wo$ i~ by *mlsslon by to ok'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through...

20
MINU1E ITEM , This Caler4(far Item No. J.5 WO$ OPP-roved as Minute Item No. by the State lands *mlsslon by a 3 tO at Its OK'/3o:tr- meetlng. A 7 s 1 APPLICANT: CALENDAR ITEM 15 APPROVAL OF A RECREATIONAL PIER PERMIT Beverly Bone 3981 Robler Avenue Santa Ynez, California 93460 08/30/89 PllC 5401 J. Ludlow AREA, TYPE LAND AND LOCATION: LAND USE: A parcel of submerged land in Lake Tahoe at Agate Bay, Placer County. Partial reconstruction, use, and maintenance of an existing pier. TERMS OF PROPOSED PERMIT: Initial period: Five-years beginning August 30, 1989. CONSIDERATION: Rent-free, pursuant to Section 6503.5 of the P.R.C. APPLICONT STATUS: Applicant is owner of upland. PREREQUISITE CONDITIONS, FEES AND EXPENSES: Filing and processing costs have been received. STATUTORY AND OTHER REFERENCES: AB 884: A. P.R.C.: Div. 6, Parts 1 and 2; Div. 13. B. Cal. Code Title 2, Div. 3; Title 14, 6. 01/13/90. -1- CALENDAR PAGE tAtruTE PAGE

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jan-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

MINU1E ITEM , This Caler4(far Item No. J.5

WO$ OPP-roved as Minute Item No. I~ by the State lands *mlsslon by a vote~ 3 tO at Its OK'/3o:tr-meetlng.

A 7

s 1

APPLICANT:

CALENDAR ITEM

15

APPROVAL OF A RECREATIONAL PIER PERMIT

Beverly Bone 3981 Robler Avenue Santa Ynez, California 93460

08/30/89 PllC 5401 J. Ludlow

AREA, TYPE LAND AND LOCATION:

LAND USE:

A parcel of submerged land in Lake Tahoe at Agate Bay, Placer County.

Partial reconstruction, use, and maintenance of an existing pier.

TERMS OF PROPOSED PERMIT: Initial period: Five-years beginning

August 30, 1989.

CONSIDERATION: Rent-free, pursuant to Section 6503.5 of the P.R.C.

APPLICONT STATUS: Applicant is owner of upland.

PREREQUISITE CONDITIONS, FEES AND EXPENSES: Filing f~e and processing costs have been received.

STATUTORY AND OTHER REFERENCES:

AB 884:

A. P.R.C.: Div. 6, Parts 1 and 2; Div. 13.

B. Cal. Code ~egs.: Title 2, Div. 3; Title 14, Di~. 6.

01/13/90.

-1-

CALENDAR PAGE

tAtruTE PAGE

Page 2: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

CALENDAR IfEM N°o. 15 (CONT'D)

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION: 1. Pursuant to the Commission's delegation of

authority and the State CEQA Guidelines {14 Cal. Code Regs. 15025), the st~ff has prepared a Proposed Negative Declaration identified as EIR ND 466, State Clearinghouse No. 89031312. Such Proposed Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated for public review pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

Based upon the Initial Study, the Proposed Negative Declaration, and the comments received in response thereto, there is no substantial evidence that the project will hav~ a significant effect on the environment. (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15074(b))

2. In lieu of total reconstruction, the applicant proposes to reconstruct only that portion of the pier waterward of the low water mark {6223' elevation). That portion of the pier located in the shorezone area shall remain as is. It has been found that that portion of the pier within the shorezone area is in a safe and serviceable condition and is not in need of reconstruction at this time.

3. The work, as proposed, will be done from a barge that will be located in the lake. First, the existing sections of the pier to be replaced will be removed, placed on the barge, and hauled away. Once the barge is unloaded, the new materials to construct the new sections of the pier will be placed on the barge and taken to the construction site. The new portion of the pier and boathouse will be constructed entirely from the barge with a crane and a pile driver that are located on the floating platform.

4. Materials will be neither stored or placed, nor will any activity associated with construction, be conducted above the low water line on the subject property. This

-2-

CALENDAR PAGE

MINUTE PA!:E

Page 3: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

CALENDAR ITEM NO. 15 (CONT'D)

will prevent any disturbance to what may be considered a Tahoe Yellow Cress (Rorippa) habitat.

5. The existing pier is a previously authorized structure.

6. In order to determine the other potential trust uses in the area of the proposed project, the staff contacted representatives of the following agencies: TRPA, Departm~nt of Fish and Game, County of Placer, and the Tahoe Conservancy. None of these agencies expressed a concern that the proposed project would have a significant effect on trust uses in the area. The agencies did not identify any trust needs which were not being met by existing facilities in the area. Identified trust uses in this area would include swimming, boating, walking along the beach, and views of the lake.

7. This activity involves ~ands identified as possessing significant environmental values pursuant to P.R.C. 6370, et seq. Based upon the staff·s consultation with the persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is consistent with its use classification.

