world bank document€¦ · earth borrowing sites, waste disposal sites, and asphalt mixing sites...

E- 344 7VOL. 1

Philippines: Metro Manila UrbanTransport Integration Project

(MMUTRI P)

DPWH / DOTC / MMDA

Draft Environmental Analysis

December 1999

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

------

OVERVIEW

On May 1997, the Metro Manila Urban Transport Integration Project(MMURTRIP) was initiated by the Government through the Department of PublicWorks and Highways (DPWH) and in coordination with the Department ofTransportation and Communication (DOTC) and the Metro Manila DevelopmentAuthority (MMDA) to improve transport facilities in selected areas of MetroManila. The project is expected to be implemented through World Bank fundingsupport.

MMURTRIP is now on the process of preparing the necessary documentsneeded based on World Bank and DENR guidelines prior to implementation ofthe traffic management scheme.

This report presents the Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) of theMMURTRIP undertaken by the Environmental Impact Assessment Project(EIAPO), DPWH to secure the Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) orCertificate of Non-Coverage (CNC) prior to project implementation.

The subject of environmental examination presented in this report consists of:

Phase l:

1. LRT Line 2 Corridoe2. EDSA LRT Line 3 Corridor3. MARIPAS-Marikina Valley, Project

- Marcos Highway (Marcos Bridge to Masinag)4. Secondary Roads

- Ortigas Avenue (C5 to Tikling)- Legarda- Aurora Boulevard- Pasong Tamo- Quezon Boulevard- D. Romualdez

Phase Il:

1. Southern Corridor- Bicutan- Alabang- Sucat

2. MARIPAS - Marikina Valley, Project- Marcos Highway (Katipunan-Major Dizon)- Radial Road IlIl (R3)

3. Secondary Roads- Don Mariano Marcos Avenue- Banawe- Moriones- Quirino Highway- Antonio Arnaiz- South Supe Highway West/East Service Road- Pedro Gil/Panaderos- Gil Puyat- M. de la Fuente (Trabajo)- Hacobo Fajardo (Lealtad)- Tayuman- 1 oth Avenue

Summary of Costs and Project Financing and the Implementation Schedule ispresented in the Annexes.

The project will involve pavement rehabilitation through drainage and sidewalkimprovements with traffic management measures, improvement of intersections(new traffic signals, marking for pedestrian crossing and minor widening), androad improvement (re-surfacing). Pedestrian barriers on median and on sidewalkand new signalized pedestrian crossing will also be provided.

The objective of the project is to address the deterioration of urban transportsituation in Metro Manila by improving integration and management of thetransport system. The focus is on actions within selected areas which wouldenhance the use of public transport, improve the effectiveness of the committedmega-projects and offer road access.

INTRODUCTION

The Public and Private transport system of Metro Manila and its environs whichmakes use of the existing road system consist mostly of tricycles, jeepneys, cars,buses and trucks. With the continually rising number of the vehicles it mayresult to heavy traffic flows along and particularly in certain corridors along MetroManila. An example of this is the heavy concentration of cars and buses alongEDSA.

The conceptual road network of Metro Manila comprises 10 radial roads and 5circumferencial roads. However, the existing road network has becomeinadequate to meet the transport demands of the expanding metropolis due topartially developed primary road system, lack of a well planned and developedsecondary arterial and distributor roads, uncoordinated and inaccessible privateroads and inadequate drainage structures and road appurtenances.

At present, the urban structure of Metro Manila is characterized as follows:

a. The main transport network, including the radial and circumferential roads,emanates from the traditional Central Business District (CND) in the City ofManila. Some of these routes are still incomplete. C4 (EDSA) is the mainring road through which traffic between the north and south Luzon passes.

b. Sub-CBDs are found along C-4 at Baclaran, Makati, Ortigas-Shaw, Cubaoand Monumento. Of these, makati and Ortigas-Shaw are the most important.

c. Large-scale commercial facilities (e.g. shopping centers, supermarkets andrecreational facilities) are concentrated in strategic locations, such as, alongAurora Blvd. (SM Centerpoint), Ortigas Ave. (Greenhills Shopping Center),at the junction of EDSA and North Avenue (SM City), EDSA-JP Rizal(Guadalupe Commercial Complex), Commonwealth Avenue (Ever-Gotesco),Zapote-Alabang Road (SM South mall), Regalado Ave.-Quirino Highway (SMFairview) and along Rl Expressway (Uniwide Coastal Mall).

d. Industrial developments are mainly located around the port area, along or inthe vicinity of the Pasig and Marikina Rivers and along major roads such asC5, South Superhighway, Quirino Highway (R8), Mc Arthur Highway (R9) andthe North Diversion Road.

Likewise, there are lots of future major developments that will have significantimpacts on the urban structure of the metropolitan.

Cognizant of the problems posed by these developments on the road network,the Government has initiated to construct high impact projects both using publicand private sector funds. Among the projects presently being implementedinclude the Metro Manila Skyway, Maniloa-Cavite Toll Expressway, the MRTLines 3 and 2, EDSA-Ayala/Pasay Road Interchange and the Kalayaan-Buendiaviaduct.

However, the simultaneous construction of these projects have resulted in trafficcongestion not only along routes traversed by these projects but also along theroutes of the project area.

Observations made on the existing environmental concerns in the project areaincludes:

1. Indiscriminate bus/FX loading and unloading practices2. Waiting passengers overflow on streets3. Frontage parking operations interfering crossing facilities, bus stops and

passenger waiting facilities.4. Poor interface between pedestrian crossing facilities, bus stops and

passenger waiting facilities.5. Inadequate crossing facilities and poor sidewalks especially in areas with

heavy pedestrian traffic. Sidewalks are occupied by vendors right up to thecurb. People walk on carriageways and cross everywhere.

6. Poor and inadequate lighting7. Indiscriminate pedestrian crossing practices8. Some of the existing signalized intersection is now closed.

The conceptual road network of Metro Manila comprises of 10 radial roads and 5circumferencial roads. However, the existing road network has becomeinadequate to meet the travel demands of the expanding metropolis due partiallydeveloped primary road system, lack of a well planned and developedsecondary arterial and distributor roads, uncoordinated and inaccessible privateroads and inaccessible

Secondary roads program is one of the project component for Metro Manila Urban RoadTransport Integration Project (MMURTRIP). The objective of MMURTRIP is to addressthe deteriorating urban transport situation in Metro Manila by improving integration andmanagement of the transport system. The focus is on actions within selected areas whichwould enhance the use of public transport, improve the effectiveness of the mega-projectsand offer strategic road access particularly outside EDSA.

Aurora Boulevard, Pasong Tamo, Quezon Boulevard and D. Romualdez which areclassified under secondary roads play an important feeder and distribution function forboth private and public transport vehicles.

Measures to Minimize Negative Impacts

Although the adverse impacts are short term in nature the following are planned actionsor countermeasures for adverse impacts:

Pre - Construction

As soon as the contract for the project has been approved and the notice to proceed isreleased, management should brief the workers on their respective job assignments,proper use, care and maintenance of equipment and pertinent rules and regulations of theDPWH, DOH, DOLE, DENR in order to ensure the health and safety of laborers and thesettlers to minimize damage of the environment.

Environmental Issues

Dust/Air Pollution

Earth borrowing sites, waste disposal sites, and asphalt mixing sites should be identifiedon this stage to concern with the enviromnental issues.

Water Pollution

Sewage disposal facilities should be considered to treat the sewage before entering intopublic water source.Noise

Sound barriers should be incorporated.

Population/Socio-Economic

Coordination with concerned offices and agencies for proper settlement and

compensation for the displacement/dislocation of sidewalk vendors. A ResettlementAction Plan (RAP) is being undertaken by Consultants to address such problem.

Prior to implementation, Project Affected Persons (PAPs) should be properlycompensated or relocated to avoid problems during implementation.

Impact during Construction Phase

1 Dust/Air Pollution - During implementation, the extent of air pollution is minimaland temporary.

Mitigation measures:- dust discharge associated with cement storing and handling at the site will be

eliminated through the use of ready mixed concrete- vehicles delivering materials should be covered to reduce spills- limit dust with a sprinkler system

2. Noise Pollution - During work execution, noise impacts can be limited by:- using equipment with less noise generation- installing temporary barriers or screens- working during regular business hours- maintenance of machinery and vehicles should be enhanced to keep their noise

at a minimum.

3. Soil Erosion/Water Pollution

Mitigation Measures:- in building permanent drainage system, temporary canals and culverts will be

built for the sake of irrigating drainage- all necessary measures will be taken to prevent earthworks and stone works

from impeding the existing drainage system- all justifiable measures will be taken to prevent the waste water produced in

construction from entering the system

4. Construction Camp - Sufficient measures will be taken in the construction camps, i.e.provision of garbage tanks and sanitation facilities. Waste in septic tanks will becleared periodically. Special attention shall be paid to the sanitary condition ofcammps.

5. Traffic Management - Installation of warning signs and detour to ensure continuousflow of traffic and minimize traffic disturbance.

6. PopulationlSocio-eonomic issues - Although the construction activities are notexpected to significantly affect the people, the DPWH and Contractor shall quicklyaddress any related issues or problems with the help of the concerned LGUs. The

EIAPO and the RAP Team shall actively participate in the resolution ofissues/problems.

Mitigative measures on this issue during construction includes:- maintain access during work execution- enclose the work site with fencing for safety- plan specific iteneraries for site machinery traffic- define traffic rules encouraging contractors to respect highway regulations

7. Employment - Hiring of local worklers during construction will enhance beneficialimpact on local labor employment.

8. Potential environrnental effects on public health and safety of workers and the public;strict compliance of industrial- health hazards laws and regulations; provision ofworkers camp, water supply and waste management for workers.

Operation and Maintenance Phase

The proponent shall accept the project from the contractor after final inspection of thecompleted project and all the environmental requirements have been satisfied. Theproponent shall then tum-over the project to the concerned LGU who will be responsiblefor the operation and routine periodic maintenance of the facilities.

Maintenance of Drainage System

- Part of the regular maintenance should include the clearing and cleaning ofdrainage structures. Not only will this prevent minor or major flooding of theroad, but also will allow water to drain into the main water courses.

Vehicle Management

- Public will be educated about the regulations on air pollution and noise ofvehicles.

Contingency Plans

There are no major environmental hazards expected to arise during implementation andafter the project completion.

Abandonment Phase

Abandonment of the project site after the turn over shall take the form of simplewithdrawal of the equipment and the labor force from the area. The site will be restoredto natural and stable condition.

Building materials for work camps and other materials remaining after the completion ofthe project shall be turned over to URPO and BOT under the DPWH.

Executive Summary.rtf

I I I:

INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATIONMETRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORT

INTEGRATION PROJECT

Section I General Information

1.Project Name LRT Line 2 Corridor

2. Project Location This corridor extends some 12 km from aterminal station at the intersection of C.M.Recto Avenue and Evangelista St. in the Cityof Manila, to a second terminal (and depot) atsantolan, adjacent to the Marcos Highway.From C.M. Recto, the route follows LegardaSt. then crosses A.H. Lacson (C-2) intoRamon Magsaysay Blvd. The remainder ofthe route follows Aurora Blvd. (R-6) to crossEDSA at Cubao and Katipunan Ave. at theKatipunan Flyover. Thereafter, it follows theMarcos Highway to descend into the MarikinaValley and cross the Marikina River toSantolan.

3.Project Proponent Department of Public Works and Highways

Contact Person Godofredo Z. Galano -Built Operate Transfer(BOT)/Traffic Engineering Center (TEC)

Elsie Joson -Urban Roads Project Office(URPO)

Address DPWH, Bonifacio Drive Port Area, Manila

Designation Director of TEC/BOTDirector PMO-URPO

Tel/Fax # 527-56-28/527-89-21/527-27-12

E-mail Dpwheia@skyinet. net

4.Project Category and The project covers:Project Components

- traffic management at and betweenintersections

- measures for controlling inappropriatefrontage activity

- road improvements (including drainage)- sidewalk improvements- additional lighting- intersection improvements- pedestrian barriers- replacement of signal for pedestrian

crossing

5.Project Objectives : The objective of the project is to address thedeteriorating urban transport situation inMetro Manila by improving integration andmanagement of the transport system. Thefocus is on actions within selected areaswhich would enhance the use of publictransport, improve the effectiveness of thecommitted mega-projects and offer strategicroad access particularly in areas outsideEDSA.

