· web viewthe occupational data were more limited for spouses; however, we saw similar...
TRANSCRIPT
A STUDY TO ASSESS THE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE HEALTH
PROBLEMS OF AGRICULTURAL WORKERS RELATED TO
PROLONGED CONTACT WITH PESTICIDES IN SELECTED RURAL
AREAS AT BANGALORE IN VIEW TO PROVIDE HEALTH
EDUCATION
M.Sc Nursing Dissertation Protocol submitted to
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, Bangalore.
By
MR. MARYDASAN.F
M.Sc NURSING 1ST YEAR
2010-2012
Under the Guidance of
HOD, Department of Community Health Nursing
Nightingale College of Nursing
Guruvanna Devara Mutt
Near Binnyston garden
Bangalore –23
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE,KARNATAKA
CURRICULAM DEVELOPMENT CELL
CONFORMATION FOR REGISTRATION OF SUBJECTS FORDISSERTATION
Registration number :Name of the candidate : Mr. Marydasan.f
Address : Guruvanna Devara Mutt, Near Binnyston Garden, Magadi Road, Bangalore-23
Name of the institution : Nightingale College of Nursing
Course of study and subject : M.Sc. Nursing in Community Health Nursing..Date of admission to course :
Title of the topic : A study to assess the knowledge about the health problems of agricultural workers related to prolonged contact with pesticides in selected rural area at Bangalore in view to provide health education
Brief resume of the intended work : Attached
Signature of the student :
Guide Name :.Remarks of the guide :
Signature of the guide :
Co-guide name :
Signature of co-guide :
HOD name :
Signature of HOD :
Principal Name : Mrs.Jayakadambari
Principal Mobile No : 09886367287
Principal E-mail ID : [email protected]
Remarks of the Principal :
Principal signature :
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES,KARNATAKA, BANGALORE.
ANNEXURE-II
PROFORMA FOR REGISTRATION OF SUBJECT FORDISSERTATION
1 NAME OF THE CANDIDATE AND ADDRESS
MR. MARYDASAN.FI YEAR M.Sc. NURSING,
NIGHTINGALE COLLEGE OF NURING
GURUVANNA DEVARA MUTT, NEAR BINNYSTON GARDEN,
MAGADI ROADBANGALORE-23
2 NAME OF THE INSTITUTION NIGHTINGALE COLLEGE OF NURING, GURUVANNA DEVARA
MUTT, NEAR BINNYSTON GARDEN, MAGADI ROAD,
BANGALORE-23
3 COURSE OF STUDY AND SUBJECT
M.SC NURSING IN COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING
4 DATE OF ADMISSION TO THE COURSE 20/ 05/2010
5
TITLE OF THE TOPIC:
A STUDY TO ASSESS THE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE HEALTH
PROBLEMS OF AGRYCULTURAL WORKERS RELATED TO
PROLONGED CONTACT WITH PESTICIDES IN SELECTED RURAL
AREAS AT BANGALORE IN VIEW TO PROVIDE HEALTH
EDUCATION
BRIEF RESUME OF THE INTENDED WORK
6.1) INTRODUCTION
We've all heard the term pesticides before, but do we really know what
they are? Pesticides are chemicals that we use to kill undesirable organisms. When we
say undesirable organisms, we are referring to organisms (plants, animals, insects,
etc.) that are harmful to us. Some of these organisms, or "pests," eat our crops, while
others spread diseases. And it doesn't always have to be this serious. Weeds can be
considered a pest for just growing in the wrong places (our yards). The point is, if we
are using some type of chemical to control these pests, that chemical would be
considered a pesticide. DDT is one of the most famous pesticides in the world, and it
has been with us for quite a long time.1
A pesticide is any substance or mixture of substances intended for
preventing, destroying, repelling or mitigating any pest. A pesticide may be a
chemical substance, biological agent (such as a virus or bacterium), antimicrobial,
disinfectant or device used against any pest. Pests include insects, plant pathogens,
weeds, molluscs, birds, mammals, fish, nematodes (roundworms), and microbes that
destroy property, spread disease or are a vector for disease or cause a nuisance.
