west contra costa unified school district nystrom ......2013/01/30 · west contra costa unified...
TRANSCRIPT
West Contra Costa Unified School District
Nystrom Elementary School
Title I - Program Improvement
SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
2012-13
Board Approval Date:
Contact Person: LaDonna Williams
Principal: LaDonna Williams
Telephone Number: (510) 231-1516
Address: 230 Harbour Way South
Richmond, CA 94804
E-mail address: [email protected]
BOARD OF EDUCATION 2012-13
MADELINE KRONENBERG, President
CHARLES T. RAMSEY, Clerk
RANDALL ENOS, Member
TODD A. GROVES, Member
ELAINE R. MERRIWEATHER, Member
Superintendent Dr. Bruce Harter
District Address
1108 Bissell Avenue City
Richmond, CA Zip Code
94801
Telephone
(510) 231-1101
Fax
(510) 236-6784
Email Address
Assistant Superintendent Nia Rashidchi
District Address
1108 Bissell Avenue City
Richmond, CA Zip Code
94801
Telephone
(510) 231-1130
Fax
(510) 620-2074
Email Address
Contents Page
School Site Council (SSC) Recommendations and Assurances
SSC Roster
Safety, Library, Technology Assurance Page
Executive Summary
Stakeholder Involvement
Action Plan for Improving Student Achievement (Academic)
Goals, Indicators, Data Analysis
QEIA Checklist/Monitoring and APS (Harding, Helms, Peres, - Only)
System-wide Barriers
Student Achievement Strategies
ELA #1
ELA #2
Math #1
Math #2
Science
History/Social Science
Physical Education
Visual and Performing Arts
Educationally Disadvantaged Youth
Special Education
Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)
English Learners
Extended Learning
Preschool Transition
Action Plan for Improving Student Achievement (Student Support)
Data Analysis
Student Support Programs
Attendance
Health and Safety
School Climate
Coordination of Services Page
Agreements
Centralized Services
School Site Council (SSC) Recommendations and Assurances
The school site council recommends this school plan and proposed expenditures to the district governing board for approval, and
assures the board of the following:
1. The school site council is correctly constituted, and was formed in accordance with district governing board policy and state
law.
2. The school site council reviewed its responsibilities under state law and district governing board policies, including those
board policies relating to material changes in the school plan requiring board approval.
3. The school site council sought and considered all recommendations from the following groups or committees before adopting
this plan (Check those that apply):
[X] School Advisory Committee for State Compensatory Education Programs
[X] English Learner Advisory Committee
[ ] Community Advisory Committee for Special Education Programs
[ ] Gifted and Talented Education Program Advisory Committee
Other (list)
4. The school site council reviewed the content requirements for school plans of programs included in this Single Plan for
Student Achievement and believes all such content requirements have been met, including those found in district governing
board policies and in the Local Improvement Plan.
5. This school plan is based on a thorough analysis of student academic performance. The actions proposed herein form a
sound, comprehensive, coordinated plan to reach stated school goals to improve student academic performance.
6. This school plan was adopted by the school site council on: .
7. The School Site Council will monitor the implementation and effectiveness of strategies in the plan at least twice during the
2012-13 school year, using the WCCUSD monitoring process.
Attested:
LaDonna Williams
Typed name of school principal Signature of school principal Date
Maria Torres
Typed name of SSC chairperson Signature of SSC chairperson Date
Assurances Regarding the School Safety Plan
The principal’s signature verifies that Nystrom Elementary School has reviewed the school Safety Plan for 2012-13.
The plan [ ] was [ ] was not updated. Key elements of safety, emergency and crisis preparedness were reviewed and discussed with
all school faculty and staff.
LaDonna Williams
Typed name of school principal Signature of school principal Date
Assurance Regarding the Library Plan
The principal’s signature verifies that Nystrom Elementary School has reviewed the district Library Plan for 2012-13.
LaDonna Williams
Typed name of school principal Signature of school principal Date
Assurance Regarding the Technology Plan
The principal’s signature verifies that Nystrom Elementary School:
[ ] will develop a Technology Plan for 2012-13
[ ] has updated the Technology Plan for 2012-13
LaDonna Williams
Typed name of school principal Signature of school principal Date
West Contra Costa Unified School District
Nystrom Elementary School
2012-13
School Site Council Membership Roster
Education Code Section 64001(g) requires that the SPSA be reviewed and updated at least annually, including proposed expenditures
of funds allocated through the Consolidated Application, by the school site council. The current make-up of the school site council is
as follows:
Names of Members Email address
(Home mailing address if email n/a) Phone Number
Term
ends on*:
Identify
Chair
Person:
Parent/Community Members
#1 Maria Torres 6/8/13 [X]
#2 Juana Villalobos 6/8/12 [ ]
#3 Patricia Herrera 6/8/12 [ ]
#4 Saby Mencia 6/8/12 [ ]
School/Other Members
Tchr #1 Mary Flanagan 6/8/13 [ ]
Tchr #2 Megan Macpherson 6/8/13 [ ]
Tchr #3 Gabriela Rodriquez 6/8/13 [ ]
Other Rose Bright 6/8/13 [ ]
Principal LaDonna Williams [ ]
Membership Composition:
Elementary (10 total)
1 Principal
3 classroom teachers
1 other school staff
5 parents/community members
* Indicate “n/a” if your council does not have SSC Bylaws that specify term limits.
Executive Summary
Equity, Student Achievement, Accountability for All, Safety, Community Engagement and Stewardship are the 2012-13
WCCUSD Goals. Our school establishes programs, activities and actions which are designed to continually address these
goals.
GOALS:
Equity: Implement fair, evenhanded district and school level policies, practices, and actions that ensure each student counts, all
students can learn, district resources are developed and deployed based on recognition and acknowledgement of the needs and
strengths of each student, and all stakeholders are valued members of the WCCUSD community.
During the current school year, Nystrom participates in the RTI and Culturally Responsive Teaching Training. RTI
(Response To Intervention), Program is designed to identify and monitor all of our students academic proficiency levels. The
new Dibels assessment is one tool that we use to track students current reading fluency levels; which is then correlated to
students reading comprehension proficiency levels. Throughout the year, Nystrom staff will continue the cycle of inquiry,
grade level collaboration and progress monitoring, while fully implementing the RTI model. In addition, our staff will use
student data to develop and implement rigorous intervention programs and strategies that will ultimately help move our
students performing below grade level towards grade level proficiency.
Our staff will continue to use Culturally Responsive Teaching practices. As part of our District Equity Initiative, our goal as a
school is to continue the conversation regarding the full implementation of culturally responsive teaching in the classroom.
Throughout the year we will accomplish the following:
*Culturallly Responsive Teaching Strategies PD
*Collaborate and Plan as a staff frequently
*Perform Equity Walkthroughs to monitor full implementation
Student Achievement: Provide a clear, well-resourced and rigorous student achievement program that addresses the full range of
student needs and results in all students being prepared for a successful life.
The mission of Nystrom Elementary School is to provide all students with an excellent quality education that focuses on the
California State Standards. We know that, with effective effort, confidence, and strong instruction, all children are able to
learn and reach proficiency of grade level specific standards.
Our school values and embraces the richness of the diversity of our school population. We believe in the importance of
recognizing each child as an individual who has unique background experiences, interests, and readiness levels. With this
diversity of students’ needs, we know that it is critical that each child receive a differentiated educational experience that
addresses these individual needs in the context of a standards-based learning environment.
Our goal is to give students the knowledge and skills in order to become confident, productive citizens who have solid critical
thinking skills that will allow them to function in a rapidly changing society. Along with developing the academic skills of our
students, we also strive to foster positive development of students physically, emotionally and socially. Our educational goal is
to make learning so exciting that our students experience the joy of discovering new ideas and building new skills, thereby
developing a love of learning that will create lifelong learners.
Our school recognizes the importance of building a learning community where all stakeholders feel welcome and have an
active role in the success of student academic achievement. Teachers, staff members, parents and families, community
members, and business partners offer support to move students towards academic achievement. The Nystrom community
works together to establish a learning environment that enables teachers to teach and students to learn. The effort to create a
climate for learning is reflected in the accomplishments and achievements of our students.
Positive attitudes toward school and staff and long-term changes in behavior are the staff’s behavioral goals for each student.
The Nystrom staff places an emphasis on building self-esteem by teaching children respect for themselves and others.
Students are provided with many opportunities to develop and demonstrate self-discipline and responsibility. BEST
Strategies are also being implemented schoolwide to address positive reward systems that help students regulate their
behavior. School rules, reward systems and teacher adapted lessons are currently being implemented to improve the school
culture and enhance the learning environment.
The Nystrom staff is deeply committed to providing and maintaining a strong discipline policy for students. We believe that
all students have the right to a quality education and to attend school to learn and play in positive, safe, threat-free
environment. Positive behavior and performance will be recognized through awards assemblies as well as through individual
achievement recognition in classrooms. Students are also recognized for demonstrating character traits/life skills such as
friendship, respect, caring and cooperation. In order to successfully eliminate reading deficits in students, grades K-3 teachers
receive additional professional development and support from our Instructional Specialist and Resource Teacher to deliver
comprehensive reading instruction to all students.
