whatisthe best surrogatemarker for adequate volemic ... · microsoft powerpoint - julien maizel -...
TRANSCRIPT
What is the best surrogate marker
for adequate volemic ressuscitation?for adequate volemic ressuscitation?
Porto, 2010
Maizel Julien
Medical ICU, Amiens, France
Right ventricule
Left ventricule
Absolute hypovolemia Relative hypovolemia
Always decreased preload and stroke volume
Septic shock
Septic shock = relative hypovolemia
≠ absolute hypovolemia
Always LV preload and stroke volume decreased
Volume expension
Always LV preload and stroke volume decreased
When do i stop volume
resuscitation?resuscitation?
SSC, CCM 2008
Volemia
≠
Fluid responsiveness
Does volume expension will provoke an increase of stroke volume ?
How to explore fluid
responsiveness?
• Clinical findings
• Biology• Biology
• Echocardiography•Static parameters•Dynamic parameters
Clinical findings
YesConscious patient: tachycardia, postural dizziness (tilt), Hypotension + clinical context (trauma, blood loss)
Mc Gee, JAMA 1999
NoPatient intubatedProbability of 50% to predict fluid responsiveness based on clinical and static preload parametersHypoprotidemia, hepatopathy, right heart failure.
Teboul, Chest 2000
CHEST 2002, 121:2000CHEST 2002, 121:2000--8 8
R / NRR / NR R R (%)(%)
Calvin Calvin (Surgery 81)(Surgery 81) 20 / 820 / 8 71 71 %%Schneider Schneider (Am Heart J 88)(Am Heart J 88) 13 / 513 / 5 72 72 %%ReuseReuse (Chest 90)(Chest 90) 26 / 1526 / 15 63 63 %%Magder Magder (J Crit Care 92)(J Crit Care 92) 17 / 1617 / 16 52 52 %%
MeanMean 211 / 195211 / 195 52 52 %%
Magder Magder (J Crit Care 92)(J Crit Care 92) 17 / 1617 / 16 52 52 %%Diebel Diebel (Arch Surgery 92)(Arch Surgery 92) 13 / 913 / 9 59 59 %%Diebel Diebel (J Trauma 94)(J Trauma 94) 26 / 3926 / 39 40 40 %%Wagner Wagner (Chest 98)(Chest 98) 20 / 1620 / 16 56 56 %%Tavernier Tavernier (Anesthesio 98)(Anesthesio 98) 21 / 1421 / 14 60 60 %%Magder Magder (J Crit Care 99)(J Crit Care 99) 13 / 1613 / 16 45 45 %%Tousignant Tousignant (A Analg 00)(A Analg 00) 16 / 2416 / 24 40 40 %%Michard Michard (AJRCCM 00)(AJRCCM 00) 16 / 2416 / 24 40 40 %%Feissel Feissel (Chest 01)(Chest 01) 10 / 910 / 9 53 53 %%
Chakko S, Am J Med 1991
Biology
Renal functionHaemoglobinProtidemiaHaematocrite
Poor diagnostic value
Haematocrite
Anguel, ICM 2008
Before weaningPAOP 14
Spontaneous breathing trialPAOP 24
H+1 after reventilationPAOP 12
Protidemia 58 Protidemia 66 Protidemia 60
Biology
Renal functionHaemoglobinProtidemiaHaematocrite
Poor diagnostic value
BNP ?
Pirrachio, CCM 2008
Pirrachio, CCM 2008
Clinical + Bio + Radio
Fluid responsiveness ?
Uncertain
Hemodynamic parameter
Certain
Fluid challengeVolume expension
Improvement WorsenedNo effect
Evaluation
Predictive factors of fluid
responsiveness
Static parameterMeasured under a single ventricular loading condition
Dynamic parameterTry to detect a stroke volume variation under two different ventricular loading condition
Presumed to reliably estimate the preload
Assuming that lower preload increases the probability of FR
variation under two different preload condition.
Stroke volumeStroke volume
PreloadPreload unresponsivenessunresponsiveness
PreloadPreload responsivenessresponsiveness
VentricularVentricular preloadpreload
CVPCVPCVPCVP
Michard et al. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. Chest 2002; 121: 2000Michard et al. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. Chest 2002; 121: 2000--88
Michard et al. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. Chest 2002; 121: 2000Michard et al. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. Chest 2002; 121: 2000--88
1212
1414
1616
LVEDALVEDABefore volume expensionBefore volume expension
LVEDALVEDA
44
66
88
1010
1212
répondeursrépondeurs non répondeursnon répondeurs
(cm(cm22/m/m22))
Feissel M et coll, Chest 2001
NormalNormal
PreloadPreload--responsivenessresponsiveness
SVSV
Why static parameters are not predictive of fluid responsiveness?
PreloadPreload--unresponsivenessunresponsiveness
VentricularVentricular preloadpreload
Heart failure
Stroke volumeStroke volume
Dynamic parameters
VentricularVentricular preloadpreload
InsuflationInsuflation
Mechanical ventilationMechanical ventilation
Intrathoracic pressureIntrathoracic pressure
?
SVC collapsibility IVC Distensibility
?
SVC
Vieillard Baron ICM 2005
(VCImax – VCImin) / VCImin
>36%
IVC
Vieillard Baron ICM 2005
Feissel CCM2005
(VCImax – VCImin) / VCImin
>18%
InsuflationInsuflation RV preloadRV preload
RV EjectionRV Ejection
Mechanical ventilationMechanical ventilation
RV EjectionRV Ejection
LV LV preloadpreload
2 to 3 cardiac cycles later2 to 3 cardiac cycles later
PulmonaryPulmonary transittransitinspirationinspiration
SedatedAdapted to ventilatorSinusalVt>7ml/KgSta > 0.15m/sec
Stroke volume variation ?
(PPmax – PPmin) / PPmean >12%
Michard AJRCCM 200
Après remplissage vasculaire
Avant remplissage vasculaire
DAM = 3.92 L/min
DAM = 2.30
30 L/min
30 L/min
1 sec
Oesophageal Doppler
Plethysmography
L/min∆DAM = 13%
L/min∆DAM = 39%
A
(Max – Min) / Mean > 12% (Vmax Ao) and > 20% (VTI Ao)
B
Slama AJPHCP 2002Feissel Chest 2001
(Max – Min) / Mean > 12% (Vmax Ao) and > 20% (VTI Ao)
Spontaneous breathing
InsuflationInsuflation RV preloadRV preload
RV EjectionRV EjectionRV EjectionRV Ejection
LV LV preloadpreload
2 to 3 cardiac cycles later2 to 3 cardiac cycles later
PulmonaryPulmonary transittransitinspirationinspiration
(Max – Min) / Mean ≥ 50% predict a RAP <10mmHg
Kircher Am J Cardio, 1990
Lever de jambe passif
Maizel, ICM 2007
•Dynamic > static
Conclusion
•Dynamic > static
•Non invasive > invasive
•Feasibility