world system review
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 World System Review
1/4
The World System and the Earth System: Global Socio-Environmental Change and
Sustainability since the Neolithic by Alf Hornborg; Carole L. CrumleyReview by: David HelgrenJournal of Anthropological Research, Vol. 65, No. 1 (Spring, 2009), pp. 124-126Published by: University of New MexicoStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25608159.
Accessed: 13/01/2015 12:36
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
University of New Mexicois collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access toJournal of
Anthropological Research.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 132.248.172.184 on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:36:10 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=unmhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/25608159?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/25608159?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=unm -
8/9/2019 World System Review
2/4
124
JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL
RESEARCH
All
in
all,
this
volume
is
a
worthy,
if
highly-technical,
addition
to
the
impeccable,
substantial,
and
timely
series
of
monographs
on
theNeuch?tel sites.
Kudos
to
Leesch,
her
team,
and theCantonal Museum
Lawrence
Guy
Straus
University
of
New
Mexico
The World
System
and the
Earth
System:
Global
Socio-Environmental
Change and Sustainability since theNeolithic. Alf Hornborg and Carole L.
Crumley,
eds.
Walnut
Creek,
CA: Left Coast
Press,
2007,
416
pp.
$75.00,
cloth;
$34.95,
paper.
This is
one
of
two
volumes
recounting
a
conference
titled "World
System
History
and Global
Environmental
Change"
held
in
Lund,
Sweden,
in
September
2003.
Included
here
are
twenty-one
papers
following
a
summative introduction
by
Alf
Hornborg. Clearly
the intent
as
to
bring
together
wide
spectrum
of
perspectives
on
relations
between human
societies and
their
biophysical
environments.
The
individual
contributions
come
from several academic
tribes and
thus
include
diverse
methodologies
at
multiple temporal
and
spatial
scales.
In
addition,
the
degree
of
polish
varies.
Some
were
given
full embellishment
before
or
after
the
conference;
others
read
more
closely
to
the
verbal
presentations.
The
relatively
long
delay
to
publication
led
many
contributors
to
publish expansions
of
their
presentations
elsewhere.
Nonetheless,
the
combined
narrative
and
bibliography
provide
lasting
value
and
a
possible
point
of
departure
for
a
graduate
seminar.
Hornborg
and
Crumley
divide
the
presentations
into three
sets.
The first
has six contributions and is titled "Modeling Socioecological Systems: General
Perspectives."
Carole
Crumley
defends
systemic
historical
ecology
at
multiple
spatial
and
temporal
scales.
Frank
Oldfield
reflects
on
developing
synergistic
linkages
between
biophysical
and
cultural
realms.
Importantly,
he
outlines how
the
emerging
anxieties
over
future
global
environmental
changes
are
challenging
both the
social
and
biophysical
sciences.
In
particular,
scientific
findings
should
be
reproducible,
but
predictions
of
the future
cannot
be verified
until
then.
Simultaneously predictions
are
being
used
to
develop
policy
and
enforce
management goals.
Yet
without
a
robust
scientific
foundation,
how
can
we
choose
wise
policies
for
limited
current
resources?
Oldfield
also
points
out
that
the
changing
cultures
of
scientists
and
science
are
stressing
the
whole
system
of scientific
endeavor.
For
example,
social
scientists
traditionally
avoid
making
predictions
about
the
biophysical
world.
Meanwhile
biophysical
scientists
have
a new
tradition
of
sailing
merrily
into
predictions
about
the
cultural
world.
Also
in
this
first
set
of
articles,
Thomas
Hall
and Peter Turchin
raise
thematter
of
apparently
coeval,
population-political
expansions
across
great
world
regions
over
the
past
1,400 years.
Such
large-scale
rhythms
are
both
evocative
as
well
Journal
of
Anthropological
Research,
vol.
65,
2009
This content downloaded from 132.248.172.184 on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:36:10 PMAll use subject toJSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
8/9/2019 World System Review
3/4
BOOK
REVIEWS 125
as
methodologically
challenging.
Another article
of
interest
in
this
first
set
is
by
Jonathan
Friedman,
who
points
out
societies tend
to
collapse,
or
at
least
substantially
reorganize,
before their
ecological
limits
are
reached.
And
social
issues
may
be
as
important
s
biophysical
change.
He
points
out
that ew
Orleans
was a
reasonably
functioning
river-ocean
port
in thenineteenth
century.
However
the
twentieth-century
ultural
template
that
built
a
sprawling
city
on
this
deltaic
landscape
was
dysfunctional?and
much warned about
long
before Hurricane
Katrina
in
2005.
The
second
set of
articles,
titled Case Studies
in
Socio-environmental
Change
in
Prehistory,"
has
eight
entries.
All
focus
on
apparent
coincidences between
cultural and environmental
changes;
however,
the
diversity
in
methodological
or
conceptual
strategies
is
substantial.
George
Modelski
asks whether
the
recurring
"dark ages" in the past 4,500 years were reversing societal reorganizations
after
periods
of
cultural exuberance
or
the result of
unmet
challenges
of natural
environmental
change,
or
both.
And human-environment
interactions
in
the
same
region
at
the
same
times
can
be
profitably
examined
from
quite
different
perspectives.
For
example,
Betty
Meggars
emphasizes
her
perspective
that
Amazonian
populations
have
always
been limited
by
low soil
fertility
cross
wide
areas.
In
contrast,
Alf
Hornborg
looks
at
the rich
archaeological
opportunities
along
the
narrow,
fertile
floodplains
of northern
South
America,
where
he finds
successful raised
fields
and
"Arawak"
trading
networks.
