women’s struggle under the practice of patriarchy in … · ngulyi and alice di gambarkan sebagai...
TRANSCRIPT
WOMEN’S STRUGGLE UNDER THE PRACTICE OF
PATRIARCHY IN ALICE NANNUP’S WHEN THE PELICAN
LAUGHED
AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra
in English Letters
By
Gavin Anditya Putra
Student Number: 114214079
ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS
FACULTY OF LETTERS
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2016
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ii
WOMEN’S STRUGGLE UNDER THE PRACTICE OF
PATRIARCHY IN ALICE NANNUP’S WHEN THE PELICAN
LAUGHED
AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra
in English Letters
By
Gavin Anditya Putra
Student Number: 114214079
ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS
FACULTY OF LETTERS
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2016
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
iii
A Sarjana Sastra Undergraduate Thesis
WOMEN’S STRUGGLE UNDER THE PRACTICE OF
PATRIARCHY IN ALICE NANNUP’S WHEN THE PELICAN
LAUGHED
By
Gavin Anditya Putra
Student Number: 114214079
Approved by
Sri Mulyani Ph.D 15 September 2016
Advisor
Drs. Hirmawan Wijanarka M.Hum 15 September 2016
Co. Advisor
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
iv
A Sarjana Sastra Undergraduate Thesis
WOMEN’S STRUGGLE UNDER THE PRACTICE OF
PATRIARCHY IN ALICE NANNUP’S WHEN THE PELICAN
LAUGHED
By
GAVIN ANDITYA PUTRA
Student Number: 114214079
Defended before the Board of Examiners
on September 26, 2016
and Declared Acceptable
BOARD OF EXAMINERS
Name Signature
Chairperson : Dr. Fx. Siswadi M.A
Secretary : Sri Mulyani, Ph.D.
Member 1 : Maria Ananta Tri S., S.S, M.Ed.
Member 2 : Sri Mulyani, Ph.D.
Member 3 : Drs. Hirmawan Wijanarka M.Hum
Yogyakarta, September 30, 2016
Faculty of Letters
Sanata Dharma University
Dean
Dr. P. Ari Subagyo, M. Hum.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
v
LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH
UNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS
Yand bertanda tangan dibawah ini, saya mahasiswa Universitas Sanata Dharma
Nama : Gavin Anditya Putra
Nomor Mahasiswa : 114214079
Demi pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan, saya memberikan kepada Perpustakaan
Universitas Sanata Dharma karya ilmiah saya yang berjudul
WOMEN’S STRUGGLE UNDER THE PRACTICE OF
PATRIARCHY IN ALICE NANNUP’S WHEN THE PELICAN
LAUGHED
Beserta perangkat yang diperlukan (bila ada). Dengan demikian saya memberikan
kepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma hak untuk menyimpan,
mengalihkan dalam bentuk media lain, mengelolanya dalam bentuk pangkalan data,
mendistribusikan secara terbatas, dan mempublikasikannya di internet atau media
lain untuk kepentingan akademis tanpa perlu meminta ijin kepada saya maupun
memberikan royalty kepada saya selama tetap mencantumkan nama saya sebagai
penulis.
Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya.
Dibuat di Yogyakarta
Pada tanggal 10 September 2016
Yang menyatakan,
Gavin Anditya Putra
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vi
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY
I certify that this undergraduate thesis contains no material which has been
previously submitted for the award of any other degree at any university, and that,
to the best of my knowledge, this undergraduate thesis contains no material
previously written by any other person except where due reference is made in the
text of the undergraduate thesis.
Yogyakarta, September 10, 2016
Gavin Anditya Putra
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vii
This undergraduate thesis is dedicated to
My Mother
My Father
My Brother
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my gratitude to my thesis advisor, Sri Mulyani Ph.D,
who has helped me in writing this thesis. I thank her for the advice, the
encouragement and the guidance that she gave to me.
I also express my gratitude to Drs. Hirmawan Wijanarka M.Hum as co.
advisor of my thesis. I thank him for his advice and guidance to complete my thesis.
I would also like to thank all the lecturers of English Letters and the staff
for the guidance and knowledge that they gave to me since I entered English Letters
Department.
My special gratitude goes to God, my beloved parents, and my brother, who
always give their love and support me in every way, my comrades in arms: Bobob,
Ceribo, Hagil, Melan, Nindi, Panji, Patrick, Piwi, Rian, Siman, Tata, Tyok, and
Willy, I thank you all for the kindness. I also thank to ‘Eleven’: Afel, Ariya, Ceha,
Deas, Dicky, Echo, Ipul, Ismid, Kunthi, and Lulung.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................... ii
APPROVAL PAGE ......................................................................................... iii
ACCEPTANCE PAGE .................................................................................... iv
LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI ............................ v
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ............................................................... vi
DEDICATION PAGE ...................................................................................... vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................. viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................. ix
ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................... x
ABSTRAK ........................................................................................................ xi
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1
A. Background of the Study ...................................................................... 1
B. Problem Formulation ............................................................................ 4
C. Objectives of the Study ........................................................................ 4
D. Definition of Terms .............................................................................. 4
CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF LITERATURE .................................................. 6
A. Review of Related Studies ................................................................... 6
B. Review of Related Theories ................................................................. 7
C. Theoretical Framework ....................................................................... 12
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 14
A. Object of the Study ............................................................................... 14
B. Approach of the Study .......................................................................... 15
C. Method of the Study ............................................................................. 16
CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS ............................................................................... 18
A. Women and the Practice of Patriarchy in When The Pelican Laughed
18
B. Women’s Response to the “Unfair” Practice of Patriarchy.................. 33
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION .......................................................................... 38
BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................... 41
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
x
ABSTRACT
Gavin Anditya Putra. Women’s Struggle Under The Practice of Patriarchy in
Alice Nannup’s When The Pelican Laughed. Yogyakarta: Department of English
Letters, Faculty of Letters, Sanata Dharma University, 2016.
This study centers on the novel When The Pelican Laughed, written by Alice
Nannup with Lauren Marsh and Stephen Kinnane. The novel tells us about the
struggle of two main characters, Ngulyi and Alice under the practice of patriarchy
in their society. They were described as brave, smart, and tough women who will
fight for their rights.
There are two objectives in this study: First, to find out the practice of
patriarchy that occurs in the novel When The Pelican Laughed; Second, to find out
the responses of the two main women characters in facing the practice of patriarchy.
The writer applies library research method to gather the data and references
for this study and uses feminism approach when analyzing the novel to have a better
understanding in reveals the two main women characters in When The Pelican
Laughed.
From the analysis, the writer reveals some practices of patriarchy that had
been experienced by Ngulyi and Alice which oppressed them like a ceremonies that
only allowed men to join, a law that allowed men for choosing their mother-in-law
and her daughter without permission from them, and bad treatments from the man.
The writer also finds the responses toward the practice of patriarchy from the two
main characters who are struggling for their rights; they fight over the law and also
the men that limit their rights.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xi
ABSTRAK
Gavin Anditya Putra. Women’s Struggle Under The Practice of Patriarchy in
Alice Nannup’s When The Pelican Laughed. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Sastra Inggris,
Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma, 2016.
Penelitian ini berpusat pada novel berjudul When The Pelican
Laughed, yang di tulis oleh Alice Nannup beserta Lauren Marsh dan Stephen
Kinnane. Novel ini menceritakan tentang perjuangan dua tokoh utamanya, Ngulyi
dan Alice di bawah tekanan praktik patriarki yang berada di lingkungan mereka.