Although there are benefits to the use of pesticides, there are also drawbacks, such as
potential toxicity to humans and other animals. According to the Stockholm
Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, 10 of the 12 most dangerous and
persistent organic chemicals are pesticides. 2
India Pesticides Limited entered the Agrochemicals & Pharmaceutical
Industry in 1973 founded by Mr. Anand Swarup Agarwal an industrialist with a
strong vision for future growth.The use of pesticides has a long history. There is
evidence that ancient Romans and Chinese, for example, used various minerals and
plant extracts as pesticides. Manufactured chemical pesticides began in the 1930s and
dramatically increased after World War II (1939–45). The widespread use of
chemical pesticides led to an increased concern for how pesticides were affecting the
environment, animals, and people. Over the years, pesticides have undergone much
advancement, including the development of natural substances and improvements on
the traditional. The use of pesticides is a hotly debated topic. While they can be
extremely useful in terms of protecting plants from disease-carrying insects and pests,
most pesticides are risky, by their very nature. To be effective, pesticides must be able
to kill some living organisms,
and this can pose risks to humans, pets, or the environment. Since pesticides can
provide such a benefit to humans, researchers continue to look for safe, effective
solutions.3
Chemicals are being used increasingly in agriculture either as fertilizers,
insecticides or pesticides. Agricultural workers are exposed to toxic hazards from
these chemicals. Associated factors such as malnutrition and parasitic infestation may
increase susceptibility to poisoning.4
Most farmers rely heavily on the use of synthetic pesticides. Although
most of them know that these pesticides are dangerous chemicals that can be
hazardous to their health they seem to ignore this and handle the chemicals as if they
were quite harmless. This has created a very serious problem in rural areas where
pesticides are being used. One of the objectives of the IPM DANIDA Project is to
help farmers reduce the risks of pesticide use. Therefore, the project had invited Ms.
Helen Murphy, an epidemiologist specialized in pesticide poisoning, to conduct a
training workshop on this issue. The goal of this workshop was to develop trainers
who can help farmers survey pesticide use and to become aware of how these
pesticides affect health in their own community. To find out how serious and
widespread the problems of pesticide poisoning among farmers are, it is necessary to
conduct studies where farmers are directly involved. Helen Murphy has been working
with governments and international organizations in the region to develop a
participative approach to collect health information with active participation of farmer
communities. The strength of this approach is that it does not use researchers who
extract data from farmers. It is the farmers themselves who collect the information,
who analyze the information, and who draw the conclusions. Different job functions
can lead to different levels of exposure. Most occupational exposures are caused by
absorption through exposed skin such as the face, hands, forearms, neck, and chest.
This exposure is sometimes enhanced by inhalation in settings including spraying
operations in greenhouses and other closed environments, tractor cabs, and the
operation of rotary fan mist sprayers.5
6.2 )NEED FOR STUDY
Many of the pesticides that we use make our lives easier. For instance,
(using some of our earlier examples) the pesticides in wool and our wood makes our
clothes and furniture last longer. You wouldn't want to have to buy a new wool
sweater everyyear,wouldyou? The fact that pesticides are in our food is probably
what makes people the most uncomfortable. Do we really need that? Why can't all the
farmers just grow food organically 1
The international development disease centre (Ottowa) has claimed that
about 10,000 people every year in developing contries due to pesticides India
accounts to one third of it. Some problem which have come to certain part of India are
blindness, cancer, deformities and cancer of liver and nervous system in the cotten
growing areas of Andrapradesh and Maharashtra. Similarly in Madhya Pradesh 50
peacocks died due to eating poisoned crabs and chemical bajra. we are using more
pesticides than ever. Here in the US, we use almost 4 pounds of it annually per
person! Although most modern pesticides are much safer than their predecessors, a
few of our commonly used pesticides are considered toxic.The health and
environmental effects of pesticides have increased over the past several years6
The issue of pesticides and their use is actually quite complex, involving the
(sometimes) conflicting interests of health concern advocates, the $500 billion agro-
industry, environmentalists, consumers as well as politicians... There is no doubt to
many scientists that most pesticides are toxic, after all that is what they were designed
to do, and should eventually be eliminated from the environment. The question is how
quickly so that farmers and their critical products ( our food supply) are not left
without recoursePesticide poisoning is an important occupational health issue because
pesticides are used in a large number of industries, which puts many different
categories of workers at risk. Extensive use puts agricultural workers in particular at
increased risk for pesticide illnesses. Workers in other industries are at risk for
exposure as well. For example, commercial availability of pesticides in stores puts
retail workers at risk for exposure and illness when they handle pesticide products.7
Damage or injury to kidneys caused by exposure to pesticides. Often other
organs and tissues are also affected. The most common exposure scenarios for
pesticide-poisoning cases are accidental or suicidal poisonings, occupational
exposure, by-stander exposure to off-target drift, and the general public who are
exposed through environmental contamination.