6.Project Cost : See Annex

7.Project Schedule : See Annex

Section II. Description of Existing Environment

i. Physical Environment

Components / Parameters Yes No RemarksA. ) Does the road pass through flat terrain? X

(0-8% slope) In what portion?

B.)Does the road pass through rolling toundulating to rolling terrain? (8-18% slope) X

C.) Does the road pass through rolling tomoderately steep / steeply mountainous Xterrain? (18-40% slope)

D.) Is the road terrain steeply mountainous?(above 50% slope)

E.) Is the road project near or within a forestreserve or a protected watershed area? If X"Yes", Name of area and how near?

Meters

F.) 1. Would there be berthing or pier structurealong the shoreline/tidal zone that are proneto storm/monsoonal tidal surges? X

2. Does the road project passes thrushoreline? X

G.) Is the area prone to erosion? If so, what isthe status; slight, moderate or severe X

H.) Are there existing natural hazards on thearea? E.g. landslides, gullying, subsidence. If"Yes" enumerate them? X

I.) Are there drainageways/creeks within thearea draining toward communitiesdownstream? X

J.) Is the road project prone to flooding/stormssurge area? X

11. Biological / Ecological Environment

Parameters Yes No Remarks

a.) Is the road project adjacent to a naturalecosystem

x1. Forest

x2. Coastal/marine

x3. Grassland

x4. Mangrove

x5. Agriculture

.x6. Lake & river

|7. Others

b.) Is there any wildlife that could be affected?x

c.) Are there trees that will be cut within theproject site? X

d.) Are there vegetation with economic valuewithin the project site that could be Xaffected?

d.) Are there fishery resources that could beaffected by the project X

111. Socio-Economic Environment

The project will not in anyway cause adverse effects on the socio-economicenvironment. It is expected, however, that impacts beneficial to thesurrounding community will be created as a result of the major developmentson the transport infrastructure system.

The proposed improvements such as traffic signal synchronization, upgradingof sidewalks, removal of commercial activities along roadside will bringefficiency in traffic and vehicle movements, reduction in travel time andpedestrian safety.

Section III: Environmental Impact Checklist

Initial Environmental ExaminationEnvironmental Parameters Positive Impact No Negative Impact

___ _Impact

High Med Lo Hig Med Low_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ w h

3 2 1 0 3 2 11. Physical _ _ :_ =__

Erosion __ = XDrainage X XRegional Hydrology/ XFlooding _ _

Ground water table X XWater quality XWaste water flow = X =Air quality XHouse quality _ _ XLand Conversion= __ _____ XOthers : (Specify)_________

E11. Biological / Ecological = = =Mangrove XCoral reefs XEndangered Species XAquatic life __ XWildlife . XOthers: (Specify)

111. Human Interest (Social) _ =Labor & employment X =_= =Housing & Social Services

x _Population X _ X_=X=

Culture & Lifestyle X _

Transportation XPublic Health & Safety XVulnerable groups XI P's X _ _

Historical / ArcheologicalInterest X

Tourism X = XX

Others : (Specify) X = _

Section IV - Environmental Assessment

Because of its function as a major urban radial route - this road project isdesignated as radial road R6 in the Metro Manila road hierarchy.

Along its inner section the route passes through old, but very busy commercialareas, where physical conditions are far from good. The area around C.M.Recto and Legarda is also occupied by many schools and colleges thatgenerate large movements of students at certain times of day, added to whichthe roadway in Legarda is fairly narrow.

Between A.H. Lacson and the San Juan River, the route is wider, with buildingsgenerally set back in a more planned design. Here commercial activity is notso intense, but there are still many schools and some government buildings. Atthe corner with G. Araneta Avenue (C3) lies SM Centre Point - one of the largeretail complexes operated by Shoe Mart.

Beyond the San Juan River, as far as Cubao, the route passes through alargely residential area with some small businesses as well as more schoolsand colleges. In many places the roadway here is much narrower-barely twolanes in each direction, sidewalks are poor or non-existent and buildings arelocated quite close to the roadway.

Being one of the major urban sub-centres in Metro manila, the area roundCubao is commercially very active, with much pedestrian and roadside activity.Cubao is also a major public transport hub, with 32 jeepney routes and 45 busroutes currently terminating there, and others passing through. Beyond Cubao,the route continues to pass through a highly commercialized part of AuroraBlvd. before coming to an area near Katipunan that is fronted by schools andoffice developments. Throughout this section, sidewalks are often in poorcondition and informal activities (such as the construction and repair ofjeepneys) often spill over onto the roadway.

The final section to Santolan passes through a cutting in the Marikina Valleyescarpment. The RROW are generally wider here, and frontage activity is lessobvious.

With the implementation of the project, no properties will be affectedconsidering that the proposed component of the project is only improvement ofthe existing traffic facilities.

Section V. Project Activities

The Proposed actions in this corridor are concentrated on improving thegeneral flow of traffic, improving passenger handling capabilities in the vicinityof the proposed LRT stations and providing better facilities for integrationbetween road and rail based transport modes. To achieve this, corridormanagement measures are proposed, including (but not limited to) thefollowing:

- a coordinated traffic signal system along the corridor;

- physical and management actions (such as frontage control through sidewalkimprovements and limitation of parking, loading/unloading and other roadsideactivities) to ensure maximum operating efficiency and pedestrian safety;

- similar actions along side roads leading to major intersections, especiallywhere public transport routes are involved or where such actions are requiredto ensure maximum efficiency of traffic signal equipment;

- closure of selected side roads to separate/rationalise pedestrian andvehicular movements in the vicinity of proposed LRT stations or other transportinterchange points.

For sidewalks, the objective is to bring them up to uniform standards, whereverpossible, with a view to reducing side friction effects to a minimum andproviding a safe and convenient facility for the passage of pedestrians.

Special consideration will be required in the vicinity of proposed LRT stations.Special consideration will also be required in locations where there are arcadedsidewalks (which are usually regarded as public right-of-way within privateproperty).

Section VI. Environmental Management Plan

Although the adverse impact are minimal and short term in nature consideringthat the proposed project involves only traffic management wherein emphasis ison the improvement and better management of existing facilities improvementsof intersection, road pavements, sidewalks an Environmental ManagementPlan is presented in this IEE. The following are the planned actions orcountermeasures on the adverse environmental impacts:

PROJECT MODERATE MITIGATION OR RESPONSIBL COSTPHASE OR ENHANCEMENT E

SIGNIFICANT MEASURES PERSONIMPACTS

I.Pre- Hiring of Local DPWH will prioritize DPWH, LGUs NilConstruction labour force the people residing in concerned

the area for the Contractorconstruction laborforce

Spoil and Strict Consultants Nilconstruction enforcement/implem DPWH, DEN Rwaste disposal entation of health

hazards laws andregulations

IL. Air Pollution/ During construction DPWH, NilConstruction Dust discharge the extent of air ContractorPhase pollution is minimal and DENR

and temporary. Dustdischarge associatedwith cement storingand handling at thesite will be eliminatedthrough the use ofready mixed concreteHeavy dustgeneration is notexpected duringconstructionactivities.

Noise Equipment with less DPWH, NilGeneration noise generation will Contractor

be used during and DENRconstruction.

Socio-Economic Although the DPWH,Issues construction activities Contractor

are not expected to LGUs

significantly affect the concernedpeople, the DPWHand Contractor shallquickly address anyconstruction-relatedissues or problemswith the help of theconcerned LGUs.

Employment Hiring of local Contractor, Nilworkers during DPWH andconstruction period LGUswill enhancebeneficial impact onlocal laboremployment

Traffic Installation of DPWH, NilManagement warning Signs. Contractor,

MMDAEnsure continuousflow of traffic andminimize trafficdisturbanceEnsure goodbehavior ofconstruction trafficthrough restriction,incentives and

________________ ____________ sanctionsPublic Health/ Strict enforcement/ DPWH NilSanitation Implementation of Contractor

health hazards lawsand regulations

111. Operation Noise Enforce use of good DPWH,LGU Niland mufflers; driver Police MMDAMaintenance education and local

ordinance on properuse of horn

Risk of Install safety features DPWH, Nilincreased following local Contractoraccident consultation LGU

Section VI. Environmental Monitoring Plan

The proposed impact and compliance monitoring is intended for the continuedobservation and evaluation of the integrated impacts during the entire phase ofproject cycle. The proponent will closely coordinate with the DENR and theLGUs on the monitoring activities. For a smooth implementation of the project,the proponent will appoint a monitoring team for proper coordination with theDENR and the LGUs.

A Multi-Partite Monitoring Team (MMT) will be created to monitor complianceto the conditionalities of ECC and monitor the environmental impacts that mayarise before, during and after implementation of the project.

The composition of the MMT are:

1. Representative from the Proponent2. Representative from DENR/EMPAS3. Representative from Local Government Unit (LGU)4. Representative from NGO5. Representative from the EIAPO

PROJECT ISSUES SUBJECT OF REMARKS/ RESPONSI-PHASE MONITORING MEASURES BILITY

1. Pre- Hiring of Number of skilled Ensure that local LGU, DPWH,Construc- labor force and unskillied local labor force are NHA andtion Phase workers being prioritized. other

concernedagencies

II. Air pollution Air pollution Air pollution is only DENR, DPWHConstruc- level/dust discharge minimal andtion Phase temporary during

Compliance with air construction,standard sprinkling of water

on dust producingpiles/mounds.

Noise Monitor noise level Schedule DENR, DPWHpollution according to operation of

standards. equipment atdaytime

Monitor thecompliance of

contractor tomitigation measures

Traffic Traffic Flow/ Install traffic signs DPWH,Management subject to Contractor

supervision of the MMDAMMDA trafficpersonnel.

Spoil and Monitor Solid Waste Identification of ContractorConstructio Management Plan Disposal Sites and DPWH, DENRn waste implement theDisposal Solid Waste

Management Plan

Screening Checklist Project: MMURTRIP EIAPO

LRT Line 2 Corridor Social and Environmental Management System(Ma Bridge-Recto) ~~~~~~~~~~~~Form No., Page 1 of 3(Marcos Bridge-Recto) Revision No., 14/12/99

Checklist to determine whether the project is an Environmental Critical Project:

Project Description Yes No Explanation

a) Is the project a new construction .

b) Does the project comprise realignments exceeding themaximum length shown in the third column of Table 2

c- I) Does the road project comprise widening >20%. Thisshall be measured in relation to the existing width of thepaved area or travel width of gravel roads.

c-2) Does the road project include widening that will 'result in one or more additional lanes.

d) Is it expected that the road project will increase the Although the AADT is expected to increase for this sub-component is aboveaccess to the influence area by 50% or more as measured 50% the project is intended to alleviate the present and future trafficby an increase in the Annual Average Daily Traffic over congestion by means of providing signalization, pedestrian improvements.the first five year period Thus, the increase of traffic is not caused by the project and therefore the

project is not considered to be an Environmental Critical Project.e) Is the project a water impoundment project with a

3capacity of >20 million m3.

) Does the project comprise betterment, improvement orreplacement of bridges with more than 4 spans and/orexceeding 80 m.

If the yes is the correct answer to just one of the questions a) - f) then the project shall be considered as an Environmental Critical Project.

Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/dateBenjamin Austria Glenn Morgan

World Bank

Screening Checklist Project: MMURTRIP EIAPOLRT Line 2 Corridor Social and Environmental Management System

Form No., Page 2 of 3(Marcos Bridge-Recto) Revision No. 14/12/99

Checklist to determine whether the project is located in an Environmental Critical Area:

Question Yes No Rating Actual Explanationif Yes Rating

I) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in NationalIPark/Watershed/Sanctuary2) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an 2Aesthetic potential tourist spot3) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 4with endangered species4) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with unique/archeological/scientific area5) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with indigenous culture communities6) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 Iwith high incidence of natural hazards7) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with critical slopes (>40%)8) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with prime agricultural land9) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 4 2recharge area for aquifers10) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 2with protected water bodiesI I) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 4 4mangrove area12) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4with coral reefsTotal Rating 0

If yes to just one of the questions and with a total rating less than 5 then an IEE shall be prepared. If the total rating is 5 or above an EIS shall beprepared.


World Bank

Shift in horizontal Shift in horizontal Maximum total lengthrealignment (m) for realignment (m) for lowland permitted for non-criticalmountainous roads roads (<200 m above sea projects (m)(>200 m above sea level) level)

0-1 0-2 1,0001-2 2-5 5002-5 5-10 100

5-10 10-20 50>10 >20 ECP

Table 2 Maximum length of realignments

S;ocial and Lnvironmental Management SystemForm No. Page I of I

Revision No. 0, 14/12/99

ENFORM I

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Region: NCR - National Caoital Region

I. Name Proponent DPWH - URPO PMO

II. Address 2nd St., Port Area Manila

Ill. Project Name or Title MMURTRIP - LRT Line 2 Corridor Marcos Bridge-Recto

IV. Project Location (See map attached)

Barangay C.M. Recto

Municipality Manila

Province : Metro Manila

V. Description of Project:

This corridor extends some 12 km from a terminal station at the intersection of C.M. Recto Avenue and

Evangelista St., in the City of Manila, to a second terminal (and adopt) at Santolan, adjacent to the Marcos

Highway. From C.M. Recto, the route follows Legarda St. then crosses A.H. Lacson (C-2) into Ramon

Magsaysay Blvd. The remainder of the route follows Aurora Blvd., (R-6) to cross EDSA at Cubao and

Katipunan Ave., at the Katipunan flyover. Thereafter, it follows the Marcos Highway to descend into the

Marikina Valley and cross the Marikina River to Santolan

I hereby certify that the above information are true to my knowledge and I shall be held liable if found to beuntrue.

Date Filed

Signature of Proponent orAuthorized Representative

Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/dateBenjamin A usteria/Dolly Vilorial Glenn MorganPnu,k,,, Aviorn WnrId Rfl,-

I I' I i.


INTEGRATION PROJECT


1 .Project Name EDSA (LRT Line 3 Corridor)

2.Project Location EDSA is one of the most important transportcorridors in Metro Manila. It extends in broadarc from Roxas Boulevard in the south, toMonumento, in the north, and is designatedas Circumferential Road 4 (C4) in the MetroManila road hierarchy.






Tel/Fax # : 527-56-28/527-89-21/527-27-12

E-mail : [email protected]

4.Project Category and : The project covers:Project Components

- traffic management at intersections- bus stopping management- frontage management- intersection improvements- replacement of existing signals for selected

pedestrian crossings- sidewalk improvements (clearing of

obstruction and paving)- new pedestrian overpasses

3

- pedestrian barriers- road improvement (including sidewalks)- Bollards (for pedestrianization)- Additional lighting- Service road barrier

5.Project Objectives The objective of the project is to address thedeteriorating urban transport situation inMetro Manila by improving integration andmanagement of the transport system.

6.Project Cost See annex

7.Project Schedule See annex

4

Section II: Description of Existing Environment

I. Physical Environment

Components I Parameters Yes No RemarksA. ) Does the road pass through flat terrain? X


B.)Does the road pass through undulating torolling terrain? (8-18% slope) X


D.) Is the road terrain steeply mountainous?(above 50% slope) X


Meters


2. Does the road project passes thrushoreline? If "Yes", how far?m. X





5

111. Biological / Ecological Environment



x1. Forest

x2. Coastal/marine

x3. Grassland

x4. Mangrove

x5. Agriculture

x6. lake& river

7. Others

b.) Is there any wildlife that could be affected?




6

111. Socio-Economic Environment


The proposed improvements such as traffic signal synchronization, upgradingof sidewalks, removal of commercial activities along the roadside will bringefficiency in traffic and vehicle movements, reduction in travel time andpedestrian safety.

7


Initial Environmental Examination - _|

Environmental Parameters Positive Impact No Negative ImpactImpact

High Med Lo Hig Med Loww h

3 2 1 0 3 2 11. Physical

Erosion X _

Drainage = X =Regional Hydrology i XFloodingGround water table XWater quality XWaste water flow XAir quality _ XHouse quality = XLand Conversion XOthers :(Specify)

11. Biological / EcologicalMangrove = X = -Coral reefs X _Endangered Species XAquatic life _ _ XWildlife _ |_ _ XOthers: (Specify)

lli. Human Interest (Social) .Labor & employment X XHousing & Social Services

xPopulation X __

Culture & Lifestyle XTransportation XPublic Health & Safety X = =_=_Vulnerable groups XIP's XHistorical / ArcheologicalInterest X

Tourism X _

Others: (Specify)

8

Section IV - Environmental Assessment

EDSA is designated as a bus corridor by DOTC and it is the most heavilytrafficked bus corridor in the Metropolis, with bus flows in the core section of theroute exceeding 6,500 per 14-hour day in each direction and averaging about600 buses in each direction during peak hours. The structure of services issuch that most bus routes in Metro Manila converge on EDSA. It is a wideroad-generally with 5 lanes in each direction-and is grade-separated at mostlocations where it crosses major radial routes.

From Roxas Boulevard to the South Superhighway (SSH), at Magallanes,EDSA passes through an area of older commercial development backed bydense residential areas. Here commercial activity spills onto the street andthere is also much public transport passenger activity, especially in the vicinityof the LRT Line 1 EDSA station.

Beyond the SSH, as far as Buendia (Gil Puyat) Avenue, the route is flanked bythe walls of prosperous subdivisions, which result in minimal frontage access.Only in the vicinity of the Ayala Centre-in front of the Shoe Mart departmentstore- do such effects make themselves felt. Along this section the three at-grade intersections (with Pasay road, Ayala Ave. and Buendia Ave.) presentmajor obstacles to movement of both traffic and pedestrians, and regularlygenerate long traffic delays.

The section of EDSA between Buendia Avenue and the Pasig River, atGuadalupe Bridge, continues to be flanked by sub-division walls on the westernside, while the eastern side is lined for the most part by low-intensitycommercial activity, backed by dense low-rise residential development. At thenorthern end, however, the commercial activity intensifies around theGuadalupe market, as does public transport passenger activity. This regularlyresults in the congestion for through traffic, which is made worse when queuesfrom the two intersections on J.P. Rizal Street extend back onto the maincarriageway.

Between the Pasig River and Ortigas Ave., EDSA passes close to the majornew urban sub-centre of Ortigas. As its southern end, this part of the route islined with relatively low intensity commercial development, but this intensifiesaround Shaw BLVD. Where there are several large commercial and retailcomplexes, including the SM Mega Mall. On the eastern side of EDSA, and tothe south of Shaw Boulevard. Lies the EDSA Central bus and jeepney terminal,which together with other smaller terminals in the area generates significantpublic transport passenger movements. The intersections with ShawBoulevard and Ortigas Avenue are both grade-separated, the former beinggrade-separated in both directions and the latter having flyovers for left-turningvehicles, as well as along EDSA itself.

The section of EDSA beyond Ortigas Avenue, as far as Santolan road, passesbetween high-income sub-divisions and two military camps. There is therefore

9

little frontage activity, and even where this does exist it poses little problem topassing traffic.

Beyond this, the corridor changes character again, with a series ofunderpasses and flyovers and inter-linked service roads taking traffic throughthe busy Cubao area. Here frontage activity is at its highest and roadsideconditions are at their worst-although the presence of service roads protectsthrough traffic from much of the resulting disruption.

From East Avenue to North Avenue, EDSA is fronted by government officecomplexes and low-intensity commercial developments, which have little impacton traffic flow. Work is in hand to grade-separate the two major intersections inthe area (at Quezon Avenue and North Avenue), thus reducing the delays thatare currently experienced at those locations.

The implementation of the project showed that no properties will be affectedand no person will be displaced considering that the proposed projectcomponent is only measures for improving transport facilities.

Section V: Project Activities

The primary objective of the proposed bus management measures relates tobus stopping arrangements that would be needed to adjust the position ofsome existing bus stops (particularly taking into account their inter-relationshipwith LRT station access points) and to reconsider the stopping pattern of busservices (effectively amending the existing bus stop segregation scheme). Amore permanent system of barriers and segregation will need to be consideredand bus stops will need to be more clearly marked.

The LRT Line 3 is under construction and is expected to be in operation by theend of 1999, and there are ongoing traffic signal upgrading and re-pavingcontracts.

10

Section VI: Environmental Management Plan

Although the adverse impact are minimal and short term in nature consideringthat the proposed project involves only traffic management wherein emphasis ison the improvement and better management of existing facilities, improvementsof intersection, road pavements, sidewalks an Environmental ManagementPlan is presented in this IEE. The following are the planned actions orcountermeasures on the adverse environmental impacts:



I.Pre- Hiring of Local DPWH and DPWH, LGUs NilConstruction labour force Contractor will concerned

prioritized the people Contractorresiding in the areafor the constructionlabor force

Spoil and Establish Consultants, Nilconstruction guidelines/criteria for DPWH, DENRwaste disposal spoil disposal

methods/sitesII. Air Pollution/ During construction, DPWH, NilConstruction Dust discharge the extent of air ContractorPhase pollution is minimal and DENR





are not expected to LGUs

11



Traffic Installation of DPWH, NilManagement warning Signs, Contractor,

Detour MMDA

Ensure continuousflow of traffic andminimize trafficdisturbanceEnsure goodbehavior ofconstruction trafficthrough restriction,incentives andsanctions

Public Health/ Strict enforcement/ DPWH NilSanitation Implementation of Contractor





12

Section VIl: Environmental Monitoring Plan


A Multi-Partite Monitoring Team (MMT) will be created to monitor compliance tothe conditionalities of ECC and monitor the environmental impacts that mayarise before, during and after implementation of the project.


1. Representative from the Proponent2. Representative from DENR/EMPAS3. Representative from Local Government Unit (LGU)4. Representative from NGO5. Representative from EIAPO


1. Pre- Hiring of Number of skilled Ensure that local LGU, DPWH,Construc- labor force and unskilled labor force are and othertion Phase workers being prioritized concerned

agencies



on dust producingpiles/mounds

Noise Monitor noise level Schedule DENR, DPWHpollution According to operation of


Monitor thecompliance ofcontractor tomitigation measures I

13


supervision of the MMDAMMDA trafficpersonnel


Management Plan

14


EDSA LRT Line 3 Corridor Social and Environmental Management SystemEDSA LRT Line 3 Corridor ~~~~~~~~~Form No. , Page I of 3

Revision No., 14/12/99



a) Is the project a new constructioin

b) Does the project comprise realignments exceeding themaximum length shown in the third column of Table 2

c-I) Does the road project comprise widening >20%. This -shall be measured in relation to the existing width of thepaved area or travel width of gravel roads.

c-2) Does the road project include widening that willresult in one or more additional lanes.

d) Is it expected that the road project will increase the Although the AADT is expected to increase for this sub-component is above

access to the influence area by 50% or more as measured 50% the project is intended to alleviate the present and future traffic

by an increase in the Annual Average Daily Traffic over congestion by means of providing signalization, pedestrian improvements.

the first five year period Thus, the increase of traffic is not caused by the project and therefore theproject is not considered to be an Environmental Critical Project.

e) Is the project a water impoundment project with acapacity of >20 million m3.

f) Does the project comprise betterment, improvement orreplacement of bridges with more than 4 spans and/orexceeding 80 m.


Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/date

Benjamin Austria Glenn MorganWorld Bank

Screening Checklist Project: MMURTRIP EIAPOSocial and Environmental Management SystemEDSA LRT Line 3 Corridor Form No., Page 2 of 3




I) Does the project traverse and/or arc the project located in National 4 5ParklWatershed/Sanctuary _2) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an 4 2Aesthetic potential tourist spot3) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 4with endangered species4) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with unique/archeological/scientific area5) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with indigenous culture communities6) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 Iwith high incidence of natural hazards7) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with critical slopes (>40%) .8) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with prime agricultural land9) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 4recharge area for aquifers10) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 2with protected water bodies _

I I) Does the project travese and/or are the project located In a 4 4mangrove area I_ _ .12) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with coral reefs ___ _____

Total Rating 0



World Bank


0-1 0-2 1,0001-2 2-5 5002-5 5-10 100

5-10 10-20 50>10 >20 ECP


Žoczal ana tnvzronmentai man"gementr 0.)IyC,lForm No. Page I of I


ENFORM 1


Region: NCR - National Capital Region


II. Address 2 nd St., Port Area Manila

III. Project Name or Title MMURTRIP - EDSA LRT Line 3 Corridor

IV. Project Location (See attached map)

Barangay Epefanio de los Santos Avenue

Municipality Quezon City

Province Metro Manila


EDSA Corridor, extending some 18 km. between North Avenue, and Roxas Blvd., the same general

design philosophy is to be followed in terms of intersection and frontage management, the provision of

facilities for pedestrians and catering to the needs of public transport passengers and vehicles. This will

involve complementary action inside streets areas such as Cubao, Shaw Boulevard, Boni/Pioneer,

Guadalupe, Magallanes and Taft.

I hereby certify that the above inforrnation are true to my knowledge and I shall be held liable if found to beuntrue.

Date Filed


Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/dateBenjamin Austria/Dolly Vilorial Glenn MorganRnulm, .4,ieorn WnrMd Rnnlr

I fr p


INTEGRATION PROJECT


1.Project Name Marcos Highway (Marcos Bridge to Masinag)

2.Project Location : This package runs for a distance of 4.6 kmfrom the construction limit of Package 3 to theSumulong Highway at Masinag. It passes infront of the proposed Santolan LRT 2 terminal(station and depot site), where furthercommercial development is planned, throughthree closely spaced signalized intersections,with A. Rodriguez, F. Mariano and ImeldaAve. And in front of another commercialdevelopment at Sta. Lucia East.

3.Project ProponentDepartment of Public Works and Highways

Contact PersonGodofredo Z. Galano -Built Operate Transfer(BOT)lTraffic Engineering Center (TEC)


AddressDPWH, Bonifacio Drive Port Area, Manila

DesignationDirector of TEC/BOTDirector PMO-URPO

Tel/Fax #527-56-28/527-89-21/527-27-12

E-mail [email protected]

4.Project Category and : Intersection Management Measures has beenProject Components proposed for this road such as:

- Widening of northern approach by 1 laneover a 40 m length. Widening of MarcosHighway approaches included in generalcarriageway expansion.

- Prohibit left turn in Marcos Highway/F.Mariano, from east to south and west tonorth.

- New traffic signals (co-ordinated)- Clearance of frontage activity, signal

optimisation, road signing and marking,and improvement of pedestrian crossingfacilities are proposed at all intersections.

Project Objective The objective of the project is to address thedeteriorating urban transport situation inMetro Manila by improving integration andmanagement of the transport system. Thefocus is on actions within selected areaswhich would enhance the use of publictransport, improve the effectiveness of thecommitted mega-projects and offer strategicroad access particularly in areas outsideEDSA.

6. Project Cost see annexed

7.Project Schedule See annexed

Section II Description of Existing Environment


Components / Parameters Yes No RemarksA. ) Does the road pass through flat terrain?

(0-8% slope) In what portion? X



D.) Is the road terrain steeply mountainous?(above 50% slope) x


Meters


2. Does the road project passes thrushoreline? If "Yes", how far?m X



i.) Are there drainageways/creeks within thearea draining toward communitiesdownstream? X


11: Biological / Ecological Environment



x1. Forest

x2. Coastal/marine

x3. Grassland

x4. Mangrove

x5. Agriculture

x6. lake & river

7. Others

b. Is there any wildlife that could be affected?.____x




IlI: Socio-Economic Environment





Impact ______

High Med Lo Hig Med Loww h

3 2 1 0 3 2 11. Physical

Erosion XDrainage XRegional Hydrology/ XFlooding _

Ground water table XWater quality XWaste water flow _ X Air quality =XHouse quality _ xLand Conversion X_Others: (Specify) _

11. Biological / EcologicalMangrove XCoral reefs XEndangered Species X _ _ XAquatic life X -Wildlife - XOthers: (Specify) _ _

111. Human Interest (Social)Labor & employment X _Housing & Social Services

xPopulation X _ -

Culture & Lifestyle XTransportation X Public Health & Safety XVulnerable groups XIP's = = X = = =Historical / ArcheologicalInterest X

Tourism X

Others: (Specify) _

Section IV - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

This section of Marcos Highway passes in front of the Santolan LRT2 terminal(station and depot)site, through three closely-spaced signalized intersections,in front of the Sta. Lucia East shopping mall, and on towards the SumulongHighway, at Masinag. The intention here is to establish an at-grade trafficmanagement scheme which, together with priority measures for public transportvehicles, will act as an efficient conduit for traffic travelling to and from MetroManila. It will also assist public transport vehicles to access the LRT terminal,thus providing greater integration between road-based and rail-based publictransport services.

It is intended that the roadway be widened to 4 lanes in each directionthroughout, with additional lanes as required at intersection approaches. TheRoad cross-section to be developed would allow for sidewalks and covereddrains, together with a sufficiently wide median to accommodate futureextension of the LRT as far as Masinag. Allowance would also be made forfuture grade-separation, should this become necessary (and justifiable). Thiscross- section is wider than is strictly required for existing traffic flows, but thephilosophy is to define a carriageway edge treatment (kerbing, sidewalks,drainage, etc.) that does not have to be adjusted later - rather than an interimcross-section that will need further widening. The additional width would betaken up by a wider median, or could be used to facilitate the introduction ofpublic transport priority lanes.

A pedestrian bridge and associated jeepney bays are likely to be required atthe Santolan LRT terminal. This is especially important on the northern side ofMarcos Highway, where passengers will alight from passing jeepneys to enterthe station (passengers on jeepneys that are turning via the Marikina loop roadwill also probably wish to alight at this top.)

On the southern side of Marcos Highway, public transport vehicles could beaccomodated in the planned multi-mode terminal, rather than on the highway.However, this will only be achieved in practice by making access to the terminalvery convenient for passing vehicles. The exact access arrangements are stillbeing determined by the private sector developers of the site - but therequirement should nevertheless be noted, and steps taken to ensure that anappropriate design is followed.

The Rosario area immediately to the east of the bridge is also an importanttransport interchange between east-west bus and jeepney routes on OrtigasAvenue and north-south jeepney routes on A. Rodriguez and Dr. Sixto AntonioAvenues. Here, interchange and boarding and alighting activities usually takeplace on the street, contributing with other frontage activities, to a significantloss of traffic capacity. (When this occurs, the roadway is reduced to only 2lanes in each direction instead of the normal 3 lanes).

As to environmental consideration, the first 150 meters of the route are lined by

Masinag Market and a, series of small-scale commercial developments. Furthereast, for a distance of about 2 kms, the main frontage land use consists ofresidential sub-divisions, and for the final 300 m, the ROW between twosections of the Heaven's Gate Memorial Park. In addition, as the road risesinto the hills, the ridge of land on which the existing ROW is situated isrelatively narrow.

With the implementation of the proposed improvements, assessmentsrevealed that no structures and persons will be affected.


The proposed scheme involves establishing a uniform cross-section withurbanized characteristics (kerbs, sidewalks, covered drainage and regulatedstopping places for public transport vehicles). The roadway would be widenedto 4 lanes in each direction throughout, with additional lanes at intersectionapproaches, and the central median would be sufficiently widened toaccomodate the structures of the future extension of the LRT as far asMasinag. Allowance would also be made for grade separation of the majorintersections should this become necessary (and justifiable) in the future.

The overall intention is to establish an at-grade traffic management schemewhich, together with priority measures for public transport vehicles, will act asan efficient conduit for traffic travelling to and from Metro Manila. It will alsoassist public transport vehicles to access the LRT Terminal, thus providinggreater integration between road-based public transport services.

Special intention will be required to the area adjacent to the LRT terminal,where a pedestrian bridge and associated jeepney bays are likely to berequired. Adequate pedestrian crossing facilities will also be required in otherlocations, both at and between intersections to ensure that convenient accessto public transport stopping places is possible in both directions.

In order to ensure a smooth flow of traffic, it is anticipated that traffic signaltimings along the corridor will be coordinated. Rationalization and prohibition ofsome turning movements at major intersections may also be required to ensureoptimum system performance.


Although the adverse impact are minimal and short term in nature consideringthat the proposed project involves only traffic management wherein emphasis ison the improvement and better management of existing facilities, improvementsof intersection, road pavements, sidewalks an Environmental ManagementPlan is presented in this IEE. The following are the planned actions orcountermeasures on the adverse environmental impacts:

PROJECT MITIGATION ORPHASE MODERATE ENHANCEMENT RESPONSIBL COST

OR MEASURES ESIGNIFICANT PERSON

IMPACTS

I.Pre- Hiring of local DPWH and DPWH, LGUs NilConstruction labour force Contractor will concerned

prioritized the people Contractorresiding in the areafor the constructionlabor force.

Spoil and Establish Consultants, Nilconstruction guidelines/criteria for DPWH, DENRwaste disposal spoil disposal

methods/sites11. Air Pollution/ During construction, DPWH, NilConstruction Dust discharge the extent of air ContractorPhase pollution is minimal and DENR





Iare not expected to LGUs




Detour MMDA

Ensure continuousflow of traffic andminimize trafficdisturbance

Ensure goodbehavior ofconstruction trafficthrough restriction,incentives andsanctions

Public Health/ Strict enforcement! DPWH NilSanitation Implementation of Contractor


Ill. Operation Noise Enforce use of good DPWH,LGU Niland mufflers; driver PoliceMaintenance education and local MMDA




The proposed impact and compliance monitoring is intended for the continuedobservation and evaluation of the integrated impacts during the entire phase ofproject cycle. The proponent will closely coordinate with the DENR and theLGUs on the monitoring activities. For a smooth implementation of the project,the proponent will appoint a monitoring team for proper coordinates with theDENR and the LGUs.



1. Representative from the Proponent2. Representative from the DENR/EMPAS3. Representative from the Local Government Unit (LGU)4. Representative from NGO5. Representative from EIAPO

PROJECT ISSUES SUBJECT OF REMARKS! RESPONSI-PHASE MONITORING MEASURES BILITY

1. Pre- Hiring of Number of skilled Ensure that local LGU, DPWH,Construc- labor force and unskilled local labor force are NHA andtion Phase workers being prioritized. other

concernedagencies


Compliance with air construction butstandard require contractor

watering of theproject area ifdusty

Noise Monitor noise level Schedule DENR, DPWHpollution operation of

Monitor the equipment atcompliance of daytimecontractor to

mitigation measures


Supervision of the MMDAMMDA


Management Plan

Screening Checklist 1roject: MMURTRIP EIAPOMarcos l{ighway (Marcos Bridge- Social and Environmental Management System

Marcos Itighway (Marcos Bridge- ~~~~~Form No., Page I of 3Masinag) Revision No., 14/12/99



a) Is the project a new construction 4

b) Does the project comprise realignments exceeding tile 4maximum length shown in the third column of Table 2

c- I) Does the road project comprise widening >20%. This 4shall be measured in relation to the existing width of thepaved area or travel width of gravel roads.

c-2) Does the road project include widening that will 4result in one or more additional lanies.

d) Is it expected that the road project will increase the 4 Althoughi the AADT is expected to increase for this sub-component is above 50% theaccess to the influence area by 50% or more as measured project is intended to alleviate the present and ftiture traffic congestion by means ofby an increase in the Annual Average Daily Traffic over widening of northern approach by I lane over a 40 m length, including carriageway.the first five year period Thus, tie increase of traffic is not caused by the project and therefore the project isnot considered to be an Environmental Critical Project.

e) Is the project a water impotindment project with a 4capacity of>20 million m3.


