wte in scandinavia - b2match · • landfilling in scandinavia • energy recovery from waste •...
TRANSCRIPT
2
OVERVIEW
Subjects
• Landfilling in Scandinavia
• Energy Recovery from Waste
• District Heating
• EfW Plants in Denmark and Scandinavia
• Economics of EfW
• Carbon footprint of waste management
• Organisation and financing of the waste sector in Denmark
• Plant examples
4
LANDFILL BANS and TAX IN SCANDINAVIA
• Landfill ban introduced
• Denmark 1997
• Sweden 2002/2005
• Norway 2009
• Landfill tax (2011)
• Denmark 63 EUR /ton
• Sweden 43 EUR/ton
• Norway 59 EUR/ton
• Why:
• High cost of landfilling
• CO2 emission and other greenhouse gases
• Difficult location aspects
• Public opinion against landfills
• Reduction in the use of resources (oil, gas, coal, materials)
• Energy self sufficiency
5
WHY EFW?
• Contribution to energy self-sufficiency
• Carbon footprint (see later)
• Economic (see later)
• It works - all grate-fired proven technology
• In Denmark always heat export. DH network determines size of plant. DoE historically must approve capacity and configuration (Heat-only or CHP)
• DH from EfW plants is cheaper than own oil/gas for the consumer
6
EFW IN SCANDINAVIA
U S S R
U S
S R
GULF O
F B
OTHNIA
Gulf of FinlandB A L T
I C
S E
A
Katte
gat
SKAGERRAK
N O
R T
H S
E A
A R C T I C O C E A N
BARENTS SEA
A T
L A
N T
I C
O
C E
A N
NORWEGIANSEA
S W
E
D
E
N
N O
R
W
A
Y
F I N
L
A
N
D
9
EXAMPLE: ENERGY FROM EFW IN DENMARK
3.5 million tonnes of waste incinerated
Electricity 1.5 million MWh
430,000 households
17% of all households
Heat 6.5 million MWh
360,000 households
14% of all households
12
=
COST OF EFW: EXAMPLE – POWER ONLY
Example: New plant 150,000 tpa, EU Directive 2000 Construction cost:130 m EUR
Costs – average year
§ Amortisation
§ Operation
§ Maintenance
= EUR/tonne
110
Income from sale of electricity
0.66 MWh/t x 50 EUR/MWh = ÷ 35
Net treatment cost: Energy from Waste - PO EUR/tonne 75
= EUR/tonne
•2011 price level •Prudential Financing •No extra overheads/profits •Indicative costs only!
13
=
COST OF EFW: EXAMPLE – CHP
Example (continued) New CHP plant 150,000 tpa - EU Directive 2000
Treatment cost: Energy from Waste (as above) EUR/tonne 75
Sale of heat: 20 EUR/MWh x 2 MWh/ton = EUR/tonne 40
Net treatment cost (CHP) = EUR/tonne 35
14
ORGANISATION IN DENMARK
• 90% of the 29 plants are publicly owned and operated by municipal or inter-municipal companies.
• Not-for-profit companies
• Municipalities underwrite loans => very cheap financing
• Construction: Process plant normally through 2-3 DB type contracts (maximise risk vs. competition).
• Projects are completed on time and on budget
• Availability is fine – 8000 hours
• Staffing levels are fine
• Operational cost are normal
• Tipping fees are the lowest in Europe
• No municipal step-in has ever been required
15
ORGANISATION IN OTHER COUNTRIES
• Private Involvement?
• DB + O
• DBO
• DBFO (private ownership of facility)
• Germany – mix (Public, DBO, DBFO)
• France – mix (Public, DBO)
• UK – mainly DBFO (”PFI”, but DBOs are happening)
• Low risk to municipality BUT very complex and expensive transactions, very unflexible, VFM?, off balance sheet?
• Very significant government grants
• USA - DBO
16 May 2008 Bettina Kamuk - the Public Perception Challenge
How to overcome the challenge
Low emissions
High energy efficiency
High quality
Create a landmark – nice appearance
Be open – offensive not defensive
Involve local people/layman and let them talk
Remember all stakeholders
Select only one site after a careful screening
AMAGERFORBRÆNDING, COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
• Green-field WtE facility
• 2 x 280,000 tonnes of waste annually
+ prepared for 50% extension
• Energy output: 400,000 MWh
electricity and 1,000,000 MWh heat
per year
• From project analysis and planning to
commissioning
• M&E
• Commissioning: 2015
KARA/NOVEREN, ROSKILDE, DENMARK
• New waste-to-energy unit
• 200,000 tpa
• From project analysis and
planning to contract negotiations
• M&E
• Commissioning: 2013
SYSAV, MALMÖ, SWEDEN
• Two new units and retrofit of two
existing units
• 2 x 210,000 tpa + 2 x 96,000 tpa
• From project analysis and
planning to commissioning
• M&E and civil works
• Commissioning: 2008 + 2003
KRISTIANSAND, NORWAY
• Green-field waste-to-energy
facility
• 120,000 tpa
• From project analysis and
planning to commissioning
• M&E and civil works
• Commissioning: 2010
I/S FASAN, DENMARK • Green-field waste-to-energy
facility
• 65,000 tpa
• From project analysis and
planning to commissioning
• M&E and civil works
• Commissioning: 2005
TAS, DENMARK • New Unit for waste-to-energy
facility 80,000 tpa
• From project analysis and
planning to commissioning
• M&E and civil works
• Commissioning: 2007
HAMAR, NORWAY • New green-field waste-to-energy facility. 72,000 tpa
• Consultant on all phases and aspects: From project planning to commissioning
• M&E in three DB lots
• Year: 2007-2012
• Supplier: BWV/Alstom
• Taken over end 2011
UDDEVALLA, SWEDEN • Green-field waste-to-energy
facility
• 88,000 tpa
• From project analysis and
planning to commissioning
• M&E
• Commissioning: 2009
Ramboll WTE
ISLE OF MAN • Green-field waste-to-energy
facility:70,000 tpa
• 25 year DBO contract
• Clients Representative
• From project analysis and
planning to project follow-up and
supervision of O&M
• Supplier: Babcock Borsig Power
/Seghers
• Commissioning: 2004
Ramboll WTE
LINCOLNSHIRE • Green-field waste-to-energy facility. Base case: 150,000 tpa DBO contract (options allowed)
• Technical advisor for LCC on: OBC, planning design, procurement, construction, commissioning and operation (in JV with Gifford and FTC).
• Contract signed 2011
• WRG with CNIM
• Commissioning: 2014
Contractors proposed design
HERTFORDSHIRE, UK • A PFI residual waste treatment contract.
• DBO reference case: 270,000 tpa WTE facility.
• Technical advisor for HCC on the procurement of the contract.
• District Heating.
• Contract signed: 2011
• Commissioning: 2014
Ramboll WTE
USA • Maryland - Green-field 500,000 tpa WtE
facility. Evaluation of technical proposals
• York, PA - Expansion of existing WtE
facility. Procurement planning and
implementation
• Salt Lake City, Utah - Evaluation of
alternative waste management
technologies
• West Palm Beach: Strategic
Engineering advisor
30 2010-09-13 NCH - meeting with Rumania
THANK YOU FOR YOUR
ATTENTION!
Nils Christian Holm