world bank documentdocuments1.worldbank.org/curated/ru/240841486133172274/...document of the world...
TRANSCRIPT
Document of
The World Bank
Report No: ICR00004007
IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT
(IBRD-80240)
ON A
LOAN
IN THE AMOUNT OF
US$ 12 MILLION EQUIVALENT
TO THE
Republic of Azerbaijan
FOR A
Capital Markets Modernization Project (CMMP)
January 25, 2017
Finance & Markets Global Practice
Europe and Central Asia Region
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
(Exchange Rate Effective October 11, 2016)
Currency Unit = Azeri New Manat (AZN
1.00 AZN = US$ 1.599
1.00 SDR = US$ 1.382
FISCAL YEAR
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ABS Asset Backed Securities MoF Ministry of Finance
ADB Asian Development Bank MoT Ministry of Taxes
AZN Azerbaijan New Manat NCB National Competitive Bidding
BSE Baku Stock Exchange NDC National Depository Center
CAS Country Assistance Strategy ORAF Operational Risk Assessment
CMMP Capital Markets Modernization Project Framework
CPS Country Partnership Strategy PAD Project Appraisal Document
EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and PID Project Information Document
Development PIU Project Implementation Unit
ECA Europe and Central Asia POM Project Operation Manual
EU European Union PQ Prequalification
FIRST Financial Sector Reform and Strengthening PPP Public-Private Partnerships
Initiative RVP Regional Vice President
FIMSA Financial Markets Supervision Authority SBD Standard Bidding Documents
GDP Gross Domestic Product SCS State Committee for Securities
IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and SECO Swiss State Secretariat for
Development Economic Affairs
ICR Implementation Completion and Results TAL Technical Assistance Loan
Report USAID United States Agency for
IC SSS Individual Consultant Single Source International Development
Selection WBT World Bank Treasury
IDA International Development Association
IFC International Finance Corporation
ISDS Integrated Safeguard Data Sheet
Senior Global Practice Director: Gloria Grandolini
Sector Manager: Rolf Behrndt
Project Team Leader: Angela Prigozhina
ICR Team Leader: Stephen Pirozzi
Republic of Azerbaijan
Capital Markets Modernization Project (CMMP)
CONTENTS
Data Sheet
A. Basic Information
B. Key Dates
C. Ratings Summary
D. Sector and Theme Codes
E. Bank Staff
F. Results Framework Analysis
G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs
H. Restructuring
I. Disbursement Graph
1. Project Context, Development Objectives and Design ............................................. 11
2. Key Factors Affecting Implementation and Outcomes ............................................ 15
3. Assessment of Outcomes .......................................................................................... 19
4. Assessment of Risk to Development Outcome ......................................................... 25
5. Assessment of Bank and Borrower Performance ..................................................... 25
6. Lessons Learned ....................................................................................................... 29
7. Comments on Issues Raised by Borrower/Implementing Agencies/Partners .......... 30
Annex 1. Project Costs and Financing .......................................................................... 31
Annex 2. Outputs by Component ................................................................................. 32
Annex 3. Economic and Financial Analysis ................................................................. 33
Annex 4. Bank Lending and Implementation Support/Supervision Processes ............ 34
Annex 5. Beneficiary Survey Results ........................................................................... 36
Annex 6. Stakeholder Workshop Report and Results ................................................... 37
Annex 7. Summary of Borrower's ICR and/or Comments on Draft ICR ..................... 41
Annex 8. Comments of Cofinanciers and Other Partners/Stakeholders ....................... 50
Annex 9. List of Supporting Documents ...................................................................... 50
Annex 10. Borrower ICR .............................................................................................. 52
Map (IBRD 33365) ....................................................................................................... 97
A. Basic Information
Country: Azerbaijan Project Name: Capital Markets
Modernization Project
Project ID: P120321 L/C/TF Number(s): IBRD-80240
ICR Date: 01/10/2017 ICR Type: Core ICR
Lending Instrument: TAL Borrower: REPUBLIC OF
AZERBAIJAN
Original Total
Commitment: USD 12.00M Disbursed Amount: USD 11.96M
Revised Amount: USD 12.00M
Environmental Category: C
Implementing Agencies:
Azerbaijan State Committee for Securities
Cofinanciers and Other External Partners:
B. Key Dates
Process Date Process Original Date Revised / Actual
Date(s)
Concept Review: 12/09/2010 Effectiveness: 11/07/2011 11/07/2011
Appraisal: 01/19/2011 Restructuring(s): 05/06/2015
Approval: 03/17/2011 Mid-term Review: 01/20/2014 02/03/2014
Closing: 12/31/2015 07/01/2016
C. Ratings Summary
C.1 Performance Rating by ICR
Outcomes: Satisfactory
Risk to Development Outcome: Substantial
Bank Performance: Moderately Satisfactory
Borrower Performance: Satisfactory
C.2 Detailed Ratings of Bank and Borrower Performance (by ICR)
Bank Ratings Borrower Ratings
Quality at Entry: Moderately Satisfactory Government: Satisfactory
Quality of Supervision: Satisfactory Implementing
Agency/Agencies: Satisfactory
Overall Bank
Performance: Moderately Satisfactory
Overall Borrower
Performance: Satisfactory
C.3 Quality at Entry and Implementation Performance Indicators
Implementation
Performance Indicators
QAG Assessments
(if any) Rating
Potential Problem Project
at any time (Yes/No): No
Quality at Entry
(QEA): None
Problem Project at any
time (Yes/No): No
Quality of
Supervision (QSA): None
DO rating before
Closing/Inactive status: Satisfactory
D. Sector and Theme Codes
Original Actual
Sector Code (as % of total Bank financing)
Public administration - Financial Sector 7 7
Capital Markets 93 93
Theme Code (as % of total Bank financing)
International financial standards and systems 36 36
Other Financial Sector Development 22 22
Regulation and competition policy 42 42
E. Bank Staff
Positions At ICR At Approval
Vice President: Cyril E Muller Philippe H. Le Houerou
Country Director: Mercy Miyang Tembon Asad Alam
Practice
Manager/Manager: Rolf Behrndt Sophie Sirtaine
Project Team Leader: Angela Prigozhina Michael Edwards
ICR Team Leader: Stephen Francis Pirozzi
ICR Primary Author: Stephen Francis Pirozzi
F. Results Framework Analysis
Project Development Objectives (from Project Appraisal Document)
Increase the use of equity and corporate debt as financing and/or investment instruments
through the adoption of an effective capital markets regulatory framework and
infrastructure
Revised Project Development Objectives (as approved by original approving authority)
(a) PDO Indicator(s)
Indicator Baseline Value
Original Target
Values (from
approval
documents)
Formally
Revised
Target
Values
Actual Value
Achieved at
Completion or
Target Years
Indicator 1 : Increased issuance of corporate bonds
Value
quantitative or
Qualitative)
1.9%
3.8%
14.1%
Date achieved 10/04/2011 12/31/2015 07/01/2016
Comments
(incl. %
achievement)
Outstanding amount of corporate debt to 2010 Non-oil GDP
Indicator 2 : Increased number of listed companies
Value
quantitative or
Qualitative)
2
8-10
5
Date achieved 10/04/2011 12/31/2015 07/01/2016
Comments
(incl. %
achievement)
Number of listed companies
Indicator 3 : Improved price transparency
Value
quantitative or
Qualitative)
0%
90%
100%
Date achieved 10/04/2011 12/31/2015 07/01/2016
Comments
(incl. %
achievement)
Ratio of competitive transactions / total equity (non-block transactions)
(b) Intermediate Outcome Indicator(s)
Indicator Baseline Value
Original Target
Values (from
approval
documents)
Formally
Revised
Target Values
Actual Value
Achieved at
Completion or
Target Years
Indicator 1 :
Ratio of market participants electronically linked to market infrastructure
(trading, clearing and settl
Value 0% 100% 100%
(quantitative
or Qualitative)
Date achieved 10/04/2011 12/31/2015 07/01/2016
Comments
(incl. %
achievement)
Ratio of market participants electronically linked to market infrastructure
Indicator 2 : Enactment of new Capital Market Law
Value
(quantitative
or Qualitative)
No
Yes
Yes
Date achieved 10/04/2011 12/31/2015 07/01/2016
Comments
(incl. %
achievement)
Law enacted
Indicator 3 :
Promulgation of capital markets regulation required upon enactment of
Law
Value
(quantitative
or Qualitative)
No
Yes
Yes
Date achieved 10/04/2011 12/31/2015 07/01/2016
Comments
(incl. %
achievement)
Regulations promulgated
Indicator 4 :
Number of companies involved in the listing advisory program (debt and
equity)
Value
(quantitative
or Qualitative)
0
15
16
Date achieved 10/04/2011 12/31/2015 07/01/2016
Comments
(incl. %
achievement)
Number of companies involved in the listing advisory program
Indicator 5 :
Increased of the threshold pass rate of the Financial Certification
examination for market participants
Value
(quantitative
or Qualitative)
50%
75%
75%
Date achieved 10/04/2011 12/31/2015 07/01/2016
Comments
(incl. %
achievement)
Measures financial literacy level
Indicator 6 : Consumer Awareness of Capital Market Instruments
Value
(quantitative
or Qualitative)
24
45
59.38
Date achieved 10/04/2011 12/31/2015 07/01/2016
Comments
(incl. %
achievement)
using the Capital Markets Awareness Index
G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs
No. Date ISR
Archived DO IP
Actual
Disbursements
(USD millions)
1 07/09/2011 Satisfactory Satisfactory 0.00
2 02/09/2012 Satisfactory Satisfactory 0.00
3 10/08/2012 Satisfactory Satisfactory 0.45
4 01/09/2013 Satisfactory Satisfactory 1.96
5 10/24/2013 Satisfactory Satisfactory 3.41
6 06/11/2014 Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 4.24
7 11/22/2014 Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 4.75
8 05/18/2015 Moderately Satisfactory Satisfactory 6.18
9 11/10/2015 Satisfactory Satisfactory 8.38
10 06/29/2016 Satisfactory Satisfactory 11.74
H. Restructuring (if any)
Restructuring
Date(s)
Board
Approved
PDO Change
ISR Ratings at
Restructuring
Amount
Disbursed at
Restructuring
in USD
millions
Reason for Restructuring &
Key Changes Made DO IP
05/06/2015 MS S 6.18
I. Disbursement Profile
11
1. Project Context, Development Objectives and Design
1.1 Context at Appraisal
1. From 2004 – 2008 Azerbaijan experienced an average annual increase in GDP over 20
percent and decrease in poverty, due in large part to rising oil and gas production and prices.
However, given the exhaustive nature of oil and gas production, it was believed that Azerbaijan may have
reached its peak, as production was estimated to remain steady over the next decade and decline thereafter,
thereby leaving limited window to create an economic environment to support growth in the non-oil
economy. The challenge for Azerbaijan was the ability to transform into a sustainable higher middle
income country with a more diversified economy.
2. At the time of appraisal, Azerbaijan had made good progress on its first round of economic
reforms. This includes establishing a sound macro-framework, including the oil fund. It also includes
small-scale privatization, internal trade and price liberalization and a stable central banking and foreign
exchange system. Improved policies to provide effective services in basic health, education and social
protection had also been put into place. However, Azerbaijan continued to lag behind most other CIS
countries in second generation reforms, in such areas as, large-scale privatization, competition policy,
consumer protection, rural access to financial services, banking and securities market reform, and foreign
trade in the non-oil sector. In addition, there was a lag in developing policies and institutions needed to
support a competitive highly skilled workforce, an innovative and flexible private sector environment, and
to address the environmental legacy of the Soviet Union.
3. The Government sought to maintain progress reflected in the 2011 Doing Business Report by
further diversifying the economy and making gains in areas that at the time were identified as
requiring urgent attention, including business licensing, tax and customs administration and
reduction of corruption. While the Country’s rankings for business entry were good at the time of
appraisal, Azerbaijan ranked poorly on exit, competition and dimensions that deal with ongoing business
operations, including trading across borders, paying taxes, etc. For example, Azerbaijan’s rank for
“Starting a New Business” improved from 64 to 15 during the period 2008-2011. However, during the
same period, the rankings for “Trading Across Borders” and “Paying Taxes” ranged from 173-177 and
141-103, respectively.
4. During the time of appraisal, the capital market in Azerbaijan was underdeveloped, with
equity and debt market capitalization of 0.5 percent and 1.9 percent of non-oil GDP, respectively, at
the end 2010. Development of the capital market in the medium term was considered crucial to support
economic diversification of the non-oil sector. The main activity of the Baku Stock Exchange (BSE) was
to serve as the auction mechanism for the issuance of Government Securities. However, due to a number
of limiting factors1, secondary trading of treasury debt did not exist. Only two companies had listed their
shares on the BSE to date, one of which was closely-held and did not trade. The most active trading
surrounded shares of about 500 companies privatized in the mid-1990s, which represent the “unlisted
securities market”, which was not regulated by the State Committee for Securities (SCS). As virtually all
equity trades were pre-arranged, traditional exchange driven price discovery is not attained. The investor
1 These include artificially low yields, high frequency of issuance, and a broad range of available maturities
12
base was acutely underdeveloped and banks have had little interest of investing in low yielding existing
market instruments2. As a consequence of the underdevelopment of the capital markets, the banking sector
dominates the financial sector with more than 95 percent of total assets.
5. A number of key benefits would result in the medium term from the development of the
capital market. As a result of prior years’ high bank credit growth, both credit and related foreign
exchange risks had become concentrated in the banking system. It was anticipated that over time these
risks would be diffused as the nascent corporate bond market develops and more firms are able to gain
access to longer term funding. Secondly, the banking system’s domestic funding structure would be
enhanced through banks’ improved access to debt and equity financing. Thirdly, through a stronger capital
market, holders of privatization vouchers would be able to more readily determine the price offered to sell
their holdings. In sum, lenders, borrowers and investors would each have new opportunities to participate
in the growth of non-oil economy through the capital market.
6. At project design, market participants were interested in exploring more attractive financing
opportunities for the private sector. At the time the project was conceived, the corporate sector was
relying on expensive, short-term and increasingly scarce local financing from the commercial banks.
Moreover, with the exception of IBA (which is majority owned by the State), few banks were large
enough to provide substantial funding to enterprises. Market participants and the regulator alike had
indicated that a number of enterprises have an interest to access the capital market for debt and/or equity
financing. Equally, banks were interested in diversifying their funding sources away from short-term
deposits and find alternative sources of finance. The capital market, through both equity and debt
financing, offered banks potential access to longer term funding, which was considered essential to
encourage private sector development.
1.2 Original Project Development Objectives (PDO) and Key Indicators (as approved)
Increase the use of equity and corporate debt as financing and/or investment instruments through the
adoption of an effective capital markets regulatory framework and infrastructure.
1.3 Revised PDO (as approved by original approving authority) and Key Indicators, and reasons/justification
The PDO was not revised.
1.4 Main Beneficiaries
7. The main beneficiaries of the CMMP project identified in the PAD are:
• State Committee for Securities
• Baku Stock Exchange
• National Depository Centre
• Central Bank of Azerbaijan
• Ministry of Finance
• Ministry of Economic Development
• Professional financial intermediaries
2 Apart from the government securities, mostly for the reserve requirements
13
• Corporate Sector
• Individual, corporate and institutional investors
1.5 Original Components
8. The PAD defined five components or parts (as they are called in the Development Credit
Agreement), as follows:
9. Component 1: Streamlining and Automating Market Infrastructure. This
Component will address the outdated capital market infrastructure constraints by focusing on: (i)
increasing automation of the market through establishing one depository center and consolidating
clearance and settlement; (ii) opening the infrastructure’s inclusion/participation and access; (iii)
minimizing off-market trades and improving price discovery; (iv) facilitating the operational introduction
of investment funds; and (v) building better risk protection through establishing an updated trade
guarantee mechanism. Market infrastructure activities supported under this Component will seek to
maximize compliance with the Group of Thirty standards on clearance and settlement, IOSCO Principles
35-38 and CPSS-10 clearance and settlement principles. In this manner the Project will promote
compliance with best international practices, and just as importantly, ready the reformed market
infrastructure for connectivity to EU systems, when the level of Azeri market activity makes this advisable.
10. Component 2: Updating and Strengthening the Legal and Regulatory Framework. To
maximize the benefits of adopting an adequate legal and regulatory framework, this Component will focus
on: (i) reviewing the draft capital market legislation, ensuring that the existing gaps are addressed through
the forthcoming new Capital Market Act and identifying key implementing regulations needed to make the
law effective; (ii) enhancing market confidence and safety by introducing minimum capital requirements
for market participants; (iii) in collaboration with the Ministry of Taxes and Ministry of Finance,
eliminating tax obstacles to capital formation for companies and avoiding double taxation of participants
in investment funds; (iv) allowing pooled investments by insurance companies; (v) fostering
competitiveness by extending market participation through new licenses and broader geographic coverage;
and (vi) ensuring effective coordination with other regulatory authorities in the financial sector (e.g., the
Central Bank of Azerbaijan and the Ministry of Finance Insurance Directorate) to minimize regulatory
gaps and arbitrage opportunities. The EU TACIS project is currently supporting drafting of the new and
approximation of the EU directives in Azerbaijan regulatory framework. This Component of the Project
will largely build on the preparation of the draft Capital Market Act and be strengthened through the SCS
undertaking in 2013 an IOSCO self-assessment and an independent IOSCO assessment at the end of the
Project
11. Component 3: Stimulating Supply. This Component will promote greater use of capital markets
as a financing alternative by focusing on: (i) creating a more appropriate environment to encourage equity
listings and the corporate bond market; (ii) actively reaching out to corporations to promote benefits of
financial market as a funding alternative and working proactively with prospective issuers to assist them in
coming to the market; (iii) promoting development of reliable benchmarks in the government bond market
(in cooperation with IMF); (iv) supporting domestic capital market financing of the large infrastructure
projects, by examining the potential for PPPs; and (v) assessing potential for introduction of new financial
products (e.g., Electronic Traded Funds in the medium term).
14
12. Component 4: Capacity Building. This Component will seek to overcome the low capacity of
market participants and regulators through launching capacity building activities. First, as the SCS is the
major force leading the CMMP reform, it is important to assure that the agency’s human and financial
capacities are sufficient and effective. This Component, will aim to: (i) strengthen the SCS’ knowledge
management, its policy formation processes and transparency of operations; and (ii) strengthen the
institutional capacity of the SCS’ surveillance, reporting and enforcement systems. Second, investor
education is a key factor to the encouraging the breadth and depth of participation in capital markets. It is
therefore necessary to ensure that potential investors are well-informed as to the use, benefits and risks of
securities ownership.
13. This Component will include, inter alia, activities to: (i) improve public awareness of the capital
market by carrying out a series of effective communication programs through media, outreach sessions
hosted by the SCS in major cities of Azerbaijan; (ii) increase potential investors’ understanding of capital
market by series of education seminars and outreach tools to nascent investment funds and insurance
industry; and (iii) promoting the Azeri market to international investors. Third, skilled capital markets
intermediaries are essential to the creation of efficient capital markets. The establishment of high
professional standards for capital markets professionals has a direct influence on the credibility of the
capital market and encourages the inflow of investment funds.
14. The set of proposed measures regarding on-going training and certification under this Component
should provide investors with confidence that the persons they are dealing with have the necessary skills,
knowledge, experience and ethical standards to administer their investments This Component will
support an increase in the professional knowledge base by: (i) developing a capital markets training center;
(ii) gauging the current capacity of the capital markets participants; (iii) establishing curricula for
qualification for licenses; and (iv) developing a sustainability plan for Training Center.
1.6 Revised Components
15. No material changes were made to project components.
1.7 Other significant changes
16. Changes were made to the loan closing date and funds were reallocated between
procurement categories. The revised closing date was July 1, 2016 which was six months beyond the
original closing date of December 31, 2015. Funds totaling USD 440,000 were reallocated, between
procurement categories. The extension of the project closing date was requested to accommodate the
installation of the Capital Market Information System (CMIS) under Component 1 of the Project
“Streamlining and automating capital markets infrastructure”. The work under the CMIS contract
commenced in late February 2015 and installation was estimated to be completed within 12 months
thereby representing a two-month slippage from the original project end date. A formal letter (#13/06-53-
1271) dated March 4, 2015 was received from the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Azerbaijan
(MOF) requesting extension of the closing date to July 1, 2016 and the reallocation of funds between
procurement categories.