The
final
set
of
articles
asks,
"Is
theWorld
System
Sustainable?
Attempts
toward
an
Integrated Socioecological
Perspective."
Its
seven
articles
vary
from
environmentalist
exhortations
to
society-environment
model
building
to
defending
preferred
academic
taxonomies.
Two
reports
remind
us
of
the
threats f
globalization.
Thomas
Malm
reflects
on
the
preservation
of economic
resiliency
in
the
Pacific,
where
he finds the
assessment
of
carrying capacity
both
variable
and
mutable,
so
environmental
"crisis
points"
are
culturally
relative.
Similarly
Alfred
Crosby
recounts
the
global
history
of
epidemics,
wherein
societies
now
and thenpay dearly for spatially intensifiedconnectivity.
With
its
amusing
collection of
perspectives
on
gauging
culture-environment
relationships,
this
volume
points
out
how
much
work
remains.
Five
directions for
improvement
are
obvious.
First,
the
fundamental
interdisciplinary
grammar
and
vocabulary
need
precision.
Concepts
such
as
"landscape
sensitivity,"
"adaptive
capacity,"
"social
vulnerability,"
"world
system evolution,"
and
"risk
and
resilience" need
consistent,
measurable
definition.
Second,
social
scientists,
in
particular,
need
to
clarify
linkages
between
climate
change
and
societal
change.
Climate
is
actually composed
of
a
suite
of
measurable
variables, including
temperature,
precipitation,
and
seasonality,
linked
in
some
way
to
soil
and
biotic
patterns.
Is
a
set
of
unambiguous
cultural
variables
available
to
connect to
such
environmental
variables in
a
systemic
fashion?
Third,
spatial
and
temporal
scales
matter
profoundly
in
assessing
the
relationships
between
culture
and
environment.
Is it
appropriate
to
link
cultural
processes
inferred
from
an
archaeological
site
with
a
regional
concept
of
climate?
Can
one
really
ascribe
one
day
of
garbage
in
a
midden
to
the
environmental
adaptations
of
the
whole
Neolithic?
Fourth,
collections
of
anecdotal
data,
no
matter
how
abundant
and
pleasing,
generate
Journal
of
Anthropological
Research,
vol.
65,
2009
This content downloaded from 132.248.172.184 on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:36:10 PMAll use subject toJSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
8/9/2019 World System Review
4/4
126 JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL
RESEARCH
neither social
science
nor
biophysical
science. And
fifth,
eveloping
management
plans
for
a
better human-environmental future
is viable
through modeling.
However,
the
biophysical
models of the
present
and
near
future
are
much
more
complete
than the
decidedly
primitive
models of cultural
patterns
and
adaptations.
Social scientists
appear
to
be
far,
far behind.
David
Helgren
Geography
Department
San
Jose State
University
Civilizing
Climate:
Social
Responses
to
Climate
Change
in the
Ancient
Near
East.
Arlene
Miller
Rosen.
Lanham,
MD: Rowman
&
Littlefield, 2007,
184
pp.
$72.00, cloth;
$32.95, paper.
This
volume
is
a
masterful
example
of how difficult
it is
to
carry
out true
interdisciplinary
research. Rosen
examines the
complex
interrelationship
of
humans
to
their
environment
in
the face
of
changing
climatic conditions
and
shows
the
fallacy
of
being
a
strong
advocate
of
either
environmental
or
cultural
determinism.
Despite
a
title
implying
a
broad
focus
on
theNear
East,
Rosen
instead
emphasizes
the southern
Levant from the Terminal
Pleistocene
through
the
Holocene.
This volume
will be
of
considerable
interest
to
a
wide
range
of
scholars
and
to
more
general
readers interested
in the
nuances
of how
climate
change
affects,
but does
not
determine,
culture.
In
Chapter
1,
Rosen
states
that
she
"attempts
to
examine
the interactive
relationship
between
ancient
Near
Eastern
societies
and
their
nvironments,
taking
into consideration
social
organization,
technology,
and
political
and economic
factors, as well as human perceptions of nature and environmental change" (p.
4).
This
chapter
sets
up
Rosen's theoretical
perspective,
one
at
odds
with
often
simplistic
models
viewing
the
interactions of
culture
and
environmental'stress
in
which
the latter
ften
"wins."
Instead,
Rosen's
focus
is that cultures
have
many
ways
of
dealing
with
environmental
shifts,
nd thatwhen
they
are
unsuccessful,
a
failure of
the
social
or
political
system
is often
to
blame.
Chapter
1
also addresses
scale
in environmental
change
and
perceptions
of
nature
and environmental
change,
and
how
these
are
culturally
variable,
often
based
on
a
group's
level
of
complexity. Finally,
an
important
observation
is that
archaeologists
often
pay
little
attention
to
societies
that have
survived
severe
environmental
stress,
preferring
instead
to
focus
on
failures and
collapses
(something
that
might
be
called
the
"Jared
Diamond"
syndrome,
although
this
does
not
do
justice
to
his
often
compelling
arguments).
Chapter
2
is
a
useful
primer
on
tools
used
in
reconstructing
past
climates.
Since
direct
climatic
data
are
not
generally
available,
Rosen
provides
a
discussion
of
proxy
data.
These
include
three
broad
categories:
historical
accounts,
paleoecological
data
(e.g., pollen
and
fauna),
and
geological
data
(e.g.,
sedimentation
rates,
stream
Journal
of
Anthropological
Research,
vol.
65,
2009
This content downloaded from 132.248.172.184 on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:36:10 PMAll use subject toJSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp