[박사논문] 영어 발표본 2014
TRANSCRIPT
-
R e s h a p i n g P a r t i c i p a t o r y P l a n n i n g t h r o u g h L o c a l S N S :
F o c u s i n g o n H i g h - r i s e N e w T o w n s i n G y e o n g g i P r o v i n c e
S N S
- -
1 3 A u g , 2 0 1 4
U rb a n D es i gn La b
Y o o n , Z o o s u n
-
Source: NAVER open API
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
-
3
Korean high-rise new towns, which accounts for 59% of total housing stocks as of 2010,
have many non-ideal conditions for participatory planning
1.1 Background
Conditions References
1. Urban area Putnam (2000), Cabinet Office of Japan (2007)
2. Large group Olson (1965), Mosher (1967), Hardin (1982), Friedmann (1987), Ostrom (1990), Rimmerman (1997), Renee (2004)
3. High-mobility Putnam (2000)
4. High-rise Sinnett el al (1972), Bickman el al (1976), Nadler, A el al (1982), Korte et al (1983), Cabinet Office of Japan (2007)
Thus, participatory planning and Maeulmandeulgi have been seldom conducted in high-rise
new towns
Government-funded Maeulmandeulgi project in Korea (2007-2009 ) City-funded Maeulmandeulgi project in Ansan-Si (2008-2012)
Table 1-1. Non-ideal conditions for participation (Author)
Figure 2-17 Apartment share in Maeulmandeulgi projects (Statistics Korea, 2013; Shin JJ, 2013; Ansan MM center, 2013)
-
41.2 Definition of Term
Local Social Network Service (Local SNS) refers geographically-defined online community that comprised of local residents
Agrarian Society
Industrial Society
Information Society
Local SNS
Town City Nation World
Offline community Online community
Neighborhood = Community
Neighborhood Community
Splinternet (Cyberbalkanization)
Blend online and offline network
Meanwhile, although face-to-face(FTF) communication is still important and never be replaced,
Local SNS has recently emerged to supplement these limitations
Source: Author
Figure 1-2. Concept of Local SNS
Among Facebook friends, Neighbor: 2% (PEW research, 2013)
-
1.3 Problem Statement 5
Unlike scholars rosy expectations, many Local SNSs have turned to the E-ghost town
Many studies examined Local SNS planning based on theoretical reviews, one-time social experiments,
or experts perspectives. Fewer studies have attempted to analyze real projects.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2004 2005 2006 2007
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Chosun newspaper Joongang
newspapaer
Donga newspaper Hangyeorae
newspaper
mbc (newsdesk) kbs (news9) sbs (8news) Sanbon online
community
Local SNS has boomed and its influence has steeply increased.
Figure 5-19. Influence of media (Korea Advertisers Association (2010), Author)
(% of citizen)
Source: complete enumeration in Japan, (Shouji, 2012), sample survey in Korea, (Choi, 2008)
FIgure1-3. Local SNS trend (Number of Local SNSs in Japan and Korea)
(# of RSNS)
Japan Korea0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-
61.4 Purpose of Research
Main claim / hypothesis
Purpose of research & research questions
To verify impact of Local SNS on participatory planning
Q1-1. What are the limitations of participatory planning on high-rise new towns? (CH2)
Q1-2. What aspects of the limitations can be overcome? (CH2, 5, 6)
To reveal origin and transformation of Korean Local SNS
Q2-1. How Korean Local SNS started? (CH3)
Q2-2. What lessons can we learn from rise and fall of Local SNS? (CH3)
To understand characteristics of Local SNSs for participatory planning
Q3. Which differences of Local SNS make participation different? Characteristics, (CH3, 5, 6)
To offer design principles to Local SNS for participatory planning
Q4. Do we need a new participatory planning theory for Local SNS? If so, what must change? (CH7)
Local SNS will help to improve participatory planning on high-rise new towns when its
characteristics considered properly
-
(1) WORST for offline-participation
1.5 Research Area 7
(2) BEST for online-participation
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Double-edged sword: Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Apartment ratio per total housing stocks in Gyeonggi-do (%), Source: Korea statics, 2010
Households with access to the Internet, 2011 or latest available year (%), Source: OECD, 2012
Gyeonggi-do is a region covered by high-rise new towns
Korea is a leading global test bed for IT (1st in E-government and E-participation, UN 2010)
Applying Local SNS is more effective on participatory planning in high-rise new towns
-
1.6 Research Design
Mo
dern
Pla
nn
ing
Partic
ipato
ry
Pla
nn
ing
E-P
artic
ipatio
n
1960s
Local Social Networks (LSN)
1920s 1990s 1998
CH2 CH3
OFFLINE ONLINE + OFFLINEONLINE
CH4
Resident-run
PART I PART II
Limitations of Conventional Way Lessons from Rise and Fall of LSNs Evaluation of LSNs
Company-run
5th
perio
d
2nd
perio
d
3rd
perio
d
1stp
eriod
4th
perio
d
CH5, CH6
Case Study
Old
NEW
TO
WN
New
OLD
TO
WN
CA
SE 1
CA
SE 2
Best
Best
2006
Best PracticesPer Each Type
All Local SNSIn Gyeonggi-di
Longitudinal study Cross-sectional study
Source: Author
Figure 1-5. Research design
8
-
CHAPTER 2
Difficulties of participatory planning in high-rise new towns
E-P
artic
ipatio
n
1960s
Local Social Networks (LSN)
1920s 1990s 1998
OFFLINE ONLINE + OFFLINEONLINE
Resident-runCompany-run
5th
perio
d
2nd
perio
d
3rd
perio
d
1stp
eriod
4th
perio
d
O-N
TN
-OT
CA
SE 1
CA
SE 2
Best
Best
2006
Mo
dern
Pla
nn
ing
Partic
ipato
ry
Pla
nn
ing
THE AIM To investigate current difficulties of participatory planning in high-rise new towns by
each criteria
so that we can find out which limitations will be overcome when Local SNS applied
CH2
-
102.1 Introduction
(1) high-rise new towns, (2) citizen participation, and (3) participation in large groups
Difficulties of participatory planning in high density urban towns causes by 3 problems
(1) Problems of high-rise new towns
(3) Problems of participation in large groups
(2) Problems of citizen participation
Theory(general)
Practice(local)
Physical
Process
We will describe such limitations in terms of both general theories and Korean practices
Source: Author
Figure 2-2. Problem analysis frame in chapter 2
-
1853B. HaussmannRenovation
of Paris
1890s 1900sCity Beautiful Movement
1898E. Howard
Garden City
1924Le CorbusierRadiant City
1950sE. Banfield
Comprehensive Rational Planning
Bentham, Comte, Mill
M. Weber, Mannheim
1970sSatisfying Model
1959C. Lindblom
Incrementalism
1968A. EtzioniMixed-
Scanning Model
1965P. DavidoffAdvocacy Planning
1974J. FriedmannTransactivePlanning
1980sHall
Marxist Planning
1980sNew Right Planning
1980sRadical
Planning
1980sPost Modern
Planning
Nietzche, Derrida
1969S. ArnsteinA Ladder of
Citizen Participation
1961J. Jacobs
The Death and Life of Great
American Cities
1992P. Healey
Collaborative Planning
1989J. Forester
Communicative Planning
Habermas, Giddens
Project
Philosophy
Theory
Article
Development
Oppositional
Creative city
Smart growth
Smart city
1996New Urbanism
Breakdown
Breakdown
Breakdown
Euclidean mode of planning Non-Euclidean mode of planning
Blu
eprin
tto
ratio
nal p
lannin
g
Outco
me-o
riente
dto
pro
cess-o
riente
d
Com
munica
tive tu
rn:g
ove
rnance
& so
cial ca
pita
l
Cultu
ral tu
rn
Euclidean mode of planning Non-Euclidean modeof planning
1988
1996
1st
New
tow
n(5
,015 h
a)
2011Cancellation of 2nd Newtown(1,203 ha)
2007 Government-
fundedMaeulmandeulgi
Breakdown
Pla
nnin
g T
heory
Housin
g p
olicy in
Kore
a
1994
1999
Unpla
nned sp
raw
l (40,4
00 h
a)
2000
pre
sent
2nd
New
tow
n(1
3,6
71 h
a)
High-rise towers
Massive construction
Rational decision
without participation
Source: Author
Figure 2-3 Trend of urban planning theory
-
2.2 Problems of High-rise New Towns (Korea) 12
Sourc
e: Kim
, JE
(2013)
Sourc
e: The K
ore
a E
conom
ic d
aily
2007-0
2-1
2
Develo
ping
area400ha
2000haD
evelopin
g a
rea6ha
350ha
FAR (Floor area ratio)
FAR
FAR Up-z
onin
g
Sweep out
Government-driven Massive development (Old New Town)
(1) 1st planned New Town (1988 1996) : 5,015 ha
(3) 2nd planned New Town (2000 present) : 13,671 ha
(4) 2nd planned New Town cancellation (2007 present )1,203 ha cancelled until 2011
Private-driven Spot development (New Old Town)
(2) Unplanned sprawl by deregulation policy (1994 2007) : 40400ha
Kim, Young-sam administration made strategic choice to deregulate land use control of green
area to supply housing units without large scale new-town development
MAX
-
Spot development (New Old Town)
Inside o
f apartm
ent com
plex
Pub
lic space
2.2 Problems of High-rise New Towns (Korea)
Sourc
e: Auth
or
Massive development (Old New Town)
Inside o
f apartm
ent com
plex
Public sp
ace
GOOD
GOOD
POOR
POOR
-
2.3 Problems of Citizen Participation (Theory) 14
Participants
(1) Representativeness problems (Verba, 1972; Campbell, 2000; Weber, 2000; Abram, 2000; Renee, 2004; Innes,
2004)
(2) Expertise problems (Kramer, 1972, Lee, SJ, 1994; Fainstein, 2000)
Inner Relationship
(3) Power inequity: Ideal speech of Habermas vs. reality (Curry, 2001; Huxley, 2000; Flyvbjerg, 1998; Few,
2000, Foster, 1989 )
Government favored some groups over others including business power over elected local
government, men over women, stakeholders over citizens (Tickell and Peck, 1996)
All of these bodies are made up of elites, and not representative of a range of interests and voices ...
discourage busy and thoughtful individuals from wasting their time (Judith E. Innes & Booher, 2004).