Ngulyi and alice di gambarkan sebagai wanita pemberani, cerdas, dan kuat yang
akan selalu berjuang demi hak nya.
Penelitian ini memiliki dua tujuan, yakni: Pertama, untuk mengetahui
adanya praktik patriarki di dalam novel When The Pelican Laughed; Kedua: untuk
mengetahui respons dari kedua karakter wanita dalam menghadapi praktik patriarki
tersebut.
Penulis menerapkan metode studi pustaka untuk mengumpulkan data
serta referensi dan menggunakan mendekatan feminism dalam menganalisa novel
tersebut agar memiliki pemahaman yang lebih baik dalam mengungkap kedua
karakter wanita di When The Pelican Laughed.
Dari hasil analisa novel tersebut, penulis menampakan beberapa
praktik patriarki yang bersifat menekan di alami oleh Ngulyi dan Alice seperti
upacara adat yang hanya diperbolehkan untuk kaum pria, hukum yang
memperbolehkan para pria memilih calon mertua nya tanpa persetujuan dari sang
mertua dan anak perempuannya, serta perlakuan-perlakuan buruk yang dilakukan
para pria terhadap wanita. Penulis juga menemukan respons terhadap praktik
partriarki dari kedua karakter tersebut dalam memperjuangkan hak nya, mereka
melakukan perlawanan terhadap hokum dan para pria yang telah membatasi hak
mereka sebagai wanita.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study
Women worldwide are still discriminated since they are all under men’s
domination. Some men in this time still assume that “female” is a second sex. Men
underestimate women role in daily life, starting from the common things to the
complex things. Rosemarie Tong in Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive
Introduction argues that:
Thus, in the United States, for example, women are pushed into jobs like
nursing, teaching, and childcare, while they are steered away from jobs in
business, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. In addition,
legislation specifically barring women from such “masculine” jobs as
mining and firefighting or preventing women from working the night shift
or overtime is not exactly a distant memory (Tong, 2009:34).
The explanation shows the discrimination over women in daily life,
Rosemarie Tong briefly says that in the US, they limit women’s freedom to choose
any job, and thus there are only several jobs that allowed for women there.
There are various cases from time to time. Long time ago, women terribly
suffered from men’s domination either from their own society or from the other
society like the colonizers. They experience a social inequality in many aspects and
they get a lot of pressure from both their own society and colonizer or we can call
it “white people”. In nineteenth century, women in America experienced some
gender discrimination by their own community as Madsen says in Feminist Theory
and Literary Practice, “woman in America was unable to vote, and after
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2
marriage had no control of her property or her children. Her status was akin to that
of a minor or slave.”
Thus after a lot of discrimination, women begin to start their movements to
fight back the men’s domination over everything; they fight for their right, and try
to bring back their dignity and also their role in daily life. One of their movements
is producing some literary works that show us about their experience and how they
solve all the problems that caused by men’s domination. In this case, literature has
a big role as a media to inform and show the struggle of women to reach the gender
equality issue and to emphasize their existence in this world. They show and prove
that female is reliable in this life and they can change the world with their own
power without men domination. In this case, the researcher uses a novel by Alice
Nannup entitled When The Pelican Laughed to elaborate more about how women’s
being discriminated and suffers from men’s discrimination.
According to Marjorie Boulton in The Anatomy of the Novel, the novel is a
branch of fiction that developed in late in history but a relish for stories seems to be
as recorded humanity (Boulton, 1975: 1). Boulton also mentions the definition of
novel from Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, ‘Novel is an invented prose
narrative that is usually long and complex and deals with human experience through
a connected sequence of events’ (Boulton, 1975:11). Thus, novel is a form of prose
that consist a story which reflects and deals with human’s life experience.
Alice Nannup, as an author, writes her own life experience in the form of
novel with the help of Lauren Marsh and Stephen Kinnane entitled When The
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
3
Pelican Laughed. She is an aborigine. She portrayed her whole life since she was a
child. She tells us how she was raised by the aborigine family with all the traditions
in the aboriginal society. The aborigine was considered as a patriarchal society
where the men dominated. This novel takes place in Australia where the aborigines
lived under white people’s domination. Alice is a part of aboriginal society that
lives under the white people domination. Besides, she also has to live under men
domination and obey men’s rules in her aborigine society. In her novel she focuses
on her struggle against the domination by her surrounding especially from the men
which reflects the idea of feminism.
The reason why the researcher chose this topic is because we have to revalue
women’s contribution to our life and consider once again the important of women’s
role in our life, Peter Barry said in Beginning Theory about feminist, so we can have
more respect to women and not thinking that woman or female is a second sex.
Women need equality in all of aspects, so we have to give them chances to take part
in this life and they also have the same right as the men in all aspects of life.
The researcher uses the feminist approach in literary work and some theories
on feminism to analyze this novel, and focus on Alice Basset as the main female
character and also her mother, and her struggle against her own society (Aborigine)
and white people domination in her society.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4
B. Problem Formulation
1. How do women experience the practice of patriarchy in Alice Nannup’s
When The Pelican Laughed?
2. What are the responses of women in facing the practice of Patriarchy in their
environment in Alice Nannup’s When The Pelican Laughed?
C. Objectives of the Study
The first objective of this study is to see what Alice and other women
experience in his life as a woman from aboriginal society and under the white
people domination. I want to find out what treatment that she got from her own
society whether it is good or not, and also from white people around her that have
more power in her environment and reveal whether there is any gender
discrimination that given by her from both society or not
The second objective is to find out what the responses of Alice and other
women are to face all the pressure from both society (Aborigine and White). The
researcher will reveal whether they fight back or not.
D. Definition of Terms
Feminism
According to Peter Barry, Feminism is women’s movement that struggle
over the image of the women (Barry, 2002: 121-122). In The Dictionary of Feminist
Theory, Feminism is a doctrine of equal rights for women and ideology of social
transformation aiming to create a world for women beyond simple social equality.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
5
(Humm, 1995: 94). In general, feminisms is the ideology of women’s liberation
since intrinsic in all its approaches is the belief that women suffer injustice because
of our sex. (Humm, 1995: 94)
Patriarchy
According to Peter Barry, Patriarchy is cultural thought of men or women
in the society about sexual inequality where the men have more power and control
the women (Barry, 2002: 122). And according to The Dictionary of Feminist
Theory, Patriarchy is a system where the men have an authority to control and
oppress the women in the society (Humm, 1995: 200)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
6
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
A. Review of Related Studies
Feminist criticism is a theory that focuses in the image of women and it is
used to analyze the struggle of women right under men’s domination. I will provide
the review from other studies that also use feminist approach to analyze the story.
It is from Amanda Rindu Dyah Perdana in Patriarchy, Woman Suffering, and the
Ideas of Feminism Reflected Through the Character in Maria Irene Fornes’s: The
Conduct of Life.In the story, there is a male character named Orlando, he described
as a powerful man with maximum authority and he also reflects patriarchal value
by his characteristics. Orlando has several servants; one of their servants is Olimpia.
Olimpia is one of the victims that experience Orlando’s violence. Perdana states:
At this time Olimpia does not see Orlando as her employer but as a man
who always abuses her verbally and also a man who treats her unkindly. She
has to rebel and what Olimpia has done is her form of rebellion. (Perdana,
2008:50)
In that statement, the researcher agrees that Olimpia has reflected the idea
of feminism toward Orlando (man), she wants to rebel and be free from Orlando
domination. Then, in this study, rebellion is not just toward a single man. The
women can fight back towards society rule, and it proves that feminism can do more
than struggling towards one man but also a society that has wider scope.
There is also a research by F.X. Risang Baskara about the novel When The
Pelican Laughed. In his undergraduate thesis entitled The Indigenous Struggle Of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
7
Aborigines In Western Australia In The 19th Century As Reflected In Alice Nannup’s
Life In When The Pelican Laughed, Baskara also discusses about the major
character’s (Alice Nannup) struggle, but he focus more on the idea of
postcolonialism that is revealed by the characters. He states:
The second part of the analysis will study the indigenous struggle in
Western Australia in 19th century that are reflected through Alice Nannup’s
characteristics in When The Pelican Laughed. The theory of indigenous
struggle is used to help the writer to analyze what kind of struggle emerge
in the characteristics of Alice Nannup. Besides, the writer also uses the
postcolonialism approach to see what happened in Australia during the
colonialism period (Baskara, 2010:68).
We can see in the quotation above, the researcher has almost the same object of the
study with Baskara, but the approach that the researcher uses to analyze the
characters is different. Baskara uses postcolonialism approach to analyze the
characters, while the researcher uses feminism approach in his research.
B. Review of Related Theories
1. Theory of Characterization
According to Characterization theory in Thomas R Arp and Greg Johnson’s
Perrine’s Literature: Structure, Sound, and Sense, there are some ways to describe
a human character in a story. First the author of the story will decide whether he or
she uses a Direct Presentation by tell the reader about the character or Indirect
Presentation by show the reader the character through the actions (Arp and Johnson,
2006: 162).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
8
According to M.J Murphy in Understanding Unseen: An Introduction to
English Poetry and the English Novel for Overseas Students, there are 9 ways to
know the characteristics of the character, those arefrom personal description like
the character’s appearances and clothes, character description as seen by another or
opinions from other characters, Speech of the character or what character said in
the story, character’s past life or past experience, conversation of other characters
and all things that other characters said about him or her, character reaction to some
situations, direct comment by the author, thoughts by the third person point of view,
and mannerisms that can describe a character’s habits.
M.H. Abrams also has some methods for characterizing, in A Glossary of
Literary Terms he says, “The author may show not only external speech and actions,
but also character’s inner thoughts, feelings, and responsiveness to events; for a
highly developed mode of such inner showing” (Abrams, 1999: 33-34). So, instead
of speech and physical actions that occur in the story, the author may show
character’s thoughts, feelings and responses to the events that happen in the story.
2. Theory of Feminism
Feminist literary criticism is the product of woman movement that deals
with literature and focuses on the significance of the images of the woman that
appear in literary work. (Barry, 2002: 121). It shows the importance of the women
in every aspect of our life and women have the same role just like men. Barry also
writes:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
9
In this sense the women’s movement has always been crucially concerned
with books and literature, so that feminist criticism should not be seen as an
off-shoot or a spin-off from feminism which is remote from the ultimate
aims of the movement, but as one of its most practical ways of influencing
everyday conduct and attitudes (Barry 2002: 121-122).
It proves that feminist criticism wants to show us how reliable the women
participation is in our daily life and prove that women have the same power as men.
Deborah L.Madsen in Feminist Theory and Literary Practice also explains about
Feminist literary theory and its aims. She said that literary feminism tried to show
the value of the feminine by promoting the image of women in literature so
everyone sense it (Madsen, 2000:16). She also mentions three main aims from
Feminist literary theory, she states:
Feminist literary theory had three main aims: to expose the workings of the
ubiquitous patriarchal power structure; to promote the rediscovery of
women’s historical achievements (including literary history); and to
establish a feminine perspective on critical, literary, political, scientific,
philosophical (and other). (Madsen, 2000:14-15)
We know that they want an equality and recognition from the others in many
aspects of life and also create a woman perspective on those subjects and want to
show about the image of woman.
From the basic theory of feminism, we also have Multicultural, Global, and
Postcolonial Feminism. Those branches of feminism concern to women from any
race, ethnicity, class, sexual identity, age, etc. (Tong, 2009: 215). Multicultural
Feminism initially focus only in one nation, the U.S., then Global and Postcolonial
Feminism widen the scope, like Rosemarie Tong says in her book:
Multicultural feminist focus on the basic insight that even in one nation—
the United States, for instance—all women are not created or constructed
equal. Depending on her race and ethnicity but also on her sexual identity,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
10
gender identity, age, religion, level of education, occupation or profession,
marital status, health condition, and so on, each U.S. woman will experience
her identity and status as a woman differently. Expanding on multicultural
feminists’ basic insight, global and postcolonial feminists stress that
depending on whether she is a member of a First
World/developed/Northern/Western nation or instead a Third
World/developing/Southern/Eastern nation, each woman in the world will
be positively or negatively affected in significant ways (Tong, 2009: 200-
201).
Multicultural feminism has many similarities with Global and Postcolonial
feminism; both of them focus on the women from any race, ethnicity, class, etc.
The one that differentiate them is only in the scope. Multicultural feminism only
focus in United States while Global and Postcolonial feminism focus in all
developed and developing nations and also the nations that were colonized.
C. Review of Related Backgrounds
1. The Writer’s Biographical Background
Alice was born in 1910s on Abydos Station, out from Port Hedland,
Australia. Her mother was fifteen years old when she had her, and they left there
when Alice was a baby. Her mother’s name was Ngulyi and her European name
was Dot. She was born on Pilbara Station, which is between Roebourne and Marble
Bar, Western Australia. After leaving Abydos, they went to Kangan station and
Ngulyi travelled from station to another station to work. They lived there for a while
and they moved to Roebourne at Alice’s father house and they were staying there.
They lived there in the aborigine society.
When Alice was twelve years old she was taken to the south to get an
education. The Campbells promised to return Alice to his family when she finished
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11
her study, but she ended up in Moore River Settlement. According to the website
www.noongarculture.org.au, Moore River Settlement was designed to be a self
supporting farming settlement and planned to provide schooling, employment, and
also health facilities, but during 1920s it changed from farming to the interment for
aborigine people. It also stated that “Children of ‘mixed decent’ or what was termed
‘half-castle’ aboriginal people, were brought there to be trained as domestic
servants for white society” (www.noongarculture.org.au/moora/). Alice was not the
only victim of this movement, many aborigine children were taken from their
family at that time.
In Moore River, Alice stayed in a dormitory which had very strict rules that
sometimes oppressed her freedom. In there she was given a training to work. In her
childhood, she was sent to some family to work there until she got older and went
back to the settlement.
She got married in 1932, right after she went back to the settlement. In
history, 1930s era was a difficult time for people in Australia, it called “The Great
Depression”. According to the website www.australia.gov.au, this event gave
terrible impact to Australian society, people at that time did not have a steady job
and income. The main cause of the Great Depression is not completely solved, the
website states “Although the collapse of the New York Stock Exchange determined
its timing there were several factors involved: A fall in export prices and sales, a
fall in overseas loans leading to a reduction in government capital spending, and a
fall in residential construction”(www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-
story/great-depression).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
12
By that time, Alice kept travelling with her husband to one place to another place
to find a job and raise their children. During their lifetime, they raised ten children.
