web viewpage 3 of 23 (2016 edition ... multiple choice/ underline the correct word/ true or...

Directorate: Curriculum GETSenior Phase

EMS

EMS Advisors Mnr Anele Mxinwa Mev Juanita Allies Mev Elmaree EksteenCell no 073 215 9285 082 446 1181 082 874 2079

Office no 021-900 7042 021-900 7200 021-900 7043

Email [email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Fax 086 234 7210 086 535 8615 086 219 7092

CAPS Moderation Checklists

Gr 7 – 920…

EMS: ASSIGNMENT (Please use a separate checklist for each grade)

LEVEL OF MODERATION(indicate with X)

School(Internal)

Subject group(Cluster)

District(Subject adviser) Province

Date of Assignment

Date of Moderation

Name of ModeratorPost level/Designation of ModeratorGrade (indicate with X) 7 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9

A: MODERATION OF INSTRUMENT (PRE-MODERATION)

School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments

1. Are the following indicated on the question paper/instruction page(s)?Name and logo of school, Subject, Grade, Date of task, Time and Total.

2. Is each page of the task clearly numbered?

3. Are the instructions of the task clearly indicated?4. Is the minimum total of the task clearly indicated?

Gr 7+8: 30

Gr 9: 505. Are the ‘Date Issued’ and ‘Due Date’ clearly

indicated?Date Issued:

Due date:

6. Did learners receive clear and detailed instructions with the task?

7. Do the task’s questions meet the following criteria?

Questions are phrased clearly and unambiguously.

Correct use of subject terminology.

Use of suitable illustrations/graphs/tables/scenarios. Illustrations/Graphs/Tables/Scenarios, etc. are legible

and fit for copying. Suitable mark allocation per question. Questions comply with the relevant cognitive levels

per grade: Low: 30%, Middle: 40%; High: 30% The completed assessment grid is included and shows

the actual cognitive levels for the task.Low Middle High

of 23

(Task continued) School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments

8. Is the assessment instrument (memorandum/rubric) complete?

9. Does the assessment instrument (memorandum/ rubric) allow for alternative answers, and/or learners’ own opinion?

10. Was the task instrument internally moderated?Any proof available of this moderation?

COMMENTS ON PRE-MODERATION:

DATE for re-submission after corrections to the question paper and assessment instrument were madeDATE for acceptance the final version of the question paper and assessment instrument

B. Evidence of Learner performance (Post Moderation)

School

Cluste

r Distric

t Prov.

Comments

1. How many periods/school times were spent on the task?

2. Is there evidence of internal moderation in the learner evidence submitted?

3. Is marking in accordance with the marking memorandum/ rubric?

4. Does the final mark reflect the actual standard of learners’ answers?

5. Were marks added correctly per question/section/ rubric?

6. Have the marks been accurately recorded on mark sheets?

COMMENTS ON POST-MODERATION

of 23 (2016 edition)

C. LEARNER EVIDENCE (Leave space for moderators at all moderation levels)

Gr&

CL

Surname Name Mark or % before

mod.

Mark or % after mod.

Mark adjusted on mark sheet ()

Comments

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Signature Date

Internal moderator

Cluster moderator(Subject group member)

District moderator(Subject Adviser)

Provincial moderator


EMS: CASE STUDY (Please use a separate checklist for each grade)


School(Internal)



Date of Case Study

Date of Moderation



School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments




Gr 7 + 8: 30



Due date:










(Case study continued) School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments







School

Cluste

r Distric

t Prov.

Comments



3. Is marking in accordance with the memorandum/ rubric?







Gr&

CL


mod.



Comments

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Signature Date

Internal moderator





EMS: DATA RESPONSE (Please use a separate checklist for each grade)


School(Internal)



Date of Data response

Date of Moderation



School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments




Gr 7 + 8: 30



Due date:







per grade: Low: 30%, Middle: 40%; High: 30% The completed assessment grid is included and show



(Task continued) School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments







School

Cluste

r

Distric

t

Prov.

