why one modality stands out from the rest

1
Invasiveness Accuracy Most Invasive Least Accurate Most Accurate Least Invasive 3M Bair Hugger Temperature Monitoring System • Pulmonary Artery • Bladder • Rectal Forehead Skin • Tympanic (Infrared) • Axilla • Temporal Artery (Infrared) Sunlingual / Oral • • Tympanic (contact) • Esophageal / Nasopharyngeal 30% 2% When temperature was not monitored, 30% of patients with a MH episode died. 8,9 If core temperature monitoring was used, the risk of death was reduced to 2% (P = 0.0012). 8,9 Temperature monitoring trade-offs Most current technologies are unable to non-invasively and accurately measure core body temperature. The 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System can do both, allowing you to improve active warming practices. You can only manage what you can accurately measure. The future of non-invasive temperature monitoring is here The Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System is the first accurate, non-invasive solution that allows you to easily monitor core body temperature consistently throughout the perioperative journey. 3M Health Care Medical Solutions Division P.O. Box 5757 London, Ontario N6A 4T1 Canada 1-800-364-3577 www.3M.ca 3M Health Care 2510 Conway Avenue St. Paul, MN 55144 U.S.A. 1-800-228-3957 www.bairhugger.com 3M, Bair Hugger and the Bair Hugger logo are trademarks of 3M. Used under license in Canada. © 2018, 3M. All rights reserved. 1809-12968 E Pre-op Intra-op Post-op The sensor remains on the patient throughout the perioperative journey, but may be disconnected from and reconnected to the control unit as needed. Technology that’s more than skin deep Monitor with confidence Eliminates the potential of trauma from invasive modalities 16,17 Clinically equivalent to invasive methods 15 One sensor, one proven solution Now there is one accurate 18 , consistent 19 , non-invasive 20 temperature monitoring solution 21 that can help you maintain normothermia across the patient journey and improve patient outcomes. 3M Bair Hugger Designed to be different. One modality eliminates variability Displays current and 2-hour temperature trends Directly beneath the sensor, an isothermal pathway forms, allowing the deep tissue temperature to rise to the skin surface. Isothermal pathway Why one modality stands out from the rest for measuring patient core temperature. Core body temperature is a critical vital sign that should be monitored throughout the perioperative journey Proactively monitoring temperature with a consistent, accurate and non-invasive system is the only true way to own the normothermic temperature zone (36.0ºC - 37.5ºC) 1,2 and help to protect patients from unintended perioperative hypothermia. The importance of measuring and monitoring core temperature Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is defined as a core body temperature of less than 36.0ºC, which can: Inadequate monitoring of core temperature can increase the risk of death associated with malignant hyperthermia (MH). 8,9 The Bair Hugger temperature monitoring system makes it possible to get accurate readings throughout the entire perioperative journey with a single sensor. Global guidelines: ORNAC 10 Suggests using the same method of temperature monitoring throughout the surgical journey and considers core temperature monitoring to be most accurate ASPAN 11 Recommends the use of one modality throughout the perioperative journey NICE 12 Recommends continuous temperature monitoring DGAI 13 Recommends continuous core temperature monitoring with a consistent method CAS 14 Strongly recommends monitoring patient core temperatures during cases of general and neuraxial regional anesthesia lasting 30 minutes or longer Teunissen LPJ. Measurement and manipulation of body temperature in rest and exercise. Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit – PhD Thesis; 2012. Adhesive backing Patient temperature thermistor Insulating foam layer Insulating foam layer Flex circuit Above image shows the inverse direction of how the product appears when in-use. Zero heat flux technology produces near-perfect insulation, so heat cannot escape from the skin surface, creating an isothermal pathway. For further information on how the Bair Hugger temperature monitoring system can help your facility improve patient outcomes, please visit: www.bairhugger.com or contact your local 3M representative. Fight SSIs from every angle. Extend recovery time 6 Lead to increased mortality 5 Cause patient discomfort 7 Increase surgical blood loss 4 Increase the rate of SSIs 3 1 Schroeck, H.; Lyden, A.K.; Benedict, W.L.; Ramachandran, S.K. Time Trends and Predictors of Abnormal Postoperative Body Temperature in Infants Transported to the Intensive Care Unit. Anesthesiology Research and Practice. 