8. All permits covering structures in Lake Tahoe will include a condition subsequent that if any structure authorized is found to be in nonconformance with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency's shorezone ordinance, and if any alterations, repairs, or removal required pursuant to said ordinance are not accomplished within the designated time period, then the permit will be automatically terminated, effective upon notice by the State, and the site shall be cleared pursuant to the terms thereof.

-3-

C/.:.tNDAtt PJ'.GE

Page 4: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

CALENDAR ITEM NO. 15 (CONT'D)

APPROVALS OBTAINED: Placer County, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, California Department of Fish and Game, and Lanhontan Regional Water Quality Co~trol Board.

FURTHER APPROVALS REQUIRED: United States Army Corps of Engineers.

EXHIBITS: A. Site Map. B. Location Map. C. Placer County Let~er of Approval. D. Negative Declaration.

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMMISSION:

1. CERTIFY THAT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, EIR ND 466, STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 89031312, WAS PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CEQA AND THAT THE COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED THE INFOR~ATION CONTAINED THEREIN.

2. DETERMINE THAT THE PROJECT, AS APPROVED, WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT OM THE ENVIRONMENT.

3. AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE TO BEVERLY BONE OF A FIVE-YEAR RECREATIONAL PIER PERMIT, BEGINNING AUGUST 30, 1989; FOR THE PARTIAL RECONSTRUCTION OF AN EXISTING PIER ON THE LAND DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT 11 A11 ATTACHED AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.

-4-

CAU'.NDAA PAGE

Page 5: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

EXHIBIT "A" ---------, --~..... -- - ---------1---- ---------==------·--·-··------~ared J:> • lliasJ...!?.7---Ju~y Ludlow_ ---- ---·-----'IP~Ruc:C"--"'540-l;·~ ---.. · -------

--- ~-- ~ ---- \!! - ----- e . .. -~. -- -·-· -~

~ ,, ·::·~ ~-- ·- .... -~

-~ l~-~ l:i;

'' ~ ~,,

. -- --· - - 1 -- "'

······---·· ··~-~~ ~ - . - -- ~~-~~~

- . -.--·---- ··-~-· ---- -·· e -- ------- -- ----- ---

------ --- ---- ----·-·-------

- ---------- ----

-----. ·-·-·· -------- ·--------·------

--····. .. . ·-··--- -··· ... ,.

.. -~----

.. ···-· ..-\.-.... ~---·

""' --·- ·--· .. -··· ......... ... A,,G,~\E,. e:J .. ··- "\ ..

. P~o.)e.c:t S1T

~sz.c.. ~~-mt

I . I·. ~.. ...-- . .. . . . ·-· -. -·--.. . . . -- -- --···-- ---1--E·-· --~::-: ·-- -~:- ~~~}.o\fk'~-~~-~'1-----"". .,,,.~~ .

·- ·····- -· - .. --·- -- .. -- ·-- -·--- .. ~- ····----·- --" .... .. . ··-··. __ :ro :rA~~r..,.\1'-t ··-:·--·----I.A~ TA\':\OE

~ SM\C..6.$ . ..... ol

. --------- --------------------------·------. . -- -- ·- ..

---··-··------···. --··---------' ...,_ _________ ·--- ··--· -----

------~~~---- --····--···- .. ·-· .. --------~---- -----------------------------·--··-----·---

-----··· ···--·-·· - ··----·----------- -··-·--··-·-------------·-------- ____ ... ,. ________ ~

Page 6: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

-~ -----·- -----· .:.--.. ~-=-=------- --· -.. --:-.. _____ ..... __ :-___ --r . ---_--=----------------------=-------lfc,co-~~lfr--------- -------c_ ,-__J----le~201=------ __________ _ -- . -----------r---~~------=--1 ------- ·--- ---~ -·· ___ ,;_______ ·- ___ .., ----

.. ----- -- ---------~ -- ··--- . ----- ---- ------··-----------. --·-··---. ....... .. -···----· ..

. . .

so' .. . . . . "11.;r .. . . -·---©.~,,,..,,.,.,,.PE.~~.,.,...

. . -- N'r.5 . . .. - ---·· -

~ •' · .

JO.t '\&Wt. .P"-Ei:·· l'S'O·C. .,_,/ '4t~ It~ ' ·-

~--· -.....• ·-· - . . . . ·---··· . ~--.,, ~ --··-··-· ·--·---··---·-----· ~ - .... ··--·· ··-. ~~~ -- - -- .... - .. ···------- ·--- .. -· -----· - -- .. ··--

···---------- ---- ---~4' - -··----···· ·--- - ... -----·····-··--- .. ----·· -··-·-·--·- ~-- -·----·· --· --~!~:-~-~~-~--:-.-~ ··-__ ·-· -~ ---.------ -- -----· --- -------~'2!:>' --·----- ·-----·-- --- ----- -· _., ... - . - -·-·· ----- 17 - ------ - --·---- ----- ____ '_ _'t1.L=~~e3.z.11