If the yes is the correct answer to just one of the questions a) - f) then the project shiall be considered as an Environmental Critical Project.


World Bank

Screening Checklist Project: MMURTRIP EIAPOMarcos Highway (Marcos Bridge- Social and Environniental Management System

Marcos Highway (Marcos Bridge- ~~~~~~Formn No. , Page 2 of 3Masinag) Revision No. 14/12/99



i) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in National -5

Park/Watershed/Sanctuary2) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an 2Aesthetic potential tourist spot3) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area j 4with endangered species4) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an areawith unique/archeological/scientific area5) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an areawith indigenous culture communities6) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an areawith high incidence of natural hazards7) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 5 5with critical slopes (>40%)8) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area _ j 3with prime agricultural land9) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a j 2recharge area for aquifers10) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area ' 2with protected water bodiesI I) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 4 4mangrove area12) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area J 5with coral reefsTotal Rating 0



World Bank


0-1 0-2 1,0001-2 2-5 5002-5 5-10 100

5-10 10-20 50>10 >20 ECP


Sociai and tnvironmenial Management .vsiemForm No. Page I of]


ENFORM I


Region: NCR - National Capital Reeion

I. Name Proponent : DPWH - URPO PMO

II. Address 2nd St.. Port Area Manila

III. Project Name or Title MMURTRIP - Marcos Bridge Masinag

IV. Project Location (See Attached Map)

Barangay :

City . Marikina



This package runs for a distance of 4.6 km from the construction limit of Package 3 to the Sumulong

Highway at Masinag. It passes in front of the proposed Santolan LRT 2 terminal (station and depot site),

Further commercial is planned, through three closely spaced signalized intersections, with A Rodriguez,

F. Mariano and Imelda Ave. and in front of another commercial development at Sta. Lucia East.

Intersection Management Measures has been proposed for this road such as:- Widen northern approach by I lane over a 40 m length. Widenine of Marcos hi2hway apRroaches included

in general carriagewav expansion.- Prohibit left turn in Marcos Highwav/f. Mariano. from est to south and west to north.- New traffic si2nals (coordinated)- Clearance of fronta2e activity. sisnal oRtimisation. road signing and marking. and improvement of

pedestrian crossing facilities are proposed at all intersections.


Date Filed


Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/dateBenjamin Austria/Dolly Vilorial Glenn MorganPnwla,, J,iorn WfirlJ Rrn4


INTEGRATION PROJECT


1 .Project Name Ortigas Avenue Extension -C5 to Tikling

2.Project Location The 6.8 km project starts at the intersection ofC5 and extends eastward crossing Marikinariver by way of Rosario Bridge and thenpasses through the Rosario commercial areauntil it crosses the Manggahan Floodway.After the floodway, Ortigas Avenue continuespassing through a mixture of commercial andmeduim/heavy manufacturing industryfrontage lane including access roads tonumerous subdivisions, crossing CaintaJuction (Ortigas Avenue Extension-ImeldaAvenue) up to Tikling.

3.Project Proponent : Department of Public Works and Highways



Address : DPWH, Bonifacio Drive Port Area, Manila


Tel/Fax # 527-56-28/527-89-21/527-27-12

E-mail : Dpwheia@skyinet. net


- intersection and corridor management

- measures for controlling inappropriate

frontage activity

- improvements to public transport operationsand pedestrian facilities

5.Project Objectives The objective of the project is to address thedeteriorating urban transport situation inMetro Manila by improving integration andmanagement of the transport system. Thefocus is on actions within selected areaswhich would enhance the use of publictransport, improve the effectiveness of thecommitted mega-projects and offer strategicroad access particularly in areas outsideEDSA.

6.Project Cost see annexed

7.Project Schedule - See annexed


1. Physical Environment




C.) Does the road pass through rolling tomoderately steep / steeply mountainous Xterrain? (1840% slope)

D.) Is the road terrain steeply mountainous?(above 50% slope) X


Meters







II: Biological / Ecological Environment



x1. Forest

x2. Coastal/marine

x3. Grassland

x4. Mangrove

x5. Agriculture

x6. Lake& river

7. Others

b. Is there any wildlife that could be affected?

c. ) Are there trees that will be cut within theproject site? X

di. Are there vegetation with economic valuewithin the project site that could be Xaffected?


IlI: Socio-Economic Environment



Station Ill: Environmental Impact Checklist


ImpactHigh Med Lo Hig Med Low

w h3 2 1 0 3 2 1

1. PhysicalErosion XDrainage XRegional Hydrology! XFlooding _Ground water table XWater quality X __=Waste water flow XAir quality XHouse quality XLand Conversion X _

Others: (Specify)

II. Biological / Ecological = =Mangrove X _Coral reefs XEndangered Species X _Aquatic life XWildlife = XOthers: (Specify)

Ill. Human Interest (Social) _

Labor & employment XHousing & Social Services

XPopulation X = = _=

Culture & Lifestyle XTransportation X = =Public Health & Safety XVulnerable groups X =_=IP's _ _ _ _ X __= _

Historical / ArcheologicalInterest X

Tourism X

Others : (Specify) _ _ _


After the Floodway, where the bridge is 3 lanes wide in each direction, OrtigasAvenue continues as a 4-lane road with a narrow median. The frontage landuse here is a mixture of commercial and medium/heavy manufacturing industry,although this is backed by sub-divisions that usually have direct access to thearterial road.

Around Cainta Junction (the major intersection between Ortigas AvenueExtension and Imelda Avenue), the frontage type becomes more commercial,but beyond that (as far as Tikling) it reverts to the same mixture ofmedium/heavy industry, small-scale commercial developments andsubdivisions.

The location of new signalized intersections, as elsewhere, has been chosen tostrengthen the definition of the secondary road network. Thus, it has not beenpossible (nor is it sensible) to signalize each sub-division exit. There willhowever, be sub-division access roads that generate significant traffic onto thecorridor. One solution would be to locate at-grade pedestrian crossings - co-ordinated with the main traffic signals - upstream of the affected entrances, inorder to provide natural breaks in the traffic flow.

Bus and jeepney bays already exist along the Ortigas Avenue Extension.These are not well used, due to their generally inadequate design, poorcondition and the undisciplined behaviour of drivers. The project proposes thatthese be retained, where they are sensibly located, and their conditionupgraded. Associated pedestrian crossings will be required to ensure that theyare accessible to passengers travelling in both directions.


The proposed works to be done involves the improvement of intersections (newtraffic signals, markings for pedestrian crossing and minor widening), sidewalkimprovement, and road improvements (re-surfacing). Pedestrian barriers onmedian and on sidewalk will also be provided. A new signalized pedestriancrossing will be provided at Ever Gotesco Commercial Complex.





I.Pre- Hiring of local DPWH will DPWH, LGUs NilConstruction labour force prioritized the people concerned

residing in the area Contractorfor theimplementation ofproposedmanagementmeasures

11. Construction Socio-Economic Although the DPWH,Phase Issues implementation Contractor

activities are not LGUsexpected to concernedsignificantly affect thepeople, the DPWHand Contractor shallquickly address anyrelated issues orproblems with thehelp of theconcerned LGUs.The proponent mustresolve issues.

Employment Hiring of local Contractor, Nilworkers during DPWH andimplementation LGUsperiod will enhancebeneficial impact onlocal laboremployment


Detour MMDA


Ensure goodbehavior ofconstruction trafficthrough restriction,incentives and

sanctions

Public Health! Strict enforcement/ DPWH NilSanitation Implementation of Contractor


Ill. Operation Noise driver education and DPWH,LGU Niland local ordinance on Police MMDAMaintenance proper use of horn



The proposed impact and compliance monitoring is intended for the continuedobservation and evaluation of the integrated impacts during the entire phase ofproject cycle. The proponent will closely coordinate with the DENR and theLGUs on the monitoring activities. For a smooth implementation of the project,the proponent will appoint a monitoring team for proper coordinates with theDENR and the LGUs.



1. Representative from the Proponent2. Representative from DENR/EMPAS3. Representative from Local Government Unit (LGU)4. Representative from NGO5. Representative from the EIAPO


1. Pre- Hiring of Number of skilled Ensure that local LGU, DPWH,Construc- labor force and unskilled local labor force are NHA andtion Phase workers being prioritized. other

concernedI_agencies

IL. Air pollution Compliance with air Air pollution is only DENR, DPWHConstruc- standard minimal andtion Phase temporary.

Noise Monitor noise level DENR, DPWHpollution according to

standards


Supervision of the MMDAMMDA

Screening Checklist Project: MMURTRIP EIAI'OOrtigas Avenue (C-5 to Tikling) Social and Environmental Management System

Form No., Page I of 3Revision No., 14/12/99

Checklist to determine whethier the project is an Environmental Critical Project:


a) Is the project a new constructioni 4

b) Does the project comprise realignimlenits exceeding the 'maximum lengthi shown in the third column of Table 2

c- I) Does the road project comprise widening >20%. lThis vshall be measured in relation to the existing width of thepaved area or travel width of gravel roads.

c-2) Does the road project include widening that will 1result in one or more additional lanes.

d) Is it expected that the road project will increase the Althiougih the AADT is expected to increase for this sub-component is aboveaccess to the influence area by 50% or more as measured 50% the project is intended to alleviate the present and future trafficby an increase in the Annual Average Daily Traffic over congestion by means of providing signalization, pedestrian improvements.the first five year period Thus, the increase of traffic is not caused by the project and therefore the

project is not considered to be an Environmental Critical Project.e) Is the project a water impoundmenit project with acapacity of >20 million m3 .




World Bank

Screening Checklist Project: MMURTRIP IIAPOOrtigas A*enue (C-5 to Tikling) Social and Environmental Management SystemOrtigas Avenue (C-5 to Tikling) Form No. ,Page 2 of 3

Revision No. 14/12/99


Question Yes No Rating Actual Explanation

if Yes Rating1) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in National 4Park/Watershed/Sanctuary2) Does the project traverse and/or are the project iocated in an ' 2Aesthetic potential tourist spot3) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 4with endangered species4) Does tihe project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with unique/archeological/scientific area5) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with indigenous culture communities6) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 Iwith high incidence of natural hazards7) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with critical slopes (>40%)8) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with prime agricultural land9) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 4 2recharge area for aquifers10) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area '4 with protected water bodiesI I ) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 4 4mangrove area12) Does the project travese and/or are the project located In an area 4 5with coral reefsTotal Rating 0



World Bank


0-1 0-2 1,0001-2 2-5 5002-5 5-10 100

5-10 10-20 50>10 >20 ECP


Social and Environmental Management SystemForm No. Page I of I


ENFORM 1





III. Project Name or Title : MMURTRIP - Ortigas Avenue (C-5 to Tikling)


Barangay Ortigas Avenue

Municipality : Mandaluyong



The 6.8 km project strts at the intersection of C-5 and extends eastward crossing Marikina river by way of

Rosario Bridge and then passes through the Rosario commercial areauntil it crosses the Manggahan Floodway.

After the floodway, Ortigas Avenue continues passing through a mixture of commercial and medium/heavy

manufacturine industrv frontane lane includine access roads to numerous subdivisions. crossing Cainta Jctn.

(Ortigas Avenue Extension-Imelda Avenue) up to Tikling.

The project covers:- intersection and corridor management- measures for controllin2 inappropriate frontage activity- improvements to public transport operations and pedestrian facilities


Date Filed



Wnwld Rnnl-


INTEGRATION PROJECT


1 .Project Name : Legarda

2.Project Location This road extends from Arlegui street to R.Magsaysay Boulevard


Contact Person : Godofredo Z. Galano -Built Operate Transfer(BOT)/Traffic Engineering Center (TEC)



Designation : Director of TEC/BOTDirector PMO-URPO

Tel/Fax # 527-56-28/527-89-211527-27-12

E-mail Dpwheia@skyinet. net


- Improvement of sidewalks

- upgrading of traffic signals

5.Project Objectives : The objective of the project is to address thedeteriorating urban transport situation inMetro Manila by improving integration andmanagement of the transport system. Thefocus is on actions within selected areaswhich would enhance the use of publictransport, improve the effectiveness of thecommitted mega-projects and offer strategicroad access particularly in areas outside

3

EDSA.