15
17. Project funds were reallocated as follows:
• USD 400,000 transferred from “Consulting Services, Audit and Training” category to “Goods”
category;
• USD 40,000 transferred from “Consulting Services, Audit and Training” category to
“Incremental Operating Costs” category
Table 1: Reallocation of Proceeds
Category
Amount of the
Loan Allocated
(expressed in USD)
Current)
Amount of the
Loan Allocated
(expressed in
USD)
(Revised)
Percentage of
Expenditures to be
Financed
(Net of VAT)
(1) Goods 4,300,000
4,700,000
100.00
(2)Consultants' services
including audit and
training
7,600,000
7,160,000
100.00
(3) Incremental Operating
Costs 70,000 110,000 100.00
(4) Front-end fee 30,000 30,000
TOTAL 12,000,000
12,000,000 100%
2. Key Factors Affecting Implementation and Outcomes
2.1 Project Preparation, Design and Quality at Entry
18. Preparation of the CMMP took place in an economic climate significantly different from that
of today. In 2010, the corporate bonds market saw eight new issuances making it one of the most active
segments of the capital markets. These new issuances were led by banks, insurance and microfinance
companies. The total amounted to 17.6 AZN million with an average maturity of 1.5 years and an average
interest rate of 14 percent. One bank issued a 0.999 AZN million Eurobond with a maturity of 1 year and
an interest rate of 11 percent. The Azerbaijan Mortgage Fund (AMF) issued 5 and 7 year covered bonds at
3.0 and 3.25 percent respectively3. The CMMP intended to leverage these positive trends in the market
and increase private sector financing through the capital markets as an alternative to bank financing which
was more expensive and offered shorter terms. The bond market remained active but it was apparent by
3 See Pre-Implementation mission Aide-Memoire (May 26th-June 3rd, 2011)
16
early 2015 that there was waning interest in listing equities as the macroeconomic conditions began to
weaken.4
19. The TAL was the appropriate instrument for the implementation of the CMMP. As described
in detail in the PAD, the GoA was committed to improving the capital market infrastructure so that it
would encourage and support securities issuance (debt and equity) as an alternative to bank borrowing.5
The CMMP continued and complemented work focused on the securities and capital markets supported by
IMF, SECO, IFC, EBRD, USAID and EU TACIS. More specifically, the project was designed to address
existing regulatory, infrastructure and capacity gaps identified in the Capital Market Assessment Report
developed with support of the FIRST Initiative in mid-2010
20. Commitment to the project remained high despite economic challenges. In spite of the
prevailing economic challenges facing Azerbaijan during project implementation, the borrower remained
committed to achieving the reforms and structural changes required under the CMMP plan. The level of
commitment is evidenced by the issuance of Presidential Decree #760 (February 3, 2016) which created an
integrated Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FIMSA). FIMSA has been created with regulatory and
supervisory responsibility over banks, non-bank credit institutions, capital markets, payment systems, and
financial monitoring of AML/CFT. Upon approval of the FIMSA Charter on March 11, 2016, the State
Committee for Securities (SCS) had been dissolved. The move was designed to add efficiency to
securities and capital markets regulation and oversight.
21. Appropriate risks were identified at the time of project design. However, macroeconomic
stability and a decline in crude oil prices were neither identified nor anticipated. Given the scope of
the project, the team correctly identified the following core risks:
Stakeholder risks. Failure to secure broad political, industry and investment community would
potentially result in delay or discontinued implementation of the capital markets reform process.
Institutional risks. Unforeseen changes in the SCS leadership structure (both high and mid-level)
could significantly delay portions of the project implementation.
Implementation risks. Given the limited capacity of the SCS there was a potential for delay. The
SCS had no experience leading a broad reform agenda and implementing World Bank Projects.
However, SCS did have successful experience implementing projects with other IFIs
22. The team believed that “the relatively simple design and implementation arrangements”6 would
help mitigate operational risks, while other risks regarding the institutional environment and governance
will be mitigated through the active engagement of the SCS Board of Directors and robust local project
supervision. However, the team did not identify macroeconomic risks that could have an adverse effect on
4 16 bond issuances occurred in the first quarter of 2016 compared to 82 issuances during the same period in 2015. The Manat
devaluations in February and December 2015 negatively impacted investor sentiment, while tighter monetary policy and fiscal
consolidation resulted in a tightening of local currency liquidity and an increase in cost of funds in the period 2H2015-1H2016.
Several IPOs planned for 2015 had been cancelled pending improved conditions. (See Aide-Memoire June 6-10, 2016)
5 See PAD page 12, Paragraph 37
6 See PAD page 12, Paragraph 34
17
both project implementation and market participation. An unanticipated significant drop in oil prices7
triggered a series of negative consequences including sharply reduced economic activity, tightened
liquidity and significant distress in the banking sector which resulted in several high profile bank closures.
With the benefit of hindsight, it is apparent that this has had a significant negative affect on the expected
uptake and issuance of corporate debt and securities.
2.2 Implementation
23. In spite of some delay in implementation, all deliverables were realized by the revised project
end date. As mentioned, in spite of unforeseen economic challenges most of the project deliverables were
completed on time. In April 2015, the project team sought a six month extension in the project closing
date.8 The extension was requested due to a delay in procurement and contracting of a consultant for the
IT solution related to the capital markets infrastructure system (CMIS) under component 1. By June 10,
2016, all deliverables under components 1, 2 and 3 were completed. Two remaining items under
Component 4 were completed before project closing. These were (i) recommendations of expanding
commercial b2b consultancy services of the CMTC, and (ii) Financial Literacy Survey.
24. Delays were encountered in the early stages of the project which are attributed to a more
complex preparation process than anticipated and a delayed launch in the CMIS. The disbursement
schedule lagged almost 12 months behind initial projections and persisted until the end of 2015 Q3 when
disbursements began to pick up. In addition to project complexities cited by the team, it is understandable
why such a project would experience delays given the overarching threat of financial crisis and two
currency devaluations in February and December 2015. In spite of these challenges, the project had
achieved essentially all its objectives by the revised closing date, which was only six months beyond that
of the original closing date.
2.3 Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Design, Implementation and Utilization
25. At the time of approval the Project was relevant to country needs and the M&E framework
supported the assessment of progress towards the achievement of the PDO. At the time of approval,
Azerbaijan had largely weathered the financial crisis in 2008 and experienced a 9.3% GDP growth rate in
2009. However, growth in the non-oil sectors had slowed down to 3.2% in 2009 compared with double
digit growth during the period 2006-2008. As Azerbaijan had already begun instituting economic reforms,
strengthening of the capital markets by modernizing, facilitating access and promoting transparency was a
logical step towards market expansion and encouraging non-bank long-term financing. The banking
system, however, was not a primary focus of these efforts.
7 Crude oil prices began a steady trend upward starting in early 2002 and dipped in early 2007 when the financial crisis hit.
Subsequently, there was a rapid and dramatic rise to a peak price of $139.05* in June 2008 which was followed by an equally
dramatic drop to $35.23* in February 2009. Since then, the price per barrel has risen to about $100* and has settled to about
$52* as of January 2, 2017 *(2016 Dollars)
8 See Report No: RES18549 Restructuring Paper on a Proposed Project Restructuring of Capital Markets Modernization Project
Loan IBRD-80240 Board Approval: March 17, 2011 To the Republic of Azerbaijan
18
26. Monitoring of the CMMP TAL was conducted by the PIU, located within the State
Committee for Securities (SCS), in close collaboration with the Government and World Bank. The
SCS was responsible for project implementation and M&E. The PIU was established within the SCS and
had direct responsibility for procurement, disbursement, accounting and reporting to the SCS, Government
and World Bank. The Internal Audit Department of the SCS was specifically given the responsibility of
M&E tracking and reporting. It was also responsible for ensuring that the implementation units were
integrated into the management information results aggregation process. Reporting was provided on a
regular and timely basis. The project was also closely monitored by the World Bank. Two ISR missions
per year were completed at regular intervals during Project implementation for a total of ten missions.
27. Of three PDO indicators, two were achieved, and one fell short. The indicator which fell short
of its target is “number of companies with listed equity”. At the time of project closing, five companies
had listed equity which fell short of the target of 8-10. It is not hard to see why this was not achieved
given the prevailing macroeconomic conditions. Poor investor sentiment, low market liquidity and
uncertainty in the stability of the Manat are not conducive to IPOs or other forms of equity issuance. All
other indicators linked to the Project’s four components were either met or surpassed – a significant
achievement given the uncertain macroeconomic conditions during project implementation.
2.4 Safeguard and Fiduciary Compliance
28. Fiduciary performance by the Borrower was satisfactory. The PIU provided financial
reporting on a timely basis in a form and format satisfactory to the World Bank Financial Management
Specialist. All annual audits were conducted by a reputable firm and all audit opinions on the Project’s
financial statements were unqualified. Accounting records are maintained in a 1C based accounting system
for SCS components and accounting records were consistently found to be accurate and with adequate
controls to ensure accuracy of accounting records and reports.9
ISR FM Rating
Key ISR Indicator Previous Rating Final ISR Rating Financial Management Satisfactory Satisfactory Counterpart Funding Satisfactory Satisfactory
29. Environmental Safeguards: Current Environmental Assessment Category: C - Not Required.
2.5 Post-completion Operation/Next Phase
30. At the time of the drafting of this ICR, The GoA is in discussions with the World Bank for an
Advisory Services and Analytics (ASA) package for the purposes of financial sector stabilization and
development. Given the decline in macroeconomic conditions in Azerbaijan, the shift to focus on broader
9 Capital Market Modernization and Financial Sector Modernization Projects Financial Management Supervision Report, May
2016
19
issues to stabilize the financial markets appears to be an appropriate and much needed follow up to the
CMMP.
3. Assessment of Outcomes
3.1 Relevance of Objectives, Design and Implementation
Dimension Rating
Relevance of Objectives Moderate
Relevance of Design Substantial
Relevance of Implementation Substantial
Overall Relevance Rating Substantial
Sub-Rating for Relevance of Objectives: Moderate
31. The objectives of the Project have less relevance to current Government priorities than when
it was approved. At the time of project approval, the economic situation in Azerbaijan was reasonably
stable. At the time, emphasis was placed on diversification of the local economy and fostering the
development of alternative sources of financing to support growth in the private sector. The deepening of
the capital markets was accepted as a path forward to create a more efficient means for companies to
obtain cheaper long term capital and encourage growth in the non-oil economy. However, the
macroeconomic environment has changed significantly and there is greater need to stabilize the economy
and the financial sector generally to prevent further deterioration. Currency devaluation in 2015 has put
the banking sector under enormous pressure and has contributed to the failure of some institutions.
Markets are virtually illiquid and companies are not accessing the equity markets and are conducting
limited bond issues in the bond market. This is due to the currently high degree of economic uncertainty
and waning confidence in the financial sector, manly banks.
Sub-Rating for Relevance of Design: Substantial
32. The Project’s design correctly placed emphasis on institutional strengthening, reform of the
regulatory regime and streamlining market infrastructure. As mentioned earlier in this document,
gaps existed in the regulatory and institutional structures supporting capital markets development and
growth. The CMMP project leveraged off of prior work that had identified these weaknesses and focused
on critical elements that would serve as a platform for the issuance of debt and equity securities. Among
these elements are capacity building, streamlining and automation of the capital market infrastructure
including the trading platform, strengthening the legal and regulatory framework and educating business
and the public, generally, on capital markets operations and corresponding benefits. The level of
transparency achieved by the project should not be undervalued given the prevailing adverse
macroeconomic conditions that has shaken confidence in the banking sector and financial markets. It is
also important to note, however, that there has been lower than originally expected market activity and
participation due to these poor conditions. Uncertainty over the strength of the Manat as well as the
viability of several large retail banks (following a series of attempted restructurings and liquidations) has
dogged the domestic financial sector.
Sub-Rating for Relevance of Implementation: Substantial
20
33. Throughout project implementation, the SCS, Baku Stock Exchange, National Depository
Center and the Bank remained committed to meeting project objectives and in spite of a challenging
environment, substantially all objectives were met within budget and on time. The CMMP, has
established a streamlined capital market trading platform underpinned by a revised legal framework and
regulations that support its operations. However, the prevailing economic climate is not attractive to
potential issuers of securities and more fundamental financial sector strengthening work is needed at this
time. Related challenges such as instability of the banking sector and two currency devaluations had a
negative effect on the banks’ ability to attract deposits. Several commercial banks have been declared
insolvent and overall confidence in the financial sector is low. Measures to stabilize the financial sector,
generally, are very much needed at this time. As mentioned above, WB is working with the GoA to
develop an ASA package focused on financial sector stabilization to address these issues.
3.2 Achievement of Project Development Objectives
Overall Achievement of PDOs Rating: Substantial
34. The Project contributed to the overall development objectives, with gains made in most areas. Project contribution is broadly recognized and well appreciated by the GoA and significant advances in
PDO outcomes were achieved despite considerable challenges. Responsible
Institution
PDO Indicator Description –
Indicator
Definition
End Target
(Approved)
Actual
Result
Level of
Achievement
(ICR’s
Assessment)
Rating
PDO: Increase the use of equity and corporate debt as financing and/or investment instruments through the adoption
of an effective capital markets regulatory framework and infrastructure.
Internal
Audit
Department
of
SCS
1. Increased
issuance of
corporate
bonds
Outstanding
Amount of
Corporate Debt to
2010 Non-oil
GDP
3.80% 14.1% Fully achieved High
Internal
Audit
Department
of
SCS
2. Increased
number of
companies
with listed
equity
(cumulative)
Number of Listed
Companies
8-10 5 Partially achieved Substantial
Internal
Audit
Department
of
SCS
3. Improved
price
transparency
Ratio of
Competitive
Transactions/Total
Equity (Non-
Block
Transactions)
90% 100% Fully achieved.
High
35. PDO: “Increase the use of equity and corporate debt as financing and/or investment instruments
through the adoption of an effective capital markets regulatory framework and infrastructure”
21
36. PDO Indicator one: Increased issuance of corporate bonds. There has been an increase in the
issuance of securities during the life of the project based on results tracked under the indicator
“Outstanding Amount of Corporate Debt to Non-oil GDP”. The baseline in 2010 was 1.9%. The
percentage rose steadily during the life of the project and was 14% as of May 2016. This was down from
a high of 24% in 2015 and highlights the quickly changing macroeconomic environment as well as the
short-term nature of corporate debt issues. Nonetheless, it is significantly higher than the target of 3.8%.
In retrospect this target, although a doubling of the 2010 baseline, may have been set at a more ambitions
level considering the fact that the result of 14% has been achieved under the current challenging economic
conditions.
Outstanding Amount of Corporate Debt to 2010 Non-oil GDP (actual)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 May 2016
4.9% 4.1% 7.3% 21.4% 24% 14%
37. PDO Indicator two: Increased number of companies with listed equity. This indicator fell short of
its original target range of 8-10 companies with listed equity. It is not surprising that there was a
slowdown in equity issues given the lack of appetite and ability of companies to conduct an initial public
offering. Unanticipated price volatility, lack of market confidence and tightening liquidity contributed to a
stagnation in the equity markets.
38. PDO Indicator three: Improved price transparency. This indicator achieved 100% of its target.
The indicator was defined as the ratio of competitive transactions to total equity. “Competitive
transactions” are non-block transactions as block transactions are not considered competitive and
transparent. However, the BSE has taken measures that are designed to make block (or cross trades) more
competitive by allowing a 60 minute price discovery period to allow counter-bid/offers and prepay
requirements have been eliminated for purchase orders. Whether this actually increases competitiveness
and transparency of block trades remains untested in the currently illiquid market.10
Intermediate Results Indicators
39. Component 1: Streamlining and Automating Market Infrastructure. The rating for this
component in the project’s final ISR was Satisfactory and targeted results had been achieved by project
closing. However, this comment was rated as moderately satisfactory in two consecutive ISRs, November
22, 2014 and May 18, 2015, respectively. The implementation of new (CMIS) is a critical step in advancing and
supporting capital market development as it main focus/function is aimed at substantial upgrading of trading,
clearance and settlement, depository and surveillance functions. The procurement process experienced delays in
finalizing the supporting technical specifications and the bid invitation which was originally planned for September
2013 was delayed until April 2014.
Intermediate Indicators for Component 1. Responsible
Institution
Intermediate Indicator End Target
(Approved)
Level of
Achievement
Rating
10 See CMPP Mission Aide-Memoire (June 6-10, 2016)
22
(ICR’s
Assessment)
Internal
Audit
Department
of
SCS
1. Ratio of market
participants
electronically linked to
market infrastructure
(trading, clearing and
settlements)
100% Fully achieved High
40. Component 2: Updating and Strengthening the Legal and Regulatory Framework. The rating
for this component in the project’s final ISR was Satisfactory and targeted results had been achieved by
project closing. This component had experienced some minor delay during project implementation as the
review and consultation process within the Cabinet of Ministers and the Presidential Administration was
longer than anticipated.
Despite the delay in the enactment of the Law, the SCS and the consultancy firm had in parallel advanced
thirty required regulations while awaiting the Law’s passage.11
Intermediate Indicators for Component 2 Responsible
Institution
Intermediate Indicator End Target
(Approved)
Level of
Achievement
(ICR’s
Assessment)
Rating
Internal
Audit
Department
of
SCS
2. Enactment of a new
Capital Market Act
Enacted Fully achieved High
Internal
Audit
Department
of
SCS
3. Promulgation of
capital markets
regulation required
upon enactment of
Law
Regulations
Promulgated
Fully Achieved High
41. Component 3: Stimulating Supply: The rating for this component in the project’s final ISR was
Satisfactory and results were fully achieved by the time of project closing.. However, this comment was
rated as moderately satisfactory in two consecutive ISRs, January 11, 2014 and November 22, 2014,
respectively. The objective of Component 3 is to stimulate supply of issuers in the Azerbaijan capital
market and its core activity is the Listing Advisory Program (LAP) which an effort to focus available
resources on increasing listings on the Baku Stock Exchange. The LAP was approved in March 2013 and
formally launched in April 2014 after a 6 months delay which resulted from ) as a result of
recommendations made in the Inception Report to shift certain deliverables into this unified program. By
September 2014, realignment of these deliverables were agreed.
Intermediate Indicators for Component 3 Responsible Intermediate Indicator End Target Level of Rating
11 See CMPP ISR #7 (22-Nov-2014)
23
Institution (Approved) Achievement
(ICR’s Assessment)
Internal
Audit
Department
of
SCS
Number of companies involved in the listing advisory program (debt and equity)
15 Companies Fully achieved High
42. Component 4: Capacity Building. The rating for this component in the project’s final ISR was
Satisfactory, and was rated at Satisfactory for the life of the project. The Capital Markets Training Center
has been with some slight delay and curricula for the Training Center have been adopted and a train-the-
trainers program enacted. A nation-wide education program was approved by the SCS and has been
continued under FIMSA. FIMSA leadership confirmed that in addition to university curricula, an
agreement was made with the Ministry of Education to include security markets materials to school books
and to explore expanding the curriculum to secondary schools. The 100US$ million SOCAR bond issue
in 2016 played an important role in raising public awareness of the bond market due to SOCAR’s
visibility.
Intermediate Indicators for Component 4 Responsible
Institution
Intermediate Indicator End Target
(Approved)
Level of
Achievement
(ICR’s Assessment)
Rating
Internal
Audit
Department
of
SCS
Increase of the threshold
pass rate of the Financial Certification examination for market participants
75% Fully achieved High
Internal
Audit
Department
of
SCS
Consumer Awareness of
Capital Market
Instruments12
45 Fully Achieved:
59.38
High
3.3 Efficiency
Rating for Efficiency: Substantial
43. The project achieved a high level of cost effectiveness given the multitude of complex
deliverables competed within budget. However, the project required an extension of six months due
to early delays. The project helped facilitate the modernization of the debt and equity trading platform for
the BSE and helped inform the creation of the Financial Markets Supervision Authority (FIMSA) and
subsequent liquidation of the SCS. However there was some delay experienced in the early stages of the
project due to unanticipated complexities surrounding the TOR, tendering and ultimate installation and
12 Using the Capital Markets Awareness Index.
24
testing of the CMIS system. The successful completion of the later tasks necessitated a six month
extension of the project closing date. Aside from this particular delay, the amount of progress made was
considerable. For example, the new “On Securities Markets” Law was adopted on July 14, 2015. Twelve
new NDC and post-trading system rules and thirty implementing regulations were adopted in support of
the new securities law.
44. The markets are currently too illiquid to perform an economic analysis to assess the cost
savings accruing to issuers of corporate debt or equities vis-à-vis the alternative of short term bank
financing. An economic analysis calculating the cost savings benefits to securities issuers’ vis-à-vis
reliance on bank debt would have been a useful measure to quantify current savings and perhaps
extrapolate future benefits. Furthermore, bank lending activity has declined due to macroeconomic
uncertainly, recent devaluations of the Manat and illiquidity.
3.4 Justification of Overall Outcome Rating
Rating: Satisfactory
Overall this TAL is rated as Satisfactory.
