without taxes

Upload: mario-munaylla

Post on 26-Feb-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/25/2019 Without Taxes

    1/2

    Optimal Taxes without Commitment

    On this section we introduces lack of commitment to future policies,government will reoptimize its choices in every period. The choices will befocused on the government needs for the period it belongs. This generatedistrust in households on the government's commitment in the application of

    taxes and the debt default.

    ub!ect to"

    MAX:t=0

    t[U(Ct1 , Ct2 , lt)+V(g t)]

    #mplementability condition"

    :t=0

    t[U1 (t)Ct1+U2Ct2+Ul(t) lt]=K

    CO$%#C#O$ %& (CT#)#*#%(%"

    t:Ct1+Ct

    2+Kt+1(1)Kt+gt=f(Kt, Lt)

    #ncentive compatibility constraint"

    t=s

    t s [U(Ct1 ,Ct2 ,l t)+V(g t)]W(Ms s )

    +amsay Taxation characterization without Commitment

    LRS=

    t=s

    {t[U(Ct1 ,Ct2 ,lt)+V(gt)]+t=0

    t[U1 (t)Ct1+U2Ct2+Ul( t) lt]+t[ f(Kt, Lt)Ct1Ct2Kt+1+(1

    ouseholds utility by

    the government

    olicies without

    -aximum utility of the

    households on the worts in

    the worst case scenario

  • 7/25/2019 Without Taxes

    2/2

    The following derivatives are the caractization of the solution for the +amsay

    Taxation Commitment"

    LRs

    Ct1=

    t

    U1(t)+ t

    [U11 (t)Ct1

    +U1 (t)]+s=1t

    t s

    U1(t) st=0

    /012

    ( tsU2(t)W1) st=0

    LRs

    Ct2=tU

    2(t)+ t[U22(t)Ct2+U2(t)]+

    s=1

    t

    ./312

    LRs

    lt =t

    Ul( t) 4 t

    [U (t) lt+Ul(t)]+s=1t

    ts

    Ul (t) s+t(t) 56

    ../712

    LRs

    kt+1=t+t+1 [ fk(t+1 )+(1)]=0

    /812

    LRs

    gt=tVg (t)+

    s=1

    t

    ts

    Vg (t) st=0

    /912