what is film atmosphere?

28
What is Film Atmosphere? Robert Spadoni There is no direct training in atmospherics in schools of architecture. It appears on no syllabus. Mark Wigley, The Architecture of Atmosphere1 Many kinds of writing across the history of cinema exemplify the best and worst tendencies in thinking about film atmosphere. This might seem like the emptiest statement that could be made about any subject that has been written about over such a long period, but I suggest that it holds especially true for this topic. The number of times the word atmosphere appears, in sources ranging from industry trade journals published at the start of the previous century to works of theory published this year, attests to the importance that film writers continuously attach to ityet few have paused to spell out why atmosphere matters or even to articulate what they mean by the word. This has started to change in recent years as scholars have begun taking up atmosphere more directly as a topic of inquiry. 2 This work shares with older writing a tendency to view the phenomenon as primarily or exclu- sively associated with an artworks environmental characterspecifically, in the case of a film, its settings, sounds, and depictions of weather. 3 I chal- lenge that view in this essay, and argue that film writing, even when it has applied the concept unreflectively, hints at a much broader understanding of what atmosphere consists of and what has been missed about its import- ance. Such writingoften film reviews, and other works by writers who indulge freely in impressionistic and opinionated prosepoints to a diffi- culty facing anyone who wants to describe and account for atmosphere with some academic rigor, which is that much of the best thinking on the topic has been unabashedly evaluative in nature. Disentangling the phe- nomenon from this language of appraisal poses a challenge, in part because it is not clear such a feat can be accomplished, and in part because it is not clear it should be. In what follows, I do not entirely avoid this lan- guage myself. Robert Spadoni is Associate Professor at Case Western Reserve University, where he teaches film studies. He is the author of Uncanny Bodies: The Coming of Sound Film and the Origins of the Horror Genre (University of California Press, 2007) and essays on film atmosphere, horror films, and other topics. ß 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 2020, VOL. 37, NO. 1, 4875 https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2019.1606558

Upload: others

Post on 31-Dec-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What is Film Atmosphere?

What is Film Atmosphere?

Robert Spadoni

There is no direct training in atmospherics in schools of architecture. It appears onno syllabus.

—Mark Wigley, “The Architecture of Atmosphere”1

Many kinds of writing across the history of cinema exemplify the bestand worst tendencies in thinking about film atmosphere. This might seemlike the emptiest statement that could be made about any subject that hasbeen written about over such a long period, but I suggest that it holdsespecially true for this topic. The number of times the word atmosphereappears, in sources ranging from industry trade journals published at thestart of the previous century to works of theory published this year, atteststo the importance that film writers continuously attach to it—yet few havepaused to spell out why atmosphere matters or even to articulate what theymean by the word.This has started to change in recent years as scholars have begun taking

up atmosphere more directly as a topic of inquiry.2 This work shares witholder writing a tendency to view the phenomenon as primarily or exclu-sively associated with an artwork’s environmental character—specifically, inthe case of a film, its settings, sounds, and depictions of weather.3 I chal-lenge that view in this essay, and argue that film writing, even when it hasapplied the concept unreflectively, hints at a much broader understandingof what atmosphere consists of and what has been missed about its import-ance. Such writing—often film reviews, and other works by writers whoindulge freely in impressionistic and opinionated prose—points to a diffi-culty facing anyone who wants to describe and account for atmospherewith some academic rigor, which is that much of the best thinking on thetopic has been unabashedly evaluative in nature. Disentangling the phe-nomenon from this language of appraisal poses a challenge, in part becauseit is not clear such a feat can be accomplished, and in part because it is notclear it should be. In what follows, I do not entirely avoid this lan-guage myself.

Robert Spadoni is Associate Professor at Case Western Reserve University, where he teaches film studies. He isthe author of Uncanny Bodies: The Coming of Sound Film and the Origins of the Horror Genre (University ofCalifornia Press, 2007) and essays on film atmosphere, horror films, and other topics.� 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO2020, VOL. 37, NO. 1, 48–75https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2019.1606558

Page 2: What is Film Atmosphere?

I begin by quickly surveying how film writers have invoked the termatmosphere, asking specifically how they construe the relationship betweenatmosphere and style. From these claims it will be possible to infer somegeneral propositions about the nature of film atmosphere, and tie thesepoints to writing by German philosopher Gernot B€ohme, who considersthe atmosphere in such aesthetic works as theatrical stage sets and architec-tural structures. B€ohme, I argue, offers a robust and general definition ofthe concept that sheds light on how atmosphere functions in films. Last, inan attempt to show how his ideas can be applied in film studies, I siftthrough some metaphors that have been used to characterize the atmos-phere in films, and conclude by looking at one, breath, in relation to a filmthat has probably been called “atmospheric” as often as any film evermade: Jacques Tourneur’s 1943 I Walked with a Zombie.

Atmosphere and Style

In an unbearably moving death scene, in which the hero throws himself over themoon of emotion, and the camera spills an oatmealish atmosphere around him, thestyle is a cross between Hawks and Euripides, and the visual details are magnificent.

—Manny Farber on The Champion (Dir. Mark Robson, 1949)4

Many have viewed atmosphere as a thing apart from the other aspects of afilm. Here are three examples of this endemic thinking: 1) a 1910 advertise-ment in The Moving Picture World promises that “the strength of thisstory, the picturesque settings, live western atmosphere, and the highly art-istic photography, make this picture among the best of our Western pro-ducer’s recent dramatic offerings”;5 2) screenwriter Frances Marionexplains, in 1938, that practitioners of her craft churn out variations onfamiliar story patterns by creating and manipulating “character, environ-ment, atmosphere, time, relationship, motivation, and complications”;6 and3) a 2007 book about horror films finds subgenres displaying “differencesat the levels of convention, narrative, iconography, atmosphere andsetting.”7 This inclination, to tick off a list of a film’s ingredients andinclude atmosphere in it, suggests that it should be possible to identifymany parts of a film that play no appreciable role in creating and sustain-ing its atmosphere.This thinking can insert a wall between a film’s atmosphere and its style,

one we can observe operating at different levels of generality. At the highestlevel, V. F. Perkins writes of a film that, “in terms of atmosphere the sceneis successful; it remains very questionable on the level of style”;8 not ashigh, Graham Greene describes the “atmospherically correct” qualities of aSherlock Holmes film, then adds that “this is the atmosphere conveyed, Ishould make clear, and not the effect of the photography”;9 and Lotte

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 49

Page 3: What is Film Atmosphere?

Eisner sections off just one type of shot when she writes, of G. W. Pabst’s1929 Pandora’s Box, that “it is the close-ups which determine the characterof the film; the flamboyant or phosphorescent atmosphere and the lumi-nous mists of London remain throughout merely a kind of accompanimentto these close-ups.”10

Such compartmentalizing thinking is widespread, even though manyof these same writers understand that it is ludicrous to try to separate afilm’s atmosphere from its style. I will begin with stylistic elements thateveryone agrees are inseparable from atmosphere, and work toward onesthat are less often explicitly recognized for the role they play.Maybe foremost among the unquestioned contributors is mise en sc�ene.

Lighting, for example, everyone knows, is atmospheric: in Carl Th. Dreyer’sVampyr (1932), “shadows cast by the staircase railings jerking crazilyaround on the walls of the stairwell… are left an unexplained part of thegeneral uncanny atmosphere”;11 in Cat People (Dir. Jacques Tourneur,1942), “the dappled and deceptive lighting, the rough texture of the walland the shadows of wind-blown leaves create a sinister atmosphere.”12

Noting walls and staircases, these writers identify another aspect of miseen sc�ene with a universally acknowledged connection to atmosphere: set-tings. A 1926 description of a 1909 film reports that during production,“incidental scenes for atmosphere were made, including campfires and thelike”;13 a 1950 book about Hollywood observes that, “if the actors do notcarry a romantic scene well, the director can shoot from them to a land-scape bathed in a full moon and thus increase the romantic atmosphere”;14

and Dudley Andrew, a contemporary scholar who shows great sensitivity toatmosphere, notes, of props in poetic realist films, that “coordinated light-ing and set design… bathe these objects in an atmosphere that seems toemanate from something deep inside them.”15

One reason the notion that settings help to create atmosphere seems self-evident is that settings so obviously factor in the creation of cinematicspace—and atmosphere, which conjures up images of mist, vapor, strato-spheric heights and vast stretches, and weather events of every kind gatheringand moving across these reaches—evokes space as well. This is also why, if Imay digress for a moment, atmosphere makes for a more productive name ofthe phenomenon under examination than does mood, a word that has beenused interchangeably with atmosphere throughout film history. Rather thananthropomorphize a film by giving it a mood, I suggest that it is preferable tospatialize it, thus encouraging us to focus on formal aspects of the work. Thesense of a film as a dynamic, unfolding, volumetric entity is reinforced by oneof it possessing an atmosphere. The innate spatiality of a film renders set-tings—and the things arrayed across them, such as props and lighting—uncontroversially relevant to studying atmosphere.