Well designed and resilient agricultural systems are essential for
producing the food and fiber necessary for secure, prosperous and healthy
communities. Yet farming is one of the most dangerous industries according to the
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Illnesses, acute injuries and even fatalities are high among
agricultural workers compared to other industries due to the use of machinery and
equipment, repetitive physical work, close interactions with animals, and exposure to
chemical toxicants. Agriculture is one of the oldest occupations, and approximately
2.7 billion people worldwide are employed in some form of agricultural activity.
Agriculture is also one of the most hazardous industries worldwide.
Few environmental issues have aroused the concern of the public as much
as pesticides, especially in relation to the health of children. In spite of the many
published studies on the subject of pesticides and human health, there remains deep
controversy surrounding issue.8
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
INTRODUCTION
Review of literature is a key step in the research process. The typical
purpose of analyzing a review of existing literature is to generate questions and to
identify what is known and what is unknown about the topic. The major goals of
review of literature are to develop a strong knowledge base to carry out research and
non research scholarly activity.
A) REVIEW OF LITERATURE ON PESTICIDES
Christopher B. Field conducted a study in Washington on may 2007. The
pesticides are a broad class of chemicals and biological agents that are specifically
designed and applied to kill a pest. Specific types of pesticides target specific types of
pests: insecticides kill insects, fungicides kill fungi and bacteria, herbicides kill weeds
and other unwanted plant vegetation, molluscacides kill mollusks, acaricides kill
spiders, and so on. Pesticide use dates back to ancient times.9
According to Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Pesticides
can be classified by target organism, chemical structure, and physical state. Pesticides
can also be classed as inorganic, synthetic, or biologicals (biopesticides), although the
distinction can sometimes blur. Biopesticides include microbial pesticides and
biochemical pesticides. Plant-derived pesticides, or "botanicals", have been
developing quickly. These include the pyrethroids, rotenoids, nicotinoids, and a
fourth group that includes strychnine and scilliroside.10
Many pesticides can be grouped into chemical families. Prominent insecticide
families include organochlorines, organophosphates, and carbamates. Organochlorine
hydrocarbons (e.g. DDT) could be separated into dichlorodiphenylethanes, cyclodiene
compounds, and other related compounds. They operate by disrupting the
sodium/potassium balance of the nerve fiber, forcing the nerve to transmit
continuously. Their toxicities vary greatly, but they have been phased out because of
their persistence and potential to bioaccumulate. Organophosphate and carbamates
largely replaced organochlorines. Both operate through inhibiting the enzyme
acetylcholinesterase, allowing acetylcholine to transfer nerve impulses indefinitely
and causing a variety of symptoms such as weakness or paralysis. Organophosphates
are quite toxic to vertebrates, and have in some cases been replaced by less toxic
carbamates. Thiocarbamate and dithiocarbamates are subclasses of carbamates.
Prominent families of herbicides include pheoxy and benzoic acid herbicides (e.g.
2,4-D), triazines (e.g. atrazine), ureas (e.g. diuron), and Chloroacetanilides (e.g.
alachlor). Phenoxy compounds tend to selectively kill broadleaved weeds rather than
grasses. The phenoxy and benzoic acid herbicides function similar to plant growth
hormones, and grow cells without normal cell division, crushing the plants nutrient
transport system. Triazines interfere with photsynthesis. Many commonly used
pesticides are not included in these families, including glyphosate.