Comments



3. Is marking in accordance with the marking memorandum/ rubric?







Gr&

CL


mod.



Comments

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Signature Date

Internal moderator





EMS: PROJECT (Please use a separate checklist for each grade)


School(Internal)



Date of Project

Date of Moderation

Name of ModeratorPost level/Designation of ModeratorGrade (indicate with x) 7 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9

A: MODERATION OF PROJECT INSTRUMENT (PRE-MODERATION)

School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments

1. Are the following indicated on the project instrument:Name and logo of school, Subject, Grade, Date of project, Time allocation and Total?

2. Is each page of the project clearly numbered?

3. Are the instructions of the project clearly indicated?

4. Is the ‘Date issued’ and ‘Due date’ clearly indicated? Date Issued:

Monitoring date:

Due Date:

5. Is the minimum total of the project 50? (Gr 7/8/9)

6. Did learners receive the assessment criteria with the project?

7. Did the learners receive clear and detailed instructions:

Number of pages (Length of project), cover page, table of contents

Number, type and functional use of resources

Bibliography – reference list8. Do the project questions/instructions comply with the

relevant cognitive levels per grade: Low: 30%, Middle: 40%; High: 30%? The completed assessment grid is included and shows

the actual cognitive levels for the taskLow Middle High


(Project, continued) School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments

9. Is the Assessment instrument (memorandum/rubric) complete?

10. Does the Assessment instrument (memorandum/ rubric) allow for alternative answers, and/or learners’ own opinion?

11. Was the project instrument internally moderated?Any proof available of this moderation?


DATE for re-submission after corrections to the question paper and assessment instrument were madeDATE for acceptance of the final version of the question paper and assessment instrument


School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments

1. How many periods/school times were spent on the project?


2. Is marking in accordance to the memorandum/rubric?







Gr&

CL

Surname Name Mark or % before mod.



Comments

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Signature Date

Internal moderator





EMS: CLASS TEST/CONTROL TEST(Please use a separate checklist for each test)LEVEL OF MODERATION(indicate with X)

School(Internal)



Term 1 Term 3 Term 1 Term 3 Term 1 Term 3 Term 1 Term 3

Date of Test

Date of Moderation


A: MODERATION OF QUESTION PAPER (PRE-MODERATION)

School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments

1. Are the following indicated on the test paper?Name and logo of school, Subject, Grade, Date of test, Time and Total.

2. Is each page of the question paper clearly numbered?

3. Are the instructions of the test clearly indicated?

4. Is the minimum total of the test clearly indicated? Gr 7 & 8: Test 1 (50); Test 2 (100) Gr 9: Test 1(100); Test 2 (100)

5. Is the time allocation indicated as per CAPS? Gr 7: Test 1 (60 min); Test 2 (90 min) Gr 8 & 9: Test 1 and 2 (60 min)

6. Does the test cover the content completed in accordance with the ATP per term?

Term 1 (test 1), or Term 3 (test 2)

7. Are the questions divided into sections as listed below and the main topic per section indicated? E.g.Sec. A: Short questions (all topics); Sec. B: The EconomySec. C: Financial Literacy; Sec. D: Entrepreneurship

8. Do the test questions meet the following criteria? Questions are phrased clearly and unambiguously. Correct use of subject terminology. Use of suitable illustrations/graphs/tables/case

studies/scenarios. Illustrations/Graphs/Tables/Scenarios, etc. are legible





(Test continued) School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments

9. Does the question paper include the following types of questions:

Section A (Short questions)Multiple choice/ Underline the correct word/ True or False/Match the columns/ Fill in the missing word

Section B, C and D:Short answer questions/Paragraph type/Case studies/ Scenarios/Cartoons or Diagrams(n/a Fin. Literacy)

10. Is the numbering per section and per question correct?

11. Is the assessment instrument (memorandum) complete?

12. Does the assessment instrument (memorandum) allow for alternative answers, and/or learners’ own opinion?

13. Does the numbering in the memorandum correspond with the numbers in the question paper?

14. Was the project instrument internally moderated?Any proof available of this moderation?





School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments


2. Is marking in accordance with the marking memorandum?


4. Were marks added correctly per question, per section and in total?




Gr&

CL

Surname Name Mark or % before mod.