50 R. SPADONI

Page 4: What is Film Atmosphere?

The same reasoning renders diegetic sound straightforwardly relevant aswell. Most pertinent is ambient sound, a recognition underlined by the lan-guage of sound technicians. A sound recording handbook, for example,instructs technicians to supply “background atmosphere (‘atmos’ or ‘buzztrack’) at the same level and in sufficient quantity to cover any gaps thatmay be introduced by editing or where there are more pictures than syn-chronous sound.”16 Moreover, just as often touched upon in considerationsof atmosphere is, of course, nondiegetic music. One need look no furtherthan this music’s common synonym, “mood music,” but here are two morerecognitions of the basic connection: an encyclopedist of music for silentfilms advises accompanists, when making selections, to “determine the geo-graphic and national atmosphere of your picture”;17 and a composer ofscores for sound films writes that he “tries to find a musical ‘atmosphere’that belongs to that film alone.”18

Cinematography offers up more techniques with readily apparent linksto atmosphere. In a silent film, tinting colors a film’s spaces when“atmosphere is carefully sustained with the yellow candlelight, the golddawn, the pink firelight, the deep blue of the night.”19 A shot’s durationfigures in the equation also. In Orson Welles’s The Magnificent Ambersons(1942), Andr�e Bazin finds a sequence shot emphasizing a kitchen’s clut-tered surfaces, pressurizing a dramatic buildup that, when the scene reachesits climax, discharges itself in a manner that resonates with the electricalstorm thundering outside;20 and in Steven Spielberg’s Schindler’s List(1993), another writes:

freneticism is conveyed by the camera’s rapid cuts and tracking shots as it followsthe women into the showers’ darkened interior; yet as they stare at the showerheads,the camera pace appears to slow down and the mood intensifies, heightening anatmosphere of tense anticipation.21

Third, and just as a long take will confer added weight to a setting, so willa distant camera. A book on film acting notes that “the long shot is usuallytaken to establish the atmosphere and setting of a scene.”22 Less prosaically,Manny Farber reflects on Carol Reed’s The Third Man (1949):

The movie’s almost antique, enervated tone comes from endless distance shots withpoetically caught atmosphere and terrain, glimpses of languid, lachrymose peoplesweeping or combing their hair, and that limp Reed manner with actors, whichmakes you feel you could push a finger straight through a head, and a sweater or ahat has as much warmth and curiosity as the person wearing it.23

Farber, who identifies another synonym of atmosphere (tone), is anotherwho sees distant framings making atmosphere. Also, he helps us shift ourattention to stylistic elements that are less often acknowledged for the partthey play—for Farber also finds atmosphere fueled by performances,including ones by actors in leading roles. He thus challenges a pervasive

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 51

Page 5: What is Film Atmosphere?

and long-entrenched view in film studies, which is that atmosphere prop-erly serves as a background and an accompaniment to a film’s characters,turns of the plot, and other foregrounded elements. Here are two expres-sions of this thinking: King Vidor, in the silent era, envisions a “motionpicture without a story. By that I mean a production in which the maininterest will center about the atmosphere and background rather than inthe acting or the plot”;24 and Alan Williams describes, in Hollywood soundfilms, “a clear and reassuring hierarchy of sonic importance, and this isreinforced by a kind of step-system of sonic presence, sounds being madeto seem either very close (important) or distant (‘atmosphere’).”25

One last point to note about this passage in Farber is his willingness toexplore how The Third Man makes him feel, his synesthetic grasp of themost intimate contours and textures of the viewing experience. Withoutthis sensitivity, it is difficult to analyze, appreciate, and even perceive theatmospheric character of a film.26 Here again is a challenge for film schol-arship: How to maintain a disciplined perspective while not shying awayfrom these sensuous, and, as Farber shows repeatedly, specifically tactilequalities of a film? I will address this question directly later on, and suggesthere only that we might look to Farber and some of his contemporaries forexamples and inspiration.So much for the low-hanging fruit. I now want to show that writers—

despite their frequent claims and working assumptions to the contrary—implicitly understand that no element of style can be isolated fromatmosphere. Take dialogue, which, many suppose, it is the atmosphere’sfunction to support through its subservient appropriateness. Yet JulianHanich can find, in haunted house films, that “the dense, constricting, laby-rinth-like atmosphere is not only evoked visually, but also through dialoguepassages.”27 Consider, too, close-ups, which shut out the environment, and,Lotte Eisner suggests, compel viewers to focus on those foregrounds that itis the atmosphere’s function merely to accompany.First, close-ups do not necessarily shut out the environment. One might

be of a prop, and therefore magnify a detail of setting. For example, SergeiEisenstein identifies the kettle as the subject of the “most Griffithian ofclose-ups,” and finds these shots soaking in a “Dickensian atmosphere.”28

The problem gets pricklier, though, when considering that more ubiquitoussubject of the close-up, the human face, which telegraphs character motiva-tions and other psychology, and, when dialogue issues from it, parcels outmajor quantities of narrative information.29 Yet it turns out that this car-dinal fixture of the cinematic foreground is no different than a kettle inthis regard.Referring to a scene in Billy Wilder’s Sunset Boulevard (1950), in which

a character says something to another under his breath, Farber writes that,

52 R. SPADONI

Page 6: What is Film Atmosphere?

when “the camera moved in for a very close close-up, the atmospherebecame molecular and as though diseased.”30 Gilberto Perez, quotinganother writer, describes a moonlit close-up of the love-struck Ellie inFrank Capra’s It Happened One Night (1934), when “the camera brieflycatches a moist reflection of light in her eyes: ‘a gleam slight but clear’that distills the ‘atmosphere of yearning’ suffusing the whole movie.”31

Imagine the routine perception of the relationship between narrative andatmosphere to conform not to a foreground/background schema butinstead an inside/outside one, with the characters and story claiming thebull’s-eye and the atmosphere relegated to the outer rings. Perez turns thisschema inside out when he sees an eye, that moist nucleus of a character’sexpression and emotionality, distilling an entire film’s atmosphere.Perez can see an atmosphere distilled in an eye because atmosphere is

not merely space but its emotional coloration.32 This is why nondiegeticmusic, so plainly linked to atmosphere—but, for all its association with thecinematic “background,” less obviously linked to space—constitutes awedge that can help us pry the concept away from a film’s settings andambient sounds, for any element of style that can color a film’s emotionaltonality can be shown, and has been understood, to manufac-ture atmosphere.Not just distant and close views but every kind of view can stoke a film’s

atmospheric output. No facet of cinematography lies outside the reach ofthis vast operation, including more and less mobile framings. In a film,“apparently aimless camera movements enhance the claustrophobic atmos-phere.”33 In another, featuring “limited camera movement and stationarycharacters, the pacing is slow and atmospheric.”34 Camera angles pitch inas well—when “well-chosen camera angles and memorable frame composi-tions intelligently ‘tell’ the story while adding to the movie’s atmosphere”;35

and when another film uses “bizarre low angles and depth to signify athreatening atmosphere.”36

Finally, editing might seem like the most airless component of film styleof all. But atmosphere is everywhere, and no part of a film does not con-tribute to it. A Griffith film captures details of setting in “shots which werenot called for in the plot but which, when carefully edited, created anatmosphere and background that greatly reinforced the narrative and actionof the story.”37 More abstractly—and breaking away from settingaltogether—another analyzes Griffith’s “ability to take advantage of theatmosphere of speculation arising between shots.”38

Atmosphere refuses to stay in the backgrounds and outer rings. Far froma support and an accompaniment, it is everywhere. To recognize this qual-ity is to take a step toward revising our understanding of the place andfunction of atmosphere within the total film viewing experience.

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 53

Page 7: What is Film Atmosphere?

The Highly Global Nature of the Appraisal

This quality proper to the work… is a world atmosphere. How is it produced?Through the ensemble from which it emanates. All the elements of the worldrepresented conspire to produce it.

—Mikel Dufrenne, The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience39

Many writers, in addition to seeing atmosphere as subordinate and sup-portive, do not hesitate to declare some films more atmospheric thanothers, and some not atmospheric at all. Eugene Vale, in his 1944 screen-writing handbook, draws this analogy:

Any place used or frequented predominantly by a characteristically distinct group orclass of people is likely to have atmosphere. For instance: a place which sells utensilsto fishermen who have been fishermen all their lives, has atmosphere. However, if itis only a section in a department store, selling utensils to fishermen who go fishingon Sundays, it is likely to have no atmosphere.40

Not asking whether the department store simply has a different atmospherethan the fishing shop, Vale writes that “some places have atmosphere andothers have not.”41 Then, in a move highly characteristic of the term’sapplication throughout film history, he wields it judgmentally: “Manyartists have tried to create atmosphere, some successfully, others not, andsome were able to create it occasionally.”42 Such reasoning suggests that itshould be possible to identify artworks that contain no atmos-phere whatsoever.More recent thinking reaches different conclusions. For architect and

architecture theorist Mark Wigley, even in cases of the most pragmatic andaustere designs, “atmospheric effects cannot be avoided.”43 This is so evenfor that most pragmatic and austere architectural instrument—the blueprint:

The cult of the abstract line constructs its own atmosphere. It defines a dream spacein which the architect works, a space in which atmospheric drawings or statementscan then be tolerated as subordinate excesses. The very rejection of atmosphereconstructs a particular atmosphere. Every small choice of representational techniquedefines an atmosphere.44

In another sphere, every small choice of representational technique, takentogether, constitutes a film’s style. Wigley suggests that, in architecture andcinema alike, these techniques cannot help but yield atmosphere, for thatoutcome is intrinsic to their essence and operation. So construed, atmos-phere becomes something different than a distinctive quality which somefilms possess and others lack. Whether or not the artist is successful, andindifferent to the judgments of critics, atmospheric effects cannotbe avoided.Atmospheres are “global” entities, then, in two senses: every part of a

film helps create it; and every film has it. Returning to the first sense,

54 R. SPADONI

Page 8: What is Film Atmosphere?

Gernot B€ohme links this quality to the haziness that inescapably attachesitself to the concept whenever someone tries to describe it:

Atmosphere is itself something extremely vague, indeterminate, intangible. Thereason is primarily that atmospheres are totalities: atmospheres imbue everything,they tinge the whole of the world or a view, they bathe everything in a certain light,unify a diversity of impressions in a single emotive state.45

Film writers who share this sense include Ed. S. Tan, who, summarizingwork by researchers on mood, writes that an “important characteristic isthe absence of an object and the highly global nature of the appraisal.When you feel depressed, the whole world looks miserable. Moods are notepisodic and may last longer than the film.”46

More pragmatic thinkers understand this global nature as well. Especiallyattuned to it are writers on film music. A New York Times correspondent,writing in the midst of the coming of sound, predicted that film soundwould “provide ‘atmosphere’ instead of disconnected ‘incidental noises.’”47

This journalist intuits that soundtracks will do something more dispersedand galvanizing than punctuate the odd moment here and there. RickAltman observes that, earlier, silent film accompanists came to the samerecognition.48 He quotes film music columnist Clarence E. Sinn, who, in1910, identifies the accompanist’s primary obligation:

It is the general character of the picture which you must observe. Taken together, whatis the predominant feature? Is it pathetic, mysterious, tragical or comical? Work up tothis general effect whatever it is. The producer takes great pains to convey certainimpressions and preserve a certain atmosphere, and it is his due that these unities bepreserved so the audience may receive his story in the same spirit in which it is told.49

Pushing further, Aaron Copland understands that music must not onlypreserve unities but also create them, defining this function of film scoring:

Building a sense of continuity. The picture editor knows better than anyone howserviceable music can be in tying together a visual medium which is, by its verynature, continually in danger of falling apart. One sees this most obviously inmontage scenes where the use of a unifying musical idea may save the quick flashesof disconnected scenes from seeming merely chaotic.50

Atmosphere helps to save a film from the centrifugal force of its own het-erogeneity. Binding, blanketing music makes this function explicit, althoughI have argued that every part of a film feeds atmospheric production.Writers on topics other than music who appreciate the global nature of

atmosphere include Perez, who sees an “‘atmosphere of yearning’ suffusingthe whole” of It Happened One Night; and Andrew, who perceives, inFrench poetic realist films, “atmosphere as an effect of cinematic texture, asa pervasive overtone emanating variously from cinematography, set design,sound, music, script, and acting.”51 Perez and Andrew grasp atmosphere’srelationship to the aesthetic totality.

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 55

Page 9: What is Film Atmosphere?

Atmosphere is everywhere in a film, and no film is without it. But whatis it? What do people mean when they invoke the term? Just by cataloginghow they have done so, we already begin to see the outlines of a definitiontaking shape. Yet, as even my brief survey shows, the word’s meaning isanything but fixed. There are many kinds and senses of atmosphere, and adefinition broad enough to encompass them all will necessarily be anaccommodating one. The term is widely applicable, which makes its mean-ing potentially slippery, and the phenomenon itself is as ubiquitous, inde-terminate, and diffuse as air.52 These qualities make it especially importantto resist temptations to be vague and overly impressionistic when concep-tualizing what atmosphere is and when approaching an individual film.B€ohme provides guidance on both of these fronts.

Giant Sponges and Other Metaphors

TERRY GROSS, host: Jim Cameron, welcome to FRESH AIR. Can I ask you to giveus an example of a shot or two, or a scene, that epitomizes for you what you can dowith 3-D that you couldn’t do in a regular film?

Mr. JAMES CAMERON (Filmmaker, Avatar): Well, I think it’s sometimes as simpleas, you know, a shot in a snowstorm would feel so much more tactile to the viewer.You’d actually feel like the snowflakes were falling on you and around you, youknow, that sort of thing, any time that the medium of the air between you and thesubject can be filled with something.

—Terry Gross, host, Fresh Air, National Public Radio53

Atmospheres are not backgrounds but totalities. B€ohme extends this claimby a leap, casting atmosphere’s reach outside the boundaries of the aes-thetic text. He describes, as many film writers have done, senses of the phe-nomenon as both space and emotional coloration, defining atmosphere “astuned space, i.e. a space with a certain mood.”54 But whose mood? The art-work’s, as in a piece of “moody chamber music,” or the perceiver’s?Crucially, it is both, because for B€ohme, an atmosphere consists of everyparticle of the aesthetic work and also the surrounding intersubjectiveexperience that binds perceivers to the work and perceivers to each other.This makes intuitive sense, for what ultimately matters is the atmosphere

that engulfs not a film’s characters but its audience. When Tan writes thata mood “may last longer than the film,” he has gestured beyond the filmand pointed toward its viewers. Recall, too, Clarence E. Sinn’s call foraccompanists to focus on the atmosphere the producer wanted, so “theaudience may receive his story in the same spirit in which it is told.”Accompanists help push this “spirit” out into the auditorium. But musiconly helps, for all the other elements are pushing, too, including settings:Andrew, referring to French production designer Alexandre Trauner, writes

56 R. SPADONI

Page 10: What is Film Atmosphere?

that “a general atmosphere suffuses each Trauner film, one so pervasivethat it beclouds the spectator.”55

Draw the circle of an atmosphere’s compass and it will encircle a film’s view-ers. This helps to explain why so many have identified the locus of an atmos-phere not in a film text but a theater auditorium. The press book for VictorHalperin’s White Zombie (1932) includes this wishful account of a pre-view screening:

A tense stillness pervaded the atmosphere. Eyes were riveted on the screen and everynow and then the stillness was punctuated by shrieks of horror at some thrillingclimax until the final exciting sequence practically lifted them from their seats andleft them limp.56

Another horror film, Andr�e de Toth’s House of Wax (1953), left a reviewerfeeling, when the film ended, that “if you had escaped the orgiastic partici-pation you felt dirtied, as if in an atmosphere of perversion.”57 And Farberpaints this drippingly sensuous, if unpleasant, picture of the exhibition site,tacking on a note about film atmosphere only at the end:

The hard-bitten action film finds its natural home in caves: the murky, congestedtheaters, looking like glorified tattoo parlors on the outside and located near busterminals in big cities. These theaters roll action films in what, at first, seems like anightmarish atmosphere of shabby transience, prints that seem overgrown with junglemoss, sound tracks infected with hiccups. The spectator watches two or three actionfilms go by and leaves feeling as though he were a pirate discharged from a giant sponge.

