wsc2015 tp23 pr en

WorldSkills International Keizersgracht 62-64, 1015 CS Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.worldskills.org, Tel: +31 23 5311071, Fax: +31 23 5310816 WSC2015

TEST PROJECT MOBILE ROBOTICS Competitor Information Document WSC2015_TP23_pre_EN

Submitted by:

The Competitor Information Development Team

Members:

Anton van den Brink NL

Paulo Villiger BR

Ulrich Karras DE

Masahiro Itoh JP

Mohammad Al-Shamsi AE

Eric Lo HK

Bob Tone CA

WSC2015_TP23_pre_EN Version: 1.0

Date: 22.10.14 2 of 28

CONTENTS CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTS AND TASKS ........................................................................................................ 4

THE CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT COURT ELEMENTS ......................................................................... 5 THE COMPETITION PRODUCT .......................................................................................................................... 7 OVERALL COMPETITOR EVALUATION ............................................................................................................ 8 CRITERIA A, B, C AND D EVALUATION CHECK LIST ....................................................................................... 9 COMPETITOR PRESENTATION GUIDELINE/STRUCTURE ............................................................................... 17 ROBOT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TASKS .............................................................................................. 18 EQUIPMENT SAFETY ....................................................................................................................................... 19 WORLDSKILLS ROBOT COMPONENT COLLECTION ...................................................................................... 19 INSTRUCTIONS TO COMPETITORS ................................................................................................................ 22


Date: 22.10.14 3 of 28

INTRODUCTION The Customer Service Robot task requires Competitors to:

Design/Fabricate/Manage (Program) a Competitor Built Autonomous Robot capable of compiling orders in a

future MERIAL Customer Service Department


Date: 22.10.14 4 of 28

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTS AND TASKS Prior to coming to So Paulo Competitors will:

1. Design and Build a Mobile Robot capable of functioning in 100% Autonomous Control Mode

Note:

If a Competitors Robot Design requires Active Robot to Laptop Communication while a Task Evaluation Run is in

progress then it will be a 100% Competitor Responsibility to provide and manage this process. There will be NO

WIFI-support available on the Court.

2. Create a computer based presentation (Power Point) that shows the full extent of their pre-Sao Paulo

activities.

Note: Competitor presentations should include:

(a) Images and Minimal Amounts of Text presenting the evolution of their Robot Design

(b) Images and Minimal Amounts of Text presenting their Strategy for completing the Task

(c) Images and Minimal Amounts of Text presenting the Overall Robot Assembly Process along with details

related to specific systems (Electrical/Mechanical/Programming)

(d) Images and Minimal Amounts of Text presenting details related to any Custom Fabricated Components

(e) Images and Minimal Amounts of Text presenting the Rationale for including components from outside the

WorldSkills Mobile Robot Component Collection

3. Dis-assemble their Robot to component kit level prior to shipping it to So Paulo

Note: Competitors Competition Day One AM Activity will be, within a Maximum of Two Hours, to re-assemble

their Robot and create a set of basic programmes suitable for demonstrating their Robots Core Performance

Capabilities.

Note: Familiarization Day (C-2) can NOT be used to assemble the Mobile Robot. This day is only intended for

Competitors to check whether all components, assembly parts, wires and tools are available and to check

whether individual parts (like motors, sensors, and control unit) are still functioning after shipping.

4. Competitors will present their made in advance Power Point Presentations on Competition Day One

Competition Days Two, Three and Four will involve Evaluation Task Runs that will take place on MERIAL

Customer Service Department Courts that provide the following:

(a) Each Court provides Two Side by Side Independent Customer Service Departments

(b) The Product (Eqvalan and UlcerGuard) quantities and placement positions are the same in BOTH Customer

Service Departments

(c) Five to six Teams of Competitors are expected to share the pair of Customer Service Departments in each

court during Work Periods

(d) Teams of Competitors must be prepared to have their Evaluation Task Runs on either the Left or Right

Side of the Customer Service Department Court on which they conduct their Task Preparation Activities.

(e) There are NO Restrictions on how many Products a Competition Robot may possess at one time. It is a

Competitor Decision how often they will travel to the Product Source Shelf/Assembly Table.

(f) Robots MUST deliver Complete Customer Orders to the Customer Counter on a Single Pallet.


