wichita falls independent school district · educational facilities master plan final report may...

Wichita Falls

Independent School District

Educational Facilities Master Plan

FINAL REPORT

June 3, 2013

WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN FINAL REPORT MAY 30, 2013

1

WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY ............................................. 2

2.0 EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS ............................................................. 6

3.0 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ............................................................. 9

4.0 CAPACITY & UTILIZATION................................................................ 35

5.0 FACILITIES ASSESSMENT ...................................................................... 43

6.0 PUBLIC INPUT ......................................................................................... 58

7.0 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN OPTIONS .............................................. 64

8.0 MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS ...... 86


2

1.0 INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY

In March of 2013, the Wichita Falls Independent School District (WFISD) contracted with MGT of

America, Inc. (MGT) and Bundy, Young, Sims, and Potter, Inc. (BYSP) to develop a ten-year facility master

plan to address the facility needs of the district. The Educational Facilities Master Plan is based on the

educational mission and programs of the district, data collected at each school through a four-part

facilities assessment, demographic and enrollment data, an analysis of capacity and utilization, and

public input. The goal of the study was to identify and recommend strategies to remediate all identified

deficiencies. The final report, including all data and strategies to address the issues, was presented to

the Board in May 2013.

The project includes these tasks:

Project initiation

Development of facilities and site inventory system

Educational review and programmatic priorities

Facilities assessment

Analysis of school and community demographics

Analysis of capacity and utilization

Public involvement and community collaboration

Standards for ranking building needs

Budget estimates

Recommendations and budget

Preparation and presentation of final facilities master plan

This report consists of eight sections. Sections 1-6 describe the methodology or approach used and

provides the data gathered to develop the facilities master plan. The final sections include the master

plan options and recommendations. The sections are as follows:

Section 1 – Introduction & Methodology

Section 2 – Educational Standards

Section 3 – Enrollment Projections

Section 4 – Capacity & Utilization

Section 5 – Facilities Assessment

Section 6 – Public Input

Section 7 – Facility Master Plan Options

Section 8 – Recommendations & Conclusions

INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY


3

METHODOLOGY

To develop a district facility master plan, MGT gathers and analyzes both quantitative and qualitative

data. Most of the quantitative data comes from the district, with the exception of enrollment data,

which also comes from the city, the county, and the U.S. Census Bureau (Census). Quantitative data

allows us to compare numbers and uncover trends. Qualitative data is gathered from conversations

with district officials familiar with educational programs and facilities, as well as city or county planners

to explore population changes. In addition, community input is gathered through several methods. This

qualitative data typically provides the “why” behind the numbers. Both forms of data are critical to the

preparation of a comprehensive plan for the district that will meet the needs into the future.

PROJECT INITIATION

MGT staff reviewed the goals of the project with district staff during site visits in Wichita Falls. The

review included identification of all sites to be visited, the types of evaluations to be conducted at each

site, and the timeline for the project.

EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

Educational programming is the driving factor for facility needs. School facilities should be designed and

maintained to support and enhance the delivery of the educational programs. As part of this study MGT

conducted interviews with district staff to gain an understanding of the District’s educational goals and

objectives. These discussions also inform the standards used in assessing the educational suitability of

the schools.

In addition to identifying the educational standards, MGT examined current grade configurations and

explored whether the district was anticipating changes in those configurations. This is important

because grade configurations can affect the utilization and suitability of specific facilities.

ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS

Understanding current and future enrollment in a district is critical: funding, staffing, and facility

decisions hinge on having accurate information about enrollment. Districts that can accurately predict

enrollment – by number and by location – are more likely to build new schools and maintain existing

schools in the right places and be able to staff them into the future. MGT staff discussed current 2013

enrollment numbers with district staff as well as projections based on district data. Section 3.0

describes the work to collect and analyze district and state data.

CAPACITY AND UTIL IZATION

It is important to understand that building capacity and utilization are dependent on the educational

programs offered at a given school and that capacity and utilization can change with a modification in

the planned programming. For example, the capacity of a school can be decreased by deciding to

change a grade 3 classroom, currently housing 24 students, into a Title I support space that houses 3-8

students at various times.

MGT worked with WFISD staff to understand the current program offerings and the current capacity and

utilization numbers for each building. During the on-site review, MGT staff discussed program needs

and plans with the administrative staff at each site.



4

Current and future utilization was calculated by dividing current and projected enrollments by the

capacity of each facility. Utilization is expressed as a percentage with a preferred utilization being

between 80 to 90 percent. Section 4.0 documents the current capacity and utilization data developed

for each site.

FACILITIES ASSESSMENT

An assessment was conducted at each school site by MGT and BYSP personnel, using MGT’s BASYS®

Facility Assessment software. The assessment included:

Site Condition which evaluates the physical condition of all site systems

Building Condition which evaluates the physical condition of all building systems

Educational Suitability which evaluates the ability of the facility to support and enhance educational program delivery

Technology Readiness which evaluates the level to which the building infrastructure supports information technology

Each assessment results in a score based on a 100 point scale. Scores are interpreted as shown on the

following chart.

NUMERICAL SCORE INTERPRETATION

90 – 100 New or like new, Excellent

80 – 89 Good

70 – 79 Fair

60 – 69 Poor

Below 60 Unsatisfactory

The scoring is structured to measure the level of deficiencies as related to the total value of the building.

Consequently, scores can be used to calculate the budgets required to remediate the deficiencies

identified in the assessments. The BASYS® software produces a detailed report for each facility

assessment which includes each deficiency identified.

The results of the assessment were reviewed with WFISD staff to ensure accuracy and completeness.

PUBLIC INPUT

Public input and support are important key to developing a facility master plan that meets the priorities

and needs of the community. MGT conducted two public input processes. A community charrette was

held, in which community members were invited to attend a structured meeting. The meeting began

with a presentation of the master planning process. That presentation was followed by an electronic

survey of the audience. The survey included questions relevant to the facilities plan and responses to

each question were immediately presented in the form of bar graphs. After the survey, the audience

was broken up into small groups to discuss their views of each question.



5

In addition, a survey was conducted via the internet. This survey contained the same questions asked in

the charrette and was open to all community members. The results were tabulated and combined with

the results from the charrette to guide the long range planning.

MASTER PLAN OPTIONS

MGT developed multiple options for meeting the facility needs of the district. Key differences among

the options included the number of schools and the level to which deficiencies would be remediated.

Additional, the sixth grade choice option that allows students to attend either an elementary school or a

junior high school was examined.

RECOMMENDATIONS

MGT has selected a recommended option for the facility plan. In addition, supporting recommendations

are presented to facilitate implementation of the master plan.

EXHIBIT 1-1 WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

MAP OF DISTRICT

Source: Wichita Falls Independent School District, 2013.


6

2.0 EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS

The Wichita Falls Independent School District mission statement provides the Board’s view of the

fundamental principles of the district.

“The Mission of the Wichita Falls Independent School District is to prepare all students to

become lifelong learners who are productive, responsible and participating members of

society.”

Adequate school facilities play a major role in the ability of the district to fulfill this mission as well as the

corresponding core beliefs and commitment to excellence. Therefore an early step in the development

of a master plan for facilities improvement is to ascertain the facility implications of the curriculum.

Before assessing facilities to determine their educational suitability, a review of all programs (current

and planned) and the facilities that are necessary to support the curriculum must be undertaken. The

overall goal is to provide a facilities master plan that is based on and supports the educational program

of the district.

Standards for development of the criteria to assess educational suitability were developed for each of

the following program areas:

Art

Computer labs

Early Childhood Education

General classrooms

Instructional resource rooms

Kindergarten

Learning environment

Media center

Music

Physical education

Performing arts

Science

Special education

Career and technical education

Non-Instructional spaces (cafeteria, administration, clinic, etc.)

Outside spaces and athletic facilities

Safety and security

Technology readiness



7

MGT developed assessment standards for each of the above program areas that included total space

(square footage), environmental considerations, appropriateness of the location, and the availability of

equipment and storage.

The overall objective in planning and designing the learning spaces is to develop facilities that will best

meet the educational needs of the students to be served. The educational facility should reflect the

value placed on education by the residents, staff and Board of Education of the district. It is critical that

learning spaces be designed to facilitate the implementation of the district’s educational program and

provide the flexibility to accommodate changes in use, educational program, teaching methods and

instructional technology. Specific facility implications based on the results of the review of programs in

the Wichita Falls Independent School District include the following:

The district has adopted a choice program for secondary school students. In addition, when space is available sixth grade students are given the option of attending either an elementary or junior high school. The decision whether or not to continue to offer choice and for which grade levels will have a profound effect on facility planning.

Secondary school improvements are seen as a priority for the development of the current facility master plan.

All facilities must provide a safe and secure environment for students, staff and the community.

The facility must provide an atmosphere that encourages and supports innovative instructional methodologies. The facility should be designed to provide flexibility in accommodating a variety of teaching and learning styles and allow for changing program needs with spaces that are conducive to restructuring without major impact on building systems.

The educational facility should create a setting that is conducive to optimal learning and student performance. The materials, textures, colors, lighting, climate and fixtures should be considered vital to the learning process and should be scaled throughout to the program needs and developmental level of the student.

Technological changes are occurring at an ever-accelerating pace. The educational facility must be designed to accommodate current technologies such as computers, computer networking, internet, distance learning, teleconferencing, telecommunications, television and video. The facilities design should be flexible to accommodate the installation of emerging technologies. It will be important to provide spaces where students can work on computers either individually or in a group setting.

The facility should foster communication between and among students, teachers, administrators, counselors, support staff and parents.

The design of the facility should encourage parent and community integration into the program and activities.

Educational facilities should be efficiently-designed to minimize energy usage, incorporate sustainable principles, provide maximum assignable space/utilization, be easily maintained/operated, and provide maximum life-cycle value.

To the extent possible, it is desirable to provide space for all programs without the use of portables.

Design considerations that are necessary to accommodate the district’s instructional goals need to be developed including:



8

instructional and social space that will accommodate a variety of group sizes,

allowances for students in special programs to be easily integrated into the regular program for the length of time that meets their individual needs, and;

equal access to programs for all students.

In examining the facility implication of the educational program, it is important to emphasize that

teaching and learning are cooperative communicative activities that can be affected by the classroom

environment. A variety of classroom organizational patterns, large groups, small groups, and

independent study are necessary to accommodate various kinds of learning styles and activities. These

include physical movement, long-term projects, cooperative-learning groups, work with manipulatives,

learning centers, and process learning. The school should provide the child with essential facts,

experiences, skills, and sources of information. Because of these extensively-developed curriculum

programs, space for specific materials and equipment to support these programs must be appropriately

designed.


9

3.0 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS

MGT developed enrollment projections for the ten-year planning period, using several enrollment

projection models to evaluate enrollment patterns for the district. Over the next ten years, enrollment

is expected to increase slightly across the district. The specific impact of future student enrollment on

school building capacities is outlined in Section 4.0 of this report.

HISTORICAL DATA

An analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data forms the basis for MGT’s enrollment projections.

Quantitative data comes from the district, the city, the county, and the U.S. Census Bureau (“Census”).

Quantitative data provides the basic understanding of trends “by the numbers.” Qualitative data is

gathered from conversations with district officials familiar with enrollment trends, city planners, and

personnel from the city, and provides the “why” behind the numbers. Both forms of data are critical to

the preparation of enrollment projections for the district’s ten-year facility master plan.

CITY OF WICHITA FALLS POPULATION TRENDS

It is important to understand the context in which enrollment trends occur within the district. The city

of Wichita Falls, TX had a population of 104,197 in 2000; Census data indicates that number has

increased to 104,553 in 2010. Exhibit 3-1 shows the increase in total population from 2000 to 2010.

EXHIBIT 3-1 CITY OF WICHITA FALLS

TOTAL POPULATION 2000 TO 2010

Source: U.S. Census Bureau.

104,197 104,553

-

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

2000 2010

City of Wichita Falls, TX - Population



10

An examination of the age structure of Wichita Falls reveals that the largest segment of the population is

between 25 and 54 years of age. Exhibits 3-2 and 3-3 illustrate the age structure of Wichita Falls

population in 2000 and in 2010.


POPULATION AGE STRUCTURE (TOTAL BY AGE GROUP)

2000 TO 2010


- 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000

Under 5

5 to 9

10 to 14

15 to 19

20 to 24

25 to 34

35 to 44

45 to 54

55 to 59

60 to 64

65 to 74

75 to 84

85 and over

City of Wichita Falls, TX - Age Structure

2000 2010



11


POPULATION AGE STRUCTURE (BY PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION)

2000 TO 2010


Analysis of the age structure does not necessarily lead to any specific conclusions, but it does offer some

interesting observations. Note that the population from Under 5 through the 15 to 19 segment shows a

decline from 2000 to 2010, which indicates a decline in the school age population. Also note that the

segments from 45 to 54 through 60 to 64 show an increase from 2000 to 2010. This indicates that the

older poupulation is growing, while the younger population is declining.

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Age Strucuture by Percentage of Population

Wichita Falls, TX

2000 2010



12

Of additional interest is the change from 2000 to 2010 in the age segments for 20 to 24 and25 to 34. In

2000, the total number and percent of population increased from one group to the next. In 2010, the

trend continued but at a much slower rate. This indicates that the largest segments of the population

are getting older, a fact that is also evidenced by the increase in the median age of the Wichita Falls

population. Exhibit 3-4 shows the increase in median age from 2000 to 2010.


MEDIAN AGE OF POPULATION 2000 TO 2010


31.9 32.4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2010

Median AgeCity of Wichita Falls, TX



13

The percent change in population at each age segment further reveals that the population in Wichita

Falls is getting older. Exhibit 3-5 shows the percent change in population for each age segment. The

Under 5 population decreased approximately 2 percent from 2000 to 2010. In addition, the 5 to 9 and

10 to 14 age segments decreased 8.4 percent and 8.2 percent, respectively, over that same time period.

This data suggests that children who are born in Wichita Falls move out of the area before those children

start attending school.


PERCENT CHANGE IN POPULATION - 2000 TO 2010 (BY AGE SEGMENT)

Age Segment % Change

Under 5 -2.1%

5 to 9 -8.4%

10 to 14 -8.2%

15 to 19 -12.6%

20 to 24 11.2%

25 to 34 3.2%

35 to 44 -24.2%

45 to 54 14.7%

55 to 59 46.9%

60 to 64 29.7%

65 to 74 -5.3%

75 to 84 2.5%

85 and over 19.0%




14

The white population decreased from 71,782 in 2000 to 66,509 in 2010, additionally the population also

decreased as a percentage of total population (-5.3 percent). Other races accounted for the remaining

31 and 36 percent of the Wichita Falls population in 2000 and 2010 respecitvley. Exhibit 3-6 illustrates

the racial structure in Wichita Falls for 2000 and 2010.


RACIAL STRUCTURE (TOTAL POPULATION BY RACE)

2000 TO 2010

2000 2010 CHANGE

% CHANGE

% OF 2000 POPULATION

% OF 2010 POPULATION

CHANGE IN % OF

POPULATION

White 71,782 66,509 (5,273) -7% 69% 64% -5.3%

Hispanic or Latino 14,570 19,771 5,201 36% 14% 19% 4.9%

Black or African American

12,705 12,812 107 1% 12% 12% 0.1%

American Indian and Alaska Native

696 790 94 14% 1% 1% 0.1%

Asian 2,256 2,396 140 6% 2% 2% 0.1%

Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

90 82 (8) -9% 0% 0% 0.0%

Some other race 128 98 (30) -23% 0% 0% 0.0%

Two or more races 1,970 2,095 125 6% 2% 2% 0.1%


The data presented thus far builds the context for the following discussion regarding future WFISD

enrollment.



15

HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT

The core body of data used to develop an enrollment projection is historical enrollment. Total

enrollment in Wichita Falls Independent School District stood at 13,135 students in 2003. Since then,

enrollment has increased to 14,196 in 2012. Exhibit 3- 7 details the enrollment history of PK-12

students.


ENROLLMENT HISTORY* 2003-2012

03-04 04 - 05 05 - 06 06 - 07 07 - 08 08 - 09 09 - 10 10 - 11 11 - 12 12 - 13

PK 465 470 449 491 642 609 531 602 560 618

K 974 903 965 927 1,147 1,082 1,172 1,115 1,191 1,195

1 942 935 962 941 1,091 1,155 1,049 1,172 1,131 1,207

2 919 898 936 902 1,062 1,050 1,166 1,033 1,140 1,113

3 846 928 943 896 1,072 1,037 1,060 1,124 1,017 1,100

4 838 808 924 930 1,008 1,042 1,022 1,031 1,125 1,032

5 828 814 893 959 1,102 1,024 1,051 1,024 1,044 1,112

6 926 820 825 841 1,030 1,080 990 996 982 1,045

7 1,137 1,086 1,065 975 978 1,030 1,076 980 973 938

8 1,117 1,132 1,095 1,048 978 1,006 1,065 1,083 1,006 971

9 1,256 1,225 1,266 1,196 1,145 1,033 1,058 1,163 1,090 1,069

10 1,092 1,094 1,088 1,076 1,039 1,027 922 933 1,041 987

11 942 959 993 968 954 943 957 902 879 959

12 853 905 944 881 929 949 965 937 899 850

PK-6 6,738 6,576 6,897 6,887 8,154 8,079 8,041 8,097 8,190 8,422

7-8 2,254 2,218 2,160 2,023 1,956 2,036 2,141 2,063 1,979 1,909

9-12 4,143 4,183 4,291 4,121 4,067 3,952 3,902 3,935 3,909 3,865

Total 13,135 12,977 13,348 13,031 14,177 14,067 14,084 14,095 14,078 14,196


*Excludes EE Students, Farris Early Childhood Center, Northwest Head Start and Rosewood.



16


HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT 2003-2012


An examination of historical enrollment at the grade-band level reveals that the increase in overall

enrollment over the last ten years has been led by an increase in enrollment at the PK-6 grade band,

which increased 25 percent. The 7-8 grade band decreased in enrollment by 15.3 percent, and the 9-12

grade band decreased as well with a seven percent decline in enrollment. Exhibit 3-9 illustrates the

historical enrollment for each grade band.

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

Historical Enrollment PK-12



17


HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT (BY GRADE BAND)


-

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

Historical Enrollment - by Grade Band

Grades PK-6 Grades 7-8 Grades 9-12



18

A closer look at historical enrollment at individual grade levels does not reveal any clear trends.

Elementary grade-level enrollment data have all historically trended upward with no individual grade

having an evidently stronger influence than another grade. Likewise, the junior and high school grade-

level enrollment data do not indicate any particular grade influencing the overall trend in historical

enrollment. The following Exhibits 3-10, 3-11, and 3-12 illustrate the historical enrollment for each

grade level.

EXHIBIT 3-10 WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT HISTORICAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT

(BY GRADE LEVEL)


-200 400 600 800

1,000 1,200 1,400

Elementary Historical Enrollment -by Grade Level

Pre-K K 1 2 3 4 5 6



19

EXHIBIT 3-11 WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT HISTORICAL JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENROLLMENT

(BY GRADE LEVEL)



HISTORICAL HIGH SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (BY GRADE LEVEL)


The trends observed in the historical enrollment data will form a key component of the enrollment

projections prepared as a part of this master plan.

-200 400 600 800

1,000 1,200

Junior High School Enrollment -by Grade Level

7 8

-200 400 600 800

1,000 1,200 1,400

High School Historical Enrollment -by Grade Level

9 10 11 12



20

LIVE BIRTHS AND KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT

A second key component to analyzing potential future enrollment is to examine live-birth trends in the

county and the live-births-to-kindergarten capture rate. A steady or increasing birth rate in the county

could lead to additional students in the district, which would also push future enrollment higher. In

Wichita Falls, live births have been declining since 2006. However, the number of live births in Wichita

Falls has been fluctuating between a low of 2,151 in 2000 to a high of 2,411 in 2004. Exhibit 3-13 shows

the trend of historical live births for the city.


HISTORICAL LIVE BIRTHS 1998-2012

Source: Vital Records Office of the Wichita Falls Health Department, 2013.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Historical Live Births



21

When examining the ratio of live-births-to-kindergarten enrollment, live-birth data is collected for the

past fifteen years and kindergarten enrollment for the past ten years. For example, a child born in 1990

would enroll in kindergarten at the age of five. Therefore, in this analysis, we are looking at how many

children are enrolled in kindergarten as compared to the number of children born in the county five

years prior to a particular school year. Exhibit 3-14 compares the district’s historical prekindergarten

and kindergarten enrollment to the live birth data.


HISTORICAL PREKINDERGARTEN AND KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT AND HISTORICAL LIVE BIRTH DATA

Source: MGT of America, Inc., 2013.

Two statistics are critical to understanding the relationship between live births and kindergarten

enrollment in the district: the correlation coefficient and the capture rate.

The correlation coefficient calculates the relationship between two series of data. A correlation

coefficient of 1 indicates a strong relationship; a correlation coefficient of 0 indicates a weak

relationship. For WFISD, the correlation coefficient for kindergarten enrollment to live births is 0.805

which indicates a fairly strong relationship and therefore the live birth rate is a good indicator of future

kindergarten enrollment.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Live Births v. Kindergarten Enrollment

Live Birth 5 yrs earlier K Enrollment Pre-K Enrollment



22

The capture rate measures the percentage of live births that resulted in kindergarten enrollment five

years later. Over the last ten years, the district’s capture rate has averaged 46.6 percent, however, the

capture rate has been increasing in recent years as Exhibit 3-15 illustrates. This capture rate indicates

that young families have been moving out of the district. The recent increase in this capture rate

probably indicates that slightly more young families are migrating into the city than in the past.


HISTORICAL CAPTURE RATES


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Historical Capture Rates

Pre-Kindergarten Capture Rate Kindergarten Capture Rate



23

Exhibit 3-16 illustrates the projected live births for the district. Live births are projected using a linear

regression model based on historical live births in the county. Given the strong correlation of historical

live births to historical kindergarten enrollment as shown in Exhibit 3-15, future kindergarten enrollment

can be expected to follow a similar trend.


PROJECTED LIVE BIRTHS


-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Projected Live Births



24

HOUSING UNITS

A third key piece of data used to develop enrollment projections is analyzing the trends in housing units

in the county. The U.S. Census Bureau recorded 41,916 housing units in the city of Wichita Falls in the

2000 Census and 43,632 households in 2010. The census data provides a starting point for this analysis,

but building permits provide additional information upon which to base an assumed number of

households following the 2000 and 2010 Census.

Since 2003, the number of housing permits issued each year in Wichita Falls has significantly decreased.

Exhibit 3-17 illustrates the number of housing permits issued each year since 2003 in Wichita Falls,

which includes both single- and multi-family building permits.


HISTORICAL RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS

Source: Wichita Falls Building Inspection Department, 2013.

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Historical Building Permits(All Types)



25

Exhibit 3-18 projects the number of housing units for Wichita Falls through 2017. Normally a projection

would be based on historic trends, but in Wichita Falls’ case, the historical trend of housing permits

would have led to a negative count of the number of existing housing units. Consequently, we have

developed an average number of permits (197 per year) that could be realized under the current growth

limits and used this factor to project housing units. Clearly the actual number of permits and resulting

housing units will be dependent on the state of the economy which no one can predict at this point.

If we combine the historical and average projected building permits, and assume that each permit will

result in a built residential unit, we can estimate the number of future households in the district. The

total estimated number of households is generated by using the number of households established by

the 2010 Census and adding it to the number of historical and projected building permits as illustrated

by Exhibit 3-18.


ESTIMATED NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS


-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

Estimated Number of Housing Units



26

CONCLUSIONS AND OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HISTORICAL DATA

Based on the analysis of data presented in this section, we have concluded the following regarding the

demographics of Wichita Falls:

1. Live births have been declining since 2006, which could lead to a decline in PK-6 students in the

near future.

2. Housing units are increasing, but new residents are not adding many students to the district.

3. The population is getting older, which will lead to fewer students.

4. Census Bureau population counts show only a 0.3 percent increase in population from 2000 to

2010.



27

ENROLLMENT PROJECTION METHODOLOGY

Enrollment projections are merely an estimate of future activity based on the historical data and

information provided. As demonstrated by the district calculations over the past ten years, there can be

constant variations in growth. These numbers can be highly accurate, but it must be remembered that

the numbers are still a projection or estimate. During the implementation of any of the

recommendations provided, it is critical that the district reassess these numbers on a regular basis and

adjust plans accordingly.

To identify trends and prepare for adequate spaces, teaching staff and materials and supplies,

educational leaders use several methods of projecting enrollment. Among the most commonly used

models are Average Percentage Annual Increase, Cohort Survival, Linear Regression, and Student-per-

Housing Unit models. Because no one model is foolproof, MGT generates a weighted average of these

four “base” models to arrive at its enrollment projection.

A rule of thumb when forecasting enrollment is that the models should use as many years of historical

data as there are years in the projection period. In other words, if the model is projecting enrollment

for five years from now, then five years of historical data is used. If the model is projecting enrollment

for ten years from now, then ten years of historical data is used. Each of the following “base” models

draw data in this manner for their calculations.

AVERAGE PERCENTAGE ANNUAL INCREASE MODEL

This model calculates future school enrollment growth based on the historical average growth from year

to year for each grade level. This simple model multiplies the historical average percentage increase (or

decrease) by the prior year’s enrollment to project future enrollment estimates. For example, if

enrollment in the first grade decreased five percent from 2000 to 2001 and decreased seven percent

from 2001 to 2002, then the average percentage change would be a six percent decrease, and six

percent would be the factor used to project future enrollment in this base model.

LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL

This model uses a statistical approach to estimating an unknown future value of a variable by

performing calculations on known historical values. Once calculated, several future values for different

future dates can then be plotted to provide a “regression line” or “trend line”. MGT has chosen a

“straight-line” model to estimate future enrollment values, a model that finds the “best fit” based on

the historical data.

COHORT SURVIVAL MODEL

This model calculates the growth or decline in a grade level over a period of ten years based on the ratio

of students who attend each of the previous years, or the “survival rate”. This ratio is then applied to

the incoming class to calculate the trends in that class as it “moves” or graduates through the school

system. For example, if history shows that between the first and second grades, the classes for the last

ten years have grown by an average of 3.5 percent, then the size of incoming classes for the next ten

years is calculated by multiplying them by 103.5 percent. If the history shows a declining trend, the

multiplying factor would be 100 percent minus the declining trend number.



28

The determination of future kindergarten enrollment estimates is critical, especially for projections

exceeding more than five years. There are two methods of projecting kindergarten enrollment as

previously discussed on pages 20-23. The first model is based on the correlation between historical

birth rates (natality rates) and historical kindergarten enrollment. The second model uses a linear

regression line based on the historical kindergarten enrollment data. The correlation method was used

for WFISD due to the relatively strong correlation coefficient between live births and kindergarten

enrollment.

STUDENTS-PER-HOUSEHOLD MODEL

This last model utilizes the estimated number of households as its base data. Using the housing unit

data and historical enrollment data, MGT created a student generation factor for each projected

housing unit. By taking the total enrollment by grade level and dividing it by the current housing levels,

a student generation factor (SGF) was calculated for each grade level. This factor indicates the number

of students within each grade level that will be generated by each new housing unit.

Once each of these four base models has been calculated, MGT generates a weighted average of each of

the models. A weighted average allows the analysis to reflect all of the trends observed in the historical

data and the over-arching themes from the qualitative information gathered in this process. The

weighted average also works to maximize the strengths of each of the “base” models.

Two models, the Average Percentage Annual Increase Model and the Linear Regression Model,

emphasize historical data. These models are quite effective predictors if there is no expectation of

unusual community growth or decline and student population rates have minimal fluctuation.

The Cohort Survival Model also uses historical enrollment numbers, but takes into account student-

mobility patterns and the effects of the natality rates in prior years. The Cohort Survival Model is

perhaps the best-known predictive tool using this type of data. However, like the Annual Percentage

Annual Increase Model and the Linear Regression Model, the Cohort Survival Model loses its predictive

capabilities in communities that experience, or are expecting to experience, more rapid growth or rapid

decline.

The Students-Per-Household Model allows the planner to take into account projections for housing

developments and general growth in the county. This model looks forward and is based on the input

from local planners. The planning information is important and the district should continue to monitor

this information.



29

Exhibit 3-19 identifies the weights used in this analysis.

EXHIBIT 3-19 WEIGHTS USED TO GENERATE WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF “BASE” MODELS

Weighting Factors

Model Elementary and District-

Wide Weight

Junior High and High School Weight

Average Percentage Annual Increase 0% 25%

Students-per-Household 33% 25%

Cohort Survival 34% 25%

Linear Regression 33% 25%


With the exception of the Average Percentage Annual Increase model for the district-wide and

elementary projections, the projections are based on weighting the models equally. Due to anomalies

for some years in the annual increases of enrollments, the Average Percentage Increase Model

produced unrealistic projections for the elementary and district-wide enrollments. This variation in the

weighting is part of the qualitative analysis explained in the beginning of this section.


MGT has utilized the methodology described above to forecast enrollment for the district over the next

ten years. Exhibit 3-20 identifies the projected enrollment for each grade level. Exhibit 3-21 illustrates

the historical and projected enrollment for the entire district.



30


PROJECTED ENROLLMENT*

13 - 14 14 - 15 15 - 16 16 - 17 17 - 18 18 - 19 19 - 20 20 - 21 21 - 22 22 - 23

PK 607 620 584 609 582 558 555 552 550 547

K 1,131 1,130 1,160 1,133 1,159 1,143 1,146 1,149 1,152 1,155

1 1,225 1,210 1,166 1,197 1,163 1,179 1,182 1,188 1,190 1,194

2 1,103 1,098 1,123 1,065 1,077 1,092 1,104 1,104 1,106 1,105

3 1,133 1,185 1,109 1,092 1,104 1,093 1,100 1,112 1,110 1,109

4 1,030 995 1,087 1,106 1,066 1,081 1,079 1,088 1,100 1,100

5 1,081 1,131 1,124 1,122 1,124 1,069 1,075 1,074 1,077 1,086

6 1,067 1,063 1,065 1,055 1,035 1,045 1,015 1,021 1,016 1,017

7 967 972 954 939 950 1,009 1,022 1,001 1,009 1,001

8 992 1,007 988 981 1,040 1,063 1,094 1,111 1,093 1,105

9 1,074 1,061 1,060 1,127 1,134 1,135 1,132 1,166 1,185 1,166

10 945 909 973 1,017 990 947 969 966 995 1,010

11 956 975 933 888 907 913 891 910 905 931

12 896 868 852 836 839 879 880 856 871 863

PK-6 8,377 8,431 8,418 8,379 8,310 8,259 8,257 8,288 8,301 8,314

7-8 1,959 1,978 1,942 1,920 1,990 2,072 2,116 2,112 2,102 2,107

9-12 3,871 3,814 3,817 3,868 3,870 3,874 3,872 3,898 3,956 3,970

Total 14,208 14,224 14,177 14,167 14,170 14,205 14,245 14,298 14,359 14,391


*Excludes EE Students, Farris Early Childhood center, Northwest head start and Rosewood.

Note: The difference in total projected enrollment for the district (Exhibit 3-20) and the total of the individual schools (Exhibit 4-4) is

due to the mathematics of the models and the historical enrollment of a particular school. For example, a school may show significant

growth from year to year, which would result in a high average annual growth modeling factor and a high overall projection for that

particular school. However, the abundance of growth at a particular school will be balanced by the other schools in the district-wide

model, which leads to a lower average annual growth modeling factor and a less significant increase in future enrollment. The same is

true for grade band projections as compared to the sum of the individual schools within a particular grade band. In the end, the

district-wide and grade band totals provide good macro views of potential future trends. The individual school projections provide

micro views of the potential future of a particular school, which makes the individual school projections appropriate for planning for

that particular building’s future.



31


HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED ENROLLMENT – PK-12


As the foregoing Exhibit 3-21 shows, enrollment across the district is expected to fluctuate slightly in the

next few years and then show a slight increase near the end of the ten year planning period. This is a

reasonable projection given the following:

Live births are projected to decrease.

While there is a strong correlation between the live birth rate and the kindergarten capture rate, the capture rate has historically been less than 100 percent indicating an exodus of students out the district.

The census data from 2000 to 2010 has shown a decrease in elementary age children.

While the slowing economy has negatively affected the rate of construction of homes, there is a general consensus among stakeholders that the rates of building and migration into the county will increase once the economy improves.

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

PK-12 Enrollment

Historical Projected



32

The district is strongly encouraged to revisit these projections on an annual basis and update them to

reflect current trends and data. The following Exhibits 3-22 through 3-24 illustrate the historical and

projected enrollment at each grade band.


HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED ENROLLMENT – PK-6


-

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

PK-6 Enrollment




33

EXHIBIT 3-23 WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED ENROLLMENT – 7-8


-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

7-8 Enrollment




34


HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED ENROLLMENT – 9-12


In the next section of the report, we will utilize these enrollment projections to measure the future

utilization rates in Wichita Falls schools and determine whether there will be excess space or a need for

additional space.

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

9-12 Enrollment



35

4.0 CAPACITY & UTILIZATION

This section examines and compares the capacity and utilization rates for the schools of Wichita Falls

Independent School District as calculated by this study.

The functional capacity of an educational facility is defined as the number of students the facility can

accommodate. More specifically, a school’s capacity is the number of students which can be

accommodated given the specific educational programs, the class schedules, the student-teacher ratios,

and the size of the rooms. The utilization rate of a facility is calculated by dividing the current or

projected enrollment of the educational facility by the capacity. The utilization rate is used to determine

if the facility has excess space or if it is over-crowded.

FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY

Typically, all classrooms are not scheduled for every period at a middle school or high school. In

addition, all classrooms do not have the maximum number of students allowable, e.g. special education,

advanced classes, etc. An elementary school, on the other hand, has students that remain in one room

for most of the school day. Therefore, MGT uses a 95 percent scheduling factor for elementary schools

to reflect the fairly consistent, day-long use of elementary classrooms.

The Functional Capacity Model, used by MGT, counts the number of the various types of instructional

rooms and multiplies that number by the maximum students-per-room or the loading factor to identify

the gross capacity for the school. The gross capacity is then multiplied by a scheduling factor, which

takes into account the realities of how the space is used. Typically, not all classrooms are scheduled for

every period at a middle school or high school. For example, high school students move from room to

room and enroll in a variety of courses. As a result, some rooms will sit empty or will be less than fully

occupied at any given time. Teacher preparation periods will also contribute to rooms not being used

for instruction at a particular time. Therefore, MGT uses a 75 percent scheduling factor to reduce the

gross capacity of the building to reflect the unused rooms due to the realities of how a high school

functions. Middle schools are assigned an 85 percent scheduling factor. An elementary school has a

much more static and consistent daily use so MGT uses a 95 percent scheduling factor.

CAPACITY & UTILIZATION


36

Exhibit 4-1 lists the loading factors and scheduling/grouping factors used to calculate the functional

capacities.


FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY LOADING FACTORS

STANDARDS FOR PLANNING WFISD

Functional Capacity Model Guidelines

Room Type Students/ Room

Head start (3 year olds) 17

Head start (4 year olds) 18

Preschool 20

Elementary Classroom (K-4) 22

Elementary Classroom (5-6) 24

Art (K-6) 0

Music (K-6) 0

Technology/Computer Lab (K-6) 0

Science Labs (K-6) 0

Secondary Classroom (7-12) 25

Secondary Advanced Placement (7-12) 25

Science Lab Classes (Secondary) 25

Keyboarding/Computer Lab (Secondary) 30

Art (Secondary) 24

Music (Secondary) 24

Trade, Industrial, Etc. (Secondary) 15

PE (Secondary) 35

Special Ed - Self Contained (Elementary) 8

Special Ed - Resource (Elementary) 0

Special Ed - Self Contained (Junior High) 8

Special Ed - Resource (Junior High) 0

Special Ed - Self Contained (High School) 10

Special Ed - Resource (High School) 0

Portable 0

Scheduling Factors

Elementary Schools 95.0%

Jr. High Schools 85.0%

High Schools 75.0%

Source: MGT of America, Inc. and Wichita Falls Independent School District, 2013.



37

The following example shows how the model is used to calculate the capacity of a theoretical school.


EXAMPLE OF CAPACITY CALCULATION

ROOM TYPE NUMBER OF

CLASSROOMS X STUDENTS/CLASS

ROOM =CAPACITY

Secondary Classroom (7-12) 47 25 1,175

Secondary Advanced Placement (7-12) 0 25 0

Science Lab Classes (Secondary) 9 25 225

Keyboarding/ Computer Lab (Secondary) 2 30 60

Art (Secondary) 3 24 72

Music (Secondary) 4 24 96

Trade, Industrial, Etc. (Secondary) 5 15 75

PE (Secondary) 5 35 175

Special Ed - Self Contained (High School) 2 10 20

Special Ed - Resource (High School) 0 0 0

Portable Room Count 5 0 0

Total Capacity (w/o scheduling factor) = 1,898

x High School scheduling factor of 75%

High School Capacity = 1,424


SQUARE FOOT/STUDENT CAPACITY

The Square Foot/Student Capacity Model (SFSCM) calculates the capacity of a school by assigning a given

number of square feet of space per student. This number is divided into the total square footage of the

school facility to arrive at a capacity. This model is useful when comparing older schools to school

designed using the Functional Capacity Model (FCM). A school with a higher FCM capacity usually

indicates that the school has the adequate number of classrooms, but has smaller core support spaces,

circulation spaces, and/or smaller classrooms than current standards.

The Square Foot/Student Capacities were calculated using the median square feet per student for

schools built in Region 9 (AR, LA, OK, TX,) as published in the 2013 Annual School Construction Report

published by School Planning & Management Magazine. Those median square footages are shown in

Exhibit 4-3.



38

EXHIBIT 4-3 MEDIAN SQUARE FOOTAGE PER STUDENT

REGION 9*

SQ. FT. PER STUDENT MODEL STANDARDS

Elementary Schools 158.8

Jr. High Schools 177.5

High Schools 227.3

Source: School Planning & Management Magazine - 2013 Annual School Construction Report. *Region 9 (AR, LA, OK, TX)

Exhibit 4-4 below includes the SFSCM capacities to inform the analysis of how schools in WFISD are

being utilized.

UTILIZATION RATES

The effective management of school facilities requires a school’s capacity and enrollment to be aligned.

When capacity exceeds enrollment (underutilization), operational costs are higher than necessary and

facilities may need to be repurposed or the facilities may need to be removed from inventory. When

enrollment exceeds capacity (overutilization), the school may be overcrowded and may require capital

expenditures or redistricting (adjustment to attendance boundaries) to alleviate the crowding.

Exhibit 4-4 shows the corresponding utilization rates calculated using the Functional Capacity Model and

the current and projected enrollments at each school.



39


PROJECTED UTILIZATION RATES3

SCHOOLS SFSCM FUNCTIONAL

CAPACITY1

2012-13 ENROLL

2017-18 PROJECTED

ENROLL

2022-23 PROJECTED

ENROLL

2012-13 CURRENT

UTILIZATION

2017-18 UTILIZATION

2022-23 UTILIZATION

Elementary Schools (utilization based on attendance zones)

Alamo ES 350 452 572 563 567 126% 125% 125%

Burgess ES 382 445 436 472 356 98% 106% 80%

Crockett ES 362 513 554 529 536 108% 103% 105%

Cunningham ES 308 466 354 338 322 76% 73% 69%

Fain ES 428 511 573 541 551 112% 106% 108%

Fowler ES 365 576 589 578 575 102% 100% 100%

Franklin ES 323 467 656 668 681 140% 143% 146%

Haynes Northwest Academy

270 353 272 304 285 77% 86% 81%

Houston ES 310 365 454 478 449 124% 131% 123%

Jefferson ES 454 462 492 496 491 107% 107% 106%

Lamar ES 281 376 443 441 457 118% 117% 122%

Milam ES 405 534 604 645 624 113% 121% 117%

Scotland Park ES 449 637 459 408 395 72% 64% 62%

Sheppard AFB ES 303 338 300 307 303 89% 91% 90%

Southern Hills ES 492 621 554 500 464 89% 80% 75%

Washington Jackson ES

712 513 335 334 397 65% 65% 77%

West Foundation ES 416 600 541 563 579 90% 94% 96%

ELEMENTARY TOTAL 6,609 8,229 8,188 8,166 8,034 100% 99% 98%

COLOR KEY Utilization between 80% and 90%

Utilization greater than 100% Utilization between 70% and 80%

Utilization between 90% and 100% Utilization below 70%



40

EXHIBIT 4-4 (CONTINUED) WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT


SCHOOLS SFCSM FUNCTIONAL

CAPACITY1

2012-13 ENROLL

2017-18 PROJECTED

ENROLL

2022-23 PROJECTED

ENROLL

2012-13 CURRENT

UTILIZATION

2017-18 UTILIZATION

2022-23 UTILIZATION

Junior High Schools (utilization based on choice trends)

Barwise JHS 507 753 425 441 466 56% 59% 62%

Kirby JHS 635 704 437 397 410 62% 56% 58%

McNiel JHS 662 687 618 635 615 90% 92% 90%

Zundy JHS 625 774 663 696 743 86% 90% 96%

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL

2,430 2,918 2,143 2,168 2,234 73% 74% 77%

High Schools (utilization based on choice trends)

Hirschi HS 979 845 728 751 676 86% 89% 80%

Rider HS 1,126 1,346 1,705 1,708 1,792 127% 127% 133%

Wichita Falls HS 1,720 1,417 1,350 1,349 1,383 95% 95% 98%

HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL 3,825 3,608 3,783 3,808 3,850 105% 106% 107%

Brook Village Early Childhood

212 277 N/A2 N/A

2 N/A

2 N/A N/A N/A

DISTRICT TOTAL 13,706 15,032 14,114 14,142 14,118 94% 94% 94%






41



OTHER SCHOOLS SFCSM FUNCTIONAL

CAPACITY4

2012-13 ENROLL

2017-18 PROJECTED

ENROLL

2022-23 PROJECTED

ENROLL

2012-13 CURRENT

UTILIZATION

2017-18 UTILIZATION

2022-23 UTILIZATION

Carrigan Career Center

N/A 191 N/A5 N/A

5 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Denver Alternative Center

N/A 86 N/A5 N/A

5 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Farris Early Childhood Center

N/A 215 209 N/A N/A 97% N/A N/A

Harrell Accelerated Learning Center

N/A 191 82 74 74 43% 38% 39%

Northwest Head Start

N/A 41 52 N/A N/A 127% N/A N/A

OTHER TOTAL N/A 725 343 74 74 N/A N/A N/A

Source: MGT of America, Inc., 2013. 1 Excludes Head Start capacity

2 Current enrollment and projected students for Brooke Village are included with Alamo and Franklin ES

3 Excludes EE students

4 Includes Head start capacity

5 Current enrollment and projections for Carrigan Career center and Denver Alternative center are included with their home schools

Note: The difference in total projected enrollment for the district (Exhibit 3-20) and the total of the individual schools (Exhibit 4-4) is due to the mathematics

of the models and the historical enrollment of a particular school. For example, a school may show significant growth from year to year, which would result

in a high average annual growth modeling factor and a high overall projection for that particular school. However, the abundance of growth at a particular

school will be balanced by the other schools in the district-wide model, which leads to a lower average annual growth modeling factor and a less significant

increase in future enrollment. The same is true for grade band projections as compared to the sum of the individual schools within a particular grade band.

In the end, the district-wide and grade band totals provide good macro views of potential future trends. The individual school projections provide micro

views of the potential future of a particular school, which makes the individual school projections appropriate for planning for that particular building’s

future.






42

CAPACITY AND UTILIZATION CONCLUSIONS

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

The district’s elementary schools are at capacity on a district-wide basis, however some schools are

overcrowded and some schools are underutilized. The district has some schools that have a relatively

small capacity (less that 400).

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS

The district’s junior high schools have excess capacity. This analysis includes the sixth graders that

attend two of the junior high schools.

HIGH SCHOOLS

The district’s high schools are over capacity on a district-wide basis, however the students are not

evenly spread throughout the three high schools.


43

5.0 FACILITIES ASSESSMENT

This section presents the results of the facilities assessment that was conducted by MGT and BYSP for

Wichita Falls Independent School District. The assessment was conducted using BASYS®, MGT’s facility

assessment software program. There are four types of assessments, including:

Building condition

Educational suitability

Grounds condition

Technology readiness

BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT

The BASYS® building condition score measures the amount of deferred maintenance in the building’s

major systems. The weighted condition score of a school is the average condition score (weighted by

building square footage) of all the buildings at a school (excluding portables). The scores are interpreted

as follows:

90+ New or Like New: The building and/or a majority of its systems are in good

condition, less than three years old, and only require preventive maintenance.

80-89 Good: The building and/or a majority of its systems are in good condition and only

require routine maintenance.

70-79 Fair: The building and/or some of its systems are in fair condition and require

minor to moderate repair.

60-69 Poor: The building and/or a significant number of its systems are in poor condition

and require major repair, renovation, or replacement.

BELOW 60 Unsatisfactory: The building and/or a majority of its systems should be replaced.

The condition assessment rates each system in a building as “new”, “good”, “fair”, “poor”, or

“unsatisfactory” based on a detailed description of each rating for the particular system. The possible

score for each system is based on that system’s contribution to the overall cost of building construction.

Therefore, the condition score is a measure of that portion of the value of the building which is in good

condition. The capital needs score (100 minus the condition score) is a measure of the capital needs or

deferred maintenance. This score, when presented as a percent, is also referred to as the facility

condition index or FCI. For example, a building which has a condition score of 80, has a capital needs

score of 20 (100 – 80 = 20). A capital needs score of 20 indicates that 20 percent of the value of the

building can be reinvested in the building in order to attain a score of 100 and put the building in a “like



44

new” condition. Typically, capital needs scores are calculated using a base condition score of 90 (which

indicates that a system is in good condition and requires only routine maintenance), since it is

unreasonable to expect all buildings to be in “like new” condition indefinitely. The condition score and

resulting calculations do not include the costs of additions, site improvements, improvements for

educational suitability, or technology readiness improvements.

Exhibit 5-1 presents the range of weighted condition scores and the weighted average condition scores

(weighted by GSF) by type of facility for WFISD As the exhibit shows, there is a range of condition

scores, from 53 to 87, with the average condition scores in the “Fair” to “Poor” range.

EXHIBIT 5-1 WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BUILDING WEIGHTED CONDITION SCORE RANGES

SITE TYPE

BUILDING CONDITION SCORE RANGE AVERAGE CONDITION

SCORE LOW HIGH

Elementary Schools 57.23 87.32 71.80

Junior High Schools 53.98 74.92 65.10

High Schools 57.50 65.78 62.25

Other Facilities 53.41 82.75 69.63




45

Exhibit 5-2 presents the weighted average condition score for each school that was assessed. As the

exhibit shows, condition scores are in the “Unsatisfactory” to “Good” categories which indicates that the

facilities range in need from routine maintenance to replacement.


CONDITION SCORES – BY SITE

SITE NAME GSF* WEIGHTED AVERAGE

CONDITION SCORE*

Elementary Schools

Alamo ES 55,516 60.62

Burgess ES 60,660 67.21

Crockett ES 57,552 67.77

Cunningham ES 48,852 72.75

Fain ES 67,986 71.73

Fowler ES 58,039 75.90

Franklin ES 51,315 70.47

Haynes Northwest Academy 42,837 70.07

Houston ES 49,219 57.23

Jefferson ES 72,042 64.24

Lamar ES 44,645 66.61

Milam ES 64,377 74.89

Scotland Park ES 71,280 87.32

Sheppard AFB ES 48,090 76.66

Southern Hills ES 78,080 86.24

Washington Jackson ES 112,993 67.47

West Foundation ES 66,000 83.48

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL/AVERAGE 1,049,483 71.80

Junior High Schools

Barwise JHS 89,904 72.39

Kirby JHS 112,736 59.10

McNiel JHS 117,585 74.92

Zundy JHS 111,023 53.98

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL/AVERAGE 431,248 65.10



46


CONDITION SCORES – BY SITE

SITE NAME GSF* WEIGHTED AVERAGE

CONDITION SCORE*

High Schools

Hirschi HS 222,501 65.78

Rider HS 256,026 63.48

Wichita Falls HS 390,861 57.50

HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL/AVERAGE 869,388 62.25

Other Facilities

Brook Village Early Childhood 33,729 79.40

Carrigan Career Center 64,692 66.16

Denver Alternative Center 10,000 76.54

Farris Early Childhood Center 39,028 53.41

Harrell Accelerated Learning Center 33,615 82.75

Northwest Head Start 6,790 61.29

Stadium 42,990 67.88

OTHER SCHOOL TOTAL/AVERAGE 230,844 69.63

DISTRICT TOTAL/AVERAGE 2,580,963 69.52


*Excludes portables



47

EDUCATIONAL SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT

The educational suitability assessment evaluates how well the facility supports the educational program

that it houses. Each school receives one suitability score which applies to all the buildings at the facility.

The educational suitability of each school was assessed with BASYS® using the following categories:

ENVIRONMENT The overall environment of the schools with respect to creating a safe and positive learning environment.

CIRCULATION Pedestrian/vehicular circulation and the appropriateness of site facilities and signage.

SUPPORT SPACE

The existence of facilities and spaces to support the educational program being offered. These include general classrooms, special learning spaces (e.g. music rooms, libraries, science labs), and support spaces (e.g. administrative offices, counseling offices, reception areas, kitchens, health clinics).

SIZE The adequacy of the size of the program spaces.

LOCATION The appropriateness of adjacencies (e.g., physical education space separated from quiet spaces).

STORAGE & FIXED EQUIPMENT

The appropriateness of utilities, fixed equipment, storage, and room surfaces (e.g. flooring, ceiling materials, wall coverings).

Suitability scores are interpreted as follows:

90+ Excellent: The facility is designed to provide for and support a majority of the educational program offered. It may have a minor suitability issues but overall it meets the needs of the educational program.

80-89 Good: The facility is designed to provide for and support the educational program offered. It may have minor suitability issues but generally meets the needs of the educational program.

70-79 Fair: The facility has some problems meeting the needs of the educational program and will require remodeling.

60-69 Poor: The facility has numerous problems meeting the needs of the educational program and needs significant remodeling, additions, or replacement.

BELOW 60 Unsatisfactory: The facility is unsuitable in support of the educational program.



48

Exhibit 5-3 presents the range and average of suitability scores by facility type. The suitability scores

range from 53 to 95. The average scores fall within the “Fair” to “Poor” category:


SUITABILITY SCORE RANGES

SITE TYPE

SUITABILITY SCORE RANGE AVERAGE

SUITABILITY SCORE LOW HIGH



High Schools 68.20 75.52 71.16



Exhibit 5-4 presents the educational suitability score for each school. As the scores indicate, some

schools have significant suitability deficiencies.


SUITABILITY SCORES – BY SITE

SITE NAME SUITABILITY

SCORE

Elementary Schools

Alamo ES 62.04

Burgess ES 80.41

Crockett ES 62.56

Cunningham ES 79.22

Fain ES 77.09

Fowler ES 76.79

Franklin ES 70.90

Haynes Northwest Academy 68.00

Houston ES 61.86

Jefferson ES 71.86

Lamar ES 64.80

Milam ES 72.81

Scotland Park ES 95.08

Sheppard AFB ES 72.90

Southern Hills ES 89.12

Washington Jackson ES 78.78

West Foundation ES 81.70

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AVERAGE 74.47



49


SUITABILITY SCORES – BY SITE

SITE NAME SUITABILITY

SCORE

Junior High Schools

Barwise JHS 78.98

Kirby JHS 78.04

McNiel JHS 73.68

Zundy JHS 72.20

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL AVERAGE 75.72

High Schools

Hirschi HS 75.52

Rider HS 69.75

Wichita Falls HS 68.20

HIGH SCHOOL AVERAGE 71.16

Other Facilities

Brook Village Early Childhood 67.90

Carrigan Career Center 68.51

Denver Alternative Center 66.45

Farris Early Childhood Center 78.30

Harrell Accelerated Learning Center 55.84

Northwest Head Start 53.33

Stadium 77.80

OTHER SCHOOL AVERAGE 66.88

DISTRICT AVERAGE 72.59




50

GROUNDS CONDITION ASSESSMENT

The grounds condition assessment score is a measure of the amount of capital needs or deferred

maintenance at the site, which includes the driveways and walkways, the parking lots, the playfields, the

utilities, and fencing, etc. The scores are interpreted as follows:

90+ New or Like New: The site and/or a majority of its systems are in good condition, less than three years old, and only require preventive maintenance.

80-89 Good: The site and/or a majority of its systems are in good condition and only require routine maintenance.

70-79 Fair: The site and/or some of its systems are in fair condition and require minor to moderate repair.

60-69 Poor: The site and/or a significant number of its systems are in poor condition and will require major repair or renovation.

BELOW 60 Unsatisfactory: The site and/or a majority of its systems should be renovated.

The grounds assessment scores were calculated in the same manner as the building condition scores.

Exhibit 5-5 presents the range of grounds assessment scores and the average grounds assessment scores

by facility type. The grounds assessment scores averaged in the “Fair” to “Poor” categories.


GROUNDS ASSESSMENT SCORE RANGES

SITE TYPE GROUNDS ASSESSMENT

SCORE RANGE AVERAGE GROUNDS

SCORE LOW HIGH



High Schools 60.48 75.57 70.44





51

Exhibit 5-6 presents the grounds assessment score by each school site. Each school site receives a single

grounds assessment score.


GROUNDS SCORES – BY SITE

SITE NAME GROUNDS SCORE

Elementary Schools

Alamo ES 67.58

Burgess ES 79.41

Crockett ES 75.36

Cunningham ES 69.74

Fain ES 68.75

Fowler ES 71.89

Franklin ES 70.25


Houston ES 70.10

Jefferson ES 56.56

Lamar ES 77.00

Milam ES 75.09









52


GROUNDS SCORES – BY SITE

SITE NAME GROUNDS SCORE

Junior High Schools

Barwise JHS 72.97

Kirby JHS 69.53

McNiel JHS 74.76

Zundy JHS 70.56

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL AVERAGE 71.96

High Schools

Hirschi HS 75.27

Rider HS 75.57


HIGH SCHOOL AVERAGE 70.44

Other Facilities







Stadium 41.43

OTHER FACILITIES AVERAGE 61.96





53

TECHNOLOGY READINESS

The BASYS® technology readiness score measures the capability of the existing infrastructure to support

information technology and associated equipment. The score can be interpreted as follows:

90+ Excellent: The facility has excellent infrastructure to support information technology.

80-89 Good: The facility has the infrastructure to support information technology.

70-79 Fair: The facility is lacking in some infrastructure to support information technology.

60-69 Poor: The facility is lacking significant infrastructure to support information technology.

BELOW 60 Unsatisfactory: The facility has little or no infrastructure to support information technology.

Exhibit 5-7 presents the range of technology scores and the average technology scores by facility type.

Technology readiness scores vary from 56 to 100, with the averages in the “Excellent” to “Good”

categories.


TECHNOLOGY SCORE RANGES

SITE TYPE TECHNOLOGY READINESS

SCORE RANGE AVERAGE

TECHNOLOGY SCORE Low High



High Schools 85.00 95.00 90.57





54

Exhibit 5-8 presents the technology readiness score for each school site.


TECHNOLOGY SCORES – BY SITE

SITE NAME TECHNOLOGY

SCORE

Elementary Schools

Alamo ES 90.00

Burgess ES 84.20

Crockett ES 85.00

Cunningham ES 89.20

Fain ES 90.00

Fowler ES 80.80

Franklin ES 95.00


Houston ES 90.00

Jefferson ES 85.00

Lamar ES 85.00

Milam ES 77.50









55


TECHNOLOGY SCORES – BY SITE

SITE NAME TECHNOLOGY

SCORE

Junior High Schools

Barwise JHS 68.30

Kirby JHS 95.00

McNiel JHS 84.10

Zundy JHS 85.00

83.10

High Schools

Hirschi HS 95.00

Rider HS 85.00


90.57

Other Facilities







Stadium 94.50

OTHER FACILITIES AVERAGE 85.04





56

COMBINED SCORES

The building condition, educational suitability, grounds condition, and technology readiness scores are

combined into one score for each school to assist in the task of prioritizing projects. Since the building

condition score is a measure of the maintenance needs (e.g. leaky roofs, etc.) and the educational

suitability score is a measure of how well the building design and configuration supports the educational

program, it is possible to have a high score for one assessment and a low score for another assessment.

It is the combined score that attempts to give a comprehensive picture of the conditions that exist at

each school and how each school compares relative to the other schools in the district.

To create the combined score, the four scores are weighted, based on which deficiencies the district

wants to emphasize and the relative impact on capital costs. For Wichita Falls Independent School

District, the building condition score was weighted 50 percent, the educational suitability score was

weighted 30 percent, the grounds condition score was weighted 5 percent, and the technology

readiness score was weighted 15 percent. Exhibit 5-9 presents all the scores for each facility and the

resulting combined score using this weighting formula.


COMBINED SCORES – BY SITE

SITE NAME

WEIGHTED BUILDING

CONDITION SCORE*

SUITABILITY SCORE

GROUNDS CONDITION

SCORE

TECH. READINESS

SCORE

COMBINED SCORE 50/30/5/15

Elementary Schools

Alamo ES 60.62 62.04 67.58 90.00 65.80

Burgess ES 67.21 80.41 79.41 84.20 74.33

Crockett ES 67.77 62.56 75.36 85.00 69.17

Cunningham ES 72.75 79.22 69.74 89.20 77.01

Fain ES 71.73 77.09 68.75 90.00 75.93

Fowler ES 75.90 76.79 71.89 80.80 76.70

Franklin ES 70.47 70.90 70.25 95.00 74.27

Haynes Northwest Academy 70.07 68.00 85.02 95.00 73.94

Houston ES 57.23 61.86 70.10 90.00 64.18

Jefferson ES 64.24 71.86 56.56 85.00 69.25

Lamar ES 66.61 64.80 77.00 85.00 69.35

Milam ES 74.89 72.81 75.09 77.50 74.67

Scotland Park ES 87.32 95.08 85.38 100.00 91.45

Sheppard AFB ES 76.66 72.90 76.25 80.00 76.02

Southern Hills ES 86.24 89.12 82.12 100.00 88.96

Washington Jackson ES 67.47 78.78 63.79 97.50 75.18

West Foundation ES 83.48 81.70 82.71 100.00 85.39

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AVERAGE 71.80 74.47 73.94 89.66 75.39



57


COMBINED SCORES – BY SITE

SITE NAME

WEIGHTED BUILDING

CONDITION SCORE*

SUITABILITY SCORE

GROUNDS CONDITION

SCORE

TECH. READINESS

SCORE

COMBINED SCORE 50/30/5/15

Junior High Schools

Barwise JHS 72.39 78.98 72.97 68.30 73.78

Kirby JHS 59.10 78.04 69.53 95.00 70.69

McNiel JHS 74.92 73.68 74.76 84.10 75.92

Zundy JHS 53.98 72.20 70.56 85.00 64.93

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL AVERAGE 65.10 75.72 71.96 83.10 71.33

High Schools

Hirschi HS 65.78 75.52 75.27 95.00 73.56

Rider HS 63.48 69.75 75.57 85.00 69.19

Wichita Falls HS 57.50 68.20 60.48 91.70 65.99

HIGH SCHOOL AVERAGE 62.25 71.16 70.44 90.57 69.58

Other Facilities

Brook Village Early Childhood 79.40 67.90 64.90 85.00 76.06

Carrigan Career Center 66.16 68.51 42.80 95.00 70.02

Denver Alternative Center 76.54 66.45 54.76 92.50 74.82

Farris Early Childhood Center 53.41 78.30 71.24 90.00 67.26

Harrell Accelerated Learning Center 82.75 55.84 88.08 82.50 74.91

Northwest Head Start 61.29 53.33 70.50 55.75 58.53

Stadium 67.88 77.80 41.43 94.50 73.53

OTHER FACILITIES AVERAGE 69.63 66.88 61.96 85.04 70.73

DISTRICT AVERAGE 69.52 72.59 70.64 87.86 73.25


*Excludes portables

COLOR KEY

80 - 100

70 - 79

Below 70

The above exhibit provides the data to prioritize needs based on the overall condition of the facility.


58

6.0 PUBLIC INPUT

PROCESS

MGT understands that public input is of critical importance in the crafting of a facility master plan for a

school district. Key individuals, community groups, and the public as a whole should be included and

offered opportunities for input as the planning process unfolds. Interviews, a survey, and a community

meeting were conducted with key stakeholders, both internal and external, and the community at large

for Wichita Falls Independent School District. This section provides a summary of the findings from the

public input. The purpose of these activities is to gather background information from staff and

community members to become better informed regarding WFISD in terms of its programs, facilities,

and key facility-related issues.

INTERVIEWS

MGT staff held interviews with WFISD’s School Board as well as central office administrators.

COMMUNITY PUBLIC CHARRETTE

Parents and community members were invited to a presentation about the study and then participated in an electronic survey and small group discussion.

SURVEY

MGT conducted an online survey open to all community members. The survey questions were the same questions used during the community charrette. There were over 1,000 respondents to the survey.

PUBLIC INPUT


59

INTERVIEWS

MGT staff interviewed members of the WFISD Board of Trustees, district administrators and other staff

to gain an understanding of current and planned educational programs, policies, and practices of the

district. Their insight and perspectives were an important aspect of the analysis conducted regarding

existing facilities, future needs, and how facilities can be best planned to support the educational

program.

FACILITY ISSUES

Respondents were then asked to focus on the most pressing facility challenges facing the WFISD. The

most frequent responses included:

The need to better utilize facilities throughout the district

The pressing facility needs at the secondary school level

Safety and security issues

Age and condition of many schools

The location of sixth grade students (Junior High and/or Elementary)

The effect the choice program has on school facilities and facility planning

COMMUNITY PUBLIC CHARRETTE – LARGE- AND SMALL-GROUP

DATA

In March 2013, MGT staff conducted a community charrette input session at the Washington-Jackson

Elementary School. The data gathered at the community charrette are understood to be a

characterization of the sentiment of those present and not a representative sampling of the Wichita

Falls community.

METHODOLOGY

The charrette included three activities. The first was an informational presentation about the facility

master planning process. The second activity was an audience participation session using electronic

Response Cards™, or “clickers.” These devices enable the participants to record their individual answers

to the survey, which was projected on a screen as a PowerPoint presentation.

Questions started with demographics to determine the make-up of the audience and continued on,

asking the audience a variety of questions that pertained to WFISD facilities. (See Appendix A for the

complete public input data from both the community charrette and the online surveys.) The

anonymous results from each question were posted instantaneously on the screen as a bar graph which

allowed the participants to view how the group as a whole had responded to each question. This group

survey was designed to act as a lead-in to foster more in-depth conversations when the audience was

broken up into smaller groups. The audience responded positively to this format, based on the

comments that were made during the presentation.

PUBLIC INPUT


60

Exhibit 6-1 is an example of the survey questions and the graphical response from the participants. The

responses for all charrette questions are included in the Appendix B.


SAMPLE CHARRETTE BAR GRAPH


The third activity was a small group discussion of the issues identified in the large group session. These

discussions were facilitated by staff from MGT. The role of each facilitator was to moderate the

discussion, listen to the comments, and record the views of the group.