The cutthroat atmosphere in the itch house is reproduced in the moviesshown there.58

Atmosphere’s expansive reach and essential status make intuitive sense.B€ohme’s intervention is that he makes these attributes explicit terms of thediscussion, and this approach is overdue. He also accounts for the indeter-minacy and diffuseness of atmosphere while simultaneously suggesting away that our analysis of it need not itself lack concreteness. He does thisby emphasizing atmosphere’s quality of betweenness. Atmospheres are an:

intermediate phenomenon, something between subject and object. That makes them,as such, intangible, and means that… they have no secure ontological status. But forthat very reason it is rewarding to approach them from two sides, from the side ofsubjects and from the side of objects, from the side of reception aesthetics and fromthe side of production aesthetics.59

B€ohme brings together, under his umbrella concept, the circumscribed par-ticulars of the aesthetic text with the ephemeral intangibles of its reception.And so the steady and “objective” eye we bring to formal analysis can helpanchor the study of something more airy and elusive.Some who register this quality of betweenness envision atmosphere as a

sort of viscous substance spread across a film’s surface. A film’s story is“impressionistically coated with San Francisco’s oatmeal-gray atmosphere;”60

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 57

Page 11: What is Film Atmosphere?

another’s bad music is “poured over the whole film like a sticky sauce;”61

another’s director and art director:

clothe everything in chiaroscuro and mist… Swirls of dust and smoke wreath thedwellings of the beggar king and cling to the bare walls, where the wretches’ rags arelike ornamental blobs of paint, and hover in the nuptial shed on the docks, softeningthe splendour of the tables brimming with fruit and silverware amid the reflectionsof the gentle candlelight.62

These evocations of clothing, clinging, wreathing, brimming, and reflectingaffix our senses to edges and surfaces—including, when costumes becomepaint blobs on canvas, the film’s surface, a membrane that simultaneouslydemarcates and forms a seam of contact between the film’s world and itsviewers. That we can, as B€ohme notes, approach an atmosphere from twosides is suggested in the way an atmosphere can adhere to a film’s wallsand costumes and wrap in the other direction with equal ease—as whenHouse of Wax deposits a residue on viewers, and another film’s “hauntingatmosphere clings onto you like steam in a bathhouse.”63 Atmosphere goesboth ways because its location can be pinpointed in neither the film nor itsviewers. It comes into being when these entities come together.

Our task is to concretize this uniqueness in its sensuous external features… so thatthe screen manifests the “flesh” and the texture of the atmosphere.

—Andrei Tarkovsky on his 1972 film Solaris64

Atmospheres are vague, spread out, and ineffable, and so a writer can beforgiven for resorting to figurative and even fanciful language when tryingto evoke one. This approach turns out, in fact, to be a valuable rhetoricalimpulse, for such language casts light on atmosphere’s functioning, sources,and character—including its liminality. A metaphor implied by the figura-tions of atmosphere as a coating is atmosphere as a skin, a metaphor thatsends us into territory that has been explored by theorists who take a phe-nomenological approach to cinema. Vivian Sobchack, Laura Marks,Jennifer Barker, and others argue for decentering sight as the reigningmode of perception for understanding film spectatorship, reimagining theprocess as a form of touch. Sobchack construes spectatorship as “embodiedvision,” and places at the core of her theory a conception of the experienceas heavily intersubjective.65 Barker, in The Tactile Eye: Touch and theCinematic Experience, examines “the relation between the spectator’s lived-body and that of the film.”66 Her emphasis on two bodies calls to mind avacillation described previously, whereby an atmosphere may stick to a filmor to its viewers. For Barker—and Laura Marks, for whom skin figures cen-trally in her theory of haptic visuality67—atmosphere is not a key word, butsome of their concerns and priorities nevertheless dovetail with mine.

58 R. SPADONI

Page 12: What is Film Atmosphere?

The overlap increases in work by Kristi McKim, who introduces anothermetaphor. In Cinema as Weather: Stylistic Screens and Atmospheric Change,McKim asks how on-screen weather conditions shape and mirror “the wea-ther of our screening experience.”68 Taking a cue from the roots of theword atmosphere in meteorology, and asking how cinematic portrayals ofsuch environmental conditions as wind, rain, and snow infiltrate film view-ing, McKim finds these conditions creating atmosphere in more substantiveways than notions of weather as merely an appropriate backdrop wouldsuggest.69 Others recognize the importance of diegetic weather in makingatmosphere—Robert Bird, for example, who describes, in a Tarkovsky film,“an atmosphere fed by the harsh sea wind that scours the landscape,courses through open windows and carries the force of war.”70 Weather isatmospheric—and, importantly, whether or not a film features much salientweather at all, atmospheres are weather-like: Katie Trumpener finds, whena musical transitions into or out of a number, viewers registering “a per-ceptible shift in the atmosphere, the emotional ‘weather’ of a movie.”71

While the skin metaphor visualizes atmosphere’s betweenness, a benefitof construing atmosphere as “emotional weather” is that it offers a modelof the phenomenon as airborne, and this is appropriate given its name; asB€ohme writes, “atmospheres are moods, which one feels in the air.”72 Whatis gained by thinking about atmosphere as an air one can feel? Somethingnot lost is a sense of the phenomenon as eminently shared by a film andits viewers, as the James Cameron quote at the top of this section suggests.Furthermore, once airborne, atmosphere lends itself to other metaphorsthat illuminate the phenomenon’s intersubjectivity with special vividness.

The atmosphere reeks of compulsive wrongness.

—Anthony Lane, reviewing Robin Pront’s film The Ardennes (2017)73

There are types of air that, more than weather, enter and exit the bodyfreely, and demonstrate that the envelope separating a person from her sur-roundings is nothing if not porous. One such air is aroma. Laura Marks, inTouch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media, explores how films by theBrothers Quay arouse viewers’ sense of smell by confronting them withrich textures and an “overwhelming presence of detail.”74 More mainstreamworks evoke this sensation as well. For B€ohme, “what is characteristic ofthings is their tone, their ‘odor’ or emanation—that is to say, the way inwhich they express their essence”;75 while for B�ela Bal�asz, atmosphere is“the air and the aroma that pervade every work of art.”76 Film atmospheresthat trigger experiences akin to olfactory sensations include one that carries“a genuine aroma of Poe”;77 one featuring “exteriors with a tangy sharpnessthat was practically three-dimensional”;78 and, two from James Agee—a

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 59

Page 13: What is Film Atmosphere?

film with “an atmosphere you can all but get the temperature and cider fra-grance and staidly sporty erotic tension of,”79 and one that exudes an“oxygen-sharp, otherwise unattainable atmosphere, almost a smell,of freedom.”80

Aromas enter and exit the body. The outside world coming in is com-parable to the emotions that can grip and pervade a viewer, blurring theline that objectively, although not experientially, tells us where a film leavesoff and its reception begins. Another air that suggests this permeabilityis breath.81

Cinema Audiences Reproducibly Vary the Chemical Composition of Air DuringFilms, by Broadcasting Scene Specific Emissions on Breath

—Jonathan Williams et al. Report title in Scientific Reports82

Linking Walter Benjamin’s concept of the aura to atmosphere, B€ohme writesthat an aura is “something which flows forth spatially, almost something likea breath or a haze.”83 In film studies, one finds breathing to be another bod-ily experience that phenomenologists, including Barker, explore for what itcan tell us about a process that theorists throughout film history have con-strued overwhelmingly as an optical one.84 In The Place of Breath in Cinema,Davina Quinlivan asks how some films highlight the “dualistic nature ofbreathing which unsettles boundaries between ourselves and the outerworld.”85 Here again, a phenomenologist’s observations apply in a study ofatmosphere—where one detects two-way traffic across this boundary in writ-ing that points, collectively, to two bodies breathing while a film unreels. Ina film, diegetic sound “breathes atmosphere into the tale;”86 another findsways “to intensify the real-life atmosphere in which the camera canbreathe;”87 in another, settings “breathe the atmosphere of an uncannyruin.”88 And so soundtracks, cameras, and settings are breathing. So arewhole films: Hans Janowitz, cowriter of The Cabinet of Caligari (1920),directed by Robert Wiene, writes that “the atmosphere of the picture had tobreathe an air of unreality”;89 in another film, a close-up marks the momentat which the film “holds its breath.”90 We can add to this list audiences, andnote that what they are inhaling is films: on a commercial airliner, “the flick-ering screens that surround passengers create an atmosphere of images light-ing the cabin and permeating the cabin, as if cinema becomes air tobreathe.”91 But, if audiences are breathing, it is not at every moment: in asilent film, just before a gunshot is fired, the orchestra paused, “held itsbreath with the patrons until the suspense had passed”;92 while in film scenescharacterized by dread and stillness, “viewers hardly dare to breathe.”93

Films and their audiences breathe each other. I suggest that one reasonbreath, better than aroma, captures this sense of mutual intake and outflow

60 R. SPADONI

Page 14: What is Film Atmosphere?

is that breathing is essential to life; and without atmosphere, likewise, thereis no film experience at all. And yet one cannot dispel the notion thatsome films are more atmospheric than others quite so easily, in fact notnearly so. All films have it, but some brew atmospheres that intoxicate andlinger. Again we return to evaluation, built into the DNA of the concept,for Vale has a point when he claims that aficionados of atmosphere willfind the piquant specificity of a shop for dedicated anglers more enticingthan the bland countertops and smells of a department store. Both mightbe, technically speaking, “atmospheric,” but qualities we associate with theword waft more compellingly from the cluttered, dim, 40-year-old placethan from the Sears. All films have it, but some launch us into rhapsodiccelebrations of their atmospheres while most do not. I close with a filmthat does.

I Walked with a Zombie

The dialogue is almost nothing but a commentary on past events, obsessivelyrevising itself, finally giving up the struggle to explain and surrendering to a muteacceptance of the inexplicable. We watch the slow, atmospheric, lovingly detailedscenes with delight and fascination, realizing at the end that we have seen nothingbut the traces of a conflict decided in advance.

—Chris Fujiwara on I Walked with a Zombie94

I Walked with a Zombie arouses sensations of touch, for one writer effusinga “velvety lushness,” including in a scene in which “whispering slivers oflight streak through the slatted blinds of a Caribbean mansion, like fingersreaching out in the darkness.”95 Moreover—and switching metaphors—ifthe film rolls over its viewers like a fog, then the material of this advance isnot primarily narrative in nature, for—as Chris Fujiwara and J. P. Telotte96

note—the film’s narrative is oblique and thinly dispersed. It never explainswhether the root of zombieism is supernatural or physiological, but insteadprovides dramatic setups that lack payoffs, and, in general, loosens up thecausal connections, making room for air we can feel.97 No sharply incisedtwists and turns pull a viewer through this film. Instead, something moreconsistent churns through every shot, giving rise to the hypnogogic experi-ence that watching this film can induce.98 The film is no thrill ride but69minutes of what one admirer calls “an enveloping mood piece.”99

Narrative construction is one reason this modest film manifests a volumin-ously and palpably diffuse nature. Others include light that streaks like fin-gers, and qualities of a formal organization that are strongly characterizedby things that spread.This quality of dispersal and diffuseness, and the morbid substance of

the film’s veil-like textures, are signaled early on, when a character, Paul

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 61

Page 15: What is Film Atmosphere?

Holland (Tom Conway), on a boat slipping through the night, tells his newemployee, Betsy Connell (Frances Dee): “That luminous water—it takes itsgleam from millions of tiny dead bodies. The glitter of putrescence. There’sno beauty here. Only death and decay.” Across the film, lattice-works ofshadows cast by tree branches and window blinds, and plant fronds thatsplay out and coat the exterior as well as the interior settings, blend thefilm’s spaces and wash over the frame, softening distinctions between fore-ground and background, and inside and outside (Figures 1–2).Simultaneously, studding the film are emblems anchoring vigorous motivicconstellations and parallels. A hanging gourd offshoots a link to a hanginganimal carcass, which connects to an animal skull suspended on a stick,which connects to a human skull set into a circle of stones on the ground(Figures 3–6); and Ti-Misery, the slave-ship masthead grimly ornamentinga courtyard, sparks a link to the black, statue-like zombie Carrefour; and azombie woman in a diaphanous gown, pierced first by a sabre and later anarrow, visually rhymes with her voodoo-doll counterpart, pierced by a pin,all while circling us back to the arrow-pierced figurehead (Figures 7–10).Death and decay imagery spreads over the film, while spreading over

and through it is an air that is restlessly, noisily moving. Wind blowsthrough the animal skull, making an eerie sound, and through the holes inthe gourd, making a doleful chime; and a conch shell, when blown into,

Figure 1. An example of the film’s approach to dispersing shadows finely across its settings.

62 R. SPADONI

Page 16: What is Film Atmosphere?

Figure 2. Plants and shadows crowd an indoor space that is wide open to the night air.

Figure 3. A hanging gourd.

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 63

Page 17: What is Film Atmosphere?

Figure 4. A hanging animal carcass.

Figure 5. An animal skull on a stick.

64 R. SPADONI

Page 18: What is Film Atmosphere?

Figure 6. A skull in a circle of stones.

Figure 7. The figurehead Ti-Misery.

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 65

Page 19: What is Film Atmosphere?

Figure 8. Carrefour guards the crossroads.

Figure 9. Pierced by a sabre, the zombie does not bleed.

66 R. SPADONI

Page 20: What is Film Atmosphere?

issues a call that summons the zombie woman to the houmfort—the voo-doo temple that is the film’s center of death. Wind is seen and heard atmany moments, including when it disturbs the inside of the manor house,where the characters dine. More strikingly, wind blows louder than wehave heard before, in a shot that marks the beginning of a journey to thehoumfort, as the camera tracks more dramatically than we have seenbefore, sweeping past leaves that stir and rattle. The ensuing walk throughthe cane field is accompanied by a constant wind that carries drumbeatsblowing from the characters’ destination. Back at the house, a character lis-tens to the drums and complains: “For some reason, they always pick anight like this. This hot wind even sets me on edge.” Hot and—we canassume, in this tropical place—humid wind is like a breath that streamsfrom the characters, settings, and the themes not only of death and decay,but, as Alexander Nemerov notes,100 an uncontainable sadness that is con-centrated most potently in the weeping Ti-Misery. This breath intermingleswith that of viewers. Where the air comes from, and who or what inspiresand expires it, ceases to be clear. The mournful enchantment of the filmkeeps expanding, and is not halted by the final credits.Near the beginning, on the boat, Betsy says in a voiceover: “I looked at

those great glowing stars. I felt the warm wind on my cheek. I breatheddeep, and every bit of me inside myself said, ‘How beautiful.’” Hollandspeaks up. “It’s not beautiful,” he says. Betsy replies, “You read my

Figure 10. The voodoo doll, pierced by a pin.

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 67

Page 21: What is Film Atmosphere?

thoughts, Mr. Holland.” The exchange dramatizes something atmospheredoes, and atmospheric films do with exemplary power. Floating on thedreamy, meaning-charged, luminescent waves, a character reads another’sthoughts. Thoughts and feelings crisscross and interfuse in the spacebetween. Interior things breach boundaries effortlessly, mysteriously. Thebalmy air carries the emotional charge of the scene all the way to us.

Notes

1. Wigley, “The Architecture of Atmosphere,” in Daidalos p. 27.2. See, for example, Bird, Andrei Tarkovsky: Elements of Cinema; Groening Cinema

Beyond Territory: Inflight Entertainment and Atmospheres of Globalization, Spadoni,“Carl Dreyer’s Corpse: Horror Film Atmosphere and Narrative,” in A Companion tothe Horror Film; and Spadoni, “Horror Film Atmosphere as Anti-Narrative (andVice Versa),” in Merchants of Menace: The Business of Horror Cinema.

3. See, for example, Pollmann “Kalte Stimmung, or the Mode of Mood: Ice and Snowin Melodrama,” in Colloquia Germanica; McKim, Cinema as Weather: StylisticScreens and Atmospheric Change; Hanich, Cinematic Emotion in Horror Films andThrillers: The Aesthetic Paradox of Pleasurable Fear; and, for an example fromliterature study, Pizzo, “Atmospheric Exceptionalism in Jane Eyre: Charlotte Bront€e’sWeather Wisdom,” in PMLA.

4. Farber, “Fight Films,” in The Nation [7 May 1949], reproduced in Polito, Farber onFilm: The Complete Film Writings of Manny Farber, p. 314.

5. “Essanay Films—Comedy and Western—Two Big Releases” [advertisement], inMoving Picture World, p. 159.

6. Marion, “Scenario Writing,” in Behind the Screen: How Films Are Made, p. 34.7. Schneider, 100 European Horror Films, p. xxi.8. Perkins, Film as Film: Understanding and Judging Movies, p. 87.9. Greene, “Sherlock Holmes,” in The Spectator [8 March 1940], reproduced in Parkinson,

The Graham Green Film Reader: Reviews, Essays, Interviews, and Film Stories, p. 379.10. Eisner, The Haunted Screen: Expressionism in the German Cinema and the Influence

of Max Reinhardt, p. 300. On the strong tendency to section off film atmospherefrom narrative, see Spadoni, “Dreyer’s Corpse.”

11. Harrington, “Ghoulies and Ghosties,” in Horror Film Reader, p. 18.12. Powell, Deleuze and Horror Film, p. 70.13. Ramsaye, A Million and One Nights: A History of the Motion Picture, p. 520.14. Powdermaker, Hollywood, The Dream Factory: An Anthropologist Looks at the

Movie-Makers, p. 187.15. Andrew, Mists of Regret: Culture and Sensibility in Classic French Film, p. 37.16. Nisbett, The Sound Studio: Audio Techniques for Radio, Television, Film and

Recording, p. 283. B€ohme returns to sound many times in his writing. See, forexample, B€ohme, The Aesthetics of Atmospheres, pp. 129–132, 167–175.

17. Rapee, “Selections from Encyclopaedia of Music for Motion Pictures,” in CelluloidSymphonies: Texts and Contexts in Film Music History, p. 87.

18. Burt, The Art of Film Music, p. 11.19. Brownlow, The Parade’s Gone By, p. 290.20. Bazin, Orson Welles: A Critical View, p. 80.

68 R. SPADONI

Page 22: What is Film Atmosphere?

21. Picart and Frank, “Horror and the Holocaust: Genre Elements in Schindler’s List andPsycho,” in The Horror Film, p. 212.

22. Marsh, Screen Acting, p. 91.23. Farber, “The Third Man,” in The Nation [1 April 1950], reproduced in Polito, Farber

on Film, p. 331.24. Trent, “Daily Film Chaff for the Fans,” in Morning Daily Telegraph.25. Williams, “Godard’s Use of Sound,” in Film Sound: Theory and Practice, pp. 336–7;

On atmosphere as background, see Spadoni, “Dreyer’s Corpse.”26. On the high value Farber placed on emotional expression in films, see Bordwell, The

Rhapsodes: How 1940s Critics Changed American Film Culture, pp. 82–110.27. Hanich, Cinematic Emotion, p. 173.28. Eisenstein, “Dickens, Griffith, and Ourselves” in Sergei Eisenstein, Selected Works,

vol. 3, Writings 1934–47, p. 195.29. On how film narratives generate atmosphere, see Spadoni, “Dreyer’s Corpse.”30. Farber, “The Gimp,” in Commentary [June 1952], reproduced in Polito, Farber on

Film, p. 389.31. Perez, The Material Ghost: Films and their Medium, p. 10.32. For B€ohme on atmospheres as both emotional and spatial, see, for example,

Aesthetics of Atmospheres, p. 5.33. S. Jacobs, The Wrong House: The Architecture of Alfred Hitchcock, p. 259.34. Kelley, “‘A Revolution in the Atmosphere:’ The Dynamics of Site and Screen in

1940s Soundies,” in Cinema Journal, p. 78.35. Johnson and Miller, The Christopher Lee Filmography: All Theatrical Releases,

1948–2003, p. 97.36. Bordwell, Staiger, and Thompson, The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and

Mode of Production to 1960, p. 351.37. L. Jacobs, The Rise of the American Film: A Critical History, pp. 109–110; note this

writer buying into the foreground/background view.38. Jesionowski, Thinking in Pictures: Dramatic Structure in D. W. Griffith’s Biograph

Films, p. 67.39. Dufrenne, The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience, p. 178.40. Vale, The Technique of Screenplay Writing, p. 56.41. Ibid.42. Ibid.43. Wigley, “Architecture of Atmosphere,” p. 27.44. Ibid.45. B€ohme, Aesthetics of Atmospheres, p. 29. On this passage, see also Spadoni, “Dreyer’s

Corpse,” pp. 164–5. On this quality of atmosphere, also see the Introduction,subtitled “Not to Leave Vagueness (But to Stay in It in the Right Way),” in Griffero,Atmospheres: Aesthetics of Emotional Spaces, pp. 1–7; and Orsoni “Point of View: AQuestion of Atmosphere,” in Vis A Vis International, p. 11.

46. Tan, Emotion and the Structure of Narrative Film: Film as an Emotion Machine,p. 204. On film atmosphere as “vague and elusive,” also see Bird, Andrei Tarkovsky,pp. 10, 13, 211.

47. MacCormac, “Sound and Screen,” in New York Times, p. X3.48. Altman notes that live music before 1910 tended to accentuate individual moments

and that “not until the teens would musicians regularly adopt an aesthetic ofcontinuous music matched not to transient images or actions but to each scene’soverall atmosphere” (Altman, Silent Film Sound, p. 368).

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 69

Page 23: What is Film Atmosphere?

49. Altman, Silent Film Sound, p. 243.50. Copland, “Tip to Moviegoers: Take off Those Ear-Muffs,” in New York Times

Magazine, p. 30.51. Andrew, Mists of Regret, p. 270.52. On the many senses of atmosphere and on its indeterminacy, see, for example,

B€ohme, Aesthetics of Atmospheres, pp. 11–12, 28–29, 183; and Bird, AndreiTarkovsky, p. 211. On film atmosphere’s diffuseness, see Spadoni, “Dreyer’s Corpse.”

53. Cameron interviewed by Terry Gross on Fresh Air, National Public Radio.54. B€ohme, Aesthetics of Atmospheres, p. 2. Griffero refers to “the spatiality of feelings”

(Atmospheres, p. 73).55. Andrew, Mists of Regret, p. 188.56. “What ‘Scarface’ Meant to Gangster Films ‘White Zombie’ Means to Thrillers,” in

Exhibitors’ Campaign Book for White Zombie, 1932.57. Sisk, “Passion in a New Dimension,” in Commonweal [26 October 1953], quoted in

Heffernan, Ghouls, Gimmicks, and Gold: Horror Films and the American MovieBusiness, 1953–1968, p. 32.