Date: 22.10.14 5 of 28

THE CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT COURT ELEMENTS

The Customer Service Environment Floors will be the DEFAULT competition facility floor (likely concrete).

Note: The Evaluation Environment presents Multiple Mobility and Object Management Cues. It is a Competitor Decision to determine which Cues they will utilize when managing their Autonomous Robot.

Fixed Position Entities: Product Source Shelves, Pallet Stack, Order Assembly Table and Customer Counter

Tape Lines that are Aligned with the Centre Point of the Entity they are referencing

The Perimeter Court Wall will be 600mm Tall to enable it to extend 85 mm above the Top of a ten Product Package on the Top Shelf of the Product Source Shelf. This is intended to provide a clean, consistent back drop for the Product on the Top Shelf.

Barcode 39 Bar Codes printed on 10 by 15 cm Labels

11cm by 11cm Grid Patterns with the Outer Ring always White and the First Inner Ring always Black to establish a Consistent Frame

The Centre 7 by 7 Grids 1cm Squares can be either Black or White and are used to generate the Unique Patterns

A Word File Grid_Pattern_Builder has been provided to enable Competitors to generate accurate Grid Patterns using Words Table/Borders and Shading Properties during their Competition Preparation

Note: The Grid Patterns and the Bar Codes in this document and in the Sample Animations are EXAMPLES ONLY. The Final Competition Grid Patterns and Bar Codes will be set as part of the 30% Change immediately prior to the start of the competition.


Date: 22.10.14 6 of 28

Product Source Shelves

Each Customer Service Environment has its own Product Source Shelf

The product on the shelves includes:

(a) Single boxes of Eqvalan and UlcerGuard (b) Three box packages of Eqvalan and

UlcerGuard (c) Ten box packages of Eqvalan and UlcerGuard

Note: Package Sets will be bound together using Clear Shrink Wrap

The product on the shelves are identified by:

(a) Black and White Grid Patterns, and (b) 10cm by 15cm Bar Code Labels

Tape Lines on the floor point to the Center of each Single product box or Multiple box package

Note: If Competitors decide to use Product Photos as a Mobility Management Cue then it is a Competitor Responsibility to provide their Own Product Photos.

Note: All Teams will be provided with UlcerGuard and Eqvalan samples for use during their preparation activities.

THE ASSEMBLY TABLE/ROBOT STARTING POSITION

Each Customer Service Environment has its own Assembly Table

Assembly Tables are positioned along the Evaluation Environments 20cm tall Centre Divider

Robots Start of the Task Position will be set in Sao Paulo during the 30% Change Discussions immediately prior to the competition

Assembly Tables are identified by Black and White Grid Patterns and 10cm by 15cm Bar Codes

Assembly Tables have a Tape Line aligned with the Table Centre

Assembly Tables provide an Optional Location for Robots to use when assembling Customer Orders


Date: 22.10.14 7 of 28

The Customer Order Pallets

Each Customer Order Department has a Stack of four Pallets

The Pallet Location is identified by Black and White Grid Patterns and 10cm by 15cm Bar Codes and a Tape Line aligned with the Pallet Stand Centre

Note: The Proposed on the Floor Tape Lines will NOT be provided IF the nature of the facility floor does not support positioning them accurately and securely. Note: If a floor placement for the Tape Lines is not possible then Tape Lines will be placed on the Front Edges of the Shelves and Pallet Stand.

The Customer Order Counter

Each Customer Order Department has its own Customer Order Counter

Each Customer Position along the counter is identified by a Black and White Grid Pattern and 10cm by 15 cm Bar Code Label

Each Customer Position has a Tape Line pointing to the Centre of the Customer Space

THE COMPETITION PRODUCT The Competition product is MERIALs UlcerGuard and Eqvalan in:

1. Individual 50 by 50 by 250 mm Boxes weighing approximately 30 grams each 2. Package sets of 3 Boxes 50 by 150 by 250 mm weighing approximately 90 grams each 3. Package sets of 10 Boxes 100 by 250 by 250 mm weighing approximately 300 grams

Note: The Product Packaging does NOT look exactly as shown in these images

UlcerGuard

Eqvalan


Date: 22.10.14 8 of 28

OVERALL COMPETITOR EVALUATION

Competitor Evaluation will be based on the Pattern presented in the image below:

The Check List below provides the structure on which Competitors will be evaluated in the following criteria:

Work Organization Value 10 Marks

Communication and Interpersonal Skills Value 10 Marks

Design Value 25 Marks

Fabrication and Assembly Value 5 Marks

Note:

The Presentation Content Samples presented in the Benchmarks sections below represent suggested presentation content only and MUST NOT BE INTERPRETED as setting Minimum Content Guidelines.

Given the 10 minute Presentation Limit and the restricted time likely to be available for questioning it is expected that NO Team will present all of the content suggested below.

For Criteria C3 to C8 below Competitors should keep in mind indicators that are aligned to industry practice, for example, identification of functional requirements/specifications, listing of brainstormed concepts/ideas, selection of concept/idea, enhancement to chosen concept/idea, actual design, fabrication, assembly and testing.


Date: 22.10.14 9 of 28

CRITERIA A, B, C AND D EVALUATION CHECK LIST

Criteria: Work Organization and Management Total Value 10 marks

Acceptable Not acceptable

A1 Team Space Condition 1.5 Marks per Day Benchmarks:

Workspace management is an on-going requirement

Workspace Status Evaluations will be conducted at Random Times throughout the 4 Competition Days

Robots must be secured/mounted on a stand to ensure that if a robot drive system unexpectedly engages the robot cannot drive OFF the workbench

Safety and Efficiency are the primary goals of workspace management and the placement of tools, materials will be viewed from the perspective of whether or not they are contributing to a safe and efficient workspace Examples:

no tools or waste on the floor

cables are not allowed to be spanned over walkways

food/drinks only in closed bottles/boxes while working IF the Expert Jury Panel decides these items will be allowed in the workspaces

tools with blades must have their blades protected when not in use

tools should be mainly in their boxes

Competitors have to wear protective clothes according to the WS Health, Safety and Environment policy and regulations. NOTE: The Expert Jury Panel will provide Competitors, during their in Sao Paulo Briefings, with the specific requirements for when the wearing of protective glasses/gloves will be required

A2 Arrival On Time and Fully Prepared in the Shared

Group and at their Assigned Competitor Court

Spaces 1.0 Marks per Day Benchmarks:

Time management is an on-going requirement


Date: 22.10.14 10 of 28

Competitor adherence to set schedules regarding when and where they should be will be monitored during all competition days Examples:

Always on time = Acceptable

Late by more than 1 minute = Unacceptable

Criteria: Communication and Interpersonal Skills Total Value 10 Marks


B1 Co-operative Behaviour with Opponents in the Shared Competition Court Space 1.5 Marks per Day Benchmarks:

Space and Time Restrictions in the competition space will be tight

Competitor Interactions with their Opponents will be observed throughout the competition period with respect to their contributing to creating a fair and equitable access to shared spaces for all participants Examples: Note: Competitors may arrive late to or even choose to skip an Assigned to the Team Shared Court Robot Preparation Time

Competitors still in the Shared Court Space 30 seconds after their Team Shared Court Robot Preparation Time has ended = Unacceptable

B2 Co-operative Behaviour with their Compatriot Team

Member 0.5 Marks per Day Benchmarks:

WSI Mobile Robotics is a Team Competition

Competitor Interactions with their Compatriot will be observed throughout the competition period

It is expected both competitors will be making strong contributions to addressing the competition requirements Examples:

Both Competitors actively contributing to the Teams performance = Acceptable

One Competitor observed to be leaving the clear bulk of the work to their partner = Unacceptable


Date: 22.10.14 11 of 28

B3 Co-operative Behaviour with Experts 0.5 Marks per Day

Benchmarks:

Competitor Interactions with the Experts managing the competition experience will be observed throughout the competition period

It is expected Competitors interactions with Experts will be conducted in a respectful manner

Criteria: Design Total Value 25 Marks

The Competitors Prepared In advance Power Point Presentation will be the Primary Evaluation Vehicle for the Design Criteria


C1 Identification of the Robot Mobility Base Unit requirements needed to address the Clients needs 3 Marks

Benchmark:

Identification of all essential destination locations within the Evaluation Environment

Identification of the environmental features defining destination locations within the evaluation environment