The number of community members at the charrette was approximately 100. A slight majority (54%) of

the participants were parents of students in WFISD. Approximately 36 percent of the participants were

employees of WFISD.

MEETING RESULTS SUMMARY

Exhibit 6-2 provides a summary of the questions covered during the public sessions. Topics of discussion

included outlining the strengths and weaknesses of the district’s educational programs, commenting on

the physical condition of the buildings, and getting a sense of whether the school district was operating

the correct number of schools.

PUBLIC INPUT


61

EXHIBIT 6-2 WICHITA FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT

SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO THE LARGE GROUP SURVEY MARCH 2013

ISSUE SUMMARY

1. Quality of education students receive in WFISD.

42% of participants responded that the quality of education at WFISD was Excellent or Good.

2. Overall physical condition of WFISD schools.

22% rated the physical condition of WFISD schools as Excellent/Good; 74% rated the condition as Fair/Poor with 3% undecided.

3. Overall safety in WFISD schools. 28% rated safety as Excellent or Good while 64% rated safety as Fair or Poor.

4. Appropriate learning spaces. 26% rated the learning spaces as Excellent or Good.

5. Physical condition of the school sites. Only 18% rated the condition of the sites as Excellent or Good.

6. Athletic facilities. More than half (54%) of the respondents rated the athletic facilities as Excellent or Good.

7. Number of schools. 36% of the respondents Strongly Agreed or Agreed that WFISD was operating the correct number of schools.

8. Size of elementary schools. 48% of the respondents Disagreed or Strongly Disagreed that WFISD elementary schools are the appropriate size.

9. Size of junior high schools. 50% of the respondents Disagreed or Strongly Disagreed that WFISD junior high schools are the appropriate size.

10. Size of high schools. 68% of the respondents Disagreed or Strongly Disagreed that WFISD high schools are the appropriate size.

11. Location of sixth graders. Respondents were almost equally split as to whether the sixth graders should be at the junior high schools.

12. High tech/vocational facilities. 60% of respondents Disagreed or Strongly Disagreed that WFISD’s facilities support high tech/vocational programs.

13. Parking 94% of respondents Strongly Agreed or Agreed that schools should have adequate parking for everyday use.

14. Tax increase support 58% of respondents Strongly Agreed or Agreed that they would support a tax increase to improve school facilities.

PUBLIC INPUT


62

EXHIBIT 6-2 (CONTINUED) WICHITA FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT

SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO THE LARGE GROUP SURVEY MARCH 2013

ISSUE SUMMARY

15. Community support of a tax increase. However, only 44% of respondents felt that the community would support a tax increase.

16. Successful bond measure. Nearly 43% of the respondents felt that the key to passing a bond measure would be communicating a clear plan that defines improvements.

Source: MGT of America, Inc. 2013.

The major themes of the charrette focused on the following issues.

1. INCONSISTENCY

Inconsistency was cited numerous times as an issue that needs to be addressed. The inconsistencies cited were numerous but could be categorized as:

Size of schools

Condition of facilities

Availability of programs / staff

Quality of programs / staff

2. SAFETY AND SECURITY

Concern regarding the ease of access to schools, the number of entrances, adequate fencing, the lack of security cameras and lighting were commonly cited as issues that needed attention.

3. NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS

The desire to keep neighborhood elementary schools was seen as a priority by many respondents.

4. COMMUNICATIONS

The need for improved communications with parents and community was often cited as a need. This could be combined with many responses indicating that improved communications along with good stewardship and developing trust is a needed in order to pass a bond for school improvements.

5. SIXTH GRADE

The desire to keep the option for sixth graders to be at either an elementary school or a junior high is seen as a priority.

PUBLIC INPUT


63

ON-LINE SURVEY

The on-line survey utilized the same questions posed to the large group in the public charrette. There

were approximately 1,000 responses.

Exhibit 6-3 is a sample analysis of the on-line survey for one question regarding the condition of schools

in WFISD. The analysis of all the online survey questions and comments can be found in Appendices C-E.

EXHIBIT 6-3 WICHITA FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT

SAMPLE ANALYSIS OF SURVEY QUESTION MARCH 2013

4. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL PHYSICAL CONDITION OF THE SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN WICHITA FALLS?

Excellent 11 1.12%

Good 233 23.70%

Fair 491 49.95%

Poor 236 24.01%

No Opinion/I don’t know 12 1.22%

Total 983


The major themes of the on-line survey included the following perceptions.

Nearly 70 percent of respondents rated the quality of education students receive in WFISD as good or excellent.

Approximately 70 percent of respondents rated both the physical condition and educational spaces of schools in WFISD as fair or poor.

A significant majority of respondents do not feel that high schools are sized correctly.

75 percent of respondents indicated a willingness to support a bond for improved school facilities.

Respondents were divided regarding:

The quality of technology available in schools

Site condition

The size and number of elementary and junior high schools

The location of sixth grade students (elementary or junior high)

Community support for a bond


64

7.0 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN OPTIONS

The facility options contained in this section are based on the data presented in previous sections and

will be divided into the following three sections:

THE PROCESS: The process of prioritization, budget estimates, and development of the options.

SUMMARY BY GRADE LEVEL BAND: Summary of each option by grade level band and the associated costs.

SAMPLE SCENARIOS:

Possible scenarios that can be created based on the data and grade level options. It is not intended that this will encompass all possible scenarios but can be used as a guide for future committee deliberations.

PROCESS AND PRIORITIZATION

The process of prioritization involved the development of a needs summary based on the data obtained,

budget estimates, and assigned “cut points” for determining the priority level. The initial step is to

determine budget estimates based on the budget formula shown in Exhibit 7-1 below. Renovation

budgets were calculated using the “Renovation Cost per SF” with a target score of 80 on each

assessment.

MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


65


BUDGET FORMULA

PROJECT TYPE FORMULA

COST PER GSF FOR

NEW CONST.

FURNITURE FIXTURES & EQUIPMENT

@ 10%

CONTINGENCY @ 5%

A&E, PERMIT, TESTING, ETC.

@20%

REPLACEMENT COST PER GSF

RENOVATION FACTOR @

10%

RENOVATION COST PER GSF

Building Condition Deficiencies ES

Bldg. construction cost based on average replacement cost

$155.00 $15.50 $8.53 $35.81 $214.83 $21.48 $236.31

Educational Suitability Deficiencies

35% of Building cost $54.25 $5.43 $2.98 $12.53 N/A $7.52 $82.71

Technology Readiness Deficiencies

30% of Electrical system costs $3.00 N/A $0.15 $0.63 N/A $0.38 $4.16

Grounds Condition Deficiencies

Site development cost per building square foot as established by MGT historical data (15% Bldg Cost)

$23.25 N/A $1.16 $4.88 $29.30 $2.93 $32.22

Building Condition Deficiencies JHS


$160.00 $16.00 $8.80 $36.96 $221.76 $22.18 $243.94







$24.00 N/A $1.20 $5.04 $30.24 $3.02 $33.26

Building Condition Deficiencies HS & Other


$170.00 $17.00 $9.35 $39.27 $235.62 $23.56 $259.18







$25.50 N/A $1.28 $5.36 $32.13 $3.21 $35.34


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


66

The second step in the prioritization process is to assign “cut points” to help determine which projects

could fall into first, second, or third priorities. The cut points utilized for Wichita Falls are:

FIRST PRIORITY:

The school has a combined score of <70

The school has a projected utilization of >110%

Facility improvement / changes that would affect either of the above criteria (e.g. adding capacity at one school would decrease the utilization at a neighboring school).

SECOND PRIORITY:


The school has a projected utilization of >100%

Facility improvement / changes that would affect either of the above criteria.

THIRD PRIORITY:


Facility improvement / changes that would affect the above criteria.

The third step in the prioritization process is to take into consideration the following factors:

Educational program enhancements

Public engagement priorities

Site acreage

Capacity of nearby schools

Demographics including growth potential

School-level feeder patterns

SUMMARY BY GRADE LEVEL BAND

In order to provide a variety of options that can be combined to develop possible facility scenarios the

following exhibits are provided. Exhibits 7-2 through 7-5 show the priorities and budget estimates for

possible high school options; Exhibits 7-6 through 7-9 show the priorities and budget estimates for

possible junior high options; and Exhibits 7-10 through 7-13 show the priorities and budget estimates for

possible elementary school options. All budget estimates provided for facility renovations are based on

bringing the school up to a score of 80 for each criteria (physical condition, educational suitability, site

condition, technology readiness).

MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


67


SINGLE HIGH SCHOOL OPTION

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED

SCORE UTILIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND PHASES

PROJECTED (2022-23)

REPLACE RENOVATE ADDITION FOR CAPACITY NEW SCHOOL IN AREA BOUNDARY

CHANGE SELL TOTAL

PHASE COST PHASE COST PHASE COST PHASE COST

Hirschi HS 44 73.56 80% x

Rider HS 47 69.19 133% x

Wichita Falls HS 14 65.99 98% x

New school to replace all high schools

1 $206,193,000

Total/Average 35 69.58 107% $ - $ - $ - $206,193,000 $206,193,000

Comments: Replace Hirschi, Rider and Wichita Falls HS with new school on new site with capacity of 3,850. Estimates do not include new site costs


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


68


2 HIGH SCHOOL OPTION – KEEP HIRSCHI

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED


PROJECTED

(2022-23) REPLACE RENOVATE ADDITION FOR CAPACITY NEW SCHOOL IN AREA

BOUNDARY CHANGE

SELL TOTAL


Hirschi HS 44 73.56 80% 1* $62,138,000 x

Rider HS 47 69.19 133% 1 $13,743,000 1* $32,667,000 x

Wichita Falls HS 14 65.99 98% x

Total/Average 35 69.58 107% $ - S13,743,000 S94,805,000 S - S108,548,000

Comments: * Planned capacity of 1,900 students


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


69

EXHIBIT 7-4 WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 HIGH SCHOOL OPTION – KEEP WICHITA FALLS

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED


PROJECTED (2022-23)


CHANGE SELL TOTAL


Hirschi HS 44 73.56 80% x

Rider HS 47 69.19 133% 1 $13,743,000 1* $32,667,000

Wichita Falls HS 14 65.99 98% 1 $29,669,000 1* $28,469,000

Total/Average 35 69.58 107% $ - $43,412,000 $ 61,136,000 $ - $104,548,000

Comments: *Planned capacity of 1,900 students


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


70


3 HIGH SCHOOL OPTION

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED


PROJECTED

(2022-23) REPLACE RENOVATE ADDITION FOR CAPACITY NEW SCHOOL IN AREA

BOUNDARY CHANGE

SELL TOTAL


Hirschi HS 44 73.56 80% 1* $9,479,000

Rider HS 47 69.19 133% 1 $13,743,000 2** $9,102,000

Wichita Falls HS 14 65.99 98% 1 $29,669,000

Total/Average 35 69.58 107% $ - $52,891,000 $9,102,000 $ - $61,993,000

Comments: *Program driven renovation **Planned capacity of 1,500 students


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


71


4 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL OPTION – EXISTING SCHOOL FACILITIES

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED


PROJECTED (2022-23)


CHANGE SELL TOTAL


Barwise JHS 20 73.78 62% 2 $2,003,000 x

Kirby JHS 17 70.69 58% 2 $6,329,000

McNiel JHS 20 75.92 90% 2 $2,295,000 x

Zundy JHS 5 64.93 96% 1 $8,135,000 x

Total/Average 16 71.33 77% $ - $18,762,000 $ - $ - $18,762,000

Comments:


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


72


4 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL OPTION – REPLACE ZUNDY WITH NEW FACILITY

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED


PROJECTED (2022-23)


CHANGE SELL TOTAL


Barwise JHS 20 73.78 62% 2 $2,003,000 x

Kirby JHS 17 70.69 58% 2 $6,329,000

McNiel JHS 20 75.92 90% 2 $2,295,000

Zundy JHS 5 64.93 96% *1 $29,522,000 x

Total/Average 16 71.33 77% $29,522,000 $10,627,000 $ - $ - $40,149,000

Comments: *New school on new site with capacity of 750 students. Estimates exclude new site costs.


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


73


3 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL OPTION – DISCONTINUE USE OF ZUNDY

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED


PROJECTED (2022-23)


CHANGE SELL TOTAL


Barwise JHS 20 73.78 62% 2 $2,003,000

Kirby JHS 17 70.69 58% 2 $6,329,000

McNiel JHS 20 75.92 90% 2 $2,295,000 2* $9,231,000

Zundy JHS 5 64.93 96%

Total/Average 16 71.33 77% $ - $10,627,000 $9,231,000 $ - $19,858,000

Comments: *Planned capacity of 900 students


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


74


3 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL OPTION – DISCONTINUE USE OF BARWISE

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED


PROJECTED (2022-23)


CHANGE SELL TOTAL


Barwise JHS 20 73.78 62% x

Kirby JHS 17 70.69 58% 2 $6,329,000

McNiel JHS 20 75.92 90% 2 $2,295,000 2** $9,231,000

Zundy JHS 5 64.93 96% 1* $35,426,160

Total/Average 16 71.33 77% $35,426,160 $8,624,000 $9,231,000 $ - $53,281,160

Comments: *New school on new site with capacity of 900 students. Estimates exclude new site costs. ** Planned capacity of 900 students


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


75


17 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPTION

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED


PROJECTED (2022-23)

REPLACE RENOVATE ADDITION FOR

CAPACITY NEW SCHOOL IN AREA

BOUNDARY CHANGE

SELL TOTAL


Alamo ES 4 65.80 125% 1 $3,589,000 x

Burgess ES 16 74.33 80% 2 $1,844,000

Crockett ES 6 69.17 105% 1 $2,579,000

Cunningham ES 10 77.01 69% 3 $1,030,000 x

Fain ES 9 75.93 108% 3 $1,739,000

Fowler ES 10 76.70 100% 3 $868,000

Franklin ES 5 74.27 146% 2 $1,703,000 x


9 73.94 81% 2 $1,430,000

Houston ES 5 64.18 123% 1 $3,544,000 x

Jefferson ES 13 69.25 106% 1 $3,713,000

Lamar ES 10 69.35 122% 1 $2,017,000 1 $4,203,000

Milam ES 8 74.67 117% 2 $1,268,000 2 $4,357,000

Scotland Park ES 10 91.45 62% x

Sheppard AFB ES 4 76.02 90% 3 $719,000

Southern Hills ES 11 88.96 75% x

Washington Jackson ES 40 75.18 77% 3 $4,050,000 x

West Foundation ES 12 85.39 96%

Total/Average 11 75.39 98% $ - $30,093,000 $8,560,000 $ - $38,653,000

Comments: Increase Lamar capacity to 500 Increase Milam capacity to 650


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


76


16 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPTION – REPLACE ALAMO / HOUSTON WITH NEW FACILITY

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED


PROJECTED (2022-23)


CHANGE SELL TOTAL


Alamo ES 4 65.80 125% 1 x

Burgess ES 16 74.33 80% 2 $1,844,000

Crockett ES 6 69.17 105% 1 $2,579,000 x

Cunningham ES 10 77.01 69% 3 $1,030,000 x

Fain ES 9 75.93 108% 3 $1,739,000

Fowler ES 10 76.70 100% 3 $868,000

Franklin ES 5 74.27 146% 2 $1,703,000 x


9 73.94 81% 2 $1,430,000

Houston ES 5 64.18 123% 1 x

Jefferson ES 13 69.25 106% 1 $3,713,000

Lamar ES 10 69.35 122% 1 $2,017,000 1 $4,203,000

Milam ES 8 74.67 117% 2 $1,268,000 x


Sheppard AFB ES 4 76.02 90% 3 $719,000


Washington Jackson ES 40 75.18 77% 3 $4,050,000


New School to replace Alamo and Houston

1 $22,925,000

Total/Average 11 75.39 98% $ - $22,960,000 $4,203,000 $22,925,000 $50,088,000

Comments: Replace Alamo and Houston with one new school on new site - Capacity of 650. Estimates do not include new site costs. Increase Lamar capacity to 500


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


77


15 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPTION – REPLACE ALAMO / HOUSTON WITH NEW FACILITY – DISCONTINUE USE OF HAYNES

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED


PROJECTED (2022-23)


CHANGE SELL TOTAL


Alamo ES 4 65.80 125% 1

Burgess ES 16 74.33 80% 2 $1,844,000 2 $4,203,000 x

Crockett ES 6 69.17 105% 1 $2,579,000

Cunningham ES 10 77.01 69% 3 $1,030,000 x

Fain ES 9 75.93 108% 3 $1,739,000

Fowler ES 10 76.70 100% 3 $868,000

Franklin ES 5 74.27 146% 2 $1,703,000 x


9 73.94 81% x

Houston ES 5 64.18 123% 1

Jefferson ES 13 69.25 106% 1 $3,713,000

Lamar ES 10 69.35 122% 1 $2,017,000 1 $4,203,000

Milam ES 8 74.67 117% 2 $1,268,000 x


Sheppard AFB ES 4 76.02 90% 3 $719,000




New School to replace Alamo and Houston

1 $22,925,000

Total/Average 11 75.39 98% $ - $21,530,000 $8,406,000 $22,925,000 $52,861,000

MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


78


15 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPTION – REPLACE ALAMO / HOUSTON WITH NEW FACILITY – DISCONTINUE USE OF HAYNES

Comments: Replace Alamo and Houston with one new school on new site - capacity of 650. Estimates do not include new site costs Sell Haynes and adjust boundaries among Haynes, Burgess and Scotland Park. Increase Burgess capacity to 550. Increase Lamar capacity to 500


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


79


15 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPTION – DISCONTINUE USE OF ALAMO / HOUSTON – RESTRUCTURE BOUNDARIES

SCHOOL NAME

ACREAGE COMBINED


PROJECTED (2022-23)


CHANGE SELL TOTAL


Alamo ES 4 65.80 125%

Burgess ES 16 74.33 80% 2 $1,844,000 x

Crockett ES 6 69.17 105% 1 $2,579,000 x

Cunningham ES 10 77.01 69% 3 $1,030,000 x

Fain ES 9 75.93 108% 3 $1,739,000

Fowler ES 10 76.70 100% 3 $868,000

Franklin ES 5 74.27 146% 2 $1,703,000


9 73.94 81% 2 $1,430,000 x

Houston ES 5 64.18 123%

Jefferson ES 13 69.25 106% 1 $3,713,000

Lamar ES 10 69.35 122% 1 $2,017,000 1 $4,203,000

Milam ES 8 74.67 117% 2 $1,268,000


Sheppard AFB ES 4 76.02 90% 3 $719,000




Total/Average 11 75.39 98% $ - $22,960,000 $4,203,000 $ - $27,163,000

Comments: Discontinue use of Alamo and Houston, restructure boundaries Increase Lamar capacity to 500


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


80

SIXTH GRADE FACTOR

For each of the junior high and elementary school options shown above, the cost factor has been

calculated assuming that the sixth grade students retain the option of attending at either level. Changes

in the budget estimates for housing all sixth graders at either the elementary or junior high level differ

depending on the school scenario selected but range from a low of no cost (if all elementary schools

remain open and sixth grade is housed in elementary) to a high of over $25,000,000 additional cost (if

the number of junior highs are reduced to three and current facilities are utilized). The formula for

determining actual cost of the sixth grade factor can be applied to specific scenarios as the district

determines.

SAMPLE SCENARIOS

In order to both develop recommendations and further assist any future committee deliberations the

following sample scenarios have been developed:

SCENARIO 1:

CURRENT CONFIGURATION Facility improvements utilizing current school configuration

SCENARIOS 2A AND 2B:

3 HIGH SCHOOL, 3 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, 16 ELEMENTARY MODEL

3 high schools, move Carrigan program to Hirschi 3 junior high schools, 2A with new Zundy 2B with discontinued

use of Zundy 16 elementary schools with new Houston/Alamo

SCENARIOS 3A AND 3B:

3 HIGH SCHOOL, 4 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, 15 ELEMENTARY MODEL

3 high schools, move Carrigan program to Hirschi 4 junior high schools 15 elementary schools, 3A with new Alamo/ Houston and

discontinued use of Haynes, 3B with discontinued use of Alamo/Houston

MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


81


SCENARIO 1 – CURRENT CONFIGURATION

Phase 1 80/80/80/80

Renovate Hirschi High School $9,479,000

Renovate Rider High School $13,743,000

Renovate Wichita Falls High School $29,669,000

Renovate Zundy Junior High School $8,135,000

Renovate Alamo, Crockett, Houston, Jefferson, & Lamar Elementary Schools

$15,442,000

Increase capacity at Lamar Elementary School to 500 $4,203,000

Phase 1 Subtotal $80,671,000

Phase 2

Renovate Barwise, McNiel, & Kirby Junior High Schools $10,627,000

Increase capacity at Rider High School to 1,500 (if necessary) $9,102,000

Increase capacity at Milam Elementary School to 650 $4,357,000

Renovate Burgess, Franklin, Haynes and Milam Elementary Schools $6,245,000


Phase 3

Renovate Cunningham, Fain, Fowler, Sheppard, and Washington-Jackson ES

$8,406,000


Grand Total $119,408,000

MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


82

EXHIBIT 7-15 WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT DISTRICT

SCENARIO 2A – 3 HIGH SCHOOLS, 3 JUNIOR HIGHS (NEW ZUNDY), 16 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (REPLACE ALAMO/HOUSTON WITH NEW SCHOOL)

Phase 1 80/80/80/80




New Zundy Junior High School with capacity of 900 $35,426,160

Renovate Jefferson, Lamar and Crockett Elementary Schools $8,309,000



Phase 2

Replace Alamo and Houston ES with new school* with capacity of 650 $22,925,000


Renovate Kirby, renovate and increase capacity to 900 at McNiel JHS $17,855,000


Increase capacity at Milan to 650 $4,357,000


Phase 3

Renovate Cunningham, Fain, Fowler, Sheppard and Washington-Jackson ES $8,406,000



*Phase 2 so Zundy site can be utilized

MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


83


SCENARIO 2B – 3 HIGH SCHOOLS, 3 JUNIOR HIGHS (DISCONTINUE ZUNDY), 16 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (REPLACE ALAMO/HOUSTON WITH NEW SCHOOL)

Phase 1 80/80/80/80




Renovate and increase capacity to 900 at McNiel Junior High School $11,526,000




Phase 2



Renovate Barwise and Kirby Junior High Schools $8,332,000


Increase capacity at Milam to 650 $4,357,000


Phase 3





MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


84


SCENARIO 3A – 3 HIGH SCHOOLS, 4 JUNIOR HIGHS (NEW ZUNDY), 15 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (REPLACE ALAMO/HOUSTON WITH NEW SCHOOL, DISCONTINUE USE OF HAYNES)

Phase 1 80/80/80/80




New Zundy Junior High School with capacity of 750 $29,522,000

Renovate Crockett, Jefferson, & Lamar Elementary Schools $8,309,000



Phase 2



Renovate McNiel, Barwise, and Kirby Junior High Schools $10,627,000

Renovate Burgess, Franklin, and Milam Elementary Schools $4,815,000

Increase capacity at Milam to 650 $4,357,000


Phase 3



Grand Total $155,157.000


MASTER PLAN OPTIONS


85


SCENARIO 3B – 3 HIGH SCHOOLS, 4 JUNIOR HIGHS, 15 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (DISCONTINUED USE OF ALAMO/HOUSTON – ADJUST BOUNDARIES)

Phase 1 80/80/80/80




Renovate Zundy Junior High School $8,135,000

Renovate Crockett, Jefferson, & Lamar Elementary Schools $8,309,000



Phase 2


Renovate McNiel, Barwise, and Kirby Junior High Schools $10,627,000

Renovate Burgess, Franklin, Haynes, and Milam Elementary Schools $6,245,000

Increase capacity at Milam to 650 4,357,000


Phase 3





86

8.0 MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS

The recommendations and conclusions contained in this section are based on the data presented in

previous sections and are divided into the following three sections:

PROCESS: The section describes the methodology used to develop the

recommended master plan.

MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS:

This section outlines the master plan recommendations for school

facility improvements, additions and new construction. It includes

recommendations for providing adequate instructional facilities

phased over the next ten-year period. Included will be condition

improvements, additions, and new facilities.

SUPPORTING RECOMMENDATIONS:

This section includes supporting recommendations that are necessary

to implement the ten-year plan. Recommendations address the

choice program, program implementation at certain facilities,

enrollment projections, communication of the master plan, key

indicators of success, on-going preventative maintenance, and

liquidation of sites no longer needed.

PROCESS

The process of developing a recommended plan took into account all aspects of facility planning as

presented in previous sections of this report. Factors considered included:

Facility assessments

Program considerations

Demographics / enrollment projections

Facility utilization

Staff and community input

Financial limitations

When all of the above factors are examined together it is inevitable that priorities emerge that do not

necessarily do so through the process of looking at individual options and possible scenarios (Section

7.0, above). In Wichita Falls the following items were identified for consideration in the development of

recommendations:

The need for safety and security improvements across the district regardless of where a particular school falls on the priority cut points.

RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS


87

The need for improvements to the grounds at the district stadium. When looking at the combined score for this facility it does not emerge as a high priority, however, the individual score for the grounds (including parking) is one of the lowest scores in the district.

The need to consolidate programs that are spread among a variety of facilities.

The need to address district-wide non-instructional facilities.

MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS

Using data from all sources and information identified through the comprehensive analysis process

described earlier, MGT recommends the following:

Continue with a three-high school model with the goal of more fully utilizing all three schools. This would include moving programs currently housed at Carrigan to Hirschi. All high schools would receive substantial renovations, with those at Hirschi intended to create a regional skills center.

Change to a three-junior high school model by discontinuing the use of Barwise Junior High and constructing a new Zundy Junior High on a new site. This will provide increased overall utilization and decreased operational costs. Discontinuing the use of Barwise will strategically locate the three junior high schools and the sale of the Barwise site could result in a substantial return to the district.

Move to a sixteen-school elementary model by initially discontinuing the use of Houston Elementary School and re-drawing attendance boundaries to more fully utilize Scotland Park, Washington-Jackson, Haynes and Cunningham Elementary Schools. This would be intended as an interim solution followed by a Phase 2 bond including a new elementary school to replace both Houston and Alamo Elementary Schools and located on the current Zundy Junior High School site.

Include funding for safety and security improvements at schools most in need regardless of the combined score.

Include funding for grounds improvements at the district stadium.



88

Exhibit 8-1 below provides a summary of the recommended master plan and associated budget.


FACILITY MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATION

Phase 1 80/80/80/80

Renovate Hirschi HS $9,479,000

Renovate Rider HS $13,743,000

Renovate Wichita Falls HS $29,669,000

New Zundy JHS $35,426,160

Safety & security improvements $5,000,000

Stadium site improvements $2,500,000

Phase 1 Total $95,817,160

Phase 2

Replace Alamo and Houston ES with new school $22,925,000

Increase capacity at Rider HS to 1,500 (if necessary) $9,102,000

Renovate both McNiel and Kirby JHS and increase capacity to 900 at McNiel JHS

$17,855,000


Increase capacity at Lamar $4,203,000

Phase 2 Total $62,394,000


The proposed master plan outlined above provides the following advantages:

The total dollar amount required falls into two similarly size bonds when the anticipated reduction in the current bond is included.

The emphasis in Phase 1 centers on the need for improvements at the secondary school level with significant renovations at all three high schools, the creation of a regional skills center, and a new junior high school facility.

The plan results in improved utilization rates and decreased operational costs.

To the degree possible, the community desire for neighborhood schools is maintained.

Immediate safety and security needs are addressed.



89

SUPPORTING RECOMMENDATIONS

The following recommendations are intended to provide guidance with the implementation of the

facilities master plan.

RECOMMENDATION 1 CONTINUE TO UPDATE LONG-TERM ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ON A REGULAR BASIS

Long-term enrollment projections should continue to be updated as the master plan is implemented. A

sound projection methodology has been provided in this report. Updates of these projections will be

relatively simple to prepare and, therefore, require much less effort than was undertaken for this study.

MGT recommends continuing to update the data on a yearly basis. Data gathered from these regular

updates should be shared with both staff and community as the basis for continuation of, or changes to,

the original plan.

RECOMMENDATION 2 COMMUNICATION OF THE FACILITY MASTER PLAN

The district is commended for its efforts to involve the community in the development of a facility

master plan. MGT recommends that the district continue to communicate clearly and often to all

stakeholders regarding the implementation progress of the facility master plan. To ensure community

engagement and awareness, MGT recommends that a formal communications plan be developed.

Formal communications plans establish clear goals, define the audiences to be reached (both internal

and external) and identify the key messages that must be communicated if the facility plan is to be

successful. In a well developed communications plan, responsibilities for implementation are assigned

to specific individuals, timelines for completion are established, and success indicators are determined

to know whether strategies have been successful. Frequent reports to the Board and community are

essential elements of a successful plan.

RECOMMENDATION 3 CONTINUE THE SECONDARY SCHOOL CHOICE PROGRAM WITH STRENGTHENED POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

The choice program in district secondary schools (including the sixth grade choice) is a popular program

with students and their families. However, there are some administrative and operational issues that

need to be resolved. It is therefore recommended that the program be continued with strengthened

policies and procedures. These should include:

Once a choice has been made by a student, the ability to change should be limited to specific circumstances.

If demand warrants, sixth grade choice should be made available at all junior high schools on a phased basis as adequate capacity becomes available.

School capacities should be strictly adhered to.



90

School choice policies and procedures should be examined annually, revised as appropriate and communicated regularly.

RECOMMENDATION 4 DEVELOP EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES

The recommendations included in this master plan will necessitate new and remodeled facilities, and

design teams will require program guidance from the district’s educational team. It is recommended

that the district develop educational specifications and design guidelines that reflect current and

planned educational programs, current trends in educational facility planning, and design standards

which promote the greatest efficiency.

Educational specifications and design guidelines are the documentation required to ensure the physical

design will meet the educational program requirements and the most efficient design techniques. The

design guidelines include conversations about energy conservation, maintenance and utilities, the types

of materials to be used, color palates, room sizes, lighting levels, and so on; educational specifications

are even more detailed. Some of the key areas that the educational specifications will address are:

Information technology requirements

Special education spaces

Circulation issues, both internal and external

Vehicle access and parking

Support space guidelines (library, cafeteria, counseling, child nutrition area, )

Energy efficiency and sustainability

Maintenance and operations

Specialized room space requirements (kindergarten, science, music, art, CTE, PE)

General classroom specifications

Community use of facilities

Administrative and office areas

Building safety and security

RECOMMENDATION 5 LIQUIDATE BARWISE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL PROPERTY

As is the case with most school districts, the facility needs of WFISD exceed the resources readily

available to the district. Therefore, it is recommended that the district liquidate Barwise Junior High

School in order to provide additional revenue. The value of the Barwise property presents the district

with an asset that is not always available to other districts. Given the location of this property its value

is significant and can potentially add additional revenue to the funding of the facility master plan.



91

RECOMMENDATION 6 UTILIZE THE CARRIGAN FACILITY FOR DISTRICT MAINTENANCE

The facility master plan recommendations include the development of a region wide skills center at

Hirschi High School. It is anticipated that as a part of the skills center curriculum, programs currently

housed at Carrigan would be moved to Hirschi making that facility available for other use. The current

location of the maintenance department could be better utilized for warehouse and food service

functions while the newer section of the Carrigan facility could meet the needs of the maintenance

department at little cost for renovations or other changes.

RECOMMENDATION 7 STRENGTHEN THE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

The facilities master plan recommendations include significant improvements to schools throughout the

district. A key component to keep both new facilities in the best condition possible as well as keep older

schools from deteriorating rapidly is an aggressive, structured preventative maintenance program. It is

recommended that the Wichita Falls Independent School District strengthen the existing preventive

maintenance plan.

RECOMMENDATION 8 PLAN FOR IMPROVEMENTS AT AUXILIARY FACILITIES

As the master plan is implemented, needs at auxiliary facilities will need to be considered by the district.

This will include the district’s agricultural farm, administrative offices, and other support facilities. As

funding becomes available, the deficiencies at these facilities need to be addressed.

Wichita Falls

Independent School District

Educational Facilities Master Plan

APPENDICES

May 30, 2013

Appendix A – Combo Survey Data

Survey Data

WFISD All Survey Data

Created: 4/16/13

Charrettes English Spanish ALL %50 484 5 539 49.8%42 499 2 543 50.2%

Totals 92 983 7 1082 100%

1.) Are you a parent/guardian of a student in the Wichita Falls Independent School District? (multiple choice)

Yes

Responses

No

49.8%50.2% 49.8%50.2%

Yes No

Charrettes English Spanish ALL %36 529 1 566 52.0%62 454 6 522 48.0%

Totals 98 983 7 1088 100%

YesNo

2.) Are you an employee of the Wichita Falls Independent School District? (multiple choice)

Responses

49.8%50.2%

Yes No

52.0%48.0%

Totals 98 983 7 1088 100%

49.8%50.2%

Yes No

52.0%48.0%

Yes No

49.8%50.2%

Yes No

52.0%48.0%

Yes No

MGT of America, Inc. Page 1 of 10

Survey Data


Created: 4/16/13

12 8%5 1% 1 6%

Charrettes English Spanish ALL %9 129 1 139 12.8%30 573 3 606 56.0%35 229 2 266 24.6%12 42 1 55 5.1%Poor

3.) How would you rate the quality of education students receive in Wichita Falls? (multiple choice)

ExcellentGoodFair

Responses 12.8%

56.0%

24.6% 5.1% 1.6%

12 42 1 55 5.1%7 10 0 17 1.6%

Totals 93 983 7 1083 100%

PoorNo Opinion/I don’t know

12.8%

56.0%

24.6% 5.1% 1.6%

Excellent Good Fair Poor No Opinion/I don’t know

Charrettes English Spanish ALL %2 11 0 13 1.2%18 233 3 254 23 5%

4.) How would you rate the overall physical condition of the school buildings in Wichita Falls? (multiple choice)

ExcellentGood

Responses

12.8%

56.0%

24.6% 5.1% 1.6%


1.2% 23.5%24.6% 1.4%

18 233 3 254 23.5%40 491 1 532 49.3%27 236 3 266 24.6%3 12 0 15 1.4%

Totals 90 983 7 1080 100%


GoodFair

12.8%

56.0%

24.6% 5.1% 1.6%


1.2% 23.5%

49.3%

24.6% 1.4%


12.8%

56.0%

24.6% 5.1% 1.6%


1.2% 23.5%

49.3%

24.6% 1.4%



Survey Data


Created: 4/16/13

2 2%4 8%


5.) How would you rate the instructional spaces in schools relative to the programs assigned to them? (multiple choice)

ExcellentGoodFair

Responses2.2%

25.1%

47 5%

20.5%4.8%

27 194 1 222 20.5%7 45 0 52 4.8%

Totals 95 983 7 1085 100%


2.2%25.1%

47.5%

20.5%4.8%


Charrettes English Spanish ALL %2 31 1 34 3.1%24 300 2 326 30.1%28 388 2 418 38 6%

6.) How would you rate WFISD facilities for safety and security? (multiple choice)

ExcellentGoodFair

Responses

2.2%25.1%

47.5%

20.5%4.8%


3.1%30.1%26.1% 2.0%

28 388 2 418 38.6%32 249 2 283 26.1%7 15 0 22 2.0%

Totals 93 983 7 1083 100%


Fair

2.2%25.1%

47.5%

20.5%4.8%


3.1%30.1%

38.6%

26.1% 2.0%


2.2%25.1%

47.5%

20.5%4.8%


3.1%30.1%

38.6%

26.1% 2.0%



Survey Data


Created: 4/16/13

5 1%3 0%


7.) How would you rate the quality of the technology provided for students and staff? (multiple choice)

ExcellentGoodFair

Responses5.1%

34.7%

37.1%

20.1% 3.0%

35 182 1 218 20.1%6 26 1 33 3.0%

Totals 95 983 7 1085 100%


5.1%34.7%

37.1%

20.1% 3.0%


Charrettes English Spanish ALL %3 17 0 20 1 8%Excellent

8.) How would you rate the site condition of schools in Wichita Falls (parking, landscaping, playgrounds, etc?) (multiple choice)

Responses

5.1%34.7%

37.1%

20.1% 3.0%


1.8% 25.6%26.5% 0.6%

3 17 0 20 1.8%14 261 3 278 25.6%46 446 2 494 45.5%31 254 2 287 26.5%1 5 0 6 0.6%

Totals 95 983 7 1085 100%


ExcellentGoodFair

5.1%34.7%

37.1%

20.1% 3.0%


1.8% 25.6%

45.5%

26.5% 0.6%


5.1%34.7%

37.1%

20.1% 3.0%


1.8% 25.6%

45.5%

26.5% 0.6%



Survey Data


Created: 4/16/13

9 ) How would you rate the athletic facilities in Wichita Responses16.3%

24 1%10.2% 5.2%

Charrettes English Spanish ALL %13 161 2 176 16.3%36 439 4 479 44.3%27 233 0 260 24.1%13 96 1 110 10.2%2 54 0 56 5.2%


9.) How would you rate the athletic facilities in Wichita Falls? (ball fields, tracks, stadium, etc.) (multiple choice)

ExcellentGoodFair

Responses16.3%

44.3%

24.1%10.2% 5.2%

2 54 0 56 5.2%Totals 91 983 7 1081 100%No Opinion/I don t know

16.3%

44.3%

24.1%10.2% 5.2%


Charrettes English Spanish ALL %11 45 0 56 5.2%23 278 3 304 28.0%26 351 1 378 34.8%27 246 1 274 25 3%Strongly Disagree

10.) Wichita Falls ISD operates the right number of schools. (multiple choice)

Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagree

Responses

16.3%

44.3%

24.1%10.2% 5.2%


5.2%28.0%25.3% 6.7%

27 246 1 274 25.3%8 63 2 73 6.7%

Totals 95 983 7 1085 100%

Strongly DisagreeNo Opinion

16.3%

44.3%

24.1%10.2% 5.2%


5.2%28.0%

34.8%

25.3% 6.7%

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree No Opinion

16.3%

44.3%

24.1%10.2% 5.2%


5.2%28.0%

34.8%

25.3% 6.7%



Survey Data


Created: 4/16/13

3 7%10.6%

Charrettes English Spanish ALL %5 34 1 40 3.7%29 386 3 418 38.6%27 361 1 389 36.0%17 102 1 120 11.1%Strongly Disagree

11.) Wichita Falls elementary schools are the appropriate size (enrollment). (multiple choice)


Responses3.7%

38.6%

36.0%

11.1%10.6%

17 102 1 120 11.1%14 100 1 115 10.6%

Totals 92 983 7 1082 100%


3.7%38.6%

36.0%

11.1%10.6%


Charrettes English Spanish ALL %7 27 1 35 3.3%24 377 2 403 37 5%

12.) Wichita Falls junior high schools are the appropriate size (enrollment). (multiple choice)

Strongly AgreeAgree

Responses

3.7%38.6%

36.0%

11.1%10.6%


3.3%37.5%10.4%

15.5%

24 377 2 403 37.5%28 330 1 359 33.4%16 95 1 112 10.4%11 154 2 167 15.5%

Totals 86 983 7 1076 100%


AgreeDisagree

3.7%38.6%

36.0%

11.1%10.6%


3.3%37.5%

33.4%

10.4%15.5%


3.7%38.6%

36.0%

11.1%10.6%


3.3%37.5%

33.4%

10.4%15.5%



Survey Data


Created: 4/16/13

4.1% 19 9%11.4%

Charrettes English Spanish ALL %8 35 1 44 4.1%12 201 1 214 19.9%21 399 2 422 39.1%40 234 1 275 25.5%7 114 2 123 11.4%


13.) Wichita Falls high schools are the appropriate size (enrollment). (multiple choice)


Responses 4.1% 19.9%

39.1%

25.5%

11.4%

7 114 2 123 11.4%Totals 88 983 7 1078 100%No Opinion

4.1% 19.9%

39.1%

25.5%

11.4%


Charrettes English Spanish ALL %25 230 1 256 23.9%12 253 2 267 25.0%10 260 2 272 25 4%

14.) Sixth graders should be located at the junior highs. (multiple choice)


Responses

4.1% 19.9%

39.1%

25.5%

11.4%


23.9%

25.0%25.4%

17.5%8.1%

10 260 2 272 25.4%29 157 1 187 17.5%3 83 1 87 8.1%

Totals 79 983 7 1069 100%


Disagree

4.1% 19.9%

39.1%

25.5%

11.4%


23.9%

25.0%25.4%

17.5%8.1%


4.1% 19.9%

39.1%

25.5%

11.4%


23.9%

25.0%25.4%

17.5%8.1%



Survey Data


Created: 4/16/13

18 8%

Charrettes English Spanish ALL %9 22 3 34 3.1%14 234 2 250 23.1%20 362 0 382 35.3%36 175 2 213 19.7%Strongly Disagree

15.) Wichita Falls ISD’s current facilities support high tech/vocational tech programs. (multiple choice)


Responses 3.1% 23.1%

35.3%

19.7%

18.8%

36 175 2 213 19.7%13 190 0 203 18.8%

Totals 92 983 7 1082 100%


3.1% 23.1%

35.3%

19.7%

18.8%


Charrettes English Spanish ALL %69 428 2 499 46 2%Strongly Agree

16.) Every school should have adequate parking for everyday usage with separate bus and parent drop‐off areas. (multiple choice)

Responses

3.1% 23.1%

35.3%

19.7%

18.8%


46.2%

44 7%

4.0%1.5% 3.6%

69 428 2 499 46.2%16 463 4 483 44.7%2 41 0 43 4.0%1 15 0 16 1.5%2 36 1 39 3.6%

Totals 90 983 7 1080 100%No Opinion

Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree

3.1% 23.1%

35.3%

19.7%

18.8%


46.2%

44.7%

4.0%1.5% 3.6%


3.1% 23.1%

35.3%

19.7%

18.8%


46.2%

44.7%

4.0%1.5% 3.6%



Survey Data


Created: 4/16/13

7 4%

Charrettes English Spanish ALL %40 342 0 382 35.3%13 407 4 424 39.2%10 98 2 110 10.2%

17.) Do you agree that if Wichita Falls ISD proposed a tax increase to improve school facilities for children, YOU would support it? (multiple choice)


Responses35.3%

39.2%

10.2%7.9% 7.4%

10 98 2 110 10.2%19 65 1 85 7.9%9 71 0 80 7.4%

Totals 91 983 7 1081 100%No Opinion

DisagreeStrongly Disagree

35.3%

39.2%

10.2%7.9% 7.4%


Charrettes English Spanish ALL %7 46 0 53 4 9%

18.) Do you agree that if Wichita Falls ISD proposed a tax increase to improve school facilities for children, THE COMMUNITY would support it? (multiple choice)

Strongly Agree

Responses

35.3%

39.2%

10.2%7.9% 7.4%


4.9%41.2%

35.1%

11.3% 7.5%

7 46 0 53 4.9%36 407 5 448 41.2%21 360 1 382 35.1%25 97 1 123 11.3%8 73 0 81 7.5%

Totals 97 983 7 1087 100%



35.3%

39.2%

10.2%7.9% 7.4%


4.9%41.2%

35.1%

11.3% 7.5%


35.3%

39.2%

10.2%7.9% 7.4%


4.9%41.2%

35.1%

11.3% 7.5%



Survey Data


Created: 4/16/13

19 ) Which of the following would have the greatest Responses 20.7%13.4%

Charrettes English Spanish ALL %24 201 0 225 20.7%19 226 2 247 22.7%41 422 5 468 43.1%12 134 0 146 13.4%

Totals 96 983 7 1086 100%I have another idea that I will share in the ...

19.) Which of the following would have the greatest influence on successfully passing a bond? (multiple choice)

Allowing community input in shaping the plan.Having a well‐developed, data‐driven faciliti...Communicating a clear plan that defines impro...

Responses 20.7%

22.7%43.1%

13.4%

Totals 96 983 7 1086 100%

20.7%

22.7%43.1%

13.4%

Allowing community input in shaping the plan.

Having a well‐developed, data‐driven faciliti...

Communicating a clear plan that defines impro...

I have another idea that I will share in the ...


Appendix B – Charrette Data

Survey Data

50 54.35%42 45.65%

Totals 92 100%

36 36.73%62 63.27%

Totals 98 100%

Session Name: WFISD 3-28-2013 7-09 PMCreated: 4/1/2013 8:43 AM

1.) Are you a parent/guardian of a student in the Wichita

Falls Independent School District? (multiple choice) Responses

Yes

Created: 4/01/13

WFISD Charrette Data

No

2.) Are you an employee of the Wichita Falls Independent

School District? (multiple choice) Responses

YesNo

54.4%45.6%

Yes No

36.7%

63.3%

Yes No


Survey Data

Created: 4/01/13


9 9.68%30 32.26%35 37.63%12 12.90%

7 7.53%Totals 93 100%

2 2.22%18 20%40 44.44%27 30%

3 3.33%Totals 90 100%

3.) How would you rate the quality of education students

receive in Wichita Falls? (multiple choice) Responses

ExcellentGoodFairPoorNo Opinion/I don’t know

4.) How would you rate the overall physical condition of the

school buildings in Wichita Falls? (multiple choice) Responses


9.7%32.3%

37.6%

12.9% 7.5%


2.2% 20%

44.4%

30% 3.3%



Survey Data

Created: 4/01/13


6 6.32%19 20%36 37.89%27 28.42%

7 7.37%Totals 95 100%

2 2.15%24 25.81%28 30.11%32 34.41%

7 7.53%Totals 93 100%

5.) How would you rate the instructional spaces in schools

relative to the programs assigned to them? (multiple choice) Responses


6.) How would you rate WFISD facilities for safety and

security? (multiple choice) Responses


6.3%20%

37.9%

28.4% 7.4%


2.2%25.8%

30.1%

34.4% 7.5%



Survey Data

Created: 4/01/13


5 5.26%17 17.89%32 33.68%35 36.84%

6 6.32%Totals 95 100%

3 3.16%14 14.74%46 48.42%31 32.63%

1 1.05%Totals 95 100%

7.) How would you rate the quality of the technology

provided for students and staff? (multiple choice) Responses


8.) How would you rate the site condition of schools in

Wichita Falls (parking, landscaping, playgrounds, etc?)

(multiple choice) Responses


5.3%17.9%

33.7%

36.8%6.3%


3.2% 14.7%

48.4%

32.6%1%



Survey Data

Created: 4/01/13


13 14.29%36 39.56%27 29.67%13 14.29%

2 2.20%Totals 91 100%

11 11.58%23 24.21%26 27.37%27 28.42%

8 8.42%Totals 95 100%

9.) How would you rate the athletic facilities in Wichita

Falls? (ball fields, tracks, stadium, etc.) (multiple choice) Responses


10.) Wichita Falls ISD operates the right number of schools.


Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeNo Opinion

14.3%

39.6%29.7%

14.3% 2.2%


11.6%

24.2%

27.4%

28.4%

8.4%



Survey Data

Created: 4/01/13


5 5.43%29 31.52%27 29.35%17 18.48%14 15.22%

Totals 92 100%

7 8.14%24 27.91%28 32.56%16 18.60%11 12.79%

Totals 86 100%

11.) Wichita Falls elementary schools are the appropriate

size (enrollment). (multiple choice) Responses


12.) Wichita Falls junior high schools are the appropriate

size (enrollment). (multiple choice) Responses


5.4%

31.5%

29.4%

18.5%

15.2%


8.1%

27.9%

32.6%

18.6%

12.8%



Survey Data

Created: 4/01/13


8 9.09%12 13.64%21 23.86%40 45.45%

7 7.95%Totals 88 100%

25 31.65%12 15.19%10 12.66%29 36.71%

3 3.80%Totals 79 100%

13.) Wichita Falls high schools are the appropriate size

(enrollment). (multiple choice) Responses


14.) Sixth graders should be located at the junior highs.



9.1%13.6%

23.9%

45.4%

8%


31.6%

15.2%12.7%

36.7% 3.8%



Survey Data

Created: 4/01/13


9 9.78%14 15.22%20 21.74%36 39.13%13 14.13%

Totals 92 100%

69 76.67%16 17.78%

2 2.22%1 1.11%2 2.22%

Totals 90 100%

15.) Wichita Falls ISD’s current facilities support high

tech/vocational tech programs. (multiple choice) Responses


16.) Every school should have adequate parking for

everyday usage with separate bus and parent drop-off

areas. (multiple choice) Responses


9.8%15.2%

21.7%39.1%

14.1%


76.7%

17.8%2.2% 1.1% 2.2%



Survey Data

Created: 4/01/13


40 43.96%13 14.29%10 10.99%19 20.88%

9 9.89%Totals 91 100%

7 7.22%36 37.11%21 21.65%25 25.77%

8 8.25%Totals 97 100%

17.) Do you agree that if Wichita Falls ISD proposed a tax

increase to improve school facilities for children, YOU would

support it? (multiple choice) Responses


18.) Do you agree that if Wichita Falls ISD proposed a tax

increase to improve school facilities for children, THE

COMMUNITY would support it? (multiple choice) Responses


44%

14.3%

11%

20.9%9.9%


7.2%

37.1%

21.6%

25.8%8.2%



Survey Data

Created: 4/01/13


24 25%19 19.79%41 42.71%12 12.50%

Totals 96 100%

Communicating a clear plan that defines impro...I have another idea that I will share in the ...

19.) Which of the following would have the greatest

influence on successfully passing a bond? (multiple choice) Responses

Allowing community input in shaping the plan.Having a well-developed, data-driven faciliti...

25%

19.8%42.7%

12.5%


Having a well-developed, data-driven faciliti...




Appendix C – Online Survey Data

Survey Data

Online Survey

489 49%

501 51%

Totals 990 100%

530 54%

460 46%

Totals 990 100%

130 13%

576 58%

231 23%

43 4%

10 1%

Totals 990 100%

11 1%

236 24%

492 50%

239 24%

12 1%

Totals 990 100%

WFISD Online Survey Results

Created: 4/16/13

1.) Are you a parent/guardian of a student in the Wichita Falls

Independent School District? (multiple choice)

Responses

Yes

No

2.) Are you an employee of the Wichita Falls Independent School

District? (multiple choice)Responses

Yes

No

3.) How would you rate the quality of education students receive

in Wichita Falls? (multiple choice)

Responses

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

No Opinion/I don’t know

4.) How would you rate the overall physical condition of the school

buildings in Wichita Falls? (multiple choice)

Responses

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor


MGT of America, Inc. 1 of 5

Survey Data

Online Survey


Created: 4/16/13

18 2%

253 26%

479 48%

195 20%

45 5%

Totals 990 100%

32 3%

302 31%

390 39%

251 25%

15 2%

Totals 990 100%

50 5%

359 36%

371 37%

183 18%

27 3%

Totals 990 100%

17 2%

264 27%

448 45%

256 26%

5 1%

Totals 990 100%

5.) How would you rate the instructional spaces in schools relative

to the programs assigned to them? (multiple choice)

Responses

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor


6.) How would you rate WFISD facilities for safety and security?

(multiple choice)Responses

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor


7.) How would you rate the quality of the technology provided for

students and staff? (multiple choice)

Responses

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor


8.) How would you rate the site condition of schools in Wichita

Falls (parking, landscaping, playgrounds, etc?) (multiple choice)

Responses

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor



Survey Data

Online Survey


Created: 4/16/13

163 16%

443 45%

233 24%

97 10%

54 5%

Totals 990 100%

45 5%

281 28%

352 36%

247 25%

65 7%

Totals 990 100%

35 4%

389 39%

362 37%

103 10%

101 10%

Totals 990 100%

28 3%

379 38%

331 33%

96 10%

156 16%

Totals 990 100%

9.) How would you rate the athletic facilities in Wichita Falls? (ball

fields, tracks, stadium, etc.) (multiple choice)

Responses

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor


10.) Wichita Falls ISD operates the right number of schools.

(multiple choice)Responses

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

No Opinion

11.) Wichita Falls elementary schools are the appropriate size

(enrollment). (multiple choice)

Responses

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

No Opinion

12.) Wichita Falls junior high schools are the appropriate size

(enrollment). (multiple choice)

Responses

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

No Opinion


Survey Data

Online Survey


Created: 4/16/13

36 4%

202 20%

401 41%

235 24%

116 12%

Totals 990 100%

231 23%

255 26%

262 26%

158 16%

84 8%

Totals 990 100%

25 3%

236 24%

362 37%

177 18%

190 19%

Totals 990 100%

430 43%

467 47%

41 4%

15 2%

37 4%

Totals 990 100%

13.) Wichita Falls high schools are the appropriate size

(enrollment). (multiple choice)Responses

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

No Opinion

14.) Sixth graders should be located at the junior highs. (multiple

choice)Responses

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

No Opinion

15.) Wichita Falls ISD’s current facilities support high

tech/vocational tech programs. (multiple choice)

Responses

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

No Opinion

16.) Every school should have adequate parking for everyday

usage with separate bus and parent drop-off areas. (multiple

choice)

Responses

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

No Opinion


Survey Data

Online Survey


Created: 4/16/13

342 35%

411 42%

100 10%

66 7%

71 7%

Totals 990 100%

46 5%

412 42%

361 36%

98 10%

73 7%

Totals 990 100%

201 20%

228 23%

427 43%

134 14%

Totals 990 100%

17.) Do you agree that if Wichita Falls ISD proposed a tax increase

to improve school facilities for children, YOU would support it?

(multiple choice)

Responses

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Having a well-developed, data-driven faciliti...

No Opinion

18.) Do you agree that if Wichita Falls ISD proposed a tax increase

to improve school facilities for children, THE COMMUNITY would

support it? (multiple choice)

Responses

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

No Opinion

19.) Which of the following would have the greatest influence on

successfully passing a bond? (multiple choice)



Responses



Appendix D – Other Options Responses

Survey Data Other Option Responses

19.) Which of the following would have the greatest influence on successfully passing a bond?Other Option [I have another idea]:All of the above are equally important. The general public will not like the idea of tax increase.

We do not need new schools! There are two High schools ( Hirschi and Rider)in town that are in really good condition and could support the student population and Hirschi has pleanty of space to expand where the other tow high schools are land locked. Old High would take too much money to make repairs that are so desperately needed. Sheppard Elm. should have been closed already and those students go to Kate Haynes....not John Tower.

all 3 answers togetherAll of aboveApproaching any improvement plan from a "safety" angle would help to pass any suggestions.

Allowing community representatives along with a representative from each department on the seperate campuses form a committee for each respective area of facilities. I.E, one committee for athletics, CTE, Band, Athletics, Theatre, etc. Allow these groups to work with the students, school personnel and parents to determine what the needs may be. Then have this group report to a larger committee meeting to determine what is most needed in each particular area.

Make sure the plan includes an expanded career and tech center and has very little to do with athletics.We will need the well thought out plan related to data and clear communication that defines the improvements.include community when developing data driven facilities master planSchool vouchers

Nothing will pass in this economy. Inflation and mandatory insurance or a minimum of a $500.00 tax per person on those that can't afford insurance have cut into anyone's willingness to pay more taxes for a school bond.

Fix the choice program. It is not feasible under its current guidelines. Do away with the transportation of kids across town and save that money. Also, lower the caps on enrollement at the high schools to better distribute the student population equitably. The current system is driving the success of those only on one side of town and not benefitting the entire communityI don't feel the the school district demonstrates enough frugality in managing the funds they are already appropriated. Property owners in WFISD pay a great amount of money to keep the status quo. I might possibly be more open to the idea of a bond if there were a greater transparency in spending of our tax dollars.Let the parents explain why it is important. As a mother to a kindergartner and 2nd grader I see a desperate need for new schools here. Put all Freshman & Sophomores in one building and Juniors & Seniors in other buildings preparing them for the future whether it be college or a vocation. Film other schools in our district (Dallas) and compare their facilities to ours. The school buildings and gyms are severely lacking.loosing C‐ScopeBudget cuts within the school facilities and allow the community to input in shaping the plan.Go and visit the other schools in our district outside of Wichita Falls! It is an embaressment what our schools, athletic facilities, and students must contend with. If this town expects to educated children effectively and COMPETE althetically we must INVEST more money in our schools, students, and teachers!All of the aboveEducate our community by showing a comparison between our facilities and other facilities in districts of comparable size and enrollment through a series of videos.Let the teachers teach instead of forcing an agenda into the class roomDon't make decisions based on emotions; base decisions on true need. Everybody knows we need to close/consolidate schools, but you are never going to make everyone happy. A combination of the above.Although hard to do if some small enrollment schools are closed and consilidated with others, upgrade every school in the district so that all students can share in the bond...have something for everyone.

Online Survey "Other Option" Responses



19.) Which of the following would have the greatest influence on successfully passing a bond?Other Option [I have another idea]:


Treating all subgroups of our community equally (without favoritism), doing away with the choice program, and giving teachers a significant raise. All the aboveMore technical training in areas of job markets that children can prosper in our society.be BOLD! Big vision, make it the best in Texas! All of the aboveDo away with any form of a teacher's union or teacher's organization and the CSCOPE education system which is a failure everywhere it has been tried.

Review staff assignments and cut staff accordingly. Also study cost analysis on building/facilities. Reduce amount of schools and re‐assign/distribute students and staff accordingly. Cost analysis should include current maintenance and energy costs versus new or improved facilities. Continue and improve grant research and private funding.

We need to find a way to show our community how behind WFISD schools are compared to metro‐plex school districts our size. WFISD schools are better suited to educate students in the 1970's, not students in the 2000's who are technology driven and need to more from our city.input from all parents, teachers, and students‐everything seems to be school board driven and community with no thought to the kids or their parents‐I think kids, especially junior high thru high school have a good grasp on what they need for education but no one asks them

WFISD has not addressed segragating our children. District 2 students are bused out of their community.The schools are not equal. We as a community should have a strong voice in what is to happen to our children. I want a person who looks like me to have input. Not a going along get along person trying to move up the WFISD ladder!!!

All of the above.

I agree with all of the above. But I also feel that in order to pass a bond, citizens must be convinced that this is the ONLY way we will be able to allow our students to compete with society academically, technologically, athletically, socially, etc.

I am not sure expecially with the current economy.All 3 of the choices, shoule be used. The community wants to help shape the plan, looking at it from a financial stand point we do need a data‐driven master plan and Communication is ABSOLUTELY necessary. That, I believe, is why our citizens are so divided and torn over the proposals in the first place.Actually be honest with the information that is given to the public. Novelty...A clear plan that defines improvements but make sure the funds are spread equally to the schoolsNot just selling it on the athletic end but selling the academic benefits of facility improvementsNo one in this town wants to pay their fare share to support education. You need to first convince people that education is critical before you will every get a bond passed.Work within the boundaries we currently have set. Do with what we have.All of the above along with viable proof that monies were being properly handled/distributed by the district rather then as is the present case.LISTEN and act upon what was previously said when reviewed twice before.Has the last one been paid off?Listen to the people about taking out CSCOPE and the people will be more willing to pass a bond.Will be hard to pass because of so many broken promises from the last bond.All of the aboveCreate or reorganize a campus to be an intermediate school for 5th and 6th graders only. Putting 7th 8th and 9th together would be ideal also.





Listen to what the people who actually work with the kids everyday and take their suggestions on improvement seriously instead pretending that what we say means something and then doing what the board and/or administrators are going to do anyway.

All of the above! Each campus has specific needs and requires individual considerations. There are so many improvements that need to be made to buildings and facilities. Communication and good public relations is always the key to passing any bond. You will not make everyone happy but need to stress the importance of our children's education as always.

Unify community behind a new single high school with the best instructors and facilities available.Shcool board members and WFISD administrators who come out in the media in favor of holding "closed sessions" on this issue are only hurting chances for the community passing a bond. Quit wasting tax payer money on plans that just extend the problem and not solve the problem.Consolidate schools to capacity. Close old buildings Make it CLEAR to public that taxes freeze for people over 65no opinion

All of the above. You must include the community, parents, teachers and students. Teachers are on the front lines and see the need first hand. Students can offer input on what they need, and what they need to be successful. Parents are more likely to support a bond, if they have helped build the vision, and they MUST see a well developed, data‐driven master plan that communicates a clear plan, and actually follows through. Lastly, two junior highs in town have very low enrollment, and thus small class sizes, verses the larger schools who suffer with large class sizes. Teaching is more effective if the classes are smaller, which allows the student to receive more one‐on‐one assistance, a repoire with the teacher, which ultimately enhances the students' confidence to learn and ask questions, in addition to the wealth of kinesthetic and creative activities that can be used to enhance student mastery of topics.

showing that a restructure of the districts schools to include some new facilities would better students as well as save money by having long term savings such as energy and maintenence costs while providing the students with better facilities that are more comfortable and easy to learn in with the money saving that can be used for more programs and supplies.

Having a well‐developed, data driven facilites master plan and communicating a clear plan that defines improvements

I think all of the above are very important. the more the communiity understands and the more information they have access to the more likely they will support a tax increase. Be HONEST with community.

In having a well‐developed, data driven master plan.....make Hirschi "The Vocational/Technical School". Students could attend classes there full time, saving money on busing. And that would increase Hirschi's enrollment and attractiveness to attend. The pay‐off would be considerate for the city of Wichita Falls, if we had more classes to put our students right into the workforce. The community would have more buy‐in to a bond if the school district is trying to help out the students who are not planning on attending college. (More students involved and becoming productive citizens.)

All three influences are important. I fully support the bond issue and will support this in the community. Educating the community is probably most important. Do all three, but a majority of the data that is used, needs to come from staff and people who actually use the facilities on a daily basis. Parents and community members do need a say, but they are not the people working in the buildings day in and day out.Building brand new facilities as a better use of proposed funds in a bond that is comparable to other schools in our surrounding counties. Restructure the high schools and realign the district lines without the opportunity for choice. Return to teaching neighborhood schools.





Buildings are cheaper than people. Clearly show the cost savings in consolidating and improving buildings vs. maintaining multiple buildings and administrators when we can house more under one new roof. Include tax savings in salary, benefits, retirement costs, etc. for x number of administrators over life of old buildings vs y (fewer) administrators over life of old building. Maybe these thick headed Wichita Falls taxpayers and elite will understand these dollars and sense (pun intended). Include the enrollment projections as well. Also, explain economic benefit if new construction and work the angle of maintaining the air base means also having quality buildings while airbase personnel are stationed here.

Tie bond in with state trophies, both academic and sports‐related. Make Rider (largest campus) a freshman/sophomore facility. Make Hirschi (SAFB connection) a junior campus. Make WFHS (historical tradition) a senior campus. Let the community see the potential of what unified WFISD students can achieve, and no bond issue will be a problem.

Combine all of the above and you should have excellent community support.Keep the Board out of it. They are not present on campus enough to know what the needs of the students and teachers are. What looks good on paper isn't necessarily what works in reality.Use your money more effectively. I believe all of the above are important.The majority of people think WFISD wastes a lot of money. Everyone is having to cut back, so I think they will want to see the district cut back.Getting rid of STAR tests ‐ mandated tests that stress the teachers and children. Possibly the company that provides that testing to the school system could donate some of their profits.All are important, but I really just don't know how you get people to buy in. Parents might, but people with no kids and those struggling to make ends meet (WF has more than its share of this) might just adamantly fight a tax increase. You might go back and see what strategies were used to pass the funding of building Kay Yeager Coliseum. That was something I never thought would pass but didWe can stop busing in children and save money there , if a parent and or guardian wants their child or children to attend a different school let them foot the bill.

Having a clear plan that would define closing of some schools and having only high school but it would mean 2 schools that housed 9 & 10th grade and 2nd schoodl that housed 11‐12 grade or 2 schools that housed 7,8 and 9th grades and one housing 10th, 11th and 12th. Wichita Falls can no longer afford the costs of 3 high schools!

Get out from under excess facility expenditures. Figure savings and present to community. Saving could be rolled over to improve current facilities. All of the above and a look at why the current tax base which assesses as much money as the entire city requires is not sufficient to fund infrastructure.Ending choice and building one high school

We are taxed enough....for such a poor product. My children attended private school and I paid tuition in addition to very high WFISD property tax for another person's child. I will do everything I can to fight a tax increase. The problem is non‐property owners can vote in bond elections ...the deck is stacked. Live within your means and don't run to the citizens everytime...we are still paying on the other. We have been taxed enough

it is a terrible time to build a new high school... a very bad idea. The structure of the three we have needs to be revamped. the choice program is too free. New zoning is a good choice.





In my opinion you are going to have to convince the community emotionally that what we are doing is not frivolous or exorbitant.

We are doing this not only for now but for the future. You don't HAVE to have a child in the school system in order to do what is right for Wichita Falls as a community. THAT right there is what will hold any bond back. People (60 and older) who think that they don't have any kids in the system, so why should they pay for it. Presenting as a team effort for the community and Wichita Falls in general would be more effective than ONLY focusing that it is for the students.

Use the money you already have ‐ this question is worded such that a person answering agrees with the bond issue ‐ fraudulent.Cutting out the choice plan and making all students go to the school within the district that they live. Not having a bond. Town hall meetings would be great to get the publics input and to continue to educate the community regarding the intended plan. all of the aboveLearn to live within your means. Tighten your belt. Look at the Economy.Cut the overhead.Work slowly. Working with smaller budgets to gain the trust of those funding it.A quick improvement of the condition of the U.S. economyEliminate Administration building jobs and put these teachers BACK in the classroom!All of the above in addition to full‐disclosure of financial information, especially the number of administrators on staff and their salaries. No more taxesNo more taxesA combination of the above suggestions seems optimum.Do not react to current conditions. Plan to deal with the future!Allowing input from successful community members who have actually studied the issue. All of the above

What happened to the Lottery Plan? When Texas sells lottery tickets, all that money would go to education. I have never heard anything about using that money to improve education and education facilities. So it makes me very skeptical that if we do OK a tax increase, will it really go to education? What is the accountability standard?

Show us how we will not waste taxpayer money by closing campuses and letting private schools use the same facilities at less expense. We have been down this road before.i don't think they will approve a bond issue no matter what you do.Based on our previous experience with school bond elections, I believe that all of the above are essential to ensuring success of a bond election effort.I strongly disagree with a bond issue. All of the above. Get the data, make a master plan, communicate the plan, listen to community feedback and make adjustments if needed, communicate plan again. No one is greater than the other.OForget about the tax increase and fix what's broken with the system.All three of the above.ALL of the above!





present a segment visual walk thru 's of the schools via the news media, showing the out of date or need of repair buildings.make it up front and personal to invite community inputall of the above need to happenRegaining the trust of the board.

I think the community needs to be told clearly what the problems are and that it would be best to do that through personal and touching series of stories each highlighting how our children are being placed at a disadvantage. An out cry for change needs to be created, with demands from the community that changes be made. Perhaps then people will support the size bond we will need, or feel ok about closing the school facilities that need to be closed.

all of the above.NASchool vouchers.Develop a very strong vocational program based at Hirschi. This would include meaningful courses in career English, math, and sciences. Students should not have to leave campus for travel to a home school. Ag Department could remain at Rider because of the closeness of the school farm, unless there is room at Hirschi. Shop facilities for could perhaps be enhanced or shared with other programs if at HirschiBond not required at this time.Having a plan that truely improves the community, provide opportunity for students to remain in their community and/or allow other students to return to their community. Thus rebuilding communities. Taking schools away will only tear down community more.Make cuts I in tranortation and maintenance first.All of the aboveYou cannot focus just on one of the above aspects. They all are equally importantrequest grant fundingcreating a new high school‐‐List each project and let community decide in which order should be priority.Have a well‐developed, data‐driven facilities master plan that requires less maintenance costs and frees up tax dollars for technology training for teachers; and communicating a clear plan that defines the improvements.This is a tough one! I think you need all three, but it sure didn't help in the past. We need parents to really want better facilities for their children. Try to involve as many parents as you can from all socio‐economic groups.I think that in order to get the needed community support, it needs to be very clearly communicated just how much the students of WFISD are being short‐changed by the severely antequated facilities that we currently have. Emphasis needs to be placed on how almost every single facility in WFISD is extremely outdated and not capable of adequately meeting the needs of students in the 21st century. Almost all of the schools that our students "compete" against academically, athletically and in the arts are worlds ahead of WFISD when it comes to offering up to date facilities, technology, and other opportunities. The community must be made aware that the children of Wichita Falls are being left behind.

I feel that parents need to be met with. I see all the meetings that are going on during the day that working class people cannot attend due to jobs. I would like to be given the opportunity for evening meetings or events that all parents could attend.How about a combination of all three?Community input and a strong, specific plan are important but also a feeling that this is not something we will be dealing with in such a desperate way every 10 years. We should not be rehashing this to such a degree when the last bond was described as a solution. Apparently, we didn't solve anything.





You will have to work VERY HARD to convince a lot of people you are not lying THIS TIME. "Close four schools, build two"... Only Fannin remains open under a different name. I attended WFISD at a time when education meant something. I learned (‐4)+2=2 NOT 3!!!


Appendix E – Comments Responses

Survey DataComment/Suggestions Responses

20.) Comments/Suggestions?WFISD should continue dispelling inaccurate media reports to better inform the community and prevent negative perceptions of the district. The rebuttal posted on the website is a perfect example and I applaud you for it. Efforts like that should continue and become more visible as the district will need support for a bond election.

Online Survey "Comments" Responses

I'm not sure that any of the current fact finding methodology will provide statistically accurate opinions. One meeting polling an interested audience and voluntary online survey is not an unbiased sample. Board leadership will need to make tough decisions in the long term best interest of the District and the community. That decision will not be popular regardless.I think we need to eliminate the CHOICE program.We also need to close schools with low enrollment and close those facilities that are in poor shape, especially if the cost of improving outweighs the reason to improve (i.e., the enrollment is low or the costs are astronomical)Our teachers, administrators and students have survived for too long with subpar facilities and resources. We desperately need facilities that support student success from elementary through high school. Vocational education is vital for those students who are not college‐bound. Serious consideration should be given to enrollment at all schools and to providing equal opportunities and facilities for all students. A very clear, well‐defined plan is critical ‐ should be given to enrollment at all schools and to providing equal opportunities and facilities for all students. A very clear, well defined plan is critical communicating that plan to all members of the community will significantly improve chances of success. there is no way to improve the schools untill the authority portion of staff is improved. the schools are not safe for the kids! there is not any inforcement of the rules and regulations that are set and portraied as the law by the district! untill each school is held to uphold the same rules and punishment (particularly in the bully situations) there will be no control over anything set in place to benifit the students.

I am a Hirschi Alumni and my child attends Hirschi. It is very frustrating to hear all the time that Hirschi is the school that everyone wants to close. Hirschi is not falling apart like WFHS and it has plenty of land for expansion unlike WFHS. It is sad to think that this City only thinks about the South side of town when it comes to schools. Please make a decsision based on what is truly best for the children and not for the pocket books of those who thinnk they run the city.

Security is upmost important for our children, especially this day and and time. I don't really feel the schools are safe anymore‐‐anyone can walk into the school building‐espeicially at where my child goes. Good school‐‐just lacking security!Also we want our children to get a quality education so they can be successes in the future‐after all they are our FUTURE! Larger classrooms would not help us work towards this goal. I realized the population is growing‐‐so I y g p g p p g gproposed expanding some of the schools. There is no need to consolidate‐‐as this would create bigger problems. Sure new is nice‐‐but we need to focus on a quality education‐quality teachers and quality resources. Having heard the BCI speakers over the last few years they continue to say the most important thing to attract new business is our schools and our medical care. When you look at surrounding cities their physical plants are very impressive and I feel ours are lacking. So when we bring prospective business owners to town and they ask to look at our high schools where do we take them? It is time the BCI and Wfisd worked together to improve our high schools. Don't repair old schools that will continue to look old, build a new one. Mike Bomar,DVMI have based my answers on the facility in which I am employed.

Re: School Security it is my personal opinion that we can keep doors secured & have a visitor sign in system perfected but until we have metal detectorsRe: School Security, it is my personal opinion that we can keep doors secured, & have a visitor sign in system perfected, but until we have metal detectors installed, especially at the secondary level campuses, the chances of a tradegy happening are great.

I stongly feel that the older schools need to be 'made‐over'

Stop the choice plan!Rider is overcrowded and unsafe.Go back to district.It worked for years without the added cost of busing.Stop using all the lighting at the stadium just for band practice or small games.

As Hirschi is low on students,could Harrell,Denver and Carrigan be relocated at Hirschi. This would close three small schools and better utalize Hirschi.

Build one high school and house freshman and sophmores on one campus and juniors and seniors on another campus. You should also place the vocational programs on the upper grade campus and build better vocational facilities.programs on the upper grade campus and build better vocational facilities.Something needs to be done about the time alloted for students to eat at the Jr high and high school level, which I'm told is a function of overcrowding. Also, students should be able to access everything the district has to offer without going to one of the least desirable schools. Count me as one in favor of one super high school. Yes, fewer children would get as many opportunities as they have now, but it would unify our community, which we desperately need. The actions of PARENTS of high school students is atrocious ‐‐ hurtintg children in the name of rivalry. Heard a Rider parent just this week say, 'Oh, good, Old High lost.' We need to rally behind our kids at one beautiful school. People who haven't visited metroplex high schools, which are so beautiful that they seem almost like college campuses, have no idea what our kids are missing out on. We can only afford to give them one, but let's give them that one ‐‐ a beautiful school that everyone will feel good about attending, full of technology.This will unite the community and make Wichita Falls a powerhouse in the region, since we have nothing but talented, terrific kids here. Also, tell Dr. Frossard that we need a community meeting about CSCOPE like we had about facilities How come that hasn't been scheduled? Don't you want to know what we think about what's going onmeeting about CSCOPE like we had about facilities. How come that hasn't been scheduled? Don't you want to know what we think about what's going on inside the building walls?


Item has been removed to maintain confidentiality of personnel information.


20.) Comments/Suggestions?


I think the passage of a bond will fail unless there is direct evidence to show the physical problems in the older schools and what it will cost to make sufficient improvements. People remember the schools when they attended and fail to see the deterioration since they attended. I, as a parent and a teacher, want a facility that will provide the very best for my child and my students. Many of the schools cannot be updated to support today's technology.teacher, want a facility that will provide the very best for my child and my students. Many of the schools cannot be updated to support today s technology. There are rat problems in some of the schools, as well as buildings well over 100 years old. We cannot attract new businesses to our area when we are offering patched up school buildings. People need to be reminded that a student's memories come from the activities and the people, not a building.

With our population, I think if there is any consideration in closing a high school, then the best plan would be to close all the high schools and combine them into a super high school (perhaps with a separate 9th grade campus) and to include a separate, self‐functioning career and technology campus. The choice program needs to end anyway, and the school rivalries could be set aside at the same time. Closing only one high school will never be accepted by our tradition‐focused population.District has many problems that have developed over the past 20 years: tax base has declined, the community needs to be a bit more progressive, outdated facilities, poor money management, choice system too expensive and has created problems such a coaches recruiting athletes. The previous 2 facilities, poor money management, choice system too expensive and has created problems such a coaches recruiting athletes. The previous 2 administrations made many poor decisionswhich resulted in major drop in morale throughout the district. Faculties tend to view downtown as having a 'gotcha' attitude. some quality educators have literally been run off while others who have engaged in unacceptable activities that most districts would terminate for. List includes several administrators in the district, and lastly we need to get away from the 'good old boys' in the district making all the decisions.

Involve the school personnel from individual campuses because they are directly affected by facilities.

The students deserve a well rounded education and that includes education in Career and Technology (CTE). WFISD needs to invest more in the CTE courses. Despite what some people think, not every student needs to go to college, there are some kids that do not want to go to college, some may need to take some time out of school in order to raise funds to pay for college. They can get a good education and training by going through the CTE courses. to take some time out of school in order to raise funds to pay for college. They can get a good education and training by going through the CTE courses. These course will start them out into a good career that will pay them well. If we have a good CTE center, the other school districts can also send their students to the Center. Look at what they do in Denton and also Lawton. Districts from around the area send their students to their Career and Technology Centers.

Have heard a lot of people want to replace Hirschi or close it down. Why would you keep a school that is old over a school that is newer and in better condition. Look at the work that needs to be done to get the older school in to the same condition as the newer school. Just because there is a long history at one school, if it is taking a lot of money to keep it running maybe it is time to close the older school.

Get rid of the idea of 'Junior high.' Put 6th grade in our junior high and operate a middle school concept...not just in name only, but true middle school Get rid of the idea of Junior high. Put 6th grade in our junior high and operate a middle school concept...not just in name only, but true middle school philosophy. I believe many more parents would be accepting of this if 6th graders were introduced to middle school versus the idea of junior high.

We definitely need to take a closer look at student populations and consider closing some campuses with very low populations.

All three of the above are important, especially the first two. Citizens should be well informed, or have information readily available to make appropriate decisions. Citizens appointed to committees or boards should be more diverse than the usual 'civic leaders'. I have heard MANY comments, especially in the last 16 years collecting school taxes, from many type people. I believe Barwise should be the ju hi closed, if we do one because the land is so valuable that it could be sold for enough to almost build another school in a different location. It is more land locked than the others because allothers either have landaround them or such old or run down properties that they can easily expand, particularly Zundy. The survey questions were hard to answer because we have some excellent and some really poor in our district. It's hard to evaluate McNiel's athletic facility and Zundy or Barwise's in the same question!! I havehave some excellent and some really poor in our district. It s hard to evaluate McNiel s athletic facility and Zundy or Barwise s in the same question!! I have three very close family members working at Barwise, and I hope and pray that they don't lose their jobs, but that school is the one to go if any do. Wichita Falls High School is so centrally located, I hate to see it closed also. There is plenty of distressed property around to be bought that it seems to have plenty of room to expand. I get on a soapbox easily about public schools, so I'll stop now. Thanks for your hard work! Lou Murdock

WFISD needs more technical classes for the students who do not go to college. Classes should teach curriculum on plumbing, electricians, HVAC, etc.

Save money by consolidating Carrigan and Harrell's program at Hirschi. Save money by doing away with the buses for school choice. Allow studdents to choose where to go, just don't bus them to secondary schools, except Eastside students. Eastside students have no neighborhood secondary school, so they should still be bused to their choice. The racial bands would be balanced now, just by where the students live. This is evident by the location of section 8

2 E h h l b d b i d 8 d l h j hi h hl i i h d i hapartments. 2 years ago. Each school board member received an 8‐page, typed letter on how to save money on jr. high athletics without decreasing the services to our student/athletes.I think if peopel who used outlets at school ( your own microwave, Scentsy, coffee maker, etc. ) would pay a certian ammount just to help out it would be a huge help. When almost every teacher has more than one thing plugged into the outlets in their classroom, at the schools cost, I think that is a problem. If everyone pitched in just a little, it would go a long way! THE DISTRICIT NEEDS TO BUILD A NEW FOOTBALL?TRACK STADIUM FOR THE EVERYONE TO USE,TEACHERS SHOULD BE ON THE SIDEWALKS IN THE MORNING BEFORE SCHOOL AND AFTER SCHOOL IN ALL SCHOOLS INCLUDING HIGH SCHOOLS

I feel the 'choice program' at the jr. high & high school levels should be stopped. That way the enrollment at the schools would be the appropriate.

Decisions should be data driven and made in the best interest of all schools.





The parking lot at the stadium is embarassing to the WFISD when other communities come in to participate in athletic events. I feel there is a lack of vocational training for students that do not want to pursue a college education.

Our district needs to address the vocational learning programs in the the district. These programs are not adequate and do not serve enough students.Our district needs to address the vocational learning programs in the the district. These programs are not adequate and do not serve enough students.

WFISD seems to operate ten or more years behind other progressive districts(ie. school districts in the metroplex). Building that service PreK ‐ 6th grade cannot meet the instructional requirements adequately. It's almost like we are the WalMart of schools. Rework our elementary schools like other districts, with some buildings being PreK ‐ 2, 3 ‐ 5 or 6(for STAAR tested grade levels), and then have middle school be 6(7) ‐ 8. That way schools and the teachers in those schools can tailor all of the campuses activities to fit the appropriateness of those particular ages.Many districts have gone to sixth grade campuses, to help those students transistion from elementary to secondary, where more individual responsibility is placed on the student.High school in some districts have become 9‐10 campuses and 11 ‐ 12 campuses. I believe this might help in both the learning, but also the maturity level of

hi h h l kidour high school kids.

Cscope is taking our teachers and turning them into robots. Please allow them to teach and not waste their education and skills.

Put kids back in their school district. Put more emphasis on education and less on athletes.

Make Hirschi into a Vocational High School so that they could get their regular classes as well as their skill classes in one place.

Get rid of choice. It wastes time and money on a 'fake' competition between the schools. Make Hirschi a vocational/ tech school. Get more A/P classes offered ie Sociology, Psychology, Accounting. With an 8th period schedule, require all students to have a study hall period. I wish these questions were worded differently. For example is the technology better than it was 4 years ago...or is our technology comparable to other di t i t ? Th ti l l t f f i t t tidistricts? These questions leave lots of room for interpretation.

Thank you for allowing those of us not able to be at the meeting input in this way! Great idea!!

End the choice program. Keep 6th graders at elementary school. Open a 7‐8th grade campus‐at HirschiOpen a freshman‐soph campus‐at RiderOpen a jr‐sr campus‐ (tear down McNeil and build new updated jr‐sr campus with updated technology. Football, soccer, track, softball, baseball, tennis stadiums are all right there. Build new gym for basketball within new school building. Plenty of parking for everyone already available)The change would be an adjustment for current students but incoming kids would not know any different Our town would be more appealing this way forThe change would be an adjustment for current students, but incoming kids would not know any different. Our town would be more appealing this way for people to move Wichita Falls, as well as, give our kids a better education.I hope that if one of the high schools has to close, the overriding reason is NOT to improve our standings when it comes to athletics. The education and safety of our students has to be of the upmost importance. My children are at Franklin, Zundy, and WFHS‐ we LOVE our schools, but the buildings need updates with more space, and smaller numbers in classrooms (27 children in one classroom is too many) I do feel they are receiving excellent instruction for the most part. Reorganize the choice system and that alone will save the district hundreds of thousdands dollars a year. The system that is in place is not equitable to all parts of the city.

Some of the questions are open to interpretation which could lead to misunderstandings.

Please get away from cscope. Kids aren't learning.

1. Get rid of C‐Scope. It isn't effective and its not working. It's not innovative, forward‐thinking or beneficial to the kids or teachers.

2. Assess administrators. Many have been in this district for several years with no success to speak of and no results to warrant keeping their job.

3. Get rid of old facilities. We've spent too much money maintaining old facilities instead of building newer, state‐of‐the‐art campuses in areas of town that have seen growth.

4. Get rid of choice. There's no reason to have it and it serves no purpose.

5. Until we fix our school district, Wichita Falls will see no growth because quality schools bring people to cities.

shut down old high and increase size of other highschools.

Choice program should cease to exist and new attendance zones developed to help with overcrowding in older schools and under usage of newer schools. A vocational/technical high school should be created to help with those students not going to college. Not just car repair and beautician but a real, needed vocational and technical school.





Visits to most of the facilities in the WFISD have always left me wondering exactly where dollars have been spent. Our facilities are dated and appear to have been neglected over the years. After visiting Allen High School, I have a new appreciation for having a single high school in the WFISD, but I doubt it could be managed as well as that of Allen. As an outsider I'm disappointed in seeing such a divide in this city when it comes to our school district. It is beyond time to stop the Rider/Old High/Hirschi propaganda and do what is best for the children in our district. The Choice program is ruining our school district. Unfortunately it is not about academics but rather athletics. Though I know better, the perception is that wealthy parents and athletics take precedent in the district.

Until the school board makes some tough decisions, a bond proposal will likely fail again. Our residents simply don't trust the district with their money. It's a shame as our children and our community need some drastic improvements to facilities.combine the schools to equalize the percentage per each and every bldg. Close the older ones, possibly demo, and reconstruct new facilities on same locations of some. Turn Shepperd elem. upkeep over to the base. Move the Ed. Cntr. location to the current Burgess location. Move Harrell, Carrigan, to the Hirschi campus. Recycle materials when remodeling existing bldgs. Sell some of the land where older schools are,now, use the money to assist in Hirschi campus. Recycle materials when remodeling existing bldgs. Sell some of the land where older schools are,now, use the money to assist in construction of new or renovations of old.

I believe WFISD is a great district but improvements NEED to be made.

I was a student in the Wichita Falls school district from 7th grade to graduation. In all those years, I was not prepared for a college education. I was however prepared how to take a taks get and was hammered on how to take an AP test (a month before the test where we had to cram). I wish the option to take dual enrollment would have been advertised to me so I could have avoided taking the AP classes that were ultimately a huge waste of time.

I am strongly opposed to the concept of one large high school. I base this on the fact we would be a 5A sized district and our community does not have the capability to offer enough private instruction/training required to make us competitive. I am not speaking of athletics only but also in the fine arts, p y g p g q p p g yagricultural, technical, and vocational fields. The amount of travel required of our students if were to become a 5A district is a huge reason I am opposed to the one high school concept. I do feel our students need indoor practice facilities, auditoriums for performances, dance studios, and modified areas for the impaired students. Our pre‐AP and AP students deserve to be taught in a master class type setting better preparing them for the rigors of university life and study. A lot of time they do what the feel is needed and not what is actually needed for the kids and the teachers... Example 'the choice' plan which is very racially discriminatory for kids... Parents buy houses so that kids can attend those schools... But then a kid gets their hopes set on a school and gets rejected because of the color of their skin. Plus is it not costing the school district more money to transfer kids all over town? Money well spent???? Could have been spent elsewhere.May be a hard sell at this time Quite abit of distrust within the community itselfMay be a hard sell at this time. Quite abit of distrust within the community itself.A hard look needs to be taken at the number of elementary, junior high and high school buildings. Another look should be taken at Hirschi High School specifically to maintain it's IB program but consolidate vocational offerings at the location. Students at the other two high schools could participate in the IB or vocational offerings but return to their home campus for extra curricular activities.

Make it plain how much it will raise each family's tax cost and explain what will be done with the money.

No tax increase, we are already taxed to death. Taxes here, taxes there, taxes everywhere.

GET RID OF CSCOPE!!!!cscope must go. period. Your job is to educate our children not indoctrinate them. I oppose any program that is cloaked in secrecy from the parents and any program that teaches an agenda over facts I demand that cscope be removed from our school system immediatley To all the wfisd elected officials I willprogram that teaches an agenda over facts. I demand that cscope be removed from our school system immediatley. To all the wfisd elected officials, I will be voting accordingly.

Could save money if the choice plan was dropped and not give state test.

There is terrible congestion and dangerous pick up procedures at our school. The children's playground has been broken and is a safety hazard for three years. The GT program is scanned busy work worksheets from kinder to 3rd grade. The computer take 5‐10 minutes just to boot up. The size of elementary school classrooms are at their make at 24 students. Teachers can not appropriately teach each child what they need.

C‐scope is the worst thing you could possibly bring into the education system. I have listened to both sides and those who support the program all seem to have a financial agenda rather than the best interest of the children. The more understanding the comunity gets about this program the less likely thet will b t t b d M lf d th tl i t t th t th t t th bli th t h t i d h d t hidbe to support any bond. Myself and many others are currently pursuing many ways to get the truth out to the public that you have tried so hard to hide. The floodgates are soon going to open and I beleive Region 9 better be ready for parents taking our children out of WFISD, spreading the word about your agenda, and a drastic reduction in revenue. I attended your school board meeting and your presentation was nothing more than smoke and mirrors and dancing around the true content. Thank You for your time ‐ Education Not Indoctrination.

Get rid of the choice program. Reconfigure district school zones to ensure fair and equal student bodies, OR build one high school. Stop allowing the community to self‐segregate. For example, students living in the Tanglewood district are closer to Hirschi than Rider. Let our addresses accurately determine the school zone our children will be in. Stop accommodating people who have irrational beliefs/prejudices. This is the only way our community will be able to grow beyond the small‐town 'Southern' mentality that has become the elephant in every classroom in the district.g y y p y

In the past, people have let their loyalty to a particular school cloud their vision of the future. We need to set our sites on the best education we can offer our students in the most cost‐effective manor possible.





I do not feel that that the Architectural Team that has been hired will truly survey all aspects of the facilities (structural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical) to portray a true picture on facility conditions. I do not believe they will take the time needed to discuss facility needs with Adimustrators and Staff and will thus rush through with a proposed facilities plan. Therefore, once again the citizens of WF will see through a rush job and not support a Bond Issue alrhought it is desperately needed.One super high schoolThree middle schools/jr highsTo attract new business, families and children to our city we need to have something to offer them. Plus, I want my children who are in the public school to have better facilities and stop having her teacher teach out of a broom closet anymore. Shameful!! let's suck it up and make those hard decissions now instead of waiting until the cost is outragous.

Smaller class sizes will help with test scores. Technology is behind in many schools. Class room size is too cramped for a lot of teachers.

Not sure this survey will do any good, because your goal is not clear. Exactly what is the outcomeyou are looking for?

WFISD could be a powerhouse not only in athletics but in ACADEMICS if we could have a 9th/10th grade campus and a 11th/12th grade campus. I understand, as I am also a graduate of WFISD, the tradition in the school rivalry we have in this town. Times have changed. Better school facilities, combining excellent teachers from different campuses, developing stronger athletic programs, is far more important to our children that Rider vs. Old High week. It is embarrassing for our students, and somewhat disheartening, to travel to schools in SMALLER areas that have facilities that are so far advanced and new, above and beyond what ANY of our current campuses have., not to mention the comparison to schools in OUR district. When schools travel to us, either for academics or athletics, the comments that I have personally heard are very hurtful not only for our students, but for staff members. Give our kids something to be proud of. Give our students who are NOT college bound, programs to help them be successful in the work force. With better facilities and programs, our economy will thrive because people will WANT to come live here and have their children be a part of something great. We have great students, teachers, and administrators. It is time the community opened its eyes and saw this. Give back to WFISD.students, teachers, and administrators. It is time the community opened its eyes and saw this. Give back to WFISD. Totally eliminate use of 'Cscope' ... combine school facilities not essential to community ... stop busing to a school of choice... down size administration and it's support staff...

Result = better education and lower school taxes.

Be careful not to request so large a bond that the community will not support it. This would be a gigatinic setback!

Drastically cut the number of schools, especially the older ones. Start with Wichita Falls High School ‐ it should be the first one closed. Continue with others. Remodel Rider High School into a state of the art, technologically up to date facility. Make it the 9th and 10th grade campus. Build a brand new state of the art school on the western side of town as the new 11th and 12th grade campus Remodel Hirschi and make it the career and vocational centerstate of the art school on the western side of town as the new 11th and 12th grade campus. Remodel Hirschi and make it the career and vocational center. Encourage non‐academic students to attend there. Drop the IB program and focus on the AP program at the academic high schools. Stop ALL busing. Eliminate the CHOICE program. Go back to neighborhood (smaller) schools with attendance zones. Use junior high attendance zones. Then everybody goes to the vocational high school or to the two academic high schools. Eliminate ALL school cafeterias. Bid the food service out to private companies or let everyone pack their lunches. Reduce all mid‐level administrators. Reduce as much waste and repetition of services as possible. Cut ALL athletic spending by 50%. Put a cap on the number of coaches at a campus to a bare minimum (i.e., one coach for every 500 students enrolled). FOCUS on ACADEMICS!!!!!!!

New facilities would result in substantial energy savings.Change the attitude toward the vocational programs to give students pride in learning to be repairmen or stylist. Not everyone needs/wants to go to college.Consult with teachers by departments to see what they need for day to day function in their classrooms.(I personally need more sinks in my room). Times have changed, what we teach has changed, what the job market demands has changed. Some people are going to have to let the nostaligia go and realize that facilities like Old High and Zundy are/were not designed to accomidate the needs of modern education and to update them is cost prohibitive. Perhaps some kind of foundation could be established to use the older facilities as museums or community centers or for adult education.

Any proposed bond issue should be a staged program with a few schools identified for closing/upgrade/or replacement and a site plan showing the voters what will be built. Once approved do it and prove we can trust you before submitting a second etc...staged of bonds.

One thing I am the most interested in seeing is our High Schools coming up to par. I would live to see ONE high school built, allowing maximum benefit to One thing I am the most interested in seeing is our High Schools coming up to par. I would live to see ONE high school built, allowing maximum benefit to each student. I hate seeing kids struggle with a choice between good academics and a good music program. Or academics and football and seeing them actually choose football! ugh! Why are we behind academically? Because we force our children to choose high schools instead of offering them ONE WITH IT ALL! Second, I think as much as people follow high school sports around here, one team, one city would do wonders for camaraderie for our wonderful city! I love Wichita falls, but I swear, we are like gangs around here with high school choice...... not cool! Our city can do without that! Also, updating our schools to be ahead of the curve, with technology will bring more people to our city and produce youth/ young adults Ray to meet challenges of the world ahead of them.

All d d hi h h l lki b f li f f ili li f d i f Old h l d b d dAll responses depend on which school you are talking about as far as quality of facility, quality of education, safety. Older schools need to be updated.

Be honest, clear, and exact when explaining things to the staff, parents, and community.


This items has been removed to maintain confidentiality of personnel information.




I don't think community feedback is as important as feedback from professionals who have solutions to offer through their expertise and experience. If I am sick, I want a health care professional prescribing me a remedy, not some random individual off the street.I believe that kids should target training for technical and hands on. In the education plan.This would provide job markets for the people who would not be attending college. In this day and time. With prices escalating for most families, it is detrimental for job training in many areas. Target hospitals, AT&T, plats in the area,City, counties, maintenance etc.I strongly agree that the WFISD operates too many schools‐high schools included. We need to be able to provide the highest quality education we can for all of our students, including those who would benefit from a vocational‐technical education.We do not need a super high school. That is to many kids at one place and would refuse the amount of participation in extra activities. These activities are important to their education.

We just built gyms at the elementary schools at tax payers expense and now we are talking about closing these schools. Seems like we should have closed We just built gyms at the elementary schools at tax payers expense and now we are talking about closing these schools. Seems like we should have closed schools before we added gyms.Combine two of the high school on a new campus in a new building/facility. Everything is just old and in poor condition. People in this town do not want change. You can still have tradition in a new school. We have gotta get out of the dark ages and make the right long term investments. Attractive new schools will also help out on growth for the town as well. I think the board and administration are doing a good job. I do think there are still ways to cut at downtown. I would not cut any more aides or school personnel if more work (paperwork, lesson planning, meetings, etc.) is going to be put on the teachers. I would not close Hirschi because I think Rider and Old High are already busting out the seams. Unless most of those students are going to chose City View, I think closing Hirschi will cause more problems. I do think the busing for the Choice Program can be cut. Face it, if parents want their children to go to Rider to play football bad enough then they will get th th h O ll I thi k th TRN ht t l ff th b d I thi k th d i th b t th i t th t h th i d tthem there somehow. Overall, I think the TRN ought to lay off the board. I think they are doing the best they can in a town that has no growth, no industry, no management jobs and no incentive for college grads to stick around. The school board cannot fix the city. It cannot build manufacturing plants and it cannot make it rain. As a parent of two WFISD children, I think CSCOPE limits the parents involvement with no books and being worksheet driven.

I think the STAAR testing is a joke but realize this is a

The district spends too much money on athletic facilities and not enough on schools and teacher support

The community is emotionally driven when it comes to the schools. Anything presented needs to be clearly defined and explained and the community needs to fully understand why changes are needed and how those changes will benefit not just the children, but them as individuals but also the impact on the community. The education system is still very much functioning on a law impressed upon them by the federal government. While it needs to be lifted, the community is still very segregated. We have segregated ourselves and put ourselves in this position.

Whether or not it needs to be done, I do not believe this community will support a bond that closes a high school.Sixth grade needs it's own facility.

This may not be the time to include this but I strongly disagree with using CSCOPE to educate my child. After talking with other parents and teachers I would recommend finding an alternate guideline. I know several parents who will pull their children from the school system if you renew this program in June.

Make sure you show people what a quality 21st century classroom looks like. Show them the difference between that and what we have now. Make sure the community sees the correlation between 21st century classrooms and industry choosing Wichita Falls. This isn't only an education issue. Wichita Falls

d li h l b i i b ineeds quality schools to bring in new business.We have to get new facilities.... period. we don't come close to competing with other schools our size.... heck we don't even compete with the smaller schools in the area. It's time to quit worrying about the politics involved and start focusing on what's best for the kids.The fact that the current School Board supports the secret implementation of a horrible education plan/tool called CSCOPE completely undermines any trust the public has in the current board. Furthermore we have NO TRUST in the current administration and education planners in the WFISD. They are doing everything possible to sell CSCOPE at all costs to support the teacher's union at the expense of the students. Bottom line, this again shows that administrators, teachers and the School Board care more about themselves than the students.

I believe strongly that all sixth graders should be returned to the elementary schools, that the Barwise property, which is extremely valuable, should be sold, th t M Ni l h ld b d d d th t C i d H ll h ld b f ld d i t Hi hi hi h ld b t d i t T d S h lthat McNiel should be expanded, and that Carrigan and Harrell should be folded into Hirschi, which would be turned into a Trade School.

I feel that all students should attend their zoned area. The District can zone the area so that a variety of ethnic and socio economic areas are included at all schools. This would help in filling each school and would reduce some transportation.

I would also like to see a school for 9‐10th graders and one for 11‐12th graders. This would cut down on issues involving rivalry. We could all work in the same direction. I also strongly agree that we need a very advanced and wide spectrum tech school. Hirschi would make a great tech school. WFHS could be the 9‐10 and Rider would be the 11‐12.I would support a bond if they closed down Barwise‐as it sits on a highly desired location for building businesses, multi‐million dollar property that would sell quickly and it houses only 2 grades There is no reason not to shut that down at a great profit and increase the building sizes of Mcniel and Kirby Untilsell quickly and it houses only 2 grades. There is no reason not to shut that down at a great profit and increase the building sizes of Mcniel and Kirby. Until I see Barwise sold, I will never support a new bond‐due to the schoold district's bad business sense.


This item has been removed to maintain confidentiality of personnel information.




I feel WFISD is such a large district and has so many students to support, that we need to hold ourselves to a higher standard and give our students better facilities and environments that will enhance their learning, and give teachers more and better opportunities to educate students.

Regarding Q: 13. Personally I dissaprove of the choice program and believe all schools enrollment should be based on attendance zones, including jr highs, and high schools. However, if the district continues to have the choice program in place why doesnt the district follow the rules it has set in place. For example, Rider HS has an enrollment of 1700 students and is apparently over populated. When a school needs what they call a mobile teacher to push around a cart because there is no room for that teacher something is wrong. Why doesnt the district cutoff the enrollment at the set number and then send any student over that number to their 2nd choice? I understand that Rider walks on water and Hirschi gets the bum rap, but why doesnt the district just even all the numbers out, or better yet dump the choice program!!Building one very large High School that could accommodate all students and close the old buildings....would improve costs for electricity (old outdated wiring, etc.).... putting computers on desks that do NOT require moving to clean.Also, I think it is a HUGE issue that we choose to have tile floors that require waxing, costing the District thousands of dollars during the summer to move Also, I think it is a HUGE issue that we choose to have tile floors that require waxing, costing the District thousands of dollars during the summer to move out all technology and furniture ( we lose a lot of cost because things are torn up and lost due to this Technology wise)...cables, etc...and have to be all hooked back up, etc... Waxing costs are tremendous, hiring personnel to do this in a timely manner is a great cost every year. If we could have tile installed that is easily cleaned and does NOT require waxing, it would be a HUGE improvement on cost overall, by reducing this huge expense to hire all the extra cleaning personnel to do all this waxing and movement of furniture every year... it would cut way down on the cost to replace and repair everything that is damaged each year due to this.

Too many schools some should be combined. Two new elementary schools were built and not even full.

Yes, some of the schools are very old, but you know as well as I do. WFISD will not close Wichita Falls High School, nor the Sheppard School (which has low enrollment) I do not want to see Hirchi or Lamar Closed They are both great schools with Great Teachers I would like to see the new supertendent go withenrollment). I do not want to see Hirchi or Lamar Closed. They are both great schools with Great Teachers. I would like to see the new supertendent go with me, and have a SUPRISE visit to each school, and really see what is going on. I would love to go with him!!! He might get his eyes open!!!

Choice program is expensive to bus students. It also makes for over crowding in some schools while others are under used. There needs to be more equal distribution of students. Cut the busing and make students responsible for transportation to 'choice' school but also limit the number of students who can be accepted to non‐neighborhood schools to keep from over crowding the schools.

Old buildings should be examined for repairs and cost effectiveness.

I believe that the WFISD offers a wide range of programs to students International Baccalaureate (IB) Program Cosmetology Welding Auto‐mechanicsI believe that the WFISD offers a wide range of programs to students. International Baccalaureate (IB) Program, Cosmetology, Welding, Auto‐mechanics, Nursing etc but they are in limited numbers. We should offer students these choices but make them available to more students. Also add Technical options like: Computer programming, A+ certification, computer repair, networking, and other trades that will get them a well paying job once they graduate. We should have a path for all students who enter the WFISD. If they are not college bound they should be placed in a Workforce Ready plan, one that will get them qualified to enter the workforce upon graduation. I believe that we should go back to neighborhood schooling and no more bussing students out of the district. Schools are overcrowded with kids wanting to go to one school more than the school that is in their district. A ninth grade center and a sixth grade center would be beneficial. It is imperative to develop a career and technology curriculum‐looking at career opportunities in WF area.

f ll h d i i i b h d i i i i d d h b hi f h d d i i lHopefully the Board can gain community input, be honest and transparent in its communication, and do the best thing for the students, despite emotional ties to schools, traditions, etc. Best of luck to the WFISD!

I do not want my daughter's educational experience lacking because corners were cut. Educators can not be expected to meet the minimum standards set by both the state and relegated by the TAKS and STARS testing modules if campuses are closed and class ratios are higher. Since the CHOICES Program has been a hot button issue as well, here are my two cents, I have heard the argument that this allows for high school to be a popularity contest, picking schools based on 'better' athletic programs, etc. I feel that the program works well. We have become so politically correct that we are not preparing our children for the harsh realities of the world. Not everyone will like everyone else, not everyone makes the team.

I would like the elementary (already doing this) and Jr. High students to continue/be able to attend school where their parent(s) teach due to transportation I would like the elementary (already doing this) and Jr. High students to continue/be able to attend school where their parent(s) teach due to transportation issues.

If we continue choice I think the parents should be required to get their students to the school that their child/children attend.





Often times we see 13 year olds in the same school as 4 year olds, this is not a good thing. The spread in ages should be more equitable among elementary and secondary buildings.

Mcniel has a ridiculous amount of students compared to some of the other middle schools. Make sure that the amount of students stays fairly equal among campuses so that you can spread an even work load to your teachers. Why should one set of coaches deal with 40 students, when another set of coaches has to deal with 100?

The future of SAFB is always tied to the future of the elementary school there. Why not just take that issue away by moving thos students to Haynes?

Teachers need to be rallied to vote if a bond issue goes up.

Hirschi HS has the least amount of high school students and is the smallest, but we are often pressed for space in core academic areas. This might have to do with numbers of teachers hired as well as size and number of rooms. The cosmetic state of the rooms and hallways is very poor. Students have no place to keep their belongings because there are not enough lockers for everyone to have so, so students must 'rent' one if they want.

In the English hall, most classrooms are filled with 25‐30 students, so students are closely seated in 40 year old desks. We had to let go some elective courses to spread these out.

There is not much technology space that is kept up to date and accessible for classes across the school.

6th grade at one campus

Better buildings and more tech stuff for high school schools.

I strongly disagree with choice programs. That being said, I don't feel like the old way is the answer either. I have considered moving before my children reach high school. I would love to see a 5th and 6th grade campus along with a 9th and 10th grade campus seperate from 11 and 12.

Over all the WFISD schools should have, and need to have more security during school hours. Especially in the elementary school.

Wichita Falls has always been driven by citizen opinion and influential citizen influence. If that is allowed to drive this change, there will be no real change. And our children and our pocketbooks can't really afford that.p yThe Community needs to feel that its tax dollars are being well spent and will benefit a broad segment of students. (For example I would not support money just spent on athletic facilities development... in general I feel that athletics are given too much weight in upper grades. )

I believe that you need to have one super high school and get away from the division that the high schools make now ‐ if you were to build one, it could be state of the art, offer better technology, a better facility, better security, more classes, etc. Look at the schools in the Dallas area ‐ or the surrounding towns for ideas. We are stuck in the past ‐ what school is better that the other ‐ and that mentality is not healthy for the education for the kids today.I also think that some of the Elementary classrooms are packed to overflowing while other schools are not. This is not a healthy learning environment for our children or our teachers.

I have been in Wichita Falls since 1994 and have watched bandaid after bandaid put on our public schools The city of Wichita Falls spends alot of timeI have been in Wichita Falls since 1994 and have watched bandaid after bandaid put on our public schools. The city of Wichita Falls spends alot of time recruiting new citizens and business, however, particularly the high schools are run down and I see no need for 3. Also I feel our school of choice issue is a mistake, politics and bonfires only teach our children how to start a popularity contest, which we try to discourage with our daughter. However because of old oilfield money and Alumni that refuse change I wish you luck in your endeavors.

I have heard some chatter over the years about combining high schools into one large 5A high school. I don't know if this is even a serious possibility but I strongly disagree w/it. I hail from a very small town w/just under 200 students in my entire high school. This small school scenario allowed students to participate in the arts (theater, etc.) and athletics who would may not have had the level of talent to do so in a larger school. No matter the size of the school, there can only be 5 players on the basketball court, only so many in the latest musical, etc. Each of our 3 high schools has a role in this community, although we could have another conversation about the negative impact of 'choice' in our community... Creating one huge school would severely limit thealthough we could have another conversation about the negative impact of choice in our community... Creating one huge school would severely limit the creative, artistic, & athletic participation for the students of Wichita Falls to only the most talented. These pursuits are sometimes the only thing keeping a student in school; limiting them, I believe, would affect behavior and retention.

Since a lot of money went into updating Hirschi High School, I think they should have more students enrolled. Those facilities are not being fully utilized. Also, Rider is the most popular choice with the largest student population, but it is the facility with the smallest amount of space for students.

I believe WFISD should continue to allow 6th grade to be at junior high. Going to junior high at the age of 11 and 12 years old, helps in the transition before hormones and junior high hits all in one big blow. Classrooms across the district are dated, in need of extensive repair, and cramped. Technology is a joke. I am embarrassed that WFISD has less technology Classrooms across the district are dated, in need of extensive repair, and cramped. Technology is a joke. I am embarrassed that WFISD has less technology than MANY towns MUCH smaller than Wichita Falls. I am basing this information on what I learn from my family members who are employed by other districts. Their classrooms are full of laptops, tablets, iPads, and iPods. There is not a single iPad, tablet, laptop or iPod in my classroom. There are 2 student computers. And 1 teacher computer.





As a local architect having contracted with WFISD in the past to do preliminary surveys of every facility, and with children currently attending school here, I have a unique perspective on the dilemma facing the District. Most WFISD facilities are well beyond their useful life and have current enrollment that far exceeds what these facilities were originally designed for. Building additions over the years have only compounded the problem and have done nothing toexceeds what these facilities were originally designed for. Building additions over the years have only compounded the problem and have done nothing to correct/address poor parking and circulation around the site or substantially improve learning environments. It is both sad and embarrassing that we still choose to educate our children in buildings approaching 90 years old. I am ashamed of the apathy our community exhibits on this issue and am frustrated at the stubborn refusal of some to recognize the need for new schools for fear of abandoning 'Tradition'. I fully support a complete overhaul of our school system, it's facilities, and more importantly, our attitude as a community.

GET RID OF THE CHOICE PLAN!!!

In the interest of preserving a financially sound school district, practicality must replace desire and tradition. WFISD needs to combine schools at the elementary and high school level. Wichita Falls is not growing in population and the cost of operating schools is going to increase. WFISD should not keep a school open if it is not at least somewhat in line with the district average cost per student at its peer schools Public education is not designed to make aschool open if it is not at least somewhat in line with the district average cost‐per‐student at its peer schools. Public education is not designed to make a profit, but it should be as cost efficient as possible.I think the WFISD has too many elementary schools operating in the school system. Certain schools are too old to be updated and would be better to be closed and the students sent to other schools. Also, the high school system needs to be revisited. Too many students at Rider, not enough at Hirschi. It would be better served to just have Rider and Old High then shut down Carrigan and make Hirschi the career center since they already have the auto and CNA programs. The facilities in WFISD are extremely inadequate to the other schools in our district. Particularly in athletics. We will not be taken seriously in our district if our facilities do not improve. It is a disservice to our kids to not give them the same facilities that some of the other schools get in DFW and in other areas around Texas.

The district should take some steps away from the testing‐driven funding as it is increasingly controlled by Austin and D.C.. Like the entire U.S. should make moves to become less dependent on foreign fossil fuels, the WFISD should take some steps to truly be an 'independent' school district. This will enable all local stakeholders more precise decision making abilities which is certain to have a direct effect on quality education as our community sees it.

I think it is imperative that we have a plan of action for the facilities in WFISD. In the past, people have not wanted to make the tough decisions. Therefore, we are now at a point where we are operating way too many schools that are halfway full. Then...you have several schools on the southwest part of town that can't fit another student! The demographic shift in our community has made it very difficult to continue operating that way without closing or consolidating some schools. The financial toll that it is taking on our district is unbelievable. It does not seem like a massive problem until you look at the domino effect that it has on our community When a school district has no 'extra' money they are not able to pay their staff which causes good teachers todomino effect that it has on our community. When a school district has no extra money they are not able to pay their staff which causes good teachers to look elsewhere. We are also not able to equip our schools with the technology needed to keep up with other districts. It hurts our entire community. We have some excellent teachers and excellent administrators in our district but we have to give them what they need to do their job! This is something that needs to be done now!

Get rid of all school athletics programs and put all of the money spent on them to educating students. You need to improve the quality of teachers, the quality of technology, get rid of the STAAR and CSCOPE and put learning ahead of state mandates that do nothing to facilitate learning (bubbling in forms is not the same as learning). Texas and the country as a whole are FAILING when it comes to educating students. We need to change that to stay competitive.

With the state of the economy being what it is, and there are no signs of it significately improving in the next few years, I think it would be best to try to h l h h h f h l b dimprove on what we currently have without the use of increasing taxes or using a school bond.

REMOVE CHOICE PROGRAM!

Quit dumping money into high schools that don't need it at the moment (rider) and invest in schools that need fiscal assistance (WFHS)

Combine Sheppard and part of Burgess with Kate Haynes(has room to expand), close carrigan while greatly enlarging the CATE offerings and bring them to Hirschi along with its current academics(students would receive their academic and CATE training at Hirschi). As Hirschi has a vast amount of area to expand this should be a 'no brainer'. Raze WFHS sell the land and rebuild to the west.

All of this has come to play before and the district has still maintained TO much spending in some areas. You can only continue to ask the community for more money if the current funds are appropriately spent. We had a bond before, but just tacked on the gyms. You can only continue to TACK on so much tomore money if the current funds are appropriately spent. We had a bond before, but just tacked on the gyms. You can only continue to TACK on so much to buildings. This is the third committee being paid. The results are going to be very similar to the first times this has been reviewed.

I believe that the physical conditions of schools need to be looked at closely when considering closing. Haynes is in great physical condition compared to the much older, dilapidated school in our district, for example, and should not even be considered to be on the closure list, regardless of enrollment.

Times are tight, you have to show that it will pay off in the long run and added benifits.

More technology in the classrooms...computers, ipods, ipads





Unfortunately, education is not valued in this community. This has been the case for many years. We are seeing the effects of this in our local economy. These beliefs are also present in the school board and most of the employees in the Ed center. Teachers are not valued. Just a few years ago, teachers would come from smaller towns to join WFISD. Now, we are seeing teachers leave WFISD for the smaller towns. This is the result of the freeze in teacherwould come from smaller towns to join WFISD. Now, we are seeing teachers leave WFISD for the smaller towns. This is the result of the freeze in teacher raises, increased class sizes, increased insurance cost for teachers, and overall lack of support for teachers. I have not met one teacher that got into the profession to get rich. Most teachers get into the profession because it is what they enjoy doing. The WFISD has put the teachers in a position where they must chose between doing what they love and providing for their family. It is very unfortunate and we are losing great teachers.

In regard to #19, the best developed data‐driven master plan is only as good as it is communicated to the community. Regarding student populations at various schools, it is poorly balanced and driven by the desire to attend a school with a successful sports program. Consolidation of some campuses may be something to consider.I feel our facilities are sorely out of date. We do not have technology that many other schools in Texas have no matter the size of the districts. Many of us have to use precious funding to order paper or general school supplies and have not money for better technology. We need to have workshops to help us have to use precious funding to order paper or general school supplies and have not money for better technology. We need to have workshops to help us learn how to use the technology we do get. Our schools are in poor shape as far as heating and cooling the facilities. The windows leak air, the walls are not insulated properly, and we have doors that are not properly caulked and weather stripped. The community has no clue what it is like to work in or learn in this type of environment. The classrooms are too crowded for what we need to teach. When we have so many kids in a room, and teachers are begging for new desks, or desks that aren't completely falling apart, or we have to have kids who have special physical needs sit in a counselor's office or principal's office due to not being able to have access to the classroom they are assigned, it is time to do something about our facilities!!!!

Every elementary school should have busses available OR provide after school care.

I feel that safety should be more of a priority in all of the schools The new check in program is a slight improvement but I feel like more needs to be doneI feel that safety should be more of a priority in all of the schools. The new check in program is a slight improvement but I feel like more needs to be done.

If you are going to improve the facilities, improve the facilities for the primary mission of the school district ‐ education. Not athletics, not vocational tech, unless you are planning to make a dedicated vocational school. My experience over the years is that it will be exceedingly difficult to get a levy passed because it will not be supported by people who no longer have children in the schools. You must remind them that those in school now will be those taking care of them and building their retirement communities. You must emphasize the importance of education and an educated public in a caring, progressive society. To do that, you must yourselves believe it. That means you must quit pumping all available funds into sports. The last money crisis teachers and arts were cut but we got a brand new grass field at the stadium. Where does that say your priorities are? Why are we supporting kindergarten cheerleaders when it took 6 months to get the AR reading program back up and running? Where does that say your priorities are? I am willing to support a tax increase IF it goes to actual education efforts. If it ends up that the funds go to athletics I will not support another ever. Fix the roofs, the HVAC, update the kitchensit goes to actual education efforts. If it ends up that the funds go to athletics I will not support another ever. Fix the roofs, the HVAC, update the kitchens and get the computers into the 21st century. Only then worry about the playgrounds, and worry about the sports stuff last. If they need legitimate help, I can understand the board wants to be behind closed door when making decisions based on the information gathered and input gathered. BUT, the this agency and the board MUST publicize the need of the people input of what they want. Remember, the board's duty is to speak FOR THE PEOPLE. They need to gather the input of the people before going behind those closed doors.My kids go to Houston elementary and I know its an old building but I am worried if it shuts down then my kids could be in trouble. They walk to school and I am guessing 1 out of 3 kids at that school do. We only have 1 car and most kids have the same problem at that school even some don't have cars to drive there kids to school. It worries me. Thank you.

h d hi h h l l h l i d ll bi f h h l bli d ' iShort term: Reduce 3 high schools to 2 large 4A schools. Carrigan and Harrell combine campuses for a vo‐tech school enabling students to get GED's in 2 yrs/vocational training skills. By 16, they could be done with schooling instead of dropping out with no skills, a rap sheet, and children. Close 4 smallest attended elementary schools. Move all 6th grade to jr highs‐‐middle school concept. *Get rid of CHOICE* and redraw attendence zones for secondary.

Long term: By 2020, depending on school population trends, build one new high school, one new middle school, and one new elementary school by population density studies. Attendence zones stay in place. Closures or restructuring of current buildings determined by attendance under new zones.

Unfortunately I did not attend recent mtg held at Washington Jackson Elem School. I feel our school district has down sized many positions and programs in our district. I also feel that has affected our student body as well as our hard I feel our school district has down sized many positions and programs in our district. I also feel that has affected our student body as well as our hard working teachers who dedicate many hours with our student body. I have attended three different high schools and feel if did things the way it use to be according to attending high school which pertained to your district would save cost of transporting children across town. If parents want children at a specific school then it is our obligation of getting them there.....I wish our board could visit our different schools and spend some real time seeing how each school/junior high school and high school handles situations. When I think of school closings I automatically believe Hirschi High is standing high on one end of boat for closing‐ because of location however on another side WFISD owns land /good location for busing and parking and I must say they are probably the best behaved students over the other high schools. Hirschi doesn't have the administrative turn over rate like the other high schools because they get the job done. Facility is dedicated and the kids know that.........I strongly agree that if we consider a closing of high school that would be the oldest bldg in W.F. Board look at the numbers ‐visit the schools at all hours of the day......look how crowded some of the classes are.......





Support, stand behind and listen to the teachers. They are the ones in the trenches. Talking about a war and being in one are two different things. The teaching profession is looking less and less appealing to college students. Increase the number of students that can be in Denver or get a bigger campus and more staff. Create another place like Denver. Get an officer on the campuses that need it. (in uniform and armed!) ISS should be available to all campuses every day! Get rid of the STAAR and let's just have school. As an experienced teacher with the district, I have seen the deteriotation of this district by the lack of community support for maintaining the schools and letting emotions and school loyality control decisions about the school closings. The moral of the teachers that I come in contact with is at an all time due to factors like lack of student respect based upon no enforcement of student rules, more work load due to factors such as testing and more classes and larger class sizes and lack of adequate compensation for the extra work load demanded of all teachers.

WFISD needs to improve their vocational education programs increase courses and opportunitiesWe have too many facilities and could combine them for instance‐9‐10 HS11‐12 HS then a vocational Tech High School that has academics so students wouldn't have to travel unless involved in sports etc at another campus.

Community input only means the rich influential disembodied around here get what they want. And the nobodies are ignored. (The poor, Hispanics, African American). Community as a whole can't afford much more tax increase year after year in every direction.I do not want to see one HUGE high school in Wichita Falls. I understand these are tough times and tough decisions need to be made. I support the teachers and I believe they deserve a raise. (Most do anyway...). I support smaller class sizes and better facilites. Good luck B ild hi h h l d th th t hi h h l b ildi f iddl h l U t iddl h l l t h l d lBuild a new high school and use the three current high school buildings for middle schools. Use current middle schools as elementary schools and close oldest existing elementaries.

I can only answer these questions for the school my child attends. I do not know the condition of other schools in the area.

WF needs another elementary school in the southern part of town to relieve enrollment at Milam elementary.

Sheppard has a very small enrollment and only a fair building. Those students could easily go to Haynes, but Haynes students couldn't go to Sheppard. Closing either will probably cause loss of students to John Tower in Burkburnett.

HIrschi has low enrollment The HS could be housed on one floor with a combination of Denver or Harrell or something else now in a stand alone facilityHIrschi has low enrollment. The HS could be housed on one floor with a combination of Denver, or Harrell or something else now in a stand alone facility housed on the other floor.

A new school building for Alamo and Sam Houston students should be a priority.Enough with pouring money into sports programs, facilities, etc. We've gotten to the point that our academics are suffering but, WOW, we have an awesome scoreboard and turf! Do what you what you have to do to get smaller class sizes and support low‐income parents in developing parenting skills. Hirschi has the real estate that it could be enlarged and modernized. Close WFHS. The neighborhood is deteriorating at a fast pace and there isn't room to grow. Country club families are just going to have to wake up and do what's best for everyone!

EC‐4 classrooms should have sufficient space for desks AND carpet time. This is essential for effective instruction.

Lamar needs to be closed with those students going to Washington Jackson.Sixth graders need to attend Jr. High they do not fit into the elementary structure.Close Carrigan, Denver and Harrell and move all those facilities to Hirschi. if not close Hirschi. There are too many small secondary campuses that need to be consolidated into one loction Hirschi is the logical site.In my opinion a bond will be very hard to pas. Having lived here all my life the public is very leery of WFISD and how they spend the tax payers money. Spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on new turf for the football field and a new score board for the stadium are just two examples. I would reconsider the 'private school board meetings' to discuss school closings that have been discussed in the media because this only adds to the public's and WFISD staff skepticism. We all have a right to know what the school board and WFISD administration is thinking with regards to school closings and staff 'terminations'with regards to school closings and staff 'terminations'.

There is NOTHING that aggravates me more than watching money being poured into sports and parking lots while my child's elementary school is lacking on almost every area. The teachers and staff are there with heart and drive to teach my children while they are being let down by YOU. They aren't provided the SPACE, RESOURCES, or TECHNOLOGY! I see the safety improvements, but let's get into the classrooms!!! I will gladly pay more taxes if I knew it was going to improve LEARNING! This school board has lost focus on the sole reason we send our kids to school. Our school is lacking in almost every area because we aren't a Title 1 school. We are dropping from being the most desirable school zone to the lowest because our teachers don't have access to what every other school is given. Yes, improve the building, technology, and get rid of CSCOPE!

Pickup/ drop off are very dangerous for the children at Southern Hills. It is a 2 way street with high traffic at early release days. People leave their vehicles in front of the school and both lanes are blocked off because of this. The high volume of traffic is dangerous for the children. I can't believe that one has not been hit by a vehicle. Good Friday was the worst I have ever seen. A staff member needs to step up and tell people not to exit vehicle or park in a parking space that allows others courtesy and safety.


Item removed to maintain confidentiality of security information.




The facilities are not appropriate for the classes I teach. Classes are frequently held in halls, classrooms which are to small for the number of children and we are displaced because of other teaching needs (such as tutoring, pta programs in cafeteria and facility meetings with parents), My class at McNiel is held in the cafeteria while food is being served (this is a problem with the noise).

I am aware of quite a few things that are totally unbelivable. Some of the pricipals of the elementarys are a complete joke and have no reason being in the postion other than senority. my sister was a teacher in another district in Texas and she can not beleive the things that go on in the schools here. Telling them that they can not send any more blacks to denver because its full of blacks and reached its level of them and then telling them its there problem and to handle it with no assitance from the Prinicipal or Assistant. the schools are a cesspool of lazy teachers and office personel and until you deal with that No one will support your bond. Why is it that the small school districts like bowie and others can build school buildings for a fraction of what you can? Its because they don't have your friends and family getting payed to be consultants and big contracts that are rigged to pay them. What Wfisd needs is a Board that cares about its schools and not about 'look at me im the shot caller of the district' attitude. If the board members really cared about the schools they would all resign and let someone else on the board that really cares.

There are too many elementary schools open that are not at capacity. You should consider closing a few of them. The Jr. High and Highs schools should not be a choice, because too many students are allowed to attend McNiel and Rider. There are way too many student enrolled at Rider and not enough at Hirschi, while Hirschi has a better campus layout. By allowing choice schools you are giving the message that Rider is the best school to attend and the other two just are not good enough. Don't give choice on High schools and redraw the district lines to even these three campuses out.

The school board needs to 'suck it up' & build 2 new high schools; 1 to house freshmen & soph and 1 to house jrs & Srs. Close WFHS; turn Rider to a Jr High & combine McNiel & Barwise & Zundy. Turn Hirschi into a vocation school. The good ole' boys need to think of the children of the future ‐ not live their lives thru their kids.M d ti ld b t l B i d bi th t d t b di f B i d Ki b i t Ki b Th ll th i l t t hMy recommendation would be to close Barwise, and combine the student bodies of Barwise and Kirby into Kirby. Then sell the prime real estate where Barwise is located to address other needs in the district.

I have heard many parents complain about the conditions of our schools: they are very bland and almost depressing. The buildings do not need major overhalls but color and updating. There is a huge amount of research that shows institiutional white is one of the worst colors for learning environments.

Consolidate some schools and close Hirschi. Raise teacher salaries‐‐no one wants to work here. Develop lines and get rid of choice system. All of these save money.these are loaded questions: some schools good, some are poorly maintained. Some classrooms are excellent and some have poor teaching going on. W/ all money spent on this Mgt. Co. You should have provided a better survey.y p g p yOne high school with two campusses (junior ‐ senior building would be brand new). Put Barwise and Mcneil at Rider's current building and Zundy and Kirby at Hirschi's current building. Old High could be the freshman ‐ sophmore building. That would close 4 junior high buildings and at least Barwise could be sold at a good profit to help in building the new high school. I believe the current 6th grade programs are fine and should be left alone as is. Then, as far as the elementary schools go, close and combine to have them be 500 ‐ 700 students. The talk I hear is that people are not going to pass a bond issue if there is a tax increase, so this may all be for nothing. The changes (any) will be hard if we get no support.

Rider High School is not equipped for handicapped students and teachers to have access to all classrooms.

The school system not only needs improvement in the areas addressed in the survey, it also needs to be more competitive in the job market. It seems that some of our good staff members eventually leave for better opportunties including pay. B li i d i f hi h h l i h i h f ll V i l h d d ll h i l biBottom line is we need a maximum of two high schools with either a separate full Vocational campus the students can attend all their classes at, or combine the vocational campus with another but still have a max of two high schools if going that route. Additionally, take advantage of all cost savings devices possible to make for more energy savings (better insulation, more efficient hvac, possible timers on water fountains and water heaters, drop ceilings, other green energy efforts). Our schools seem very energy wasteful, I think many mainly due to thier age. Money is hard to come by for so many.....Maybe we could work some of the parents so they could see and help with what WFISD wants to improve on in helping their kids have a better education. Just putting it out there !The answers of no opinion would be changed depending of the final outcome of the plans. Let's get the basics that are needed and then build from there. The passage of the bond will depend on how much is asked for and how the communityis involved. So often the perks are not shared equally among the schools. Schools in the upper income seem to get the high end of the deal and others get is involved. So often the perks are not shared equally among the schools. Schools in the upper income seem to get the high end of the deal and others get the left overs.Ask the teachers what is needed, I think two high school are appropriate and make one a junior high. We need a Tech center. We are not offereing a Culinary, and we are a food based community.End Choice Program.End Choice bus program.We need to keep schools in their community. Draw lines to equal out enrollment. We need a STRONG CTE program. Students need to leave with a skill to make a living if they don't want to go to collegeThe three high school i see as biggest problem. Numbers are not even across the district. i would love to see a ninth grade campus and one super school with new upated technology centerwith new upated technology center.

Please spend our tax dollars wisely!





Better facilities good, Better Disciplinary Management GREAT.Better the over school district, better the community, The community will support a tax increase if the schools where : safe, secure and healthy.All of the high schools are uneven in numbers. The choice program served its purpose, now it is time to move forward. By allowing the number of students to continue overfilling Rider's classes, it is unfair to the students who might live in an area around the school. Also by allowing students with behavior and attendance problems to transfer, puts a burden on the largest high school, teachers, and students. Hirschi is a great school with ample room, it just does not make sense to overfill one school when there is room at another. I do not have the numbers at every school in order to determine if every school is necessary or attendance equally or better distributed. I feel, based on the information and experience I do have, that we shouldn't have as many buildings open as we do as a district. I am not a lifetimer from here so I do not have an emotional connection to the buildings either.

I am glad this is being looked at because I feel money is being wasted.

The community needs to see very clearly that improving facilities does not necessarily mean spending more money. The voting community needs a vivid picture depicting that improvements may actually save money over the long run Information should be presented this way with stats graphs etc Futurepicture depicting that improvements may actually save money over the long run. Information should be presented this way with stats, graphs, etc. Future generations needs to be prepared. Our children will not be prepared if they are still being educated in the same facilities their great, great grandparents were. Think very carefully about how this will be marketed to the public and the bond will pass!What about having a 9th grade facility rather than having such huge numbers in high school? It might help with the transition from jr. high into high school while allowing those kids a chance to grow and be ready for the jump into high school.

I feel that staff at at least Jr. high and elementary should be allowed to have their children attend the school with them if they work at a school.

7th, 8th and 9th grades should be together.

Either move 6th to Jr. High or close a Jr. High. If moved 6th to Jr. High close 2 to 3 Elementary schools.

Move Carrigan and Harrell to Hirschi. Make Hirschi a non traditional high school, no sports or extra curricular activities, just tech stuff getting a degree and valuable certificates like CNA, welding, cosmotology, mechanics, etc.

We need to develop the IB Program and expand its teaching strategies to other schools not just Hirschi and Kirby. It is world renown. I am not opposed to Hirschi but feel it is superior to our own quality school because of its opportunity and the level of learning they get to engage in. We would like the same professional opportunities to grow a global learning community as Hirschi. IB students get credits that AP does not and those same students take advantage of AP testing. It is not fair that IB students get a better education and opportunities for scholarship than we do in AP.

I believe that the WFISD does good things but are limited. I believe that the WFISD does good things but are limited.

The survey is too general, it is hard to say that all campuses are one thing or another. Some of the elementary schools are full to capacity, while others are just normal. I am sure it is the same way at the upper levels. It is also hard to say that all of the schools have enough space, good parking lots, etc. when I am only at one campus. There should NOT be some schools that are 6,7, and 8th grade schools while others are solely 7 and 8th. It needs to be ALL are 6,7, and 8th grade campuses or NONE of the campus include 6th grade....only 7th and 8th.Computer technology is inadequate. The training for new programs is almost non‐existant. That makes using it difficult. Also, programs recommended do not work consistantly. It is hard to use programs for classes if you have to spend an hour each time you use it, reworking the student features. We spend money on software without the hardware to support it. We spend money on software without providing training to users. We spend money on gadgets d h i land store them in closets.

Have 1maybe 2 high schools. Make Hirschi a world class Vocational/Special ed faciltiy.

See above.

I appreciate and value the idea of citizen input, but any bond idea that follows the proposal of the last two failures will also be a failure.

It is also time to show the community how much utility money the district would save by turning ALL cold a/c units OFF from Oct. 1 to the end of April. Yes, it will be a little warm ‐ ‐ but we all survived 'back in the day' and the units are still there for use in Sept. and May. Average citizens just have no idea how much of our budget goes for air, and much of the school day happens in the morning (coolest part of the day) anyway. Money talks and people listen. Tiemuch of our budget goes for air, and much of the school day happens in the morning (coolest part of the day) anyway. Money talks and people listen. Tie those savings in to the need for a new parking lot at Memorial Stadium to host area playoff football games, and it will get approval easily.

Make long‐term investments. Plan for what we don't know we will need in ten years. Have space that isn't needed right now ‐ it will be needed later. Besides, couldn't we rent space?WFISD needs a true Career and Technology Center that is modern and cutting edge. Need more programs.

Schools need to remain in the communities to encourage a community atmosphere and keep Wichita Falls economy strong.

Someone needs to draw lines to level out attendance. Someone needs to draw lines to level out attendance.





I do not have any children in the WFISD. I do feel however, that our campuses could be more secure. It is too easy for someone to walk onto school grounds and into the school itself. I feel we need to step up our security measures and as sad as it is make sure there is no possible way anyone could come into our schools armed. Our kids are worth it. Let's not wait until the unthinkable happens here in Wichita Falls to put this as a priority!schools armed. Our kids are worth it. Let s not wait until the unthinkable happens here in Wichita Falls to put this as a priority!

Some of my chocies above were based on working for the district and seeing how campuses, I believe, are NOTappropriate sizes [staffing of personnel] to handle the enrollment or programs available to students at the various campuses, especailly the elementary level, then JHS and up to HS. Seems like some that need more, have less...and those that need less, have more. I did not respond to the bond issues, because I don't what other options are available. Citizens will do what they have to do/told to do. Mainthing, must not lose sight of who all of this for...the KIDS that need educating now to live and be productive later. I feel we need to build more school AROUND the city and remodel/repair WELL those that we have. Then put staff, programs and other resources needed for our kids.

Focus on safety, and the bond would pass. The community wants the schools to be safe and keep out those that could be a danger to the kids.

Your Teachers need a raise in salary Four years without a raise is a disgrace Teachers are leaving this system Great buildings without great teachers willYour Teachers need a raise in salary. Four years without a raise is a disgrace. Teachers are leaving this system. Great buildings without great teachers will not work.The population is obviously moving westward. Enrollment growth should also be taken into consideration. The schools on the west side are full with no room to expand.Classroom sizes vary in elementary schools. Many classrooms have more than 22 students but some other campuses have much smaller classes. The schools with the higher enrollment should be able to hire more teachers to reduce class size. They should not take an average across the district because it does not adequately represent the true student teacher ratio in all schools.

I am a teacher at a very low income school. I think a lot of money is wasted on programs and materials and tutors. We need stronger adminstration, smaller class sizes and aides for each grade level We need to let K‐2 focus on the basics and stop pulling kids out of the class for tutoring They wouldn'tsmaller class sizes and aides for each grade level. We need to let K‐2 focus on the basics and stop pulling kids out of the class for tutoring. They wouldn't need so much tutoring if they weren't pulled out of class so much. We need experienced administrators, more discipline support and teacher support, not another program! If we spend our money on helping the schools (ask the teachers what they need!) the teachers will be more supportive and the community will be also. Our school needs a GOOD counselor, our P.E. teachers are overcrowded with 3 classes at a time, our kindergarten has 24 students and no aide, we don't get music because they pulled her for tutoing. They also pulled the librarian. Now we can't go to the computer lab because of some program the upper grades need to use. Our kids get no recess except for a few minutes after lunch. Paper is rationed. Our district needs to make a list of NEEDS and WANTS and put the money where the needs are and cut the wants.

When are parents going to be held accountable for their kids education and responsible for school supplies as well as parenting in general? We shouldn't be passing kids that are not ready for the next grade level Giving kids more math and reading help on top of their regular classes (like RTI which is not forpassing kids that are not ready for the next grade level, Giving kids more math and reading help on top of their regular classes (like RTI which is not for current grade level needs), intervention is used to help kids with their current grade level needs. It doesn't go back and build those missing foundations. It isn't for the kids that are 2‐3 grade levels below the current grade level!! We need to be teaching critical thinking skills early on and expecting the younger grades to kick it up a knotch. All kids can learn, but not all at the same level required and to expect a child who doesn't qualify for special ed because their IQ is too low to be up with the rest of the class is not being realistic. We should have some program designed for them because many of these kids have trouble retaining and retrieving information from day to the next. Expecting teachers to provide more IEPs, mods and accommodations is putting to much on the teachers who are already dealing with an overloaded plate of duties. Smaller student/teacher ratio would be beneficial to kids especially when a teacher has other kids with disabilities in the classroom. We need a successful school wide reading and math program to help these kids be better prepared Our career facility is very out dated and needs to be brought up to today's standards. We need a new Career center. WFISD needs to prepare students for ll d h k f l ld h l d f h k f ll d ll d h l hcollege and the work force. A larger Career Center would help prepare students for the work force. Not all students go to College, we need to help these

students be productive members of society by preparing them for the work force.

dioougfai;jg;lsdfjpg]osdgkpebtkl';wr;ogki;/xse4 rgbzdf/njlkj;aetfugj'eardkgjarklgna'ewiofj;lmwmegnbaeriugtjwemtl'l

We just built new schools on a bond. Dr. Forssard is doing good Trim some more fat at the top ,show us its a two way street.Expand and/or renovate the two high school campuses that are not land locked (Rider, Hurshy) and close down the Old High Campus. Possible build a new High School with state of the art classroomsI would personally like to see improvements in the concurrent enrollment program for high school students. Students should be allowed to attend college courses (at a local university) and receive high school credit for doing so The IB program is great but it can be improved by allowing more college credits forcourses (at a local university) and receive high school credit for doing so. The IB program is great, but it can be improved by allowing more college credits for these kids. Some students may be interested in taking summer college courses and they should receive high school credit for that work. Not all students interested in medicine want to be a nurse. Let the more intelligent children excel without patronizing them with trivial nonsense. They need to work towards their life goals instead of wasting time on low‐level nursing. Don't get me wrong, that vocational program is wonderful for some students (especially those who will use it as their career choice) but it's not a cookie cutter for all who are interested in medicine. I would rather my child take courses at the university that would ultimately be applied towards a degree than take courses in a vocational program at the school that would cumulate in a certificate. If the university classes counted for credit in high school, that would benefit the child much more greatly as they would be closer to finishing their bachelor degree when they complete high school. More hadicap spaces relative to the number of parents picking up/dropping off handicapped children in appropriate areas. EX there are only 2 at S hills and 2 at Jefferson which are usually occupied the entire pick up time by elderly grandparents picking up grandchildren. This would help traffic move much more efficently. thank you






Maybe an action team of influential community members can be formed to champion this cause. If you get enough people to influence those around them, you just might have a shot and getting enough people to vote for funding a facilities improvement initiative. I will likely vote for it, (once I see the plan that is). And if I was armed with facts and was contacted directly, I would do my part to spread the word to obtain community buy‐in.is). And if I was armed with facts and was contacted directly, I would do my part to spread the word to obtain community buy‐in.

My water bill has been raised 3 times in the past years , property and school taxes were also raised since then I have had one $0.25 raise not to mention the cost of gas . I would rather home school my children, I can not afford another tax hike . What happened to the TEXAS lottery that was supposed to fund education?The facilities is the biggest problem with this community moving forward. The schools in the metroplex are really nice almost overboard. In Wichita Falls we have buildings that are 50 to 100 years old. They all need to be blown up and start all over again. High Schools we should have 2 buildings middle schools 3 ucurrentrreTa There are some Science classrooms that desperately need to be redone in some of the high schools. Improper set‐up can put huge limits on what can be done with students.done with students.Less schools = Less operations costs saving me (taxpayer) money. If the WFISD closed some schools they could reinvest that money that is going to pay for the dilapidated schools that are beyond repair.

I believe the students would survive having one high school and the parents would just have to get used to it!

Change the choice program back to what it's original intent was for the high schools. Students should get a choice, but in order to lessen the over crowding of some of the high schools, students may have no choice but to accept the second choice of high school in order to better accomodate all students, utilize facilities to their potential, but not overcrowd them.Move vocational programs from Carrigan to Hirschi, get out from under the facility cost expenditure at Carrigan's current site, have students that wish to be part of Carrigan attend Hirschi, thus increasing attendance at Hirschi, relieving the pressure on WFHS and Rider. Keep all staff and reinvest savings in expanding vocational education. Additionally, students would not have to commute back and forth during the day and this would alleviate the normal snafus associated with testing schedules, tardiness, etc. My sincere desire is that no action is taken to close any schools in what is considered a minority majority community. I have a fear that these simple questions in this survey may be misconstrued in a way to say we 'voted' to close those schools. There are structure improvements needed in some schools due to age but there are other avenues that can be explored besides closing schools that you feel aren't worth saving due to where they're located. Don't feed into the prevalent racist attitude in the city of Wichita Falls!

I agree that 6th grade should be in jr high ONLY if the schools follow the idea of Zundy. Having the 6th gr seperate while incorporating the skills and tasks needed to successfully merge into jr.high. It is important to have choice and diversity with regards to the studant population in WFISD. The arts also seem to be neglected in comparasion to the athletics. Good teachers and staff need to be recognized and acknowledged more often!

My husband and I are pregnant with our first child, and it is my sincere hope that the public schools are in such a position that we are not forced into private education when the time comes. As a product of both public and private schooling myself, it makes me very worried that our hands will be forced if the schools continue to decline. It is not only bad for the children, but is a huge negative for our entire community as well. Wichita Falls needs to make itself as attractive as possible, and the educational system is a large component of that. I think the high school situation is extremely problematic. We do not need three high schools, and by the media's portrayal, you would think only one school existed anyway. This town needs two good high schools that can be supported by the community as a whole. I think the Choice program has been detrimental to all. Rider is busting at the seams, Old High gets an unfair amount of bad publicity, and Hirschi has all but been forgotten about. I support the fact that the school board and the superintendent have been examining

f h l i i d h h k hi b h d O h i f h h l b d i i i h d h l bsome of the most glaring issues and that they know things must be changed. On the issue of the school board‐ it is curious that we do not go to schools by district but elect school board members by them. Doesn't make much sense to me. Things must be changed, now we just have to have the guts to change A look to adminstrative and leadership costs should be involve in any need to increase taxes as the tax base is quite large right now and a need for an increase indicates a lack of understanding of what such a tax base can support.

Kirby and Hirschi are too

In order for this city to compete for more industry, the schools MUST be improved.

There is a reason why academcially the US is so far behind Europe, China, Japan. We worry more over sports than academics. I'm not sure, but I'd be curious to know if these other countries also have funding attached to teachers teaching tests that are designed to increase funding; TAKS, TASS, STARRS....whatever, take your flavor of the day

I do not believe a bond program that includes closing Old High will pass. Any high school consolidation that takes place must include the usage of Old High and Rider (as high schools) or I think it will be an uphill battle. A new high school, although it may be cheaper than renovation, will have trouble at this time.

The choice program has served to divide the community and is too costly. Because of it, schools are not being operated properly and education has suffered. We must build one high school and end the choice program.

WFISD lacks in many ways. The quality of education is very poor, as is the amount of homework. The kids are now bringing home large packets of homework in preparation for the STAAR testing. WFISD should take better care throughout the year, not just at testing time. The focus should be on l i d t d i th h t th h l Th l t h l i d t d f d ti Th i k d d ff t t Mil ilearning and studying throughout the whole year. The elementary schools are in desperate need of updating. The pick up and drop off system at Milam is dangerous with children and teachers crossing streets at random places. There are no crosswalks, it's a free‐for‐all. Already witnessed a child hit by a car while on a bike. There is very poor communication between the school (Milam) and the parents. I've never seen a school without a monthly newsletter.





Need to close some schools, as difficult as this will be for the community to accept. It's a business decision based on the lack of funds. You cannot serve ALL of the people ALL of the time.

Improving security further. ie. doing what Harold I.S.D. has done to ensure the safety of the students and staff. p g y g y

Deal with the traffic mess that West Foundation has caused in Lake Wellintong...a real solution...not just school zone signs.

Can we get more money from the federal gov for all the illegal aliens we pay to educate?High schools should not be too big, either keep 3 or send all 9th grade to one.Explain where the money goes now.Some effort should be made to have some landscaping, most schools have dirt lawns and playgrounds,Ask for community volunteers to do things / projects to save money.Take some money from the football program to help other sports.Fix West Foundation first ‐ you cannot even use the money wisely there to improve your property to protect the children at pick up / drop off time ‐ not the city's fault ‐ there is plenty of ISD property that can be asphalted. To expand that school at present is negligence on the part of the ISD. Continued expansion there is dangerous for the students and the community that is isolated back there because the parents are rude and ignore traffic laws and safe driving practices. A stop light will only placate the parents and cause even more issues. Use the money you were already given to fix the issue first before you ask for more. The ISD expanded West last bond go‐around with NO concern for the residents of the subdivision. If they sent a survey it was before there were many residents back here (who were told that a second entrance would be provided by 2006 which has never happened again not on the city or the ISD that this did not occur) and the ISD safety person should have reviewed the area before expansion took place. On nights when the PTO meets or there is a school function ‐ residents are blocked from entering their garages or even the back end of the sub‐division because parents feel they can park anywhere they feel like it. A house will burn to the ground or a person will not get medical attention if those things occur at 3:15 on a school day because Modify the Choice Program to remove transportation (only after having an up‐to‐date regional attendance map). I f parents want their child to attend aModify the Choice Program to remove transportation (only after having an up‐to‐date regional attendance map). I f parents want their child to attend a certain school, fine, but they are responsible for getting them there and back. Quit over‐filling Rider and utilize Hirschi to its capability. There is not enough trust involved by the school board, the community, the teachers, or the administration to successfully pass a school bond. There has been no leadership from within the school board to help promote any kind of community 'sympathy' for spending more money. The choice system has helped to 'dumb down' our school district, as well become a financial drain on the city.The parking lots are in bad shape in most schools that I attend. 6th graders do not need to be mixed with Junior High students. Most 6th graders are not mature enough an are still small in size to mix them with 7th & 8th graders.

Promote HONEST and TRANSPARENT communication between the community and the school district! ACCOUNTABILITY

Less than 10 years ago a $60 million bond was passed. Administrators told us the school were too old and enrollment was going to expand beyond capacity. Has that happened. Now the WFISD has 'paid' someone to figure out the best way to influence us to successfully pass another bond? If there are issues that need to be addressed, they should be presented to the community and weighed on their merit. Don't ask us to tell you 'what is the best way we can get you to sign on to give us more money'.It is my opinion that moderization is important. People do not like to see the old schools torn down, but there comes a point when continued maintance is not worth it. I believe it would be great for the economy to rebuild and better our schools.

Why not do one high school?

make sure all the assistants at all levels are truely needed or could they be consolidated or pickup additional duties. stick to the cap at the schools...if you make sure all the assistants at all levels are truely needed or could they be consolidated or pickup additional duties. stick to the cap at the schools...if you aren't in the area you can't transfer if there isn't an opening, would go a long way at getting rid of the over crowding in the schools & parking lots. address the busing issues, perhaps use city buses for non‐school hrs, students get a certain kind of pass to use. was done in lubbock in the 70's and 80's.

I am not familiar with the elementary schools. My main concern/worry is that the Board will decide to close Hirschi before my son finishes. I want him to receive his IB diploma. There are options for improvements, undoubtedly, but closing any of the junior highs or high schools is NOT A GOOD OPTION!!!!!

1. loose the choice program and have a equitable education for all students.2. One super high school.

we need more technology courses offered and supportedwe need more technology courses offered and supported

I believe that the reason the WFISD is in such taters is from misuse of funds. The administrative offices are over staffed and the kids are the ones suffering from it. Also no one in this town is going to support their taxes going up in this economy simply so the district can continue to tout CSCOPE as the answer to our childrens educational needs. Its nothing more then an indoctrination curriculam and many parents including myself have grave concerns about what it is doing to our kids. Again, I think the answer is to close some of the schools, esp. some of the elementary schools and to finally end this choice program. It's the biggest waste of tax payer money. If a kid wants to go to a school across town, it is NOT the tax payers responsibility to pay for it. I hear that from so many people across town. It's really not fair and we our an oddity, as most other districts in the state do it as it should be done with kids going to the school closet to their homes. Until these things are corrected, I will not support a tax increase. Too much that the school board is ignoring that could cut costs and ultimately improve our kids education Thank youcosts and ultimately improve our kids education. Thank you.





The biggest issue I see with getting people on board to accept a bond is ensuring ALL acting school board members pay their property/school taxes just like everyone else. It's hard to take a bond seriously when you have a school board member who is grossly delinquent in paying his own property taxes. Lead by example!Use existing buildings (that are in good shape) to house students and close buildings that are in need of repair without worrying about the community's vote. Too many people are fighting to keep Old High open just because of the 'money' people. This building is in terrible shape and needs to be closed. Bite the bullet and do what needs to be done.

do away with the choice program and save the money to be put on the facilites and stop choice busing to put money back into the facilites.

glad to see john frossard come in and see the real problems ready to see downsizing go john cut the fat out

stop the choice program and stop choice busing .use the money wasted on this program to improve the other facillites .

The school district like the city needs to base their budget on a population that is getting smaller. Quit taxing like we are a growing area. Consolidate schools d f ili i d d l i R d l i f ll h id W d l f l l !!and facilities and reduce taxes on a low income area. Reduce salaries of all these overpaid upper mangt. We can get good people for a lot less money!!

The quality of education is in need of improvment. The paraprofessionals are used for babysitting along with dealing with hard to deal with students and are not being used to help in teaching or bring up lower level children. Para's are not paid enough to live on.. The quality of education should be looked at first. Bring that up to date and the community will have your back on other needs. Quit using the 'good ole boy' method in all aspects of business and have a level of account ability for all that is equal. The Blow taxes are outrageously being handled and that's upsetting the community and until you have the accountability handled no one will support the isd. Talk to the para's and the teachers for input and use their suggestions, make them feel needed, without them you have nothing and with out them you know nothing, because you are not in the classrooms.

P t b d i t i h l di t i t f iliti h t d h t d i ll th fi t ti t d t th t Wi hit F ll hPast bond issues to improve our school districts facilities have not passed when voted on, especially the first time presented to the voters. Wichita Falls has a large precentage of it's voters in the lower economic class that will not vote a tax increase for any reason, even if it will improve the education of their own children and children in the future. Manage our taxes better so you can have money going to places where there is a need and not increase our property taxes EVERY year like it has been. How can we afford to save for our son's college tuition if our taxes, food, gasoline and other expenses keep going up, but our wages are NOT! Inflation goes up EVERY year about 3‐4% and our health insurance goes up also about the same or more EVERY year.

Since the last bond issue passed, things that were to be done were changed. I don't trust that the improvements proposed will be finished.

Even though it is a hassel for you let the public feel involved ‐ especially with the closing of schools. Many closeminded people are against taxes‐ no matter what they are for‐‐ so promote very clearlywhat you are doing.Many closeminded people are against taxes‐ no matter what they are for‐‐ so promote very clearlywhat you are doing.People without students need to be educated very clearly on the benefits to them as to why our students need these improvments.Don't send out political smokescreens that don't make sense to your average voter‐‐ even if you have to dumb down your promotion, make it clear. this is coming from a retired teacher of twenty years

I would like to see more new school buildings for our existing, aging, falling down, dingy looking interior buildings.

Professional development should be a large portion of school finance. Without exemplary teachers, there are few exemplary students. Parenting courses should be offered as well, with assistance in GED preparation and testing, as well as job training. Better educated parents have better students. Early education programs should be fully supported. Children from low socio‐economic families need to be in school as early as possible. We are who we are by age five Brain cells not synapsed die making it difficult to teach children with substantially smaller experiences vocabulary and social skills difficult toage five. Brain cells not synapsed die, making it difficult to teach children with substantially smaller experiences, vocabulary, and social skills difficult to teach. Music, foreign languages, and the arts instruction should begin in preschool and continue throughout students' careers.

I think WFISD and WFISD Trustees should be embarrassed by the shape of our facilities when we host other schools to events such as choir or sports in our school system. We have done a poor job of keeping our facilities up to standards. It seems that our community is more worried on which side of town our child will 'choose' for high school than we are on making sure we provide the safest and most up‐to‐date facility for our students.

CLOSE (WFHS) AND THE OLD REAGAN JR. HIGH (CURRENT ADMIN. BLDG) TURN (WFHS) INTO ADMINISTRATION BLDG., VO‐TECH & MUSEUM , USE RIDER AND HIRSCHI AS HIGH SCHOOLS (BOTH BUILT AT ABOUT SAME TIME 1960's) , ALSO CLOSE ZUNDY AND USE AS STORAGE, (WFHS & ZUNDY ARE THE OLDEST SCHOOLS) LOTS OF SAVING IN CLOSING ADMIN BLDGSCHOOLS) LOTS OF SAVING IN CLOSING ADMIN. BLDG. We have already tried the 6th grade at junior highs and dumped it district‐wide. I think another facility might be considered as a 6th grade only campus, such as Washington‐Jackson or Zundy. Parents who do not support this idea could possibly have the option to keep their student in a neighborhood school, possibly.???

As always, kindergarten (and all prek programs) along with 6h grade and seniors are a special entity and should be treated as such. Maybe students who have to be retained should also be in a unique category????

We don't need more taxes. People are struggling enough.

The choice plan needs to be eliminated. Logistically it doesn't make sense. If choice is eliminated, entire elementary schools need to funnel to their The choice plan needs to be eliminated. Logistically it doesn t make sense. If choice is eliminated, entire elementary schools need to funnel to their respective junior high and high school instead of breaking up schools. Also, with the size of this town, 2 high schools are sufficient.

Security at all schools needs to be a priority. Let's not wait until something tragic happens to take action.





I am not a isd employee but my spouse is. I think if we continue Choice then those parents should pay for bussing. Also some facilities are worse than others. Some don't have intercoms or telephones in the individual classrooms. If 1 of my spouse's students got sick, (or violent) the only way to contact the office is to leave the room.Are the current properties being maintained? Is there room for improvement on upkeep and upgrades versus patching them up? I prefer that my tax contribution be used to keep our schools in good and clean working order. Make Hirschi the academic campus, WFHS the 9th‐10th grade campus and Rider the 11th‐12th grade campus with sports. Reduce the coaching staffs and take them out of the classrooms...they are mostly dead wood anyway. Allow a vocational education pathway starting in the 10th grade with some alternate type of diploma. Stop busing, period! Reduce the admin staff by half. Quit putting a disproportionate amount of funding for the low producing and disinterested. A high school junior that can't do 4th grade level math needs to be put in a vo‐ed career pathway, not into tutoring programs. Academia is not everyone's cup of tea, but a skilled trade is just as valuable for that student's and society's future success. We taxpayers pay for too many college remediation courses that should have been mastered before high school graduation. Get someone on the school board who is an advocate for the taxpayer, not a yes‐man for the administration, the classroom teachers, the parents, or the jocks....but for the people actually footing the bill for all this nonsense. I not a yes man for the administration, the classroom teachers, the parents, or the jocks....but for the people actually footing the bill for all this nonsense. I attended lectures at Oxford University and my dorm room was over 800 years old. Don't tell me our buildings are too old. Every school we have closed, other than San Jacinto, is still being used. What a waste of assets. We need business people involved in running the business of the WFISD...not career I think the real issue is to clearly define a direction for this district over the next decade. Reacting to current conditions without taking into account how those conditions will be changing over the next decade ensures that WFISD will be open to criticism and a decline in support. If you don't allow the community to provide input, particularly with regard to closing schools or being present for all meetings, community members will be less likely to vote in favor of a bond.I think our city is too small to have 3 High Schools. I think our town would benefit having only two high schools and use the money that is saved from closing one high school to improve the other two.With th th it i I d 't thi k b d i ld i ht T l d hi h h i ll f th fi d i d j tWith the economy the way it is I don't think a bond issue would pass right now. Taxes are already high enough especially for those on fixed income and just living on retirement funds with no children using the facilities.Don't take the elementary schools out of the neighborhood. If it is too far to walk to school then it shouldn't be closed. Most parents work and would be hard for getting children to school and picking them up. I don't think busing is good for preschool and kindergarten and first grades. Most need to have a parent take them and drop them off. The immediate concern is to get rid of the 'choice' plan. It has racially divided this community. There needs to be a new high school in central location (Kell Corridor) and Rider and Old High need to be shuttered. Hirschi needs to be become a vocational/tech school for those not intending to go to college so that they can be equipped with the tools of a trade upon leaving high school.

i think the only way a bond eliection would be approved by this community is all the 'old timers' are going to have to let go of the attitude 'well you aren'ti think the only way a bond eliection would be approved by this community is all the 'old timers' are going to have to let go of the attitude, 'well you aren't doing this or this with my school' In order for this town to progress into the future and EDUCATE our kids, we need to start new thinking. the old way of thinking will only keep this town from progressing and improving our education system. If you can change the 'old' attitudes then you might have a chance. I went through the system, as did my kids, and now my grandkids. I just really feel attitudes need to change if we are to move into the 21st centry. and the way to do that is with clear, presise ideas. polictics should not play into this. school board members should not argue if a school in their district will be closed. they should be able to explain to the people in that area WHY and HOW it will benefit the system.

First, decide one way or the other if 6th grade is going to be in elementary or junior high. Having it both ways doesn't work. The 'high' kids tend to leave and the 6th graders left at elementary are disproportionately 'low'. This reflects poorly on the teacher and the school. Kate Haynes needs to go. Combine it with Burgess. It is too close to the base. The military kids can go to Sheppard, the others can be bussed to Burgess. The 'fake' white boards installed are horrible. I get that it saved a buck, but it will be a waste of money in the long run. I work in a classroom that is freezing in the winter to the point that my kids can't concentrate. I had to purchase my own space heater. There are not enough computer 'drops' in the classrooms. Anyone can walk into our building at anytime. If they mean harm, they are not going to 'check in' using your new program that identifies sex offenders and felons. Also, roaches are a problem even though I keep no food in my classroom. Replace windows that don't seal and treat the buildings to get rid of pests.

We need to keep all the teacher and aid positions we have now. And add more! The classes are getting so big, that everyone feels like sardines? Surely there is some other area we can cut spending, because if we do it in education, our state and country will be in big trouble! Education is the backbone of our culture.I think you need to worry about what you are teaching and how you are teaching it instead of worrying about facilities and test scores. No matter how much money you throw at education our kids get a worse education.

The population of our community has not varied too much in many, many years. Things haven't really changed that much in our area in the last 30 or so years. We should concentrate on growing our foundation (the school children of Wichita Falls), not growing in debt by closing or rebuilding schools. It isn't the building that teaches the children, and it shouldn't be a tutorial on a screen that no one seems to know the content of, teaching the children. Supposedly the teachers are supposed to teach. Cut cost by cutting technology. Do away with CSCOPE and let the teachers do what they are trained to do, teach! Take a good hard look at budget cuts, realign spending, ask is it absolutely necessary. Don't throw MY good money after bad unless and/or until you get YOUR house in orderget YOUR house in order.We need to remember that all students do not intend to attend college, but need a good foundation in the basic skills. The higher level math and science courses need to be offered, but not required of all students.






As a retired WFISD teacher with 32 years in the classroom and 3 years subbing, I have had the privilege of teaching in most of the WFISD schools. While I agree that several of our elementary buildings are currently underutilized and will need to be combined in some way, I caution against increasing the enrollment at our junior high and high school campuses. In spite of some excellent secondary teachers and administrators, most of our secondary campuses are struggling with discipline and academic achievement. Students at this age level need more individual attention and more freedom within structured boundaries. Adding more students to the campus and/or classroom will not serve those needs well. If we must remove 6th grade from all elementary campuses, which is probably necessary or at least inevitable, we must consider increasing secondary space by adding on to our existing schools or building a larger middle school. Thank you for the opportunity to share my views and also for your efforts at addressing the current inadequacies of our WFISD school facilities.If you keep the junior highs add the 6th grade but in all truth the junior highs should go. It makes no sense to maintain facilites for just 2 years of schooling. I think 6th graders should go straight to combined junior senior high schools. I did it and it is not that traumatic. In fact it reduces the trauma days for 2 to 1. Eliminate Choice.Eliminate Choice.Do not increase student/teacher ratios.Provide more security at school doors at all times.

Current facillites may be better utilized if we get rid of the Choice program and go back to zoning.

IF the community would support it ‐ I believe a plan for one high school might be an idea to explore. Perhaps a separate freshman campus and a 10,11, 12 campus or a 9, 10 campus and an 11, 12 campus to possibly use current facilities. I am sure there are many pros and cons to the idea. Schools should have closed/consolidated years ago due to decline in student/general population trends. I feel this was not done because of reluctance to decrease number of teaching positions, i.e. jobs. I was shocked when I found the teacher student ratio to be a range from 11‐1 to 16‐1 at WFISD. I don't know if that is comparable state/nation wide, but that seems ridiculous to me, an 'old‐timer' 64 yrs. old! p yDespite protestations from school officials that they don't 'teach the test', in reality it seems that is all they really do.I also have my doubts about the C‐Scope curriculum, have read extensively about it and am afraid that it was not properly vetted before implementation. A bill of goods was sold on that one, I think.As far as a bond issue goes, no I would not support one. I am not of the opinion that spending more money will produce better results. So far that has not proven true!!Frankly I would rather see vouchers given to promote competition in our schools. Until that happens I see our public schools declining even more, despite higher spending per student in comparison to parochial schools.The system we have now is broken, no amount of money thrown at the system will magically 'cure' it, our children deserve better. Sadly this community will never agree on any idea that involves closing a school So many people are blinded by their own pride and traditions that theySadly, this community will never agree on any idea that involves closing a school. So many people are blinded by their own pride and traditions that they can not see what an embarassment many of our facilities have become. It's time for this city to let go of the bricks and mortar, and allow the next generation an opportunity take pride in something new. i would close some of the oldest junior highs and open a new super junior highand bulit it in the middle town so that each child has a chance to go.no matter what dist.you are in. I have seen in some class room it seem like the class room are to small to handle our tech eg.

Close Old High and Hirschi and build a new combined school in between with adequate technology and parking. This a political hot potato, but necessary. The new grade schools are excellent. The new gyms at grade schools are good but underutilized. Playgrounds are in pretty good shape. Still too many older grade schools are landlocked. Junior highs can use some work.Land is available for expansion Kirby and Barwise. Zundy needs to start over or combine.grade schools are landlocked. Junior highs can use some work.Land is available for expansion Kirby and Barwise. Zundy needs to start over or combine.

Facility needs should be based on objective criteria; not 'neighborhood' desire or perspectives.

I am worried about my kids having to walk a long way to school if they close there school. I know Sam houston is old but it is really close and we do not have cars. Can you build new school on there playground if they want to close. Thanks.

Isd needs more special needs programs for children with mental and psychical conditions.

This is NOT a good survey because it is not possible to rate the schools in the distsrict as a whole because they are SO different! Some schools may be the right size, some not. Some may have appropriate instructional spaces for the classes assigned, some do not... they are not 'Uniform' and it is not right to answer questions with all grouped together.As for 6th grade in the junior highs....only if they are separated from the 7th and 8th grade as Zundy is now.ways to save monies 1. do not let the maintenance persons drive home the vans, trucks, etc. this would save on gas, oil, and insurance if in wrack after hours. 2. charge the parents 5.00 dollars a month for use of busesif their student choices to go to a school out of his/her area. 3. cut down on buses used for after hour programs ‐‐CIS,etc.While I agree technology is important for the future, I think practical skills young adults need for life outside of school are lacking. I also believe we need to start stressing vocational training. Not every student needs college or will be able to attend college. There is a severe need for vocational training (mechanics, electricians, plumbers, etc.) and I do not think the district is preparing those students for life after school. We should not doom those students (mechanics, electricians, plumbers, etc.) and I do not think the district is preparing those students for life after school. We should not doom those students to minimum wage jobs.





The WFISD cam no longer to continue to operate the number of campus' currently in it's inventory. The District needs to evaluate the population trends which indicate the continued growth along Southwest Parkway from Jacksboro Hwy continuing west past Memorial Stadium. It continues to amaze me that we operate schools such as Kate Haynes which has a current enrollment less than 300 and Hirschi High School with approximately 700 students per the district website.Based upon those numbers, let's consolidate these and other campus' and elimate the overhead. Hirschi needs to be a tech/trades campus with no UIL activities. Consolidate Carrigan and Harrell plus section off a portion of the campus for Denver which will result reducing expenses by the better use of the exisiting Hirschi facility. When attending athletic events in the metroplex it is unbelievable to compare the facilities they have with what we scrape by with. When visiting teams come to Wichita Falls they must poke fun at coming here and seeing how we operate with such old and outdated facilities. My sons in highschool never talk about using computers or any technology in their AP classes at Rider. This seems so sad to me. Their classes are too crowded at Rider, and so are the hallways and cafeterias. The choice plan needs to be gone.I suspect many of the building closures will impact minority communities' first. Please let the parents , guardians know asap what is happening so that all I suspect many of the building closures will impact minority communities first. Please let the parents , guardians know asap what is happening so that all interests will be represented in this community and not merely those parents, residents living in Rider Land.

THE CHOICE PROGRAM IN ITS CURRENT FORM IS A JOKE!

I don't think that improving school facilities should come before making sure that there is enough funding for simple things like copy paper and other supplies that teachers need in order to teach the children.

The layout of the schools, currently, are very unsecure (in regards to safety) for our children. There appears to be no concern for safety or what is happens on

the school grounds. Who decides this is acceptable behavior and at what point do we make changes with the world we live in today or do we wait till something happens then scramble to attempt to make our schools safe Majority to all of our schools need improvements with facilities ‐something happens, then scramble to attempt to make our schools safe. Majority to all of our schools need improvements with facilities ‐

I work at a Title 1 school. Some of our teachers are so very dedicated, while others are just here for a paycheck. It is very disheartening for the good teachers, who take on extra duties because some of the teachers refuse to do their jobs.

We need a full time couselor who is dependable and dedicated to our children.

We need a nurse who cares about our children and is willing to do her job.

We need smaller class sizes so that intervention can occur within the classroom instead of 'extra' support that doesn't seem productiveWe need smaller class sizes, so that intervention can occur within the classroom, instead of extra support that doesn t seem productive.

Get rid of choice and combine high schools

WFISD has schools located on some valuable pieces of realestate (Barwise comes to mind). I think that if people could see that the sale of one school could help finance improvments in other schools perhaps they would be more willing to close a school.The staff of WFISD and students must see some action. We have watched things stay the same for 30+ years. We must have change but no one wants it bad enough. It might help to get a bond passed if others could see what other school districts have. Go get pictures of other districts new schools. It will show how poor the condition of our schools are. Our teachers and students deserve better.p

I would suggest building a large high school for the entire city. It should hold grades 10,11, 12. Also place the new school in a new spot.

Questions in this survey are very generic and seem designed to generate a desired outcome. Low community response may be due to the fact that no upfront purpose or details for the survey have been stated. A follow‐up survey and public hearings should definitely be conducted once an actual facilities proposal has been drafted. At that point, no doubt, community involvement and opinion will soar!

We feel the overall appearance of our junior high and high school campuses ‐ along with below‐average performance ‐ is the biggest hindrance to economic development in Wichita Falls. Quite simply, major technology‐based employers will not consider relocating to a community with a school system whose performance and appearance doesn't help that employer attract/hire/recruit quality employees.

We would especially support a secondary education overhaul that would combine students from all high schools into one 5A‐Ranked High school ‐ but divided into two or three campuses ‐ For example: Freshman/Sophomore Campus, Junior/Senior Campus, and Technology/Vo‐Tech Campus.

Under the above plan, the two most physically‐sound existing high school campuses could be converted for use by Freshman/Sophomores and Technology/VoTech Education. A third, state‐of‐the‐art facility would be constructed for use by Juniors and Seniors only. If this facility could be

The community view of wfisd and the board is poor. I think it will be very hard to pass any bond at this time or the near future.






Something has got to be done. It is abundantly clear when you travel just within our district how far behind the power curve this town is. When my children went to a state college, they were behind their peers because we don't have the technology to have an AP Computer Programming class. Their peers had that advantage and my kids had to struggle to catch up (the eldest did this) while my younger son had to take an extra course to get caught up. Neither one of my children was ever in a proper science lab while they attended WFISD. My husband hires people from all over the country in his job and their usual reaction when they visited our schools is, 'Are you kidding me?' We used to be able to rationalize that while our buildings were old, what was going on in those buildings was first rate. I am no longer giving this argument as I have seen first hand what the budget cuts and mismanagement of money has done to the district.

The school board needs to do something. They might not be popular choices, but choices need to made and our board needs to man up and get some things done. The most disturbing thing for me would be to see a Community Committee form. That is the black hole where all ideas go to die. These

Have a clear plan that can be implimented a little at a time. For example use show us what you are going to do 5 and 10 years out.

NANA

WFISD is behind in many areas...test scores, technology, and staffing. WFISD has wasted money on curriculums that are inadequate because they are scrambling to improve test scores. The teachers are underpaid and taken advantage of in many areas. This district is falling apart. Something drastic needs to happen. My children are not in high school yet, so I don't have a suggestion on what to do concerning the High School situation. I will tell you that parents I speak with have horrible things to say about the high schools in WFISD. Violence, drugs, and 'certain hallways' that all students aren't allowed to walk down/through. I'm not sure closing/combining high schools will help. I can definitely tell you elementary schools need help. Classrooms are small, staffing is sparse, and buildings are in need of extensive repair. Classroom furniture is old and broken, technology is at a minimum, and there is virtually no security in place to prohibit an intruder with a weapon from entering a building.

Don't pass a bond. Give a partial voucher so students can attend private schools. With a reduction in students, the staff, administration, and number of facilities could be reduced and more $/child could be spent with the same tax base. This survey was very vague and in most cases geared or targeted to ask questions that would obtain answers that could be formulated to say whatever the survey maker wants. It should ask more specific questions such as 'should this (name the school) be closed and why?

Both of our children attended WFISD over 10 years ago. The teachers were passionate. We believe the teachers are still passionate because our grandson attends WFISD. However, after living in the metroplex for 12 years, it is sad to return to Wichita Falls and see that the same problems exist among the highschools. WFISD needs to be able to compete with other districts academically through providing technology and letting go of living in the past.

I d d th t f h l t N i i l h ld h d f t d b d i f th tI demand that you remove cscope from our school system. No cirriculum should push an agenda over facts and be covered in secrecy from the parents. Remove this from our schools NOW. Election day will come....

Unrelated but I think that if someone decides to put their children in a school that is not in their neighborhood, the district should NOT provide transportation. If you want to choose your school, you provide your own ride. This is not related to physical aspects of schools, but please note that NO student can have a maximum educational experience without the following components in place. 1. All students must be in safe, disciplined classroom. Good students should not be expected to sit in any classroom with unruly, undisciplined students; nor should teachers have to teach in overcrowded classrooms. This leads to babysitting, constant disciplining, and no teaching time for the good students.y g, p g, g g 2. Students and parents should know that only the highest expectations are acceptable, based on the students' academic abilities. This should include responsibility on the part of students in seeing that work is completed on time and that only acceptable behavior (regardless of race or academic abilities) will be allowed in classrooms. Teachers should have the highest expectations for their students' education and for their students' behavior, backed by their administrators. Students will do only what is expected of them so expectations should be the highest. 3. Parents should be informed quickly and accurately of any problems so that parents can become involved in helping with students' behaviors and Will not support a tax increase ‐ city, state and federal taxes are totally out of hand. Federal programs are a waste of time (past magnet programs that were left to die without local support). Smaller schools are better for children ‐ do not close schools.

Why are there so few schools in the area whose boundary is Iowa Park Road on the north side, Kemp Blvd on the east side and CallField y y pRoad/Wyoming/Johnson Road on the south side? Why is this area neglected? Tanglewood, Brandywine, BelAir, Bent Tree, Fountain Park, WillowBend, Rivercrest Park, Canyon Trails, Wichita Gardens, Westmoreland Park, Country Roads and other smaller additions have children who are overlooked.

I have two children who have attended Jefferson Elem for the past five years. I can not say enough positive things about the staff however, the only major complaint I have is inadequate parking. Picking the children up after school is a nightmare. There is no easy way in or out. Mistletoe is a narrow street and when you have cars parked up and down that street along both sodes it is very hard to maneuver my Tahoe through in the narrow path between. It's very hard to see the crosswalks as well because of the cluster of cars thusly making it hard to see children crossing. It's nail biting every day. There just is NO parking available for anyone except the faculty and I feel horribly sorry for the homeowners who live on mistletoe who have to deal with cars parked bumper to bumper blocking their driveways in day in and day out. Thank you for listening.


Item removed to maintain confidentiality of personnel information.




older, smaller elementary schools must be closed, torn down and newer schools built.Because they are a drain on the tax dollors.Both Rider and Old High need to be torn down and one large modern school campus needs to be built with It could be right off Kell near the Weeks Mansion and the former old high area. or there may be a better piece of land a little mo centrally located. Junior highs shoujld be combine and one or two jmunion highs built.

Hirschi should be a vo tech. IB program could be located in theSome of these questions were too vague to answer. My daughter's school is entirely too full, but there are other schools that are not. Also, choice allows two junior highs to be overcrowded as well as one of the high schools. Some of the issues would be alleviated with going back to attedance zones, but with some adjustments.I TAKE MY DAUGHTER TO SCHOOL AT HIRSCHI HIGH EVERY DAY. WE LIVE OUT OF HIRSCHI'S DISTRICT AND I HAVE NO PROBLEM CONTINUING TO TAKE HER MYSELF. SHE LOVES HIRSCHI AND ALL HER TEACHERS AND HAS NO DESIRE TO ATTEND HIGH SCHOOL ANYWHERE ELSE. IF YOU WISH TO DO AWAY WITH MYSELF. SHE LOVES HIRSCHI AND ALL HER TEACHERS AND HAS NO DESIRE TO ATTEND HIGH SCHOOL ANYWHERE ELSE. IF YOU WISH TO DO AWAY WITH THE BUSSING FOR CHOICE SCHOOLS THATS FINE, BUT PLEASE DO NOT DO AWAY WITH THE CHOICE PROGRAM ALTOGETHER.

I think allowing students to choose the junior high or high school they attend is not an effective method of enrollment.

Athletic facilities at this time should not even be on the table. Lets focus on classrooms and maintaining a quality staff to fill those classrooms.Also, as technology is looked at and considered for purchase for the classroom, teachers should be asked about the technology and involved in the process about how it will be used and installed. RE: Q14, Sixth graders belong in Jr. High. I have lived in WF for 18 years but moved several times in my youth. As a result, I have attended Jr. High in Nebraska, California (two different schools) and Houston. This policy of not having all sixth graders in Jr High is the first I have seen anywhere. Sixth graders are at an age where they are maturing physically and emotionally, keeping them in a school where first graders must hold hands while walking to lunch is wrong. They need to be with kids of their own age and maturity for academic and social development reasons. Additionally, 6th grade boys who have experienced growth spurts are much bigger than the younger children at an elementary school are and present a physical safety issue. This may be through unintentional injury at play or by a boy recognizing that because he is bigger, he can bully the younger kids. I should note that this is possible with girls as well, but much less likely.

RE: Q17, A key part of my support of a new bond for school facilities will be dependent upon actions taken/planned. The three high schools should remain open simply due to student population. Hirschi High School, while not the “popular” school gives some of the best chances for success at college because of its IB and technology programs. Additionally, I think that school choice for high school and Jr high must remain in place with the caveat that if aits IB and technology programs. Additionally, I think that school choice for high school and Jr high must remain in place with the caveat that if a parent/student chooses to attend a school outside their normal district boundary, they are responsible for transportation to and from the school. A voucher

the taxes are already up, and lower and middle class people are feeling it most ‐ to increase taxes would further hurt the lower and middle class people and with the economy in the shape it is in at this time i'm not sure that a tax increase for the school would be beneficial or supported by the community

If you did not waste so much money on administrative and other feel good programs you would have plenty to provide a strong, core education. That should be your goal.Our students and staff need better, healthier spaces in order to achieve! Please do not let a community of outdated, uninformed opinions limit the vision and ultimately the provision for our future! li i i hi f ll d k hild f h h l d d i i i b i d ffi h h i j d l i h iI live in wichita falls and took my child out of the schools due to administration being standoffish when my son was injured several times on their campus. The moral is not as high as it was in the past when I worked as a teacher for the district‐‐my friends frequently are frustrated with the lack of supplies and support from the administration.

I would suggest having information meetings held at all campuses explaning the clear plan with defined improvements, why the improvements are needed. In most cases, people are against something due to lack of information on or knowledge of the issue OR incorrect information being spead. Comes down to how good of a salesman you are. May want to gain some strategies from a successful sales team or business. Keep in mind, my area of expertise is education not sales. Sorry

Too many times users of taxpayers' money think that getting more money from citizens is the solution. I think more energy needs to be put into being more Too many times users of taxpayers money think that getting more money from citizens is the solution. I think more energy needs to be put into being more efficient and proficient with taxpayers' money instead of always wanting more and more of it. Yes, our facilities need improving, but why has this happened? Poor planning, not setting goals, and wrong priorities.

I would like to see the High Schools change and have 9th and 10th graders at one and the 11th and 12th graders at the other, and making one a tech school.

Include employees (especially teachers) to have input.

Public schools must continue to update and have available good staff, good technology to produce excellent students. We risk losing out to private schools and losing funding to produce students with good character and abilities to maintain our workforce and run our city government and keep Wichita Falls a great place to live. I believe the students' education will be a reflection of how well the teachers are trained, and how well they are equipped with what they need to teach technology savvy students.





Don't need to spend money on improving technology at any level. Focus on the fundamentals of learning. When our students show more signs of competence and advancement, then we can worry about having state of the art labs and equipment. ‐recent graduate'Safety First' might do the trick! I know parents are concerned about the safety of these old buildings. After that, try to get teachers and administrators to give you lists of parents who are involved and care about our schools. Then pray that God will give these parents a shared vision of what our community could be like withstate of the art facilities that would make every section of our city proud!!!!

I think it has been clear for quite some time that WFISD is operating way too many campuses. Consolidation and closing is a necessary step in order to make the positive changes that our district so desperately needs. Elementary schools need to be assessed as well as the junior high schools and high schools. Hirschi needs to close. It is a waste of money. There need to be 2 high schools in Wichita Falls that hopefully remain 4A. That would offer the best possible option for our students and our district. Having a monster high school would put us at a disadvantage locally and in the state.As a parent, I wish for my children to have the best opportunities possible. Spending as much money as WFISD currently does on all the extra buildings and

ff d b d l k f d h l h h ll h ld b di h i dstaff and budgets, only takes away from programs and technology that they really should be spending the money on instead.I applaud and passionately support anyone who has the courage to make the hard decisions and necessary changes to put our children and their education first. Above the moaning and complaining about 'saving our school' for posterity's sake. The school district should not be in the business of maintaining historic properties. Educating and preparing our children for the future, the REAL future that they will be a part of, should be WFISD's number one priority.

I understand that there are board members that are responsible for making decisions on the things that happen within the district. I also understand that there has to be voting and things like this. I do not understand why parents are not given the opportunity to make their suggestions and allow these parents to be given the correct resources to make informed decisions. I feel that input from parents (whose children are actually going to be the one's that benefit from the changes) are not given more of an opportunity to put their two cents in. Also, all of these decisions are made by people who either don't have hild th i hild t f h l I d 't d t d h l d ki l t t b f i fl i th d i ichildren or their children are out of school. I don't understand why normal everyday working class parents cannot be more of an influence in these decisions since it will effect our children. Come‐on. Several of these questions are impossible to have an opinion on due to the lack of information or knowledge the average non‐student voter has. Give us the info we need to make the best decision on these issues. Questions 17 & 18 '...for children...'; what does that mean?Build another stadium on the northside of town to bring between downtown and the flyover to bring more businesses and people downtown. Make our support and education more visible. Team up with MSU for funds to build and share the sports area.Build a college type campus at WFHS by making a Village Square around the front parking lot. Making buildings of technology/sports/library on both sides where the houses are that the city has purchased. Make use of this land and rebuild Wichita Falls.

We need two new high school buildings The old buildings are too antiquated for technology and fine arts programs One high school would be too large andWe need two new high school buildings. The old buildings are too antiquated for technology and fine arts programs. One high school would be too large and not able to compete with the super schools in larger metropolitan areas. The junior highs may also need to be new to use the latest technology and offer state of the art fine arts programs. The elementaries need major work and some need to be combined. We need to also think of these improvements in light of energy conservation and savings in the long run. If we do not have great schools, we will not be competitive in gaining and keeping businesses and industries. Our children deserve the best we can provide for them; they are the future of Wichita Falls, Texas, the USA, and, indeed, the world.

I would like to see FEWER elementary schools, but not at the sacrifice of class size. My children attend one of the largest elementary schools, and it is overflowing. Please keep class sizes reasonable (30 5th and 6th graders in a small classroom isn't reasonable‐‐ask anyone who works in an elementary!).

I am aware of a Head Start facility operating with only 3 classes I realize that WFISD owns this building but I see this as a HUGE waste‐‐especially since itI am aware of a Head Start facility operating with only 3 classes. I realize that WFISD owns this building, but I see this as a HUGE waste‐‐especially since it has all the support staff of larger elementaries: nurse, social worker, site coordinator (administrative position). Why are we overlooking select facilities in our discussion? While I feel the public should have input, and I appreciate the opportunity to share my ideas, I also think it is time for those in charge to make a solid decision that will truly impact kids and facilities in a meaningful way without bending to the desires of a few strong citizens.

While I have less knowledge and opinion of our secondary schools, I would also like to see some consolidation of programs so that perhaps fewer buildings had to be maintained. Hirschi, Carrigan, and Harrell surely could be combined in some other more effective way. Again, the support staff needed to maintain separate facilities is staggeringly expensive. Please look at ways to maintain the more structurally sound facilities and eliminate those that are siphoning money each year. My children will be out of WFISD in 10 years, and I will NOT be as willing to support this issue again at that time.

Some people will not support a bond due to never fulfilling promises made in the last two bonds.

I have a student now and in the past at Hirschi High School and Kirby Jr. High and I have been very pleased for the most part on their education and safety. I do believe that there may be problems at the other high schools with too many numbers and safety. (this is why I chose Hirschi for my boys) Some of the elementary schools have too many children and some too few. Also, I feel that redistricting some of these elementary schools would help with the capacity also.Many of these elementary schools need a better plan for parking, dropping/picking up children, and bus loading/unloading. New parking lots etc...





I believe that all of the middle school campuses should be composed of the same grades, so that all students of that age are afforded the same opportunities in education and extra curricular activities.

I also strongly believe that the district needs to consolidate to two high schools. The cost of operating three high schools that are not close to capacity, far outweighs the benefits of having three high schools in town.Traffic flow and parking are HUGE problems, even at many of the elementary schools. Please don't overlook to need to improve these areas along with the buildings.

Technology needs to be improved. Students and teachers should have I‐pads or tablets to use in the classroom.

There is a need for two new high school buildings with modern technology and efficient energy usage. Our students need to be able to compete with the modern schools in the metroplex. There is a need for performing arts facilities. There is a need for indoor practice facilities that can be shared by sports and bands.Why doesn't the city of Wichita Falls have any laws or code enforcements as to businesses that can be located within a certain radius of a public schoolWhy doesn't the city of Wichita Falls have any laws or code enforcements as to businesses that can be located within a certain radius of a public school. Example Maximus across the street from Harrell learning center.

Do not shut down any schools. Do not stop busing for the Choice program.

T

[Translation from Spanish‐speaking survey]: Mediocre and racist teachers is what we have…and it’s what ought to change, they only care about the money, and about who has money, giving grades and merits to students that have not even earned them, they have only gotten them due to money and friendship.


Appendix F – BASYS® Reports

Building Condition Assessment Full Report

Project:

Site: Building:

Systems Component(s)Possible

ScoreScorePercentScore

Wichita Falls ISDCounty: 1Region: 101bBuilding #:

% of System Rating

243905101Site #:

Assessments 2013

Alamo ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 22.65 20.38 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.61 6.85 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.55 4.09 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.44 3.09 90.00Exterior Windows 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.52 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 12.89 11.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.90 4.41 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.82 1.64 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.89 0.80 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.14 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical

ElectricalSingle Component 2.54 2.28 90.00Main Service 100.00 Good

Single Component 2.54 2.28 90.00Distribution 100.00 Good

PlumbingSingle Component 3.39 3.05 90.00Supply 100.00 Good

Single Component 3.39 3.05 90.00Fixtures 100.00 Good

Single Component 3.39 3.05 90.00Waste 100.00 Good

HVACSingle Component 4.68 4.21 90.00Energy Generation 100.00 Good


Single Component 1.87 1.68 90.00Controls 100.00 Good

Single Component 3.97 3.57 90.00Lighting 100.00 GoodSafety\Fire Protection

Means of ExitSingle Component 0.46 0.41 90.00Exit Operation 100.00 Good

Single Component 0.46 0.41 90.00Exit Safety 100.00 Good

Fire Control CapabilitySingle Component 1.44 1.30 90.00Fire Control Operation 100.00 Good

Single Component 1.44 1.30 90.00Fire Control Safety 100.00 Good

Fire Alarm SystemSingle Component 0.44 0.39 90.00Fire Alarm Operation 100.00 Good

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:22:15AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905101Site #:

Assessments 2013

Alamo ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Single Component 0.44 0.39 90.00Fire Alarm Connectivity 100.00 Good

Single Component 0.87 0.78 90.00Emergency Lighting 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.91 0.82 90.00Fire Resistance 100.00 Good

Single Component GoodADA

100.00 90.00 90.00Total For Building :

Comments

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionHeavy dust/dirt on top of ducts.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:22:15AM


Project:

Site: Building:



Wichita Falls ISDCounty: 1Region: 101aBuilding #:

% of System Rating

243905101Site #:

Assessments 2013

Alamo ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 15.96 4.79 30.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 PoorSingle Component 8.82 5.29 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.02 4.52 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.90 1.47 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.47 0.42 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.38 5.03 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.14 4.88 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.12 0.67 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 1.63 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 3.61 2.16 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical

ElectricalSingle Component 2.70 1.62 60.00Main Service 100.00 Fair

Single Component 2.70 1.62 60.00Distribution 100.00 Fair

PlumbingSingle Component 1.78 0.53 30.00Supply 100.00 Poor


Single Component 1.78 0.53 30.00Waste 100.00 Poor



Single Component 3.08 0.92 30.00Controls 100.00 Poor

Single Component 3.94 2.36 60.00Lighting 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.60 0.54 90.00Elevators and Conveyances 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.74 1.57 90.00Connectivity 100.00 Good

Safety\Fire Protection





Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:22:09AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905101Site #:

Assessments 2013

Alamo ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773



Single Component 0.87 0.78 90.00Emergency Lighting 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.84 0.25 30.00Fire Resistance 100.00 Poor

Single Component FairADA


Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureMajor signs of settling and shifting at lower level flooring. Some cracking at exterior walls. Floor joist are the original wood joist.

Structural->Exterior WallsPoor exterior walls have been skinned with E.I.F.S. Visible inspection shows a fair condition. Some areas of cracking from settling and damage from thrown rocks.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are single pane clear glass and not efficient. Windows have broken hardware and will not stay in the open position.

Structural->Interior FloorsCracking from settling foundation.

Structural->Interior WallsSheetrock areas have soiling and damage.

Structural->Interior DoorsPlastic laminate clad doors have chipped edges.

Structural->CeilingMany areas with 2x4 ceiling tiles that are chipped, soiled or sagging.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentCasework is in poor condition.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceService panels are at capacity.

Mechanical->Electrical-->DistributionSub panels and breakers are at end of life cycle.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplyHistory of leaks and at end of life cycle.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteHistory of leaks and at end of life cycle.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationCafeteria and kitchen units are nearing end of life cycle.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControls are near end of life and parts hard to find.

Mechanical->LightingSeveral areas with yellow and dim lighting.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceWood framed structure with no fire separation at classrooms. Also have open stairwells with no separations.

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:22:09AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905101Site #:

Assessments 2013

Alamo ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

ADASome administration areas are not accessible.

Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:22:09AM


Project:

Site: Building:



Wichita Falls ISDCounty: 1Region: 101cBuilding #:

% of System Rating

243905101Site #:

Assessments 2013

Alamo ES Portable - 1st Grade

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 28.97 26.07 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.60 5.04 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.27 4.74 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 2.40 60.00Exterior Windows 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.33 3.00 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.77 8.26 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.00 2.40 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.00 1.50 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 5.00 3.00 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical




Single Component 1.00 0.30 30.00Fixtures 100.00 Poor


HVACSingle Component 3.50 2.10 60.00Energy Generation 100.00 Fair



Single Component 3.00 0.90 30.00Lighting 100.00 PoorSingle Component 1.05 0.95 90.00Connectivity 100.00 Good






Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:22:23AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905101Site #:

Assessments 2013

Alamo ES Portable - 1st Grade

Project #: 5773

Single Component 0.50 0.45 90.00Fire Alarm Operation 100.00 Good



Single Component PoorADA


Comments

Structural->Exterior WindowsResidential style storm windows have slight damage.

Structural->Interior WallsWalls are wood paneling with minor damage.

Structural->Interior DoorsSlightly damaged doors with old hardware.

Structural->CeilingSheetrock ceiling with cracking and separation from joist.


Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesSeveral older fixtures at restrooms.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationThe HVAC equipment requires maintenance.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsSame as main building, controls are at end of life cycle.

Mechanical->LightingSurface mounted fixtures with poor light output.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistancePortable is a wood framed structure without the proper fire resistance.

ADARestrooms are not ADA compliant.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:22:23AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905104Site #:

Assessments 2013

Brook Village Early Childhood Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 22.65 20.38 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.61 6.85 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.55 2.73 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.44 3.09 90.00Exterior Windows 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.52 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 12.89 11.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.90 4.41 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.82 1.64 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.89 0.80 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.14 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:23:00AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905104Site #:

Assessments 2013

Brook Village Early Childhood Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Structural->RoofThe roof has occasional leaks.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceThe service is at capacity. The panels have water lines running above them.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:23:00AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905104Site #:

Assessments 2013

Brook Village Early Childhood Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 2.32 60.00Exterior Windows 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical









Single Component 4.25 2.55 60.00Lighting 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.52 1.37 90.00Connectivity 100.00 Good



Single Component 0.42 0.25 60.00Exit Safety 100.00 Fair



Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:22:52AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905104Site #:

Assessments 2013

Brook Village Early Childhood Main Bldg

Project #: 5773



Single Component 0.76 0.68 90.00Emergency Lighting 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.84 0.50 60.00Fire Resistance 100.00 Fair



Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsThere is evidence of water infiltration on some exterior walls.

Structural->RoofThe roof has a history of leaks..

Structural->Exterior WindowsSome of the windows are single pane on NW part of building.

Structural->Interior FloorsSome of the rooms have half carpet and is worn in areas.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome equipment is chipped and at the end of its life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceThe service is at capacity. The panels have water lines running above them.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationSystem is toward the end of its expected life expectancy.

Mechanical->LightingThe building has a mix of T8 and T12 fixtures.

Safety\Fire Protection->Means of Exit-->Exit SafetyMany doors open into the corridor and reduce the corridor width.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceCorridors had some transoms.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:22:52AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905105Site #:

Assessments 2013

Burgess ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 22.65 20.38 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.61 6.85 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.55 4.09 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows (N/A)Single Component 0.52 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 12.89 11.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.90 4.41 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.82 1.64 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.89 0.80 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.14 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:23:14AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905105Site #:

Assessments 2013

Burgess ES Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControls are obsolete.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:23:14AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905105Site #:

Assessments 2013

Burgess ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 7.52 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 1.63 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical




Single Component 3.61 2.16 60.00Fixtures 100.00 Fair











Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:23:07AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905105Site #:

Assessments 2013

Burgess ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureBuilding has some minor settlement issues.

Structural->Exterior WallsWalls need caulking and paint in areas.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are single pane and in need of replacement.

Structural->CeilingMany ceiling tiles are discolored and broken.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome equipment/millwork has chipped plastic laminate or is at the end of life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceElectrical main service is at capacity and in need of some upgrades.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesSome fixtures have reached the end of their life cycle.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteSome pipe have cracked and split.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHVAC equipment in Kitchen and Cafeteria is at end of life expectancy.


Mechanical->LightingMany areas have original surface fixtures and bulbs.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceMany corridors have transoms.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:23:07AM


Project:

Site: Building:



Wichita Falls ISDCounty: 1Region: 107eBuilding #:

% of System Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013

Crockett ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:23:53AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013

Crockett ES Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationThe system has filter problems.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:23:53AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013

Crockett ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 15.96 9.57 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.82 5.29 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.02 3.01 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.90 1.47 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.47 0.42 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.38 7.54 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.14 4.88 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.12 0.67 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 1.63 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 3.61 2.16 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical



PlumbingSingle Component 1.78 1.07 60.00Supply 100.00 Fair





Single Component 3.08 1.85 60.00Controls 100.00 Fair







Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:23:45AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013

Crockett ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureSome cracks allow water into the basement. Settlement occurs at Serving line exterior wall.

Structural->Exterior WallsSome leaks in the walls drain into the basement.

Structural->RoofSome of the roofs are at the end of their life cycle.

Structural->Exterior WindowsThe windows are single pane.

Structural->Interior WallsSome laminate panel system pieces have delaminated from the substrate.

Structural->Interior DoorsSome doors are in need of repairs and hardware replacement.

Structural->CeilingMany tiles are discolored and cracked.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome of the fixtures have reached the end of their life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceSystem is at capacity and in need of some upgrades.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplyLines are original and have a history of leaks.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteThe sewer pipe is original and has begun to split open.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationKitchen/Cafeteria area is at the end of its life cycle.


Mechanical->LightingLighting in areas is too dim.

Safety\Fire Protection->Means of Exit-->Exit SafetyThere are open stairways in the original structure.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceBuilding has open stairways.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:23:45AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013

Crockett ES Portable A

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 28.97 26.07 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.60 3.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.27 3.16 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.00 1.20 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 3.33 3.00 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.77 12.39 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical






HVACSingle Component 3.50 0.00 0.00Energy Generation 100.00 Unsat


Single Component 1.40 0.00 0.00Controls 100.00 Unsat

Single Component 3.00 2.70 90.00Lighting 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.05 0.95 90.00Connectivity 100.00 Good






Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:24:00AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013

Crockett ES Portable A

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsThe exterior is in need of constant maintenance.

Structural->RoofThe roof is in constant need of maintenance.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindow are single pane.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationThe HVAC is at it's life cycle.


Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceInside of exterior walls have wood paneling.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:24:00AM


Project:

Site: Building:



Wichita Falls ISDCounty: 1Region: 107dBuilding #:

% of System Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013

Crockett ES Portable A-1_A-2

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:24:08AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013

Crockett ES Portable A-1_A-2

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsThe exterior walls has interior wood paneling.

Structural->RoofThe roof needs constant repairs.


Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationThe system is at the life cycle.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsThe controls are obsolete.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceThe inside of the exterior walls has wood paneling.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:24:08AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013

Crockett ES Portable B_C

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:24:15AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013

Crockett ES Portable B_C

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsThe exterior walls have interior wood paneling.

Structural->RoofThe roof needs constant repairs.


Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationThe system is at the end of its life cycle.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsThe controls are obsolete.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceThe inside of the exterior walls has wood paneling.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:24:15AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905108Site #:

Assessments 2013

Cunningham ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 22.65 20.38 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.61 6.85 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.55 2.73 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows (N/A)Single Component 0.52 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 12.89 11.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.90 4.41 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.82 1.64 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.89 0.80 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.43 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:24:30AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905108Site #:

Assessments 2013

Cunningham ES Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Structural->RoofThe ridge leaks.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentEquipment has some chips and some items have reached the life cycle.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:24:30AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905108Site #:

Assessments 2013

Cunningham ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 7.52 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 Fairsingle component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows 100.00 UnsatSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical





Single Component 3.61 2.16 60.00Waste 100.00 Fair










Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:24:22AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905108Site #:

Assessments 2013

Cunningham ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureBuilding has some settlement cracks and water infiltration under slab.

Structural->Exterior WallsSome corners of the masonry have cracked.

Structural->RoofSome of the roofs are at the end of their life cycle.

Structural->Exterior WindowsMost windows are original and single pane.

Structural->Interior FloorsSome of the VCT has seepage. Some carpet has reached its life cycle.

Structural->CeilingSome ceilings are discolored and cracked or sagging.

Mechanical->Electrical-->DistributionSubpanels are inadequate.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteSome of the sewer lines have occasional stoppages.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationThe Kitchen/Cafeteria HVAC system is at the end of it's life cycle.

Mechanical->LightingSome fixtures are still T12 bulbs.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceMany corridor walls have transoms.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:24:22AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905108Site #:

Assessments 2013

Cunningham ES Portable

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:24:37AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905108Site #:

Assessments 2013

Cunningham ES Portable

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior walls require constant maintenance.

Structural->RoofRoof requires constant maintenance.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are single pane.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHVAC is at the end of it's life cycle.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceThe interior sides of exterior walls are wood paneling.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:24:37AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fain ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:25:30AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fain ES Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionThe exposed spiral duct has signs of dust infiltration. The main supply ducts are dirty on top from outside dust.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:25:30AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fain ES Hut

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 7.52 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows (N/A)Single Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 4.41 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.20 0.72 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical









Single Component 4.25 3.82 90.00Lighting 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Connectivity (N/A)






Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:25:07AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fain ES Hut

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureMinor cracks observed on exterior walls and interior floor from settling.

Structural->Exterior WallsSlight cracking from settling of foundation.

Structural->Interior FloorsFloor are stained concrete and have some cracking from foundation issues.

Structural->Interior WallsSurfaces are soiled and need repainting or cleaning.

Structural->Interior DoorsInterior doors have some damage and signs of wear.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentCasework is at end of life and needs to be replaced.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesFixtures are in need of replacement.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteSystem is currently under repair for stoppage in sewer line.


ADADoor openings are narrow to smaller rooms. Restroom is not ADA compliant.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:25:07AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fain ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 7.52 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 2.32 60.00Exterior Windows 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 4.41 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.20 0.72 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:25:14AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fain ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureSigns of settling in classroom 5 and in hallway. Cracks in walls in kindergarten classroom from settling.

Structural->Exterior WallsThe soffits at the exterior walls are discolored and need repainting. Observed some areas with minor cracking.

Structural->RoofRoof needs some maintenance.

Structural->Exterior WindowsMost window are inefficient, with a single pane and clear glass

Structural->Interior FloorsSeveral areas with floors showing signs of wear and damage.

Structural->Interior WallsAreas of minor cracking, chipped corners and soiling.

Structural->Interior Doorsseveral doors have chipped laminate and minor damage. Doors are patched from hardware upgrades.

Structural->CeilingAreas with older 2x4 tiles, some are chipped, cracked and a few spots with missing tiles.


Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceMain service is at full capacity.

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionSeveral classrooms with airflow issues. Many have only one supply duct with short duct runs which create heavy noise.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControls are at end of life cycle and in need of upgrade.

Mechanical->LightingSeveral classrooms with older surface mounted fixture. Fixtures are dim.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceCorridors have transom windows and doors are not fire rated.

ADAAccess to portable classrooms is not adequate.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:25:14AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fain ES Portable - GT

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 28.97 26.07 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.60 3.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.27 4.74 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 2.40 60.00Exterior Windows 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.33 2.00 60.00Exterior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.77 12.39 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 2.40 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:25:37AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fain ES Portable - GT

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsMinor repair needed for loose boards and battens.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are single pane with clear glass. Observed one broken window on west side.

Structural->Exterior DoorsDoors are showing minor wear and need painting.

Structural->Interior WallsWalls are wood paneling.

Structural->Interior DoorsDoors show minor wear and have old hardware (knobs).

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHVAC equipment is at end of life cycle.


Mechanical->LightingLighting was dim, as if fixtures were not functioning properly.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceBuilding is not constructed of fire resistant materials.

ADARestrooms are small and do not meet accessibility requirements.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:25:37AM


Project:

Site: Building:



Wichita Falls ISDCounty: 1Region: 109fBuilding #:

% of System Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fain ES Portable - Pre K Bldg.

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 2.32 60.00Exterior Windows 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.53 0.32 60.00Exterior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 0.72 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:25:22AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fain ES Portable - Pre K Bldg.

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->RoofRoof has a few broken and loose shingles.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are inefficient. They are single pane with clear glass.

Structural->Exterior DoorsDoors show minor wear and are in need of painting.

Structural->Interior FloorsStorage area has sign of water intrusion that has damaged the flooring.

Structural->Interior WallsInterior walls are wood paneling.

Structural->Interior DoorsDoors have signs of wear and most have non-accessible hardware (knobs).

Structural->Fixed EquipmentCasework is in poor condition and is nearing end of life span.




ADABuilding is not at grade level. Ramps are provided. Restrooms are not the proper size for accessibility.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:25:22AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905130Site #:

Assessments 2013

Farris Early Childhood Center Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 3.76 30.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 PoorSingle Component 8.93 2.68 30.00Exterior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 4.41 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.20 0.72 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical

ElectricalSingle Component 2.75 0.83 30.00Main Service 100.00 Poor

Single Component 2.75 0.83 30.00Distribution 100.00 Poor













Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:25:44AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905130Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773




Single Component UnsatADA


Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureObserved several areas with cracking at interior floor from settling. At classroom 4, exterior wall has separated from floor due to settling foundation. Classroom 2 has cracks at exterior wall. Floor is supported by original wood floor joist. Water infiltrating building through cracks in foundation at basement, water is contacting some of the main electrical panels.

Structural->Exterior WallsObserved several areas with cracking of brick and mortar. Other areas have been repainted in the past. Stoop on south end has major damage from cracking.

Structural->RoofPortion of roof have been replaced in past several years. Southern portion is in poor condition.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are single pane with clear glass and not energy efficient. Some windows are hard to open and will not stay open.

Structural->Interior FloorsRenovated area has floors in good condition. South wing is in poor condition and needs replacement.

Structural->Interior WallsSouth wing has very soiled and worn walls.

Structural->Interior DoorsFacility has several older wooden doors as well as some plastic laminated doors that have minor damage. Some have old hardware that is not ADA compliant.

Structural->CeilingSouth wing has ceiling with major stains, sagging and damaged 2x4 tiles. Kitchen and library have stained ceilings.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentCasework is wood/plastic laminate-clad and in poor condition. Many cabinets have chipped or damaged laminate tops as well as damaged wood bases.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceSystem is at end of life expectancy. Some of the main panels in basement have some exposure to water and have rust issues. Water infiltrating building through cracks in foundation.

Mechanical->Electrical-->DistributionDistribution system has areas with old wiring needing replacement.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplyMost of main piping is original and has areas of corrosion and frequent leaking.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteMost of main piping is original and has areas of corrosion and frequent leaking.

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionRooms 8, 9 & 10 in south wing share two units for the three rooms.

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:25:44AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905130Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControls are nearing end of life expectancy and need updating.

Mechanical->LightingSouth wing fixtures are surface mounted and in poor condition

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceWalls separating classrooms from hallways have transom windows and non-rated doors, creating a break in fire separation.

ADAThere is no wheelchair access to main entry of school. All entry points to building have several steps.

Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:25:44AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905130Site #:

Assessments 2013

Farris Early Childhood Center Portable

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 28.97 17.38 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.60 3.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.27 3.16 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.00 2.40 60.00Exterior Windows 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.33 2.00 60.00Exterior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.77 8.26 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.00 2.40 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.00 1.50 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 5.00 3.00 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:25:51AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905130Site #:

Assessments 2013

Farris Early Childhood Center Portable

Project #: 5773

Single Component 0.50 0.00 0.00Fire Alarm Operation 100.00 Unsat


Single Component 0.50 0.30 60.00Emergency Lighting 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.00 0.60 60.00Fire Resistance 100.00 Fair



Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureObserved area of cracking and spalling near entry doors.

Structural->Exterior WallsWalls have some minor cracking and in need of repainting.

Structural->RoofRoof has a few areas of loose or damaged shingles.

Structural->Exterior WindowsBuilding has older residential storm windows with limited life remaining.

Structural->Exterior DoorsDoors need adjustment and repainting.

Structural->Interior WallsWear and slight damage to wood paneling on interior walls.

Structural->Interior DoorsDoors have some soiling and old hardware (knobs).

Structural->CeilingCeilings are sheetrock with blown texture. Ceiling has cracks and is coming loose from ceiling joist.



Mechanical->LightingLighting is older and very dim.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire Alarm System-->Fire Alarm OperationThere is no fire alarm in building.

Safety\Fire Protection->Emergency LightingThere are insufficient emergency fixtures at secondary exits.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceBuilding is constructed of non fire resistant materials.

ADABuilding is at grade and accessible, however there is no wheelchair access to main entry.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:25:51AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905111Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fowler ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:26:06AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905111Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fowler ES Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionThe exposed spiral duct has signs of dust infiltration. The main supply ducts are dirty on top from outside dust.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:26:06AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905111Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fowler ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 7.52 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 4.41 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.20 0.72 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:25:59AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905111Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fowler ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureThe north and south side of the original structure have cracking of the foundation in multiple areas below the brick ledge. The 1970 addition has major cracking at the four corners of the building. Some of the corners have concrete broken away from the building exposing the rebar.

Structural->Exterior WindowsThe windows in the original building are inefficient single pane windows with clear glass.

Structural->Interior WallsMain corridor and cafeteria walls have numerous cracking ceramic tiles in the wainscot. Areas with sheetrock have soiled spots and areas of damage.

Structural->Interior DoorsSome of the plastic laminate covered doors have chipped or cracked veneer. Several doors have outdated hardware that is not ADA accessible.

Structural->CeilingMajor portions of the school have older 2x4 ceiling tiles that are soiled, sagging and some cracked or broken tiles. Areas of original sky lights are open with exposed painted (some un-painted) plywood.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentThe casework is mostly plastic laminate clad and is nearing the end of its life cycle. Observed areas of chipped or broken laminate. Also some of the plastic laminate toilet partitions show the same signs of age with chipped pieces.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceThe existing electrical service is at maximum capacity.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsHVAC controls are nearing end of life cycle. System is still in operations, however the parts for repair are not being produced any longer.

Mechanical->LightingCorridor and some classroom lighting is in poor condition, fixtures are stained and some look to be not operating properly.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceThe corridor walls in the original portion of the school have transom windows to the classrooms. The glass has been removed and replaced with painted plywood.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:25:59AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905112Site #:

Assessments 2013

Franklin ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:26:20AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905112Site #:

Assessments 2013

Franklin ES Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationSystem has filter issues.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:26:20AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905112Site #:

Assessments 2013

Franklin ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 15.96 9.57 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.82 5.29 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.02 3.01 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.90 1.47 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.47 0.42 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.38 7.54 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.14 4.88 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.12 0.67 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.61 2.16 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical









Single Component 3.94 3.55 90.00Lighting 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.60 0.54 90.00Elevators and Conveyances 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.74 1.57 90.00Connectivity 100.00 Good






Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:26:13AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905112Site #:

Assessments 2013

Franklin ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773


Single Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Fire Alarm Connectivity (N/A)




Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureThere is some water infiltration into the basement.

Structural->Exterior WallsSome areas have minor water infiltration.

Structural->RoofSome repairs are needed on the roof.


Structural->Interior WallsThe walls have some cracking from settlement.

Structural->Interior DoorsDoors are historic and in need of some repair.

Structural->CeilingSome tiles are discolored and cracked.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome of the equipment has reached the end of it's life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceSystem is at capacity and in need of upgrades.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplySome of the piping is galvanized.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesSome of the fixtures have reached the end of their life cycle.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteThe lines have a history of stopping up and needs some upgrades.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationThe Kitchen/Cafe HVAC system has reached the end of its life cycle.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceSome corridor walls have transoms.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:26:13AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905114Site #:

Assessments 2013

Haynes Northwest Academy Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:26:56AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905114Site #:

Assessments 2013

Haynes Northwest Academy Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionThere is dust infiltration into the building thru the system.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:26:56AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905114Site #:

Assessments 2013

Haynes Northwest Academy Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical






HVACSingle Component 9.08 2.72 30.00Energy Generation 100.00 Poor









Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:26:49AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905114Site #:

Assessments 2013

Haynes Northwest Academy Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsThere is some water infiltration.

Structural->Exterior WindowsThe windows are single pane and sweat enough to rot the cabinets below.

Structural->CeilingMany tiles are discolored and there are some cracks.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome equipment has chipped surfaces and/or at the end of the life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceMain service is original and is in need of upgrades.


Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesSome fixtures are original and some trough urinals are still in use.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteSystem is in need of repairs.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationMany of the systems are original as added in 1984 and at end of life cycle.


Mechanical->LightingSome light fixtures are original and not energy efficient.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceSome walls have transoms that have been filled, but not at same rating as wall.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:26:49AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013

Houston ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:27:47AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013

Houston ES Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationThe system allows too much dust accumulation on the exposed ductwork.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:27:47AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013

Houston ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 15.96 4.79 30.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 PoorSingle Component 8.82 2.65 30.00Exterior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 5.02 3.01 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.90 1.47 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.47 0.42 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.38 2.51 30.00Interior Floors 100.00 PoorSingle Component 8.14 2.44 30.00Interior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 1.12 1.01 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.61 3.25 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:27:40AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013

Houston ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureFoundation has some settlement and termite damage.

Structural->Exterior WallsThe exterior walls have water infiltration and need tuckpointing.

Structural->RoofThe roof has occasional leaks and is at its life cycle end.

Structural->Exterior WindowsThe older areas of the building has single pane glass.

Structural->Interior FloorsSome of the floor is spongy in the original building and is uneven. Carpet is at the end of its life.

Structural->Interior WallsMuch of the plastic laminate system is delaminating from the wall substrate.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome equipment is chipped and/or at the end of its life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceThe main electrical service is located in the basement which has water infiltration.


Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplyThe water service is at the end of its life cycle and is galvanized pipe.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteThe waste water has a history of leaks and is at the end of its life cycle.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationSome of the units are at the end of their life cycle.


Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceCorridors have transoms and stairwells are open.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:27:40AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013

Houston ES Portable 1_2

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 28.97 26.07 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.60 3.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.27 1.58 30.00Roof 100.00 PoorSingle Component 4.00 2.40 60.00Exterior Windows 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.33 3.00 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.77 12.39 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:27:54AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsPortable requires continual upkeep.

Structural->RoofRoof is at it's life cycle end.



Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceSome walls still have wood paneling.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:27:54AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013

Houston ES Portable 3

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:28:01AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013

Houston ES Portable 3

Project #: 5773






Comments







Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:28:01AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:28:09AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773






Comments







Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:28:09AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905118Site #:

Assessments 2013

Jefferson ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 3.76 30.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 PoorSingle Component 8.93 2.68 30.00Exterior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:28:16AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905118Site #:

Assessments 2013

Jefferson ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureBuilding has settled and has water infiltration under the slab in areas.

Structural->Exterior WallsThe insulated panels are in very bad condition and need replacement.

Structural->RoofSome areas of the roof are at the end of their life cycle.

Structural->Exterior WindowsMost windows are single pane and in poor condition.

Structural->Interior FloorsSome floors have settled and some floors have cavities and seepage under them.

Structural->CeilingMany tiles are sagging or discolored.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentEquipment has some chips and other repair needs.

Mechanical->Electrical-->DistributionThis school needs additional outlets throughout.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteThe system has history of leaks, seepage and smells.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationThe building needs new HVAC in the Kitchen.

Mechanical->LightingMany areas have unprotected bulbs.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceSome old corridor walls have transoms still in use.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:28:16AM


Project:

Site: Building:



Wichita Falls ISDCounty: 1Region: 44Building #:

% of System Rating

243905118Site #:

Assessments 2013

Jefferson ES PreSchool Portable

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 28.97 26.07 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.60 3.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.27 1.58 30.00Roof 100.00 PoorSingle Component 4.00 1.20 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 3.33 3.00 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.77 12.39 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:28:23AM

Project:

Site: Building:



Wichita Falls ISDCounty: 1Region: 44Building #:

% of System Rating

243905118Site #:

Assessments 2013

Jefferson ES PreSchool Portable

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior walls need continual upkeep.

Structural->RoofRoof is at end of life cycle.


Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHVAC is at the end of life cycle.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceSome walls have wood paneling.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:28:23AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013

Lamar ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:28:52AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013

Lamar ES Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationThe HVAC system needs filter maintenance.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:28:52AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013

Lamar ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 15.96 4.79 30.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 PoorSingle Component 8.82 5.29 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.02 3.01 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.90 1.47 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.47 0.42 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.38 7.54 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.14 7.33 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.12 1.01 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.61 2.16 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:28:45AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013

Lamar ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureBuilding still settling and is worse at cafetorium.

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior has some water infiltration.



Structural->CeilingMany tiles are discolored, sagging or cracked.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome equipment is chipped and/or at the end of life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServicePanels are at capacity and in need of some upgrades.


Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesThere are many old fixtures.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteWaste system under kitchen needs to be replaced.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHVAC system is at the end of the life cycle.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControls are obsolete and at the end of life cycle.

Mechanical->LightingThere are many outdated fixtures that need to be replaced.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceSome corridor walls have transoms.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:28:45AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013

Lamar ES Portable 23

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:28:59AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior is in need of constant maintenance.

Structural->RoofRoof is in need of constant maintenance.


Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationSystem is at end of life cycle.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceExterior windows are single pane.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:28:59AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:29:06AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior needs constant maintenance.

Structural->RoofShingle roof needs some repair.



Mechanical->LightingSome of the fixtures are outdated and need replacement.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceExterior walls have wood paneling.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:29:06AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:29:13AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior is in need of constant maintenance.

Structural->RoofRoof is in need of constant maintenance.




Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:29:13AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905121Site #:

Assessments 2013

Milam ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 15.96 14.36 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.82 2.65 30.00Exterior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 5.02 3.01 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.90 1.47 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.47 0.42 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.38 7.54 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.14 7.33 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.12 1.01 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.61 2.16 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:29:35AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905121Site #:

Assessments 2013

Milam ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsThe exterior walls have some water infiltration and non-insulated window panels.

Structural->RoofSome areas of the roof are at the end of the life cycle.


Structural->CeilingSome ceiling tiles are discolored and cracked.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome equipment is chipped and/or at the end of it's life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceThe panels are at capacity and in need of some upgrades.


Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteSome of the pipe is at the end of its life cycle.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceSome corridor walls have transoms and the stairways are open.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:29:35AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905121Site #:

Assessments 2013

Milam ES Portable

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 28.97 26.07 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.60 3.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.27 4.74 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 1.20 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 3.33 3.00 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.77 12.39 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:29:43AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905121Site #:

Assessments 2013

Milam ES Portable

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsBuilding needs continual exterior maintenance.


Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceThe portable has some wood paneling on exterior walls.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:29:43AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905128Site #:

Assessments 2013

Scotland Park ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 3.48 90.00Exterior Windows 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:30:47AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905128Site #:

Assessments 2013

Scotland Park ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsObserved cracking at 35% of classroom windows. Cracks run from center portion of the window sill down to the foundation.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:30:47AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905123Site #:

Assessments 2013

Sheppard AFB ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:31:01AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905123Site #:

Assessments 2013

Sheppard AFB ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Single Component 0.44 0.26 60.00Fire Alarm Connectivity 100.00 Fair




Comments

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire Alarm System-->Fire Alarm ConnectivityThe fire alarm is not connected to outside monitoring service.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:31:01AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905123Site #:

Assessments 2013

Sheppard AFB ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 7.52 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:30:54AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905123Site #:

Assessments 2013

Sheppard AFB ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureObserved areas with cracking or settling of floor. Exterior brick veneer has cracking from settling. Portion of front of school had brick replaced after settling caused a brick to separate from building.

Structural->Exterior WallsHorizontal cracks observed in brick. Soffit has areas that need painting and some repair.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are single pane with clear glass and are not energy efficient.

Structural->Interior DoorsSeveral doors have older hardware including cafeteria.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentCasework is in classrooms in in fair condition. Observed several areas with crack or chipped counter tops. Base cabinets are showing signs of heavy wear.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceMain service is at capacity, any future building additions will require upgrade to service.


Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplySupply system has several leaks throughout building that need repair ever so often. Condition due to older pipes.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteWaste system has several leaks throughout building that need repair ever so often. Condition due to older pipes.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationCafeteria and kitchen equipment is at end of life cycle and needs replacing. Remainder of building is in good condition.

Mechanical->LightingSome classrooms have older 1x4 surface mounted fixtures that are not providing proper light levels.

Safety\Fire Protection->Means of Exit-->Exit SafetyDoors leading out of cafeteria do not have panic hardware for egress out of space. Also doors are not properly spaced to create two separate exits. Doors into library can be locked and have no panic hardware..

Safety\Fire Protection->Emergency LightingLibrary has no emergency exit lighting.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceThe classroom walls shared with the corridors have transom windows preventing a complete separation.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:30:54AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905123Site #:

Assessments 2013

Sheppard AFB ES Portable

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 28.97 26.07 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.60 3.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.27 3.16 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Exterior Windows 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.33 3.00 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.77 8.26 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 3.00 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:31:08AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905123Site #:

Assessments 2013

Sheppard AFB ES Portable

Project #: 5773

Single Component 0.50 0.30 60.00Fire Alarm Operation 100.00 Fair

Single Component 0.50 0.30 60.00Fire Alarm Connectivity 100.00 Fair




Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior walls have some areas with loose siding and trim.

Structural->RoofRoof has some loose or damaged shingles.

Structural->Interior WallsWood paneling has several damaged areas.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentCasework has some damaged to counter tops and bases.


Safety\Fire Protection->Fire Alarm System-->Fire Alarm OperationAlarm is not in building, it is mounted outside to main building.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire Alarm System-->Fire Alarm ConnectivityThe fire alarm is not connected to outside monitoring.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistancePortable is constructed of non fire resistant materials.

ADABuilding has ramp for access, but ramp doesn't meet current code.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:31:08AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905129Site #:

Assessments 2013

Southern Hills ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 22.65 20.38 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.61 4.57 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.55 2.73 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows (N/A)Single Component 0.52 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 12.89 7.73 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.90 2.94 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.82 1.64 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.89 0.27 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 5.71 5.14 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical









Single Component 3.97 2.38 60.00Lighting 100.00 FairSafety\Fire Protection




Single Component 1.44 0.43 30.00Fire Control Safety 100.00 Poor

Fire Alarm SystemSingle Component 0.44 0.00 0.00Fire Alarm Operation 100.00 Unsat

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:31:22AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905129Site #:

Assessments 2013

Southern Hills ES Gym

Project #: 5773

Single Component 0.44 0.00 0.00Fire Alarm Connectivity 100.00 Unsat




Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsMetal wall panels have several areas of damage.

Structural->RoofObserved areas inside that indicated some roof leaking.

Structural->Interior FloorsSome signs of wear and a few areas around volleyball sleeves are buckling.

Structural->Interior WallsWalls have worn and damaged areas. Some areas also need repainting.

Structural->CeilingInsulation panels at roof are sagging (falling), torn or soiled.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHVAC equipment needs maintenance.

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionHVAC units are in corners of gym and have no duct runs for better distribution.

Mechanical->LightingFixtures have inefficient T-12 lamps and are not providing enough light.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire Control Capability-->Fire Control SafetyOnly one small fire extinguisher in entire gym.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire Alarm System-->Fire Alarm OperationNo fire alarm observed.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire Alarm System-->Fire Alarm ConnectivityNo fire alarm observed.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:31:22AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905129Site #:

Assessments 2013

Southern Hills ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 3.48 90.00Exterior Windows 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:31:15AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905129Site #:

Assessments 2013

Southern Hills ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsObserved cracking under 25% of classroom windows.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:31:15AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905125Site #:

Assessments 2013

Washington Jackson ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 15.96 14.36 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.82 5.29 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.02 4.52 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.90 1.47 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.47 0.42 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.38 5.03 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.14 4.88 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.12 0.67 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.61 2.16 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:32:01AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905125Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsWindow wall panels need repainting or refinishing.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are single pane clear glass and not energy efficient. Several observed with broken hardware and unable to stay open.

Structural->Interior FloorsSeveral areas with worn carpet. Others with older VCT that is at end of service life.

Structural->Interior WallsUpper portions of gym walls need repainting. Glazed tile in corridors chipped or cracked tiles. Sheetrock walls have minor damage and soiling.

Structural->Interior DoorsPlastic laminate doors have chips, patches for hardware changes and some still have older hardware (knobs).

Structural->CeilingClassrooms are mostly 2x2 and in good condition. Hallways still have original 1x1 tiles that are stained, broken or missing.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentCasework and lockers are in poor condition.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceMain service equipment is at or nearing end of life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->DistributionSub panels are original and in need of replacement in the near future.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplyPiping is original and has the occasional leak.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesDrinking fountains are original in many areas and need upgrading. Other fountains are broken and repair. A couple restrooms have old (original fixtures).

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteLines are cast iron and have history of splitting.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationCafeteria and kitchen nearing end of life cycle.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControls are at end of life and hard to found replacement parts.

Mechanical->LightingHallway lighting is older and very dim.

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:32:01AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905125Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773

Safety\Fire Protection->Means of Exit-->Exit SafetySeveral renovated areas have less than adequate exit egress. Some have second exit path through another occupied space, while others are at end of dead end corridors.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceCorridor walls have transom windows.

ADAClinic is not accessible. Stairwells do not have proper handrails or guardrails. Main entry is not wheelchair accessible.

Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:32:01AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905126Site #:

Assessments 2013

West Foundation ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 3.48 90.00Exterior Windows 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:32:08AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905126Site #:

Assessments 2013

West Foundation ES Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->RoofRoof is showing some blistering and cracking in original roof areas.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentPlastic laminate/MDF casework nearing end of life cycle. Counter tops at wet areas have signs of MDF swelling due to moisture penetration. Base cabinets under sink have stains from past leaks.


Mechanical->LightingPoor Light levels in library and kindergarten multi-purpose area. Some broken or damaged fixtures in classrooms and kitchen.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:32:08AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905041Site #:

Assessments 2013

Barwise JHS Field House

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 22.65 20.38 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.61 6.85 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.55 2.73 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.44 2.06 60.00Exterior Windows 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.52 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 12.89 7.73 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.90 4.41 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.82 1.09 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.89 0.80 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.14 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:22:38AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905041Site #:

Assessments 2013

Barwise JHS Field House

Project #: 5773





Comments

Structural->RoofRoof has numerous blisters, no apparent leaks at this time.

Structural->Exterior WindowsClassroom windows are single paned with clear glass and not energy efficient.

Structural->Interior FloorsSmall gym floor is in poor shape and needs resurfacing. Main gym floor is in good condition.

Structural->Interior DoorsDoors showing signs of wear. Many locations have out dated hardware (knobs).

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceSimilar to main building, capacity is at maximum.


Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesSome older, poor condition toilet fixtures in the locker rooms.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationNo cooling provided in locker rooms.

Mechanical->LightingMain gym lights are HID fixtures that are inefficient.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceAreas with new partitions constructed are not properly rated. Some walls have wood paneling.

ADASmall gym and offices on second floor are not accessible. some locker room restrooms are not accessible.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:22:38AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905041Site #:

Assessments 2013

Barwise JHS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 15.96 14.36 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.82 7.94 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.02 1.51 30.00Roof 100.00 PoorSingle Component 4.90 1.47 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.47 0.42 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.38 5.03 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.14 7.33 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.12 0.67 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.61 2.16 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical









Single Component 3.94 2.36 60.00Lighting 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Elevators and Conveyances (N/A)Single Component 1.74 1.57 90.00Connectivity 100.00 Good






Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:22:30AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905041Site #:

Assessments 2013

Barwise JHS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->RoofAll roof areas have major blistering. Some areas have ponding issues. Informed of leaks in several locations, most have been repaired to date.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are single pane, clear glass and are inefficient.

Structural->Interior FloorsObserved several areas with older carpet flooring that is warn and soiled. Most of building has older VCT that is still in good condition.

Structural->Interior DoorsInterior doors show some sign of wear and have patches from change in hardware. Areas of doors still have original hardware.

Structural->CeilingObserved several areas with 2x4 ceiling tiles that are soiled, sagging or damaged.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentCasework in most classrooms is damaged and needing major restoration work.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceMain is in working order, however there is no capacity for future expansion.

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionClassroom distribution is poor. There are no dampers or controls to adjust air flow to individual rooms.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControls are in working order, but are at the end of service life.

Mechanical->LightingObserved several areas with poor light levels. Additional areas with surface mounted fixtures that are showing age.

ADASecond floor areas are only accessible by stairs, there is no elevator in building.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:22:30AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905041Site #:

Assessments 2013

Barwise JHS Portable - BDC

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 28.97 26.07 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.60 3.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.27 3.16 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Exterior Windows 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.33 3.00 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.00 3.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.77 8.26 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Interior Doors (N/A)Single Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.00 4.50 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical











Means of ExitSingle Component 0.50 0.30 60.00Exit Operation 100.00 Fair




Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:22:45AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905041Site #:

Assessments 2013

Barwise JHS Portable - BDC

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior walls have some areas of lost or damaged siding.

Structural->RoofRoof has some areas with damaged or missing shingles.

Structural->Interior WallsWalls show signs of wear and some soiling.



Safety\Fire Protection->Means of Exit-->Exit OperationExits not at grade level.


ADABuilding not at grade, only access is by set of steps.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:22:45AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905048Site #:

Assessments 2013

Kirby JHS Field House

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 3.76 30.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 PoorSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows (N/A)Single Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 4.41 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:28:30AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905048Site #:

Assessments 2013

Kirby JHS Field House

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureThe south and north wall of the main gym as well as the north wall of the girls locker room have major settling issues. Floor is 2-3 inches lower at wall than the floor only 3 feet in from the wall. Observed areas of cracking walls at corners and interior pilasters.

Structural->Exterior WallsSigns of water intrusion in northwest corner. Walls/foundation has cracking from water infiltration. There is minor cracking on the plaster covered walls on all sides of the field house.

Structural->Interior FloorsThe auxiliary gym flooring shows signs of nearing end of its life cycle and needs to be restriped.

Structural->Interior WallsThere are some cracking on the walls from settling issues described in the foundation notes. Walls in locker room areas are soiled and need repainting.

Structural->CeilingCeiling in girls locker is in poor condition and needs replacing.


Mechanical->LightingMain gym fixtures are inefficient HID fixtures. Surfaces mounted fixtures in locker rooms are in fair condition.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:28:30AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905048Site #:

Assessments 2013

Kirby JHS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 7.52 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.93 2.68 30.00Exterior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 2.32 60.00Exterior Windows 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.53 0.32 60.00Exterior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 4.41 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 1.63 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical











Means of ExitSingle Component 0.42 0.25 60.00Exit Operation 100.00 Fair




Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:28:37AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905048Site #:

Assessments 2013

Kirby JHS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureSeveral areas around the building with cracking and spalling of the foundation between the grade level and bottom of the plaster veneer.

Structural->Exterior WallsMinor cracking to wall surfaces, no signs of water infiltration at upper portions of wall.

Structural->Roof60% of roof was replaced in summer of 2012 (sloped portions). Remaining 40% of roof (flat portions) need replacement. Scheduled for summer 2013.

Structural->Exterior WindowsThere are very few windows in facility. Windows are however single pane and clear glass and not energy efficient.

Structural->Exterior DoorsSeveral of the exterior doors are older doors with painted plywood inserts in place of original glass. Observed one set of doors that stuck and would not open with proper force applied to panic bar.

Structural->Interior FloorsThere are several areas of VCT flooring that are showing heavy wear. Carpeted areas are in poor condition.

Structural->Interior WallsThere are numerous areas throughout the facility that have wallpaper that is coming loose from wall. Other areas with sheetrock have soiled spots and some damage.

Structural->CeilingMost of the school still has the original 2x4 lay-in ceiling tiles. These tiles are in poor condition with areas of stains, cracks and some heavily damaged or missing tiles.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentThere is a lot of original casework that is in poor condition.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationThe air handlers and piping are all original and are inefficient and at the end of the life cycle. Chillers are less than 5 years old.

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionSystem was set-up for larger open spaces as building was originally designed. Now that spaces have been enclosed to smaller classroom areas the distribution system is not providing proper distribution of air to all spaces. Many complaints about hot or cold rooms. Currently there is no fresh air intakes into the system for proper air changes.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsThe controls are mostly in non working order which is a factor to uneven heating and cooling in rooms.

Mechanical->LightingThe light fixtures are the original fixtures, however most have new ballast and lamps.

Safety\Fire Protection->Means of Exit-->Exit OperationThere is one set of exit doors that could not be opened with proper force applied to panic bar. Also there are inadequate exit signs leading out of resource center (library).

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:28:37AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905048Site #:

Assessments 2013

Kirby JHS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceThe walls erected to create individual classroom out of larger open spaces do not continue to bottom of roof structure. The break doesn't allow for the proper fire resistance between the classrooms and the exit corridors.

ADAObserved rooms with no or very limited accessibility.

Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:28:37AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905047Site #:

Assessments 2013

McNiel JHS Field House

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows (N/A)Single Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 4.41 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:29:21AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905047Site #:

Assessments 2013

McNiel JHS Field House

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Interior FloorsThe small gym flooring is worn and needs to be restriped. Large gym floor has some minor wear at bleachers.

Structural->Interior WallsMost interior walls have minor to major soiling and are in need of fresh paint. Some walls have damage and require patching.

Structural->CeilingCeiling areas in locker rooms and weight room have original 2x4 ceiling tiles that are stained, chipped and cracked. Ceilings in gym areas are exposed and in good condition.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentThe basketball equipment in the small gym is in poor condition. Lockers in boys locker room have areas of damage and heavy wear. Main gym bleachers have areas that are not functioning properly. Guardrails on each end of bleachers are loose.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplyLocker room shower areas have mixing valve issues and need to be repaired due to extended periods of non use.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteAt the girls locker room the toilets have issues connecting to the sewer lines. Waste pipe becomes disconnected from main trunk line.


Mechanical->LightingThe main lighting in the large gym are older HID light fixtures that are inefficient and some are currently not in working order.

ADAThe lavatories in the girls locker room are not accessible. No accessible water closets in either locker room.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:29:21AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905047Site #:

Assessments 2013

McNiel JHS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 3.48 90.00Exterior Windows 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 2.20 30.00Interior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 1.20 0.72 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 1.63 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical












Single Component 0.42 0.13 30.00Exit Safety 100.00 Poor



Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:29:28AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905047Site #:

Assessments 2013

McNiel JHS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Interior FloorsThere are several areas with older flooring that is showing signs of wear and has staining.

Structural->Interior WallsThe majority of the facility is sheetrock walls that are in poor condition due to staining, damage and need of repainting. Many of the restrooms have issues with students coloring on ceramic tile walls.

Structural->Interior DoorsThe facility has plastic laminate clad doors that have areas of wear and damage. Most of the non classroom doors have older hardware (knobs) that are not ADA compliant.

Structural->CeilingThe majority of the facility has the old original 2x4 lay-in ceiling tiles and grid. Many of these are soiled, chipped or broken and need replacement.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSeveral areas have casework that shows signs of wear and are nearing end of life cycle.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHVAC system is using furnaces that are not supported by the manufacturer and district cannot find parts to maintain. They are original to building and are at the end of the life cycle.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsThe controls are 15+ years old and similar to other facilities parts are becoming hard to find. system is however in working order currently.

Safety\Fire Protection->Means of Exit-->Exit SafetyThere is no second exit egress for the pod without having to travel through other occupied spaces (classrooms). The doors to the other spaces do not open with the path of travel and there are no exit signs leading occupants to the secondary exit that are now hidden from view.

Safety\Fire Protection->Emergency LightingSee comments for Exit Safety. Pods B,C & F need additional emergency lighting in corridors for secondary exits in classroom.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceThe newer partitions in the pods do not continue to structure to construct an unbroken smoke or fire barrier between classrooms and exit corridors.

ADAThe non-classroom doors have older non accessible hardware such as the original door knobs.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:29:28AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905045Site #:

Assessments 2013

Zundy JHS Field House

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows (N/A)Single Component 0.53 0.32 60.00Exterior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:32:50AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905045Site #:

Assessments 2013

Zundy JHS Field House

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureSome cracking of exterior masonry wall at pilaster on west side of gym.

Structural->Exterior WallsSome cracking of exterior masonry wall at pilaster on west side of gym. Some discoloration of west wall from water running down surface causing stains

Structural->RoofRoof is showing signs of nearing end of life cycle. Observed numerous blisters and rippling. It was noted by escort that part of roof (>10%) had been replaced when it was damage by a storm several years back.

Structural->Exterior DoorsSome of the exterior doors are in need of painting and an adjustment of the hardware.

Structural->Interior FloorsObserved several holes in rubber floor from retractable bleachers warring on surface. holes are in usable floor space when bleachers are retracted.


Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionExterior vents for fresh air intake have been sealed from the outside and not allowing for proper fresh air intake into large gym area.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:32:50AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905045Site #:

Assessments 2013

Zundy JHS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 15.96 4.79 30.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 PoorSingle Component 8.82 5.29 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.02 3.01 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.90 1.47 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.47 0.28 60.00Exterior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.38 5.03 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.14 2.44 30.00Interior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 1.12 0.67 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.61 2.16 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical









Single Component 3.94 1.18 30.00Lighting 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.60 0.54 90.00Elevators and Conveyances 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.74 1.57 90.00Connectivity 100.00 Good






Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:32:57AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905045Site #:

Assessments 2013

Zundy JHS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureFront facade of main building showing major signs of settling and failure of foundation. Observed major cracking of brick veneer and cast stone detailing. Front doors to facility are always having to be re-adjusted to correct door operation. Interior side of front wall has major cracking from settling. Also, some of the flooring in this front area is unlevel due to settlement.

Structural->Exterior WallsSee notes on foundation/structure. Masonry veneer has numerous cracks and damage from foundation issues and freeze/thaw conditions.

Structural->RoofSome portions of the 1995 additions have blisters and rippling of roof surface. Areas with EPDM roofing look to be in good condition, but are nearing end of life expectancy.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are single pane and not efficient. Windows sweat with only single pane causing water to run down on interior surfaces.

Structural->Exterior DoorsSome of the older doors need an upgrade to hardware and re-painting. Front doors sticking because of foundation issues.

Structural->Interior FloorsObserved numerous areas with poor flooring conditions. Issues include major signs of cracking ,wear, stains and large gaps in joints between tiles.

Structural->Interior WallsInterior walls in the original building that are constructed of plaster are failing and releasing wall tile wainscoting. Walls in the same areas have major cracking and bulging from foundation issues. Settling of some walls causing issue with doorways.

Structural->Interior DoorsNon classroom doors equipped with non-ADA hardware, such as old standard door knobs.

Structural->CeilingMany of the areas have 2' x 4' lay-in ceiling tiles that are in poor condition. Many are chipped, soiled and sagging from grid. Areas with 2'x2' tiles are in fair to good shape.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentLockers in hallways are in need of some new hardware and re-painting. Casework in some areas is showing needs of being replaced or re-surfaced.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceThe current system is at full capacity, no additional room for future expansion or upgrades to existing system.

Mechanical->Electrical-->DistributionObserved locations of panels boxes mounted to hallway walls with exposed conduit below. Also a number of the original classrooms have surface mounted outlets with damaged or missing wire covers.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplyWFISD escort staff noted that facility has issues with leaks on a continuous basis.

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:32:57AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905045Site #:

Assessments 2013

Zundy JHS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesSome of the plumbing fixtures showing signs of age and need to be repaired or possibly replaced.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteWFISD escort staff noted that facility has issues with leaks on a continuous basis.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationTen plus units have been in operations for over 30 years.

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionObserved several classrooms with noisy air supply from the only supply duct in the space. Other rooms seem stuffy and not cooling properly.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControls are at or nearing end of life cycle

Mechanical->LightingMany classrooms have inadequate lighting levels for amount of fixtures in the room. Most of these fixtures have inefficient T-12 lamps. Also, observed several other areas with damaged or broken fixtures.

Safety\Fire Protection->Emergency LightingFacility has adequate emergency lighting, some fixtures however are old and do not look to be in proper working order.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceAt the original portion of the building, the main exit stairs are not enclosed with the properly rated walls and doors.

ADAA couple of the classrooms on the lower level are not accessible.

Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:32:57AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013

Hirschi HS Auto Mechanics

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 14.26 12.83 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.19 11.87 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 2.71 2.44 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.88 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.45 0.40 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.66 5.99 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.81 7.93 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.44 1.30 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.37 3.04 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.48 1.33 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical









Single Component 4.41 3.97 90.00Lighting 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Elevators and Conveyances (N/A)Single Component 1.32 1.19 90.00Connectivity 100.00 Good






Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:27:33AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013

Hirschi HS Auto Mechanics

Project #: 5773






Comments




Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:27:33AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013

Hirschi HS Field House

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 0.00 0.00Ceiling 100.00 UnsatSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:27:04AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013

Hirschi HS Field House

Project #: 5773






Comments


Structural->CeilingCeiling and coating is rusty and severely damaged.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesBuilding still has trough urinals.


Mechanical->LightingLighting level is not sufficient.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:27:04AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013

Hirschi HS Husky Hut

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:27:11AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013

Hirschi HS Husky Hut

Project #: 5773






Comments

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesHut still has trough urinals.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHVAC system is in need of replacement.


Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:27:11AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013

Hirschi HS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 16.92 10.15 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.79 5.27 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.02 3.01 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.44 1.93 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.38 0.34 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.95 5.36 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.27 6.54 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.21 1.09 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.50 3.30 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.19 1.91 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:27:25AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013

Hirschi HS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureBuilding is settling at entry and near chairlift.

Structural->Exterior WallsWalls have some water intrusion.

Structural->RoofMain building roof is at mid-life cycle. Roofs should be replaced at Mechanical room, Cafeteria/Kitchen and Student Center.


Structural->CeilingMany tiles are discolored and many are broken or cracked.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome equipment is chipped or at end of life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceElectrical service is at capacity and is at end of life cycle.


Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplyThe supply line to the street needs to be replaced due to brown water.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteThe system has reached its life cycle and has a history of leaks.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHalls, restrooms and Student Center do not have HVAC.

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionHalls, restrooms and Student Center do not have HVAC.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControl system has become obsolete.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceBuilding has open stairwells.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:27:25AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013

Hirschi HS S&C Facility (Weight Rm)

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:27:18AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013

Hirschi HS S&C Facility (Weight Rm)

Project #: 5773






Comments


Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:27:18AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS Field House

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows 100.00 UnsatSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:30:04AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS Field House

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->RoofRoof has history of some leaks.


Structural->CeilingCeiling is discolored and in need of repairs.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplyWater lines have history of some leaks.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesMany fixtures are original and need replacement.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteSewer has history of leaks.

Mechanical->LightingLight levels are not sufficient.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:30:04AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS JV Football Locker Rm

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 3.48 90.00Exterior Windows 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 4.41 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:30:11AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS JV Football Locker Rm

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Interior FloorsFloors are rough and in need of upgrades.

Structural->Interior WallsWalls need updating.

Structural->CeilingCeilings are discolored and in need of repair.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesMany fixtures are at end of life cycle.


Mechanical->LightingLighting needs upgrades.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:30:11AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 16.92 10.15 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.79 5.27 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.02 3.01 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.44 1.93 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.38 0.34 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.95 5.36 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.27 6.54 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.21 1.09 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.50 1.65 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 3.19 1.91 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:30:32AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureFoundation has settled in band area.

Structural->Exterior WallsSome wall have water infiltration around windows and other areas.

Structural->RoofSome roof areas have reached the end of their life cycle and other areas have blisters.


Structural->CeilingMany tiles are discolored and broken.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome of the equipment is chipped or at the end of the life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceMain panels are original and need some upgrades.

Mechanical->Electrical-->DistributionSome breakers are tripping and need some upgrading.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesMany fixtures need replacement.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteSewer piping needs to be replaced under the slab.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationMany of the systems have been replaced in 1984, but are again at the end of their life cycle.

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionNo HVAC in Halls, restrooms and Student Center.


Mechanical->LightingThere are areas with inefficient lighting.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceSome halls still have transoms and the stairwells are open.

ADABuilding not accessible to English and Math wing and Drama area.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:30:32AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS S&C Facility (Weight Room)

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:30:18AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS S&C Facility (Weight Room)

Project #: 5773






Comments


Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:30:18AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS Student Center

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:30:25AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS Student Center

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WindowsWidows are single pane.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationControls are near end of life and parts hard to find.

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionControls are near end of life and parts hard to find.


Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:30:25AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS Vo-Ag Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 14.26 12.83 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.19 11.87 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 2.71 2.44 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.88 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.45 0.40 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.66 5.99 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.81 7.93 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.44 1.30 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.37 2.02 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.48 1.33 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:30:39AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS Vo-Ag Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments


Structural->CeilingCeilings are discolored in places and there are some broken tiles.



Mechanical->LightingAll lighting is not energy efficient.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:30:39AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013

Wichita Falls HS Auxillary Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 22.65 20.38 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.61 6.85 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.55 1.36 30.00Roof 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows (N/A)Single Component 0.52 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 12.89 11.60 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.90 4.41 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.82 1.64 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.89 0.27 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 5.71 3.43 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:32:43AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013

Wichita Falls HS Auxillary Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Structural->RoofRoof is near the end of it's life cycle.

Structural->CeilingCeiling is discolored and in need of repairs.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome equipment needs upgrades.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesSome fixtures need repair or replacement.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationControls are near end of life and parts hard to find.

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionControls are near end of life and parts hard to find.


Mechanical->LightingLight level is not sufficient.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:32:43AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013

Wichita Falls HS Field House

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 7.52 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows 100.00 UnsatSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 0.00 0.00Ceiling 100.00 UnsatSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical





Single Component 3.61 0.00 0.00Waste 100.00 Unsat










Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:32:15AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013

Wichita Falls HS Field House

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureSome areas have settlement issues.

Structural->RoofThe roof has a history of some leaks.


Structural->CeilingCeiling is stained and rusted severely throughout.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesMany of the fixtures are old.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteSewer has history of leaks.

Mechanical->LightingLighting is not sufficient and needs additional fixtures.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:32:15AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013

Wichita Falls HS Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 16.92 10.15 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.79 5.27 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.02 3.01 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.44 1.93 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.38 0.34 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.95 3.57 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.27 4.36 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.21 0.73 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.50 3.30 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.19 1.91 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:32:36AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureMany settlement cracks at east end of building and along North wall.

Structural->Exterior WallsSome water infiltration around the building.

Structural->RoofThere is a history of minor leaks.

Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are single pane and not energy efficient.

Structural->Interior FloorsFloors still have some 9x9 tiles which are at the end of service life..

Structural->Interior WallsInterior walls need maintenance.

Structural->Interior DoorsMany of the doors are original and in need of repairs and upgrades.

Structural->CeilingMany of the tiles are discolored and cracked.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome equipment is chipped or at the end of the life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceMain service is at end of service life.

Mechanical->Electrical-->DistributionSome of the subpanels are at the end of their service life.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplyWater lines have history of leaks. Gas lines are at end of service life.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesAbout 25% of the fixtures need to be replaced.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteThe sewer lines have significant leaks.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationMany of the systems are at the end of their life cycle.

Mechanical->HVAC-->DistributionNo HVAC in Halls, restrooms and Student Center.

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:32:36AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773


Mechanical->LightingSome of the light fixtures are outdated and some are energy inefficient.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceMany of the rooms have non-rated original doors and transoms in the corridors plus the stairways are open.

Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:32:36AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013

Wichita Falls HS S&C Facility (Weight Room)

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:32:22AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013

Wichita Falls HS S&C Facility (Weight Room)

Project #: 5773






Comments

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:32:22AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013

Wichita Falls HS Tennis Locker Rooms

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:32:29AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013

Wichita Falls HS Tennis Locker Rooms

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior needs constant maintenance.

Structural->RoofRoof needs constant maintenance.




Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:32:29AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0009Site #:

Assessments 2013

Carrigan Career Center Building B

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 14.26 12.83 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.19 11.87 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 2.71 2.44 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.88 2.33 60.00Exterior Windows 100.00 FairSingle Component 0.45 0.40 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.66 5.99 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.81 5.29 60.00Interior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.44 1.30 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.37 2.02 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.48 0.89 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:23:29AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0009Site #:

Assessments 2013

Carrigan Career Center Building B

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WindowsSingle pane clear glass windows that are not efficient.

Structural->Interior WallsInterior walls have soiled areas and cracked areas.

Structural->CeilingSoiled ceilings in lab spaces.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentCasework is showing signs of wear with cracked or chipped laminate.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesSome older fixtures needing replacement.

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControls are at end of life and need updating.

Mechanical->LightingThe corridors and lab spaces have poor light levels

ADAThere are no accessible restrooms in building.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:23:29AM


Project:

Site: Building:



Wichita Falls ISDCounty: 1Region: Building #:

% of System Rating

0009Site #:

Assessments 2013

Carrigan Career Center Construction Tech

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 14.26 12.83 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 13.19 7.91 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 2.71 2.44 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows (N/A)Single Component 0.45 0.27 60.00Exterior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.66 5.99 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.81 7.93 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.44 1.30 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.37 3.04 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.48 1.33 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:23:37AM

Project:

Site: Building:



Wichita Falls ISDCounty: 1Region: Building #:

% of System Rating

0009Site #:

Assessments 2013

Carrigan Career Center Construction Tech

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsSlight damage to metal panels.

Structural->Exterior DoorsDoors need repainting and some minor adjustments.


Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControls are at end of life expectancy.

Mechanical->LightingLighting levels are poor.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:23:37AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0009Site #:

Assessments 2013

Carrigan Career Center Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 3.76 30.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 PoorSingle Component 8.93 2.68 30.00Exterior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows 100.00 UnsatSingle Component 0.53 0.32 60.00Exterior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 2.20 30.00Interior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 1.20 0.72 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 1.63 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:23:22AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0009Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureOriginal wood floor joists are rotting at cosmetology. Many areas of cracking and separating floors throughout building as a result of settling.

Structural->Exterior WallsWalls have cracking in several areas. Mortar is in poor condition and is needing repointing. Some separation of buildings at classroom additions.


Structural->Exterior WindowsWindows are single pane clear glass and not efficient. Windows will not stay in the open position and some have been screwed shut.

Structural->Exterior DoorsOlder doors need adjustment and repainting.

Structural->Interior FloorsSome areas of old 9x9. Carpet areas have minor staining and wear. VCT in corridors has several areas of cracking from building movement.

Structural->Interior WallsPlaster walls have cracking from building movement and some soiling.

Structural->Interior DoorsMany doors are original wood doors that need painting, adjustments or replacement.

Structural->CeilingMost ceiling are 2x4 tiles. Many are sagging, stained or damaged.


Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceMain service is at capacity and at end of life expectancy.

Mechanical->Electrical-->DistributionSub panels are original and at end of life expectancy.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplyPiping is original and has history of leaks.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesSeveral areas with older fixtures needing minor repair.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WastePiping is original and has history of leaks.

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:23:22AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0009Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773

Mechanical->HVAC-->ControlsControls are still working but are obsolete and will need upgrading.

Mechanical->LightingMany areas with 8' surface mounted fixtures with dim yellow light.

Safety\Fire Protection->Means of Exit-->Exit SafetyLarge classrooms on each end of building only have one exit with occupancies larger than 50.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceCorridors have transom windows.

ADAAll entries have multiple steps and no wheelchair access. Restrooms have not been reconfigured for accessibility.

Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:23:22AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905008Site #:

Assessments 2013

Denver Alternative Center Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows 100.00 UnsatSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 0.72 60.00Interior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:24:45AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905008Site #:

Assessments 2013

Denver Alternative Center Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior walls are in need of constant maintenance and some upgrades.

Structural->RoofRoof has history of leaks.


Structural->Interior FloorsInterior floors are worn.

Structural->Interior DoorsMany doors are slightly damaged and in need of some upgrades.

Structural->CeilingSome tiles discolored and cracked.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteWaste lines have a history of some leaks.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceSome doors, frames and finishes are not fire rated.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:24:45AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905008Site #:

Assessments 2013

Denver Alternative Center Portable A_B

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:24:52AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905008Site #:

Assessments 2013

Denver Alternative Center Portable A_B

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior walls are in need of constant maintenance.

Structural->RoofRoof has need for constant maintenance.



Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceInside of existing exterior walls are wood paneling.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:24:52AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905008Site #:

Assessments 2013

Denver Alternative Center Portable C

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:25:00AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905008Site #:

Assessments 2013

Denver Alternative Center Portable C

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior walls are in need of maintenance.

Structural->RoofThe roof is in need of constant maintenance.


Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHVAC equipment is at life cycle.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceInside of exterior walls have wood paneling.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:25:00AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905006Site #:

Assessments 2013

Harrell Accelerated Learning Center Horticulture Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 5.36 60.00Exterior Walls 100.00 FairSingle Component 6.71 4.03 60.00Roof 100.00 FairSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:26:28AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905006Site #:

Assessments 2013

Harrell Accelerated Learning Center Horticulture Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior has wood siding in need of some repair and occasional maintenance.

Structural->RoofBuilding has shingle roof and needs occasional repairs from wind damage.


Structural->Fixed EquipmentSome equipment is chipped and in need of some repair and is at the end of the life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceService is at capacity and in need of some upgrades.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->SupplySupply lines are original and have some history of leaks.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteWaste lines are original and have history of occasional leaks.



Mechanical->LightingLight levels are not all acceptable.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceThe inside of the exterior wall is wood paneling.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:26:28AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905006Site #:

Assessments 2013

Harrell Accelerated Learning Center Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 2.68 30.00Exterior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.32 60.00Exterior Doors 100.00 FairSingle Component 5.71 1.71 30.00Interior Floors 100.00 PoorSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 1.63 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 1.68 1.01 60.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Fair

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:26:35AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905006Site #:

Assessments 2013

Harrell Accelerated Learning Center Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsWalls have some water infiltration.


Structural->Exterior DoorsSome doors need upgrades on hardware and finishes.

Structural->Interior FloorsFloors are at end of life cycle and may contain asbestos.

Structural->CeilingCeilings are in need of repair.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentMany pieces of the fixed equipment have reached the end of their life cycle.

Mechanical->Electrical-->Main ServiceOriginal service in need of upgrades and at capacity.


Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesMany fixtures are in need of upgrades.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationSystem is at life cycle end.


Mechanical->LightingThere are many types of lights and many types of bulbs, and there are some exposed bulbs.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceMany corridors have transoms.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:26:35AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905006Site #:

Assessments 2013

Harrell Accelerated Learning Center Parenting Ed Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural


Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:26:42AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905006Site #:

Assessments 2013

Harrell Accelerated Learning Center Parenting Ed Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Exterior WallsExterior walls are in constant need of maintenance.

Structural->RoofRoof is in constant need of maintenance.

Structural->Exterior WindowsExterior windows are single pane.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHVAC is at the end of its life cycle.


Safety\Fire Protection->Fire ResistanceThe exterior walls have wood paneling.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:26:42AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905207Site #:

Assessments 2013

Northwest Head Start Gym

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 22.65 20.38 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.61 6.85 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 4.55 4.09 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.44 3.09 90.00Exterior Windows 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.52 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 12.89 7.73 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 4.90 4.41 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.82 1.64 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.89 0.80 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.14 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:29:57AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905207Site #:

Assessments 2013

Northwest Head Start Gym

Project #: 5773





Comments

Structural->Interior FloorsCarpet has some staining.


Mechanical->LightingLight fixtures have T12 bulbs.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:29:57AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905207Site #:

Assessments 2013

Northwest Head Start Main Bldg

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 3.48 90.00Exterior Windows 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:29:50AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

243905207Site #:

Assessments 2013

Northwest Head Start Main Bldg

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Interior FloorsThe carpet in some rooms has reached its life cycle expectancy.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHVAC is at it's life expectancy.


Mechanical->LightingLight fixtures have T12 bulbs.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:29:50AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0010Site #:

Assessments 2013

Stadium Baseball Stadium

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 7.52 60.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 FairSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Roof (N/A)Single Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows (N/A)Single Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 3.27 60.00Ceiling 100.00 FairSingle Component 1.68 1.51 90.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Good

Mechanical














Single Component 1.31 0.79 60.00Fire Control Safety 100.00 Fair

Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:31:39AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0010Site #:

Assessments 2013

Stadium Baseball Stadium

Project #: 5773

Single Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Fire Alarm Operation (N/A)





Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureStadium needs water infiltration maintenance and upgrades.

Structural->CeilingAreas with ceilings need upgrades.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesMany fixtures are at end of life cycle and needs upgrades.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteWaste system is at end of service life.

Mechanical->HVAC-->Energy GenerationHeating only is in need of maintenance and upgrades.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire Control Capability-->Fire Control SafetyThe number of extinguishers is limited.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:31:39AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0010Site #:

Assessments 2013

Stadium Enclosed Areas

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 3.76 30.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 PoorSingle Component 8.93 2.68 30.00Exterior Walls 100.00 PoorSingle Component 6.71 2.01 30.00Roof 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.00 0.00 0.00Exterior Windows (N/A)Single Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 3.42 60.00Interior Floors 100.00 FairSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 4.90 90.00Ceiling 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.68 0.50 30.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Poor

Mechanical














Single Component 1.31 0.79 60.00Fire Control Safety 100.00 Fair

Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:31:46AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0010Site #:

Assessments 2013

Stadium Enclosed Areas

Project #: 5773






Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureMany of the areas have water infiltration from the structure.

Structural->Exterior WallsThe exterior walls have water infiltration issues.

Structural->RoofWater infiltration leaks from seating above.

Structural->Exterior WindowsAreas are located under the stadium and have no windows.

Structural->Interior FloorsFloors have high traffic and need extensive maintenance and some upgrading.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentMuch of the equipment is at the end of it's life cycle.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesMany of the fixtures are at their life cycle expectancy.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->WasteSystem is at end of life cycle and has history of occasional leaks or clog-ups.

Mechanical->LightingMany fixtures are at the end of their life cycle. Lighting levels are low in many areas.

Safety\Fire Protection->Fire Control Capability-->Fire Control SafetyFire extinguishers are limited.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:31:46AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0010Site #:

Assessments 2013

Stadium Field House_Apt

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 12.53 11.28 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 8.93 8.03 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 6.71 6.04 90.00Roof 100.00 GoodSingle Component 3.86 1.16 30.00Exterior Windows 100.00 PoorSingle Component 0.53 0.47 90.00Exterior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.71 5.13 90.00Interior Floors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 7.34 6.61 90.00Interior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 1.20 1.08 90.00Interior Doors 100.00 GoodSingle Component 5.45 1.63 30.00Ceiling 100.00 PoorSingle Component 1.68 0.50 30.00Fixed Equipment 100.00 Poor

Mechanical















Fire Alarm System

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:31:53AM

Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0010Site #:

Assessments 2013

Stadium Field House_Apt

Project #: 5773






Comments


Structural->CeilingCeilings are discolored and have broken tiles.

Structural->Fixed EquipmentMany pieces of equipment are original and at their life cycle and need upgrades.

Mechanical->Plumbing-->FixturesMany plumbing fixtures are original and in need of upgrades.


Mechanical->LightingSome fixtures are damaged and have low light levels.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:31:53AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0010Site #:

Assessments 2013

Stadium Press Box

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 20.00 6.00 30.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 PoorSingle Component 20.00 18.00 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 20.00 18.00 90.00Roof 100.00 Good

Mechanical








Comments

Structural->Foundation\StructureWater infiltration down into the seating and areas below requires some continual maintenance.

ADAPress Box is at top of stadium w/no accessible route.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:31:27AM


Project:

Site: Building:




% of System Rating

0010Site #:

Assessments 2013

Stadium Ticket Booths (4)

Project #: 5773

Structural

Single Component 20.00 18.00 90.00Foundation\Structure 100.00 GoodSingle Component 20.00 18.00 90.00Exterior Walls 100.00 GoodSingle Component 20.00 18.00 90.00Roof 100.00 Good

Mechanical








Comments


Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:31:32AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:



Wichita Falls ISDCounty: 1Region:

% of System Rating

243905101Site #:

Assessments 2013

Alamo ES

Project #: 5773

Grounds - ESPaved Surfaces

Parking Lots 60.00Single Component 17.91 10.75Fair 100.00Driveways 60.00Single Component 15.12 9.07Fair 100.00Sidewalks 90.00Single Component 7.22 6.50Good 100.00Play Courts 90.00Single Component 8.48 7.63Good 100.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 30.00Single Component 6.39 1.92Poor 100.00Playfields 60.00Single Component 4.40 2.64Fair 100.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 4.19 2.51Fair 100.00

PlaygroundsEquipment 90.00Single Component 9.00 8.10Good 100.00Playground Surfaces 90.00Single Component 3.02 2.71Good 100.00

UtilitiesWater Service 60.00Single Component 4.71 2.83Fair 100.00Waste Water Service 60.00Single Component 5.50 3.30Fair 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 3.93 3.53Good 100.00Site Lighting 60.00Single Component 2.09 1.26Fair 100.00

Fencing 60.00Single Component 8.04 4.82Fair 100.00

100.00 67.58 67.58Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsHalf of rear parking lot is old asphalt with cracks and pot holes.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysDriveways have cracking and potholes.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensLarge areas of bare ground. Front yard area is mostly dirt that is eroding and washing on to sidewalks and drives.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->PlayfieldsLarge areas of bare ground.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is currently shut off for water restrictions. System would require minor repair to became operational.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Water ServiceOld piping with history of leaks.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceOld piping with history of leaks.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingNo site lighting at drop-off areas or parking.

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:56:44AM

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905101Site #:

Assessments 2013

Alamo ES

Project #: 5773

Grounds - ES->FencingFencing has rusted posts and mesh.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:56:44AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905104Site #:

Assessments 2013

Brook Village Early Childhood

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 60.00Single Component 17.91 10.75Fair 100.00Driveways 30.00Single Component 15.12 4.54Poor 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 7.22 4.33Fair 100.00Play Courts 90.00Single Component 8.48 7.63Good 100.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 6.39 3.83Fair 100.00Playfields 90.00Single Component 4.40 3.96Good 100.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 4.19 2.51Fair 100.00


UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 4.71 4.24Good 100.00Waste Water Service 60.00Single Component 5.50 3.30Fair 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 3.93 3.53Good 100.00Site Lighting 30.00Single Component 2.09 0.63Poor 100.00


100.00 64.90 64.90Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsParking lots are cracked and have uneven areas. The lots need restripping.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysThe drives have unlevel areas and cracks.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSidewalks are cracked and heaving in areas.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensAreas need reseeding and are uneven in spaces.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is off and in need of repair.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceLines are still partly original and in need of some repair.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingThe site has no poles/lights.

Grounds - ES->FencingSome of the fencing is old and rusty.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:57:07AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905105Site #:

Assessments 2013

Burgess ES

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 90.00Single Component 17.91 16.12Good 100.00Driveways 90.00Single Component 15.12 13.61Good 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 7.22 4.33Fair 100.00Play Courts 90.00Single Component 8.48 7.63Good 100.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 6.39 3.83Fair 100.00Playfields 60.00Single Component 4.40 2.64Fair 100.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 4.19 2.51Fair 100.00


UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 4.71 4.24Good 100.00Waste Water Service 30.00Single Component 5.50 1.65Poor 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 3.93 3.53Good 100.00Site Lighting 60.00Single Component 2.09 1.26Fair 100.00

Fencing 90.00Single Component 8.04 7.24Good 100.00

100.00 79.41 79.41Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSome sidewalks are cracked with some heaving.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensLawns need reseeding and have some ponding.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->PlayfieldsPlayfields need reseeding.


Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Waste Water ServicePiping has some history of stoppages.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingLots have minimum site lighting.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:57:19AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013

Crockett ES

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 60.00Single Component 17.91 10.75Fair 100.00Driveways 90.00Single Component 15.12 13.61Good 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 7.22 4.33Fair 100.00Play Courts 90.00Single Component 8.48 7.63Good 100.00





100.00 75.36 75.36Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsSome of the lots are asphalt which need striping and repair.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksAreas have some upheaval and cracks.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensAreas need reseeding and also have some drainage problems.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is turned off and needs repairs.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceOriginal lines are breaking and in need of repairs.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingMinimum lighting on the building and no poles/lights in the lots.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:57:43AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905108Site #:

Assessments 2013

Cunningham ES

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 60.00Single Component 17.91 10.75Fair 100.00Driveways 60.00Single Component 15.12 9.07Fair 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 7.22 4.33Fair 100.00Play Courts 90.00Single Component 8.48 7.63Good 100.00





100.00 69.74 69.74Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsSome lots have asphalt in need of patching and striping.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysSome driveways need patching.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSome sidewalks have cracks and some heaving.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensSystem is off and areas need reseeding.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->PlayfieldsAreas need reseeding and some drainage renovation.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is off and in need of some repair.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Water ServiceThe line has a history of breaks on south side.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceMuch of the system is at the end of its life cycle.

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:57:55AM

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905108Site #:

Assessments 2013

Cunningham ES

Project #: 5773

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingSome site lighting is in place. Some of the parking is lacking site lighting.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:57:55AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fain ES

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 30.00Single Component 17.91 5.37Poor 100.00Driveways 60.00Single Component 15.12 9.07Fair 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 7.22 4.33Fair 100.00Play Courts 90.00Single Component 8.48 7.63Good 100.00



UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 4.71 4.24Good 100.00Waste Water Service 90.00Single Component 5.50 4.95Good 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 3.93 3.53Good 100.00Site Lighting 60.00Single Component 2.09 1.26Fair 100.00


100.00 68.75 68.75Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsAsphalt parking lots have major cracking, potholes and need restriping.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysDriveways have cracking, potholes and need restripping.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksThe concrete sidewalks are mostly in good shape. The asphalt picnic area and walkways have major cracking and are in poor condition.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensBare spots in lawn with some areas of erosion.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemIrrigation is currently shut-off due to water restrictions. System would require minor repair to become operational.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingDrop-off area and parking lot lack proper lighting.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:58:18AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905130Site #:

Assessments 2013

Farris Early Childhood Center

Project #: 5773




PlaygroundsEquipment 60.00Single Component 9.00 5.40Fair 100.00Playground Surfaces 90.00Single Component 3.02 2.71Good 100.00

UtilitiesWater Service 60.00Single Component 4.71 2.83Fair 100.00Waste Water Service 30.00Single Component 5.50 1.65Poor 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 3.93 3.53Good 100.00Site Lighting 60.00Single Component 2.09 1.26Fair 100.00


100.00 71.24 71.24Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsLots need restriping.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSeveral areas with cracking and damage that needs replacement.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensSeveral bare spots in lawn.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is currently shut-off for water restrictions. Some minor repair required to make system operational again.

Grounds - ES->Playgrounds-->EquipmentSome older equipment with areas of rust.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Water ServiceWater service has history of leaks that need repair on regular basis.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceSewer line has had leaks and collapsed lines. Needs repair on regular basis.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingNo site lighting at drop off areas or at staff parking area.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:58:29AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905111Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fowler ES

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 60.00Single Component 17.91 10.75Fair 100.00Driveways 90.00Single Component 15.12 13.61Good 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 7.22 4.33Fair 100.00Play Courts 60.00Single Component 8.48 5.09Fair 100.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 6.39 3.83Fair 100.00Playfields 60.00Single Component 4.40 2.64Fair 100.00Irrigation System 30.00Single Component 4.19 1.26Poor 100.00


UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 4.71 4.24Good 100.00Waste Water Service 60.00Single Component 5.50 3.30Fair 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 3.93 3.53Good 100.00Site Lighting 60.00Single Component 2.09 1.26Fair 100.00


100.00 71.89 71.89Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsTeachers parking lot and front drive need re-striping. Secondary staff parking area near building has cracking and some pot holes on asphalt surface.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSidewalks on east side of campus have cracks and broken segments.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Play CourtsThe west basketball court has cracking issues and some spalling of the surface.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensNumerous bare spots observed at front of building. Drainage issues at northwest corner of 1970 addition. Run off from downspouts washing out soil from building foundation.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->PlayfieldsThe playfields on the north end of the campus have many bare spots.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is currently turned off because of drought and water restrictions. System is in poor condition and will require extensive work to become operational again.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceThere have been several issues with sewer line stopping up outside of kitchen.

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:58:41AM

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905111Site #:

Assessments 2013

Fowler ES

Project #: 5773

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingThe front driveway does not have dedicated site lighting for student drop-off areas.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:58:41AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905112Site #:

Assessments 2013

Franklin ES

Project #: 5773







100.00 70.25 70.25Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsAreas have uneven surfaces and some cracks.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSidewalks have some uneven surfaces and cracks.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensAreas need seeding and have some drainage issues.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is turned off and in need of repairs.

Grounds - ES->Playgrounds-->EquipmentSome equipment is old and in need of upgrading.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceSystem is old and in need of some repair.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingSome areas are in need of more lighting.

Grounds - ES->FencingSome fencing is rusted and in need of repair.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:58:53AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905114Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 90.00Single Component 17.91 16.12Good 100.00Driveways 90.00Single Component 15.12 13.61Good 100.00Sidewalks 90.00Single Component 7.22 6.50Good 100.00Play Courts 90.00Single Component 8.48 7.63Good 100.00



UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 4.71 4.24Good 100.00Waste Water Service 90.00Single Component 5.50 4.95Good 100.00Storm Sewer 60.00Single Component 3.93 2.36Fair 100.00Site Lighting 60.00Single Component 2.09 1.26Fair 100.00


100.00 85.02 85.02Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensSome lawn areas are bare and need reseeding.


Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Storm SewerSystem is at end of it's life cycle and has a history of some leaks.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingSome site lighting is provided but more is needed and minor repair required.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:59:17AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013

Houston ES

Project #: 5773





UtilitiesWater Service 30.00Single Component 4.71 1.41Poor 100.00Waste Water Service 30.00Single Component 5.50 1.65Poor 100.00Storm Sewer 30.00Single Component 3.93 1.18Poor 100.00Site Lighting 30.00Single Component 2.09 0.63Poor 100.00

Fencing 30.00Single Component 8.04 2.41Poor 100.00

100.00 70.10 70.10Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksThe sidewalks have some heaving and cracks.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensLawns have bare spots, drainage and ponding issues.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is not working and in need of repair.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Water ServiceThe system is old and has history of leaks.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceThe system is old and has a history of major leaks and considerable seepage.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Storm SewerSystem is at the end of its life cycle.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingSite lighting is on the building only with no parking/site lights.

Grounds - ES->FencingFencing is old and in need of repair.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:59:40AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905118Site #:

Assessments 2013

Jefferson ES

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 30.00Single Component 17.91 5.37Poor 100.00Driveways 30.00Single Component 15.12 4.54Poor 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 7.22 4.33Fair 100.00Play Courts 90.00Single Component 8.48 7.63Good 100.00



UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 4.71 4.24Good 100.00Waste Water Service 60.00Single Component 5.50 3.30Fair 100.00Storm Sewer 60.00Single Component 3.93 2.36Fair 100.00Site Lighting 60.00Single Component 2.09 1.26Fair 100.00

Fencing 30.00Single Component 8.04 2.41Poor 100.00

100.00 56.56 56.56Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsSouth side of building parking needs major repairs.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysAlthough attempts have been made to make the drainage better, many areas still pond water.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSome sidewalks have heaving and cracks.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensAreas need grass and better drainage.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is turned off and needs repair.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceSystem has occasional leaks and seepage along with smell.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Storm SewerSystem is at the end of it's life cycle and in need of some repair.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingThere is minimum lighting on the building for the site, but there are no pole/lights.

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:59:52AM

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905118Site #:

Assessments 2013

Jefferson ES

Project #: 5773

Grounds - ES->FencingFencing needs major repair.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:59:52AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013

Lamar ES

Project #: 5773







100.00 77.00 77.00Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSidewalks had some upheaval and cracks.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensAreas need seeding and has some drainage issues.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->PlayfieldsFields need seeding and have uneven surfaces and some drainage issues.


Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceSewer needs to be replaced under Kitchen. Rest of building is original.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingOnly one north lot is lighted.

Grounds - ES->FencingSome fence repair is needed.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 12:00:16PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905121Site #:

Assessments 2013

Milam ES

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 60.00Single Component 17.91 10.75Fair 100.00Driveways 90.00Single Component 15.12 13.61Good 100.00Sidewalks 90.00Single Component 7.22 6.50Good 100.00Play Courts 90.00Single Component 8.48 7.63Good 100.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 30.00Single Component 6.39 1.92Poor 100.00Playfields 30.00Single Component 4.40 1.32Poor 100.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 4.19 2.51Fair 100.00


UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 4.71 4.24Good 100.00Waste Water Service 90.00Single Component 5.50 4.95Good 100.00Storm Sewer 60.00Single Component 3.93 2.36Fair 100.00Site Lighting 60.00Single Component 2.09 1.26Fair 100.00


100.00 75.09 75.09Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsParking lots have some cracking and uneven surfaces.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensSite very flat and in need of better drainage.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->PlayfieldsPlaygrounds have major drainage issues to the North.


Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Storm SewerSystem is at the end of life cycle and has history of some leaks.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingSite lighting is on the building with minimum poles/lights.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 12:00:40PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905128Site #:

Assessments 2013

Scotland Park ES

Project #: 5773



Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 6.39 3.83Fair 100.00Playfields 90.00Single Component 4.40 3.96Good 100.00Irrigation System 90.00Single Component 4.19 3.77Good 100.00


UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 4.71 4.24Good 100.00Waste Water Service 90.00Single Component 5.50 4.95Good 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 3.93 3.53Good 100.00Site Lighting 90.00Single Component 2.09 1.88Good 100.00


100.00 85.38 85.38Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensNumerous bare spots around the entire building.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is currently shut off for drought and water restriction.

Grounds - ES->Playgrounds-->EquipmentKindergarten playground equipment is older and shows signs of rust.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 12:01:16PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905123Site #:

Assessments 2013

Sheppard AFB ES

Project #: 5773



Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 90.00Single Component 6.39 5.75Good 100.00Playfields 90.00Single Component 4.40 3.96Good 100.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 4.19 2.51Fair 100.00




100.00 76.25 76.25Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsParking lots have minor cracking and some need of restriping.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSeveral areas of cracking. Paved areas between wings have major cracking and spalling.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Play CourtsThe basketball court has several bad spots in asphalt and needs restriping.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is currently shut off for water restrictions. System will require minor repair to become operational.

Grounds - ES->FencingThere are a few areas with holes in chain link as well as minor damage and rust.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 12:01:29PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905129Site #:

Assessments 2013

Southern Hills ES

Project #: 5773



Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 30.00Single Component 6.39 1.92Poor 100.00Playfields 30.00Single Component 4.40 1.32Poor 100.00Irrigation System 90.00Single Component 4.19 3.77Good 100.00


UtilitiesWater Service 60.00Single Component 4.71 2.83Fair 100.00Waste Water Service 90.00Single Component 5.50 4.95Good 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 3.93 3.53Good 100.00Site Lighting 90.00Single Component 2.09 1.88Good 100.00


100.00 82.12 82.12Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensSeveral large areas with no grass. Other areas with significant erosion.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->PlayfieldsSeveral large areas with no grass.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemIrrigation system is shut off for water restrictions.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Water ServiceThere has been problems with water service to building. Some lines have been repaired or replaced.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 12:01:41PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905125Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 30.00Single Component 17.91 5.37Poor 100.00Driveways 60.00Single Component 15.12 9.07Fair 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 7.22 4.33Fair 100.00Play Courts 60.00Single Component 8.48 5.09Fair 100.00





100.00 63.79 63.79Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsAsphalt parking lots have cracking, pot holes and need of re-striping.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysRear driveways in poor condition having pot holes and heavily damaged asphalt. Front drives are fairly new concrete and in good condition.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSidewalks are in good condition. However the ceramic tile and entry steps and stoop is in poor condition. Tiles are cracked, broken or missing.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Play CourtsTennis and basketball courts need resurfacing and re-striping

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensThere are several bare spots in lawn needing reseeding.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is currently shut off. System will require minor repair to become operational.

Grounds - ES->Utilities-->Site LightingThere is insufficient lighting on the site.

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 12:02:04PM

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905125Site #:

Assessments 2013


Project #: 5773

Grounds - ES->FencingFencing around athletic courts has rust on all the piping.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 12:02:04PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905126Site #:

Assessments 2013

West Foundation ES

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 60.00Single Component 17.91 10.75Fair 100.00Driveways 90.00Single Component 15.12 13.61Good 100.00Sidewalks 90.00Single Component 7.22 6.50Good 100.00Play Courts 90.00Single Component 8.48 7.63Good 100.00





100.00 82.71 82.71Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsRear (north) parking lot has minor cracking throughout entire lot.

Grounds - ES->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksCracking of concrete walks on north side (rear) of school.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensSeveral bare spots on the northeast side of the school. Some erosion from storm water run off.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is currently shut off and not operational due to drought condition and water restrictions.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 12:02:17PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905041Site #:

Assessments 2013

Barwise JHS

Project #: 5773

Grounds - JHSPaved Surfaces


Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 10.04 6.02Fair 100.00Playfields\Track 60.00Single Component 6.82 4.09Fair 100.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 4.30 2.58Fair 100.00

PlaygroundsEquipment 0.00Single Component 0.00 0.00(N/A) 0.00



98.93 72.19 72.97Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsStaff parking lot is in poor condition. There are cracking and pot holes in the asphalt. Lot also needs to be restriped.

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksObserved large portion of sidewalk on eastside of clinic that has been washed out and settled.

Grounds - JHS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensSome drainage issues exist with areas of ponding and improper drainage away from building.

Grounds - JHS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Playfields\TrackTrack running surface is cracking and spalling and in poor condition.

Grounds - JHS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is currently off for water restrictions. System would require work to become operational again.

Grounds - JHS->Utilities-->Site LightingNo site lighting for main drop-off driveway.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:56:56AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905048Site #:

Assessments 2013

Kirby JHS

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 60.00Single Component 21.28 12.77Fair 100.00Driveways 60.00Single Component 22.79 13.67Fair 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 10.48 6.29Fair 100.00Play Courts 60.00Single Component 2.90 1.74Fair 100.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 10.04 6.02Fair 100.00Playfields\Track 90.00Single Component 6.82 6.13Good 100.00Irrigation System 90.00Single Component 4.30 3.87Good 100.00




98.93 68.78 69.53Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsAll parking lots need restriping. The teacher's parking lot (asphalt) on south side has cracking and potholes.

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysAsphalt drives have major cracking and potholes.

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSidewalks have some minor cracking with a few areas of uneven surfaces, major cracking and washed out areas that are settling. There are large areas of spalling concrete in the courtyard.

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->Play CourtsTennis court surface is in need of resurfacing and repainting.

Grounds - JHS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensThere are areas around the building with large bare spots that need reseeding.

Grounds - JHS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is currently shut off due to water restrictions.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 12:00:04PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905047Site #:

Assessments 2013

McNiel JHS

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 90.00Single Component 21.28 19.16Good 100.00Driveways 60.00Single Component 22.79 13.67Fair 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 10.48 6.29Fair 100.00Play Courts 60.00Single Component 2.90 1.74Fair 100.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 10.04 6.02Fair 100.00Playfields\Track 90.00Single Component 6.82 6.13Good 100.00Irrigation System 90.00Single Component 4.30 3.87Good 100.00


UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 4.84 4.35Good 100.00Waste Water Service 90.00Single Component 5.64 5.08Good 100.00Storm Sewer 60.00Single Component 4.03 2.42Fair 100.00Site Lighting 90.00Single Component 3.23 2.90Good 100.00


98.93 73.96 74.76Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysDriveways at loading areas on north side of building have major cracking and pot holes.

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSidewalks on north side near bus loading area have areas of cracking and breaking apart.

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->Play CourtsTennis courts have minor cracking throughout play surface.

Grounds - JHS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensThere are numerous bare spots in the lawn around entire facility, mainly on sides and rear of building. Lawn area to the west of field house is bare with stone/rock ballast blown from the roof covering most of the area. Site has several areas where water ponds with no drainage.

Grounds - JHS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemIrrigation system is currently not operational due to water restrictions.

Grounds - JHS->Utilities-->Storm SewerSite drainage is dependant on two sump pumps and has several areas where water ponds with no drainage.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 12:00:28PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905045Site #:

Assessments 2013

Zundy JHS

Project #: 5773



Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 90.00Single Component 10.04 9.04Good 100.00Playfields\Track 90.00Single Component 6.82 6.13Good 100.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 4.30 2.58Fair 100.00


UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 4.84 4.35Good 100.00Waste Water Service 30.00Single Component 5.64 1.69Poor 100.00Storm Sewer 30.00Single Component 4.03 1.21Poor 100.00Site Lighting 60.00Single Component 3.23 1.94Fair 100.00


98.93 69.80 70.56Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsParking lots have cracking throughout and in need on re-striping. Some areas of spalling due to ponding water or extensive wear.

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSidewalks have areas of minor cracking and settling. A few areas have major cracking and settling.

Grounds - JHS->Paved Surfaces-->Play CourtsTennis court surface shows signs of minor spalling and require re-painting or finishing.

Grounds - JHS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensNumerous bare spots around the facility. There are drainage problems in several areas. Water not being directed away form building properly causing some possible foundation issues.

Grounds - JHS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is currently shut down due to water restrictions. System is, however, in fair condition but needs repairs to become operational again.

Grounds - JHS->Playgrounds-->EquipmentThere is no playground equipment on-site.

Grounds - JHS->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceWaste line has had constant leaks requiring repair.

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 12:02:41PM

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905045Site #:

Assessments 2013

Zundy JHS

Project #: 5773

Grounds - JHS->Utilities-->Storm SewerFacility has issues with storm water not being directed away from building sufficiently. Some of the storm water drainage flumes are stopped up by shrubs and debris. Also found areas of ponding near loading dock.

Grounds - JHS->Utilities-->Site LightingInsufficient lighting for parking and drop-off areas. Noticed a few missing light fixtures at front of building and at portable classroom.

Grounds - JHS->FencingFence shows some areas of rust and gates need some work for better operation.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 12:02:41PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013

Hirschi HS

Project #: 5773

Grounds - HSPaved Surfaces

Parking Lots 60.00Single Component 19.12 11.47Fair 100.00Driveways 60.00Single Component 13.91 8.34Fair 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 5.60 3.36Fair 100.00Athletic Courts 90.00Single Component 7.46 6.72Good 100.00Track 90.00Single Component 18.66 16.79Good 100.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 4.81 2.89Fair 100.00Athletic\Playfields 90.00Single Component 18.66 16.79Good 100.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 2.24 1.34Fair 100.00

UtilitiesWater Service 30.00Single Component 0.84 0.25Poor 100.00Waste Water Service 60.00Single Component 0.98 0.59Fair 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 0.70 0.63Good 100.00Site Lighting 60.00Single Component 0.75 0.45Fair 100.00


100.00 75.27 75.27Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsParking drives have many cracks, need striping and some uneven areas with some pot holes.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysDriveways have many cracks.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSidewalks have some heaving and some cracks.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensMany areas need reseeding.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSprinkler system is off and in need of repairs.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Water ServiceWater supply line needs to be replaced from the building to the street.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceSewer line has some leaks.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Site LightingSome light poles/fixtures need repair.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:59:28AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013

Rider HS

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 60.00Single Component 19.12 11.47Fair 100.00Driveways 60.00Single Component 13.91 8.34Fair 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 5.60 3.36Fair 100.00Athletic Courts 90.00Single Component 7.46 6.72Good 100.00Track 90.00Single Component 18.66 16.79Good 100.00


UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 0.84 0.76Good 100.00Waste Water Service 60.00Single Component 0.98 0.59Fair 100.00Storm Sewer 60.00Single Component 0.70 0.42Fair 100.00Site Lighting 60.00Single Component 0.75 0.45Fair 100.00


100.00 75.57 75.57Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsParking lots need minor repair and striping in many areas.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysDrives need minor repair throughout.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSidewalks have some heaving and cracking.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensLawns need grass and has some drainage issues at Weight Room and at northwest side of building.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is off and needs repairs.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceSome of the piping is at the end of it's life cycle.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Storm SewerDrainage is a problem around the Band Hall. Some areas around the building drain back to the exterior wall.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Site LightingThere is minimum site lighting in the lots.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 12:01:03PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013

Wichita Falls HS

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 0.00Single Component 19.12 0.00Unsat 100.00Driveways 60.00Single Component 13.91 8.34Fair 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 5.60 3.36Fair 100.00Athletic Courts 90.00Single Component 7.46 6.72Good 100.00Track 90.00Single Component 18.66 16.79Good 100.00


UtilitiesWater Service 30.00Single Component 0.84 0.25Poor 100.00Waste Water Service 0.00Single Component 0.98 0.00Unsat 100.00Storm Sewer 0.00Single Component 0.70 0.00Unsat 100.00Site Lighting 30.00Single Component 0.75 0.22Poor 100.00


100.00 60.48 60.48Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsMajor repair needed in many areas and a lot of gravel parking on the North side.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysMinor repairs are need in many areas.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksThere are some upheavals and cracks on the North side.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensThe lawns have bare spots.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is off and in need of repair.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Water ServiceWater has history of leaks throughout.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceThe water lines have a history of leaks.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Storm SewerThe sewer and GAS lines need to be replaced.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Site LightingMany areas need more lighting and repairs on existing lights.

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 12:02:29PM

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013

Wichita Falls HS

Project #: 5773

Grounds - HS->FencingSome areas of the fence need minor repair.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 12:02:29PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

0009Site #:

Assessments 2013

Carrigan Career Center

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 30.00Single Component 19.12 5.74Poor 100.00Driveways 30.00Single Component 13.91 4.17Poor 100.00Sidewalks 30.00Single Component 5.60 1.68Poor 100.00Athletic Courts 0.00Single Component 0.00 0.00(N/A) 0.00Track 0.00Single Component 0.00 0.00(N/A) 0.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 4.81 2.89Fair 100.00Athletic\Playfields 0.00Single Component 0.00 0.00(N/A) 0.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 2.24 1.34Fair 100.00



55.22 23.63 42.80Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsAsphalt parking areas have numerous potholes and cracking. Lots need restriping.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysDriveways have cracking, potholes and need restriping.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksThe sidewalks have several areas with heavy damage, and others with cracking and spalling.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensThere are bare spots in lawn.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemCurrently shut off, system would require repairs to become operational again.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Water ServiceWater lines have leaks from time to time that need repair.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceOld piping that needs continual observation for line collapses.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Site LightingThere is no site lighting for parking and drop-off areas.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:57:31AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905008Site #:

Assessments 2013

Denver Alternative Center

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 30.00Single Component 19.12 5.74Poor 100.00Driveways 60.00Single Component 13.91 8.34Fair 100.00Sidewalks 60.00Single Component 5.60 3.36Fair 100.00Athletic Courts 0.00Single Component 0.00 0.00(N/A) 0.00Track 0.00Single Component 0.00 0.00(N/A) 0.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 4.81 2.89Fair 100.00Athletic\Playfields 60.00Single Component 18.66 11.20Fair 100.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 2.24 1.34Fair 100.00

UtilitiesWater Service 60.00Single Component 0.84 0.50Fair 100.00Waste Water Service 60.00Single Component 0.98 0.59Fair 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 0.70 0.63Good 100.00Site Lighting 30.00Single Component 0.75 0.22Poor 100.00


73.88 40.46 54.76Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsLots have cracks and need striping.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysThe drives have cracks and uneven surfaces and are in need of repair.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSidewalks are uneven and have cracks.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensAreas need reseeding.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Athletic\PlayfieldsFields are available but not used and still in need of some repair.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is off and in need of some repair.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Water ServiceSystem is original and has history of some leaks.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceLines are original and have history of some leaks.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Site LightingSite has minimum site lighting.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:58:06AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905006Site #:

Assessments 2013

Harrell Accelerated Learning Center

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 60.00Single Component 19.12 11.47Fair 100.00Driveways 90.00Single Component 13.91 12.52Good 100.00Sidewalks 90.00Single Component 5.60 5.04Good 100.00Athletic Courts 0.00Single Component 0.00 0.00(N/A) 0.00Track 0.00Single Component 0.00 0.00(N/A) 0.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 4.81 2.89Fair 100.00Athletic\Playfields 0.00Single Component 0.00 0.00(N/A) 0.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 2.24 1.34Fair 100.00

UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 0.84 0.76Good 100.00Waste Water Service 30.00Single Component 0.98 0.29Poor 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 0.70 0.63Good 100.00Site Lighting 30.00Single Component 0.75 0.22Poor 100.00


55.22 38.92 70.50Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsLots in need of repair.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensLawns need seeding and has drainage issues.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemSystem is off and in need of repair.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceLines are original and has history of leaks.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Site LightingLots are not lighted.

Grounds - HS->FencingFences are in need of some repair.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:59:05AM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

243905207Site #:

Assessments 2013

Northwest Head Start

Project #: 5773







100.00 88.08 88.08Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensLawn sprinkler is not turned on. Ponding occurs between the Gym and Main building.

Grounds - ES->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemLawn sprinkler system is not turned on.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 12:00:51PM

Grounds Assessment

Project:

Site:




% of System Rating

0010Site #:

Assessments 2013

Stadium

Project #: 5773


Parking Lots 0.00Single Component 19.12 0.00Unsat 100.00Driveways 0.00Single Component 13.91 0.00Unsat 100.00Sidewalks 30.00Single Component 5.60 1.68Poor 100.00Athletic Courts 90.00Single Component 7.46 6.72Good 100.00Track 90.00Single Component 18.66 16.79Good 100.00

Landscaped SurfacesLawns\Gardens 60.00Single Component 4.81 2.89Fair 100.00Athletic\Playfields 30.00Single Component 18.66 5.60Poor 100.00Irrigation System 60.00Single Component 2.24 1.34Fair 100.00

UtilitiesWater Service 90.00Single Component 0.84 0.76Good 100.00Waste Water Service 60.00Single Component 0.98 0.59Fair 100.00Storm Sewer 90.00Single Component 0.70 0.63Good 100.00Site Lighting 90.00Single Component 0.75 0.67Good 100.00


100.00 41.43 41.43Total For Site :

Comment

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->Parking LotsParking lot is at end of life cycle, needs total replacement.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->DrivewaysPaving is past it's life cycle.

Grounds - HS->Paved Surfaces-->SidewalksSome areas have uneven surfaces and cracks.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Lawns\GardensSome areas have drainage issues and others need seeding.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Athletic\PlayfieldsStadium needs water infiltration maintenance and upgrades.

Grounds - HS->Landscaped Surfaces-->Irrigation SystemFields are irrigated, but all other grass surfaces are not being watered currently.

Grounds - HS->Utilities-->Waste Water ServiceSystem is original and has occasional leaks.

Grounds - HS->FencingFences need minor repair in areas.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 12:01:52PM

Suitability Report - Full

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore

Wichita Falls ISDCounty:

1Region:

Rating

243905101Site #:

Assessments 2013 Alamo ES

Project #: 5773

Site Type: Site Size:Grade Config: EE 01-06 4.00Elementary

Suitability - ES Learning Environment

5.00 2.50 50.00 Learning Style Variety Poor 2.00 1.60 80.00 Interior Environment Good 1.50 0.98 65.00 Exterior Environment Fair

General Classrooms 4.90 3.92 80.00 Environment Good

12.25 6.13 50.00 Size Poor 3.68 2.94 80.00 Location Good 3.68 1.84 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Kindergarten 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

ECE 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.47 65.00 Environment Fair 1.80 1.17 65.00 Size Fair 0.54 0.54 100.00 Location Excel 0.54 0.27 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Science 0.50 0.50 100.00 Environment Excel 1.25 0.63 50.00 Size Poor 0.38 0.30 80.00 Location Good 0.38 0.38 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Music 0.74 0.48 65.00 Environment Fair

Page 1 of 55/8/2013 11:44:29AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905101Site #:


Project #: 5773


1.85 0.93 50.00 Size Poor 0.56 0.36 65.00 Location Fair 0.56 0.28 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Art 0.47 0.30 65.00 Environment Fair 1.17 0.58 50.00 Size Poor 0.35 0.35 100.00 Location Excel 0.35 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Unsat

Computer Labs 0.34 0.34 100.00 Environment Excel 0.85 0.85 100.00 Size Excel 0.26 0.26 100.00 Location Excel 0.26 0.26 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

P.E. 1.92 1.92 100.00 Environment Excel 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 1.15 80.00 Location Good 1.44 1.15 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Performing Arts 0.60 0.39 65.00 Environment Fair 1.51 0.76 50.00 Size Poor 0.45 0.45 100.00 Location Excel 0.45 0.45 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Media Center 0.97 0.63 65.00 Environment Fair 2.44 1.58 65.00 Size Fair 0.73 0.48 65.00 Location Fair 0.73 0.73 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel 0.89 0.71 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.56 1.66 65.00Fair Administration 0.29 0.00 0.00Unsat Counseling 0.58 0.47 80.00Good Clinic 1.27 0.82 65.00Fair Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 0.00 0.00Unsat Cafeteria 6.20 3.10 50.00Poor Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.33 65.00Fair Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.00 50.00 Vehicular Traffic Poor 0.97 0.78 80.00 Pedestrian Traffic Good 0.81 0.53 65.00 Parking Fair 2.34 1.52 65.00 Play Areas Fair

Safety and Security 0.75 0.75 100.00 Fencing Excel 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 1.50 50.00 Ease of Supervision Poor 0.50 0.25 50.00 Controlled Entrances Poor

Page 2 of 55/8/2013 11:44:29AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905101Site #:


Project #: 5773


93.02 57.71 62.04Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESThe school was constructed in 1910 and has had major additions over the years. It is a 1st through 6th grade neighborhood school where most of the students walk to school. The school offers bilingual programming in the primary grades. Two first grade classes are housed in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe school was not designed for small group and individualized instruction. These instructional methods are provided by using hallways and storage rooms for instructional spaces.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe school has had a major upgrading of the facility. The HVAC system does not provide uniform heating throughout the building.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThe school is located on a very small lot. Much of the lot is used for play grounds. The school does not have an outdoor learning lab or social area.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentThe lack of storage and size of classrooms cause some of the rooms to be cluttered. There is not uniform heating and cooling in the various instructional spaces.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeThe general classrooms ranged in size from 560 square feet to 700 square feet. The rooms do not meet the standard of 900 square feet.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->LocationThe school has two 1st grade classes in portables.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe classrooms have a set of shelves along the back wall. This is not adequate storage for supplies and materials.

Suitability - ES->KindergartenThe school does not provide Kindergarten instruction.

Suitability - ES->ECEThe school does not have an Early Childhood Program.

Suitability - ES->Self-Contained Special EdThe school does not have a program for self contained special education.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentA book closet and other storage spaces are used for small group tutorial instruction. General classrooms with temporary dividers are used for multiple teaching stations with in one classroom.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->SizeThe tutorial instruction in storage rooms are not adequate in size.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe resource rooms do not have adequate storage cabinets and shelves for the storing of supplies and materials.

Suitability - ES->Science-->SizeThe science classroom does not meet the size standard of 1000 square feet. The room is approximately 660 square feet.

Page 3 of 55/8/2013 11:44:29AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905101Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentMusic is taught in a general classroom that does not have any acoustic treatments or fixtures normally found in a room designed for music instruction.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeThe music room does not meet the square feet standard.

Suitability - ES->Music-->LocationThe music room is adjacent to general classrooms and noise infiltration between rooms is a problem.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe music room does not have any specialized storage closets or cabinets for equipment and supplies.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentArt is taught in a general classroom and due to a lack of storage the room is extremely cluttered.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe general classroom that is used for art instruction is approximately 650 square feet, which is approximately half the size of the standard of 1200 square feet.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe art room has one small sink. It does not have adequate storage cabinetry and lacks equipment associated with art instruction.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->LocationThe gym is a separate building and is accessed by a covered walkway.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe gym does not have a storage closet that is adequate in size.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->EnvironmentThe performing arts area is a stage at the end of the cafeteria. It is not ADA accessible and is showing the wear and tear of many years of use.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->SizeThe cafeteria is not large enough to seat the number of parents who attend student programs.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->EnvironmentThe library is on the first floor on an instructional wing. The entrance is the same as a regular classroom and the interior is not a very stimulating environment.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->SizeThe library is small for the student population.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->LocationThe library is close to the music room and noise from the music room is a concern.

Suitability - ES->Restrooms (Student)The boys' restrooms are not all equipped with urinal partitions. The restroom on the first floor has an entrance that has the boys looking directly into the girls restroom.

Suitability - ES->AdministrationThe support staff work areas are very small. There is not adequate storage for office supplies and materials in the administrative area.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThe counseling area is a former closet that is 70 square feet.

Suitability - ES->ClinicThe clinic does not have a restroom. There is a restroom a short distance down the hall.

Page 4 of 55/8/2013 11:44:29AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905101Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe faculty lounge is very small. The second floor lounge and workroom is a general classroom. They are not equipped with staff restrooms and kitchenettes.

Suitability - ES->CafeteriaThe cafeteria is very small for the number of students served. It does not have storage for tables and chairs.

Suitability - ES->Food Service and PrepThe kitchen is very small with inadequate food preparation areas, dry storage, and office area.

Suitability - ES->Custodial and MaintenanceThe custodial closets have wall mounted sinks and are not properly ventilated. There are not a enough custodial closets.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficParents drop off students in an offset drop off lane on the street in front of the school. The buses unload and pick up students using the driveway behind the school in the faculty staff parking lot.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Pedestrian Traffic A large percentage of students walk to school. There is only one cross walk that is monitored at one intersection in front of the school.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->ParkingThere is adequate parking for faculty and staff. Visitor and parent parking is in a small gravel lot across the street from the school.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasThe school lacks adequate space for an open play area for soccer and other activities.

Suitability - ES->Safety and Security-->Signage & Way Finding

Suitability - ES->Safety and Security-->Ease of Supervision

Suitability - ES->Safety and Security-->Controlled Entrances

Page 5 of 55/8/2013 11:44:29AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905104Site #:

Assessments 2013 Brook Village Early Chil

Project #: 5773

Site Type: Site Size:Grade Config: EE-KG 4.00Early Childhood

Suitability - Early Childhood Learning Environment

4.12 2.06 50.00 Learning Style Variety Poor 2.00 1.60 80.00 Interior Environment Good 1.50 1.20 80.00 Exterior Environment Good

Kindergarten 4.69 3.75 80.00 Environment Good

11.72 7.62 65.00 Size Fair 3.52 3.52 100.00 Location Excel 3.52 2.28 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

ECE 4.69 3.75 80.00 Environment Good

11.72 7.62 65.00 Size Fair 3.52 2.81 80.00 Location Good 3.52 2.28 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair


Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.58 80.00 Environment Good 1.80 1.44 80.00 Size Good 0.54 0.43 80.00 Location Good 0.54 0.43 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

P.E. - Activity 1.95 1.56 80.00 Environment Good 4.87 3.16 65.00 Size Fair 1.46 0.95 65.00 Location Fair 1.46 1.17 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good 1.70 1.36 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 4.58 2.97 65.00Fair Administration 3.75 0.00 0.00Unsat Counseling 0.78 0.51 65.00Fair Clinic 3.00 2.40 80.00Good Staff Lounge-WkRm 3.00 2.40 80.00Good Cafeteria 3.00 1.95 65.00Fair Food Service and Prep

Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:44:44AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905104Site #:


Project #: 5773


0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance Outside

2.00 1.00 50.00 Vehicular Traffic Poor 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Traffic (N/A) 0.81 0.65 80.00 Parking Good 2.34 1.17 50.00 Play Areas Poor

Safety and Security 0.75 0.60 80.00 Fencing Good 0.09 0.06 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 2.00 1.60 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.33 65.00 Controlled Entrances Fair

96.63 65.61 67.90Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - Early ChildhoodBrook Village Elementary School offers educational programs for grades pre-kindergarten through kindergarten. The school is housed in a former elementary school. There were three additions to this school for classrooms and a gym addition 2008, 2009, and 1996

Suitability - Early Childhood->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThere is no flexible learning space available. The library is a converted classroom and is inadequate for this program.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere is a covered outside pavilion.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Kindergarten-->SizeThe kindergarten classrooms do not meet the standard of 1200 square feet.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Kindergarten-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe majority of classrooms do not have sufficient fixed storage for a kindergarten program. Four of the classrooms have sufficient storage.

Suitability - Early Childhood->ECE-->SizeThe pre-kindergarten classrooms do not meet the standard of 1200 square feet.

Suitability - Early Childhood->ECE-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited in the classrooms for a pre-kindergarten program.

Suitability - Early Childhood->P.E. - Activity-->SizeThe gym does not meet the standard of 3000 square feet.

Suitability - Early Childhood->P.E. - Activity-->LocationThe students must leave the building to enter the gym.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Restrooms (Student)There are two gang restrooms with individual restrooms in every classroom.

Suitability - Early Childhood->AdministrationThe administrative area has a small reception space. There are two offices in this area.

Suitability - Early Childhood->CounselingThere is no counseling program available to the students.

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:44:44AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905104Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - Early Childhood->ClinicThere is only one cot available.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Food Service and PrepThere is insufficient dry storage space.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThe parent drop-off area has three lanes of traffic into the building. The separation is not sufficient to allow for a safe drop-off. Bus drop-off is in a separate area but is also not sufficient for pickup/drop-off.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficThere is no pedestrian traffic into the building due to the age of the children attending this facility.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Outside-->ParkingDay time parking is adequate for faculty and staff.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Outside-->Play AreasThe playground is separate from the building. The standard for pre-kindergarten requires the playground be accessible from the classroom. It is not.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Safety and Security-->Signage & Way Finding

Suitability - Early Childhood->Safety and Security-->Controlled Entrances

Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:44:44AM




Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905105Site #:

Assessments 2013 Burgess ES

Project #: 5773

Site Type: Site Size:Grade Config: EE-06 16.00Elementary


5.00 3.25 65.00 Learning Style Variety Fair 2.00 1.60 80.00 Interior Environment Good 1.50 1.20 80.00 Exterior Environment Good


12.25 9.80 80.00 Size Good 3.68 2.94 80.00 Location Good 3.68 2.39 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Kindergarten 0.42 0.27 65.00 Environment Fair 1.04 0.52 50.00 Size Poor 0.31 0.20 65.00 Location Fair 0.31 0.20 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

ECE 0.50 0.50 100.00 Environment Excel 1.25 1.00 80.00 Size Good 0.37 0.37 100.00 Location Excel 0.37 0.30 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.48 0.48 100.00 Environment Excel 1.20 0.96 80.00 Size Good 0.36 0.36 100.00 Location Excel 0.36 0.36 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel


Science 0.50 0.40 80.00 Environment Good 1.25 1.00 80.00 Size Good 0.38 0.30 80.00 Location Good 0.38 0.30 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Music 0.74 0.37 50.00 Environment Poor

Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:44:52AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905105Site #:


Project #: 5773


1.85 1.48 80.00 Size Good 0.56 0.28 50.00 Location Poor 0.56 0.28 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Art 0.47 0.23 50.00 Environment Poor 1.17 0.58 50.00 Size Poor 0.35 0.28 80.00 Location Good 0.35 0.23 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Computer Labs 0.34 0.27 80.00 Environment Good 0.85 0.55 65.00 Size Fair 0.26 0.26 100.00 Location Excel 0.26 0.20 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

P.E. 1.92 1.54 80.00 Environment Good 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 1.44 100.00 Location Excel 1.44 1.15 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Performing Arts 0.60 0.48 80.00 Environment Good 1.51 1.51 100.00 Size Excel 0.45 0.45 100.00 Location Excel 0.45 0.29 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Media Center 0.97 0.97 100.00 Environment Excel 2.44 2.44 100.00 Size Excel 0.73 0.48 65.00 Location Fair 0.73 0.58 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good 0.89 0.71 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.56 1.66 65.00Fair Administration 0.29 0.23 80.00Good Counseling 0.58 0.38 65.00Fair Clinic 1.27 0.63 50.00Poor Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 5.00 100.00Excel Cafeteria 6.20 6.20 100.00Excel Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.30 65.00 Vehicular Traffic Fair 0.97 0.63 65.00 Pedestrian Traffic Fair 0.81 0.65 80.00 Parking Good 2.34 1.87 80.00 Play Areas Good

Safety and Security 0.75 0.60 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 2.40 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.40 80.00 Controlled Entrances Good

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:44:52AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905105Site #:


Project #: 5773


100.00 80.41 80.41Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESBurgess Elementary serves students in grades pk-6 from the surrounding neighborhood. The facility also houses a district wide autism program. The school is adjacent to both Hirschi High School and Kirby Middle school forming an education park.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe school consists primarily of regular and special education classrooms. There is some availability for a variety of learning styles.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeGeneral classroom sizes range from exceeding the space standard to approximately 75% of the standard. Most classrooms meet approximately 80%.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipSome of the general classrooms have little to no storage, others have minimal.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->EnvironmentOne of the kindergarten rooms is located in a general classroom space.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeOne kindergarten room meets approximately 75% of the standard, the other meets less than 60%.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->LocationKindergarten rooms are located in the main academic area. there is no separate kindergarten playground.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->Storage/Fixed EquipOne of the kindergarten rooms is located in a general classroom with minimal storage and no restroom.

Suitability - ES->Science-->SizeThe science room meets approximately 85% of the standard.

Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentMusic class is taught on the stage.

Suitability - ES->Music-->LocationMusic class is taught on the stage.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipMusic class is taught on the stage.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentMusic is in a regular classroom space.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe music room meets approximately 55% of the standard.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipArt is taught in a regular classroom space with some, but not adequate storage.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab meets approximately 70% of the standard.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited. There are curtains and a lighting system.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:44:52AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905105Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Media Center-->LocationThe media center is located in one of the far wings.

Suitability - ES->AdministrationSome offices are small. There is no conference area.

Suitability - ES->ClinicTheir is no cot area with separation. The overall space is small.

Suitability - ES->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe staff lounge/workroom has no sink or restrooms.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficAccess to the playground crosses a traffic lane.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficSome pedestrian traffic crosses traffic lanes.


Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:44:52AM



Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905107Site #:

Assessments 2013 Crockett ES

Project #: 5773

Site Type: Site Size:Grade Config: EE KG-06 6.00Elementary


5.00 3.25 65.00 Learning Style Variety Fair 2.00 1.30 65.00 Interior Environment Fair 1.50 1.20 80.00 Exterior Environment Good

General Classrooms 4.90 3.19 65.00 Environment Fair


Kindergarten 0.42 0.27 65.00 Environment Fair 1.04 0.52 50.00 Size Poor 0.31 0.16 50.00 Location Poor 0.31 0.20 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair



Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.47 65.00 Environment Fair 1.80 1.44 80.00 Size Good 0.54 0.43 80.00 Location Good 0.54 0.35 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Science 0.50 0.33 65.00 Environment Fair 1.25 0.81 65.00 Size Fair 0.38 0.30 80.00 Location Good 0.38 0.24 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Music 0.74 0.00 0.00 Environment Unsat

Page 1 of 55/8/2013 11:45:10AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905107Site #:


Project #: 5773


1.85 0.00 0.00 Size Unsat 0.56 0.00 0.00 Location Unsat 0.56 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Unsat

Art 0.47 0.00 0.00 Environment Unsat 1.17 0.00 0.00 Size Unsat 0.35 0.00 0.00 Location Unsat 0.35 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Unsat

Computer Labs 0.34 0.22 65.00 Environment Fair 0.85 0.55 65.00 Size Fair 0.26 0.20 80.00 Location Good 0.26 0.17 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

P.E. 1.92 1.54 80.00 Environment Good 4.80 3.84 80.00 Size Good 1.44 1.15 80.00 Location Good 1.44 0.72 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Performing Arts 0.60 0.48 80.00 Environment Good 1.51 1.21 80.00 Size Good 0.45 0.36 80.00 Location Good 0.45 0.36 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Media Center 0.97 0.78 80.00 Environment Good 2.44 1.58 65.00 Size Fair 0.73 0.58 80.00 Location Good 0.73 0.37 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor 0.89 0.71 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.56 1.28 50.00Poor Administration 0.29 0.19 65.00Fair Counseling 0.58 0.29 50.00Poor Clinic 1.27 0.82 65.00Fair Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 3.25 65.00Fair Cafeteria 6.20 4.03 65.00Fair Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.00 50.00 Vehicular Traffic Poor 0.97 0.49 50.00 Pedestrian Traffic Poor 0.81 0.53 65.00 Parking Fair 2.34 1.17 50.00 Play Areas Poor

Safety and Security 0.75 0.60 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 1.95 65.00 Ease of Supervision Fair 0.50 0.25 50.00 Controlled Entrances Poor

Page 2 of 55/8/2013 11:45:10AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905107Site #:


Project #: 5773


95.10 59.49 62.56Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe size of the classrooms do not provide for flexible learning opportunities. There are no flexible learning spaces in the building.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentBoth the age and condition of the building do not contribute towards an inviting environment. Natural lighting is limited in most rooms.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere is a covered pavilion.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentThe general classrooms' lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting is limited in most rooms.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeGeneral classrooms do not meet district size standards.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->EnvironmentThe kindergarten classrooms' lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting is limited in most rooms.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeThe kindergarten classrooms do not meet district size standards. Half of the kindergarten classrooms are located in portables.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->LocationHalf of the kindergarten classrooms are located in portables.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentThe resource classrooms' lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting is limited in most rooms.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Science-->EnvironmentThe science classroom lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting is limited in most rooms.

Suitability - ES->Science-->SizeThe science classroom does not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - ES->Science-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentMusic is located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeMusic is located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Music-->LocationMusic is located in a portable.

Page 3 of 55/8/2013 11:45:10AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905107Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipMusic is located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentThere is no art room available.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThere is no art room available.

Suitability - ES->Art-->LocationThere is no art room available.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is no art room available.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->EnvironmentThe computer classroom lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting is limited in most rooms.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer classroom does not meet the districts size standards.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Environment

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->SizeThe library does not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is very limited.

Suitability - ES->AdministrationThere is no conference room available in the building.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThe counselor's office is a smaller room with inadequate storage.

Suitability - ES->ClinicThe clinic has one cot. It shares a bathroom with the teacher's lounge.

Suitability - ES->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe upstairs lounge/workroom is very small.

Suitability - ES->CafeteriaThe cafeteria does not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - ES->Food Service and PrepThe kitchen is long and narrow and does not meet district size standards. Dry storage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficMost of the traffic routing does not have good separation. The circular drive is not large enough to accommodate parent drop-off, making on-street drop-off necessary.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficPedestrian traffic must enter the school through a congested area. There are numerous crossing guard volunteers to supervise this area.

Page 4 of 55/8/2013 11:45:10AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905107Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Outside-->ParkingParking is very limited. On-street parking is necessary.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasThe kindergarten playground is not near the classrooms. Equipment is somewhat old.




Page 5 of 55/8/2013 11:45:10AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905108Site #:

Assessments 2013 Cunningham ES

Project #: 5773



5.00 4.00 80.00 Learning Style Variety Good 2.00 1.60 80.00 Interior Environment Good 1.50 1.20 80.00 Exterior Environment Good



Kindergarten 0.42 0.33 80.00 Environment Good 1.04 0.83 80.00 Size Good 0.31 0.31 100.00 Location Excel 0.31 0.25 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

ECE 0.50 0.50 100.00 Environment Excel 1.25 1.25 100.00 Size Excel 0.37 0.37 100.00 Location Excel 0.37 0.30 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.48 0.48 100.00 Environment Excel 1.20 1.20 100.00 Size Excel 0.36 0.36 100.00 Location Excel 0.36 0.29 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.58 80.00 Environment Good 1.80 1.80 100.00 Size Excel 0.54 0.43 80.00 Location Good 0.54 0.43 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Science 0.50 0.40 80.00 Environment Good 1.25 1.25 100.00 Size Excel 0.38 0.38 100.00 Location Excel 0.38 0.30 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Music 0.74 0.59 80.00 Environment Good

Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:45:19AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905108Site #:


Project #: 5773


1.85 1.20 65.00 Size Fair 0.56 0.36 65.00 Location Fair 0.56 0.44 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good


Computer Labs 0.34 0.27 80.00 Environment Good 0.85 0.68 80.00 Size Good 0.26 0.20 80.00 Location Good 0.26 0.20 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

P.E. 1.92 1.54 80.00 Environment Good 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 1.15 80.00 Location Good 1.44 1.15 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Performing Arts 0.60 0.48 80.00 Environment Good 1.51 1.51 100.00 Size Excel 0.45 0.45 100.00 Location Excel 0.45 0.29 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Media Center 0.97 0.97 100.00 Environment Excel 2.44 2.44 100.00 Size Excel 0.73 0.73 100.00 Location Excel 0.73 0.58 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good 0.89 0.71 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.56 1.66 65.00Fair Administration 0.29 0.29 100.00Excel Counseling 0.58 0.58 100.00Excel Clinic 1.27 1.27 100.00Excel Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 4.00 80.00Good Cafeteria 6.20 4.96 80.00Good Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.60 80.00 Vehicular Traffic Good 0.97 0.78 80.00 Pedestrian Traffic Good 0.81 0.81 100.00 Parking Excel 2.34 2.34 100.00 Play Areas Excel

Safety and Security 0.75 0.60 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.80 80.00 Signage & Way Finding Good 3.00 1.95 65.00 Ease of Supervision Fair 0.50 0.33 65.00 Controlled Entrances Fair

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:45:19AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905108Site #:


Project #: 5773


100.00 79.22 79.22Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESCunningham Elementary serves grades k-6 from the surrounding neighborhood. In addition Cunningham includes centralized special education facilities that serve students from throughout the district for a variety of programs as well as throughout the region for the deaf education program.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeGeneral classrooms range in size. Most fall within 70-80% of the standard.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipMost of the general classrooms have some built in storage, most do not have sinks.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeKindergarten rooms meet approximately 85% of the standard.

Suitability - ES->Self-Contained Special EdA section of Cunningham school was designed as a special education center for the district and region.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeThe music room meets approximately 75% of the standard.

Suitability - ES->Music-->LocationThe music room is located in a classroom wing but is acoustically isolated.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe music room includes a separate storage area. There is no sink.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentThere is no art room at Cunningham. Art is taught in the regular classrooms.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThere is no art room at Cunningham. Art is taught in the regular classrooms.

Suitability - ES->Art-->LocationThere is no art room at Cunningham. Art is taught in the regular classrooms.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is no art room at Cunningham. Art is taught in the regular classrooms.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab meets approximately 80% of the standard.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe stage has curtains but no lighting system. Storage is minimal.

Suitability - ES->AdministrationMany of the office areas are small. While the administrative area is located near the entrance it is not easy to control.

Suitability - ES->Staff Lounge-WkRmOne of the unused special education spaces is being used as a staff lounge/workroom. This provides most amenities.

Suitability - ES->Food Service and PrepThe food service areas is reasonable size and includes all required spaces. There is some conflict with the delivery area and other traffic.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:45:19AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905108Site #:


Project #: 5773




Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:45:19AM




Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905109Site #:

Assessments 2013 Fain ES

Project #: 5773



5.00 3.25 65.00 Learning Style Variety Fair 2.00 1.60 80.00 Interior Environment Good 1.50 0.98 65.00 Exterior Environment Fair


12.25 9.80 80.00 Size Good 3.68 3.68 100.00 Location Excel 3.68 2.94 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Kindergarten 0.42 0.33 80.00 Environment Good 1.04 0.52 50.00 Size Poor 0.31 0.25 80.00 Location Good 0.31 0.20 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

ECE 0.50 0.00 0.00 Environment Unsat 1.25 0.00 0.00 Size Unsat 0.37 0.00 0.00 Location Unsat 0.37 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Unsat


Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.58 80.00 Environment Good 1.80 1.17 65.00 Size Fair 0.54 0.43 80.00 Location Good 0.54 0.35 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Science 0.50 0.50 100.00 Environment Excel 1.25 1.25 100.00 Size Excel 0.38 0.30 80.00 Location Good 0.38 0.38 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Music 0.74 0.59 80.00 Environment Good

Page 1 of 55/8/2013 11:45:35AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905109Site #:


Project #: 5773


1.85 0.93 50.00 Size Poor 0.56 0.36 65.00 Location Fair 0.56 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Unsat

Art 0.47 0.47 100.00 Environment Excel 1.17 0.76 65.00 Size Fair 0.35 0.35 100.00 Location Excel 0.35 0.35 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Computer Labs 0.34 0.34 100.00 Environment Excel 0.85 0.55 65.00 Size Fair 0.26 0.26 100.00 Location Excel 0.26 0.26 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

P.E. 1.92 1.92 100.00 Environment Excel 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 1.15 80.00 Location Good 1.44 1.15 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Performing Arts 0.60 0.39 65.00 Environment Fair 1.51 0.98 65.00 Size Fair 0.45 0.45 100.00 Location Excel 0.45 0.23 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Media Center 0.97 0.97 100.00 Environment Excel 2.44 2.44 100.00 Size Excel 0.73 0.48 65.00 Location Fair 0.73 0.58 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good 0.89 0.89 100.00Excel Restrooms (Student) 2.56 1.66 65.00Fair Administration 0.29 0.15 50.00Poor Counseling 0.58 0.47 80.00Good Clinic 1.27 0.82 65.00Fair Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 5.00 100.00Excel Cafeteria 6.20 4.96 80.00Good Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.33 65.00Fair Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.30 65.00 Vehicular Traffic Fair 0.97 0.97 100.00 Pedestrian Traffic Excel 0.81 0.53 65.00 Parking Fair 2.34 1.87 80.00 Play Areas Good

Safety and Security 0.75 0.60 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.50 50.00 Signage & Way Finding Poor 3.00 1.50 50.00 Ease of Supervision Poor 0.50 0.50 100.00 Controlled Entrances Excel

Page 2 of 55/8/2013 11:45:35AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905109Site #:


Project #: 5773


97.60 75.24 77.09Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESFain Elementary School is a pre-kindergarten through sixth grade facility. The school was originally constructed in 1956 and has had numerous additions. The school is a neighborhood school that offers comprehensive elementary educational programming.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe school uses tables in the hallways for individual group instruction. The school was not designed to accommodate small group and individualized instructional methodology.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentDue to the age of the school and a lack of a significant remodeling the school is showing its age.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThe grounds are in poor condition. The school has one science related instructional area outside. It does not have an outdoor social area or classroom.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentThe general classrooms in the original parts of the building are in need of locker replacement, and updating.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeThe average classroom size for general classrooms is less than 800 square feet .

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe general classrooms have a set of shelves under the windows along the wall. The rooms do not have additional storage for supplies and materials. The back walls have student lockers for student materials. Some of the classrooms are equipped with a sink but not a drinking fountain.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->EnvironmentThe space in the back of the room that houses the lockers, restrooms, and storage rooms is very small and congested.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeThe kindergarten classrooms do not meet the standard square footage of 1200 square feet. They are approximately 725 square feet.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->LocationThe kindergarten rooms are at the end of a hallway and are a significant distance from the lunch room, music room, and library.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe kindergarten rooms do not have adequate built in storage cabinets. They have a small storage room that is approximately 60 feet in size.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->EnvironmentThe pre-K facility is a portable.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->SizeThe pre-K facility is a portable.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->LocationThe pre-K facility is a portable.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe pre-K facility is a portable.

Page 3 of 55/8/2013 11:45:35AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905109Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Self-Contained Special EdThe school does not have any self contained Special Education programming.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentThe gifted and talented classrooms are located in a portable. The resource rooms are either general classrooms or storage rooms that are converted to small group rooms.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->SizeThe storage rooms that are used for instruction are small and do not meet the size standard. The general classrooms utilize temporary partitions to divide the rooms into multiple instructional spaces.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->LocationThe gifted and talented rooms are located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe resource rooms in the storage rooms do not have dedicated storage cabinets. The resource rooms in the general classrooms only have the general classroom storage shelves.

Suitability - ES->Science-->LocationThe only access to the science room is through the library.

Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentThe music room is located in a general classroom. It does not have any specialized acoustic treatments.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeThe music classroom is approximately 750 ft.? and does not meet the standard for music room size.

Suitability - ES->Music-->LocationThe music room is located at the end of the hallway and noise infiltration down the hallway can be a concern.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe music room does not have any specialized cabinetry or storage space for equipment and materials.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe art room is less than 800 ft.? in size and does not meet the established classroom size standard.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab is 850 square feet and does not meet the standard of 1000 square feet.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->LocationThe gymnasium is located in a separate building and can only be accessed via the covered walkway.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe gymnasium does not have adequate storage for physical education equipment and supplies.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->EnvironmentThe performing arts area is a stage at one end of the cafeteria. The cafeteria does not have any acoustic treatments. Seating is provided by utilizing the cafeteria tables and stools.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->SizeThe seating is not adequate for many of the school programs.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe stage area does not have adequate storage for supplies and materials.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->LocationThe library/media center is located at the end of a hallway and is not in close proximity to many of the general classrooms.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe media center does not have an adequate workroom for library staff.

Page 4 of 55/8/2013 11:45:35AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905109Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->AdministrationThe administrative area has a very small reception area. It does not have adequate built-in storage for office supplies and materials. The conference room can only seat six people. The mail room is very small.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThe counselor's office is small, lacks adequate storage, and has a small area for a conference table that will seat four individuals. The conference area contains a washer and dryer as well as a handicapped accessible shower. The counselor's office is not adjacent to the student record storage.

Suitability - ES->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe lounge is very small and has only one restroom.

Suitability - ES->Food Service and PrepThe office area is located in the kitchen and is not separated from the kitchen area.

Suitability - ES->Custodial and MaintenanceThe main custodial area can only be accessed from the exterior of the building. It is located in an electrical room.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThe bus unloading zone is in the same location as the faculty parking lot. The parent drop-off zone is in front of the school. Parents dropping off students often wait a significant distance on city streets prior to accessing the drop off zone.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->ParkingThe school building does not have adequate off street parking requiring people to park on the street in front of the building.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasThe playground equipment is located a significant distance from the main school building. The playground has standing water during wet weather. Some of playground equipment is old and is not ADA compliant.

Suitability - ES->Safety and Security-->Fencing



Page 5 of 55/8/2013 11:45:35AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905130Site #:

Assessments 2013 Farris Early Childhood C

Project #: 5773

Site Type: Site Size:Grade Config: EE PK 2.00Early Childhood


4.12 4.12 100.00 Learning Style Variety Excel 2.00 2.00 100.00 Interior Environment Excel 1.50 1.50 100.00 Exterior Environment Excel


ECE 4.69 4.69 100.00 Environment Excel

11.72 7.62 65.00 Size Fair 3.52 3.52 100.00 Location Excel 3.52 2.81 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.48 0.38 80.00 Environment Good 1.20 0.60 50.00 Size Poor 0.36 0.36 100.00 Location Excel 0.36 0.23 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.47 65.00 Environment Fair 1.80 1.17 65.00 Size Fair 0.54 0.54 100.00 Location Excel 0.54 0.27 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

P.E. - Activity 1.95 1.95 100.00 Environment Excel 4.87 4.87 100.00 Size Excel 1.46 1.46 100.00 Location Excel 1.46 0.95 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair 1.70 0.85 50.00Poor Restrooms (Student) 4.58 2.29 50.00Poor Administration 3.75 2.44 65.00Fair Counseling 0.78 0.78 100.00Excel Clinic 3.00 1.50 50.00Poor Staff Lounge-WkRm 3.00 2.40 80.00Good Cafeteria 3.00 3.00 100.00Excel Food Service and Prep

Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:45:42AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905130Site #:


Project #: 5773


0.50 0.33 65.00Fair Custodial and Maintenance Outside

2.00 0.00 0.00 Vehicular Traffic Unsat 0.97 0.97 100.00 Pedestrian Traffic Excel 0.81 0.65 80.00 Parking Good 2.34 2.34 100.00 Play Areas Excel

Safety and Security 0.75 0.75 100.00 Fencing Excel 0.09 0.06 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 2.00 1.60 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.50 100.00 Controlled Entrances Excel

76.57 59.95 78.30Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - Early ChildhoodThe Farris Early Childhood Center is a federally approved Head Start program for students 3 and 4 years old. The facility is a renovated vacated elementary school. It is important to note that the class sizes for each room meet the federal standard of 35 square feet per student. This assessment of the facilities utilizes the school district standard of 1200 square feet per room.

Suitability - Early Childhood->KindergartenThe school does not have any programming for Kindergarten.

Suitability - Early Childhood->ECE-->SizeThe classrooms are approximately 650 square feet. They do not meet the district standard of 1,200 square feet per room. They have varying enrollments from 15 to 17 students based upon the size of the classroom. The enrollments are in compliance with the federal Head Start standard of 35 square feet per student.

Suitability - Early Childhood->ECE-->Storage/Fixed EquipEach classroom has student cubbies and built in cabinets below the windows. The majority of the classrooms have restrooms and sinks. They are not all equipped with drinking fountains.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Self-Contained Special Ed-->EnvironmentThe building does not have a specific room for self contained special education children. The students with specific needs are included in a general classroom with additional staff. The class room has a large bathroom but the bathroom does not contain a changing table, sink or shower.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Self-Contained Special Ed-->SizeThe classroom is a general classroom and does not meet the standard of 1200 square feet.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Self-Contained Special Ed-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe room has a closet at one end that runs the width of the room. The room has a restroom that does not have a sink or changing table.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentInstructional Resource staff are housed in either former storage rooms or in the library area using portable dividers. The services located in the storage rooms do not have adequate natural light and HVAC systems.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Instructional Resource Rooms-->SizeThe resource areas located in the storage rooms are small.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe resource spaces do not have adequate built in storage for supplies and materials.

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:45:42AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905130Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - Early Childhood->P.E. - Activity-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe storage of PE equipment is not located adjacent to the playgrounds and indoor PE space.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Restrooms (Student)The number of student fixtures are not adequate for the population served.

Suitability - Early Childhood->AdministrationThe Principal's office and Administrative Assistant's office are very small. The facility does not have a conference room. There is not adequate built in storage for office supplies and materials.

Suitability - Early Childhood->CounselingThe counselors office is a partitioned area in the library.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe faculty lounge is very small in size. It also serves as a workroom. There is not adequate storage space for instructional supplies. The room does not have a kitchenette. It has only one staff restroom,

Suitability - Early Childhood->CafeteriaThe cafeteria does not have a storage space for tables and chairs. It also serves as the large group assembly room with a stage at one end.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Custodial and MaintenanceThe building has one custodial closet with a floor sink. None of the closets have ventilation.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficParents park on three side streets adjacent to the school and walk children to and from the school.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Outside-->ParkingParking for staff is adequate. Parent and visitor parking is on the streets adjacent to the building.


Suitability - Early Childhood->Safety and Security-->Ease of Supervision

Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:45:42AM




Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905111Site #:

Assessments 2013 Fowler ES

Project #: 5773





12.25 9.80 80.00 Size Good 3.68 2.94 80.00 Location Good 3.68 1.84 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Kindergarten 0.42 0.33 80.00 Environment Good 1.04 0.68 65.00 Size Fair 0.31 0.16 50.00 Location Poor 0.31 0.25 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good




Science 0.50 0.50 100.00 Environment Excel 1.25 1.25 100.00 Size Excel 0.38 0.30 80.00 Location Good 0.38 0.38 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel


Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:45:51AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905111Site #:


Project #: 5773


1.85 0.93 50.00 Size Poor 0.56 0.28 50.00 Location Poor 0.56 0.28 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Art 0.47 0.37 80.00 Environment Good 1.17 0.58 50.00 Size Poor 0.35 0.35 100.00 Location Excel 0.35 0.18 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor


P.E. 1.92 1.92 100.00 Environment Excel 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 0.94 65.00 Location Fair 1.44 0.94 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Performing Arts 0.60 0.48 80.00 Environment Good 1.51 1.51 100.00 Size Excel 0.45 0.29 65.00 Location Fair 0.45 0.36 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Media Center 0.97 0.78 80.00 Environment Good 2.44 2.44 100.00 Size Excel 0.73 0.73 100.00 Location Excel 0.73 0.48 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair 0.89 0.58 65.00Fair Restrooms (Student) 2.56 1.66 65.00Fair Administration 0.29 0.19 65.00Fair Counseling 0.58 0.58 100.00Excel Clinic 1.27 1.01 80.00Good Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 3.25 65.00Fair Cafeteria 6.20 6.20 100.00Excel Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.25 50.00Poor Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.30 65.00 Vehicular Traffic Fair 0.97 0.78 80.00 Pedestrian Traffic Good 0.81 0.53 65.00 Parking Fair 2.34 1.52 65.00 Play Areas Fair

Safety and Security 0.75 0.60 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.50 50.00 Signage & Way Finding Poor 3.00 2.40 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.33 65.00 Controlled Entrances Fair

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:45:51AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905111Site #:


Project #: 5773


95.10 73.03 76.79Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESFowler Elementary School provides a general education program for grades kindergarten through sixth.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThere are no spaces to accommodate a variety of learning/teaching styles.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipMost classrooms do not have sinks or a full wall of cabinets.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeThe kindergarten rooms are 70% of the size standard.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->LocationThe kindergarten rooms are not located near the parent drop off areas.

Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentThe acoustics of the music room are not good.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeThe music room is 58% of the size standard.

Suitability - ES->Music-->LocationThe music room is centrally located but not acoustically isolated.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is no sink or storage room.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe art room is 64% of the size standard.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is only one sink and no storage room.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->LocationThe gym is at one end of a long building.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe gym storage room is small.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->LocationThe performing arts space is centrally located in the cafeteria but cannot be closed off from the rest of the school for evening events.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe library does not have an office.

Suitability - ES->Restrooms (Student)The restrooms in the west end are very small.

Suitability - ES->AdministrationThe administrative area is very small, there is little room for the public to wait.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThe counseling area does not have a waiting area.

Suitability - ES->CafeteriaThe cafeteria is also the performing arts area and has no table storage room.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:45:51AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905111Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Custodial and MaintenanceThere is no custodial receiving area and very little storage space. School supplies and the book room are located in the mechanical room.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficOne parent pick up area is on the street. There are no buses (only vans) to this school.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->ParkingThere are no parking spaces for visitors in the front of the school. Visitors typically park in the loading zone.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasThere is no separately fenced play area for the kindergarten.



Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:45:51AM




Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905112Site #:

Assessments 2013 Franklin ES

Project #: 5773



5.00 3.25 65.00 Learning Style Variety Fair 2.00 1.30 65.00 Interior Environment Fair 1.50 1.20 80.00 Exterior Environment Good



Kindergarten 0.42 0.27 65.00 Environment Fair 1.04 0.68 65.00 Size Fair 0.31 0.25 80.00 Location Good 0.31 0.20 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair



Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.47 65.00 Environment Fair 1.80 1.44 80.00 Size Good 0.54 0.43 80.00 Location Good 0.54 0.43 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Science 0.50 0.33 65.00 Environment Fair 1.25 0.63 50.00 Size Poor 0.38 0.30 80.00 Location Good 0.38 0.24 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair


Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:45:59AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905112Site #:


Project #: 5773


1.85 0.93 50.00 Size Poor 0.56 0.28 50.00 Location Poor 0.56 0.28 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Art 0.47 0.30 65.00 Environment Fair 1.17 0.58 50.00 Size Poor 0.35 0.28 80.00 Location Good 0.35 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Unsat

Computer Labs 0.34 0.22 65.00 Environment Fair 0.85 0.55 65.00 Size Fair 0.26 0.20 80.00 Location Good 0.26 0.13 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor


Performing Arts 0.60 0.48 80.00 Environment Good 1.51 1.21 80.00 Size Good 0.45 0.36 80.00 Location Good 0.45 0.23 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Media Center 0.97 0.78 80.00 Environment Good 2.44 1.95 80.00 Size Good 0.73 0.58 80.00 Location Good 0.73 0.58 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good 0.89 0.44 50.00Poor Restrooms (Student) 2.56 2.05 80.00Good Administration 0.29 0.19 65.00Fair Counseling 0.58 0.47 80.00Good Clinic 1.27 1.01 80.00Good Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 4.00 80.00Good Cafeteria 6.20 4.96 80.00Good Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.60 80.00 Vehicular Traffic Good 0.97 0.78 80.00 Pedestrian Traffic Good 0.81 0.65 80.00 Parking Good 2.34 1.52 65.00 Play Areas Fair

Safety and Security 0.75 0.49 65.00 Fencing Fair 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 2.40 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.25 50.00 Controlled Entrances Poor

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:45:59AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905112Site #:


Project #: 5773


95.10 67.43 70.90Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESFranklin Elementary School houses grades kindergarten through sixth. The building was originally constructed in 1927.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyClassroom sizes limit the flexibility for teaching the curriculum. There are no flexible learning spaces available.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe building has not had a major renovation. However, there is an abundance of natural lighting, giving the building a more inviting feeling.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere is a covered pavilion outside.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentThe general classrooms' lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting help present a warm and inviting environment.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeGeneral classroom sizes do not meet the district's size standards.


Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->EnvironmentThe kindergarten classrooms' lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting help present a warm and inviting environment.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeKindergarten classrooms do not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentThe instructional classrooms' lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting help present a warm and inviting environment.

Suitability - ES->Science-->EnvironmentThe science classrooms' lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting help present a warm and inviting environment.

Suitability - ES->Science-->SizeThe science classroom does not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - ES->Science-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentThe music classrooms' lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting help present a warm and inviting environment.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeThe music room is a converted classroom that does not meet the district's size standards.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:45:59AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905112Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Music-->LocationThe music room is located near the administrative offices and near classrooms.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentThe art classrooms' lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting help present a warm and inviting environment.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe art room is a converted classroom that does not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe converted classroom has no water or proper storage.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->EnvironmentThe computer lab's classroom lighting levels are somewhat low. Natural lighting help present a warm and inviting environment.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab does not meet the district's size standards.



Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->EnvironmentThe performing arts stage is located in the cafeteria.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited. The stage is not handicapped accessible. The lighting system is inadequate.

Suitability - ES->Restrooms (Student)There are no student restrooms on the second floor.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThe counselor's office is located on the second floor in a small room. There is no reception area.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasPlayground equipment is old. The kindergarten playground is partially fenced.




Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:45:59AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905114Site #:

Assessments 2013 Haynes Northwest Acad

Project #: 5773


Suitability - PK-8 Learning Environment

5.00 2.50 50.00 Learning Style Variety Poor 2.00 1.60 80.00 Interior Environment Good 1.50 0.75 50.00 Exterior Environment Poor

General Classrooms 3.70 2.96 80.00 Environment Good 9.25 6.01 65.00 Size Fair 2.78 2.22 80.00 Location Good 2.78 1.39 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Kindergarten 0.34 0.27 80.00 Environment Good 0.84 0.55 65.00 Size Fair 0.25 0.20 80.00 Location Good 0.25 0.16 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

ECE 0.34 0.27 80.00 Environment Good 0.84 0.55 65.00 Size Fair 0.25 0.20 80.00 Location Good 0.25 0.16 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.56 0.28 50.00 Environment Poor 1.41 0.70 50.00 Size Poor 0.42 0.34 80.00 Location Good 0.42 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Unsat

Instructional Resource Rooms 0.84 0.55 65.00 Environment Fair 2.11 1.37 65.00 Size Fair 0.63 0.41 65.00 Location Fair 0.63 0.41 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Science 0.77 0.62 80.00 Environment Good 1.93 1.93 100.00 Size Excel 0.58 0.46 80.00 Location Good 0.58 0.46 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good


Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:46:16AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905114Site #:


Project #: 5773



Art 0.44 0.22 50.00 Environment Poor 1.09 0.55 50.00 Size Poor 0.33 0.26 80.00 Location Good 0.33 0.16 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Career Tech Ed 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Computer Labs 0.30 0.24 80.00 Environment Good 0.75 0.49 65.00 Size Fair 0.23 0.18 80.00 Location Good 0.23 0.15 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

P.E. 2.06 1.65 80.00 Environment Good 5.16 3.35 65.00 Size Fair 1.55 1.24 80.00 Location Good 1.55 0.77 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor


Media Center 0.69 0.56 80.00 Environment Good 1.74 1.39 80.00 Size Good 0.52 0.42 80.00 Location Good 0.52 0.34 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair 0.91 0.72 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.27 1.82 80.00Good Administration 0.41 0.33 80.00Good Counseling 0.34 0.27 80.00Good Clinic 0.91 0.72 80.00Good Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 4.00 80.00Good Cafeteria 7.84 5.10 65.00Fair Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 3.00 1.50 50.00 Vehicular Traffic Poor 1.00 0.50 50.00 Pedestrian Traffic Poor 1.35 0.88 65.00 Parking Fair 1.64 1.31 80.00 Athletic Courts and Fields Good

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:46:16AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905114Site #:


Project #: 5773


Safety and Security 1.22 0.97 80.00 Fencing Good 0.15 0.10 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 2.00 1.60 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.50 100.00 Controlled Entrances Excel

93.88 63.84 68.00Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - PK-8Haynes Elementary School houses grades pre-kindergarten through sixth. There are several self-contained classrooms serving special education children.

Suitability - PK-8->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe school has no flexible learning spaces.

Suitability - PK-8->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThe school has no outdoor learning lab.

Suitability - PK-8->General Classrooms-->SizeThe general classrooms do not meet district size standards.

Suitability - PK-8->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage in general classrooms is limited.

Suitability - PK-8->Kindergarten-->SizeOne of the two kindergarten classrooms does not meet district size standards.

Suitability - PK-8->Kindergarten-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage in the smaller kindergarten classroom is inadequate.

Suitability - PK-8->ECE-->SizeThe pre-kindergarten rooms do not meet district size standards.

Suitability - PK-8->ECE-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage in the pre-kindergarten classrooms is lacking.

Suitability - PK-8->Self-Contained Special Ed-->EnvironmentThe special education self-contained classrooms (BASE) were not designed for this program. The rooms do not provide for a stimulating environment.

Suitability - PK-8->Self-Contained Special Ed-->SizeThe rooms do not meet district size standards.

Suitability - PK-8->Self-Contained Special Ed-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe storage for this program is inadequate.

Suitability - PK-8->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentOne of the three resource rooms is located in a portable.

Suitability - PK-8->Instructional Resource Rooms-->SizeOne of the three resource rooms is located in a portable.

Suitability - PK-8->Instructional Resource Rooms-->LocationOne of the three resource rooms is located in a portable.

Suitability - PK-8->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipOne of the three resource rooms is located in a portable.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:46:16AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905114Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - PK-8->Music-->EnvironmentThe music and art share the same space. The space is a converted classroom which serves neither program well. The room does not provide a stimulating environment for either program.

Suitability - PK-8->Music-->SizeThe music and art room (shared space) does not meet district size standards

Suitability - PK-8->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is inadequate.

Suitability - PK-8->Art-->EnvironmentThe music and art share the same space. The space is a converted classroom which serves neither program well. The room does not provide a stimulating environment for either program.

Suitability - PK-8->Art-->SizeThe music and art room (shared space) does not meet district size standards

Suitability - PK-8->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is inadequate.

Suitability - PK-8->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab does not meet district size standards.

Suitability - PK-8->Computer Labs-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - PK-8->P.E.-->SizeThe gym does not meet district size standards.

Suitability - PK-8->P.E.-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - PK-8->Performing Arts-->EnvironmentThe stage is located in the cafeteria. It is not handicapped accessible.

Suitability - PK-8->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe lighting system is inadequate.

Suitability - PK-8->Media Center-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage for the library is limited.

Suitability - PK-8->Food Service and PrepThe space is adequate. There are no walk-in freezers available.

Suitability - PK-8->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThere is no separation between cars and busses.

Suitability - PK-8->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficThere are significant numbers of walkers into the campus due to the apartments surrounding the school. There are no crossing guards available. There is not good separation from pedestrian traffic and vehicular traffic.

Suitability - PK-8->Outside-->ParkingParking is inadequate for day-time parking. On-street parking is used for events.

Suitability - PK-8->Safety and Security-->Signage & Way Finding

Suitability - PK-8->Safety and Security-->Controlled Entrances

Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:46:16AM




Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905116Site #:

Assessments 2013 Houston ES

Project #: 5773





12.25 6.13 50.00 Size Poor 3.68 2.94 80.00 Location Good 3.68 2.39 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Kindergarten 0.42 0.33 80.00 Environment Good 1.04 0.52 50.00 Size Poor 0.31 0.16 50.00 Location Poor 0.31 0.16 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor



Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.00 0.00 Environment Unsat 1.80 0.00 0.00 Size Unsat 0.54 0.27 50.00 Location Poor 0.54 0.27 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Science 0.50 0.40 80.00 Environment Good 1.25 0.63 50.00 Size Poor 0.38 0.30 80.00 Location Good 0.38 0.19 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor


Page 1 of 55/8/2013 11:46:32AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905116Site #:


Project #: 5773




Computer Labs 0.34 0.27 80.00 Environment Good 0.85 0.43 50.00 Size Poor 0.26 0.20 80.00 Location Good 0.26 0.13 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

P.E. 1.92 1.92 100.00 Environment Excel 4.80 3.84 80.00 Size Good 1.44 1.15 80.00 Location Good 1.44 0.72 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Performing Arts 0.60 0.48 80.00 Environment Good 1.51 0.98 65.00 Size Fair 0.45 0.36 80.00 Location Good 0.45 0.23 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Media Center 0.97 0.78 80.00 Environment Good 2.44 1.95 80.00 Size Good 0.73 0.58 80.00 Location Good 0.73 0.58 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good 0.89 0.71 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.56 1.28 50.00Poor Administration 0.29 0.15 50.00Poor Counseling 0.58 0.47 80.00Good Clinic 1.27 1.27 100.00Excel Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 4.00 80.00Good Cafeteria 6.20 4.96 80.00Good Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.00 50.00 Vehicular Traffic Poor 0.97 0.63 65.00 Pedestrian Traffic Fair 0.81 0.65 80.00 Parking Good 2.34 1.17 50.00 Play Areas Poor

Safety and Security 0.75 0.60 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 2.40 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.25 50.00 Controlled Entrances Poor

Page 2 of 55/8/2013 11:46:32AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905116Site #:


Project #: 5773


97.60 60.37 61.86Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESHouston Elementary school houses grades K-6. The building is 100 years old with one addition in 2009.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe school has no flexible learning spaces. The halls are used for this purpose.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere is a covered pavilion near the playground.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeNone of the general classrooms meet district standards for size. The rooms run from 700 to 865 square feet. The older students have the smaller classrooms, located on the second floor.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited in many of the classrooms.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeTwo of the three kindergarten classrooms are located in portables. The kindergarten classroom located in the building does not meet district size standards.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->LocationTwo of the kindergarten classrooms are located in portables. Access to these portables is via an outside sidewalk.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage for this program is very limited.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->EnvironmentBoth pre-school classrooms are located in portables.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->SizeBoth pre-school classrooms are located in portables.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->LocationBoth pre-school classrooms are located in portables.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->Storage/Fixed EquipBoth pre-school classrooms are located in portables.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentThe resource room located in the building is in a small classroom that has been divided, making the actual resource space very small. The spatial configurations are not conducive to and of these programs.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->SizeThe resource room do not meet district size standards.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->LocationTwo of the three resource programs are located on the stage. Access to the stage is difficult. There are no hand rails on the steps.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is very limited for the resource rooms.

Suitability - ES->Science-->SizeScience rooms do not meet district size standards.

Page 3 of 55/8/2013 11:46:32AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905116Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Science-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is no water in the room. The science room is a converted classroom.

Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentThe music program is located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeThe music program is located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Music-->LocationThe music program is located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe music program is located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentThe art room is not designed to be an art room. The environment is not stimulating for this program.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe art room does not meet district size standards.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe art room was not designed to teach art. There is no water available in the room.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab does not meet district size standards.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is very limited.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->LocationThe gym is a stand-alone building with a covered walk-way.


Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Environment

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->SizeThe stage area located in the cafeteria is small. There have been two offices added to this space to teach resource programs.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is a sound system with limited capability. Stage lighting is inadequate. The stage is not handicapped accessible.

Suitability - ES->AdministrationThe principal's office is secluded from the main office. The line of sight to the front entrance in the main office is inadequate.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThe counselor's office is located a storage room. There is no reception area available.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThere are no busses. Parent drop off is located on a busy street, making the drop off zone difficult.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficThere is a traffic guard for Grant Street. There are a significant number of walkers into this neighborhood school.

Page 4 of 55/8/2013 11:46:32AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905116Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasThere is one playground space. There are no designated playground spaces for the Kindergarten or Pre-School programs.



Page 5 of 55/8/2013 11:46:32AM




Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905118Site #:

Assessments 2013 Jefferson ES

Project #: 5773






Kindergarten 0.42 0.27 65.00 Environment Fair 1.04 0.68 65.00 Size Fair 0.31 0.25 80.00 Location Good 0.31 0.25 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

ECE 0.50 0.25 50.00 Environment Poor 1.25 0.62 50.00 Size Poor 0.37 0.24 65.00 Location Fair 0.37 0.19 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.48 0.31 65.00 Environment Fair 1.20 0.78 65.00 Size Fair 0.36 0.29 80.00 Location Good 0.36 0.23 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair


Science 0.50 0.40 80.00 Environment Good 1.25 0.81 65.00 Size Fair 0.38 0.30 80.00 Location Good 0.38 0.30 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good


Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:46:41AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905118Site #:


Project #: 5773



Art 0.47 0.23 50.00 Environment Poor 1.17 0.76 65.00 Size Fair 0.35 0.28 80.00 Location Good 0.35 0.18 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Computer Labs 0.34 0.27 80.00 Environment Good 0.85 0.55 65.00 Size Fair 0.26 0.20 80.00 Location Good 0.26 0.17 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

P.E. 1.92 1.92 100.00 Environment Excel 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 1.44 100.00 Location Excel 1.44 1.15 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good


Media Center 0.97 0.63 65.00 Environment Fair 2.44 1.58 65.00 Size Fair 0.73 0.58 80.00 Location Good 0.73 0.37 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor 0.89 0.71 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.56 2.05 80.00Good Administration 0.29 0.19 65.00Fair Counseling 0.58 0.58 100.00Excel Clinic 1.27 1.01 80.00Good Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 4.00 80.00Good Cafeteria 6.20 4.96 80.00Good Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.00 50.00 Vehicular Traffic Poor 0.97 0.78 80.00 Pedestrian Traffic Good 0.81 0.65 80.00 Parking Good 2.34 1.17 50.00 Play Areas Poor


Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:46:41AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905118Site #:


Project #: 5773


100.00 71.86 71.86Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESJefferson Elementary School houses grades pre-kindergarten through sixth. The facility was originally built in 1959 with renovation work in 1985 and 2008. The elementary school has a large competitive gym as a result of the last renovation.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe school has no flexible learning spaces. The halls are used for this purpose.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere is a covered pavilion.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentThe general classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeThe general classrooms do not meet the size standards for the district.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage in the general classrooms is limited.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->EnvironmentThe kindergarten classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeThe kindergarten classrooms do not meet the size standards for the district.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->EnvironmentOne of the pre-kindergarten classrooms is located in a portable. The other classroom in the building is newly remodeled.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->SizeOne of the two pre-kindergarten classrooms is located in a portable classroom.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->LocationOne of the pre-kindergarten classrooms is located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->Storage/Fixed EquipOne of the pre-kindergarten classrooms is located in a portable. The other classroom in the building is newly remodeled. Storage is limited in the portable.

Suitability - ES->Self-Contained Special Ed-->EnvironmentOne of the self-contained classrooms was designed for this program. The other is in a converted classroom with limited space. This does not create a stimulating learning environment.

Suitability - ES->Self-Contained Special Ed-->SizeOne of the two self-contained classrooms does not meet the size standards for the district.

Suitability - ES->Self-Contained Special Ed-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage in the converted classroom is limited for the self-contained program that utilizes this space.

Suitability - ES->Science-->SizeThe science room does not meet the size standard for the district.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:46:41AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905118Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentThe music room is located in a multi-purpose room ("JAG" room). The room does not provide for an inviting and stimulating environment. It is not designed for orchestra.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeThe music space does not meet the size standards for the district.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage in the music room is very limited.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentThe art room is a converted classroom that is not designed to accommodate this program. The environment is not inviting or stimulating.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe art room does not meet the size standards for the district.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is no water available. Storage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab does not meet the size standards for the district.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage in the computer lab is limited.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->EnvironmentThe performing arts area is located in the cafeteria.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipBoth lighting and sound systems are inadequate.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->EnvironmentThe library is in two converted classrooms. The environment is not stimulating or inviting.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->SizeThe library does not meet the size standards for the district.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage for the library is very limited.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThe counselor's office is located next to the computer lab is a small space. There is no reception area.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficTraffic routing does not have good separation for parent drop-off. Drop-off zone includes the main street.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasThe kindergarten and pre-school play area is not near the school building. The play area for the other grades is located a greater distance from the school, crossing over a service road into the facility.



Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:46:41AM




Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905119Site #:

Assessments 2013 Lamar ES

Project #: 5773



5.00 2.50 50.00 Learning Style Variety Poor 2.00 1.30 65.00 Interior Environment Fair 1.50 1.20 80.00 Exterior Environment Good


12.25 7.96 65.00 Size Fair 3.68 2.94 80.00 Location Good 3.68 1.84 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Kindergarten 0.42 0.33 80.00 Environment Good 1.04 1.04 100.00 Size Excel 0.31 0.25 80.00 Location Good 0.31 0.25 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

ECE 0.50 0.32 65.00 Environment Fair 1.25 0.62 50.00 Size Poor 0.37 0.30 80.00 Location Good 0.37 0.19 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor


Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.47 65.00 Environment Fair 1.80 1.17 65.00 Size Fair 0.54 0.43 80.00 Location Good 0.54 0.27 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor



Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:46:58AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905119Site #:


Project #: 5773




Computer Labs 0.34 0.17 50.00 Environment Poor 0.85 0.43 50.00 Size Poor 0.26 0.20 80.00 Location Good 0.26 0.13 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor



Media Center 0.97 0.78 80.00 Environment Good 2.44 1.95 80.00 Size Good 0.73 0.58 80.00 Location Good 0.73 0.37 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor 0.89 0.71 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.56 2.05 80.00Good Administration 0.29 0.15 50.00Poor Counseling 0.58 0.58 100.00Excel Clinic 1.27 1.27 100.00Excel Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 3.25 65.00Fair Cafeteria 6.20 4.96 80.00Good Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 0.00 0.00 Vehicular Traffic Unsat 0.97 0.49 50.00 Pedestrian Traffic Poor 0.81 0.65 80.00 Parking Good 2.34 1.17 50.00 Play Areas Poor

Safety and Security 0.75 0.49 65.00 Fencing Fair 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 1.50 50.00 Ease of Supervision Poor 0.50 0.25 50.00 Controlled Entrances Poor

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:46:58AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905119Site #:


Project #: 5773


97.60 63.25 64.80Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESLamar Elementary School houses graded pre-kindergarten through grade five. The building was originally built in 1955 with a major addition in 2009.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThere are no flexible learning spaces available. Halls and small storage rooms are used for instruction.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Environment The classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeThe general classrooms do not meet the district size standards.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage in the majority of general classrooms is limited.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->EnvironmentThe pre-school classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->SizeThe pre-school classrooms do not meet the district size standards.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe storage in the pre-school classrooms is limited.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentSeveral of the resource programs are located in small spaces in various parts of the building, wherever a space is available.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->SizeSeveral of the spaces used for the resource programs do not meet district size standards.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage in many of the resources spaces is limited.

Suitability - ES->Science-->SizeThe science room does not meet the district size standards.

Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentThe music classroom is a converted classroom that does not provide a stimulating environment for the program.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeThe music room does not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage for the music room is very limited.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentThere is no art room.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:46:58AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905119Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThere is no art room.

Suitability - ES->Art-->LocationThere is no art room.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is no art room.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->EnvironmentThe computer classroom is a converted classroom that does not provide a stimulating environment for this program.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab does not meet the district size standards.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage for the computer lab is limited.


Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe stage is also handicapped accessible.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe storage spaces in the library are used for resource program. Storage is limited.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThe counselor's office is located in a small office not near the administrative offices. There is no reception area.

Suitability - ES->CafeteriaThe cafeteria storage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThe parent drop-off and bus zone do not have separation. The drop off area is small which requires cars to back up on Lucas Avenue.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficThe pedestrian traffic enters into the main entrance where the drop-off zone is located, adding to the congestion in this area.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->ParkingEvent parking is a challenge. Street parking is the norm.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasKindergarten and pre-school do not have designated play areas located near the classrooms.

Suitability - ES->Safety and Security-->FencingThere is a paved play area used by students that abuts Lucas Avenue that is not fenced.




Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:46:58AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905121Site #:

Assessments 2013 Milam ES

Project #: 5773





12.25 7.96 65.00 Size Fair 3.68 3.68 100.00 Location Excel 3.68 2.39 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Kindergarten 0.42 0.33 80.00 Environment Good 1.04 0.83 80.00 Size Good 0.31 0.25 80.00 Location Good 0.31 0.20 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair



Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.58 80.00 Environment Good 1.80 1.44 80.00 Size Good 0.54 0.43 80.00 Location Good 0.54 0.35 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Science 0.50 0.33 65.00 Environment Fair 1.25 0.81 65.00 Size Fair 0.38 0.30 80.00 Location Good 0.38 0.24 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair


Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:47:14AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905121Site #:


Project #: 5773





P.E. 1.92 1.92 100.00 Environment Excel 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 1.44 100.00 Location Excel 1.44 0.72 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor


Media Center 0.97 0.78 80.00 Environment Good 2.44 1.95 80.00 Size Good 0.73 0.58 80.00 Location Good 0.73 0.58 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good 0.89 0.71 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.56 2.56 100.00Excel Administration 0.29 0.23 80.00Good Counseling 0.58 0.58 100.00Excel Clinic 1.27 1.27 100.00Excel Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 3.25 65.00Fair Cafeteria 6.20 4.96 80.00Good Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.60 80.00 Vehicular Traffic Good 0.97 0.78 80.00 Pedestrian Traffic Good 0.81 0.65 80.00 Parking Good 2.34 1.52 65.00 Play Areas Fair

Safety and Security 0.75 0.60 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 1.95 65.00 Ease of Supervision Fair 0.50 0.50 100.00 Controlled Entrances Excel

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:47:14AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905121Site #:


Project #: 5773


97.60 71.07 72.81Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESBen Milam Elementary school teaches a traditional elementary curriculum to grades pre-kindergarten through grade six.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThere are no flexible learning spaces available.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere is an outside pavilion.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeThe general classrooms do no meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->LocationAll the grade levels are clustered together.


Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited in some of the kindergarten classrooms.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->EnvironmentBoth pre-school programs are located in portables.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->SizeBoth pre-school programs are located in portables.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->LocationBoth pre-school programs are located in portables.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->Storage/Fixed EquipBoth pre-school programs are located in portables.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Science-->EnvironmentThe science classroom is a converted classroom.

Suitability - ES->Science-->SizeThe science room does not meet the district size standards.

Suitability - ES->Science-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe science room is a converted classroom with a portable science table.

Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentThe music room is a converted classroom that does not provide for a stimulating music environment.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeThe music room does not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage for the music room is limited.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentThe art room is a converted classroom that does not provide for a stimulating art environment.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:47:14AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905121Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe art room does not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->EnvironmentThe computer lab is a converted classroom that does not provide a stimulating environment.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab does not meet the district's size standards.



Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe sound and lighting system is inadequate. The stage is not handicapped accessible. Storage is poor.

Suitability - ES->CafeteriaStorage is very limited.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThere is a new front entrance into the building that makes traffic flow much smoother. There is good separation of parents and busses.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasThe pre-school and kindergarten playgrounds are not located near the programs. Equipment is older for both playgrounds.




Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:47:14AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905128Site #:

Assessments 2013 Scotland Park ES

Project #: 5773



5.00 3.25 65.00 Learning Style Variety Fair 2.00 2.00 100.00 Interior Environment Excel 1.50 1.50 100.00 Exterior Environment Excel

General Classrooms 4.90 4.90 100.00 Environment Excel

12.25 12.25 100.00 Size Excel 3.68 3.68 100.00 Location Excel 3.68 3.68 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Kindergarten 0.42 0.42 100.00 Environment Excel 1.04 0.83 80.00 Size Good 0.31 0.31 100.00 Location Excel 0.31 0.25 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

ECE 0.50 0.50 100.00 Environment Excel 1.25 1.00 80.00 Size Good 0.37 0.37 100.00 Location Excel 0.37 0.37 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel


Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.72 100.00 Environment Excel 1.80 1.80 100.00 Size Excel 0.54 0.54 100.00 Location Excel 0.54 0.54 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Science 0.50 0.50 100.00 Environment Excel 1.25 1.25 100.00 Size Excel 0.38 0.38 100.00 Location Excel 0.38 0.38 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Music 0.74 0.74 100.00 Environment Excel

Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:47:38AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905128Site #:


Project #: 5773



Art 0.47 0.47 100.00 Environment Excel 1.17 0.76 65.00 Size Fair 0.35 0.35 100.00 Location Excel 0.35 0.35 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel


P.E. 1.92 1.92 100.00 Environment Excel 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 1.15 80.00 Location Good 1.44 1.44 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Performing Arts 0.60 0.60 100.00 Environment Excel 1.51 1.51 100.00 Size Excel 0.45 0.29 65.00 Location Fair 0.45 0.29 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Media Center 0.97 0.97 100.00 Environment Excel 2.44 2.44 100.00 Size Excel 0.73 0.73 100.00 Location Excel 0.73 0.73 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel 0.89 0.89 100.00Excel Restrooms (Student) 2.56 2.56 100.00Excel Administration 0.29 0.19 65.00Fair Counseling 0.58 0.58 100.00Excel Clinic 1.27 0.82 65.00Fair Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 5.00 100.00Excel Cafeteria 6.20 6.20 100.00Excel Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.33 65.00Fair Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.60 80.00 Vehicular Traffic Good 0.97 0.78 80.00 Pedestrian Traffic Good 0.81 0.81 100.00 Parking Excel 2.34 2.34 100.00 Play Areas Excel

Safety and Security 0.75 0.75 100.00 Fencing Excel 1.00 0.80 80.00 Signage & Way Finding Good 3.00 3.00 100.00 Ease of Supervision Excel 0.50 0.50 100.00 Controlled Entrances Excel

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:47:38AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905128Site #:


Project #: 5773


97.60 92.80 95.08Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESScotland Park Elementary School offers a general education program for grades K-6. It also provides a Montessori program for the PK classes.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe classrooms in the center of the pods allow for flexibility in grouping students since they are flex spaces. However, if the enrollment were to grow, and these classrooms were used full time for classes, this flexibility would be lost.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeThe classrooms average about 90% of the size standard.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeThe kindergarten rooms are 80% of the size standard.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe sinks in the kindergarten rooms are not at an appropriate height.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->SizeThe ECE rooms are 80% of the size standard.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe art room is 75% of the standard.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->LocationThe gym is located at one end of the school so some students must walk the length of the school to access it.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->LocationThe performing arts space is not located near the large parking area for convenient public access and the rest of the school cannot be closed off during public performances.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe cafetorium lacks storage for the tables.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThere is no waiting area for students.

Suitability - ES->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe staff lounge is small.

Suitability - ES->Custodial and MaintenanceThere is no custodial receiving area.

Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:47:38AM


Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905123Site #:

Assessments 2013 Sheppard AFB ES

Project #: 5773



5.00 3.25 65.00 Learning Style Variety Fair 2.00 1.60 80.00 Interior Environment Good 1.50 1.50 100.00 Exterior Environment Excel


12.25 7.96 65.00 Size Fair 3.68 3.68 100.00 Location Excel 3.68 2.94 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Kindergarten 0.42 0.42 100.00 Environment Excel 1.04 0.83 80.00 Size Good 0.31 0.31 100.00 Location Excel 0.31 0.31 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

ECE 0.50 0.50 100.00 Environment Excel 1.25 1.00 80.00 Size Good 0.37 0.37 100.00 Location Excel 0.37 0.37 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel


Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.47 65.00 Environment Fair 1.80 0.90 50.00 Size Poor 0.54 0.54 100.00 Location Excel 0.54 0.35 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Science 0.50 0.33 65.00 Environment Fair 1.25 0.81 65.00 Size Fair 0.38 0.38 100.00 Location Excel 0.38 0.38 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel


Page 1 of 55/8/2013 11:47:47AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905123Site #:


Project #: 5773




Computer Labs 0.34 0.34 100.00 Environment Excel 0.85 0.55 65.00 Size Fair 0.26 0.26 100.00 Location Excel 0.26 0.17 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

P.E. 1.92 1.92 100.00 Environment Excel 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 0.94 65.00 Location Fair 1.44 1.15 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Performing Arts 0.60 0.48 80.00 Environment Good 1.51 1.51 100.00 Size Excel 0.45 0.45 100.00 Location Excel 0.45 0.23 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Media Center 0.97 0.78 80.00 Environment Good 2.44 2.44 100.00 Size Excel 0.73 0.73 100.00 Location Excel 0.73 0.58 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good 0.89 0.89 100.00Excel Restrooms (Student) 2.56 1.28 50.00Poor Administration 0.29 0.00 0.00Unsat Counseling 0.58 0.58 100.00Excel Clinic 1.27 0.82 65.00Fair Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 5.00 100.00Excel Cafeteria 6.20 4.03 65.00Fair Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.25 50.00Poor Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.30 65.00 Vehicular Traffic Fair 0.97 0.97 100.00 Pedestrian Traffic Excel 0.81 0.65 80.00 Parking Good 2.34 1.17 50.00 Play Areas Poor

Safety and Security 0.75 0.75 100.00 Fencing Excel 1.00 0.80 80.00 Signage & Way Finding Good 3.00 1.95 65.00 Ease of Supervision Fair 0.50 0.25 50.00 Controlled Entrances Poor

Page 2 of 55/8/2013 11:47:47AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905123Site #:


Project #: 5773


97.60 71.15 72.90Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESThe Sheppard Air Force Base Elementary School is located on the military base. The school is a pre-K to 6th grade facility. It was built in 1953 and recently the hallways and some instructional areas were remodeled.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe school does not have spaces for small group and individualized instructional activities.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe public spaces of the building have been remodeled. The classrooms have not been updated and are showing their age.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThe school does have a covered outdoor area that can be used as a social gathering space or classroom. The school also has a fenced garden area for the science curriculum.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentThe classrooms are equipped with original cabinets, windows, and fixtures. They are in need of updating.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeThe general class rooms are around 650 square feet. None of the rooms meet the standard of 900 sq ft.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe classrooms are equipped with lower storage cabinets along one wall.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeThe kindergarten rooms are sized slightly smaller than the 1200 square feet standard.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->SizeOne of the Pre K classrooms was less than 1,000 square feet compared to the standard of 1,200 square feet.

Suitability - ES->Self-Contained Special EdThe school does not have any self contained special education programming.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentThe tutorial, and basic skills rooms were converted office or storage spaces. They lack adequate windows and storage.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->SizeThe resource rooms in a classroom with two teaching stations is adequate in size. The other resource teaching areas are in converted offices and storage areas. They do not meet the standard of 450 square feet.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe resource rooms do not have adequate built in storage for supplies and materials.

Suitability - ES->Science-->EnvironmentThe science room has been equipped with additional cabinetry and lab tables. It is a general classroom that is used for science instruction.

Suitability - ES->Science-->SizeThe room is approximately 700 square feet and does not meet the standard for a science room.

Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentMusic instruction is located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeMusic instruction is located in a portable.

Page 3 of 55/8/2013 11:47:47AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905123Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Music-->LocationMusic instruction is located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipMusic instruction is located in a portable.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentThe school does not have an art room. Art is provided by each teacher.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe school does not have an art room.

Suitability - ES->Art-->LocationThe school does not have an art room.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe school does not have an art room.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab is located in a renovated general classroom. It does not meet the standard for size.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe computer lab does not have adequate storage cabinetry for the storing of supplies and materials.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->LocationThe gym is a separate facility from the main building. It is accessible using a covered walk way.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe gym does not have adequate storage space for equipment and supplies.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->EnvironmentThe stage is located in the cafeteria. The cafeteria does not have any acoustic treatments.

Suitability - ES->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe stage area does not have adequate storage. It is not ADA accessible. The PA system is not adequate.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->EnvironmentThe library configuration and fixtures do not provide an extremely inviting environment.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe library doesn't have a satisfactory work area with a sink.

Suitability - ES->AdministrationThe office areas are very small and congested. The office area does not have a reception area or adequate storage for office supplies and materials.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThe school does not have a counselor's office.

Suitability - ES->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe lounge is very small for the numbers of staff served. It only has one restroom.

Suitability - ES->Food Service and PrepThe office area is not separated from the kitchen. The dry storage area is small.

Suitability - ES->Custodial and MaintenanceThe custodial closets have wall mounted sinks and are poorly ventilated. There is no receiving area.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThe parent drop off lane is in front of the building. It uses two lanes so students from the outside lane must pass through traffic to access the school.

Page 4 of 55/8/2013 11:47:47AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905123Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Outside-->ParkingThere is adequate off street parking for staff but not for visitors.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasMuch of the play ground equipment is old and is not compliant with today's standards.




Page 5 of 55/8/2013 11:47:47AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905129Site #:

Assessments 2013 Southern Hills ES

Project #: 5773



5.00 4.00 80.00 Learning Style Variety Good 2.00 2.00 100.00 Interior Environment Excel 1.50 1.20 80.00 Exterior Environment Good


12.25 9.80 80.00 Size Good 3.68 3.68 100.00 Location Excel 3.68 3.68 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Kindergarten 0.42 0.42 100.00 Environment Excel 1.04 0.68 65.00 Size Fair 0.31 0.31 100.00 Location Excel 0.31 0.31 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

ECE 0.50 0.50 100.00 Environment Excel 1.25 0.81 65.00 Size Fair 0.37 0.37 100.00 Location Excel 0.37 0.30 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.48 0.48 100.00 Environment Excel 1.20 0.60 50.00 Size Poor 0.36 0.36 100.00 Location Excel 0.36 0.23 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.47 65.00 Environment Fair 1.80 1.44 80.00 Size Good 0.54 0.54 100.00 Location Excel 0.54 0.54 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel



Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:47:55AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905129Site #:


Project #: 5773



Art 0.47 0.47 100.00 Environment Excel 1.17 0.94 80.00 Size Good 0.35 0.35 100.00 Location Excel 0.35 0.35 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel


P.E. 1.92 1.92 100.00 Environment Excel 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 0.94 65.00 Location Fair 1.44 1.44 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Performing Arts 0.60 0.60 100.00 Environment Excel 1.51 1.51 100.00 Size Excel 0.45 0.45 100.00 Location Excel 0.45 0.45 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Media Center 0.97 0.97 100.00 Environment Excel 2.44 2.44 100.00 Size Excel 0.73 0.73 100.00 Location Excel 0.73 0.73 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel 0.89 0.89 100.00Excel Restrooms (Student) 2.56 2.56 100.00Excel Administration 0.29 0.29 100.00Excel Counseling 0.58 0.58 100.00Excel Clinic 1.27 0.82 65.00Fair Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 4.00 80.00Good Cafeteria 6.20 6.20 100.00Excel Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.50 100.00Excel Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.30 65.00 Vehicular Traffic Fair 0.97 0.97 100.00 Pedestrian Traffic Excel 0.81 0.81 100.00 Parking Excel 2.34 1.52 65.00 Play Areas Fair

Safety and Security 0.75 0.49 65.00 Fencing Fair 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 2.40 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.50 100.00 Controlled Entrances Excel

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:47:55AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905129Site #:


Project #: 5773


100.00 89.12 89.12Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESSouthern Hills Elementary School is a neighborhood kindergarten through sixth grade school. It opened in 2008. It serves a small population of self contained special education student.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe school was not designed with small group instructional spaces.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThe school grounds have numerous bare areas and the grounds are not well landscaped. The school does have a science garden area.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentMany of the classrooms do not have natural light.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeThe general classrooms range in size from 820 square feet to 900 square feet which is the established standard.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeThe kindergarten classrooms are approximately 800 square feet in size and do not meet the standard of 1200 square feet.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->SizeThe classroom that house the 3, 4, and 5 year old program is small in size.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe room does not have adequate storage spaces for supplies and materials.

Suitability - ES->Self-Contained Special Ed-->SizeThe special education spaces are small for the program and number of students served.

Suitability - ES->Self-Contained Special Ed-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe classrooms do not have a sensory space or adequate equipment.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentMany of the tutorial rooms were originally storage rooms. They do not have adequate light and instructional fixtures.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->SizeThe rooms that were originally designed as resource rooms are adequate in size. The spaces used for tutorial that were originally designed for other purposes are not adequate in size.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe art room is small for the student population.

Suitability - ES->P.E.-->LocationThe gym is not attached to the main building. Students must access the gym via a covered walkway.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->EnvironmentDue to it being a tornado shelter the library does not have natural light.

Suitability - ES->AdministrationThe open concept of the office into the foyer makes noise infiltration a problem.

Suitability - ES->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe faculty lounge is very small for the number of staff.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:47:55AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905129Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->CafeteriaThe cafeteria does not have storage for tables and chairs.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThe parent drop off lanes are two lanes where students access the parked cars from both sides of the street. The bus lane and parents parent drop off lane intermingle and pass through the main parking lot.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasThe school does not have adequate playground equipment. There is not a covered hard surface play area.




Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:47:55AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905125Site #:

Assessments 2013 Washington Jackson ES

Project #: 5773



5.00 5.00 100.00 Learning Style Variety Excel 2.00 1.30 65.00 Interior Environment Fair 1.50 1.20 80.00 Exterior Environment Good


12.25 9.80 80.00 Size Good 3.68 2.39 65.00 Location Fair 3.68 2.94 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Kindergarten 0.42 0.27 65.00 Environment Fair 1.04 0.00 0.00 Size Unsat 0.31 0.25 80.00 Location Good 0.31 0.31 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

ECE 0.50 0.32 65.00 Environment Fair 1.25 0.00 0.00 Size Unsat 0.37 0.24 65.00 Location Fair 0.37 0.37 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel


Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.58 80.00 Environment Good 1.80 1.80 100.00 Size Excel 0.54 0.43 80.00 Location Good 0.54 0.54 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel



Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:48:10AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905125Site #:


Project #: 5773




Computer Labs 0.34 0.34 100.00 Environment Excel 0.85 0.00 0.00 Size Unsat 0.26 0.20 80.00 Location Good 0.26 0.17 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

P.E. 1.92 1.92 100.00 Environment Excel 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 1.44 100.00 Location Excel 1.44 1.44 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel


Media Center 0.97 0.97 100.00 Environment Excel 2.44 2.44 100.00 Size Excel 0.73 0.73 100.00 Location Excel 0.73 0.73 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel 0.89 0.89 100.00Excel Restrooms (Student) 2.56 1.66 65.00Fair Administration 0.29 0.00 0.00Unsat Counseling 0.58 0.58 100.00Excel Clinic 1.27 1.01 80.00Good Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 5.00 100.00Excel Cafeteria 6.20 6.20 100.00Excel Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.33 65.00Fair Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.60 80.00 Vehicular Traffic Good 0.97 0.97 100.00 Pedestrian Traffic Excel 0.81 0.81 100.00 Parking Excel 2.34 0.00 0.00 Play Areas Unsat

Safety and Security 0.75 0.00 0.00 Fencing Unsat 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 1.50 50.00 Ease of Supervision Poor 0.50 0.33 65.00 Controlled Entrances Fair

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:48:10AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905125Site #:


Project #: 5773


97.60 76.89 78.78Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESThe school was originally built as a high school. It was used only for a few years as a high school. The school serves pre-kindergarten through sixth grade students and is a neighborhood school.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentMuch of the building has the original paint, ceramic wall tile, and floor tile, which makes the building very dated. Renovations of original instructional or support spaces into new instructional spaces have restricted natural light, and lowered ceilings.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThe school has a large number of open acres. The total school property is difficult to supervise and the use of much of the open area is limited.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentThe classrooms have not been renovated since the school was built. The storage shelves lack doors and are covered often with home made curtains.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeThe classrooms do not meet the standard of 900 square feet in size. Almost all general classrooms are 720 square feet in size. The current class sizes are small enough that the class rooms are adequate in size for the current student population.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->LocationThe upper grade levels are located on the second floor. These classrooms are a significant distance from the gym, and cafeteria.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe classrooms have built in storage shelves and the back of the room. Some rooms do have additional storage closets and rooms.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->EnvironmentThe kindergarten rooms are in renovated spaces that do not provide any natural light. The rooms are long and narrow with lower ceilings.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeThe kindergarten rooms do not meet the standard square feet of 1200 square feet. The rooms are currently adequate in size for the student numbers in each class.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->LocationThe kindergarten classes are located on the first floor and the library is located on the second floor. In order to access one Kindergarten class you must go through the gym or the Pre K room.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->EnvironmentThe pre-kindergarten room is in a renovated space that does not provide any natural light. The rooms is long and narrow with lower ceilings.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->SizeThe Pre kindergarten rooms does not meet the standard square feet of 1200 square feet.

Suitability - ES->ECE-->LocationThe pre K room is located in the back of the building a significant distance from the main office.

Suitability - ES->Self-Contained Special EdThe school does not have a self contained Special Ed program.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:48:10AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905125Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentSome of the resources rooms do not have natural light.

Suitability - ES->Instructional Resource Rooms-->LocationDue to the school being a two-story facility, resource rooms that are located on the first floor are not in close proximity to the classroom on the second floor.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentThe school does not have an art classroom. Art is taught by each individual teacher.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThe school does not have an art classroom.

Suitability - ES->Art-->LocationThe school does not have an art classroom.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe school does not have an art classroom.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab is in a general classroom and does not meet the standard for square feet.

Suitability - ES->Computer Labs-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe computer lab does not have adequate storage for supplies and materials.

Suitability - ES->AdministrationThe administrative assistant area is small and does not have adequate storage for supplies and materials.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThe school does not have a school counselor's office.

Suitability - ES->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe faculty lounge is small for the number of staff.

Suitability - ES->Custodial and MaintenanceThe custodial closets are equipped with wall mounted sinks and are not adequately vented.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThe school has adequate off street drop off lanes. The parents drop off students using two side by side lanes causing students to cross one lane of cars in order to access the school.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Play AreasThe school does not have any playground equipment for grades 2 through 6th.

Suitability - ES->Safety and Security-->FencingThe school grounds do not have any perimeter fencing. The school is adjacent to a walking trail.




Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:48:10AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905126Site #:

Assessments 2013 West Foundation ES

Project #: 5773



5.00 4.00 80.00 Learning Style Variety Good 2.00 1.60 80.00 Interior Environment Good 1.50 0.98 65.00 Exterior Environment Fair


12.25 9.80 80.00 Size Good 3.68 3.68 100.00 Location Excel 3.68 3.68 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Kindergarten 0.42 0.42 100.00 Environment Excel 1.04 0.83 80.00 Size Good 0.31 0.16 50.00 Location Poor 0.31 0.31 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel



Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.58 80.00 Environment Good 1.80 1.44 80.00 Size Good 0.54 0.54 100.00 Location Excel 0.54 0.54 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Science 0.50 0.50 100.00 Environment Excel 1.25 0.81 65.00 Size Fair 0.38 0.38 100.00 Location Excel 0.38 0.30 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good


Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:48:18AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905126Site #:


Project #: 5773


1.85 0.00 0.00 Size Unsat 0.56 0.56 100.00 Location Excel 0.56 0.28 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor



P.E. 1.92 1.92 100.00 Environment Excel 4.80 4.80 100.00 Size Excel 1.44 1.44 100.00 Location Excel 1.44 1.44 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel


Media Center 0.97 0.78 80.00 Environment Good 2.44 2.44 100.00 Size Excel 0.73 0.73 100.00 Location Excel 0.73 0.73 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel 0.89 0.89 100.00Excel Restrooms (Student) 2.56 1.66 65.00Fair Administration 0.29 0.19 65.00Fair Counseling 0.58 0.38 65.00Fair Clinic 1.27 0.82 65.00Fair Staff Lounge-WkRm 5.00 3.25 65.00Fair Cafeteria 6.20 6.20 100.00Excel Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.33 65.00Fair Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 2.00 1.00 50.00 Vehicular Traffic Poor 0.97 0.49 50.00 Pedestrian Traffic Poor 0.81 0.53 65.00 Parking Fair 2.34 2.34 100.00 Play Areas Excel


Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:48:18AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905126Site #:


Project #: 5773


95.10 77.69 81.70Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - ESWest Foundation Elementary School is a K-6 school and offers a general education program, including special education and adaptive PE.

Suitability - ES->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere is no outdoor learning lab.

Suitability - ES->General Classrooms-->SizeClassrooms are 80% of size standard.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->SizeKindergarten rooms are 85% of the size standard.

Suitability - ES->Kindergarten-->LocationKindergarten rooms are not adjacent to play area.

Suitability - ES->Science-->SizeScience room is 75% of size standard.

Suitability - ES->Music-->EnvironmentThe music room has a low ceiling and poor acoustics.

Suitability - ES->Music-->SizeThe music room is 48% of the size standard.

Suitability - ES->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe storage room is small.

Suitability - ES->Art-->EnvironmentThere is no art room.

Suitability - ES->Art-->SizeThere is no art room.

Suitability - ES->Art-->LocationThere is no art room.

Suitability - ES->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is no art room.

Suitability - ES->Media Center-->EnvironmentLighting level is low.

Suitability - ES->AdministrationThere is no conference room. There is a small conference room outside the administration area but it is used for small groups and storage.

Suitability - ES->CounselingThere is no waiting area for students.

Suitability - ES->ClinicThere is room for only one cot.

Suitability - ES->Staff Lounge-WkRmStaff lounge and work rooms are small, this is offset by work areas in pods.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:48:18AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905126Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - ES->CafeteriaThere is no storage room for the tables.

Suitability - ES->Custodial and MaintenanceThere is no custodial receiving area.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThe site does not have enough capacity for vehicular traffic at drop off and pick up times, either for parents or busses/vans. Parents back up on the public streets, and buses clog up the staff parking.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficStudents must cross lines of traffic to access cars at pick-up time.

Suitability - ES->Outside-->ParkingThere are sufficient parking spaces but the parking is congested due to parent and bus traffic.




Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:48:18AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905041Site #:

Assessments 2013 Barwise JHS

Project #: 5773

Site Type: Site Size:Grade Config: 7-8 20.00Junior High

Suitability - JHS Learning Environment


General Classrooms 3.90 2.54 65.00 Environment Fair 9.75 6.34 65.00 Size Fair 2.93 1.90 65.00 Location Fair 2.93 2.34 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good


Instructional Resource Rooms 0.82 0.53 65.00 Environment Fair 2.05 1.64 80.00 Size Good 0.61 0.61 100.00 Location Excel 0.61 0.40 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Science 0.95 0.76 80.00 Environment Good 2.39 1.91 80.00 Size Good 0.72 0.47 65.00 Location Fair 0.72 0.57 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Music 0.74 0.59 80.00 Environment Good 1.84 1.84 100.00 Size Excel 0.55 0.44 80.00 Location Good 0.55 0.55 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Art 0.65 0.52 80.00 Environment Good 1.61 1.05 65.00 Size Fair 0.48 0.48 100.00 Location Excel 0.48 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Unsat

Career Tech Ed 1.35 1.08 80.00 Environment Good

Page 1 of 55/8/2013 11:44:37AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905041Site #:


Project #: 5773


3.37 3.37 100.00 Size Excel 1.01 0.66 65.00 Location Fair 1.01 1.01 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Computer Labs 0.30 0.15 50.00 Environment Poor 0.75 0.38 50.00 Size Poor 0.23 0.23 100.00 Location Excel 0.23 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Unsat

P.E. 2.40 1.92 80.00 Environment Good 6.00 6.00 100.00 Size Excel 1.80 1.44 80.00 Location Good 1.80 1.80 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Performing Arts 0.42 0.42 100.00 Environment Excel 1.05 1.05 100.00 Size Excel 0.31 0.31 100.00 Location Excel 0.31 0.20 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Media Center 0.93 0.93 100.00 Environment Excel 2.32 1.86 80.00 Size Good 0.70 0.45 65.00 Location Fair 0.70 0.70 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel 0.93 0.93 100.00Excel Restrooms (Student) 2.10 2.10 100.00Excel Administration 0.42 0.34 80.00Good Counseling 0.34 0.34 100.00Excel Clinic 0.91 0.45 50.00Poor Staff Lounge-WkRm 4.00 3.20 80.00Good Cafeteria 5.72 5.72 100.00Excel Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 4.00 3.20 80.00 Vehicular Traffic Good 0.43 0.22 50.00 Pedestrian Traffic Poor 0.86 0.69 80.00 Parking Good 1.05 1.05 100.00 Athletic Courts and Fields Excel

Safety and Security 0.78 0.78 100.00 Fencing Excel 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 1.95 65.00 Ease of Supervision Fair 0.50 0.40 80.00 Controlled Entrances Good

97.27 76.82 78.98Total For Site:

Comments

Page 2 of 55/8/2013 11:44:37AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905041Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - JHSBarwise Elementary School is a seventh and eighth grade facility. It was built in 1956. The school provides comprehensive programming for junior high students.

Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe school does not have spaces for small group or individualized instruction. The general classrooms are not flexible in their configurations for various learning styles.

Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe color of the floor and wall tiles age the building. Many spaces could use a coat of paint.

Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThe school does not have any established outdoor learning spaces. The school grounds are lacking grass in some areas and shrubbery.

Suitability - JHS->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentThe color of the tiles, wall paint, and windows age the building and give the impression of a worn school.

Suitability - JHS->General Classrooms-->SizeThe general classrooms are approximately 700 square feet. They do not meet the standard of 900 square feet.

Suitability - JHS->General Classrooms-->LocationThe second floor classroom area is not ADA accessible.

Suitability - JHS->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe classrooms have storage cabinets or shelving under the windows. In subject areas that require large amounts of materials, the storage is not adequate.

Suitability - JHS->Self-Contained Special EdThe school does not have a self contained Special Education Program.

Suitability - JHS->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentOne resource room is located in a portable. Store rooms have been converted to instructional spaces for small group instruction or office spaces.

Suitability - JHS->Instructional Resource Rooms-->SizeThe resource rooms in storage spaces are not adequate in size. Resource programming in general classrooms utilize multiple instructional spaces in the same room that are not separated with permanent walls.

Suitability - JHS->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe non general classroom resource teaching spaces do not have adequate built in storage spaces.

Suitability - JHS->Science-->EnvironmentThree of the five science facilities have been remodeled and are excellent learning environments. The other two are not nearly as attractive of environments.

Suitability - JHS->Science-->SizeThe science facilities do not have adequate support spaces for storage and prep rooms.

Suitability - JHS->Science-->LocationTwo of the science rooms are located on the second floor and are not ADA compatible.

Suitability - JHS->Science-->Storage/Fixed EquipOne science room on the second floor does not have a sink, adequate built in cabinetry, or student lab stations.

Suitability - JHS->Music-->EnvironmentThe orchestra room lacks adequate natural light and the walls are covered with a dark brown wall paper.

Suitability - JHS->Music-->LocationThe orchestra room is located on the second floor and is not ADA compatible for access.

Page 3 of 55/8/2013 11:44:37AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905041Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - JHS->Art-->EnvironmentThe art room is showing it's age and could use a new coat of paint and needs to be refreshed.

Suitability - JHS->Art-->SizeThe art room is small and does not meet the standard for square feet.

Suitability - JHS->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe art room does not have an adequate number of sinks. The room is not equipped with adequate storage. The original art storage room is currently used as an office space.

Suitability - JHS->Career Tech Ed-->EnvironmentThe career tech room is long and narrow. Some students have their backs to the main presentation area.

Suitability - JHS->Career Tech Ed-->LocationThe Career Tech lab is located on the second floor and is not ADA accessible.

Suitability - JHS->Computer Labs-->EnvironmentThe computer lab is located in a small space adjacent to the library. It is small for the number of computers. The HVAC system is not adequate.

Suitability - JHS->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab is very small and does not meet the square feet requirement of 1200 square feet.

Suitability - JHS->Computer Labs-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe computer lab is not equipped with any storage cabinetry.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->EnvironmentThe Weight Room is in a portable. The second floor gym floor is in poor shape. The women's locker room is outdated.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->SizeThe weight room is located in a portable.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->LocationThe weight room is located in a portable. The second gym is located on the second floor and is not ADA accessible.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe weight room is located in a portable.

Suitability - JHS->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe performing arts area does not have dressing rooms, a green room, and scene storage.

Suitability - JHS->Media Center-->SizeThe library area does not have an adequate workroom for staff.

Suitability - JHS->Media Center-->LocationThe media center is located at the far end of the building and is not located close to many instructional areas.

Suitability - JHS->CounselingThe counseling area is small and does not have a reception area.

Suitability - JHS->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe school has two lounge/work room combinations. One on each floor. They are very small. They are not equipped with a sink or kitchenette. They only have one staff restroom.

Suitability - JHS->CafeteriaThe cafeteria does not have any table and chair storage.

Suitability - JHS->Custodial and MaintenanceSome of the custodial closets have wall mounted sinks. They are not adequately ventilated.

Page 4 of 55/8/2013 11:44:37AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905041Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - JHS->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThe school is equipped with a separate bus drop off zone and parent drop-off zone. The parent drop-off zone is two lanes one way which allows parents to drop off students in the outer lane and students pass through traffic to access the school facility.

Suitability - JHS->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficAdjacent to the school are three very busy streets. Crossing the streets is very difficult.

Suitability - JHS->Outside-->ParkingThe school does not have adequate lighting on the main drive in the front of the building.

Suitability - JHS->Safety and Security-->Signage & Way Finding

Suitability - JHS->Safety and Security-->Ease of Supervision

Suitability - JHS->Safety and Security-->Controlled Entrances

Page 5 of 55/8/2013 11:44:37AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905048Site #:

Assessments 2013 Kirby JHS

Project #: 5773




General Classrooms 3.90 2.54 65.00 Environment Fair 9.75 7.80 80.00 Size Good 2.93 2.93 100.00 Location Excel 2.93 2.93 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.55 0.35 65.00 Environment Fair 1.36 1.09 80.00 Size Good 0.41 0.41 100.00 Location Excel 0.41 0.20 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Instructional Resource Rooms 0.82 0.53 65.00 Environment Fair 2.05 2.05 100.00 Size Excel 0.61 0.61 100.00 Location Excel 0.61 0.49 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good


Music 0.74 0.48 65.00 Environment Fair 1.84 1.47 80.00 Size Good 0.55 0.36 65.00 Location Fair 0.55 0.55 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Art 0.65 0.42 65.00 Environment Fair 1.61 1.61 100.00 Size Excel 0.48 0.48 100.00 Location Excel 0.48 0.48 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel


Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:46:49AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905048Site #:


Project #: 5773


3.37 2.70 80.00 Size Good 1.01 0.81 80.00 Location Good 1.01 0.81 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Computer Labs 0.30 0.20 65.00 Environment Fair 0.75 0.75 100.00 Size Excel 0.23 0.23 100.00 Location Excel 0.23 0.15 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

P.E. 2.40 1.56 65.00 Environment Fair 6.00 6.00 100.00 Size Excel 1.80 1.17 65.00 Location Fair 1.80 1.17 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Performing Arts 0.42 0.00 0.00 Environment Unsat 1.05 0.00 0.00 Size Unsat 0.31 0.00 0.00 Location Unsat 0.31 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Unsat

Media Center 0.93 0.60 65.00 Environment Fair 2.32 2.32 100.00 Size Excel 0.70 0.70 100.00 Location Excel 0.70 0.45 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair 0.93 0.60 65.00Fair Restrooms (Student) 2.10 1.68 80.00Good Administration 0.42 0.34 80.00Good Counseling 0.34 0.27 80.00Good Clinic 0.91 0.45 50.00Poor Staff Lounge-WkRm 4.00 3.20 80.00Good Cafeteria 5.72 5.72 100.00Excel Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.33 65.00Fair Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 4.00 2.60 65.00 Vehicular Traffic Fair 0.43 0.28 65.00 Pedestrian Traffic Fair 0.86 0.69 80.00 Parking Good 1.05 0.52 50.00 Athletic Courts and Fields Poor

Safety and Security 0.78 0.62 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.50 50.00 Signage & Way Finding Poor 3.00 1.50 50.00 Ease of Supervision Poor 0.50 0.50 100.00 Controlled Entrances Excel

100.00 78.04 78.04Total For Site:

Comments

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:46:49AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905048Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe spaces are not flexible except for those that are oversized for there current use.

Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe lighting in many spaces has a yellow hue to it. This combined with the well worn floor, wall, and ceiling finishes, and some "drab colors" makes the school environment not stimulating or inviting.

Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThe school has a greenhouse that can be considered an outdoor lab.

Suitability - JHS->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentMany rooms have configurations that do not support their current functions. The overall aesthetics are "tired and drab".

Suitability - JHS->General Classrooms-->SizeClassroom size varies but the average is 80% of the standard.

Suitability - JHS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->EnvironmentThe self contained special education room has no natural light and poor overall aesthetics.

Suitability - JHS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe room does not have a sink and limited storage.

Suitability - JHS->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentThe overall aesthetics are "tired and drab".

Suitability - JHS->Music-->EnvironmentThe music spaces are well worn and have tight corridors.

Suitability - JHS->Music-->LocationThe sound from the music spaces is not isolated from adjacent spaces.

Suitability - JHS->Art-->EnvironmentThe art room lighting has a yellow hue to it.

Suitability - JHS->Computer Labs-->EnvironmentTwo of the three computer labs are in spaces that are much larger than required and feel awkward. The third computer lab is a normal classroom with some computers along one wall. The spaces are poorly designed and do not enhance the program.

Suitability - JHS->Computer Labs-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe computer labs lack sufficient storage.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->EnvironmentThe lighting in the competition gym is various colors and noisy.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->LocationBoth gyms can be used by the public while keeping access to the rest of the school closed, however they are located near limited parking. They are also located at one end of the school so students must cross the entire facility to access the gyms.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is lacking for the competition gym.

Suitability - JHS->Performing Arts-->EnvironmentThere is no auditorium. The stage in the cafetorium is open on three sides, more like a platform.

Suitability - JHS->Performing Arts-->SizeThere is no auditorium.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:46:49AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905048Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - JHS->Performing Arts-->LocationThere is no auditorium.

Suitability - JHS->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is no auditorium.

Suitability - JHS->Media Center-->EnvironmentThe media center is open on four sides to hallways and is not acoustically isolated from the cafetorium. The lighting has a yellow hue.

Suitability - JHS->Media Center-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is no enclosed office for the library. The storage room has equipment and materials from other programs making it congested.

Suitability - JHS->Restrooms (Student)The restrooms do not have urinal privacy partitions.

Suitability - JHS->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe staff lounge is very small, not centrally located or located near the administration.

Suitability - JHS->CafeteriaThe cafetorium is not acoustically isolated.

Suitability - JHS->Custodial and MaintenanceThere is no custodial receiving area.

Suitability - JHS->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThere is some congestion in the mornings with the parents and buses if the buses are behind schedule. The afternoon pickup area can become congested due to the single access road to the parking lot.

Suitability - JHS->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficStudents may have to cross lanes of traffic to get to cars.

Suitability - JHS->Outside-->Athletic Courts and FieldsThere is no track. There is only one football practice field and it is remotely located. Students must cross a narrow bridge (one person wide) across an irrigation ditch to get to the field.



Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:46:49AM




Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905047Site #:

Assessments 2013 McNiel JHS

Project #: 5773



5.00 2.50 50.00 Learning Style Variety Poor 2.00 1.30 65.00 Interior Environment Fair 1.50 0.00 0.00 Exterior Environment Unsat

General Classrooms 3.90 2.54 65.00 Environment Fair 9.75 6.34 65.00 Size Fair 2.93 2.34 80.00 Location Good 2.93 2.34 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.55 0.35 65.00 Environment Fair 1.36 0.89 65.00 Size Fair 0.41 0.33 80.00 Location Good 0.41 0.20 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor


Science 0.95 0.76 80.00 Environment Good 2.39 2.39 100.00 Size Excel 0.72 0.57 80.00 Location Good 0.72 0.72 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Music 0.74 0.48 65.00 Environment Fair 1.84 1.47 80.00 Size Good 0.55 0.44 80.00 Location Good 0.55 0.44 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Art 0.65 0.52 80.00 Environment Good 1.61 1.61 100.00 Size Excel 0.48 0.48 100.00 Location Excel 0.48 0.31 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Career Tech Ed 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A)

Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:47:06AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905047Site #:


Project #: 5773


0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Computer Labs 0.30 0.24 80.00 Environment Good 0.75 0.38 50.00 Size Poor 0.23 0.23 100.00 Location Excel 0.23 0.11 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

P.E. 2.40 1.56 65.00 Environment Fair 6.00 6.00 100.00 Size Excel 1.80 1.17 65.00 Location Fair 1.80 1.17 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair


Media Center 0.93 0.60 65.00 Environment Fair 2.32 2.32 100.00 Size Excel 0.70 0.70 100.00 Location Excel 0.70 0.45 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair 0.93 0.60 65.00Fair Restrooms (Student) 2.10 1.68 80.00Good Administration 0.42 0.34 80.00Good Counseling 0.34 0.34 100.00Excel Clinic 0.91 0.59 65.00Fair Staff Lounge-WkRm 4.00 4.00 100.00Excel Cafeteria 5.72 5.72 100.00Excel Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.33 65.00Fair Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 4.00 2.60 65.00 Vehicular Traffic Fair 0.43 0.43 100.00 Pedestrian Traffic Excel 0.86 0.86 100.00 Parking Excel 1.05 0.84 80.00 Athletic Courts and Fields Good

Safety and Security 0.78 0.62 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.50 50.00 Signage & Way Finding Poor 3.00 1.50 50.00 Ease of Supervision Poor 0.50 0.25 50.00 Controlled Entrances Poor

93.26 68.71 73.68Total For Site:

Comments

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:47:06AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905047Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - JHSMcNeil Junior High School provides a general education for grades seventh and eighth. The school also has programs for severe and moderate needs special education students.

Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThere are few spaces to allow for learning style variety.

Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe interior colors and finishes create a sterile environment.

Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere are no outside socializing or learning lab areas.

Suitability - JHS->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentThe colors and finishes of the classrooms create a sterile environment.

Suitability - JHS->General Classrooms-->SizeThe classrooms average about 65% of the size standard.

Suitability - JHS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->EnvironmentThe colors and finishes of the rooms do not create an inviting or stimulating environment.

Suitability - JHS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->SizeThe classrooms average 75% of the size standard.

Suitability - JHS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe self contained special education rooms lack restrooms, showers, washer and dryer, sensory breakout room, and storage room.

Suitability - JHS->Science-->EnvironmentThe science labs are an excellent environment, however the science classroom and lecture halls are not inviting or stimulating.

Suitability - JHS->Music-->EnvironmentThe orchestra meets on the stage in the cafeteria. The finishes and colors in the music rooms do not create a stimulating environment.

Suitability - JHS->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe kiln does not have it's own room and the sinks do not have clay traps.

Suitability - JHS->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab is 55% of the size standard.

Suitability - JHS->Computer Labs-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is no storage for the computer lab.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->EnvironmentThe lighting is dim in the competition gym. The practice gym walls and floors are marred. The weight room and lockers are not inviting.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->LocationThe gyms do not have access to public restrooms without keeping the rest of the school open to public access.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe gyms do not have drinking fountains and lack sufficient storage.

Suitability - JHS->Performing Arts-->EnvironmentThere is no auditorium. There is a stage in the cafeteria.


Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:47:06AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905047Site #:


Project #: 5773




Suitability - JHS->Media Center-->EnvironmentThe library is an inviting space, however it is open to general circulation on three sides.

Suitability - JHS->Media Center-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe library work room/storage is small and lacks a sink.

Suitability - JHS->Restrooms (Student)The restrooms lack urinal privacy partitions.

Suitability - JHS->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe teacher lounge is in the old home economics classroom. The old kitchen equipment takes up about half the space.

Suitability - JHS->Custodial and MaintenanceThe custodial receiving area is in the old boiler room and is not set up well for storage.

Suitability - JHS->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThe parent drop off area lacks capacity and cars back up on the street.

Suitability - JHS->Outside-->Athletic Courts and FieldsThe school doesn't have it's own track but has access to the district's track which is adjacent to the school.




Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:47:06AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905045Site #:

Assessments 2013 Zundy JHS

Project #: 5773



5.00 2.50 50.00 Learning Style Variety Poor 2.00 1.30 65.00 Interior Environment Fair 1.50 0.98 65.00 Exterior Environment Fair

General Classrooms 3.90 2.54 65.00 Environment Fair 9.75 7.80 80.00 Size Good 2.93 2.34 80.00 Location Good 2.93 2.34 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good



Science 0.95 0.76 80.00 Environment Good 2.39 2.39 100.00 Size Excel 0.72 0.72 100.00 Location Excel 0.72 0.72 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

Music 0.74 0.59 80.00 Environment Good 1.84 1.47 80.00 Size Good 0.55 0.55 100.00 Location Excel 0.55 0.44 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Art 0.65 0.42 65.00 Environment Fair 1.61 1.29 80.00 Size Good 0.48 0.39 80.00 Location Good 0.48 0.24 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Career Tech Ed 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A)

Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:48:35AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905045Site #:


Project #: 5773




P.E. 2.40 1.56 65.00 Environment Fair 6.00 4.80 80.00 Size Good 1.80 1.44 80.00 Location Good 1.80 0.90 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor


Media Center 0.93 0.46 50.00 Environment Poor 2.32 2.32 100.00 Size Excel 0.70 0.70 100.00 Location Excel 0.70 0.45 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair 0.93 0.60 65.00Fair Restrooms (Student) 2.10 1.36 65.00Fair Administration 0.42 0.28 65.00Fair Counseling 0.34 0.27 80.00Good Clinic 0.91 0.59 65.00Fair Staff Lounge-WkRm 4.00 2.60 65.00Fair Cafeteria 5.72 5.72 100.00Excel Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 4.00 2.00 50.00 Vehicular Traffic Poor 0.43 0.22 50.00 Pedestrian Traffic Poor 0.86 0.69 80.00 Parking Good 1.05 0.52 50.00 Athletic Courts and Fields Poor

Safety and Security 0.78 0.62 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.50 50.00 Signage & Way Finding Poor 3.00 1.50 50.00 Ease of Supervision Poor 0.50 0.33 65.00 Controlled Entrances Fair

90.53 65.36 72.20Total For Site:

Comments

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:48:35AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905045Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - JHSZundy Junior High School provides a general educational program for grades sixth and eighth.. It also provides a remediation program for 6th graders.

Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThere are no spaces to accommodate small groups or individual activities.

Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThis is an older facility that is due for a face-lift. Some areas are lacking in sufficient HVAC and air flow.

Suitability - JHS->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere is no outdoor learning area.

Suitability - JHS->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentSome rooms need updating, some rooms have acoustical issues with noise transfer, some rooms have insufficient HVAC.

Suitability - JHS->General Classrooms-->SizeClassrooms average 85% of size standard.

Suitability - JHS->Science-->EnvironmentScience labs are excellent, science rooms are good.

Suitability - JHS->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipBand room lacks sink.

Suitability - JHS->Art-->EnvironmentThe art room is well worn and is due for updating.

Suitability - JHS->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipArt room lacks sufficient storage, kiln is open to room, there is only one sink.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->EnvironmentThe practice gym is also the cafeteria.

Suitability - JHS->P.E.-->Storage/Fixed EquipCompetition gym can only seat about 85% of ASB. There is insufficient storage. Showers in locker rooms are used for storage and fixtures do not work.

Suitability - JHS->Performing Arts-->EnvironmentThere is no auditorium.




Suitability - JHS->Media Center-->EnvironmentLibrary has no natural light and is stuffy. The librarian's office is on the stage.

Suitability - JHS->Media Center-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe library lacks sufficient book storage.

Suitability - JHS->Restrooms (Student)Restrooms are dated and lack privacy partitions for urinals.

Suitability - JHS->AdministrationWaiting areas are small, there is no conference room.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:48:35AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905045Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - JHS->CounselingThe counseling office does not have a waiting area for students.

Suitability - JHS->Staff Lounge-WkRmFaculty lounge and work rooms are small.

Suitability - JHS->CafeteriaThe cafeteria is also a practice gym and is due for a face lift.

Suitability - JHS->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficAll parent and bus drop off areas are on the street. Students must cross a parking lot from the bus drop off to access the building.

Suitability - JHS->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficStudents must cross a parking lot from the bus drop off to access the building.

Suitability - JHS->Outside-->Athletic Courts and FieldsThere is only one football field and no track.




Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:48:35AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905001Site #:

Assessments 2013 Hirschi HS

Project #: 5773

Site Type: Site Size:Grade Config: 9-12 44.00High

Suitability - HS Learning Environment

5.00 4.00 80.00 Learning Style Variety Good 2.00 1.30 65.00 Interior Environment Fair 1.50 1.20 80.00 Exterior Environment Good

General Classrooms 3.90 2.54 65.00 Environment Fair 9.75 7.80 80.00 Size Good 2.93 2.34 80.00 Location Good 2.93 1.46 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.53 0.35 65.00 Environment Fair 1.33 0.67 50.00 Size Poor 0.40 0.32 80.00 Location Good 0.40 0.20 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Instructional Resource Rooms 0.80 0.52 65.00 Environment Fair 2.00 1.30 65.00 Size Fair 0.60 0.48 80.00 Location Good 0.60 0.48 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good


Music 0.59 0.30 50.00 Environment Poor 1.48 0.96 65.00 Size Fair 0.45 0.36 80.00 Location Good 0.45 0.29 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Art 0.67 0.33 50.00 Environment Poor 1.66 1.33 80.00 Size Good 0.50 0.32 65.00 Location Fair 0.50 0.32 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair


Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:46:24AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905001Site #:


Project #: 5773



Computer Labs 0.30 0.24 80.00 Environment Good 0.75 0.60 80.00 Size Good 0.23 0.18 80.00 Location Good 0.23 0.18 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

P.E. 2.40 1.92 80.00 Environment Good 6.00 3.90 65.00 Size Fair 1.80 1.44 80.00 Location Good 1.80 1.44 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good


Media Center 0.84 0.84 100.00 Environment Excel 2.11 1.69 80.00 Size Good 0.63 0.51 80.00 Location Good 0.63 0.51 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good 0.91 0.73 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.61 2.09 80.00Good Administration 0.76 0.61 80.00Good Counseling 0.24 0.19 80.00Good Clinic 0.71 0.57 80.00Good Staff Lounge-WkRm 4.00 3.20 80.00Good Cafeteria 5.11 4.08 80.00Good Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 1.00 0.80 80.00 Vehicular Traffic Good 0.98 0.78 80.00 Pedestrian Traffic Good 2.11 1.69 80.00 Parking Good 2.77 2.21 80.00 Athletic Courts and Fields Good

Safety and Security 0.85 0.68 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.80 80.00 Signage & Way Finding Good 3.00 2.40 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.25 50.00 Controlled Entrances Poor

100.00 75.52 75.52Total For Site:

Comments

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:46:24AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905001Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - HSHirschi High School houses grades 9 through 12. It offers a comprehensive high school curriculum with numerous vocational education programs. The building was built in 1962.

Suitability - HS->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe age of the building dictates an environment that is less stimulating or inviting.

Suitability - HS->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentThe general classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->General Classrooms-->SizeGeneral classrooms did not meet district size standards. They were approximately 80% of the needed size.

Suitability - HS->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipFixed storage in the general classrooms is not adequate.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->EnvironmentThe self-contained classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->SizeSelf-contained classrooms do no meet district size requirement.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is inadequate.

Suitability - HS->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentThe resource classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Instructional Resource Rooms-->SizeThe ISS program is located in a portable.

Suitability - HS->Music-->EnvironmentThe choir room is very small and does not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The room was not designed to teach choir.

Suitability - HS->Music-->SizeThe band room is located in a separate building and is of adequate size. The choir room does not meet district size standards.

Suitability - HS->Music-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage in the choir room is not adequate.

Suitability - HS->Art-->EnvironmentThe art room is located in a separate building next to the auto mechanics program. The room was not designed to be an art room and does not provide a stimulating environment.

Suitability - HS->Art-->LocationThe art room is located in a different building next to the auto mechanics shop.

Suitability - HS->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited. There is one sink with no trap.

Suitability - HS->Career Tech Ed-->EnvironmentThe vocational spaces in the building provide for a stimulating learning environment. The "plaza" which houses the video production program is noteworthy.

Suitability - HS->P.E.-->SizeThe school has two gyms; the district standard call for three.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:46:24AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905001Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - HS->Performing Arts-->SizeSeating capacity is 700.

Suitability - HS->Safety and Security-->Controlled Entrances

Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:46:24AM



Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905002Site #:

Assessments 2013 Rider HS

Project #: 5773



5.00 3.25 65.00 Learning Style Variety Fair 2.00 1.00 50.00 Interior Environment Poor 1.50 0.98 65.00 Exterior Environment Fair

General Classrooms 3.90 2.54 65.00 Environment Fair 9.75 6.34 65.00 Size Fair 2.93 2.34 80.00 Location Good 2.93 1.46 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.53 0.35 65.00 Environment Fair 1.33 0.67 50.00 Size Poor 0.40 0.32 80.00 Location Good 0.40 0.20 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor



Music 0.59 0.48 80.00 Environment Good 1.48 1.19 80.00 Size Good 0.45 0.36 80.00 Location Good 0.45 0.36 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Art 0.67 0.43 65.00 Environment Fair 1.66 0.83 50.00 Size Poor 0.50 0.40 80.00 Location Good 0.50 0.25 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Career Tech Ed 1.71 1.11 65.00 Environment Fair

Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:47:30AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905002Site #:


Project #: 5773


4.27 2.78 65.00 Size Fair 1.28 1.03 80.00 Location Good 1.28 1.03 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Computer Labs 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

P.E. 2.40 1.56 65.00 Environment Fair 6.00 4.80 80.00 Size Good 1.80 1.44 80.00 Location Good 1.80 1.44 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Performing Arts 0.32 0.21 65.00 Environment Fair 0.80 0.64 80.00 Size Good 0.24 0.19 80.00 Location Good 0.24 0.16 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Media Center 0.84 0.67 80.00 Environment Good 2.11 1.69 80.00 Size Good 0.63 0.51 80.00 Location Good 0.63 0.51 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good 0.91 0.73 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.61 2.09 80.00Good Administration 0.76 0.61 80.00Good Counseling 0.24 0.19 80.00Good Clinic 0.71 0.57 80.00Good Staff Lounge-WkRm 4.00 2.00 50.00Poor Cafeteria 5.11 4.08 80.00Good Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 1.00 0.65 65.00 Vehicular Traffic Fair 0.98 0.78 80.00 Pedestrian Traffic Good 2.11 1.05 50.00 Parking Poor 2.77 1.80 65.00 Athletic Courts and Fields Fair

Safety and Security 0.85 0.68 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 2.40 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.25 50.00 Controlled Entrances Poor

98.50 68.70 69.75Total For Site:

Comments

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:47:30AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905002Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - HSRider High School houses grades nine through twelve, teaching a comprehensive curriculum.

Suitability - HS->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThere are no flexible learning spaces available.

Suitability - HS->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe size of the school's hallways create bottlenecks in student traffic flow. The building does not provide for an inviting and stimulating environment due to its age and condition.

Suitability - HS->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere is no outside learning lab available.


Suitability - HS->General Classrooms-->SizeThe general classrooms do not meet district size standards.

Suitability - HS->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is very limited fixed storage available in the general classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->EnvironmentThe self-contained classroom does not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->SizeThe self-contained classroom is a small converted classroom that does not meet district size standards.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe self-contained classroom is a converted classroom that has none of the characteristics of this program. There is no restroom available that is near this classroom.

Suitability - HS->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentThe resource classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - HS->Art-->EnvironmentThe art classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Art-->SizeTwo of the art rooms do not meet district size standards.

Suitability - HS->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage in all three art rooms is very limited. There is no water available in one of the room. Two rooms are converted general classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Career Tech Ed-->EnvironmentThe career technical classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Career Tech Ed-->SizeThe Family Skills and Food Lab's classrooms is not large enough for the program.

Suitability - HS->Computer LabsThere are 5 mobile units with 20 computers in each.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:47:30AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905002Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - HS->P.E.-->EnvironmentTwo of the three gyms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment due to age and condition.

Suitability - HS->Performing Arts-->EnvironmentThe auditorium does not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Performing Arts-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - HS->CafeteriaThe cafeteria seating area is inadequate. Students will also eat in the Student Center. Upper classes are permitted to leave the campus for lunch.

Suitability - HS->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficVehicular traffic is through parking lots and does not flow smoothly.

Suitability - HS->Outside-->ParkingParking is inadequate for day-time student and staff parking.

Suitability - HS->Outside-->Athletic Courts and FieldsSeveral of play areas are a significant distance from the main building. The track is not a completive track; events are held at a junior high school.

Suitability - HS->Safety and Security-->Signage & Way Finding


Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:47:30AM




Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905004Site #:

Assessments 2013 Wichita Falls HS

Project #: 5773



5.00 3.25 65.00 Learning Style Variety Fair 2.00 1.60 80.00 Interior Environment Good 1.50 0.98 65.00 Exterior Environment Fair

General Classrooms 3.90 2.54 65.00 Environment Fair 9.75 6.34 65.00 Size Fair 2.93 2.34 80.00 Location Good 2.93 1.46 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.53 0.35 65.00 Environment Fair 1.33 0.00 0.00 Size Unsat 0.40 0.32 80.00 Location Good 0.40 0.20 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor



Music 0.59 0.30 50.00 Environment Poor 1.48 1.19 80.00 Size Good 0.45 0.36 80.00 Location Good 0.45 0.36 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Art 0.67 0.43 65.00 Environment Fair 1.66 0.83 50.00 Size Poor 0.50 0.40 80.00 Location Good 0.50 0.25 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor


Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:48:27AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905004Site #:


Project #: 5773




P.E. 2.40 1.92 80.00 Environment Good 6.00 3.90 65.00 Size Fair 1.80 1.44 80.00 Location Good 1.80 1.44 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Performing Arts 0.32 0.21 65.00 Environment Fair 0.80 0.64 80.00 Size Good 0.24 0.19 80.00 Location Good 0.24 0.19 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Media Center 0.84 0.67 80.00 Environment Good 2.11 1.69 80.00 Size Good 0.63 0.51 80.00 Location Good 0.63 0.51 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good 0.91 0.59 65.00Fair Restrooms (Student) 2.61 2.09 80.00Good Administration 0.76 0.61 80.00Good Counseling 0.24 0.15 65.00Fair Clinic 0.71 0.57 80.00Good Staff Lounge-WkRm 4.00 2.00 50.00Poor Cafeteria 5.11 4.08 80.00Good Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 1.00 0.50 50.00 Vehicular Traffic Poor 0.98 0.49 50.00 Pedestrian Traffic Poor 2.11 1.05 50.00 Parking Poor 2.77 1.80 65.00 Athletic Courts and Fields Fair

Safety and Security 0.85 0.85 100.00 Fencing Excel 1.00 0.65 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 3.00 1.50 50.00 Ease of Supervision Poor 0.50 0.25 50.00 Controlled Entrances Poor

100.00 68.20 68.20Total For Site:

Comments

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:48:27AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905004Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - HSWichita Falls High School houses grades nine through twelve, teaching a comprehensive high school curriculum. The building is approximately 100 years old, sitting in the heart of Wichita Falls. Tradition is a cornerstone for this school.

Suitability - HS->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThere are no flexible learning spaces.

Suitability - HS->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere are no outside learning spaces available.


Suitability - HS->General Classrooms-->SizeThe general classrooms do not meet the district size standards.

Suitability - HS->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is inadequate for the general classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->EnvironmentThe self-contained classroom does not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->SizeThe special education self-contained classroom does not meet district size standards. The room is very small and was not designed for this program.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is not enough fixed storage for this program.

Suitability - HS->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentThe instructional resource classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - HS->Science-->SizeMost of the science rooms do not meet district size standards.

Suitability - HS->Music-->EnvironmentAcoustics in the all the music rooms is inadequate.

Suitability - HS->Art-->EnvironmentThe art classrooms do not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms. One of the art spaces is a converted classroom.

Suitability - HS->Art-->SizeThe three art classrooms do not meet district size standards.

Suitability - HS->Art-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is inadequate.

Suitability - HS->Career Tech Ed-->Environment

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:48:27AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905004Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - HS->Computer Labs-->EnvironmentThe computer lab does not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Computer Labs-->SizeThe computer lab does not meet the district's size standard.

Suitability - HS->Computer Labs-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - HS->P.E.-->SizeThere are three gyms. They do not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - HS->Performing Arts-->EnvironmentThe auditorium does not provide an inviting and stimulating environment. The age and condition of the building dictates the overall appearance and feeling when entering the classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Restrooms (Student)There is one set of restrooms available on each floor.

Suitability - HS->ClinicThe configuration of the clinic spaces make it less functional.

Suitability - HS->CafeteriaThe cafeteria does not meet district size standards.

Suitability - HS->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficTraffic routing is very challenging. Busses and drop off are on Avenue "H". The student parking lot is located across this street, causing students to enter into the same congested area.

Suitability - HS->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficThe pedestrians enter into the front of the school where busses and cars are dropping off students. This contributes to the congestion in this area.

Suitability - HS->Outside-->ParkingParking is on the other side of Avenue "H". Students must cross this street to enter the building. This is also the bus unloading zone.

Suitability - HS->Outside-->Athletic Courts and FieldsThe locker rooms are inadequate in size, age, and lighting. The showers are in poor condition.


Suitability - HS->Safety and Security-->Ease of Supervision


Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:48:27AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

0009Site #:

Assessments 2013 Carrigan Career Center

Project #: 5773

Site Type: Site Size:Grade Config: 11-12 5.00Other

Suitability - Career Tech Learning Environment

5.00 2.50 50.00 Learning Style Variety Poor 2.00 1.00 50.00 Interior Environment Poor 1.50 0.98 65.00 Exterior Environment Fair

General Classrooms 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Agriculture and Natural Resources 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage\Fixed Equip. (N/A)

Business, Management, and Admin 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage\Fixed Equip. (N/A)

Tech Ed and Communications 1.00 0.50 50.00 Environment Poor 2.50 1.25 50.00 Size Poor 0.75 0.75 100.00 Location Excel 0.75 0.38 50.00 Storage\Fixed Equip. Poor

Culinary 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage\Fixed Equip. (N/A)

Health Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage\Fixed Equip. (N/A)

Construction Trades 1.40 0.91 65.00 Environment Fair

Page 1 of 55/8/2013 11:45:02AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

0009Site #:


Project #: 5773


3.50 2.28 65.00 Size Fair 1.05 0.84 80.00 Location Good 1.05 0.53 50.00 Storage\Fixed Equip. Poor

Automotive Tech 1.40 0.70 50.00 Environment Poor 3.50 1.75 50.00 Size Poor 1.05 1.05 100.00 Location Excel 1.05 0.68 65.00 Storage\Fixed Equip. Fair

Cosmetology 1.20 0.96 80.00 Environment Good 3.00 2.40 80.00 Size Good 0.90 0.90 100.00 Location Excel 0.90 0.90 100.00 Storage\Fixed Equip. Excel

Computer Labs 0.40 0.32 80.00 Environment Good 1.00 1.00 100.00 Size Excel 0.30 0.30 100.00 Location Excel 0.30 0.30 100.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Excel

P.E. 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Media Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A) 0.91 0.46 50.00Poor Restrooms (Student) 2.27 2.27 100.00Excel Administration 0.00 0.00 0.00(N/A) Counseling 0.24 0.15 65.00Fair Clinic 0.71 0.46 65.00Fair Staff Lounge-WkRm 0.00 0.00 0.00(N/A) Cafeteria 0.00 0.00 0.00(N/A) Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.33 65.00Fair Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 1.00 0.80 80.00 Vehicular Traffic Good 0.50 0.50 100.00 Pedestrian Traffic Excel 2.00 1.30 65.00 Parking Fair 0.00 0.00 0.00 Athletic Courts and Fields (N/A)

Safety and Security 0.85 0.85 100.00 Fencing Excel 0.11 0.05 50.00 Signage & Way Finding Poor 2.00 1.60 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.33 65.00 Controlled Entrances Fair

Page 2 of 55/8/2013 11:45:02AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

0009Site #:


Project #: 5773


47.09 32.26 68.51Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - Career TechThe Carrigan Career Center enrolls junior and senior students in Career Technical Programs. Students attend either in a morning or afternoon program. The programs are taught in a vacated elementary school and a shop building. The facility is also used for district services and training.

Suitability - Career Tech->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe technical labs do not have areas for small group and individualized instruction.

Suitability - Career Tech->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe shop areas are in need of painting and a refreshing of the instructional spaces. They are showing their age and wear and tear. They are not stimulating instructional environments.

Suitability - Career Tech->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThe school does not have any outdoor instructional areas or social meeting areas.

Suitability - Career Tech->General ClassroomsThe school does not have general classrooms. The classrooms are directly related to a specific technical program.

Suitability - Career Tech->Agriculture and Natural ResourcesThe school does not offer any programming in Ag and Natural Resources.

Suitability - Career Tech->Business, Management, and AdminThe school does not offer any programming in Business.

Suitability - Career Tech->Tech Ed and CommunicationsThis assessment is for the welding program.

Suitability - Career Tech->Tech Ed and Communications-->EnvironmentThe welding facilities need to be cleaned and painted. It lacks adequate natural light and is not a positive environment for learning. The electronics classroom and computer lab is located in the shop space. The classroom has been converted to a residential wiring lab. The area lacks adequate natural lighting. When you walk into the lab you are not sure what is being taught in the space.

Suitability - Career Tech->Tech Ed and Communications-->SizeThe welding classroom is very small for the number of students served. The classroom is shaped in a" L" which restricts how the room can be configured for students to be able to see the projection screen. The welding lab does not allow any flexibility in the labs configuration due to concrete block welding booths. The lab is not large enough for in shop project construction. The total square feet of the electronics area is adequate for the program. The use of the classroom for residential wiring lab and housing the computers and classroom in the shop/lab area is not

Suitability - Career Tech->Tech Ed and Communications-->Storage\Fixed Equip.The ventilation system in the welding area is not adequate. The tool room storage is small in size. The welding lab is not equipped with any CNC equipment. The shop does not have adequate racks for the storing of metal. The electronics lab does not have adequate cabinets, tool rooms and specialized equipment for the program.

Suitability - Career Tech->CulinaryThe school does not provide instruction in culinary.

Suitability - Career Tech->Health ServicesNo Health program.

Suitability - Career Tech->Construction Trades-->EnvironmentThe construction trades program is located in a metal building adjacent to the other programs. Due to the age and condition of the building it does not provide a stimulating environment.

Page 3 of 55/8/2013 11:45:02AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

0009Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - Career Tech->Construction Trades-->SizeThe construction trades building is small for the number of projects being built and the amount of equipment housed in the facility.

Suitability - Career Tech->Construction Trades-->LocationStudents cannot access any of the other school facilities without going outside.

Suitability - Career Tech->Construction Trades-->Storage\Fixed Equip.The construction trade building does not have a permanent dust system. The dressing room is configured using a temporary wall. There is not adequate storage for tools and building supplies. The facility has only one restroom.

Suitability - Career Tech->Automotive TechThe automotive program that is offered at the school is auto body.

Suitability - Career Tech->Automotive Tech-->EnvironmentThe auto body shop is a long narrow facility. Due to the age of the facility and the physical condition of the shop it does not provide a stimulating educational environment.

Suitability - Career Tech->Automotive Tech-->SizeThe auto body shop is not large enough to accommodate student projects for the number of students enrolled. The classroom is extremely small for the number of students.

Suitability - Career Tech->Automotive Tech-->Storage\Fixed Equip.Neither the shop facility or the classroom have adequate storage spaces for teaching supplies and equipment.

Suitability - Career Tech->Cosmetology-->EnvironmentThe cosmetology program does not have adequate ventilation.

Suitability - Career Tech->Cosmetology-->SizeOne of the dressing rooms is small for the number of students. The instructional areas for manicures and facials are small.

Suitability - Career Tech->Computer LabsThe school has one small computer lab that is used by the students in their general education core curriculum. It is not a technical program related specifically to computer technology.

Suitability - Career Tech->Computer Labs-->EnvironmentThe computer lab is located in the old elementary school in a general classroom space. It is not a warm instructional environment.

Suitability - Career Tech->P.E.This facility does not provide physical education programming.

Suitability - Career Tech->Media CenterThe school does not have a media center.

Suitability - Career Tech->Restrooms (Student)The cosmetology locker rooms do not have restrooms. Many of the shop programs do not have both a men and women's restroom.

Suitability - Career Tech->CounselingThe school does not have a counselor.

Suitability - Career Tech->ClinicThe clinic is not equipped with a restroom.

Suitability - Career Tech->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe staff lounge is a general classroom in the former elementary school. It is not equipped with a restroom or kitchenette.

Page 4 of 55/8/2013 11:45:02AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

0009Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - Career Tech->CafeteriaThe school does not provide meals.

Suitability - Career Tech->Food Service and PrepThe school does not serve lunches.

Suitability - Career Tech->Custodial and MaintenanceThe custodial closets are equipped with wall-mounted sinks and are not adequately ventilated.

Suitability - Career Tech->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficThe buses load and unload on a side street.

Suitability - Career Tech->Outside-->ParkingThere is not adequate parking for students and staff.

Suitability - Career Tech->Outside-->Athletic Courts and FieldsThe school does not offer any athletic programming.

Suitability - Career Tech->Safety and Security-->Signage & Way Finding

Suitability - Career Tech->Safety and Security-->Ease of Supervision

Suitability - Career Tech->Safety and Security-->Controlled Entrances

Page 5 of 55/8/2013 11:45:02AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905008Site #:

Assessments 2013 Denver Alternative Cent

Project #: 5773


Suitability - PK-12 Learning Environment

5.00 4.00 80.00 Learning Style Variety Good 2.00 1.60 80.00 Interior Environment Good 1.50 0.98 65.00 Exterior Environment Fair

General Classrooms 3.50 2.28 65.00 Environment Fair 8.75 4.38 50.00 Size Poor 2.63 1.71 65.00 Location Fair 2.63 1.31 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor




Instructional Resource Rooms 0.71 0.57 80.00 Environment Good 1.77 1.42 80.00 Size Good 0.53 0.43 80.00 Location Good 0.53 0.35 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Science 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Music 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A)

Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:45:27AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905008Site #:


Project #: 5773



Art 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Career Tech Ed 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)



Performing Arts 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Media Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A) 0.89 0.58 65.00Fair Restrooms (Student) 1.73 1.39 80.00Good Administration 0.31 0.25 80.00Good Counseling 0.26 0.13 50.00Poor Clinic 0.68 0.44 65.00Fair Staff Lounge-WkRm 0.00 0.00 0.00(N/A) Cafeteria 0.00 0.00 0.00(N/A) Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 3.00 1.50 50.00 Vehicular Traffic Poor 0.34 0.27 80.00 Pedestrian Traffic Good 2.55 2.04 80.00 Parking Good 0.00 0.00 0.00 Athletic Courts and Fields (N/A)

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:45:27AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905008Site #:


Project #: 5773



43.90 29.17 66.45Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - PK-12Denver Alternative center serves students in grades 1-12 that have been placed in a disciplinary alternative program. The program is tutorial-based so educational spaces consist primarily of regular classrooms with cubicles.

Suitability - PK-12->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe variety of spaces needed to provide for the program is good.

Suitability - PK-12->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThe amount of exterior spaces is limited but adequate for the program.

Suitability - PK-12->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentThe environment for junior high and high school classrooms are good. High school classes are in a portable building.

Suitability - PK-12->General Classrooms-->SizeJunior high and elementary classroom spaces meet approximately 60% of the standard. High school classes are in a portable building.

Suitability - PK-12->General Classrooms-->LocationThe location of Junior High and Elementary classrooms is good. High school classes are in a portable building.

Suitability - PK-12->General Classrooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage and equipment is fair in the junior high and elementary classrooms. High school classes are in a portable building.

Suitability - PK-12->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - PK-12->Restrooms (Student)There is one set of student restrooms located in the junior high / elementary area. There are no restrooms in the high school area with the exception of a single restroom in a portable classroom that is rarely used.

Suitability - PK-12->ClinicThe clinic is small, has no separated cot area and no restroom.

Suitability - PK-12->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe staff lounge/workroom is small and does not have a restroom.

Suitability - PK-12->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficBus drop-off is on street. There is an off street parent drop off and pick up but conflicts with other traffic.

Suitability - PK-12->Safety and Security-->Signage & Way Finding

Suitability - PK-12->Safety and Security-->Controlled Entrances

Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:45:27AM




Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905006Site #:

Assessments 2013 Harrell Accelerated Lear

Project #: 5773



5.00 2.50 50.00 Learning Style Variety Poor 2.00 1.00 50.00 Interior Environment Poor 1.50 0.75 50.00 Exterior Environment Poor

General Classrooms 3.90 1.95 50.00 Environment Poor 9.75 7.80 80.00 Size Good 2.93 2.34 80.00 Location Good 2.93 2.34 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Self-Contained Special Ed 0.53 0.27 50.00 Environment Poor 1.33 0.87 65.00 Size Fair 0.40 0.32 80.00 Location Good 0.40 0.26 65.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Fair

Instructional Resource Rooms 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Science 0.83 0.41 50.00 Environment Poor 2.07 1.04 50.00 Size Poor 0.62 0.50 80.00 Location Good 0.62 0.50 80.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Good

Music 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Art 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Career Tech Ed 1.71 0.85 50.00 Environment Poor

Page 1 of 45/8/2013 11:46:07AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905006Site #:


Project #: 5773





Performing Arts 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environment (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip (N/A)

Media Center 0.84 0.42 50.00 Environment Poor 2.11 1.05 50.00 Size Poor 0.63 0.51 80.00 Location Good 0.63 0.32 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor 0.91 0.73 80.00Good Restrooms (Student) 2.61 1.31 50.00Poor Administration 0.76 0.38 50.00Poor Counseling 0.24 0.12 50.00Poor Clinic 0.71 0.57 80.00Good Staff Lounge-WkRm 4.00 0.00 0.00Unsat Cafeteria 5.11 0.00 0.00Unsat Food Service and Prep 0.50 0.40 80.00Good Custodial and Maintenance

Outside 1.00 0.00 0.00 Vehicular Traffic Unsat 0.98 0.49 50.00 Pedestrian Traffic Poor 2.11 1.69 80.00 Parking Good 0.00 0.00 0.00 Athletic Courts and Fields (N/A)

Safety and Security 0.85 0.68 80.00 Fencing Good 1.00 0.50 50.00 Signage & Way Finding Poor 3.00 0.00 0.00 Ease of Supervision Unsat 0.50 0.00 0.00 Controlled Entrances Unsat

71.84 38.32 53.33Total For Site:

Comments

Page 2 of 45/8/2013 11:46:07AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905006Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - HSHarrell Learning Center is an alternative high school with numerous self-contained special education programs. The building was originally constructed in 1953 as an elementary school.

Suitability - HS->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyThe building offers no flexible learning spaces within classrooms.

Suitability - HS->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe age and condition of the building does not provide for a stimulating environment. The building is old and tired.

Suitability - HS->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThe building has no outside flexible learning spaces.

Suitability - HS->General Classrooms-->EnvironmentNone of the classrooms provide for a stimulating environment due to the age and condition of the building.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->EnvironmentThe self-contained special education classrooms do not provide for a stimulating environment due to the age and condition of the building.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->SizeThe self-contained classrooms do not meet district size standards.

Suitability - HS->Self-Contained Special Ed-->Storage/Fixed EquipStorage is limited.

Suitability - HS->Science-->EnvironmentThe science lab does not provide for a stimulating environment due to the age and condition of the building.

Suitability - HS->Science-->SizeThe science lab does not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - HS->Career Tech Ed-->EnvironmentThe CTE classrooms do not provide for a stimulating environment due to the age and condition of the building.

Suitability - HS->Computer LabsThere is no general computer lab that is not directly tied to a specific program.

Suitability - HS->P.E.There is no gym space needed for this type of program.

Suitability - HS->Media Center-->EnvironmentThe media center does not provide for a stimulating environment due to the age and condition of the building.

Suitability - HS->Media Center-->SizeThe library does not meet the district's size standards.

Suitability - HS->Media Center-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe media center does not have sufficient storage.

Suitability - HS->AdministrationThe administrative offices do not provide for a stimulating environment due to the age and condition of the building. The administrative offices are small.

Suitability - HS->CounselingThe counseling office is located in the administrative area and is small.

Suitability - HS->ClinicThe clinic has one cot with no restroom or water available.

Suitability - HS->CafeteriaThe cafeteria does not meet the district's size standards. The serving line is inadequate for this program.

Page 3 of 45/8/2013 11:46:07AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905006Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - HS->Food Service and PrepThe school does not have a functioning kitchen. Food is brought into the school from a junior high school.

Suitability - HS->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficBusses drop off students on Seymour Road, requiring students to walk a distance in order to enter the school building. There is no pull-off area on Seymour Avenue.

Suitability - HS->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficThere are few walkers but entering the building must be done through a congested traffic area.


Suitability - HS->Safety and Security-->Ease of Supervision


Page 4 of 45/8/2013 11:46:07AM





Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905207Site #:

Assessments 2013 Northwest Head Start

Project #: 5773

Site Type: Site Size:Grade Config: PK 1.00Early Childhood


4.12 2.06 50.00 Learning Style Variety Poor 2.00 1.30 65.00 Interior Environment Fair 1.50 0.00 0.00 Exterior Environment Unsat


ECE 4.69 3.05 65.00 Environment Fair



Instructional Resource Rooms 0.72 0.36 50.00 Environment Poor 1.80 0.90 50.00 Size Poor 0.54 0.27 50.00 Location Poor 0.54 0.27 50.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Poor

P.E. - Activity 1.95 1.56 80.00 Environment Good 4.87 2.43 50.00 Size Poor 1.46 1.17 80.00 Location Good 1.46 0.00 0.00 Storage/Fixed Equip Unsat 1.70 0.85 50.00Poor Restrooms (Student) 4.58 2.29 50.00Poor Administration 0.00 0.00 0.00(N/A) Counseling 0.78 0.39 50.00Poor Clinic 3.00 1.50 50.00Poor Staff Lounge-WkRm 0.00 0.00 0.00(N/A) Cafeteria 3.00 1.95 65.00Fair Food Service and Prep

Page 1 of 35/8/2013 11:47:21AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905207Site #:


Project #: 5773


0.50 0.33 65.00Fair Custodial and Maintenance Outside

2.00 1.00 50.00 Vehicular Traffic Poor 0.97 0.49 50.00 Pedestrian Traffic Poor 0.81 0.53 65.00 Parking Fair 2.34 1.87 80.00 Play Areas Good

Safety and Security 0.75 0.60 80.00 Fencing Good 0.09 0.06 65.00 Signage & Way Finding Fair 2.00 1.60 80.00 Ease of Supervision Good 0.50 0.40 80.00 Controlled Entrances Good

67.42 37.65 55.84Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - Early ChildhoodNorthwest Head Start center is a three-classroom preschool with a general program.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Learning Environment-->Learning Style VarietyClassrooms are small and do not have sufficient space for a variety of learning activities. The corridor is narrow and there are no other spaces for learning activities.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Learning Environment-->Interior EnvironmentThe building has a narrow corridor and generally feels crowded with a minimum of natural light.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Learning Environment-->Exterior EnvironmentThere are no outdoor learning or socializing areas outside of the playground.

Suitability - Early Childhood->ECE-->EnvironmentThe classrooms "feel" crowded because they are small and the cabinetry is adult-sized.

Suitability - Early Childhood->ECE-->SizeThe classrooms do not meet the size standard.

Suitability - Early Childhood->ECE-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe classrooms lack sufficient storage. The cabinets are not sized appropriately. There are no sinks or restrooms in the classrooms.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Instructional Resource Rooms-->EnvironmentThe instructional resources rooms (2) are portable partitions set up in the gym building.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Instructional Resource Rooms-->SizeThe instructional resources rooms (2) are portable partitions set up in the gym building. They do not meet the size standard.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Instructional Resource Rooms-->LocationThe instructional resources rooms (2) are portable partitions set up in the gym building.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Instructional Resource Rooms-->Storage/Fixed EquipThe instructional resources rooms (2) are portable partitions set up in the gym building. There is no fixed equipment or storage.

Suitability - Early Childhood->P.E. - Activity-->SizeThe gym does not meet the size standard.

Page 2 of 35/8/2013 11:47:21AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

243905207Site #:


Project #: 5773


Suitability - Early Childhood->P.E. - Activity-->Storage/Fixed EquipThere is no storage room. There is a custodial closet that also serves as an office and a electrical room.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Restrooms (Student)The toilet fixtures are not age appropriate.

Suitability - Early Childhood->AdministrationThe office can not accommodate a small group and there is no conference room. There is no waiting or reception area.

Suitability - Early Childhood->ClinicThe clinic is also the staff work room. There is no space for a cot on a permanent basis.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Staff Lounge-WkRmThe staff work room is also the clinic and is undersized.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Food Service and PrepThe kitchen is residential grade.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Custodial and MaintenanceThe custodial closets are also used for other purposes.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Outside-->Vehicular TrafficVehicular traffic crosses pedestrian paths and is insufficient for the amount of traffic.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Outside-->Pedestrian TrafficStudents cross the lane of traffic to load into cars.

Suitability - Early Childhood->Outside-->ParkingThere is insufficient parking.


Page 3 of 35/8/2013 11:47:21AM



Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

0010Site #:

Assessments 2013 Stadium

Project #: 5773

Site Type: Site Size:Grade Config: N/A 158.00Vacant

Suitability - Support Facilities 5.00 5.00 100.00Good Traffic 5.00 5.00 100.00Good Parking 5.00 5.00 100.00Good Fencing 5.00 0.00 0.00Unsat Signage & Wayfinding

Maintenance, Custodial, Grounds 5.00 5.00 100.00 Size Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Adjacencies Good 5.00 3.35 67.00 Storage\Utilities\Fixed Equip. Fair

Food Service Spaces 5.00 1.65 33.00 Size Poor 5.00 5.00 100.00 Adjacencies Good 5.00 3.35 67.00 Storage\Utilities\Fixed Equip. Fair

Transportation 0.00 0.00 0.00 Size (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Adjacencies (N/A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage\Utilities\Fixed Equip. (N/A)

Storage Warehouse 5.00 5.00 100.00 Size Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Adjacencies Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Storage\Utilities\Fixed Equip. Good

Administration 4.00 4.00 100.00 Size Good 0.50 0.50 100.00 Adjacencies Good 0.50 0.50 100.00 Storage\Fixed Equip. Good 0.00 0.00 0.00(N/A) Employee Lounge, WkRm, RR 0.00 0.00 0.00(N/A) Employee Cafeteria 5.00 0.00 0.00Unsat Meeting Rooms

75.00 58.35 77.80Total For Site:

Comments

Suitability - Support FacilitiesWFISD Memorial Athletic Complex consists of athletic facilities including soccer, track, football, softball, and baseball. All the appropriate support spaces are also present. District high schools and junior high schools play their games at this site. The complex consists of the Ervin Stadium, Girls Softball and Optomist Field, Field House, Stadium Complex (Memorial Stadium), and the Hoskins Baseball Field. In addition to the school athletic facilities, there are other athletic fields that have been constructed by local organizations. The Field of Dreams, which is a

Page 1 of 25/8/2013 11:48:01AM

Project: Site:

SuitabilityPossible

ScoreScore

PercentScore


1Region:

Rating

0010Site #:


Project #: 5773

Site Type: Site Size:Grade Config: N/A 158.00Vacant

Suitability - Support Facilities->Signage & WayfindingOutside signage is limited.

Suitability - Support Facilities->Maintenance, Custodial, Grounds-->Storage\Utilities\Fixed Equip.The leaks in the storage area have limited some of the available space.

Suitability - Support Facilities->Food Service Spaces-->SizeConcession stands located in the Stadium and the Hoskins Baseball field are small. Concession stand located in the Ervin Garnet Stadium is good.

Suitability - Support Facilities->Food Service Spaces-->Storage\Utilities\Fixed Equip.Storage is limited in the concession stands.

Suitability - Support Facilities->AdministrationThe administrative office is located in Field House. There is also an apartment that houses a security guard for the complex. Locker rooms are also located at the Field House

Suitability - Support Facilities->Administration-->Size.

Suitability - Support Facilities->Meeting RoomsThe press box is being evaluated under the title, "Meeting Rooms" category due to the types of activities conducted in that facility. There are a total of 13 press boxes located on two floors. Many of the 13 viewing areas and technical booths are quite small.

Page 2 of 25/8/2013 11:48:01AM

Technology Readiness Report - Full

Project: Site:

Technology ReadinessPossible

ScoreScorePercent Score


1Region:

Rating

243905101Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 5.00 50.00 Electrical Power Fair 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Voice Distribution Unsat

10.00 10.00 100.00 Faculty & Staff Technology Good

100.00 90.00 90.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerThere have been additions to the number of outlets over the years, however they are often not in the correct location which requires the use of power strips.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThe school does not have phones in the classrooms and does not have voice mail for faculty.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:52:15AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905104Site #:

Assessments 2013 Brook Village Early Childho

Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Electrical Power Good 10.00 0.00 0.00 Cooling Unsat 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Voice Distribution Unsat


100.00 85.00 85.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->CoolingThe two computer labs are very small and "stuffy." There are 12 computers in each lab.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere are no telephones in any of the classrooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:52:27AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905105Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 5.00 50.00 Electrical Power Fair 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 6.70 67.00 LAN-WAN Performance Fair 5.00 0.00 0.00 Video Distribution Unsat 5.00 2.50 50.00 Voice Distribution Fair


100.00 84.20 84.20Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerSome classrooms have power on only two walls.

Technology Readiness->LAN-WAN PerformanceThe school experiences occasional connection issues.

Technology Readiness->Video Distributionthere is no video distribution system.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionBurgess has intercom but not phone to instructional spaces.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:52:34AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905107Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 0.00 0.00 Electrical Power Unsat 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Voice Distribution Unsat


100.00 85.00 85.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerThere are limited electrical outlets in all the classrooms and offices.

Technology Readiness->WAN BackboneThe building is also wireless.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere are no telephones in the classrooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:52:47AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905108Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 5.00 50.00 Electrical Power Fair 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 6.70 67.00 LAN-WAN Performance Fair 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 2.50 50.00 Voice Distribution Fair


100.00 89.20 89.20Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Comm\IT Equipment EnvironmentCunningham has three IT equipment rooms. Each is a separate climate controlled space.

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerMore power outlets are needed.

Technology Readiness->LAN-WAN PerformanceThe school experiences occasional connection problems.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere is intercom but no phone system.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:52:54AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905109Site #:


Project #: 5773



100.00 90.00 90.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerThe number of electrical outlets and their locations are not adequate for technology and other instructional equipment.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThe classrooms are not equipped with telephones with voice mail capability.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:53:08AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905130Site #:

Assessments 2013 Farris Early Childhood Cente

Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Electrical Power Good 10.00 5.00 50.00 Cooling Fair 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Voice Distribution Unsat


100.00 90.00 90.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->CoolingThe HVAC system is not sufficient to keep all spaces comfortable.

Technology Readiness->Video DistributionThe school uses video streaming.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThe schools uses a two way voice communication via intercom. The schools does not have voice mail.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:53:14AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905111Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 5.00 50.00 Electrical Power Fair 10.00 5.00 50.00 Cooling Fair 10.00 3.30 33.00 Equity of Access Poor 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 2.50 50.00 Voice Distribution Fair


100.00 80.80 80.80Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerSome computers are plugged into power strips.

Technology Readiness->CoolingThe lab is warm on some days.

Technology Readiness->Equity of AccessThe wireless access is "spotty" and each classroom does not have 4 drops.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThe classrooms have intercom but no phones.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:53:21AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905112Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Electrical Power Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Voice Distribution Unsat


100.00 95.00 95.00Total For Site:

Comments


Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere are no telephones in the general classrooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:53:28AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905114Site #:

Assessments 2013 Haynes Northwest Academ

Project #: 5773



100.00 95.00 95.00Total For Site:

Comments


Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere are no telephones in most classrooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:53:41AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905116Site #:


Project #: 5773



100.00 90.00 90.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerThe computer lab uses numerous daisy chains for electrical connections.

Technology Readiness->WAN BackboneThe facility has wireless as well as fiber.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere are no telephones in classrooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:53:55AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905118Site #:


Project #: 5773



100.00 85.00 85.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerThere are limited numbers of electrical outlets in the classrooms and the computer lab.

Technology Readiness->WAN BackboneThe building is wireless as well as fiber.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere are no phones in the classrooms with the exception of the two self-contained classrooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:54:02AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905119Site #:


Project #: 5773



100.00 85.00 85.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerElectrical outlets are limited in the majority of classrooms.


Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere are no telephones in the majority of classrooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:54:16AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905121Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 7.50 50.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Fair 10.00 0.00 0.00 Electrical Power Unsat 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Voice Distribution Unsat


100.00 77.50 77.50Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Comm\IT Equipment EnvironmentThe upstairs hub space is warm.

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerElectrical outlets in the classrooms are limited.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere are no telephones in most of the classrooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:54:29AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905128Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Electrical Power Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Voice Distribution Good


100.00 100.00 100.00Total For Site:

Comments

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:54:50AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905123Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 5.00 50.00 Electrical Power Fair 10.00 0.00 0.00 Cooling Unsat 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Voice Distribution Unsat


100.00 80.00 80.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerThe school does not have adequate outlets in the proper locations for computers and other equipment.

Technology Readiness->CoolingThe school does not have uniform heating and cooling in all instructional spaces.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThe staff do not have voice mail capabilities.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:54:58AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905129Site #:


Project #: 5773



100.00 100.00 100.00Total For Site:

Comments

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:55:05AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905125Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Electrical Power Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 2.50 50.00 Voice Distribution Fair


100.00 97.50 97.50Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThe school does not have voice mail capabilities for faculty.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:55:18AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905126Site #:


Project #: 5773



100.00 100.00 100.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerThe classroom computers are plugged into power strips but there are sufficient outlets.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:55:25AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905041Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 0.00 0.00 Electrical Power Unsat 10.00 0.00 0.00 Cooling Unsat 10.00 3.30 33.00 Equity of Access Poor 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Voice Distribution Unsat


100.00 68.30 68.30Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerThe school does not have adequate electrical outlets in the proper location for computers and other instructional equipment.

Technology Readiness->CoolingThe classroom temperatures vary significantly due to the rooms locations and the capabilities of the heating and air-conditioning system. The HVAC system does not adequately cool the computer labs.

Technology Readiness->Equity of AccessMany of the classrooms are not hardwired for five computers.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThe school does not have a system for the teachers to communicate directly with the main office either via intercom or phone.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:52:21AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905048Site #:


Project #: 5773



100.00 95.00 95.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere is no two way intercom or phones to the classrooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:54:09AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905047Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Electrical Power Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 3.30 33.00 Equity of Access Poor 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 3.30 33.00 LAN-WAN Performance Poor 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 2.50 50.00 Voice Distribution Fair


100.00 84.10 84.10Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Equity of AccessThe classrooms only have 1-2 drops for internet. The school has laptops on a cart (3) but the internet does not have sufficient bandwidth for all the computers to be used at once.

Technology Readiness->LAN-WAN PerformanceThe internet access lacks bandwidth for the number of users.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThe classrooms have intercom but no phones.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:54:22AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905045Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 7.50 50.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Fair 10.00 10.00 100.00 Electrical Power Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Video Distribution Unsat 5.00 2.50 50.00 Voice Distribution Fair


100.00 85.00 85.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Comm\IT Equipment EnvironmentThe IT room is in an attic space which is dusty and cluttered with trash.

Technology Readiness->Video DistributionThere is no central video distribution system.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere is an intercom system but not a phone system to all rooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:55:39AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905001Site #:


Project #: 5773



100.00 95.00 95.00Total For Site:

Comments



Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:53:48AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905002Site #:


Project #: 5773



100.00 85.00 85.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerElectrical outlets in the classrooms are limited.


Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere are no telephones in most of the classrooms. The intercom system is one-way.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:54:43AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905004Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Electrical Power Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 6.70 67.00 LAN-WAN Performance Fair 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Voice Distribution Unsat


100.00 91.70 91.70Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->WAN BackboneThe building is mostly wireless with some "dead" spots.

Technology Readiness->LAN-WAN PerformanceThe building has experienced some issues with dependability and reliability.


Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:55:33AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

0009Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 5.00 50.00 Electrical Power Fair 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Voice Distribution Good


100.00 95.00 95.00Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerThe old elementary school does not have outlets in the proper location.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:52:41AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905008Site #:

Assessments 2013 Denver Alternative Center

Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 15.00 100.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Electrical Power Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Video Distribution Unsat 5.00 2.50 50.00 Voice Distribution Fair


100.00 92.50 92.50Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Video DistributionThere is no video distribution system.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere is an intercom but not phone.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:53:01AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905006Site #:

Assessments 2013 Harrell Accelerated Learnin

Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 7.50 50.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Fair 10.00 0.00 0.00 Electrical Power Unsat 10.00 5.00 50.00 Cooling Fair 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 4.95 33.00 LAN Connectivity Poor 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 3.30 33.00 LAN-WAN Performance Poor 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 0.00 0.00 Voice Distribution Unsat


100.00 55.75 55.75Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Comm\IT Equipment EnvironmentOne of the two hub rooms does not have individual climate control.

Technology Readiness->Electrical PowerElectrical power is limited in most of the classrooms.

Technology Readiness->CoolingCooling systems are inadequate for many of the classrooms.

Technology Readiness->LAN ConnectivityThe network is now located in another building. This affects the band width coming into the building.


Technology Readiness->LAN-WAN PerformanceThe LAN/WAN system is often unreliable. The network is now located in another building. This affects the band width coming into the building.

Technology Readiness->Video DistributionThe building has no closed circuit system. Each classroom has a projector with streaming capabilities.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere are limited telephones in the classrooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:53:34AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

243905207Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 15.00 0.00 0.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment Unsat 10.00 10.00 100.00 Electrical Power Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Equity of Access Good 15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 WAN Backbone Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 5.00 5.00 100.00 Video Distribution Good 5.00 2.50 50.00 Voice Distribution Fair


100.00 82.50 82.50Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->Comm\IT Equipment EnvironmentThe equipment is in a closet with electrical equipment and the room overheats.

Technology Readiness->Voice DistributionThere is an intercom system but no phone system to the classrooms.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:54:35AM


Project: Site:




1Region:

Rating

0010Site #:


Project #: 5773

Technology Readiness 0.00 0.00 0.00 Comm\IT Equipment Environment (N/A)

10.00 10.00 100.00 Electrical Power Good 10.00 10.00 100.00 Cooling Good 0.00 0.00 0.00 Equity of Access (N/A)

15.00 15.00 100.00 LAN Connectivity Good 10.00 6.70 67.00 WAN Backbone Fair 10.00 10.00 100.00 LAN-WAN Performance Good 0.00 0.00 0.00 Video Distribution (N/A) 5.00 5.00 100.00 Voice Distribution Good 0.00 0.00 0.00 Faculty & Staff Technology (N/A)

60.00 56.70 94.50Total For Site:

Comments

Technology Readiness->WAN BackboneThere is no fiber into the complex. Wireless is available.

Page 1 of 15/8/2013 11:55:11AM

MGT Olympia | 4317 6th Ave SE, Suite 201 | Olympia, WA 98503 | 360-866-7303 phone

wichita falls independent school district · educational facilities master plan final report may...

Documents