiar enough with the stimulos words to use

them in differing sequences. Should be'able to eliminate guessing by Ehe subject,Other Persons Required:

. None


16 Picture plates-

M


Procedure: Each response is marked with a dec for correct or a zero for, incor-

*.Tect. All correct answers are totaled for a raw score). Raw scores may be compared

to norm tables for,IQ equivalents.Format: IP.

There are separate answer sheets for each form. Each answer sheet lists thestimulus words by plate numb r and includes the point levels for each word. This sheet

is used nlIL by the examispace Tor-Recording etest:

a

Alternate form is available for'retest.

Summary Sheet (graphilerepresentation):

None 4

1 26

4 TEST ANALYSIS.-

TITLE: rum. RANGE PICTURE VOCABULARY TEST , Screening Ea Verification,, 4vIMPtICAtIONS. FOR PROGRAMMING: t.,

.

, . ..

-,,, ., .

.

.. 1

-0

-May be used in mass screening efforts for quick determinations Of verbal co-0prehension. .

, °'

. ,

-May be used to test a non-verbal child to determine the size of his receptive.language vocabulary.

- .

...

-May be used as a quick, unobtrusive method to determine an' individual's levelpf intelligence.

..

.

.. ,

NORMATIVE DATA:'.

.

.

Sample SLze: 589 children and adults

PopulationDescriptors Used: ....

Age \..Sex . '

, Grade placementFather's or own occupation ...,

..

.

,. .

TECHNICAL. ASPECTS: .

Reliability: Form A with Form B correlationsNrange ftom .86 to 99 with a,

median'of .93. Correlations found have been: .93-for.120 preschool children, .87 for 61 ,

mild-aeverely disturbed7children, .96 for 80 black children and .86 for 80 Spanish -American children.

.

Validity: ....e-4 Validity studies are extremely nUmerois. Examples of validity correlationsare .78 with the Leiter with SO cerebral palsied kndividuals, .48 and .57.with the WISC for 61.mild-severelydisturbed children, .85 and .83 with the Binet-fOr'120 preschool children, .84 with Raven Progressive Matrices for 50 cerebral palsied.

'REFERENCES: .

.

Full -Range Pieture.Vocabulary Test - Test platesAnswer.Sheets

.

Norms

.

,..

A ..

.

1294..

TESL ANALYSIS

TITLE: FULL RANGE PICTURE VOCABULARY TEST

r- ) ,


Screening CD Verification ElI

Separate norms have been developed for Mites and Blacks Of all ages and

Spanish- AmVican bilingual children.

The FRPVT does not go below the,two year age leve146r to

Sincenormitive and standardization datawerp compiledqueStion as to its current reliability and, validity.

Pictures Whibh were to be cartoon-liNt_line dpawings are

and.interpret. Modification and updating of the digawings are

4,4

the superior adult'in 1948,.there is some

difficult to recognizesorely needed.

no

IANOWTHIMOGRESSAVENUE .

1610191911URO,PENiSYLVANIA 17109TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: April 1977

go*

11115F: GOLDMANTFAISTOE TEST OF VTICOLATION Screening 0 Verification la

BJBLIOGRAPHIt INFORMATION:

Author: .Ronald Goldman, ph.D.MacalynefistOe,.Ph.D.

Publisher:. .

7 .

American Guidance Service,:Inc..Publishers' BuildingCircle Pine &, Minnesota '55014

Editor.:

Copyright 'Date: 1972

Cost: Kit - $22.60; ManualTest Plates -.$18.20


Forms:,

A

$1.75; Response Forms (pkg. of 50) - $3.85;


Purpose:' "To provide a method of assessing an individual's articulation of

consonant sounds."

Age Range (CA): 2.yr. - MA:

Adult'

"Gtadi/Level:

Format: Child is to identify 35 pictures, retell stories With the aid of

victures,and repeat sounds in syllables, words and sentences.

Time Reqdired: Untimed

Sub - Areas`:. Sounds in WordsSounds in SentencesStimulability

Observational infOrmation':

Record form unavailable for review.

.4;0


Record form unavailable' for review.

131

.

I

f

Page 2, , TEST ANALYSIS

4041DMAN-FR/STOE TEST OFARTICUL4TION

A

Screening a) Verificatfog


Prerequisite Skills:NOne

4

Disability Groups; All, except the visually mpaired and the Heari g

impaired with no verbal language.

Age Rang (CA):' 2 F. - MA:

Adult

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIOERATIONS:

Group or individual: Iddividual

Training Needed by Examiner: Examiner should be extremely familiar with'the

direction; for administration. Knowledge of phonetic notation is useful. Examiner%does not have to be a speech clinician but may score the test for errors only. A

moreMWsdaeable-Derson may test for type of error.rersons mtreat!:

None

Materials Required: (*items not'provided in kit)

Te'st plates

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:',.

Procedure: Each item mal(hbe scooted on two levels: (1) for errors2and (2) for

'type of error. Sub-test andlotal scores are determined and may be converted to

percentile ranks.Format: Each stimulus Dr key word on the response form has-the sound position

color, coded as to init-par, medial, or fina1.- Each item is ,scored by the proper mark

in a .0gr1 alongside the stimulus.Space for Recording Retest:fr-,;-

Response form unavailabl0 for review.

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):,

Response form unavailable for review

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: GOLDMAN -FRISTOE TEST OF ARTICULATION Screening Cr VesificRion a


May determine a child's specific difficulty in sound production.

i-May indicate'the stimulability (ability to have that sound reproduced) of that

sound for remediation.

etc.

d

-May-indicate conslistency with sounds - always misarticulites initial sounds,

-11

4

tp

4

NORMATIVE DATA:

Sample Si.zet: 38,884

Populatidn Descriptors Used:Grade: 1 - 12National Speech and Hearing SurVey

TVAN4CAL ASPECTS:

Reliability: Test /R etest reli ab ility

had a correlation of ptescence of error ofin sentences; for type of error it was".89respefatiiivAltyy Inter -rater .reliability was

Content validity is establishe

Speech sound prodtction.

Witb 37 articulatory defective children.95 for sounds in Words and .94 for soundsand .86 for sounds in words avid sentendesfound to be .92 for errors and .88 for type

y the collection of-items used to assess

REFERENCES:

Goldman -Fristoe Test pf Articulation - examiner's manual

133

ommy=vv)LA NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE

HARRISBURG, PENNSYVANIA 17169 .

04,

tEST ANALYSIS

DATE:. March 1977

TITLE: GOLDMAN-FRISTOE-WOODCOCK TEST OFAUDITORY U.BCRIMINATION

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:Ronald Goldman, Ph.D.

o

Author: Macalyne Fristoe, M.S.?Richard W. Woodcock, Ed.D.

Publisher:

American Guidance Service, IncPublishers Building

Circle Pines, Ainnesota 55014.

Editor:

Copyright Date; ,1970

Screening VerificationEI(

Ordering information:

Forms:

/--Cost: Test kit - $23.00; Mandal - $1.75; Test Mates

plates - $4.20; Response forms (pkg. of 50) - $3.50.

20"

- $16.25; Large Training


Pur_pose:

ability..."

"...deefIgned to provide measures of speech-sound discrimination

Age Range (CA):3.8.yr. - MA: Grade Level:'

Senior adult /5 .

Format: Pleon is trained to the correct answering procedures and to identify

each picture bye its proper label. ,Client is then prsented with basically the same

task'- identifying a p4cture from four.

Time Required: 10-15 mutes

SUb-AreasL., Quiet dub-testNoise sub-test -..

Observational Information: Space for commpts about the client ot.test

aituatioll is provided of1the response form.

.

. . . '

Pobrsonally Identifiable Information Iquired:r. .

.Standard, information

Typeof tape player1' Whetlierlearphones or large training plates wer5,uselie ,

... v/ ,,i-. .

135

TEST ANALYSIS.

GOLDMAN-FRISTOE-WOODCOCK TEST OFTITLE: AUDTTIOY DISCRIMINATION SCreening Verification

EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENE4:

Pretequisite Skills:-

Ability to indicate response

Disability Groups: All

J

Age Range (CA): 3.8 yrs -MA:Senior adult

of

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS:.k.

-Group or Individual: Training with large plates mAy }fie done in small groups.Actual test-situation is individual.

Training Needed by. Examiner: ---Eiaminer must be familiar with the manual and-scoring procedures. Should' b2 abit-to establish-rapportleas.1.1y with person being

410.tested. --Othe'rsPersons Required:

None .411,

Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit)* Tape recorder* 1-2 earphone setsEasel Kit

Large training cards (optional)

/

d

,g

r

SpRING AND .INTER ETATIO111

cedureient is scored for the sub-test's only. Clint is giNeen one poi,nt111r

-, :

f a cope ,identification dr zero points for an incorrect response: All correctres s in each subtest are totaled and maybe converted to Percenti#e ranks:- .1*-

Fo t: The response form has the stimulus words and'the designatid.correct .4,picture er. Trainingrpfbdidures and the.tbree,trials are on the score sheet forinformation only.

,_....Space for Recording Retest:

None. g

Summary Sheet (graphi representation):None

136'

4

...

TITLE:GOLDMANFRISTOE -WOODCOCK TEST OF

AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION Screening . Verification..

.

'IV

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:..

. , L-Will prolhde "an index of an individual's ability to discriminate speech

soun4s under quiet and/or noisy conditions."

-May be useful in screening for hearing problems. ..., . .

.. . . ,

.

. -May be helpful' in the evaluation of,the relative ulpfulnbss of hearing aids.

. * ,

....

,-

. ... ,

§.

:..../

.

* ,.... r ,i

,u-

,

I, .

. ,

_. 4

.. I

i./ . 4

NORMATIVE )*TA: © , .. ..

-----L....._____. ,

'Sampld.S4ze: 745 inOlviduals, aged 3 -84'years. '

CO

...

Population DeScilptors Uspd: - f .

Reqients of Minnesota, New Jersey, and TennesseeRegular public school classes - school age -...,

ipublic and-private - kindergartgns',Personal contact - preschool and adult, ..1

I,

. .

-.

...'TECHNICAL ASPECTSI -w .

,

.-

Standard Error of-Measurement ranges from 1.41for 7-9 years old to'fReljability: AK for 4-6 years. Split-half reliability ranges from .51 (10-12

years) to .88:(7 -9 years). Test/Retest with 17 presemol stieech handicapped chi, en),

.

was- .87 fof quiete and .81 for noise. , ,' . r

t ialidi01: .

sy ,

,,

, V.

Crcurrent'validity with experienced Cilniciants judgments was..76.4 ,.- '

_ .

, As .

s 1.

,,. 4e k. ,

.,

..

s''

_. . . ,

. . ,

fl'"iiirr

.,

aREFERENCEA: a'

....

.., Is,.

, ,.GOLDMIN -PRISTOE -WOODCOCK: TEST OF AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION - Manual .,..,

. 4.

1I \..._-.)

II

w.

g - .$

. ,. -,

137

TEST ANALYSISImmeGOLDMAN- FRISTOE- WQODCOCK TEST OF

TITLE: AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION Screenirig Verification 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:.

Sinde the entire 'test is administeredvbi a tape recording thedifferenCes 'of the examinerjr of no importance.

4

4

'1

a

speech

1

1-A NOM TACKINESS AVENUEHARMONIUM, TENNSVLVAN1A 17109

TEST ANALYSTS

11TLE: QJIDE TO THE CHILD'S LEARNING SKILLS

:DATE: March 1977 ,

. .

. Screening Verification


Author: D.' H. Stott, Ph.D.

Publisher: Ordering information:Dr. D. H..Stoit

* 10 Colborn StreetGuelph, Ontario, Cigada,

Editor:' Forms:

COpyright Date: 1976

Cost: Guide - $0.50 See Additional Information

1,-

a

cA

DEtCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:

Purpose:"A schedule for the systematic observati5n of learning behavior."

lirir.w

Age Flange (CA): MA: Grade Level:

No age or grade level specifiedFormat

Teacher -is asked to respond to 16 questiont concerning the-child's cligNiTomandittfierall behavior; and nine questions regarding any physical or family problems.

Time Required: lintimed

SuB*Areas:Preliminary screeningIdentification of poor learning habits

. Observational informption:

'The Guide is totally an observational instrument.

-

,Personally Identifiable Information Required:

Child's name, date of birth, sexTeacher's name, school, Vast, type of classDate of form completion

, I

133

ro


TITLE: GUIDE TO THE CHILD'S LEARNING SKILLS Screening Verification b .

EXAMINEE. APPROPRIATENESS:


NOne

Disability Grotips:

Learning disabled, Mentally retarded (Mild-Moderate), Slow,I Underachiever.

Age Range (CA):

No age or grade level specified

ADMINIWATIVE CONSIDERATIONS:

likroup or Individual: Individual

/Training

Needed by Alamrnere:

Examiner should read the questions over And then observe the dhild closelyfor several 'eeks. 'Good obpervation skills are a must.

Other persons'Required4- .

None

, -

Materials Required: (*items not provided ill kit)Nor '

.oe

3

SCORINGAUNTERPRETATION:

PrOcedule:

Teacher reads'the qdtstions and.rate the child by severity in accordanCewith t4e sentence` descriptors.

format: .!

Scoring form is the quet'tion.form.w

Space for Recording Retest:1 None 1P

Summary-Sheet

None

aphc representation)':

1'. 1

.A

140

Page.; TEST ANALYSIS.

TITLE: GUIDE TO ilHE CHILD'S LEARNING SKILLS Screening'() Verification

"It

.


1

..,

.

-May help the teacher observe the 4hild's behavior more closely. .

-May indicate a. need for motivational training rather than special educationin its classic form,

.

k' r

. #

' 1 .

. . ,

. .

.

. .

..

.

..

,

'NORMATIVE DATA:, No Data Avai;ble ..

mSample Size:

,,.....

-...._


.

..

.

,. . .w .


, Reliability: C

.*

Validity:.

,

.

.

e .

. , ,

.

.

%.

.

. t

REFERENCES: .. .-

,

Guide to the Child's Learni Skills - preliminary screening.

1- identificatibn.of poor learning habits. . ....

. - ...

, 1

.

.

1

Ir

14.1

Page-'4 TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: GUIDE,TO THE cpILD's LEARNING SKILLS

ommo.."


Screenings . Verification

The author will graiit permission (at a small fee) for interested persons toduplicate the guide. Costs'are:

-for service or research institutions and individuals doing research ith.grant support - $5.00/year,

-for graduate students and others doing researdh without grant support - $2.50/year. #

The Guide correlates with the Flying Start'CUriculum developed by D, 4..Stott.This curriculum is a motivational approach to learning problems.

The terms in the Guide are'very value laden, e.g. queer, stupid.

t

'1

142II

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: May 1977


Author: Richaid J. Hess, .D.'."ILPublisher:

Mafex Associates, Inc.90' Cherry Street

Johnstown,Pennsylvania 15902

Editor:r w


Cost : - $19.95

A

Ordering Information:4

Forms:444.


Purpose:,Desigi)ed "...to detect the presence or absence of intellectual readiness

to enter schook."

Age Range (CA): 31/2-7 yrs. MA: 3-71/2 yrs. Grade Level:

Format:Child is presented with 45 items relating to intellectual functioning.

,There are 29 non-verbal items and 16 items requiring verbal response.

Time Required: 8 minutes

51e-Oeas: (See Additional Information)Pictorial identificationDiscrimination of animal picturesPicture mempryForm perception


Couprehension and discrimination-Copying geometric formsPaper foldingNumber concepts

Observations should be made in accordance with the Personal-Social Scale.

Items on the scale are rated Poor, Fair, Average, Above Average,,Excellent.. Items

rated are intellectually related, i.e. speech'development, self-help development.

'Suspected physical or sensory probleop'shOul4 b indicated too.Personally Identifiable 1n-formation Required:

Child's name, sex, grade level, exact chronological ageSchool

ft

r

'Teacher's nameParent's name, address, phone nuiberExaminer's name

,143

g TEST ANALYSIS .

TITLE: HE4,SCHOOL READINESS SCALE Screening El Veri fi cad on 4:1

EXAMINEE AePROPRIATENESS:

"' PrerequiSite Skills:Ability to indicate a choiceAbilitmto manipulate paper easily

Disability Groups:Mentally retarded, Hearing,impaired, Physically han4}tapped, Speech

impaired, Language Disorders

v.

Age Range (CA):31/2. yrs. MA:7 yrs.

31 yrs. - 71/2 yrs.


.Group or Individual: Individual

Training Needed by Examiner: Examiner Should be trained in the administration

of wychological tests. Should acquaint himself witWobservational techniques. Be

tho?oughly familiar with the HSRS administration, scoring and interpretation.Other Persons Required:

It is preferred that the examiner and child be alone. It is possible, hoW-ever, to test with the parent present cannot be postponed to a later date.

Materials Required: ( *items, not provi In kit)Counting frame (10 neutral colored,beadik4 x 4" paper5 1/4 x 3 3/4 x 3 3/4" paper (triangular)5 1/2 x'S 3.1/2".paper

.0"


Procedure: Each correct response is one point, each is circled on the record

form. Item scores are totaled to yield.a raw score which may be converted to a MentalAge, IQ and percentile rank for predicting school success by comparison to tables.

Flormat:.Record form is divided into sub-areas, Reverse of, the form is the Personal

Social Scale and Physical & Sensory Development questionnaires to be completed.

...Space for Recorang Retest:

None

Summary 'Sheet (graphic representation) :.

None

yo'

144

Psge 3 TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: HESS SCHOOL READINESS SCALE S&eening 53 .Verification

IMPLICATION FOR PROGRAMMING:.

.

.

%.* ).-May indicate which ch4dren should be given priority to be Cychologically

and edudationally evaluated. -.-_,

-May indicaghich children may be in need of special services in orderto ,

learn in a school setting. _,/ . ,

.

.---

. 4 '

...1

.

. .

tiORMATIVEWTA: :

Sam.0e Size: 3,00

Population DescriptoPlace of residence:Race: white, non-whiteEducational levelOccupational levelEastern Pennsylvania

.

pre-kindergarten, pre' -Grade i ,

. .

aftI

41

urban, suburban,'iural.

.

of head of householdof head of household . . c

i .

.


IReliability: Testing 323 children three weeks apart, Test/Retest correlations

ranged from .91 (for the total group)to .83 (pre 1st graders); Standard Error ofMeasurement ranged from 2.05 (for boys)to 2'33 (for girls). -

Validity" Correlations of HSRS mentarages with the Stanford-Binet form L-M .

mental ages was . 86 for 272 children (pre-KgaIld pre 1), correlations with each test'sIQ scores wSt .ao for the same group. Correlltion of the sub-tests with the totalranged from a high of .81 (comprehension and discrimination) to a low of .33 (Formperception and discrimination) with a mean of .475. Prediction of School Successcorrelates with teacher ratins one year later .92. ,./

..

REFERENCES: . .

.

The Hess School Readiness Scale - manual .

test book ,

record form .-s-,, .

. i ,

/_

. / .

. . 4 . ..........145

.-Paige 4 'TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE:- sass SCHOOL READINESS SCALE Screenings Verific4tion


Sub-Areast lcontinued)

. ,

Digit memory span,Opposite analogies

O.Ar.

4 Comprehension_ II*Sentence memory span

-----The-manual states repeatedly that the test will identify those children who

should be excluded from school,- Yet, the test format having several small pictures

on the same page would confuse the child with visual perception problems and those

children are usually above average in intelligence:

It should be recognized that school readiness is net only intelligence but

emotional/social maturity, etc.; therefore, the HSRS eliminates testing many

important facets of the child.

It seems that-although the manual was written in 1975, no, one informed the

akthor of the.right to education for ALL children; and appropriate revisions seem

necessary.

-4

146'

NORM PROGRESS AVENUENARINSWINI, PENNSYLVANIA t7103

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: July '1977

TITLE: BISBEE-Mann TEST OFLEARNING APTITUDE

Screening 0 Verification

,BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:

Authot: Marshall S. Hiskey, Ph.D.

Publisher: Ordering information:Hiskey-Nebraska Test of

156"40niBliaLIWPgi:treeet

Editor: FormLincoln, Nebraska 68507s:

COpyright Date: 1966- 1

Cost: Complete kit -$68.00; Manual - $3.00; Record forms (pkg. of 50) - $4.00;Completion of drawing sheets (pkg. of 50) - $2.00.

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION;.

Purpose:

To assess the non-verbal intelligence of an acoustically handicapped orverbally limited child. .

ARange (CA): 3 -16 yrs. MA: Grade Level:

Child is presented with varying fine motor and visual tasks to perform.Format: Directions are given in pantme -or verbally in accordance with thechild's abilities. Each sub-test evaluates essentially the same tasks but they areincreasingly more difficult to perform, e.g. Bead Patterns ?art A-stringing beads,tart B-stringing beadi in a specified pattern, Part C -stringing beads in a specifiedpattern from

:rime Requr745-50 minutes in two sessions

Sub-Areas: (see Additional Information)Bead PatternsMemory for colorPicture identificationPicture association

Observational Information:None

Paper foldingVisual attention spanBlock patternsCompletion of drawings


Child's name, age, gradeSchool's name

.Date of .test

Examiner's name

147.

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE:RIMY-NEBRASKA TEST OF

LEARNING APTITUDE Screening Verification


Prerequisite Skills:Ability to understand verbal and/or non-verbal/directionsDegree of fine motor cooAdinatioM

Disability Groups:Deaf, Hard of Hedring, Aphasic, SevereAoeech disorders, Medlfately/Sev-

erely Mentally retarded I

Age Range (CA): 3-16 yrs. MA:



Exandner should have a background in psychometricsTraining Needed by Examiner: and be familiar with individual testing techniques,'hould be thoroughly familiar with the directions, both pantomime and-verbal. Someknowledge of testing handicapped children is essential. May require examiner's' know-ledge, of m4nual communication.

utnerwersons xequired:If the child is young, a third person (parent, child careworker) may be re-

quired. This person should be seated behind or out of the line of-sight Of the child.Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit) (See Additional Information)

Colored beads (round, squaye, cylindrical)2 Strings

'2 Sets of colored plastic strips (black, blue, orange, yellow, green,,brown, white, red)

Cardboard screen78 Pictures7 Picture series2 Booklets of pictures6" Square paper

16-l" CubesPattern booklet_


Each correct response is marked with a check, each incorrect with anProcedure: X: Each sub-testis totaled. Child's rating.on the-scale is themedian rating for that sub-test- A median age is found by using tables in the manual+

which is the child's Learning Age and may be converted into a learning quotient. Dev-iation IQ's are available for hearing children only.

Format:

Record Dorm unavailable for review,


Record form unavailable for reviewArt.


A profile is made by plotting each sub -test score on the norms tableincluded with the record form.

146

'Page 3 TEST ANALYSI

TIT1.6 HISEEY-NEBRABXX TEST OPLEMMING APTITUDE Screening Verification 0


-May indicate an intellectual deficit for a hearing impaired child.

e-May provide an idea of a non-verbal child's cognitive capabilities without

regard to his, understanding or use of verbal language.,

5.

NORMATIVE DA1A:

Sample Size: 1,079 deaf children1,074 hemming children

Population Descriptors Used:Age: 2 yrs. ,6 nos. to 17 yrs. 5 nos.

Deaf children were from state schools for the deaf'Hearing children were selected on the basis of parents' occupational level10 widely separated states -

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:Sub-test intercorrelations-ranged from .729 to .332 for the deaf and

Reliability: from 777 to .315 for the hearing. Correlations were obtained be-tween age rating on sub-tests and the median Age rating for the

total test ranging from .514 to .889. Split half reliability was .947 for-deaf 3-10yr. olds. and .918 for the 11-17 yr.blds1.933 for hearing 3-10 yr. olds and .904k forhearing 11 -174tyr. olds.

Afalidity:A correlation of .86 for hearing children from 3 to 10 years with the

Stanford-Binet (D-M) was found and .78 for hearing children 11 to 17 years. B'coire-lation of .82 was obtained for' hearing children when,compared to their WISC Scores.

REFERENCES

Itiskey- Nebraska Test of Learning Aptitude"Revision and Restandardization of the Hiskey-Nebraska Test of Learning

Aptitude"

4

149

TEST ANALYSIS' a'

TITLE:HISKEY-NEBRASKA TEST Of

LEARNING APTITUDEsz-rpening Verification


Sub-areas: (continued)Memory for digitsPuzzle'blocks,Picture analogiesSpatial reasoning

Materials: (continued) 1

Pictures with missing piecesBooklet of digits .

10 Individual digits8 Colored blocks divided into parts

12 Picture analogies /

12 Plates of 5 pictureslwach-as choides for analogies10 Plates of geometric designs

4Findings show that the younger deaeLchild has greater diffiCUlty grasping the

directions-than hearing children of equal age. Due to this fact, young deaf childrentend to lower a sub-test score by failing the beginning items. This is not.true forthe older deaf child whoa had had trlining in visual discriminAtion.and will surpassor equal the hearing child's rating on items-concerned with visual perception.

1114%

At least five sUt-tests must be administered to have a valid test score.

.

Picture analogies and spatial reasoning sub-areas provide the most; difficulttasks to perform even'for normal hearing individuals.

400

...

i 71

'6

11.0.

a

150

4

I;

ROGRESS AVENUEPENNSYLVANIA 17109

.

TEST ANALYEIS

DATE: March 1977

- 0

s.

U

TITLE: *HOUSTON TEST FOR LANGUAGE DEVELOMIgNT Screening'

-BIBLI9pRAPHICINFORMATION:

Author.: Margaret Crabtree; Ed.D.

1Publsher:The Houston Test 'CompanyP. 0. BoA35152HoustOn, Texa 76101

Editor:*

Copyright,Date: 1963

It/

Verificationn,

llordering Inforhation:

Forms:

...

,,' Cost: cart I: Complete kit - $11.00; Manual -'$4.00;-Score\sliects (pkg..

of 25)-

$3.50; Part II: Complete kit - $24.Q0; Manual $4.50r Score sh ets (pkg. of 20) -

$e010; 'Both

4

S

is - $35.00

i--7-DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:

Purpose: "...designed ..or the purpose of establishing a'basis for the objec-",..to,,measure the growth of Danguage intii,eevaluation of,language functionings.,",

order,to determiA the leVel of.theraPy,.."'

Age -Range (CA) : 6 mop, - MA:

6 yrs.Format: Chialais observed in a testing

is asked tb perforf a task or gesture or to

Grade Level:

situation. -For :older children the chitverbalize, -4

Time Required: Approximately 30 minutes per test

Sub-Areas: ,

Observational Information: Under Comments,- record any unus.tal use of hand

visual adjustments,, hyperactivity, etc. (Part II) or additional language abilries

(Part I).

a

Personally Identifiable Information R fired;

Record.sheet not al/enables foF r view.A

151

V

.

Page 24 TEST' ;ANALYSIS t

IlkTITLE: HOUSTON TEST FOR LANO,VAGE.DEVELOPMEN7. Screening 01 Verification 0 ,,

tXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS':


None

a.

W

Disability GToupi: -All....' - -

. . .

. ..

.

_

items onAprt.

II may have to be changed for the.

Visually impaired. Ae,

.

Age: Range,(CA):6 mos. MA:

6,yrs.-%

ADMINISTRATIVi CONSIDERATIONS:

Group 'or Individuairl:

Training Neededby Examiner:

behaviopal characteristics of young children. Should be

1'Examiner should have an und9istanding of the

faMiliar with test items.. 0

. -

child is hesitant to perform, the child's Abtfier.

may

r .

Other Pirsons Required: If

}fie present. or.

ar.Materials Required: (*items

%

notprovidedPart I

* 10" doll20 picture voca4lary 'cards

"Chilaren's dictionaiyht-_-

* Sever'al small tor

s

in kit)Part I,I.: -'

.4

VocOsulary cards. HiniatUre-objects'- doll'amily

bathtu, dining room set, truck,, ,

.', i-toy 'animals,

,,,

°rayons - primary colorsDrawing palier - - ,,,

V

0

-

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION: jscr

Procedure: Eact) lt6 has a pass/fail criteriaUpper Age, and Language Age 'axe all calculated.

Format:

Record forms not aVailable for review.

Space for Recording Retest:Record forms not'available for review.

4

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):RecoO forms not available/Lor review.

foiletcft age group. A Baal Age,

4

. ,

pPage 3 TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: HOUSTON TEST FOR LANGUAGE, DEVELOPMENT Screening II Verification

illimmw

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING: . . ,

0'

-May be used to assist in the of language disorders.. . ..,'

/ '

-May be used as an indication of progress as a result of specific thertD%

.

-..

!.

.1.

. # '.

,-.

: .4Ai *'

. .

V - .. '5'

7. , I..--____

... NORMATIVE DATA:.

'Sample Size: Part I: 113 child:en

..--j....". Part II: 102 children .

4

"Population Descriptors Us'ed:

4 Part I: . Part II:! ,

WhiteMetEopolitan Houston HoustonA.Age Age

SexNo bilingual children were used.

.TECHNICAL ASPECTS: NO Data Available I,.

, ...

Reliability: L.

:Validity:-) .

3* . .

, .%..

". . ' v.pl. .

I - t ..

REFERENCES: ., 1 ,.. w. .

The Houston Test for 1enguage Development viManuaLs. part I and,II

) *

..,

.

4.

.

.

.

. . .

1 .# IL

s

,

.

\

153

4

,

rage 4 . TEST ANALYSIS 1

TfikE:/s HOUSTON TEST FOR LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT

,ADOITIONAL INFORMATION:

Screening-(a Verification 1:3

Rationale for the inclusion of each item in both tests are presented in pac,11--.\

manual.

The HTLO will betaken off the market May 15, 1977.

r

a

I a,

I


NARRISRURG; PENNSYLVANIA 17109

DATE: .Ma.Koh 1977

TITLE: INITIAL LURNING ASSESS

BIBLIAGRAPHIC INFORMATION:


Author: ,Edward G. 'scagliotta, Ph.D.

Publisher:. 6

cad is TWapy,Publications15397Fourth Street

' San Rafael, California 94901 .

Editor: FOrms:

Copyright'Date:, 1970

Cost: Book - $4.75


4

.4..

41

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION%

Purpose:

"...to ascertain the gross acguisition.of a chil,d's'abilities in order thatan individual, educational Rrograt can be' provided."

Age Range. (CA): MA: Grade Level:No age or level stated.

Format:

Child is asked to perporm various tasks in each sub-area.

Time Required:

UntimedSub-Areas:

,,.

p

.Peripheral modalities Perceptual-motor functionsConcept formation 'Behavioral and emotional characterMicsSymbolic devejopment Academic achievements

Observational Information:Observational information about how the child performs a specific task,

reacts, to 'a specific sgMUlus di:Action, and reacts' to the test situation itselfmay be collected and summarized at the end report.

Personally Identifiabte Information Reqtlired:No sdore, sheet is.provided.,

155

TEST ANALYS S

TITLEr INITIAL LEARNING ASSESSMENT icrettningEZ Veilfic4tion

EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS:'

Prerequisite Skills:Appropriate cog4tive and 4tor,skills for age and/oi level.

Disability Groups:Mildly to modekateiy handicapped, some activities could be omitted for the

Visuaslly, Aurally or Physically handicpped.

Age Range (CA): 4A:No, age or level stated.

AMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS:

Group or individual.: Arvidual

Training Needed by Exaiiiner: Examiner should be highly trained and experienced

in psychometrics andtesting '.116 should be experienced in teaching

exceptional children'and have an,understandoing of child development.

urner i,ersons,ReqUTred:-

None

Materials Required: ( *item's not

* -Tisque fapercylinder,* Environmental. objects* flashlight*, Mirror

,* Optometric scanner* Sound instruments,*, Rubber tithe

*,Funnel'* Opaque bag* 'Sandpaper letters* Tinkerboard

provided in kit} See Additional Information11' Colored picture Cards.(;amellits objects)

Word cards (napes of objects)6,-piece doll

.*.10-pieceaoll3-piece forieboerd

* 5-plece.form board* Montessori gthduate.d cylinders* Geometric fragment forms* 'Puzzled

*'Elastic board* Rubber bands '/^pegbo&rd.

'SCORING ND INTERORETATIO,

Pr cedure:e4

Scoring is qualitative.

FormatResults of theeILA ate,stated in anecdotalform,

child can do oll has difficulty in doing,Space for Recording Retest.:

No score sheet is used..

444. .

Summary Sheet (graphicNone

representatibil):o.

by. sub -area ,as to what the

et

44.

Pagemt

.

TEST ANALYSIS.

TITLE: INITIAL LEARe4oAssassmENT Screening 0 Verification 0-# w .1

'.

,IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING: .

Nr-May be helpfurfor determining a child's pres" level for development of an

IEP./

IP-May identify a child needing further evaluation.

o

.

III.

C:'Q)-'/. 1

.. .

'l

o

.

. .

. ,

AP' .

. .

. .

d

1.

)

1 .

--"---11,

,

. .

NORMATIVE-DATA: No Data Availablet

.

Sample, Size:.

Popuiaon Descriptors thed:,

. , .

,.

..

.

.

4...

:TECHNICAL ASPECTS: No Data Available g '

A

_ 4

Reliability: t 1r

.

..

...

Validity: .

,

41.

,-.....:

. ,

.

REFERENCE .

Initial Learning, Assessment - manual

,- OW.- i I

Al

\,-,

11111A, A

f5 74

Page.4. TEST ANALYSIS_ .

TITLE: INITIAL ASSESSMENT Screening G. Verification 0

tiADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

Materials: (cont ued)

Golf tees or pegs ,

Copysheets - AppendixLow balance beamRocker boardSoccer ballMarsden ballDirectionality cardsCrayonS: red, green, blue,ScissorsCubes (varying in siie)'Sequential. sizes and shapesPlain and solid round objectsSquare object.Triangular objectVisual discripation cardsComposite picturesPhonographRecord - instructional-Alphabet cardsWord cardsPicture cards (--

Standard graded readingTwo sets: number cardsTwo sets: .pattern cardNickel,

* Eight pennies* Felt pen

The format that the ILA is written-in provid4s thewhat typeii.of things hdoashould Idok'for.

(

*

a

black

iisicarmusic

and spelling\ texts

,Photographs of materials which 03.1A be constructed

00`

I

examiner with information of

are contained in the manual.

P.

k.15b

14 MORIN PROGRESS AVENUE

TEST ANALYSISiimuissiUltd;PINNIIKLVANIA 17109

DALE: March 1977

4 .

TITLE:KAHN INTELLIGENCE TEST:NA CULTURE MINIMIZED EXPERIENCE Screening Verification p


eAuthor: Theodore C. Kahn

Publisher:PsYchalogical-Test Specialists'Box /441Missoula, Montana 59801

EditorI

Ordering Information,,

Tor:Ms:


1.

Cdct: Kit - #52.00; Manual - $5.00; Record sheet (pkg. of 50) - $16.00

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:-

Purpose: .

Measures developmtit levels of children as well as estimating severaldi ferent types of intelligence.

NYI

,-

- 4 -

Age RangX(CA): 1 mo. MA: - Grade Level:. Adult . .

F t: Main Scale has six items per age leyel. .A Brief Placement Scale to411;dete. point of entry in the Main Scale has, one item per age. level. All items are

responded to non-verbally by manipulating the test objects.

Time Required: Urttimed

Sub-Areas:Concept formation Verbal

Recall Sii languageMotor coordination Use with the blind

Observitional Informdtion:

R.ebording sheet has space.for behavior notes and evaluation of results.

. t

IPersonally Identifiable Information R quired:

Record form not available for r vie w./

159

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: KAHN INTELL1gENCE TEST:A CULTURE. MINT.MIEsED 'EXPERIENCE Screening Verification CB

P.



Gross and fine motor skills- 4'

Disability Groups:

Mentally retarded,. Emotionally disturbed, BebavioF Probldmi, Visuallyimpaired, Hearing impaired. -

Age Range (CA): 1 mo. - MA:'

Adult


.0"


TrainingNeedid by Examiier:

Examiner should be thordighly familiar with the test 'manual and its supple-mm nts. Examiner should test many individuals Prior to testing for scaring purpOSed.


None LAlt

Materials Required: (*items notprovided in kit) All materials are plastic.AnchorButterfly (L each) large brown; thin transparent

'Circle - transPhrentDog (1 each) large black; small black; small whiteHeart (1 each) large transparent; blue; redStar -'1 large transparent; 2 redSegment of a circle - transparentCross ti

Parrot

/1:4,

Felt strip

4

1

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION: b , &

Procedure: Each item is scored based upon the item 4iterion. Score + forcorrect, - for incorrect. A basal age is calculated and anaddipional correct itemsare worth 2 months credit. Ain IQ is calculated.

Format:. -

Record form not available for review.

Space far Recording Retest:

,Record form not available for review.


Record form not available for r- iew.

e

a

atTEST ANALYSIS

T/TLE..\_KANN INTELLIGENCE TEST: Screening 0 Verification E3

,.

A CULTURE MINIMIZED EXPERIENCE.


-To provide information regarding the child's developmental level..

'._ .

. . '

. .

x.

.../

. ..

.

..

,

.

.

.....,.-

NORMATIVE DATA: ,

Sample Size: 337 persons ,

Population Descriptors UsedAges 1 month 17 years .

40_ Adults.

.

...

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: Additional reliability and validity studies are cited. .

'..,

. Re 1 iab4 1 i ty:

Test/Retest with 23 children, aged 1-14 years, tested 3 weeks apart. MA's

correlated with theKIT,,..94Validity:

With the same 23 children above,, KIT MA's compared to the MA received on

4 1537 Standford-Binet, .75., v

41 .-

\ ,

REFERENCES:. .

Perceptual and Motor Skills - monograph supplementKahn Intelligence Test: A Culture - Minimized Experience 4 .

Up-Dating the Kahn Intelligence-Test s

1 Reprints of additional validity studies

. V t

4111,-

/

4

PareN4 TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE:XAI* INTELLIGENCE TEST:A CULTURE MINIM/ VD EXPERIENCE

Screening Verification ID


The KIT is a, culturally minimizing experience, as'much as it is possible to

since one aspect of intelligence is the'capacity to adjust to culture.

Special test items have been developed for the visually impaire ,g.

a

Oa

41,

.1 6



DATE: ',May 1977

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: Komi PROBLEM CHECKLIST ANDKOHN SOCIAL COMPETENCE SCALE

Screening 1:2i Verification


Author: Martin.KohnBarbara Parnes

Publisher:

Editor:


Cost:

Bernice L. 'Roman

vo

Specimen set - $5.00,

S.

Ordering Information:Martin Tohn,IPh.D.Wm. Alanson White Institute20 West 74th'StfeetNew York, N. Y. 1W23

Forms:111


Purpose:

"...designed to assess the social-emotional functioning of young childrenin preschool settings."

Age Range (CA): 3-6 yrs. 1A: Grade Level:

Format: -Children are raked an a 3, 7 or 5-point scale as to the typical occur-rence of a behavior within the past week., 3-point scale for the Checklist, a 7 or5-point scale for the SocialiCompetence Scale for either full or half-day schoolattendance.

Time Required:-Untimed

Sub-Areas:Scales are not divided into sub-areas; but.each yields Two Factor Scores.

Factor*I deals with geneial utiliiation of opportunity in the classroom while Factor/IIdeals with conformance to rures;,regulations and routines n a classroom.

Observatignal Information''Scales are rated through observation, no additionaliniormation is collected

Personally Identifiable Information Required!

Child's name, age, room or group'Rater's name, position (head. teacher, vide, etc.)

4

TEST ANALYSIS

a

TITLE: KOHN PROS EM CHECKLIST AND

KOHN SOCIAL COMPETENCE SCALEScreening Q Veriftcation


Prerequisite Skills:.

iSkill_development adequate for age.

Disability-Groups:Emotionally disturbed, Behavioral problem, Speech/Language iiripared,

Mildly Mentally/ retarded. air .Age Range (CA): 3-6 yrs. MA:


Group or Indivrdual: Individual

Training Needed by Examiner:Examiner must be a good observer. May be ciassAbomHteacher, aide or impar-

tial observer that observes child a-week prior to the rating.

Other Persons Required:41°Ratings may be made independently by one or more persons,if necessary.

No other person is required. 41/1

Materials Required: (*items not provided in ktt)'Observations are made during the course of the child's school day and are

mainly concerned with a child's ability to interact with his environment; therefore,1.0

no specific,materials are required.

.k


Procedure; Each item is given a, specific rating. Each scale is'divided into-two

Factors, all items for each factor are summed for the Checklist. The algebraic sum

-for each factor is used for the Social Competency Scale. Both sets of scores may be

convertedto standard scores and added together. .

rormat:Score sheets have item numbers listed in a matrix with each-row,or column

corresponding to Factor I or Faotor II.

Space for Recording Retest:None

Summary Sheet.. (graphic representation):

None'

164

TEST ANALYSIS

. Nir 'I. /I, . _ytTLE: ICOHN:PROBLEM CHOINLIST AND'

1COHN SOCIAL.COMPETENCE SCALE i Screening Ea ferification.

'..IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:a

-.

it.:,

.. ,

4'

-May identify a child having emotional problems. C.

. .

-May ,indicate the need for in invdepth pychiat c evaluation o a chilia.

,4

-e-,

.. . ..' .'I ..... ,

.. ,

. . s.'A s

. . .

AP. . , 4

. c... . . ,.4 .

..,,,

. 1 .

?--

.. $

,

1°

.

Ai

.

NORMATIVE DATA: No DatirAvailable . .

.,

..

.

SaMple Size: r

-uJation DesV criptors Used: . .

... .

0 ..

.

.. .

... --

. .

.

4 . . 4 4 _ . .

.

TECHN AL ASPECT* No Data Available b t

Vf'eliabi. lity:

' *11-... .,

.

Validity:* /k. ,. .

, . -.4, . ,

. 40.

I.

.

. . . .. .

'' REFERENCES: .

*, 4..'

A Rating and Scoring Manual for the Kohn Problem'Checklist-and\---, Kohn Social Competence Scale

JD.,,

'

.

. ..

. .

- - 4-

.

.

I .1

j

Pagb 'TEST ANALYSIS

PA

KWH PROBLEM CHECKLIST AND=UNSOCIAL COMPETENCE SCALE

MOTIONAL ft/MOTION:


11/

'0, .

,

Further information about the Scales may be foUnd in Developmental

'Pswho/ogy)41972.-

`,___

cN. .

,.

, Dimensions involved wi theProblem Checklist are Factor I: Apathy-Withdrawal;t

Factor II: Apger-Defiance. ,

.

Dimensions involved with the Social Competence Scaleare Factor'I: InteresttiCipation vs. Apathy-Withdrawal; Factor 11;4 COoperation-Compliance vs. Anger-

.

Defiance. , .,

Id

A full day and half day rating scale for social compete4Re has beenigevelopedconsisting of 73 and 64 items respectively. The 64 iftm scale 6mitsems concern-,ing nap and,luncb tOle.

. ...-.

,,

A high score on the Problem Checklist indicates disturbance, while 0 highsooreon the Social Compet nce Scale indiCates health.

.4a.

A

1 .

4 ar

e

its

l'

-

V

r

11

A

166

CC1NNEMtom,PENNSYLVANIA 17109

NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE

L

TEST ANALYSIS ,

DATE: June, 1977

,

TITLE!: LEARNING ACCOMPLISHMENT PROFILE Screening Verification


Author:. Anne'R. Sanford

.1.

1Publisher: Ordering InformatIon:. .:

Cifapel Hill Training-Outreach Project Kaplan Schcil.Supply,CorporationLincoln Center 600 Jonestown Road

.Chapel Hill, North Carolina Winston-Salem, N. C. 27101

EdIbpr:.

-- Forms:

. '

COpyright Date:,, 1974 -

Cost: Diagnostic Kit"- $150.00; Manual $2.50; LdividualProfile -,$2.00;Infant LAP - $3.00

4

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMXTION:'

Putpose:4'.Designed to provide a record of the chflds'exiAting

.P

', N.

Age RaRge (CA),:: 1 to. - MA: Grade, evel:_ *6 yrs.

.

Foi-mat: %.

. 'Tice -LAP is in thecklist;divided-inwfub7areas:' Each sub-area has skills

sequenced detrelopmentally and crops-referenced to the bibliographic.source of theitem.' 11 . -

, -

Time Required:...0 g Untimed $ _I

/

,

eSub'Areas-:

...Gross motor ! Self-help

:.; Find motor CognitiveSocial Ilinguage

pbservat iona 1 informfft fon:.1,

, .

.

Eaeh,itemtkoredleither pa'ss or faili.should include comments as to howsehe

child performed the item. SpAFeis-provided for this information to the right of the

item.,

r, ,.

Personally Identifiable Inforniation Required:.,

I

p . 9hilcrs name, date, of birth

/1

'

1 6

". TEST ANALYSIS

TIT`. LEARNING. ACCOMPLISHMENT PROFILE


Prerdiuisille Skills:

NoneI

G'roups:

%

Agq Range (CAN: mo. - MA:

6 yri.

f

Screening CB Verification

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERAfIONS: .i

# t

Group or Individual :' Individuals child may be observed during the course of a

program day rather thAn setting lip,a formal test situation.

Training Needed, by Examiner: Examiner should b familiar with the LAP items and,

progression to be ible.to assess the Child during the course of.a day or be able tb

et allvi_tieslito provide the child with- the opportunity to demopstrate the skIll.ay ,a nistered by a classroom teacher. P

thqr ersons'Required: ,

None -

, .

- ' .

d

. ate_rialsioRequired: PtiteMs.dot prOyided inli/cit):. -

4

e

:4.

1

SCORING AND INtERPRETATION: 4

Procedure: A plusis scored for pass, a minus for fail:

fleof rate of deveem befb

out of 5 items failed). A .chanmental age is determined as beipg the last passe

the 0g219pmental 'age by the child's chronological age:),

The LAF.is in a bound book. Each item Contifor bibliographic source, developmental age, assessmspace

5 ci Wlegi.ding Retest:o

Reteets.may be recorded on the, same

may be useful.Summary Sift (qraPhiC repee&tntation):'

A priffilelof developttnt is plotted for each

profiles may,appelr on one form.

forms, di

The childks develep-rNe-ceiling is found (4

e,computedwbydividing;

descripUon of the behav-.achieve tent

onan

fferent colored ink 'sach time'

area ssessed. Multiple

a

16S

10

Page 3 TEST PSIS

TITLE: LEARNING ACCOMPLISHMENT "PROFILE 'Screening Ea Verification [3A


-Aid in determiniih a child's present educatiorai levels fbr the developmentof an Individualized edtication program.

-May identify specific behavioral objectives that should be taught to the child.

-May evaluAte a child's,progre?sby both, ,skill acquisition and computing.atchabge in the rate ofAevelopment quotient. "`

NORMATIVE DATA: Criterion referenced

Samplae


t

TECHNICAL ASPECTS.: No Qata Availabn'

Reliability:

41; Valid,ity:..

REFERENCEi:.J/

AManuad for Use of thetLeisin6 AccqmplishmeAt Profile

Learning Accdmplishment Pfofile

1

I

,4,Page 4r

TEST ANALYSIS.

TITLE: LEARNING ACCOMPLISHMENT PROFILE Screeninga Verification


r.

1*

fi

-r$,I

The LAP is cross referenced to the Planning Guide" for Preschool Curriculum

whictiprovidesteachiffg strategie 'to encourage skill development.t,

/The LAPis to be aCcomplisshed in three steps which include:,1)tompiling develop-

mental data, 2)task analysis of a skill, and 3)cUrriculum development.

Training filmstrips are available.

4

I-

I

V.

1 7;Y

.4 1-

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: April 1977

TITLE: LINDAMOOD AUDITORY CONCEPTUALIZATIOh TEST Scrlening Verification, 53

11BLIOGRAPACWFORMATION:

Author: Charles H. Lindamood, M.A.Patricia C. Lindamood, M.S.

Publisher:

Teaching Resources Colop Boylston StreetBoston, Massachusetts 02]46

i% , Editor: 1


Ordering Inforthation:

Forms: Alternate Forms: 'Form Aand B

f.

COst: Complete kit 131095; Test forms (pkg. of 50) - $4.75

4

CRIPTIVE INFORMATION:

se:

De gned to measure auditory perception.

Age Range (CA): MA:. 'trade Level: Preschool-Adult.

.,

Formatl-.. .

Child-is to listen to sounds and syllables said by the examiner and to ?ladlecolored hloakd'to represent the sounds (e.g. /p/ /p/ - 2-blocks, same color; /p/ /t/,

...-%it/ 3 blocks, 'different colors..

.

Time Required: .4 .

jintimee *k

Sub-Areas: (21 - '..:-

.. ', Category I - isolated sounds in_sequence' Category4kI - sounds within syllable pattern

...

.

.. -

,.f ,

Observat-tona I A nformat Nin : ,

iAny behavior which appears significant to the te#t performance should be

reybided, " .. t"/

Personally Identifiable Information Required:Child's name, sex, birthdate, age, grade, i

V . Examiner's name('Schools name' .

Type of speech deviation, if anyNative language,other languige spoken'Results of other tests

-,

Use of visual cues

i .. 4:

171Mir

a


TITLE: UNDAMOOD AUDITORY CONCEPTUALIZATION TEST Screening In Verification, DJ

EXAMINE6NROPRIATENESS:

Prerequisite Skills:Understanding of same and differentUnderstanding of left to right progression.Understanding number concept to for

.Understanding of first and Letat

Disability Groups: ,

All but Clearing Impaired (modificatiOn may be-made to the blocks so that

the Visually- Impairedqhild can use the ,test). Modification f6r Physically handi-

capped may be.needea.Age Range (CA): MA: GRADE LEVELS 'Preschool , Adult

.ADMINISTRATIVECONSIDERATIONS:

Group or individual: Individual

1 Training Needed by Examiner: ff.

Examiner should be familiir with the manual and the corrk pronunciation

of the sounds and syllables. A tape is provided for pronunciation.

. Other Persons Required:

None

Materials, Required: (*items not provided in, it)

18-colored blocks

. k

a

'4f

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:.,

Procedure: ach response is recorded in the olor-tode. A + or'- is marked after

the test is tonpl ed. Each correct'answer is Ode point, then multiply the correct,

ntimbez fl, 3 or 6)'fox a'corTerted score. Cut. off scores for grade lievels K-12 are,provided on the record sheet.

.

o JFormat

lifir

. .

Each form of the LAC has an. Individual Reqprd Sheet. Stimulus, response,

and indicationoof correct or incorrect ay recorded. .

Space for Recording Retest: ' , \Record sheet is non-reusable

e Summar), Sheet (graphic representation):' .

NOrib ,

V

TEST ANALYSIS-

,

TITLE: LINDAMOOD AUDITORY COMPREHENSION TEST Screening El . Verification a''.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING':, .

,

. r ,

.

-May provide for early identification of children with auditory perceptual

problems. . .

.

' -May aid in the understanding of the point of breakdown in the proCess ofreading or spelling.

AI

l

% .. .

4 ..

a '.

%.

4 f

' i

A

4 .

. .

NORMAjIVE DATA: , .

.

.

Sample Sile: kample 1: 660

.tample 2: 52, .

Population Descriptors Used:School district:* Monterey Peninsula Unified S. D.

Lucia Mar Unified H. D. % NSocioyconomic status: all categOries . .

TeacHer: divided class into four parts (upper/lower boys., upper/lower girls). bider

,stddents were selected by the guidance counselors on the basis of

performance.4(

,

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:V

Reliability: _,,

Test /Retest:'. alternate form reliability with 52.children with a minimum of

,four weeks between testings, the correlation was .96.e

. Validity:Correlations with the WRAT (Wide Range Achievement Test)' Spelling7Reading

subtests ranged from 66 to .81 at different grade levels. /-,a

1

.

