w(h)ither the lms?

Click here to load reader

Upload: michael-feldstein

Post on 12-Nov-2014

2.494 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Michael Feldstein's presentation to UMassOnline about the future of the LMS, from August 2010.

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1. W(h)ither the LMS? Michael Feldstein 8.5.2010
  • 2. The Genesis of Online Learning CC: adebnd
  • 3. In the Beginning, There Was eMail CC: nashworld
  • 4. and Shared Files CC: redjar
  • 5. Then We Saw Groupware Julian Robicheax
  • 6. and We Genuflected CC: Camera Wences
  • 7. The Modern LMS CC: redjar
  • 8. Characteristics of Todays LMS
    • Private
    • Class-centric
    • Role-focused
    • Self-contained
    • Institution-oriented
    • 1990s architecture
  • 9. But the World Has Changed 2010 architecture 1990s architecture Inter- and extra-institutional Institution-oriented Integrated Self-contained Relationship-focused Role-focused Person-centric Class-centric Permeable Private Need Have
  • 10. Should We Throw the LMS Away? CC: Axel Schwenke
  • 11. Step 1 Internet architecture Enterprise architecture Inter- and extra-institutional Institution-oriented Integrated Self-contained Relationship-focused Role-focused Person-centric Class-centric Permeable Private Need Have
  • 12. Two Integrations That Work Today CC: _ Yoshi _
  • 13. Learning Information Services Student Admin
  • 14. SIS Person External Academic System ( LMS, Social Network, Wiki, etc.) Course Enrollment IMS LIS 2.0: Logical Architecture Grades/ Outcomes
  • 15. LIS Integrations
    • Existing Today
    • Oracle SAIP (released Aug 2008)
    • Sakai (available in all distributions)
    • Moodle (only via Moodlerooms)
    • Schools on Facebook
    • In Progress
    • Sungard
    • Desire2Learn
    • Pearson (eCollege and MyLabs)
    • Planned
    • Blackboard
  • 16. Learning Tool Integration
    • Problem: Need to integrate the long tail of learning tools with the LMS
    • Solution
      • Build a standard plug-in for all LMSs
      • Tool and Content Providers can build one integration and use it in any LMS that supports the standard
      • Start simple and then expand feature sets to allow market to adjust over time and insure that engineering due diligence is being done phased release
  • 17. LEARNING TOOL L T I PHP Java App Engine Wookie... ...
  • 18. Certified - LMS
    • PowerLink for Blackboard WebCT v8
    • Building Block for Blackboard Learn v9
    • Desire2Learn Learning Environment v8.4
    • Desire2Learn Learning Environment v9.0
    • Jenzabar JICS v7.2
    • Learning Objects Campus Pack v4
    • Sakai v2.7
    • Sakai 3 v0.4
  • 19. Certified - Tool
    • Learning Objects Campus Pack v4
    • SpACE v0.5 (Spatial Activities in Course Environments, map application)
    • WebPA v1 (online peer assessment application)
  • 20. Caution: Demo Ahead CC: mag3737
  • 21. Oracle HQ Unicon HQ U Michigan Peoplesoft Campus Solutions Integration Broker SAIP LIS Sakai CLE Sakora LIS BLTI Portlet Wordpress MediaWiki IMS BLTI IMS LIS BLTI BLTI
  • 22. More Integration Needed
  • 23. BUT Integration Isnt Everything CC: urbanwoodchuck
  • 24. Hard to Bolt On
    • Permeability
    • Person-centric
    • Relationship-focused
    • Inter- and extra-institutional
    • 2010 architecture
  • 25. Blank Sheets of Paper
    • Agilix BrainHoney
    • Instructure Canvas
    • NIXTY
    • Sakai 3
  • 26. About Sakai 3
    • Complete ground-up rewrite (and rethink)
    • Heavily based on existing open source projects
    • Commercial-friendly open source license
    • Heavily standards-based (e.g., JCR, OSGi, OpenSocial, BLTI, LIS, etc.)
    • Service-Oriented
    • Multi-tenant
    • Design-driven
  • 27. Sakai 3 Themes
    • Everything is Content
    • Everything is Wikied
    • Everything is Social
    • Everything is Permeable
    • Everything is Widgets
  • 28. Sakai 3 Status
    • Several years in incubation
    • Deployed for non-course sites at Cambridge
    • Managed project has begun
      • 12 months with quarterly milestones
      • Participants include NYU, Cambridge, Berkeley, Charles Sturt, Georgia Tech, Indiana, Cape Town, Stanford
      • NYU, Berkeley, and Cambridge all deploying soon
  • 29. We Need a Bridge from Old to New CC: Daquella manera
  • 30. Standards Save the Day
  • 31. To Sum Up
    • Current-generation LMSs are old designs built to meet old needs
    • The LMS needs to evolve or be replaced
    • I believe it can evolve and is evolving
    • Current-generation systems are evolving primarily through better integration support
    • Next-generation systems being built right now will further this evolution
    • Current-generation and next-generation systems will need to co-exist and integrate for some time to come
    • The LMS also needs to integrate with the rest of the academic enterprise
  • 32. Questions? CC: CRASH:candy