zara officer - holman webb lawyers - lessons learnt from the quakers hill coronial inquest
TRANSCRIPT
25th Annual Medico-Legal Congress
25-26 February 2016
Lessons Learned from the
Quakers Hill Coronial Inquest
Presented by:
Zara OfficerSpecial counsel
(02) 9390 8427
Quakers Hill Fire
Quakers Hill Fire
Lessons Learned
Recruitment and
background/reference checking
potential staff
Dealing with staff who are
impaired with substance abuse
and Schedule 8 limitations
Mandatory reporting
Emergency evacuation procedures
Findings of Deputy State Coroner, HCB
Dillon delivered 9 March 2015
Combined inquest into the fire and death of 14 residents
Fire lit by Roger Dean, registered nurse
Convicted of 11 counts of murder by reckless
indifference to human life
Convicted of recklessly causing grievous bodily harm to
8 people
Life imprisonment without parole
The Fire
The Fire
Employment Background of Roger Dean
Born 1976
Registered nurse 1996
Employed at St. George Hospital
& Community Health
Services 2002 to 2007
Employed at St. John of God
Hospital, July 2007 to September
2011
28 June 2011 found to be drug
affected at work at St John of God
Application for Employment at
Quakers Hill Nursing Home
Provided CV to Quakers Hill Nursing Home prior to 6
September 2011
Omissions in CV
No mention of employment at St. John of God Hospital
2007-2011
Old references provided, the most recent from Year 2000
Appointment to Quakers Hill Nursing
Home
Appointed soon after single interview
References not checked
Employee engagement checklist included obtain police
check, but not reference check
Checklist completed 7 September 2011
No pre-employment medical screen done
Attended in-service staff training – 6 September 2011
Commenced nightshift - 13 September 2011
Formal contract of employment – 20 September 2011
Nightshift 16-17 November 2011
AIN observed Roger Dean in treatment room for a large
amount of time with doors closed
CCTV footage showed Roger Dean going in 36 times
Spent approx 2 hours of the shift in treatment room
Missing – 237 tablets Endone; one tablet Kapanol
Roger Dean suspected of theft, not suspended from duty
Destruction of Evidence
Latham J criminal sentence finding –
Intention to light fire was either to:
deflect management from further inquiring into the theft and/or
destroy the treatment room evidence
Abuse of Prescription Medication and
Psychiatric Issues
Search warrant 21 November 2011 – 203 Endone
tablets, 28 part Endone tablets, Kapanol, MS Contin,
Xanax, 20 prescriptions
Medical records evidenced “doctor shopping” – seen by
10 different GP’s April-November 2011
Forensic psychiatric in criminal trial diagnosed
polysubstance abuse, adjustment disorder, and cluster B
personality disorder with narcissistic and histrionic
features
Nursing Staff Concerns about
Roger Dean
On occasions before the fire:
white substance in corners of mouth
waking patients in middle of night to give Endone when they did not
request it
dishevelled appearance, shirt not buttoned to match the holes
performance issues
suspicions of substitution of pain medications with Panadol or No-Doze
patient observed to be in pain despite records showing pain medication
was administered
Missed Opportunities
St John of God Hospital episode in June 2011
No report made under s.142(1) National Law (cf s.117A
Health Services Act, for public hospital employees)
Failure by Quakers Hill to check with previous employers
Failure to follow up staff reports of concerning incidents
Staff not trained in detecting signs of drug intoxication or
addiction in professional colleagues
Staff Training and Development of
Protocols for Mandatory Reporting
In-house training on potential misuse of drugs by
colleagues
Training in signs of impairment or intoxication due to
drug use or dependency
Education as to responsibilities for mandatory reporting
under the National Law (s.140, s.142)
Establish operating procedures and protocols for
investigation and management of staff suspected of
working while drug intoxicated
Immediate suspension
Management of Drug Affected Health
Professionals
Education on the signs of impairment due to drug misuse
Signs and symptoms – physical signs – behaviour
changes
Clustering of signs
Reporting suspected cases of drug abuse
Management of Drug Affected Health
Professionals
To encourage staff to report, emphasise:
The primacy of the interests of vulnerable patients
The need to help the affected health professional
Their lack of discretion in the matter – mandatory
reporting
Send an apparently drug affected person or suspected
thief away from the workplace
Pre-Employment Screening
Applicant interviews
Tests to confirm general ability,
aptitude and personality
Medical checks
Reference and background checks
In the Interview
It is appropriate to ask:
How long did they spend in
previous jobs?
Recruitment source – who
were they referred by?
Do they have accurate
perceptions of what is
involved in the role?
Reasons for seeking the role?
After the Interview
Reference check prior to any offer
Qualification check – documentary evidence
One/possibly two, competency based interviews by the
line manager/HR
Medical assessment
Obtain consent from the candidate before conducting
searches (include on an application form or request
following first interview).
Searches After Interview. . . continued
Background checks such as police/criminal checks
AHPRA enquiries with respect to conditions on
registration or impairment
NSW service check register – Section 133C Health
Services Act allows a public health organisation to share
or exchange appointment information about a health
practitioner with a private facility licensee registered
under the Private Health Facilities Act 2007 (NSW),
subject to conditions
Section 133C Health Services Act 1997
(NSW)
133C Sharing or exchange of information about health
practitioner appointments
(1) Public health organisation may share or exchange appointment information about a health practitioner with a private health facility licensee if a public health organisation:
(a) reasonably believes that the health practitioner practises at the private health facility, and(b) reasonably considers that the disclosure of that information to the licensee is necessary because it raises serious concerns about the safety of patients
(2) Information is appointment information about a health practitioner for the purposes of this section if:
(a) the health practitioner practises (or formerly practised) at a hospital or health institution of the public organisation (whether under a service contract or otherwise), and(b) the information relates to the variation, suspension or termination by the public health organisation of clinical privileges of the health practitioner
Recommendations Concerning AHPRA
That AHPRA consider requiring employers to notify it when a
health professional falling under the agency’s jurisdiction
commences work and when he or she leaves that
employment. Any regulatory changes necessary be given
urgent consideration.
That AHPRA consider including employment details in its
registration database. Include name, contact details of
employer, period of employment, any notifications made to
AHPRA concerning the employee. Any regulatory changes
necessary be given urgent consideration.
Emergency Evacuation Procedures
Emergency Evacuation Procedures
Recommendations for Emergency
Evacuation Procedures
Use “000” instead of relying on automatic systems
Remove non-ambulant patients in beds or wheelchairs
preferably or alternative dragging methods
Passageways kept clear as far as reasonably practicable
Fire evacuation plan take into account impediments to
rescuing non-ambulant patients – connections to medical
equipment – make specific provision addressing those
challenges
Fire exits and doors kept clear of obstructions
Implement regular scenario based practical training including
practicing urgent removal of non-ambulant patients or
residents
Conclusion – Ongoing Issues
The incidental question of
doctor shopping
Robustness or otherwise of
mandatory reporting regime
Issue of drug dependence in
health professionals, access to
drugs
Practical procedures for
handling S8 drugs
Questions