what made yahoo successful? what was their strategy?
TRANSCRIPT
What made Yahoo Successful? What was
their strategy?
What has led to Yahoo’s problems?
What should Yahoo’s new strategy be?
What people issues must be addressed for
Yahoo to regain success?
SWOTAnalysis II -
Internal Analysis(Strengths & Weaknesses)
The Purpose of Internal Analysis is to Identify Strengths and Weaknesses in the Firm’s
Value Creation Capabilities
• The intended strategy that is derived should rest upon strengths and bolster weaknesses
• We analyze the firm in its competitive context to identify how our particular organization is different from others and how we can use that difference to our advantage
• Labor costs, capital costs, raw materials sourcing are seldom sources of sustained competitive advantage
• Must base strategies on resources that other firms do not have
• Internal structures and processes are often critical (human resource management)
Resources ==>Capabilities==>Core Competencies
• Resources: Inputs to the firm’s production process
• Capabilities: The capacity of a set of resources to integratively perform a task or activity
• Value chain - an analytical method
1. Break the firm into activities
2. Analyze how each activity creates value (lead to economic value)
3. Examine how the value created compares to that of competitors
Purchasing Operations Distribution Marketing Service Overhead
MARGIN
Firm Infrastructure
TechnologyDevelopment
HumanResource
ManagementProcurement
Complete Value Chain
Support Activities
Primary Activities
Core Competencies7
• Form the roots of long-term competitive advantages
• Arise from capabilities and resources
• Help the firm design and produce an ongoing stream of distinctive products or services
• The idea behind core competence is to identify critical skills and keep them inside the firm
• Neither technology nor products drives competitive advantage - competencies do7 The definitive work on core competencies is:Prahalad, C.K., & Gary Hamel. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review,
(May/June): 79-91.
Core Competencies
• Don’t overemphasize today’s products
• Competencies must be developed, they can’t be purchased
• Unlike physical assets, core competencies improve with use
• Identifying core competencies
1. Core competencies must provide potential access to a wide variety of markets
2. Core competencies must make a contribution to the perceived customer benefits of the end product
3. Core competencies must be hard for competitors to imitate.
• Core competencies cannot be separated from the people who embody them
OutcomeEx: Reduced
Downtime
OutcomeEx: Reduced
Downtime
Choosing Activities: “Inside Out” Versus “Outside In”
CustomerVALUE
ActivityService Network
Resource 1
Resource 2
Activity
Service Network
CustomerVALUE
Resource 1
Resource 2
“Inside Out”: Based on Resources Already Controlled
“Outside In”: Begins with Customer Value as Focus --Presumes Necessary Resources can be Obtained or Developed
Time Between
Alternative
A Creative “Outside In” Approach Opens the Door to Develop Multiple Alternatives and/or Unique Combinations of Activities for Delivering Value to Customers. May require additional resources not previously possessed
Activity CSelf Service
Service Network
CustomerVALUE
Resource 1
Resource 2
Resource 3
Resource 4
Resource 5
Resource 6
AlternativeActivity BReduce Mean
Failures
AlternativeOutcome
DowntimeEx: Reduced Activity A
Margin Enhancing (Critical) Activities
Activities that allow a firm to add value (contribute to margin) over the cost of the activities are the critical activities for the firm
Typically each firm is characterized by its choices regarding a few critical activities
A firm must strive to deliver more value from the critical activities or deliver the same value at a lower cost than its competitors
What Is Strategy?*
Strategy is not Operational Effectiveness
Strategy is about:
Understanding Critical Firm Activities
From “What is Strategy?” Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec, 1996
Recognizing the importance of Strategic Positioning
So….Competitive Strategy is about being different
Unique activities
Unique mix of value…based on: Product or ServiceNicheGeography
What Is Strategy?
Sustainable Strategic Position
requires Trade-offs
You can’t be all things to all people
Creates the need to make choices
Protects against straddlers
Requires Focus and Prioritization
Is essential to strategy
Purposefully limits what a firms does or offers
Strategy is about making trade-offs in how to compete
What Is Strategy?
Fit drives both Competitive Advantage
and Sustainability
You need to understand the opportunity and the ability to deliver
Opportunity is defined by Five Forces analysis
Ability to deliver is defined by Value Chain and VRIO analysis
Strategy is about combining activities and achieving positions that are difficult to imitate
Implies complex combinations of resources and capabilities
May rely on entire systems of activities
What Is Strategy?
Successful Strategies involve:
Defining and communicating the firm’s unique position
MakingTrade-offs
Forging fit among activities
Generic Strategies for the Future
The firm should focus on individual activities rather than a generic strategy for the entire firm
Depending on the nature of the value to the customer (visible or invisible), firms should try to lower costs or differentiate in individual activities. This approach may require additional resources.
Value of the Activity
Visible to the customerInvisible to the customer
Lower costs
Differentiate
Try to reduce cost of activities if it does not impact any visible values
If the outcome detracts from value, then make it invisible or eliminate
If activity adds value, then make it visible
Must provide at least as much value as the main competitors even if it means increased expenses