Algicides or algaecides for the control of algae
Avicides for the control of birds
Bactericides for the control of bacteria
Fungicides for the control of fungi and oomycetes
Herbicides (e.g. glyphosate) for the control of weeds
Insecticides (e.g. organochlorines, organophosphates, carbamates, and
pyrethroids) for the control of insects - these can be ovicides (substances that
kill eggs), larvicides (substances that kill larvae) or adulticides (substances
that kill adults) Miticides or acaricides for the control of mites 10
B) REVIEW OF LITERATURE ON THE HEALTH PROBLEMS
DUE TO PESTICIDES
John Kent conducted a study at 1991 in Astralia the community was
experience awareness of environmental and public health issues and this has focused
attention on pesticides and their potential hazards. The result has been strong pressure
on those involved in farm chemical management to limit the use of these products. At
the extreme there are those who wish to ban pesticides completely or at the least
impose very harsh legislation to strictly control their use. From an agricultural
industry perspective, pesticides are an important component of economic and
effective pest control and their continued use is essential. With the benefits of
increased knowledge and experience, it is apparent that these products must no longer
be used as they were in the past. All farm chemicals must be utilised strategically in
the farming system and only be applied with care by competent operators. We all
benefit from farm chemicals and therefore we all have a responsibility to ensure that
these benefits are maximised, while any adverse effects are minimised.11
Dina M. Schreinemachers, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina in July
2003 conducted a study that babies born to families living near wheat growing
agricultural areas using chemical pesticides have been found to have a 65% greater
risk of having birth defects related to the respiratory or circulatory system. The
conclusion of the study found there was over a 100% increas in circulatory or
respiratory birth defects in babies if heart malformations were excluded. When
looking at masculoskelatal/ integumental anomalies for both sexes in the high wheat
growing contries, there was 50% increased risk of this type of defects. Infant death
for male babies was over 2.5 times higher than normal. Scientist also found that
infants concieved from April-June had 75% increased risk of being diagnosed birth
defects-compared to birth defects rates for conception during other times of the year.12
Erin M. Bell, Maryland conducted a study in March 2001 states that over
600 children to determine what part local pesticides use plays in increasing the risk of
having a late fatal death after 5 months of pregnancy. Using maps and records of
pesticides use, the researchers divided mothers into categories according to how close
they lived to pesticide applications. If they lived within 1 mile of an agricultural
pesticide application that occured between weeks 3-8 of gestation they were
considered as “exposed”. Weeks 3-8 during pregnancy were selected since this is the
critical period in which formation of organs and limbs are occuring. Results of this
study showed there was approximately 2-fold greater risk of having a stillbirth if the
mother lived within 1 mile from an agricultural area which used organophosphate-
pyrethroid- carbamate- or chlorinated pesticides. Primary defects which contributed
to the death of the child were urinary system and multiple congenital anomalies.13
Julie L. Daniels, Andrew F. Olshan conducted a study in January 2001
states that pesticides use around the home can double the chance of a child
developing neuroblastoma. It accounts for approximately 10% of all childhood
tumors. There are 550 cases in the United States each year, with an annual incidence
rate of 9.2 cases per million children under 15 years of age. This works out to
approximately 1per 100,000 children under age 15 on a national level. As statistics
shows that neuroblastoma rates have increased over the past 50 years, it is reasonable
to assume environmental factors may be involved. One of the largest collaborative
effords among 7 universities and medical facilities worked together to determine
what extent pesticides use in the home could increase child neuroblastoma rates.