Dimension Rating
Relevance Substantial
Achievement of Objectives Substantial
Efficiency Substantial
Overall Outcome Rating Satisfactory
45. The overall outcome rating for the project is Satisfactory. This is based on its Substantial rating
for Relevance, Substantial rating for Achievement of Objectives, and Substantial rating for Efficiency.
The project’s objective of strengthening key institutions continues to be highly relevant for the GoA’s and
World Bank’s development priorities, and the project objectives were substantially met. Revisions to the
project completion data was needed – and reflects the Bank’s responsiveness to the project and
implementing institutions. There were moderate shortcomings primarily in the project’s efficiency
evidenced by the six month extension.
3.5 Overarching Themes, Other Outcomes and Impacts
(a) Poverty Impacts, Gender Aspects, and Social Development - (N/A)
(b) Institutional Change/Strengthening
46. During the implementation phase, the responsible agency, SCS, was dissolved and its
responsibilities transferred to the newly established Financial Market Supervisory Authority
(FIMSA). The Decree of the President of Azerbaijan #760 dated February 3, 2016 called for the creation
of an integrated Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FIMSA) with regulatory and supervisory
responsibility over banks, non-bank credit institutions, capital market, payment systems and financial
monitoring for AML/CTF. Upon approval of the FIMSA Charter on March 11, 2016, the State Securities
Committee (SCS) was dissolved with FIMSA designated as its legal successor. Prior to this, the World
Bank had expressed concern that the oversight powers of the SCS (as they related to inspection and
25
investigation of market players) were impeded by the Inspections Law13
. The FIMSA has a much broader
mandate than the SCS and is responsible for ensuring the effective functioning of the financial markets, as
well as protection of the rights of creditors, investors and insurers.14
This institutional change is viewed as
an improvement that will have a positive effect on capital markets oversight and securities price
transparency. Experienced leadership within SCS (many of whom were directly involved in the CMMP)
were assigned new roles in FIMSA thereby retaining the knowledge and experience of key managers.
(c) Other Unintended Outcomes and Impacts (positive or negative) – None identified
3.6 Summary of Findings of Beneficiary Survey and/or Stakeholder Workshops – No Stakeholder workshop
was conducted. However a project closing event was held in Baku on November 4, 2016. See Annex 6.
4. Assessment of Risk to Development Outcome
Rating: Significant
47. The overall risk the project outcomes are rated as Significant due to the struggling banking
and financial sector. The devaluation of the Manat, lack of liquidity in the financial markets and the
draining of deposit accounts in retail banks have shaken popular confidence in the banking system. Direct
stakeholders and market participants have reported that the lack of regulatory transparency and uncertainty
in the markets are major factors contributing to the anemic state of the financial sector. Several large banks
have been declared insolvent thereby eroding confidence in the banking sector.15
5. Assessment of Bank and Borrower Performance
5.1 Bank Performance
(a) Bank Performance in Ensuring Quality at Entry
Rating: Moderately Satisfactory
48. The Bank correctly assessed the relevance of the PDO at the time of project design as well as
the strategic relevance of the objective to broaden and deepen the capital markets in Azerbaijan.
This was a timely and relevant project from inception. The project is well aligned with the FY07-10 and
FY11-14 Country Partnership Strategies16
and their common objective of strengthening the non-oil
13 Law on Audits of Entrepreneurs and Protection of Interest of Entrepreneurs. Adopted in August 2013 and enforced in March
2014.
14 See: http://en.fimsa.az/pages/10
15 Based on interviews with private sector stakeholders during the ICR Preparation Mission
16 See: Country Partnership Strategy FY07-10 for Republic of Azerbaijan (37812 – AZ); November 8, 2006, and; Country
Partnership Strategy for Azerbaijan FY11-14 (56246 – AZ).
26
economy through changes in a wide range of areas including financial markets. In the case of the CMMP,
the focus was on the development of the securities markets. At the time of project design, this was a highly
relevant objective. However, over the course of project implementation the financial sector generally
began to weaken under the pressure of lower economic activity, tighter liquidity and distress in the
banking sector
49. The Bank team failed to identify potential macroeconomic risks that could have an adverse
effect on the overall success of the project. During implementation, an unanticipated significant drop in
oil prices triggered a cascade of negative effects including a sharp reduction in economic activity,
tightened liquidity and significant distress in the banking sector. As a result of the increasingly adverse
macroeconomic conditions, there was and remains an acute need for financial market stability and
management and oversight of the banking sector. This threatened the success of the project as well as cast
some question on project relevance vis-à-vis the prevailing economic issues and distress in the financial
and banking sectors.
(b) Quality of Supervision
Rating: Satisfactory
50. The Bank team actively supervised project implementation and was responsive to client
needs. The project was closely monitored by the Bank. Two ISR missions per year were completed at
regular intervals during project implementation for a total of ten missions. A review of project documents
indicates regular and active communication between the Bank, the PIU and implementing agencies. The
ISRs provided straightforward assessments of project progress and highlighted potential issues or areas on
concern. The project was led by four TTLs at varying points, with most of them supervising the project
from Washington DC. A variety of senior technical staff from the Bank joined implementation missions to
ensure quality control of the technical aspects of components, as detailed in ISRs and AMs. Procurement
and Financial Management specialists were present in the region. Project implementation took place in a
very challenging macroeconomic environment and the Bank team provided adequate support and expertise
to bring the project to a satisfactory completion.
51. Fiduciary aspects of the project were managed in a timely manner and all audits were clean. As mentioned earlier in this document financial reporting was submitted by to the World Bank Financial
Management Specialist on a timely basis in the proper form and format. All annual audits were conducted
by a reputable firm and all audit opinions on the Project’s financial statements were unqualified.
Accounting records were consistently found to be accurate and with adequate controls to ensure accuracy
of accounting records and reports. A review of project–related documents and correspondence indicate a
close working relationship between the Bank’s Financial management Specialist and the PIU.
(c) Justification of Rating for Overall Bank Performance
Rating: Moderately Satisfactory
52. The Bank’s overall performance is assessed to be Moderately Satisfactory based on the
ratings for quality at entry, quality of supervision, and the overall outcome rating (see table below).
The CMMP project was relevant at the time of time of its inception and had the solid backing the GoA and
the respective implementing agencies. Substantially all targets were met and some were surpassed. Delays
were experienced early in the preparation stage which delayed the launch of the procurement process for
27
the capital markets information system (CMIS). Some delay was also experienced in the launch of the
national public awareness program for capital markets. The project team requested a six month extension
of the closing date to allow for the completion al all project components. The extension was reasonable
given the unexpected challenges that were encountered and the high quality of deliverables. Substantially
all outcomes were achieved in spite of unforeseen macroeconomic challenges including falling oil process,
tightened liquidity and a deteriorating banking sector. The Bank team did not account for these
macroeconomic or financial sector risks during project design. Consequently, the project is less relevant
today given the current market conditions. The successful completion of the CMMP can be largely
attributed to strong counterpart commitment to the project.
Dimension Rating
Quality at Entry Moderately Satisfactory
Quality at Supervision Satisfactory
Overall Bank Performance Moderately Satisfactory
5.2 Borrower Performance
(a) Government Performance
Rating: Satisfactory
53. The Government’s performance is rated as Satisfactory. The Azerbaijan Ministry of Finance
demonstrated ownership and commitment to the project during preparation and led project implementation
via a PIU established at the SCS. It maintained the PIU with staff responsible for project coordination,
procurement, financial management and M&E. The project was declared effective on Nove. 7. 2011, eight
months after Board approval, which is a period longer than average for this type of project and was the
result of a lengthy approval process and delays in establishing and staffing the PIU. Following Bank
Board approval, the Borrower initiated a lengthy review process of the Loan document which included the
Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Justice, and the Cabinet of Ministers. The
initiation of the CMMP was also dependent on the then-anticipated Presidential decree endorsing the State
Program on the Development of the Securities Markets.17
(b) Implementing Agency or Agencies Performance
Rating: Satisfactory
54. The Azerbaijan State Committee for Securities (SCS) was the primary implementing agency
for the CMMP. The overall implementation of the CMMP was delayed during the preparation phase. The
17 Decree of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan endorsing the State Program on the Development of the Securities
Market of the Republic of Azerbaijan in 2011-2020. May 16, 2011,18:35
28
establishment and staffing of the PIU proved to be a more problematic than anticipated.18
In March 2011,
two specialists were identified but could not be retained until project effectiveness. As the process edged
forward, one of the specialists took another position and notified SCS of this decision in late August.
Similarly, the procurement of the 1C financial system and the search for consultants for the task “Creation
of General Framework for Stimulating Supply and Capacity Building of Capital Markets”, took longer
than what was originally anticipated. The unexpectedly complex preparation process also delayed the
launch of the procurement process for the CMIS. The setbacks experienced early in the project had a
ripple effect that ultimately required an extension of the closing date by an additional six months.
55. Despite early implementation delays and unanticipated negative macroeconomic conditions,
SCS remained fully committed to the project and achieved all deliverables. As mentioned earlier in
this document, commitment to the project remained high despite economic challenges. The borrower
remained committed to achieving the reforms and structural changes required under the CMMP plan. The
creation of the integrated FIMSA resulted in an improved agency with regulatory and supervisory
responsibility over banks, non-bank credit institutions, capital market, payment systems and financial
monitoring for AML/CTF.
(c) Justification of Rating for Overall Borrower Performance
Rating: Satisfactory
56. Overall Borrower performance is assessed to be Satisfactory. (see table below).With a high
level of commitment, the borrower undertook and implemented complex reforms in a difficult
environment which was exacerbated by falling oil prices, tightened liquidity and a weak financial sector.
Despite delays experienced during the initial phase of the project, significant achievements were realized
and internal capacity ultimately improved.
57. As of July 1 (the amended closing date), all the deliverables envisioned under the project had been
delivered and endorsed by the implementation agency. These include:
• Component 1: the adoption of 31 new regulations by the State Committee for Securities (SCS)
following the enactment of the new Law on Securities Market, which introduced new standards for
capital market operation and new requirements for licensing and operations of market participants;
• Component 2: successful installation of the new integrated Capital Market Information System (CMIS)
and its satisfactory testing result,
• Component 3: all the activities under the component were completed at the previous supervision
mission;
• Component 4: finalization of the national capital market education program and launch of the
respective public financial awareness activities; the development of strategic plan for a sustainable
operation of the Capital Market Training Center (CMTC).
18 In March 2011, two specialists were identified but could not be retained until project effectiveness. As the process edged
forward, one of the specialists took another position and notified SCS of this decision in late August.
29
58. Procurement under the project has been completed. Disbursement of the loan funds are at 98% in
June 2016, with several outstanding payments due in the next few months. Funds under the capital market
component of the FSMP grant TF00975 has been fully disbursed by October 2015.
Government Performance Rating Satisfactory
Implementing Agency Rating Satisfactory
Overall Borrower Performance Rating Satisfactory
6. Lessons Learned
59. When a country’s economy is reliant on a particular commodity or sector, it is critical to
assess the risks associated with both short and long-term price fluctuations. Azerbaijan’s economy
has been and remains highly reliant on oil exports. Based on customs data, petroleum products represented
over 90% of the country’s exports in 2011.19
Sustained downward price movements would have
significant effects on the country’s national budget and, as experienced during project implementation,
negative effects on GDP, pressure on the national currency, tightened liquidity and pressure on the
financial sector. As a result, the prevailing economic conditions are not conducive to participation in the
capital markets. The countries’ vulnerability to macroeconomic conditions must therefore be identified
and, if available, a mitigation plan should be developed.
60. It is important to fully assess all required actions during the preparation stage of a project
and identify and assess the implementing agency’s internal capacity to execute or manage all
required functions. The project experienced initial delays largely due to a protracted process requiring
approval from multiple government authorities before loan signing and staffing the PIU. The procurement
process also proved to be challenging in the early stage as the PIU team lacked the capacity and had taken
time to become familiar with requirements and standards. Tendering and contracting also proved to be
more involved that initially anticipated. As a result, the project got off to a slow start and, despite efforts
to catch up, required a six month extension. The scale and scope, as well as the timeline, of a project
should be well aligned with the implementing agency’s capacity for coordination, procurement, contract
management, and financial management. The Bank should consider up-front training of key government
operational staff or temporarily embedding experts in the PIU if necessary to help support the weaker
aspects of project implementation
61. Strong government commitment to a project agenda is a vital aspect in helping assure the
success of Bank-sponsored projects. Strong ownership of this TAL helped to make sizable progress
which included decisive legal and regulatory actions by the Government including the President, Cabinet
of Ministers and the SCS/FIMSA. It is especially noteworthy that a high level of commitment was
maintained in the face of macroeconomic and financial sector distress. If not for the Government’s
perseverance the project may very well have been sidelined in order to shift resources to other pressing
issues.
19 Economist Intelligence Unit, Country Risk Services: Azerbaijan. August 2016.
30
62. Capacity building and institutional reforms are not only more challenging to measure, but
often take longer to be realized. The Bank should dedicate resources to monitoring and tracking such
projects after closure since impacts may be realized more in the medium-term as opposed to the short term
just after closing. This could help account for longer development periods needed for capacity building
and institutional reforms to be fully realized. Teams should also be encouraged at the design stage to
consider indicators and M&E arrangements that will allow for the tracking of results and follow up after
closing.
7. Comments on Issues Raised by Borrower/Implementing Agencies/Partners
(a) Borrower/implementing agencies – No Comments received
(b) Cofinanciers – No Comments received
(c) Other partners and stakeholders – No Comments received
31
Annex 1. Project Costs and Financing
(a) Project Cost by Component (in USD Million equivalent)
Components Appraisal Estimate
(USD millions)
Actual/Latest
Estimate (USD
millions)
Percentage of
Appraisal
Component 1: Streamlining and
Automating Market Infrastructure 6.05 7.72 127%
Component 2: Updating and
Strengthening the Legal and
Regulatory Framework
1.89 1.42 74%
Component 3: Stimulating Supply 1.86 1.70 91%
Component 4: Capacity Building 3.84 2.70 58%
Total Baseline Cost 13.64 13.56 99%
Physical Contingencies
0.00 0.00
0.00
Price Contingencies
0.00 0.00
0.00
Total Project Costs 0.00 0.00
Front-end fee PPF 0.00 0.00 0.00
Front-end fee IBRD 0.03 0.03 100%
Total Financing Required 13.64 13.56 99%
(b) Financing
Source of Funds Type of
Cofinancing
Appraisal
Estimate
(USD millions)
Actual/Latest
Estimate
(USD millions)
Percentage of
Appraisal
Borrower 2.2 2.2 100%
International Bank for Reconstruction
and Development 12.00 11.96 99.6%
SECO (Component 2 and 3) 1.60 1.6 100%
Total: 15.80 15.76 99.7%
32
Annex 2. Outputs by Component
The following are Key deliverables by Component:
Key deliverables Component 1:
- The country’s post-trading architecture and environment was consolidated making the National
Depository Centre (NDC) the sole CSD for government and corporate securities, providing
clearing and settlement functions to members;
- The central role of the NDC was supported by converting it to the non-for-profit infrastructure
organization serving its members and local issuers. All other registry-keeping licenses in the
country were abolished. The securities numbering and lean registration were transferred to the
NDC’s sole operational control. The NDC was connected to the country’s RTGS (AZIPS) systems
ensuring DVP principles of both government and corporate securities.
- The securities numbering function was transferred to the NDC and its methodology was
harmonized with internationally recognized ISIN standards; the NDC is a member of the
Association of National Numbering Agencies.
- Implementation of the renewed post-trading procedures complying with the international best
practices and newly adopted securities market legislation;
- Drafting extensive, best-practices based TOR for the new electronic trading/post-
trading/surveillance platform comprising.
- Automation of the broking, trading, registry-keeping, central depository, clearing and settlement,
issuing functionalities in the market in strict compliance with the newly adopted securities market
legislation;
Key deliverables Component 2:
- Adoption of adequate legal and regulatory framework including “On the Securities Markets” Law
harmonized with the EU directives and IOSCO principles, adoption of the 29 implementing
regulations, as well as new rule books of the Baku Stock Exchange (as a part of the Component 3)
and National Depository Centre (as a part of the Component 1) fully complying with the country’s
new governing legislation;
- Drafting tax regulation initiatives covering various aspects of the securities market operations.
Key deliverables Component 3:
- Re-organization of the BSE listing tiers and adoption of the new listing requirements;
- BSE trading (subscription, public offer and secondary market) rules and procedures enabling
transparent and competitive price discovery and fully complying with the newly adopted securities
market regulation;
- Conducting Listing Advisory Program (LAP) to local issuers, stimulating new issues at BSE
platforms.
Key deliverables Component 4:
- Conducting of the Nation-wide Education Program, including producing and disseminating printed,
visual and interactive study materials for schools, universities and general public, establishment of
the Financial Laboratory at the Azerbaijan State University of Economics;
- Establishing Capital Markets Training Centre (CMTC);
33
Annex 3. Economic and Financial Analysis
The markets are currently too illiquid to perform an economic analysis to assess the cost savings accruing
to issuers of corporate debt or equities vis-à-vis the alternative of bank financing. By 2013, the twin
shocks of low oil prices and currency devaluations had brought to an end the growth in bank credit
availability that the markets had enjoyed up to that point.
Therefore, as both the securities and banking sector are under severe pressure and uncertainty, it is
impossible to conduct an analysis of relative savings that issuers of securities could realize over the
alternative of bank financing.
34
Annex 4. Bank Lending and Implementation Support/Supervision Processes
(a) Task Team members
Names Title Unit
Alina Nagdimunov Consultant GTCDR
Altantsetseg Shiilegmaa Economist GMF02
Angela Prigozhina Senior Financial Sector Specialist - TTL GFM09
Arben Maho Procurement Specialist GGO03
Deepal Fernando Consultant GGO03
Dulguun Byambatsoo Consultant GGO20
Farid Bakhshiyev Economist ECSF2
Gantuya Paniga Senior Program Assistant EACMF
Ghada Youness Senior Counsel LEGLE
Jianjun Guo Senior Procurement Specialist GGO08
Johanna Jaeger Senior Financial Sector Specialist GFM03
Joseph Huntington La Cascia Senior Procurement Specialist GGO03
Joseph Paul Formoso Senior Finance Officer CTRLA
Ketut Ariadi Kusuma Senior Financial Sector Specialist GFM08
Lars Jessen Lead Debt Specialist GMF13
Michael Edwards Adviser GFMDR
Michael Engelschalk Consultant GGO15
Nasreen Chudry Bhuller Program Assistant GFM03
Robert H. Singletary HQ Consultant ST GFM10
Sabina Vagif Majidova Program Assistant ECCAZ
Sandro Nozadze Procurement Specialist GGO03
Sau Ngan Wong Senior Counsel GFM02
Stephen Francis Pirozzi Senior Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist GFMSO
Tanja Boskovic E T Consultant ECSPF - HIS
Tural Jamalov Senior Financial Management Specialist GGO21
Uzma Khalil Senior Financial Sector Specialist GFM01
Yagut Iltifat Ertenlice Procurement Assistant ECCAZ
Yi Dong Senior Financial Management Specialist GGO20
Zahid Hasnain Senior Public Sector Specialist GGO15
(b) Staff Time and Cost
Stage of Project Cycle
Staff Time and Cost (Bank Budget Only)
No. of staff weeks USD Thousands (including travel
and consultant costs) Le
Lending
FY10 3.10 26,023.63
FY11 27.96 173,689.25
35
Total: 31.06 199,712.88
Supervision/ICR
FY11 7.01 50,653.03
FY12 14.38 136,454.66
FY13 17.34 109,879.30
FY14 11.15 99,207.36
FY15 12.95 77,346.30
FY16 12.26 89,507.74
FY17 6.90 45,272.48
Total: 81.99 608,320.87
Overall Total: 113.05 808,033.75
36
Annex 5. Beneficiary Survey Results
No official survey was administered. However, an ICR mission in Baku20
from October 17-21, 2016
included meetings with the stakeholders listed below.
The main objectives of the mission were to:
a) Conduct meetings with key stakeholders to inform the preparation and completion of the project
ICR.
b) Use the findings of these meetings in concert with information provided during and subsequent to
the June 2016 ISR mission to assess the achievement of project objectives and identify measurable
results for inclusion in the ICR.
c) Identify lessons learned that may improve future capital markets activities and projects.
Name of Organization Name of Representative Title of Representative
1. Financial Market
Supervisory Authority
and Project
Management team
Mr. Ilgar Muradov Deputy Board Director
Mr. Bakhtiyar Azizov Project Manager, Head of Supervisory
Board of National Depository Center
Mr. Fariz Azizov PIU Manager, Chairman of Baku Stock
Exchange
2. Azerbaijan Mortgage
Fund
Mr. Samir Rzayev Head of Treasury
3. Demir Bank Mr. Elshad Ibrahimov Head of Treasury
4. Rabita Bank Mr. Ogtay Gasimov Head of Treasury
5. Pasha Bank Mr. Ivan Ukhlianidza Deputy Head of Investment Banking
Department
Mr. Mansur Mammadov Chief Risk Officer
6. Finex Group Mr. Farid Hamidov Chairman of the Board, Finexkredit
Mr. Vugar Zeynalov
7. European Bank for
Reconstruction and
Development
Ms. Ayten Rustamova Senior Banker
8. AXA MBASK
Insurance
Mr. Selcuk Adiguzel Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Fuad Musa Director of Legal & Finance
20 Mission led by Stephen F. Pirozzi, Senior Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist, GFMSO
37
Annex 6. Stakeholder Workshop Report and Results
A closing event was held in Baku on November 4, 2016. Below are links to local media reports as well as
a WB project impact video. Two sample articles are also included.
WB project impact video:
http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/azerbaijan
Report on the website of the implementation agency
http://en.fimsa.az/articles/58
Media reports (in English and Russian)
http://www.xebersaati.com/85041-wb-project-benefits-azerbaijani-capital-markets.html
http://www.azernews.az/business/104682.html
http://en.trend.az/business/economy/2681183.html
https://report.az/en/finance/azerbaijan-completed-implementation-of-capital-markets-modernization-
project/
http://azertag.az/en/xeber/1007867
http://en.azvision.az/WB-project-benefits-Azerbaijani--51139-xeber.html
https://report.az/ru/finansy/vsemirnyj-bank-azerbajdzhan-effektivno-ispol-zuet-sozdannuyu-dlya-rynkov-
kapitala-infrastrukturu/
Government of Azerbaijan, World Bank conclude implementation of Capital
Markets Modernization Project
04.11.2016 [15:11]
A+ A
–
Baku, November 4, AZERTAC
Azerbaijan’s Financial Markets Supervisory Authority (FIMSA) and World Bank have today hosted a conference to
discuss the results of the Capital Markets Modernization Project (CMMP) supported by the World Bank and
Switzerland’s State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO). The conference was attended by the representatives
of the Government of Azerbaijan, World Bank, international development partners, private business community,
civil society and media. Participants took stock of Azerbaijan’s path in modernizing its capital markets, and
discussed future challenges and actions to deepen financial markets and make capital market an important source of
financing the country’s private sector growth and economic diversification.
38
Rufat Aslanli, Chairman of the Board of Directors of FIMSA, said: “CMMP has provided organizational and
operational support to modernization of Azerbaijan’s capital markets. It has supported implementation of
Azerbaijan’s national program for development of securities market, and made important contribution to creating
state-of-the-art legal and operational infrastructure, and building capacity of the market.”
Rolf Berhnd, World Bank’s Practice Manager for Finance and Markets, said: “Improved access to finance for SMEs
and increased foreign direct investments are crucial for non-oil sector development and modernization in Azerbaijan.
Capital market is one of the key vehicles for domestic and international investment mobilization, but it requires
concerted efforts, holistic reforms and time to do it right.”
“CMMP supported a package of reforms needed to diversify the financial sector and ease the access to alternative
financing tools for Azerbaijani companies operating in the non-oil sectors. We believe that effects of the project will
be transformational and long-lasting,” said Angela Prigozhina, World Bank’s senior financial sector specialist and
the team leader for the project.
CMMP was approved on March 17, 2011 with a $12 million loan from the World Bank, supplemented by SECO
Trust Fund grant of $1.6 million. The Project closed on July 1, 2016. It supported capital market reform program
through four components aimed at enhancement of legal and regulatory framework for capital market, development
of a modern capital market infrastructure for securities trading, clearing, settlement and surveillance, increased
transparency, access and awareness of market participants, issuers and potential investors about capital market
opportunities, and enhanced capacity of the financial regulator to enforce sound market conduct rules and investor
protection practices.
Among notable results of the project are enactment in July of 2015 of the modern Law on Securities and
implementation of new regulatory requirements and normative acts in line with the best international practices,
establishment of Centralized Trading System (CETA) which linked investors, market-players, Baku Stock Exchange
and National Depositary Center in a single trading and post-trading system, and thus, significantly reduced
transaction time and costs. The project also helped streamline listing requirements at the Baku Stock Exchange and
build capacity of 16 local companies under the Listing Advisory Program (LAP) to raise more than half a billion
Manats from the domestic capital market.
AZERTAG.AZ :Government of Azerbaijan, World Bank conclude implementation of Capital Markets
Modernization Project
© Content from this site must be hyperlinked when used.
39
Azerbaijan, WB hail implementation of Capital Markets Modernization
Project
4 November 2016 17:58 (UTC+04:00)
571
By Nigar Abbasova
The development of the capital market, which is considered to be a multi-faceted sector of the economy, is currently
in focus of relevant financial authorities of Azerbaijan.
The results of the Capital Markets Modernization Project (CMMP) supported by the World Bank and Switzerland’s
State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO), was at core of discussions at the conference hosted by Azerbaijan’s
Financial Market Supervisory Body (FMSB) and the World Bank (WB).
The CMMP for Azerbaijan was aimed at the increase of the use of equity and corporate debt as financing or
investment instruments through the adoption of an effective regulatory framework of the capital market.
Head of FMSB Rufat Aslanli addressing the event said that the project has significantly enhanced the potential of
Azerbaijan’s capital market, providing organizational and operational support to modernization of the market.
However, the authority believes that the country needs implementation of additional measures in this direction.
Aslanli mentioned that the main objective is to attract those, who will be interested in the use of the potential of the
market.
SECO Deputy Regional Director for South Caucasus Simone Haeberli, speaking at the event said that the secretariat
is ready to implement new projects of technical assistance to help Azerbaijan solve the most difficult issues existing
in the sphere.
Haeberli said that Azerbaijan and Switzerland have been cooperating effectively for already 25 years, including the
cooperation within the SECO, which covers the microeconomic policy and ensuring financial stability. She
40
underlined that modern and transparent capital markets are now more important for Azerbaijan than at the time
when the SECO started implementation of the project.
Capital market, which stands for the market for buying and selling of equity and debt instruments, is vital to the
functioning of an economy, since capital is a critical component for generating economic output.
World Bank’s Practice Manager for Finance and Markets Rolf Berhnd, in turn, said that one of the main functions
of the WB is improvement of conditions for small and medium-scale entrepreneurs, mentioning that capital markets
are considered to be one of the main tools for reaching the goal. He mentioned that capital market is one of the key
vehicles for domestic and international investment mobilization, which requires concerted efforts, holistic reforms
and time to do it right. Berhnd said that the implementation of the reform of the capital market is quite a difficult
process, underlining that Azerbaijan has managed to succeed in the sphere despite the difficulties. He mentioned
that the reform will allow to create favorable conditions for the attraction of foreign investments.
WB’s senior financial sector specialist Angela Prigozhina said that the project supported a package of reforms
needed to diversify the financial sector and ease the access to alternative financing tools for Azerbaijani companies
operating in the non-oil sectors.
CMMP was approved on March 17, 2011 with a $12 million loan from the World Bank, supplemented by SECO
Trust Fund grant of $1.6 million. The share of Azerbaijani government in the project, which was closed on Luly 1,
2016 amounted to $2.2 million.
Among the most notable results of the project are enactment of the modern Law on Securities and implementation
of new regulatory requirements, which are in line with the best international practices. Moreover, the project
contributed to the establishment of the Centralized Trading System (CETA) which linked investors, market-players,
Baku Stock Exchange and National Depositary Center in a single trading and post-trading system, significantly
reducing transaction time and costs.
41
Annex 7. Summary of Borrower's ICR and/or Comments on Draft ICR
Executive Summary of Borrowers’ ICR (Portions extracted from the Borrower’s ICR)
1. Context of the project initiation phase: Economic reforms which were implemented in the Republic of Azerbaijan during the recent years
determined the economic system functioning on the basis of free market relations. Fundamental
institutions of the market economy, including, legislative framework fixing new economic relations,
public institutions regulating such relations and private entrepreneurs, which are the main subjects of new
economic systems have been formed. During this period price and exchange rate policy had been
liberalized, large scale privatization program implemented and favorable environment for the
entrepreneurial activities in whole, macroeconomic stability and the country’s significant investment
attractiveness had been achieved.
Consequently, during the recent decade before the project the country’s GDP increased approximately 9
times, export more than 15 times, strategic currency reserves 31 times, hundreds of thousands of new jobs
has been created, relative number of poor population reduced by more than 5 times.
During this period, comprehensive reforms were implemented aimed at establishment and institutional
development of effective financial sector, administration, supervision and regulation of this sector was
improved in line with the international standards and consequently competing abilities of banks’ increased
significantly.
For the decade preceding the project initiation the bank assets increased 15 times, deposits of population
36 times and credit investment into economy increased 19,6 times.
Securities market, being an important component of financial system, had permanently been subject to
attention and advanced legal and organizational measures had been undertaken in this area. Initial legal
and regulatory framework and mechanisms, trading, clearing and settlement system, financial intermediary
institutes had been created for the securities market.
For the 5 recent years before the project volume of trading at the organized securities market increased 4,3
times. In whole, the securities market had demonstrated growth higher than general economic growth and
ratio of trading volume of the Baku Stock Exchange to non-oil GDP increased by 41% reaching 12,1%.
Lessons and consequences of resent Global Financial Global of 2007-2008 urged reshaping of regulatory
paradigm in the financial services sector including strengthened capital adequacy norms for financial
services intermediaries, reforms in post-trade/depository infrastructure, etc.
In parallel, development of the non-oil sector of the economy was declared by the government as a main
priority. Achieving new level of quality for the securities market enhances means to regulate economy,
facilitates attraction of financial resources to real sector and cross-sector movements of investment flows
and by putting forth necessary requirements, such as increasing transparency of economic activities
ensures increased effectiveness of the economic system in whole.
Increasing geopolitical instability in the region and commodities prices volatility of the mid-2010s
underpinned the importance and timeliness of the government’s “2011-2020 State Program on Capital
42
Market Development” (endorsed by the Presidential Degree on 16th
May, 2011). The Capital Markets
Modernization Project supported the implementation of the State Program goals for the first 5 years of it.
A primary goal of the State Program on the Development of the Securities Market of the Republic of
Azerbaijan in 2011-2020 is to develop a highly effective securities market, which is modern, complying
with the international standards, providing large capitalization opportunities for the economy and ensuring
reliable risk management.
To achieve this goal, the following tasks were identified:
- Improving securities market regulation mechanism in line with the best international practices,
increasing institutional development level of the securities market and ensuring that it complies
with the international standards ;
- achieving increased capitalization rate in national economy, enhancing use of non-inflational
investment resources attracted through the securities market for the purposes of financing
economic projects;
- creating conditions with protected investment and reliable risk management for the purposes of
effective placements of savings of economic subjects and the public;
- creating relevant conditions necessary for gradual integration of national securities market into
international stock market.
The State Program is comprised of three stages:
- First stage (2011-2014) envisions modernization of securities market infrastructure, improvement
of legal and regulatory base for this purposes, strengthening material-technical base, as well as
creating necessary opportunities for the development of human capacity at the securities market.
- Second stage (2015-2017) provides for full automation and consolidation of transactions at the
securities market and, meanwhile, establishment of framework necessary for introduction of new
tools and services.
- Third stage (2018-2020) envisions increased depth of securities market through the introduction of
new and more complicated types of tools and services and, in parallel, creation of effective system
risks management arrangements. Upon completion of this stage covering the last 3 years of the
State Program the stock market of Azerbaijan will be ready for integration into international
financial markets.
A very important role in the formulation of the capital markets strategic development goals was played by
the FIRST project initiated by the SCS in March 2010. Through the intense cooperation with the SCS and
country’s capital market organizations, by late 2010, FIRST consultants prepared a comprehensive capital
market assessment report. The FIRST initiative also catalyzed the inception of the CMMP project
supported by the World Bank and the SECO.
2. The Project:
According to the agreement with donors assisting in financing the implementation, the project was divided
into 4 parts and included 2 major tenders: on provision of the consultant services and on provision of
goods (the Capital Market Information System).
The agreements defined project parts as follows:
43
Part A: Streamlining and Automating Capital Market Infrastructure;
Part B: Updating and Strengthening the Legal and Regulatory Framework;
Part C: Stimulating Supply;
Part D: Capacity Building.
The total project finances breakdown is as follows:
1. IBRD loan- 12,000,000.00 USD
2. SECO grant – 1, 600,000.00 USD
3. Azerbaijan Government – 2,200,000. USD (for VAT)
Brief information of two major procurements within the project:
The Request of Expression of Interests for provision of the consulting services, namely the assignment
"Creation of General Framework for stimulating supply and capacity building of Capital Markets" was
announced on 11 October, 2011. QCBS was used as the selection method for this procurement. Forty-
six international companies, expressed their interests. The consortium of companies Corporate Solutions
Consulting Ltd, Wiener Borsa, CAPMEX was selected as a winner and the contract was signed on the 15th
of August 2012. The Consulting services contract 95 deliverables and 102 tasks to support the
implementation of the four project parts (components).
The tender for supply and installation of Capital Markets Information Systems was announced on 18 April
2014 within works and goods category. The two stage bidding selection method was used for this
procurement. KOREA EXCHANGE was selected the winner of the tender and on 13 January, 2015 the
contract was signed.
3. Project Development Objective (PDO) Indicators and Intermediate Result Indicators:
The project’s development objective was to increase the use of equity and corporate debt as financing
and/or investment instruments through the adoption of an effective capital markets regulatory framework
and infrastructure. The PDO level results indicators are: (i) increased issuance of corporate bonds; (ii)
increased number of listed companies and (iii) improved price transparency. The Project outcome and
output indicators are measurable
PDO 1. Increased issuance of corporate bonds
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6m
Outstanding amount of
corporate debt 344 907 751 1,340 3,940 4,418 2,619
Non-oil GDP 18,443 24,165 28,474 32,638 35,969 37,670 10,939
Outstanding amount of
corporate debt/Non-oil GDP 1.9% 3.8% 2.6% 4.1% 11.0% 11.7% 23.9%
44
This indicator represents the ratio of outstanding amount of corporate debt to non-oil GDP (the
outstanding amount of corporate debt to 2010 non-oil GDP, 1.9% was taken as a baseline for the indicator).
In 2016 outstanding amount of corporate debt to non-oil GDP increased to 23.9%. The baseline indicator
was 1.9% and the target was 3.8%.
The major factor for increase in indicator was a significant increase of corporate bond issuance including
by organizations like Azerbaijan Mortgage Fund (AMF). From 2011 to 2015 total issuance of AMF bonds
amounted to 256.6 mln AZN. Optimized REPO procedures, introduced incentives for market makers,
awareness programs to treasury managers resulted in total amount of corporate debt issuance from 2011 to
2016 was 2,400 mln AZN. The outstanding amount of corporate debt at the end of the project to baseline
year’s (2010) non-oil GDP is 14.2%, which is still considerably higher than expected target of 3.8%.
PDO 2. Increased number of companies with listed equity
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Prime Market - 1 1 1 1 2 2
Standard Market - - - - - 3 3
In 2016 number of companies with listed equity is 5. The baseline was 2 and the target was 8-10
companies. There was only one listed company during 2010 - 2014 periods. The company was listed in the
first Tier. However, most of the transactions occurred in the Alternative Trading Market (ATM) without
needing to fulfill extensive listing and disclosure requirements. The first listing took place in the first tier
in 2011 which was Demir Bank OJSC with market capitalization of 23.11 million AZN. Due to the low
volatility in the market, this number has not significantly changed during the period from 2011 to 2014. In
2015 four new companies were listed in BSE. 1 – International Bank of Azerbaijan in Prime Market 2 –
Azerkosmos, Turanbank and Aqrolising in Standard market. Overall market capitalization increased to
1,019 million AZN. The Listing Advisory Program and other initiatives worked with tens of local
potential IPO candidates. Global financial crisis consequences, geo-political and regional instability and
volatilities in national currencies in all neighboring countries as well as in commodity prices turned local
issuers to conservative mood, making them consider bond issuances as more applicable capital market
fund raising tool, if any at all.
PDO 3. Improved price transparency
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Price Transparency - 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%
In 2016 overall price transparency indicator was 100%. The target for that period was 90%.
In 2014 the SCS, BSE and NDC took a number of measures to increase transparency and accessibility of
trades to all categories of traders and investors. First, a special regime was adopted at BSE for all cross
transactions at secondary market (cross transactions are transactions conducted by the same broker from
the buying and the selling side). Thus, a crossing transaction cannot be matched (finalized) unless within
next 30 minutes of trade session any other broker bids with better conditions (price) for the buying or the
selling side of the transaction. If the latter happens, the auction starts. If no interest was shown the original
transition was finalized. In 2015 the holding period of cross transactions was prolonged to 60 minutes.
45
Secondly, in 2014 the special regime was introduced by the NDC to let smaller and less financially
advanced brokers to participate instantly in cross transaction. The NDC eliminated funds pre-validation
regime for all categories of brokers and let them deliver funds after the transaction matched. The funds
provision is ensured by liquid assets pledged or bank guaranty mechanisms. Elimination of funds pre-
validation allows brokers and all categories of investors to promptly react on bid quotes in the trading
system. All transactions that appear on BSE trading system are a non-block transaction which means that
all of the transactions are counted as being competitive transactions. Thus all transactions in BSE trading
system are transparent and competitive.
Intermediate Results:
Intermediate Result One (Component One): Streamlining and Automating Market Infrastructure:
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Ratio of market
participants
electronically linked to
market infrastructure
(trading, clearing and
settlements)
0% 0%
100%
0%
100%
75%
100%
90%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Despite the project planning phase expectations of gradual grow of number of market participants
electronically connected to trading and post-trading operations at BSE, NDC and other involved entities,
the transformation was instant due to the decision of BSE and NDC to conduct all the necessary changes at
once and at their own expense. Thus, in 2011 BSE and NDC agreed the electronic protocol of data
exchange, developed the connection facilities and handed over them to all brokers. Later, in 2016 the
achievement was reinforced by implementation of the Korean technologies, through which, inter alia, the
surveillance, market watch and DVP processes were also processed and automated.
Intermediate Result Two (Component Two): Updating and Strengthening the Legal and Regulatory
Framework
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Enactment of a new
Capital Market Act No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
After inter-ministerial, parliamentary and Presidential Administration discussions, the “On Securities
Markets” Law was enacted in July 2015.
Intermediate Result indicator Three (Component Two): Promulgation of capital markets regulation
required upon enactment of Law
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Promulgation of capital
markets regulation
required upon
enactment of Law
No No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
46
All implementing regulations required by the enactment of the “On Securities Markets” Law were adopted
by end of the 2015.
Intermediate Result indicator Four (Component Three): Number of companies involved in the
listing advisory program (debt and equity)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Number of companies
involved in the listing
advisory program (debt
and equity)
0
5
0
10
0
15
1
15
4
15
16
15
16
The Listing Advisory program came into being after extensive negotiations with potential service
providers (brokers, auditors, lawyers and others) on 16th of April 2014.
Since its establishment LAP partners arranged numbers of company meetings and organized several group
seminars for companies that might be interested in listing. The aim of those seminars was to educate
companies and its management about the capital markets opportunities and help them to take advantage of
this market. Key events were:
On the 17th
of October 2014 the BSE staged a workshop for companies who had potential to do initial
public offers (IPOs) or otherwise to issue and list equity or debt securities. This workshop was led by BSE
team and invited guest expert Dr. Albrecht Buerger. There was an inspiring and “lessons learned”
presentation from the first company joined LAP, Embawood Furniture Production, about their successful
listing, through which they issued AZN10 millions of corporate bonds. A guest speaker from Borsa
İstanbul gave a presentation on the similar experience, corporate governance practices in Turkey,
challenges that Turkish SME issuers are facing.
On the 22nd
of May 2015 together with PWC Azerbaijan, BSE organized a workshop on the topic of
“Raising Public Equity and Debt Capital”. Over 70 representatives of 40 companies attended. The
workshop was led by Mr. Rustem Teregulov, Partner and Capital Markets Leader, PwC CIS and CEE.
Issues of major Azerbaijani companies were case studied in detail.
Since its establishment and till the end of the Project period, the LAP signed consortium contracts with 16
organizations, out of which 12 listed their instruments at Prime and Standard tier of BSE listing.
Alternative tier companies are decided not to be taken into account for the purposes of this indicator as
ATM tier companies are either offered to or traded by limited number of investors or have lower listing
entrance requirements.
Intermediate Result indicator Five (Component Four): Increased of the threshold pass rate of the
Financial Certification examination for market participants
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Increased of the
threshold pass rate of 50%
50%
55%
60%
65%
75%
75%
47
the Financial
Certification
examination for market
participants
50% 50% 75% 75% 75% 75%
Financial Certification examinations were conducted by the SCS and lately by the FSMA. In 2013 the
methodology of the examination was completely revised based on the Consultant’s recommendations.
Since 2014 the CMTC provides preparation courses for the examinations. The threshold pass rate for the
Financial Certification has been 75% for the last 4 reporting periods.
Intermediate Result indicator Six (Component Four): Consumer Awareness of Capital Market
Instruments
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Consumer Awareness
of Capital Market
Instruments
24%
28
N/A
33
32
37
36
41
56
45
59.11
45
59.38
Consumer Awareness of Capital Market instruments was the most important indication that the SCS was
focusing on. Initiatives like establishing CMTC, launching LAP, Nation-wide Education Program
initiative, cooperation with universities, youth organizations and journalists, conducting local and
international conferences and workshops (detailed in above chapters) contributed to the increasing rates of
financial literacy and consumer awareness. Moreover, the CMMP coincided with analogous initiatives of
other financial institutions and governmental bodies, with whom the SCS cooperated closely in this regard
(CBAR, MoF, etc). The indication surveys were conducted by the external independent specialized
companies.
4. Amendments and extensions to the original project work plan.
There were 3 occasions when the Project’s work plan was amended to comply with its main direction and
goals: at the inception (October 2012), in the midst of the project span (October 2014) and at the end of
the original project period (extension negotiations, October 2015- February 2016). All amendments were
pre-approved by the World Bank and consequently confirmed by official amendments to the consulting
services contract (the provision of goods contract remained unchanged for the whole period from Jan 2015
to Feb 2016).
4.1. Inception period amendments:
In the initial meetings in October 2012 with the project team, the Consultant and the World Bank, the SCS’
Chairman raised the issue of importance of increasing listing on BSE as a priority of the initial phase to be
supported by CMMP. The SCS had been considering the creation of a Listing Advisory Program (LAP) to
attract issuers to listing with resources to be allocated from BSE, SCS and other market participants and
professionals to actively promote Capital Market, provide training and provide preliminary listing
advisory services. The Consultant was requested to take the lead in defining the program and provide
technical and managerial support with its delivery. Supporting the LAP necessitated changes to the
activities under Component 3 namely 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.3, 3.3.1 and 3.3.2. (See table 2.1.1 above).
48
Moreover, other changes were also agreed in the inception phase.
Activities 2.3.1: “Review and analyze the risks and opportunities” and 2.3.2: “Recommendations on the
optimal participation of the banks and requirements” were considered no longer required as the Central
Bank had decided that commercial banks would only participate in Capital Market through their
subsidiaries and not directly. Resources of these two tasks were agreed to utilize to support BSE to
develop their rules and regulations to adapt new technological and legislative environment after launching
the Capital Markets Information system and enactment of the new “On Securities Market Law”
accordingly.
Activities 3.2.4 and 3.3.2 were similarly re-focused to concentrate on LAP activities, supporting seminars
to be provided by the LAP etc.
Activity 3.4.2: “Develop and publish educational material on Corporate Governance” was considered no
longer valid as the IFC had initiated, prepared and published extensive material on Corporate Governance
for local issuers. The Consultant was asked to assist BSE and prepare a study material on opportunities of
IPO for local issuers.
All changes were endorsed by the World Bank and then confirmed in the Amendment to the contract with
the Consultant (in October 2014).
4.2. Mid-period amendments:
In mid-2014 the SCS initiated another round of negotiations with the World Bank and the Consultant on
updating and amending the tasks and activities in the deliverables to comply with the recent developments
at the capital markets.
The role of the NDC as an asset manager of commercial investment funds were was reconsidered based on
the experts recommendation in order to prevent the State owned NDC’s monopolization of the segment.
Thus, it was asked to re-direct the Activity 1.3.8 from NDC to providing recommendations on potential
private fund administration entities.
Activities 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 were renamed and reshaped in order to comply fully with the task of preparing
the implementing regulations that would support the new “On Securities Market Law” draft.
Activity 2.3.3 was reconsidered to concentrate more specifically on role of banks in newly proposed
settlement model for the securities market of the country.
In light of the local real estate market dynamics, Activities3.5.4 and 3.5.5 were re-organized to focus on
bringing international expertise of organizing foreign securities trade (MTF) to BSE.
Activities 4.6.4 and 4.6.5 supporting the CMTC were completed by the SCS itself before the
commencement date of the Consultant assignment. So, the Consultant was asked to prepare self-study
materials on various topics of the capital market operations.
All changes were endorsed by the World Bank and then confirmed in the Amendment to the contract with
the Consultant (in October 2014).
4.3. Extension of the Project period:
49
In light of the complexity and significance of CMIS procurement tender as well as multiplicity of terms
and conditions to be assessed, in the first quarter of 2015 the SCS and the World Bank started negotiating
the possibility of the Project Period extension. Indeed, the procurement of the CMIS took longer time than
initially anticipated. The project closing date extension topic was eventually triggered by the need to
complete installation of CMIS in 12 months period after its inception, whereas all pre-requisite technical
agreements and future contract negotiation were completed by mid-February 2015. The implementation of
the information system could be finalized at least within 12 months, meaning a two-month slippage from
the project’s original end-date (31 Dec 2015). In turn, the assessment of the development and
implementation results of the CMIS was possible only after its go-live and required the consultants at least
one month after its launching to be able to comprehensively assess all aspects of the implementation.
At the same time, the SCS requested to consider two additional tasks for CMTC strategic development and
sustainability. In consultation with the World Bank it was decided to sign new agreement with the same
Consultant for additional services. The SCS asked the World Bank’s no-objection for SSS method and the
Bank provided SCS with NOL on February 1, 2016 and new agreement with Corporate Solutions
Consulting Ltd was signed on the same date. At the same time the existing agreement was extended to
conduct the deliverable no 1.4.5 on assessing the CMIS implementation results.
The Borrower, Ministry of Finance (MOF) of Azerbaijan, requested extension of the project for additional
6 months to have enough time for CMIS installation and handover and accommodating services. The Bank
provided its approval of Project Closing Date extension till July 01, 2016.
50
Annex 8. Comments of Cofinanciers and Other Partners/Stakeholders
None Available
Annex 9. List of Supporting Documents
World Bank Group (WBG), Country Partnership Strategy FY07-10 for Republic of Azerbaijan. November
8, 2006.
WBG. Country Partnership Strategy FY11-14 for Azerbaijan. September 15, 2010.
WBG. Country Partnership Strategy Progress Report for the Period FY2-11-FY2014 for Azerbaijan.
April 30, 2013.
Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) of the WBG. Completion and Learning Review CPS Period: FY11 –
FY14. June 30, 2015.
WBG. Project Information Document (PID) Concept Stage: Capital Markets Modernization Project.
November 30, 2010.
WBG. Project Appraisal Document on a Proposed Loan in the Amount of $12 Million Equivalent to the
Republic of Azerbaijan for the Capital Markets Modernization Program (CMMP). February 10, 2011.
WBG. Implementation Status and Results Reports: Capital Markets Modernization Project (P120321).
Sequence 1-10
WBG. Aide Memoires for Capital Markets Modernization Project (P120321). Dated June 2011; June
2012; March 2013; February, September 2014; February, October 2015.
WBG. Loan Agreement (Capital Markets Modernization Project) between the Republic of Azerbaijan and
the International bank for Reconstruction and Development. September 22, 2011.
WBG. Restructuring Paper on a Proposed Project Restructuring of Capital Markets Modernization
Project Loan IBRD-80240. Board Approval: April 29, 2015.
WBG. Azerbaijan Systemic Country Diagnostic. June 3, 2015
WBG-IMF. Financial Sector Assessment Azerbaijan. November 2015.
The Economist Intelligence Unit, Country Risk Service. Azerbaijan. London, UK. August 2016.
State Committee for Securities (SCS) PIU. Project Operations Manual, Capital Markets Modernization
Project. December 24, 2012
WBG. Azerbaijan Partnership Program Snapshot. April 2015.
51
WBG. Doing Business 2008. September 26, 2007.
Doing Business 2009. September 10, 2008.
Doing Business 2010: Reforming through difficult times. September 9, 2009.
Doing Business 2011: Making a difference for entrepreneurs. November 4, 2010.
52
Annex 10. Borrower’s ICR
COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT
ON A LOAN
IN THE AMOUNT OF US$12 MILLION
TO
THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN
FOR THE
CAPITAL MARKETS MODERNIZATION
PROJECT
OCTOBER, 2016
53
ABBREVIATIONS AND
ACRONYMS
ABS Asset Backed Securities MoF Ministry of Finance ADB Asian Development Bank MoT Ministry of Taxes
AZN Azerbaijan New Manat NCB National Competitive Bidding
BSE Baku Stock Exchange NDC National Depository Center
CAS Country Assistance Strategy ORAF
Operational Risk
Assessment
CMMP Capital Markets Modernization Project Framework
CPS Country Partnership Strategy PAD Project Appraisal Document
EBRD
European Bank for
Reconstruction and PID
Project Information
Document
Development PIU
Project
Implementation Unit
ECA Europe and Central Asia POM Project Operation Manual
EU European Union PQ Prequalification
FIRST Financial Sector Reform and Strengthening PPP
Public-Private Partnerships
Initiative RVP
Regional Vice
President
FSMA
Financial Markets Supervision
Authority of SBD Standard Bidding Documents
the Republic of Azerbaijan SCS State Committee for Securities
GDP Gross Domestic Product SECO Swiss State Secretariat for
IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Economic Affairs
Development USAID United States Agency for
ICR Implementation Completion and Results
International Development
Report WBT World Bank Treasury
IC SSS Individual Consultant Single Source
Selection
IDA International Development Association
IFC International Finance Corporation
ISDS Integrated Safeguard Data Sheet
LAP Listing Advisory Program
54
5. Context of the project initiation phase:
Economic reforms which were implemented in the Republic of Azerbaijan during the recent years
determined the economic system functioning on the basis of free market relations. Fundamental
institutions of the market economy, including, legislative framework fixing new economic relations,
public institutions regulating such relations and private entrepreneurs, which are the main subjects of new
economic systems have been formed. During this period price and exchange rate policy had been
liberalized, large scale privatization program implemented and favorable environment for the
entrepreneurial activities in whole, macroeconomic stability and the country’s significant investment
attractiveness had been achieved.
Consequently, during the recent decade before the project the country’s GDP increased approximately 9
times, export more than 15 times, strategic currency reserves 31 times, hundreds of thousands of new jobs
has been created, relative number of poor population reduced by more than 5 times.
During this period, comprehensive reforms were implemented aimed at establishment and institutional
development of effective financial sector, administration, supervision and regulation of this sector was
improved in line with the international standards and consequently competing abilities of banks’ increased
significantly.
For the decade preceding the project initiation the bank assets increased 15 times, deposits of population
36 times and credit investment into economy increased 19,6 times.
Securities market, being an important component of financial system, had permanently been subject to
attention and advanced legal and organizational measures had been undertaken in this area. Initial legal
and regulatory framework and mechanisms, trading, clearing and settlement system, financial intermediary
institutes had been created for the securities market.
For the 5 recent years before the project volume of trading at the organized securities market increased 4,3
times. In whole, the securities market had demonstrated growth higher than general economic growth and
ratio of trading volume of the Baku Stock Exchange to non-oil GDP increased by 41% reaching 12,1%.
Lessons and consequences of resent Global Financial Global of 2007-2008 urged reshaping of regulatory
paradigm in the financial services sector including strengthened capital adequacy norms for financial
services intermediaries, reforms in post-trade/depository infrastructure, etc.
In parallel, development of the non-oil sector of the economy was declared by the government as a main
priority. Achieving new level of quality for the securities market enhances means to regulate economy,
facilitates attraction of financial resources to real sector and cross-sector movements of investment flows
and by putting forth necessary requirements, such as increasing transparency of economic activities
ensures increased effectiveness of the economic system in whole.
Increasing geopolitical instability in the region and commodities prices volatility of the mid-2010s
underpinned the importance and timeliness of the government’s “2011-2020 State Program on Capital
Market Development” (endorsed by the Presidential Degree on 16th
May, 2011). The Capital Markets
Modernization Project supported the implementation of the State Program goals for the first 5 years of it.
55
A primary goal of the State Program on the Development of the Securities Market of the Republic of
Azerbaijan in 2011-2020 is to develop a highly effective securities market, which is modern, complying
with the international standards, providing large capitalization opportunities for the economy and ensuring
reliable risk management.
To achieve this goal, the following tasks were identified:
- Improving securities market regulation mechanism in line with the best international practices,
increasing institutional development level of the securities market and ensuring that it complies
with the international standards ;
- achieving increased capitalization rate in national economy, enhancing use of non-inflational
investment resources attracted through the securities market for the purposes of financing
economic projects;
- creating conditions with protected investment and reliable risk management for the purposes of
effective placements of savings of economic subjects and the public;
- creating relevant conditions necessary for gradual integration of national securities market into
international stock market.
The State Program is comprised of three stages:
- First stage (2011-2014) envisions modernization of securities market infrastructure, improvement
of legal and regulatory base for this purposes, strengthening material-technical base, as well as
creating necessary opportunities for the development of human capacity at the securities market.
- Second stage (2015-2017) provides for full automation and consolidation of transactions at the
securities market and, meanwhile, establishment of framework necessary for introduction of new
tools and services.
- Third stage (2018-2020) envisions increased depth of securities market through the introduction of
new and more complicated types of tools and services and, in parallel, creation of effective system
risks management arrangements. Upon completion of this stage covering the last 3 years of the
State Program the stock market of Azerbaijan will be ready for integration into international
financial markets.
A very important role in the formulation of the capital markets strategic development goals was played by
the FIRST project initiated by the SCS in March 2010. Through the intense cooperation with the SCS and
country’s capital market organizations, by late 2010, FIRST consultants prepared a comprehensive capital
market assessment report. The FIRST initiative also catalyzed the inception of the CMMP project
supported by the World Bank and the SECO.
6. The Project:
According to the agreement with donors assisting in financing the implementation, the project was divided
into 4 parts and included 2 major tenders: on provision of the consultant services and on provision of
goods (the Capital Market Information System).
The agreements defined project parts as follows:
Part A: Streamlining and Automating Capital Market Infrastructure;
56
Part B: Updating and Strengthening the Legal and Regulatory Framework;
Part C: Stimulating Supply;
Part D: Capacity Building.
The total project finances breakdown is as follows:
4. IBRD loan- 12,000,000.00 USD
5. SECO grant – 1, 600,000.00 USD
6. Azerbaijan Government – 2,200,000. USD (for VAT)
Brief information of two major procurements within the project:
The Request of Expression of Interests for provision of the consulting services, namely the assignment
"Creation of General Framework for stimulating supply and capacity building of Capital Markets" was
announced on 11 October, 2011. QCBS was used as the selection method for this procurement. Forty-
six international companies, expressed their interests. The consortium of companies Corporate Solutions
Consulting Ltd, Wiener Borsa, CAPMEX was selected as a winner and the contract was signed on the 15th
of August 2012. The Consulting services contract 95 deliverables and 102 tasks to support the
implementation of the four project parts (components).
The tender for supply and installation of Capital Markets Information Systems was announced on 18
April 2014 within works and goods category. The two stage bidding selection method was used for this
procurement. KOREA EXCHANGE was selected the winner of the tender and on 13 January, 2015 the
contract was signed.
57
2.1. List of the Consultancy services contract deliverables:
Task name No Deliverables Del
No.
Date
Approved Comment
Formation of Policy Steering
Committee 1.1.1
Draft description of the Steering
Committee and establishment of Steering
Committee
1 30/01/13
Formation of MAGs 1.1.2 Draft description of the MAGs and
establishment of MAGs 2 30/01/13
Arranging MAG(s) and
Policy Steering Committee 1.1.3 Minutes for each of the meeting 3 24/11/14
Diagnostic study on
clearance and settlement and
depository functions
1.2.1
Financial and operational diagnostic
report for consolidating the clearance and
settlement and depository functions
4 15/05/13
Road map for consolidating
functions 1.2.2.
Road map for consolidating the clearance
and settlement and depository functions 5 24/06/13
Present the consolidation
plan to industry. 1.2.3
Organization and delivering of workshop
on the presentation of the plan to the
industry with support of SCS
6 15/08/14
Rules and procedures for
clearance and settlement
systems
1.2.4
Draft rules and procedures for
administering clearance and settlement
systems at CSD
7 24/11/2014
Settlement default guarantee
fund procedures and
procedures for use of
guarantee fund for CSD
1.2.5 Draft Settlement default procedures at
CSD 8 23/02/15
Review of ISIN codification
system, its implementation
and functionality.
1.2.6 Review of already-existing ISIN
Implementation 9 24/06/13
58
Prepare new rules and
procedures for CSD on its
participants‘ structure that
allows custodians and
investment firms to access
CSD
1.3.1
Prepare new rules and procedures for
CSD
10 23/02/15
Draft internal procedures on
registry keeping services 1.3.2 Draft procedures on registry keeping 11 15/08/14
Draft procedures for
dematerialized securities 1.3.3
Draft procedures on conversion of
certificated securities into dematerialized
securities
12 03/04/14
Recommendations on the
transfer of functions on
registration of securities liens
from SCS to CSD, including
business procedures
1.3.4
Recommendations report on the proposed
approaches for the transfer of lien
registration from SCS to CSD
13 24/11/14
Draft procedures for CSD in
managing information
security
1.3.5 Draft procedures ensuring the security of
accounts 14 23/02/15
Draft risk-management and
internal technical-audit
procedures for the new CSD
1.3.6
Risk management and internal technical
audit procedures for CSD (name is
different in the work plan)
15 23/02/15
The CSD’s ability to provide
services 1.3.7
Feasibility report on the CSD’s ability to
provide the services mentioned under
activity 1.37
16 24/11/14
Review the CSD’s ability to
act as share registry for
investment funds
1.3.8 Feasibility report on the CSD’s ability to
provide services mentioned under activity 17 28/04/15
This deliverable was
changed to “Report on how
Investment Funds Asset
Managers can provide fund
administration services for
investments funds” by the
Amendment No 1, dd 15 Oct
59
2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
Provide capacity building to
newly formed CSD 1.3.9
Completion of around 10 training
sessions on the operations of the newly
formed CSD through CMTC.
18 08/10/15
IT system needs of the
consolidated capital market
infrastructure
1.4.1
Report on the assessment of the IT
system requirements for the consolidated
capital market infrastructure
19 24/06/13
Develop functionality for the
required IT systems 1.4.2
Presentation of the parameters for the
required IT systems’ functionality on the
main infrastructure components: trading,
depository, registry, clearance-settlement
and surveillance.
20 24/06/13
Draft the technical
specifications for IT system
and bidding documents
1.4.3
ToR for acquiring the integrated IT
systems for the consolidated capital
market infrastructure.
21 24/10/13
Assist PIU with selecting the
appropriate system(s) and
consult SCS for selection of
appropriate system(s
1.4.4
Provide assessment report for each of the
proposed IT systems during the IT
procurement
22 23/02/15
Oversee the system
installation and testing 1.4.5
Assessment report on the testing results
of the selected and installed systems prior
the ownership transfer.
23 May 2016
The deadline for this
deliverable was changed due
to prolongation of the project
life span till 1 July 2016. The
change was confirmed by
parties in additional contract
signed with the Consultant
on 1 February 2016
Analyze the market risk for
revised settlement
procedures.
1.5.1 Risk assessment report of revised
settlement procedures 24 24/11/14
Review of various options for 1.5.2 Recommendations report on clearance- 25 15/08/14
60
clearance and settlement
procedures
settlement procedures
Identify the extent of a
required settlement guarantee
fund, including sources of
funding, such as transaction-
based fees, letters of credit
and/or insurance
1.5.3 Identify the extent of a required
settlement guarantee fund 26 23/02/15
Roadmap for reforming the
current pre-pay / pre-deliver
system
1.5.4
Road map containing recommendations
for reforming current pre-pay / pre-
deliver system into a system based on
payment and delivery post-trade,
implemented together with risk-reducing
mechanisms.