2. Patriarchy in the Australian Aborigines Society
Patriarchy is a system which dominates by the men. They have an authority
which oppresses women (Humm, 1995:200). This research makes Patriarchy as one
of the main concern since the researcher wants to reveal about the patriarchy that
occurs in the novel When The Pelican Laughed which take place in the Australian
Aborigines Society.
According to Sandra Bloodworth in her article on the website, she
mentioned about the proof that she got from the observations of the Europeans in
nineteenth century regarding the degraded of Aboriginal women. The Aboriginal
woman described as the one that cruelly beaten and torture if she does not obey the
man. The woman should work all day, mind the children, carry all the family
belongings when travel, and also there is a fact that marriages are arranged for the
girls in Aborigines society at a very young age or even before birth
(www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/interventions/gender.htm).
D. Theoretical Framework
This thesis studies the novel by Alice Nannup entitled When The Pelican
Laughed. The researcher focuses on the woman main characters in the story, Ngulyi
(Alice’s mother) and Alice herself. The researcher analyzes the characters from
their characteristics, social experiences, and responses to the treatments from their
society.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
13
The characterization theories are really needed to discover Alice’s life that
she had experienced. Those theories are not only used to find out the characteristic
of the character but also the treatments from other elements in her environment, her
life experience, her struggle to face the pressure, her suffers, and so on. These
theories can be helpful to answer the first problem formulation and even the second
problem formulation.
Since this study focuses on the female or women characters, the feminism
theory is really helpful to determine what Alice as the female character do which
reflect and show the idea of feminism as our concern. We need to find out the value
of women itself and what movements are done by Alice when she faces her life and
some pressures from her environment. And we can find out what men do to limit
women movement and their rights, and dominate over the women, we can call it as
patriarchy. In this story, of course we concern to Alice’s society, we can find out
what her society especially the men give to her, everything that maybe limit Alice
movement. This theory is really helpful to bring the idea of feminism closer to us
and answer both problem formulations.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
14
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
A. Object of the Study
The literary work that the researcher discusses in this study is a novel by
Alice Nannup with Lauren Marsh and Stephen Kinnane, entitled When The Pelican
Laughed. This novel was first published in 1992 by Fremantle Arts Centre Press,
and reprinted in 1992, 1993, 1996, and 2000. This novel has 225 pages and divided
into 4 parts. This novel is based on Autobiography of Alice Nannup.
This novel tells us about Alice Nannup’s life from she was a young girl until
she became a great-grandmother. The story of this novel is set in Australia. In the
beginning, Alice also tells a story about her relationship with her mother and her
life as a little girl in the society where she lived. She lived with her parents and her
sister. She has an aborigine mother while her father is a white man. She knew the
truth when she got older.
Her life was apprehensive since she was taken from her family and society
to work as domestic servant and sent to a dorm with a terrible treatment. In the
beginning she was offered to get an education, but she ended in the settlement and
trained as a servant. She began to get some pressure with that environment and
sometimes she fought back for her right, freedom and dignity. She moved from one
place to another and worked for various masters. She got
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
15
both good and bad experience when she worked as a servant but she kept struggling
to get a better life.
Then, in her adulthood, she came back to the settlement and met a guy, and
then she married him. She began her journey with her husband. She and her husband
had to struggle to raise their children. She moved from one place to another place
to work and get a better life.
In her old age, she finally could go back to her hometown and met the rest
of her family who she left behind when she was taken to the settlement. She spent
her old age in Geraldton and she was happy that she was able to live peacefully.
This novel is focus on Alice and also her Mother’s life and struggle as an
aboriginal woman in her society that dominated by man and white people. They had
to survive by travel from one place to another in order to get better life. Sometimes
they had to experience the suffers from the law that existed in their society.
B. Approach of the Study
As this research focuses on the female character, the researcher uses
Feminism as an Approach to analyze the literary work that has a women or female
character as the main concern.
Indeed, feminism has often focused upon what is absent rather than what is
present, reflecting concern with the silencing and marginalization of women
in a patriarchal culture, a culture organized in the favor of men (Guerin,
2005: 222-223).
From the quotation above, using Feminism to analyze this novel can help the
researcher know more about the characteristic of Alice as an aborigine woman, her
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
16
own life experience, what she felt in any condition that told in the novel, and what
she did to struggle against her society domination.
C. Method of the Study
The method that the writer uses in this study is Library Research. The main
data or sources for the research were taken from the novel When The Pelican
Laughed, and the writer gets secondary sources and some theories to analyze the
data from books of literature, related theories, and also the book of feminism since
the writer use feminism approach to analyze the novel.
There are some steps that the writer did to doing this research. The first step
was reading the novel very carefully to understand what the main concern of the
novel and find the practice of patriarchy and also the response from the main female
characters to the practice of patriarchy.
Next, the writer chose the Feminism Approach to analyze the novel When
The Pelican Laughed since the main female character that really complex and
become the main concern in the novel and also using the theory of characterization
to know all about Ngulyi and Alice as major female characters. The writer searched
some supportive data and theories through books in the library and e-book.
Then, the researcher paid more attention to the major female characters’
characteristics and their life experience including all their suffer in the story and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
17
also the society where they belonged. The writer concerned about that in order to
find out about the practice of patriarchy that may be experienced by them.
Next, the writer began to find out their response to their surrounding that
gave her some pressures and the practice of patriarchy itself. Then the writer applied
feminist literary theory to answer the problem formulation.
Finally the writer made a conclusion from the analysis. That was how this
study was finished.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
18
CHAPTER IV
ANALYSIS
In this chapter, the researcher answers the problem formulations which
stated on the first chapter of the research. First, the researcher analyzes on how the
women experience the practice of patriarchy as reflected by the main character in
the novel. Second, the researcher finds out and discuss about the responses of
women in facing the practice of patriarchy in their environment.
A. Women and the Practice of Patriarchy in When The Pelican Laughed
In the novel When the Pelican Laughed, there are two main women
characters that experienced the practice of patriarchy; they are Alice and her
mother, Ngulyi. Alice’s mother experienced the practice of patriarchy in Aborigine
society, while Alice experienced it in a bigger scope aborigine and white society.
The meaning of the practice of patriarchy itself is anything that the men do to
oppress and harm the women.
1. Ngulyi’s Experience of the Practice of Patriarchy
Alice’s Mother whose name Ngulyi is a smart woman, she spoke six
languages, Nyamal, Palyku, Kariyarra, Ngarluma, Yindjibarndi, and of course
English, she also has an European name, Dot. She was born on Pilbara Station,
which is located between Roebourne and Marble and she belong to the Yindjibarndi
tribe. She is a quite hard worker, stated in the novel that she travelled from station
to station and worked there in the kitchen and doing housework. She
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
19
married to aborigine man, Old Ned and had a daughter, Mangkayurangu, or Ella.
Old Ned is Alice’s stepfather. They stayed in Kangan because Old Ned worked for
Tommy, Alice’s father.
One day, Old Ned had a terrible ill and needed a medical attention. They
took him to Roebourne to get a better medical treatment, but he still cannot be cured,
he ended up dying and then he died. He was buried in the Aboriginal cemetery. Not
long after the funeral, an aborigine scout came and asked Ngulyi to be at Yule River
to fulfill the custom to shave her head, it was necessary for a wife that belonged to
YindjiBarndi tribe to shave her head not long after her husband died.