58. Farber, “Underground Films,” in Commentary [November 1957], reproduced inPolito, Farber on Film, p. 489. Mark Kermode suggests that, for an atmosphere tocast its spell, the audience need neither be large nor in a theater:

At around 11:00, when everyone else was in bed, I would sneak down into thefamily living room and sit entranced by a selection of creaky… horror flicks,usually from the Hammer or Amicus stable. No matter that I had to have thevolume turned down so far that it was impossible to hear anything that wasbeing said: what was captivating was the electrifying atmosphere, the sense ofwatching something that was forbidden, secretive, taboo” (“I Was a TeenageHorror Fan, Or, ‘How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Linda Blair,’” in IllEffects: The Media/Violence Debate, p. 57).

59. B€ohme, Aesthetics of Atmospheres, p. 29; also see, for example, p. 183; and Griffero,Atmospheres, pp. 121–123.

60. Farber, “‘Best Films’ of 1951,” in The Nation [5 January 1952], cited in Polito, Farberon Film, p. 376.

61. Prawer, Caligari’s Children: The Film as Tale of Terror, p. 225.62. Eisner, The Haunted Screen, p. 317.63. L-A Marks, “Eastern Promises,” in Culture Compass.64. Tarkovsky quoted in Bird, Andrei Tarkovsky, p. 117.65. Sobchack, Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture and The

Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience.66. Barker, The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience, p. 20.67. Marks, The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses and

Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media.68. McKim, Cinema as Weather: Stylistic Screens and Atmospheric Change, p. 4.69. For the word’s meteorological origins, also see, for example, B€ohme, Aesthetics of

Atmospheres, pp. 2, 25, 28, 163.70. Bird, Andrei Tarkovsky, p. 210.71. Trumpener, “The Ren�e Clair Moment and the Overlap Films of the Early 1930s:

Detlef Sierck’s April, April!” in Film Criticism, p. 39.72. B€ohme, “Acoustic Atmospheres: A Contribution to the Study of Ecological

Aesthetics,” in Soundscape: The Journal of Acoustic Ecology, p. 15. In the essay as it

70 R. SPADONI

Page 24: What is Film Atmosphere?

appears in B€ohme’s 2017 book, the phrase becomes “atmospheres are moodspervading the air” (p. 167).

73. Lane, “Family Packs” in New Yorker, p. 86.74. Marks, Touch, pp. 132. Also see Davina Quinlivan’s analysis of David Cronenberg’s

Spider (2002) in relation to “olfactory trauma,” in Quinlivan, The Place of Breath inCinema, pp. 100–102; and B€ohme, Aesthetics of Atmospheres, p. 125–6.

75. B€ohme, Aesthetics of Atmospheres, p. 32.76. Bal�asz, Visible Man [1924] in Carter (editor) and Livingstone (translator), B�ela

Bal�asz: Early Film Theory: Visible Man and The Spirit of Film, p. 22. For anotherinvocation of this metaphor in a description of atmosphere, see Orsini, Michel.“Point of View,” p. 11.

77. Rigby, American Gothic: Sixty Years of Horror Cinema, p. 146.78. Brownlow, The Parade’s Gone By, p. 221.79. Agee, in The Nation [25 November 1944], reproduced in Agee, Agee on Film:

Criticism and Comment on the Movies, p. 113.80. Agee, in The Nation [13 April 1946], reproduced in Agee, Agee on Film, p. 185.81. On atmosphere and the olfactory, and the olfactory linked to breath, see Griffero,

Atmospheres, pp. 63–9.82. Williams, St€onner, Wicker, et al., “Cinema Audiences Reproducibly Vary the

Chemical Composition of Air During Films, by Broadcasting Scene SpecificEmissions on Breath,” in Scientific Reports.

83. B€ohme, Aesthetics of Atmospheres, p. 15.84. Barker, Tactile Eye, pp. 145–157.85. Quinlivan, Place of Breath, p. 91.86. Andrew, Mists of Regret, p. 110.87. Kracauer, Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality, p. 200.88. Jacobs, Wrong House, p. 122.89. Janowitz, “Caligari—The Story of a Famous Story (Excerpts)” in The Cabinet of Dr.

Caligari: Texts, Contexts, Histories, p. 236.90. Eikhenbaum, “Problems of Cinema Stylistics,” in Russian Formalist Film Theory,

p. 75.91. Groening, Cinema Beyond Territory, p. 11.92. Beynon, Musical Presentation of Motion Pictures, pp. 137–8.93. Hanich, Cinematic Emotion, p. 180.94. Fujiwara, Jacques Tourneur: The Cinema of Nightfall, pp. 86–7.95. Zacharek, “Val Lewton Horror Collection,” in New York Times, p. A56. On how

another film, John Llewellyn Moxey’s The City of the Dead (1960), evokes tactilesensations in ways that thicken its atmosphere, see Spadoni, “Horror FilmAtmosphere,” pp. 118–21.

96. Fujiwara, Jacques Tourneur, p. 85–97; Telotte, Dreams of Darkness: Fantasy and theFilms of Val Lewton, p. 52.

97. On how a weak narrative can make a film more atmospheric, see Spadoni, “HorrorFilm Atmosphere.”

98. A fan refers to the “poetic and somewhat dreamy pacing of this tale of doomedromance and voodoo” (Arena, Fright Night on Channel 9: Saturday Night HorrorFilms on New York’s WOR–TV, 1973–1987, p. 115).

99. Sragow, “Scare Tactics,” in New Yorker, p. 24.100. Nemerov, Icons of Grief: Val Lewton’s Home Front Pictures, pp. 97–131.

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 71

Page 25: What is Film Atmosphere?

Works Cited

Agee, James. Agee on Film: Criticism and Comment on the Movies (New York: ModernLibrary, 2000).

Altman, Rick. Silent Film Sound (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004).Andrew, Dudley. Mists of Regret: Culture and Sensibility in Classic French Film (Princeton,

NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Arena, James. Fright Night on Channel 9: Saturday Night Horror Films on New York’s

WOR–TV, 1973–1987 (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2012).Bal�asz, B�ela. Visible Man (1924), in B�ela Bal�asz: Early Film Theory: Visible Man and The

Spirit of Film, Erica Carter, editor, and Rodney Livingstone, translator (New York:Berghahn, 2010).

Barker, Jennifer M. The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience (Berkeley, CA:University of California Press, 2009).

Bazin, Andr�e. Orson Welles: A Critical View (Los Angeles: Acrobat, 1991).Beynon, George W. Musical Presentation of Motion Pictures (New York: G. Schirmer,

1921).Bird, Robert. Andrei Tarkovsky: Elements of Cinema (London: Reaktion, 2008).B€ohme, Gernot. Acoustic Atmospheres: A Contribution to the Study of Ecological

Aesthetics. The Soundscape: Journal of Acoustic Ecology 1:1(2000), 15.B€ohme, Gernot. Aesthetics of Atmospheres, edited by Jean-Paul Thibaud (London:

Routledge, 2017).Bordwell, David, Staiger, Janet, and Thompson, Kristin. The Classical Hollywood Cinema:

Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960 (New York: Columbia University Press,1985).

Bordwell, David. The Rhapsodes: How 1940s Critics Changed American Film Culture(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016).

Brownlow, Kevin. The Parade’s Gone By (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press,1968).

Burt, George. The Art of Film Music (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1994).Copland, Aaron. “Tip to Moviegoers: Take Off Those Ear-Muffs.” New York Times

Magazine (1949 November 6), pp. 28–32.Dufrenne, Mikel. The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience, translated by Edward S.

Casey (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973 [1953]).Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Problems of Cinema Stylistics,” edited and translated by Herbert

Eagle. Russian Formalist Film Theory (Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Studies, 1981[1927]), pp. 55–80.

Eisenstein, Sergei. “Dickens, Griffith, and Ourselves.” Sergei Eisenstein, Selected Works, Vol.3, Writings 1934–47, edited by Richard Taylor, translated by William Powell (London: I.B. Taurus, 2010 [1942]), pp. 193–238.

Eisner, Lotte. The Haunted Screen: Expressionism in the German Cinema and the Influenceof Max Reinhardt (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1973).

“Essanay Films—Comedy and Western—Two Big Releases [advertisement].” MovingPicture World (1910 July 16), p. 159.

Farber, Manny. Farber on Film: The Complete Film Writings of Manny Farber, edited byRobert Polito (New York: Library of America, 2009).