........ _.. - -~ -----EL ~ZSJ.~~-'""--__ -_-_ ........ .._ __ ::_-_-'_ . _____ -----

1 ~" ---- --· - -··-- O.q. (;6~1?- 'flt..e --- --- --·---- ___ _ ·--·--·------··--··· ------- -·-- ______ --···· ~~'.C. w/_<o~1~~ ------· --- - - -r:~--. -- - A·-·- ~FLA~=-oF~s"'°··;-··-· ... ______ "'/;········-· .. ''°"'¥_ . ----· ---- -- ............ - , .... ;+· ··- -e-- __ __g_HEJfim ____________ 1;? ______ ., _____ ., ______ ·- ·-----

--cltr~,.~·~ ;_ · . - -. -?:'-V,~~:-~~··.=>:;.: .... -.-. -----EB- ~,m.,....e.-flE'f..~~---~ . -· .. , ·J '1--r-·· . z -- 3.S':f _._ .. __ , ·:.::.:::·:-.~;.:__ _ _____________ _hO:s. ______ ·----·-··-------

--.J---t·--- - -- - .,_._4-_"¢~-~-------------------·--- --·--·- -- -----l- -~ -· w 0L£:.e_G-!.Q .. e ... ___ _ ___ -----·-------·-t-i----1--1-- -· --::---G)~~~ ------···--------

·-----1- __ __ ==:..B.e:~-~_7'>-E.~1,,,;r) :nt.1::._'Se.c:..n~.fl!lN.:...y .... -···----­pI>l=T IN U!N&nt

I • ---------·--- ·-·----------··- ----------~l':rfl~_f~.JlAf..P/l~-·· ·----- -'-------------- ·--- ----····-

Page 7: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

., .!..I ~. .:...,~ .....

----- ~"?-Ti---~ -·-----... ,,..,,_==--=- ;...•---·-~·- -·---. . .. • t" ..... .,, .•. -----------

--·----. ::..;.,--.__\_ .... if~ g_-- f

__ '()____ ii~- --l~---,. .. -------------11 ',, ~ ~ • ~------~r---.:z~o!.;..• ---7f""' -.-: i _j ·- -_jll---::::;;,._;,,~1 ____ ___: _________ _

~~1- . . . " ===$15 , I I ''!d"""°Ji;M~ -§1·-. ~r-~.--11---""---------....... ·7--::: p,c.£ ... e 7'r-"o· :!. :S ~ !/. ' ,.. _. -R:JZ-~"""'f -tlf---A- - --- ~--~-- -- ~ec_ GJ~~~- r ____ 97-12.l~zr'!O

u.~-·-:1;~"·-J:~ -- --- -·- !l~-:_~~-=-~ ~ =~-:= I I N If _! :_· __ ~;;~~ ~~ --------1,- ----

1 - .... ~J.J.~_-----_ --~~;:'~ -- - · i.------ -- "".45r~~L£JQ~~~"' {- -t= - 1 ,-.;;; e lt;'O·C... . . ------------ -· ----- -----2: 1 ' -- ·---- .;. --- ~-ff ' d , ii. I ·----- -- -·---·-·-· ----~ Cit - '. -------1- ·-·-------" l~ ~=--~ ~-----_:ff- -~--1-·-: ··--· ·--~--~~~-----------" --~----· --- --- ~­--·-j 1---~ ---------~·-1---~-- --~@ - ---- ----·- - -------lS '1 ~ ~ ~ v. 'S ~~-~-~Q __ 'flt.e... ------ ---~-~--'11- -----·v--··~---~- 1 .t. ~

QI ~ c )<.,. .(l ___ ~f,vr_c..p_,~~~---- - - - - ---_.., .... _ .'1_ ---·---- .u. ....... ~ -;-:--- -·- --~~ - ..... c::. . - ·--·'Ila-~ ~ u ~- ·· N ·~ · - ---- _,q 3. ----?,--- -~ -~~-- -; --- ·---· k --- .. 1~~-;---~-1 ~-~ -~--. ·_ •· -&-~-~:_ -- . . ~ --- ·t··~--- -~--;.-· ·-r -- ·- 7___ ·--- -

---~~ -----n-~11 - . ---

:·-~ -~ :--~=i-l ~-:1~ =--~::. ' ·----=-:. <>~~~¥•<£ - '" · -~!\-4;~-~- -- --- - ~e:L c..~ l;.. 1s•o.e..tMf flJ..,.,1

____ ;;,___.......,,j,,jl.,--- ~I ~ ~-t~~ ~ J 11 u fl I - - S'C't.. t+ &M ""( 4, /' , -E ~ ~ , ro N ---;i-.~e ~-o.t... -----=-·---·'-4'~-1-'--~~~--~-:; - 4~·~~

-t<-'f' Al ) ~1N-··· i-~ 'U --:= =- ~=- . __ , _____ _\_y____ . , 1-·-- r~-~~ -- -- ---- ·- --, ~-- :fH. rf - ~-- ------- --~i~- -.I<:-~· --- f~ ·- ---~~=-~~ ··-. ___ , ___ _ ~. ,_ -,.~"' ~ -·-- -~?'