Then one night one of the Aborigine scouts came and saw Tommy. He said
that Mother had to be at the Yule River by a certain time. You see, it’s a law
that when a woman’s nyuba (partner) dies she’s got to have all her hair cut
off to make herself ugly for somebody else. (Nannup, 1992: 25)
We can see in that paragraph, aborigine society has a law only for women that
oblige all women in their society to shave their head immediately after they lost
their husband. It is intended to make themselves ugly and not attracted for
somebody else. Then, if the women did not want to do that, Aborigine scout who
sent by the elders will come over them to give a warning and ask them to go to Yule
River to be judged. Alice also mentions about the place where used to organize the
judgment by the elders,
We got to meeting place, and that evening they made a big fire at two sites.
The elders were all there waiting and Mother had to kneel down in a circle
of men. We were sitting back from women.(Nannup, 1992: 25)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
20
From the quotation above, we know that Ngulyi had to kneel down and surrounded
by men while the women and her kids were sitting in the back. This clearly shows
the domination of men that surrounded Ngulyi and she had to kneel down in the
center of them. They asked her why she did not carry the law and rattled their spear,
but Ngulyi just kept silent, and they jabbed the spear on her leg.
The researcher believes that this thing proves a practice of patriarchy that
occurs in the aborigine society. This law was only made for women in that society
and what the custom did based on that story was really harm the women and limit
women’s right. If a woman did not carry the law and just remained silent while the
elders asked some questions, she will get a cruel treatment just like Ngulyi have
got.
This law really gave a disadvantage for women, they have to cut off their
hair while they grieve because their husband died, and it does not make any sense
to ask people to be ugly, nobody has a right to change a woman into something that
she did not want to, and if a woman did not want to carry on the custom, they will
get a punishment and it could be a cruel physical treatment that really harm like
Ngulyi have got. Implicitly, this law took away women’s right, women lose their
freedom to be somebody that they want to, they were not liberal because they had
to oblige the law, and of course this law reflected the idea of patriarchy which is
oppress and harm the women by the rules or laws that made by the men in the
society.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
21
As it is told in the novel, there were various kinds of meetings and
ceremonies that exist in the aborigine society that Ngulyi belongs to. Ngulyi usually
took her kids, Ella and Alice, and also their cousin to the ceremony where they
could sing and dance. As Alice stated, they really enjoyed it, that was a really great
time, but not all ceremony in their society could bring happiness to them.
In that society, there are also some ceremonies held by aborigines which
reflected the practice of Patriarchy. It means that the ceremonies were made by men
and for men, and the women are forbidden to take a part or join these ceremonies.
In the ceremonies, the women in the society were strictly not allowed to enter those
ceremonies, the women seemed to be ignored by the society itself because the
society that dominated by the men does not allowed the women to take some parts
of that custom. This is the prove that told by Alice in the novel, she says,
There were also ceremonies that women weren’t allowed to go to, like
Initiation time. Then the men used to be on one side of the river. The women
had to the other side and they couldn’t pass on the men’s side. To walk on
it would be crossing sacred ground because that’s the business side, See,
that’s what my mother did that time, and they reckoned she went blind of it.
That’s just the way of the law; they tell you not to do things, and if you do,
well, you’re disobeying. (p 27)
We can see clearly on that quotation that the men from aborigine society that Ngulyi
belongs to made some kind of ceremonies that only have the men for its participant.
It is described in the novel like initiation and women were not allowed to join the
men in the ceremonies, we see that women should be in the other side of the river,
and the men called their side as a sacred ground, and women are not allowed to
walk on it, it is like a private area for the ruler in that society, the men.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
22
From the feminist perspective, the researcher believes that the ceremony did
a practice of patriarchy which limits the women right to take a role in a society. The
society itself contains men and women, thus the women should be considered to
take a role in the society. Besides, the society belongs to both men and women.
The information above stated that men have an authority to control
everything, they give a name of their side as the sacred ground, and forbid the
women to walk on it. Actually they have no authority to take the women’s right to
take a part on the events or ceremonies that held in the society. Women and men
should have the same right in order to run and build the society.
Not only prohibit women for joining them in the ceremony, men also did a
cruel treatment for women who break that strict law. They were willing to make
someone blind. They made such a terrible punishment for women
Unfortunately, Ngulyi as the main character in the novel, experienced this
cruel punishment from the men. She went blind because she walked on the sacred
ground, the side that the men claimed to be their territory. She did it with Alice’s
aunt, Winnie, Alice states
Mother had gone blind. See, her and Auntie Winnie had gone out walking
and they’d walked across sacred ground where the men were having
meeting. They reckoned she went blind for doing that. So we had to stay
there for a week, and I used to go and get hot water to bathe her eyes
(Nannup, 1992: 26).
The quotation above shows that Ngulyi had a terrible punishment from the men
because she was considered to break the law that women were not allowed to
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
23
walking on the sacred ground. The men decided that she had to be blind for doing
that. Ngulyi had to take care of Alice because of the men did to her. She was lucky
that she only got temporary blind, but this thing cannot be underestimated.
The men had no right to do such a bad treatment like that to women. They
have already made many limitations for women in their society, and they still gave
a cruel punishment to women and showed no humanity. Women have a right to
receive a good treatment. Men should not be that cruel to women. Men had already
taken away women’s right, but they still gave a bad treatment to women. The men
have no right to hurt women, in this case, they made someone blind just because
she broke the law. The punishment shows no humanity.
Thus, the researcher believes that there are some ceremonies in the
aborigine society that Ngulyi belonged to oppress women, limit women’s right, and
give no freedom to women to be liberated like they want to do. Those ceremonies
of course reflected the practice of patriarchy that really gives a limitation to every
women move, take away women’s right, even it tortures them. The researcher can
see clearly that the laws, the ceremonies that mentioned above are made by the men
who believe that they are the one who has the authority to control the society, so
that they oppressed women, and took way the women’s right. The researcher also
believes that in the society the women should take a part equally like the men did,
and also treated better in every way.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
24
2. Alice Bassett’s Experiences of the Practice of Patriarchy
Alice is the main character of the story after Ngulyi, her mother. She was
described as a really complex character in the novel since the novel was her
autobiography, it told us about Alice’s life from she was a young girl, until she
became a grandmother. When she was a girl, Alice described as a curious girl, she
was interested with a new thing in her surrounding, but her curiosity sometimes
made her into a clumsy and careless girl, she was also described as a tomboy. Alice
has a father named Tommy, who was a white man, but since Alice’s mother is an
aborigine, she also considered as aborigine and belonged to the same tribe as her
mother.
Unfortunately, Alice Bassett also experienced the practice of patriarchy,
even when she was a little girl. In this case, the custom and law that created by
aborigine were also involved to bring the practice of patriarchy, and this issue also
happened in the same society that made Ngulyi as the victim of the practice of
patriarchy.
This case began when there was a law that allowed the men for choosing
their mother-in-law. When the man had decided their choice, the women could not
avoid it. They had to surrender their daughter to the man.