Fujiwara, Chris. Jacques Tourneur: The Cinema of Nightfall (Baltimore: Johns HopkinsUniversity Press, 1998).

72 R. SPADONI

Page 26: What is Film Atmosphere?

Greene, Graham. The Graham Green Film Reader: Reviews, Essays, Interviews, and FilmStories, edited by David Parkinson (New York: Applause, 1995).

Griffero, Tonino. Atmospheres: Aesthetics of Emotional Spaces, translated by Sarah DeSanctis (Surrey, UK: Ashgate, 2010).

Groening, Stephen. Cinema Beyond Territory: Inflight Entertainment and Atmospheres ofGlobalization (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).

Gross, Terry, host. Interview with James Cameron. Fresh Air. National Public Radio (2010April 23) Transcript available at <http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=126191838>

Hanich, Julian. Cinematic Emotion in Horror Films and Thrillers: The Aesthetic Paradox ofPleasurable Fear (New York: Routledge, 2010).

Harrington, Curtis. “Ghoulies and Ghosties.” Horror Film Reader, edited by Alain Silverand James Ursini (New York: Limelight, 2000 [1952]), pp. 9–19.

Heffernan, Kevin. Ghouls, Gimmicks, and Gold: Horror Films and the American MovieBusiness, 1953–1968 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004).

Jacobs, Lewis. The Rise of the American Film: A Critical History (New York: Teacher’sCollege, 1968).

Jacobs, Steven. The Wrong House: The Architecture of Alfred Hitchcock (Rotterdam: 010Publishers, 2007).

Janowitz, Hans. “Caligari—The Story of a Famous Story (Excerpts).” The Cabinet of Dr.Caligari: Texts, Contexts, Histories, edited by Mike Budd (New Brunswick: RutgersUniversity Press, 1990 [1939]), pp. 221–39.

Jesionowski, Joyce E. Thinking in Pictures: Dramatic Structure in D. W. Griffith’s BiographFilms (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987).

Johnson, Tom, and Miller, Mark A. The Christopher Lee Filmography: All TheatricalReleases, 1948–2003 (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2004).

Kelley, Andrea. “‘A Revolution in the Atmosphere’: The Dynamics of Site and Screen in1940s Soundies.” Cinema Journal 54:2 (2015 Winter), 72–93.

Kermode, Mark. “I Was a Teenage Horror Fan, Or, ‘How I Learned to Stop Worrying andLove Linda Blair.’” Ill Effects: The Media/Violence Debate, edited by Martin Barker andJulian Petley (London: Routledge, 1997), pp. 57–66.

Kracauer, Siegfried. Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality (Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1997 [1960]).

Lane, Anthony. “Family Packs”. New Yorker (2017 January 16), p. 86–7.Marks, Loma-Ann. “Eastern Promises.” Culture Compass (2007 October 21). <www.cultur-

ecompass.co.uk/eastern-promises/> (As of 30 May, 2019, this content was on longeravailable).

MacCormac, John. “Sound and Screen.” New York Times (1928 June 24), p. X3.Marion, Frances. “Scenario Writing.” Behind the Screen: How Films Are Made, edited by

Stephen Watts (New York: Dodge, 1938), pp. 29–39.Marks, Laura U. The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses

(Durham: Duke University Press, 2000).Marks, Laura U. Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media (Minneapolis: University

of Minnesota Press, 2002).Marsh, Mae. Screen Acting (New York: Frederick A. Stokes Co., 1921).McKim, Kristi. Cinema as Weather: Stylistic Screens and Atmospheric Change (New York:

Routledge, 2013).Nemerov, Alexander. Icons of Grief: Val Lewton’s Home Front Pictures (Berkeley, CA:

University of California Press, 2005).

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 73

Page 27: What is Film Atmosphere?

Nisbett, Alec. The Sound Studio: Audio Techniques for Radio, Television, Film andRecording, 7th ed. (New York: Focal Press, 2003).

Orsoni, Michel. “Point of View: A Question of Atmosphere.” Vis A Vis International(1998), 9–11.

Perez, Gilberto. The Material Ghost: Films and Their Medium (Baltimore: Johns HopkinsUniversity Press, 1998).

Perkins, V. F. Film as Film: Understanding and Judging Movies (New York: Da Capo,1993).

Picart, Caroline J. S., and Frank, David A. “Horror and the Holocaust: Genre Elements inSchindler’s List and Psycho.” The Horror Film, edited by Stephen Prince (New Brunswick:Rutgers University Press, 2004), pp. 206–23.

Pizzo, Justine. “Atmospheric Exceptionalism” in Jane Eyre: Charlotte Bront€e’s WeatherWisdom. PMLA 131:1(2016), 84–100.

Pollmann, Inga. “Kalte Stimmung, or the Mode of Mood: Ice and Snow in Melodrama.”Colloquia Germanica 43:1/2(2010), 79–96.

Powdermaker, Hortense. Hollywood, The Dream Factory: An Anthropologist Looks at theMovie-Makers (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co, 1950).

Powell, Anna. Deleuze and Horror Film (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005).Prawer, S. S. Caligari’s Children: The Film as Tale of Terror (New York: Da Capo, 1980).Quinlivan, Davina. The Place of Breath in Cinema (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press,

2012).Ramsaye, Terry. A Million and One Nights: A History of the Motion Picture, vol. 2. (New

York: Simon and Schuster, 1926).Rapee, Erno. Selections from Encyclopaedia of Music for Motion Pictures [1925]. Celluloid

Symphonies: Texts and Contexts in Film Music History, edited by Julie Hubbert(Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2011), pp. 84–96.

Rigby, Jonathan. American Gothic: Sixty Years of Horror Cinema (London: Reynolds andHearn, 2007).

Schneider, Steven Jay, ed. 100 European Horror Films (London: BFI, 2007).Sobchack, Vivian. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture (Berkeley, CA:

University of California Press, 2004).Sobchack, Vivian. The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience (Princeton:

Princeton University Press, 1992).Spadoni, Robert. “Carl Dreyer’s Corpse: Horror Film Atmosphere and Narrative.” A

Companion to the Horror Film, edited by Harry M. Benshoff (Malden, MA: Blackwell,2014), pp. 151–67.

Spadoni, Robert. “Horror Film Atmosphere as Anti-Narrative (and Vice Versa).” Merchantsof Menace: The Business of Horror Cinema, edited by Richard Nowell (New York:Bloomsbury, 2014), pp. 109–28.

Sragow, Michael. “Scare Tactics.” New Yorker (2005 October 31), p. 24.Tan, Ed S. Emotion and the Structure of Narrative Film: Film as an Emotion Machine,

translated by Barbara Fasting (New York: Routledge, 1996).Telotte, J. P. Dreams of Darkness: Fantasy and the Films of Val Lewton (Urbana, IL:

University of Illinois Press, 1985).Trent, Gordon. “Daily Film Chaff for the Fans.” Morning Daily Telegraph (1925 March 17).Trumpener, Katie. “The Ren�e Clair Moment and the Overlap Films of the Early 1930s:

Detlef Sierck’s April, April!” Film Criticism 23:2–3 (1999 Winter/Spring), 33–45.Vale, Eugene. The Technique of Screenplay Writing (New York: Crown, 1944).

74 R. SPADONI

Page 28: What is Film Atmosphere?

“What ‘Scarface’ Meant to Gangster Films ‘White Zombie’ Means to Thrillers.” Exhibitors’Campaign Book for White Zombie, 1932. New York: Lincoln Center Branch of the NewYork Public Library.

Wigley, Mark. “The Architecture of Atmosphere.” Daidalos 68(1998), 18–27.Williams, Alan. “Godard’s Use of Sound” [1982]. Film Sound: Theory and Practice, edited

by Elisabeth Weis and John Belton (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985), pp.332–45.

Williams, Jonathan, St€onner, Christof, Wicker, J€org et al. “Cinema Audiences ReproduciblyVary the Chemical Composition of Air During Films, by Broadcasting Scene SpecificEmissions on Breath.” Scientific Reports 6:25464(2016). <www.nature.com/articles/srep25464>

Zacharek, Stephanie. “Val Lewton Horror Collection.” New York Times (2005 September11), p. A56.

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 75