who classification 2021

43
4/29/2021 1 WHO classification 2021 H.K. Ng Chinese University of Hong Kong Full ppt at http://www.acp.cuhk.edu.hk/hkng/ Sorry this is going to be a boring talk 45 minutes are not enough for the CNS classification as We have many more entities than other systems So there is only enough time to read through the entire Classificatiion Parts of the classification which do not have many changes will not be dealt with.

Upload: others

Post on 29-May-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

1

WHO classification 2021

H.K. Ng

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Full ppt at http://www.acp.cuhk.edu.hk/hkng/

Sorry this is going to be a boring talk

45 minutes are not enough for the CNS classification asWe have many more entities than other systemsSo there is only enough time to read through the entireClassificatiionParts of the classification which do not havemany changes will not be dealt with.

Page 2: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

2

Just too many entities

WHO also includes a section on hereditary brain tumor syndromes

Some entities I have not seen myself

Sorry cannot illustrate everything

WHO Classification 2021

Imminently in print and latest June

Look out for summary in Neuro‐oncology soon

Louis DN et al. 

Page 3: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

3

Disclaimer : Just don’t shoot the messenger

WHO 2021 – led by IARC

Ten neuropathologists

‐ Brat, Dan

‐ Ellison, David

‐ Figarella‐Branger, Dominique

‐ Hawkins, Cynthia

‐ Louis, David

‐ Perry, Arie

‐ Ng, H K

‐ Von Deimling, Andreas

‐ Reifenberger, Guido

‐ Wesseling, Pieter

Two clinicians

‐ Pfister, Stefan

‐ Soffietti, Riccardo

Page 4: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

4

Some general changes

• Pediatric and adult gliomas separate

• Grading changed to Arabic numerals, e.g. 1, 2,3, 4 and not I, II, III,IV

• Grading is WITHIN each tumor group

• Methylomes a desirable criteria in

• Many of the new and rare lesions diagnosable by methylation profiles

• Appreciate that some tumors are Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC)

• Integrated diagnosis as per Haarlem (2014) recommendation

Page 5: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

5

Whole genome methylation profiling

BinaryIDAT files(1 for red, 1 for green)

Page 6: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

6

Typical report from DKFZ Molecular Classifier

Capper D et al. Nature 2018 

Methylation profiling listed as DESIRABLE criteria in WHO 2021for many entities

“Histological diagnosis withoutHistology”

Page 7: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

7

IDH glioma, subclass high grade astrocytoma

IDH glioma, subclass 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglioma

IDH glioma, subclass astrocytoma

IDH mutant glioblastomas (our cohort, n=86)

glioblastoma, IDH wildtype, subclass RTK I

glioblastoma, IDH wildtype, subclass RTK II

glioblastoma, IDH wildtype, subclass mesenchymal

O_IDH

A_IDH

A_IDH_HG GBM_MES

GBM_RTK I

GBM_RTK II

The methylomesA new kind of“histology”

Figure 1. Unsupervised clustering of reference cohort samples and 85 IDH mutant glioblastomas using t-SNE dimensionality reduction. The reference cohort of the DKFZCNS tumor classifier includes 82 tumour and 9 non-tumour classes and they are shown as circles of different colors. The 85 primary IDH mutant glioblastomas of ourcohort clustered mainly to the (I) IDH mutant high grade astrocytomas; (2) glioblastoma, IDH wildtype, subclass RTK II and (3) subclass mesenchymal (green triangles).Mutations of IDH in our samples were tested and confirmed by independent PCR and sanger sequencing.

Wong, NgModern Pathology 2021

Methylomes also give you the complete cytogenetic picture of copy number variation of genes

Wong, Ng.   Modern Pathology 2021

Page 8: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

8

Other information obtainable from methylomes

• MGMT

• 1p19q status

• G‐CIMP status (have to workOut yourself)

Pediatric gliomas

2.1.2: Pediatric-type diffuse low-grade gliomas2.1.2.1: Diffuse astrocytoma, MYB- or MYBL1-altered2.1.2.2: Angiocentric glioma 2.1.2.3: Diffuse low-grade glioma, MAPK-altered2.1.2.4: Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumour of the young

2.1.3: Pediatric-type diffuse high-grade gliomas2.1.3.1: Diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant2.1.3.2: Diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant2.1.3.3: Diffuse paediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype and IDH-wildtype2.1.3.4: Diffuse midline glioma, EGFR-mutant 2.1.3.5: Infant-type hemispheric glioma, H3-wildtype

2.1.4: Circumscribed astrocytic gliomas2.1.4.1: Pilocytic astrocytoma2.1.4.2: High-grade astrocytoma with piloid features2.1.4.3: Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma2.1.4.6: Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma2.1.4.7: Chordoid glioma2.1.4.8: Astroblastoma-MN1

2.1.5: Glioneuronal and neuronal tumours2.1.5.1: Ganglioglioma2.1.5.2: Desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma / ganglioglioma2.1.5.3: Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour2.1.5.4: Diffuse glioneuronal tumor with oligodendroglioma-like features and nuclear clusters 2.1.5.5: Papillary glioneuronal tumour2.1.3.13 Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor

Many others………………………………

Page 9: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

9

Bandopadhayay P  Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2014

N=4,400   

Grades 1 and 2 gliomas in children have similar prognosis

Grades 3 and 4 gliomas in children have similar prognosis in children

Page 10: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

10

H3K27M

• Midline H3K27M mutant gliomas (DIPG)

• Pitfalls : may occur outside midline; usually poor prognosis

6 years old female

Thalamic GBM

K27M-H3.3 mutations

(AAG → ATG, lysine → methionine)

Page 11: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

11

“DIPG”  – H3K27M mutant mid‐line glioma

Cynthia Hawkins, AANP 

Page 12: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

12

Cynthia Hawkins, AANP 

Cynthia Hawkins, AANP web

Pediatric high grade gliomas IDHwt, H3wt are still poorly characterized

Page 13: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

13

Diffuse midline glioma, EGFR mutant

Page 14: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

14

2019

Infant high grade gliomas comprise multiple subgroupsCharacterised by novel target fusions and better survivalsClarke M, Mackay A…….Ng HK……Jones CCancer Discovery 2020

Infantile gliomas are a separate group in WHO 2021

Note : NTRK inhibitors in clinical trials

Polymorphous low grade neurepithelial tumor of the youngFrom WHO 2021

About 50% BRAF mutated or have other MAPK aberrations,usually FGFR2 or FGFR3

CD34WHO 2021

Page 15: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

15

? A form of PLNTY or pediatric low gradeGlioma with MAPK activationYang, Ng.   Brain Pathology 2020

8/M

BRAF

Angiocentric glioma – MYB‐QKI fusionA Grade 1 pediatric diffuse glioma characterized by chronic intractable seizure

WHO 2021

Page 16: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

16

Diffuse astrocytoma, MYB or MYBL1 alteredIs a grade 1 pediatric diffusely infiltrative glioma

Previously called isomorphic glioma

Lassaletta…Ng....TarboriJournal of Clinical Oncology2017

BRAF V600E is a poor prognosticator for p‐LGG

Page 17: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

17

Pro

gres

sion

fre

e su

rviv

alO

vera

ll s

urvi

val

Time (months)

Time (months)

Intermediate risk; n=111

Low risk; n=86

High risk; n=21

Risk stratification of pLGG into low, intermediate and high groups

p<0.0001

High risk (H3F3A or TERT promoter mutation)

Low risk(BRAF fusion or MYB amplification

Intermediate risk (BRAFV600E or without H3F3A/TERT/BRAF/MYB alterations)

p<0.0001

p-=0.0002

Intermediate risk; n=111

Low risk; n=86

High risk; n=21 p<0.0001

p<0.0001

p-=0.0023

Yang,  Ng.  Acta Neuropathologica 2018

Ryall, HawkinsCancer Cell 2020

Page 18: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

18

WHO2021 defines DNET as a cortical, circumscribedGlioneuronal tumor with alterations of FGFR1

Page 19: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

19

Desmoplastic infantileAstrocytoma / Ganglioglioma

Glioneuronal tumor

Myxoid glioneuronal tumor

A tumor at septum pellucidum or periventricularregion with characteristic dinucleotide putationof PDGFRA.  Slow growing.  Grade 1.

Page 20: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

20

Diffuse leptomeningeal gliomaNg, Poon.  Pathology 1999

May exhibit 1p loss or BRAF fusion

Page 21: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

21

Papillary glioneuronal tumor is defined by PRKCA‐fusions

WHO 2021

2.1.4: Circumscribed astrocytic gliomas2.1.4.1: Pilocytic astrocytoma2.1.4.2: High-grade astrocytoma with piloid features2.1.4.3: Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma2.1.4.6: Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma

2.1.4.7: Chordoid glioma2.1.4.8: Astroblastoma-MN1

Page 22: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

22

Astroblastoma is defined now by MN1‐alterations 

WHO 2021

pilocytic

Prototype circumscribed glioma : pilocytic astrocytoma

Page 23: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

23

BRAF Gene Rearrangement (Fusion)

Two normal signals (orange) plus a smaller third signal near one of the large signals 

PXA is characterized by BRAF mutation and CDKN2A deletion

BRAF V600E

Page 24: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

24

Adult diffuse gliomas

Page 25: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

25

Should  the diagnosis of glioblastoma just be HISTOLOGICAL ?

Endothelial proliferationnecrosis

Page 26: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

26

TERT promoter mutations

From Wesseling and Verhaak

Life history of a glioblastoma

TERT is a common end point

Page 27: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

27

CDKN2A/B  homozygous deletion (FISH or methylation) : major prognosticator in IDH mutant astrocytomasCriteria for molecular Astrocytoma Grade IV

Also Shirahata, von Deimling, ANP 2019; Yang R, Ng HK.  Brain Pathology 2020

CIMPACT‐NOW   Brat et al. 2020

Li,  Ng. NOA 2019

Adult diffuse gliomas

• Astrocytoma, IDH mutant

(Grades 2‐4, “IDH mut glioblastoma” discarded;

homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B as Grade 4 criteria for cases not   

fulfilling histology criteria)

• Oligodendroglioma, IDH mutant and 1p19q codeleted

• Glioblastoma, IDH wild type 

(EGFR, TERT, 7+/10‐ for cases not fulfilling histology criteria)

Page 28: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

28

But that does not mean :

• You need to do CDKN2A/B to diagnose an obvious glioblastoma which is IDH mutant (Wong, Ng.  Modern Pathology 2021)

• You need to do EGFR or TERT or 7+/10‐ for an obvious glioblastoma which is IDHwt

• These are criteria for molecular glioblastoma or Grade 4 for the Grade 2‐3 lesions which do not fulfil the histological criteria

Giant cell glioblastoma is a variant enriched for p53 mutatipn (Shi, Ng.  Brain Pathology 2019) 

Page 29: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

29

Epitheloid glioblastoma typically has BRAF mutation

BRAFWHO 2021

Ependymoma

• Supratentorial ependymoma• Supratentorial ependymoma ZFTA (RELA) fusion‐positive• Supratentorial ependymoma YAP1 fusion‐positive• Posterior fossa ependymoma• Posterior fossa ependymoma Group PFA• Posterior fossa ependymoma Group PFB• Spinal ependymoma• Spinal ependymoma, MYCN‐amplified• Myxopapillary ependymoma• Subependymoma

Page 30: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

30

Posterior fossa ependymoma is the commonestclinical scenario for ependymomas

Witt & Pfister Cancer Cell 2011

PFA younger age and majority

Page 31: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

31

Page 32: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

32

M/3    L frontal lobe tumor

RELA

LICAM

Or p65/RELA

Most supratentorial ependymomas are ZFTA (RELA) fusion positiveand clinically aggressive

RELA‐positive ependymoma

M/15, ST. T and QMH, 2007‐2019

Page 33: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

33

Spinal cord ependymomas are mostly low grade

From :Ng in Russell and Rubinstein2006

Spinal ependymoma

• Without MYCN : good prognosis

• With MYCN : poor prognosis

Page 34: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

34

Medulloblastoma

`

Medulloblastoma

Medulloblastoma, molecularly defined

• Medulloblastoma, Wnt activated

• Medulloblastoma, SHH activated and p53 wt

• Medulloblastoma, SHH activated and p53 mt

• Medulloblastoma, non‐Wnt, non‐SHH

• Medulloblastoma, histologically defined

Page 35: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

35

McLendon, Ng.Hematology /OncologyClinics 2021

Wnt MB ‐ Beta‐catenin

Page 36: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

36

SHH medulloblastoma

Filamin

Yap1

M/5.   Anaplastic medulloblastoma with drop metastasis and MYC amplification

Page 37: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

37

Molecular grouping of medulloblastoma

• IHC (cannot distinguish Group 3 and Group 4)

• Nanostring transcriptomes

• Methylation profiling

• In addition

• FISH for example for MYC or MYCN or other cytogenetics required by your clinicians if not doing methylation profiling

Page 38: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

38

Other CNS embryonal tumors

• Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT)

• Cribriform neuroepithelial tumor 

• Embryonal tumor with multi‐layered rosettes (ETMR)

• CNS neuroblastoma FOXR2 activated

• CNS tumor with BCOR internal tandem duplication

SMARCB1 (INI1) loss

• Lost in ATRT

• But also in poorly differentiated chordomas

• CRINET

Page 39: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

39

Figure 2a.  AT/RTM/6 months, cerebellar tumor.This area represents the  area of the tumor with rhabdoid‐like cells

Heterozygous mutationNM_003073.4:c.367C>TNP_003064:p.Q123*

Germline mutation of SMARCB1exon 4

AT/RT, negative INI1‐staining

Page 40: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

40

CRINET is a ventricular tumor characterized by histology and SMARCB1 mutation and INI1‐lossBehavior is still not very certain at this stage

WHO 2021

ETMR(embryonal tumor with multi‐Layered rosettes)F/1, frontal lobe tumor.

Page 41: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

41

ETMR – Lin28A positive and C19MC amplifictaion

All types of meningiomasas a single tumor entity with Different grades

Page 42: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

42

Mesenchymal non‐meningeal tumors ‐selected• Solitary fibrous tumor

• Rhabdomyosarcoma

• Intracranial mesenchymal tumor, FET‐CREB fusion positive

• CIC‐rearranged sarcoma

• Primary intracranial sarcoma, DICER‐mutant

• Ewing sarcoma

Pineal tumors

• Pineocytoma

• Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation

• Pineoblastoma

• Papillary tumor of the pineal gland

• Desmoplastic myxoid tumor of the pineal region, SMARCB1 mutant

Page 43: WHO classification 2021

4/29/2021

43

Tumors of the sellar region

• Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma

• Papillary craniopharyngioma

• Pituicytoma, granular cell tumor and spindle cell oncocytoma

• Pituitary adenoma of PitNET

• Pituitary blastoma

Robin OBarnard

Peter BurgerF Stephen Vogel

S K Yee Foundation