One day, there was an old man in the society came and asked Alice’s
mother, Ngulyi if she got pregnant and the child born as a girl, the girl should serve
him and become his wife in the future. And it was the evidence that Alice provides,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
25
When I was born they gave me to an old man. My group is garimarra, and
balyirri is my straight. They did it by the men picking who they wanted as
their mother-in-law. Like when this old fella was around fifty, and mother
was having me, he said, ‘If that’s a girl, that’s my woman.’ Well I was born
a girl, worst luck. (p 35)
Once again the researcher found out that the aborigine society where Alice
belonged to had a custom which reflected the practice of patriarchy. The men chose
their own mother-in-law in order to get the daughter, and they indicated that they
wanted to exploit the girls by marrying them without the girls’ permission. No
matter the condition, if the men have chosen it, the girl should be their woman and
serve them. The girl and her mother have no option left as the men have taken away
their right and their freedom, the women must obey this law although they did not
agree about that.
Men’s domination was really strong in this case. They made such an unfair
custom without thinking about the effect to women. They took away women’s right
to get an equal treatment and freedom in the society. They tried to exploit women.
They wanted to be served by the women without making any excuses, and they
showed how the men have an authority over the women. They can control them.
Thus, this thing was really unfair and only brought disadvantages for the women.
Besides, woman also has a right to decide whom she wants to marry. If she
already reaches a proper age to be married and ready to build a family, she could
marry a man that she love. In the novel we provided with a different thought. The
aborigine girl was taken from her mother since she was born. The little baby has no
right to choose her partner in life because she was chosen by a man in the society
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
just like what Alice says in the novel “It was never the old women that chose, it was
only ever the men. They had it all their own way”(p35). She and also her mother
cannot do anything but they have to surrender to this custom that has been made by
the men in society. They cannot escape from the man’s domination in their society,
although Alice was still a little girl, the Old man has to wait until Alice was old
enough, like what Alice says
He was waiting until I was old enough, however old that was, and he’d say,
‘When you’re ready to come with me, you’re coming, whether you like it
or not.’ This was all in Aborigine of course, and he’d come over demanding
a feed (Nannup, 1992: 35).
The quotation above shows that Alice has never been given an option as the men
would wait for her until she was old enough, then Alice should be coming with him,
whether she like it or not. The researcher believes that the old man violated the
women’s right that the women wants to be free from any force The old man does
not have any rights to limit their freedom. They cannot simply choose any mother-
in-law he likes and marry her daughter. Besides marrying her daughter, the old man
will also turn Alice to be his servant, the researcher finds in the quotation that the
old man demands a feed from Alice, and her mother cannot make her daughter
refuse it, like what Alice says afterward
When he’d come, Mother would go off and hide herself because she was
forbidden to mix with her son-in-law. She used to say to me, ‘Make it, make
him a cup of tea. Go on, give him what he wants (Nannup, 1992: 35).
The information above showed that Ngulyi as Alice mother could not do anything
to refuse the old man request, and she gave Alice an advice to give whatever he
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
wants, she also remained to hide herself because there is a law that not allowed her
to mix with her son-in-law, and she could only give an advice to her daughter. From
the explanation above, the researcher sees clearly that the women have lost their
right to refuse the things that they do not like. They only surrender by the law that
oppresses their right. Whether they like it or not, they have to serve the men that
are considered in that society as the one who has the authority over everything.
The researcher believes that this case proves the form of patriarchy exists in
aborigines’ society. The women who have a girl that already chosen by the men
cannot do anything but give the girl to the men. They cannot refuse the men to
marry their daughter though their daughter might be turn as a servant for the men.
They cannot do anything against the law that reflected the practice of patriarchy
The researcher still concerns about another issue of the law that reflected
the practice of patriarchy in Aborigine society that Alice belonged to. Apparently,
there is another custom that oppress women based on the information that Alice
provides in the novel. Alice mentions about a custom that requires the women to
walk behind the men if the women want to walk together with the men. Not only
walk behind the men, the women also get inequality treatment, they have to carry
on the luggage while the men only carry a simple thing. Here is the custom that
Alice tells us about
It was never the old women that chose, it was only ever the men. They had
it all their own way. A woman used to walk about four or five yards behind
her man, carrying a baby on her hip, a bundle of wood or something on her
head, another bundle on her back, and have children walking along with her.
She’d do all that while the man was walking along carrying a couple of
spears! I tell you what, the men had it made. (Nannup, 1992: 35)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
28
In this case, the researcher found that the man gave unfair treatment to the woman.
It meant the man has violated women’s right which the woman should get an equal
treatment from everyone. The information above described about the woman who
used to walk around four or five yards far behind the men. It was a quite far distance
for a couple to walk together. Not only walked far behind the man, the women also
have to carry their baby on her hip, and if they had more children, the children must
walk along with her. The woman also has to carry many luggages by herself. It is
described in the quotation that it might be a “bundle of wood or something, and he
carried the luggage on her head and another luggage in her back.”
It seemed like a heavy task for the woman to do all of that thing, while in
the other hand, the man only carried a simple thing like describe in the quotation,
the men only carried a couple of spear, and it meant nothing if we compare to what
woman did. This law is very unfair. The man did a practice of patriarchy which
harms the woman by ordering her to do a heavy task while he carried couple of
spears.
In the novel, Alice also expresses her anger and disappointment about this
custom. She says in the last two sentences, “She’d do all that while the man was
walking along carrying a couple of spears! I tell you what, the men had it made”
(p35). It is unbelievable, when a couple walked together, but only the women that
carried the luggage while the man can walk comfortably by only carrying a couple
of spears. She was really disappointed about what the men had made by creating a
law that only give advantage to the men but oppress the women in the other way.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
29
The researcher concludes that this law is a form of practice of patriarchy in
the aborigine society. Those evidences prove that only the man that considered as
the one who has an authority over woman like giving an order to his woman without
consider about the woman’s condition, and the woman should obey the order from
her man. This law reflects an inequality in the aborigine society, and that is how the
patriarchy works.
When Alice got older, a couple, Mr and Mrs Campbell met her and talked
to her family that they want to take her down South to educate her and of course
she was really excited and accepted that offer. It was a long journey to the south,
they had to stop by so many times and Alice not expected that she had to work for
someone before she was going to school. Alice was taken to Beeginup, and she
started her school there, but she still has to work at the farm. That circumstance did
not last long, they continue their cruise from farm to another until Alice realized
that the promise to bring her to school will never happen and she was sent into
Moore River Settlement.
Alice was taken to Mogumber and from that place she ride out to the
settlement. There, Alice lived in a dormitory, and she tells that everything was
separated there. There were separate dormitories for boys and girls, even the dining
room was also separated.
Evidently, leaving her hometown did not make Alice free from the practice
of patriarchy. She also experienced it in the society among the settlement, and this
time she experiences it from the boy that lived in the same settlement like her. There
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
30
is a habit in the dormitories when the boy writes a note and sends it to the girl, and
the girl never supposed to send notes, she just answered them. Once, a boy wrote
Alice a letter that he wanted to see her, but Alice seems did not care about it and
just ignore the note. In a few days, the thing that did not expect to be happened.
They had a morning break and the boy came over Alice when she was in a hurry to
visit someone, and then they had a conversation,
‘Just a minute,’ he said. ‘I want to talk to you.’
‘ What do you want?’
‘Did you get my note?’
‘Yeah,’ I said.
‘Well, what did you do? Why didn’t you answer it?’
‘I ripped it up,’ I said, ‘I don’t want you.’
Well he grabbed hold of me by the neck and pushed me down onto the fence.
He was nearly choking me and I couldn’t get away. ‘When I write notes to
girls I expect an answer,’ he said, and I could hear how angry he was.