Identification of the Mobility Management Utilities (Sensor/Other) used to support Robot Movement Management

Explain and reason why the robot can move to all essential locations within the Evaluation Environment

Explain and reason (using different sensors) why the robot can detect all essential locations with needed accuracy


Date: 22.10.14 12 of 28

C2 Identification of the Object Management System (OMS) requirements needed to address the Clients needs 3 Marks

Benchmarks:

Identification of the Target Object Characteristics

Identification of the Target Object starting and ending location characteristics

Identification of the Target Object Management Systems Movement Characteristics (Degrees of Freedom)

Identification of the Object Gripper Details, Core Function Pattern / Specific Gripper Management (Sensors / Other)

C3 Explanation of the Strategy they have selected to meet the Clients Needs 3 Marks

Benchmarks:

Presentation of their overall strategy for dealing with Customer Orders of all types

C4 Presentation of the Evolution of their Overall Robot Base Unit Design 3 Marks

Benchmarks:

A sequential display of the concept development from initial sketches through to final test videos

Visualize the electric circuit for the Emergency Stop on the robot

Visualize the interface structure between PC programming environment and robot controller

Visualize the interface structure of sensor signal and robot controller


Date: 22.10.14 13 of 28

C5 Presentation of the Evolution of their Overall Object Management System Design 3 Marks

Benchmarks:


Explain and demonstrate the programming language structure

Demonstration of motor control function

Demonstration of Cartesian movement functions

Demonstration of navigation functions

Demonstrate how to use the available sensors in the software

Demonstrate how to operate the OMS in the software

Demonstrate how to download a programme into the controller

C6 Presentation of the Electrical/Electronic Systems of their Robot and Object Management Systems 3 Marks

Benchmarks:


C7 Presentation of the Mechanical Systems of their Robot and Object Management Systems 3 Marks

Benchmarks:



Date: 22.10.14 14 of 28

C8 Presentation through a Video Clip of their Robot/Object Management Systems Performance Capabilities demonstrated at home during their WSC2015 Competition Preparation Activities 4 Marks

Benchmarks:

A video displaying of the completion of task samples at all three task levels

Acceptable: The video shows at least:

robot drives forward and backwards at least 2m

robot turns left and right

robot picks up a box from shelves with at least two different heights

robot picks up a pallet from the floor and puts it on a table

robot shows signal light while driving

Competitor demonstrates function of emergency-stop-button.

filming directions support the recognition of the above

video lasts no more than 5 minutes, therefore speeding up the video during monotonic robot movements is allowed

video has enough quality (enough light, nearly no shaking, resolution at least 480p)

A video of a complete test run is NOT necessary for an acceptable rating

Criteria: Fabrication & Assembly Total Value 5 Marks

Acceptable Not Acceptable

D1 Frame Assembly meets Industry Standards for fit and alignment of components 1 Mark

Benchmarks:

Examination of the Robot Frames Structural Integrity (fit between connected components, accuracy of component alignment angles, sizes etc.)

Construction drawing with all measures and tolerances

Verification of measures and tolerances


Date: 22.10.14 15 of 28

D2 Object Management System meets Industry Standards for fit and alignment of components 1 Mark

Benchmarks:

Examination of the Object Management Systems Structural Integrity (fit between connected components, accuracy of component alignment angles, sizes etc.)

Construction drawing with all measures and tolerances

Verification of measures and tolerances

D3 Wiring installation meets Industry Standards for secure/safe installation 1 Mark

Benchmarks:

Examination of the Robots Wiring (secure wire placement, efficient wire organization, inclusion of appropriate fusing and master safety switch)

Examples:

Acceptable: all wires are fixed to the chassis (for example with cable binders).

There is special protection for wires applied where they have to go over metal edges (paddings or guiding rails or...).

Wires cross each other only when necessary.

