why uttar pradesh fares poorly on socio-economic parameters

8
5/6/2014 Election watch: Why Uttar Pradesh fares poorly on socio-economic parameters : Business Today http://businesstoday.intoday.in/storyprint/205359 1/8 Print Close Election watch: Why Uttar Pradesh fares poorly on socio-economic parameters Shweta Punj April 22, 2014 A closed factory in Amethi. UP ranks 14 among 15 major states in terms of average number of factory workers. It had 301 workers for every one lakh of population, compared with the national average of 780, in 2010/11. Photo: Shekhar Ghosh "Factory tab khulegi jab kamal khilega (factories will open when the lotus blooms)," says Smriti Irani, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) candidate from Amethi in Uttar Pradesh, at a small gathering in Atawa village. Irani is referring to the scores of factories in India's most highprofile parliamentary constituency that lie abandoned and the lotus, the BJP's election symbol that she wants her audience to choose on May 7 when Amethi goes to polls. Most of these factories were set up when former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi represented Amethi in parliament and made a concerted effort to get businesses to invest in the constituency. What remains today are crumbling structures of iron, which local residents steal and sell as scrap to buy illicit drugs. Amethi is a Gandhi family bastion. It has elected members of the Gandhi family since 1980 first Sanjay Gandhi, then brother Rajiv, followed by Rajiv's widow, Sonia, and now son Rahul, the Congress party's vice president who is seeking reelection. Besides factories, the Gandhis have managed to get several bigticket educational projects sanctioned from the central government including institutes for information technology, hotel management and footwear design. These projects also have not yielded the desired results. And, little has changed on the ground. Roads are full of potholes, power cuts last up to 16 hours a day, and irrigation and healthcare facilities remain abysmal. Amethi, however, is not an exception and the situation is similar across India's most populous state. But why does the state that elects the most number of lawmakers for the Lok Sabha 80 of 543 and which produced eight of 13 prime ministers remains one of the worst in the country on socioeconomic parameters?

Upload: ravi-the-indian

Post on 05-May-2017

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Why Uttar Pradesh Fares Poorly on Socio-economic Parameters

5/6/2014 Election watch: Why Uttar Pradesh fares poorly on socio-economic parameters : Business Today

http://businesstoday.intoday.in/storyprint/205359 1/8

Print   Close

Election watch: Why Uttar Pradesh farespoorly on socio-economic parametersShweta  Punj          April  22,  2014

A  closed  factory  in  Amethi.  UP  ranks  14  among  15  major  states  in  terms  of  average  number  of  factory  workers.  It  had  301workers  for  every  one  lakh  of  population,  compared  with  the  national  average  of  780,  in  2010/11.  Photo:  Shekhar  Ghosh

"Factory  tab  khulegi  jab  kamal  khilega  (factories  will  open  when  the  lotus  blooms),"  saysSmriti  Irani,  the  Bharatiya  Janata  Party  (BJP)  candidate  from  Amethi  in  Uttar  Pradesh,  at  asmall  gathering  in  Atawa  village.  Irani  is  referring  to  the  scores  of  factories  in  India's  mosthigh-­profile  parliamentary  constituency  that  lie  abandoned  and  the  lotus,  the  BJP's  electionsymbol  that  she  wants  her  audience  to  choose  on  May  7  when  Amethi  goes  to  polls.  Most  ofthese  factories  were  set  up  when  former  prime  minister  Rajiv  Gandhi  represented  Amethi  inparliament  and  made  a  concerted  effort  to  get  businesses  to  invest  in  the  constituency.  Whatremains  today  are  crumbling  structures  of  iron,  which  local  residents  steal  and  sell  as  scrapto  buy  illicit  drugs.

Amethi  is  a  Gandhi  family  bastion.  It  has  elected  members  of  the  Gandhi  family  since  1980  -­first  Sanjay  Gandhi,  then  brother  Rajiv,  followed  by  Rajiv's  widow,  Sonia,  and  now  sonRahul,  the  Congress  party's  vice  president  who  is  seeking  re-­election.  Besides  factories,  theGandhis  have  managed  to  get  several  big-­ticket  educational  projects  sanctioned  from  thecentral  government  including  institutes  for  information  technology,  hotel  management  andfootwear  design.  These  projects  also  have  not  yielded  the  desired  results.  And,  little  haschanged  on  the  ground.  Roads  are  full  of  potholes,  power  cuts  last  up  to  16  hours  a  day,  andirrigation  and  health-­care  facilities  remain  abysmal.

Amethi,  however,  is  not  an  exception  and  the  situation  is  similar  across  India's  mostpopulous  state.  But  why  does  the  state  that  elects  the  most  number  of  lawmakers  for  theLok  Sabha  -­  80  of  543  -­  and  which  produced  eight  of  13  prime  ministers  remains  one  of  theworst  in  the  country  on  socio-­economic  parameters?

Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Page 2: Why Uttar Pradesh Fares Poorly on Socio-economic Parameters

5/6/2014 Election watch: Why Uttar Pradesh fares poorly on socio-economic parameters : Business Today

http://businesstoday.intoday.in/storyprint/205359 2/8

One  of  the  main  reasons  is  the  dominance  of  caste,  religion  and  identity-­based  politics  in  thestate.  Muslims,  for  instance,  have  typically  voted  for  Mulayam  Singh  Yadav's  SamajwadiParty  (SP)  or  the  Congress  while  the  backward  castes  have  supported  Mayawati's  BahujanSamaj  Party  (BSP)  and  the  BJP  has  traditionally  relied  on  the  upper  castes.  In  other  words,development  agendas  have  never  been  the  focus  of  debate.  "There  is  still  a  very  feudalmindset  in  the  state,"  says  Sharat  Pradhan,  a  veteran  journalist.  Pradeep  Kashyap,  Founderand  CEO  of  consultancy  firm  MART,  says  the  state  has  failed  to  produce  a  visionary  leaderwho  could  rise  above  caste  and  religion  and  focus  on  socio-­economic  progress.  "You  need  aperson  with  a  vision  of  a  prime  minister  to  govern  UP.  It  is  as  big  as  a  country.  Businessesthere  have  grown  because  of  their  proximity  to  ruling  parties,"  he  says.

TOUGH  BUSINESS  ENVIRONMENT

A  couple  of  hours'  drive  away  from  Amethi  is  Lucknow.  The  state  capital  is  dotted  withstatues  of  elephants,  the  BSP's  election  symbol.  At  the  state  secretariat,  not  too  far  awayfrom  the  modern  wing  that  houses  the  chief  minister's  office,  is  the  dusty  industry  affairsdepartment  where  a  bureaucrat  who  is  barely  two  days  into  his  job  offers  a  perspective  thatcomes  from  years  of  experience.  The  bureaucrat,  who  wished  not  to  be  named,  talks  abouta  company  trying  to  obtain  approval  for  a  project.  "This  clearance  shouldn't  take  more  than  afew  hours  but  it's  been  three  months,"  he  says.  "Decisions  that  can  be  and  should  be  madeat  much  junior  levels  are  being  referred  to  the  CM's  office  for  approval."

Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Page 3: Why Uttar Pradesh Fares Poorly on Socio-economic Parameters

5/6/2014 Election watch: Why Uttar Pradesh fares poorly on socio-economic parameters : Business Today

http://businesstoday.intoday.in/storyprint/205359 3/8

A  dirt  road  in  Karchana  village,  near  Allahabad.  UP  ranks  ninth  based  on  the  average  road  length.  It  had  78.5  km  ofsurfaced  roads  for  every  one  lakh  of  population,  compared  with  82.3  km  for  the  country,  in  2007/08  Photo:  ShekharGhosh

No  wonder,  industry  leaders  are  disillusioned.  "I  have  met  the  CM  [Akhilesh  Yadav,  son  ofMulayam  Singh  Yadav]  multiple  times.  We  meet  him,  discuss  our  issues  and  then  there  is  nomovement,"  says  a  senior  manager  at  a  sugar  company.  A  top  industrialist,  who  wished  toremain  anonymous,  says  "it  is  next  to  impossible"  to  do  business  in  the  state.  "Over  the  pasttwo  decades  the  state  has  not  focused  on  development.  You  go  to  Maharashtra  or  Gujaratand  you  will  find  a  different  picture  since  the  governments  there  are  development-­oriented,"he  says.

What  exacerbates  the  problem  is  that  successive  governments  discontinue  policies  madeby  previous  governments.  For  instance,  the  SP  government  in  2004  announced  a  policy  toencourage  sugar  mills,  promising  them  several  fiscal  incentives.  The  next  government,  ledby  Mayawati,  scrapped  the  policy  even  though  sugar  companies  such  as  Balrampur  ChiniMills,  Bajaj  Hindustan  and  Triveni  Engineering  had  added  capacities  to  take  advantage  of  thesops.

Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Page 4: Why Uttar Pradesh Fares Poorly on Socio-economic Parameters

5/6/2014 Election watch: Why Uttar Pradesh fares poorly on socio-economic parameters : Business Today

http://businesstoday.intoday.in/storyprint/205359 4/8

In  UP  we  don't  have  a  Congressgovernment  and  this  affects  the  ofthe  state  and  that  is  the  reality  haveto  accept:  Rahul  Gandhi,  CongressVice  President  and  sitting  MP  fromAmethi  Photo:  Sanjay  Sonkar

A  group  of  villagers  in  Bundelkhand.  The  state's  per  capita  income  was  `26,355  in  2010/11,  half  the  national  average,placing  it  at  the  14th  spot  among  major  states.  Photo:  Shekhar  Ghosh

Abinash  Verma,  Director  General  of  the  Indian  Sugar  Mills  Association,  says  cane  pricing  isa  political  issue  in  UP  and  does  not  take  into  account  the  returns  mills  make  on  sugar.  Headds  that  other  major  sugar  producers  like  Maharashtra  and  Karnataka  have  enacted  lawsto  link  cane  price  with  that  of  sugar.  Kushagra  Bajaj,  Vice  Chairman  and  Joint  ManagingDirector  of  Bajaj  Hindusthan,  the  biggest  sugar  maker  in  the  state  as  also  in  India,  says  thestate  government  will  have  to  take  many  proactive  measures  over  the  next  10  to  15  years  toearn  industry's  trust  and  attract  investments.

Industry  contributes  about  a  fifth  to  the  state  economy.  But,  between  1991  and  2010  thestate  received  investment  proposals  from  industrial  projects  that  accounted  for  barely  six  toseven  per  cent  of  the  total  proposed  industrial  investment  in  the  country.  Moreover,  only  athird  of  the  total  proposed  investment  of  Rs  2,25,552  crore  materialised,  official  data  show.The  investment  pattern  has  also  been  highly  skewed,  with  the  western  region  attracting  morethan  half  the  total  funds  and  the  central  and  eastern  regions  lagging  far  behind.

A  case  in  point  is  the  decline  of  Kanpur.  Once  known  asManchester  of  the  East,  Kanpur  has  lost  its  status  as  oneof  the  most  industrialised  cities  in  the  country.  Of  thehundreds  of  textile  mills  that  made  Kanpur  an  industrialtown,  barely  a  few  are  still  functional.  "Mill  owners  did  notinvest  in  upgradation  of  their  machinery  and  slowly  becameobsolete.  Moreover,  trade  unions  resisted  modernisation,"says  A.K.  Singh,  Professor  at  Lucknow's  Giri  Institute  ofDevelopment  Studies.  Another  example  is  Noida,  nearDelhi,  which  is  often  cited  as  a  success  story  by  the  UttarPradesh  government.  In  2010/11,  319  factories  shut

Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Page 5: Why Uttar Pradesh Fares Poorly on Socio-economic Parameters

5/6/2014 Election watch: Why Uttar Pradesh fares poorly on socio-economic parameters : Business Today

http://businesstoday.intoday.in/storyprint/205359 5/8

A  dry  hand  pump  in  Chandauli  village,  near  Varanasi.  Getting  a  hand  pump  installed  can  be  a  very  difficult  task  forpeople  in  a  state  where  nearly  a  third  of  the  population  is  below  the  poverty  line.  Photo:  Shekhar  Ghosh

operations  in  the  city  where  poor  law  and  order  and  powersupply  are  the  main  issues.  "Roads  are  much  better  inNoida  than  Gurgaon  in  Haryana.  Yet,  companies  still  preferGurgaon  because  of  the  law  and  order  situation,"  saysKashyap  of  MART.

The  state  administration  insists  industry  is  high  on  itspriority.  Alok  Ranjan,  Infrastructure  and  IndustrialDevelopment  Com-­missioner,  says  the  state  is  reachingout  to  businesses  who  want  to  invest  more  than  Rs  100crore.  "We  are  asking  businesses  what  they  want.  We  are

Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Page 6: Why Uttar Pradesh Fares Poorly on Socio-economic Parameters

5/6/2014 Election watch: Why Uttar Pradesh fares poorly on socio-economic parameters : Business Today

http://businesstoday.intoday.in/storyprint/205359 6/8

happy  to  discuss  and  resolve  issues  on  a  case  to  case  basis,"  he  says.  Ranjan  adds  thatthe  state  has  received  Rs  8,250  crore  of  investment  proposals  in  the  last  one  month.  Ranjansays  the  state  government  is  planning  to  set  up  a  single-­window  clearance  system  forindustry.  The  government  is  also  working  to  improve  power  supply,  attract  global  investors

Page 7: Why Uttar Pradesh Fares Poorly on Socio-economic Parameters

5/6/2014 Election watch: Why Uttar Pradesh fares poorly on socio-economic parameters : Business Today

http://businesstoday.intoday.in/storyprint/205359 7/8

Amethi  is  one  of  the  top  10  backwarddistricts  in  Uttar  Pradesh.  Samepromises  have  been  madegeneration  after  generation:  SmritiIrani,  BJP  candidate  from  AmethiPhoto:  Sanjay  Sonkar

and  formulate  policies  to  encourage  electronics  and  food  processing  sectors,  he  adds.

A  broken  irrigation  canal  in  Bundelkhand.  The  state  is  a  major  producer  of  food  grains.  But  in  the  case  of  the  moreremunerative  commercial  crops,  it  ranked  13  in  2009/10.  About  a  fourth  of  the  cultivable  area  is  under  commercial  crops,compared  with  more  than  a  third  for  India.  Photo:  Shekhar  Ghosh

The  efforts  have  yet  to  bear  fruit.  State  government  data  show  that,  of  the  50-­odd  projectspromised  and  cleared  in  2014,  work  hasn't  begun  on  nearly  40  projects.  Also,  largecompanies  such  as  Reliance  Industries,  PepsiCo  and  Indo  Gulf  Fertilizers,  which  signedpacts  last  year  to  set  up  projects  in  the  state,  have  either  yet  to  begin  work  or  have  shelvedtheir  plans.  In  contrast,  Bihar  -­  a  relatively  poor  state  that  has  40  Lok  Sabha  seats  -­  set  up  asingle-­window  clearance  system  in  2006,  and  a  June  2009  World  Bank  report  rated  Patna  asthe  second-­best  city  in  India  to  start  business  after  Delhi.

{blurb}Meanwhile,  in  Amethi,  BJP's  Irani  and  Kumar  Vishwas,  the  Arvind  Kejriwal-­led  AamAadmi  Party's  candidate,  are  exhorting  people  to  throw  out  the  Gandhi  dynasty  and  vote  fordevelopment.  "Amethi  is  one  of  the  top  10  backward  districts  in  Uttar  Pradesh.  Samepromises  have  been  made  generation  after  generation,"  says  Irani.  Vishwas  promises  tocreate  jobs.  "We  will  revive  sick  units  and  open  businesses  which  can  employ  the  localyouth?  There  are  no  jobs  in  this  area.  There  is  a  class  of  beneficiaries  the  Congress  hasbuilt,"  he  says.  {blurb}

In  his  defence,  Rahul  Gandhi  blames  the  state  governmentfor  the  lack  of  development.  "The  responsibility  of  roads,electricity  and  schools  lies  with  the  state  government.  Thecentral  government  has  built  national  highways  and  wehave  done  a  good  job?  In  UP  we  don't  have  a  Congress

Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Aditya Trivedi
Page 8: Why Uttar Pradesh Fares Poorly on Socio-economic Parameters

5/6/2014 Election watch: Why Uttar Pradesh fares poorly on socio-economic parameters : Business Today

http://businesstoday.intoday.in/storyprint/205359 8/8

We  will  revive  sick  units  and  openbusinesses  which  can  employ  thelocal  youth…  There  are  no  jobs  inthis  area:  Kumar  Vishwas,  AAPcandidate  from  Amethi  Photo:Sanjay  Sonkar

government  and  this  affects  the  people  of  the  state  and  thatis  the  reality  we  have  to  accept,"  he  said  in  a  TV  interviewwith  Headlines  Today,  part  of  the  India  Today  Group  thatpublishes  Business  Today.

Is  the  electorate  preparedto  ignore  narrowconsiderations  ofdynasty,  caste,  andreligion,  and  instead  putdevelopment  issues  at  theforefront?  Perhaps  not.

Renu  Singh,  35,  a  resident  of  Attawa  village,  says  herfourteen-­year-­old  son  tells  her  to  vote  for  BJP,  which  haspromised  development  as  its  main  agenda.  Veerganj  farmerand  Congress  supporter  Ram  Prasad,  55,  says  he  will  votefor  a  party  that  waives  his  Rs  6,000  farm  loan.  ArjunYadav,  39,  moved  to  Lucknow  from  Amethi  about  threeyears  ago  for  better  opportunities  and  education  for  hischildren,  but  remains  a  Gandhi  family  loyalist.  Sonia  Gandhi

is  Amethi's  daughter-­in-­law  and  he  would  again  vote  for  Rahul,  he  says  and  talks  about  ahand  pump  that  the  Gandhis  gave  his  family  in  2002.

"The  aura  of  the  Gandhis  will  take  time  to  fade  away,"  sums  up  Pradhan,  the  journalist.  "Igive  it  two  more  elections  for  development  to  take  precedence  over  everything  else  in  UttarPradesh."  That's  bad  news  for  the  state.  

With  inputs  from  Ajay  Modi

Print   Close

URL  for  this  article  :http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/uttar-­pradesh-­on-­socio-­economic-­parameters/1/205359.html

@  Copyright  2010  India  Today  Group.