week 5 ohs
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
1/17
1
MGMT2718
Human Resource Management
Lecture 5
Occupational Health and Safety
Introduction:
each year in Australia
2,900 work related deaths
650,000 work related injuries economic losses $34Billion
ILO 4% GDP worldwide. Aust - $60.6 billion 8% ofGDP.
Health and safety concerns reflect an organisations strategicconcern for employee productivity and quality of work life.They should be linked with the organisation strategicbusiness objectives to seek competitive advantage bypromoting employee commitment, a safe culture, thecompanys image as a preferred employer, reduced costs andincreased productivity. (Stone)
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
2/17
2
Introduction: Unitarism in OHS (cont)
Interests of workers and employers do not neatly coincidealthough obviously there is overlap
James Reason: safety lives in the tension betweenproduction (profits) and protection.
Cost-cutting and profit seeking can erode protectionsagainst workplace hazards
Workplace safety is linked to public safety eg aeroplanesare workplaces; BP Deep Water Horizon disaster
Two Definitions: OHS =
the promotion and maintenance of the highest degree of
physical, mental and social wellbeing of workers in alloccupations
The physical, physiological and psychosocial conditions of anorganisations workforce, related to aspects of work and the workcontext
Intro (Continued): Background
Obviously a role for state intervention/regulation fines forviolating employers, and compensation system for theinjured
Since the 1970s,
shift from detailed regulation of standards and specifichazards (eg levels of chemical exposure)
to general duties and regulation of process (Robens) has coincided with work reorganisation (intensification,
outsourcing, offshoring, downsizing) and the rise of HRM
And neoliberalism: light touch regulation
This has led to new hazards especially psychosocialhazards bullying, stress, poor life/work balance
Challenges for regulation as well as HRM
xy ra cng lc vi stng ln, sn i ln)
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
3/17
3
Lecture Aims and Structure
Show the importance of preventive OHS practices Describe the major features of the legislative context for
OHS in Australia
Identify the basic features of an OHS management system,and criteria for its effectiveness
Identify characteristics of a positive safety cultureandexpose this concept to critical scrutiny
1. The ABC of OHS2. Risk Management: The Reason Model
3. Safety Culture and the Management of OHS
4.Australian Regulation of OHS
5. Hazards Old and New
1. The ABC of OHS
Approaches to understanding workplace injury
Blaming the victim focuses on individual characteristicsand behaviours that contribute to injury
Blaming the system focuses on the organisational, socialand economic environments in which injury and disease
occur the employers duty of care is the starting point
Even if worker negligence has contributed, the employeris directly liable or vicariously liable if harm is done byan employee to another
Although there may be mitigating circumstances
There are a variety of measures available to the injuredparty, from common law action to workers compensation
khi n trch
lm du bt
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
4/17
4
Workplace Hazards, Risk Assessment, RiskManagement
Workplace hazardsare circumstances, proceduresor environments that expose individuals to possibleinjury, illness, damage or loss Physical hazards
Chemical and other hazardous substances
Ergonomic hazards
Psychosocial hazards
Risk assessment is the process of identifyinghazards It assesses the severity of the risk in terms of how likely the
hazard is to occur, and the severity of the hazard
Risk Management is the process managing risk
based on the assessment.
2. The Reason Model of Risk Management
Understanding safety in complex high reliabilityorganisations esp aircraft maintenance, nuclearpower, medical
Tension between profits/production and protection
Safety is a dynamic non event the absense of an
accident does not mean a system is safe
During the absense of a disaster, safety marginsare being eroded and a given system may actuallybe becoming increasingly unsafe!
xi mn
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
5/17
5
Swiss Cheese Model
Defences against accidents are like layers of swisscheese.
Holes are like breaches in the defences when they lineup an accident trajectory may occur
The protective layers are continually being eroded bycost cutting
Especially by managers who dont appreciatetechnicalities
Accidents come from human error (or deliberatedepartures from procedure), interacting withorganisational latent factors
such as management decisions, practices, governmentpolicy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIQQhqpVY80
Show first few seconds, then From 30 mins > 41
t i m tng
phng trnh tai nn
khi n thnh 1 hng, quo tai nn c th xy ra
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
6/17
6
Implications
Rarely one single cause - Human error involved Latent factors
organisational characteristics, even aspects of publicpolicy (training or regulation) broad concept
The investigation pointed to systemic failures ofmanagement in the engineering hangar
Time pressure - for on time departure; supply of bolts
Engineer departed from procedure incautiously
Not the full story in the official accident report dueto pressure from the airline
Argument the investigators denied natural justice to theengineer by not informing him that he was underinvestigation
3. Safety Culture and the Management of OHS
Positive safety culture is a set of values, perceptions,attitudes and patterns of behaviour with regard to safetyshared by members of the organisation, reflecting a highlevel of concern and commitment to the prevention ofaccidents and illnesses
objective is to create an atmosphere in which employees
are aware of the risks in their workplace, are continually onguard against them, and avoid taking any unsafeaction (Kramer et al, 2014:123)
employees are more likely to comply with safetyprocedures because they are more aware and havegreater ownership of those procedures
BUT positive safety climate cannot be developed withoutconsideration of the daily constraints on employees
nh cha my bay
cuc i u tra chra th t bi c hth ng
sao lng thi u thn trng qu trnh
mc ch
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
7/17
7
Reporting Culture
Reporting culture is when people are prepared toreport errors, near misses, unsafe conditions,inappropriate procedures and any other concernsthey may have about safety
Some concerns:
Reporting ones own errors can lead to disciplinary action
Importance of no blame or aka just culture (anotheraspect of SC).
Yet no blame is incompatible with performancemanagement (accountability) culture
Tensions with pluralism unitarist assumptions
Also in tension with new HRM practices, esp PM
Elements of a safety culture
Reasons safety culture concept also contains unitarism
[in addition to] Reporting culture
Informed culture
values and propagates knowledge of safety principles
Just (no blame) Culture
People are not blamed for their errors, as long as they
own up Flexible Culture
Delegates decision making power to expertise
Eg aircraft maintenance engineers make decisions torelease the plane to service, and will delay if there is asafety concern
but sometimes non-technically trained managers willcontest and override
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
8/17
8
OHS safety management systems
a combination of the planning and review, themanagement organisational arrangements, theconsultative arrangements, and the specific programelements that work together in an integrated way toimprove health and safety performance
Policy and programs that cover the planning,implementation, evaluation and improvement of OHS inan organisation
OHS policy: a written statement approved by top
management, typically accompanied by a set of OHSprograms, rules and instructions, that identifies OHSaccountabilities and sets out how OHS compliance willbe met
OHS safety management systems
1. Organisation, responsibility and accountability
Shared among HR, Exec, Line mgt, Employees (unions?)
Overt commitment by senior mgt important, as are policies andperformance management systems
2. Consultative arrrangements
OHS representatives, committees and broad employeeparticipation
3. Specific program elements
OHS program: a plan designed for policy implementation thatidentifies the OHS procedures, practices and people necessaryto reach policy objectives
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
9/17
9
Elements of OHS management systems
OHS program elements include:
rules and procedures, training programs
workplace inspections
incident reporting and investigation
principles for hazard prevention/control
data collection, analysis, record keeping
OHS promotion and information provision
emergency procedures medical/first aid facilities and procedures
NB Also organisational learning feedback loops
Barriers to an effective OHSmanagement system
Not customising systems to organisational needs, impositionwithout consultation, weak senior management commitmentand poor employee involvement
Application in hostile contexts (small business, precariousemployment, contractors and labour hire companies)
Inappropriate use of audit tools (where they become an endin themselves, are governed by misplaced managementobjectives and are conducted without sound auditor skills,standards and criteria)
NOTE also ability of OHSMS to continuously improve, itsability to detect hazards, assess and manage them.
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
10/17
10
4. Australian Regulation of OHS
Approaches to OHS regulation and inspection in general
have changed as the introduction said
Earlier (pre-80s) voluminous regulations detailing technicalworkplace hazards
British Robens report mix of general duty of care,performance standards and process standards
Internal processes especially worker (union?) representationin OHS committees and other processes essential
But unitarist assumptions
Need systems to involve workers and expertise at workplace
Criticised by OHS experts as having failed
due to erosion of union influence? Representation gap?
leaning too far to self regulation especially SafetyManagement Systems (SMS)
Much depends on external auditing and inspection >regulated self regulation
Australian Regulation
Principles: Employers Duty of Care.
requirement for everything reasonably practicable to bedone to protect the health and safety of the workplace
Each state had own laws large volume of legalrequirements, particularly for employers operating in
more than one state and own WorkCover (workers compensation) system -
some were stronger than others
By 2009, there were 10 OHS Acts, at least 50 otherregulatory instruments and 282 codes of practiceconcerned with workplace health and safety acrossAustralia
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
11/17
11
Harmonisation process
Labor 2008 began harmonisation
Used Victorian legislation as a model
NSW held out
wanted right to jail employers
Strong right of entry for unions and to closedown a business
all state governments (except Western Australia)agreed to enact legislation identical to the federalmodelAct by the end of 2011
Not completed yet complex mix of state regulations,moving towards national harmonisation based onFederal WHS Act
Work, Health and Safety Act 2010.
Organisations will have to ensure workplaces are safeand without risks to all types of workers carrying outactivities on behalf of the organisation, and any otherperson affected by those activities
Workers will have an obligation to undertake reasonable
care for themselves and for others, and to cooperate withany reasonable instruction by the organisation
State and territory OHS Acts are enforced through aprocess of inspection, investigation, education andprosecution, a process that will continue under the newnational system
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
12/17
12
Work, Health and Safety Act 2010.