REFERENCES: .

.

. ).

Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test - preliminary manual. response sheets

% .

tape.

. .. .

,.

L7;8

Page - TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: LIMDAMOOD AUDITORYCCMPRIIMENSTON TEST Screening Verification GI


The Manual states, "It (the LAC) is suitable for administration at any chrono-logical or functional'age and any academic lerel."

It has been found that color blindness does not alter the test, since the blocksare perceived 'arying degrees of grey.

- tConceptualization of sounds and order-o sounds as represented by colored blocks

may prove difficult to obtain with younger and more involved children.

Sr.

174

1-A NORM PROGRESS AVENUEmmunssuni.PENNSYLVANIA 17109 ,

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE:

AMay 1477;

TITLE: MAGIC KIN Screening 031 Verificationa

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INF1 TION

Author:c

P!Jbl isher:

Editor: Southeast Mental Healthd Retardation Center

Copyrig Date:

Cost: Manua1drc15.00

Ordering Information:Southeast Mental Health andRetardation Centei700 1st Avenue, SouthFargo, North Dakota 581.02

Farms;Experimental edition: 3rd Revision

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION

Purpose:To mass' screen all preschool childr

Age Range (CA): 3-5 yrs.' MA:

Format:.

Child is guided fromnon- verbally and motorically.

n all -areas of functioning.

Grade Live!:

.1

area to area and iF to_perform

Time Required:Appropimately 11/2 hours

Sub-Areas: Recommended- Hearing

VisionMotor tasksVisual tasks

for the total screening.

Auditor tasksLanguage batterySelf-concept test:- .

. Observational Information:_'Observation is made within each area

bel.ng used for that specific area.

various tasks, verbally,

Parental assessmentWalker readiness test

(or, like)Developmental history

questionnaire

in accordance with the instrument

Personally Identifiable Information Required:Child's name, sex, date of birth,,ageParent's- name, address,' phone number

Community131rent'a age, educaEion

IPrior schooling..Number of Aildien in familyFamily income levelRace

I

175

s

, Page 2 TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: MAGIC KINGDOM-'

A

,S6Tening .Verification 2,


Prerequisite Skills:Ability to move freely from situation,to- situation

Ability to indicate a response

Disability Groups:All thought to be handicapped chiAlken

Ale Range (CA): 3-5 years MA:

S

r


Group'or Individual and small group

on thetype' of.instruments being used.

Training, Needed by Examiner:Examiner may be'a paraprofessional,

in the manual.Other Persons Required:

Depending upon the number of children being

15-35 volunteers. -,Materials Required: (*items not provided

Audiometer36 Lnstruction cards

Perilig4 flashlightOcciuder

'3 PlasticYardstick_

'Stimulus cardsBell\Hammer-l

Toy toothbrushPencil

situations may be used depending

instructions for training examiners are

uring .laceS

in kit)Balloon `-'HarmonicaSpoonScipsorsBagToy truck

Screened, there is a need for

SCORING AID INTEITETATION1 p . for cokrect, 0 pts. r incorrect, U for

Procedure:out station personnel chec that all stationsdetermines the total,results and the indicator of positive (+)(-); no problem by comparing sub-area scores to the tables.the testing session is made.

Forst

untestable. Thecheck-have seen the child and; probledt or negaXive

An overall EVIA.Ation of

An Admission Ticket to the Magic Kingdom is'Imarried b

area. -All pooring and indicationsis scored on its awn.form;, results


None '-#/0

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):,

None.

are made on this form. Theare transferred' to the Aami

0

f

y the child from area toWelke; ReadinessTestssion Tigket.

11.

/ r:

Pit.' TEST ANALYSIS4

TITLE: MAGIC KINGDOM Screening 0, Verification


-May indicate a child's strengths and weaknesses.t

-May indicate a subtle vision or hearing problem.*b .

-May indicate the need for an in-depth educational and psychological evaluation.

a

NORMATIVE DATA: No Data Availab

Sample Size:

Populatiori-Descriptors Used

J

N.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:. jio Data 'Available

Reliability: s

Validity:

S

r 11

REFERENCES:

The Magic Kingdom 7 inanua).

V 1

1(

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: MAGIC KINGDOM - .Sereeningff -Verification

ADDITIONAL INFORRM ION:

Ai .

Manual provides information on how to run a mass screening program in a com-

munity.munity. Also provides room layout.plans for:the screening;

0.

.00

4

"-

.4

4

4IP

'NW

17L,

ccimmEcir1 -A NORTH PROGIOS AVENUE

t HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

!IP DATE: March '1977

BEST) ANALYSIS .

TITLE: MEMPHIS' MODEL:

COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENTAL SCALEScree ning Ea Verification

. 4p,

'BIBLIOGRAPHIC_INFORMATION: .

0.

Alt9n,D. Quick, Ed.D. A. Ann Campbell .M.S.,f," Author ::

Thomas L. Little, Ed.D. 4 -..0i'41.Publisher:

Lear.Siegler, Inc.,Otdering Information.

Fearon ,Publishers ,.6 DaVis DriveBelmont, Califoirlio 441302

Editor: 0 ,

., NEms:f

Copyright Date: , 1974

Cost: 1 set.('30

forms and guide) $1.50

h ,. .

,. .

'OESCRIPTK. INFORMATION:.ii.

4

-'Purposel " '"viesigned toof functioning.%. I

4

.4iassist teachers n finding a,child's present 17vel

0

Age Range ,(CA) : Sexth : Grade lLeve:.

lie4

yrs..

.

Formai: .

.

0,

.1

Teacher is to observe the child o pose situations f6r.he child's per-

formance an each sub -areas A Ceiling Age is determined Apr each subLarea. ,

0

Time Required:w

ub-Areas: .

.Personal - social Fine motor,

Grips? motor Langshes.

UntiMed.

ObserVatiorol Information: .

The MeMphLs scale is sn observation instrument;.

4 /`, A

-Personally identifiable Information Required:

'Standard informatrl.

Ic /9121.

-

r

Perceptive-Cognitive

4

'I

Page;' 2TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE:MEMPHIS MODEL:

isILC: COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENTAL SCALE ikeerfing E3 Verification 0

EXAMINEE'APPROPRIATENESS:

Prerequisite Skills:None

Disability GroupS:

0#

Developmentally delayed, Mentally retarded, Sensory impaired0.

Age Range (CA): Birth5 yrs.

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS':

Group or Individual: Individual.,

Training Needed.by Examlner:.

soNone..

Other' Persons Requirtd:....-

i

. NoneI .0

lat)erials Required: , *items not provided in kit)

1"..1 Materials required may be found in any nursery or pre -school lassroom or

,

in the home..,.

is.

.

a

IL

4SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:

en/

'1, Procedure: For each item circle P or F, as'appropriate, until. 6 F's b.re scored -._

in a'rcm. Count numbei of P's' for a raw score.; the, Developmental Age: is determi,ned

by the ge level of the lapt item passed. * it

N

. \Each ub-area has its own scale and page. Along the left hand side each

Ip-',item is corre ated with, a DeveloPmental Age And a P,- F.

Space-for ecording Retest:,. N,i %Aine, Profilg.tay be used over.

. ... '

, ,

Summary Sheet,(graphic representation) : A profile,oE Developmental Statds is`

formed 'by. plotting each sub-area's Developmental Age with asoldd blue line and ,

plotting,the child's Chronological Ag 'th a Vokeh red line. De ?icit areas may',

'.be determined by a.comparison of- the lines l IS,

I

: .

180-

L

'Page 3 TEST ANALYSIS'

.4 f

TITLE:MEMPHIS, MODEL:'

Scrieiing\101 Verification p,COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENVIL scAtn

,

It

'


-Provides information regardipg th? child's present furictioning level which.maybe used when writing an individualk.. educational progr.,am.(IEP).

- -May be used as a continuous record of progress during'the child's preschool

years. ) .

.l..

.

. , //

4 ..

I, i . . .

.,

.

.

. ..

..

. . A ..

,

..

:

'.1

-SP.

.

1. - .

.

.

)

-

NORMATIVE DATA: No Data 'Available.

'Sample Size:

POpullhon Descriptors Used:'1

.

..

% - .

V. . -

'

A

;

*

c

TECHNI AL ASPECTS: No Data Available k. ,

R liability: .

,..,

Validity: ...

%.

, ..

. .

. .

* . ..

* .*- .

r.

, ..

C

4REFERENCES:.. ,

Project Memphig: Guide to Programming ,

Comprehensive Developmental Scale' .

4 °

, .

'I

. ..'

.

*S. .

a. ) 1

%

1 8 1 )

r

S

cage 4 TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: REmPHIs44°D":

""'1"1"22"17114611111441611C4141

Mir

Screening Ca Nerificat'ion [3_.,

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:,

The Comprehefleive Developmental' Scale is one component of the 3yfart Ndmphis

Model which leads'ultimately to an individual educational program for the hild

which iscontinuously, monitored.

, Lesson Plans for Enhancing,Preschool DevelOpmentaifProgress is a resultant

curriculum guide of the Memphis Model (available, Fearon Publishers - 24.95).i

4

4

1

4

.

A

a

4

1 5,2

144 NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE

HAiRISOURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

7

TITLES MINNESOTA PRESCHOOL SC. .

ST AkALYSIS

DATE: Apr1.1 1977

,c7

Screening c3 Verification

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: .

Florence L. Goodenough M. J. Van WegenenAuthor: .Katharinell. Maurer.

.

Publisher: sf , Ordering InfOrmation:

American Guidance Service, Inc./

e Publishers' Buildinb..

..

Circle Pines, Minnesota 55014

Eclitdr: , ForMt: orm A

1.

Copyright.Date: f938; ig. .. , .

40, ..

1..

Cost: Complete set.- $43.00; Spee men set - $3.80; Manual - $1.50; Record

blanks (pkg. of 25). ..7 $2".-35.

IW


Purpose: To investigate a child's verbal and non-verbainte)ligence.

Age Ring :2-6 yrS. MA: Grade Level:

Format:Child is.presented 24 short tests with a total of 97 test items. Aditivities

differ as to response and stimulus.

Time Required; 30 minutes

Sub-Areas:

See additional inforination

m.. .

, .

.

. ,

Observational, Information: Checklist of various behaviorsis to'be :filled out-

after the test situation. Notes re5arding.the child'sphysical'condition, mental

.development, medical history, habits, social-emotional characteriitics, ifiterestsi

and play behavior, family history and he background and home management are

entered40 the clinical record on the individual'recordform. .

Per

. '.-

ally Identifiable Information Required:hild's name, age, sexExaminer's nameDate of test and placeParent's name, address, whether living, divorced or-serarated

. Birthplace, years in U. SS. education P- . .

Eather's-Occupation7 re

.

: 'Aguage spoken .in homp .

d's siblings, date of Abi th,. age at dbath, schol grade

183I

I

.1

TEST ANALYSIS

MINNESOTA PRESWOL scw Screening la Verifigation

EXAINIKE:AppRopRIATENES

.PrerequiSite Skips:None .

Disability Groups:

Mentally retarded,Learning disabled,handicapped.

Age Range (CA): 2-6 yrs. MA: "1.0k

Speech impaired, Physically

ADMIiiISTRATIVE'ONSICTIATIONS:.

Grbup or individbal: Individual

Train

item orderOther

None'

Miterials4Nuired:

t

ing Needed by Examiner: EXAminee should pe able. to establi.sh rapport wit}

Should be thoroughly familiar with instructions for adminiitration and, 0.

Persons Required: Ii..;

)' J ...., ,

.

, 4

* Large doll

* OAP"'k Largelaall* WatCh

. * tCissOrsPerils:, 4-5 inches

* 3x5',' Paper

* '12 onevinch cubes4'one-1nch cubes nailed to' a base

* Small" ball -

* Small doll

(*1 tems not provided in ki.t),

,SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:

* Key

* Penny* 10x15" piece of cardboard* 6x6" paper*Cardboard clock with moveable hands

IOther items provided in kit -

1

,

7 ,71'47

PYOteduee: 'Each is 'scored according to its -own criteria'. 'scores are .

totaled for verbal and non - verbal items and total score. :-Scoris may'be'oonverted to'Csoores, percentile' placements or.IQ equi'Qalents bg consulting the manual-- .

Format: Individual record form provides room fOr'botil'Veibatim'verbal spoinse

and other item markings. Scoresadded and checktd by two different inditridual

insures accurReadli.Space for cording Retest:

Recordlormcis 'no6*-redsabIe. '

I.Summary Sfieet Ographicrepreseolati001:

'A Score summary is on the face sheet.

111

/.!4

Rage 3 TEST- ANALYSIS. _

TITHE: MINNESOTA PREiCH OO L-SCALE -Screening a Verificltion i

...

f,

. .

,

,IMPLICATIONS 4MMING:' . -TPLICATIONS FOR PROGRa

.,

.

-May provide baSeline information for class grouping according,to different

'mental abilities. . ,

.

-May. indicate-a .child that is in need of special edIkatiqn seryices..

.

._

. .

.

.

,. .

g

.

. .

..

.

< . 41.

.I

. 4

.

4... .. .

110 . l%

-. t.

...J, .0' I 4. .

U . .

% IPI 4 '.

f. .

,. ,.

. ..

.

.

4

-..

NORMATIVE DATA:,

. , ,

Semple Size: 900 children,4 18 months to 6 years

e. .

_ .

Population Descriptors Used:C ,.

,.

Occupational class. ifrorre 1920 Stgte Census')

/ SexMinnesota

-----

'.r

.

. - .

.,

4

-

a ,

.

4

,

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: .; ,- .

o

,

Reliability: Arteinate form reliability ranges from .68 to,

.94 for verbal,

.67 to .92, non-verbal; :80 to,.94 combiped Single form reliability is .86 verbal,

.82.non-verbal, .g9 total. -

--Validity: . ,,..

..

No Data Available' 4

II: .

V

..

) ..

, .

. .r

I

I

, REFERENCES:...

.

r0

. MINNESOTA PRESCHOOL SCALE - ManUal I

ti Individual recorriNst

'lest'Sample materials,' .

I ' t.%. . .

* 'o

.

4

. -

.,....

.

t -

,

-

.

. ,

18 t )

4

PN

-Page 4 . TEST ANALYSIS*

Screening In Verification, la1ITLE:-.11INwEpTAWEscHom SCALE1.1"'ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

Sub-areas:

Ah1. Body parts -.;

2. Pointing out objects in es

3. Naming familiar objects4. Copying drawings5, Imitative.drawing6. Block building

.

pictur4

'4:r.t,

7.

8.

9.

Relponse to piCturesKnox cube imitation ;

Obeying sijnple coMmands10. Comprehension .; .

11. Discrimination of-forms12; Naming objects from memory

; -0.

13. Recognition of forms14. Colors15, Tracing a form16. Picture puzzles:' rectangular17. Incomplete pictures18. Digit span '

19. Picture puzzles: diagonal20.. Paper folding _

21. AiSsurdities-:

22. Mutilated pictures23. Vocabulary .

24. Opposites25. Imitating positions of clock hands26. Speech

When using the MPS, it should be kept in mind that 'it was standardized in1938-43. Therefore,.its use for verification of a mental deficiency isOPery hazy.Words in common use, i.e. copper meaning policeman are not in use at, this time.Caution' should be usild'if the MPS isused for verification, althoIA ugh it is guicquick

\.....4., enough to be a core test in a screening battery.4

I

.10

4

i.

6e

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: March 1977

TITLE: HY7DURRELL READING READINESS, ANALTSIS SCreening Verificatfon0


Apthor: Helen A. Murphy"Donald, D. Durrell

Harcourt, ,Bral-& World, Inc. The Psychological CorporationPublishet: _, OrderingInformation: v

New Yotk 757 Third Avenue-

New York, N. Y. 10017

Forms:

t4,

Editor:

CopylIght Date: 1965

Cost: Specimsn set - $2105.4...Manual - $1.5p; Test booklet (pkg.eof 35) - $8.50.

4.

7 DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:

To determine acpild's degree.of readiness for reading.Purpaie:

:

Age Range (CA): MA: Grade Level: End Kind4rgarten-

, . First GradeFormat: Child isto mark the correct response in his booklet "'Stimulus for

response is verb* %'

Time Required: Untimed, adminiStered in three sessions

Sub - Areas:' Phonemes test

Lettei- acmes testlearning rate test-

-Observational Information:

None

Personally IdentifiablerinfOrmatiOnRequirdd:

Standard informationa

ir

157

1

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE! MURPHY-DURRELL READING REAPINES VALYSIS Screening' Verification


Prerequisite Skills: I 4

Ability to follow directions.Ability to 'make a mark or indicate a correct response

aet

Disability Groups:` Learning disabled, Mehtally retarded, Physically handicapped

7

Age Range (CA): MA: GRADE LEVEL: End Kindergarten-First grade

ADMINISkTIVE CONSIDERATIONS:

,Group or Individual: group

Training Needed by ExaMiner: Examiner should, be thoroughly familiar with the

test and manual.

Other Persons Required:. A teacher's aide may be helpful, especially if the

group is large.

Materials Required: (*items not Oovided in kit)

Flash cards 4* 1 x 8" colored marker

It\SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:

Procedyre: A score key is provided» Each correct item is one point, sub teat-'

-and total scores are calculated. Conversion tables for percentile, quartile ranks

and etanines are in the manual.Format: 0

Scoring is dons within the-pupil test booklet.

Spacefor Recording ,Retest:,Test is In a non - reusable booklet.

4

Summary Sheet (graphic nepreeefftation)! A Class Record is compiled to include

child's qame,.percentile and stanine,for each sub-test and total teat and. other-test

scores. ,

r0

4

' TEST ANALYSIS

0

..

_ .

TITLt: MURPHY-DpRRELE READING READINESS ANALYSIS Screening.0 Verification [3

,

4

A

..

.

IMPLICATIONS' FOR PROGRAMMING:.

"Amit, be most ulieful for grouping.

the class avcording to reading ability.i

.

.

-May help determine eachthild's degree of-readiness to undertake formal work.

in...reading, C.

.

.'.

.

. ... t

,

.

.

-

.

.

.

.,

,

A

NORMATIVE DATA:.

.

, .

Sample Size: 12,21 o'

.

..

,

.

PopulationADescriptors Used: rd

,Eptering first gFaders IF .

65 school systems,

.

..

. ,

012 states (VT, MA, CN,'NIfy NJ, PA, DE;:' MI, WI, KA NC, CA) .

_

.

%

.

..

. ,.

..

. 1.

.

.

. ., .

.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS;!4t- , ..

,

1- *'

. -

Rel i.,36.i 1 i ty: /Even reliability ranged from..98 (total test)-to .88 (le ing/

rate). % ax3dard, rlay of measur'ement ranged from_3.5 (total test),,,to 1.5 (lea ng

rate). -,. .0.. ,

'Valid y: Comparing the'MDRRAtota score and the MetidPolitin headiness st,

total'scior yielded a Correlation of .80. A. correlation of .64 was found betwee the

MDRRA And ePintner-Cunningham PtimAry eSt. ' ,

, ,r

.

14 .

. .

e.

REPERENCES: .

.

., .

. , . .

'Murphy-,Durrell-Reading Readiness Analysis - Manual of directions.

,Score key

.

^/Test bookletI* .

.

h,Flashcards - F.

:. .

iClass record

..

. ,.

_. .\

1 8 9

Oage 4

iko

TEST` ANALYSIS

TITLE: AURiHY-DUkRELL READINdtREADINESS ANALYSIS IPScreenirtg,.

Verification CI


Manual gives suggestions tO.tid-in plannig instructio pr-three levels of,re ing groups. / -

"

Il

"

ti

ry

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE:. May 1977.111.

TIM: PEABODY DEVELOPMENTAtMOTOR SCALES ScreeninglA Verification CI

BIBLIOGRAPHIC ,

Author:

Publisher:

Editor:

INFORMATION:

Ri?ox)da Folio, Ed. S.

Rebecca P.-DuBose, Ph.D.-

-W

Copyr.ighf Date: 1974

4

Ordering Information:,

Dirci.J1, e'

GeorgePeabody College,Nashville, Tennessee 37203

Forms:

I Revised, experimental edition

Cost: Monograph' - '$3,00; Setof scales - $0:50

' .

O

DESCRIPTIVE_ INFORMATION:,

Purpose:

To evaluatea child's motor skillSadaptive capatities.

Age Range (CA): Birth- MA:

7 yrs.

Format:-

Child isobserved or requested tois scored auto his ability to perform thdscale.


Sub-Areas:'Gross motorFine motor

(

(bot gross and fine).,- in

Grade Level:..o

perform var.i.ous motor'task'independently on

4 )

\

items:a 5-poipt criterion

relation to

0 ervatiobal Information:

The PDMS may be utilized as,anoiservaticina,1 guide. Comments may hethe Score Sheet, for, each item, if necessary.

.

Personalhy Identifiable Information Rewired:Child's name, age, date of birth, sexExaminers' nameDate of testingChecklist of imparments: visual,

status during assessmentAttitude during assessment

Spditori,Nphysical,lo her

191.a

on

a.

te

TEST ANALYSIS'''

aa,

$1

4'

fo

TITLE: PEABODY DEVELOPMENTAL MOTOR SCALES Screening

. .

Verification

'EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS:


Disability GrOlos:0 All, may be mostPhysicallyhandicappkd or

-Age Range (CA):Birth-7 yrs.

useful.and meaningful with the Sevvely,,,or Profoundly

Mentally retard4p.

MA:4

ADAINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS:

GrouR or individual: Individual.

, -

Training Needed by Examiner: 'Examiner should be familiar with the'item sequence

directions and scoring.cr'iterion. May be aipmfessiondl or paraprgfessiOnal 'trait-fed

in admihisttetion of the PENS.' 4'

'Other Persons Requireded: . 'A

.-.100!A parent or teacher may be required when.testing a very youn-or.severely,

hied child to answer the examiner's questions. Items may be'passed on 'report,

handicappedqsy. '7 h

Vterial?. Required: Otitems not kit) (

.

t

Most materials would be found it-i'a eme with a preschool child. ,, . il

!,t

'(

1

7

1:

SCORING AND FMTERPRETATION:' f i, , .

Each item is scored qh 4a 5t' pt. scale (5--4ndep41/dent'i 1.-: deRendent3.

,Procedure: A Basal and 'Ceiling Age Level are determined by getting alt,5's or

1!S respectively at one age levell- Arl.overall Developmental Motor'Age and Develop-mental Motor Age Gross and one for Fipti are Lived. A Readiness Skill Scoe may b

determined to measure small gains in motor deVPtopment.Format:' -

The Peabody Scales are'. in Checklist form._ Sore,sltets contain item number

criterion levels to be checked by the examiner. . :

/ '.

', .. -.!

40kSpace, for Recording Retest:

None, scales may be used again if score sheets

Summary Sheet (graphic, representation):a '

-b

r-r"

are used:

$

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PEABODY DEVELOPMENTAL MOTOR SCALES creeping LA Verification"

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:. 7

-

-May indicate the need for a stimulation program. ' . .

-May identify a child with a motoric delay.

-May indicate a severely involved child's progreii over time.

'- Maybe used to determine a child's present capabilities in motor behavior. .

.

L

. ,

..

t_. .

. , .

.

.

.

w

NORMATIVE DATA: No Data Available .

.

I i

Sample Si.ze: ' .

Population Descriptors Used: .,

. .

.

.

.-

.

,


Reliability)

Validity: . .t

...-

-. ..

4

I.

. ,

..

REFERENCES: _

Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (Revised experimental edition) - monographscore sbadts

. _

. 3.

. .

.. .

. .

TESZ ANALYSIS

TITLE: PEABODY DEVELOPMENTAL MOTOR SCALES Screening 0 . Verification 0


With the standardization of the E.ody Scales, this instrument will be useful

for 'verifying a child with a motor delay; until that time the Scales may best be used

as a screening or evaluative instrument.

A program of activities designed tocteach each skill on thePeabody Scale is

included in the Monograph. Each skill is task analyzed and written in easily

understandable language that may easily be converted to goals and objectives.

A

194

1-A NORTH PROGRESS piENUEHARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 11109

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: February 1977

, TITLE: PEABODY PICTURE VOCABULARY TEST Screening Verification

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMaT ON:

Pthor: Lloyd Dunn, Ph.D..

Publisher:

Amer an Guid nce Service,.Inc.Pub ishers BuildingC cle Pines, Minnesota 55014

Edit Forms:


yright Date: 1965

Form AForm B

Cost: - $14.00; v.anual $2.25; Test records - both forms (pka. of 25 each)3.65;

eSeries of plates - $.40

'41

e

DE RIPTIVE INFORMATION:

Purpose:

"...designed to provide an estimate of a child's verbal intelligencehrough measuring'his hearing vocabulary."

Age Range (CA)2 yr. 6 mos7MA: Grade Level:18 yrs.

Format:

Child is presented'with-series of plates containing four line drawings oneach. Child is to identify the picture that demonstrates the moaning of the word saidby.the examiner.

Time Required:

\10-15 minutes; 1-2 minutes-for scoringSub-Areas: ,.


Multiple choice questions on page four of the record booklet about thechild's test behavior and physical characteristics. Observations as to whether thechild's test behavior is a fair representation of the child's ability are recorded.

Personally 'Identifiable Information Required:Chiold's.name, sex, grade, exact chronological age N.

School's name, teacher's nameExaminer's name, amount of time to complete testChild's language background, quality and intelligibility of speechOthpr test data-dates and scores

1 95

Page, 2 TESTANALYSISA'

_ -

TITLE: PEABODY PICTURE VOCABULARY TEST)1.

rn (

Screening 0 Verification uu

S



None.

,

Disability Groups:Mentally retarded, Emotionally disturbed, Physically handicapped, Lanquaae

disorder§, Speech impaired, with slight modifications; Learning disabled children maybe tested.

Age Range (CA):2yTs. 6 mosMA:18 yrs.


'Group or Individual:

IndividualTrain Ing Needed by Ekaminer:.

