wireless sensor network survey
DESCRIPTION
Wireless sensor network surveyTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Wireless sensor network survey
Author: Jennifer Yick, Biswanath Mukherjee, Dipak GhosalReported by Jiang
![Page 2: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Introduction
• Subject: wireless sensor network (WSN)
• WSN consists of spatially distributed autonomous sensors to monitor physical or environmental conditions, such as temperature, sound, pressure, etc. and to cooperatively pass their data through the network to a main location.
What?
![Page 3: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Overall image
A typically WSN consists of generic and gateway nodes.
![Page 4: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Typically WSN
• A WSN typically has little or no infrastructure. There are two types of WSNs.
Structured WSN Unstructured WSN
![Page 5: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Structured WSN
• Deployed in a pre-planned manner• Fewer nodes• Lower network maintenance• Lower cost• No uncovered regions
![Page 6: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Unstructured WSN
• Densely deployed (many node)• Randomly Deployed • Can have uncovered regions• Left unattended to perform the task• Maintenance is difficult
a. managing connectivityb. detecting failures
![Page 7: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
generic nodes
gateway nodes
![Page 8: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Requirement
WSN
military target tracking hazardous environment exploration
natural disaster relief
surveillance
biomedical health monitoring
seismic sensing
![Page 9: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Why we select WSN ? Not traditional networks.• Power and environment constraints
determine us to design a lower power, feasible, and smart network.
• Sensors that are smaller, cheaper, and intelligent.
![Page 10: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
About this paper
• Goal: present a comprehensive review of the recent literature.
① An overview of the key issues in a WSN② Compare different types of sensor networks③ Applications on WSN④ Internal sensor system⑤ Network services⑥ Communication protocol
![Page 11: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Key issues
• Energy constraint • Quality of service (QoS)
Each sensor node is an individual system. Development should satisfy current requirement.
Self-organizingConsume less power
Total number and placement
Address network dynamicsOptimize communication and
be energy efficiency
![Page 12: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Types of sensor networks
1. terrestrial WSN• Ad Hoc (unstructured)• Preplanned (structured)
2. underground WSN• Preplanned, with additional sink nodes to relay data.• more expensive equipment, deployment, maintenance
3. underwater WSN • fewer sensor nodes( sparse deployment)• more expensive than terrestrial• acoustic wave communication
– Limited bandwidth– long propagation delay– signal fading
![Page 13: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Types of sensor networks(cont.)
4. multi-media WSN • sensor nodes equipped with cameras and microphones• pre-planned to guarantee coverage• High bandwidth/low energy, QoS, filtering, data
processing and compressing techniques
5. mobile WSN• ability to reposition and organize itself in the network• Start with Initial deployment and spread out to gather
information• deployment, localization, self-organization, navigation
and control, coverage, energy, maintenance, data process
![Page 14: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
WSN applications
![Page 15: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Example: CenWits• Berkeley Mica2 sensor mote• GPS receivers• radio frequencies (RF)-based
sensors• storage and processing devices
![Page 16: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Internal sensor system
![Page 17: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Internal sensor system
•sensor platform –radio components–processors–Storage–sensors (multiple)
•OS–OS must support these sensor platforms.
It’s hard to design a general platform to be applied to all applications due to requirements vary in terms computation, storage and user interface.
![Page 18: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Internal sensor system Standards• IEEE 802.15.4, ZigBee• WirelessHART • ISA100.11 • IETF 6LoWPAN • IEEE 802.15.3 • Wibree
![Page 19: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Internal sensor system Standard example: ZigBee• IEEE 802.15.4:
–standard for low rate wireless personal area networks (LR-WPAN)
–low cost deployment, low complexity, power consumption
–topology :star and peer-to-peer
–MAC layer: CSMA-CA mechanism
• ZigBee–simple, low cost, and low
power–embedded applications–can form mesh networks
![Page 20: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Internal sensor system Storage• problems
–storage space is limited –Communication is expensive
• Solutions–Aggregation and compression –query-and-collect (selective gathering)–a storage model to satisfy storage constraints and query
requirements
![Page 21: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Internal sensor system Testbeds• Provides researchers a way to test their protocols,
algorithms, network issues and applications in real world setting
• Controlled environment to deploy, configure, run, and monitoring of sensor remotely
![Page 22: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Internal sensor system Testbeds example: Orbit• a two-dimensional grid of 400 802.11 radio nodes.• dynamically interconnected into specified topologies
with reproducible wireless channel models.
![Page 23: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Internal sensor system Diagnostics and debugging support• Measure and monitor the sensor node
performance of the overall network• To guarantee the success of the sensor
network in the real environment
![Page 24: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Network services
① Localization② Synchronization③ Coverage④ Compression and
aggregation⑤ Security
![Page 25: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Network services Localization• Problem:
–determining the node’s location (position) • Solutions:
–global positioning system (GPS)•Simple•Expensive•outdoor–beacon (or anchor) nodes•does not scale well in large networks•problems may arise due to environmental conditions–proximity-based•Make use of neighbor nodes to determine their position •then act as beacons for other nodes
• Other solutions
![Page 26: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Network services Synchronization• Time synchronization is important for
–routing –power conservation–Lifetime–Cooperation–Scheduling
![Page 27: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Network services Coverage• Is important in evaluating effectiveness• Degree of coverage is application dependent• Impacts on energy conservation• Techniques:
–selecting minimal set of active nodes to be awake to maintain coverage
–sensor deployment strategies
![Page 28: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Network services Compression and aggregation• Both of them
–reduce communication cost –increase reliability of data transfer
• Data-compression–compressing data before transmission to base –Decompression occurs at the base station–no information should be lost
• data aggregation–data is collected from multiple sensors–combined together to transmit to base station–Is used in cluster base architectures
![Page 29: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Network services Security• Constraints in incorporating security into a
WSN –limitations in storage–limitations in communication–limitations in computation–limitations in processing capabilities
![Page 30: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Network services Open research issues• localization
–efficient algorithms–minimum energy–minimum cost–minimum localization errors
• Coverage: optimizing for better energy conservation• time synchronization: minimizing uncertainty errors over long periods of
time and dealing with precision• compression and aggregation: Development of various scheme
–event-based data collection–continuous data collection
• Secure monitoring: protocols have to monitor, detect, and respond to attacks
–It has done for network and data-link layer (can be improved)–Should be done for different layers of the protocol stack –Cross-layer secure monitoring is another research area
![Page 31: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Communication protocol
① Transport layer② Network layer③ Data-link layer④ Physical layer
![Page 32: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Communication protocol Transport layer• Packet loss
–may be due to •bad radio communication, •congestion, •packet collision, •memory full, •node failures–Detection and recovering•Improve throughput •Energy expenditure
![Page 33: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Communication protocol Transport layer• Congestion control/packet recovery
–hop-by-hop•intermediate cache•more energy efficient (shorter retransmission)•higher reliability–end-to-end•source caches the packet•Variable reliability
![Page 34: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Communication protocol Transport layer(Open research issues)• cross-layer optimization
–selecting better paths for retransmission–getting error reports from the link layer
• Fairness–assign packets with priority–frequently-changing topology
• Congestion control with active queue management
![Page 35: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Communication protocol Network layer• Important:
–energy efficiency –traffic flows
• Routing protocols–location-based: considers node location to route
data–cluster-based: employs cluster heads to do data
aggregation and relay to base station
![Page 36: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Communication protocol Network layer (Open research issues)
• Future research issues should address –Security•Experimental studies regarding security applied to different routing protocols in WSNs should be examined–QoS•guarantees end-to-end delay and energy efficient routing–node mobility•handle frequent topology changes and reliable delivery
![Page 37: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Communication protocol Data-link layer (Open research issues)
• system performance optimization• Cross-layer optimization
–Cross-layer interaction can •reduce packet overhead on each layer•reduce energy consumption–Interaction with the MAC layer provide •congestion control information•enhance route selection–Comparing performance of existing protocols of static
network in a mobile network–improve communication reliability and energy efficiency
![Page 38: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Communication protocol Physical layer• Minimizing the energy consumption
–Optimizing of circuitry energy•reduction of wakeup and startup times–Optimizing of transmission energy•Modulation schemes
• Future work–new innovations in low power radio design with emerging
technologies–exploring ultra-wideband techniques as an alternative for
communication–creating simple modulation schemes to reduce synchronization and
transmission power–building more energy-efficient protocols and algorithms
![Page 39: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Communication protocol Cross-layer interactions (Open research issues)• Collaboration between all the layers to
achieve higher –energy saving–network performance–network lifetime
![Page 40: Wireless sensor network survey](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081413/548b612bb479596f608b47aa/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Thanks! That’s all for today.