(Nannup, 1992:74)
That conversation shows us that even at the young age, a man can do something
that reflected the practice of patriarchy. Alice did not expect this thing to happen
because of the notes that have been written to her. This is a simple thing that if she
does not like someone, she does not have to answer the notes or meet that person,
she has a right to reject or ignore the notes from the boy, but in this case, that boy
forced Alice to answer the notes because he expected a response. It was like a law
that a boy writes a note for a girl, she had to answer it. It shows the practice of
patriarchy because the boy forced Alice to answer his note even though Alice has a
right to not to do that, this boy clearly violated the woman right by forced someone
else will.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
The boy also treated Alice cruelly. The novel describes that he grabbed
Alice’s neck and pushed her down onto the fence, and he was nearly choking her
after he knew that Alice did not want to answer the note and ripped the notes from
him and he told us how he expected an answer from a girl who received a note from
him. This issue really oppresses Alice as a woman. She has a right not to answer
the notes, but the boy as a man does not care about her right, he forced to get an
answer and treated Alice cruelly like that whereas he has no right to treat a woman
like that. From the case above, the researcher finds that what the boy has done to
Alice reflected the practice of patriarchy by forcing the girl’s will and treat her
cruelly.
The researcher still concerns about the patriarchy in the Moore River
settlement. In this case, not only Alice who experiences an inequality treatment, but
also all women in the settlement that lived in dormitory experiences it. The problem
is revealed when Alice observed the dormitory for girls and the dormitory from
boys. From the beginning the society has kept everything separate in that place. The
women and men got a different dormitory to live in and so was the dining room.
Alice realizes that boys got a better space and more freedom in their dormitory, like
what Alice says:
The camps were off limits to us up in the compound – well, the girls really,
because boys were much freer. Some of the girls had relatives down there
and they would ask to go down to see them. They might be allowed, but if
they weren’t they’d sneak down (Nannup, 1992: 84).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
32
The information above shows that the camps were very limited for the girls. There
are so many strict rules that limit them for doing anything, unlike the girls, the boys
never feel the same. While the girls were limited, the boys got more freedom. They
were much freer than the girls. Sometimes, the girls had to sneak down illegally if
they want to meet their relatives because the law restrained them.
The researcher sees an inequality that reflected by the law in the Moore
River, the law was very strict for the women and restrain them. In the other hand,
the boys were much freer as Alice described in the story, the law was unfair, it sides
with the boys.
Previously in the novel, Alice also mentioned about the boys who got more
freedom in the settlement, Alice says, ‘Although us girls were pretty much
supervised, the boys were free to roam around as they liked.’ (Nannup, 1992: 82).
The researcher finds out that the girls in the settlement got much supervision than
the boys got. The quotation says that the boys were freer to wander everywhere they
liked. This thing completely shows that there was a law that only for the men and
the law itself only restrained the girls. It limited the girls’ freedom and took away
their right to be treated equally like the boys. This law is very unfair for the girls.
They have a right to be treated equally and get the same freedom in their life.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
33
B. Women’s Response to the “Unfair” Practice of Patriarchy
In this session, the researcher answers the second problem formulation
about the women response to some treatments and laws that reflected the practice
of patriarchy by observing the responses of the character Ngulyi and Alice since
they are the main characters that experience the practice of patriarchy in their
society in the novel. Ngulyi experienced the practice of patriarchy in her aborigine
society which belonged to Yindjibarndi tribe, while Alice experienced it not only
in the aboriginal society that she belonged to, but also in the Moore River settlement
where she sent to.
1. Ngulyi’s Response to the Practice of Patriarchy
Based on the first issue that the researcher stated in the first problem
formulation which was experienced by Ngulyi, which was about the custom that
requires the women to shave their hair when they lost their husband in order to
made themselves ugly for other people, the researcher found out that Ngulyi made
an opposition over the law. She did not do what the law has said. She refused to
shave her head because she thought that it was not necessary. An Aborigine scout
asked her to be at the Yule River to judge Ngulyi for breaking the law. In the Yule
River, they asked Ngulyi some questions about why she did not carry out the law
and forced him to keep shaving her head, even Ngulyi deserved a cruel treatment
from the men. They hurt her by jabbing her leg with a spear, but she kept carry on
her stand and told them that the law was not necessary. It is proved when Alice
states
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
34
She told them that she didn’t think it was necessary to cut off her hair, and
they were really cross with her. They said to her she thought she was white
because she had Tommy behind her. But Mother didn’t think that at all and
she was very upset. (Nannup, 1992: 26)
The quotation above showed us that Ngulyi made a resistance to avoid the law that
reflected the practice of patriarchy which violated the women’s right by forced
women to do something. She refused to shave her hair and stood in her principle
even though the men tortured her by jabbing her leg with a spear while kept forcing
her to shave her head in order to make herself ugly for somebody else, she told them
that the law for women to shave the hair was not necessary to do, until the elders
and the men were really annoyed at her. She was also very upset about their opinion
about her that she thought she was white because she had Tommy. And the writer
could conclude that this resistance is a part of Feminism which struggle for
women’s right against the men rule and domination toward women.
2. Alice Bassett’s Response to the Practice of Patriarchy
The researcher now moves to the response that Alice has done in facing the
practice of patriarchy that she experienced. As the researcher mentioned before in
the first problem formulation, Alice was already ‘reserved’ by an old man from her
society before she was born. ‘Reserved’ here means that the old man has already
ask Alice’s mother to let Alice marry him one day when she was mature enough to
be married, Ngulyi as her mother could not do anything to refuse it. When Alice
knew the truth that she has to marry the old guy, she refused it. When the old man
asked her to be a servant by feeding him, this was how Alice tried to refuse to feed
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
35
the old man although her mother gave her an advice to give him what he wants, as
she says in the novel:
He’d be saying to me, ‘You my woman, you feed me.’
I said to him, ‘Mirda, nyinda buga,’ That means, no! you buga, you stink.
‘Never mind about the buga,’ he said. ‘You my manga (woman).’ (Nannup,
1992: 35)
In the conversation above, Alice refused to serve the man by directly said no when
he said that she was his woman and asked her to feed him. She believed that she
did not belong to the old man. She also fought him back by saying that he smelled
stink. But the men still insisted and affirmed that Alice was his woman and she had
to obey him. Although her mother gave her an advice to give the man all things he
requested, Alice stood on her principle and resisted the old man.
Alice’s resistance did not stop at that time. She had an idea to run away from
marrying that old man. She got a chance to escape from that guy when the
Campbells came to meet Alice’s family and they were going to take her to the South
and educate her, like what the researcher had explained earlier. Alice says, ‘I was
really excited about going, it sounded like a real adventure. Besides, I thought, it
was a good way for me to get out of marrying that old fella I was promised to.’
(Nannup, 1992: 39). In that sentence, Alice was really excited about going to the
south and shows her consideration to escape for marrying the guy. She thought that
if she went to south far away from her home; she could avoid marrying the old man,
and she also got an education there.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
36
Although the promise to give her an education never happened, at least
Alice’s consideration to be free from the old man reflects the idea of Feminism
because she wants to escape from that man’s domination which considered as the
practice of patriarchy by exploiting Alice.
The next response from a woman in facing the practice of patriarchy that
the researcher found in the novel occurs in the part when Alice has moved to the
Moore River settlement. In the previous part, the researcher found that Alice also
faced the practice of patriarchy from a boy in the Moore River settlement.
