why the cod shortage? what are the alternatives?tably russia. spain. portugal. francc. and sweden....

5
MFR PAPER 1014 Cod prices have been rising and will probably continue to rise. Th e following article tells why. Why the Cod Shortage? What are the Alternatives? DONALD R. WHITAKER INTRODUCTION In recent years it has become in- creasingly eviden t that the re is a grow- ing short age of the traditional spec ies of North Atl a ntic gro undfish a nd more particul a rl y of cod a nd h ad d ock. For examp le, in 1 97 1 th e U.S . market exper ie n ced a co ntinuin g short age of cod blocks a nd fillet s . Bi ol og ists are of the view that it is not possible to in crease the landin gs of cod a nd other g roundfish in the o rth Atlantic to any significant de g ree . Therefore , th e prospects for s uppl y, bo th in the s hort run a nd in the long run , do not appear to be very en courag in g . Demand for cod, h oweve r, co ntinu es to be s tr ong in a ll cod marke ts. Durin g 1970, 1 97 I, a nd 1 97'2, prices of m ost gro und - fish pr od uct s in the U.S . market und er- went a sha rp increase . In pa rticul ar, the price of cod blocks has been o n a tead y up sw in g, h aving near ly tripled s inc e the s umm er of 1969. The major questions which emerge hid es two divergent tr ends . First, th e ca tch from 1960 to its peak in 1968 incr eased at a rate of -t o I perc ent per yea r. Si n ce 1968 it h a been de c linin g at a rate of 8.3 percent per year (T ab le I ). Although 1 97'2 data are not avail- a ble for a ll co untri es. th e ca tch was probabl y a little less th an in 1 97 1. Much of the catch of co d is not ava il ab le for expo rt to th e United States market. Some co untri es utili ze a ll th eir landin gs for their domestic markets . For th ese co untri es, ri ing prices h ave not caused th em to dive rt are: h ow can the growi ng demand of 2 cod blocks a nd fi lI ets be met a nd what are the a ltern a ti ve so ur ces of supply for cod') 1 WORLD LANDINGS OF COD Donald R. Whitaker is a mem- ber of the s taff of the Fisher) Product s Research and Inspec- tion Division, NOAA, NMFS, Was hington , DC 20235. co d fr om their dome ti c markets to the Uni ted States. Severa l co untri es, no- t ab ly Russia. Spain. Po rtu ga l. Francc . a nd Sweden. take a s ub s tanti al part of the At la ntic cod, but hip littl e, if any, to the United States. Th eir h are of th e cod ca tch has been runnin g 30 to 40 percent of the wor ld total. The bottom part of Fig ur e I sh ows th e catch from II coun tries which no rm a l- ly s hip so mc cod to th e United Stat es plus the U. S. catc h. Of th e I I , IX co untri es regul ar ly s uppl y over thr ee- fourt hs of o ur bloc k imp orts. Of th e total world ca tch, we h ave imp ort possibilities for o nl y a little ove r half of the catch . ote al so th at the catc h in the se I I countries has n ot risen as fast as th e world catc h. nor has it dropped as much in r ece nt years. One co nclusion that we can draw h ere i that we have littl e chance of buying a good part of th e wo rld cod ca tch, eve n though prices h ave risen sharply. Of th o e I I co untri es whi ch n orma l- ly s hip some co d to the Unit ed States, let us see h ow U nit ed States consump- ti on has compa red with their catches (Fig ur e 2). The cod catc h in those The ove rall trend in world cod landi ng s sh ows an incr ease of on ly 1.3 percent per year sin ce 1960 (F ig- ur e I). H oweve r. the long-r un tr e nd Figure 1. - World cod landings , 1960-71.

Upload: others

Post on 20-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Why the Cod Shortage? What are the Alternatives?tably Russia. Spain. Portugal. Francc. and Sweden. take a substantial part ... fourths of our block imports. Of the to al world ca c

MFR PAPER 1014

Cod prices have been rising and will probably continue to rise . Th e following article tells why.

Why the Cod Shortage? What are the Alternatives?

DONALD R. WHITAKER

INTRODUCTION

In recent years it has become in­creasingly eviden t th at th e re is a grow­ing sho rt age of the traditional species of North Atl a ntic groundfi sh a nd more particul a rl y of cod and haddock. For example, in 197 1 th e U.S . market exper ie nced a continuin g sho rt age of cod blocks a nd fillet s . Bi ologists are of th e view that it is not poss ible to increase the landings of cod and o th er groundfish in the o rth Atlantic to any signi fica nt degree . Therefore, th e prospects fo r suppl y, both in th e short run and in the long run , do not appear to be very encouragin g . Demand for cod, howeve r , continues to be stro ng in a ll cod markets. Durin g 1970, 197 I , a nd 197'2, prices of most ground -fish products in the U.S . market under-went a sha rp increase . In pa rticul a r, th e price of cod blocks has been o n a teady upsw in g, having near ly tripled

since th e summer of 1969. The major questions which emerge

hides two divergent trends . F irs t, th e ca tch from 1960 to its peak in 1968 increased at a rate o f -to I percent per year .

Si nce 1968 it ha been dec lining at a ra te o f 8.3 percent per yea r (T able I). A lth ough 197'2 d ata a re not avai l­a ble for a ll countri es. th e catch was probabl y a littl e less th a n in 197 1.

Much of the catch of cod is not ava il ab le fo r ex port to th e United States market. Some countri es utili ze a ll th eir landings for their domestic markets . F o r th ese countri es, ri ing prices have no t caused th em to dive rt

are: how can th e growi ng demand of 2

cod blocks and fi lI e ts be met and what a re the a lterna ti ve sources of supply for cod')

1

WORLD LANDINGS OF COD

Donald R. Whitaker is a mem­ber of the staff of the Fisher) Products Resea rch and Inspec­tion Division , NOAA, NMFS, Washington , DC 20235.

cod from their do me ti c m ark ets to th e Uni ted States. Severa l countri es, no­tably Ru ss ia. Spain. Po rtu ga l. Francc. a nd Sweden. take a substanti a l part o f the At lantic cod, but hip littl e, if any, to the United States. Th eir hare o f th e cod ca tch has been runnin g 30 to 40 pe rce nt of th e wor ld to tal. The bottom part o f Figure I shows th e catch from II coun t ries which no rm a l­ly ship so mc cod to th e United States plus th e U .S. catch . Of th e I I , IX

countri es regul ar ly suppl y over three­fourt hs of our block impo rts. Of th e to ta l world ca tc h, we have import possibilities for o nl y a little ove r ha lf of th e catch . o te a lso th a t th e catch in these I I countries has not risen as fast as th e world catch . nor has it dropped as much in recent years. One conclus io n th at we can draw here i th a t we have littl e chance of buying a good part of th e wo rld cod ca tch , even though prices have risen sharply.

Of th o e I I countri es which normal­ly ship some cod to the U nit ed States, let us see how U nited States consump­ti o n has compared with their catches (Figure 2). The cod catch in those

The overall trend in world cod landi ngs shows an increase of on ly 1.3 pe rcent per year since 1960 (F ig­ure I). Howeve r. the lo ng-run trend Figure 1. - World cod landings , 1960-71.

Page 2: Why the Cod Shortage? What are the Alternatives?tably Russia. Spain. Portugal. Francc. and Sweden. take a substantial part ... fourths of our block imports. Of the to al world ca c

Table 1.- World cod landings (1 ,010 III.ric tOftS live wei""t) 'or selected years .

Counlry

Canada Denmark Faroe Is Greenland Iceland Norway Poland St P,erre-M,quelon Sc otland U .K . (Eng & Wales) W Germany U .S.A Subto tal

Belgium Cuba France E Germany Ireland Neth erlands Portugal Romania Spain Sweden USSR Subtotal TOTA L

ATLANTI C

Canada Japan Korea U S.A USSR TOTAL

PACI FIC

GRAND TOTAL

... .l..l.l.

1960 1962 l1li4 1966 1968 1970 1971

--------- -- -------------- Atlantic Cod - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2747 3206 315 .5 3064 58.4 62 .9 68 .3 897 841 116 3 Hl3 2 90 .8 286 3tl3 231 30 .0

2434 2234 260 7 231 .5 213 .5 296 S 2114 6 291 1

51 1 472 535 1058 44 29 38 49

41 0 476 55 6 557 273 .6 3379 305 8 33 1 3 922 200 1 1763 2079 183 21 3 176 170

1.3833 1.7 f3 0 1.1280 1.762 1

9 .8 148 104 209 12

66.2 1726 Hi4 7 1764 451 689

13 10 16 2 .3 72 8 2 11 2 237

617 217 ti 2278 202 .3

598 1994 221 2 2327 294 368 254 293

5312 1.IU 1.ijj :

3572 7666 1 1149

2 .1499 2 ,971 9 2 .176 i 2 .877 0

- . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pa cifiC Cod

24 67 7

18 24

12 .0

86 .3

2.2362

20 54 76 1 ii 3

1 4 1.5 1.4 29 9 .3 4 .9

902 110 .0

3.0621 2.710 .8

tr _ QU. tries 11 rnlslJ..Y exportin som cod t. . S .

10 .5 i68 22 4 .5 64

1102

2.9872

323. 1 262 .8 244 .5 1074 968 1334 80.9 71 2 61.4 21 3 205 19 .9

2346 3083 2550 3884 456 .6 489 .5 1552 1262 881

22 22 18 691 546 57.4

378.4 3599 3098 2742 1908 1976 223 24 1 240

2 .057 1 1.9740 1.8824

281 122 23 .8 9

209 .2 140 .9 124 .3 347

3 .5 3 .2 40 314 253 46 .9

219.4 1987 1527 50 28

3297 268 1 2549 309 228 220

986 .3 448.4 2830 18394 1.5054 9491

3.896 .5 3.0986 2 .831 .5

- . ---------- - -- - -- -- - -

6 .2 2 .8 4 .8 109 .5 1171 948

22 28 31 27 1 .3 2 .9

222 616 1012

142 .8 185 .6 2068

4.039 .3 3.2842 3038 .3

).s . cor consump_t_i-"n---------l

00 60 6M 69 70 71

Figure 2. - U.S. saare of av~e cod , 1960-71 .

2

countri e shipping to th e nit ed Sta tes has been increasing by 2.8 percent per yea r(1 960-7 1).

H wever, United States cod con­sumption (fi ll et and blocks) has bee n increa ing by 8 .3 percent per yea r ( 1960-72). In 1960, we took 11.9 per­cen t of their catch . By 197 1 we took 20.8 percent .

PRICE

What ha!> been the effect o n c d price. give n the rise and fal l in cod la ndi ngs? One com pari o n we can make is between the world catch and th e Boston Market ews price for cod blocks . As th e catch turned up in th e mid-1960·. cod block prices dipped in 1966 and 1967 (Figure 3). Pri ces in 1968 and 1969 held about stead y . ince 1969. price ha ve moved inversely with cod suppli es. which i ""hat yOU would e\pect. Although the direction in price wa probably no surpri se. th e magnitude of price in­creases wa fantastic . i nce 196 . th e world cod uppl y has dropped 2-+ .8 percent. but th e price of cod blocks has nearly tripl ed. In ea rly Jun e 1973. cod blocks were se lling for 65 cents per pound compared with 2 I to 22 cent at the ame time in 1969.

SUPPLY-DEMAND RELATION

In 1960. the world suppl y of cod was 13 .6 ti mes greater th an .S. consumptio n. This ratio dropped steadi I)' and by 1966 the wo rld sup­pl y was onl y 8 times greate r than our consumpti o n. The figures went up in 1967 and 1968 becau e of th e big

jumps in world catches. Th ey have now fallen to th e point where in 197 1 th e world suppl y was o nl y 7 . 1 times grea ter than U .S. consumption .

ow let us look at the same ra ti os for th e top 6 uppliers o f cod to the U nit ed States. They are orway. Ice­land . Canada. Denmark-Greenland. Po la nd , a nd West Germany. In 1960. th e ir catches were nearly 6 times our consumption. The ratio has dropped steadil y to the point where. in 1971.

Page 3: Why the Cod Shortage? What are the Alternatives?tably Russia. Spain. Portugal. Francc. and Sweden. take a substantial part ... fourths of our block imports. Of the to al world ca c

Ulli on tons Cents per pc...1na

fO

3. 5 1---------------'=::::....;= ------ 60

o

3. 0 40

/

,.,,.,----........... ~/// ----------,., , ....... -------'

30

) ------------< 20

Price of Blocks 10

) . 0 '------'---'----'-----'---'----'-----'----'-----'------'---'-_ _ , 0 1900 "1 03 b4 ho b7 b8 69 70 71 7'<

Figure 3.-:-World catch (1960-71) and price (1960-72) of cOd .

Times U.S. consumption

..., p sv.ppliers

- \ -

'3 r7 g 7') 7'<

Figure 4.-Ratio of cod supply to U.S. consumption , 1960-71.

catches by o ur top suppli e rs were on ly 3.5 tim es o ur co nsumpti o n . Our cod con umpti o n is increasing faster than th e world catch a nd much faster than the ca tc h of countri es whi c h normall y suppl y us (F igure 4).

Such a suppl y-dema nd ~ itu at i on can o nl y lead to o ne thin g-and th at is higher prices . A lthough it appears that th e cod catch has leve led off near it s maximum susta inable yield. the m ajor prod uc in g countri es still have great fl ex ibilit y a to the utili zat io n

of cod production. Even if production i rel ative ly stable in the years to

come. the major producing countrie~ can increase their cod revenues by continually adjusting their production to th e products whi ch they feel will bring the highest prices o n th e wor ld market. They have four major product categories:

I. Fresh-drawn and fillets. 2. Frozen-fi ll et and blocks. 3. Dry ing for s tockfl sh . -I . Salting.

3

If their goa l is to produce the right mix of products to ma\.imize returns. th is requires the major producer to

plan in advance. 0 later than in December, the major U.S. suppli er shou ld ha ve ana lyzed the demand for the various cod product in the major consuming nation for the following yea r. The world cod season is fairly short. By the end of Jul y in Canada. the world cod season is just about over . a nd cod suppli es are relatively fixed for the last half of the year.

WORLD TRADE

Not on ly is the United States buying more cod. but also th e whole wor ld is buying more. Since 1960. the ca tch of cod has increased 12 percent. But , the world trade in cod. as re­ported by the Food and Agriculture Organization of th e United Nation (FAO)' has increased by 53 percent. This would indica te that demand i increasing faster than supply. In eco nomic terms. we would say th at demand and supply are in balance. But. they have been coming into bal­a nce at higher prices . especially in the last four or five year.

World trade in cod has risen from a third of the catch in 1960 to nearly half in 1970. The e tatistics come from F AO data.

If you take a ll the e:-..port data a nd convert it back to the approximate li ve weigh t to make it comparable with the catch. you find that trade in dried a nd sa lted cod till e\.ceeds that in fresh a nd frozen cod (Figure 5). The

Million Ions

• Fresh ond Frozen D Dned ond Salted

Catch Catch

Figure 5.--Cod catch and yolume of trade (by types of processing) compared for 1950, 1960, and 1970.

Page 4: Why the Cod Shortage? What are the Alternatives?tably Russia. Spain. Portugal. Francc. and Sweden. take a substantial part ... fourths of our block imports. Of the to al world ca c

tre nd appea r th at th is wi II no t be so fo r ve ry much lo nger . In 195 0 , fresh a nd fr ozen was about a fou rt h o f th e tr ade. T his rose to a th ird in 1960 a nd nea rl y ha lf in 1970 . J ust in the pas t decade th e trade in cod has gone fr o m 1 to I in favo r of dri ed and salted to nea rl y 50-50 . A noth er po in t th a t is int e restin g to no te is th e wo rld trade in dri ed a nd sa lted cod . Afte r decl ini ng fo r many yea rs, it has been on the re­boun d in recent yea rs. In 1950, nearly ha lf of th e wo rld ca tch ended up as ex po rts of d ri ed a nd sa lted cod . Th e trade of dri ed a nd salted cod dec lined d uring th e 1950' , but in th e 1960's it sta rt ed to ri se slowly . Trade in dr ied a nd sa lted cod has not been growing a fas t as froze n cod in recent yea rs, but th e fac t that it is h igher now th an 10 yea rs ago is impo rt ant. With the re la ti vely fi xed supp ly o f cod, eve ry poun d th a t goes fo r dryin g o r sa ltin g is taki ng away fro m th e frozen t rade .

In No rway, -+ 9 pe rcent of th e cod catc h was frozen in 1970 ; in 197 1 th is dro pped to 38 percent. N orway sa lted 13 pe rcent o f its cod catch in 1969 : !.7 pe rcent in 1970 ; and 40 pe rcent in 197 I . Th e same patt ern is ev ide nt in Icela nd. In 1969. Iceland a lted 16 percent o f it s cod ca tch; th is rose to 18 pe rcent in 1970; and 36 pe rcent in 197 1.

Alth ough the United States buys more cod th an any other country, it is inte res ting to see w hich countr ies a re the principal purchase rs of cod- in othe r \\ord , who a re our competito rs .

I n fresh and frozen cod , we are by fa r th e la rgest purchasers ; however, we take o nl y a litt le ove r h alf o f thi s trade (Figure 6). The U nit ed Kin gdom purchases nearly 300 m illi o n pounds , o n a li ve we ight bas is, and Sweden 100 milli o n pounds. Seve ra l cou nt ries import c lose to 50 m ill io n pounds.

Brazil is the la rgest purchaser of dri ed and sa lt ed cod , fo llowed by Po rtu gal a nd It a ly (F igure 7) . Th e maj or ma r l-ets a re outhe rn Euro pe,

o uth Amer ica, th e C a ri bbean , a nd fric a . T he surpri ing th ing is th a t

q uantiti e and prices o f salted cod to these areas ha been inc reas ing in

9

";;:..

'1' Q

t;;:

'" 4 .~,. ~

Il!~! "-"-

~ ..J

~

" '" ;'i :3 1:'

~ ~ '" '"

Figure 6.-Major importers 01 fresh and frozen cod , 1970.

4

Figure 7.-Major importers of dried and salted cod , 1970 .

recent yea rs . T hese a re no t th e mos t afA uent a reas o f the wo rl d , ye t they a re paying su bstanti a l pri ces fo r sa lt cod . T he facts a re tha t we are co m­pe ti ng with J amaica , Po rtu ga l, Ita ly,

igeri a , Brazil, and ma ny o th er cou n­tri es fo r th e wo rl d suppl y of cod . A nd our co mpeti tors a re gettin g th e ir sha re.

T o su mm arize thi a rea of catch , trade , and consumptio n, let us look a t th e la test ava il ab le data fo r 1970 . O ut of a ca tch of 3 .3 milli on to ns, 44 per­cent we nt in to fo re ign trade and 56 pe rce nt o f th e cod was consumed in th e country whi ch caught it. Out of th e to tal fo re ign trade in cod , th e

4

U nit ed Sta tes took 28 pe rcent , which means nearl y three- fo urth s of th e trade is w ith o th e r countri es. When yo u add th e U nited Sta tes impo rt s and its ca tch o f cod , thi s indi ca tes we con­sume about 13 percent o f th e wo rld cod catch .

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES

Wh at d o we do whe n we see cod suppli es runnin g ho rt ? Th e obvious first step is to seek new sources o ther th a n th e s ix count r ies whi ch suppl y most o f our cod bloc ks . Recentl y new uppli e rs o f cod blocks have emerged­

Argen ti na , Belgiu m , F rance , Fin land , ether lands, Pa nama, Ro ma ni a , and

Sweden . C o mbined , th e count ries prov ided only a m ill io n pou nds--400 ,000 o f wh ich was fro m Ro ma nia . This is no t ve ry e ncouraging.

Ca n we inc rease our impo rts of o ther groundfish species we no r mall y use? F igure 8 shows th e wo rl d catch fo r hadd ock and ocean perch . e ither speci es has th e growth po tenti a l to ind icate tha t we can expect substanti a l increases in the e u pp li es . It is a lso dou btful th at we will be seeing any su bs tan ti a l increases in world Aounder la ndin gs .

T here a re some species th a t U.S. p roce sors a re turning to--whitin g a nd po ll ock . F igure 9 shows th e whitin g ca tch in South Afr ica a nd Arge ntina . It in c rea ed su bstanti a ll y in 1970 and 197 I . The whit ing ca tch in th ese two count r ies is o nl y 6.7 percent of th e cur re nt wo rld ca tch of cod .

The spec ies which seems mos t like ly to take up th e future slac k between th e growing demand a nd sta ble suppl y of cod is A las ka poll ock caught by J a pan. T he growth in J a pa nese Al as ka po ll ock ca tches h a been ph eno menal. I t is now eq ui va lent to about 80 to 85 pe r­cent o f th e world cod ca tch . The J apa­nese A laska po ll oc k ca tch . in 1971 was a bout 1 .6 milli on tons . T o put thi s in pe rspec t ive. th e J a pa nese ca tch of thi s one spec ies- Al as ka po llock- was 11 pe rcent greate r th an th e entire U nit ed Sta tes ca tch o f edible

Page 5: Why the Cod Shortage? What are the Alternatives?tably Russia. Spain. Portugal. Francc. and Sweden. take a substantial part ... fourths of our block imports. Of the to al world ca c

Th lusend tons

600

600

400

"00

o 19S0

Hedd,

\ ..... - -.... ' -, - , ..... _ - ',-- /,- / ----'''' (' ",/ ,,. ... __ <I

Ocean Perch

19<;S 1960 1970

Figure 8. - World catch of haddock and ocean perch , 1950-70 .

Figure 9. - Whiting catch from Argentina and South Afri ca , 1960-7 1.

normall ) put about half thclr Id\h.J poll och. i nto fi h mcal and thc lllha hal f I nto uri mi . I n 1971 thc J apanc\c started puttin g ~mall quantltlc~ l)t Al a h. a poll ock int o ti h bloch. \\ c rece ived 1.9 m illi on pounds of l a~ h. a

poll ock blocks from Japan In 197 I L ast yea r poll och. bloc h. from Japan j umped to 32.0 milll n pound

Anoth er alt ern ati\ e I!> m i nced bloch.~ which have been ava il able fo r about 15 year . and mo t were madc Into fi h cake or econd grade nsh tl ch. \ . A few yea rs ago be tter debonlng equipment became a\ ail ab lc and quality has il11pro \ ed s me",h at In the pa t coupl e o f yea rs. th eir u c h a~ increa ed sub tanti all ). In additi on to takin g up ome of the ~ I ac h. In fi ll et block suppli e , the) can al 0 be u~ed when the pri ce f blocks I n ~lng

fa ter th an the pri ce of nnished pro­ducts.

CONCLUSION

It is po sibl e to conclude "'Ith a relati ve ly opt im isti c outl ooh. . The tran iti on f rom cod to po ll och. 1\ de­finitel ) underway a\ 1\ the gro\\ Ing \ arie t) of p rodu c t ~ coming trom mi nced blocks. T hi hould ea\e the uppl y pre ure on cod bloch. . I f the

Japane e pollock quality Imprl)\C\. i f h.inning machin e are de\cloped fo r whit i ng. and If the quallt) of minced blocks imprO\e , It IS po \Iblc th at suppl ies of bloch. v. il l be ample fo r .S. trade need for the remainder of th e 70' .

Th e . . bloc h. marh.et ha hcen

and industri al fi h . Th e Japanese ca tch more than hal f thei r poll ock off A laska . Thei r poll ock ca tch in th e Berin g Sea

In 1972 w as 1.6 mil li on to ns. Th e ent ire .S. catch or edibl e fi h in 1972 wa .0 mi ll ion tons. The Japane e

e'\pandin g by 20 million pound\ pLr ,ear . Poll ock . \,h l t ing. and 1l1lnLcd bloc k hould be able to mect thl\ rate and e\ en e'\pand It

MFR Paper 1014, from Marine Fisheries Review , Vol . 35 . No. 11 , November . 1973. Copies of th is paper. in limited numbers . are available from 0 83, Technical InformatIOn Division , Environmental Science InformatIOn Center. NOAA , Wash ington , D.C. 20235.

5