2016: 7318137. 2 Hooper, V.D.; Chard, R.; Clifford, T.; Fetzer, S.; Fossum, S.; Godden, B.; Martinez, E.A.; Noble, K.A.; O’Brien, D.; Odom-Forren, J.; Peterson, C.; Ross, J.; Wilson, L. ASPAN’s Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for the Promotion of Perioperative Normothermia: Second Edition. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, Vol. 25, No. 6 (December), 2010: pp. 346-365. 3 Kurz, A.; Sessler, D.I.; Lenhardt, R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. NEJM. 1996 May 9; 334(19): 1209-16. Melling, A.C.; Ali, B.; Scott, E.M.; Leaper, D.J. Effects of preoperative warming on the incidence of wound infection after clean surgery: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2001 Sep. 15; 358(9285): 876-80. Scott, A.V.; Stonemetz, J.L.; Wasey, J.O.; Johnson, D.J.; Rivers, R.J.; Koch, C.G.; et al. (2015) Compliance with Surgical Care Improvement Project for Body Temperature Management (SCIP Inf-10) is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes. Anesthesiology 123: 116-125. 4 Schmied, H.; Reiter, A.; Kurz, A.; Sessler, D.I.; Kozek, S. Mild hypothermia increases blood loss and transfusion requirements during total hip arthroplasty. The Lancet. 1996 Feb. 3; 347(8997): 289-92. 5 Bush, H. Jr.; Hydo, J.; Fischer, E.; et al. Hypothermia during elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: The high price of avoidable morbidity. J. Vasc. Surg. 1995; 21(3): 392-402. 6 Lenhardt, R.; Marker, E.; Goll, V.; et al. Mild intraoperative hypothermia prolongs postanesthetic recovery. Anesth. 1997; 87: 1318-23. 7 Sessler, D.I. Current Concepts: Mild perioperative hypothermia. NEJM, 1997. Vol. 336, No. 24, pp. 1730-1737. 8 Larach, M.G.; Brandom, B.W.; Allen, G.C.; Gronert, G.A.; Lehman, E.B. Malignant Hyperthermia Deaths Related to Inadequate Temperature Monitoring, 2007-2012: A Report from The North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2014; 119(6): 1359-1366. 9 Shafer, S.L.; Dexter, F.; Brull, S.J. Deadly Heat: Economics of Continuous Temperature Monitoring During General Anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2014; 119(6): 1235-1237. 10 Operating Room Nurses Association of Canada. 11 American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. 12 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 13 German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. 14 Canadian Anesthesiologist Society. 15 <0.28˚C error between Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitor and a nasopharyngeal probe. <0.28˚C error between Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitor and a pulmonary artery catheter. 16 Insler, S.R.; Sessler, D.I. Perioperative thermoregulation and temperature monitoring. 2006. Anesthesiology Clinics, (24): 823- 837. 17 Cereda, M.; Maccioli, G,A. Intraoperative temperature monitoring. 2004. International Anesthesiology Clinics, (42)2: 41-54. 18 LAB-SUPPORT-05-237254 (2011-055) The 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System vs Oral vs Rectal Thermometer Clinical Comparison Testing. LAB-SUPPORT-05-237256 (2011-071) Thermometer Performance Criteria Verification Testing. Publication: Iden T, Horn, E.-P.; Bein, B.; Böhm, R.; Beese, J. and Höcker, J. Intraoperative temperature monitoring with zero heat flux technology (3M™ SpotOn™ Sensor) in comparison with sublingual nasopharyngeal temperature. 2015. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol, 32: 387-391. 19 LAB-SUPPORT-05-237253 (Dec. 20, 2012) Clinical Usability Study. 20 LAB-SUPPORT-05-237436 Perioperative Thermoregulation and Temperature Monitoring; Publication: Insler, S.R.; Sessler, D.I. Perioperative thermoregulation and temperature monitoring. 2006. Anesthesiology Clinics, (24): 823-837. LAB- SUPPORT-05-237440 Intraoperative Temperature Monitoring; Publication: Cereda M, & Maccioli GA. Intraoperative temperature monitoring. 2004. International Anesthesiology Clinics, (42)2: 41-54. Rationale: The 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring device is a non-invasive temperature monitoring system, as compared to other systems that measure core temperature invasively, e.g. Esophageal and Rectal methods. 21 LAB-SUPPORT-05-237254 (2011-055) The 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System vs Oral vs Rectal Thermometer Clinical Comparison Testing. LAB-SUPPORT-05-348142 White paper: Al Van Duren, The equivalency of the terms deep tissue and core temperature.

Upload: others

Post on 23-Jan-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Why one modality stands out from the rest

Invasiveness

Acc

urac

y

Most Invasive

Leas

t Acc

urat

eM

ost A

ccur

ate

Least Invasive

3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System

• Pulmonary Artery

• Bladder

• Rectal

Forehead Skin •

Tympanic (Infrared) •

Axilla • •Temporal Artery (Infrared)

Sunlingual / Oral •

• Tympanic (contact)• Esophageal / Nasopharyngeal

30% 2%

When temperature was not monitored, 30% of patients with a MH episode died.8,9

If core temperature monitoring was used, the risk of death was reduced to 2% (P = 0.0012).8,9

Temperature monitoring trade-offsMost current technologies are unable to non-invasively and accurately measure core body temperature. The 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System can do both, allowing you to improve active warming practices. You can only manage what you can accurately measure.

The future of non-invasive temperature monitoring is hereThe Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System is the first accurate, non-invasive solution that allows you to easily monitor core body temperature consistently throughout the perioperative journey.

3M Health CareMedical Solutions DivisionP.O. Box 5757 London, Ontario N6A 4T1Canada1-800-364-3577www.3M.ca

3M Health Care2510 Conway AvenueSt. Paul, MN 55144 U.S.A.1-800-228-3957www.bairhugger.com

3M, Bair Hugger and the Bair Hugger logo are trademarks of 3M. Used under license in Canada. © 2018, 3M. All rights reserved. 1809-12968 E

Pre-op Intra-op Post-op

The sensor remains on the patient throughout the perioperative journey, but may be disconnected from and reconnected to the control unit as needed.

Technology that’s more than skin deep

Monitor with confidence

Eliminates the potential of trauma from invasive modalities16,17

Clinically equivalent to invasive methods15

One sensor, one proven solution Now there is one accurate18, consistent19, non-invasive20 temperature monitoring solution21 that can help you maintain normothermia across the patient journey and improve patient outcomes.

3M™ Bair Hugger™

Designed to be different.

One modality eliminates variability

Displays current and 2-hour temperature trends

Directly beneath the sensor, an isothermal pathway forms, allowing the deep tissue temperature to rise to the skin surface.

Isothermalpathway

Why one modality stands out from the rest for measuring patient core temperature.

Core body temperature is a critical vital sign that should be monitored throughout the perioperative journeyProactively monitoring temperature with a consistent, accurate and non-invasive system is the only true way to own the normothermic temperature zone (36.0ºC - 37.5ºC)1,2 and help to protect patients from unintended perioperative hypothermia.

The importance of measuring and monitoring core temperatureInadvertent perioperative hypothermia is defined as a core body temperature of less than 36.0ºC, which can:

Inadequate monitoring of core temperature can increase the risk of death associated with malignant hyperthermia (MH).8,9

The Bair Hugger temperature monitoring system makes it possible to get accurate readings throughout the entire perioperative journey with a single sensor.

Global guidelines:

ORNAC10 Suggests using the same method of temperature monitoring throughout the surgical journey and considers core temperature monitoring to be most accurate

ASPAN11 Recommends the use of one modality throughout the perioperative journey

NICE12 Recommends continuous temperature monitoring

DGAI13 Recommends continuous core temperature monitoring with a consistent method

CAS14 Strongly recommends monitoring patient core temperatures during cases of general and neuraxial regional anesthesia lasting 30 minutes or longer

Teunissen LPJ. Measurement and manipulation of body temperature in rest and exercise. Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit – PhD Thesis; 2012.

Adhesive backing

Patient temperature thermistor

Insulating foam layer

Insulating foam layer

Flex circuit

Above image shows the inverse direction of how the product appears when in-use.

Zero heat flux technology produces near-perfect insulation, so heat cannot escape from the skin surface, creating an isothermal pathway.

For further information on how the Bair Hugger temperature monitoring system can help your facility improve patient outcomes, please visit: www.bairhugger.com or contact your local 3M representative.

Fight SSIs from every angle.

Extend recovery time6

Lead to increased mortality5

Cause patient discomfort7

Increase surgical blood loss4

Increase the rate of SSIs3

1 Schroeck, H.; Lyden, A.K.; Benedict, W.L.; Ramachandran, S.K. Time Trends and Predictors of Abnormal Postoperative Body Temperature in Infants Transported to the Intensive Care Unit. Anesthesiology Research and Practice. 2016: 7318137.