Results showed that using pesticides in and around the home resulted in a 60%
increased likelyhood of children developing the disease(Odds ratio=1.6) . Looking at
pesticides used for the lawn and garden only resulted in an increased risk of 120%
( Odds ratio=2.2). When the mother had applied pesticides in the yard and 50%
higher (Odds ratio=1.5). When the father had applied pesticide in the yard.14
Erin Bell (Ph.D), North Carolina was conducted a study in March 2001
states that living close to areas where agricultural pesticides are applied may increase
the risk of fatal death from birth defects. The study which involved almost 700
women in 10 California countries, showed an increased risk of death among
developing babies. Mothers who lived near crops where certain pesticides were
sprayed faced a 40 to 120% increase in risk of miscarriage due to birth defects. The
largest risks for fatal death due to birth defects were from pesticides exposure during
the third week to the eighth week of pregnancy. The risk appeared to be strongest
among pregnant women who lived in the same square mile where pesticide were
used.About 19,000 fatal deaths occur in the United States each year, and the cause
remain a significant public health problem. Among known risk factors are smoking,
advanced age among pregnant women and previous history of fatal death.15
C) REVIEW OF LITERATURE ON THE HEALTH PROBLEM
OF AGRICULTURAL WORKERS DUE TO PROLONGED
CONTACT WITH PESTICIDES
Calvert GM, Karnik J, Mehler L conducted a study in 2005 at
United States Acute pesticide poisoning among agricultural workers that Of the 3,271
cases included in the analysis, 2,334 (71%) were employed as farm workers. The
remaining cases were employed as processing/packing plant workers (12%), farmers
(3%), and other miscellaneous agricultural workers (19%). The majority of cases had
low severity illness (N = 2,848, 87%), while 402 (12%) were of medium severity and
20 (0.6%) were of high severity. One case was fatal. Rates of illness among various
agricultural worker categories were highly variable but all, except farmers, showed
risk for agricultural workers greater than risk for non-agricultural workers by an order
of magnitude or more. Also, the rate among female agricultural workers was almost
twofold higher compared to males .The findings from this study suggest that acute
pesticide poisoning in the agricultural industry continues to be an important problem.
These findings reinforce the need for heightened efforts to better protect farm workers
from pesticide exposure. 16
Moses M conducted a study in March 1989 U.S that Migrant and
seasonal farm workers are primarily ethnic minorities who are excluded from federal
laws that protect other workers. Farm workers live and work under substandard
conditions that place them at increased risk of pesticide-related illness. Agriculture
uses 80% of all pesticides in the handlers who mix, load and apply pesticides as well
as workers cultivating and harvesting crops sprayed with them are at risk of acute
poisoning or even death from their exposures. Drift and run-off of agricultural
pesticides pollute the air, soil and water, creating additional hazards to workers'
families, community residents, and the environment. Chronic effects, including
cancer in adults and children, adverse reproductive outcomes, delayed neuropathy and
neurobehavioral effects, are also associated with occupational and environmental
exposure to pesticides.17
M. Sanborn, MD conducted a study in 2007 In agricultural
workers with contact dermatitis, sensitization to both plant material and pesticides
was documented, but most study designs did not allow attribution of rashes
specifically to pesticide exposure. One study that used a biomarker for pesticide
exposure found a dose-response relationship between dermatitis and years of
fungicide exposure or poor application practices 61% of pesticide-exposed
agricultural workers and 31% of controls had dermatitis (P < .001). Pet groomers who
gave more than 75 pyrethrin flea treatments per year had more rashes (odds ratio [OR]
2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 4.09) and more eye symptoms (OR 4.75,
95% CI 1.14 to 18.23) than those who gave fewer treatment Long-term effects of
pesticides on the nervous system include cognitive and psychomotor dysfunction, and
neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental effects. Pesticide poisonings result in
well-described acute and chronic neurotoxic syndromes. Chronic effects from low or
moderate exposures have been less well documented.18
Nana O.B. Ackerson conducted a study in 2010 that Urban
agriculture, a world-wide practice, faces both environmental and health challenges.
