young’s modulus of cellulose fibrils measured using atomic

18
2008 International Conference on Nanotechnology for the Forest Products Industry, June 25-27, 2008, St. Louis, Missouri Siqun Wang, Qingzheng Cheng University of Tennessee Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic Force Microscopy

Upload: others

Post on 26-Oct-2021

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

2008 International Conference on Nanotechnology for the Forest Products Industry, June 25-27, 2008, St. Louis, Missouri

Siqun Wang, Qingzheng Cheng

University of Tennessee

Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic Force Microscopy

Page 2: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Composites and nanocomposites• The Boeing airplane 787 Dreamliner is a milestone for advanced carbon

fiber composites that make up over 50 percent of the materials of the

airplane.

Page 3: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Composites and nanocompositesTo design fiber reinforced polymer composites, we need to know

Matrix

Fiber

Interphase

Page 4: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Cellulose fibrils and nanocrystal

Fiber: One of the thin thread-like parts that from many plant growths, μm-mm;

Fibril: A small, slender parts of fibers, bundles of microfibrils, nm-μm;

Source: www.empa.ch/; Fengel, D., and G. Wegener. 1984

Microfibril: Cellulose molecule bundles surrounded with hemicellulose.

Elementary microfibril: smallest fibril or unit in cell wall, 3-5 nm diameter for wood, also called nanocrystal or whisker.

Page 5: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Cellulose fibrils and nanocrystal

Chemical treatments: acid hydrolysis to remove the amorphous regions, obtain nanocrystal or whisker.

Source: Samir, Biomacromolecules 2005, 6, 612-626

Transmission electron micrograph from a dilute suspension of hydrolyzed(a) cotton, (b) sugar-beet pulp and (c) tunicin.

Page 6: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Cellulose fibrils and nanocrystal

Mechanical treatment: high pressure homogenizer, grinder treatment, fibrils in nano and micro scales.

< 50 nanometers

Page 7: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Cellulose based nanocomposites

• Fibers:• Cellulose whisker• Bacterial cellulose• Cellulose microfibrils• Microfibrillated cellulose

• Matrix:• Polypropylene (PP)• PE• Poly(lactic acid) (PLA)• Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)

Page 8: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Objectives

• Conduct the nano-scale three-point bending testing to measure elastic moduli of individual cellulose fibril

• Study some factor that may affect the determination of bending deflections

Page 9: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Materials and Method

Nano-scale three-point bending in AFM.

Page 10: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Nano-Scale Three-Point Bending Test in AFM

where F is the maximum force applied, L is the suspended length, δis the deflection of the beam at midspan, and I is the second moment of area of the beam, where I=πD4/64 and D is the beam diameter.

Page 11: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Fibril Deflection Determination

0

100

200

300

400

500

800 820 840 860 880 900Displacement (nm)

Forc

e (n

N)

Load on fibrilLoad on reference

Fibril deflection δ

Many factors affect the determination of deflection δ.

Reference: on wafer, on fibril above wafer, or clean wafer

Page 12: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Fibril deflection determination

To determine δ, Reference: on wafer, on

fibril lay on wafer

106.7

79.288.7

0

30

60

90

120

On wafer On fibril lay onwafer

On fibril abovegroove

Exte

nsio

n of

Z-s

cann

er (n

m)

Cantilever spring constant: 2.3 N/m,max force: 400nN

Page 13: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Elastic modulus determination

Affected by “Reference”Not much between 200nN & 400nN, as well on L/4 & L/2.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Wafer as reference Fibril as reference

MO

E (G

Pa)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Test on L/4 Test on L/2

MO

E (G

Pa)

200nN400nN

Page 14: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Fibril surface roughness

Page 15: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Elastic modulus of Lyocell fibrils

0

30

60

90

120

150

140 170 200 230 260 290Diameter (nm)

Elas

tic M

odul

us (G

Pa)

30min60min

HIUS treated 30 vs 60 min, d>180nm, E dramatically decreased.

Page 16: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Elastic modulus of different fibrils

HIUS vs Homoginizer: no big difference;Pulp vs MFC: no big difference.

0

30

60

90

120

180 234Diameter (nm)

Elas

tic M

odul

us (G

Pa) Pulp30min

MFC

0

10

20

30

40

270 230Diameter (nm)

Elas

tic M

odul

us (G

Pa) Homoginizer

Ultrasonic

Page 17: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Summary

Nano-scale three-point bending test using AFM can be used to measure the elastic modulus of single cellulose fibrils;

The penetration of AFM tips to the cellulose fibril surfaces need to be considered; the elastic modulus of Lyocell fibrils with d from 150 to 180 nm was evaluated to be 100 GPa, but it decreased dramatically when d > 180 nm.

Page 18: Young’s Modulus of Cellulose Fibrils Measured Using Atomic

Acknowledgements

USDA Wood Utilization Research Grant

Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station MS#96 and #83