WelcomeLeon Heward-MillsJournals Global Publishing DirectorTaylor & Francis

Timetable for the day

• 09.30 – 09:45: Welcome and introduction

• 09.45 – 10:20: Storytelling: sense-making and sciencecommunication

• 10.35 – 12.00: SSH & STM breakout sessions

• 12.00 – 13.00: Lunch and poster session

• 13.00 – 13.30: Using data to manage reviewers

• 13.30 – 14.00: ORCID update

• 14.15 – 15.00: Data policy panel discussion

• 15.00 – 15.45: ‘Sharing your experience’ mentoring session

• 15.45 – 16.00: Closing remarks

2

Global % of research outputTop 10 countries by Web of Science Documents

3

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

% o

f Glo

bal O

utp

ut

USA

China Mainland

United Kingdom

Germany (Fed Rep Ger)

Japan

France

Canada

Italy

Australia

India

Data Source: InCites(Clarivate Analytics)2017

STM documents published by region

4

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Num

ber

of S

TM W

eb o

f Sci

ence

Doc

um

ents

Global Baseline

Europe

Asia

USA & Canada

Middle East

Latin America

Australasia

Africa

Data Source: InCites(Clarivate

HSS documents published by region

5

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Num

ber

of H

SS W

eb o

f Sci

ence

Doc

um

ents

Global Baseline

Europe

USA & Canada

Asia

Australasia

Middle East

Latin America

Africa

Data Source: InCites(Clarivate

Funders by Output from American Authors

- 40,000 80,000 120,000

National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USANatl Sci Fdn

National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUnited States Department of Energy (DOE)

NIH National Cancer Institute (NCI)National Aeronautics & Space Administration…

German Research Foundation (DFG)European Research Council (ERC)

European Union (EU)Natural Sciences and Engineering Research…

2016 – 2017 Research Outputs

Funders

Data: Clarivate Analytics’ InCites

International Collaborations

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

China UnitedKingdom

Germany Canada France Italy Australia Japan Spain Netherlands Switzerland

2016

-201

7 Re

serc

h O

utp

uts

Countries Colaborating with USA

Global Research Publishing Market

8

Market for all products $21-25bn- of which Journals $8.6bn

Market growth (annual): 2012-2016Books (1.0%)Journals 2.5%Services 4.7%

Number of jobs worldwide:Global c110,000US c38,000Europe c25,000

Sources: Outsell; Simba; STM; PRC Facts and Figures

Q. Why hasn’t scholarly publishing been disrupted?

When conditions for disruption seem ripe:

… and when media disruption is so widespread?

Limited AccessRedundant Intermediaries

Broken Trust Complex Experiences

Music Film Books/anything News

9

Q. Why hasn’t scholarly publishing been disrupted? 3 possible answers

1. It has been– we just didn’t notice

2. It is being– but the full effects are yet to be realised

3. It’s special…

10

From…• Generalist• Print• Online• Subscription• Site license• Words• Shelf• Serendipity• England

…to• Specialist• Online• Digital• Site license• Open Access• Research Objects• Search• Text mining• China

Q. Why hasn’t scholarly publishing been disrupted? A. It has been

11

Q. Why hasn’t scholarly publishing been disrupted? 3 possible answers

1. It has been– we just didn’t notice

2. It is being– but the full effects are yet to be realised

3. It’s special…

12

13

Scholarly Collaboration Networks

14

The rise of SCNs

15

Elsevier

acquires

SSRN

SCNs have grown substantially in recent years, particularly Academia.edu, ResearchGate, and Mendeley

– Registered users: Academia.edu 15+ million users; ResearchGate 8+ million; Mendeley 5+ million

– Uploaded documents: Mendeley reported users had uploaded 470+ million documents, and ResearchGate reported that 14 million are “accessible” via its platform

– SSRN: when bought by Elsevier, and merged with Mendeley, over 292,700 authors and more than 1.7 million users devoted to the rapid worldwide dissemination of social science research

– T&F: estimated 25% of our content is available on ResearchGate

“A social networking site is not an open access repository”

Office of Scholarly Communication, University of California

http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/sharing-your-work/

Q. Why hasn’t scholarly publishing been disrupted? 3 possible answers

1. It has been– we just didn’t notice

2. It is being– but the full effects are yet to be realised

3. It’s special…

18

• Inertia and embeddedness– In academic recognition & reward– Across a range of smaller publishers and societies

• Made for www 1.0– Short, structured content

• Ready for www 2.0 – www.4.0– Network effects

Q. Why hasn’t scholarly publishing been disrupted? A. It’s special…

19

From PC to Web 4.0

20

Credit: Nova Spiavck, Radar Networkshttp://novaspivack.typepad.com/ http://www.mindingtheplanet

Technology facilitates discoverability & visibility

21

Funder Registry

Submit. Review. Accept

Submitted manuscript

Published Content

Technology facilitates discoverability & visibility

22

Funder Registry

Submit. Review. Accept

Submitted manuscript

Published Content

Revenues/Investmentcolwiz: wizdom.ai Comprehensive Research Intelligence updated in Real Time

Revenues/Investment

Patents

Clinical

Trials

Social

Attention

Our strategy is to create and strengthen connections to drive impact

25

Research is a collaborative, networked effort.Our strategy is:• To create and strengthen rewarding connections between

people, knowledge and organisations• To empower and assist world class research• To distribute and promote access and readership

We will create services and products based on innovative technology to amplify these network effects