' ,, ------- --~---.·' • r;;-' ---•-" -1-1·---tB ----\t.·fi" "CJ .. ,fl-- ~~ ~-AM?-P1t-f!. ____ - - ---

1=-S · ·- ~·j - -~E.WiW-1.Qfm9M ~_i._ ··· -·· ---···-· · _.,~\] __ _J ___ ' •I., 1., .. :-:--- ·=~At-r.rgcc.~===~==:=:=r-Gap; 1..ra11.-. ., " ' =f1 -----'~'j --- ;I =«~·:-: .'.~

1

,.-- I ~ J . llitfJm@ iiEeWt.,J2 m,,, B&,f!;-~l~-..j. fl,~ , ~!$..:_L&Jr::lrtl!:::.1 11fl!a/?.'o'' --- ---- --

~tam-"' J• /e>'Ott

Page 8: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

T 15 N

U.t UJ \0 .....

a: a:

Sunnyside

T 15 N

Homewood

Ill I if I m I a !!I fi Ill

LAKE: • B

TA H O:E 13 B a I

Placer County 111 Uli:lll am .. -- ~- _. .,. --1

. El Dorado County 11

.EXHIBIT ~8" PRC 5401

UJ, .UJ \0 ,....

a: c:t:

T14N

T 13 N UJ UJ ,.... (X)

a:: 0:

I I Q

I fJ l!I a a

'~ ~~ ~~ ~~

Page 9: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

EXHIBIT '~C"

PRC 5401 PLACER COUNTY

, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

C'rER.\l l"G DIVISION

.\,J,n ... u-,.r1.ll•-'

Et111'~"'""' E1~111pn.._ .. ,s 1..•.unt~.lnc~ Ro."1 ~.t ltnt•<t;1.1nc._•

SN"C•JI 01s'r14...'1$

Novembl!r 17, !988

Hs. Judy Ludlow California State Lands Commission 1807 - 13th s,~eet Sacramento, CA 95814

JACK WARREN. Director JAN WITTER. Assistant Director LARRY ODDO. Deputy Director

ALAN ROY. Deputy Director

RE: PLACER COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS ~OTIFICATION

De:t r 'Is. Ludlo;J:

The County ?f ?lacer has received notice of the below referenced projects in Lake Tahoe and has no objection to the pier repair/construction or the issuance of the State Lands Co~mission's permit.

NAME: ADDRESS:

COUNTY A.P.N.

NAME: A'DDRESS:

Beverly Bone 5526 North Lake Blvd. Agate Bay 4116-220-52

?at and Paula Pearson 4210 North Lake Blvd. Cedar Flat

COUNTY A.P.N. #92-200-08

NAME: ADDRESS:

Gail Cq High 9872 Pilot Circle Brockway

COUNTY A.P.N. #90-321-19

If you have any questions, you may reach me at 916-823-4511.

COUNTY OF PLACER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JACK WARRE DIRECT

-------I I.UCB Avenue I OcW1ll Ccnlar I Auburn. Cahlotnta 95603 I (9t6) 823·4511

C/..LENOAR PAGE

MINUTE ?AGE

....

1 9 '2

Page 10: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

. 8903131~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA-5TATE LANDS COMMISSION GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN. Govemor

STATE LANDS COMMISSION 1807 t3TH STREET • SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 EXHIBIT "D"

PRC 5401

.. ~

; PROPOSED NEGATIVE OEC~ARATION

Project Title: BONE PIER REPAIR

Project PrDponent: BeverJy Bone

EIR ND 466 S4-0I File Ref.: PRC~

SCH#: 89031312

Project Location: In lake Tahoe adjacent to 5526 North Lake Blvd. - Agate Bay, Placer County.

Project Description: Reconstruction of an existing pier.

Contact Per'.son: TED T. FUKUSHIMA Telephone: (916)322-7813

This document is prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 21000 et seq., Public Resources Code), the State CEQA Guidelines (Sec­tion 15000 et seq., Title 14, California Cope Regulations), and the State Lands Commission regulations {Section 2901 et seq., Title 2, California Code Regulations).

Based upon the attached Initial Study, it has been found that:

~ the project will not have a significant effect on the environment.

t:::J' mitigation measures included in the project will avoid potentially significant effec

·;~~.~:. ~ :.t...... .. •:i~4:: ::··: ::.~

•. .. ...,, .... ~·r

-·: ,.."-: . ~."

. , ·· . ... . ·:·,.~;. :.. ~

"~--::·,:::·

.... .; ....

... " . : .

. ~:· .. ~

Page 11: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

... ,, or-,... ....... ,,_~ I \ r I :· I: '- • ; ;

- >..J - " "- t.J

.JA~tO 41989 '!l!••r.- ,...., .. "'.O'. • 11r.vt r.t1.:i .1·J1:L

PLANNING AGEf.Jt;Y

Page 12: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

I

I 11

I 25' I I I

I ., ... I t:i

5'fl . t: I le..

i ~

SO'

J_

l 4'

I

!