Comments

12

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Signature Date

Internal moderator





EMS: MID YEAR/JUNE EXAMINATION (Please use a separate checklist for each grade)


School(Internal)



Date of Moderation



School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments

1. Are the following indicated on the front page?Name and logo of school, Subject, Grade, Date of examination, Number of pages, Time and Total

2. Is each page of the question paper and answer book (where applicable) clearly numbered?

3. Are the examination instructions clearly indicated?4. Is the minimum total of the exam clearly indicated?

Gr 7 & 8: 75

Gr 9: 1005. Is the time allocation as per CAPS requirements?

Gr 7 - 9: 60 min

6. Does the examination cover content completed in accordance with the ATP? (Term 1 – 2 work)

7. Are the questions divided into sections as listed below and the main topic per section indicated?Sec. A: Short questions (all topics); Sec. B: The EconomySec. C: Financial Literacy; Sec. D: Entrepreneurship







(Midyear Exam, continued) School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments

9. Does the question paper include the following types of questions:


Section B, C and D:Short answer questions/Paragraph type/Case studies/ Scenarios/Cartoons or Diagrams(not Fin. Literacy)


11. Is the Assessment instrument (memorandum) complete?

12. Does the memorandum allow for alternative answers, and/or learners’ own opinion?


14. Was the exam paper and memo internally moderated? Any proof available of this moderation?





School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments








Gr&

CL


mod.



Comments

123456789

10

Signature Date

Internal moderator





EMS: FINAL/ NOVEMBER EXAMINATION (Please use a separate checklist for each grade)


School(Internal)



Date of Moderation



School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments

1. Are the following indicated on the front page?Name and logo of school, Subject, Grade, Date of examination, Number of pages, Time and Total

2. Is each page of the question paper clearly numbered?

3. Are the examination instructions clearly indicated?4. Is the minimum total of the exam clearly indicated?

Gr 7 & 8: 150

Gr 9: 2005. Is the time allocation as per CAPS requirements?

Gr 7 - 9: 120 min / 2 hours6. Does the examination cover content completed in

accordance with the ATP? (Term 1 - 4)7. Are the questions divided into sections as listed

below and the main topic per section indicated?Sec. A: Short questions (all topics); Sec. B: The EconomySec. C: Financial Literacy; Sec. D: Entrepreneurship







(Final Exam continued) School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments

9. Does the question paper include the following type of questions:


Section B, C and D:Short answer questions/Paragraph type/Case studies/ Scenarios/Cartoons or Diagrams(not Fin. Literacy)


11. Is the Assessment instrument (memorandum) complete?

12. Does the memorandum allow for alternative answers, and/or learners’ own opinion?


14. Was the exam paper and marking memo internally moderated?Any proof available of this moderation?





School

Cluster

District

Prov.

Comments








Gr&

CL


mod.



Comments

123456789

10

Signature Date

Internal moderator





EMS COGNITIVE LEVEL GRID

GRADE TASK CASE STUDY

DATA RESPONSE

CLASS TEST PROJECT JUNE

EXAMNOV

EXAM7 8 9

(Tick the applicable)

Sect

ion

Que

stio

n

TOPIC covered per task/question

RememberingUnderstanding

(define, list, name, illustrate, explain, classify, compare,

etc.)

Applying Analysing

(Illustrate, discuss, solve,

prepare, distinguish, differentiate,

classify, criticize, etc.)

EvaluatingCreating

(Select, support, debate, evaluate, develop, rewrite, design, develop,

etc.) TOTA

L pe

r sub

- qu

estio

n

A 1.1 Supply /Econ 21.2 Assets/Fin Lit 2 4

Total Marks per level% per level TOT.

markTarget % per level 30% 40% 30%


web viewpage 3 of 23 (2016 edition ... multiple choice/ underline the correct word/ true or...

Documents