27 24/10/13
Devise the required rules to
implement the roadmap and
revise business processes and
procedures
1.5.5
Draft rules to implement the roadmap,
including revised business procedures
(Rule Book)
28 08/10/15
Recommendations on the
CCP capacity of the CSD 1.5.6
Assessment report on the CCP capacity of
the newly established CSD 29 24/10/13
Review the fee schedules and
incentives for trade 1.6.1
Recommendations report including
proposed fee structure on eliminating
financial incentives for pre-arranged
trades
30 24/06/13
Definition and use of
“address sales” and provide
recommendations
1.6.2 Draft revised legislation to cover the gaps
indicated under activity 1.6.2. 31 24/06/13
Recommendations for
integrating C&S of limited
off-market transaction
1.6.3
Feasibility report on integrating clearance
and settlement operations of the limited
off-market transactions.
32 15/08/14
Review the definition and use
of non-trade transfers 1.6.4
Draft revised legislation to cover gaps in
negotiated trade transfer. 33 24/06/13
61
Recommendations on
approaches to order
placement and trading rules
for thinly-traded securities
that will promote depth and
better price discovery
1.6.5
Recommendations report on the
placement and trading rules for thinly –
traded securities
34 24/11/2014
Support SCS and review laws
and regulation 2.1.1
Recommendations and international
expertise (cases) during the discussions of
the Draft Law, as required.
35 30/01/13
Revisions to the legislation
and international standards 2.1.2
The list of the laws and regulations
requiring amendment including the scope
of the amendments to ensure the
maximum compliance with IOSCO
principles.
36 30/01/13
Inventory of implementing
regulations supporting Law
on Securities
2.2.1
The list of the new implementing
regulations and revisions to the existing
legislation under the new law.
37 30/01/13
Draft/comments on the
required new implementing
regulations
2.2.2 Draft and deliver 16 high-priority
implementing regulations 38 24/10/13
This deliverable was
changed to “Draft and
deliver high-priority
implementing regulations”
by the Amendment No 1, dd
15 Oct 2014, to the lump
sum contract with the
Consultant.
Revisions to existing
regulations to conform to
new Law
2.2.3 Draft and deliver remaining
implementing regulations 39 15/08/14
This deliverable was
changed to “Completion of
remaining implementing
regulations” by the
Amendment No 1, dd 15 Oct
2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
62
Review, analyze the risks and
opportunities 2.3.1
Review/ development of agreed rules for
BSE 40 28/04/15
This deliverable was
changed to
“Review/development of
agreed rules for BSE” by the
Amendment No 1, dd 15 Oct
2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
Additional regulation for
BSE 2.3.2
Additional regulation for BSE to ensure
compliance with new Securities Market
Law
41 07/10/15
This deliverable was
changed to “Additional rules
for BSE to ensure
compliance with new
Securities Market Law” by
the Amendment No 1, dd 15
Oct 2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
Recommendations and
Guidelines related to the role
that banks will play in the
new settlement model
2.3.3
Recommendations and Guidelines related
to the role that banks will play in the new
settlement model imposed by the new
draft legislation
42 24/11/14
This deliverable was
changed to “Report on
Recommendations and
Guidelines related to the role
that banks will play in the
new settlement model
imposed by the new draft
legislation ” by the
Amendment No 1, dd 15 Oct
2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
Adopt accounting and tax
treatment for shares sold
above nominal value
2.4.1
Recommendations report on the proper
accounting and tax treatment for shares
sold above nominal value
43 03/04/14
Implement “tax
transparency” of investment
funds
2.4.2
Recommendations report on the “tax
transparency” implementation of
investment funds
44 03/04/14
Reinstate the tax waiver on 2.4.3 Recommendations report on the tax 45 15/08/14
63
dividend and interest income
from bonds
waiver on dividend and interest income
from bonds
Provide tax incentives for
companies to list their
securities on the BSE
2.4.4
Recommendations report on the tax
incentives for companies to list their
securities on the BSE
46 03/04/14
Analyze pooled investment
by insurance companies 2.5.1
Report on feasibility of pooled
investment by insurance companies 47 15/08/14
Drafting the regulations on
capital adequacy of the
market participants.
2.6.1 Draft the regulations on capital adequacy
of the market participants. 48 03/04/14
Drafting regulations on risk
management & requirements
of the market
2.6.2
Draft regulations on risk management
systems and prudential requirements of
the market participants.
49 24/10/13
Drafting regulations on
reporting procedures of the
market participants
2.6.3
Drafting regulations on the prudential
reporting procedures of the market
participants
50 24/10/13
Assessment report on the
modality of attracting local
and foreign issuers to the
listing
3.1.1
Assessment report on the modality of
attracting local and foreign issuers to the
listing
51 10/04/13
This deliverable was
changed to “Listing
Advisory Programme (LAP)
Report” by the Amendment
No 1, dd 15 Oct 2014, to the
lump sum contract with the
Consultant.
1st LAP Progress Report 3.1.2
Strategy for BSE for providing fund
raising platform for Azerbaijani
companies
52 03/04/14
This deliverable was
changed to Strategy for BSE
for providing fund raising
platform for Azerbaijani
companies, to be included in
the 1st LAP Progress
Report” by the Amendment
No 1, dd 15 Oct 2014, to the
lump sum contract with the
64
Consultant.
Expanding distribution
channels for government
securities.
3.2.2 Expanding distribution channels for
government securities 53 23/02/15
Recommendations Related to
Investment Companies and
Securities Market
Participants Bankruptcy
3.2.3
Report on the feasibility of the market-
makers and draft regulations governing
them
54 08/10/15
This deliverable was
changed to “Report on
bankruptcy of investment
funds and securities market
participants” by the
Amendment No 1, dd 15 Oct
2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
Recommendations covering
the issues under activity
3.2.4. as required
3.2.4 Recommendations covering the issues
under activity 3.2.4. as required 55 08/10/15
This deliverable was
changed to “Organization of
at least 4 workshops and
LAP launch event” by the
Amendment No 1, dd 15 Oct
2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
Provide recommendations for
developing the corporate
bond market
3.3.1 Recommendations report for developing
the corporate bond market 56 28/04/15
This deliverable was
changed to
“Recommendations report
for developing the corporate
bond market, to be included
in a report on initial
screening of at least 4
companies” by the
Amendment No 1, dd 15 Oct
2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
Support LAP Activities – 2nd
LAP Progress Report 3.3.2
List of best Azerbaijani corporate
candidates for corporate debt offering 57 07/08/15
This deliverable was
changed to “List of best
Azerbaijani Corporate
65
candidates for corporate debt
offering to be included in 2 nd
LAP Progress report” by
the Amendment No 1, dd 15
Oct 2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
Develop Presentation
Materials for LAP Team and
Coordinate with Agencies
3.4.1
Published educational materials
describing the role of the capital markets
and opportunities for corporate issuers
58 15/08/14
Develop and publish
educational materials on IPO 3.4.2
Published educational materials
describing the benefits of good corporate
governance and profitability
59 23/02/15
This deliverable was
changed to “Published
educational materials on
IPO” by the Amendment No
1, dd 15 Oct 2014, to the
lump sum contract with the
Consultant.
Create a cadre of instructors
capable of leading corporate
education events - At least 3
training sessions for trainers
leading the corporate
education events
3.4.3 At least 3 training sessions for trainers
leading the corporate education events 60 24/11/14
Develop educational
materials for investors
describing investment funds
3.5.2 Published educational materials for
investors describing the investment funds 62 28/04/15
Recommendations on
creating and enabling ETFs 3.5.3
Recommendations report on creating and
enabling ETF 63 15/08/14
This deliverable was
changed to
“Recommendations report
on enabling and creating
ETFs and developing the
needed regulations and
published educational
materials concerning ETFs”
66
by the Amendment No 1, dd
15 Oct 2014, to the lump
sum contract with the
Consultant.
Feasibility study for
implementing a market
(MTF) for foreign stocks
traded on the BSE
3.5.4 Recommendations report on enabling and
creating REITs and their regulations 64 15/08/14
This deliverable was
changed to “Feasibility study
for implementing a market
(MTF) for foreign stocks
traded on the BSE” by the
Amendment No 1, dd 15 Oct
2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
Concept guidelines for local
sponsors for trading in
foreign stocks (MTF) on the
BSE
3.5.5 Published educational materials on ETF
and REITs, as requested 65 15/08/14
This deliverable was
changed to “Concept
guidelines for local sponsors
for trading in foreign stocks
(MTF) on the BSE ” by the
Amendment No 1, dd 15 Oct
2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
Recommendation/
educational materials/manual
for ABS sponsors
3.5.6 Recommendations on introduction of
Assets Backed Securities 66 23/02/15
Recommendations on how
capital markets can support
projects
3.6.1 Recommendations report on the project
financing through securities market 67 28/04/15
Recommendations on how
capital markets can support
state companies
3.6.2 Recommendations on how Capital
Market can support state companies 68 23/02/15
Recommendations on how
capital markets can support
privatization
3.6.3 Recommendations on how capital
markets can support privatization 69 23/02/15
67
Review current government
support to private sector
development
3.7.1
Recommendations report on development
of instruments to support government
funding for the private sector
71 24/11/14
Conduct a training needs
assessment for all levels of
SCS staff
4.1.1 Training needs assessment report 71 30/01/13
Devise and provide a training
program 4.1.2
Curricula for all subject matter categories
of staff and all levels 72 03/04/14
Conduct in-house training for
SCS staff 4.1.3 Around 30 training sessions for SCS staff 73 07/08/15
Conduct a train-the-trainer
program for the training
sessions
4.1.4 Conduct around 10 train-the-trainers
programs 74 28/04/15
Identify external training
opportunities for SCS staff 4.1.5 Identified external training opportunities 75 27/05/13
Devise and provide a
knowledge management
system
4.1.6 Establish information portal and
searchable database within SCS intranet 76 24/10/13
Review the SCS’s internal
systems, policies, structures
and procedures
4.2.1
Recommendations report with proposed
time based road map for SCS ‘ s internal
systems , structures and procedures
realignment
77 28/04/15
Review the SCS’ current
procedures and practices of
decision-making
4.2.2 Recommendations report on SCS’s
current procedures and decision making 78 15/08/14
Review the SCS’ current
market surveillance policies
and systems
4.3.1
Recommendations report on SCS’s
interim market surveillance policies and
procedures
79 28/04/15
Review the SCS’ market
enforcement capacity and
revisions to enforcement
4.3.3 Recommendations report on SCS
enforcement capacity and revisions to 81 07/08/15
68
procedures enforcement procedures
Review the current systems
used for reporting by market
participants
4.3.4
Recommendations report on
improvement of the current systems of
reporting by market participants
82 07/08/15
Automation of the disclosure
of public information and
reports to the regulator
4.3.5
Report on module descriptions,
parameters for the automated disclosure
of public information and reports to the
regulator.
83 24/10/13
Promote the Azeri market to
International Investors 4.4.1
Conducting 2 regional conferences every
year and 2 international conferences
overall.
84 30/01/13
Two international
conferences have been
supported technically and
financially. Financial support
for regional conferences has
been provided.
Assist SCS in conducting
annual financial surveys 4.5.2
Financial support for annual financial
literacy surveys 85 03/04/14
Prepare a communications
plan for SCS 4.5.4 Communication plan for SCS 87 24/10/13
Recommendation/
educational materials/manual
for ABS sponsors
4.5.5 Review and update the SCS’s website 88 23/02/15
Assessment training
programs propose a model
for the training center
4.6.1
Assessment report of the current situation
and presentation of the proposed model
for the training center
89 18/3/13
Strategic business plan for
establishing training center 4.6.2 Business plan for the training center 90 24/10/13
Conduct needs assessment
and identify demand for
training programs
4.6.3
Recommendations report on the training
programs (such as certification programs,
regulatory trainings, trading trainings,
mini-MBA with concentration in finance,
etc.)
91 03/05/13
69
Developing a self-study kit
on securities trading (capital
market )
4.6.4
Around 3-4 training programs and
curricula for more general public based
on the agreement with SCS on the
recommendations for the task 4.6.3. At
each training session approximate number
of participants will be around 10 to 15
92 July 2015
This deliverable was
changed to “Developing a
self-study kit on securities
trading (Capital market)” by
the Amendment No 1, dd 15
Oct 2014, to the lump sum
contract with the Consultant.
Developing a self-study
guide on Corporate Bonds 4.6.5
Attracting the trainers and identifying the
trainers for each program 93 July 2015
This deliverable was
changed to “Developing a
self-study guide on corporate
bonds” by the Amendment
No 1, dd 15 Oct 2014, to the
lump sum contract with the
Consultant.
Start the train the trainers for
the local trainers 4.6.6
Conducting the “Train the trainers”
program for local staff 94 30/05/14
Prepare the marketing plan of
the center and promote the
center
4.6.7 Marketing plan of the center and its
execution 95 30/07/13
70
2.2 Component 1: Streamlining and Automating Market Infrastructure.
This Component was designed to address the outdated capital market infrastructure constraints by
focusing on: (i) increasing automation of the market through establishing one depository center and
consolidating clearance and settlement; (ii) opening the infrastructure’s membership and access; (iii)
minimizing off-market trades and improving price discovery; (iv) facilitating the operational introduction
of investment funds; and (v) building better risk protection through establishing an updated trade
guarantee mechanism.
Key deliverables of the Component 1:
- The country’s post-trading architecture and environment was consolidated making the National
Depository Centre (NDC) the sole CSD for government and corporate securities, providing
clearing and settlement functions to members;
- The central role of the NDC was supported by converting it to the non-for-profit infrastructure
organization serving its members and local issuers. All other registry-keeping licenses in the
country were abolished. The securities numbering and lean registration were transferred to the
NDC’s sole operational control. The NDC was connected to the country’s RTGS (AZIPS) systems
ensuring DVP principles of both government and corporate securities.
- The securities numbering function was transferred to the NDC and its methodology was
harmonized with internationally recognized ISIN standards; the NDC is a member of the
Association of National Numbering Agencies.
- Implementation of the renewed post-trading procedures complying with the international best
practices and newly adopted securities market legislation;
- Drafting extensive, best-practices based TOR for the new electronic trading/post-
trading/surveillance platform comprising.
- Automation of the broking, trading, registry-keeping, central depository, clearing and settlement,
issuing functionalities in the market in strict compliance with the newly adopted securities market
legislation;
2.2.1 List of NDC rules and post-trading system rules adopted in accordance with the new “On
Securities Markets” Law (2015):
1. Rules on requirements to Central Depository members;
2. Rules on opening, closing and managing accounts in Depository Centre;
3. Rules on registration and transfer of securities;
4. Rules on safe-keeping of securities in Depository Centre;
5. Rules on forming and holding securities owners’ registry;
6. Rules on registering liens in the Depository Centre;
7. Rules on fees payment;
8. Rules on depository risks management;
9. Rules on operation of financial security in the Depository Centre;
10. Rules on depository information protection and retention;
11. Requirements on post-trading system formation and operation;
71
12. Requirements to clearing organization members;
13. Rules on clearing operations;
14. Rules on information exchange in clearing operations;
15. Rules on information protection and reporting in clearing operations.
2.3. Component 2: Updating and Strengthening the Legal and Regulatory Framework.
To maximize the benefits of adopting an adequate legal and regulatory framework, this Component was
designed to focus on: (i) reviewing the draft capital market legislation, ensuring that the existing gaps are
addressed through the forthcoming new Capital Market Act and identifying key implementing regulations
needed to make the law effective; (ii) enhancing market confidence and safety by introducing minimum
capital requirements for market participants; (iii) in collaboration with the Ministry of Taxes and Ministry
of Finance, eliminating tax obstacles to capital formation for companies and avoiding double taxation of
participants in investment funds; (iv) allowing pooled investments by insurance companies; (v) fostering
competitiveness by extending market participation through new licenses and broader geographic coverage;
and (vi) ensuring effective coordination with other regulatory authorities in the financial sector to
minimize regulatory gaps and arbitrage opportunities.
Key deliverable elements of the Component 2:
- Adoption of adequate legal and regulatory framework including “On the Securities Markets” Law
harmonized with the EU directives and IOSCO principles, adoption of the 29 implementing
regulations, as well as new rule books of the Baku Stock Exchange (as a part of the Component 3)
and National Depository Centre (as a part of the Component 1) fully complying with the country’s
new governing legislation;
- Drafting tax regulation initiatives covering various aspects of the securities market operations.
The new “On Securities Markets” Law was adopted on 14th
July, 2015. The adoption of the Law was
assessed as a considerable effort to improve the legal and operational framework within which securities
market will operate in the future by experts. The Law sufficiently addresses “rule of law” related issues,
including: provisions for finality of settlement, better rules of supervision administration, initiatives that
move toward the creation of a modern central depository, enhanced book entry securities “ownership”,
reporting requirements, provisions for an investor compensation fund, more intensive monitoring of
market abuses, proper conduct of business with retail market participants. In brief, the Law provisions
observe the three IOSCO core objectives of securities regulation:
- The protection of investors;
- Ensuring that markets are fair, efficient and transparent; and
- The reduction of systemic risk.
The regulator recognizes that matters which are not directly subject of the law itself, such as thorough
surveillance and compliance programs, effective enforcement and close cooperation with other regulators
are necessary to give further effect to all three objectives.
72
After the adoption of the Law (as well as the Presidential Decree endorsing it and subsequent Regulations)
the supervisory authority (e.g. SCS at that time) works under a clear mandate, with its responsibilities and
powers established by legislation and further specified within the Law for specific areas. Responsibility
for supervision of the conduct of business obligations of investment companies and other market
participants (institutions) is clearly stated. Decisions of the regulator are required to be transparent and are
open to judicial review.
On the other hand, under the new legislative platform the supervisory authority has adequate powers to
carry out its regulatory functions, and has rulemaking authority. In addition, members and staff are subject
to integrity policies that ensure high standards of professional conduct.
Under the Law provisions supervisory authority has appropriate powers to obtain information and records,
and can exercise these powers on a routine basis to ensure compliance with the laws it administers.
Regulated entities are subject to record keeping requirements directly under the LAW, including records
relating to clients’ orders. Supervisory authority has adequate powers to investigate both administrative
violations of the law. Further development of the legislative platform is agreed to consider in future
enabling the regulator(s)’criminal prosecution and sanctions ability for serious violations.
Under the Law, appropriate disclosure rules requiring public offering, material event reporting and
ownership and control reporting, which attempt to improve transparency of information and to guide
continuous disclosure has been adopted, as has the requirement for preparers and management to be liable
for the accuracy of disclosure. Issues to the public of equity and debt securities require a prospectus
approved by the supervisory authority. Secondary legislation adopted under the Law ensures disclosure
requirements for prospectuses are in line with IOSCO principles. Issuers are also required to submit
reports about material developments. Financial statements must be prepared in accordance with IFRS. The
supervisory authority has sufficient powers to enforce issuers ‘compliance with reporting standards, and to
issue supporting secondary legislation. In addition, changes of control transactions are required to comply
with disclosure requirements.
The Law provisions related to market intermediaries in general properly achieve three main objectives: to
protect client assets from insolvency of the investment company, guard against defaults and sudden
disruption to the market, either through sudden insolvency or settlement failure, and, to ensure that
intermediaries are fair and diligent in dealing with their clients.
The Law sets appropriate licensing standards (limiting the market place to those with sufficient resources
and qualification), prudential standards (protecting against sudden financial failure), internal controls and
risk management standards (reducing the possibility of default or appropriate of client assets), and
business conduct rules (ensuring proper handling of client accounts).
Provisions on secondary markets are in place to ensure the efficiency and credibility of the markets as
mechanisms for pricing and transfer of securities. Exchange is subject to licensing requirements, including
standards applicable to information technology systems and risk management, and is subject to on-going
supervision, including inspections and reporting requirements.
Potential sources of market disruption are addressed through the regulation of clearing, settlement and
depository services, including risk management mechanisms designed to ensure that intermediaries settle
73
their market obligations in a timely and orderly manner. Market activity is properly subject to market
abuse rules, including prohibitions on trading on insider information, market manipulation and
misrepresentation.
Exchange business is subject to licensing allowing operating both securities and derivatives markets.
Clearing and settlement facilities are performed by the NDC. Both trading and post-trading are subject to
the supervision of the supervisory authority, which has proper powers to ensure both institutions acts in
accordance with regulatory requirements. The Law has sufficient provisions that trading on the markets is
transparent, and supervisory authority has direct responsibility for detecting insider trading and other
forms of market abuse, which will be further subject of uses and assistance of technological system.