I i

' 5~

:S..S':t

I 7'

~::::.--------,

'I. 2 ·~-· -fi.AEi rct.f."'~ 1; Ir I

....

~Ft.I\~ ~E... ~·no.-t

, ... _¥( --7'/I t, II' ----~ )i

f-7'

4>1.tO.l~"'t"JQ ~Z.41 0,( l'..1('2.y:r;_ 9f:.~MG

~ "? ~ f'it.J:•P­l?'C·C.. c...(c.y.1.;.s:r, It~

J 0 ~ .. ~"711- 1'11.£~ e n:--.1 S'O·C. tu/ Co't.IS-<:>"Tt.

++t.M,"'n{~ I . -. EB C> Wt:mi OF C.a.c6!> 6 ""1 :::: , (2>~1eiw. :. . .

~ ""'"""'" p.,.__.. ~o...l N.T.5

• t t."¢1..0q ~

>, Au.:.:.@ (.,,.'O. C. ~i: FUt.:J ~

13~'le.cz.L.:!.{ 'eo.4e.'.s . ..fie:.~ i..~A-1~ S2.~ _M~ lAt:.E-~ '~ l!Ay

..

Page 13: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

·. -.:

. <> II .. g " It

J ~ v & ~ b" :: ~ € . > - A .;_•

x ,j ~ .. -~ ·o.'3 5 ~ c;,

(£..,

I I

~ .