Examiner should be thoroughly familiar with the PPVT and practice giving the

test priOr to its use. Words shoUld be pronoync4d correctly. May be given,by a

psychme

logist, teacher, wpeeoh therapists, physician, counselor, social worker.r rersons

teacher,

None


Spiral bound book series of plates

4

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:'

Procedure: For each word presented to the chill, record the number of the, pic-

ture the child has chosen;in the space proVided on the record form. A line is made

through the geometric shape for errors. ,The Raw Score is the number of correct respon

ses (subtract errors from number of the ceiling item (last item presented). Score

POT-mat:converts to an MA, IQ and/or Percentile.

Record form is in-booklet formai. All words and,correct.answers are listed.

Space for Recordirig Retest:Alternate form is

Summary jheet (graphic representation):Score.sUimary is on face sheet.

d for etest.

1 3

TEST ANALYSIS.

-

TITLE: PEABODY PICTURE VOCABULARY TEST Screening 7. verification


,

.-May quickly determine the extent of a child's vocabulary' even. if the child isphysically unable to speak.

-May identify those childreh in need of a language enrichment prograM, due tolanguage delay. ,

,: ,/ .

.

..

...

: .

., 0

. . .

..

*.

w

.

.

.

.

1

NORMATIVE DATA:

Sample Size: 4,012 children...,

. .

Population Descriptors Used: .

WhiteLiving in or around Nashville, Tennessee .

4. .

Age range 2 yrs. 6 mos. to 18 yrs, .

All levels of intellect v

4

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: Additional studies are too numerous to mention.

Reliability: Alternate form reliability is from .67 at..6 yrs. of age to .84 at

18 'ears, with a median of .77. Standard error of measurement for IQ scores rangesfrom 6.00 to 8.61 with a median of 7.20.

. Validity: Content - ail words were taken from Webster's New Collegiate Diction-ary, sole criteria originally was that they could be put into pictures. Tibrds"wereselected for the PPVT, only if the percent Passed increased with age.

Congruent tbhs..,P.prP correlates better witlithe WISC than the Binet. PPVT

correlates best with the Ammons and Van Alstyne Picture Vocabulary Test.Concurrent - PPVT scores have a fair relationship to school achievement.

.

.

.

.,

1

REFERENCES:,

I

Peabody'Picture Vocabulary Test lsanualt 'record forms (A + B)

.

.

..

.

TESVANALYSIS

TITLE:' PEABODY PICTURE VOCABULARY TEST Screening [a Verification G3

ADDITLONAL -INFORMATION:

The manual states that the PPVT may be used with, ".any English speakingresident of the United States between 2 years- 6months''and 18 years, who is' able ,

to hear words, see the drawings, and has the facility to indicate 'yes' or 'no' ina manner which communicates."

All words that,biased Culturally, regionally or racially were, omitted.

Colloquial or local pronunciations accdioted by the community should be used.,

Comparing, order of difficulty to order of presentation a correlation of .90(TMR, EMR), .76 (Deaf),'.76 (British institutionalized mentally retardedjwere found.

'

2

r-,

Y

.

C--- :)k CA NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE(F HARRISBURG; PENNSYLVANIA'17109

, TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: June 1977

TITLE:PHYSICIAN'S HANDBOOK:kikEENINq FOR MBD

Screeninga Verification0

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:John E. Petets, M.D.

Author: Joanna S. Davis, M.S.

Cleo M. Goolsby, M.S.W.Publisher:

Editor:


Cost:

Sam D. Clements, Ph.D.Tom J. Hicks, M.S.

Orderingbinformation:Linden Medical4Wook Co.P. O. Box 860Newark, New Jersey 07101

Forms:

Book - $6.50; Quantity discount prices available

4


Purpose:Designed to increase awareness of Minimal Brain Dysfunction and to present

guidelines and diagnostic aids for screening and case management.

Age Range (CA): MA:. Grade Level:

No age group specified

Format:Child is asked to perform various tasks dependent upon his age and capabil-

ities. Provides a comprehensivemany situations.


SUb-Areas:MedicalSocial 4

Psychological

preliminary analysis of the child's behavior in

EducationalLanguage

Observational Information:All observed information is imporfant;*a child's behavior may

indicatjearning disability. Observations may help the diagnostician decide on the

appropriate case managementeechniques'required for the child

'Personally Identifiable Information Required:

Child's nameDateExaminer's name

1 3

TEST ANALYSIS

PHYS IAWS HANDBOOK:TITLE: SC KING FOR MBD

,Screening G1 Verification


' Prerequisite Skil\liw

None

Disability Groups:Learning disabled (Minimal brain dysfunctfon)

Age Range (CA):, MA:No age group specified

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS.

Group or Individual: Individual, .

Training Needed by Examiner: Examiner should be thoroughly familiar with thescreening items, rationale and procedures. 'Should be'familiar with appropriate andinappropriate responses for accurate recommendations tojpe made.

Other Persons Required: Parent is required for the completion of a medicalhistory and behavior rating scale.' Child's teacher.is required to complete theschool report.'


Articulation test cardStory cardsGeometric form cardsWord list cards

No total score is determined. Recommendatfons are madeSCORING AND INTERPRETATION: as to managdment of the child based -on the pattern of

the items passed or failed..Procedure:

Format:

=Space for Recording Retest:


2 ()

Page TEST ANALYSISlompl

TIT E:.:PHYSICIAN'S HANDBOOK:;pCRE9ING FOR MBD

Screening (Verification

IMPL CATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:

1- Provides recommendations

4

for management of the child in school and home.

-Provides recommendations for additional

-May indicate neurological soft signs.

testing that may be\

required.

NORMATIVE DATA: No Data Available.

Sample'Size:

Population Descriptors UsedP:

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:

Reliability:

Validity:

No Data Available

REFERENCES:

Physician's Handbook: Screening for MBD .

TEST ANALYSIS

, TITLE: PFIYS IC IAN S HANDBOOK:SCREEIUNG .'OR MBD

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:*

i

L

Screening 0 Verification

I

P.

. 2 03

4114.14M11.1114=1441111M1114114k

(ccnnEcii))IA NCIRTH PROGRESS AVENUE


(TEST ANALYSIS

trScreening Ig VerificationTITLE: PIAGWIAN ATTAINMENT KIT'

BIBLfOGRAPRIC INFORMATION:

Author: Donald Eurk, Ph.D.

DATE: May 1977 A

Rublisher:Paul S. Amidon'& Assoc., Inc.5408 Chicago Avenue S. N

Minneapolis,, Minnesota 55417

Editor:


Cost:Kit - $17.60


Forms:

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:'

Purpose: . .

To determine a child's level of functioning according to Piaget's

developmental levels. '

Age Range 4CA):.4112-12 yrs.MA: 11/2-12 yrs% Grade Level: Preschool-EleMentary

Format:Child is asked to perfOrm several tasks above, below and at his aqe'level.

Child is asked questions to justify his ans'ers. 16 tests w!th additional alterna- .4

tives for each-level - pre4(hoerational and cr6increte operations are included.


Sub-Areas: 4-N

See Additiona-Information

Observational Information:'All tasks are observed' carefully since the pkocess and the justification

of the process are more important than the answer.

Perspnally Identifiable Information Required:

/ No score sheet is provided.

2 0 3

4

ftzsi ANALYSIS 4

tITLE:PIAGET6X'ATTAINMENT KIT

EXAMINEE AOROPRIATENtS:.

Screeirig al Verification

Prerequisite Skill's: -" .

.,...,

Ability o cOMmunic:ite in,,a:logiaal fashion. ..-

Ability'ta manikmlatA objets. , .

Some knoW1014e,e, 01p4nt44", and-relationships.

0 i sab i 1 ity -Groups : * "a ): ''-, ' . 4 .-

Mentally retarded, Learning, disabled, Hearing impaired, Physically

handicapped,"Efperientially deprived". . ,

4 . ''[ .

Age Range (CA),112-12 yrs.- MA: 11/2-12 yrs4..

A


Group or Individual: - Individdal -.

o , . . ,,

Training Needed by Examiner: .

May be administered by "...any responsible adult after a minin.ix

amount of familiarization.':' 111k. 0 4 .

Other Persohs Required:None t .

.

No

Materials Required: ( *item's not provided in bit) (S4 Additional information)

'25 Geometric attainment record (GAR) figfires

10 'Rods, 1-14centimeterN.,Time order cardsPrimary pencilGeometric attainment feel figures

2 -;reen index sheets, 9 x 12"

2 small farm animalsSmall pad, 81/2 x 41.1" duplicator paper

70 clear marbles27 Clear wooden beads,3 Red wooden beats

PTr\I

I


Procedure: Scoring criteric4 is in the manual after wach-sub-test. No total

score is given but an overall developmental level either preoperational or'concrete

pperational may be determined.

Format:Norge

Space for Recording Retest:,There is no score sheet for

retesting.

Summary Sheet Lgraphic representatiOVO:/None

4,

0

the PAK, but the test may be used for frequent

4

1TEST ANALYSIS

6

TITLE: PIAGETIAN ArfTAINMENT-KIf Screening Ea Verification

IMP4ICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:

1

some indication as tam,why a child is having a problem with aspecific eurriculitr area (i.e. problems in math due to- havirig not yet achievedthe stage Of measurement permanency).*

-May provide an, indication of the'child's logic and conceptual understanding.

N

4


S'ample Size:,

PopulaiTan4De'scrip4Pr4sed:.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:

Reliabitity:

1

4

No Data Available ,

*FERENCES:4

Piagetian Attainment Kit'- examiner's manualmaterials

TEST ANALYSIS .

TITLE: P;AGETIAN ATTAINMENT KIT Screening In Ver fication


Sub -Areas

Preoperational:1.' 'Orien 'topological figures

2. Staircase seriation3.. Binet square4: One to one correspondence

5. Blind I. D.

6. Ordering seriation7. DiscOntinuous quantity

8. Mass9. GAR figures

10. Numbers11. Discontinuous quantity

12. Discontinuous' volume

13. Drawing figures

14. Inclusion '

15. Length16. Cardinal-ordinal relations

Materials: (continued)2 -8 oz. tumblers, straight sides

A. Jar, straight sides, 4 x bottom

of the tumblerlbs. sticks of clay

10 Paste sticks

2 Ca/0(1s for superimposition

3 String loops - 12" diameterBic ball point pen

2 Displacement-weights5 Leaf shapes - diffefent colors

30 NIC playing cards, 6 each: tree,

boy, girl, blankFood coloring

2, Rubber bands16'-1"cub'es - 8 each of 2 colors

a

Concrete operations:1. Equivalent sets18, Diamonds

.19. Area

20. Inversion figures

21. Blind f. D.

22. Continuous volume

lir 23. Piaget bottles-horizontal24, . Piaget bottles-vertical25. Blind I. D.

26. Logical relations27 Super impositions28, Set-union29. DoublF class30. 'Inclusion (Null)31. _Inferring point32. Displacement (A)

33. Left of right

34. Equivalent angles

35. Squirrel logic

36. Displacement (B)

* Blind - Constructed tospecifications

* Scissors.* Ruler* Spool

* Cup* Large button,* Crayon* 24 pennies* Compass* Caroard

C.1-A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE


TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PICTORIAL TEST OF INTELLIGENCE Screening 0 Verification Ea


Author: Joseph L. French

Publisher:

Houghton Mifflin Go..Pennington-Hopewell RoadHopewell, New Jersey 08525

Editor:


der in

Forms:

Information:

).

Cost: Complete kit - $48.00; Examiner's manual -4$4,95; Record forms (pkg. of35) $3.30

1


Purpose:

Tp assess the wneral intellectual level of ayoung child.

:AgeMange (CA) : 3-8 years MA: Grade Level:j

Format:

Child\is asked "o respond to 160 items by pointing or looking at the pic-ture of his choice for response. A short form for,3-4 year olds has been devised,although it is preferable to administer the entire test.

Time Required:

Approximately 45.minutesSub-Areas:,

Picture vocabulary SimilaritiesForm discrimination Size and numberInformation and comprehension Immediate r' all

Observational Information:When testing a physically handicapped child whOis to indicate his,hoice

,

of answer by looking at the'picture of his choice, close observation of eye movementsis necessary.


Record fora unavailable for review..

2 0

r gt)


TITLE: PICTORIAL TEST OF INTELL ENCE



Screening verification

-i,

Disability Grolips:Physically handicapped, Mentally retarded, Multi-handicapped, Hearing i

impaired, Severe speech and/or Language disordered

Age Range CA): 3-8 yrs. MA:

ADMINISTRATIVE C0440 TIONS:t

i

7 .!

Group or individua ' Individual

....,'

Training Needed by Examiner: ExaMiner shoUld be familiar with the prooed4res for

administration and scciing_f the PTI. He should practice with.the materialslto in-

sure ease Of manipulatiOn of thateYials.Other Persons ReClui'red:

.None. Parent may be.'present, if necbssary, but must sit behind the child,

to inbure that there will be little interference.Materials Required: (144tems not provided in kit)

137 Response cards54 Stimulus cads

Easpl or kit ,case

O

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:fc

Procedure:. A slash through the letter of the child's choice is made on the scoresheet. 'Total number of items answered correctly is used to derive a deviation IQ,percentile rank or mental age. Mental ages are available for each sub -test.

'of)

Pormat:.

Record form not available for review.

Space,for Recordirip Retest:Record form got available for review.

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):Record form not available foli review.

$

r

TESTS ANALYSIS

TITLE: PICTORIAL TEST OF INTELLIGENCE Screening Verificatibn kJ


,

-May indicate a comprehension level for a child with unintelligible speech orlack of control over body movements. .

,/. -May provide information to the multidisciplinary team which may assist.in theidentification of the type of program a child needs.

. ,

.

.

..

. .

. .

..

- -

. * .

1 .

NORMATIVE DATA: '

Sample Size: 1830; 260-347 at each age from 3-8 years

dor

I

/

Population Descriptors Used:Region41 area-Community sizeOccupational level of father

o.

. . .

_ ..

.

'

,

.


Reliability: Standard error of measurement ranges from 3.61 at 3 years, to a.30at 7 years. Test/Retest with 27 children, aged 3-5 years, tested 3-6 weeks apart,was .96. Sub-test iptercorrelations range from .57 (immediate recall) to .69(form discrimination). ... , ,

'Validity:' . . .

ItPTI total score correlates with the Stanford-Binet MA,.77; .with the CMMS

IQ, .61;. with the WISC full scale score, .67.. .

..

REFERENCES".4y.

.-,..

Pictorial Test of Intelligence - examiner's manual

.

.

.. .

,.

.

.

, .

- .

20',J

J

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PICTORIAL TEST OF INTELLIGENCE Screening Verification 0

4DDIT.ONAL INFORMATION:

Although procedures are provided for, testing the severely physically disabledithese directions were never standardized on.physically handicapped children.Rationale for this was'that no two cerebral palsied children are afflicted the same.The same 4,s true for normalhchpdren, no two have the same background, experienCes,etc., yet, 'they are used to determine test 'norms.

1.

t

y

,

61

4

AM.

I

1IA NORTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRISBURG,PENNSYLVANIA 17109

21TEST ANALYSIS

1

TITLE: PORTAGE GUIDE TO4EARLY EDUCATION

ft .

DATE: Oebfuary 1977

Screening a Verification 0


. Author:Susan M. BlOmeAlma H. Frohmah

Publisher:The Portage ProjectCooperative Educational ServiceAgency 12, 412 E. Slifer StreetPortage,' Wisconsin. 5.5904."

'Editor: ,

'Jean A. Hilliard ,

Marsha.S.:Shearer

r.

Copyright` Date:. 1976

Cost: 'coMplete set 41 set of cads,checklist (pkg of 15') - $6.50 4.

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION: ct . . .

Ordering Information:CSEA i2

) PortageEcox.564

FOrms:Portage

Revised

Project,

,,Wikconsift 53901. .

Edition

manual,Manual, 15 checkliit0 -.$32;.00

e

is

4.,

Purpose: " . .develOpedto serve:as a gdidg td teachers, a/des, nurses,. .parents

,4or others who need to assess a child's behaviarand'plah realiStic curriculum goals-

thae lead to additional skills."

.Age' Range (CA): TIA: Birth Oradee:evel:

,76'years

yFormat: The PGES chacilisrorm containing 580 developmentally.seguencdd

behaviors. Each sub-atea of the checklist is color coded and items are numbered

for easy cross reference 'to the!Currioulum Ttards-., -Each item appears only' in-one,

area. .

'Time Required:AUntimed

Sub- Areas:

Infaht'stimulatj.dn

'Socialization: ':

.6

tr.

' Language

tognition

Selfrhelp.

'Motor -.

01;serva t I.nfo'rmat i.

'Comment section after 'each item may be utilized _for pertinent observational

.information -as it pertained to that skill (i.e: item ', "copies a circle", child

.draws.in imitatiori, is useful. observation). Behavioral information may be entered

on the checklist face sheet.Personally Identifiable Information,Required: 0

4Child's name, -date df birth iInstructor's name; program year rseveral spages are provided)

Addational4space may be-used to gg any major events or milestones in the

I

child's life. .

21,. 4

Page ,2 t ti

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PORTAGE GUIDE TOEARLY EDUCATION Screening Verification


Prerequisite Stills:None ,

Disability Gro ps:All

,Age Range (CA):' MA: Birth -6 years

.7



Training Needed by Examiner:Examiner should be, familiar with the checklist format. May be a stracher,

aide, parent or any othermembet of a helping-pcofession.'Other Persons Required:

1 None

Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit)R . ..

---..../..

Materials should be,available,in any preschool or nursery school or home

with a your-14 child in it (e.g. paper and crayons or pencil).

1

,SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:r

Procedure: Fach skill child can accomplish at the time of testing is checked iii

the column entry Behavior. Additional skills assessed at later periods-of time are

dated in the Date Achieved column. No quantitative score or developmental age isassigned.

Format:Checklist areas are color coded for easy identification. Each item has a

number and is between two year intervals. Comments column is provided, for each item

as well as scoring areas.'Space for Recordi.ng Retest:

Retests may all'be recorded on the same checklist. "Checklist)Ray beused

until all items are successfully accomplished.'Summary Sheet (graphic representation):,

None

21

TITLE: P9RTAGE GITIffE TO EARLY EDUCATION .Screening Ea Verification.

',IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING: .

i .

-Indicates a child's present levels in all Curricular areas.. .

-All items are in sequential order and in behavioral terms which may help atLCher when writing an individual educational program.

,

-Aids in the atermination of tong term goals for a child to accomplish.

* . .

-May be utilized as a progress report of the child for. parents and school,officials.

. .

.. , .

. .../ .

. . 0.

..

.

-

/

.

t.

NORMATIVE DATA: CrAerion'.Refertnced

Sample Size:.

,

Population Dtcriptors Used:

.

.

.

,.

4

4

r

.

.

1 .-

JECHRICAL ASPECTS:- No Data Available ..

Reliability:

. .

, ,Validity: _

,

. .

,, .

.

,

,

REFERENCES: .

.

7 t

IPortage,Guide ,A0 Early Education; ievised manual

checklist.

t., .

....e..

. ,

..

.

. .

.

2] ,)

. .PageTEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PORTAGE GUIDE TO EARLY EDUCATION Screening° Verification


The PGEE may be used with olde'r Children,that.are functioning`within the limits.

The Infant Stimulation sub-area was developed to assess the severely handicappedchild.

'

Items are cross-referenced to the Portage tuide to Early Education curriculum,but the checklist may be used with any curriculum;

,r

21

1A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: March 1977

. TITLE: PRESCHOOL AND EARLY. PRIMARY SKILL SURVEY Screening El verification

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:John A.. Long, Jr., Ed.D.

Author: "Morton Morris, Ed.D..George A. W. Stouffer, Jr., Ed.D. -

Publisher: Ordering,,Information:

mbfex Associates, Inc.MK Baron AvenUeJohnstqwn, Pennsylvania. 15906

Editor: Forms:

COpyright Date: Manual 1973; Test form - 1971'

Cost: Specimen set 7 $2.50

1.6

DESCOIPTIVE INFORMATION:

Purpose:

To help the teacher identify the needs of ech child for readiness skills.- 4

.Age Range (CA): MA: Grade Level: Preschool - Lower Prilrary

Format:.The PEPSS it a pictorial test with 4 subscales and a total of 59 items,

including samples. Child is required to, in some way, mark or complete the form

to indicate his answer.Time Required: 15-25 minutes per subscale. PEPSS may be given in up to four

sessions depending 'upon the children being tested.Sub-Areas:

PiCture recognition: Picture sequence

Picture relationship Form completion


None*44


Child's name, date Of birth, ageDate of testing 'r

Echopl's name, location

2J5

Page- 2 TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PROFILE OF BASIC LEARNING ABILITIES Screening Verification



None

Disability Groups:All, intended

learning disabilities.

for compiling a better overall picture of a child with

Age Range (CA) : MA.: # GRADE LEVEL: Preschool-Elembntary

ADMINISTRATIVE:CONSIDERATIONS: This is not a test, but a summary of manystandardized tests.

Group or Individual':

Training Needed by ExaMiner:



V

SCORING AND INTER ETATION:

RrnredurP. I task. is accomplished within the norms stated, a plus is markedthe response col ;.a minus and the date if accomplished after the norm. Ii within

normal limits, a ea vy red dot is put in the Normal Column. If the response is laterthan the norm, mark appropriate column dependent on the amount of deviation.

Format: gach item and its reference is listed within each sub-area, followed bysix columns; response (+ or. -), Norm and Profile categories from very weak (-2

standard deviations below the norm) to very.strong (-r2 standard deviations above).

Space for Recoiding Retest:

None. -


Entire booklet is a profile for several standardized tests.

TEST ANALYSIS,

.

TITLE:PRESCHOOL AND EARLY PRIMRY SKILL SURVEY Screening a VerificAtion

IMPLICATIONS FOR' - PROGRAMMING:

-May help ickntify a child's strengths and weaknesses.1

---May identify children requiring a complete evaluation.

. . ,

- ..-

-May 'aid the teacher in the determination of skills and goals needed to be

taught to one or more specific children, ,

l

..

.

.

NORMATIVE DATA: Available in the Technical Manual, which was not available for review'

Sample Site:

Population De.scriptors Used:

.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: Available in the Technical Manual, which was not available forA

review.Reliability:

,,

/b

validity:

, .

:.,

/

.

.

REFERENCES:

Preschool and .Early Primary Skill Survey - manual .

. student booklet

.,,.

-

. .

.

WM.

TEST tasIALYS * 1'

TITLE: 'PRESCIOOL.AND EARLY PRIMARY SKILL SURVEY Screening al , Verification/ .

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:'

4eSeveral of the pictures (line drawings) used in the test booklet are out ofor difficult to distinguish from the alternatives.

Form completion sub-scale scoring is subje4ctive and not totaled into the'Total

Score and Rating. I (4

21 r;,

Cf:11141:Cir'14 NORTH.PROGRESS AVENUE


TEST. ANALYSI*

DATE: March 1977

;

TITLE: PROVLE OF BAS V LEARNING ABILfTIES Screening Verification

INN

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:,

Author: Robert E. Valett,' Ed.D.44,

Publisher: Ordering Informatibri:

ConsultAg PSychologists,Priss, Inc.577 College'venue

California'Palo Alto, 94306Editor: 411) corms:

. Copyright Date: 1966'f

Cost: Spegimen,se- $1.00; Manual -'$0 75; Profiles (pkg.- of 25) - $6.50;Examiner' s Kit _$3e 0.

At

07-DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:.

. Purpose: "...to provide the psychologist with a developmenthl summary..."

from which he may integrate hisclinical recommendations.

Age Range-(CA): MA: Grade Level: Preschool-Elementary

Forrlat: ResUits of various tests are consolidated into an 8-page, 5 area booklet.Cross-references to specific tests and items are provided.

Time Required: Not applicableN\ 4

.Sub- Areas: .

Motor integ ration & physical deelopment . __Social-Personal adaptivity

' Perceptiza). abilities '- General intellectual functi ning

Langua4e '',

.

Observitional Infor'Mation:4. None. ReSted health comments are entered under/physical devPlOoment.

44. .

,

Personally entifiable Information Required: Ir.

Child's name, address, date of birtr.grade, age, nationality

School's name' .,. .

Reason for referral :

Examiner's name and findings'or recommendations

yI

ti

21

11


,TITLE: PRESCHOOL'AND EARLY PRIMARY SKILL SURVEY


Screening Ea :Verification

,Priwequisite Skills:

Ability to discriminate a specific picture from a row of oictureA.'Ability to indicate a choice.

Disability Groups: ..

Manual slftes the PEPSS is suitable for: SlowoAUisadvantaged,or Normalchildren. May be useful with Mild-Moderate Mentally retarded, Language delayed,Hearing impaired. .--

Age Range (CA): -- MA: GRADE LEVEL: Preschool-Lower Primary

ADMINISTRATIVE 'CONSIDERATIONS:

Group or Individual: Group should not exceed 4-10 children, depending upon theirlevel of maturity. Individual testing may be done, if desired, as with a severelycerebral pia/lied child etc..

irainrng weeded by 'Examiner:

Examiner_should be familiar with the survey and sample items. Examinermay be the classroom teacher.


Teacher aides or proctors may be used to provide added assistance to thechildren. Number needed will vary with group size and maturity.


None. ,


Procedure: Each'6orreCt answer as compared to the key or pictorial criteria iscredited with-one paint. Scores are conberted to a rating scale (hi, med., lo) orpercentile or stanine rankings. Each sub-scale is cored separately.

Scoring is done on a RecOrd & Analysis Form to provide easy a'6cessibilityof'overall scoring rbr the group. Survey scores donot appear on this form.


None, testis in a non-reusable booklet. 4

Summary Sheet (graphicrepresentation):

Summary is provided tor the total group via the Record and Analysis Form.

TEff ANALYSIS -

TITLE: PROFILE OF BASI ING ABILITIES.