2.3.1. List of implementing regulations adopted subsequent to the “On Securities Market” Law
(2015):
1. Rules on securities issuance and conversion at reorganization of juridical entities;
2. Rules on real estate certificates in the Republic of Azerbaijan;
3. Rules on merging, splitting and par value increase of shares;
4. Requirements applicable to issuers’ management reports;
5. Rules on statutory registry of securities;
6. Rules on issuance of securities outside of the boarders of the Republic of Azerbaijan;
7. Disclosure rules for persons conducting research on securities or issuers, proposing investment strategies recommendations;
8. Rules on lien registration, lien cancelation, pledge management;
9. Disclosure rules on securities issuers;
10. Rules on prospectuses and information memoranda;
11. Rules on transactions with investment securities;
12. Rules on investment securities subscription and allocation; 13. Rules on payment, notarial and depository registration of securities enactment contracts;
14. Regulations on market manipulation (market abuse);
15. Rules on issuers maximal limits of bond issuances;
16. Regulations on the registration of the mortgage cover and form and manner of a mortgage cover inspection report;
17. Rules on registry-keeping of the mortgage covers, depository reports on validating mortgage covers;
18. Regulations on the procedure of stabilization of prices of securities;
19. Rules on issuance, registration and turnover of depository receipts;
20. Rules on placement and turnover of derivative financial instruments;
21. Disclosure rules for stock exchanges;
22. Rules on drafting and submission of reports by investment firms;
23. Rules on conducting investment services (transactions) by investment firms;
24. Rules on post-trading systems and clearing operations;
25. Rules on margin trading with securities;
74
2.3.2 Tax regime initiatives:
One of the aspects of the component 2 was modernization of the tax legislation in respect of the securities
market operations. Together with the Project consultants the SCS specialists elaborated main aspects of
the taxation legislation and in 2015 proposed the following amendments to the Ministry of Taxes:
- Elimination of the double taxation on dividends (withholding tax on issuer and profit tax on
investors);
- Elimination of the double taxation on investment funds units (withholding tax on issuer and profit
tax on investors);
- Elimination of the capital gain tax in securities operations;
- Elimination of tax on profit made from difference of par value and public placement price of
shares;
- Elimination of profit tax on accrued interest of fixed income instruments;
- Elimination of the VAT tax on financial services operations made with securities.
The Ministry of Taxes were handed the prepared drafts of amendments to be made into variety of
legislative acts and codes to implement the above stimulating measures. The amendments will be
considered as a part of the State Budgetary plenaries in 2016/7.
In January 2016, the Parliament adopted amendment to the Taxation Code withdrawing profits tax on
dividends and coupon payments for the next 3 fiscal years.
2.4. Component 3: Stimulating Supply
This Component was designed to promote greater use of capital markets as a financing alternative by
focusing on creating a more appropriate environment to encourage equity listings and the corporate bond
market; actively reaching out to corporations to promote benefits of financial market as a funding
alternative and working pro-actively with prospective issuers to assist them in coming to the market.
Key deliverable elements of the Component 3:
- Re-organization of the BSE listing tiers and adoption of the new listing requirements;
- BSE trading (subscription, public offer and secondary market) rules and procedures enabling
transparent and competitive price discovery and fully complying with the newly adopted securities
market regulation;
- Conducting Listing Advisory Program (LAP) to local issuers, stimulating new issues at BSE
platforms.
26. Rules on conducting attestations for qualification certificates on delivering investment firm services (transactions);
27. Rules on attestation of executives and branch managers of licensed entities in securities market;
28. Regulations on the requirements to external auditors of the regulated institutions;
29. Rules on minimum chapter capital and sources of its formation for licensed entities in securities market;
30. Rules of capital adequacy for investment firms.
75
2.4.1. New Listing regulations at BSE:
As a key aspect of the Component 3 the re-drafting of BSE listing/delisting rules and regulations were
started in 2014. Initial changes were made to the listing rules on the 30th
of January, 2015. After the
adoption of the “On Securities Market Law” (2015) the listing rules and regulations were updated to fully
comply with certain provisions (definitions) of the new Law.
Regarding the new Listing regulations, separation of bond and stock market, the creation of market
segments, minimum capital requirements according to market segments, compulsory free float rates are
the most noteworthy changes for the description of key developments headline.
Before the modernization of Market Structure, Bond and Stock markets (requirements to Bond and Stock
issuers) were not separated. Therefore, there was sole requirement for the acceptance of companies to the
listing and disclosures for both the issuance of stocks and bonds. However, after the new regulations, the
bond and stock markets were apportioned and each was treated as an independent market as regards to
listing and disclosure requirements.
Moreover, after the approval of new Listing regulations, the transition from 2 tiers listing structure (1st tire
and the 2nd
tire listing markets) to 3 tiers listing structure (Prime, Standard and Alternative segmentations)
was realized. This development made the ground for the companies to be rearranged to these market
segments according to their financial and other indicators.
One of the main contributions of new Listing regulations was to shed light on the minimum capital
requirements of the companies. Hence, companies that were to be listed in prime segment should carry at
least 2.5 million AZN of minimum capital requirement), this indicator is 0.5 million AZN for standard
market segment (in which there was not any capital requirement before new the regulation).
Another noteworthy and one of most essential changes was the creation of free-float rates required to be
listed in each tier. For the Prime market, minimum portion of shares to be on free-float if 5% to 10%
depending on the overall equity of the company and those new shares should be held by at least 50
shareholders and no more than 5 % for each singular investor.
It can be noted that there were substantial changes in the listing requirements, trading fees and the
acceptance regulation of the companies to the listing.
For the easing of burden of the listed companies and to enhance the capital market practice, some fees
were substantially lowered, even some of them totally eliminated. With respect to these modifications,
one-time fee for being accepted to the listing was canceled out which was 3000 AZN and 600 AZN for
stocks and 600 AZN and 300 AZN for bonds for the 1st and the 2nd tire listings, respectively.
76
Annual membership fee for issuers was fixed by 1000 AZN in prime market, 500 AZN in standard market
and 200 AZN in alternative market. Previously, these numbers were 0.03% of total issue in the 1st tire
listing and 0.015% of total issue 2nd
tire listing.
Moreover, the bonds to be traded in prime market segment were required by this new regulation to be
rated by S&P and Fitch rating agencies with the rating “BBB-“, “Baa3” by Moody’s or should be rated
with the equivalent rating by other rating agencies. Otherwise, Market maker is required to be appointed
for these bonds within the whole maturity date of these securities.
Additionally, for providing the creditworthiness of issuer, it is required that 50 % of the sum of the last 3
year PBIT (which should take into consideration the outstanding bonds as well) should exceed the annual
interest payments on the new issued bonds.
2.4.1.a. Equity Market Listing Requirements:
Market
Structure
(listing
levels)
Listing Requirements
Primary
Market
Issuer should have the legal form of OJSC
No bankruptcy procedures should have been started for the year before
the listing application
Net positive income for at least one of the past three years
At least one year of operating history
Equity capital AZN 2.5m - 5m: minimum 10% free float
Equity capital AZN 5m - 10m: minimum 7% free float
Equity capital more than AZN 10m: minimum 5% free float
Shares in free float should be divided among at least 50 shareholders,
each of whom cannot possess more than 5% of total shares.
Financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS and audited by
an international auditor
No significant changes in structural management for past six months
(i.e. at least two-thirds of management staff should remain unchanged).
Standard
Market
Equity capital should be at least AZN 0.5m
At least one year of operating history
Financial statements in accordance with local accounting standards
(GAP)
Audit by an independent auditor
Minimum of 5% free float (or at least AZN 125,000) which should be
divided among at least 20 shareholders, each of whom cannot possess
more than 5% of total shares.
Alternative Shares of issuers that do not meet the requirements of either the Primary
77
Trading
Market
Market or the Standard Market will be included in the Alternative
Trading Market
2.4.1.b. Bond Market Listing Requirements:
Market
Structure
(listing
levels)
Listing Requirements
Primary
Market
Financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS, and audited by
an international auditor
No significant changes in structural management for past six months
(i.e. at least two-thirds of management staff should remain unchanged).
No bankruptcy can be declared by the issuer during one year prior to the
date of submission of listing application
Equity capital at least AZN 2.5m.
The presence of a market-maker and/or a high credit ranking granted by
an international credit agency (i.e. at least “BBB-” from Standard &
Poor's or Fitch, “Baa3” from Moody's, or equivalent of those rankings
granted from other rating agencies)
Sound and clear debt history
The I to be paid over one year should not be more than 50% of total
earnings before tax for the past three years.
Government bonds can be traded in this segment
Bonds with maturity of less than one year cannot be traded in this
market
Standard
Market
Equity capital should be at least AZN 0.5m
Net positive income for at least one of the past three years
At least one year of operating history
Financial statements in accordance with local accounting standards
(GAP)
Audit by an independent auditor
Sound and clear debt history
Alternative
Trading
Market
Bonds of issuers that do not meet the requirements of either the Primary
Market or the Standard Market will be included in the Alternative
Trading Market
2.4.2. Listed instruments at the BSE to the date of the document:
78
Segment /
Instrument Equity Bond
Prime
Market
DemirBank OJSC Ministry of Finance
Central Bank
International Bank of
Azerbaijan OJSC
Azerbaijan Mortgage Fund
SOCAR
Standard
Market
Azərkosmos OJSC Unileasing CJSC
Finans Lizinq OJSC
Turanbank OJSC Finex Kredit BOKT OJSC
KredAqro CJSC
Aqrolizinq OJSC Merkuri BOKT LLC
Amrahbank OJSC
Alternative
Market
Meqa Siğorta OJSC ProKredit BOKT OJSC
Bank BTB OJSC Premier Kredit BOKT LLC
Bakı Siğorta OJSC FinansLizinq OJSC
Muğanbank OJSC FINOKOBOKT OJSC
FINOKO BOKT OJSC
AXA MBASK Sığorta Şirkəti
OJSC
FinEx Kredit BOKT"OJSC
Bank of Baku OJSC
Rabita Bank OJSC
2.4.3. Listing Advisory Program:
Listing Advisory Program was established and implemented by Baku Stock Exchange within Capital
Market Modernization Project as part of the government program of “The development of the Capital
Markets of Azerbaijan for the years of 2011-2020”. The Program was launched in April 2014 and aims to
build on success in making a “highly effective securities market” in order to attract financial resources to
the real sector, move capital between sectors and increase effectiveness of the economic system,
contributing to creating better corporate governance and more transparency about economic activities of
listed issuers and increasing popular participation. Together with the consortium of the partners joining the
initiative (the country’s leading auditors, lawyers, investment firms) LAP is conducting seminars and
round-tables for prospective issuers on variety of technical topics, and, on pro-bono basis, is providing
issuers with legal and organizational guidance and support to assess their needs and potentials for capital
market fund raising, and, once decided, fulfill the whole process, from drafting comprehensive prospectus
to organization of secondary market for their issued instruments. So far, more than 40 local companies
participated in the initiative, out of 16 companies signed special agreement with LAP consortium for
closer, one-to-one cooperation and support of the capital market fund raising.
Joining Partners of the LAP:
Auditing companies: KPMG Azerbaijan, Baker Tilly Azerbaijan, PwC Azerbaijan, EY Azerbaijan;
Legal companies: Dentons Azerbaijan, Baker & McKenzie;
79
Investment firms: Pasha Capital, Invst Az, AzFinance Invest, UniCapital.
Key activities of LAP in 2014/5/6:
LAP organized several seminars for companies that might be interested in listing. The aim of those
seminars was to educate companies and its management about the capital markets and help them to take
advantage of this market. Key events were:
On the 16th
of April 2014 LAP was introduced to the public through the initial workshop organized by
BSE.
On the 17th
of October 2014 the BSE staged a workshop for companies who had potential to do initial
public offers (IPOs) or otherwise to issue and list equity or debt securities. This workshop was led by BSE
team and invited guest expert Dr. Albrecht Buerger. There was an inspiring and “lessons learned”
presentation from the first company joined LAP, Embawood Furniture Production, about their successful
listing, through which they issued AZN10 millions of corporate bonds. A guest speaker from Borsa
İstanbul gave a presentation on the similar experience, corporate governance practices in Turkey,
challenges that Turkish SME issuers are facing.
On the 22nd
of May 2015 together with PWC Azerbaijan, BSE organized a workshop on the topic of
“Raising Public Equity and Debt Capital”. Over 70 representatives of 40 companies attended. The
workshop was led by Mr. Rustem Teregulov, Partner and Capital Markets Leader, PwC CIS and CEE.
Issues of major Azerbaijani companies were case studied in detail.
Issuers joined LAP and the initiative results:
Over what period have these shares ben issued?
# Name of the
Company
Memorand
um of
Cooperatio
n (under
LAP)
Listing
tier
Type
of
instru
ment
Number of
Issued
Securities
Par
value
per unit
Total Amount
of Issue
1 Azərkosmos ASC signed Standard Equit
y 1,180,530
AZN
20.00
AZN
23,610,600.00
2 Mega Sigorta ASC signed Alternati
ve
Equit
y 500
AZN
5,000.0
0
AZN
2,500,000.00
3 Bank of Baku ASC signed Alternati
ve
Equit
y 3,400,000
AZN
15.55
AZN
52,870,000.00
4 Bank BTB ASC signed Alternati
ve
Equit
y 5,160
AZN
1,000.0
0
AZN
5,160,000.00
80
Equit
y 2,000
AZN
1,000.0
0
AZN
2,000,000.00
5
Prokredit BOKT
ASC
signed Alternati
ve Debt
400
AZN
1,000.0
0
AZN
400,000.00
6 Finans Lizing ASC signed Standard
Debt 1,200
USD
500.00
USD
600,000.00
Debt 600
USD
500.00
USD
300,000.00
Debt 600
USD
500.00
USD
300,000.00
Debt 500
USD
500.00
USD
250,000.00
7 FinEx Kredit BOKT
ASC signed Standard
Debt 800
USD
500.00
USD
400,000.00
Debt 900
USD
500.00
USD
450,000.00
Debt 390
USD
500.00
USD
195,000.00
8 Finoko BOKT ASC signed Alternati
ve
Debt
750
USD
1,000.0
0
USD
750,000.00
Equit
y 70,000
AZN
10.00
AZN
700,000.00
9 Turanbank ASC signed Standard
Equit
y 43,440
AZN
1,082.0
0
AZN
47,002,080.00
Equit
y 2,773
AZN
1,082.0
0
AZN
3,000,386.00
10 Embawood MMC signed Standard Debt
10,000
AZN
1,000.0
0
AZN
10,000,000.00
11 Nikoil Bank ASC signed Standard Debt
5,000
USD
1,000.0
0
USD
5,000,000.00
12 Unileasing QSC signed Standard Debt 5,000
USD
1,000.0
USD
5,000,000.00
81
0
13 Azersun Holding
MMC signed
No issue till the moment of the report 14
Kaspiyan
Təhlükəsizlik
Baltaları MMC
signed
15 Səba Kredit MMC signed
16 Golden Pay ASC signed
2.4.4. List of Operational Rules and Regulations by BSE:
After the endorsement of the “on Securities Markets” Law in mid-2015 and subsequent adoption of new
implementing regulations by the SCS, in early 2016, BSE has totally revised and introduced its operational
rules and procedures. New BSE rules and procedures were strictly harmonized with new technological
trading and post-trading platform (the Capital Markets Information System) launched early 2016 as well.
List of new operational trading rules and regulations implemented in early 2016 by BSE are as follows:
1. Rules on trading membership; Enacted 30 Dec. 2015
2. Rules on trading of securities and derivative financial instruments;
Enacted 30 Dec. 2015
3. Rules of securities and derivative financial instruments market abuse and market protection;
Enacted 30 Dec. 2015
4. Rules dispute resolution at the Baku Stock Exchange; Enacted 30 Dec. 2015
5. Disclosure rules at the Baku Stock Exchange; Enacted 30 Dec. 2015
6. Rules on indices calculation; Enacted 30 Dec. 2015
7. Rules on ethical behavior and access to service information by the exchange executives;
Enacted 30 Dec. 2015
8. Rules of information protection, retention and security at the Baku Stock Exchange
Enacted 30 Dec. 2015
9. Rules on listing and delisting of securities Enacted 30 Jan. 2016
2.5. Component 4: Capacity Building
This Component was designed to overcome the low capacity of market participants and regulators through
launching capacity building activities. First, as the SCS was the major force leading the CMMP reform, it
was important to assure that the agency’s human and financial capacities were sufficient and effective.
This Component, was aiming to: (i) strengthen the SCS’ knowledge management, its policy formation
processes and transparency of operations; and (ii) strengthen the institutional capacity of the SCS’
surveillance, reporting and enforcement systems. Second, investor education is a key factor to the
encouraging the breadth and depth of participation in capital markets. This Component included, inter
alia, activities to: (i) improve public awareness of the capital market by carrying out a series of effective
communication programs through media, outreach sessions hosted by the SCS in major cities of
82
Azerbaijan; (ii) increase potential investors’ understanding of capital market by series of education
seminars and outreach tools to nascent investment funds and insurance industry.
Key deliverable elements of the Component 4:
- Conducting of the Nation-wide Education Program, including producing and disseminating
printed, visual and interactive study materials for schools, universities and general public,
establishment of the Financial Laboratory at the Azerbaijan State University of Economics;
- Establishing Capital Markets Training Centre (CMTC);
2.5.1. Nationwide Education Program:
The SCS adopted the action plan on Capital Market Related Nationwide Education Program on 25 Feb
2015.
The action plan segmented the target audience and included the following initiatives:
- For secondary schools: i) Preparing and agreeing study material brochure for pupils and teachers
on securities market topics, ii) video films on securities market topics;
- For universities: i) updating economics faculties curriculum and study materials with securities
market topics; ii) assisting preparing separate securities market securities market classes and
subjects; iii) internship programs for students at SCS, BSE, NDC and market participants; iv)
Development of the electronic securities trading simulation platform; v) Research projects for
students on securities market topics; vi) Financial Laboratory (study room) organized at a leading
economics university faculty.
Within the Action Plan securities market study material (brochure and video film) was agreed and
produced, and as a pilot project they are studied as a part of curriculum in Baku schools no 7 and 189-190
for 7th
, 9th
, 10th
grade pupils. Test exams conducted at the end of pilot courses demonstrated positive
comprehension indications.
Capital market based case-study tournament was organized at the Azerbaijan State Economic University.
The results were studied by the academic staff of faculties and teaching materials on case study based
examination were disseminated to applicable faculty professors. Relevant capital market based library of
study material and case-studies (in the university’s all teaching languages: Azerbaijani, English, Russian
and Turkish) was created at the University and handed over to the professors and student unions. High
achieving students in capital market topics were appointed as “Capital Markets Ambassadors” by the SCS.
Ambassadors are entitled to create academic and business practice ties between students and market
participants/regulators.
Financial laboratory was created and handed over to the University by BSE. The laboratory is fully
equipped for seminar workshops, simulation trading activities, invited guess lectures, practical exercises.
The Lab’s annual activity schedule is drafted mutually by SCS and the University’s administration.
2.5.2. The Capital Market Training Centre (CMTC):
83
In 2013, together with the CMMP experts the SCS established a working group on planning and launching
of the Capital Markets Training Centre (CMTC) under auspices of the SCS. For the next 12 months the
CMTC’s strategic plan, development plan, management structure, financial plan, corporate identity and
legal for was agreed and prepared. The CMTC was officially launched and presented to the public on 01
March 2014. According to its strategic and marketing plan the initial courses portfolio was elaborated.
(According to the Charter of the Financial Markets Supervision Authority (FSMA) endorsed by the
Presidential Decree dated 10 March 2016 and subsequent amendments in the CMTC’s own Charter, the
Centre was organized as non-for-profit training center under the auspices of the FSMA).
Two main audiences that the CMTC is targeting are: a/Capacity building for the SCS, BSE and NDC
personnel and b/ Capital markets based training for wider professional audience including attestation exam
preparations for market participants. Currently, CMTC is developing its potential to develop consulting
capability to capital markets involved firms.
Training and Seminars conducted by CMTC in 2015:
No Date Audience Title No of
Participants
1 2/10/2015 SCS personnel Notion of the financial risks and
financial risk management 20
2 3/13/2015 SCS personnel Managerial skills in public
sector 10
3 4/27/2015 SCS personnel Team building 27
4 6/8/2015 SCS/BSE/NDC The ways financial markets
operate (Master Class) 12
5 9/7/2015 SCS personnel Corporate finance 31
6 10/16/2015 SCS/BSE/NDC Performance Management
(Master Class) 10
7 1/30/2016 "Fabrika Co-working Centre"
youth center participants
1) Capital Markets, instruments,
participants (seminar)
2) Foreign exchange (Master
Class)
30
8 2/9/2015
Azerbaijan Architecture and
Construction Engeneering
University strudents
Capital Markets financing,
instruments, participants
(seminar)
41
9 2/11/2015 Qafqaz University students Investment management
(Master Class) 32
10 2/12/2015 Public Administration Academy
students
Capital Markets financing,
instruments, participants
(seminar)
26
84
11 2/19/2015 Qafqaz University students
Capital Markets financing,
instruments, participants
(seminar)
40
12 2/25/2015 Baku State University Finance and finance
management (seminar) 27
13 3/10/2015 Azerbaijan State Economy
University students
Investment management
(Master Class) 10
14 3/11/2015
Azerbaijan State Economy
University students
Capital Markets financing,
instruments, participants
(seminar)
17
15 3/17/2015 Azerbaijan State Economy
University students Finance and finance
management (seminar) 32
16 4/1/2015 Azerbaijan State Economy
University students Corporate finance 10
17 4/2/2015 Azerbaijan State Economy
University students Foreign exchange 10
18 4/13/2015 Baku State University Investment management 16
21 4/15/2015 Baku Business University
students
Capital Markets financing,
instruments, participants
(seminar)
14
2.6. Capital Markets Information System:
The tender for supply and installation of Capital Markets Information Systems was announced on 18 April
2014 within works and goods category. The two stage bidding selection method was used for this
procurement.