6.Project Cost : see annexed

7.Project Schedule : see annexed

4



Components J Parameters Yes No RemarksA. ) Does the road pass through flat terrain?



C.) Does the road pass through rolling tomoderately steep I steeply mountainous Xterrain? (18-40% slope)

0.) Is the road terrain steeply mountainous? X-(above 50% slope)

E.) Is the road project near or within a forestreserve or a protected watershed area? If X"Yes", Name of area and how near?___Meters




H.) Are there existing natural hazards on thearea? E.g. landslides, gullying, subsidence. If'Yes" enumerate them? X



5




x1. Forest

x2. Coastal/marine

x3. Grassland

x4. Mangrove

x5. Agriculture

x6. lake & river

7. Others

b. Is there any wildlife that could be affected?


a.) Are there vegetation with economic valuewithin the project site that could be Xaffected?


6

Ilil: Socio-Economic Environment


The proposed improvements such as traffic signal synchronization, upgradingof sidewalks, removal of commercial activities along the roadsidewill bring efficiency in traffic and vehicle movements, reduction intravel time and pedestrian safety.

7




w h3 2 1 0 3 2 1

1. Physical _Erosion XDrainage XRegional Hydrology I XFloodingGround water table X XWater quality = XWaste water flow = XAir quality =XHouse quality = XLand Conversion Others.: (Specify)XT

II.Biloica EclogicalMangrove 7 = X xCoral reefs - XEndangered Species XAquatic life X _

Wildlife X X XOthers: (Specify) l _

Ill. Human Interest (Social) T I_ILabor & employment XHousing & Social Services

xPopulation X

Culture & Lifestyle _ X _

Transportation X _

Public Health & Safety X =__Vulnerable groups XIP's = XHistorical / ArcheologicalInterest X

Tourism X = _=__ ___

Others: (Specify) = _

8


The frontage land use is predominantly commercial but also contains manyschools and colleges. There are sixteen jeepney routes and six bus routes (1intra-city and 5 provincial) in this section of the road. The pavement andsidewalks are generally fair to good condition. Asphalt overlay is proposedbetween C.M Recto and R. Magsaysay, and four existing traffic signalintersections need upgrading. Part of the route is included in the LRT Line 2Corridor, where improvements of other aspects of the right-of-way areproposed.


The proposed works to be done involves the improvement of sidewalks andupgrading of traffic signals. The objective is to provide comprehensive corridortreatment similar to that recommended elsewhere, with a view of ensuringefficient traffic flow, convenient public transport operations and safe pedestrianenvironment.





I.Pre- Hiring of Local DPWH will prioritized DPWH, LGUs NilConstruction labour force the people residing in concemed

the area for the Contractorimplementation laborforce. .

II. Construction Socio-Economic Although the DPWH, NilPhase Issues implementation Contractor

ctivities are not LGUsexpected to concernedsignificantly affect thepeople, the DPWHand Contractor shallquickly address any

9

related issues orproblems with thehelp of theconcerned LGUs.The proponent mustresolve issues.

Employment Hiring of local Contractor, Nilworkers during DPWH andimplementation LGUsperiod will enhancebeneficial impact onlocal laboremployment


Detour MMDA





Ill. Operation Noise Driver education and DPWH,LGU Niland local ordinance on Police MMDAMaintenance proper use of horn


10

Section VII. Environmental Monitoring Plan




1. Representative from the Proponent2. Representative from DENR/EMPAS3. Representative from LGU4. Representative from NGO5. Representative from the EIAPO


1. Pre- Hiring of Number of skilled Ensure that local LGU, DPWH,Construc- labor force and unskilled labor force are NHA andtion Phase workers being prioritized other

concernedagencies

I. Air pollution Compliance with air Air pollution is only DENR, DPWHConstruc- standard minimal andtion Phase temporary.

Noise Monitor noise level DENR, DPWHpollution according to

standards.


supervision of the MMDAMMDA traffic

11

personnel.


Management Plan

12

J AzaaaaIil;, v-ittI.iii lProject: MMUlIR11111, EIAPO

Legarda Social and Environmental Management SystemForm No. , Page I of 3Revision No ., 14/12/99



a) Is tile project a new construction __

b) I)oes the project comprise realignments exceeding the v

maximum length shown in the thiird columin of Table 2

c- I) Does the road project comprise widenitig >20%. This

shall be measured in relation to the existing width of thepaved area or travel width of gravel roads.

c-2) Does the road project include widening that will v

result in one or more additional lanes.

d) Is it expected that the road project will increase the Alhotihogh the AADT is expected to increase for this sub-component is aboveaccess to the influence area by 50% or more as measured 50% the project is intenided to alleviate the present and future trafficby an increase in the Annual Average Daily Traffic over congestion by means of providing signalization, pedestrian improvements.the first five year period Thus, thie increase of traffic is not caused by the project and tlherefore the

project is not considered to be an Environmenital Critical Project.e) Is the project a water impoundment project witli acapacity of>20 million in3.

f) Does the project comprise betterment, improvement orreplacement of bridges with more than 4 spans and/orexceeding 80 ni.

If the yes is the correct answer to just one of the questions a) - f) then the project shall be considered as anl Environmental Critical Project.


World Bank

Social and Environmental Management SystemLegarda lForm No., Page 2 of 3

Revision No. , 14/12/99



I ) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in National 4Park/Watershed/Sanctuary2) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an 4 2Aesthetic potential tourist spot3) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 4with endangered species4) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with unique/archeological/scientific area5) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with indigenous culture communities6) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 Iwith high incidence of natural hazards _

7) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with critical slopes (>40%)8) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with prime agricultural land9) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 4 2recharge area for aquifers10) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 2with protected water bodies .

I I ) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 4 4mangrove area12) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with coral reefslotal Rating 0



World Bank


0-1 0-2 1,0001-2 2-5 5002-5 5-10 100

5-10 10-20 50>10 >20 ECP


Sociai and Environmental Management SystemForm No. Page I of I


ENFORM I




II. Address 2nd St... Port Area Manila

III. Project Name or Title MMURTRIP - Legarda


Barangay Legarda

City : Manila



Improved pedestrian routes between the station and sorrounding land uses (predomninantly universities)

form the main nucleus of the proposals. Arcade sidewalks are provided on the northern side of Legarda. but

not on the southem side. Options for improving pedestrian access include enhancements to the southern

sidewalks or construction of a new access routes over the nearby Estero de San Miguel. I


Date Filed


Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/dateBenjamin Austria/Dolly Vilorial Glenn MorganPnur,/l,

4i,iipr Wnrld Rn,,k

1. r, t' f

INITIAL ENVIRONENTAL EXAMINATIONMETRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORT

INTEGRATION PROJECT


1 .Project Name Aurora Boulevard

2.Project Location Aurora Boulevard is classified to belong totheThird District of Manila. It runs betweenRizal Avenue Extension and Dimasalng.


Contact Person Godofredo Z. Galano -Built Operate Transfer(BOT)lTraffic Engineering Center (TEC)




Tel/Fax # : 527-56-28/527-89-21/527-27-12


4. Project Category and : The main proposals under this componentProject Components cover:

- Resurfacing from Blumentritt to Dimasalng- Provision of sidewalks- Removal of on-street parking particularly

from Blumentritt to Dimasalng towards A.Maceda.

- Intersection improvement (Traffic signsand pedestrian markings)

5.Project Objectives : The objective of the project is to address thedeteriorating urban transport situation inMetro Manila by improving integration andmanagement of the transport system.

6.Project Cost : See annexed

7.Project Schedule : See annexed



Components / Parameters Yes No RemarksA. ) Does the road pass through flat terrain? X


B.)Does the road terrain undulating to rolling?(8-18% slope) X

C.) Does the road terrain rolling to moderatelysteep / steeply mountainous? (18-40% Xslope)


E.) Is the road project near or with a forestreserve or a protected watershed area? If X"Yes", Name of area and how near?

Meters







II. Biological / Ecological Environment



x1. Forest

x2. Coastal/marine

x3. Grassland

x4. Mangrove

x5. Agriculture

x6. lake & river

7. Others





III: Socio-Economic Environment

EXISTING SETTLEMENT WITHIN THE PROJECT SITECategorylDescription Number What will happened to them?

Total households affected N/a N/aLand OwnerTenants _

SettlersOthers (specify) ___

Profile of Population (work force)

Age/ Gender.- I Male - ! Femalei <15 1_!

16-2021-25 x x26 - 30 x X31 -35 x xI___ ______

35 - 45 j x __ x> 45

Are there Indigenous People within the Project Area

Name of Indigenous People Group -4 Number ofPopulation-

n/a

Total

I ** =* .t,ie.iWeopIe?--(during construction)Others (specify) N/aHow about vulnerable groups

ElderlyChildren I IHandicapped ____ iOthers (specify)




w h3 2 1 0 3 2 1

1. PhysicalErosion =_= XDrainage XRegional Hydrology / XFloodingGround water table _ XWater quality XWaste water flow = X = =Air quality XHouse quality XLand Conversion XOthers: (Specify)

11. Biological / EcologicalMangrove _ XCoral reefs XEndangered Species _ XAquatic life XWildlife = XOthers: (Specify) _

111. Human Interest (Social)Labor & employment X =Housing & Social Services

xPopulation X _Culture & Lifestyle X =Transportation XPublic Health & Safety X = =_=Vulnerable groups X _

IP's XHistorical / ArcheologicalInterest X

Tourism X .

Others: (Specify) =

Section IV - ENVtRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Aurora Boulevard runs between Rizal Avenue Extension and Dimasalang.Currently the carriageway width of the existing road is 6 lanes wide but iseffectively reduced to 4 lanes by the presence of on-street parking associatedwith the residences that line along the road.

South of Blumentritt, the traffic flow includes more than 6,000 jeepneys per day,although there are fewer jeepneys further north. Over this section, thesouthbound carriageway forms part of a 1-way system, with Dimasalang andBlumentritt streets providing the northbound part. The southbound section iscongested, since it is used as an informal jeepney terminal as well as beingencroached upon by squatters and sidewalk vendors. At present, it is also partof the eastern truck route (westbound direction).

The main proposals under this component cover resurfacing from Blumentritt toDimasalang, removal of on-street parking and clearing of sidewalks fromBlumentritt to Dimasalng towards A. Maceda and intersection improvement.

Assessment made on the project area revealed that dominant land use isresidential with few small commercial stores. The sidewalk is occupied bysquatters and stalls. There are trees planted on the sidewalks.

In view thereof, the implementation of the project will not affect the existingstructures, however, it will result in the displacement of vendors occupying theexisting sidewalks.

Section V: Environmental Management Plan

Although the adverse impact are minimal and short term in natureconsidering that the proposed project involves only traffic management whereinemphasis is on the improvement and better management of existing facilitiesimprovements of intersection, road pavements, sidewalks an EnvironmentalManagement Plan is presented in this IEE. The following are the plannedactions or countermeasures on the adverse environmental impacts:



I.Pre- Displacement/di Coordination with DPWH, LGUs DependsConstruction slocation of concerned offices concerned on the

Vendors and agencies for Resettle-proper settlement mentand compensation Action Plan

____________________________________(RAP) to

Ensure that Project beAffected Persons prepared(PAPs) are properly by thecompensated consul-

tants

11. Air Pollution/ During construction, DPWH, NilConstruction Dust discharge the extent of air ContractorPhase pollution is minimal and DENR





are not expected to LGUssignificantly affect the concernedpeople, the DPWHand Contractor shallquickly address anyconstruction-relatedissues or problemswith the help of theconcerned LGUs.The proponent mustresolve issues.