Screening VerificatiNt x

;

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:-Aid inlinderstanding the learning disabla child through the scatter in his

test scores. .

)-t

-May aid in the development of a meaningful educational program to meet the

child's individUal needs (IEP). .

0-May help determine the need for relevant educational services (adaptive

physical education program, counselirig, etc.). -

-May determine child's strengths and weaknegses. -, .

4,...,

,.

,

.

.

NORMATIVE DATA: Not applicables .

Sample Size:.

.

.

Population Descriptors Used:.

,... .

,.

4,

., ,

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: Not applicable4'

Reliability: .

*

Validity:

.

0

.

e

REFERENCES:A Psychoeducational Profile of Basic Learning Abilities - manual N

/ profile form

.. ..

_ .

vr .%

.

'

2 °

111MMIPage 4 -TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PROFILE OF BASIC LEARNING ABILITIES Screening Q Verification ED


The entire profile may not be used at all times, but some testing should bemade in each area. :

0

irr

Scoring in certain areas is subjective.

1

A

4

e.

100RTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEllitANALYSIS

DATE: March 1977

.19

TITLE: PROGRAM FOR PRE - SCHOOL VISUALLY -

Screening VerificationIMPAIRED CHILDREN DEVELOPMENTAL CHECKLIST


Author: Rochelle Rosenthal

Publisher:

Editor:

Copyright Date: None

Cost: May be duplicated-

I


CONNECT1 A North Progress Avenue

ForttlHarrisburg, Tennsylvania,17109

.14

DESCRIPTIVE I'MATION:4 .

NPurpose: To assess the v'sually impaired child's flictioning withifi thenormal world.

4 \ ir

\

---:.%----AgeRaage (CA): Birth to GrAde5 years

Format: Items are divided by sub-area and by developmental age in which theyoccur,in.normal children. 'Child is observed or actual test si ion is posed, orinformation is gathered by an informant.

Time Required:

Sub-Areas:

Gross motor Social Visual

Untimed

Fine motor EmotionalPerceptual Communication

Observational Information: : eli careConceptual

Checklist may be used in conjunction with observation

Personally Id.entifiable lhformation Required:Child's name, birthdateRecorder's nameInformant's nameVisual informationOther information (relevant birth data, additional handicaps)

22.3

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PROGRAM FOR PRE-SCHOODA VISUALLYIMPAIRBO CSILDREN 6EVELOPMENTAL CHECKLIST

'Screening El Verification

hAMINEE:APPRQPRIATENESS:'

4rer.equisite e

None

, OisathlTTY Groups:

fl.sila149.y impaired. See Addi,tional,Information

Agg Range (CA): Birth

5 years

ADMINISTRATIVEiONSIDERATIONS:

Group*Ibr Individual: Individual

Training Needed by Examiner: Informant should be familiar with the child'shabitual performance. Recorder shoUld be familiar with items and specific itemOr.der for expedient administration or di'rected interview.


Informant-

Materials Required: (*items not prOvided in kit). If actual test situations are posed, the materials required are usually

available in any nursery or pfe-S.ctiool or home of a young child.

SCORfNG AND INTERPRETATION:

Procedure: Each item is checked if the child does or has done it habitually in

the past. A Developmental Age is determined by the age of the last items passed.

Format: .

Checklist


Space for pre-test, interim and post-testing.

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):Face sheet contains a score summery for each sub-area developmental age

for each of the three testings.

ti29.".--

TEST ANALYSIS

.,

TITLE:PROGRAM FOR PRE-SCHOOL VISIpiLLY . Screening Ea Verification 0IMPAIRED CHILDREN DEVELOP AL CHECKLIST

,

.('

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:-Items are in sequential order of developmenti therefore, the failed items

may become short term objectives. .,

. ,1

-May aid in the determination of a child's current preset levels of function-

ing..

.

.

, 4-.

. .

. .

4 .

. .

. ,

. 6

. ?A , .

v


.

Sample Size:.

Population Descriptors Used: i

. .

.

.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: 14o uata Avallaole

Reliability:'N

% .

n

Validity: ,...--

f

1

.

J

REFERENCES:. . EHA(Title VI-B) Program for Pre-school Visually Impaired Children

Developmental Checklist4

/f .

,

.

.

, .

,

4

_Page 4. TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PROGRAM FOR PRE - SCHOOL, VISUALLY

IMPAIRED CHILDREN DEVELOPMENTAL CHECKLISTScreenly Verification


This checklistGesell, Verna Hart,

This Checklisttype of handicap. It. yields

was abstracted from the worksSuzanne Ramos, Smeet & Barraga..

\

of:"01bnited Cerebral Palsy,

without

-r"

01,147ALAIIIMINO

cNENNINNIN

he vision sub-area is in wide - spread use for everycomplete baseline infotmation for all children.

V

e

4.)

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: June 1977

TITLE:PSYCk0EDUCATIONAL EVALt4ATION OF 'AB

PRESCHOOL CHILD


,

Screening ® Verification

Author: Eleonora Jedrysek Lillie Pope

Zelda Klapper Joseph Wortis

Publisher: . Ordering Information:.

Grune & Stratton, Inc.111 Fifth Avenue . . r

New York, N. Y. 10003

Editor:


40.

Cost: 'Book - $15.75

Forms:,

DESCRolig4IVE INFORMATION:

Purpose: "...to asses the child's present functions and level of achievement

ih a variety of areas."

Age Range (CA): 3-6 yrs. MA: 3-6 yr,A. Grade Level: Preschool

' ,Foriupt: The evaluation consists of 41 Main_Items and-several Probes to be used

if a child is having difficdlty with a specific item. All items need/not be admini-

stered to all children. Items progress to a mastery level of competence required in

first grade. . , f


Sub-Areas: (See Additional Information)Physical functioning and sensory status

Perceptlial functioningComprehension in learning for short-term retention

Observational Information:.Child's beha'ior and process of performing a task should be observed care-

fully. All'pertinent behaviors which-would facilitate or impede learning shou)i be

noted on the re ord form.

irNrsonally Identifiable Information,Requireth

.

0, 'It is not necessary to use a formal record form.

TESTANALYSIS

TITLE: PSYCHOEDUCAT!ONAL EVALUATION OFTHE PRESCHOOL CHILD



Prerequisite Skills:'

Developmental level adequate for, age.

Disability Groups:

Difficult to test chir&en e.g., Emotionally disturbed, Behavior problems-'

Age Range (CA) : 3-6 yrs. MA: 3-6 yA.



Training Needed by Examiner: Examinen should be, flexible and able to keep

child in control and mAilited. Should be thoroughly familiar with items, Probes

sequences and materials.Other Persons Required:

Parent may accompany a child into the examination room if he is hesitant

to separate.Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit) (See Additional Information)

* Chalk * Flashlight

alkboard D ;inking straw

* P per Pointer stick

* Cr * 4 Pill-bottles* Peg d * Salt* Pegs r * Rice

* Toy car * 6 Paper clips* Ball * Picture cards* Doll. * Cardboard shield

* Small animal * Match sticks

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:ve

Procedure:A plus is marked for correct response, agninus for incorrect, response. Com-

ments and teaching suggestions are noted upon completion-of the evaluation.Format:

Record form may vary in accordance with cndividual local needS.

Space for Rec.ording Retest:

None

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):A case study should be written to summarize the evaluation results and

and recommended teaching techniques and methods that may be useful to the classroom/-

teacher.

I

'

I

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE:PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL EVALUATION OP:"

Screening LA VerificationTHE PRESCHOOL CHILD

IMPLICATIONS FOR. PROGRAMMING:. . .

-May indicate possible Methods ant techniques useful to teach the child.

-May indicate areas in need of further evaluationor programming.

-May indicate a child's ability to learn under standardized conditions.

-May aid in the determination of k child's present levels for creation of an

IEP.

.-

.

.

.

-..

NORMATIVE DATA: No Data Available

Sample Size:

.

Population Descriptors Used: /,

---------I-

._

7.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: No-Data Available

Reliability:61.

.Validity:

. ..

$

REFERENCES:Psychoeducational Evaluation of the Preschool Child: A Manual Utilizing the

Flaeussermann Approach.

:,..4..

,/

. 0 N,.

.

,

,-)

2.n

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL EVALUATION OF

THE PRESCHOOL CHILDScreening El Verification


Sub-areas: (contind)

Language comprehensionCognitive functioning

Materials: (continued)

* 8 BlocksBrush

* Comb*' Shoe

Spoon

3 Paper cups* 30 Pennies! 2 Teaspoons* Doll spoon** 2 Tablespoons

PencilBook

This evaluation instrument is a companion documenf4to Developmental potentialof Preschool Children by Else Haeussermann, (Grune & Stratton).

*1

J

ti

2

(CONNECT)1( 1A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE


TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: March 1977

TITLE: PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL INVENTORY OF BASIC SKILLS Screening El Verification aAND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT


Author) Franklin E. French

Publisher:Mafex Associates, Inc.

\--'90 Cherry Street

Johnstown, Pennsylvania 15902


Cost: Specimen Set $2.50f

4

-


Forms:

Test package - $2!'n; Technical manual - $2.50,11)

DESCRI'TIVE INFORMATION:

Purpose:

"...provides a method of organizing skills andacquired in infancy'and early childhood."

Age Range (CA): , ' MA:

Igo age or level" specified.Format:

Child is observed as to whetherlist contains 197 skills to be assessed;any one child.

Time Required:

UntimedSub-Areas:

Social-emotional developmentSensory discriminationGross motor development


abilities that are normally

Grade Level:

certain skills are iH his repetoLre. Clkck-J

all skill are not necetsaily observed in

Entire instrument is an observation of

Visual-motor coordinationPerceptual integrationAcademic shillsSelf-care

a child's usual


Child's name, ageEvaluator's name, schoolDate of test

behavior andskills.

I

231

, * TEST ANALYSIS

f

JITLE PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL INVENTORY OF BASTIr

SKILLS Screening EDAND PERSONAL, DEVELOPMENT

, ----



None

Disability Groups:

Severe Mental retardation, Brain dar,,ager childhood Schi;.ophrenia, Severe

Language disorder, Infantile Autism, Gros% Sensory defects (Deafness. Blindness}

rnVerification

Age Range (CA): MA:

No age or level specified

or


Group orAndividual: Individual


No special training is required. Good observation skills a're necessary.


None

Materials Required: (*items not 'rovided in kit) ,

None, those materials requ red for the PIBSPD would usually be found in aprogram foil preschool children or i the child's home.

I

?.

4,


Procedure: Check all be viors prelloentin tile manual. Shade on the chart alliteMschecked and passed acco ng to Observatidn. Shade all items pertaining togross disabilities that would event the child from learning the skill.

Format:

Basic Skills Chart is the recordin form. I41 layout is circular with thenames and numbers of the subareas and the numbers of t corresponding items for eachspec ific area.

space tor Recording Retest:

None

Summary Sheet (graphiC representation):

Basic Skills Chart

2

Page.3 VEST ANALYSISN

TITLE:PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL INVENTORY OF BASIC SKILLS.-

-:screening Pi ri 'cation .

AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT

/

-

,

*7

. .

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING: -,

-Little interpretation required for parents of Para professionals,, .

..

-May be used inlparent c9nferendes as a chant to delmonstrate what skills thbchild knows.

AA

0 -Aids in the identification of specific learning needs of children'that do..not..

rit the normal learning pattern.'fl

. '*

-May be use s a guide to planning appropriate developmental or remadialactivities.

It.. .

.

,

. '.

.

. .

-.

. .' .. '"T 0

,

,

,

NORMATIVE DATA: No Data Available :

/.

Sample Size: v' .

. .

.

Population bescriptors Used: -1-- .-

.. ,,

I

. 4

4-.

.,.....

.. .

. ., .

.

TECHNICAICASP CTS: No Data Available hnicalc...11

(tec manual not available for review)": .

...

Kel iabll\ty; -\ " -It.

To

44 Validity: / ,

.,

. ,

,v,.

7

t ..

.

.d

4 ,.

v , ,

----.

.

REFERENCES:

,Psychoeducational Inventory of,BasicbSklAs and'Per5onal Developmdrit sbasic Skills Cbart

me*1 ''

o , ' . .

,

4 V' e 411.

100..

e 6 , ' ,\ Ni t

A

233

.r

0

Page 4 .TEST ANALYSIS-,PSYCHOEDUpATIONAL INVENTORY OF BASIC SKILLS Scree fig E Verific 10n

AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT

p


Manuil "states that, "Tasks. may be modified or ikiparable,tasks used, when

,appiopriate."

1v

0

, vs

,'

4,

I'

'40

er

234

4

14NORTHPROGRESSAVENUEHARRaBURVENNSYLVANIA0109

TEST ANALYSIS

ATE: March 1977

TITLE: PUPIL RATING SCALE

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION':

Screening1]. Verificati

Authdr: Helmer R. Myklebust, Ed.D.

Publisher':

Grune & Stratton'111 Fifth Avenue'New York, N. Y. 10003

Editor:

Ordering Information:-

.Forms:

Copyright Oate: 1971

Cost: Specimen set - $5.50;' Set (manual, 50 forms) - $9.001 Forms (pkg. of 50) -

$5.50

A

--,,,--


Purpose: ,,

4 .

"...to identify chilVen.not achieving normally but have the potential to

do so."' To identify children with learning disabilities.

'Age Range ('CA): MA: Grade Level:

No age or level specified.Poemr:-

.

. .

Classroom teacher observes the'child during the regular classroom activities

apd rates him on a five point scale.,

1

Time Required:fic.

Untimed ,C

SA-Areas:'

Auditory eomprellAsion Motor coordination

'Spoken language-, Personal-social behavior

.16

Orientation

Observational Information:,Entire scale is rated by- observation of the child's behaviors.

*

Personally-Identifiable Information Required:

Child's name, address, date of birth, age

Parent's name /

Teacher's name, grade, schoolDate of testing .

235

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PUPIL RATING SCALE Screening C3 Verification


Prerequ'isite Skills: .

None

Disability Groups:All, especially Nfntally retarded, Learning disabled,

Age Range (CA): MA:

No age or level specified


Group or individual: Individually scored; observation is done within thecontext of the classroor.

Training Needed by Examiner:411

Rater is the regular classroom teacher; shQuld be familiar with themanual, the rating scale and the child's usual behafiort.



None

1

I I


112,._...,.-

Procejure: Each it am is rated on a 5-point scale.. 3 being average, 1 being well,below and 5 well above. '1Circle corresponding number of statement which best destxibeethe child's behavior. Add the totals for each area for a total score which indicates'normal learning abilities - 90 or above1or learning disabilities,- 89 or below.

Forman iir.

Scoring is done on the''rlating sheet.

-4

Space for RecorALzgdiletest%

None

Summary Sheet i(graphic represerftation)Suvmary of scores is on'the front covir sheet of the PRS.

L 2 '5 t)

.44

TEST ANALYSIS. !

TITLE: PUPIL RATING SCALE Screening Ea Verification a--

IMPLICATIONS FOIL PROGRAMMING: ,

9 t

.P.

-Should identify children with learning disabilities.

-May indicate which areas should be further evaluated. .

. f

I ir

. _

1

.. 4

,.

,

.

---4

1

.

NORMATIVE DATA: . ,

Sample. Size: 2176.

.

Population Descriptors Used:'Third and fourth graders

.

.,

Four suburban school systemsAll socioeconomic groups . ..

.


. .\

Reliability: No Data Available4 C

,

Validity: .

Ii comparison with various other instruments used to identify learning

disabled children, the PRS was found nat only to identify thse_children accurately

but also to indicate the severity of the problem. Close agreement between the PRS

and results from intensive diagnostic evaluations.'

1.

.

REFERENCES: .

.

. .

Pupil Rating Scalq: Screening for Learning Disabilities - manual

fscale .,.

)-_ .

. ',.

. . , .

1

$111

1

...-

t

ax .

. .

..

-"?

pimpuppippmE4.444444-.

111-

Page 4 TEST ANALYSIS.

TITLE: PUPIL RATING SCALE Screening 12 Verification


gt

4

.

S

2J "

146 NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE


TEST ANALYSIS

DATE::May 1977

TITLE: PUPIL RECORD OF EDUCATIONAL BEHAVIO& , Screenings Verification. _

O


Author: Ruth Cheves, M.S. Ed.

Publisher:Teaching Resources100 Boyleston StreetBoston, Massachuslif

Editor:


C W: Complete kit - $59.00; Pupil record booklets (pkg. of 15) $6.95;Spanish edition, complete kit - $68.00

02116

Ordering'Information:'

4

Forms: Available in Spanish

4


Purpose:

To determine a ,child's individual pattern:of-functioning and determine hisproficiency in various. skills.

Age Range (CA): MA: Grade Level: Preschool-Low intermediate

Format:

Child is asked to manipulate materials, perform motor tasks and answer es-tions. Child is allowed as much time as he needs until-the task is completed, or hegives up. -

Time Regaired:Approximately 30-75 minutes in 1-2 sessions for preschooleer.--7

Sub-Areas:Visual -motor perception Mathematical conceptsAuditory perception Language development

- Observational !AI:nation:

Child is carefully observed during the performance of each item. Commentsmay be listed for each item. General overall observations of child's distractabil-ity, serserverance, etc. are entered on the back pages of the PREB booklet.

Personaliy4Identifire Information Required:Child's name, grade levelInstructor's name 11IP

Date

4

239

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PUPIL RECORD OF EDUCATIONAL BEHAVIOR Screening G3 Verification


frereqvisite Skills: ,

%Ability to speak understandablyAbility' to manipulate materials freely '

Disability GrOups:

Mentalll,retarded, Learning disabled,

Age Range (CA):

__1



Individual

MA: GRADE LEVEL: Preschool-Low intermediate

Training Needed by ExamiNer: Mkaminer should be thoroughly familiar with thetest procedure and item administration. Any educationally oriented person may admin-ister the PREB, i.e., teacher, ancillary personnel, diagnostic specialist,_psycholo-giSt.


Materials. Required: (*items not provided in kit) See Additional Iidformation8 Geometric form cards Ditto masters 1 ea.. square, circle,

18 Color form cards dog4 Puzzles

4 Peg design patterns.8 Block design patterns12Incomplete picture cards6" Pointed scissors,6" Wood4n peg board99 Colored 1" wood blocks:

(10 green, 4 red, 4 yellow,3 purple, 4 blue, 7 orange)

4k,Card with hole

* 6 Large crayons - red, blue, yellow,green, orange, purple

'41. 10" Playground ball

* 12 5x/" pieces white construction paper* 5 5x5" pieces white construc*ion paper* 2 811x11" pieces white construction pap* 7 Pieces primary writing paper


Procedure:

All responses are either marked with a check or written as accurately as-possible in the record booklet. The PREB yields no score.

Format:

P.REB record booklet provides adequate space for scoring each item withcomments.

Space for Recording Retest:None

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):None

2.f ,.

*I

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: Pun RECORD O' EDUCATIONAL BEHAVIOR Screening C3 Verification 0

IMPLICATIONS FtPROGRAMMING:

-Will provide

- May provide the

modalities.

ormation for individual program dolvelopment.

program implementor with information about, the-chird,:s learning

- Provides a record of the child's functioning abilities that may be used in-

parent- teacher conferences.

*

NORMATIVE DATA: The PREB is not and ill not be standardized..

Sample Size:

Population Descripfors Used:

"s


Reliability:

Validity:

TREFERENCES:

Pupil Record o? Educational Behavior - manualrecord bookletmaterials

.1

211

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: PUPIL RECORD OF EDUCATIONAL BEHAVIOR Screentog Verification 0


Materials (continued)

Picture chart6 Consonant picture cards6 Letter cards

12 Rhyming cardsWhistle

24 Letter cards4 Sequence picture cards6 Word list cardsWord list holder

2 Lined pieces of paper12 ConfiguratiOn cards12 Numeral cards16 Number word cards.

* 1 ca. Penny, nickel, dime, quartet, dollar billComputation problioms on primary writing paper

.N

a task is too difficult for a child, e.g., color naming, then the child isasked to match colors. If still too difficult, then child is to identify colors.This is done for all cognitive items - colors, shapes, numbers, letters.

1.

ti

(1A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE - .6

HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109 .

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: March 1977

TITLE: QUICK TEST Screening al Verification':


Author: R. B. AmmonsC. H. Ammons

Publisher:

Psychological Test SpecialistBox 101 ..4

Missoula, Montana 59801

Ordering 4-nfprmation:

Editor: Forms: Form 1, 2, 3

Copyrigfit eate: '1962

Cost: Tester's set $16.00; Manual - $5.00; Record sheet (pkg. of 100) $10.00;

Plates $4.00; Instruction cardboard - $0.80; Item cardboard - $0.70


Purpose:"...designed for quick 'screening of verbal-perceptual intelligence in

practical situations."

Range (CA): 2 yrA- MA: Grade Level:Adult

Fo'rmat:

Child is presented with a picture plate with four different pictures.Child is asked to idenAkfy the picture whiCh best illustrates the word the examinersaps.

Time Required:

3 10 minutesSub-Areas;

Nonea

p Observational Information:

Observations are to be included on the record sheet under Notes.



2713

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: QUICK TEST Screening CI Verification



Ability to indicate a 'yes' or response.

Disability Groups: .

Emotional or Behavior problems, Severely Physicailly handicapped, Hearingimpaired, Mentalletarded, Aphasic, Speech impaired.

Age Range (CA): 2 yr. - MA:

Adult



Training Needed by-Examiner: May be administered -by persons familiar with they

test materials, objectives and scoring and observed several testing situations. lutist

be able to eliminate guessing from the response.Other Persons Required:.

None


Picture platesItem cardboard - older persons

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION':

Procedure: Each correctly identified item/picture is marked plus, incorrect

mihus. Scores are totaled and may be concerted to an MA, IQ or percentile ranking.

Format: Record sheet'has each stimulus word and the correct number of the pic-

ture it corresponds to. The difficulty or grade level of each word is indicated.

tit of each of the three forms available.Space,for Recording. Retest: Each record form may be used to,administer orie


None

2

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: QUICK TEST Screening al Verification,

.

.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:\

..

. .

'-May be used as a screening device for tandicapped children to determine whichchildren need referral for a diagnostic evaluationfor reasons concommitant totheir physical or sensoral handicap. ,

......-1

,

-May be used ,to help gain rapport before full psychological testing.

-May be used for longitudinaal studies of a child's intellectual growth..

..

-May be used in mass screening efforts.4

\ .

. '

'

.

. ..

.

NORMATIVE DATA:

'Sample Size: children and adults; 23 persons & each age or grade levelfrom 2 yrs. 12th grade.


Age .

SexEducation1.1 level t'

Father's occupational level (own,or husband's for. adults)

. .

J

Additional studies on this subject are quoted in the. manual andTECHNICAL ASPECTS: reprints.

- .

ReliabHit,14 With 69 preschool age children mean interform reliability was .78,predicted 2 fbim was .87 and predicted

34111

form was .92.r .

Validity:-

..

. ,

Comparing the QT with the F411 Range Picture Vocabulary Test, the followingcorrelations were made: Form 1, .76; Form 2, .77; 'Form 3, .621 Form 1,- 2, 3, .79.

Items have a highce validity..

)1r. .

.

.

,.

REFERENCES: ,_

"The Quick Test: provigional manual" - Ptychological Reports, 1962

"A Rapid Screening Test for Intelligence in Children"reprint from

.

American Jour al of Diseases of Children, Vol. 109, 1965.

.

. . 4.

245

Paige 4 TEST ANALYSII,

4

TITLE: QUICK TEST , Screening ° Verification 1,3


) The Quick Test and the Full Range Picture Vocabulary Test may be usedeaohterchangeably. ,t.

.Standard error of measurement: for 1 form 2.45; 2 forms, 3.66; 3 forms1combined, 4.61.

MAs below 2.5 should be interpreted cautiously.

O

aro

1

A7-

01,

CCM1-A' NORTI1 PR091k4S AVENUE '

HARRISBURG; iktiNSYLVANK 17109ST 'ANALYSIS'

.

TITLE.:: ,,PrEPTivE-

I

DATE: May 1977

RESSIVE EMERGHNT LANGUAGE scALEScreening

* .

et,Verification°

BIaLrOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:

A4thor: Kenneth R. BzochRichArdLeague

Publisher: Ordering Information:"Ahinga PressRdute 2,,Box 5Tallahassee, Fl 32361

Editor: - *4

CopyrigOtDate: _1974 .

Cost: Kit - $T5. 0i- Handbook - $.1t; Scale forms (pkg. of 25) - $6.75

I,

Porms:

f;4 t; -

k

BESCRIPTIVE rNFORMATIDN:

Purpose:

k

To determine a young child's developmental level bbth receptive and. .

. .

expressive langua abilities.o--/-

.

* .

, ,

Age 114ngke (C,A.): 0-Q yrs., MA: . -. A Grade Level:

Format: Parent or surrogate is asked broad questions about the chiltd'sf'

language abilities. All items hate been simiblified'o be moreunderstandableto:parenpac Includes items related to auditory perceptidh association, recall andauditory -motor learning.

Time Required: 4.

UntImedSub-Apas4

.

l

' Expressive language . .

1 Receptive ilanquage.

Observational InfoAlation: m04, .40

The child is directly observed, bnly if there is some question with the' 0 ' t

responses.givenlby the informant. Notes about the child's clinical history, langu-age-disorders, etc-, may be made -in the response'booklet. ..

le''. Peri.onally IdEnlOriable Information Required: .7

. Child's nam , address, date of,birth, chronological age,telephbne number .

.

Father's name, occupation,Mpther's name, occupation

brdther'..s nams and age%'Infozmaat's''relationship o lk

SPIL a

1Page 2

4

0

f ._

i

TEST ANALYSIS . ,.-

°TITLE:RECEPTIVE-EXPRESSIVE EMERGENT LANGUAGE SCALE kreaning VOrlfiCatiOn40



Disabiljty Groups:All

F.

10' Age Range (CA): 0-3 yrs.

A

k..

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS':

Group or Individual,: _ThdivioduM.