The following are the core curricular materials that the teaching faculty uses at Nystrom:
Reading/Language Arts grades K-5 ~ Open Court
Mathematics grades K-5 ~ Everyday Math
Science grades K-5 ~ Scott Foresman
Social Studies Grades K-5 ~ McGraw Hill
Moving In To English~ELD Instruction
For more detailed information on core programs offered district-wide, please see Local Education Agency (LEA) Plan. It is
the companion document to the SPSA. The LEA Plan is available on the district website, www.wccusd.k12.ca.us.
In order to analyze data as well as to create assessments to determine student learning, Nystrom uses the EduSoft program.
Regular data analysis using standards-based assessments is vital to the success of the instructional programs and teaching at
the site. Site administrators, our Instructional Specialist, and classroom teachers routinely use EduSoft and other forms of
student assessments to determine the effectiveness of instructional strategies.
Grades 3 and 4 will model effective RTI programs for their collegues and share useful tips for how to maximize learning in
workshop and Tier 1 and 2 groupings.
Nystrom provides academic-focused after school and summer extended learning opportunities in reading and math for
students in grades K-5. Students achieving below grade level in reading, math, and writing are provided additional
instructional support. Nystrom also offers a targeted after school academic intervention program for English Language
Learners in addition to the language support that they receive during the instructional day. We provide targeted academic
support for students in our two learning centers, and specific support for struggling African American students. More
detailed information is provided on these intervention programs in the action plan section of our SPSA.
Accountability for All: Build a system of accountability for all that nurtures a culture where all administrators, teachers, district
employees, families, students, and community members are accountable for their roles in improving student achievement.
Nystrom’s data teams, made up of grade level teams, meet bi-monthly to review data and make decisions about curriculum
and instruction. Grade levels discuss the results of specific assessments, possible strategies for implementation, and next steps
for instruction. The grade level teams make decisions for classroom instruction based upon the needs of students through
analyzing student data. The teams also use the California Standards Test blueprints, grade level standards and district-
created pacing guides to determine the appropriate timing for lessons. The administrative team and literacy coach meet
regularly with the grade level teams to discuss areas of strength, areas of challenge, targeted areas, and effective uses of
resources. At the end of each OCR unit, grade level teams participate in OCR unit planning with the Instructional Specialist.
In addition, teams analyze most current student data, reflect on instructional practices, and determine areas of focus in
academic conferences facilitated by the administrative team.
The Instructional Leadership Team (ILT) consists of the principal, instructional specialist, RSP teacher and lead teachers
from all grades (K-6). The ILT meets monthly to address academic concerns, look at school-wide data and make instructional
decisions that are implemented/addressed on a school-wide basis, and recommend intervention strategies and resources.
Nystrom Elementary School has an active Student Success Team (SST) that meets bi-monthly to discuss student referrals for
Special Education and determine the best path to meet students’ needs. A care team also meets bi-monthly to discuss at risk
students and assess the types of rcsources that are available to assit these students. The care team is made up of 1
administrator, School Psychologist, RSP Teacher, and a BACR therapist. Teachers are invited to come to these meetings at
lunch to express concerns and come up with solutions for the most at risk students.
The members of Nystrom’s Student Council, upper grade students who serve the school as members of this student leadership
body, are elected by their peers and meet regularly with lead teachers coordinating the council. Student Council members
gather input from their peers and help make decisions about school-wide issues, as well as plan events for the student body.
Safety: Implement strategies that ensure 1) safe, positive learning and working environments, 2) site preparedness for any crisis or
emergency.
The members of the Nystrom learning community recognize the importance of creating a safe, positive environment where
student learning can thrive. This focus is a critical element in students succeeding in their academic program. Safety is taken
very seriously at Nystrom. Every year, the staff reviews the safety plan, and every member is given an assigned role and
responsibility according to the job descriptions outlined in the school’s comprehensive safety plan. All members of the
Nystrom staff are trained by site/district experts on the Standard Emergency Management System (SEMS). The principal
serves as the lead person on the incident command team, and other key staff are assigned leadership roles with specific tasks to
take on should an emergency situation occur while school is in session. In addition, all classrooms have fully equipped
emergency kits and supplies.
Nystrom is currently implementing a character building program that empowers all students; giving them the opportunity to
be leaders in their school community. In addition, our students character building foundation is the implementation of our
student lead daily Community Virtues. Our virtues our integrated in our daily core curriculum and teaching instruction. The
four components of our Character Building Program at Nystrom are as follows:
1) Community Virtues (Student led)
2) Character Building Assemblies
3) Integration of community virtues in the classroom/core curriculum/teacher instruction
4) Student Reflection
We are also implementing a program that builds students’ skills to making positive behavioral choices. The Mindful Life
Project is a violence prevention curriculum that is designed to reduce impulsive and aggressive behavior by teaching skills in
Mindfulness, impulse control and anger management.
Community Engagement: Engage the community in a process that provides for open, transparent, and inclusive participation of
community stakeholders in WCCUSD planning and provides for meaningful dialogue on critical issues. This will be fostered and
sustained on a district-wide level by continuously improving WCCUSD internal capacities and capabilities to engage all stakeholders.
Nystrom Elementary School knows that the success of our students is significantly impacted by the partnership between home
and school. Our community involvement is extensive. We offer our parents training to help them act as partners and
resources in the education of our students. These opportunities will range from: training in Second Step violence
prevention/anger management strategies and Discipline with Love and Logic strategies; providing on-site Adult Education
classes for ESL, computers, math, and positive parenting skills; participating in Parent Forums during the Saturday Scholar's
Academy.
To assist our students and families in the face of difficulties and for our students to succeed in spite of these circumstances, we
seek innovative ways to offer support for families, to involve parents in activities at school, and to offer means to build
parents’ capacity in supporting their child’s academic growth. This year, parent involvement activities will include activities
such as: Family Literacy, Math, and Science Nights, EL Take-Home program, School Site Council, English Language
Advisory Committee, and a Parent Club. The parent club is also in the process of forming a PTA for further parent
participation. More detailed information on the SSC and ELAC committees is provided on the Stakeholder Involvement page
of our SPSA.
Home-school communications provide parents with information about their child’s school programs along with ways that they
can be involved and supportive of school efforts. With the support of parents, staff, students and the community, we have
created a school where a climate of learning is one of our primary educational goals.
With this overview of Nystrom Elementary, please continue to read through our SPSA to learn about our 2011-2012 site goals,
the strategies to accomplish these goals, and how we are allocating our site-based monies to improve student achievement.
Stewardship: Continually strive to improve the effective and efficient use of financial and other resources. Stewardship is the wise
use of resources and the attribute by which the district can build and maintain public trust.
The professional staff at Nystrom Elementary is committed to working closely together with parents and community members
to develop and implement programs that will close the achievement gap and overall, foster student (proficiency) achievement
in all academic areas. Ultimately, the goal is to prepare our students for high school and college. Most importanly, we want to
set the foundation for all our students so that they are prepared for live.
Description of any grants (i.e., Scully) that are not under the purview of the SSC, yet contribute to the school’s path to
academic excellence:
Program Focus: After School/Extended Learning
SPSA Stakeholder Involvement
The School Site Council (SSC) works effectively with its stakeholders to complete the variety of tasks involved in developing,
implementing, and monitoring the effectiveness of the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA).
As the lead group, the SSC agrees to the following procedures for completing all work involving the SPSA:
Choose one task management option for each step
Task SSC Actively Involved in Task or Task Delegated to
Step 1 Analyze CST and local assessment
data
Process:
Parents are informed in the following
areas:
Student Proficiency Levels
School Sanctions (Program
Improvement)
Ttile I Informational
Intervention Programs that move
students towards proficiency
or Process:
Step 2 Gather input from
(check all that apply)
[X] GATE
[X] ELAC
[ ] CAC
[ ] Others
Process:
Meet to discuss student prograss and
school's academic program.
Parents give input on how to make our
academic program and school climate
better.
or Process:
Step 3 SPSA strategies development Process: Teachers, SSC members, and
Administration review the school plan
frequenly throughout the year. All
budgeted programs get approved by
the SSC.
or Process:
Step 4 Budget development Process: Principal works on budget
w/state and federal. The budget is
reveiwed by teachers and the SSC.
or Process:
Step 5 Finalize and submit SPSA for
School Board Approval
Date:
Step 6 SPSA monitoring Process: ILT Team and SSC members
monitor student achievement and all
programs frequently throughout the
year.
or Process:
ACTION PLAN
FOR IMPROVING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
(CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION)
Elementary/Middle School ELA Goals and Indicators
Status of 2011-12 AYP Goal [ ] 2011-12 NCLB AYP Goal for ELA of 78.4% met for all students and all significant subgroups
- or -
[ ] Made AYP by Safe Harbor or other CDE Criteria
[ ] 2011-12 established school goal for ELA of % met for all students and all significant subgroups
[X] 2011-12 AYP Goal for ELA of 78.4% not met in the following areas: Schoolwide and for all significant subgroups
2012-13 AYP Goal (Check One)
[X] Our goal for 2012-13 is that 94.2% of all students and all numerically significant subgroups will be proficient in ELA. This
goal is based on the NCLB AYP target of 89.2% proficient, plus the additional 5% District level requirement.