Employment Hiring of local Contractor, Nilworkers during DPWH andconstruction period LGUswill enhancebeneficial impact onlocal labor

I employment


Detour MMDA





Spoil and Establish guidelines/ Consultants Nilconstruction Criteria for spoil DPWH,DENRwaste disposal disposal

methods/sites



Risk of Install safety features DPWH, Nilincreased following local Contractoraccident consultation LGUsecurity

Section VI: Environmental Monitoring Plan

The proposed impact monitoring is intended for the continuedobservation and evaluation of the integrated impacts during the entire phase ofproject cycle. The proponent will closely coordinate with the DENR and theLGUs on the monitoring activities. For a smooth implementation of the project,the proponent will appoint a monitoring team for proper coordination with theDENR and the LGUs.

PROJECT ISSUES SUBJECT OF REMARKSI RESPONSI-PHASE MONITORING MEASURES BILITY

1. Pre- Displace- Compensation and Resettlement LGU, DPWH,Construc- ment/dis- Relocation of Action Plan and NHA andtion Phase location of settlements Compensation other

settlers Package/Scheme concemed

I. Air pollution Air pollution Air pollution is only DENR, DPWHConstruc- level/dust discharge minimal andtion Phase temporary during




standard equipment atdaytime

Monitor thecompliance ofcontractor tomitigation measures




Management Plan

cre ningtIlCcklst lroject: MMUR1RIP EIAPOee"iiig t-ijeckiist Aurorat:M iJ URev RIP Social and Environmental Management System

Aurora Boulevard ForniNo. , Page I of 3Revision No., 14/12/99




b) Does the project comprise realignments exceeding the 4maximum length shown in the third column of Table 2

c- I) Does the road project comprise widening >20%. This 4shall be measured in relation to the existing width of thepaved area or travel width of gravel roads.


d) Is it expected that the road project will increase the 4 Althiotighi the AADT is expected to increase for this sub-component is aboveaccess to the influence area by 50% or more as measured 50% the project is intended to alleviate the present and future trafficby an increase in the Annual Average Daily Traffic over congestion by means of providing signalization, pedestrian improvements.the first five year period T hus, the increase of traffic is not caused by the project and therefore the

project is not considered to be an Environmental Critical Project.e) Is the project a water impoundment project with a 4capacity of >20 million m3 .

f) Does the project comprise betterment, improvement or treplacement of bridges with more than 4 spans and/orexceeding 80 m.


Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/dateBenjamin Austria World Bank

Glenn Morgan

Screening Checklist Project: MMURTRIP EnAPO

AuoaBolvr Social and Environmental Management SystemAurora Boulevard Form No. ,Page 2 of 3Revision No. 14/12/99



I) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in National 4 5Park/Watershed/Sanctuary2) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an 7 2Aesthetic potential tourist spot3) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 4with endangered species4) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with unique/archeological/scientific area5) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 5with indigenous culture communities _6) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 l

with high incidence of natural hazards7) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an areawith critical slopes (>40%)8) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 3with prime agricultural land9) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 2recharge area for aquifers10) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 2with protected water bodiesI I ) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 4mangrove areai2) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 5with coral reefsTotal Rating 0

If yes to just one of the questions and with a total rating less than 5 then an IEE sliall be prepared. If the total rating is 5 or above an EIS shall be

prepared.

Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/date

Benjamin Austria World BankGlenn Morgan


0-1 0-2 1,0001-2 2-5 5002-5 5-10 100

5-10 10-20 50>10 >20 ECP


Social and Environmental Management SystemForm No. Page I of I


ENFORM 1



1. Name Proponent DPWH - URPO PMO


III. Project Name or Title MMURTRIP Aurora Boulevard


Barangay Aurora Boulevard

Municipality Marikina



The main proposals under this component cover:

- Resurfacing from Blumentritt to Dimasalang.

- Provision of sidewalks.

- Removal of on-street Darking narticularly from Blumentritt to Dimasalane towards A. Maceda.

- Intersection improvement (traffic signs and pedestrian marking).


Date Filed


Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/dateBenjamin Austria/Dolly Viloria Glenn MorganRnidv 4 uiorn W-r'ld Rn,.1

Ui li1


INTEGRATION PROJECT


1 .Project Name : Pasong Tamo

2.Project Location This subcomponent extends from J.P Rizalstreet to Maricaban Bridge.






Tel/Fax # 527-56-28/527-89-21/527-27-12

E-mail : Dpwheiaaskyinet.net


- Pavement rehabilitation

- Upgrading of traffic signals

- Installations of signal lights


3


7.Project Schedule : see annexed

4


l. Physical Environment

Components I Parameters Yes No RemarksA. ) Does the road pass through flat terrain?






Meters




H.) Are there existing natural hazards on thearea? E.g. landslides, gullying, subsidence. If'Yes" enumerate them? X



5

II: Biological / Ecological Environment



x1. Forest

x2. Coastal/marine

x3. Grassland

x4. Mangrove

x5. Agriculture

x6. lake & river

7. Others

b.) Is there any wildlife that could be affected?x


d.) Are their vegetation with economic valuewithin the project site that could be Xaffected?


6


EXISTING SETTLEMENT WITHIN THE PROJECT SITECategory/Description Number What will happened to them?

(Effects of the project)Total households affected N/a ; N/aLand OwnerTenantsSettlersOthers (specify) ;


Age/ Gender -I Male - Female

16-20 _ | _l'

21-25 X I X26-30 X X31 - 35 X I X35 -45 X x

> 45l


Name of Indigenous People Group- I Number ofPopulation

n/a

Total

Did you employ indigenous people? How many(during construction)Others (specify) N/aHow about vulnerable groups

ElderlyChildren _

Handicapped |Others (specify)

7

Section IlI: Environmental Impact Checklist



w _h

3 2 1 0 3 2 11. Physical ___

Erosion _ = XDrainage = XRegional Hydrology! XFloodingGround water table XWater quality xWaste water flow XAir quality XHouse quality XLand Conversion X __

Others :(Specify) _

11. Biological / Ecological = =Mangrove XCoral reefs XEndangered Species XAquatic life XWildlife X _

Others: (Specify) _

111. Human Interest (Social) .Labor & employment XHousing & Social Services

Population X =Culture & Lifestyle XTransportation X _

Public Health & Safety XVulnerable groups XIP's = XHistorical / ArcheologicalInterest X

Tourism X

Others: (Specify) .

8


The frontage land use consists of small/medium commercial premises north ofPasay Road and major commercial/light industry south of Pasay Road. The 4-lane roadway runs parallel to the South Super Highway and provides a reliefroute between the Nichols interchange and the south-western part of t-he AyalaCentre. There is a short section Of 1-way system (northbound) between DonBosco street and Pasay Road. The return section makes use of part of Pasayroad and a parallel street, which has been newly re-concreted.

The main recommendations involve pavement rehabilitation between J.P Rizaland Pasay Road, but three existing signalised intersections need upgradingand six new signalised installations need to be provided.


This component include a wide variety of recommended actions, ranging frompavement rehabilitation, through drainage and sidewalk improvements, to trafficmanagement measures. The objective is to provide comprehensive corridortreatment similar to that recommended elsewhere, with a view to ensuringefficient traffic flow, convenient public transport operations and safe pedestrianenvironment.





1.Pre- Hiring of local DPWH will DPWH, LGUsConstruction labour force recommend to the concerned,

contractor hiring Contractorpriority be given tothe people residing inthe area for theconstruction labor

Iforce. .

9

11. Construction Air Pollution/ During construction, DPWH, NilPhase Dust discharge the extent of air Contractor

pollution is minimal and DENRand temporary. Dustdischarge associatedwith cement storingand handling at thesite will be eliminatedthrough the use ofready mixed concreteHeavy dustgeneration is notexpected duringconstructionactivities.







Detour MMDA

Ensure continuous

10

flow of traffic andminimize trafficdisturbance





methods/sites

Ill. Operation Noise Enforce use of good DPWH,LGU Niland mufflers; driver Police MMDAMaintenance education and local






Hiring of j Number of qualified Ensure that local LGU, DPWH,1. Pre- labor force I workers labor force are NHA and

11

Construc- being prioritized. othertion Phase concerned

agencies




Noise Monitor noise level Schedule DENR, DPWHpollution According to operation of






Management Plan

12

,t, t;v1ks118g t-liftchlist I'roject: MMURT 'IRI1 EIA P0Pasong Tamo Social and Environmental Management SystemPasong Tamo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~Forrn No. , Page I of 3

Revision No. 14/12/99




b) Does the project comprise realignimenits exceedinig the 4maximum length shown in the third column of Table 2

c-I) Does the road project comprise widening >20%. This 4shall be measured in relation to the existing width of thepaved area or travel widtih of gravel roads.


d) Is it expected that the road project will increase the Althiougih the AADT is expected to increase for this sub-componenit is aboveaccess to the influence area by 50% or more as measured 50% the project is intended to alleviate the present and future trafficby an increase in the Aniual Average Daily Traffic over congestion by means of providing signalization, pedestrian improvemiients.the first five year period Thus, the increase of traffic is not caused by the project and therefore the

project is not considered to be an Environmental Critical Project.

e) Is the project a water impoundment project withi a 4capacity of>20 million m3.

f) Does the project comprise betterment, improvement or 'replacement of bridges with more than 4 spans and/orexceeding 80 m.

If the yes is the correct answer to just one of the questions a) - f) then the project shiall be considered as an Environmental Critical Project.


World Bank

2flcilixig un lecklisi I'roject: MM URIRIP LIAPOPasong Tamo Social and Environmental Management SystemXPasong ITamo lForm No., Page 2 of 3

Revision No. 14112/99


Question Yes No Rating Actual Explanation

if Yes RatingI) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in National 4 5Park/Watershed/Sanctuary2) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an 4 2Aesthetic potential tourist spot3) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 4with endangered species4) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with unique/archeological/scientific area5) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with indigenous culture communities6) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 Iwith high incidence of natural hazards7) Does the project travese and/or are (he project located in an area 4 5with critical slopes (>40%)8) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with prinme agricultural land9) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 4 2recharge area for aquifers10) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area2with protected water bodies ,_.

I I ) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a 4 4mangrove area12) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with coral reefsTotal Rating 0



World Bank


0-1 0-2 1.0001-2 2-5 5002-5 5-10 100

5-10 10-20 50>10 >20 ECP


Žoczal and Lnvlronmenlta Management iystem

Form No. Page I of IRevision No. 0, 14/12/99

ENFORM I




11. Address 2nd St., Port Area Manila

III. Project Name or Title MMURTRIP - Pasong Tamo


Barangay Pasong Tamo

Municipality Makati



This subcomponent extends from J.P. Rizal street to Maricaban Bridge and use by 7 jeepney routes.

Frontage land use consist of smalL7medium commercial premises north of Pasay Road and major commercial/

light industry south of Pasav Road. The 4-lane roadwav runs parallel to the South Super Hizhway and

provides a relief route between the Nichols interchange and the south-western part of the Ayala Centre. There

there is a short section of 1-way system (north bound) between Don Bosco St., and Pasay Road. The return

section makes newly re-concreted within the past 12 months. The main recommendations involve pavement

rehabilitation between J.P. Rizal and Pasay Road, but three existing signalized installation need to be provided.


Date Filed


Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/dateBenjamin Austria/Dolly Vilorial Glenn MorganP,nu,Ia,, 4 ,,wrn WWnr

4rI PRnl'


INTEGRATION PROJECT


1.Project Name Quezon Boulevard

2.Project Location This subcomponent is between Paquita street(at end of Espana) and Arroceros street (onthe south side of Quezon Bridge).


Contact Person Godofredo Z. Galano -Built Operate Transfer(BOT)lTraffic Engineering Center (TEC)




Tel/Fax # 527-56-28/527-89-21/527-27-12


4.Project Category and : The project covers:Project Components

- Asphalt overlay


5.Project Objectives The objective of the project is to address thedeteriorating urban transport situation inMetro Manila by improving integration andmanagement of the transport system.