Training Needed by paminer:-ExaTOner "shourld be thoroughly familiar with the REEL items. Should be able°

to, conduct a:nonlpiretted inter4ew with 'ease.. ,.

--Other Persons Required:An info ant, la person thorough familiar with the child's language. ,.

behavior, is- needed tb complete tke REW . 4 , 10

Materials Requir,ed: (items not provided in kit),...'

x

None, :44l**414 °:

.1s

t.

.0'

SCORING. AND INTERPRETATION:, 4r N..

di ' --o ProCedure: Aplus is given all items Passed; a minus for each failed; at plus /> usb

for.partially exhibited behavior. A plus/minlis is given full credit if the otheritems For the age group are plus or if the items irr the nextiage "level are scored aplus; in ether cad's, it equals a minus, (See Additional Information)

Forman. ,

*Each booklet includes the REEL scale, divided into agelevels, 1, 2, or 3-

month eminWrvals. Receptive1language items ate on the left, expressive items OF' theright.

5-pace for Recording Retest;

N

Summ ry Sheet (graphic representation):

None.

3

TEST ANALYSIS

1

, .

tITLE:RECEPTIVE-EXPRESSIVE EMERGENT LANGUAGE SCALE Screening 0 Verification II

.. .

. !

A


..

. .

..

..

-May proyide information as to whether the child's language development. .,

is within normal limits.1 -

..-

. . ,

,

, .

May proyide'informationas to discrepancies" etween a child's receptive andexpressive. language development. .

,. ---dr'-May indicat theneed foran actual eva,luation of the child's speech and/or

language.

4

%.., . itii .

.

.41

.44 ii' .

.,

. ----

4' ..,

. .

NORMATIVE DATA: NO Bata-Availaple ..

Sample Size:

''.


4

4,.

-..

i.

'..

.

.

'TECHNICAL ASPECTS:,

.

... , .

Reliabil-ity: Mith 2P normal infants, tested by ine erie d giaduate students,test/retest, reliability between 4ifferent aaministrator was . to 1.00, and after2a three wee%,interval between testings, a correlation o .71, for the LanguageQuotient was obtained. -

Validity: . ..

A longitudinal study 'of 50 normal infants from lingbisticilly enriched,

environments was bonducted.i After-a 2-3 year peripd of monthly testing, alk infants

were found to achieve mean average ''cores foReceptive, Expressive-and Cpmbined .

Language Ages at or abgve their CA. .

I

.

'

,

171.

,

..

REFERENCE: 1

.. ,

( 4 .. .

.Assessing Language Skills in Infancy': a handbook'for t, he multidimensional '

,

analysis of, emergent language,,'The Bzoch-League Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Scale f2r the

Measurement of Langu/ge Skills in Infancy.,..,,

.4

.

,

. :0"'N,

'. .

s .

1 . i 1

*2 (1

TEST ANALYSIS1r-

TITLE: RECEPTIVE-EXPRES§,IVETMERGENT LANGUAGE SCALE Screening ar 'Verificationf


Scoring procedure (continued)

An.RIA (Receptive Language AgeY, anELA (Expressive Language Age),; a CLA(Combined Language Age), an RQ (Receptive Quotient), EQ (Expressive Quotient) andan LQ (Language/CoMbined Quotient) are derived.

There are only three items each for expressive and receptive language per ageievel ( nth until one year, thenp2 months until 2 vearsiand three months'until

3 years). Dueto the lumber of items per leve e REEL.can only be effective as a

very gross screening-instrument. - -;!

AP,

A

1

L

1

-

A

(1-A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

-0***-1

y

DATE: march 1977

STEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: SALE OF EFFECTIVENESS MOTIVATION Screening Verification0

BNLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:>

Author: D. H. Stott, Ph.D.J. D. Sharp, Ph.D.

Editor:

Copyright Date:, 1973

unknown


Dr, D. H. StottUniversity of GuelphGuelph, Ontario, Canadq

Forms: a

,9

a,


Purpose:"...to assess the strength of a young- child's effbctiveness motivation..."

4Age Range (CA):

Format:

3 -5 yrs. MA:

Teacher is to observe thestatement of that behavior.

each.Time Required:

Sub-Areas:

None

Untimed

Grade Level:

child's behaVior and choose the most descriptive

There are.11 areas with 9 alternative

Obser4tional Information:

''The scale is totally observational.:

Personally-identifiable Information Required:`Child's.4aMe, sex, date of birth

Date of recordingTeachers nameSchool's pane

.

251

TEST ANALYSIS s

TITLE: SCALE OF EFFECTIVENESS .MOTIVATION Screening C3 Verification 0-

EXAMINEE APA6RIATeNESS:


. None .01

f

Disabitty Groups:

SOcially'"Emotionally tlisturbed,UnderactieVer, Behavior problems

Age Range (OA): 3-5 yrs. MA:

4 ;

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATI'bNS:


Training .Needed by Examiner:,

Good observation skills

Ober Versons Required:.1 None

Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit),, 4.

A,Noric

*.

I

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION: ..,,

. Cheek the senten descriftor Stich best describes ete chiltProcedure; behavior. Circl the digit to the right oI the ansWer sheet on the

record form. Addjliqh*ft single scores for each area for an E Score.. There are waysof computing score forlautistic children oblivious to consequence which would natur-ally lower the E spore.

Format: .

:- ..

Scoring form is divided into Actions for each area. Scaring numbers are in

columns for easy transfe from scale to form. L


4.None

Surinary Sheet (graphic representati9n):

None

25:

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE:. SCALE OF EFFECTIVENESS MOTIVATION' Suleening E Verification

4,....._


,.

.

,

-To help place the child in the correct educational program. "IP

..

-Maj identify young children who are potential underachiells.

-May aid in putting the autistic child and the child not conscious of conse-

quence in the pertpectiv.1e of their Internal Motivation to meet inner needs.

/_

i.

. .

.

,

. .

.

.

. .

NORMATIVE DATA: t.. °.

.

- )

. .

Sample.Size: 4:26 (69eys, 61 girls)J ,

Populatqor). Descriptors Used:

Enrolled in one of five state nursery schtols-'-

Aged between four and fiv,c years

. , . 1.

.14111 '

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:.

Reliability: Scores in all eleyen.areas correlatel-pcaitiyely with the scores,forthe remaining ten areas, mean correlations tor males .61, for .temales .67 and com-

bined .64. The lovApst correlation with the Whole were Activities Involving Noise, and

Helping Others.Validity:

The scale scores correlate with the Caldwell Pre-School Inventoryjachieve-

ment and receptive vocabulary). and the" British adaptation of the Peabody Picture

Vocabulary Test.' .

REFERENCES:-

Scale of Effectivenesq-MotiVatjon -test form

.

scoring form

"Effectiveness-Motivation in ?re-School Children", Educational Research

1!'ol. 18 No. 2.

Al.

..

. lb. -ti

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: scALe OF EFFECTIVENESS MOTIVATION 'Ow eening al Verification

ADDITIONAL INFORMATe:

Scoring procedures are difficult to under-stand.

The Scale has just been published.

4K

4

4 0-4 251

t.

1A.NORTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEST ANALYSIS

a

DATE: April 1977

vd

TITLE: 'SCHOOL READINESS SURVEX Screening 113 Verification


Author: F. L. Jofraan.

James Massey

Publisher:Consulting Psychologists Prss577 College AvenuePalo Alto, California 94306

Editor:


e/7"-----Cost: Specimen set - $1,0 (Manual - $0

116

Ordering Information:K

Forms: 6

11.

urveys (pkg. of 25) - $12.50


Purpose:"...designed to appraise skills'that are loiwowt to be related to adequate

functioning in the'school setting."

Age Range (CA): .4-6 yrs. lkA: Grade Level: Preschool

Fprmat:

Parent presents the 0011d with various tasks. May be administered with or

without direct supervision by the school.I

Time Required: .

Untimed.Sub-Areas:

Ngmber concepts Speaking vocabulary

Discrimination of form Listening vocabulary

Color naming 4 General informationSymbol matching

Observational Information:A General Readiness Checkljst is to'be filled out by the parents, but is

not part of the total score.

t



I

.14

TEST ANAJNYSIS

TITLE: ,SCHOOL READINESS SURVEY


Prerequisite' Skills:

None

Disability Groups:

All6 Mildly impaired

Age Range (CA): 4-6yrs, MA:

Screening al Verification

V

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS,:

, Group or Individual,: Individual

Training heeded by Examiner: ,:

Examiner/fgThsh-t-sbould be familiar with the directions and format.

Other Persons Required:.

None


* Paper marker 4


Prog.durr: Scoring criterion is'gieren for individual sub-areas after that

specific test. All points are totaled and compared to the scale to determine the

child's degree of readiness.Format: .

Scoring is done in the survey booklet on the page 1.1.0t faces the parent'

Mar as are to be made so the child cannot discern whether the answer wag-corrector correct.

pace for Re#ording Re,test:

Survey is in a non reusable booklet.

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):Scores are summarized on the scoring guide - general ranges for readiness,

borderline readiness and not ready are provided.

25f,

1

4

TEST, ANALYSIS

TITLE: SCHOOL READINESS SURVEY \-- Screening :1g Verification 111


.

.

", -May make the parent aware of the need to help the child develop skills in the

home. ,-

-Provides school superintendents with an idea of which children need evaluations

-immediately for possible, special class placement., .

- Maybe used as a pre-'and post-test in speci41 preschool programs (e.g. Held

Start).

,.

..

.

.

,

.

. 1

NORMATIVE DATA: Restandardized in 1975

Sample Size: 383, .

Population Descriptors Used:_

20 elementary schools .

Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties,' California0 .

.

X.' ft

-TECHNICAL ASPECTS: -..,..

Reliability: Test/Retest teliabftity with 32 children administered the survey by

trained teachers was .79. For 20 children whose parents administered the survey

once and teacher readministered it 4 months later, the. correlation was .64.

Validity:

.

, The staildardizaiipn population had the survey administered to them by their

parents in May. The next May, teacher's rated the children on a 5-point scale,

ratings correlated .62. ___

Jfa

REFERENCES:.

School Readiness Survey - professional manual

* survey .

..

2 5 if

TEST ANALYSIS I

TITLE: SCHOOL READINESS SURVEY screening Verification. .


;nstructions to adminiSter the survey are easily'understood.

Ideas for a home remediation program appear in the'Survey to enable the parentassessing the child in the spring to work upon similar activities to the surveydipring the summer to encourage growth.

Some (4 the pictures are difficult to determine and may be difficult for adisadvantaged child to identify' (e.g. binoculars).

The manual has not been revised since 1967 to make parents aware that.nochild may be excluded from a free public education.

4.

4

2

caNnEcr)(ir -1-A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE

HARRISBURG, PENNSYbVANIA 17104

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: FSbruary 1977

TITLE:SEQUENCED INVENTORYOF COMMUNICATION

F.t.

Screen i ng VerificationDELOPMENT


Annette R. TobinAuthor: Dona Lea Hedrick

Elizabeth M. Prather

Publisher:

University of Washington PressSeattleWashington 98105

Ordering. Information:.

Forms:


Cbst: Test kit $95.00; Manual - $8.50; Receptive or expressive tes' booklets(pkg. of 50) $7.50 each

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:'

Purpose:

To evaluate the communication abilities of children

f

Age Range (CA): 4 mos. - MA: Grade Level:

4 yearsFormat:

Child is asked to respond physically and verbally to an examiner's ques-tions., Number of questions is limited to the child's critical level for hischronological and mental ages.

,Time Required:Approximately one hour

Sub-Areas:Expressive languageReceptive language

ObserWational Information:

Personally-Identifiable Information Required:

Record form was not available for review.

25J

TEST ANALYSIS.

TITLE : SEQUENCED INVENTORY OF COMMUNICATIONDEVELOPMENT

Screeting VerificatioQ 0EXAMINEE APPROPRIATENESS: .

Prerequisite tkills:None

4.

.).

Disability Groups:'All. Originally designed for normal and mentally retarded chil

4 mit11

Age Range (CA): 4 mos. MA:

4 years

ren.


Group or Individual:Individual

_A

Training Needed'by Examiner: Examiner should give at least five practice test%

before administering the test for scoring purposes. Examiner should be thoroughly

familiar and comfortable with the administration and Jrcoring'procedures.

Other Persons Required: A reorder to record performance results is in the.'standardization of the SICD as is one parent, who may priivide information for parent

report items. (See Additional Information)Materj'als Required: (*items no.t provided in kit)

Teddy bear Puppet Large block A

Rattle Toy Chair Large piece of cardboard

CellophaneQuie't Toy

Cup10 Plastic spoons

ShoeBalls 1 lg. & I sm.

6 Small carsDollPaper

KeyTree

2 Open boxesSockS

20 Chips6 Blocks - orange,

green, purple,,yellow, red, blue

3 Bells"No.

- lg., med.,sm.

SCORING AND INTERPRNTION:

Toy dogCircles - hard & softTriangles - hard & softSquares - hard & softkBalloon*

- li

Procedure: Circle appropriate answer to the item aschild or paren resp

'Yes' or 'No'. The manual must be consulted for point values for each em.

and,a basal are established. Af CA (receptive) and an ECA-(expr sive). are

computed.Format: Record sheet is divided into each sub-area and its components. Items

appropriate to that specific component are listed, age jevels in four month intervals

correspond to appropriate, items.Space for Recording Retest:

.None

Summary Sheet (graphic representation)Record form is considered to be a profile of a child's communication

abilities. 4.

04;71 , -*

itMb 1,

TITLE:SEQUENCER INVENTORY OF COMMUNICATION

DE,ELOPMENT.,Itreening VViation

N.1

-4

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMOG:. ---

.

-_ s. ,..

, a 4, a °

.-Items ar'e sequenced so that failure of an item indicates a remeditHion

4 . .

ogram.,. . . J

li -

-May ad with the deterMination,of a hierarchy of therapeutic goals for a child.

hI

14

e

to a

NORMATIVE DATA: ,(

,

.. . ..

Sample Size: 252 children 1, at each 4-mont interval (1 year; 1 year, 4 mos.;

1 year, 8 mos.; 2 years, etc.) "V ,

Population Descriptors Used? .4

le

, .Equal number in each a groupoin three'social classes as determined by the

authors and Myers and Bean'sTT actor Index of Socal Position.

' Caucasian.-Sex ratios were not rigidly controlled

-

4 Excluded children with handicaps or relating problem&

44 .

C -c

TECHNICAL AtPECTS:, ',

t)iiIn4rscorer,ReiNability - 16 childr4b raadomlybselected, 2-3 &t 4,

R,P .eabiiity: 12,120., 28, 36, and 44 months were `test and simultanepuslY, S'

scored by two ex'aminws; percentiof agreement ranged from 90.3 to 1.00. TesIiRetestReliability_- randomly selected from 14 16, 24, 32, 4p, 48-month age levr15. Re-

testeol pop week after the initial testi .Perclnt of agreement ranged from .88'to.986'

Validity:/t

,

4

Test, items were tffliken from standardized measures (Gesellt DDST, ITPA, etc..),

Item's were all placed at the age level where 75 %-o the children irthe preliminar7

study passed. Comparing tlie PPVT to the Receptivelltbrrnicaton Age (RCA) and the

,E4restive CommmEcation Age (ECA) shoAs correlations f .8097 and .7553 respec-

tivelY. lhe ECA correlates with the Wan Length of Besponse and the Structural Com-

lexit -Score t same level as the PVT .7613-and .744 r Is ectivel

REFERENCES: .

P P,*# *

Sequenced Tnventory of Communication Development - manual

4

Io

TE§,T ANALYS I S

TITLE: SEQUENCED Ti V ORY OF cpmmuNicATIoNOPMENT

Screening . Veri f i ca on, [2]4,

ADDITIONAL INFO

Materials: .(c nued)

bus, soap, ball, baby, cake, table,shoe, pipe, cars, dogs, cats,"6

y Book, "TheW9ndprs of the Seasons"* Ta Recorder

Pictures monkey, book, stove,

Specific instructio bout scoring exceptions and difficulties a4e0 detailed.

"Excluding the 4-month and 48-month group Which were not .as free to varybecause of test base and ceiling, the largest discrepancy between chronological ageand communication age is 1.71 months for RCA at the 36-month level and for ECA'atthe 40-44-month level. The standard deviations range from 1.41 to 6.87 mdnths andaveraged 4.04 m ths, he equivalent of one age level., .These results mean that amongthe rtormative ple of children most scored from -1 to +1 age level from their49inropological ."

Supplementary testing can be included__ h SICD. During the stand dizationstudy both the PPVT (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test) and the PAT (PhotooA ticulationTel* were administered.

I

c

2(11

.J.

1=4144.

1-A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

4M,

TEST ANALYSIS

/ DATE: March 1977

TITLES. fLOLON DRAWING COORDINATION TEST Screening 0 Verification n

BIBLiOGRAWC INFORMATION:4

4

Author: Richard L. Slosson

Publisher: Ordering Information:Slosson Pducational Publications, Inc..140qine Street

4 East Aul'ora, New,York 14052Editor: Forms:.

A

'Copyright Date: 1967

SiCost: Kit - $7.50

Ale

OESOIPTIYE INFORMATION:

400'purpose: ,

designed to identify individuals 'with various forms*Or Arceptusl'disorders whFe eye-hand coordination is involved.",

Age .Range (0.14).: yr. - 'AA:

Adult

Grade Level:

Forpt: .. .

-Child is told to Copy each geometric fo three times.'as

--)

mAny,forMs a% his age,(e.g. 3-ryear'old child, capes forms 1,

.'.. ,.

Time Reqojred:

.- Apprbximately l041.5 minutes A

,Sub-kreas.: - .

,None, . 1

C

° -

Observational Information: to,

None

.

Personally 4dent'vfiable Information Required:

&ild's name, address, age, glasses worn.. -. 4'School, grade. I

Examiner's nameDate of testing

N4

of brain dysftinctiOn

p

Child is to-copy2, and 3).

S

2

4,

I


TITtE: SLOSSON DfAWING COORDINA,TION TEST Screening Verification'

ORMINEE APPROPRJATENffi:'wq

, Prerequisite Pcjils:'AbilitytO holdp,cray:on or pencil functionally.

at

isab7lity Groups:' All

4*

Age Range (CA): 1 yr. -

Adult,4: 1

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS:: .

r

Group or.trid(vidul:

Either s

Training Needed bi Examiner: Examiner requires no additional training but should

be thoroughly fathiliar with the scoring,criter4. Examiner.may be"used by profesSion-

als-ealing with problems of eduCation, teachn, guidance; and counseling.Other Persons

t,

quired: ..1-.

4None.....,

. ... .1'Materials Requjre : {*.items not prOviojed in kit) _ ;

None

4

4

SCORING AND INTURRETATION:

Procedure,: Each drawing is compared to'the scoring criteria in the manual. The

number of errors is totaleil (1 error per drawing attempt) ani compared to the acy

Score chart forea final score.Format:.

Scori is done on the test sheet.

Space',for Recording Retest:

None

Summary She* (graphic representation%', None .

Criteria are provided in the manual

.

, A

TITLE: SLOSSO DRAWING COORDINATION TEST Screening 111: ,Verification-.

. . .

.

0

.

. ,


_. 4

-May 1pdicatv a need for an in-depth evaluatidn (neurological, psychological,p,sychiatri,c).

-

,

.

..

.. -May identify subtle eye-hand coordination-Perception Ifroblems ( minimal .'cerebral palsy) .

;

, o

IP.

. .

. ,

. r

t .

.

le. , .

4 ..

. .

, .

, ..

,,. .

® ..

..

..

.

i .. ,

NORMATIVE. DATA : 1

.

)

.

Sample Size:qq

4,

. X .

. NOt s ed

Population Descriptors Used: . .

New York State'Urban/rural . '

.

.

Black, white,American Indiarr ..

Nursery schOol, well child ienfer n e, public, private, parochial schoolse .

. .. .

.

.

4. .

.TECHNICAL ASPECTS:....

.

* Reliability: Test/i4test reliability with 200 pergons! aged 4-52 yrs., with 27%having IQ's lower than 05 on the Stanford-Binet was, .96., Average "differ'enc'e betweentesting was 3:3.

. 'V 40

-,.Validity:...

. 4. ..

Norms havebeen p viously determined. for each form to bp copiO by Geselland others or throtigh th uthorrs pwm studiess. . .

. .

.

.,..

4 -,.

,

.

- -.

/

REFERENCES:1.'

.

Slosson Drawing Coordination Test -.manualfo, 4 * ,e

,

. scoresheet . ** ..

' ' -, ..

, .

'

. , . ,

-

.

-

.

. 265'

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: SLOSSON DRAWING COORDINATION TEST Screening B Verification

0ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

4I

Cautions the examiner about testing-youn* children.

A cut-off score of 85%-was established which means that a 1 or 2-year old child

can make no errors, 3 -4 year's can make one-and 5-6 years - two, in order to attain

the 85% correct.

Examples of scoring criteria are provided in narrative and picttire form.

The case stud ovided in40. the al may heoft#1p professional bepore.sensitilip

to the parent and child with a handi7:7

ti

4

st

I

tt.

1

/.

04,

.1A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE.HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: MARCH 1977

N,TITLE: s-SLossoN INTELLIGENCE,TEST Screening El 'Verification 0


Author: Richard L. Slosson

Publisher: a OrderingSlosson Educational' Publications, Inc.P. O. Box' 280

East Aurora, New York 14052

Editor: A Forms:

Copyrrjgq.Date:

Cost: kit - $7.50

1963

(IESER1PTPE INFORMATION

Purpose:A

To provide quick' screening

Information:

41110

Age Range

Format : .

(CA) : Infant

Adult

MA:

a child or adult's intellectual functioning.

Grade Level:

Child must verbally answer 10e 'examiner's,aqe are determined: There is one question per agemonth interva/s Until 5 years and.2 month interval

Time Reuired:UptiMed, usually froth 10-e5 minutes for an

.for,ba,loWeas

or timid ,person.1,10-

None

th

questions. A basal and a ceilinglevel. Age is divided into ones until 27 years..

4average persolvand 20-30 minutes'

..-Observational,Information:

41Va1iner should observe the child's outward behavior attitude, speed, 4

speech, p sture, emotional tone, facial eXpreasion, mannerisms, bizzare behavior.°

PerSonalWIdentl ble Information Required:child's name, address, date of birth,-present gradeSchool's naMe.,EAkminer's naMe'15.ate of testing 1

267,

N

TEST ANALYSISa

TITLE: SLOSSON INTELLIGENCE TEST' Screening E1 Verification

EXAMINEE APPROPRIATKSS:

Prerequisite Skills:Adequate and clear speech

40,

Disability Groups: , `

All. Special precautions for testing the following groups is provided:Visually impaired, Hearing impaired, Language handicapped, Organic Brain damage,Emotionally disturbed, Reading handicapped, Deprived.

Age Range (CA): Infant MAR

Adult

p

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATFONS:_

Group or individual: Individual,

,Training Needed by Examiner:Examiner shollil be familiar

may, be classroom teacher, principal,social worker, or school nurse.

Other Persons Required:When testing an infant, the parent

the parent may be present( if ndcessary. Ato evaluate the parent/child relationship.

Materials'Required: (*items not prqvided in kit)* Blocks (1" square) or spools (same size)* Rubber ball - small* Rattle* Spoon* Tin cup* Several small toys

with. the items A scoring procedures. Examinerpsychometrist, psychologist, guidance counselor,

is required, for slightly older children,good observer will take this opportunity

0SCORING INTERPRETATION:

Procedure: Score plus for pass, minus for fail in front of each item A basal'and a ceiling age (10 consecutive correct or incorrect answer's), is determined,Count number of correct answers above basal and give appropriate credit in months.This MA may be converted to a deviation TO.

Format:Yellow scoresheet is providAid for each testing. Each item is coded for years

and months. All items are'in columns directly related to the amount of credit per

item. Back of,scoresheet is to be usedlfor copying and drawing items.Space for RecordingaRetest:

. None*,

Summary Sheet (graph icorepresentat ion) :

None

9 e

/Page

N

TEST ANALYSIS x

.

TITLE: SLOSSON INTELLIGENCE TEST Screening 0 Verification

.

ftw

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:'

-May indiCate a need for more precise and indepth evaluation.

r,.. -.May indicate a child's strengths and weaknesses through analysis of scatter.

-May help parents understand the child's cognitive needs.

1. .

.

,, ,

. ,

.

.

.

* 44

4NORMATIVE DATA:

. .

Sample Size:. Not stated 40

.Population Descriptors Used:Urban and rural areasNew York State .

White, black, American Indian 4Children ranged from being. mentally retarded to being mentally gifted.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: Standard error of measurement is 4.3.

Relipbility: Test/retest 2 months apart for 139 persons, age 4-50 years was

.97. Items for the infant portion of the scale Were taken or adapted from theGesell Developmental Sche'dules.

Validity:Concurrent validity is indicated by the high correlations with the Stanford-

Binet, ForM L-M. When,144 persons were independently tested with the SIT and the'Stanford-Binet, the average difference of scores received was 6.1.

.

REFERENCES-:

.

Slosion Intelligence Test manualf

o scoresheet

1L ..

.

.. .

\

2r'.1

%ft


TITLE: SLOSSON INTELLIGENCE TEST Screening 12 Verification


LIAdapted many items from the Stanford-Binet Form L-M.

MaTqual cautions examiners to the validity of scores obtained from childrenbelow four years of age; although unusually high or low scores would be usefulinfoimatior.

The tlosson Oral ReZ'ding Test is separate,'yet included in the manual for theSIT. Thin may be used with older or exceptionally bright children. Word lists are

Argraded for difficulty and type size varies with"the level.

An IQ Finder is provided in the manual, accompanied by explicit directions for.finding the I2.

AP

The Chronological Age never. exceeds 16 years.

Cautions, directions and explanations are very easily understood.

There 1,5 only one question per age lwel, often, it is divided into two parts andbothftimustbe answerediorrectly to get credit.