Legally enforceable rights to participation, consultationand representation for workers
Workers can elect representatives on OHS committees
Strong powers to H&S rep at workplace can orderstopwork issue Infringement Notice
Responsibilty for OHS extends down the supply chain tocontractors
principal OHS statutes throughout Australia areaccompanied by workers compensation regulation, which
sets out the rights and obligations of employers andemployees following a work-related injury
Workers Compensation
Workers compensation and rehabilitation legislationprovides for compensation to injured employees,regardless of who is responsible for the workplaceillness or injury
Injured workers are entitled to (1) compensation forlost wages while injured and medical and relatedexpenses, and (2) be offered suitable duties or theirpre-injury employment to help the rehabilitation ofinjured workers and safeguard them against dismissal
Return to work approach is based on the jointassumptions that it will benefit injured workers andreduce the costs of compensation
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
13/17
13
5. Workplace Hazards Old and New
Traditional falls, trips and spills, exposure todangerous substances, like Asbestos Smokingincluding passive, and Substance abuse
New Occupational Stress
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-3wDQJEHdI
Some new hazards are exacerbated by HRM practices,like outsourcing, offshoring, (the dark side of) flexibility especially precarious work
Long Work Hours andboundariless work' Obesity
Sitting is the new smoking
Muscular sceletal disorders (RSI; etc)
Some Current Health and Safety Issues (cont)
Lack of work-life balance, and Work-familyconflict
Tensions between traditional work hours, especially longdays, depends on traditional domestic role of women career impediment for the latter
And long hours not necessarily a problem work time isnot necessarily negative some people thrive on it
Intra-family tension can create a work hazard, as well asbeing the result of it, especially in case of
Home-based work
need policies because its a workplace yet employersoften cant control should they be liable?
Technology can be a trap inability to break free fromwork (smartphones; iPads)
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
14/17
14
New classes of psychosocial injury
Occupational stress: the adverse emotional and/orphysiological reaction to excessive pressures or othertypes of demands placed on a worker
A condition of strain that affects ones emotions, thoughtprocesses and physical condition
Sources of Stress = stressors
Highjob demands combined with inability to controlhow you work (Karosek and Theorell)
Workplace bullying (next OHD)
Challenge for OHS design OHSMS and Regulatory/auditing/inspection to manage risk of psychosocialinjury depression etc > workplace death
Management bystress - dangers
Japan in the 80s and 90s
Put people under stress (overload) so they find betterways of organising work drives innovation but alsokaroshiand suicide
Workplace Bullying
Hard to define Kramar (p. 133):
Bullying at work: workplace bullying is any behavior that is repeated, systematic and directed towards an
employee or group of employees that a reasonable person,having regard to the circumstances, would expect to victimize,humiliate, undermine or threaten which creates risk to health andsafety
Can take in a lot, new forms of management as well as
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MC32nbGVuJM
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
15/17
15
Workplace Bullying: workplace factors conducive to
A workplace culturethat promotes conformity and regardsdiversity as a threat
Work organisation involving poor job design, which promotes roleambiguities and role conflicts, coupled with a low level of individualworker control including a lack of involvement in setting workobjectives
Leadership styles that are excessively authoritarian or laissez-faire
To deal with:
Develop a workplace bullying policy
Have a clearly stated no toleranceapproach
Establish expectations of appropriate behaviours andconsequences for not meeting those expectations
Develop a complaint-handling and investigation procedure thatincludes due process and natural justice
Policies to deal with workplace bullying (cont)
Provide training, information and awareness on workplacebullying to all employees, irrespective of their level within theorganisation
Ensure all who have responsibility for employees are awareof their need to assist their employer in complying with abullying-free workplace
Nominate a contact person
Provide clear job descriptions, which outline specific roles/responsibilities
Take disciplinary action against employees and managersengaged in bullying
Limitations on redress available tendency to fall throughthe cracks see
cho php hoc gip ci g xy ra/ d n d n k t qu
stng ng, gi ng nhau
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
16/17
16
Case Study
View this Documentary (10 minutes): the Human Cost ofWorkplace Bullying in Australia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA49hYJiGsU&spfreload=10
WA Ambulance will be the case study next week.
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2015/s4345509.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-24/families-of-dead-paramedics-call-for-st-john-ambulance-to-change/
7244088
Conclusion
OHS is changing but its difficult to be optimistic onthe analysis of this lecture
Shift from detailed, standards regulation andinspection, to process regulated self regulation, incontext of light touch regulation creates difficulties
At the same time, new hazards associated with workreorganisation (outsourcing, offshoring,intensification) and new management techniques
Psychosocial hazards particularly difficult redressdifficult to get
Continued decline in job quality likely
Not just a workplace, but a public health issue
-
7/26/2019 Week 5 OHS
17/17
References
Kramar,et al, 2014, ch 4
Parliament of Australia (2012) Workplace Bullying: We just want it tostop. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Educationand Employment, Canberra http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_committees?url=ee/bullying/report.htm
Quinlan, M (2007) Organisational restructuring/downsizing, OHSregulation and worker health and wellbeing, International Journal ofLaw and Psychiatry, 30, 385-399
Reason, J. (1997), Managing the Risks of Organisational Accidents,Aldershot: Ashgate
Walters, D et al, (2011) Regulating Workplace Risks: A ComparativeStudy of Inspection Regimes in Times of Change, UK: Edward Elgar,chs 1-5, 12-13, passim