[ ] We have met the 2012-13 school-wide NCLB and District target AYP goal for ELA of 94.2%. We have established the
following goal:
ELA Data Analysis
(3-Year Comparison)
CST (AYP) Performance - School Wide 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient 21.4 55 24.2 60 25.6 65
Students at basic and below 78.6 202 75.8 188 74.4 189
Total valid scores 100 257 100 248 100 254
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for ELA: 68.6% 175
Description of findings: There was a slight increase in the number of students scoring proficient or above in ELA. It continues
to be an area of concern.
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - African-American [ ] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient 16.5 13 26.9 18 25.8 16
Students at basic and below 83.5 66 73.1 49 74.2 46
Total valid scores 100 79 100 67 100 62
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for ELA: 68.4% 43
Description of findings: There was a slight decrease in the number of African Americans scoring proficient or above.
[ ] Area of strength [X] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - Latino [X] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient 22.7 37 22.4 39 23.8 43
Students at basic and below 77.3 126 77.6 135 76.2 138
Total valid scores 100 163 100 174 100 181
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for ELA: 70.4% 128
Description of findings: Although there was a slight increase in the number of Latino students scoring proficient or above, it
continues to be an area of concern.
[ ] Area of strength [X] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - White [ ] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient -- -- -- -- -- --
Students at basic and below
Total valid scores 2 2 0
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for ELA: %
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [ ] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - Asian [ ] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient -- -- -- -- -- --
Students at basic and below
Total valid scores 3 2 3
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for ELA: %
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [ ] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - EDY (SED) [X] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient 21.4 55 24.1 56 25.6 65
Students at basic and below 78.6 202 75.9 176 74.4 189
Total valid scores 100 257 100 232 100 254
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for ELA: 68.6% 175
Description of findings: There was a slight increase in the number of students scoring proficient or above for the EDY
subgroup in ELA.
[ ] Area of strength [X] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - English Learners [X] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient 22.3 31 22.4 34 25.6 41
Students at basic and below 77.7 108 77.6 118 74.4 119
Total valid scores 100 139 100 152 100 160
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for ELA: 68.9% 110
Description of findings: Although there was an increase in the number of students scoring proficient, our English Learners
still are an area of concern. 74.4% are still at basic or below.
[ ] Area of strength [X] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - Other [ ] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient
Students at basic and below
Total valid scores
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for ELA: %
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [ ] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - Other [ ] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient
Students at basic and below
Total valid scores
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for ELA: %
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [ ] Area of concern
Elementary/Middle School MATH Goals and Indicators
Status of 2011-12 AYP Goal
[ ] 2011-12 NCLB AYP Goal for MATH of 79.0% met for all students and all significant subgroups
- or -
[ ] Made AYP by Safe Harbor or other CDE Criteria
[ ] 2011-12 established school goal for MATH of % met for all students and all significant subgroups
[X] 2011-12 AYP Goal for MATH of 79.0% not met in the following areas: School wide and all significant sub-groups
2012-13 AYP Goal (Check One)
[X] Our goal for 2012-13 is that 94.5% of all students and all numerically significant subgroups will be proficient in Math. This
goal is based on the NCLB AYP target of 89.5% proficient, plus the additional 5% District level requirement.
[ ] We have met the 2012-13 school-wide NCLB and District target AYP goal for MATH of 94.5%. We have established the
following goal:
MATH Data Analysis
(3-Year Comparison)
CST (AYP) Performance - School Wide 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient 29.6 76 39.9 99 38.6 98
Students at basic and below 70.4 181 60.1 149 61.4 156
Total valid scores 100 257 100 248 100 254
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for MATH: 55.9% 142
Description of findings:
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - African-American [X] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient 22.8 18 47.8 32 35.5 22
Students at basic and below 77.5 61 52.2 35 64.5 40
Total valid scores 100 79 100 67 100 62
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for MATH: 59.9% 38
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [X] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - Latino [X] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient 32.5 53 36.2 63 37.0 67
Students at basic and below 67.5 110 63.8 111 63 114
Total valid scores 100 163 100 174 100 181
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for MATH: 58.4% 106
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [X] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - White [ ] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient -- -- -- -- -- --
Students at basic and below
Total valid scores 2 2 0
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for MATH: %
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [ ] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - Asian [ ] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient -- -- -- -- -- --
Students at basic and below
Total valid scores 3 2 3
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for MATH: %
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [ ] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - EDY (SED) [X] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient 29.6 76 40.5 94 38.6 98
Students at basic and below 70.4 181 59.5 138 61.4 156
Total valid scores 100 257 100 232 100 254
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for MATH: 56.8% 145
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [X] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - English Learners [X] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient 33.8 47 37.5 57 39.4 63
Students at basic and below 66.2 92 62.5 95 60.6 97
Total valid scores 100 139 100 152 100 160
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for MATH: 56% 90
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [X] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - Other [ ] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient
Students at basic and below
Total valid scores
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for MATH: %
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [ ] Area of concern
CST (AYP) Performance by Subgroup - Other [ ] Significant Subgroup 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Students at/above proficient
Students at basic and below
Total valid scores
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal for MATH: %
Description of findings:
[ ] Area of strength [ ] Area of concern
Academic Performance Index (API)
All Students
Base 2011 API
2012 Growth
Target Points 2012 API Growth Points Met API
678 6 686 8 Yes
English Learner Goals
Status of 2011-12 AMAO 1 Goal (Check One)
[ ] 2011-12 NCLB AMAO 1 goal of 56.0% of English learners meeting the annual growth target met.
[X] 2011-12 NCLB AMAO 1 goal of 56.0% of English learners meeting the annual growth target not met.
Status of 2011-12 AMAO 2 Goal (Check One) – Cohorts 1 and 2
[ ] 2011-12 NCLB AMAO 2 Cohort 1 goal of 20.1% of English learners attaining English proficiency (defined as a score of
Early Advanced or Advanced with no skill area below Intermediate) met.
-and-
2011-12 NCLB AMAO 2 Cohort 2 goal of 45.1 % of English learners attaining English proficiency (defined as a score of
Early Advanced or Advanced with no skill area below Intermediate) met.
[X] One or both 2011-12 NCLB AMAO 2 goals for Cohorts 1 and 2 were not met.
2011-12 NCLB AMAO 2 Cohort 1 goal of 20.1% [ ] met [X] not met.
-and-
2011-12 NCLB AMAO 2 Cohort 2 goal of 45.1% [ ] met [X] not met.
New 2012-13 AMAO 1 Goal (Check One)
[X] Our goal for 2012-13 is to meet or exceed the NCLB AMAO 1 goal of 57.5% of our English learners meeting the annual
growth target.
[ ] We have met the 2012-13 NCLB AMAO 1 goal of 57.5%. We have established the following goal
New 2012-13 AMAO 2 Goal (Check One) – 2 Cohorts
Our goal for 2012-13 is that English learners will meet the NCLB AMAO 2 Cohort 1 target of 21.4%
-and-
NCLB AMAO 2 Cohort 2 target of 47.0%
We have met the 2012-13 NCLB AMAO 2 Cohort 1 target of 21.4%.
-and-
NCLB AMAO 2 Cohort 2 target of 47.0%
We have established the following goal
Comparison of AMAO Data
(Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives - Measured by CELDT)
AMAO 1 - Annual Growth Percentage of English learners (EL) who have met the growth target (e.g., moved one level or more).
AMAO 1 2010-11 2011-12
Students met AMAO 1 50.3% 80 50.2% 102
Students did not meet AMAO 1 45.5% 79 49.8% 101
Total # in Cohort 1* 95.8% 159 100.0% 203
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the goal: 7.3% 15
* Cohort 1 includes:
EL students at the Beginning, Early Intermediate, Intermediate, Early Advanced, and Advanced levels who have matched scores.
AMAO 2 - Attaining English Proficiency Percentage of English learners (EL) who have reached English proficiency, defined as score of Early Advanced or Advanced with no
skill area below Intermediate.
Cohort 1AMAO 2 2010-11 2011-12
Students in Cohort 1 met AMAO 2 9.5% 18 10.5% 23
Students in Cohort 1 did not meet AMAO 2 90.5% 171 89.5% 196
Total in Cohort 1 AMAO 2 100% 189 100% 219
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the Cohort 1
AMAO 2 goal: 10.6% 21 10.9% 24
Cohort 2AMAO 2 2010-11 2011-12
Students in Cohort 2 met AMAO 2 26.7% 8 21.1% 8
Students in Cohort 2 did not meet AMAO 2 73.3% 22 78.9% 30
Total in Cohort 2 AMAO 2 100% 30 100% 38
Total increase required during 2012-13 to meet the Cohort 2
AMAO 2 goal: 18.4% 6 25.9% 10
Two Cohorts for 2011-12 include:
Cohort 1:
ELs, including new enrollees, enrolled less than 5 years
Cohort 2:
ELs enrolled 5 years or more
Please note: If the cohort size is smaller than 30, no AMAO results are available.
System-wide Barriers
The following system-wide barriers have impacted our ability to meet our academic goals. Check all that apply and provide brief
description of issue(s) and where applicable any site determined strategy for overcoming the barrier(s).
Barrier Description Strategy for Overcoming Barrier
[ ] Staffing: Attrition of strong probationary teachers who
positively affect API growth and contribute overall
positive school climate
[ ]* Principal will work with HR to recruit teachers who
best fit the needs of the school
[ ] Facilities maintenance: School in transitional phase due
to construction of new school. Portable site and
management of all projects affecting facility/safety
[ ]* Continue to be in close communication SGI
Construction management and district facilities
department when concerns arise
[ ] Facility capacity (space for classrooms/programs): A
portable site has been installed on campus.
Classrooms are smaller and class sizes larger.
Therefore, there is limited walking/desk space.
[ ]* Try not to exceed a 28 students per class if at all
possible.
[ ] Safety:
1. Climate issues continue to occur among students
and staff
2. Entrance and exit procedures were established for
new portable site
3. Safety plan has been reviewed and updates will be
added as issues are brought to admin attention
[ ]* 1.BEST strategies are being implemented to ensure a
safe and orderly campus and improve student/staff
relationships
2. South Harbour entrance closed off. South 12th St.
Entrance is primary entrance into the school site. A
letter to parents was sent out to solidify changes.
Kindergarten dismissal procedures were also
implemented to ensure safe pick up/sign out of each
student daily
3. Principal will solicit teacher leaders, parents, and
district facilities department to establish to
continuously update an effective safety plan for our
portable campus. Alternate evacuation are being
established to ensure safe evacuation in the event of an
emergency.
[ ] Materials availability: [ ]*
[ ] Technology: [ ]*
[ ] Fiscal Support: [ ]*
[ ] Compliance Support: [ ]*
[ ] Curriculum and Instruction Support: Further
professional development is needed for teachers
struggling with classroom management problems and
lack of engagement strategies
[ ]* Prinicipal will work with district to support teachers
through district wide PD that meet my concerns.
Principal may also use categorical funding to pay
outside consultants to assist teachers who need
additional support. Use of Grad tutor to support RTI
goals. Istructional specialist and ELD coach will be
used to support schoolwide goals to further
reclassification efforts and support curricular and
professional development for teachers.
[ ] Other: [ ]*
* A check in the box indicates that completion of this section requires additional central administrative department support.
Student Achievement
English Language Arts - ELA #1 - Writing
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
At least three times a week, students will be systematically taught the sequence of the writing process using Step-Up-To
Writing, including the revision process. In addition, students will be assessed using district benchmark assessments 3 times a
year as well as other informal writing frequenltly throughout the year to monitor their writing skill improvements.
Description of the above strategy:
Teachers will implement the Step up to Writing Program as a school wide writing program. This process emphasizes
organization, idea development, and the traits of good writing. It also incorporates the writing process. Step Up to Writing
focuses on effective multisensory writing strategies to help students master sentence, story, paragraph, essay, and report
writing. All of these components will lead to increased writing proficiency and mastery of grade level writing standards.
This strategy will address the specific learning needs of students in the following subgroups:
[ ] African-American [ ] Latino [ ] EDY
[ ] EL [ ] Special Ed. [ ] Other: [ ]
This strategy will address the content cluster area of Writing:
[ ] Written Conventions [ ] Writing Strategies
[ ] We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
False
[ ] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By 11/2012 we will
collaborate as grade levels on an on-going basis, including both the planning of explicit instruction and the scoring of student
work.
begin school-wide project of student's published writing.
calibrate scoring of student work as grade levels, analyze student data from the first benchmark writing assessment to guide
future instruction.
By 12/2012 we will purchase Writing folders for every student, grades 1-5.
By 12/2012 we will Have a Writing Process training, provided by Instructional Specialist and Teachers.
By 2/2013 we will do grade level publishing of student writing
By 3/2013 we will Reflect upon the effectiveness of Step Up To Writing Program in learning the writing process. In addition
teachers will develop a grade specific rubric to evaluate student mastery of their writing standards.
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Writing folders for students in grades 1-5,
highlighters, other supplemental instructional
materials to support the program.
Water color markers
Ink pens
Title I 2000
Parent (008) Materials for family literacy night.
Professional Dev (024) Training materials for professional development.
Technology (001) Laptops, document cameras, LCD projectors and
other technology to increase student engagement
Replacement Rolls for laminator
Replacement paper rolls for poster maker
Library (006) Books and materials for students to use to promote
literacy; general library supplies
Annual Cost: 2,000
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Sub for observation/coaching [X]
Teachers PD (24 tchrs x 2 day) [X]
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Teaching the
Writing Process
Manipis/Lead
Teachers
[X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Teacher Collaboration.
Grade Level Writing Scoring Parties monitor
student writing progress
[ ] [X] Title I 4723
Annual Cost 4,723
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Family Literacy Night [X] [X] [ ]
[X] [X] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
K-6 Planetarium, museums, farms,
government facilities, etc.
Title I 3000
Annual Cost 3,000
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Benchmark Writing Assessment
[X] [X] [ ] [ ]
Student Writing Samples [ ] [X] [ ] [ ]
WRITE Assessments [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
English Language Arts - ELA #1
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 2,000
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 2,000
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 4,723
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 4,723
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 3,000
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 3,000
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
English Language Arts - ELA #2
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
A daily systematic focus on academic language/vocabulary development and rapid recognition of high frequency words, using
daily, differentiated instruction at all grade levels.
We will utilize culturally responsive grade appropriate chapter books to support comprehension and fluency.
Description of the above strategy:
Teachers will review weekly high frequency words in all classrooms. Steck-Vaughn program for academic vocabulary
development implemented during Academic Language Development blocking program. Teachers will also utilize grade level
appropriate chapter books to increase critical thinking, tier 3 vocabulary development, and an understanding of character
motivation and development through daily reading and discussions.
Studies Weekly (Newspaper), Times for Kids (Magazine), and grade level appropriate chapter books will promote and give
students access to academic langauage and increase engagement. Technology will be used to differentiate instruction and
increase engagement for students who are not yet reading independently.
This strategy will address the specific learning needs of students in the following subgroups:
[X] African-American [X] Latino [X] EDY
[X] EL [X] Special Ed. [ ] Other: [ ]
This strategy will address the content cluster area of:
[X] Comprehension [ ] Vocabulary [ ] Other:
[ ] We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[X] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By October we will
use Steck Vaughn as a tool to bulid Academic Language/Vocabulary.
By November we will
participate in a rigorous PD to learn how to use chapter books to supplement core curriculum and support grade level
standards.
Collaboration will take place to look at student data and plan instruction based on data and student needs. (On-Going)
By December we will Walkthroughs will take place to monitor implementation of the use of chapter books and Steck Vaughn
during Academic Language Development.
By March-April we will
Teachers will come back as a collaborative group to review student data to monitor their progress in ELA.
By May we will Teachers will evaluate the effectiveness of the use of chapter books and Steck Vaughn through the data
gathered.
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Writing Folders and Journals, Student Thesaurus,
Steck Vaugh Teacher/Student instruction materials
for grades K-6, Steck Vaughn Kits for K-6,
supplementary materials to support academic
language development, Time Life Magazine and
other subscriptions copy paper, toner, and general
supplies
EIA/SCE 4500
Parent (008) Newsletter/Tips on how to guide student vocabulary
development at home
Professional Dev (024) Materials for Vocabulary Development Strategies;
copy paper and toner to make binders for teachers
Technology (001) Listening centers (with CD and cassette),
headphones for use with computer reading
programs
Library (006) Library books and supplies
Annual Cost: 4,500
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Vocabulary
Development PD
Instructional
Specialist
[X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Collaborative Grade Level Meetings. Teachers will
document grade level meetings and standards-
based goals and objectives.
[ ] [X]
Teachers plan ELD/ALD Vocabulary Development
Lessons
[X] [X]
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Family Literacy Night [X] [X] [X]
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
k-6 farms, museums, historic places, etc. hands on experience related to topics
of study
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
DIBELS
School Wide Benchmark Assessment
School-Wide Standards Based Progress Monitoring
Program
[ ] [X] [ ] [X]
Weekly vocabulary test (OCR)
Weekly vocabulary test (Prentice Hall)
[X] [ ] [X] [ ]
OCR End of Unit Assessment K-5
Prentice Hall End of Unit Assessment 6th grade
[ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
English Language Arts - ELA #2
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 4,500
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 4,500
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Math #1
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Provide differentiated and small group instruction to promote mathematical reasoning and mastery of grade level standards
at lease once a week.
Description of the above strategy:
Using a diagnostic assessment at the beginning of the year, weekly classroom assessments, and School Wide benchmark exams,
teachers will use student data to form flexible, small groups for differentiated instruction to promote mastery of key grade
level standards. Mental math, use of manipulatives, cross-grade level collaboration, and Board Math review with a focus on
STAR test release questions and/or California Math Content Standards.
This strategy will address the specific learning needs of students in the following subgroups:
[X] African-American [X] Latino [X] EDY
[X] EL [X] Special Ed. [ ] Other:
This strategy will address the content cluster area(s) of:
[X] Algebra & Functions [X] Measurement & Geometry [X] Statistics, Data, Probability
[ ] Other:
[X] We have used this strategy for 5 year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
due to partial implementation, and specific subgroup growth we have kept the strategy, but will adapt it to address
our other subgroups.
[ ] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By October we will assess and indentify students for intervention. Teachers will differentiate instruction based on student
specific needs by targeting students through SMART goal development.
By October we will analyze student data to improve their instruction through Academic conferences.
By November we will (On-going) collaborate and evaluate student date and redefine students needs.
By February we will Family math night to show parents what students have been learning and what is still to come.
By March we will
Using Math Benchmark II data and weekly assessments to inform and drive teacher instruction
Second Academic Conference will take place
By May we will Evaluate success of program for upcoming year
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Math Manipulatives, materials for small groups for
differentiating during math, supplies for creation of
games, copy paper and general supplies for
classroom use
Parent (008) Provide Math games and simple standards based
math lesson that can be taught at home
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001) Laminator and Poster Maker utlilized to enlarge
graphic organizers/charts for visual learners
Laptops, document cameras, LCD projectors and
other technology to increase student engagement
Replacement rolls for laminator
Replacement paper rolls for poster maker
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Differentiation of
Instruction
Principal/Instructi
onal
Specialist/Lead
Teachers
[X] [ ] [ ]
Implementation of
Everyday Math
aligned with the
standards
Principal/Instructi
onal
Specialist/Lead
Teachers
[X] [ ] [ ]
Math Professional
Development on
Differentiation and
Standards Based
Instruction
Off Site District
Training/Worksh
ops
[X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Teachers meet on a monthly basis to plan
instruction and review student data/progress
[ ] [X]
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Family Math Night [X] [X] [X]
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Benchmark [X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Teacher weekly assessments/ Everyday Math
assessments
[ ] [X] [X] [ ]
Math #1
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Math #2
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Board Math strategies will be implemented daily in all grade levels with emphasis on the consistent use of math vocabulary.
Description of the above strategy:
Math standards will be reviewed daily using Board Math techniques, with consistent focus on building math vocabulary in
every math strand and to develop an understanding of grade level math skills and standards through the use of scaffolding.
This strategy will address the specific learning needs of students in the following subgroups:
[X] African-American [X] Latino [X] EDY
[X] EL [X] Special Ed. [ ] Other:
This strategy will address the content cluster area(s) of:
[X] Algebra & Functions [X] Measurement & Geometry [X] Statistics, Data, Probability
[ ] Other:
[X] We have used this strategy for 4 year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
a majority of students who received Board Math instruction on a regular basis have mastered the math content
standards for their grade level.
[ ] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By October we will implement Board Math instruction on a daily basis, aligned with the Everyday Math core curriculum.
By October we will
Assess 2-6 grade students to monitor growth and proficiency while addressing the grade level specific standards.
Monitor the implementation of board math peer and administrative walkthroughs
By October we will
Schedule collaboration by grade level to analyze student data/progress. Teachers and Adminstration will plan instruction
using student data and identifying the standards the students have yet to master. (on-going)
Benchmark and Teacher designed assessments will be used.
By December we will ILT team will plan and organize the Family math night.
By we will
By March-April we will Academic Confrences (Second Trimester) will take place
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Graph paper, student white boards, expo markers,
math manipulatives
Parent (008) Math games and workbooks provided for parents so
that they can support thier students at home
Professional Dev (024) Send Teachers and Support Staff to Math
Trainings.
Technology (001) doc cameras, projectors
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Board Math
Implementation/Stra
tegies
Teacher leaders
with support of IS
[X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Teachers will plan weekly standards based
instruction and review student data/progress
[X] [X]
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Family Math Night [X] [X] [X]
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Benchmarks [X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Teacher developed assessments [X] [X] [ ] [ ]
Everday Math assessments [X] [ ] [X] [ ]
Math #2
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Science
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
All students will participate in hands-on science inquiries and experiences, with an opportunity to participate in a science.
Description of the above strategy:
Teachers will engage students in the scientific process/method, while teaching key science concepts in accordance with the CA
Science Content Standards. Suppelemental materials will help students learn concepts that are not easily attained.
[X] We have used this strategy for 2 year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
Students had continuous gradual gains in science benchmarks. In addition, there was a significant increase in student
proficiency in the CST science exam.
[ ] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By October we will In Grade Levels, teachers will use the Science Pacing Guide to help them plan standards based
instruction, in preparation for the Science Benchmark Assessments.
By November we will
Academic Conferences will take place: Teachers will look at student data to drive their instruction.
Provide resources for teachers that would help guide their instruction in preparing students for the CST.
By December we will Perform walkthroughs to monitor standards based science instruction.
By March-April we will Trimester II Academic Conferences will take place.
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Student Science Materials & supplemental
resources including posters, DVDs and other realia;
standards based materials
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001) TV & DVD players
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
4th &
5th
Students will participate in a
standards based study trip to Camp
Arroyo.
The camp will address 4th and 5th
grade science standards through
hands on activities.
All Lawrence Hall of Science, Academy
of Sciences, Exploratorium, etc.
On site science experiments and
lessons will be conducted.
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Benchmark Assessments [X] [X] [ ] [ ]
Science
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
History/Social Science
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
To supplement our social studies curriculum, teachers from grades 3 to 6 will implement Studies Weekly and other
supplemental curriculum.
Description of the above strategy:
This standards based curriculum will be utilized to teach the following: reading comprehension, vocabulary development,
expository writing, and critical thinking.
[ ] We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[X] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By October we will Teachers will begin to implement Studies Weekly.
By November we will Teachers will assess and monitor students' progress
By January we will Teachers' will evaluate the effectiveness of the curriculum
By March we will Teachers will administor a cumilative unit assessment to measure student mastery.
By April we will Teachers will do an end of the year evaluation
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Studies Weekly Newspapers and other supplemental
materials including maps, posters and DVDs
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001) TV & DVD players
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Differentiation and
Lesson Planning
Richardson/Brady [X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Teachers will collaborate on a weekly basis [X] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
k-6 Trips to historical sites or museums scaffold and supplement classroom
lessons to increase student
understanding of standards based
lessons
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
6th a contract with Melanie Demore will be provided for 6th
grade classes; students will participate in a workshop and
learn drumming skills and information about the social
groups they have been studying about.
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Unit Assessments/Weekly Assessments
Student Work will be collected and reviewed
[X] [X] [ ] [ ]
History/Social Science
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Physical Education
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Students in grades K-6 will participate in the Sparks Physical Education Program.
Description of the above strategy:
Teachers will use the Spark Instructional program to teach physical education to all students in grades K-6.
[ ] We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[X] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By November we will
Provide Sparks Training for Teachers
K-6 grade students will participate in Physical Education through the Sparks curriculm.
By February 2011 we will Provide a refresher training for all staff.
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001)
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Teachers meet to discuss Sparks strategies [ ] [X]
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
5th grade physical fitness exam [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
Physical Education
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Visual and Performing Arts
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Description of the above strategy:
[ ] We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[ ] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001)
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Visual and Performing Arts
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement Other Academic Area
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Description of the above strategy:
We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001)
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Other Academic Area
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Educationally Disadvantaged Youth (EDY) #1
(Socio-Economically Disadvantaged - SED)
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Response to Intervention (RTI) - Learning Center
Description of the above strategy:
RTI is a three-tiered model of intervention that does not wait for students to fail. It is a multi-step approach to providing services to
struggling students who have not been identified as individuals with special needs. Students are assessed early and frequently to
ensure that the researched based programs of intervention that are being used are appropriate. Student achievement and progress are
measured through continuous progressed monitoring and data collection.
Our specific program is set up as follows:
Triumphs and Read Naturally and Phonics for Reading will be implemented in the Learning Center to meet the needs of our
low performing student in literacy. We will progressively grow our classroom RTI program targeting 1st and 4th grade to
begin with. Teachers will use Open Court workshop to target far-below basic and below basic students. Learning Center will
target 1st and 2nd grade students scoring Far Below Basic and Below Basic and it will target 4th and 5th grade students
scoring Far Below Basic and Below Basic.
[ ] We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[X] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By October we will develop plan for Learning center and RTI program
By October we will implement the RTI Tier 3 Program in the Learning Center
By October we will Administer Dibels progress monitorning to the students in the learning center
By December we will
Review student progress in reading fluency.
By January we will
Continue to monitoring the intervention program in the Learning Center.
Begin classroom RTI program in 1st and 4th grade.
By May we will review both the learning center and RTI programs.
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Phonics for Reading. copy paper, general classroom
supplies needed for instruction, materials for
intervention
Title I 5000
EIA/SCE 5000
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024) Teachers will collaborate to share CRP strategies,
professional development on CRP, positive
classroom management
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 10,000
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Differention and
Standards Based
Instruction
Principal/Instructi
onal Specialist
[X] [ ] [ ]
CRP strategies Principal/Instructi
onal Specialist
[X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
RSP teacher collaborates with classroom teachers
about targeted students and standards covered with
these targeted students
[ ] [X]
Grade levels collaborate to implement RTI
program with principal,IS and EL coach
[ ] [X] Title I 14723
Annual Cost 14,723
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
DIBELS [X] [ ] [ ] [X]
benchmark assessments [X] [ ] [ ] [X]
Open Court embedded assessments [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
Educationally Disadvantaged Youth (EDY) #1
(Socio-Economically Disadvantaged - SED)
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 10,000
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 5,000
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 5,000
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 14,723
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 14,723
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Educationally Disadvantaged Youth (EDY) #2
(Socio-Economically Disadvantaged - SED)
Culturally Responsive Pedagogy
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Daily use of culturally responsive practices both inside and outside the classroom.
Description of the above strategy:
All staff will support high achievement by all students and close the achievement gap between student subgroups by:
incorporating culturally responsive pedagogy into teaching and learning across the school
effectively using the Equity Walkthrough Protocol to identify areas of focus, and
using culturally responsive approaches with students and other stakeholders
The specific strategy components are as follows:
Staff will have a meeting to discuss and define Culturally Responsive Pedagogy.
Staff will continue to conduct the site and district equity walkthroughs.
Teachers will collaborate on best practices for culturally responsive teaching during grade level planning
Implement Culturally Responsive Teaching Strategies to in enrich and engage students in the vocabulary development process
[X] We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[ ] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By August we will
Provide PD to all teachers on Culturally Responsive Teaching Strategies while implementing vocabulary develop.
Teachers will give students the opportunity to utilize academic
By January we will
Schedule follow up PD on Culturally Responsive Teaching and provide resources
conduct our first equity walkthrough
ILT (Equity Team) will meet and debrief on findings from visiting classrooms
By March-April we will
conduct our second equity walkthrough
ILT (Equity Team) will meet and debrief on findings from visiting classrooms
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Culturally Relevant Chapter Book Class sets for
grades 1-6. Kid Friendly standards, materials to
increase student engagement such as answer
buzzers, clipboards, write on boards and markers,
timers, bells, etc.
Title I 4000
Parent (008) Laptop for SSC parent meetings and power point
presentations for culturally relevant strategies.
Professional Dev (024) Laptop for power point presentations for staff for
culturally relevant strategies. Teachers will
collaborate to share effective CRP strategies,
professional development will be presented on CRP
strategies, positive classroom management,
Marzano, etc.
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 4,000
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
[X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
grade level on standards based instruction/crp
strategies
[X] [ ] Title I 5000
Annual Cost 5,000
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Observation feedback sheet [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
classroom visit sheets [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
Benchmark data [X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Educationally Disadvantaged Youth (EDY) #2
(Socio-Economically Disadvantaged - SED)
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 4,000
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 4,000
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 5,000
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 5,000
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Educationally Disadvantaged Youth (EDY) #3
(Socio-Economically Disadvantaged - SED)
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Culturally Responsive teaching and learning will address the language and literacy needs of African American and Latino
American Students.
Culturally Responsive Teaching Professional Devlopment will give teachers effective teaching strategies that address the grade
level standards as well as validate the students culture.
Description of the above strategy:
Nystrom staff/instructional leaders will provide teachers with effective instructional strategies that are culturally relevant to
meet the needs of the students. Selected Staff and Administration will support, demonstrate, model and implement feedback
and follow up to assist teachers in implementing the strategies in the classroom. Teachers will also focus on students who are
having difficulty with self-discipline and who are not making positive choices. There will be training in character education
and social skills. Tutoring will be during the regular school day. Cap enrollment in grades 4 and 5 at 22 students per
classroom to increase the instructional capacity of these subgroups, without restructuring current class lists, but by not
replacing students who may withdraw. This is a also part of our restructuring plan.
To meet the needs of our students who are performing below and far below grades 2-6 grade, will participate in the Academy
of Reading Intervention Program. The program will take place in the computer lab on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, and
Fridays.
[X] We have used this strategy for 1 year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[ ] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By August we will conduct a professional development on implementation of effective Culturally Responsive Teaching
Strategies
By February we will conduct walkthroughs to monitor the strategies taught.
By March we will Come together as a staff to reflect and discuss the effective cultural responsive strategies that were
successful with students.
By March we will Conduct Academic Conferences to discuss and show evidence of how the implementation of CRT in the
classroom has impacted students engagement and academic progress.
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001)
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024) Send Teachers ans Support Staff to Reading
Language Arts Trainings.
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Culturally
Responsive Teaching
PD
Principal/IS/Lead
Teachers
[X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Meet and refelect on teaching practices regarding
culturally responsive teaching.
Teachers will meet to plan culturally relevant
thematic lesson intergrated with the core
curriculum
[ ] [X]
Peer classroom visits/Modeling lessons [ ] [X]
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Cultural Festival: Students will study and research
a student selected country. They will then develop
a exibit and written report to show students and
family members what they learned.
[X] [X] [ ]
Monthly Assemblies (Latino Heritage, African
American History Month, Cinco de Mayo,
Mexican Independence Day, etc..)
[X] [X] [X]
Daily Character Building Assessemblies/Morning
Assemblies
Daily Implementation of CRT strategies.
[X] [X] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Educationally Disadvantaged Youth (EDY) #3
(Socio-Economically Disadvantaged - SED)
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Special Education
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
RTI Tier 3, Intensive intervention using Learning Center
Description of the above strategy:
Students in need of intensive intervention will spend 6-8 weeks in small groups with target instruction to improve academic
abilities in areas of need.
[ ] We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[X] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By October we will Students 1-6 grade will be identified and placed in the learning center to receive intensive intervention.
By November we will RTI Progress monitoring will take place during the month of November.
By January we will Progress monitoring will continue
By April we will Evaluate the effectiveness of RTI
By May - June we will End of the year progress monitorning
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) replacement materials for Read naturally,
supplemental materials for learning center
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
RTI Mr. Richardson [ ] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
DIBELS [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
Benchmarks [X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
grade level appropriate assessments [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Special Education
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
GATE students will be challenged through differentiated instruction across all curricular areas.
Description of the above strategy:
The focus is offering daily differentiated curriculum with opportunities for GATE identified students to go into greater depth
and complexity (content, process, product). Students identified as GATE or scoring advanced will have access to more
challenging curriculum both in the classroom and in the After School Program.
[X] We have used this strategy for 4 year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
Research shows differentiating instruction to the students level of ability improves student achievement.
[ ] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By September we will review CST data to help identify GATE students. Review GATE student rosters
By September we will Implement strategies in differentiated instruction to assist GATE students
By January we will plan and present learning service projects to our GATE students
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) materials for thematic service learning project
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Benchmarks looking at GATE studnets [X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Student service learning project [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
English Learners (EL) #1
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Nystrom Staff will focus on utilizing effective scaffolding techniques daily during ELD blocking and core instruction to
improve the academic acheivement of English Learners. Decoding, vocabulary and comprehension strategies will be used to
help student improve reading skills and writing skills.
Description of the above strategy:
Teachers will implement effective ELD strategies. ELD District Coach will provide teachers with strategies through the
Lesson Sequence Model to ensure that all students have access to the core curriculum. Teachers will follow the lesson sequence
model on a daily basis for ELD instruction. In addition, ELD Coach will conduct ongoing ELD professional development.
[ ] We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[X] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By October we will ELD blocking/instruction will be implemented in every classroom k-6
By October we will Conduct walkthroughs to monitor implementation of ELD instruction
By November we will Schedule PD on Lesson Sequencing and ELD/AED Instruction
By January we will Monitor the implementation of Lesson Sequencing in all classrooms K-6
By February we will Have full implementation of Lesson Sequencing in all classrooms
By May we will Evaluate the effectiveness of the ELD Program
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) MIE instructional materials, picture dicitonaries,
materials for newcomers
Lesson Sequence Posters.
EIA/LEP 11,478.50
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001) Laminator and Poster Maker utlilized to enlarge
graphic organizers/charts for visual learners
Replacement rolls for laminator
Replacement paper rolls for poster maker
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 11,478.50
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Instructional Aide Bilingual 60%/20%
[ ] EIA/LEP 15971
EIA/SCE 5325
Annual Cost 21,296
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
ELD
Instruction/Lesson
Sequence
ELD Coach [X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Teachers will meet in their grade levels to plan
standards based lesson using the Lesson Sequence
structure.
[X] [X]
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Benchmark ELD Assessments
[X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
MIE formative assessments [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
Teacher observation and weekly assessments [ ] [X] [ ] [ ]
English Learners (EL) #1
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 11,478.50
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 11,478.50
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 21,296
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 15,971
EIA/SCE 5,325
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
English Learners (EL) #2
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
In order to increase the reclassification rate of our EL students, we will implement the necessary instructional strategies listed
below. In addition, teachers, staff, parents and administrators will attend the annual CABE confrenence.
Description of the above strategy:
English Learners who have been enrolled at Nystrom for 2+ years and have been stuck at intermediate level, will recieve
additional daily push-in support by the designated grad tutors and instructional aides. In addition, the implementation of ELD
standards-based instrution will support the needs of our EL students
[X] We have used this strategy for 1 year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
Although there is some improvement with our EL students, we need to continue on focusing our efforts to increase the
number of students being reclassified.
[ ] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By Novemember we will Create a list of target students that qualify for the service
By December we will Grade Tutor and Instructional Aides will be fully trained on interventions that will meet the needs of
the students. Students will participate in the push in tintervention program.
By February we will Data Team will monitor student progess, reassess and regroup students based on CELDT 2011 data and
ELD Benchmarks
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Student Materials/Supplies.