Planners assigned to facilitate the process were committed to a non-directive role and therefore only
proposed actions when asked. sometimes taking as many as three years to determine a vague and
hard-to-implement plan (Fainstein and Hirst 1996)
-
2.3 Problems of Citizen Participation (Theory) 15
Outer Interaction
(4) Authority problems (King, 1998; Mosher, 1967; Smith, 1979; Fainsten, 2000; Renee, 2004)
Holistic process
(5) Cost problems (Renee, 2004; Rainstein, 2000; Lawrence, 2001; Wilson, 1966; Kweit, 1981; Zimmerman, 1986)
Lengthy time required for such participatory process leading to burn-out among citizen participants
(Susan, S. Fainstein, 2000)
agreement by participants to a document does not necessarily mean that anything will happen
despite the moderate nature of the plan and the cross-acceptance process, its implementation has
been half-hearted at best and often strongly resisted by local planning boards (Susan S. Fainstein,
2000).
(6) Local selfishness (NIMBY) (Renee, 2004; Barber, 1984; Levy, 1995, deLeon, 2000)
Locally based decision making as an opportunity to influence policy for personal gain (Renee, 2004)
-
Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Moderate Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree
Representativeness 13.2 57.9 23.7 5.3 0.0
Expertise 15.8 63.2 15.8 2.6 2.6
Does official citizens community committee have following ability? (to public servants in
Gyeonggi-do)
%, N=38
2.3 Problems of Citizen Participation (Korea)
Gender Age Education Occupation Residence period
Male
Fem
ale
30s
40s
50s
60s-
Mid
dle scho
ol
Hig
h scho
ol
Colleg
e
University
Grad
uate scho
ol
Housew
ife
Office
worker
Self em
plo
yed
Pro
fessions
Etc
1-2yrs
2-5yrs
5yrs -
76.1
23.9
4.4
27.3
43.7
24.6
7.1
55.4
23.4
4.3
9.8
15.2
7.1
47.3
20.1
10.3
2.7
6.0
91.3
Demographics of citizen community committee members in Gyeonggi-do
%, N=184
Table 2-3 Demographics of citizen community committee members in Gyeonggi-do
Source: GRI, 2005
Table 2-4 Public servants perception for citizen community committee's abilities
Source: GRI, 2005
-
2.4 Problems of Participation in Large Groups (Theory) 17
The Group size and participation
Hardin (1982) summarized the Olsons celebrated thesis, logic of collective action (1964)
as large groups will fail; small groups may succeed
Ostrom (1998) proofed Olsons claim studying many practices all over the world In her
Novel prize winning researches.
Reasons to expect increasing group size to decrease prospects for successful collective
action (Olson, 1964; Poteete, 2004; Cook, 1983; Friedmann, 1987; Axelrod, 1984)
(1) Frequent interactions create opportunities to build reputations and mutual monitoring.
Those foster higher levels of trust
(2) Individuals may contribute because they think their contribution will make a difference.
(3) Concerns about avoiding sanctions for defection in ongoing interactions can also
promote co-operation
-
Fail of Self-governance System
Resident participation is hardly done in apartment complex
- 74.8% had never participated in resident organizations
- 78.8% had never participated in voluntary activities at apartment complex
- 65.6% rate Low grade at voluntary activities in apartment complex
- 76.4% of owners had not participated in community activities
- 91.2% of leaseholder had not participated in community activities
Resident have no interest
on resident representative elections 14%
23%
24%
39%
Always Participate Often Particiapte
Hardly Participate No Experience
2.4 Problems of Participation in Large Groups (Korea)
Source: SDI, 2010
Figure 2-14 Experience participated in resident representative elections
-
2.5 Conclusion
Limitations of participatory planning on high-rise new towns
Hard (result) Soft (process)
Urban problems of high-rise new town Difficulties of citizen participation Difficulties of participation in large group
Problems Reasons Problems Reasons Problems Reasons
Uniform design Built maximum
number of dwelling
units in the minimum
possible time
(Glendinning and
Muthesius, 1994)
Representativeness
problem
Seniors and
housewives are
dominant of the
community meeting.
Low participation rate Few chance of
interpersonal relations
Low social capital
Weak sense of
community
High mobility
Bulldozer clearance
High-rise building
Various occupations
Expertise problem Experts are too busy to
participate in
community meeting of
their town.
Low level of trust Few chance of
interpersonal relations
Break off traditional
landscape
Massive clearance
Super blocks
Power inequity During the community
meeting, some groups
are over others such as
elder people than
youngers.
Contribution problem Free-rider
Discordance between
public space and
residents use
Regardless of
residents participation
Disregard the value of
street and public space
Authority problem Participation for
participation
phenomenon. Agreed
opinions are often
resisted by local
government because
community members
have no authority.
-
- Cost problem Lengthy time required.
NIMBY Local selfishness
Table 2-7 Limitations of offline-only participatory planning by categories
Source: Author
-
CHAPTER 3
History of Local SNS: potentials and challenges as a participatory tool
E-P
artic
ipatio
n
1960s
Local Social Networks (LSN)
1920s 1990s 1998
OFFLINE ONLINE + OFFLINEONLINE
Resident-runCompany-run
5th
perio
d
2nd
perio
d
3rd
perio
d
1stp
eriod
4th
perio
d
O-N
TN
-OT
CA
SE 1
CA
SE 2
Best
Best
2006
CH3
Mo
dern
Pla
nn
ing
Partic
ipato
ry
Pla
nn
ing
THE AIM To unveil how Korean Local SNS started
To explore how Korean Local SNS transformed and learn lessons from each failed type
of Local SNS
-
3.3 Emergence of Local SNS 21
Blacksburg Electronic Village, 1993
Netville, 1997
E-neighbors, 2002
I-neighbors, 2004
Nextdoor, 2011
- 39,000 sites as of Jun 2014 (1 in 4 US neighborhoods)
Gorrotto-yachiro, 2004
Local SNS projects by MIC (), 2005-2008
263 Local SNS as of Feb 2014
Mokdong 8, 1998
Samsung Cyber village, 1999
Tower palace, 2002
Sanbon-love, 2006
127 community-wide Local SNS 69 city-wide Local SNS in Gyeonggi-do
as of Oct 2012
- More than 160 cities and police departments include NYC, San Diego, Houston, Pittsburg established official partnership with Nextdoor
Local SNS platform OpenPNE receivedElectronic government prize by MLIT(), 2013
America Japan Korea
Start
Boom
Start
Start
Boom
BoomHistory
Membership
Openness
Government
Average 750, maximum cap up to3,000 as of Oct 2013
Average 1,300, highest 9,503as of 2010
Average 15,300, highest 89,000as of July 2014
Strongly gated (11 neighbors recommendation required)
Strong partnership
Gated ( 1 neighbors recommendation required)
Relatively strong partnership
Weakly gated (Posting 5 to 10 commentrequired to post article)
Weak partnership
-
Drew based on newspapers, research journal articles andNational Information White Paper (2000 to 2011 each year)
-
3.5 Local SNS managed by Resident
Region Area (m2)
Price (million won)
Price-fixing Real transaction p
rice
Seoul B apartment 122.3 481 270 ~ 340
Gyeonggi H apart
ment
128.9
165.3
600
750
270 ~ 320
370 ~ 500
Gyeonggi C apart
ment105.8 300 280 ~ 220
15001000
30004000
5000
80009000
10000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Current Dukso Area (2010)
Source: Naver map open API
Image of New Town
Source: Namyangju City Hall homepage (2013-05-12)
1034
317
343
14378 64 17
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Newtown Issue
Members
House price issues were dominant in Sanbon-love during
first 6 months. Sanbon-love managing staff interview (source:
Gunpo citys history book, 2010).
Newtown issue was the direct cause of a foundation of
Dukso Local SNS. Dukso Local SNS management board
members even lent a bus to claim to appoint Dukso area as a
new town. - Dukso-sarang managing staff interview
2013.1.30
Type1: Old New Town Ex) Gunpo-Si : 1992 1995 (Massive development / short period)
Type2: New Old Town Ex) Namyangju-Si : 1994 2006 (Spot development)
-
3.7 Conclusion 24
Face-to-Face Community Meeting
Email List SANPP Project E-Mailing List
Wiki
Future Melbourne Wiki
http://www.futuremelbourne.com.au
Wikiplanning
www.wikiplanning.org/
SNS(Social Network Site)
: Facebook, Mixi
Pinehurst Seattle: (Facebook Group)
http://www.facebook.com/groups/53590206898
SNS: (Facebook Group)
http://www.facebook.com/groups/53590206898#!/makuhari.sns
Micro SNS: Twitter # (Hashtag)
City Hall Home Page
The city of Seoul
http://app.seoul.go.kr/oasis/free_list.jsp
The city of Philadelphia
http://www.phila.gov/residents/
GIS Based Report Seeclickfix: Richimond, VA
http://seeclickfix.com/richmond
Independent Web Site Louisiana Speaks
http://www.urbaninsight.com/articles/lascasetudy0409.html
Portal Online Community
: Naver(NHN), Yahoo
Sanbonlove
http://www.sanbonlove.com
Ano
nym
ity
Acc
essi
bili
ty
Dis
cuss
ion
Fam
iliar
ity
Sea
rcha
ble
Eas
y to
Join
Afford
abili
ty
Exa
mple
s
Geo
gra
phi
c O
rigin
-
CHAPTER 4
Case Selection and Setting Analysis Frame
E-P
artic
ipatio
n
1960s
Local Social Networks (LSN)
1920s 1990s 1998
OFFLINE ONLINE + OFFLINEONLINE
Resident-runCompany-run
5th
perio
d
2nd
perio
d
3rd
perio
d
1stp
eriod
4th
perio
d
O-N
TN
-OT
CA
SE 1
CA
SE 2
Best
Best
2006
Mo
dern
Pla
nn
ing
Partic
ipato
ry
Pla
nn
ing
THE AIM To survey whole Local SNSs in Gyeonggi-do
To categorize and evaluate every Local SNSs in order to select most successful
practices per each type
CH4
-
city population naver naver/popnaver_LBO
CN_LBOC/p
opdaum
daum_LBOC
daum/pop
D_LBOC/pop
daum+naver_LBOC
daum+naver_LBOC
/pop
Suwon-si 1,077,535 158,680 14.73 38,548 3.58 52,602 4.88 0.00 38,548 3.58
Sungnam-si 980,190 60,393 6.16 0.00 2,945 0.30 0.00 0 0.00
Goyang-si 950,115 63,550 6.69 14,454 1.52 0.00 0.00 14,454 1.52
youngin-si 876,550 28,288 3.23 9,610 1.10 7,745 0.88 0.00 9,610 1.10
Bucheon-si 875,204 30,083 3.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Ansan-si 714,891 17,518 2.45 0.00 12,976 1.82 0.00 0 0.00
Anyang-si 621,714 9,800 1.58 7,385 1.19 10,157 3,957 1.63 0.64 11,342 1.82
Namyangju-si 564,141 77,265 13.70 47,925 8.50 0.00 0.00 47,925 8.50
Hwasung-si 505,838 87,335 17.27 0.00 46,240 46,240 9.14 9.14 46,240 9.14
Eujeongbu-si 431,801 33,118 7.67 33,118 7.67 0.00 0.00 33,118 7.67
Pyeongtaeksi 419,457 24,874 5.93 0.00 3,728 3,728 0.89 0.89 3,728 0.89
Siheung-si 403,797 18,890 4.68 1,372 0.34 17,295 17,295 4.28 4.28 18,667 4.62
Paju-si 355,632 57,514 16.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Gyangmyeong-si 343,982 7,337 2.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Gunpo-si 287,833 63,127 21.93 60,712 21.09 3,957 3,957 1.37 1.37 64,669 22.47
Gwangju-si 249,789 7,272 2.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Gimpo-si 238,339 13,397 5.62 1,838 0.77 6,178 6,178 2.59 2.59 8,016 3.36
Ichon-si 202,595 4,740 2.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Yangju-si 196,706 6,368 3.24 0.00 12,979 12,979 6.60 6.60 12,979 6.60
Guri-si 196,398 6,704 3.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Osan-si 182,516 26,293 14.41 4,554 2.50 6,588 6,588 3.61 3.61 11,142 6.10
Ansung-si 177,937 3,709 2.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Pocheon-si 158,658 17,050 10.75 17,050 10.75 0.00 0.00 17,050 10.75
Hanam-si 150,479 5,137 3.41 0.00 2,104 2,104 1.40 1.40 2,104 1.40
Euwang-si 147,443 2,415 1.64 0.00 3,957 3,957 2.68 2.68 3,957 2.68
Yeoju-gun 109,250 1,587 1.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Yangpeyoun-gun 95,833 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Donducheon-gun
95,653 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Gwacheon-si 72,279 38,897 53.82 26,545 36.73 0.00 0.00 26,545 36.73
Gapyeong-gun 58,890 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Yeongcheon-gun 45,177 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Total 11,786,622 871,339 7.39 263,111 2.23 189,450 106,982 1.61 0.91 370,093 3.14
264.2 Case Selection
Searched at 12 July, 2012
Data Collection1) Targeting Naver, Daum
portal sites, Searched Local SNS with keywords apartment and the name of each city
2) Founded 127 community-wide, 69 city-wide Local SNS
3) Joined each Local SNS4) Recorded basic
information5) Counted posts that
uploaded in last 2 months
-
4.2.2 Classification of Local SNS
4.2 Case Selection
Local SNS
City-wide Community-wide
Restaurant Baby careMaeulmandeulgi
Living Redevelopment, RemodelingBefore Completion ()
Before Completion () Living Redevelopment, Remodeling
Characteristic
Resident do not know their neighborhood befo
re moving, Participation is rapidly decreased af
ter moving
MaintenanceAssociation
Very aggressive
Budget from Construction Company Resident Reserve + City Resident + Construction Company
NegotiationConstruction Company
Resident UnitedResident Organization Resident - City Resident United A Resident United B
By scale
By activity
By period
Korea Local SNS can be classified by scale, activity, and launched period
In this study, we will focus on city-wide, Maeulmandeulgi-oriented, and living type.
27
-
4.2 Case Selection
4.2.4 Evaluation.
Source: Author
Figure 4-4 posting trend analysis
City Daily post
1 Goyang-si 101.0
2 Gunpo-si 100.8
3 Namyangju-si 85.1
4 Eujeongbu-si 41.8
5 Yongin-si 44.6
City
Membership
per population
(%)
1 Gwacheon-si 36.7
2 Gunpo-si 21.1
3 Pocheon-si 10.8
4 Namyangju-si 9.3
5 Eujeongbu-si 5.3
City
Posting
trend
(%)
1 Gwacheon-si 229.0
2 Namyangju-si 246.3
3 Gunpo-si 210.6
4 Eujeongbu-si 185.9
5 Suwon-si 181.8
Firstly, among type 1 Local SNS, I will select Local
SNS managed for public good. I will filter out online
communities having for its aim young mothers
infant care communities where male cannot join, and
online restaurant review communities.
Secondly, I will evaluate Local SNS in terms of (1)
daily post, (2) membership ratio per population, and
(3) posting trend.
Lastly, I will filter out Local SNS managed for local
selfishness.
28
-
4.2 Case Selection 29
)
1. / 19972. / 19973. Naver Open API (2012
[basin, ]
Type1: Old New Town Gunpo-Si : 1992 1995 (Massive development / short period)
Source:
Many portion of city area
are mountains.
And there is a huge basin
in northern side.
At 1992, New Town was
made all at once with
grand master plan.