WARRISSURG,,PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEST ANALYSIS

_ .

DATE: May 1977

TITLE: TEACHING RESEARCH MOTOR DEVELOPMENT SCALE Screening D, Verification°


Author: H. D. Bud Fredericks Philip Doughty.Victor L. Baldwin L. James Walter

Publisher: Ordering Information:

Charles C. Thomas Publisher301-327 East Lawrence AvenueSpringfield, Illinois 62708

Editor: Forms:

Copyright Dater 1972

Cost: Book $7.00


Purpose:Designed to measure a child's motor proficiency.

Age Range (CA): MA: Grade Level: Preschool-High school

Format:

Child is asked to perform 41 motor tasks utilizing different bOdyProficiency of both fine. and gross motor coordination is tested. Child is given

demonstrations and may even be put through the motions'of the task.Time Required:

Untimed, may be done in many short sessionsS -Areas:

one

Observational information:

Scoring is accomplished in'Part through observation of the child performingp task. Observation of the chrld's 1"avior is rot necessali for scoring the Scale.



fi

27.

TEST ANALYSIS

,TITLE: TEACHING RESEARCH MOTOR DEVELOPMENT SCAlt Screenin Verification


Prerequisite Skills: .

Child should be ambulatorySome gross motor coordination

Disability Groups:

Moderately Severely Mentally retarded

Age Range (CA) :

4

MA: GRADE LEVEL: Preschool High School


Group or Individual: Individual., some tasks may be performed individually in a

7roui--

Training Needed by Examiner: Examiner should be familiar with the test items,i,erformance and scoring criterion. May be administered by the classroom teacher or

a physical education teacher.


IPMaterials Required: (*items not provided in kit) See Additional Information

* 2 4x4x2" plastic or wooden boxes* 1 4x4x5\" plastic or wooden boxesk 1 Large spool of 1420 thread.

*2r) Kitchen size wooden rrlatches

10" square targetTennis ball6" poles dn l'- bases811x11" white paper with 4 sets parallel lines 1" apart

MazesPencil

SCUINQ AND INTERPRETATION:

Procedure: .Eacll item of the scale is scored iri accordance with the specific

ritrrion stated in the manual. Scoring methods vary from scoringiithin time limits

to meeting criteria,or not.Format.:

ge.

Score sheets provide item name, scoring information (possible sccr.esi, num,

ber of trials which may be given and time limits.

Spa/4e f

or Recording Retest:None :#

Spmmary Sheet (graphi representation):None

1

0

r.

TEST ANALYSIS

4

7 o

TITLE: TEACHING RESEARCH MOTOR gEVELOPMENT SCALE Screening ti! .Verification

-IMPLICATIONSFOR PROGRAMMING: .

It

.-May be used to determine a cfrild's present levels in various motor skills.i .

-May be used as a model far an adapttve'phsical_education curriculum.. .

1

-May aid in measuring a child's improvement in comparisor) to himself

(pre-posittesting), a,.-

.

. . ,

.

'4 .. 1 -

.., .

, .

.. ,. .

.

\

'4

,

,

NORMATIVE-DATA: The scale is not and will not be.normed due to the. wide variety

Sample Sizewithin the designated population.

:

. ....

Population Descriptors Used;

I0

. ..

. -4 /i

4

.-

...

\t

/

Ot.

. "-,

..

.

.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: NO Data Available -

Re 1 iabi 1 i ty: .

..,.

1 . ,

.., . ,

Validity:. t

,. .

. .. .

. --

4.

a

".i .

.

,

a . f

REFERENCES:

The Teaching Research Motor Developuiegt Scald for Moderately and Severely

*Retarded Chiljren; .

; ,

,

..

- .. .

. . . .

.

J,

.

27 ,c),

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE:ZEACHING RESEARCH MOTOR DEVELOPMENT SCALE Screening Ca /erificatiail

precise and easy to f w. Pictures are provided to demonstrate further wha--.

meant `by the direction77 --

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:=Ai

Materials (continued)

Concentric circlesBlunt pointed scissors

* 10 PenniesTape measureTape, chalk or paint

* lxl' rubber Mats with 4" diameter circles painted in the center of each

-4 to 5' long room handle

811x3" paper trips'

11x6" paper stripChinning bar

* '5" rubber ballStopwatch or watch with a second hank

.10x10' room

Each item is divided into fi sedtions: equipment, number of trials,

directions, scoring criteria, and nts. Direct,ions and scoring criteria re very

4

1

4

M

271

141NORMIPROGREISAMENUE-HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109 .

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE,: May 1977 Y.*

TITL TEMPLIN*DAR Y TESTS OF ARTICULATION Screening (11. Verificationa .

dliLIOGRAPMIc INFORMATION:A,

Mildred C..Templin, Ph.D.Author:

Frederic L. Darlity, Ph.D.4

Publisher: . Ordering Wormation: -Bureau of EducationalResearch & ServiceExtension Division-C20 East HaU-

4 , The,University of IowaIowa City, Iowa '52242 ' 44,

* Editor: Forms:.. .

Copyright Date: 01960; 1969

.w .

Cost: Specimen set - $6:75; Manual -$41,50; Articulation test form J $0.10;-Scoring overlays-- $2.50/set

0 Nik,, . ,

v

Second Edition

"WarCat 1.1

4

DES E INFORMATION: '*

Purposf: .

Detigned to measure a child's articulatory p;pticiancy through a quickscreening and or diagnostic test.

-Age ll'aRrge (CA): 3-8 yrs.' MA: Grade Le\41t.a.

Format: Child is to -say -el seraeof words, each containing aapeech soundor group of sounds inca specified positIqp. Child is to till in the missing word Ofsentence, using the picture clues. Odder children i'nay 1-ead prepared sentences. 6if-,ficult to test children may reneat words after the examiner,. Diagnostic test contains141' items. to

4.. #T?mg Required: ,

,110,6

.-40,, Untimed ----.

t

400Ub-Areas v. See A4ditiontil Itformation

:Itlow

i 0. 4

a

...,

Observational Information: .

.- . .

1.,

Nptes about any factors observed that may .probid.e. information of the cause

Of articulation errots should be noted tinder oNery'ations.' ,Ratings of trie child'sspeech intelligibility and a description q Nf the sting situation should be made.1

I.

. Aersonally- I-dent i f i'ab1e Inforrpat ion Required:

Child's name, age, sex.Examiner's name

- DatePr

A

c

'

TEST ANALXSIS

-TITLE: TEMPLIN-DARLEY TESTS OF ARTICULATION Screening s Verificatn


Prerequisite Skills:Semi - intelligible speech

Disability Groups:Speech impaired,

impaired. 4

Mentally retarded, Physically handicapped,31earing

s.

Age Range. (CA):3-8 yrs. MA:

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS:'


Training Needed by Examiner:Examiner should be a trained speech clinician, thoroughly familiar with all

sub- %reas, facets, scoring and W,

mpliCations of results of this test: .


Materials Reqdrired: (*items,,not provided in kit)4.

Stimulus pictulies

IP

t,

4

Z

pg.

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:.

..

Each *tem 18 scored with one of the following symbols: Checkmark for,Procedure: orrect, T4honetic symbol for sound Substituted, Dash, for omission, X

-for distortion, NE for nasal ,emissicn, NR for no'response. All correct answers are

.'totaled and score is comPared to the proper norms table. Errors are analyzed as to 1,

position, type, stimulabliity.Format: .

.

.

.

of for each sound orRecord form contains toeach

and phonetic s..cfrobp; iApformation for each ub-test and observa ional information related

. to art elation. Overlays indicate w ich items, belong to which sub-test. .

Space r Recoviinv Retest: ..

- 1 N, -

None

Summary Sheet {graphic representation):

None

4 vsp

I

276,

V

".TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: TEMpLIN:DARLEY TESTS OF ARTICULATION 'Sciven4ing 0 Verification P7

, .

IMPLICATIONS FOR.PROGRAMMING:-

-.. Is,

-May provide understanding of a child's articulation difficulties th4-ough the

Analysip of Misarticulations. ,

or.

=May aid in the planning of a child's speech therapy program and progress withintHat program. S

( . . . /-May aid in the 4leterminationtof a teaching method by determitlinglwith what .

degree or uccess the child'can produce the sound in imitation..

. '

, ,

-Screening testing may identify children in need of amn in-depth evaluation. .

.

. 4

. . .

..->

-c4,

. .4

..#'

NORMATIVE DATA:. .. .

Sample Size: 4a0'--60-children per-Ievel at 3-yrs,, 3, 4, 41/2, 5, 61., 7.

,

4114'

. Population Descriptors Used: #

Monolingual, normal intelligence, normal hearingi7 -

Urban

,Father's occupation .

Socioecoftomic status 10

.

Op -..,

,1

.,

TECHNICAL ASRECTS:. .

'Reliability:' Test/Retest for the Screening Test ranged from .93 to .99 with

children in single age groups between 2-5 yrs. tested e-ightNdays,apart Nora and

sentence testsin a single session ranged frpm-,97 to .99.Validity:

. Correlation of, the 113 item test and 50 item Scl-eening Test with MAs were

'.70 and .71 respectivly.

...."'".

,

- .,.,

,

,

*REFERENCES:

/.

k ..

.The Templin-Darley Tests of Articulation: A ManLia and Qiscussion of

Articulation Testing (2nd edition) -.64 ,

Articulation Test Form . .... '

.

.

V. .

o' _........--

t

,,, -

.

2 7

V

aTEST ANALYSIS.

TITLE: TEMPLIN-DARLEY TESTS' OF ARTICULATION-

'Screening Verification

ADDITIONAL I RMATION:

Sub=areas ontinued)

/

Screnin est .150 items)

Grouping of consonant singles (42)Iowa PreSsureArticulation Test (43)/r/ and /3/ cliter groapinq (31)/r1"/ and /1/ cluster grouping. (18)

[AY-cluster grouping (17)

!,!iscQ.1-41aneous Consonant cluster grouping (9)

Vowel gtoupina-(11)DilDthong groguping (6)

Pictures may not induce the proper wordresporlse from the child'.. The use ofquestion and answer or fill-in the last word of the sentence as recommended bn themanuAl wi41 aid in expedient administration. The examiner should be award of thosepictures which will be difficult for the child to identify and be'prepared to pro-'vide the stimull;s word for the child to

cc"

p

t

27

c

1.A 1.(012TH PROGRESS' AVENUE


4

, TEST ,ANALYSIS

ttt

DATE: 'April 1977

Is

ta

TITLE: TEST F9R AUDITORY COMPROlkENSION OF LANGLJGEScreeh Verifications


Author: Elizabeth Darrow, Ph.D,f *

Publisher: Ordering Information:

Learning Concepts2501 N. LamarAUstin, Texas 78705

Editor: . "Forms: English/Spanish

Copyright Date: 1973 .

0

Cost: Kit - $39.95 (specification must bemade:As to Spanish or English

scoring forms). =

DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION:.

,

.

1. . ,,,,

Purpose: . "To measure the auditory comprehension of language structure and, on

the bvis.of the child's performance, per4alit assignment of the chi to a develop-

mental level of comprehension." - t

Age (CA) : 3-6-yrs. MA: Gr.adp revel:

Format: .Child is presented with 101 picture cards with 3 line dras4ngs per

card. Child 15 to indicate the correct picture in response to the'stfmulus word.

t P

Time Required: 20 minutes.

, Sub-Ar Sub- scores are determined-by Form classes and Function'Words,1"-Morpholo cal Constructions, r;rammatical Categdries, Syntactic Structure. Items are

not pla d in sub-areas.

Observational Information:.

Summary and comments section is on the face sheet

.0 Personally Identifiable Information Required:

Child's name/ date of birth, sex, grade, socio-economic status

Scholl's namei Evallitor's name

sa,

TITLE:

TEST ANALYSIS

411

TEST FOR AUDITORY COMPREHENSION OF LANGuAGEScreening 0

EXAMINEE APPROPRIATEgS:

Prerequisite Skills. -

None

Verification E3

Disability Groups:

Speech impairedinguage 71elayed, mentally'Physically handicapped.

A Range (CA) : 3=6 yrs.

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDE

Group or Individual.

/

retarded, Learnin disabled,

Illi

TIONS:

Individual

Training Needed by Examiner; "...the examiner Should hold a bachelor's degree

education psycnology or sociology and have significant testing experience."

Should be familiar with the %est items and manual.


None

Materii15 Required: ..(*items not provided in kit)

Stimulus cards,

4

SCORING AND-INVRP'OETATION: ,

.,

Procedure. Each :,o'rrect response i.s gi1-Yen one point. The to ,a# score is the

sum of these poirl.s. Total-score may be converted toan age score or percentile rank,

equivalent. ,Subscorg may be determined. '

Format:-/.

7,espr,V-_,forr, -ontains stimulus, c6rict response,- age at which 75-9T* of

the children pass-an-I space for chid's responset IP

Space for Recording Retest: 1 f

4

Response form is non-riusable.

Sup1Mafy Sheet (graphi'c'representation)

Analwis section provides summary 5or eachsUbscore response.

-Page 3 TEST ANALYSIS`

TITLE:. TEST FOR ,AUDITORY COMPREHENSION 05 LAfiGUAGE Screening VeHfication.

.A°111VIMPLICATIONS,FOR' PROGRAMMING.: ,

_

,

-"baseline data on these categories Linguistic suboategarie70 tray provicle an

indication of the area(s) of the child's difficulty:" .,

,

.

,..,

.. ,, .

-"Use of subcategory scores also serves as a method for judging the change in4.

performance on siecific-item groups as a result of therapy or maturation.".

..

..

..

'

.

. .:. 0

.

. .

..

. ..

.

.

1

t ...

%.,

..

A

..

.. ,

.

NORMATIVE DATA: (using only the English version, ,i

.

Sample Size: 200' 1 ^1-

Population Descriptors Used:) ...

.

Middle class . 4 _ .. .

Ethnic grouf, - Black, Anglo, MeXican-American

Age - 3-6 years ,,

0. .

,

..

I , .

.

.

-.

. ,

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: '. .

.

Reliability: Test/Retest reliability for the English and Spanish versions

respectively werei99

and .93. Scale 1 has,, the highest reliability and Scale 4 the

lowest. of ):Validity:.

,,, - Scores were shown to increase wh an increase in language development. 1

Correlation with ±2 and the TACL was .80 with a group of trainable mentally retarded.'

children./

,

;REFERENCtS:.

Testfor Auditory CoMprehension of 'Language - manual/

stimulus cards.. .

response Forms'' i

1

(Spanish/English) .

-4..-

-

i t

.

-.

.0

3

I

. Page 4 TEST. ANALYSIS

t-

TITLE: TEST FOR AUDITORY COMP REHE§Sipl+OF LAgUAGE Screening° Verification 0, .


Some of the pictures are.d2tficult-to interpret (e.g. plate t93-"File the car

that is on the street.". Options-car in'a gas 4ation(1); car on the sidewalk(2);

and car on the road(3), Correct answer #3) 4

.1>

a

"A

,1 -A NORTH PROGRESS AVNUE . .HARRISBURGrPEWISYLVANIA17109

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: TEST OF CONCEPT UTILIZATION

DATE: May 1977

Screening Verificaticnin

BIBLIOGRAPHIC. INFORMATION:

Richard L. Crager, Ph.D.Author: Ann J. Spriggs, it

Publisher: . Ordlring Information:

. .

'Western Psychological Services12031 Wilshve Boulevard .'

Los Angeles, California 90025

Editor: Forms: ,

Copyright sate: 1972

Cost: Kit $29.50; Test plates - $14.50; Protocol sheet (pad of ldb)- $13.50;Scoring booklet (pkg. of 25) $6.50; Manual - $9.50


Purpose:. ,

Measures a child's usage and understanding of familiar concepts.

AO

Age Range (CA): 5-18 yKs. MA: Grade leVe,1:

Format: Child is presented with 50 pairs.of pictures and is to identify howeach pair is alike. He ys scored as to hilipexpiessive ability and-his utilizationof the five domains measured by the' test.

Time Required:10-25 minutes

ub-Areas: Domains covered:Color 'Relational function Abstract: funct?yon,

Shape Hoilbqenous function principle of noun class-


None

Personally Identifiable Lnformation Required:


2y.4

116

Page 2 i. TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: TEST OF CONCEPT UTILIZATION Screening CI Verification



Intelligible speech

Disability Groups:Physically handicapped, Learning disabled, Epotionally disturbed, Mildly

mentally retarded ,

I

Age Range (CA):5-18 yr. MA:



Training Owded by Examiner:

Examiner should be thoroughly familiar with the scoring system.


one


5; Picture plates

'1KSCORING AND INTERPRETATION:

Procedure: Dermination is made as to which concept category each response fits

and a plus or minus is scored.' All pluses and minuses are totaled for...a raw score

which is compared to the proper norms table for T-score and perCentile ranking.

4 Format: Child's response for'each item is written on the protocol sheet after

the response. After the test session, decisions are made -as to the.guality and cate-4

'gory of eacn response which is therL recorded in the scoring booklet.

Space for.Recording Retest:

Summary Sheet (graphic representation):A profbile is Made on the'coveTpage of the score booklet. The prof,_1.

represents the T- scores and positive and negative correlations for each concept

a category.

TEST ANALYSIS

TITLESTIvILC1 TEST OF CONCEPT UTILIZATION Screening Verification gq

-

..

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING:- .., li . 4

-klay aid a teacher in recognizing a child's verbal-conceptUal approach tolearning,

.

&

,

' -May aid in making prediction of a Child's success or fail.ure in his present

grade or his potential next grade placement.,

-May aid a teachef in choosing materials, methods and techniques for a studentwho has difficulty with conventional means. -

,.

Y .

. . .

,-

, h1

.

.

V.

.

NOMATIVE DATA:.

.

Sample Size: 700 aged 5-18 years; divided into 14 age groups .

,Population Descriptors Used:oll

I.Socio-economic status as determined by-1960 U. S. Census categorization df

..

head of household's occupation ,

Urbfin, metropolitan°- Denver, Colorado and immediate surrounds-Mostly white children; approximately 1% Spanish surname7,Brack. and

Oriental children were included , . .

. 1

..

,

. , -771iTECHNICAL ASPECTS

'5. ..

.

Reliability: Inter-scorer t th, :one untrained and one trained'test .

Administrator scoring a random s Y le' of '14Cklir6tocol- had an agreement ranging fromy.

95.4% to 99.8%. - .

. 19Validity: ,

No Data Available\)

. r

1

A

4

a .A

REFtRENCES: ,-

The Develnpmentof Concepts: A Manual for the Test, f eoncept Utilization

.

..

-. .

di 1

+ TEST ANALYSISViet r

TITLE: TEFT OF CONCEPTUTILIZATION Screening Verific,ati9n 0:

ADDITIONAL INFORMAJA:.4 ^*

The administrittion Procedures are difficult to understand.

V

4IP

110

de

2j))

1A NORTH PROGRESS AVENUE

HARRIS: , PENNSYLVANIA 17109

(")

tEST ANALYSIS

TITLE: VISUAL EFFICIENCY SCALE'

DATE June. 1977.-

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:.

Author:

Publisher:

American Printing House for the BlindP. 0. Box 6085Louisville, Kentcky 40206

Editor:

Natalie C. BarragaCopyright Date: 1970

0w

Screening.0 Verificatin

Orderin

Cost: Unknown

Forms:

Information: 4IE


Purpose: F

JO'

"...designed to assess furictfon;hg of visual behaviors and responses toitems of increasing complexity in size, detail and interpretation."

Age Range (CA):.No age range stated

MA: Grade Le41:/

, .

Format: ,-

Child is presented with 48 its geometric foims, shapes and wor4g','

ing in size, detail an complexity.

Time Required:

UntimedSub-Areas:

None

Obseliptional Information:

None


None

2g';

1

'


TITLE: VISUAL EFFICIENCY SCALE Screening GB Verification


,Prerequisite Skills:Ab2.1ity tp mark a response consistently.

a

-04P

bisaility Groups:.Visually impaired with low residual Vi ion,

Age Range (CA): MA:

Np age range stated.\

-40

ADMINIST VE CONSIDERATIONS:%

Group or Individual: Initial testings should 17 done individually; reassessmepts

may be administered ,in small groups.

Training Needed tly Eximiner:.(

,

Examiner should be familiar with e child to determi,ne if an item is too

small or complex for him to-perceive.

Other Persons Required:None,

Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit). ,

* Red pencil

4

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:a

-.Procedure: i.

/'-- A-plus ii given for each correct response; a minus forfeach injlitect re-.

, .

sponse; totals for each section and entire scale may be determined. r \Format: '

. ,,..., - -

ft

Record of performancq sheet lists item number And correct response

for that item. *

Space for Recording Retest:None +N.

1#0

10 -4 filb

*" Summary Sheet (grph#c representatiW:.:._-,,,,..

-... - ..

. A profile may be plotted on a separate profile. slIvoet by circling each item-t-

number passed. Items are listedkithfhe corresponding area they pro.po se to test.; A

written summaeV of areas of strengths and wea)tnesses may a usefdl explanation -to-

the profile for the child's future Rrogram. .,

.. .

t......

02

. .


c.

TITLE -: VISUAL EFFICIENCY tCALE 4 :Screening Verific4tion


Items cover: discrimination and matching of geometric form, size, object con-,

" tour, light%dark intensity, size:and position in space, image constancy'of outlines,pattern details, visual dlosure of figures, spatial perspective of.figure outlioes,'visual discrimination and m4bching of-object and abstract figure details, /elation=ship of letterand word symbols and groups of symbols. . A

The Teacher's Guide forDevelopment,of Visual Learning Abilities and Utilizgtipnof Low-Vision provides'suggestions for teaching a visually impaired child to ose-hisresidUal vision and lists of materials which'may be useful to teach a child with lowvision.

41.

14

111.

I

.4'89

le


TITLE: VISUAL EFFICIENCY SCALE Screening c] Verification 11


-

--zMay aid in determinIng the amount of useful residual vision a visuallyimpaired child has in order to teach him to U93 his vision as much as possible.

.

-May aid teachers in determining the type of print materials that a visually

impaired child would be able to use at various' points in his academic career.

Will point out a child's visual-pArceptual strengths and weaknesses.

.

. .

_

-.

-\

.

,

1

..

,

NORMATIVE DATA: No Data Available

Sample Size. .

Population Descr.iptors,Used:

i

. .

s

....

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: No Data Available.

- Reliability:.

411a .

Validity:s

.

. .,

. . ,

) ,

.

,

REFERENCES:/

Teacher's Guide for Development of Visual arming Abilities and Utilization

of Low Vision 7//'Visual Efficiency Scale - profile

record of perlormancescale booklet

. ..

.

4

, .

1-A NORTH PRdONESS AVENUE

NARINSINING, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: June 1977

a

TITLESWALKER READINESS-TEST FOR DISADVANTAGED Scr ning Verification 0.

PRESCHOOL CHILDRp4

BIBLIOG PHIC INFORMATION:.

uthor: Wanda Walker

Publisher: Ordering Information:U. S. Dett. Health, Education U. S. Government ViintIng Office

,S Welfare Superintendent of Documents

Office of Education A Washington, D. C. . 20402

Editor: Forms: /Form A' /

Copyright. Date: None Form B

Cost: PREP.report #22 - $0.50

I^

t

A

DESCRIPTIVE INFDRMATI,ON:

Purpose:To assess disadvantaged preschool children as culture fairly as possible.

Age Range (CA): MA: Grade level: Pre-kindergarten

Format:Child is asked to indicat4his answer in some consistent manner, nodding,

blinking, pointing or verbal response. Test consists of 50 items.

Time Require0: 8-1Q minute

Sub-Areas:

SimilaritiesDifferences

Numerical analogiesMissing parts

4

Observational Information:Pbs9rvations or unusual circumstances concerning the child or test situation

should be ncted on the score sheet.

Personalty identifiable Information Required:

Child's name, age, race, sexName and location, of the centerPopulation'density" (rural/urban)Examiner's name, titleDate of testing

291.

AM&

IPage 2 TEST ANALYSIS

TITLE:WALKER READINESS TEST FOR DISADVANTAGED

PRESCHOOL CHILDRENScreening fa Verific(tion


Prerequisite Skills:Abilitytg,ponsistently_indicate

/a response

Disability Groups:Disadvantaged, Mildly Mentally retarded, Learning disabled, Physically

handicapped, Speech impaired, Hearing impaired

Age Range (CA): MA: GRADE LEVEL: Pre-kindergarten


Group or Individual: Individual,

Training Needed by Examiner: .

No special training is.requirea for administrapon. Classrobm teacher or

teacher.aide may administer the test.Other Persons Required:

None

Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit)None

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION: A

Procedure: Scoring is accomplished by marking an'answer sheet with the child'sresponses and placing a scoring stencil over it. -Final score is the number of cor-rect answers. A percentile ranking maybe determined.

format: r

The Answer Sheet has choices_coded by A, B, C, D

Space for Recording Retest:The test booklet may be re-used Af all markings are made on the answer sheet.

Answer sheet is non-reusable.Summary Sheet (graphic representation);

None

2 9 ?

`Page 3 -TEST ANALYS IS.

i

TITLE:WALKER READINESS TEST FOk DISADVANTAGED

S eening 0 "Verification 'CI. PRESCHOOL CHILDREN /

.i

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMMING: -

-May indicate that a child requires an in-depth evaluation.

--May indicate a child's potential academic difficulties. '

. . 1 t

-May indicate a child's learning potential without regard to cultural values...

i

, .

. ,

, .

,.

.

.

. .

. .

..

..

.,---

i

NORMATIVE DATA:...

Sample Sizes .6,662 - Form A ,, .

. '-.5,271 - Form B

Population Descriptors Used:.364 Head, Start and Day Care Centers/208 urban; 156 rural

Every state had at least one class in the sampil.

. .

. .

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: No-Data Available

Reliability:.

.

,

.

Validity:, . .

.

.

.

S,

..

..

.

.

. ..

/

REFERENCES: ..

,.