~

(

~r~· -- 7'0"---~71

j u.1: .::;,(A'\ 1!~ o . ... · ..-: ~-

~~~ -P:..;.¥:.. ~'O 'PtLC..

~f,v IL.;> I o/itc-1 •-~

N, "f"-5

.. '> I 71"'"- I 11 \_:__: .;.:;:<___ v -- I 7

~ ...! ~:

I --ID~ "C.:;-n- f't<....£';:.E

V \S'O·C..~/~"'--!C::: STt- t-t- &i"I ...,( 4"f. I~ J~iM'2 °24"().t. w(

4"'~-t:i-="~

!CA:.€.: ~i'H ~ / ":::.. / 'S'o'' ffe.lf!1HT~ J• /o'O'I

. f?.E:Y~ ~ ~t:.e.. ~1fl­~~::"!:'"'re.=T.:--fl._A_· ---·~ _ ft92t.- NOfi.Tff !Aa::. ~I ,AGA"IE.. et+./

/c;/~/Be, -~f#l--~-1~

Page 14: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

STI\"; ELANDS COMMISS!GN

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To be completed by applicant) FORM f'!).31W82)

A. G~NERAL INFORMATION

1. Name, address, and teleohone number:

a. Applicant

.Beverly Bone

3981 Roblar Ave.

Santa Yn~z, Ca. 93460

( Date Filed:---'---'---

File Ref.: ______ _

b. Contact person if other than applicant:

Gary Taylor

P.O. Box 1715

Crystal Bay, Nv. 89402

c702 1 831-8626

' 2. a. Project location: (Please reference to ne~rest town or community and include county)

5526 North Lake Blvd. • Agate Bay, Placer Countx

b. Assessor's parcel number: _ _.1--.1_6_-_.2 ... 2-..0--...-_5.-2._ _______________________ _

3. Existing zoning of project site: _...,.;:T...,R .... -.... 1=-----------------------------

... Existinglanduseofprojectsite:. existing single family residence and existing pier

5. P;oposed use of site:_....;;s;..;a.-rn;.;.., e;;._-------------------------------

6. Other permits required: TRPA. l,ahontan. Army Corps of Engineers

B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. for buildi~g ~onst~uctloh p~oftcts: ~omplet~ "ATTACHMENT A".

:t. For non·building connruction projects: Describe fully, the proµosed aetivltv,·its.purpc.le and intended use, e.g. for proposed mineral pros!)ecting permits, include the number of test holes, size of.hole~. amount of materiallto be excavated, maximum surface area of disturhance, hole loc:ations, depth of holes, etc. Attach plans or other drawings·~l!?lmliiV:.----~~"r"-i

Cf.l.cN!.),\!r P~

Page 15: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

(

C. ENVIRONMENTAL SETIING

1. Describe the project site as 1t exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and an.mats, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. e

2. Describe the surrounding properties, inch,1ding information on plan~nd animals and any cul_tural, historical, or scenic aspects. indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one·family, apartment houses, shops, depart· ment stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set·back, rear yard, etc.).

0. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate IY.>x. Discuss all items checked "yes" or "maybe"'. (Attach additional sheets as necessary)

Will the project involve: YES MAYBE NO

1. a changi'! in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes, or hills, or substantial alteration • • • • • • • . 0 0 EJ of grounc,i _cc;mtours?

2. a change in scenic views or vistas from axisting residential areas or public land• or roads? • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0

3. a change in pattern, scale, or charncter of the general area of project? ............... , ....... : •••••.•• , 0 ,. I • IJ

4. a significant effect on plant or animal life?. • . • • • • • • • • . . • • • . • • . • • • . . • • • • • • • • • . • . • • • . • • • • . 0

5. significant amoun~ ~f solid waste or litter? • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • 0

6. a change in dust. ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in the vicinity?. • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0

a change in ocean, bay, lake, stream, or ground water qu~litt or quantity, or alteration of existing drair.age patterns?

D

0 []

D ~ D [] 0 g)

0 Kl

0 Pl)

8. a change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity?, • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 fKl

D D rxi 9. construction on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more?, ••••••••• , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . ~

10. use or disposal of potentially-hazardous-mmmah;·wch as toxic or radio.:active • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 gj substances, flammable$, or explosives?

11. a change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, wwag:?, etc.)7 ....................... 12. an increase in follis fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, otc.)7 ••••••.•••••••••••••••••••

0

0

0

D ~3. a larger project or a series of projects?. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 ~

E. CER1'1FICATION

I hereby certify that the statements fumished above end in the attached exhibits present the datJ and Information re· quired for this initial evaluation to tho best o1 mv ability, and that the facts, statemonu, and information prostnted are true

end correct to th• best of my knowledge and bolief. ' -C~ -

Date: IO ... Z. 5" - 8t.> Signed: · / j· ~'---:::'~/-.~~~~~~~~~----=---~

CAt.£NDM PAQE ......... J,,_')UJ! PAf.lE

Page 16: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

STATE LANDS COMMISSION

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST- PART 11 Form 13.20 (7182) File Rct.:...__P_R_c_s_12_0_..,.(t.,.._

I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

A. Applicant: ____ B_e_v_e_r_l_y __ B_o_n_e _____________________________ _

3981 Roblar Ave. Santa Ynez,.CA 93460

B. Checklist Date: 3 I 16 I 89

c. Contact PP.rson: TED T. FUKUSHIMA

Telephone: ( 916 ) 322-7813

D. Purpose: Pi er repair

E. Location: In lake Tahoe adjacent to 5520 North lake 81 vd. - Agate Bay, Pl acer County.

F. Description: Repair and the continued use and ma'intenance of an existing pier.

G. Persons Contacted=-------------------------------------

II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. (Explain all "yes" and "maybe" answers}

A. f:urt11. Will !he prop~al result in: Vos M;1ybe .No

f. Unsrable earth conditi.:>ns or changes in 9•Jolotiic substructures? • . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . • • . . • • . . . . . • . 0 ~ x"J 2. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering ot the soil? .......•.•.. , • . • . • . • . . . • . . • 0 LJ X'] J. Chan9e in topographtior ground surf<ce relief reatures?. . . . • • . . . . • • . • . • • . . . . . . • • . • • • . • . . • • 0 0 4. The destruction, covering, or modificc tion of any unique geologic: or physical features? • • • • . • . • . . • • • • 0 0