Chapter Books (Specific to approprpriate reading
levels), MIE materials, writing paper and
notebooks, vocabulary materials, etc.
EIA/LEP 5739.25
Parent (008) Paper and refreshments for ELAC, and Parent
Events.
Professional Dev (024) Lesson Sequencing Poster
ELD Instruction/Differentiation
Technology (001) Academy of Reading (Software)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 5,739.25
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Ms. Avila (Bilingual Community Worker) 6 hours
[ ] EIA/LEP 21808
EIA/SCE 7271
Annual Cost 29,079
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Teachers and subs
for CABE
Conference
CABE Key Note
Speakers
[ ] [ ] [X] EIA/LEP 6583.00
PD on Lesson
Sequencing and
Differentiation
ELD District
Coach
[X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 6,583
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Weekly Grade Level Meetings. [X] [X]
Academic Conferences [ ] [ ] Every
Trimester
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
ELAC Meetings [X] [X] [X]
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
ELD Benchmarks, [X] [X] [X] [ ]
CELDT [ ] [X] [X] [ ]
OCR Assessments/Prentice Hall [X] [X] [X] [ ]
English Learners (EL) #2
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 5,739.25
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 5,739.25
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 29,079
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 21,808
EIA/SCE 7,271
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 6,583
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 6,583
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Extended Learning #1
(Before/After/Saturday School)
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Nystrom Afterschool Program provides daily tutoring program for students who struggle in RLA and math. Group Leaders
are assigned to a specific grade level. They then assist them in completing the homework as well.
Playworks After School Program provides acdemic support and physical education instruction
Description of the above strategy:
Nystrom will recieve services from the District approved SES Program. Students will be assessed and identified based on their
proficiency levels.
SES programs are standard based programs that tutor and guide students towards proficiency at grade level. Our school has
implemented a intervention program that focuses on our below basic, and basic students.
[X] We have used this strategy for 2 year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
Research showed that identified students in our intervention program showed growth in RLA and math. This
program was discontinued last year due to budget freeze.
[ ] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By December we will Meet with the SES Providers
By January we will
SES programs will assess all students in the program.
Playworks Coach will to a mid year assessment of student progress.
By Feburary we will Full Implementation of the SES program will happen.
By March we will SES providers will meet with principal to review student progress
By December we will have planning meeting to identify students for our afternoon intervention program.
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) writing journals, relia, poster paper, laminate,
materials for writing projects
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001) laminator
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
2 teachers for tutoring [X]
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
planning for lessons and discussion of student levels [X] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
K-6 Playworks consultant
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
student work [ ] [X] [ ] [ ]
bi weekly informal assessments [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
benchmarks [X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Everyday math embedded assessments [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
Extended Learning #1
(Before/After/Saturday School)
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Extended Learning #2
(Before/After/Saturday School)
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Description of the above strategy:
We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001)
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Extended Learning #2
(Before/After/Saturday School)
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Extended Learning #3
(Site-Based Summer School)
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Description of the above strategy:
We have used this strategy for year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings from
the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001)
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Extended Learning #3
(Site-Based Summer School)
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Achievement
Pre-School Transition
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
State Pre-School Department has provided professional development for preschool teachers in the implementation of
standards based teaching. Parents are informed of the pre-school standards and encouraged to keep the child at their home
school. The Director of State Pre-K, site teacher, and administration work closly together to enroll students in pre-school and
enure that they receive standards based instruction so that they are prepared for Kindergarten.
Description of the above strategy:
To ensure that students remain at Nystrom, we will hold parent informationals to meet with parents and provide them with
student materials to support their child at home. In addition, we will plan a parent kindergarten tour so that parents have an
opportunity to see a kindergarten classroom.
[X] We have used this strategy for 2 year(s) and plan to continue the strategy this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[ ] This is a new strategy this year.
Action steps to implement the strategy:
By December we will Hold a parent informational meeting
By January we will Schedule a Kindergarten Tour for parents and students
By March we will Encourage parents to enroll their child into kindergarten
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001)
Parent (008) Parent Informational Worksheet
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the strategy: Frequency Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Parent informational [X] [X] [ ]
Kindergarten Tour [X] [X] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Pre-School Transition
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
ACTION PLAN
FOR IMPROVING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
(STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES)
Data Analysis
(Attendance, Health and Safety, Climate)
Data Reviewed Concern/Strength Description of Findings (400 character max)
Attendance Area of concern
Area of strength
2011-12 average attendance: %
Suspension Data Area of concern
Area of strength
Parent/Community Survey Area of concern
Area of strength
Crime Statistics - Site Area of concern
Area of strength
Other: Area of concern
Area of strength
Other: Area of concern
Area of strength
Student Programs
Attendance
Program to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Student Attendance/ Honor Roll Program
Description of the above Program:
Students will receive monthly attendance incentives. Students who have 100% perfect attendance for the month will receive
awards and be recognized school-wide.
[ ] We have used this Program for year(s) and plan to continue the Program this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[ ] This is a new Program this year.
Action steps to implement the Program:
By September we will Students will be recognized for their 100% attendence
By December we will Students will be recognized school-wide for their 100% attendence
By Feburary we will Students will be recognized school-wide for their 100% attendence
By March-April we will Students will be recognized school-wide for their 100% attendence
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) certificates, incentives
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
[X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Attendance reports [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
power school reports [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
Attendance
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Programs
Health and Safety
Programs to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Program Activity
Tobacco Use Prevention Education (TUPE) Students in grades 4-6 receive tobacco prevention instruction utilizing the
research-validated curriculum, Too Good For Drugs.
Safe and Drug-Free Schools (SDFS) Students in grades 4-6 receive the research-validated curriculum, Too Good For
Drugs.
Grade 5 students participate in the CA Healthy Kids Survey. Data is utilized to
inform program development and implementation and evaluation.
Conflict Mediation Second Step - for character building and problem solving skills.
Other: School Safety Team The safety team will oversee the development and implementation of the School
Safety Plan, make recommendations for program implementation and
development.
Other: Second Step Teachers, grades 1-3, implement social skills-based violence prevention pregram
focussed on empathy, impulse control, and anger management.
[ ] We have used this Program for year(s) and plan to continue the Program this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[ ] This is a new Program this year.
Action steps to implement the Program:
By November we will 1st through third grade teachers will be trained in Second Step
By January we will Monitor the full implementation of Second Step in the classroom
By we will
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Emergency Food and First Aide Packs for all
classrooms. Folders for teachers to file rosters and
necessary materials to track students
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024)
Technology (001)
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 0
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Second Step West County
Community LISC
[X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Healthy Kids Survey [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
Health and Safety
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Programs
School Climate #1
Strategy to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Daily use of Culturally Responsive classroom management plans and behavior policies to decrease disproportionality in
referrals and suspensions and increase the positive engagement of all students.
Description of the above strategy:
• Culturally Responsive engagement strategies will be used by all staff
• Schoolwide Culturally Responsive ways of managing behavior and discipline will be implemented consistently across
the school
• Situational appropriateness as it relates to both social and academic behavior will be consistently taught at all grade
levels.
Nystrom Character Building Program. Morning Assembly: Students lead school in the daily character building activities: The
Nystrom Community Virtues: School Affirmations. Weekly Lunch Character Building Lessons. Reflection Room
Making connections to literature through reading culturally relevent chapter books. Incorporate Playworks into Nystrom's
recess program to ensure student safety and character development.
[X] We have used this Program for year(s) and plan to continue the Program this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[ ] This is a new Program this year.
Action steps to implement the Program:
By December we will
have our first Student Recognition Assembly.
Playworks consultant will teach students and teachers organized games and activities.
By March we will
have our second Student Recogntion Assembly
Staff and students will continute to use safe and organized play at recess and during PE.
By June we will
have our third Student Recognition Assembly
Evidence of improved playground behavior and structured, safe PE for all students.
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Certificates and Special Prizes: Academic Focus
Social Skills curriculum; kits, books, posters to
promote responsibility, etc.
Title I 1615
EIA/SCE 2000
Parent (008) Laptop computer for SSC parent meetings and
power point presentations for monthly recognition
assemblies and family nights Materials for sibling
use in parent resource room
during parent meeting/classes; books for siblings &
students to read during parent nights Light
refreshments for parent meetings
Title I 2000
Professional Dev (024) Collaboration and Developing strategies to motivate
students, colored printer to print certificates, laptop
to connect to marquee
sharing of Playworks strategies for organized games
and activities
Technology (001) Title I 4500
Library (006)
Annual Cost: 10,115
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Bilingual School Commty' worker 20% [ ] EIA/SCE 7271
Annual Cost 7,271
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Teachers collaborate
to share strategies
for
[X] [ ] [ ]
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
PD/collaboration for supporting targeted students [ ] [X] EIA/SCE 1136
Annual Cost 1,136
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
[X] [X] [X]
Communication with parents including event
notices on school marquee
[ ] [X] [X] Title I 1000
Annual Cost 1,000
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
K-6 Playworks Consultant Title I 28000
Annual Cost 28,000
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
number of students receiving awards [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
Referrals and suspension data [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
School Climate #1
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 10,115
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 8,115
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 2,000
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 7,271
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 7,271
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 1,136
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 1,136
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 1,000
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 1,000
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 28,000
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 28,000
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Student Programs
School Climate #2
Program to be used during the 2012-13 school year:
Student and Family Recognition Assemblies,Daily Morning Assemblies and Community Virtues
Playworks consultant will instruct teachers and students in organized games.