. A Readiness Test for Disadvantaged Preschool 'children - Stock. Number i780-1012

.

..

293 .

4


MAUER READINESS TEST FOR DISADVANTAGEDTITLE: PRESCHOOL CHILDREN

Screenings Verificatfion 0 =


Many of the pictures in this test are too small to'identify siiilarities or

differences. Several of the pictures in the Differences section semen to be the same

size.

The test directions have been translated into Spanish and French to insure

that ihe staridartzation ls followed.

-.0.

t

14 NORTH PROGRESS AVENUEHARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17109

'TEST ANALYSIS

DATE: April 1977

1

f, TITLE: WASHINGTON SPEECH scximn QISCRIMINATION_TEST Screening al Verification 1::)

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION:, EliZaheth Prather

Author: Adah MinerMargaret Anne Addicott

Publishet.

Linda Sunderland


Interstate Printers 'Publisher, Inc.

19-27 North Jackson Street.Danville, Illinois 61832

Editor: Forms:


Cost: Complee set - $7.95; Test forms (pad of 64) - $2.)00


Purpose:

Designed to evaluate speech sound discrimination.

Age Range (CA): 3-5 years MA: Grade Level: Preschool-Kindergarten

Formkt:

Child is first trained to the manner of responSe (pointing). Test has 53

items using five pictures. Child is to point -at the picture every time he hears the

stimulus word.Time Required

15 minutesSub-Areas:

Cup Sun Tcotlibrush

Fish Cracker

Observational information:

None

Personally Identifiable information Rewired:


295

TEST 4NAL'tS IS

TITLE:WAiHINGTqN SPEECH soupp DISCRIMINATION TEST Screening. ElViemmimmmw


Prerequislte Skills:

. Ability to indicate having heard the word.

Verification

Disability Groups: . 4

Speech impaired, Learning diiabled, Physically handicapped, Mentally

retarded.

Age Range (CA): 3-5 years MA:



IndividualTraining Needed by EXaminer:

Examiner must be familiar with the phonetic alphabet and be able to speak

clearly.Other Pei-sons Required:

None

Materials Required: (*items not provided in kit)Stimulus cards 1 each: cup

fishsun

crackertoothbrushddgbed

SCORING AND INTERPRETATION:'

Procedure: A plus or minus is scored after each response by the child. Each

sub-area is totaled for a total score. Means and standard deviations for each age

group'is on the record form.Format:

Stimulus words and scoring are on the same record form.

//Space for Recording Retest:

Record form is non-reusable.


None

29C

AV

4 Page 3 TEST(ANALYSIS. -t/

TITLE:WASHINGTON SPEECH SOUND DISCRIMINATION TEST .Sereening Ca Verification 1:1

f

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAMING:

sid in the identification of a child with poor sound discrimination who-,

Mayalso has, poor auditory memory the test requires no memory sequencing skills.

)

.

NORMATIVE DATA:

Sample Size: 139

Population Descriptors Used: . 3,' .1Age -.29 at 3.5 years; 23 at 4.0; 21 at 4.5; 75 at kindergarten

p

r

tit

I.

TECHNICAL ASPECTS:

Reliability: Childen tested ..vith the original 66 item WSSD ad then with theprint 54 item - testing resulted in a ,correlation of .98. Intervrater reliabilitybetween 2 examiners, scoring 5 tests simultaneously was 1.0.

Validity:

No Data Available

REFERENCES:

Washington Speech Sound Discrimination Test manual 1

record formstimuluk cards

297

A ;

TEST ANALYSIS1,

.

TITLE: WASHINGTON SPEECH SOUND DISCTiImINATION TEST screening° Verification

1.1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

410

i

6

'

An intermittent reinforcement schedule is provided after`every few items. Only`statement recommendedjto be'used is, "Good listening."

r

r

f

t

I.

0

a

IP

4

% . .

o

r

29/o

il

1

1

`INDEX - ALPHAETICAL BY TITLE-

Volume,I

1. AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale (Public School Version) Nadine Lambert

2. -ABCInventory -JNormand Adair

3. Ability Protile Form - Instructional Fair -

4. Activity Level Rating Scale - Katherine $anham

Ahr's Individual De'velopment Survey - A. Edward Ahr

6. American School Reading Readiribess Test - Willis E. Pratt

a

7. Animal Crackers - Dorothy C. Adkins

8. Anton Brener Develop ental Gestalt Test of School Readiness - Anton Brenner

9. Arizona Articulation Proficiency Scale - Janet Barker Fudala

, 10. Assesameri.,of Children's Language Comprehension - R6chana Foster

Auditory Discriminaton, Test - Joseph '*epman

12. Auditory Pointing Test - Janet B. Fudala

13. Basic Concept Inventory - Seigfried Engelmann

14. Basic Sctiool Skills Inventory - Libby Goodman

a .

15. Bayleyl.Scales of InfaritOpevelopment - Nancy Bayley.

1 / ,

'16. Behavioral Characteristics Progression -,,,

Santa! Cruz Office of Education

17. Behavioral Developmental Prdfile.- John D. Montgomery

18. ''*Bender-Purdue Reflex Test - Miriam L. Bender

19. Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt Test - Lauretta Bender

20. Bingham Button 'est - William J. Bingham

21. ,Boyd Developmental Progre Scab - Robert D.Boyd

22. BrOckin-Drodin Developmental Spotcheck --Casaiolina Hospital

. 23. California Preschool Social Competency Scale - Samuel Levine

.1

24. California Test of Mental Maturity - Elizbeth T. Sullivan

30. Callier r Azusa Scale - Robert D! Stillman

-299

,I1

ti

".7; , ir

.,

f

"6

. . .

i26.- 4:carollnalvelOpmental 'Profile - David L.'Lillie. .

,

.' e,

A .A...0

.

27. arrow Elicited Longue* Inventory - Elizabeth Carrow,

'.28'. Cattell InfAnt fntelligence Scald - Psyche Cattell

29.'. Child MevelopmeAtgssessment Fore - T. Thomas McMu'rrain

30. CIRCUS - Ge-rry Ann Bogaz1

31. Cognitive Skills Assessment Battery --Ar:11,E. topic=

--'*

32. `Columbia MentAl Maturity Scale - Bessie B. Burgemeister

33. 90cmliicatiee Evaluation Chart:- Ruth, M: Anderson

34.. CompVhensive Identification ProcesS r- Reid aehrbach ,.

35. DABERON -.Virginia'A. Danzer

36. Dallas Preschool Screening Test - RObert R. Percival

37 Deaf-Blind Program and Ability Screening70t - Jt Lyall

'1

38. DELCO-ELFMAN Developmental Screening Test Rosé Marks Elfman*

.141P39. Del-Rio language Screening.Test - Allen S. Toronto

-

.,40. Denver Articulation Screening Exam - Amelia Drumwright

I

41. Denver Audiometric Screening Test - William Frankenbux.g.( .42. Denver

1.

DevelopmeneDevelopmental Screening Test - William PAnkenbUrg3 , J '.

1 .

43. Denver Eye Screening Tedt - John Barker4 i , ....

44. Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire - William Frarikenburg

410

Ar45. "Detroit Tetts of Learning Aptitude = Harry J. Barker

46. Developing Oral Language with Youn91.Children Jotn:F, MuiPhy

47. Developmental Articulation Test - Robert F. Hejna

48. 'Developmeikal Activities Screening Inventory - Rebecca F. DuBose

49. Developmental Checklist - Ruth Zimmerman

50. Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning - Carpl,D. Mardell

. .

- 6

.300

4

k

Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration - Keith iv. B eery

52. ft .Developmantallest ofVisual Perception - Marianne Frostig-

53. Devereux:Test of Extremity -Coordina,tion -.George'E. DeHaven

--Early Detection ,Inventory - F.E. McGaha

55. Fairview Developmental Scal - James S: GiampiCcolo.

56. Fairview Language E cale y Alan.proskin

fis-

57. Fairview Problem Behavior Scale - Robert T.. Ross

58. Eairview Self-Help Scale - Robert T. Ross...

- 59., FArgo Preschool $creening Test - Fargo public Schools

. 44.1

60.. First Grade Screening Test - John E. Pate

. .

61; Filli Range Picture.Vocabulary Test - R.B. Ammons'

10-,62. Functional Profile.- Peoria ARC and tJCP

. .

63. Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation - RonaldrGoldman

*ow

64. -o1dMan-Fristoe-Weodc4ck Test of Auditory Discrimination - Ronald, Goldman

.1

65. Guide toChildren's Learning &J. Stott .-.

Bess' School ResdirieSs -84-',Richard J. Hess

. - .

67. Hiskey - Nebraska. Test of Learning Aptitude - Marshall S. letkey

68. Bouston Test cif Language Development - Margaret Crabtree

69.Hyperactive Behavior Rating Scales Fearon PubliShers

70. Initial Learning Assessment,- E4Oird-G. Scagliotta

71. Kahn Intelligience Test - Theodore C. Kahn

32: Kindergarten Auditory Screening' Test - Jack KatzI

-73, Kohn PrOblem and Social Competence S le -' Martin Kohn

.

74.' Language Structurtd Auditory Retention Span Test - Luis Carlson

75.. Learning Accomplishment Profile -Anne R. Sanfor )

L.

76. Lindamood Auditory Coricepualization pest - Charles H. Lindamood

. Magic Kingdom - Southwest Mental Health and Retardat n Center

301 t..

78. Maturity Level for School Entrance -.Katherine M. Banham

79. Maxfield-Bpcholz Scale of Social Competency - Kathryn E. Maxfield

80. Memphis Model: Comprehensive Development Scale - Alton Quick

81. Minnesota PrescnoolScale - Florence L. Goodenough

82. Motor-Free Visual Perception Test = Ronald P. Colarusso

83. Motor Problem Inventory e-,Glyndon D. Riley'

84. Murphy-Durrell Reading Readiness Analysis Helen L. Murphy

85. Northwestern Syntax Screehing Test - Laura Lee

86. Ochlocknee Five Year 014 Screening Test - Ochlocknee Project

%W. Parent Readiness Evaluation of Preschoolers - A. Edward Ahr

88. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales - Rhonda Folio

89. Peabody Picture Vocabulai-y Test - Lloyd M. Dunn

90. Pennsylvania Preschool Inventory - Russell A Dusewicz.

91. PennsyiVania Training Model - Ellen Somertbn-Fairc.

92, photo Articulation Screening Test-- Kathleen Pendergest-

93. Physician's Handbook: Screen4g for MBD,- John E. Peters

94. Piagetian Attainment Kit - Donald Buiilc

95. Pictorial Test of Intelligence - Joseph L. French

96. Porch Index of Communicative Ability in Children - Bruce E. Porch

Portage Guide to Early EdlCation.- Susan M.,Blum

98. Preschool Attainment Record - Edgar Dollr

ri#

99. Preschodl and Early #rimary Skill Survey - John A. Long

100. Preschool and Kindergarten Performance Profile - Alfred J. DiNola

!

101, Preschool Language Scale - Irla Lee Zimmerman

102. Program, for Preschool Visuall' Impaired Children: Developmental Shecklist

Rochelle Rosenthal

103. Profile of Basic Learning Abilities - Robert E. Valett

.30244....

e

'91

104.' PsichOeducatiOnal Evaluation of the Preschool Child - Eleonora Jedrysek

105. Psychoeduc?ional Inventory of Basic Skills and Personal Development -

FrankliD E. French

106- Pupil Rating Scale z- Helmer R. Myklebust

107. Pupil Record of Behavior k Roth Clieves

108. Quick neurological Screening Test - Margaret Mutti

109. Quick Test - R.W. Ammons

110. Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Scale et Bzoch

111. Riley Preschool Developmental Screening Inventory - Clara M.D. Riley

112. Scale'of Effectiveness Motivation - D.H. Stott

113. School Readiness Survey - F.L. Jordan

114. Screening Speech Articulation Test - Merlin J. Mecham

115: Screening Test for Academic Readineis - A. Edward Ahr

116. \Screening Test fork,the Assignment of Reuedial Treatments\- A. EdWard Ahr

117. Screening Test for the Auditory Comprehension of Languages - Elizabeth Carrow

. 118'. Sequenced Inventory of CommUnication Development = Dona Lee Hedrick

119. Simkoil Perceptual Organization Inventory J.P. Kovecevichge.

120. Slosson Drawing Coordination Test - Richard L. Slosson

Slosson Intelligence Test - Richard L. Slosson

t

122. Spoken Word Count -Jotter:41 Wepman

123. TARC Ass sment System Wayne Sailor

124. Teaching Research Motor Development SCale - H.D. Bud Fredericks

125. ,Templin-Darley-Tests of Articulation - Mildred C. Templin

126. eest of Auditory Comprehension of Languages --Elilzbeth Carrow

127. Test.of Basic Experiences - Margaret H.-Moss

128. /test of Concept Utilization - Richard L. Crager

303

I

o *

4 A.41

0

129. TMR Performance Profile fo6he Sevtrely and Moderately Retardede

Alfred d.'DiNola

c,130. Utah,Test of Language Development - echam

X. Valett Developmental Survey" of Basic Learning Abilities r Robert yalett

1J2. Verbal Language Development Scale Mer Mecham

133. Vineland'Social Maturity-.Scale - Edgar Do

134. 'Visual Efficiency SCalt Natalie.C. Barrage

4'

5'

,lit: Walker Readineis Test for Disadvantaged Preschool Children - Wanda Walker_ . /

. 136. Waihington Guide to Biolnotins Development in the Young Child -

, ,,Lm--K- .,..!

,, )University of Washington

e. .'117. 'Washington Speech Soilnd Discrimination Test - Elizabeth Prather

138. Yellow Brick Road - Christine Kallstrom

138 YEMRPerformance Profile for the Young Moderately and Mildly RetardedAlfred 3. DiNola

O

3

a

z

304..

a

4.

A

INDEX - ALPHABETICAL BY AUTHOR

VOLUME I & II

- Adair, Normand; Blesch, George' ABC Inventory

_

'Adkins, Dorothy C.; Ballif, Bonnie L.Animal Crackers

Aht, A. Edward',. Ahr's Individual Developmental. Survey .

r

Parent Readiness Evaluation of Preschoolers ..

'.,

. Screening Test for Academic Readiness ',4

Screfening Test for the AsSignment of Remedial TreptMents

- Ammons" Robert B.; Ammons, Helen S.Full Range Picture VocabularyQuick Test

r.1. Anderson, Ruth M.; Miles, Madeleine; Matheny, Patricia A,

Communicative Evaulation Chart

- -Baker, Harry J.; Leland, BerniceDetroit Tests of Learning Aptitude

- Benham" Katherine M.Activity Level Rating Scaler-Maturity Level for School Entrance

Barker, J ohn; Goldstein, Arnold; Frankenburg,'WilliaM K.

Denver Eye Screening Test

Barrage, Natalie C.Visual Efficiency SCale

Bayley, NancyBayley Scales of Infant Development

Bender./ Lauretta'ender Visual-Motor Gestalt Test

-Bender, Miriam

:Bender- Purdue Reflex Test

Beery, Keith E. .. 1

.*Developmental Test of Visual Motor fildigreion

305 I

r

Bingham,. William J.

.BinghiM ButtOn Test

Bluma, Susan M.; Shearer, Marsha SJ/Frohman,'AlMaPortage guide to-Early Education

Abeha, Ann E.; Slater, Barbara, M., Cognitive Skills Assessment Battery

I

H.; Hilliard, Jean4

. 'IPBogatz, Gerry Ann; Draper, Thomas;Jugeldut, Ann; Ward, William C.;Valentine,-Susan; McAloon, Ann; Swint, Spencer"

CIRCUS

roskin, AlanFairview Language Evaluation Scale

Boyd, Robert D.Boyd DevelOpmentil Prog ress Scale

Brenner, AntonAnton Brenner Developmental Gestalt Test of School Readiness.

Burgemeister,Bessie B.; Blume Lucille;Lorge, Irving. Columbia Mental Maturity Scale

- Burk, Donald '

.Piagetian At aXnment Kit

113

.

Bzoch, Kenneth R.; league, Richard'Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Scale

- Caz'lson, uis ,_..

Lan ge:StrUctd*ed Auditroy Retention Span Test, .

c.

1

Carrow,'Elizbethgarrow)Elicited Language InventoryScreening-Test-for Auditory Comprehension of Languages

Test' of Auditory. Omprehension.of Languagelb

Casa Colina Hospital.

Arekkin-Drouin DeVeldpmeOtai,Spotchecki

- Cattell,'Psyche

a.Cattell Infant Intelligence Scale '

3063

alb

os,

4

s

/Cheves, Ruth . P

Pupil Record of Behavior_

Colarusso, Ronald P.; "Hammall,'DonaldMotor-Free Viival PerceptiOh Test

11

1

A

- 'Ckabiree, Margaret.houston Test ofJ,Anguage Developtent

Crager, RiCh4rd.,-L.; Spriggs,'ann,J.40' 'Test OfCOncept

.danzgr, 1.,,xons,..Theresa M.

tIABEpou 4',

. ,

DpHaven, George E..; Brucej.1ames D.

4. Devereux Testapf Extremity Co'ordination

- .DiNolliv'Ali'ked J.i Kahinsky, Bernard P.: Sterpfeld,.Allan E.l

-Preschool and KinflerOrten performance Profile. -TM:PerforWance,Profflefetrthe Severely and'"moderately Retarded

,

1.YEMR'i,prfoi-mc4e profilli for the Young Moderately and Mildly Retarded

. , . .

- DO11,:,Edgar .:4.6. i

Prisdhool Attainment Lord ..

..

ineland Social'Maturity Scale

Diumwrightr AmetiCDenver ArtictlatiOn Screening, ticialDenver Audiometric 'Screelng Test

'DuBose, febecCa-.F.; Langley, Mary BethDevelopmental Activities Screening Inventory

Ddnn,l,loyd M. ,

.

..,Peabodrill;ture Vocabulary Test

...... .

'Dusewicz, Ru4sell A. , .,

. (

Pennsylvania Presch 1 Inventory1.=-Ic

,

..

..

t

E fial,Rose Marks .

DELCO-ELFMAP'Deveaopmemtal ScreeningTest. .

. . -c '...

Epgelmann, Seigfried .

Basic Concepts Inventory0

;

4

I .

307 .

a

4

Fair, 'Somerton-

PenneYlvania Training Model

Fargo Viablio Schools

Fargo Preschool Screening Test .

Fearon Publishers

Hyperactive`Behavior Rating Scales

0

0 - yolio, RhOnda; DuBose, F. .

Peabody Developmenta Motor Scales ..

:

.

i \

- Foster, Rochana; Giddan, Jane J.; Stark, JoelAssessment of Children's Language Comprehension'. .. ®

- Frankenbgrg, William K.; Dodds, Josiah B.; Fandal, Alma-W.. Denver' Developmental Screening Test

,--

- Frankenburg, William K.; Van Doorntnck, William J.; Dick, Nathan P.; :

Liddell, Theresa N.Denver Pre-screening Developmental Questionnaire . %

- FrederiCkd, M.D. Bud; Baldwin, Victor L.; Doughty, Philip; Walter, L. JamesTeaching Research Motor Development Scale

- French, Franklin

Psychoeducational plventory. of Basic Skills and .Personal Development

- French, Joseph L.Pictorial,Test of Intelligence

- FrostiC Marianne; Lefever, Welty; Whittlesey, J5ohn R.B.Developmental Test of,Visual Perception ,

skiFudala, Janet Barkerr

Arizon4 Articulation Proficiency Scale

- Fudala, Janet Barker; Kunze, LuVern H.; 440ss, Jo4 D.Auditory Polnting'Test ,

Giampiccolo, James ,S.; BorOskin, AlanFairview Developmental Scale

- Goldman, Ronald; Fristoe, Macalyne:-Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulati

Goldman,. Ronald; fristoe, Macalynit Woodcock Richard W.Goldmanfristoe-Woodcoc Test 0 Auditory Discrimination

- Goodenoug Florelce L.; Maurer, Katherine M.; Van Wegenen,Minness to Preschool Scale

3Q8 -

6

(-7 ,.

Goodman, Libby; Naimill, Donald D.Basic Schoolfkills Inventory

Hedrick, Dona Lee; Prather, M. Elizabeth; Tobin, Annette R.Sequenced Inventory of Communication Development j

.

1

Hejna, Robert F. . 1

Developmental ArticUlation Tesp.--e

1Heis, Richard J.

Hess School Readiness SCale

Hiskey, Marshall S.. Hiskey-Nebraska Test of Learning Aptitude

)

Instructional Fair, Inc.

- Ability Profile Form

'Jedrysekb Eleonora; ,Klapper, Zeld41 Pope, Lillie; Wortis, JosephPsyChoeducational Evaluation of the Prescp0b1 Child

Jordah, F.L. ) Massey, JamesSchool Readiness Survey

- Kahn, Theodore C.Kahn Intelligence Test

- Katz, JackKindergarten Auditiry Screening Test

- Kohn, Martini Parnes,Barbara; Rosman, Bernice L.Kohn Problem Checklist & Social Competence Scale

Kbvecevich, J.P.

4. Simkov PeiCeptual Organization Inventory,

Lambert, Nadine; Windmilleri Myra; Cole,'Linda; Figueroa RichardAAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale (Public School Version)

We fa

Lee, ;Aura"Northwestern Syntax Screening Test

- evine, Samuel; Elzey, Freeman F.; Lewis, Mary ,

California Preschool Social Competency Scale

-Lillie, liavid 1.; Harbin, Gloria L.

% Carolina Developmental Profile

-309.

:41

LiAmilahood, Charlei H.; Lindamood, Patricia C.Lindamood'Auditory Conceptualization Test

Long, 4p4 A.; Morris, Morton; StoufferiGeorge A.W.Preschool and Early rrimary'Skill Survey

Lyall, Henry,-V.; Grahan, T.; Lassiter, S.Deaf-Blind Program And Ability Screening Test

- McGahan, F.E.; ..McGahan, Carolyn

Early Detection Inventory

- Mciarrain, T. Thomas; Brooke, FanChild DevelopuentAssessmntForm

Mardell, Carol D.; Goldenberg, Dorothea S.Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning

Maxfield, Kathryn.E.; Bucholz, SandraMaxfield-Bucholz Scale of Socail Competency

- Mecham, Merlin J.Screning Speech Articulation TestVerbal Language Development Scale

Mecham, Merlin. J.; Jex, J.Lorin; Jones, J.DeanUtah Test of Language Development

Montgomery, John D.; Donahue, Mike; Keiser, Arlene F.; Smith, Vicy I.;Walden, Milford V.; Roecker, Vickey L.

Behavioral Developmental Profile

Moss, Margaret H.Test of Basic Experiences

Murphy, Helen; Durrell, Donald D.Murphy-Durrell Reading Readiness Analysis

Murphy, John F.; ' nnell, Charles A.Developing 0 Linguage with Young Children

Mutti, Margaret; Spalding, Norma V.; Sterling, Harold M.; Crawford, C.SladeQuick Neurological Screening Test

Myklebust,.HelmerR:Pupil Rating Scale

'31 0

4'

e

Ochlocknee ProjectOchlocknee Five Year Old' Screening Test

Pate, John E.; Webb, Waren W.First Grade Screening Test

- 'Pendergest, KathleenPhoto Articulation Test'

- Peoria ARC & RCPFunctional Profile

- Pe)cival, Robert R.; Poxon, Suzanne Z.Dallas Preschool Screening Test

- Peters, John E.; Davis, Joanna S.; Goolsby, Cleo M.'; Ciements, SamHicks, Tom J.

Physician's Handbook: Screening For MBD

- Porch, Bruce E.Porch Index of Communicative Ability in Children

Prather, Elizabeth; Miner, Adah; Addicott, Margaret Anne; Sunderland, LindaWashington Speech,Sound Discrimination

Pratt, Willis E.; Stouffer, George A.W.American School Reading Readiness Test./

- Quick, Alton; Little, Thomas L.; Campbell, A. AnnMemphis Model: Comprehensive Developmental Scale

Riley, Clara M.D.Riley Preschool Developmental Screening Inventory

- Riley, Glyndon D.Motor Problems Inventory

- Rosenthal, RochelleProgram, for Preschool *sue lly Impaired Children :

Developmental Checklist

Ross, Robert .T.

Fairview P,ro Tem Behavior ScaleFairview elf Help Scale

Sailor, Wayne; Mix, bonnie JeanTARC Assessment System

311

104

I

- Sanford, Anne R. ,

Learning Accomplishment Profile

-0-$ Santa Cruz Office Of EducationBehavioral Characteristics Progression

Scagliotta, Edward G.Initial Learning Assessment

SloSson,.Richard L.Slosson Drawing Coordination TestSlosson Intelligence Test

- _Sluthwest Mental Health and Retardation CenterMagic Kingdom

Stillman, Robert D.Callier Azusa Scale

D.H.

Guide to Children's Learning Skills

- Stott, D.H.; Sharp, J.D.Scale of Effectiveness Motivation

- Sullivan, Elizabpth T.; Clarke,- Willis W.California Test of Mental Maturit4

Templin, Mildred0C.; Darley, Frederic L.Templin-Darley Tests of, Articulation

Toronto, Allen S. Leverman, D.; Hanna; CoFnelia; Rosenzweig, Peggy;,Maldonado, Antoneta

Del-Rio Laxguage Screening Test

University of WashingtonWashington Guide,to Promoting Development in the Young Child

Valett, Robert E.Valett Developmental Survey of Basic Learning A?ilities.Profile of Basic Learning Abilities

- Walker, WandaWalker Readiness Test for Disadvantaged preschool Children

41.2 P

..4

Wepman, Joseph M..

-Auditory Discrimination Test

WePm410... Joseph Mo.-Kass, WilburSpoken Word Count

- Zehrbach, ReidComprehensive Identification Process

- Zimmerman, Irla Lee; Steiner,:Violette G.; Evatt, Roberta L.'Preschool Language Scale

\7 Zimmerman, Ruth; Bornstein, SusanDevelopmental Checklist

2

313

ti

o