3

Section Il: Description of Existing Environment







E.) Is the road project near or with a forestreserve or a protected watershed area? If X"Yes", Name of area and how near?_Meters







4




x1. Forest

x2. Coastal/marine

x3. Grassland

x4. Mangrove

x5. Agriculture

x6. Lake& river

7. Others

b.) Is there any wildlife that could be affected?__ _ x




5


Category/Description Number What will happened to them?I (Effects of the project)

Total households affected N/a N/aLand Owner _

Tenants I__

! Settlers II Others (specify)


< 15_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

16 -20 _

21-25 X X26 - 30 X X31-35 X X35 - 45 X X

>45


MMI : =--I 156M 1IP

n/a

Total

1LTe1'*K9htP IM[9I*1 159NTI I 0

(durng construction) _

Others (specify) N/aHow about vulnerable groups I

Elderly _

Children _

HandicappedOthers (specify) F

6




w h3 2 1 0 3 2 1

1. Physical =Erosion XDrainage XRegional Hydrology / XFlooding -Ground water table X _ __X_Water quality = X =Waste water flow XAir quality XHouse quality XLand Conversion X XOthers: (Specify) = =

11. Biological / EcologicalMangrove XCoral reefs XEndangered Species XAquatic life XWildlife XOthers: (Specify)

111. Human Interest (Social)Labor & employment X = =Housing & Social Services

Population X = lCulture & Lifestyle X _

Transportation XPublic Health & Safety X _____

Vulnerable groups XfP's __ = XHistorical / ArcheologicalInterest X

TourismX

Others : (Specify)==

7


This provides a major route across the Pasig River into Central Manila, and isused by 58 jeepney routes and 7 bus routes. The frontage land use in thisarea is predominantly commercial. Two intersections (at Andalucia street andC.M. Recto) are grade-separated.

Proposals are limited to asphalt overlay of the road pavement (including serviceroads) and the upgrading of two existing signalised intersections. The riverbridge is newly rehabilitated.


Although the adverse impact are minimal and short term in nature consideringthat the proposed project involves only traffic management with emphasis is onthe improvement and better management of existing facilities improvements ofintersection, road pavements, sidewalks an Environmental Management Plan ispresented in this IEE. The following are the planned actions orcountermeasures on the adverse environmental impacts:



I.Pre- Hiring of local DPWH willConstruction labour force recommend to the

contractor hiringpriority be given tothe people residing inthe area for theconstruction laborforce.

Air Pollution/ During construction, DPWH, NilConstruction Dust discharge the extent of air ContractorPhase pollution is minimal and DENR

and temporary. Dustdischarge associatedwith cement storingand handling at thesite will be eliminatedthrough the use ofready mixed concreteHeavy dustgeneration is notexpected duringconstruction

8

activities.







Detour MMDA




9



methods/sites


ordinance for properuse of horn



The proposed impact monitoring is intended for the continued observation andevaluation of the integrated impacts during the entire phase of project cycle.The proponent will closely coordinate with the DENR and the LGUs on themonitoring activities. For a smooth implementation of the project, theproponent will appoint a monitoring team for proper coordination with the DENRand the LGUs.


1. Pre- Hiring of Number of qualified Ensure that local LGU, DPWH,Construc- labor force workers labor force are NHA andtion Phase being prioritized. other

concernedagencies

ii. Constr Air pollution Air pollution Air pollution is only DENR, DPWHuc-tion level/dust discharge minimal andPhase temporary during



10


standard. equipment atdaytime


Traffic Traffic Flow! Install traffic signs DPWH,Management subject to Contractor



Management Plan

11

Screening Checklist Project: MMURTRIP EIAPOQuezon Boulevard Social and Environmental Management System

Fonn No. , Page I of 3Revision No., 14/12/99





c-I) Does the road project comprise widening >20%. This 4shall be measured in relation to the existing width of thepaved area or travel width of gravel roads.

c-2) Does the road project include widening that willresult in one or more additional lanes.

d) Is it expected that the road project will increase the Although the AADT is expected to increase for this sub-component is aboveaccess to the influence area by 50% or more as measured 50% the project is intended to alleviate the present and future trafficby an increase in the Annual Average Daily Traffic over congestion by means of providing signalization, pedestrian improvements.the first five year period Thus, the increase of traffic is not caused by the project and therefore the

project is not considered to be an Environmental Critical Project.e) Is the project a water impoundment project withi a 4capacity of >20 million m3.




World Bank

Screening Checklist Project: MMURTRIP EIAPOSocial and Environmental Management System

Quezon Boulevard Form No., Page 2 of 3Revision No., 14/12/99



I) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in National ' 5Park/Watershed/Sanctuary2) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an 4 2Aesthetic potential tourist spot .

3) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area '1 4with endangered species4) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area l 3with unique/archeological/scientific area5) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area _ 5with indigenous culture communities6) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area Iwith high incidence of natural hazards7) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area a| 5with critical slopes (>40%)8) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area l 3with prime agricultural land9) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a l 2recharge area for aquifers10) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area j 2with protected water bodies1I) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a j 4

mangrove area12) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area +1 5with coral reefsTotal Rating 0



World Bank


0-1 0-2 1,0001-2 2-5 5002-5 5-10 100

5-10 10-20 50>10 >20 I ECP


Žoczal ana tnvironmental Management System

Form No. Page 1 of IRevision No. 0, 14/12/99

ENFORM 1



1. Name Proponent DPWH - URPO PMO

Il. Address 2 nd St., Port Area Manila

III. Project Name or Title MMURTRIP - Quezon Boulevard

IV. Project Location : (See Attached Map)

Barangay Quezon Boulevard

Municipality : Manila



The subcomponent is between Paquita Street (at end of Espana) and Arroceros street (on the South side

of Quezon Bridge). This provides a major route accross the Pasig River into Central Manila, and is used

by 58 jeepney routes and 7 bus routes. The frontage land use in this area is predominantly commercial.

Two intersections (at Andalucia Street and A.M. Recto) are grade separated. Proposals are limnited to

asphalt overlay of the road pavement (including service road) and the upgrading of two existing signalised

intersection. The river bridge is newly rehabilitated.


Date Filed


Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/dateBenjamin Austria/Dolly Vilorial Glenn MorganRouziov 4 u,,rn Wirld Rnnlr


INTEGRATION PROJECT


1 .Project Name D. Romualdez, Sr.

2.Project Location This subcomponent is between AyalaBoulevard and G. Apacible


Contact Person : Godofredo Z. Galano -Built Operate Transfer(BOT)/Traffic Engineering Center (TEC)




Tel/Fax # : 527-56-28/527-89-21/527-27-12

E-mail [email protected]


- Asphalt overlay



6.Project Cost : See annexed


3

Section Il: Description of Existing Environment





C.) Does the road terrain rolling to moderatelysteep / steeply mountainous? (1840% Xslope)



Meters







4




x1. Forest

x2. Coastal/marine

x3. Grassland

x4. Mangrove

x5. Agriculture

x6. Lake & river

7. Others





5

Ill: Socio-Economic Environment

Category/Description Number What will happened to them?(Effects of the project)

Total households affected N/a N/aLand Owner i_TenantsSettlersOthers (specify)


1 ~< 1516-2021-25 X X26 - 30 X X31-35 X X35 -45 X_ __ _ X

> 45 I_!


_ l- , * *IH-* *

- S

n/a

Total

(during construction) I_ _

Others (specify) _N/a

How about vulnerable groups T |Elderly _

Children _Hand icappedOthers (specify)

6




w h3 2 1 0 3 2 1

1. PhysicalErosion = XDrainage XRegional Hydrology! XFloodingGround water table xWater quality = X = =Waste water flow xAir quality X

.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ __ ___ x__House quality XLand Conversion = X =Others : (Specify)

11. Biological / EcologicalMangrove XCoral reefs _ XEndangered Species XAquatic life XWildlife _ XOthers: (Specify)

ll. Human Interest (Social)Labor & employment X = = = =Housing & Social Services

XPopulation XCulture & Lifestyle X _

Transportation X =Public Health & Safety XVulnerable groups XIP's ___- XHistorical / ArcheologicalInterest X

Tourism X

Others: (Specify)

7


This road component includes D. Romualdez street between Ayala Boulevardand G. Apacible, and San Marcelino street.

Recommendations include asphalt overlay of a portion of Romualdez and SanMarcelino streets. Two existing signals need to be upgraded but no newsignals are recommended.


Although the adverse impact are minimal and short term in nature consideringthat the proposed project involves only traffic management with emphasis is onthe improvement and better management of existing facilities improvements ofintersection, road pavements, sidewalks an Environmental Management Plan ispresented in this IEE. The following are the planned actions orcountermeasures on the adverse environmental impacts:



I.Pre- Hiring of local DPWH will DPWH, LGUsConstruction labour force recommend to the concerned,

contractor hiring Contractorpriority be given tothe people residing inthe area for theconstruction laborforce.

ii. Air Pollution/ During construction, DPWH, NilConstruction Dust discharge the extent of air ContractorPhase pollution is minimal and DENR


8







Detour MMDA




health hazards laws_ _ _ _ _ _ and regulations _

9


methods/sites

Ill. Operation Noise Enforce use of good DPWH,LGU Niland mufflers; driver Police MMDAMaintenance education and local






1. Pre- Hiring of Number of qualified Ensure that local LGU, DPWH,Construc- labor force workers labor force are NHA andtion Phase being prioritized. other

concernedagencies




Noise Monitor noise level Schedule DENR, DPWHpollution operation of

10

T Monitor the equipment atcompliance of daytimecontractor tomitigation measures


supervision of the MMDAMMDA trafficpersonnel

Spoil and Monitor Solid Waste Identification of ContractorConstructic Management Plan Disposal Sites and DPWH, DENRn waste implement theDisposal Solid Waste

Management Plan

I

11


D). Romualdez Social and Environmental Management SystemForm No. , Page I of 3Revision No., 1,4/12/99



a) Is the project a new construction '4


c-I) Does the road project comprise widening >20%. This 4shall be measured in relation to the existing width of thepaved area or travel width of gravel roads.


d) Is it expected that the road project will increase the 4 Although the AADT is expected increase for this sub-component is above 50access to the influence area by 50% or more as measured % the project is intended to alleviate the present and future traffic congestionby an increase in the Annual Average Daily Traffic over by means of providing signalization, pedestrian improvements. Thus, thethe first five year period increase in traffic is not caused by the project and therefore the project is not

considered to be an Environmental Critical Project.e) Is the project a water impoundment project with a 4capacity of >20 million m3 .

f) Does the project comprise betterment, improvement or 4replacement of bridges with more than 4 spans and/orexceeding 80 m.



Glenn Morgam

Screening Checklist Project: MMURTRIP EIAPOD. Romualdez Social and Environmental Management SystemDJ. Romualdez Form No., Page 2 of 3




I) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in National l 5Park/Watershed/Sanctuary2) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an i 2Aesthetic potential tourist spot3) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area i 4with endangered species4) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area | 3with unique/archeological/scientific area5) Does the project traverse and/or are the project located in an area q 5with indigenous culture communities6) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area l Iwith high incidence of natural hazards7) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area / 5with critical slopes (>40%)8) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 3with prime agricultural land9) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a -4 2recharge area for aquifers10) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area / 2with protected water bodiesI I ) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in a '4 4mangrove area12) Does the project travese and/or are the project located in an area 4 5with coral reefsTotal Rating 0



Glenn Morgam


0-1 0-2 1,0001-2 2-5 5002-5 5-10 100

5-10 10-20 50>10 >20 ECP


f

Soczat ana lnvironmenrai management 6ystemForm No. Page I of I


ENFORM 1





III. Project Name or Title : MMURTRIP - D. Romualdez

IV. Project Location : (See Attached Map)

Barangay : D. Romualdez

Municipality Manila



The component includes D. Romualdez street between Ayala Boulevard nd G. Apacible, plus San

Marcelino Street. Recommendations include asphalt overlay of part of Romualdez and San Marcelino streets.

The existing signals need to be upgraded but no new signals are recommended.


Date Filed


4

Prepared by/date Approved by/date Submitted to/dateBenjamin AustrialDolly Vilorial Glenn Morganprnu,lrai 4 morn Wnrld R n,,i

world bank document€¦ · earth borrowing sites, waste disposal sites, and asphalt mixing sites...

Documents