For every connector a strain relief must be considered (maybe small extra wire loops in front of the connectors)


Date: 22.10.14 16 of 28

D4 Base Unit Core Mobility Demonstration 1 Mark:

Acceptable:

Robot drives 1m forward on a line (+/- 5% or 10% difference to end position in any direction is tolerated)

Robot drives backwards to start position (+/- 5% or 10% difference to end position in any direction is tolerated)

Robot is back in start position: robot turns left to a position 90 degrees from starting position. It has not to stay in place, because maybe a team chooses a steering-mechanism which can't turn in place (+/- 10 tolerance)

Robot turns right to a position 180 degrees from last position (+/- 10 tolerance) 1 Mark

D5 Object Management System Core Functionality Demonstration involving Reaching Out/Taking Possession of a Target Object/Releasing the Target Object onto the Floor/Returning the Object Management System to its Starting Configuration 1 Mark

Acceptable:

Robot can pick up one box (Competitor can choose which one single/3-pack/10-pack) from the assembling table and can put it back. No need for accurate positioning.


Date: 22.10.14 17 of 28

COMPETITOR PRESENTATION GUIDELINE/STRUCTURE Competitor Presentations must adhere to the following guideline/structure:

(a) All Competitor Presentations will be submitted in Power Point file format (b) All Competitor Presentations will be linked together in a master Auto-play file to support All

Competitor Presentations being played on a continuous basis on screens in the Mobile Robotics Competition Space.

(c) All Competitor Presentations will adhere to a Maximum Run Time of ten Minutes on Auto Play. (d) Competitors will set the Per Slide Display Time that will apply to their presentation when it is in Auto-

play Mode along with the Slide to Slide Transition Format. (e) All Competitor Presentations should Maximize the use of pictures/video clips (f) All Competitor Presentations MUST include the videos confirming their Robots Mobility and Object

Management Capabilities as demonstrated at home during their Competition Preparation Experiences. (g) All Competitor Presentations should utilize a Minimum Amount of Text. (h) When Text is included in a slide it must be displayed in either English only or English and the

Competitors Native Language.

The Competitor Presentation should identify the Team/Country either in a Title Page only and in an on all slides Header/Footer.

Competitor Presentations and Robot Assembly will be evaluated on Competition Day One.

1. Presentation files must adhere to the maximum 10 minutes run time in auto-play format when being presented to the general competition visitors

2. When competitors are making their presentation to the evaluation panel they will be allocated a minimum 20 minute time block. If scheduling constraints permit an allocation of 30 minutes will be the maximum time block provided per team. The questioning process may involve a translator.

3. During their presentation to the evaluation panel the Competitors will have to run their presentation continuously and take questions at the end of the presentation.

Work Organization and Management along with Communication and Interpersonal Skills will be evaluated on an on-going basis over the 4 Competition Days.

Robot Performance will generate 50 Marks in the following two Evaluation Criteria:

Programming Testing and Adjustment 20 Marks

Performance Review and Commission 30 Marks

Robot Performance Evaluation Tasks will take place on Competition Days 2, 3 and 4.


Date: 22.10.14 18 of 28

ROBOT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TASKS NOTE: The Customer Orders above are SAMPLES ONLY

1. All Evaluation Task Runs will require the Robot to assemble (Place the Requested Product(s) on a Pallet) and deliver the Customer Order(s) to the Correct Customer Space along the Customer Counter.

2. The sequence Customer Orders are delivered to the Customer Counter is a Competitor Decision. Example: Deliver to Customer B first then to Customer A and Customer C or Deliver to Customer C first then to Customer B and Customer A

3. Marking will be conducted AFTER the Evaluation Task Run has been completed. 4. Evaluation Task Run Marking involves two items:

(a) Has the correct order been delivered to the correct customer? (b) How long did the Order Processing take?

5. The total marks per Task Evaluation Run will be determined based on:

(a) The Task Run Level (one item orders / two item orders / three item orders) (b) The Number of Task Evaluation Runs at each level (c) All Task Evaluation Runs will involve serving three customers

6. The marks distribution within a single Task Evaluation Run will be distributed as follows:

(a) 25% awarded if Customer Ones Order is correctly delivered independent of time taken to deliver the order

(b) 25% awarded if Customer Twos Order is correctly delivered independent of time taken to deliver the order

(c) 25% awarded if Customer Threes Order is correctly delivered independent of time taken to deliver the order

7. 25% assigned for Time Taken and awarded on the following basis:

(a) Awarded ONLY IF ALL Three Customer Orders have been correctly delivered (b) Mark calculated based on the following formula: Team Time / Fastest Qualifying Team Time (0.25 X

Total Available Single Evaluation Task Run Value) = Time Mark Awarded

The Single Task Evaluation Run Values will be set when the Task Evaluation Run Schedule and the number of Task Evaluation Runs expected per team per level are known.

