what’s new in pca

Download What’s new in PCA

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: orinda

Post on 07-Jan-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

What’s new in PCA. EAU Guidelines 2010 update. Steven Joniau University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. PCA Guideline Panel. Axel Heidenreich (Chairman) Urology Germany Joacqim Bellmunt Medical Oncology Spain Michel Bolla Radiation Oncology France Steven Joniau Urology Belgium - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

  • Whats new in PCA...Steven Joniau

    University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium

    EAU Guidelines 2010 update

  • PCA Guideline PanelAxel Heidenreich (Chairman) UrologyGermanyJoacqim BellmuntMedical OncologySpainMichel BollaRadiation OncologyFranceSteven JoniauUrologyBelgiumTheodor van der KwastPathologyCanadaMalcom MasonRadiation OncologyUKVeseled MatveevUrologyRussiaNicolas MottetUrologyFranceHans Peter SchmidUrologySwitzerlandThomas WiegelRadiation OncologyGermanyFrancesco ZattoniUrologyItaly

  • ScreeningSchrder et al.New Engl J Med 2009Andriole et al.New Engl J Med 2009Risk reduction 27%Numbers needed to screen 1410Numbers needed to treat 48No significant difference

  • ScreeningRisk adapted early detection

  • Active SurveillanceActive Surveillanceclose follow-up examinations under strict rules of guidelinesPurpose: Identification & treatment of significant PCA, curative intent

    Watchful Waitingwithhold treatment until development of disease-specific symptomsPurpose: symptom-based therapy, palliative intent

  • Active Surveillance: why?Because itavoids overtreatment with insignificant or slowly proliferating prostate cancer

    avoids unnecessary impairment of quality of life

    Is a viable alternative for elderly and co morbid patients who harbour a higher mortality risk from non-cancer specific causes

  • Active SurveillanceInclusion CriteriaPSA 10 ng/mlBiopsy Gleason Score 6 2 positive biopsies 50% cancer per biopsycT1c cT2aIntervention requiredBiopsy Gleason Score > 6PSA-DT < 3 yearscancer volume patients preference

  • Adjuvant Radiation TherapyBolla et al.EORTC 22911: 60 Gy vs Wait-and-See pT3a, pT3b, pTxpR1 independent on postop. PSAWiegel et al.ARO 96-02: 60 Gy vs Wait-and-SeepT3a-bpN0, PSA negative !Swanson et al.SWOG 8794: 60-64 Gy vs Wait-and-SeepT3a, pT3b, pTxpR1 independent on postop. PSA

  • Adjuvant Radiation TherapyEORTC 22911

    RadiationW & SR076.2%67.4%R177.6%48.5%*

    R0 + RadR1 + RadHR0.870.38Benefit88/1000291/1000

  • Adjuvant Radiation Therapy72%54%ARO/AUO German Study

  • Adjuvant Radiation TherapyARO/AUO German Study5 year F-up: 25% benefit for progression-free survivalpT3aR1

  • SWOG 8794Survellance adj. Radiation Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

  • SWOG 8794Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

    Wait-and-SeeRadiationPSA 0.2 0.21 1.0 0.20.21 1.0PSA 59%23%77%34%Local relapse20%25%7%9%Metastases12%16%4%12%

  • Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

  • Intermittend Androgen DeprivationCyclic therapyOn-treatment periodOff-treatment periodIHT aims to Minimise adverse events / improve quality of life (QoL)Delay progression to hormone resistant PcaReduce costs of care

  • Intermittend Androgen Deprivation

    TrialPopulation# patients randomisedNCIC/PR7PSA relapse after RT300EC 507PSA relapse after RP201ICELANDPSA relapse/locally advanced700SEUGAdvanced PCa626JapanLocally advanced188AP 17/95Advanced PCa and M+335SWOG 9346M+ PCa (PSA > 5 ng/mL)1,345EC 210 M+ PCa (PSA > 20 ng/mL)194EuropeAdvanced PCa (90% T3)914

  • Intermittend Androgen DeprivationCalais da Silva FEC et al. ; Eur Urol 2009

  • Intermittend Androgen DeprivationEC507: IHT does not affect progression-free survivalTunn U. BJU Int 2007;99(Suppl 1)

  • Intermittend Androgen Deprivation

  • Follow-up: local

  • Follow-up: ADT

  • Follow-up: ADTCAVE: Diabetes mellitusMetabolic SyndromCholesterine, TriglycerideCholesterine/HDL - RatioFollow-up: cancer specific: PSA, Tendocrinologicmetaboliccardiovascular