website evaluation 2009

14
Website Evaluation Website Evaluation Content adapted from: Beck, Susan. The Good, The Bad & The Ugly: or, Why It’s a Good Idea to Evaluate Web Sources . 1997. http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/eval.html Image courtesy of Kristen King

Upload: patrick-woessner

Post on 09-May-2015

1.121 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Website evaluation for Middle School students

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Website Evaluation 2009

Website EvaluationWebsite Evaluation

Content adapted from: Beck, Susan. The Good, The Bad & The Ugly: or, Why It’s a Good Idea to Evaluate Web Sources.  1997.  http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/eval.html

Image courtesy of Kristen King

Page 2: Website Evaluation 2009

Spend a few minutes exploring this site. What are your general impressions of the webpage?

Page 3: Website Evaluation 2009

Five Criteria for Web Five Criteria for Web EvaluationEvaluationAuthority

Accuracy

Objectivity

Currency

Coverage

Page 4: Website Evaluation 2009

AuthorityAuthorityIs there an author? Is the author

qualified?◦Look for a header or footer showing

affiliation. ◦Look at the URL. http://www.fbi.gov ◦Look at the

domain: .edu, .com, .uk, .org, .netAnyone can publish anything on the

web. It is often hard to determine a web

page's authorship.

Page 5: Website Evaluation 2009

Are you able to identify the author of this site and/or the organization who created it? If not, how might that affect the usefulness of the information?

Page 6: Website Evaluation 2009

AccuracyAccuracyIs the information reliable and

error-free?Is there an editor or someone who

verifies/checks the information?Unlike traditional print resources,

web resources rarely have editors or fact-checkers.

Currently, no web standards exist to ensure accuracy.

Page 7: Website Evaluation 2009

Does the author cite any of his sources on the site? If not, how might that affect the accuracy of the information?

Page 8: Website Evaluation 2009

ObjectivityObjectivityDoes the information show a

minimum of bias?Is the page designed to sway

opinion?Is there any advertising on the

site?Websites are often a “soapbox”

for personal opinion.

Page 9: Website Evaluation 2009

Is there any evidence of bias on this page? If so, how might that affect the usefullness of the information?

Page 10: Website Evaluation 2009

CurrencyCurrencyIs the page dated?If so, when was the last update?How current are the links? Have

some expired or moved?Publication or revision dates are

not always provided.

Page 11: Website Evaluation 2009

Is this page up to date? If not, how might that affect the usefulness of the information?

Page 12: Website Evaluation 2009

CoverageCoverageWhat topics are covered?What does this page offer that is

not found elsewhere?How in-depth is the material?Frequently, it's difficult to

determine the extent of coverage of a topic from a web page. The page may or may not include links to other web pages or print references.

Page 13: Website Evaluation 2009

Does this site provided detailed/in-depth information? If not, how might that affect the usefulness of the information?

Page 14: Website Evaluation 2009

Remember: A Good Website Remember: A Good Website Has…Has…

Authority

Accuracy

Objectivity

Currency

Coverage