The Marks Value per level will award different per Task Evaluation Run Marks for each Task Level to reflect the escalating difficulty involved as you move from sets of one item to two item to three item orders.

Note: An Evaluation Task Run will be considered ended when the Robot Object Management System has moved completely clear of the Third Pallet on the Customer Counter.

Note: Competitors will be provided a 15 minute Time Block to Finalize their Robot Preparation and conduct an Evaluated Task Run but Competitors can only use a Maximum of 10 minutes for their actual Evaluated Task Run.

Note: A Robot MUST have a Safety Light on the Robot that indicates the Robot is moving. This light is expected to be ON when the Robot is moving and OFF when the Robot is stationary.

Note: The functionality of the Safety Light will be evaluated during the Robot Assembly Inspection/Basic Core Performance Demonstration (Move Forward/Backward/Turn Left/Turn Right/Primary Object Management System Functionality Features)


Date: 22.10.14 19 of 28

EQUIPMENT SAFETY All Robot and Object Management System Circuits must meet Industry Safety Standards.

Appropriate fusing for Electrical Circuits.

An Easily Accessible Master Shut-Off Switch for use in the event of a Major Robot Malfunction. Note: ALL Competitor Provided Equipment MUST be Inspected, Certified and Approved by WSI-Brazil BEFORE their use will be permitted.

WORLDSKILLS ROBOT COMPONENT COLLECTION The WorldSkills Robot Component Collection will be provided to ALL participating National Teams with delivery expected to be completed by the end of December, 2014.

A detailed component list will be available at the beginning of November, 2014.

Competitors are expected to utilize the provided equipment when building their robot.

Examples:

The Primary Drive Motors included in the WSI Components Collection cannot be replaced with more powerful motors.

Competitors are restricted to using the sensors and other information gathering hardware provided in the WSI Components Collection and cannot purchase / use additional sensors / information gathering hardware.

In March, 2015 after all Experts and Competitors have had direct experience with the WSI Component Collection a Mobile Robotics Forum Discussion/vote will set the degree of robot dis-assembly required prior to coming to So Paulo.

The list below provides a Description of what the WorldSkills Robot Component Collection will include. A web based source will be created to provide all competitors with equal access to technical information related to the components. Teams are restricted to using these components exclusively to build their competition robots. Competitors cannot add any additional electrical/pneumatic components, motors, sensors, gears, wheels or other performance specific components when building their robot. Competitors may add additional frame / structural components.

Brackets and Structural Components

Aluminium Channel 38 X 38 with hub pattern (460

mm Length)

4


mm Length)

4


mm Length)

2

Aluminium Channel 38 X 38 with hub pattern(115

mm Length)

2

Aluminium Channel 38 X 38 with hub pattern(38

mm Length)

