© 2006 step consortium multiscale modelling strand
TRANSCRIPT
© 2006 STEP Consortium
Multiscale Multiscale Modelling StrandModelling Strand
© 2006 STEP Consortium
Multiscale Multiscale ModellingModelling
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Multiscale modelling is a quantitative, integrative and experimentally based approach for studying biological processes and dynamics that span multiple spatial (typically nanometers to meters – 109) and temporal (typically microseconds to decades – 1015) scales with the view to transfer knowledge and information across scales, as well as support modularity and interactivity.
DefinitionDefinition
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Validation against experimental data.• Verification through numerical experi-
ments, mathematical analysis and access to models/data used in publications (open for scrutiny).
• Low level details can be approximated at higher levels, but ideally key parameters (that are experimentally verifiable) are ported to higher levels.
Validation and IntegrationValidation and Integration
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Structural, simulation and functional data.
• From 100s of MB to a few TB of data.• Remote storage of data, executables
and metadata access speed.• Data safety and security (must be
transpa-rent to the user).• Visualisation using OpenGL-based
rendering software.• Need a repository for clinical data
(legal and ethical issues, as well as reluctance from some to share data).
DataData
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Data transfer and storage/access. Not fast/convenient. Need access to structu-ral/functional data.
• Need more useable and user-friendly mo-delling environments (e.g. access to HPC facilities).
• Proper software engineering approach.
ICT IssuesICT Issues
© 2006 STEP Consortium
Position PaperPosition Paper
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Favour research that requires interaction between in silico, in vitro and in vivo work.
• Training of interdisciplinary scientists to support computational systems biology.
• Develop proofs of concept (i.e. demos).• Apply ideas and concepts from non-
biological sciences to biology.• Address problems inherent to peer-
reviewing of interdisciplinary projects.• Set up of a modelling network to share
ideas, expertise, results, etc.
Common Objectives (1)Common Objectives (1)
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Support efforts where the added value of modelling can easily and quickly be shown.
• Demand online depository of any model-ling tools and data used in published works.
• Promote the co-location and close inte-gration of interdisciplinary fields.
• Define tools and processes which will get experimentalists involved.
• Support exchange of specialists.
Common Objectives (2)Common Objectives (2)
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Facilitate discussion of existing published models.
• Standardise practices in terms of modelling development, data, etc.
• Focus on what Europe can improve or do better rather than reinvent the wheel.
Common Objectives (3)Common Objectives (3)
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Experimentalists: modelling may help them both in their research and teaching.
• Modellers: agree on standards (to facilitate exchange of models of various dimensions).
• Industry and health policy makers: demos where modelling has paid off.
• Clinicians: modelling can benefit patient care (insight into disease mecha-nisms, aid diagnosis and treatment).
• Society: 3 Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) and personalised medicine.
Common Objectives (4)Common Objectives (4)
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Physiome Project, i.e. development of quantitative and integrative models descri-bing life from conception to death and from genes to whole organism.
• Wherever possible, these models have to be human specific Improve health.
• Need an even stronger interaction between experimentalists and modellers.
• Low level mechanisms are important, but what actually matters is the organism.
Research ChallengesResearch Challenges
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Financial: need to shift from a reductionist to an integrative approach to science.
• Human: mathematicians with a biological background, life scientists with a mathema-tical background, and biomathematicians.
• Infrastructural: modelling and computing platforms, supercomputers, especially desi-gned knowledge bases, as well as mecha-nisms for sharing data, ideas, expertise, results, etc.
Resources RequiredResources Required
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Modelling as such doesn’t raise ethical/ legal issues, it’s what you do with it that does.
• Have to take responsibility for what a model could be used for, but difficult to enforce.
Ethical, Legal andEthical, Legal andGender Issues (1)Gender Issues (1)
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Low level of interest from some stakehol-ders.
• We are too few to tackle the issues at hand.
• Mathematical/computational limitations.
• Lack of collaboration between research groups.
• Potential lack of interest from the industry.
• Our incomplete knowledge of the biological mechanisms we are trying to model.
Ethical, Legal andEthical, Legal andGender Issues (2)Gender Issues (2)
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Need knowledge bases (experimental data, models and modelling environments).
• Computing platforms and resources.• Thematic and technical networks.• Have output that demonstrates the
effect we are having on wealth/health.• Have to be familiar with the metrics
used by local governments.• Set of standards, quality
rules/assurance.• Mirror of repository.
Organisational ModelOrganisational Model
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Easy “opt-in” procedures for interested parties.
• Strategy with specific agenda and deliverables in terms of infrastructures, networks of platforms (common standards for publication and model deposition, financial support to curate/validate models/data/etc.), thematic and technical networks, and scientific achievements.
• Federation of Physiome Projects.
Community Building Community Building InitiativesInitiatives
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Two obvious areas are therapeutic innova-tion and public health (involve industry).
• Improve diagnosis. Industrial angle is different for diagnostics and therapies.
• Get involved in pre-clinical setting and then into clinical, once link well established.
• Improve research by coming up with hypo-theses that can be experimentally tested and that can result in the exclusion of at least one hypothesis.
Impact AnalysisImpact Analysis
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Researchers: as currently + tutorials on what the models actually do.
• Industry: provide demos, publish in profes-sional journals, take part in exhibitions, contact associations.
• Policy makers: provide demos, talk to existing Eropean agencies.
• Society: get involved with the media by, for instance, talking to big pharmaceutical companies.
Dissemination ModelsDissemination Models
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• Convince stakeholders of the benefits of modelling by involving them as early as possible in a very specific project.
• Provide success stories that are based on quantitative modelling studies where, for instance, drug development can be applied.
• Need major refocus of funding and an increase of support for such studies (see US and Japan for instance).
Exploitation Models &Exploitation Models &Long-Term SustainabilityLong-Term Sustainability
© 2006 STEP Consortium
• All of the above…
Recommendation forRecommendation fora Concrete Implementationa Concrete Implementation