More than half of citizen
live in this area, Sanbon.
7,390People/km2 (2005)
1. Master plan for 2020 Namyangju (2007)2. Naver Open API (2012)3. Direction and Limitation of Land Use Planning System in Korea, Choi(2002), Korea Research Institute in Human Settlements
Type2: New Old Town Namyangju-Si : 1994 2006 (Spot development)
Source:
Many portion of city area
are mountains.
Furthermore, almost of
remained area are
designated as a green
belt,
Small spot development
had been done step by
step sporadically without
consideration of
infrastructure.
923People/km2 (2005)
1990
2009
-
Analysis mode
4.3 Case Study Design
According to Yin (1996), there are six sources of evidence for case study such as (1) documentation, (2)
archival records, (3) interviews, (4) direct observation, (5) participatory observation, (6) physical artifacts.
Among those, I will pick up documentation, archival records, interviews, participatory observation, and
physical artifacts as the evidence collecting.
I set a two interviewee selection standard. Firstly, I classified participants by degree of participation.
Secondly, I classified participants by stakeholders
Non-Participant
Passive-Participant
Active-Participant
offline
Passive-Participant
Active-Participant
Non-Participant
Passive LurkerofflineOnffline
Online
Active Lurker
Passive E-participant
Active E-participant
Conventional Participation Local SNS
-
3.7 Conclusion
-
3.7 Conclusion
-
CHAPTER 5
Old New Town Case: Gunpo-Si Local SNS, Sanbon-love
E-P
artic
ipatio
n
1960s
Local Social Networks (LSN)
1920s 1990s 1998
OFFLINE ONLINE + OFFLINEONLINE
Resident-runCompany-run
5th
perio
d
2nd
perio
d
3rd
perio
d
1stp
eriod
4th
perio
d
O-N
TN
-OT
CA
SE 1
CA
SE 2
Best
Best
2006
Mo
dern
Pla
nn
ing
Partic
ipato
ry
Pla
nn
ing
THE AIM To verity how Local SNS overcome urban problems in old new town
To investigate the characteristics of Local SNS during participatory planning process
CH5
-
5.3 Urban Problems in Gunpo-si
Changed needs and rigid master plan
Since new towns designed and built by rigid master plan at once, it faces difficulties to change with
times. Public space issues were started from parking lots. When 1st period new town planned, parking
lot regulation for 60m2 85m2 was 0.5 lots per a household.
However, in accordance with Article 27 of code for housing construction standard minimum number of
parking lot should 1 lots per a household. Recently remodeled apartment shows the severity of parking
lots shortage problem.
Unit Area
(m2)
Regulation at 1991
number of parking lots / total
area (m2)
Regulation at 2013
number of parking lots / total
area (m2)
Other Metropolitan city and ci
ty area in capital region
Other Metropolitan city and ci
ty area in capital region
- 60 1 / 135
1 / 85
60 - 85 1 / 115
65 - 135 1 / 100
1 / 70
135 - 1 / 85
-
5.3 Urban Problems in Gunpo-si
High mobility
Apartment complex representatives handle up to 100,000,000()Yen a year. Representative group have
all power to make and modify regulations for apartment complex, decide operate funds, and appoint
and dismiss control offices. As shown in Table 2 2, lawsuits related with apartment operation corruption
in 2009 were 966 in Seoul (SDI, 2010). It was not only for the capital city. There were 439 cases sued in
the city of Gwangju for legal troubles (APTnews, 2010)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total
Lawsuit 158 435 785 814 966 3,158
Injunction 24 39 65 106 273 507
Total 182 474 850 920 1,239 3,665
Table 2-2 Low transparency in apartment complex in Seoul
Source: SDI, 2010
Low Transparency
According to Statistics
Korea (2013), average
period of living in current
house was 6.40 years in
Gyeonggi-do.
-
5.7 District 8 Living Environment Improvement Project
Source: http://cafe.naver.com/sanbonatpnetwork , (cvvv1230), 2007.04.13 , searched at 2012.10.13
Figure ! .-1 English town planned in unused hide ground
Environment Improvement
With new facilitys
construction, residents became
interested in their living
environment.
As one person revealed that
there were 5 billion won fund but
representative do not try to use
it, he led environment
improvement movement through
Local SNS. It had been done
with 105 residents online
signature.
-
5.4 Emergence and Transformation of Local SNS, Sanbon-Love
Changed needs and rigid master planPlan
-
CHAPTER 6
New Old Town Case: Namyangju-Si Local SNS, Dukso-sarang
E-P
artic
ipatio
n
1960s
Local Social Networks (LSN)
1920s 1990s 1998
OFFLINE ONLINE + OFFLINEONLINE
Resident-runCompany-run
5th
perio
d
2nd
perio
d
3rd
perio
d
1stp
eriod
4th
perio
d
O-N
TN
-OT
CA
SE 1
CA
SE 2
Best
Best
2006
CH6
Mo
dern
Pla
nn
ing
Partic
ipato
ry
Pla
nn
ing
THE AIM To verity how Local SNS overcome urban problems in new old town
To investigate the characteristics of Local SNS during participatory planning process
-
6.3 Urban Problems in Namyangju-si
Quasi-agricultural zone () system, which introduced at 1994 and abolished at 2003,
was the main factor of unplanned urbanization in Namyangju-city.
