· 4. vibration resistance no decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 nm on a 3 new vam...

44

Upload: tranthu

Post on 20-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 2:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 3:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 4:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 5:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 6:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 7:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 8:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 9:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 10:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 11:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 12:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 13:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 14:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 15:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 16:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 17:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 18:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 19:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 20:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 21:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 22:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 23:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 24:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 25:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 26:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 27:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 28:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 29:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 30:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 31:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 32:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 33:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 34:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 35:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 36:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 37:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 38:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 39:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 40:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 41:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 42:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 43:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance
Page 44:  · 4. Vibration resistance No decrease was obsaved of installation torque ( 35 Nm on a 3 NEW VAM connection) the 96 hours test . 5. Chemical resistance