According to the TOR the winning vendor should have developed the following systems:
- Trading system,
- Depository system,
- Clearing system,
- Market surveillance system,
- Broker front end system
- Install appropriate hardware and network infrastructure supporting the operation of the systems,
including Disaster Recovery Centre in Sumgait City, 35 km from Baku.
The main requirement to the platform was full integration, but modularity on database level, with usage of
industry standard protocols, allowing integration to RTGS (AZIPS systems). The Platform should have
been designed in the open architecture manner enabling incorporation of broker trading functionality by
users.
KOREA EXCHANGE was selected the winner of the tender and on 13 January, 2015 the contract was
signed and the integrated trading/post-trading/surveillance platform (branded CETA AZERBAIJAN) was
85
launched on the 17th
Feb 2016. The platform performs according to the expected indicators since the
official launching ensuring automation of all major processes at the local capital market trading and post-
trading. The platform enabled major placements including USD 100 mln public bond offering by State Oil
Company SOCAR in September 2016. The platform strictly complies with newly modernized and
introduced local legislation procedures, BSE listing and trading procedures, NDC post-trading, depository-
clearing and registry-keeping rules.
7. Project Development Objective (PDO) Indicators and Intermediate Result Indicators:
The project’s development objective was to increase the use of equity and corporate debt as financing
and/or investment instruments through the adoption of an effective capital markets regulatory framework
and infrastructure. The PDO level results indicators are: (i) increased issuance of corporate bonds; (ii)
increased number of listed companies and (iii) improved price transparency. The Project outcome and
output indicators are measurable
PDO 1. Increased issuance of corporate bonds
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6m
Outstanding amount of
corporate debt 344 907 751 1,340 3,940 4,418 2,619
Non-oil GDP 18,443 24,165 28,474 32,638 35,969 37,670 10,939
Outstanding amount of
corporate debt/Non-oil GDP 1.9% 3.8% 2.6% 4.1% 11.0% 11.7% 23.9%
This indicator represents the ratio of outstanding amount of corporate debt to non-oil GDP (the
outstanding amount of corporate debt to 2010 non-oil GDP, 1.9% was taken as a baseline for the
indicator).
In 2016 outstanding amount of corporate debt to non-oil GDP increased to 23.9%. The baseline indicator
was 1.9% and the target was 3.8%.
The major factor for increase in indicator was a significant increase of corporate bond issuance including
by organizations like Azerbaijan Mortgage Fund (AMF). From 2011 to 2015 total issuance of AMF bonds
amounted to 256.6 mln AZN. Optimized REPO procedures, introduced incentives for market makers,
awareness programs to treasury managers resulted in total amount of corporate debt issuance from 2011 to
2016 was 2,400 mln AZN. The outstanding amount of corporate debt at the end of the project to baseline
year’s (2010) non-oil GDP is 14.2%, which is still considerably higher than expected target of 3.8%.
PDO 2. Increased number of companies with listed equity
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Prime Market - 1 1 1 1 2 2
Standard Market - - - - - 3 3
86
In 2016 number of companies with listed equity is 5. The baseline was 2 and the target was 8-10
companies. There was only one listed company during 2010 - 2014 periods. The company was listed in the
first Tier. However, most of the transactions occurred in the Alternative Trading Market (ATM) without
needing to fulfill extensive listing and disclosure requirements. The first listing took place in the first tier
in 2011 which was Demir Bank OJSC with market capitalization of 23.11 million AZN. Due to the low
volatility in the market, this number has not significantly changed during the period from 2011 to 2014. In
2015 four new companies were listed in BSE. 1 – International Bank of Azerbaijan in Prime Market 2 –
Azerkosmos, Turanbank and Aqrolising in Standard market. Overall market capitalization increased to
1,019 million AZN. The Listing Advisory Program and other initiatives worked with tens of local
potential IPO candidates. Global financial crisis consequences, geo-political and regional instability and
volatilities in national currencies in all neighboring countries as well as in commodity prices turned local
issuers to conservative mood, making them consider bond issuances as more applicable capital market
fund raising tool, if any at all.
PDO 3. Improved price transparency
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Price Transparency - 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%
In 2016 overall price transparency indicator was 100%. The target for that period was 90%.
In 2014 the SCS, BSE and NDC took a number of measures to increase transparency and accessibility of
trades to all categories of traders and investors. First, a special regime was adopted at BSE for all cross
transactions at secondary market (cross transactions are transactions conducted by the same broker from
the buying and the selling side). Thus, a crossing transaction cannot be matched (finalized) unless within
next 30 minutes of trade session any other broker bids with better conditions (price) for the buying or the
selling side of the transaction. If the latter happens, the auction starts. If no interest was shown the original
transition was finalized. In 2015 the holding period of cross transactions was prolonged to 60 minutes.
Secondly, in 2014 the special regime was introduced by the NDC to let smaller and less financially
advanced brokers to participate instantly in cross transaction. The NDC eliminated funds pre-validation
regime for all categories of brokers and let them deliver funds after the transaction matched. The funds
provision is ensured by liquid assets pledged or bank guaranty mechanisms. Elimination of funds pre-
validation allows brokers and all categories of investors to promptly react on bid quotes in the trading
system. All transactions that appear on BSE trading system are a non-block transaction which means that
all of the transactions are counted as being competitive transactions. Thus all transactions in BSE trading
system are transparent and competitive.
Intermediate Results:
Intermediate Result One (Component One): Streamlining and Automating Market
Infrastructure:
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Ratio of market
participants
electronically linked to
market infrastructure
0% 0%
100%
0%
100%
75%
100%
90%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
87
(trading, clearing and
settlements)
Despite the project planning phase expectations of gradual grow of number of market participants
electronically connected to trading and post-trading operations at BSE, NDC and other involved entities,
the transformation was instant due to the decision of BSE and NDC to conduct all the necessary changes at
once and at their own expense. Thus, in 2011 BSE and NDC agreed the electronic protocol of data
exchange, developed the connection facilities and handed over them to all brokers. Later, in 2016 the
achievement was reinforced by implementation of the Korean technologies, through which, inter alia, the
surveillance, market watch and DVP processes were also processed and automated.
Intermediate Result Two (Component Two): Updating and Strengthening the Legal and
Regulatory Framework
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Enactment of a new
Capital Market Act No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
After inter-ministerial, parliamentary and Presidential Administration discussions, the “On Securities
Markets” Law was enacted in July 2015.
Intermediate Result indicator Three (Component Two): Promulgation of capital markets
regulation required upon enactment of Law
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Promulgation of capital
markets regulation
required upon
enactment of Law
No No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
All implementing regulations required by the enactment of the “On Securities Markets” Law were adopted
by end of the 2015.
Intermediate Result indicator Four (Component Three): Number of companies involved in
the listing advisory program (debt and equity)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Number of companies
involved in the listing
advisory program (debt
and equity)
0
5
0
10
0
15
1
15
4
15
16
15
16
88
The Listing Advisory program came into being after extensive negotiations with potential service
providers (brokers, auditors, lawyers and others) on 16th of April 2014.
Since its establishment LAP partners arranged numbers of company meetings and organized several group
seminars for companies that might be interested in listing. The aim of those seminars was to educate
companies and its management about the capital markets opportunities and help them to take advantage of
this market. Key events were:
On the 17th
of October 2014 the BSE staged a workshop for companies who had potential to do initial
public offers (IPOs) or otherwise to issue and list equity or debt securities. This workshop was led by BSE
team and invited guest expert Dr. Albrecht Buerger. There was an inspiring and “lessons learned”
presentation from the first company joined LAP, Embawood Furniture Production, about their successful
listing, through which they issued AZN10 millions of corporate bonds. A guest speaker from Borsa
İstanbul gave a presentation on the similar experience, corporate governance practices in Turkey,
challenges that Turkish SME issuers are facing.
On the 22nd
of May 2015 together with PWC Azerbaijan, BSE organized a workshop on the topic of
“Raising Public Equity and Debt Capital”. Over 70 representatives of 40 companies attended. The
workshop was led by Mr. Rustem Teregulov, Partner and Capital Markets Leader, PwC CIS and CEE.
Issues of major Azerbaijani companies were case studied in detail.
Since its establishment and till the end of the Project period, the LAP signed consortium contracts with 16
organizations, out of which 12 listed their instruments at Prime and Standard tier of BSE listing.
Alternative tier companies are decided not to be taken into account for the purposes of this indicator as
ATM tier companies are either offered to or traded by limited number of investors or have lower listing
entrance requirements.
Intermediate Result indicator Five (Component Four): Increased of the threshold pass rate
of the Financial Certification examination for market participants
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Increased of the
threshold pass rate of
the Financial
Certification
examination for market
participants
50%
50%
50%
55%
50%
60%
75%
65%
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
Financial Certification examinations were conducted by the SCS and lately by the FSMA. In 2013 the
methodology of the examination was completely revised based on the Consultant’s recommendations.
Since 2014 the CMTC provides preparation courses for the examinations. The threshold pass rate for the
Financial Certification has been 75% for the last 4 reporting periods.
89
Intermediate Result indicator Six (Component Four): Consumer Awareness of Capital
Market Instruments
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 6M
Consumer Awareness
of Capital Market
Instruments
24%
28
N/A
33
32
37
36
41
56
45
59.11
45
59.38
Consumer Awareness of Capital Market instruments was the most important indication that the SCS was
focusing on. Initiatives like establishing CMTC, launching LAP, Nation-wide Education Program
initiative, cooperation with universities, youth organizations and journalists, conducting local and
international conferences and workshops (detailed in above chapters) contributed to the increasing rates of
financial literacy and consumer awareness. Moreover, the CMMP coincided with analogous initiatives of
other financial institutions and governmental bodies, with whom the SCS cooperated closely in this regard
(CBAR, MoF, etc). The indication surveys were conducted by the external independent specialized
companies.
4. Amendments and extensions to the original project work plan.
There were 3 occasions when the Project’s work plan was amended to comply with its main direction and
goals: at the inception (October 2012), in the midst of the project span (October 2014) and at the end of
the original project period (extension negotiations, October 2015- February 2016). All amendments were
pre-approved by the World Bank and consequently confirmed by official amendments to the consulting
services contract (the provision of goods contract remained unchanged for the whole period from Jan 2015
to Feb 2016).
4.1. Inception period amendments:
In the initial meetings in October 2012 with the project team, the Consultant and the World Bank, the
SCS’ Chairman raised the issue of importance of increasing listing on BSE as a priority of the initial phase
to be supported by CMMP. The SCS had been considering the creation of a Listing Advisory Program
(LAP) to attract issuers to listing with resources to be allocated from BSE, SCS and other market
participants and professionals to actively promote Capital Market, provide training and provide
preliminary listing advisory services. The Consultant was requested to take the lead in defining the
program and provide technical and managerial support with its delivery. Supporting the LAP necessitated
changes to the activities under Component 3 namely 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.3, 3.3.1 and 3.3.2. (See table 2.1.1
above).
Moreover, other changes were also agreed in the inception phase.
Activities 2.3.1: “Review and analyze the risks and opportunities” and 2.3.2: “Recommendations on the
optimal participation of the banks and requirements” were considered no longer required as the Central
Bank had decided that commercial banks would only participate in Capital Market through their
subsidiaries and not directly. Resources of these two tasks were agreed to utilize to support BSE to
develop their rules and regulations to adapt new technological and legislative environment after launching
the Capital Markets Information system and enactment of the new “On Securities Market Law”
accordingly.
90
Activities 3.2.4 and 3.3.2 were similarly re-focused to concentrate on LAP activities, supporting seminars
to be provided by the LAP etc.
Activity 3.4.2: “Develop and publish educational material on Corporate Governance” was considered no
longer valid as the IFC had initiated, prepared and published extensive material on Corporate Governance
for local issuers. The Consultant was asked to assist BSE and prepare a study material on opportunities of
IPO for local issuers.
All changes were endorsed by the World Bank and then confirmed in the Amendment to the contract with
the Consultant (in October 2014).
4.2. Mid-period amendments:
In mid-2014 the SCS initiated another round of negotiations with the World Bank and the Consultant on
updating and amending the tasks and activities in the deliverables to comply with the recent developments
at the capital markets.
The role of the NDC as an asset manager of commercial investment funds were was reconsidered based on
the experts recommendation in order to prevent the State owned NDC’s monopolization of the segment.
Thus, it was asked to re-direct the Activity 1.3.8 from NDC to providing recommendations on potential
private fund administration entities.
Activities 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 were renamed and reshaped in order to comply fully with the task of preparing
the implementing regulations that would support the new “On Securities Market Law” draft.
Activity 2.3.3 was reconsidered to concentrate more specifically on role of banks in newly proposed
settlement model for the securities market of the country.
In light of the local real estate market dynamics, Activities3.5.4 and 3.5.5 were re-organized to focus on
bringing international expertise of organizing foreign securities trade (MTF) to BSE.
Activities 4.6.4 and 4.6.5 supporting the CMTC were completed by the SCS itself before the
commencement date of the Consultant assignment. So, the Consultant was asked to prepare self-study
materials on various topics of the capital market operations.
All changes were endorsed by the World Bank and then confirmed in the Amendment to the contract with
the Consultant (in October 2014).
4.3 Extension of the Project period:
In light of the complexity and significance of CMIS procurement tender as well as multiplicity of terms
and conditions to be assessed, in the first quarter of 2015 the SCS and the World Bank started negotiating
the possibility of the Project Period extension. Indeed, the procurement of the CMIS took longer time than
initially anticipated. The project closing date extension topic was eventually triggered by the need to
complete installation of CMIS in 12 months period after its inception, whereas all pre-requisite technical
agreements and future contract negotiation were completed by mid-February 2015. The implementation of
the information system could be finalized at least within 12 months, meaning a two-month slippage from
91
the project’s original end-date (31 Dec 2015). In turn, the assessment of the development and
implementation results of the CMIS was possible only after its go-live and required the consultants at least
one month after its launching to be able to comprehensively assess all aspects of the implementation.
At the same time, the SCS requested to consider two additional tasks for CMTC strategic development and
sustainability. In consultation with the World Bank it was decided to sign new agreement with the same
Consultant for additional services. The SCS asked the World Bank’s no-objection for SSS method and the
Bank provided SCS with NOL on February 1, 2016 and new agreement with Corporate Solutions
Consulting Ltd was signed on the same date. At the same time the existing agreement was extended to
conduct the deliverable no 1.4.5 on assessing the CMIS implementation results.
The Borrower, Ministry of Finance (MOF) of Azerbaijan, requested extension of the project for additional
6 months to have enough time for CMIS installation and handover and accommodating services. The Bank
provided its approval of Project Closing Date extension till July 01, 2016.
5. Financial Reports are attached to the report:
See attached XL tables
93
Forecast : Next
6 months
GoA 157 781,11 2 094 595,42
IBRD 230 888,26 11 999 971,99
Other - 1 410,86
SECO - 1 600 000,00
Total financing
Incremental operating cost 1 594,10 104 063,24
Consultants’ services including Audit and Training SECO - 1 385 816,56
Incremental Other - 1 295,60
Front-end fee - 30 000,00
Good 172 414,63 5 542 845,90
Consultants’ services including Audit and Training 309 777,59 8 591 166,44
Total expenditure
-95 116,95 40 790,53
Add : Foreign exchange difference
Add : Net change in advances given
Net change in cash -95 125,45 40 115,51
Opening cash balance
International Bank of Azerbaijan (Project A/c, AZN) 47,44
International Bank of Azerbaijan (DA,USD) 135 193,52
Total opening cash
Add : Net change in cash
Net cash available
Closing cash balance
Xalq BankSahil Branch (DA) 39 968,32 39 968,32
Xalq BankSahil Branch (Project, AZN) 147,19 147,19
Total closing cash balance
Note:
ii) Closing balance of PA: 1 USD = 1.6102 AZN
Signator 1: / / /
signature date signator's initials position
Signator 2: / / /
signature date signator's initials position
THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN
Capital Market Modernization Project
Sources and Uses of Funds
For the period ended: 9/30/2016
in USD
Quater: 7/1/2016 - 9/30/2016 Cumulative as of 9/30/2016
Cash receipts
388 669,37 15 695 978,27
Less: expenditure by categories
483 786,32 15 655 187,74
Receipts less expenditure
-8,50 -675,02
- -
135,240.96
-95 125,45 40 115,51
i) Opening balance of PA in Quarter: 1 USD = 1.5078 AZN
40,115.51 40,115.51
40 115,51 40 115,51
The following rates were used for conversion:
94
N Planned Actual Variance Planned Actual Variance
483,786,32 483,786,32 15,678,658,83 15,655,187,74 23,471,09
1 133,031,69 133,031,69 7,721,835,16 7,721,835,16
2 1,425,472,68 1,425,472,68
3 1,705,025,48 1,705,025,49 -0,01
4 2,231,737,43 2,231,737,43
5 2,534,64 2,534,64 289,120,78 287,450,72 1,670,06
6 157,781,11 157,781,11 2,115,028,42 2,093,227,38 21,801,04
7 190,438,88 190,438,88 190,438,88 190,438,88
Signator 1: / / /
signature date signator's initials position
Signator 2: / / /
signature date signator's initials position
THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN
Capital Market Modernization Project
Uses of Funds by Project Activities
For the period from: 7/1/2016 to: 9/30/2016
in USD
Quarter Cumulative
Project Component/Activity
Total Project Expenditure
Streamlining and Automating Market Infrastructure
Updating and Strengthening the Legal and Regulatory Framework
Stimulating Supply
Capacity Building
VAT
Supporting Capital Markets Training Center's Operational Efficiency and Its Divercification
Project management
95
1 176,598.48
2 235.97
3 214,000.00
390,834.45
4
5 390,834.45
6
7 350,432.15
8 2,074.54
9
10 350,432.15
11 40,402.30
NOTES
/i:
Disclosure to Dİscrepancy (11):
268.22
174,922.02
Total discrepancy 175,190.24
Signator 1: / / /
signature date signator's initials position
THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN
Capital Market Modernization Project
Designated Account (DA) Statement
International Bank of Azerbaijan (DA,USD)
as of 9/30/2016
in USD
Opening balance as at 1/1/2016
Add: Cumulative unexplained discrepancy
IBRD advance during period from: 1/1/2016 to: 9/30/2016
Less: Refund to IBRD from DA during the period from: 1/1/2016 to: 9/30/2016
Present outstanding amount advanced to DA
DA closing balance as at 9/30/2016 carried forward to next period
Add: Amount of eligible expenditures paid during quarter
Service charges (if debited into DA)
Less: Interest earned (if credited into DA)
Amounts due to other bank accounts(-) or DA (+)
Amount in cash on hand (retained (+)/due (-))
Total advance accounted for
Discrepancy (5) - (10) to be explained /i
The discrepancy, w hich should be explained in a separate note, may comprise eligible expenditures paid out of DA but not yet entered by the DA bank, amount
advanced by the Bank but not yet credited by the DA bank, etc.
Foreign exchange difference(losses (-)/gains(+)
Payables(-)/advances(+) to contractors and employees
96
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
147.19
39,968.32
Advance Payments
Cumulative Project Expenditures 1/ 15,655,187.74
FUNDS AND LIABILITIES
Project Financing 2/ 15,695,978.27
Other income (like bid fees)
Exchange Rate Difference 3/ -675.02
Total funds and liabilities
NOTE:
1/ Total Uses of Funds (see Report 1-A)
2/ Total Sources of Funds (see report 1-A)
3/ See Report 1-A
Signator 1: / / /
signature date signator's initials position
Signator 2: / / /
signature date signator's initials position
PROJECT BALANCE SHEET
as of: 9/30/2016
in USD
15,695,303.25
15,695,303.25
International Bank of Azerbaijan (Project A/c, AZN)
International Bank of Azerbaijan (DA,USD)
Xalq BankSahil Branch (Project, AZN)
Xalq BankSahil Branch (DA)
Total assets
1