FAR Floor limit
94.1 400% -
94.6 150% 15
94.7 250% 20
97.9 100% 20
00.2 100% 20
00.7 80% 2095
100
105
110
115
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Gyeonggi-Do Namyangju-city
Gyeonggi-do average Namyangju-city
# of public servant per 1,000 citizens 3.69 2.59
[financial independence rate, ] 73 44
Table 6-1 Regulation change for QAZ in greenfield area
Source: Minister of Construction and Transportation, 2010
Source: Author based on Statistics Korea, 2013
Figure 6-5 the annual rate of population growth
While number of public servant per 1,000 citizens in Gyeonggi-do was 3.69, Namyangju-city was
2.59 (70.2% of average). Moreover, financial independence rate in Namyangju-city was 44%
(60.3% of average) while Gyeonggi-do was 73%.
Table 6-3 Capacity of local government
Source: Korea statistics, 2010
Source: Namyangju city hall, 2011
Figure 6-7 Poor sidewalks in Namyangju-city
39
-
6.5 Sidewalk Improvement Project 40
-
06) Leaves dropped down too much Local government assisted to maintenance office of adjacent apartment complex to trim leaves
8
6
9
13
1
2
34
11
5
710
12
14
15
16
17
18
20
19
7) Although a pedestrian street was disconnected at the point, a radius for spin a baby stroll was not enough. Moreover traffic light blocked the route. Local government moved a crosswalk.
14, 15, 16) As some part of a pedestrian street was caved in, it was difficult to walk. Furthermore, when if rains it gets worse. Local government found extra drainage problem. It is under construction
4) Due to the Shrine on the way of a pedestrian street, it was very hard to walk. Even the other side were blocked by parked vehicles, baby strolls could not penetrated. Local government widened a street.
2) Though there were ramp at the bump, for its wrong location, people had to curve to raise the ramp. Local government installed an additional ramp.
10, 11, 17) There were no ramp at the bump of street end. Local government installed ramps.
12) There was no ramp at the bump of street end. However, this sidewalk is belong with shop owner. As a result, local government could not cave in the sidewalk. Local government persuaded shop owner to install ramp out of his/her territory.
20) While building a new facility. Sidewalk in front of the facility were winded and bumpy. Local government fixed the surface of sidewalk and straightened the road.
20 Sidewalk Project by Namyangju LBOC
[2007.01 ~ 2011.11 ] Total 27 posts, 226 comments and 10,664 hit
-
42
Project4
Due to the Shrine on the way of a pedestrian street, it was very hard to walk. Even the other side were
blocked by parked vehicles, baby strolls could not penetrated.
- Local government widened a street.
6.5 Sidewalk Improvement Project
Source: Namyangju city hall, 2013 Source: Author
-
43
Project7
Although a pedestrian street was disconnected at the point, a radius for spin a baby stroll was not
enough. Moreover traffic light blocked the route.
- Local government moved a crosswalk.
6.5 Sidewalk Improvement Project
Source: Daum Open API Source: Author
-
CHAPTER 7
Conclusion
Source: Author
-
45
Hardware Software
Urban problems of high-rise new town Difficulties of citizen participation Difficulties of participation in large group
Challenges Impact Challenges Impact Challenges Impact
Uniform design ( ) Representativeness problem ( ) Low participation ratio ( )
Weak sense of community ( - ) Expertise problem ( ) Low level of trust ( )
Break off traditional landscape ( - ) Power inequity ( - ) Contribution problem ( - )
Discordance between public space
and residents use( ) Authority problem ( ) Sanction problem ( )
-Cost problem ( )
-NIMBY ( )
7.3 Impact of Local SNS on participatory planning
Public Space Problems
Failure of Top-down Approach
Failure of Bottom-up Approach
Neglected Public Space
Weak CommunityLow Participation
Local SNSPromote
ParticipationSupplement Public
Servants roleImproved Public
Space
Lower huddle of ParticipationQuasi- Expert
Problem Posing
Lack of Budget& Human Resource
Impact on public space problems
Impact on participatory planning by each criteria
-
Impact on representativeness problem
467.3 Impact of Local SNS on participatory planning
Gunpo-si (June 2014) Sanbon-Love (June 2014) Resident committee (Oct 2005)
Gunpo-si (June 2014) Sanbon-Love (June 2014) Resident committee (Oct 2005)
Civil participation in dense
urban areas had considered
very challenging mission with
conventional participation
means. However, Local SNS
provides massive public
sphere regardless time and
place.
Local SNS shows more
balanced demographics
compared with resident
committees.
-
Impact on authority problem
477.3 Impact of Local SNS on participatory planning
As of November 2011 In Sanbon, numerically, 21% of citizen are member of Local SNS. In
Dukso, 29.4% of residents are member of Local SNS. Therefore, mayor, council man, and
congress man started to give careful attention to the public opinion of Local SNS.
In Namyangju-city, Local SNS leaders distributed request list to each candidates at
2008, 2012 congressman election and 2010, 2014 local election.
It gave big pressure to governor and huge power to Local SNS. Sidewalk project was one of
that lists and it was one reason that it fixed in three months, which had not been fixed past
13 years.
Impact on NIMBY problem
As people have more power, Great power comes with great responsibility became more
critical issue. However, some of them abuse it to obtain personal or regional gain.