Farmers are susceptible to occupational and other water-related health risks. The
research identified health problems related to urban agricultural farming through
farmers’ social characteristics and agricultural practices. Thorough interviews, using
structured questionnaires, were carried out. Sixty three farmers responded to
questions ranging from agricultural practices to health problems encountered.The
findings showed that farmers apply both organic and inorganic fertilisers while 97%
used pesticides of varying active ingredients at different application rates. Only 10%
used personal protective clothing during the application of pesticides. Overhead
irrigation was carried out using a watering can. Eighty four percent and 13% of the
respondents utilised water from shallow wells and shallow wells mixed with
contaminated stream, respectively. Besides schistosomiasis and cholera, other
bacterial diseases, nematode infections, malaria, headaches, dermatological, visual,
cardiac, and respiratory problems were common health complaints. Headache
complaints were the most common (75%).19
A.V.F. Ngowi,T.J. Mbise conducted a study in 2007 at Northern Tanzania
Small-scale farmers in Northern Tanzania grow vegetables that include tomatoes,
cabbages and onions and use many types of pesticides to control pests and diseases
that attack these crops. Based on the use of questionnaires and interviews that were
conducted in Arumeru, Monduli, Karatu, and Moshi rural districts, this study
investigates farmers’ practices on vegetable pest management using pesticides and
related cost and health effects. The types of pesticides used by the farmers in the
study areas were insecticides (59%), fungicides (29%) and herbicides (10%) with the
remaining 2% being rodenticides. About a third of the farmers applied pesticides in
mixtures. Up to 90% had a maximum of 3 pesticides in a mixture. In all cases there
were no specific instructions either from the labels or extension workers regarding
these tank mixtures. Fifty three percent of the farmers reported that the trend of
pesticide use was increasing, while 33% was constant and 14% was decreasing. More
than 50 percent of the respondents applied pesticides up to 5 times or more per
cropping season depending on the crop. Insecticides and fungicides were routinely
applied by 77% and 7%, respectively by these farmers. Sixty eight percent of farmers
reported having felt sick after routine application of pesticides. Pesticide-related
health symptoms that were associated with pesticides use included skin problems and
neurological system disturbances (dizziness, headache). Sixty one percent of farmers
reported spending no money on health due to pesticides. 20
Jane A Hoppin, David M Umbach, in 1993 conducted a cross sectional
study of occupational risk factors for farmer's lung among ~50 000 farmers and farm
spouses in Iowa and North Carolina that handling silage (OR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.10 to
1.82), high pesticide exposure events (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.21), and ever use
of organochlorine (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.74) and carbamate pesticides (OR =
1.32, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.68) were associated with farmer's lung in mutually‐adjusted
models. The insecticides DDT, lindane, and aldicarb were positively associated with
farmer's lung among farmers. Current animal exposures, while not statistically
significant, were positively associated with farmer's lung, particularly for poultry
houses (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.58) and dairy cattle (OR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.86 to
1.89). The occupational data were more limited for spouses; however, we saw similar
associations for dairy cattle (OR = 1.50, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.14) and organochlorine
pesticides (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.59).While historic farm exposures may
contribute to the observed associations with pesticides, these results suggest that
organochlorine and carbamate pesticides should be further evaluated as potential risk
factors for farmer's lung. Farmer's lung, the most common type of hypersensitivity
pneumonitis, is an important source of respiratory morbidity among farmers.
Estimates of the prevalence of farmer's lung in farming populations range from 0.5%
to 4.4%, owing to differences in diagnostic practices, and differences in farming
practices and climate. Farmer's lung is more common in the Northern latitudes and
among dairy farmers. The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety
estimates that as many as 2–10% of Canadian farm workers have farmer's lung.
Although thermoactinomycetes and other bacteria in mouldy hay are well‐established
causes of farmer's lung, other factors are also hypothesised to influence the
development of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. 21
6.3 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:
A STUDY TO ASSESS THE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE
HEALTH PROBLEMS OF AGRICULTURAL WORKERS
RELATED TO PROLONGED CONTACT WITH PESTICIDES
IN SELECTED RURAL AREAS AT BANGALORE IN VIEW TO
PROVIDE HEALTH EDUCATION.
6.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
To assess the existing health problem of agricultural workers related to
prolonged Contact with pesticides
To assess the knowledge of Agricultural health workers regarding health
problems related to prolonged contact with pesticides
Find out the association between knowledge and selected demographic
variables such As Age, sex, economic status, place of residence, use of
pesticides.
6.5 HYPOTHESIS
H1: There will be significant difference with knowledge and health problems
related prolonged contact with pesticides
H2: There will be significant association between knowledge level of
agricultural workers and demographic variables such as age, sex ,
education, economic status, area of residence and education.
6.6 OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS:
KNOWLEDGE :-
It is the awareness regarding the of health problems related to prolonged
contact with pesticides
PESTICIDES-
Any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying or
controlling any pest, including vectors of human or animal disease, unwanted species
of plants or animals causing harm during or otherwise interfering with the production,
processing, storage, transport or marketing of food, agricultural commodities, wood
and wood products or animal feedstuffs, or substances which may be administered to
animals for the control of insects, arachnids or other pests in or on their bodies. The
term includes substances intended for use as a plant growth regulator, defoliant,
desiccant or agent for thinning fruit or preventing the premature fall of fruit. Also
used as substances applied to crops either before or after harvest to protect the
commodity from deterioration during storage and transport.
HEALTH PROBLEM
Those who are working in agricultural field and getting problems through
prolonged contact with pesticides
AGRICULTURAL WORKERS
Those who are working in agricultural field
HEALTH EDUCATION
Health education is a powerful and effective medicine in the treatment
and prevention of illness from health problems through prolonged contact with
pesticides
6.7 ASSUMPTIONS
Agricultural workers will have inadequate knowledge regarding pesticides.
Agricultural workers will have inadequate knowledge regarding health
problems related to prolonged contact with the pesticides.
6.8 DELIMITATIONS:
Study is limited to 60 samples.
The study is limited to those who know English and Kannada.
This study is limited to selected areas of Bangalore
6.9 PROJECTED OUTCOME
The present study will help the Agricultural workers to develop a better
knowledge regarding health problems related to prolonged contact with the
pesticides.
7 MATERIALS AND METHODS
7.1 SOURCE OF DATA
The data will be collected from Agricultural workers who are working in
Gonipura village,Bangalore
7.1.1 RESEARCH DESIGN
The research design adopted for this study is descriptive
RESEARCH APPROACH
The research approach is survey.
7.1.2 SETTING:.
The study will be conducted in Gonipura village,Bangalore .It is 25 km away from the college
7.1.3 POPULATION
The population selected are Agricultural workers .
7.2 METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION
7.2.1 SAMPLING PROCEDURE
The Sampling Technique adopted for this study is purposive
7.2.2 SAMPLE SIZE
The sample size is 60.
7.2.3 INCLUSION CRITERIA
Agricultural workers who are willing to participate in the study.
Those who suffer from health hazards of pesticides
7.2.4 EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Agricultural workers who are not willing to participate.
Those who are don’t know Kannada and English
7.2.5 INSTRUMENT INTENDED TO BE USED
SELECTION OF TOOL
This consist of two parts :
PART 1 :consist of demographic variables such as age, sex, education, area of
residence, income.
PART 2:Questionnaire will be used to assess the knowledge.25 Questions will be
used.
SCORING PROCEDURE
For knowledge assessment
If answer is yes 1
If answer is no 0
SCORING INTERPRETATION:
Level of knowledge Range
Adequate knowledge Above 75%
Moderate knowledge 51- 74%
In adequate knowledge 50% and below
7.2.6 DATA COLLECTION METHOD
Prior-permission will be obtained from the farmer’s union and ward
member before conducting the study. Interview will be conducted between
10 am to 3 pm. Data will be collected from 5 samples per day. The duration
will be 4 weeks. The duration of study will be 30 minutes will be spent per
each subject.
7.2.7 PILOT STUDY
6 samples will be selected and study will be conducted to find out the
feasibility.
7.2.8 DATA ANALYSIS PLAN
The data obtained will be analyzed in view of the objectives of the
study using descriptive and inferential statistics.
The plan for data analysis was as follows: -
Frequencies and percentage of distribution will be used to analyze
the demographic data.
Mean, Median and Mode, Standard deviation will be used for
accessing the knowledge scores.
Chi-square test to find out the association between knowledge with
selected demographic variables. The significant findings will be
experienced in tables, figures and graph.