It is about the habit in the Moore River that in the dormitory, the boys used
to write notes for the girls, and the girls should answer it. The researcher has found
that there was a boy who wrote a note to Alice and expected she will answer the
notes, but the reality was not the same like he expected, Alice did not answer his
notes. He came over Alice and asked her if she got his notes or not and why she did
not reply it, and Alice said, ‘I ripped it up, I don’t want you’ (Nannup, 1992: 74).
By her answer, the researcher assumes that Alice realized that she had a right not
to answer the notes from the boy though she knew that in that society, the girls
should answer the notes from the boys.
The boy got angry because Alice did not want to reply the note and meet
him so that he hurt Alice physically and told her that if the boy wrote a note for a
girl, a girl had to answer it and he was expecting it, he seemed to force and punish
Alice for what she had done. Although got beaten by the boy, Alice did not remain
silent, once again she clarified that she had the right to not answer the notes, and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37
she said ‘You don’t get one from me’(Nannup, 1992: 74). She kept struggling on
her right and convinces the boy that he will never get an answer from her although
he forced her and torture her cruelly like that. The researcher finds how strong Alice
defended her right and her principle although the force from the boy was really
strong. She believed that the girl was not under the boy domination, she had a right
to refuse and fight back the man who tried to oppress her in any ways.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
38
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION
In the previous chapter, the researcher has answered the two problem
formulations. In his research, the researcher focused on two main characters of the
story, Ngulyi and Alice. The first problem formulation stated in the first chapter is
about the women and the practice of patriarchy.
The first character that experienced the practice of patriarchy is Ngulyi. In
the story, after her husband passed away, an aborigine scout came to Ngulyi and
asked her to fulfill the custom. The researcher found that the aborigine society that
Ngulyi belonged had a law only for women that oblige all women in the society to
shave their head after they lost their husband.
The researcher also found some ceremonies held by the society which
reflected the practice of patriarchy. In the ceremonies, the women in society were
strictly not allowed to take a part or join those ceremonies and the men also did a
cruel treatment for women who broke that law and made such a terrible punishment.
Ngulyi experienced this cruel punishment from the men.
The other character that also experienced the practice of patriarchy in the
story is Alice. There was a law which applied in the society that allowed the men
for choosing their mother-in-law. When the man had decided the choice, the women
could not do anything except surrendered their daughter to the man. Alice
experienced this unfair law. A man chose her to be his wife and she could not resist.
He would wait for her until she was old enough to be married.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
39
Based on the information given by Alice in the novel, the researcher also
found a law that gave unfair treatment to the woman. The law said that if the woman
walked with the man, she should walk behind the men in a quite far distance. Not
only walked behind the man, she also carried a baby and the entire luggage by
herself while the man only carried a couple of spears in his hand.
Then, Alice also experienced the practice of patriarchy in another society.
She experienced it Moore River Settlement. There is a habit in the dormitories that
the boy writes a note and sends it to a girl, and the girl should answer them. Once,
Alice got a letter from a boy, but she ignored it. Then, that boy came to Alice and
physically abused her.
Moore River is a very strict place to live. In his research, the researcher
found that the camps were very limited for the girls. There are many rules that limit
the girls for doing something. Unlike the girls, the boys never felt the same thing,
they seemed to get more freedom because the boys in the settlement got less
supervision than the girls got.
The second problem formulation is about women’s response to the “unfair”
practice of patriarchy. In this case, the researcher also focused on two main
characters in the novel, Ngulyi and Alice since they are the main characters that
experienced the unfair practice of patriarchy.
Based on the research from the previous chapter, Ngulyi experienced the
custom that required the woman to shave their head. The researcher found that
Ngulyi responded the unfair custom by making an opposition over it.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
40
Then the researcher found another response to the unfair treatment by Alice.
As stated in this research previously, Alice was already chosen by the old man from
the society. When Alice knew about the truth that she had to marry the old guy, she
refused it. Besides, she also had a plan to run away from marrying the old man. She
got an opportunity to escape when the Campbells offered her an education in South.
She took this chance immediately to get away from him.
Alice also made a response to the practice of patriarchy when she moved to
Moore River settlement. It is about the habit in the dormitory when a boy wrote a
letter to a girl. Alice did not want to answer the note from the boy, so he got upset
and hurt her. Although she was being forced and got beaten by the boy, Alice kept
in her stand and clarified that she had a right to not answer it.
The researcher can make a conclusion that there are some practices of
patriarchy that occur in When The Pelican Laughed which experienced by the two
main character, Ngulyi and Alice. They also had a response to those unfair
treatment. They realized that they had to struggle their right, so they stood on their
principle to maintain the equality and of course this thing reflects the idea of
feminism.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abrams, M.H. A Glossary of Literary Terms: Seventh Edition. Massachusetts:
Heinle & Heinle, 1999.
Arp, Thomas R, and Greg Johnson. Perrine’s Literature: Structure, Sound, &
Sense, Ninth Edition. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth, 2006.
Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory: And Introduction to Literary and Cultural
Theory, Second Edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002.
Bartlett, Elizabeth Ann. Rebellious Feminism: Camus’s Ethic of Rebellion and
Feminist Thought. New York: Palgrave Macmillon, 2004.
Boulton, Marjorie. The Anatomy of Prose. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd,
1954.
Boulton, Marjorie. The Anatomy of the Novel. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
Ltd, 1975.
Guerin, Wilfred L. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2005
Henkle, Roger B. Reading the Novel: An Introduction to the Techniques of
Interpreting Fiction. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc, 1977.
Hudson, William Henry. An Introduction to the Study of Literature. London:
George G. Harrap & Co. Ltd, 1913.
Humm, Maggie. A Reader’s Guide to: Contemporary Feminist Literary Criticism.
Hemel Hempstead Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994.
Humm, Maggie. The Dictionary of Feminist Theory.Columbus: Ohio State
University Press, 1995.
Jackson, Stevi, Karen Atkinson, Deidre Beddoe, Teri Brewer, Sue Faulkner,
Anthea Hucklesby, Rose Pearson, Helen Power, Jane Prince, Michele
Ryan and Pauline Young. Women’s Studies: A Reader. New York:
Harvester/Wheatsheaf, 1993.
Madsen, Deborah L. Feminist Theory and Literary Practice. London: Pluto Press,
2000.
“Moora”. Kaartdijin Noongar: Sharing Noongar Culture. South West Aboriginal
Land & Sea Council. n.d. (www.noongarculture.org.au/moora/). August 4,
2016
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
Murphy, M.J. Understanding Unseen: An Introduction to English Poetry and
English Novel for Overseas Student. London: George Allen 7 Unwin
Limited,1972.
Nannup, Alice, Marsh Lauren and Stephen Kinnane. When The Pelican Laughed.
Fremantle: Fremantle Arts Centre Press, 1992.
Stuckey, W.J. The Pulitzer Prize Novels: A Critical Backward Look. Oklahoma:
University of Oklahoma Press, 1966.
Tong, Rosemarie. Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction.
Colorado: Westview Press, 2009
“The Great Depression”. Australian Government Publishing Service.
(www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/great-depression). August 4, 2016
Warhol, Robyn R, and Diane Price Herndl. Feminism: An Anthology of Literary
Theory and Criticism. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1997.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI