white paper carrier sales network optimization approach
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
2012
Akira Oyama, Principal Consultant
3/18/2012
Carrier Sales: Network Optimization Approach
www.netstrategysolutions.com Page 1
Executive summary
The goal of this paper is to provide opportunities for facility based carriers (CLECs and IXCs) to approach their
customers from the perspective of network optimization opportunities instead of approaching their customers
with traditional sales approach. The network optimization approach will lead to the discovery of new sales
opportunities that would be very difficult to identify using the normal sales process. The network optimization
approach will also lead to better working relationships with the carriers network planning and carrier
management groups who are responsible for making the network purchase decisions to drive down the leased
expenses.
Opportunities
Traditional sales and buyer relationships have generally been superficial. The service providers present new
services and/or new pricing plans to planning and carrier management groups that will review potential
optimization opportunities by comparing current leased expenses to the proposed rates. This approach could
lead to new sales, but it will not be a very effective approach by facility based carriers as planners and carrier
managers must deal regularly with a list of carriers where they implement the same sales approach. The
planners and carrier managers don’t have enough time or resources to do an in-depth analysis and a large
number of carrier proposals will be dismissed as little time is dedicated to analyzing these proposals. A lack of
understanding of planners and carrier managers’ optimization needs by facility based carriers will also lead to a
shot-gun approach where the majority of service features or pricing proposals will not be relevant to solve
customers’ optimization needs and end up wasting time.
The facility based carriers should consider offering one time or recurring network optimization analysis to their
customers and provide solutions that will be a win-win situation for both parties. Since planning and carrier
management resources are scarce, they will likely welcome an offer from the facility based carriers to perform
optimization analysis as long as key confidential information is protected.
The following list provides key reasons for facility based carriers to provide the network optimization analysis for
their customers:
1. Perform additional due diligence which will likely uncover new opportunities rather than relying on
customers to perform in-depth analysis which may not happen due to resource constrains.
2. Better understanding of customers’ network and their optimization needs not only improve sales
prospect, but it can also be used as an input to the facility based carriers’ own network expansion plan.
3. Build strong relationships. Because facility based carriers will be working closely with customers to
provide the optimization analysis and looking after their interests, it will likely bring the two parties
much closer. I believe this is a key ingredient for successful long-range sales growth strategy for facility
based carriers.
4. Targeted approach. By providing analysis for customers, the facility based carriers will be in a better
position to provide solutions that will be customized to each customer. The optimization approach will
help eliminate any unnecessary resources to marginal opportunities and help focus on the real
opportunity.
www.netstrategysolutions.com Page 2
5. Having in-depth knowledge of customers’ network will help facility based carriers to see potential
future business opportunities.
Overall, the network optimization approach by the facility based providers will improve the customer
experiences. This approach will lead to strong customer relationships and help win additional business.
Optimization Types
There are wide ranges of optimization activities planners and carrier managers engage in. Different
organizations may engage in different optimization activities at any given time. In this section, I listed major
optimization activities customers generally engage in. Understanding what they are and why they engage in
these types of optimization activities will be important for the facility based carriers’ to effectively approach
planners and carrier managers.
Meet-point elimination – Network planners are always looking for ways to eliminate meet-point circuits
to help reduce loop expenses as well as streamline their provisioning process. The solution could be
provided by establishing nodes in strategic locations to eliminate meet-point circuits. By helping to
solve this problem, the facility based carriers can help lower the customers’ access charges significantly.
IP transport – Many customers including independent carriers and ISPs without extensive long-haul
assets must lease circuits to connect between their routers. They must lease large bandwidth to
manage their data network infrastructures. Although there are number of options in a tier 1 market,
the independent carrier must establish data network between rural and tier 1 market where options are
limited. As a result, they must lease circuits from ILECs for a part of network segment which will drive
up the cost of maintaining their data infrastructures. For facility based carriers who can establish a node
in key locations that will help groom off expensive leased circuits.
New hub/network consolidation – A consolidation of leased network is another optimization activity
planners engage in. Because the network is dynamic and carrier pricing changes rapidly, the planners
must monitor utilization of their leased hubs for a consolidation opportunity as well as finding an
opportunity to establish new hubs. It’s important for facility based carriers to work with planners and
provide solutions where help is needed.
Diversity, latency and least cost routing – The planners must find ways to reduce leased expenses to
meet optimization target while they are constrained by latency and diversity requirements. The facility
based carriers will be able to offer alternate route to support their optimization efforts while supporting
latency and/or diversity requirements.
Network Transport between local exchanges – Independent carriers must lease circuits for a part of
their network segments to provide telecommunication services between island exchanges. They often
provision individual circuit as they need to provide transport between island exchanges. For facility
based carriers, this will be an opportunity to help bundle network by establishing interconnection points
between island exchanges.
CLEC Type 1 and 2 groom – Inter-exchange carriers spend significant amount on loop charges each
month as they have to provide telecommunication services to number of remote sites. Where there are
CLEC options, the planners make every attempt to extend CLEC transport to reduce leased access cost.
www.netstrategysolutions.com Page 3
Technology migration and optimization – Legacy inter-exchange carriers and other network re-sellers
have implemented SONET/TDM network hubs to support DS1 and DS3 loops. The planners must find an
effective way to manage their migration plan to Ethernet. Establishing a new Ethernet aggregation port
to support an Ethernet loop can be a very expensive solution if they maintain separate SONET/TDM
hubs until all TDM loops can be migrated or consolidated. The facility based carriers may consider
developing a cost effective Wave based hub that will support both Ethernet and SONET/TDM. This
solution will allow customers to reduce their leased network expenses and help them with smooth
transition to Ethernet.
Metro builds – The facility based carriers can work with planners to identify network build
opportunities. The facility based carriers can propose joint builds, sell dark-fibers or lit transport
services to customers’ target on-net build sites. Unless facility based carriers analyze customers’
network and associated costs, these opportunities will likely be missed.
Carrier negotiation and optimization opportunity – Planners and carrier managers must address
constrains with initiating optimization projects due to terms and conditions in carrier contracts as well
as large term liability impacts. As a result, planners and carrier managers continue to re-negotiate
contracts with existing network providers where they may not get the best deal possible. The facility
based carriers should work with planners and carrier managers to better understand contract structures
and help provide alternative solutions.
Challenges
A challenge for facility based carriers is to invest time and resources to develop an internal planning team who
can assist in analyzing data and providing solutions to customers’ optimization needs. If optimization analysis is
done sparsely, the investment to develop internal optimization team may not be an optimal approach for facility
based carriers.
One solution is to hire an outside expert for one-time optimization review or on a recurring basis which will be a
cheaper alternative to developing the internal optimization team. Since no training is required, the outside
expert can quickly identify optimization opportunities which will be win-win situation.
Conclusion
As I described earlier, different customers require different optimization activities to stay competitive. We can
broadly categorize service provider types to identify optimization activities they may engage in, but the facility
based carriers will not know the real opportunity until optimization analysis is conducted. Some optimization
activities will also be constrained by internal policies or resources. Engaging customers by providing value added
analysis will help lift these constrains and motivate them to initiate optimization projects.
Although it may require substantial investment to staff in-house planning team who can work with and
understand customers’ optimization needs, the facility based carriers should consider an option of bringing
outside experts who can help quickly identify customers’ optimization opportunities. Outsourcing will help not
only save time and money, but this option makes sense when facility based carriers perform one-time or annual
optimization analysis for their customers.
www.netstrategysolutions.com Page 4
I believe providing an optimization analysis will lead to discovery of additional sales opportunities, both short-
and long-term. Providing optimization analysis will also take the customer relationships to a new level where
facility based providers will truly understand customers’ needs.