Teachers will provide direct instruction in social skills to promote lifelong learning.
Description of the above Program:
in order to promote student engagement and positive relationships between staff, students and families , monthly recognition
assemblies will highlight student participation, school spirit, and academic achievement.
Playworks consultant will help improve the health and well being of our studetns by increasing opportunities for physical
activities and safe, meaningful play.
Our specific strategy implementation includes:
Nystrom Character Building Program. Morning Assembly: Students lead school in the daily character building activities: The
Nystrom Community Virtues: School Affirmations. Weekly Lunch Character Building Lessons. Reflection Room
Making connections to literature through reading culturally relevent chapter books. Incorporate Playworks into Nystrom's
recess program to ensure student safety and character development.
[X] We have used this Program for year(s) and plan to continue the Program this year because data shows (include findings
from the SPSA Monitoring form where available):
[ ] This is a new Program this year.
Action steps to implement the Program:
By August we will Culturally Responsive Teaching Strategies PD and Character Building Assembly
By January we will provide ongoing professional development on Culturally Responsive Teaching for the entire teaching
staff.
By March we will Hire staff and implement Playworks recess program for students
By we will
By we will
By we will
Materials necessary to implement the strategy:
Focus Materials Cost
Program Specific for Student Use (001) Misc. materials to create leveled classroom libraries,
misc. materials to increase student engagement
including answer buzzers, write on boards and
markers, art materials, privacy screens,
EIA/SCE 1000
Parent (008)
Professional Dev (024) Professional reading materials around CRP,
effective practices, Marzano, etc.
Technology (001) computers, doc cameras, LCD projectors
Library (006) Books that represent cultural diversity, promote
equity, and engage students in literacy
Annual Cost: 1,000
Additional certificated staff to implement the strategy:
Position % FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Additional classified staff to implement the strategy:
Position # Hours FTE or Hourly/Time Card Cost
Annual Cost 0
Professional development activities to implement the strategy:
Topic Presenter/Trainer In-House or Contract or Travel/Conference Cost
Annual Cost 0
Teacher collaboration time to implement the
strategy: Frequency
Cost
Activity Weekly Monthly Other
Annual Cost 0
Parent involvement activities to support the strategy Focus
Cost
Activity Academics
Community
Building
Communicati
ons
Annual Cost 0
Study trips to support the strategy:
Grade General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Link to Strategy (e.g., poetry, reports) Cost
Annual Cost 0
Other Contracted Services, including assemblies and sports programs, to support the strategy:
Grad
e General Focus (e.g., museum, farm) Cost
Annual Cost 0
SPSA Monitoring: Focus
(must collect data from at least 2 focus areas)
Data Collected
Standards
Base-
Assessments
Student
Work
Program
Embedded
Assessments Other
Disaggragated suspension data [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
Equity walk throughs [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
School Climate #2
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 1,000
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 1,000
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Overall Budget Summary
Summary of Costs
Materials
Total Expenditures: 48,832.75
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 19,115
EIA/LEP 17,217.75
EIA/SCE 12,500
Additional Certificated Staff
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Additional Classified Staff
Total Expenditures: 57,646
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 37,779
EIA/SCE 19,867
Professional Development
Total Expenditures: 6,583
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 6,583
EIA/SCE 0
Teacher Collaboration
Total Expenditures: 25,582
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 24,446
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 1,136
Parent Involvement
Total Expenditures: 1,000
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 1,000
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Study Trips
Total Expenditures: 3,000
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 3,000
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Contracted Services
Total Expenditures: 28,000
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 28,000
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Other Coordinated Services
Total Expenditures: 0
Expenditures by Funding Source:
Title I 0
EIA/LEP 0
EIA/SCE 0
Coordination of Services
Personnel
The staff included in the table below are the people who make it “all work together” to improve student achievement. These staff
members work to support the overall, comprehensive implementation of site-based programs. Resource teachers and instructional
assistants should be referenced in the strategy sections of the plan.
Other Coordination of Services Costs (materials, supplies)
The materials/supplies included in the table below are the items that make it “all work together” to increase student achievement.
These materials are not intended for use in specific instructional or safety/climate/attendance related programs. Instead, these materials
support the overall, comprehensive implementation of site-based programs. Instructional materials, professional development, and
study trips should be referenced in the strategy sections of the plan.
Item Rationale Funding Source/Amount
Miscellaneous Student Supplies To ensure student achievement
School Wide Support Supplies/
Culturally Responsive Chapter Books/
Office & Administrator Computers
To ensure all programs work together
Student Writing Folders To monitor and guide the writng process
for students.
Agreements
The following critical compliance items are in place throughout WCCUSD:
Highly Qualified Teachers: All teachers and paraprofessional involved in our academic programs will meet NCLB’s highly
qualified requirements. Our site coordinates with the WCCUSD Human Resources Department to ensure compliance with this
item.
Strategies to attract and retain high quality teachers: Our site acknowledges the importance of attracting and retaining high
quality instructional staff. Our site coordinates with the WCCUSD Human Resources Department to develop programs and
strategies to ensure high quality instruction staff want to come to and remain at our site.
Learning Center Collaborative Model: Each WCCUSD school that runs a collaborative model provides a seamless approach to
integrating personnel, resources, and teaching strategies to serve at-risk special and general education students. Special education
teachers may work with unidentified students and regular education teachers may work with identified students (as long as they
are qualified to meet the goals on the students’ I.E.P.s).
Staff development, selected strategies to implement or continue, and materials used are focused on meeting the needs of at-risk
and general education students. This information is detailed in the SPSA. Any funds spent to support the model are also outlined
in the SPSA. Finally, staff is consistently monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of the collaborative model so that changes
can be made where needed.
Parental Involvement: We recognize that parents/guardians need to be purposely involved in the education of their children.
Our school will develop systems and opportunities for parents/guardians to understand the grade level standards and assessments,
as well as participate in learning at home and decision-making activities. Many of our parental involvement activities are reflected
in our SPSA. The following represents our agreements:
o Our site provides parents with individual student performance information and assistance with interpretation of the state
assessment results through the following activities:
Parent Literacy Night: Parents are informed about Nystroms Academic Program; Parents are provided with
information on how to support their child academically at home; Title I meetings are held every year. In
addition, we provide a CST informational for parents on a yearly basis.
o Our site provides information and assistance to parents on how to understand academic content standards, assessments
and how to monitor academic progress through the following activities:
A parent frienldly Grade Level Standards Packet is sent home to parents every year. In addition, parent
newsletters are sent home frequently to inform parents about the academic/intervention programs that are
taking place at our school.
o Parents have opportunities to attend meetings to discuss programs and decisions related to their child’s academic
performance as follows:
Nystrom has the following organizational groups:
*SSC
*ELAC
*Parent Club
o Students who have difficulty attaining proficiency are identified and provided with additional academic help.
o Parents have the opportunity to submit comments on the SPSA to the LEA if they do not find the plan to be satisfactory.
Schoolwide Plans and Homeless Children and Youth: In accordance with McKinney Vento Federal Homeless Assistance
Law, the following actions are taken:
o Flyers are posted in the front office stating the rights of homeless children and services available. These flyers are made
readily available to homeless families.
o Staff is trained before the start of each academic year on how to enroll and identify homeless students by the district’s
homeless liaison.
o Teachers receive yearly training on how to identify warning signs which may indicate homelessness and sensitivity
training on the special needs of homeless children and youth.
o Parents without homes are included in outreach efforts by parent involvement outreach workers for inclusion in school
site councils.
Title I Schools Only:
Parent Involvement is supported through the development and maintenance of
1) school-level parent involvement policy - Revised on 9/11/12
2) parent-school compact - Revised on 9/11/12
Our site will hold an annual Title I meeting to
1) inform parents of school’s participation in Title I program,
2) explain the requirements of Title I, and
3) explain the rights of parents to be involved. For 2012-13 this meeting is held on:
12/07/12
The information distributed at the annual Title I meeting will be made available to all parents through the following activities:
Family Literacy and Math Night
Parent Conferences
We have a flexible number of meetings in order to involve parents in an organized, ongoing and timely way in the planning,
review and improvement of Title I programs.
Centralized Direct Services
Educational Services provides the following centralized direct services:
• Assistance with registration materials for the families of potential English learners
• Assistance in administering annual and initial CELDT
• Primary language assessment for newly enrolled English learners (ELs)
• English learner data analysis and reports for schools
• English learner parent education opportunities
• Identifying translators and interpreters to meet school needs
• Professional development for teachers and administrators regarding English Language Development (ELD) and core
instructional methodologies appropriate for English learners
• Support for principals, teachers and paraprofessional staff for effective implementation of the EL programs and services at
the school
• Support for the local assessment system (e.g. benchmarks, placement, screening) for ELD and for bilingual programs.
• Graduate Tutors provided at all elementary schools to support ELs
• Additional FTEs for class size reduction for secondary ELD classes