what are we thinking?: using faceted classification and tagging to enhance subject access to the...

15
What are We Thinking?: Using Faceted Classification and Tagging to Enhance Subject Access to the Public Mind Elise Dunham The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research University of Connecticut SAA MDOR Meeting August 13, 2014 @elisedunham #saa14 #mdor14

Upload: gyles-clarke

Post on 26-Dec-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

What are We Thinking?: Using Faceted Classification and Tagging to Enhance Subject Access to the Public Mind

Elise DunhamThe Roper Center for Public Opinion Research

University of Connecticut

SAA MDOR MeetingAugust 13, 2014

@elisedunham #saa14 #mdor14

Roper Center Services

Datasets

Question Text, Response Categories, & Marginals

The Power of iPOLL

This day in history… Current events

Clinton’s visit to UConn=Women in Politics

MH17=Air Safety in Wake of Disaster

Nixon resignation, August 8, 1974

Civil Rights Act of 1964, July 2, 1964

The Power of iPOLL

Topics: FAMILY EQUALITY SEX GROUPS

Goals

Develop system for concept-based classification of manageable content

Implement workflows for identifying conceptual links between content at point of

acquisition/creation

Benefits of Faceted Classification & Tagging

• Flexible & agile• Indexer friendly• End user friendly• “Quick” startup

Iterative Project Steps

• Read & learn– The Accidental Taxonomist, Heather Hedden– Simmons GSLIS Taxonomy & Controlled

Vocabulary course, Heather Hedden– ICPSR & NYT vocabularies– Concepts: FRSAR, LC FAST, Syntactic Indexing

• Develop aboutness model to identify facets

Iterative Project Steps cont’d

• Develop controlled set of tags after analyzing: – Current iPOLL Topics– Topics at a Glance– User searches

• Develop backward- and forward- compatible infrastructure

• Assign tags to content

Study

Survey Samples

Variables

Power of iPOLL briefs

Primary source

Survey questions Topics

Sample Description

Methodology

Types

Secondary source

Press releases

Challenges

• Public opinion=inherently controversial• Tensions between theoretical purity &

implementation• Survey questions are sometimes shorter than

a tweet

Ideas Moving Forward

• Tag-a-thon• Outside review• Formal user testing/analysis• Linked data: be ready

ResourcesGESIS, “Improving precision and recall in study retrieval: a concept for thesaurus-based syntactic indexing,” IASSIST Conference, 2014, http://www.library.yorku.ca/binaries/iassist2014/2F/-2014_2F_Siegers.pptx

Heather Hedden, The Accidental Taxonomist, 2010.

Alexis C. Madrigal, “How Netflix Reverse Engineered Hollywood,” 2014-01-02, http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/01/how-netflix-reverse-engineered-hollywood/282679/

OCLC Research, FAST, http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/fast.html?urlm=159754

Maja Zumer, Athena Salaba, and Marcia Lei Zeng, “Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Records (FRSAR): A Conceptual Model of Aboutness,” from Asian Digital Libraries: Looking Back 10 Years and Forging New Frontiers, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 4822, 2007, pp 487-492, http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-540-77094-7_62#page-1