7 Clo t.Xi 5. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either cm or off tho site . • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • l . _

G. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or ;,~;i;,;.;~av -~ modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet, or lake?!: .. :~.;~ i i~:E. • • • ·~~

7. ExDOsure of all.~ple or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudllidl!S, groiflfti'•~ t r· ~··· f:nlu•e, or similar hazards? .....

Page 17: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

B. .Iii. Will the proposal result in:

. t. Substan\ial air emm1ssiuns or cfeteriorat1on of ambient air quality? ..••......•.••••...•••..•.•.

2. The creation of objectionable odors?. . • . . • • ............••..•••••.•.••.•.•.•.•..•...

3. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally?.

h'11tc•r. Will the ~'roposal result in:

l. ChangP.s rn the currents, or the course or direction of water movements.'rn either marine or fresh waters? ..

2. Changes in absorption rates, dra1r.age patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? .•.......

3. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters:>. . . . . . . ...... .

Yes Maybe No

[_j lJ [1 [l r··1 [•I . - I

f ~ I

l.J I ""1 t !

'X' L .

·x· I .

IX ! •

. :. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?. . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 • .i i X,

5. Oischarqe into surface Naters, or in any alteration of surface water quality. including but not limited to tP.mper;itum. dissolved C' xygcn or turbidity:>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ .

6. Altera11on of the direct on or rate of flow of ground w.iters' ..

7. Chang!! in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct .idd1t1ons or withdrawals, or through inter· cepuon of an dQu1fer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . ............ .

8. Substa17l1~I reduction in the amount of water otherwise ava1lalJlr. for publrc water supplres? .......... .

9. Exposure of people or property to water-related hazards such as flocding or tidal waves? .•...........

10. Significant chan!je~ in the temperature, flow or r.hemical content of surface thermal springs? .......... .

D. /'lullf l.i/1'. Will the proposal 11'!,ult in:

Change in the d1vcrsit't of ,11ec1es, or nurnbt:r of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, <md aquatic plants)? ....... , . . . . . . . • . . . .•.....................................

2. Aecluctiun of the nrJmb1!rs of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? ....••..............

3. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing . ' species ..........•••...•..............•.....•.........•..•.•..•.....•......

4. Reduction 1n acreage of any agricultural crop? .......................................... E. ,111i111ul l.ijl' Will the proposal result in:

Chanql! in the diversit\' of species. or numbers of any species of anrmals (birds, land ammals rncludrng reptiles, fish and shellfish, benth1c organisms. or insects1? .......•..•..........•.....•......

2. Reduction of the numb•!rs of any unique, rare or l!ndangeretl species of animals? ...•••....•..•.•...

3. Introduction of new SP•!Cies of animals into an drea, or result in a barrier to thl! m1grat1on or movement of anrm.lls? .................................................................... .

4. Deterioration to existim1 fi~h or wildlife habitat' ..••.••..•.....•. , ......•••.•.•.•...•...

F. .\"11i1t'. Will thP. proposal re~ult 111:

1. lncrl'asc 111 l!x1sting noisl? levels? ..•...•... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Ex~l<mire of people to s11verc noise lev11l\? ......................................

G. l.1)tltt um/ <il11rl'. Will the proposal re\ult 111:

1. The production of new ligh~ or glare? .•.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . H. l.u111/ lbt•, Will the pr

0

nposal result in:

1. A substantial alt11ration of the present or plan11ed land 11se of an area? •....••.•••••.•••••• , ...••

I. Natural lfrwurres. Will the proposal result in:

1. lncre<1se in the rat!! of use of any natural resources? .••••.•. , .••••. , , ••..••.••. , •••••••••.

2. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resources? ••••. , .•.••.•.••••••••••••••• ·, ••• , ••

' ~ ....

-· 2 ·-'· · ....

.x .

t..-1 I

LJ i I

' I l . I

I . , l

! .. , I !

I : i I .. I L

[] 1· I

I ' ' : .I iXl f · 1 l I ' - I

;x '

:x I

,X

~x • I

jx ;x·

:x; jX;

:x: I i I ,

1X1

Ix: ' . lx!

Ix. I I

f.J LI ix:

[I I jxl

[] [] .. LX;

n I • ·1 '.x:

Page 18: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

J. Rill\ uf Up.\t'I. Docs the proposal result in:

1. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pest1ciJes, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? •••••..••.••••••••.••.••

2. Possible interference with emergency response plan or an emergency evJcuation plan? .••••••••••...•

K. Pn,,11/c11ion. Will the proposal result in:

Yes Maybe No

oo• DC iK1

1. The alteration, distribution, density. or grow tr. rate of the human population of the are:1? . • • • • . • • • . • • 0 0 ~ L. lfnu.~inx. Will the proposal result in:

1. Affecting existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? •.••••.••..•••••.•••••.••

M. Tru11.,111mation/Circulutin11. Will the proposal result in:

1. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? .........•.••..........•..........

2. Atfcrt•n!J existing parking facilities, or create a demand for nt?w Parking? .•....•.......••......•.

3. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? .•...

4. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? ..••.•••••....••

5. Alterations to waterborne, rail, or air traffic? .••..•.......•....•.•••..•.•.•.•.•.•..•••.

6. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? ....•.........•..........

N. l'uhlir Sa1 in•s. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental se1v1ces in any of the following areas:

1. F rre Protection' .....................••.............•.•..•..•.....•••.•....•.

2. Police protection? ......•............•..........•••....•.••.••••••••.......•.

3. ::ichools? ...••.........•...........••.•.......•••••...•.•••...••••.•......•

4. Pdrks and other recreational facilities? ............................................... .

5. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? .............•.......•.•.....•..•.......

6. Otht!r '.:JOvernmental ser!1ices? .............................••.•..•....•...•.......•

0. l:"t1l'f/(I'. Will the proposal result in:

1. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ..•..........••.••••.••.••...•.•••••.•.•••

2. Substantial mer case m demand 1.1porr existing sources of energy, or req .. me the development of new sources? •

P. lftilitil'\. Will the proposal result m a need for new systems, or substantial alteratior:s to the following ut1ht1es.

D

D Ii L....i

D D D D

[J

D D D D D

D D

r- ~-t_;

L 'X1 ~

i- Xi l- ___, ,.- :X1 L __.

c '°"X1 ._1

c ·xi .- ---. L X' ~

L ·x. ..._,

L x ..... ~

r- -L

c x: r- x: L

C -· ~;

C xi ..__.

C ~i

! . Power or natural gas? ...............•.••••••.....•..•..••••••••.•••••••••••.• ·.• •. D L 2. Communication s•/stems? .•.........••.••..•..••.•.•.•.•.••.•.••.•.••••••••••.••

3. W:itt=r? ..................•..•..•.•••.•••..••....•.••••.•••..•..•••••••...•

4. SP.wcr or septic tanks? ............•.•..••.••..•••.•.•...•....••.•••.•.• • •••..••

5. Storm water drainaue? ........•..•.••..••.•..••••••••.. • . • · • • • • • • • · • • • • • • • · • • • •

6. SrJhd waste and disposal? ...........•.•••

DC [] L DC DC DC

0. //11111u11 /frultlt. Will the proposal result in:

I. Crealmn of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?

2. Exposure of people t~_potential health haza~ds! ••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••

DC DD

R. 1lc•lf/il!tic.f. Will the proposal result in:

1. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of

D E2 ~I

an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? •••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ·.-............ ~~~...:·--i.. _ _._,,,.-,.0"""";..&..-... . . ... -1 R""""""· wm tho p•oposal mull in: I C~END.".!l PME

f ·. I · • ? MfNUil:"f\'rE r1 ~~ 1. An impact upon the quality or quantity o exrstrng recreat1ona opportunities ••••••••••• ~.: • .;i:~·l.;·:...:.· ...1Lj.,.;lt,:::J;;;:;4:3;;~::!!~::t:?::=:::: ..

s.

Page 19: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

T. C11/11m1/ Rc•s1111rus.

1. Will the proposal result 1n the alteration of .or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site?.

Yes Maybe No

0 r-1 L J L~.l

2. -~:~~~~r:. ~ro~~;:~;~u.I~ ~~ .a~:e.r~e. ~~~s~~a'. .o~. a_e~t~~~1~ .e~f~-~t~. t':. ~ .~.r~~i~t~:i~ .o.r .-~i~t':~i~.-. ~~:l~'.n.g: [} Q I~ J

3. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic ~'uJtura) values? ....••..•.•..•..•...•... : ......•........ :-.: .....•..•...•.• ~~ ..•.•••••. lJ I.. I lxJ

0 'L· 11

.!.x I 4. Will the proposal restrict ex1st111g religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area?. . . . • • • • . . . • i.;

U. Ma11tlawry Fi11di11.ts of Sig11i/ic:a11re.

1. Does the 111 .>,ect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or anrmal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered .plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the ma1or periods of Cahform<> history or prehistory? .....

2. Does the pro1ect have the potential to achieve short term, to the 1.ltsadvantage of long term, environmental goals? ..........•........................................•...•............

3. Does the pro1ect have 1mp13cts which are individually limited, but cumulallv~ly considerable? ........•.

4. Does the pro1ect have environmental effects which will cause substantial ad~c!rse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? .....•..............................•.......•.......•

Ill. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (See Comments Attached)

!J { . I •I ; i~.

lJ LJ r -· .~i

0 [l ~

D rJ ~-; -.J

CS - There could be a slight rise in the turbidity level during the construction however, compliance with water quality control requirements should this impact to a minimum.

Fl - There could be a rise in the ambient noise leveis during construction hcwever, this should be of relatively short term duration.

IV. PRELIMINARY DETERMIN'ATION

On the basis of this initial evaluation:

r~J 1 find the proposed proiect COULD NOT have a s1gnif1cant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will ) be prepared. . · · , . .. . , : • · . . . ·. • • .

0 I lmd tha' although the pr.:>posed project co"uld ha~e a s1gn1ficant eifect-on the envir~nment, there will not be a s1gn1f1cant effect m thrs case beea~ the m1t1gat1on measurel described on an attached sheet have been added to tho prc1ect. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I ] I lmd the proposed pro1ect MAY have a ~lgn1f1cant effect.°', the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT i$ requied.

Date: 3 / 16. L.89.

-4-

Page 20: WO$ I~ by *mlsslon by tO OK'/3o:tr-...1989/08/30  · persons nomin~ting such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is

SHTE OF CALIFORNIA c . CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD­LAHONT/~N REGION 2092 LAltE TAHOE BOUlEVARO ,.0. 80X 9'28 SCJUTH tAKE TAHOE. CAUfORNIA 95731·2428 (916) 5"-3C81 November 16, 1988

Ms. Beverly Bone 3981 Roblar Ave. Santa Ynez, CA 93460

CONDITIONAL WAIVER OF WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED PIER RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, AGATE BAY, PLACER COUNTY APN 116-220-52

Dear Ms. Bone:

We have received and reviewed your Report of Waste Discharge which describes your proposed project.

Based on the infonnation submitted it is not against the public interest to waive the adoption of waste discharge requirements for this project, conditional llpon the following:

1)

2)

3}

4}

5)

Tahoe Regional Planning Agency's determination that the project is not subject to pier prohibitions specified in the Lake Tahoe Basin Water Quality Plan (208 Plan}.

The disturbance of lake bed materials shall be kept to a minimum during construction. Best practicable control technology shall be used to keep suspended earthen materials out of Lake Tahoe.

No petroleum products, construction wastes, litter, or earthen materials will enter any surface waters in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Any mechanical equipment operating within the lake will be cleaned and maintained prior to use.

All construction waste products will be removed from the project site and dumped at a legal point of disposal. ·

The use of wood preservatives on wood in contact with the lake water is prohibited. ·

6} Regional Board staff shall be notified at least 48 hout§ pri'or to the start of the project. ~ :";; :-..:.1

0 -· ;• .. < ·.1•! 7} Each pier owner is responsible for compliance with the-waiver) ·conditions and for ensuring that the project contractO'r' is -

1;'1

provided with a copy of these conditions. ~ .·.~.~::: ::..: ........ ;s; ::~ 117

VJ :::;c l.O • ,~ a

==