when assumptions and priorities collide tesol 2014 decapua
DESCRIPTION
This presentation introduces the Intercultural Communication Framework as a means to address conflicts in cultural orientations to learning and teaching, resulting in cultural dissonance for struggling language learners. By applying the Framework’s three guidelines, educators can greatly improve their effectiveness in classroom communication and instructional delivery for this population.TRANSCRIPT
When Assump+ons and Priori+es Collide: Exploring Intercultural Communica+on
and Schooling TESOL Conven,on 2014
Portland, Oregon Andrea DeCapua, Ed.D. New York University
[email protected] ©2014 MALP, LLC. For terms and condi,ons of use, contact informa,on@malpeduca,on.com
Ways of thinking and lear2ing
are shaped by
prior lear2ing ex6eriences
North American teachers and learners assume that:
1. the goals of K-‐12 instruc,on are a) to produce an independent learner
b) to prepare that learner for life aRer schooling
2. the learner brings along a) an urge to par,cipate as an individual
b) age-‐appropriate prepara,on for
i. literacy development
ii. academic tasks
(Marshall, 1998; DeCapua & Marshall, 2011)
Three Cultural Differences
• Literacy • Collec,vism and Individualism • Ways of thinking and learning
I never care about reading un,l I come here In my country nothing to read but here, everywhere print, words and signs and books and you have to read.
The most importants I have learned about the United States that is a book, newspapers, or notebook and pens. These things are always let me know how to live here.
Collec+vis+c vs. Individualis+c Cultures
Informal Ways of Learning
• Revolves around immediate needs of family and community
• Grounded in observation, participation in sociocultural practices of family and community
• Has immediate relevance
• Centered on orality
(Gahunga, Gahunga, & Luseno, 2011; Paradise & Rogoff, 2009)
Formal Western-‐Style Educa+on
• Abstract knowledge • Scien,fic reasoning • Logical deduc,on • Formal school se]ngs • Literacy is central
(Anderson-‐Levi^, 2003; Flynn, 2007; Grigorenko, 2007; Ozmon & Carver, 2008 )
Academic Tasks
• Definitions Ø What is a tree?
• True/False Ø New York City is the capital of New York State Ø Boston is the capital of Massachusetts
• Classification Ø Categorize these objects (see next slide)
(Adapted from Luria, 1976)
Sample Academic Task
North American teachers and learners assume that:
1. the goals of K-‐12 instruc,on are a) to produce an independent learner
b) to prepare that learner for life aRer schooling
2. the learner brings along a) an urge to par,cipate as an individual
b) age-‐appropriate prepara,on for
i. literacy development
ii. academic tasks
(Marshall, 1998; DeCapua & Marshall, 2011)
(Ibarra, 2001)
Intercultural Communication Framework (ICF)
Ø Establish and maintain a relationship Ø Iden+fy priori+es in both cultures Ø Make associa+ons between familiar and unfamiliar
(Marshall, 1994; Marshall & DeCapua, 2013)
Who Am I?
Keep Your Eye on The Ball
Spillach, 1979
“It’s a small world, after all.”
Two Learning Activities
FAMILIAR SCHEMATA
UNFAMILIAR SCHEMATA
Describing your favorite game in your first language or dialect
Writing a science lab report in academic English
Intercultural Communication Framework
Step 1: Establish and maintain a relationship • Infuse instruction with interpersonal elements
Ø Teacher and students Ø Students together Ø Teacher and student families
Step 2: Iden+fy priori+es in both cultures
• Adapt instruction to accommodate learner priorities • Develop learner awareness of community priorities
Step 3: Make associa+ons between familiar and unfamiliar
• Move from familiar to unfamiliar schemata Linguistic Content Formal
• Build associations between familiar/unfamiliar concepts
(Marshall, 1994; Marshall & DeCapua, 2013)
Strategies
• Ensure two-‐way communica,on • Use cultural brokers • Engage in peer observa,on • Become an observer • Control tasks
– Linguis,c, content, formal • Model explicitly & repeatedly • Allow focused NL use
A Con+nuum of Ways of Thinking & Learning
Informal Ways Learning
Western-style Formal Education
Struggling ELs
Collectivism Oral Print
Individualism
More Informa+on? Email: [email protected] Books: Marshall, H.W. & DeCapua, A. (2013). Making the Transi0on: Culturally Responsive Teaching for Struggling Language Learners. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DeCapua, A. & Marshall, H. W. (2011). Breaking New Ground: Teaching Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Educa0on in U. S. Secondary Schools. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DeCapua, A., Smathers, W., & Tang, F. (2009). Mee0ng the Needs of Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Schooling: A Guide for Educators. . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Websites: www.malpeduca,on.com h^p://malp.pbworks.com ©2014 MALP, LLC. For terms and condi,ons of use, contact informa,on@malpeduca,on.com
Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm – MALPtm
Instructional Model
Students with Limited/Interrupted Education U.S. Classrooms
Interconnectedness Independence
Shared Responsibility
Individual Accountability
Pragmatic Tasks
Academic Tasks
ACCEPT SLIFE CONDITIONS
COMBINE SLIFE & U.S.
PROCESSES
FOCUS on U.S. ACTIVITIES with familiar language
& content
Immediate Relevance
Oral Transmission Written Word
with
(DeCapua & Marshall, 2009, 2010; Marshall 1994, 1998)
Future Relevance