2 Hooper, V.D.; Chard, R.; Clifford, T.; Fetzer, S.; Fossum, S.; Godden, B.; Martinez, E.A.; Noble, K.A.; O’Brien, D.; Odom-Forren, J.; Peterson, C.; Ross, J.; Wilson, L. ASPAN’s Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for the Promotion of Perioperative Normothermia: Second Edition. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, Vol. 25, No. 6 (December), 2010: pp. 346-365.

3 Kurz, A.; Sessler, D.I.; Lenhardt, R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. NEJM. 1996 May 9; 334(19): 1209-16. Melling, A.C.; Ali, B.; Scott, E.M.; Leaper, D.J. Effects of preoperative warming on the incidence of wound infection after clean surgery: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2001 Sep. 15; 358(9285): 876-80. Scott, A.V.; Stonemetz, J.L.; Wasey, J.O.; Johnson, D.J.; Rivers, R.J.; Koch, C.G.; et al. (2015) Compliance with Surgical Care Improvement Project for Body Temperature Management (SCIP Inf-10) is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes. Anesthesiology 123: 116-125.

4 Schmied, H.; Reiter, A.; Kurz, A.; Sessler, D.I.; Kozek, S. Mild hypothermia increases blood loss and transfusion requirements during total hip arthroplasty. The Lancet. 1996 Feb. 3; 347(8997): 289-92.

5 Bush, H. Jr.; Hydo, J.; Fischer, E.; et al. Hypothermia during elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: The high price of avoidable morbidity. J. Vasc. Surg. 1995; 21(3): 392-402.

6 Lenhardt, R.; Marker, E.; Goll, V.; et al. Mild intraoperative hypothermia prolongs postanesthetic recovery. Anesth. 1997; 87: 1318-23.

7 Sessler, D.I. Current Concepts: Mild perioperative hypothermia. NEJM, 1997. Vol. 336, No. 24, pp. 1730-1737. 8 Larach, M.G.; Brandom, B.W.; Allen, G.C.; Gronert, G.A.; Lehman, E.B. Malignant Hyperthermia Deaths Related to Inadequate

Temperature Monitoring, 2007-2012: A Report from The North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2014; 119(6): 1359-1366.

9 Shafer, S.L.; Dexter, F.; Brull, S.J. Deadly Heat: Economics of Continuous Temperature Monitoring During General Anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2014; 119(6): 1235-1237.

10 Operating Room Nurses Association of Canada.11 American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses.12 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 13 German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. 14 Canadian Anesthesiologist Society.15 <0.28˚C error between Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitor and a nasopharyngeal probe. <0.28˚C error between Bair Hugger™

Temperature Monitor and a pulmonary artery catheter.16 Insler, S.R.; Sessler, D.I. Perioperative thermoregulation and temperature monitoring. 2006. Anesthesiology Clinics, (24): 823-

837.17 Cereda, M.; Maccioli, G,A. Intraoperative temperature monitoring. 2004. International Anesthesiology Clinics, (42)2: 41-54.18 LAB-SUPPORT-05-237254 (2011-055) The 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System vs Oral vs Rectal Thermometer

Clinical Comparison Testing. LAB-SUPPORT-05-237256 (2011-071) Thermometer Performance Criteria Verification Testing. Publication: Iden T, Horn, E.-P.; Bein, B.; Böhm, R.; Beese, J. and Höcker, J. Intraoperative temperature monitoring with zero heat

flux technology (3M™ SpotOn™ Sensor) in comparison with sublingual nasopharyngeal temperature. 2015. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol, 32: 387-391.

19 LAB-SUPPORT-05-237253 (Dec. 20, 2012) Clinical Usability Study.20 LAB-SUPPORT-05-237436 Perioperative Thermoregulation and Temperature Monitoring; Publication: Insler, S.R.; Sessler,

D.I. Perioperative thermoregulation and temperature monitoring. 2006. Anesthesiology Clinics, (24): 823-837. LAB-SUPPORT-05-237440 Intraoperative Temperature Monitoring; Publication: Cereda M, & Maccioli GA. Intraoperative temperature monitoring. 2004. International Anesthesiology Clinics, (42)2: 41-54. Rationale: The 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring device is a non-invasive temperature monitoring system, as compared to other systems that

measure core temperature invasively, e.g. Esophageal and Rectal methods.21 LAB-SUPPORT-05-237254 (2011-055) The 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System vs Oral vs Rectal Thermometer

Clinical Comparison Testing. LAB-SUPPORT-05-348142 White paper: Al Van Duren, The equivalency of the terms deep tissue and core temperature.