4

90 Degree Single Angle Channel Bracket 8

90 Degree Hub Mount 4

Channel Bracket A 4

Channel Connector Plate (Package of 2) 4

90 degree Angle Bracket 4

Aluminium Flat Bracket 100 mm Length 8


Date: 22.10.14 20 of 28

Aluminium Flat Bracket 150 mm Length 4

Aluminium Flat Bracket B 8

Flat Triple Channel Bracket 110mm X 40 mm 4

Aluminium Beam 300 mm (Pair) 2

Beam Gear Rack 2

Beam Bracket S 4

Beam Attachment Blocks B (Pack of 4) 2

Hub Spacer 25 mm 4

Hub Spacer 12.5 mm 4

Hub Spacer 6 mm 4

Hub Spacer 3 mm 8

Aluminium Tubing 16 mm dia 300 mm Length 2




16 mm Bore Tube Clamp 4

90 Degree Clamping Tube Hub 4

16 mm Bore Tube Camp Hub 2

Aluminium Clamp Collars 2

90 Degree Hub to Hub Mount 2

90 Degree Dual Side Mount (Package of 2) 2

Stainless Steel Threaded Rod 300 mm 3/8-16 2

Aluminium Hub Mount Sprockets 16 Tooth 2

Aluminium Hub Mount Sprockets 32 Tooth 2

Metal Chain (.250) (1 Foot Length) 2

Chain Connecting Link 2

Servos and Motors

Standard Servo Motor Plate Single 2

Standard Servo Motor Plate Double 2

Vertical Aluminium Mount 2

Faulhaber 12v 8100 RPM DC Motor 64:1 Optical

Encoder 12CPR

4

Metal Gear Servo Motor 2

Wheels, Gears and Drive Train

Set of 4 100mm Aluminium Mecanum

Wheels/Bearing Rollers

1

8 mm Wheel Hub 4

8 mm Precision Stainless Steel Shaft 610 mm 2

Steel Clamp Shaft Collars 4

Gear Mount C 4

Bronze Bushings 12.5mm Length 4

6 mm Bore Gearmotor Pinion Gears 24T - 32 Pitch 2


Date: 22.10.14 21 of 28

6 mm Bore Gearmotor Pinion Gears 32T - 32 Pitch 2

Set Screw Axle Hubs 6 mm 2

Hub Adaptor 2

Fasteners

Socket Head Cap Screws 5/16-inch thread 6-32

(Pack of 25)

4

Socket Head Cap Screws 1/2-inch thread 6-32

(Pack of 25)

4

Pan Head Cap Screws 3/8-inch 50

Machine Screw Nylock Nuts 100

Flange Nut 3/8" - 16 4

Round Screw Plate 3/8"- 16 4

Sensors, Controllers, and Batteries

NI myRIO-1900 (Programmable with NI LabVIEW

or C) Featuring NI industry-standard

reconfigurable I/O (RIO) technology, the enclosed

version of myRIO (myRIO-1900) places three I/O

connectors, wireless capabilities, a dual-core ARM

real-time processor, and a customizable Xilinx

FPGA. 1

10 analog inputs, 6 analog outputs,

40 digital I/O lines

NI Labview 2014 3

NI MyRio Panel Mount Kit 1

Motor Control Board for NI MyRIO 2

LIFECAM CINEMA WIN USB 1

12V 3,000 mAh NiMH Battery Pack w/20 amp fuse 2

12V NiMH Smart Charger

1

Wiring Harness with Battery Connector and

On/Off Switch

1

Sharp IR Range Sensor (10 cm to 80 cm) 2

Sharp IR Sensor Stand Kit 2

PING ultrasonic Distance Sensor 3

PING Aluminium Bracket and Proctector Stand 3

QTI Sensor 1

Gyroscope Module 3 Axis L3G4200D 1

3-Axis Accelerometer MMA7455 1

Digilent PmodALS - Ambient Light Sensor 1

Force Sensing Resistor: Square 1


Date: 22.10.14 22 of 28

INSTRUCTIONS TO COMPETITORS 1. Competitors will be assigned an Exclusive Use Work Space where they will conduct ALL of their Robot

Assembly / Programming Activities. 2. Competitors will be assigned an Evaluation Court and will use this court space for ALL of their Robot

Preparation Activities and for their Performance Evaluation Experiences. 3. Competitors may use Two Computers in their Work Space but they can bring ONLY ONE computer to

their assigned Evaluation Court. 4. Competitors must ensure their Object Management System does NOT damage the Product Boxes.

Note: Each Evaluation Court will have a Right and Left Side MERIAL 20?? Customer Service Department.

Competitors MUST be prepared to have their Robot run Marked Task Evaluation Experiences on either the Right or the Left MERIAL 20?? Customer Service Department.

The Right and Left MERIAL 20?? Customer Service Department Layouts have been configured to support NO need to alter Competitors Programs based on whether they are on the Left or the Right court space.

Competitors are expected to demonstrate True Fair Play and Co-operation at all times but most particularly when they are sharing the court spaces during the Work Periods.

Competitors are responsible to bring to the competition site and to use exclusively during the competition the Robot they have Designed and Built.

Competitors are expected to bring ALL of their Competition Equipment in a container no larger than One Cubic Meter.


Date: 22.10.14 23 of 28


Date: 22.10.14 24 of 28


Date: 22.10.14 25 of 28


Date: 22.10.14 26 of 28


Date: 22.10.14 27 of 28


Date: 22.10.14 28 of 28

wsc2015 tp23 pr en

Documents