指導教授:胡凱傑老師 學生:唐錦雲 98700008 蘇義泰 ...

Click here to load reader

Upload: nicholas-park

Post on 03-Jan-2016

79 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

以整合性模式探討保險業服務設計與服務品質之提升 (Using an Integrated Model for Service Design and Service Quality Improvement: A Case Study on Insurance Industry ). 指導教授:胡凱傑老師 學生:唐錦雲 98700008 蘇義泰 98753009 陳秋雅 98700009. 文獻出處. 管理與系統 第十七卷第一期 民國 99 年 1 月 131–157 頁 作者: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

  • (Using an Integrated Model for Service Design and Service Quality Improvement: A Case Study on Insurance Industry )

    98700008 98753009 98700009

  • 991 131157

  • 1/3

  • 2/3() ()Kano () (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis; FMEA) ()(QFD) (VOC)

  • 3/3

  • (Failure modes and effects analysis; FMEA) (Johnson, 2002) (service blueprint) Chuang (2007) FMEA (Failure-free)

  • (Quality function deployment; QFD) (Voice of the customer; VOC)

    Kano (Kano ) QFD (Tan and Pawitra, 2001)VOC

  • Kano VOC

  • (86) (95)Etherington (2002)PZB Durvasula et al. (2004)Gayathri et al. (2005)SERVQUAL 21 Tsoukatos and Rand (2006) (GIQUAL)

  • (Failure points)(94) (92) (94) (Fliess and Becker, 2006) (Chuang, 2007)

  • Kano1/2()() (93)

  • Kano 2/2

  • FMEA()Kano (Pillay and Wang, 2003) (93; Chuang, 2007; Johnson, 2002) (1) (2) (3) (Risk priority number; RPN) (4) (Follow-up) Shahin (2004) Kano (Correction ratio; Cr)FMEA Cr

  • QFD()1/2

  • QFD()2/293Matzler and Hinterhuber(1998) Shen et al(2000) Tan and Pawitra(2001) Tan and Shen(2000)

  • 1/2Kano

  • 2/2

    HOQ

  • 1/5

  • 2/5

  • 3/5 (Zeithaml and Bitner, 2000)

  • 4/5

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  • 182006

  • FMEA(SOD)(O)

  • 1

    1.10.2.11.3.12.4.13.5.14.6.15.7.16.8.17.9.18.

  • kano 1/3

  • kano 2/3

  • ::

  • ::

  • kano 3/3Shahin(2004)Kano 5

  • Pouliot(1993) Kano

  • Q Kano()Kano

  • FMEA 1/5s/sp/ps/sp/ps/sp/ps/sk(p/p) (2)

    k1k10k1(2) (3)c

  • FMEA 2/5

    RPN(Shahin,2004)RPNSOD (4)

    k -1012

  • FMEA 3/5

    Shahin(2004)

    (5)

  • FMEA 4/5

    Cr(D)

    kCr Shahin,2004)

  • HOQ 1/21 Kano(Etherington,2002),

  • 1.2.3.4.5.6.7. 8. 9.

  • HOQ 2/2HOQKanoQFD(Wasserman,1993)(Cr)

  • 1/6: 591,414,371,62.77%36.7% : 62.77%72.8%: Kano ( 0.9116 0.9182) 0.70 2006

  • 2/6Kano

  • 3/6Kano

  • 4/6Kano Kano (%) RA RO RM I Q1. 1.35 10.51 66.31 21.83 0 RM2. 4.31 10.2422.37 63.07 0 I3. 4.85 9.1621.8364.15 0 I4. 4.04 14.02 19.9561.99 0 I5. 4.58 50.40 19.14 25.88 0 RO6. 2.43 18.33 61.1918.06 0RM7. 39.62 17.25 23.45 19.68 0 RA8. 3.77 52.83 27.76 15.63 0 RO9. 3.23 12.40 60.1124.26 0 RM10. 38.54 12.94 19.95 28.57 0 RA11. 3.77 12.67 56.87 26.68 0 RM12. 1.89 46.63 25.07 26.15 0.27 RO13. 37.47 12.94 18.33 31.00 0.27 RA14. 2.96 14.82 70.89 11.32 0 RM15. 2.70 48.25 27.49 21.02 0.54 RO16. 2.43 47.7126.68 23.18 0 RO17. 2.70 49.33 21.29 26.68 0 RO18. 3.50 49.60 22.10 24.80 0 RO[] RARORMI

  • 5/6HOQ 2006 1026 0.5% 10 FMEAk(Cr)18

  • 6/6HOQ

  • 1/3 KanoFMEAQFD SBM

    KanoFMEA()QFD()

  • 2/3 QFD()FMEA()SBM

    Kano

  • 3/3 SBM

    KanoFMEA()QFD()

  • **************