© 2011 pearson education, inc. publishing as prentice hall what is forecasting? process of...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
What is Forecasting?
Process of predicting a future event
Underlying basis of all business decisions Production Inventory Personnel Facilities
??
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Short-range forecast Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months Purchasing, job scheduling, workforce levels, job
assignments, production levels Medium-range forecast
3 months to 3 years Sales and production planning, budgeting
Long-range forecast 3+ years New product planning, facility location, research
and development
Forecasting Time Horizons
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Distinguishing Differences
Medium/long range forecasts deal with more comprehensive issues and support management decisions regarding planning and products, plants and processes
Short-term forecasting usually employs different methodologies than longer-term forecasting
Short-term forecasts tend to be more accurate than longer-term forecasts
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Influence of Product Life Cycle
Introduction and growth require longer forecasts than maturity and decline
As product passes through life cycle, forecasts are useful in projecting Staffing levels Inventory levels Factory capacity
Introduction – Growth – Maturity – Decline
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life Cycle
Best period to increase market share
R&D engineering is critical
Practical to change price or quality image
Strengthen niche
Poor time to change image, price, or quality
Competitive costs become criticalDefend market position
Cost control critical
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Co
mp
an
y S
tra
teg
y/Is
sue
s
Figure 2.5
Internet search engines
Sales
Drive-through restaurants
CD-ROMs
Analog TVs
iPods
Boeing 787
LCD & plasma TVs
Avatars
Xbox 360
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life Cycle
Product design and development critical
Frequent product and process design changes
Short production runs
High production costs
Limited models
Attention to quality
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
OM
Str
ate
gy
/Issu
es
Forecasting critical
Product and process reliability
Competitive product improvements and options
Increase capacity
Shift toward product focus
Enhance distribution
Standardization
Fewer product changes, more minor changes
Optimum capacity
Increasing stability of process
Long production runs
Product improvement and cost cutting
Little product differentiation
Cost minimization
Overcapacity in the industry
Prune line to eliminate items not returning good margin
Reduce capacity
Figure 2.5
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Types of Forecasts
Economic forecasts Address business cycle – inflation rate, money
supply, housing starts, etc. Technological forecasts
Predict rate of technological progress Impacts development of new products
Demand forecasts Predict sales of existing products and services
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategic Importance of Forecasting
Human Resources – Hiring, training, laying off workers
Capacity – Capacity shortages can result in undependable delivery, loss of customers, loss of market share
Supply Chain Management – Good supplier relations and price advantages
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seven Steps in Forecasting
1. Determine the use of the forecast2. Select the items to be forecasted3. Determine the time horizon of the forecast4. Select the forecasting model(s)5. Gather the data6. Make the forecast7. Validate and implement results
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Realities!
Forecasts are seldom perfect Most techniques assume an underlying
stability in the system Product family and aggregated
forecasts are more accurate than individual product forecasts
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecasting Approaches
Used when situation is vague and little data exist New products New technology
Involves intuition, experience e.g., forecasting sales on Internet
Qualitative Methods
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecasting Approaches
Used when situation is ‘stable’ and historical data exist Existing products Current technology
Involves mathematical techniques e.g., forecasting sales of color televisions
Quantitative Methods
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Overview of Qualitative Methods
1. Jury of executive opinion Pool opinions of high-level experts, sometimes
augment by statistical models
2. Delphi method Panel of experts, queried iteratively
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Overview of Qualitative Methods
3. Sales force composite Estimates from individual salespersons are
reviewed for reasonableness, then aggregated
4. Consumer Market Survey Ask the customer
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Overview of Quantitative Approaches
1. Naive approach2. Moving averages3. Exponential smoothing4. Trend projection5. Linear regression
time-series models
associative model
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Set of evenly spaced numerical data Obtained by observing response variable at regular
time periods Forecast based only on past values, no other
variables important Assumes that factors influencing past and present
will continue influence in future
Time Series Forecasting
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Trend
Seasonal
Cyclical
Random
Time Series Components
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Components of Demand
Dem
and
fo
r p
rod
uct
or
serv
ice
| | | |1 2 3 4
Time (years)
Average demand over 4 years
Trend component
Actual demand line
Random variation
Figure 4.1
Seasonal peaks
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Naive Approach
Assumes demand in next period is the same as demand in most recent period e.g., If January sales were 68, then
February sales will be 68 Sometimes cost effective and efficient Can be good starting point
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MA is a series of arithmetic means Used if little or no trend
Used often for smoothing Provides overall impression of data over time
Moving Average Method
Moving average =∑ demand in previous n periods
n
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
January 10February 12March 13April 16May 19June 23July 26
Actual 3-MonthMonth Shed Sales Moving Average
(12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2/3
(13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16(16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1/3
Moving Average Example
(10 + 12 + 13)/3 = 11 2/3
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Graph of Moving Average
| | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Sh
ed S
ales
30 –28 –26 –24 –22 –20 –18 –16 –14 –12 –10 –
Actual Sales
Moving Average Forecast
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Used when some trend might be present Older data usually less important
Weights based on experience and intuition
Weighted Moving Average
Weightedmoving average =
∑ (weight for period n) x (demand in period n)∑ weights
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
January 10February 12March 13April 16May 19June 23July 26
Actual 3-Month WeightedMonth Shed Sales Moving Average
[(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 141/3
[(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17[(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 201/2
Weighted Moving Average
101213
[(3 x 13) + (2 x 12) + (10)]/6 = 121/6
Weights Applied Period
3 Last month2 Two months ago1 Three months ago
6 Sum of weights
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Moving Average And Weighted Moving Average
30 –
25 –
20 –
15 –
10 –
5 –
Sa
les
de
man
d
| | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Actual sales
Moving average
Weighted moving average
Figure 4.2
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Increasing n smooths the forecast but makes it less sensitive to changes
Do not forecast trends well Require extensive historical data
Potential Problems With Moving Average
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Form of weighted moving average Weights decline exponentially Most recent data weighted most (depending on
alpha value)
Involves little record keeping of past data
Many forecasts can be made with and then tested by finding forecast error – choose most accurate (in hindsight).
Exponential Smoothing
Choosing the smoothing constant ()
Requires smoothing constant () Ranges from 0 to 1 Subjectively chosen
High if data are extremely variable (moving average changes a lot)
Low is data are steady (moving average fairly steady)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponential SmoothingNew period forecast = Last period’s forecast
+ a (Last period’s demand – Last period’s forecast)
Ft = Ft – 1 + a(At – 1 - Ft – 1)
where Ft = new forecast
Ft – 1 = previous forecast
a = smoothing (or weighting) constant (0 ≤ a ≤ 1)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Effect of Smoothing Constants
Big alpha = Little interest in past periodsLittle alpha = more interest in past periods
Weight Assigned to
Most 2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th MostRecent Recent Recent Recent Recent
Smoothing Period Period Period Period PeriodConstant (a) a(1 - a) a(1 - a)2 a(1 - a)3 a(1 - a)4
a = .1 .1 .09 .081 .073 .066
a = .5 .5 .25 .125 .063 .031
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Impact of Different
225 –
200 –
175 –
150 –| | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Quarter
De
ma
nd
a = .1
Actual demand
a = .5
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponential Smoothing Example
Predicted demand(Jan) = 142 Ford MustangsActual demand(Jan) = 153Smoothing constant a = .20
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponential Smoothing Example
Predicted demand(Jan) = 142 Ford MustangsActual demand(Jan) = 153Smoothing constant a = .20
New forecast(Feb) = 142 + .2(153 – 142)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exponential Smoothing Example
Predicted demand(Jan) = 142 Ford MustangsActual demand(Jan) = 153Smoothing constant a = 0.20
New forecast(Feb) = 142 + .2(153 – 142)
= 142 + 2.2
= 144.2 ≈ 144 cars
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Choosing
The objective is to obtain the most accurate forecast no matter the technique
We generally do this by selecting the model that gives us the lowest forecast error
Forecast error = Actual demand - Forecast value
= At - Ft
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Common Measures of Error
Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD)
MAD =∑ |Actual - Forecast|
n
Mean Squared Error (MSE)
MSE =∑ (Forecast Errors)2
n
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Common Measures of Error
Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE)
MAPE =∑100|Actuali - Forecasti|/Actuali
n
n
i = 1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Comparison of Forecast Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded a = .10 a = .10 a = .50 a = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.002 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.787 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Comparison of Forecast Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded a = .10 a = .10 a = .50 a = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.002 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.787 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
MAD =∑ |deviations|
n
= 82.45/8 = 10.31
For a = .10
= 98.62/8 = 12.33
For a = .50
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Comparison of Forecast Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded a = .10 a = .10 a = .50 a = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.002 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.787 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62MAD 10.31 12.33
= 1,526.54/8 = 190.82
For a = .10
= 1,561.91/8 = 195.24
For a = .50
MSE =∑ (forecast errors)2
n
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Comparison of Forecast Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded a = .10 a = .10 a = .50 a = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.002 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.787 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62MAD 10.31 12.33MSE 190.82 195.24
= 44.75/8 = 5.59%
For a = .10
= 54.05/8 = 6.76%
For a = .50
MAPE =∑100|deviationi|/actuali
n
n
i = 1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Comparison of Forecast Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded AbsoluteActual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with forQuarter Unloaded a = .10 a = .10 a = .50 a = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.002 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.503 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.754 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.125 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.566 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.787 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.618 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62MAD 10.31 12.33MSE 190.82 195.24MAPE 5.59% 6.76%
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Variations In Data
The seasonal index model can adjust trend data for seasonal variations in demand
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Seasonal Variations In Data
1. Find average historical demand for each season
2. Compute the average demand over all seasons
3. Compute a seasonal index for each season
4. Estimate next year’s total demand
5. Divide this estimate of total demand by the number of seasons, then multiply it by the seasonal index for that season
Steps in the process:
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecasting in the Service Sector Presents unusual challenges
Special need for short term records Needs differ greatly as function of industry and
product Holidays and other calendar events Unusual events
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall