Low-cost high-efficiency solar steam generation by wick material

with micro/nano particles

Guilong Peng1,2, Sharshir S.W.1,2,3, Dengke Ma1, 2, Lirong Wu1, 2, Nuo Yang1, 2, *

1 State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology,

Wuhan 430074, China

2 Nano Interface Center for Energy (NICE), School of Energy and Power Engineering,

Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

3 Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University,

Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.

*Corresponding authors: Nuo Yang. (nuo@hust.edu.cn)

Abstract

Solar energy is an important renewable resource, generating steam is one of the way to use

it. In this paper, a wick type steam generator was proposed. It’s based on the heat localization.

A wick material was used to transport the water from the bulk water to the evaporating surface.

And an adiabatic material was used to prevent the heat transfer between the evaporation surface

and the bulk water. The energy efficiency of wick evaporation is 55%, and after modified by

graphite particles, the efficiency is up to 79%. According to the results, both of the graphite

particle concentration and size affect the efficiency. It’s also indicated that even a very low

amount of graphite particles on the evaporation surface will increase the efficiency dramatically.

Keywords: steam generation, solar energy, wick evaporation, graphite microparticles.

1. Introduction

Solar energy is an abundant, renewable and eco-friendly energy which is available for

all over the world. Many society's challenges such as air pollution, water pollution can be

alleviated by using solar energy or other eco-friendly energy as far as possible. High efficiency

solar energy usage is always one of the most important research topic in human history.

Solar steam generation technology, as one of the ways to use solar energy, has a lot of

applications such as desalination [1-3], power generation [4-6], water purification [7], oil

recovery [8, 9] and so on. To improve the solar steam generation efficiency, many works have

been done.

The traditional way for steam generation is using a black plate to absorb the solar energy

and heat the water on it to evaporate. For example, the solar still [10-17]. Although a lot of

improvements have been applied to the solar still, such as using reflector [2], designing stepped

solar still [18] or wick type solar still [19, 20], using film cooling [11, 18, 21] and so on, the

overall energy efficiency of a basin type solar still is always below 50% due to the large heat

loss.

Recently, to overcome the bottleneck of the evaporation efficiency, some researchers

tried to apply the nanotechnology to water evaporation. For example, the efficiency of steam

generation can be improved by dispersing high absorptivity nanoparticles in water, like ZnO

[22], Al2O3 [22, 23], CuO [21], Au [24-26] and graphene [27]. The evaporation efficiency

reach 69% under 10kw/m2 solar intensity [27] and 80% under 220kw/m2 solar intensity [28].

However, the dispersed nanoparticles tend to aggregate and deposit, the stability of nanofluid

remains a tough challenge [29, 30]. Besides, to get high performance, a high optical

concentration (10-1000 sun) is required which increases the cost and complexity of the system.

Meanwhile, the cost of nanoparticles is high and the nano-sized particles many affect the

environment, all of these limit its practical application.

Another popular method to enhance the solar steam generation is the heat localization

evaporation which normally based on using hydrophilic porous film or foam [31-37]. Such as

a double layer structure [32], which contains a solar absorbing layer and a thermal insulation

layer, the evaporation efficiency reaches up to 67% under 1kw/m2 solar intensity. Or using a

Al nanoparticles coated nanoporous Al2O3 film [37], which increases the energy efficiency to

91% under 6 kw/m2 solar irradiation. In this method, the heat was localized at a thin layer hence

a high local temperature is reached and the heat loss is decreased, therefore the evaporation

rate is high. But due to the high requirements of film or foam materials, the material cost is

normally very high or even only available in laboratory.

In this paper, a wick type steam generator was proposed. The generator contains a

flexible wick layer, an adiabatic material and graphite microparticles. the wick layer and

adiabatic materials can be made from cheap daily materials and the graphite microparticles can

be easily recycled by filtering, which indicates a very low cost for the generator. Due the

excellent solar absorption and thermal insulation characters, the efficiency of this generator can

reach to 79% under 1kw/m2 solar irradiation.

2. Experiment setup

The basic work principle of the wick evaporation is shown in Fig 1a. Capillary action

wicks water to the top of the structure where the water is heated and evaporates. An adiabatic

foam lies under the wick material to decrease the heat transfer between the bulk water and the

heated water layer hence decreases the heat loss. Fig 1b shows the experiment schematic

diagram. A solar simulator (CEL-S500, AM1.5) was used to generate the solar beam, the solar

intensity was measured by a power meter (CEL-NP2000) and adjusted to 1kw/m2. During the

experiment, the edge of wick layer and the under lying bulk water were insulated by

polyurethane foam (PU, 2.5cm thick) to minimize the heat loss. The diameter of the

evaporation layer is 39mm, to cut the solar beam to the same diameter, a beam shelter slice was

placed between the solar output window and the evaporation layer. The mass change during

the evaporation process was measured by an electricity balance (Sartorius Practum 224), the

data were recorded by a computer via a USB cable. The room temperature and humidity during

the experiment were controlled at 24 ℃ and 40% respectively.

Many daily materials can be chosen as the wick material such as cloth, tissues, paper and

so on as long as the capillary action is strong enough to compensate the evaporation loss. The

adiabatic material, however, should be waterproof and have low density to float on the water.

In this paper, the black linen cloth and expanded polyethylene (EPE) were chosen as the wick

material and adiabatic material, respectively. The capillary ability of the wick material can be

described by the rate of moisture regain, which is 12% [38] for linen. It is high compared with

that of other wick material like cotton (8.5%) [39], therefore a good wick ability of linen can

be expected. The price of the linen cloth is around $5/m2. The advantages of EPE are that it’s

cheap (~$10 m3), recyclable, anticorrosion and nontoxic. It safer compared with other cheap

common adiabatic material like rubber insulation cotton, expanded polystyrene (EPS). The

pictures of these two materials are shown in Fig 1c and 1d. The characteristics of the linen and

EPE are listed in table 1.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Fig 1 a) schematic diagram of the wick evaporation, b) schematic diagram of the experiment

set up, c) picture of the black linen, d) picture of the EPE foam.

Table 1 The characteristics of the linen and EPE used in experiment.

material characteristic value

linen

Rate of moisture again, (%) 12.5

Density, (warp*weft) 9*9

Thickness, (mm) 1

EPE

Thermal conductivity, (W/(m·K)) 0.03-0.04

Density, (g/cm3) 0.03

Thickness, (cm) 1

3. Results and discussion

Under the room environment, the natural evaporation rate of the steam generator is

measured at around 110 g/(m2·h), this value has been subtracted in the following figures and

calculated values. To illustrate the effect of the linen and EPE, the bare bulk water was first

heated directly, the bulk water in the steam generator is around 40 g. As we can see in Fig 2a,

the evaporation rate of the bare bulk water is very slow, the accumulated mass change is only

0.06 kg/m2 after 30 minutes. This is because, due to the low solar absorption of water and the

large heated volume, the water temperature increases very slowly. However, when the black

linen and EPE were putted on the water, the solar absorption increased dramatically and a thin

water layer with high temperature was formed. Consequently, the evaporated water reached to

0.4kg/m2 in half an hour.

To further increase the evaporation rate, CuO and graphite microparticles were added on

the surface of the wick material to improve the absorption and heat transfer. Due to the density

of the CuO (6.3~6.9 g/cm3) is around 3 times of that of graphite (2.09~2.23 g/cm3), the

concentration of particles on the wick material is 180g/m2 and 60 g/m2 for CuO and graphite,

respectively. Therefore, the volume of CuO and graphite were kept almost the same when

measuring the data in Fig 2a. The SEM images of the CuO and graphite particles were shown

in Fig 3. The results show that both CuO and graphite particles can enhance the evaporation as

illustrated in Fig 2a. The accumulated mass change is 0.47 kg/m2 and 0.55 kg/m2 after half an

hour. Except the first non-equilibrium state, the hourly evaporation rate is calculated to be 0.83

kg/(m2·h) for wick with EPE (WE), 1 kg/(m2·h) for wick with EPE and CuO (WEC) and 1.18

kg/(m2·h) for wick with EPE and graphite (WEG).

Fig 2b shows the instantaneous energy efficiency of evaporation. It’s calculated by the

following equation:

=∙

(1)

where is the efficiency, the mass change, ℎ the total enthalpy of liquid-vapor phase

change (latent heat + sensible heat), the incident solar energy. It’s obviously that the

efficiency of heating bulk water is very low. After half an hour, the efficiency is only around

15%. The increasing trend of the efficiency curve of heating bulk water indicates a long non-

equilibrium time, which means a lot part of the absorbed energy is used to increasing the

sensible heat instead of transferring to the latent heat. On the contrary, when the wick and EPE

was used, the equilibrium state was reached only in 7 minutes as shown in Fig 2b. The energy

efficiency is 55%, 67% and 79% for WE, WEC and WEG, respectively.

In practical application, the optimal concentration of particles used on the wick material

should be an important parameter. Therefore, to investigate the relationship between the

efficiency and particle amount, 5 different concentrations of graphite were studied as shown in

Fig 2c. As we can see, the optimal concentration is 60 g/m2, less or more than this concentration

will decrease the efficiency. This is due to that, when the concentration is less than 60 g/m2, the

increasing concentration increases the absorption and heat transfer characteristics, while when

the concentration is more than 60 g/m2, the particles form a thick mud layer which suppressed

the evaporation. Interestingly, when the concentration increases from 20g/m2 to 60g/m2, the

efficiency only increases 5%, but the efficiency increases around 20% when the concentration

increases from 0 to 20 g/m2. This result indicates that the graphite plays a very important role

even when it is sparse.

Another important parameter, the particle size, is also considered in this paper. The SEM

image of the four different size graphite particles: 10000mesh (~1.3μm), 2000mesh (~6.5μm),

1000mesh (~13μm) and 500mesh (~25μm) were illustrated in Fig 3b to Fig 3e. The results

show that the efficiency decreases linearly with the increases of particle size. This is attributed

to the metallic luster of graphite. When the size of particle increases, the particle surface

appears like a mirror which reflects a lot of solar irradiation. But for small particles, the

randomized particles constitute a rough porous surface which scatter and trap the light to be

absorbed for many times.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Fig 2 a) The evaporation rates of different evaporation condition, the concentration for CuO

and graphite (10000mesh, ~1.3μm) is 180g/m2 and 60 g/m2, respectively, b) The instantaneous

energy efficiency of different evaporation condition, c) The energy efficiency for different

graphite concentration on wick material, d) The energy efficiency for different graphite size on

wick material.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

(e)

Fig 3 The SEM images of materials, the scale bars for image a) to e) are 20 μm, 20 μm, 10 μm,

10 μm and 3 μm, respectively. a) CuO particles, b) 500mesh graphite particles, c) 1000mesh

graphite particles, d) 2000mesh graphite particles, e) 10000mesh graphite particles.

4. Conclusion

In conclude, compared with the traditional method or nanotechnology method, the wick

type steam generator has the advantages of high efficiency (up to 79%) and low cost. Due to

the thin heated water layer, good solar absorption and thermal insulation, the evaporation rate

increases quickly at the beginning and reaches the equilibrium state in only 7 minutes. The

result also indicate that graphite particles is very effective to enhance the efficiency, even at

very low concentration. The optimal concentration of graphite was found at 60 g/m2, a higher

concentration will form a thick graphite mud layer which impedes the evaporation. When

change the size of graphite particles, it shows that the smaller the particle size, the higher the

efficiency. This is because of that the large graphite particles reflect more solar energy than

small graphite particles.

5. Acknowledgement

N.Y. was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51576076)

6. References

[1] S.W. Sharshir, G. Peng, N. Yang, M.A. Eltawil, M.K.A. Ali, A.E. Kabeel, A hybrid desalination system using humidification-dehumidification and solar stills integrated with evacuated solar water heater, Energy Conversion and Management, 124 (2016) 287-296.

[2] M.R. Karimi Estahbanati, A. Ahsan, M. Feilizadeh, K. Jafarpur, S.-S. Ashrafmansouri, M. Feilizadeh, Theoretical and experimental investigation on internal reflectors in a single-slope solar still, Applied Energy, 165 (2016) 537-547.

[3] A.E. Kabeel, Z.M. Omara, F.A. Essa, Improving the performance of solar still by using nanofluids and providing vacuum, Energy Conversion and Management, 86 (2014) 268-274.

[4] T. Pirasaci, D.Y. Goswami, Influence of design on performance of a latent heat storage system for a direct steam generation power plant, Applied Energy, 162 (2016) 644-652.

[5] O. Behar, A. Khellaf, K. Mohammedi, A review of studies on central receiver solar thermal power plants, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23 (2013) 12-39.

[6] M. Romero, A. Steinfeld, Concentrating solar thermal power and thermochemical fuels, Energy & Environmental Science, 5 (2012) 9234.

[7] M.A. Shannon, P.W. Bohn, M. Elimelech, J.G. Georgiadis, B.J. Marinas, A.M. Mayes,

Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades, Nature, 452 (2008) 301-310.

[8] M. Absi Halabi, A. Al-Qattan, A. Al-Otaibi, Application of solar energy in the oil industry—Current status and future prospects, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43 (2015) 296-314.

[9] J. Sandler, G. Fowler, K. Cheng, A.R. Kovscek, Solar-generated steam for oil recovery: Reservoir simulation, economic analysis, and life cycle assessment, Energy Conversion and Management, 77 (2014) 721-732.

[10] A.S. Abdullah, Improving the performance of stepped solar still, Desalination, 319 (2013) 60-65.

[11] B.A.K. Abu-Hijleh, Enhanced solar still performance using water film cooling of the glass cover, Desalination, 107 (1996) 235-244.

[12] I. Al-Hayeka, O.O. Badran, The effect of using different designs of solar stills on water distillation, Desalination, 169 (2004) 121-127.

[13] O. Ansari, M. Asbik, A. Bah, A. Arbaoui, A. Khmou, Desalination of the brackish water using a passive solar still with a heat energy storage system, Desalination, 324 (2013) 10-20.

[14] M. Dashtban, F.F. Tabrizi, Thermal analysis of a weir-type cascade solar still integrated with PCM storage, Desalination, 279 (2011) 415-422.

[15] A.J.N. Khalifa, A.S. Al-Jubouri, M.K. Abed, An experimental study on modified simple solar stills, Energy Conversion and Management, 40 (1999) 1835-1847.

[16] S. Nijmeh, S. Odeh, B. Akash, Experimental and theoretical study of a single-basin solar sill in Jordan, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 32 (2005) 565-572.

[17] S.W. Sharshir, G. Peng, L. Wu, F.A. Essa, A.E. Kabeel, N. Yang, The effects of flake graphite nanoparticles, phase change material, and film cooling on the solar still performance, Applied Energy, 191 (2017) 358-366.

[18] Y.A.F. El-Samadony, A.E. Kabeel, Theoretical estimation of the optimum glass cover water film cooling parameters combinations of a stepped solar still, Energy, 68 (2014) 744-750.

[19] K. Kalidasa Murugavel, K. Srithar, Performance study on basin type double slope solar still with different wick materials and minimum mass of water, Renewable Energy, 36 (2011) 612-620.

[20] Z.M. Omara, A.E. Kabeel, F.A. Essa, Effect of using nanofluids and providing vacuum on the yield of corrugated wick solar still, Energy Conversion and Management, 103 (2015) 965-972.

[21] S.W. Sharshir, G. Peng, L. Wu, N. Yang, F.A. Essa, A.H. Elsheikh, S.I.T. Mohamed, A.E. Kabeel, Enhancing the solar still performance using nanofluids and glass cover cooling: Experimental study, Applied Thermal Engineering, 113 (2017) 684-693.

[22] T. Elango, A. Kannan, K. Kalidasa Murugavel, Performance study on single basin single slope solar still with different water nanofluids, Desalination, 360 (2015) 45-51.

[23] L. Sahota, G.N. Tiwari, Effect of Al2O3 nanoparticles on the performance of passive double slope solar still, Solar Energy, 130 (2016) 260-272.

[24] Z. Fang, Y.R. Zhen, O. Neumann, A. Polman, F.J. Garcia de Abajo, P. Nordlander, N.J.

Halas, Evolution of light-induced vapor generation at a liquid-immersed metallic nanoparticle, Nano letters, 13 (2013) 1736-1742.

[25] N.J. Hogan, A.S. Urban, C. Ayala-Orozco, A. Pimpinelli, P. Nordlander, N.J. Halas, Nanoparticles heat through light localization, Nano letters, 14 (2014) 4640-4645.

[26] M.S. Zielinski, J.W. Choi, T. La Grange, M. Modestino, S.M. Hashemi, Y. Pu, S. Birkhold, J.A. Hubbell, D. Psaltis, Hollow Mesoporous Plasmonic Nanoshells for Enhanced Solar Vapor Generation, Nano letters, 16 (2016) 2159-2167.

[27] G. Ni, N. Miljkovic, H. Ghasemi, X. Huang, S.V. Boriskina, C.-T. Lin, J. Wang, Y. Xu, M.M. Rahman, T. Zhang, G. Chen, Volumetric solar heating of nanofluids for direct vapor generation, Nano Energy, 17 (2015) 290-301.

[28] H. Jin, G. Lin, L. Bai, A. Zeiny, D. Wen, Steam generation in a nanoparticle-based solar receiver, Nano Energy, 28 (2016) 397-406.

[29] D.K. Devendiran, V.A. Amirtham, A review on preparation, characterization, properties and applications of nanofluids, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60 (2016) 21-40.

[30] K.Y. Leong, H.C. Ong, N.H. Amer, M.J. Norazrina, M.S. Risby, K.Z. Ku Ahmad, An overview on current application of nanofluids in solar thermal collector and its challenges, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53 (2016) 1092-1105.

[31] K. Bae, G. Kang, S.K. Cho, W. Park, K. Kim, W.J. Padilla, Flexible thin-film black gold membranes with ultrabroadband plasmonic nanofocusing for efficient solar vapour generation, Nat Commun, 6 (2015) 10103.

[32] H. Ghasemi, G. Ni, A.M. Marconnet, J. Loomis, S. Yerci, N. Miljkovic, G. Chen, Solar steam generation by heat localization, Nature Communications, 5 (2014).

[33] Y. Ito, Y. Tanabe, J. Han, T. Fujita, K. Tanigaki, M. Chen, Multifunctional Porous Graphene for High-Efficiency Steam Generation by Heat Localization, Advanced Materials, 27 (2015) 4302-4307.

[34] Q. Jiang, L. Tian, K.-K. Liu, S. Tadepalli, R. Raliya, P. Biswas, R.R. Naik, S. Singamaneni, Bilayered Biofoam for Highly Efficient Solar Steam Generation, Advanced Materials, 28 (2016) 9400-9407.

[35] G. Ni, G. Li, Svetlana V. Boriskina, H. Li, W. Yang, T. Zhang, G. Chen, Steam generation under one sun enabled by a floating structure with thermal concentration, Nature Energy, 1 (2016) 16126.

[36] L. Tian, J. Luan, K.K. Liu, Q. Jiang, S. Tadepalli, M.K. Gupta, R.R. Naik, S. Singamaneni, Plasmonic Biofoam: A Versatile Optically Active Material, Nano letters, 16 (2016) 609-616.

[37] L. Zhou, Y. Tan, J. Wang, W. Xu, Y. Yuan, W. Cai, S. Zhu, J. Zhu, 3D self-assembly of aluminium nanoparticles for plasmon-enhanced solar desalination, Nature Photonics, 10 (2016) 393-398.

[38] R. Caringella, A. Patrucco, M. Simionati, S. Gavignano, A. Montarsolo, R. Mossotti, M. Zoccola, C. Tonin, R. Fabris, L. Floria, Electrically conducting linen fabrics for technical applications, Textile Research Journal, (2016) 004051751667606.

[39] C.-I. Su, J.-X. Fang, X.-H. Chen, W.-Y. Wu, Moisture Absorption and Release of Profiled Polyester and Cotton Composite Knitted Fabrics, Textile Research Journal, 77 (2007) 764-769.