7.3 DOES THE STUDY REQUIRE ANY INVESTIGATION OR INTERVENTION TO BE CONDUCTED ON PATIENTS OR OTHER HUMANS OR ANIMALS?
- No-
7.4 HAS THE ETHICAL CLEARANCE BEEN OBTAINED
FROM YOUR INSTITUTION?
YES, Ethical clearance will be obtained from the research committee of
Nightingale college of nursing.
Consent will be taken from the Ward member and permission will be taken from the
study subjects before the collection of data.
8 LIST OF REFFERENCES
1. Pesticides, an introduction
http://www.chem.duke.edu/~jds/cruise_chem/pest/pestintro.html
2. Wikipedia, Articles pesticide,
http://www.facebook.com/pages/pesticides/107998409223473
3. India Pesticide Limited, the global agrochemical company http://www.indiapesticidelimited.com/
4. K. Park, Preventive and social medicine, occupational hazards of agricultural
workers, M/S Banasirdas bhanot publishers, page No-664
5. Pesticide and farmers health http://thailand.ipm-info.org/pesticides/risk_reduction.htm
6. Dr. Shobhanagnar, Sandhya joshy, Herald of health October 2008, chemicals and
residual effects on human health.
7. Pesticide poisoning, Wikipedia, free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pesticide_poisoning
8. Normant Bor Laug “The role of agricultural science and technology” April 2001 http://www.agbioworld.org/biotech-info/topics/borlaug/borlaugspeech.html
9. Christopher B.Field, “pesticides reduce symbiotic efficiency of nitrogen-fixing
rhizobia and host plants”, May 2007 http://www.pnas.org/content/104/24/10282.full
10. Food and Agricultural Organization(FAO), Pesticides http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pesticides
11. John Kent “pesticides in agriculture” 1991 http://www.regional.org.acc/ag/roc/1992/roc1992031.htm
12. DinaM. Schreinemachers, “A sick round up of science linking pesticides use to
death/ disease , environmental health perspective volume-111(9) page No.1259-
1264 July 2003 http://www.facebook.com/topic.php~leid=4078373801/08topic=8782
13. Erin M. Bell “fetal deaths linked to living close to agricultural pesticide use
during 3-8 of pregnancy” , source; epidemiology, 12(2) March 2001 http://www.chem-tox.com/pesticide
14. Julie L. Daniels “neuroblastoma linked to home treated with pesticides , source;
epidemiology 12(1) , page No. 20-26 , January 2001 http://www.chem_tox.com/neuroblastoma/default.htm
15. Erin Bell(Ph.D), pesticides increase miscarriage source; epidemiology,
March2001 http://www.chem_tox.com/pesticide
16. Calvert GM, Karnik j,acute pesticide poisoning among agricultural workers in the U.S., 2005 http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/pesticide/ajim2008.html
17. Moses M, cancer among migrant seasonal farm workers, a epidemiological review of research , volume; 24 page No.755-766 , March 1989 http://onlinelibrarywisly.com/dol/10-1002/ajm47002412/html
18. M. Sanborn.M D , “Non cancer health effects of pesticides systemic review and
implication”, volume;53(10), page No. 1712-1720, in 2007
http://www.ncbi.him.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc2231436/
19. Nana O.B. Ackerson, “Urban agriculture practice health problem among farmers
in 2010, (www.factsreports.org)
20. A.V.F. Ngowi, T.J. Mbise “Small holder vegetable farmers in north Tanzania
pesticides use ,practice, perception, cost and health effects” in 2007
http://www.worldagroforestry_org/downloads/publication/PDF/ja07043
21. Jane A Hoppin, David M Umbach “pesticide and other agricultural factor
associated with self reported farmers among farm resident in agricultural study”
volume 64(5) page No.334-342, in 1993
9. SIGNATURE OF THE CANDIDATE
10. REMARKS OF THE GUIDE
11. NAME AND DESIGNATION OF
11.1 GUIDE
11.2 SIGNATURE
11.3CO-GUIDE
11.4SIGNATURE
11.5 HEAD OF DEPARTMENT
11.6 SIGNATURE
12 12.1 REMARKSOF THE PRINCIPAL
12.2 SIGNATURE