Some of Local SNS still conflict with local government without interaction. NPOs and
activists in some region complained that Local SNS in their region have no mature civic
awareness.
-
Principle of intended weak tie
48
Successful Local SNS intentionally weaken social tie in online community, whereas
strengthen social tie in offline meeting.
Addressing real name and showing intimacy of real world are prohibited in online to prevent
other passive participants from feeling uncomfortable to join conversation.
Neutral public sphere formed by Intended weak tie may overcome Like-minded cluster
problem (P. Norris, 2002; Sunstein, 2001; Ikeda, 2005) which cause enclosed
communication.
7.5 Strategies and tactics for Local SNS planning
7 Principles for successful Local SNS supporting participatory planning Characteristics of Local SNS
1. Principle of intended weak tie Strength of weakness
2. Principle of reservist Silent majority, lurkers
3. Principle of participation elevator Written discussion
4. Principle of fruit and seed Interest-driven
5. Principle of minimum transfer Accessibility than functionality
6. Principle of size does matter Rebounding issues
7. Principle of quasi-expert Regardless of time and place
Table 7-2 7 principles for successful Local SNS on participatory planning
Source: Author
Characteristics of Local SNS and 7 Principles
-
Principle of participation elevator
497.5 Strategies and tactics for Local SNS planning
Principle of reservist
Even lurkers, silent majority, do not post articles, since they are connected to local issues,
when some issues related with them arose, they can easily turn to participate in the debate.
It takes lots of cost to spread information and recruit participants without reservist
When one issue regarding kindergarten arose, about 100 lurker members who were young babys
parents joined that discussion in a flash. It was amazing- 6th manager of Dukso-sarang
Conventional
participation
1. Taking the initiative
2. Defining shared vision
3. Understanding the locality
4. Developing ideas
5. Agreeing a program
6. Taking action
7. Learning lessons
Local SNS
-
Principle of minimum transfer
507.5 Strategies and tactics for Local SNS planning
Principle of fruits and seed
Many online participatory planning sites failed because they just contain necessary
functions for planning such as planning map, historical data, or statistics.
Ordinary citizens have little interest in those factors even it is important to planning.
Successful Local SNS uses fruit and seed strategy. Even if what their needs is spreading
seeds, they provide delicious flesh of fruit, such as buy/sell board, much bigger than seed.
Sanbon-Love tried to run independent domain to escape pay-free portal sites which have
only limited functions. Almost all of those trials turned into failure. According to Bang GJ
and Jae HS (2006), only 0.47% of independent domain Local SNS had one update in last
one month. The experimental of Sanbon-Love, the largest Local SNS, failed in six months,
and they came back to pay-free portal site,
The reasons people do not visit independent domain is similar with transfer behavior in
public transportation. Even though it does not take much effort to transfer, people are apt to
dislike transfer, rather choose little bit longer way without transfer.
-
Principle of quasi-expert
517.5 Strategies and tactics for Local SNS planning
Principle of size does matter
The significance of Local SNS is that it enables the participation of workers and students,
most of which have been left out but have professionals in each field.
These new type of leaders may cover lack of budget and human resource in local
government
They (Local SNS managers) are very smart and they play a role like a half-public servant. As we suffer
with short of human force, it was really helpful.- Head of public transportation department in Namyangju
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
May-
08
Jul-08
Sep-0
8
Nov-
08
Jan-0
9
Mar-
09
May-
09
Jul-09
Sep-0
9
Nov-
09
Jan-1
0
Mar-
10
May-
10
Jul-10
Sep-1
0
Nov-
10
Jan-1
1
Mar-
11
May-
11
Jul-11
Sep-1
1
Nov-
11
Jan-1
2
Posts Replies Members PageView(x100)
Average posting trend in community-wide Local SNS was 49.0 while city-wide was 138.7
Source: Hong, SK, 2009
Figure 3-13 Post trend of Apartment-wide Local SNS
Source: Author
Figure 5 22 Statistics of Sanbon-Love (Accumulated value)
-
Bangkok
Jakarta
Singapore
Beijing
Seoul
Taipei
Hong Kong
Shanghai
Tokyo
Source: MVRDV, 2012
Conditions References
1. Urban area Putnam (2000), Cabinet Office of Japan (2007)
2. Large group Olson (1965), Mosher (1967), Hardin (1982), Friedmann (1987), Ostrom (1990), Rimmerman (1997), Renee (2004)
3. High-mobility Putnam (2000)
4. High-rise Sinnett el al (1972), Bickman el al (1976), Nadler, A el al (1982), Korte et al (1983), Cabinet Office of Japan (2007)
-
Nextdoor
Neighborland
Meetey
Meetup
-
7.7 Further Research
Proposed model of bottom-up smart city
-
Combining ONFFline with digital tools
Goodspeed (2013) proves convincingly that ICT-planning support system helps to improve participatory
planning in terms of achieving high level of social learning. Although it raised the level of participation,
number of participants were limited as average 26.3 person for 7 workshops.
It will be more effective when digital participatory tools integrated with ONFFline platform.
INDEX I-PLACE3S
Envision Tomorrow Community VIZ Community Remarks
7.7 Further Research
-
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
PhD candidate YOON, [email protected]